ML20207T075
| ML20207T075 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 02/27/1987 |
| From: | Zech L NRC COMMISSION (OCM) |
| To: | Bliley T, Byron B, Darden G, Downey T, Gephardt R, Randy Hall, Hochbrueckner, Huckaby J, Lewis J, Lujan M, Marlenee R, Mavroules N, Moorhead C, Mrazek R, Murphy A, Myers J, Oxley M, Pashayan C, Stratton S, Young D HOUSE OF REP. |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20207T070 | List: |
| References | |
| FRN-52FR6980, RULE-PR-50 NUDOCS 8703230161 | |
| Download: ML20207T075 (21) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:1. ~~ .\\/ p recoq ,y. k UNITED STATES g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION y -g.. _y W ASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 \\q + *.. + j$ CHAIRMAN February 27, 1987 The Honorable John T. Myers United States ~ House of Representatives Washington, D. C. 20515
Dear Congressman Myers:
-Thank you for your letter of February 6, 1987 commenting on the proposed rule which the NRC staff recently forwarded to the Commission for its consideration. That proposal calls for a change in the Commission's emergency-plannino rules. It addresses those rare instances in which a state or local government elects not to participate in the emergency planning process ' for a nuclear power plant. It provides that non-participation would not necessarily preclude issuance of an operating license to the_ plant. Under the proposal a utility plan would be evaluated against a series of acceptance criteria, including the existence of measures designed to compensate for the non-participation of the state or locality in the planning process. The Commission determined on February 26, 1987 to-issue the proposed rule for public comment. Your letter, as well as others which we have received from elected public officials, will be given careful consideration. Your letter will be placed in the record of the rulemaking. Sincerely, 4. Lando W. Z h,J 8703230161 B70227 PDR COMMS NRCC CORRESPONDENCE PDR i
4 ~ [M[ k UNITED STATES vg f( g _ NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3 '- /.j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 %,..% ",e CHAIRMAN February 27, 1987 The Honorable Ron Marlenee United States House of Representatives Washington, D. C. 20515
Dear Congressman Marlenee:
Thank you for your letter of February 6, 1987_ commenting on the-proposed rule which the NPC staff recently forwarded to the Commission for its consideration. That proposal calls for a change in the Commission's emergency planning rules. It addresses those rare instances in which a state or local government elects not to participate in the emergency planning _ process for a nuclear power plant. It provides that non-participation would not necessarily preclude issuance of an operating license to the plant. Under the proposal a utility plan would be evaluated against a series of acceptance criteria, including the existence of measures designed to compensate for the non-participation of the state or locality in the planning process. The Commission determined on February 26, 1987 to issue the proposed rule for public comment. Your letter, as well as others which we have received from elected public officials, will be given careful consideration. Your letter will be placed in the record of the rulenaking. Sincerely, % L s.,k - A Lando W. Zehl,.18.
o .,j.( 9; UNITED STATES [ p NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3, .. j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 - %, +..,
- p#
CHAIRMAN February 27, 1987 The Honorable Jerry Huckaby United States House of Representatives Washington, D. C. 20515
Dear Congressman Huckaby:
Thank you for your letter of February 6, 1987 commenting.on the proposed rule which the NRC-staff recently forwarded to the Commission for its consideration. That proposal calls for a change in the Commission's emergency planning rules. It addresses those rare instances in which a. state or local government elects not to participate in the emeroency planninq process for a nuclear power plant. It provides that non-participatirn would not necessarily preclude issuance of an operating license to the plant. Under the proposal a utility plan-would be evaluated against a series of acceptance criteria, including the existence of measures designed to compensate for the non-participation of the state or locality in the planning process. The Commission determined on February 26, 1987 to issue the nroposed rule for public comment. Your letter, as well as others which we have received from elected public officials, will be given careful consideration. Your letter will be placed in the record of the rulemaking. Sincerely, h 7 _ &v44 L. V .ando W. Z h,.
pw s:vq gy,. .k UNITED STATES i y-p, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 5 .p WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 gh CHAIRMAN - February 27, 1987 The Honorable Austin J. Murphy United States House of Representatives Washington, D. C. ?0515
Dear Congressman Murphy:
Thank you for~your letter of February 6, 1987 commenting on the proposed rule which the NRC staff recently forwarded to the Commission for its consideration. That proposal calls for a change in the Commission's-emergency planning rules. It addresses those rare instances in which a state or local government elects not to participate in the emergency planning process for a nuclear power plant. It provides that non-participation would not necessarily preclude issuance of an operating license to the plant. Under the proposal a utility plan would be-evaluated against a series of acceptance criteria, including the existence of measures designed to compensate for the non-participation of the state or local.ity in the planning process. The Commission determined on February 26, 1987 to issue the nroposed rule for oublic comment. Your letter, as well as others which we have received from elected public officials, will be given careful consideration. Your letter will be placed in the record of the rulemaking. Sincerely, N. 5 LandoW.Zedi,.1 l l l
4N "%g UNITED STATES [" i NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3-g WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 e e February'27, 1987 CHAIRMAN The Honorable Ralph M. Hall United States Hcuse of Representatives Washington, D. C. ?O515
Dear' Congressman Hall:
Thank you for your letter o# February 6, 1987 commenting on the proposed rule which the NRC staff recentl.y forwarded to the Commission for its consideration. That proposal calls for a change in the Commission's emergency planning rules. It addresses those rare instances in which a state or local government elects not to participate.in the energency planning process for a nuclear power olant. It provides that non-participation would not necessarily preclude issuance of an operating license to the plant. Under the proposal a utility plan would be evaluated against a series of accaptance criteria, including the existence of measures designed to compensate for the non-participation of the state or locality in the planning process. The Commission determined on February 26, 1987 to issue the proposed rule for public comment. Your letter, as well as others which we have received from elected public officials, will be given careful consideration. Your letter will be placed in the record of the rulemaking. l Sincerely, ik. Lsk ando N. Z h, .1 i I i . ~. - -.
