ML18085A344: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| (6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
| number = ML18085A344 | | number = ML18085A344 | ||
| issue date = 03/26/2018 | | issue date = 03/26/2018 | ||
| title = | | title = Conversation Record with J. Tomlinson, D. Mitra-Majumdar, A. Mohammad, and I. Rampall/Holtec Clarification Call: Thermal RAI (CAC: 001028, Docket No.: 07201040, Edip: L-2017-LLA-0033) | ||
| author name = Longmire P, | | author name = Longmire P, Mckirgan J, Solis J | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/NMSS/DSFM/SFLB | | author affiliation = NRC/NMSS/DSFM/SFLB | ||
| addressee name = Mitra-Majumdar D, Mohammad A, Rampall I, Tomlinson J | | addressee name = Mitra-Majumdar D, Mohammad A, Rampall I, Tomlinson J | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
| document type = Note to File incl Telcon Record, Verbal Comm | | document type = Note to File incl Telcon Record, Verbal Comm | ||
| page count = 2 | | page count = 2 | ||
| project = EPID:L-2017-LLA-0033 | | project = CAC:001028, EPID:L-2017-LLA-0033 | ||
| stage = RAI | | stage = RAI | ||
}} | }} | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DATE OF SIGNATURE NRC FORM 699 | ||
/" | |||
C (03-2013) f g | |||
\\ :i CONVERSATION RECORD | |||
/.U,/oUJ1? | |||
NAME OF PERSON(S) CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT WITH YOU Joyce Tomlinson (856-797-0900 ext 3765) | |||
E-MAIL ADDRESS J.Tomlinson@holtec.com ORGANIZATION Holtec International LICENSE NUMBER(S) | |||
Holtec Hi-Storm UMAX, Amendment #3 SUBJECT Clarification call: Thermal RAI CAC/Docket No./EPID: 001028/07201040/L-2017-LLA-0033 | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
DOCKET NUMBER(S) 72-1040 CONTROL NUMBER(S) | |||
DATE OF CONTACT 03/22/2018 TELEPHONE NUMBER (888) 790-1889 TYPE OF CONVERSATION DE-MAIL 0 TELEPHONE D INCOMING 0 OUTGOING The purpose of the conference call was to obtain an update on the progress and clarification on the approach to resolving the thermal RAI issued with the acceptance letter dated 1/17/18 (ADAMS Accession No. ML18018A018) for amendment 3 to the certificate of compliance (CoC) No. 1040, the Hi-Storm UMAX system. Holtec stated they plan to use report PNL-7839,"Performance testing and analyses of the VSC-17 ventilated concrete cask", for the experimental data to support their benchmarking efforts. Basically, Holtec plans to develop a homogenized model of the VSC-17 for comparison to the PNL-7839 data; after obtaining model agreement with the experimental data they plan to then apply the same method in the homogenization of the 24PT1-DSC. Given one system (VSC-17) is an above-ground system and 24PT1-DSC is a below-grade system, NRC's staff suggested for Holtec, when developing their response to the RAI, to consider explaining the differences and uncertainties in the models. NRC's staff again suggested for Holtec to consider development of a detailed canister model. Holtec responded, they believe their approach will be conservative and sufficient to demonstrate the case for safety. | |||
Having a public meeting was mentioned but no apparent or immediate benefit was identified. | |||
Continue on Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED (IF ANY) | |||
NRC action: Maintain good communication with Holtec and continue to assess the need for further interactions including a public meeting. | |||
