ND-21-1010, ITAAC Closure Notification on Completion of ITAAC C.2.6.09.09 (Index Number 670)

From kanterella
(Redirected from ND-21-1010)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

ITAAC Closure Notification on Completion of ITAAC C.2.6.09.09 (Index Number 670)
ML21322A248
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 11/18/2021
From: Yox M
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
ND-21-1010
Download: ML21322A248 (6)


Text

f.

,1 I

Michael J. Yox 7825 River Road Southern Nuclear Regulatory Affairs Director Waynesboro, GA 30830 Vogtle3& 4 706-848-6459 tel NOV 1 8 2021 Docket No.:

52-025 ND-21-1010 10 CFR 52.99(c)(1)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001 Southern Nuclear Operating Company Vogtle Electric Generating Plant Unit 3 ITAAC Closure Notification on Completion of ITAAC C.2.6.09.09 [Index Number 6701 Ladies and Gentlemen:

In accordance with 10 CFR 52.99(c)(1), the purpose of this letter is to notify the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) of the completion of Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP) Unit 3 Inspections, Tests, Analyses, and Acceptance Criteria (ITAAC) Item C.2.6.09.09 [Index Number 670]. This ITAAC confirms that emergency exits through the protected area perimeter are alarmed and secured by locking devices that allow prompt egress during an emergency. The ITAAC also confirms that emergency exits through the vital area boundaries are locked, alarmed, and equipped with a crash bar to allow for emergency egress. The closure process for this ITAAC is based on the guidance described in Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 08-01, "Industry Guideline for the ITAAC Closure Process Under 10 CFR Part 52," which was endorsed by the NRC in Regulatory Guide 1.215.

This letter contains no new NRC regulatory commitments. Southern Nuclear Operating Company (SNC) requests NRC staff confirmation of this determination and publication of the required notice in the Federal Register per 10 CFR 52.99.

If there are any questions, please contact Kelli Roberts at 706-848-6991.

Respectfully submitted.

Michael J. Yox Regulatory Affairs Director Vogtle 3 & 4

Enclosure:

Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP) Unit 3 Completion of ITAAC C.2.6.09.09 [Index Number 670]

MJY/RLB/sfr

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-21-1010 Page 2 of 3 To:

Southern Nuclear Operating Company/ Georgia Power Company Mr. Peter P. Sena III Mr. D. L. McKlnney Mr. H. Nieh Mr. G. Chick Mr. S. Stimac Mr. P. Martino Mr. J. B. Williams Mr. M. J. Yox Mr. A. S. Parton Ms. K. A. Roberts Ms. J.M. Coleman Mr. C. T. Defnall Mr. C. E. Morrow Mr. K. J. Drudy Mr. J. M. Fisher Mr. R. L. Beiike Mr. S. Leighty Ms. A. C. Chamberlain Mr. J. C. Haswell Document Services RTYPE: VND.LI.L06 File AR.01.02.06 cc; Nuclear Reouiatorv Commission Ms. M. Bailey Mr. M. King Mr. G. Bowman Ms. A. Veil M

M M

M Ms. N. C. Coovert M

M M

M M

M M

M M

M M

M M

M

. C. P. Patel

. G. J. Khouri

. C. J. Even B. J. Kemker C. Welch J. Gaslevic O. Lopez-Santiago G. Armstrong M. Webb T. Fredette C. Santos B. Davis

. J. Vasquez J. Eargle T. Fanelli Ms. K. McCurry

. J. Parent B. Griman

. V. Hall

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-21-1010 Page 3 of 3 Qqlethorpe Power Corporation Mr. R. B. Brinkman Mr. E. Rasmussen Municipal Electric Authority of Georgia Mr. J. E. Fuller Mr. 8. M. Jackson Daiton Utilities Mr. T. Bundros Westinahouse Electric Company. LLC Dr. L. Oriani Mr. D. C. Durham Mr. M. M. Corletti Mr. Z. 8. Harper Mr. J. L. Coward Other Mr. 8. W. Kline, Bechtel Power Corporation Ms. L. Matis, Tetra Tech NUS, Inc.

Dr. W. R. Jacobs, Jr., Ph.D., GDS Associates, Inc.

Mr. 8. Roetger, Georgia Public Service Commission Mr. R. L. Trokey, Georgia Public Service Commission Mr. K. C. Greene, Troutman Sanders Mr. 8. Blanton, Baich Bingham

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-21-1010 Enclosure Page 1 of 3 Southern Nuclear Operating Company ND-21-1010 Enclosure Vogtle Electric Generating Plant (VEGP) Unit 3 Completion of ITAAC C.2.6.09.09 [Index Number 670]

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-21-1010 Enclosure Page 2 of 3 ITAAC Statement Design Commitment

9. Emergency exits through the protected area perimeter are alarmed and secured with locking devices to allow for emergency egress.
9. Emergency exits through the vital area boundaries are locked, alarmed, and equipped with a crash bar to allow for emergency egress.

