ML20207T109

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Comments Opposing Draft Proposed Rules Re Full Power Licensing of Plants Even If State & Local Authorities Object to Such Licensing & Refuse to Participate in Formulation of Emergency Planning Procedures
ML20207T109
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook, 05000000, Shoreham
Issue date: 02/06/1987
From: Gephardt R
HOUSE OF REP., WAYS AND MEANS
To: Zech L
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20207T070 List:
References
FRN-52FR6980, RULE-PR-50 NUDOCS 8703230200
Download: ML20207T109 (1)


Text

~.

'llCHARD A. CEPHARDT

-s-aron omes:

1432 Loseswontn House Orsace 8vnoino 3e DestasCT, Missouse WJ.sm=GTom. DC 2!515 wes =D ums co."

CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES OssiasCT o8FICE; HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES sess c=ois St. Louss. MO 63123 WASHINGTON, DC 20515 r oat <s 4 esi-ssse February 6, 1987 Chairman Lando Zech, Jr.

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 1717 H Street, N.W.

Washington, D.C.

20555

Dear Chairman Zech:

I have recently learned that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission is considering rule changes that could permit full-power licensing of nuclear power plants even if state and local authorities object to such licensing and have refused to participate in the formulation of emergency planning procedures.

These changes, outlined in a recent memo by the General Counsel's office, would substitute milder requirements with potentially adverse consequences for public safety.

I strongly oppose these draft rules and urge that the Commission cease their consideration.

State opposition to licensing of plants like Shoreham and Seabrook is grounded in the widespread and legitimate concerns about the safety of those plants.

These concerns demand attention and resolution.

Particularly in the aftermath of the Chernobyl accident, a Commission proposal to circumvent state or local authority would represent an affront to state and local officials.

It sends all of us an ominous message about the Commission's commitment to safety.

Effective emergency planning for nuclear plants requires the assistance and cooperation of local governments and states.

Local citizens' concerns, as reflected by the positions of their state and local representatives, must be paramount.

I urge the Commission to work with the states, rather than trying to circumvent them.

I appreciate your consideration of this matter and look forward to your reply.

Sincerely, 8703230200 B70227 n

PDR COMMS NRCC V*

g CORRESPONDENCE PDR Richard A. Gephardt RAG:jch