Holtec action: proceed on current course. | |||
Continue on Page 3 NAME OF PERSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSATION Pamela Longmire, Ph.D. | |||
SIG URE - -. | |||
7.,1,u...,..*?-*.,) 0. | |||
NRC FORM 699 (03-2013) | |||
Page 1 of 2 | |||
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DATE OF SIGNATURE NRC FORM 699 | |||
/" | |||
C (03-2013) f g | |||
\\ :i CONVERSATION RECORD | |||
/.U,/oUJ1? | |||
NAME OF PERSON(S) CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT WITH YOU Joyce Tomlinson (856-797-0900 ext 3765) | |||
E-MAIL ADDRESS J.Tomlinson@holtec.com ORGANIZATION Holtec International LICENSE NUMBER(S) | |||
Holtec Hi-Storm UMAX, Amendment #3 SUBJECT Clarification call: Thermal RAI CAC/Docket No./EPID: 001028/07201040/L-2017-LLA-0033 | |||
==SUMMARY== | |||
DOCKET NUMBER(S) 72-1040 CONTROL NUMBER(S) | |||
DATE OF CONTACT 03/22/2018 TELEPHONE NUMBER (888) 790-1889 TYPE OF CONVERSATION DE-MAIL 0 TELEPHONE D INCOMING 0 OUTGOING The purpose of the conference call was to obtain an update on the progress and clarification on the approach to resolving the thermal RAI issued with the acceptance letter dated 1/17/18 (ADAMS Accession No. ML18018A018) for amendment 3 to the certificate of compliance (CoC) No. 1040, the Hi-Storm UMAX system. Holtec stated they plan to use report PNL-7839,"Performance testing and analyses of the VSC-17 ventilated concrete cask", for the experimental data to support their benchmarking efforts. Basically, Holtec plans to develop a homogenized model of the VSC-17 for comparison to the PNL-7839 data; after obtaining model agreement with the experimental data they plan to then apply the same method in the homogenization of the 24PT1-DSC. Given one system (VSC-17) is an above-ground system and 24PT1-DSC is a below-grade system, NRC's staff suggested for Holtec, when developing their response to the RAI, to consider explaining the differences and uncertainties in the models. NRC's staff again suggested for Holtec to consider development of a detailed canister model. Holtec responded, they believe their approach will be conservative and sufficient to demonstrate the case for safety. | |||
Having a public meeting was mentioned but no apparent or immediate benefit was identified. | |||
Continue on Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED (IF ANY) | |||
NRC action: Maintain good communication with Holtec and continue to assess the need for further interactions including a public meeting. | |||
Holtec action: proceed on current course. | |||
Continue on Page 3 NAME OF PERSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSATION Pamela Longmire, Ph.D. | |||
SIG URE - -. | |||
7.,1,u...,..*?-*.,) 0. | |||
NRC FORM 699 (03-2013) | |||
Page 1 of 2}} | |||
Latest revision as of 05:25, 6 January 2025
| ML18085A344 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | HI-STORM 100 |
| Issue date: | 03/26/2018 |
| From: | Pamela Longmire, John Mckirgan, Jorge Solis Spent Fuel Licensing Branch |
| To: | Mitra-Majumdar D, Mohammad A, Rampall I, Tomlinson J Holtec |
| Longmire P | |
| References | |
| CAC 001028, EPID L-2017-LLA-0033 | |
| Download: ML18085A344 (2) | |
Text
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DATE OF SIGNATURE NRC FORM 699
/"
C (03-2013) f g
\\ :i CONVERSATION RECORD
/.U,/oUJ1?