Inspections/Tests/Analvses Tests, inspections, or a combination of tests and inspections of emergency exits through the protected area perimeter will be performed.

Test, inspection, or a combination of tests and inspections of the emergency exits through the vital area boundaries will be performed.

Acceptance Criteria Emergency exits through the protected area perimeter are alarmed and secured by locking devices that allow prompt egress during an emergency.

The emergency exits through the vital area boundaries are locked, alarmed, and equipped with a crash bar to allow for emergency egress.

ITAAC Determination Basis Tests of the emergency exits through the protected area perimeter and through the vital area boundaries were performed to verify that each emergency exit through the protected area perimeter is alarmed and secured by a locking device that allows prompt egress during an emergency, and the emergency exits through the vital area boundaries are locked, alarmed, and equipped with a crash bar to allow for emergency egress. The VEGP Unit 3 Plant Security System ITAACs only cover the Unit 3 plant security system design commitment scope.

Emeraencv exits through the protected area perimeter are alarmed and secured bv locking devices that allow prompt egress durino an emeraencv.

Testing was performed as described in ITAAC Technical Report SV3-SES-ITR-800670 (Reference 1) to verify that each emergency exit portal through the protected area perimeter is alarmed and secured by a locking device that allows prompt egress during an emergency and satisfies the applicable protected area perimeter emergency egress requirements of the VEGP Unit 3 and Unit 4 Physical Security Plan associated with 10 CFR 73.55(e)(8)(iii).

The test for each protected area perimeter emergency exit portal first verified the protected area perimeter emergency exit portal was secured by a locking device. The protected area perimeter emergency exit portal was then unlocked by releasing the lock and opening the portal door, and then verifying that an associated alarm was generated in the central alarm station (CAS) and the secondary alarm station (SAS). Once unlocked it was confirmed that the protected area perimeter emergency exit portal allowed prompt egress. The protected area perimeter emergency exit portal was then secured by a locking device i.e., lock restored and portal door closed, and it was verified that the associated alarm in the CAS and SAS could be reset.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ND-21-1010 Enclosure Page 3 of 3 The results of the test are documented in Reference 1 and verify each emergency exit through the protected area perimeter Is alarmed and secured by a locking device that allows prompt egress during an emergency.

The emergency exits through the vital area boundaries are locked, alarmed, and eauloped with a crash bar to allow for emergency eoress.

Testing was performed as described In ITAAC Technical Report SV3-SES-ITR-800670 (Reference 1) to verify that the emergency exits through the vital area boundaries are locked, alarmed, and equipped with a crash bar to allow for emergency egress and satisfy the applicable vital area boundary emergency egress requirements of the VEGP Unit 3 and Unit 4 Physical Security Plan associated with 10CFR 73.55(e)(9)(ll).

The test for each vital area boundary emergency exit portal first verified the vital area boundary emergency exit portal was locked. The vital area boundary emergency exit portal was then exited using the portal's crash bar, and verification made that an associated alarm was generated In the CAS and SAS. The vital area boundary emergency exit portal was then closed and locked, and verification made that the associated alarm In the CAS and SAS could be reset.

The results of the test are documented In Reference 1 and verify the emergency exits through the vital area boundaries are locked, alarmed, and equipped with a crash bar to allow for emergency egress.

Reference 1 Is available for NRC inspection as part of the Unit 3 ITAAC C.2.6.09.09 Completion Package (Reference 2).

ITAAC Finding Review In accordance with plant procedures for ITAAC completion. Southern Nuclear Operating Company (SNC) performed a review of all findings pertaining to the subject ITAAC and associated corrective actions. This review found there were no relevant ITAAC findings associated with this ITAAC. The ITAAC completion review Is documented In the ITAAC Completion Package for ITAAC C.2.6.09.09 (Reference 2) and Is available for NRC review.

ITAAC Completion Statement Based on the above Information, SNC hereby notifies the NRC that ITAAC C.2.6.09.09 was performed for VEGP Unit 3 and that the prescribed acceptance criteria were met.

Systems, structures, and components verified as part of this ITAAC are being maintained In their as-designed, ITAAC compliant condition In accordance with approved plant programs and procedures.

References favailable for NRC inspection)

1. SV3-SES-ITR-800670, Protected Area Perimeter and Vital Area Boundary Emergency Exit Test, Rev 0 (SRI)
2. C.2.6.09.09-U3-CP-Rev0, ITAAC Completion Package