ML11257A034: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 2: Line 2:
| number = ML11257A034
| number = ML11257A034
| issue date = 09/15/2011
| issue date = 09/15/2011
| title = 09/15/11 Proposed Meeting Slides for Forthcoming Meeting with Tennessee Valley Authority Regarding Status of Extended Power Uprate Submittal
| title = Proposed Meeting Slides for Forthcoming Meeting with Tennessee Valley Authority Regarding Status of Extended Power Uprate Submittal
| author name =  
| author name =  
| author affiliation = Tennessee Valley Authority
| author affiliation = Tennessee Valley Authority
Line 15: Line 15:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT Meeting with NRC Extended Power Uprate and Transition to NFPA 805 Update Rockville, MarylandSeptember 15, 2011 AgendaIntroductionsBackgroundContainment Accident Pressure Replacement Steam DryersSubmittal and Review ScheduleNFPA 805 Transition Status 1
{{#Wiki_filter:TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT Meeting with NRC Extended Power Uprate and Transition to NFPA 805 Update Rockville, Maryland September 15, 2011
BackgroundBrowns Ferry Nuclear (BFN) Extended Power Uprate (EPU) application currently under NRC review for all three units will result in 14.3 percent


increase above current licensed power.In September 2009, the NRC placed the application review on hold pending development of guidance on credit for Containment Accident Pressure (CAP).
Agenda
 
===Introductions===
===Background===
Containment Accident Pressure
 
Replacement Steam Dryers
 
Submittal and Review Schedule
 
NFPA 805 Transition Status 1
 
===
Background===
Browns Ferry Nuclear (BFN) Extended Power Uprate (EPU) application currently under NRC review for all three units will result in 14.3 percent increase above current licensed power.
 
In September 2009, the NRC placed the application review on hold pending development of guidance on credit for Containment Accident Pressure (CAP).
Two outstanding issues for the BFN EPU remained to be resolved:
Two outstanding issues for the BFN EPU remained to be resolved:
-CAP-Steam dryers TVA met with NRC on December 15, 2010 to:
CAP Steam dryers  
-Confirm outstanding project scope
 
-Communicate planned CAP mitigation strategy relative to draft NRC guidelines
TVA met with NRC on December 15, 2010 to:
-Communicate plans for steam dryers 2
Confirm outstanding project scope Communicate planned CAP mitigation strategy relative to draft NRC guidelines Communicate plans for steam dryers 2
Background (continued)NRC guidance associated with CAP:
 
-In January 2011, NRC Staff requested approval to resume review of EPU license amendment requests (LARs) using the revised CAP guidance.
Background (continued)
-In March 2011, the Commissioners issued a memorandum that approved the revised CAP guidance provided by the Staff and allowed work on EPU LARs to resume.Based on issuance of NRC guidance on CAP, TVA determined that submittal of key assumptions (as discussed in December 15, 2010 meeting) was not necessary.On May 15, 2011, the NRC issued a letter to TVA stating that, based on development of CAP review criteria, the NRC is prepared to resume review of  
 
NRC guidance associated with CAP:
In January 2011, NRC Staff requested approval to resume review of EPU license amendment requests (LARs) using the revised CAP guidance.
In March 2011, the Commissioners issued a memorandum that approved the revised CAP guidance provided by the Staff and allowed work on EPU LARs to resume.
 
Based on issuance of NRC guidance on CAP, TVA determined that submittal of key assumptions (as discussed in December 15, 2010 meeting) was not necessary.
 
On May 15, 2011, the NRC issued a letter to TVA stating that, based on development of CAP review criteria, the NRC is prepared to resume review of the BFN EPU application.
3
 
Containment Accident Pressure
 
TVA identified and evaluated changes/modifications to eliminate or minimize CAP credit for limiting events, using NRC CAP guidance.
 
At this time, using NPSHr (net positive suction head required) 3 percent curves eliminates CAP credit for the station blackout (SBO) and anticipated transient without scram (ATWS) events.
 
