ML20236X402
| ML20236X402 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 04/16/1997 |
| From: | David Wright NRC |
| To: | Hoffman A, Ledbetter J, Van Cise L NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20236W816 | List:
|
| References | |
| FRN-63FR31364, RULE-PR-72 AF80-1-027, AF80-1-27, SECY-97-069-C, SECY-97-69-C, NUDOCS 9808070351 | |
| Download: ML20236X402 (1) | |
Text
____-_-___-__ - __ - --__ -_- - - - - - - - - - -
k AF 0 - 1 From:
Darlene Wright 26 To:
WNPl.JAL, WNPl.LVC, WNPl.AXH, KDC, WTZ, JCH, ALB, Date:
4/16/97 5:00pm
Subject:
Draft SRM 069 The attached file contains a draft SRM which is being c'rculated for the normal 3-day period for Commission review, Please provide any responses to Ken Hart (KRH) or Andy Bates (ALB).
</ Bo 6o70 T.c,/
r Poe AF 00-/
April 24, 1997
//
T MEMORANDUM TO:
L. Joseph Callan Executive Director for Operations FROM:
John C. Hoyle, Secretary
/s/
SUBJECT:
STAFF REQUIREMENTS - SECY-97-069 - RULEMAKING PLAN :
MISCELLANEOUS CHANGES TO 10 CFR PART 72 AND AMENDMENT TO 10 CFR PART 40 TO REMOVE NATURAL OR DEPLETED URANIUM USED IN STORAGE CASK SHIELDING FROM PART 40 LICENSING REQUIREMENTS f
i This is to advise you that the Commission has not objected to the implementation of the proposed Rulemaking Plan subject to the following comments.
1.
The draf t rule language for Section 72.44 (d) (3) deleted the l
requirement to submit the report within 60 days after January 1 of each year, but retains the use of the term j
" annual" and " previous 12 months."
This revision allows for
(
flexibility in submitting the reports, but does not address the phase-in period.
Additionally, it opens up the possibility that-licensees may submit the report later than 12 months (for the first time after the effective date) or overlap data if trying to get on the same schedule as the reactor effluent report.
Staff should clarify this in the Statement of Considerations for the rule, indicating that j
licensees may submit reports for a shorter. time period for l
the first report after the effective date of the rule, if j
they are trying to get on the same reporting schedule for the reactor effluent report.
In addition, on page 2 of the Rulemaking Plan, paragraph 1.,
add to the suggested language L
of Section 72.44 (d) (3) - the following sentence:
"The time between-submission of reports must be no longer than 12 l.
months."
2.
On page 7 of the Rulemaking Plan for Section 72.140(d),
paragraph 1. (d), line 6, insert the word "also" after the word "must."
In line 7, insert "for recordkeeping" after
" Set:2on 72.174."
~\\J Y
r vv
F.-
j l
3.
The staf f has deleted section 72.75 (d) (2) (vi), which asks
(N for assessment of the extent of exposure or individuals to
) (,)
radiation or to radioactive materials without identification j
of individuals by name.
An equivalent section has not been included in the proposed revision to Section 72.75 for l
reporting requirements, and should be added.
l l
l l
l cc:
Chairman Jackson Commissioner Rogers Commissioner Dicus Commissioner Diaz Commissioner McGaffigan l
OGC l'
/ \\
Office Directors, Regions, ACRS, ACNW, ASLBP (via E-Mail)
PDR l
DCS l
l
_..__._..__-..__.5
_