ML22178A172

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Long Term Coupon Surveillance Program
ML22178A172
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 06/27/2022
From: Pat Navin
Constellation Energy Generation
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML22178A172 (11)
v • d • e


Text

Constellation, June 27, 2022 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555

Subject:

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit No. 2 Renewed Facility Operating License No. DPR-69 NRC Docket No. 50-318 Long Term Coupon Surveillance Program Patrick D. Navin Site Vice President Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant 1650 Calvert Cliffs Parkway Lusby, MD 20657 410*495-5200 Office 717-817-6827 Mobile www.constellation.com Pat.Navin@constellatlon.com

Reference:

1.

Letter from D. V. Pickett (NRC) to J. A Spina (CCNPP), dated August 27, 2008, Amendment re: Long-Term Coupon Surveillance Program This letter is submitted as required by Reference 1, the results of the coupon surveillance program are provided in Attachment (1 ).

There are no regulatory commitments contained in this letter.

Should you have questions regarding this matter, please contact Mr. Larry D. Smith at (410) 495-5219.

Respegj_

Patrick D. Navin Site Vice President PDN/LDS/lmd

Attachment:

(1)

Long Term Coupon Surveillance Program Results cc:

NRC Project Manager, Calvert Cliffs NRC Regional Administrator, Region I NRC Resident Inspector, Calvert Cliffs S. Seaman, MD-DNR

Mr. D. Lew June 27,2022 Page 2 bee:

D. P. Ferraro, AGC D. M Reddick D. P. Helker W. E. Croft T. P. Haaf J. A. Dullinger H. Crockett D. J. Hild L. D. Smith K. J. Connor NRC 22-012

ATTACHMENT (1)

LONG TERM COUPON SURVEILLANCE PROGRAM RESULTS Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, LLC May 25, 2022

Attachment (1)

Lon Term Cou on Surveillance Pro ram Results The analysis of the initial coupons for Engineering Test Procedure 86-003R "Analysis of Neutron Absorbing Material in the Spent Fuel Storage Racks and Management of the Neutron Poison Sample Coupon Trees" was completed on 4/19/2022. The initial results of coupon dimension and weight measurements did not meet the acceptance criteria listed in the long-term coupon surveillance program (approved by Reference 1 ). The specific criterion is, "Any change in weight of+/- 26-percent compared to baseline".

Weight loss values for the coupons in packet 24 are as follows:

Coupon 2U from packet 24 indicates an approximate 28% weight loss. This weight loss exceeds the acceptance criterion of 26%.

Coupons 2L from packet 24 indicates an approximate 18% weight loss, which does not exceed the acceptance criteria of 26%.

A recovery plan has been initiated to expand the scope of testing by pulling additional coupons in 2022 in accordance with the long-term coupon surveillance program. The 1 U and 1 L coupons from packet 24 were previously pulled as part of the expanded scope in 2013.

This document provides the initial results for coupon weight loss and 8-10 areal density while the expanded scope is in progress.

1

Attachment (1)

Lon Term Cou on Surveillance Pro ram Results Coupon Weight Loss The coupon weight characteristics for packet 24 are shown in Table 1. As can be seen in Table 1, the weight loss of Coupon 24-2U did not meet the limit, mainly due to the flow induced erosion caused by an inspection hole in the coupon bracket cover. This flow induced erosion was previously identified in past coupon campaigns at Calvert Cliffs. As communicated previously, the neutron absorbing material in the spent fuel racks is not susceptible to this erosion because there are no inspection holes in the active fuel region. Note that the criticality analysis of record does not credit neutron absorbing material located outside the active fuel region of fuel assemblies seated in the rack. The hole caused by flow induced erosion is shown in Figure 1 below. The coupon weight characteristics for packet 24, after weight adjustment for inspection hole, is shown in Table 2. It is shown the criterion is met for adjusted weights. In summary, the average weight loss before adjustment was 23.00% which was reduced to 20.05% after adjustment.

Table 1 P

k t 24 C ace oupon W. ht Ch eIg aractenzatIon, e ore IJUstment or nspectIon Bf Ad.

f I

HI oe Pre-Irradiation Irradiated-Dried Change Change Limit Coupon Weight Weight (a)

(g)

(%)

(%)

24-2U 8.88 6.37

-28.27

+/-26 24-2L 9.14 7.52

-17.72

+/-26 Table 2 Packet 24 Coupon Weioht Characterization, After Adjustment for Inspection Hole (Note 1)

Adjusted Pre-Irradiated-Dried Change Change Limit Coupon Irradiation Weight Weight (g)

(g)

(%)

(%)

24-2U 8.514 6.37

-25.18

+/-26 24-2L 8.842 7.52

-14.95

+/-26 Note 1. To adjust the pre-irradiated coupon weight, weight loss from erosion (in fraction) was calculated by the estimated inspection hole area divided by the pre-irradiated coupon area. Then, the "adjusted pre-irradiation weight" was calculated by multiplying the "pre-irradiation weiaht" by "1-calculated weight loss fraction."