The following actions are planned to eliminate CAP credit for fire events:
TVA plans to revise the Generic Letter 89-13 heat exchanger analysis and program to support taking credit for improved residual heat removal (RHR) heat exchanger performance.
TVA plans to increase suppression pool inventory using Condensate Storage Tank water.
Increased suppression pool water inventory combined with improved RHR heat exchanger performance reduces peak suppression pool temperature, increases RHR pump static head, and eliminates CAP credit.
4
 
Containment Accident Pressure (continued)
 
NRC CAP credit guidance introduced an uncertainty adder to NPSHr for a design basis loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) event. The Boiling Water Reactor Owners Group (BWROG) has been developing a generic approach for addressing the NPSH uncertainty adder.
 
TVA plans to use the BWROG approach.
 
Improving RHR heat exchanger performance eliminates CAP credit for the long-term (i.e., >10 minutes) LOCA event.


the BFN EPU application.
TVA plans to take CAP credit only for the short-term (i.e., <10 minutes) LOCA event in accordance with the NRC guidance.
3 Containment Accident PressureTVA identified and evaluated changes/modifications to eliminate or minimize CAP credit for limiting events, using NRC CAP guidance.At this time, using NPSHr (net positive suction head required) 3 percent curves eliminates CAP credit for the station blackout (SBO) and anticipated transient without scram (ATWS) events. The following actions are planned to eliminate CAP credit for fire events: 
-TVA plans to revise the Generic Letter 89-13 heat exchanger analysis and program to support taking credit for improved residual heat removal (RHR) heat exchanger performance.
-TVA plans to increase suppression pool inventory using Condensate Storage Tank water.  
-Increased suppression pool water inventory combined with improved RHR heat exchanger performance reduces peak suppression pool temperature, increases RHR pump static head, and eliminates CAP credit.
4 Containment Accident Pressure (continued)NRC CAP credit guidance introduced an uncertainty adder to NPSHr  for a design basis loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) event.The Boiling Water Reactor Owners Group (BWROG) has been developing a generic approach


for addressing the NPSH uncertainty adder. TVA plans to use the BWROG approach. Improving RHR heat exchanger performance eliminates CAP credit for the long-term (i.e., >10 minutes) LOCA event.TVA plans to take CAP credit only for the short-term (i.e., <10 minutes) LOCA
TVA will request formal NRC acceptance of the analysis for CAP credit for short-term LOCA.
5


event in accordance with the NRC guidance.TVA will request formal NRC acceptance of the analysis for CAP credit for  
Containment Accident Pressure (continued)
The following summarizes the CAP credit approach for the BFN EPU application:
Event Current Need Approach Short-term LOCA
(< 10 minutes)
Need CAP credit for RHR and Core Spray due to run-out flow rate and suction strainer loading Request formal NRC acceptance of CAP credit Long-term LOCA
(> 10 minutes)
Need small amount of CAP credit for Core Spray Eliminate CAP by improving RHR heat exchanger performance Fire Protection Need large amount of CAP credit for RHR Eliminate CAP by improving RHR heat exchanger performance and increasing suppression pool inventory SBO CAP credit not required CAP credit not required ATWS CAP credit not required CAP credit not required 6


short-term LOCA.
Replacement Steam Dryers
5 Containment Accident Pressure (continued)The following summarizes the CAP credit approach for the BFN EPU application:
EventCurrent Need Approach Short-term LOCA (< 10 minutes)Need CAP credit for RHR and Core Spray due to run-out flow rate and suction strainer loadingRequest  formal NRC acceptance of CAP


creditLong-term LOCA      (> 10 minutes)
In December 2009, TVA determined that NRC concerns with analyses of existing steam dryers could not be resolved, and replacement steam dryers (RSDs) would be required.  
Need small amount of CAPcredit for Core SprayEliminate CAP by improving RHR heat exchanger performance Fire ProtectionNeed large amount of CAP credit for RHREliminate CAP by improving RHR heat exchanger performance and increasing suppression pool inventory SBOCAP credit not requiredCAP credit not required ATWSCAP credit not requiredCAP credit not required 6
 
Replacement Steam DryersIn December 2009, TVA determined that NRC concerns with analyses of existing steam dryers could not be resolved, and replacement steam dryers (RSDs) would be required. An RSD specification was developed and provided to prospective vendors.
An RSD specification was developed and provided to prospective vendors.
The RSD work scope consists of three phases:
The RSD work scope consists of three phases:
-Phase I, Design and Analysis
Phase I, Design and Analysis Phase II, Fabrication Phase III, Installation
-Phase II, Fabrication
 
-Phase III, InstallationNegotiations are in progress with General Electric Hitachi for RSD design, analysis, fabrication, and installation.
Negotiations are in progress with General Electric Hitachi for RSD design, analysis, fabrication, and installation.
7 Submittal and Review ScheduleThe proposed EPU schedule is based on overall resource and risk considerations for TVA.The EPU schedule assumes the following:  
7
-RSD analysis and design will not begin until the formal acceptance of the CAP analysis by the NRC.
 
