ML17082A634
| ML17082A634 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | LaSalle  |
| Issue date: | 11/16/2016 |
| From: | Chuck Zoia NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| To: | Exelon Generation Co |
| Shared Package | |
| ML15274A401 | List: |
| References | |
| ES-201, ES-201-2 | |
| Download: ML17082A634 (1) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Ghecklist Form ES-201-2 Lø,So\\\\¿-
?.ov'-.
Facility:
Date of Examination:
lnitials Item a
b*
c#
Task Description
!'ftt / 'ttt 0/a Verify that the outline(s) f(s) the approprate model, in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401N a.
\\i,t 2 0/-
- b. Assess whether the outlne was systematcally and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all l(/A categories are appropriately sampled nûh //1h O¿
- c. Assess whether the outline over-emphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
1.
W R
Ii T
E N
- d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected l(A statements are appropriate.
w, /¿fr
/t W '*
9" Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifications, and major transients.
a.
- b. Assess whetherthere are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicanis in accordance with the expected crew compostion and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrty, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenaros are duplcated from the applicants' audt test(s), and scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
w utl n 2.
S I
M U
L A
T o
R To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conform(s) with the qualitative and quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D.
c lt'(t"tt r" I)tll'
,¿(fr I 0r Verify that the systems walk-through outlne meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) the outline(s) contain(s) the required number of control room and in-plant lasks dstributed among the safety functions as specified on the form (2) task repetition from the last two NRC examinations is within the limits specilied on the form (3) no tasks are duplicated frorn the applicants'audit test(s)
(4) the number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specilied on the form (5) the number of alternate path, low-power, emergency, and RCA tasks met the crteria on the form a.
D{tu /d 7o
- b. Verify that the adminstrative outlne meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
(1) the tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form (2) at least one task is new or significantly modified (3) no more than one task s reoeated from the last two NRC licensino examinations iY¿ tux 9o 3.
W T
Determne if there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent davs.
c.
DltL '//rl 9o Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including PRA and IPE insights) are covered n the approprate exam section.
a.
^t,,
/t9
- b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41/43 and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
\\r^ 4'* 4n
- c. Ensure that llA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5
\\ilI' /xtg ?,
- d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections.
nl4t,/61 Ø'
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
\\t( Ø,
4.
G E
N E
R A
L
- f.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO)
- a. Author
- b. Facilty Reviewer (.)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#).
- d. NRc Supervisor \\t\\)
itrrA l?ilzoto
' zil't /2.'l ø
@-,"l"llt
¿1;./415ó2,r/,
'.. /--
A -A I alilú
- lndependent NRC Reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
. Not aoolicable for NRC-oreoared examination outlines.
NOTE:
7 ES-201, Page 26o128