2

Attachment (1)

Long Term Coupon Surveillance Program Results Photo 1: Coupons 24-2U & 24-2L (Front, Ambient Light, Light Background)

Figure 1.

Irradiated Coupons 24-2U (on the Left) and 24-2L (on the Right) 3

Attachment (1)

Lon Term Cou on Surveillance Pro ram Results Coupon Weight Loss Limit The current coupon weight loss limit of +/-26% originated following the license renewal of Calvert Cliffs.

During plant license renewal, Calvert Cliffs agreed to evaluate the Carborundum for a service life of ten years after the period of extended operation (ML20217H598, page 11 [2]). The Carborundum manufacturer's original test program had shown that the only notable changes in the sheet material with irradiation to 1011 rad (simulating a 40-year lifetime) were a 20% weight loss and 15% boron reduction (ML071440224 [3), Enclosure 1, pages 9 and 15). Based on this information, a boron loss of 26% was calculated as 70/40 x 15% (15% areal density loss over 40 years, extrapolated to 70 years) for use following license renewal. Therefore, the Calvert Cliffs Unit 1 criticality analysis performed after plant license renewal (ML031270300 [4]) evaluated a boron areal density of 0.0177 g10B/cm2, which represented a 26% reduction over the 0.09" thick material with 0.024 g10B/cm2 required by the specification. Since weight loss exceeded boron reduction under the carborundum manufacturers test conditions, use of a 26% reduction for the weight loss criteria in the aging management program was considered conservative during a time when areal density testing was not being performed. Following the first areal density test required by Amendment 288 [5], manufacturing information located in plant history revealed that the Carborundum sheets installed in the Unit 1 SFP racks consisted of two layers, each 0.045" thick with an original 8-10 areal density of 0.0144 g/cm2 to 0.0153 g/cm2. This information also indicated that similar material demonstrated a minimum of 0.012 g10B/cm2 after 1011 rad gamma exposure.

Thus, the weight loss acceptance criterion that was based on a reduction from 0.024 g/cm2 (combination of two layers) is highly conservative.

The more appropriate weight loss limit, which is based on as-built boron areal density is 38.5%.

It is calculated as (0.0288 - 0.0177) *100/0.0288, where 0.0288 g/cm2 is the rack Carborundum minimum areal density, and 0.0177 g/cm2 is the Carborundum areal density credited in criticality analyses of record.

4

Attachment (1)

Lon Term Cou on Surveillance Pro ram Results Coupon Weight Loss as a Function of Coupon Service Life Figure 2 provides weight loss as a function of coupon service life. The plots in this figure show while the average unadjusted weight loss is not projected to meet the current criterion of 26%

after 2023, the coupons with adjusted weight loss are projected to meet the adjusted weight loss limit based on boron areal density beyond the period of extended operation.

80.0 l 60.0

"' g

~

  • 40.0 3

QI IIO I!

g: 20.0 c(

Weight Loss as a Function of Coupon Service Life y = 0.0132x1 - 52.221x + 51669 R2 = 0.9696

  • ... ** * ***** *
  • y :: 0.0056x -'
  • 21.98x + 21442

.t ***:**.**

R2 :: 0.919 0.0 *... * *..

1983 1993 2003 2013 2023 2033 Not adjusted for hole Year Adjusted for hole Current Weight Loss Limit Adjusted Weight Loss Limit Based on Boron Areal Density Poly. (Not adjusted for hole)

Poly. (Adjusted for hole) 2043 2053 Figure 2.

Weight Loss as a Function of Coupon Service Life (Notes 1 to 3)

Note 1: The weight loss was adjusted for the flow induced erosion if the hole was all the way through the coupon; otherwise, an unadjusted value was used.

Note 2: The current weight loss limit is for each individual coupon, not for average weight loss.

Note 3: The end of life for the spent fuel pool is 60 years plant operation + 10 years = 2046.