NAME OF PERSON(S) CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT WITH YOU Joyce Tomlinson (856-797-0900 ext 3765)
E-MAIL ADDRESS J.Tomlinson@holtec.com ORGANIZATION Holtec International LICENSE NUMBER(S)
Holtec Hi-Storm UMAX, Amendment #3 SUBJECT Clarification call: Thermal RAI CAC/Docket No./EPID: 001028/07201040/L-2017-LLA-0033
SUMMARY
DOCKET NUMBER(S) 72-1040 CONTROL NUMBER(S)
DATE OF CONTACT 03/22/2018 TELEPHONE NUMBER (888) 790-1889 TYPE OF CONVERSATION DE-MAIL 0 TELEPHONE D INCOMING 0 OUTGOING The purpose of the conference call was to obtain an update on the progress and clarification on the approach to resolving the thermal RAI issued with the acceptance letter dated 1/17/18 (ADAMS Accession No. ML18018A018) for amendment 3 to the certificate of compliance (CoC) No. 1040, the Hi-Storm UMAX system. Holtec stated they plan to use report PNL-7839,"Performance testing and analyses of the VSC-17 ventilated concrete cask", for the experimental data to support their benchmarking efforts. Basically, Holtec plans to develop a homogenized model of the VSC-17 for comparison to the PNL-7839 data; after obtaining model agreement with the experimental data they plan to then apply the same method in the homogenization of the 24PT1-DSC. Given one system (VSC-17) is an above-ground system and 24PT1-DSC is a below-grade system, NRC's staff suggested for Holtec, when developing their response to the RAI, to consider explaining the differences and uncertainties in the models. NRC's staff again suggested for Holtec to consider development of a detailed canister model. Holtec responded, they believe their approach will be conservative and sufficient to demonstrate the case for safety.
Having a public meeting was mentioned but no apparent or immediate benefit was identified.
Continue on Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED (IF ANY)
NRC action: Maintain good communication with Holtec and continue to assess the need for further interactions including a public meeting.
Holtec action: proceed on current course.
Continue on Page 3 NAME OF PERSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSATION Pamela Longmire, Ph.D.
SIG URE - -.
7.,1,u...,..*?-*.,) 0.
NRC FORM 699 (03-2013)
Page 1 of 2
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION DATE OF SIGNATURE NRC FORM 699
/"
C (03-2013) f g
\\ :i CONVERSATION RECORD
/.U,/oUJ1?
NAME OF PERSON(S) CONTACTED OR IN CONTACT WITH YOU Joyce Tomlinson (856-797-0900 ext 3765)
E-MAIL ADDRESS J.Tomlinson@holtec.com ORGANIZATION Holtec International LICENSE NUMBER(S)
Holtec Hi-Storm UMAX, Amendment #3 SUBJECT Clarification call: Thermal RAI CAC/Docket No./EPID: 001028/07201040/L-2017-LLA-0033
SUMMARY
DOCKET NUMBER(S) 72-1040 CONTROL NUMBER(S)
DATE OF CONTACT 03/22/2018 TELEPHONE NUMBER (888) 790-1889 TYPE OF CONVERSATION DE-MAIL 0 TELEPHONE D INCOMING 0 OUTGOING The purpose of the conference call was to obtain an update on the progress and clarification on the approach to resolving the thermal RAI issued with the acceptance letter dated 1/17/18 (ADAMS Accession No. ML18018A018) for amendment 3 to the certificate of compliance (CoC) No. 1040, the Hi-Storm UMAX system. Holtec stated they plan to use report PNL-7839,"Performance testing and analyses of the VSC-17 ventilated concrete cask", for the experimental data to support their benchmarking efforts. Basically, Holtec plans to develop a homogenized model of the VSC-17 for comparison to the PNL-7839 data; after obtaining model agreement with the experimental data they plan to then apply the same method in the homogenization of the 24PT1-DSC. Given one system (VSC-17) is an above-ground system and 24PT1-DSC is a below-grade system, NRC's staff suggested for Holtec, when developing their response to the RAI, to consider explaining the differences and uncertainties in the models. NRC's staff again suggested for Holtec to consider development of a detailed canister model. Holtec responded, they believe their approach will be conservative and sufficient to demonstrate the case for safety.
Having a public meeting was mentioned but no apparent or immediate benefit was identified.
Continue on Page 2 ACTION REQUIRED (IF ANY)
NRC action: Maintain good communication with Holtec and continue to assess the need for further interactions including a public meeting.
Holtec action: proceed on current course.
Continue on Page 3 NAME OF PERSON DOCUMENTING CONVERSATION Pamela Longmire, Ph.D.
SIG URE - -.
7.,1,u...,..*?-*.,) 0.
NRC FORM 699 (03-2013)
Page 1 of 2