-RSD fabrication will not begin until NRC issues the EPU amendment.
Submittal and Review Schedule
8 Submittal and Review Schedule (continued)
 
TVA SubmittalsEPU CAP Analysis Report May 2012-Schedule assumes BWROG input is receivedin March 2012
The proposed EPU schedule is based on overall resource and risk considerations for TVA.
-TVA will request NRC formal acceptance of CAP Analysis ReportEPU Steam Dryer Analysis ReportSpring 2014NRC Review ExpectationsAcceptance of CAP Analysis Report Spring 2013Issue EPU Amendment 2015 9 NFPA 805 Transition StatusMajor Milestones AchievedNFPA Code compliance evaluationsNuclear safety capability assessment (NSCA) component selection, logics, cable selection, and cable routing (final owner reviews pending)Scoping fire modeling (generic treatments calculation)
 
Remaining Major MilestonesFire PRA completion (including peer review)Fire area assessments and variance from deterministic requirements (VFDR)  
The EPU schedule assumes the following:
RSD analysis and design will not begin until the formal acceptance of the CAP analysis by the NRC.
RSD fabrication will not begin until NRC issues the EPU amendment.
8
 
Submittal and Review Schedule (continued)
TVA Submittals
 
EPU CAP Analysis Report May 2012 Schedule assumes BWROG input is received in March 2012 TVA will request NRC formal acceptance of CAP Analysis Report
 
EPU Steam Dryer Analysis Report Spring 2014 NRC Review Expectations
 
Acceptance of CAP Analysis Report Spring 2013
 
Issue EPU Amendment 2015 9
 
NFPA 805 Transition Status Major Milestones Achieved
 
NFPA Code compliance evaluations
 
Nuclear safety capability assessment (NSCA) component selection, logics, cable selection, and cable routing (final owner reviews pending)
 
Scoping fire modeling (generic treatments calculation)
Remaining Major Milestones
 
Fire PRA completion (including peer review)
 
Fire area assessments and variance from deterministic requirements (VFDR) resolutions
 
Fire risk evaluations


resolutionsFire risk evaluationsLAR preparation and submittal 10}}
LAR preparation and submittal 10}}

Latest revision as of 02:05, 13 January 2025

Proposed Meeting Slides for Forthcoming Meeting with Tennessee Valley Authority Regarding Status of Extended Power Uprate Submittal
ML11257A034
Person / Time
Site: Browns Ferry  Tennessee Valley Authority icon.png
Issue date: 09/15/2011
From:
Tennessee Valley Authority
To: Gratton C
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Gratton, Christopher
References
Download: ML11257A034 (15)
v • d • e


Text

TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY BROWNS FERRY NUCLEAR PLANT Meeting with NRC Extended Power Uprate and Transition to NFPA 805 Update Rockville, Maryland September 15, 2011

Agenda

Introductions

Background

Containment Accident Pressure

Replacement Steam Dryers

Submittal and Review Schedule

NFPA 805 Transition Status 1

=

Background===

Browns Ferry Nuclear (BFN) Extended Power Uprate (EPU) application currently under NRC review for all three units will result in 14.3 percent increase above current licensed power.

In September 2009, the NRC placed the application review on hold pending development of guidance on credit for Containment Accident Pressure (CAP).

Two outstanding issues for the BFN EPU remained to be resolved:

CAP Steam dryers

TVA met with NRC on December 15, 2010 to:

Confirm outstanding project scope Communicate planned CAP mitigation strategy relative to draft NRC guidelines Communicate plans for steam dryers 2

Background (continued)

NRC guidance associated with CAP:

In January 2011, NRC Staff requested approval to resume review of EPU license amendment requests (LARs) using the revised CAP guidance.