5

Attachment (1)

Long Term Coupon Surveillance Program Results Coupon Boron-10 Areal Density as a Function of Coupon Service Life Areal density testing was performed on 24-2U and 24-2L coupons by NETCO's laboratory facilities at Pennsylvania State University. The results for the individual coupons, as well as the total areal density are provided in Table 3. As can be seen, the total areal density is more than the limit of 0.0177 g/cm2* An evaluation of Carborundum coupons after the 2013 surveillance revealed that the majority of the coupon weight loss was due to flow induced erosion caused by an inspection hole in the coupon bracket cover. The neutron absorbing material in the spent fuel rack is not susceptible to this erosion because there are no inspection holes in the active fuel region. Note that the criticality analysis of record does not credit neutron absorbing material located outside the active fuel region of fuel assemblies seated in the rack.

Figure 3 shows the change in B-10 areal density over time, and its limit of 0.0177 g/cm2. This plot, which is conservatively drawn, shows the coupons would not fail for more than 20 years (approximately 2042).

Table 3 Packet 24 Coupon B-10 Areal Density Coupon Minimum B-10 Areal Density (a10B/cm2) 24-2U 0.0122 24-2L 0.0130 24-2U + 24-2L = 0.0252 g10B/cm2 Change in B-10 Areal Density Over Time 0.035 0.03........................

E

~O.D25 m

lll 1111 i 0.02 C

QI c o.oi5 ii

~

~ 0.01 P-4 m 0.005 0

1983 1995 2007 y ~ -3E-llx2 + 2E-06x + 0.0059 R2 = 0.6552

    • 1******.....

2018 Year 2030 2041 8-10 Areal Density -- 8-10 Areal Density Limit

        • * ** ** Poly. (8-lOAreal Density)

Figure 3.

Change in B-10 Areal Density Over Time 6

2053

Attachment (1)

Lon Term Cou on Surveillance Pro ram Results Visual and Dimensional Results The acceptance criterion for visual inspection is no visual evidence of gross changes and deterioration. However, there is a hole through center coincident with packet inspection hole, as well as edge erosion. So, the result of the visual inspection is considered as unsatisfactory.

The acceptance criterion for any change in the length and width of the coupon is +/-0.5 inches compared to the baseline. The results, from 1983 until now are provided in Figures 4 and 5. As can be seen, the limit is met for both coupon's length and width.

0.60 0.50 l(l 0.40

..c u

r:::

~ 0.30 to r:::

~ 0.20

  • =

y = 0.0013x - 2.4726 R2 = 0.2853

~ 0.10

.~........................................................................

n,

'O 0.00...................

GI b.O I!! l 1983 1993 2003 2013 2023 2033 2043 2053 Year Change In Length Limit for Change in Length

......... Expon. (Change In Length)......... Linear (Change In Length)

Figure 4.

Change in Coupon Length as a Function of Coupon Service Life 7

0.60 0.50

~ 0.40

.c u

C 0.30

.c ti 0.20 Attachment (1)

Long Term Coupon Surveillance Program Results y = 0.0019x - 3.8321 R2 = 0.601

§ C

Q 10 e

cu

..... *******.... ¥.......................

~ 0.00 **. !............. ~***"* *

  • n,

.c u

~

~ l 1983 1993 2003 2013 2023 2033 2043 Year Change In Width Limit for Change in Width

......... Expon. (Change In Width)......... Linear (Change In Width) 2053 Figure 5.

Change in Coupon Width as a Function of Coupon Service Life Extended Action While the coupon 24-2U weight loss (before adjusting the weight loss for the hole) failed to meet the weight loss criterion, the coupon is technically acceptable since the criterion for the weight loss is overly conservative, as discussed above, and the B-10 areal density requirement and dimensional criteria are met, as shown in the previous figure.

Nevertheless, per the current requirements, additional coupons will be pulled out of the spent fuel pool for further analysis. Subsequent steps are based on whether those coupons meet the acceptance criteria, and are listed in Amendment 288.

Reference

1. Letter from D. V. Pickett (NRC) to J. A. Spina (CCNPP), dated August 27, 2008, Amendment re: Long-Term Coupon Surveillance Program.
2. Baltimore Gas and Electric Company. "Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Request for Review and Approval of Commodity and System Reports and the Time-Limited Aging Analyses Evaluation for License Renewal," (ML20217H598), March 27, 1998.
3.

Constellation Energy. "Long-Term Coupon Surveillance Program for the Unit 1 Spent Fuel Pool," (ML071440224), May 10, 2007.

4. "Calvert Cliffs, Units 1 - License Amendment Request re Increase to Spent Fuel Pool Maximum Enrichment Limit with Soluble Boron Credit, Attachments 1 Through G,"

(ML031270300), May 1, 2003.

5. Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit No. 1, Amendment to Renewed Facility Operating License, Amendment No. 288.

8

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML22178A172&oldid=3794289"