ML20211P866: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:si Sandra Northern ,10 CFR Rsvision ra: Closura of LPDRs and ADAMS                                                       ' Page 1 Acro H             ,
{{#Wiki_filter:si Sandra Northern,10 CFR Rsvision ra: Closura of LPDRs and ADAMS
From:               Russell Powell To:                 Bollwerk, G Paul, Cameron, Francis, Dewey, Lee Date:               Thu, Feb 25,1999 3:55 PM                                                                         i
' Page 1 Acro H From:
Russell Powell To:
Bollwerk, G Paul, Cameron, Francis, Dewey, Lee Date:
Thu, Feb 25,1999 3:55 PM i


==Subject:==
==Subject:==
10 CFR Revision re: Closure of LPDRs and ADAMS I have made revisions to the rule regarding closure of the LPDRs to address your concerns per our meeting. I have incorporated the statement from Chip Cameron in the revised Proposed Rule along with establishing a 45 day comment period. Have also included the current plans to give collections to current libraries if they want them (so far about 80% of the respondents have expressed interest in keeping them).
10 CFR Revision re: Closure of LPDRs and ADAMS I have made revisions to the rule regarding closure of the LPDRs to address your concerns per our meeting. I have incorporated the statement from Chip Cameron in the revised Proposed Rule along with establishing a 45 day comment period. Have also included the current plans to give collections to current libraries if they want them (so far about 80% of the respondents have expressed interest in keeping them).
A clean version cf the current draft proposed rule is attached, along with a red-lined version to make it easier to see where changes were made. Pls advise if this satisfies your concems or if you have additional comments.
A clean version cf the current draft proposed rule is attached, along with a red-lined version to make it easier to see where changes were made. Pls advise if this satisfies your concems or if you have additional comments.
              .Thanks.
.Thanks.
Russ CC:               . Northern, Sandra, Scattolini, Lynn 9909140123 990908                                                                 .
Russ CC:
PDR     PR 1 64FR24531               PDR
. Northern, Sandra, Scattolini, Lynn 9909140123 990908 PDR PR 1 64FR24531 PDR
            ~f{. y}.h).                                               -
~f{. y}.h).
()S
()S


i t" * --C h,.i- 10 CFR Revision re: Closure of LPDRs rnd ADAMS                                                                   Pige 1 ]
i
yugRj
* --C h,.i-10 CFR Revision re: Closure of LPDRs rnd ADAMS Pige 1 ]
        . n,.                    -
t"yugRj 3%
3%                                           -
go.oy-j
go.oy-j           \
\\
From:               Russell Powell
n,.
                      . To: .                 Bollwerk, G Paul, Cameron, Francis, Dewey, Lee Date:               Thu, Feb 25,1999 3:55 PM s
From:
                      ' Sut$sct:             10 CFR Revision re: Closure of LPDRs and ADAMS                                                 j
Russell Powell
        ,              ' I have made revisions to the rule regarding blosure of the LPDRs to address your concems per our
. To:.
                        . meeting. I have incorporated the statement from Chip Cameron in the revised Proposed Rule along with establishing a 45 day comment period. Have also included the current plans to give collections to current libraries if they want them (so far about 80% of the respondents have expressed interest in keeping them).
Bollwerk, G Paul, Cameron, Francis, Dewey, Lee Date:
                    . ~ A clean version of the current draft proposed rule is attached, along with a red-lined version to make it easier to see where changes were made. Pls advise if this satisfies your concerns or if you have additional comments.
Thu, Feb 25,1999 3:55 PM
          ~
' Sut$sct:
10 CFR Revision re: Closure of LPDRs and ADAMS j
s
' I have made revisions to the rule regarding blosure of the LPDRs to address your concems per our
. meeting. I have incorporated the statement from Chip Cameron in the revised Proposed Rule along with establishing a 45 day comment period. Have also included the current plans to give collections to current libraries if they want them (so far about 80% of the respondents have expressed interest in keeping them).
~ A clean version of the current draft proposed rule is attached, along with a red-lined version to make it easier to see where changes were made. Pls advise if this satisfies your concerns or if you have additional comments.
ggThanks.
ggThanks.
~
i
i
            ,    , Russ-CC:                 Northem, Sandra, Scattolini, Lynn ak44 Powe3\ cecewed eca 4romL\\werk gwM3 % o v's .
, Russ CC:
k         hi                 [
Northem, Sandra, Scattolini, Lynn ak44 Powe3\\ cecewed eca 4romL\\\\werk
% o v's.
gwM3 k
hi
[
_}}
_}}

Latest revision as of 21:20, 5 December 2024

Discusses 10CFR Rev Re Closure of Lpdrs & ADAMS Per Meeting. Revs Have Been Made to Rule Concerning Closure of Lpdrs
ML20211P866
Person / Time
Issue date: 02/25/1999
From: Racquel Powell
NRC
To: Paul Bollwerk, Cameron F, Dewey L
NRC
Shared Package
ML20211N634 List:
References
FRN-64FR24531, RULE-PR-1, RULE-PR-100, RULE-PR-110, RULE-PR-2, RULE-PR-50, RULE-PR-51, RULE-PR-52, RULE-PR-60, RULE-PR-62, RULE-PR-7, RULE-PR-72, RULE-PR-75, RULE-PR-76, RULE-PR-9 AG07-1, AG07-1-023, NUDOCS 9909140123
Download: ML20211P866 (1)
v • d • e


Text

si Sandra Northern,10 CFR Rsvision ra: Closura of LPDRs and ADAMS

' Page 1 Acro H From:

Russell Powell To:

Bollwerk, G Paul, Cameron, Francis, Dewey, Lee Date:

Thu, Feb 25,1999 3:55 PM i

Subject:

10 CFR Revision re: Closure of LPDRs and ADAMS I have made revisions to the rule regarding closure of the LPDRs to address your concerns per our meeting. I have incorporated the statement from Chip Cameron in the revised Proposed Rule along with establishing a 45 day comment period. Have also included the current plans to give collections to current libraries if they want them (so far about 80% of the respondents have expressed interest in keeping them).

A clean version cf the current draft proposed rule is attached, along with a red-lined version to make it easier to see where changes were made. Pls advise if this satisfies your concems or if you have additional comments.

.Thanks.

Russ CC:

. Northern, Sandra, Scattolini, Lynn 9909140123 990908 PDR PR 1 64FR24531 PDR

~f{. y}.h).

()S

i

  • --C h,.i-10 CFR Revision re: Closure of LPDRs rnd ADAMS Pige 1 ]

t"yugRj 3%

go.oy-j

\\

n,.

From:

Russell Powell

. To:.

Bollwerk, G Paul, Cameron, Francis, Dewey, Lee Date:

Thu, Feb 25,1999 3:55 PM

' Sut$sct:

10 CFR Revision re: Closure of LPDRs and ADAMS j

s

' I have made revisions to the rule regarding blosure of the LPDRs to address your concems per our

. meeting. I have incorporated the statement from Chip Cameron in the revised Proposed Rule along with establishing a 45 day comment period. Have also included the current plans to give collections to current libraries if they want them (so far about 80% of the respondents have expressed interest in keeping them).

~ A clean version of the current draft proposed rule is attached, along with a red-lined version to make it easier to see where changes were made. Pls advise if this satisfies your concerns or if you have additional comments.

ggThanks.

~

i

, Russ CC:

Northem, Sandra, Scattolini, Lynn ak44 Powe3\\ cecewed eca 4romL\\\\werk

% o v's.

gwM3 k

hi

[

_

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20211P866&oldid=4003941"