In March 2011, the Commissioners issued a memorandum that approved the revised CAP guidance provided by the Staff and allowed work on EPU LARs to resume.

Based on issuance of NRC guidance on CAP, TVA determined that submittal of key assumptions (as discussed in December 15, 2010 meeting) was not necessary.

On May 15, 2011, the NRC issued a letter to TVA stating that, based on development of CAP review criteria, the NRC is prepared to resume review of the BFN EPU application.

3

Containment Accident Pressure

TVA identified and evaluated changes/modifications to eliminate or minimize CAP credit for limiting events, using NRC CAP guidance.

At this time, using NPSHr (net positive suction head required) 3 percent curves eliminates CAP credit for the station blackout (SBO) and anticipated transient without scram (ATWS) events.

The following actions are planned to eliminate CAP credit for fire events:

TVA plans to revise the Generic Letter 89-13 heat exchanger analysis and program to support taking credit for improved residual heat removal (RHR) heat exchanger performance.

TVA plans to increase suppression pool inventory using Condensate Storage Tank water.

Increased suppression pool water inventory combined with improved RHR heat exchanger performance reduces peak suppression pool temperature, increases RHR pump static head, and eliminates CAP credit.

4

Containment Accident Pressure (continued)

NRC CAP credit guidance introduced an uncertainty adder to NPSHr for a design basis loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) event. The Boiling Water Reactor Owners Group (BWROG) has been developing a generic approach for addressing the NPSH uncertainty adder.

TVA plans to use the BWROG approach.

Improving RHR heat exchanger performance eliminates CAP credit for the long-term (i.e., >10 minutes) LOCA event.

TVA plans to take CAP credit only for the short-term (i.e., <10 minutes) LOCA event in accordance with the NRC guidance.

TVA will request formal NRC acceptance of the analysis for CAP credit for short-term LOCA.

5

Containment Accident Pressure (continued)

The following summarizes the CAP credit approach for the BFN EPU application:

Event Current Need Approach Short-term LOCA

(< 10 minutes)

Need CAP credit for RHR and Core Spray due to run-out flow rate and suction strainer loading Request formal NRC acceptance of CAP credit Long-term LOCA

(> 10 minutes)

Need small amount of CAP credit for Core Spray Eliminate CAP by improving RHR heat exchanger performance Fire Protection Need large amount of CAP credit for RHR Eliminate CAP by improving RHR heat exchanger performance and increasing suppression pool inventory SBO CAP credit not required CAP credit not required ATWS CAP credit not required CAP credit not required 6

Replacement Steam Dryers

In December 2009, TVA determined that NRC concerns with analyses of existing steam dryers could not be resolved, and replacement steam dryers (RSDs) would be required.

An RSD specification was developed and provided to prospective vendors.

The RSD work scope consists of three phases:

Phase I, Design and Analysis Phase II, Fabrication Phase III, Installation

Negotiations are in progress with General Electric Hitachi for RSD design, analysis, fabrication, and installation.

7

Submittal and Review Schedule

The proposed EPU schedule is based on overall resource and risk considerations for TVA.

The EPU schedule assumes the following:

RSD analysis and design will not begin until the formal acceptance of the CAP analysis by the NRC.

RSD fabrication will not begin until NRC issues the EPU amendment.

8

Submittal and Review Schedule (continued)

TVA Submittals

EPU CAP Analysis Report May 2012 Schedule assumes BWROG input is received in March 2012 TVA will request NRC formal acceptance of CAP Analysis Report

EPU Steam Dryer Analysis Report Spring 2014 NRC Review Expectations

Acceptance of CAP Analysis Report Spring 2013

Issue EPU Amendment 2015 9

NFPA 805 Transition Status Major Milestones Achieved

NFPA Code compliance evaluations

Nuclear safety capability assessment (NSCA) component selection, logics, cable selection, and cable routing (final owner reviews pending)

Scoping fire modeling (generic treatments calculation)

Remaining Major Milestones

Fire PRA completion (including peer review)

Fire area assessments and variance from deterministic requirements (VFDR) resolutions

Fire risk evaluations

LAR preparation and submittal 10

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML11257A034&oldid=5272867"