M 'o) UNITED STATES E . NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION n .{ WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 %,....
- J CHAIRMAN February 27, 1987 The' Honorable Carlos J. Moorhead United States House of Representatives Washington, D. C. 20515
Dear Congressman Moorhead:
Thank you for your-letter of February 6, 1987 commenting on the proposed rule which the NPC staff recently forwarded to the Commission for its consideration. That proposal calls for a change in the Commission's emergency planning rules. It addresses those rare instances in which a state or local government elects not to participate in the emergency planning process for a nuclear pnwer plant. It provides that non-participation would not necessarily preclude issuance of an operating license to the plant. Under the proposal a utility plan would be evaluated against a series of acceptance criteria, including the existence of measures designed to compensate for the non-participation of the state or locality in the planning process. The Commission determined on February 25, 1987 to issue the proposed rule for public comment. Your letter, as well as others which we have reseived from elected public officials, will be given careful consideration. Your letter will be placed in the record o' the rulemaking. ' Sincerely, b$NW'. I.ando W. Z h,J.
?. recoq jE k'i . UNITED STATES - v NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION s, p WASHINGTON, D. C.' 20555 3 1 g[ CHAIRMAN February 27, 1987 The Honorable Charles Pashayan, Jr. United States House of Representatives Washington, D. C. 20515
Dear Congressman Pashayan:
Thank you for your letter of February 6, 1987 commenting on the proposed rule.which the NRC staff recently forwarded to the Commission for its consideration. That proposal calls for a change in the Commission's emergency planning rules. It addresses those rare instances in which a state or local government elects not to participate in the emergency planning process for a nuclear power plant, it provides that non-participation would not necesse.rily preclude. issuance of an operating license to the plant. Under the proposal a utility plan would be evaluated against a series of acceptance criteria, including the existence of measures designed to compensate for the non-participation of the state or locality in the planning process. The Commission determined on February 26, 1987 to issue the proposed rule for public comment. Your letter,.as well as others which we have received from elected public officials, will be given careful consideration. Your letter will be placed in the record of the rulemaking. Sincerely, Lando W. Zec,.I r
p M iuqh UNITED STATES [c i., ' ') NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 .p .p Y 19... j CHAIRMAN The Honorable George Darden United States House of Representatives Washington, D. C. 20515
Dear Congressman Darden:
Thank you for your: letter of February 6, 1987 commenting on the oroposed rule which the NRC staff recently forwarded to the Commission for its consideration. That proposal calls for a change in the Commission's emergency planning rules. It addresses those rare instances in which a state or local government elects.not to participate in the emergency planning process for a nuclear power plant. It provides that non-participation would not necessarily preclude issuance of an operating license to the plant. Under the proposal e utility plan would be evaluated aaainst a series of acceptance criteria, including the existence of measures designed to compensate ~ for the non-pa rticipation of the state or locality in the planning process. The Commission determined on February 26, 1987 to issue the proposed rule for public comment. Your letter, as well as others which we have received from elected public officials, will be given careful consideration. Your letter will be placed in the record of the rulemaking. Sincerely, thabe ks 9 Lando W. Z ch, r.
e Menq# 4-UNITED STATES .e-
- [
Ij NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g *- E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
- CHAIRMAN February 27, 1987-The Honorable Manuel Lujan,ilr.
United States House of Representatives Washington, D. C. 20515
Dear Congressman Lu.ian:
Thank you for_your letter of February 6, 1987 commenting on the proposed rule which the NRC staff-recently forwarded to the Commission for its consideration. That proposal calls for a change in the Commission's emergency planning rules. It addresses those rare instances in which a state or local government elects not to participate in the energency planning process for a nuclear power plant. It provides that non-participation would not necessarily preclude issuance of an operating license to the plant. Under the proposal a utility plan would be evaluated aaainst a series of acceptance criteria, including the existence of measures designed to compensate for the non-participation of the state or locality in the planning process. The Commission determined on February 76, 1987 to issue the proposed rule for public comment. Your letter, as well as others which we have received from elected public officials, will be given careful consideration. Your letter will be placed in the record of the rulemaking. Sincerely, & %. W Lando W. Z h, ; r.
h o UNITED STATES 8% k NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION h. WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 ' %,..%#,c[ CHAIRMAN February 27, 1987-The Honorable Don Young United States House of Representatives Washington, D. C. 20515
Dear Congressman Young:
Thank you for your letter of February 6, 1987 commenting on the proposed rule which the NRC staff recently forwarded to the Commission for its consideration. That proposal calls for a change in the Commission's emergency planning rules. It addresses those rare instances in which a state or local government elects not to participate in the emergency planning process for a nuclear power plant. It provides that non-participation would not necessarily creclude issuance of an operating license to the plant. Ilnder the proposal a utility plan would be evaluated against a series of acceotance criteria, including the existence of measures designed to compensate for the non-participation of the state or locality in.the planning process. The Commission determined on February 26, 1987 to issue the proposed rule'for public comment. Your letter, as well as others which we have received from elected public officials, will be given careful consideration. Your letter will be placed in the record of the rulemaking. Sincerely, N-Lando N. 7.ec ,Jr.,
orro, o 8 0 UNITED STATES -[" -.,, ( }3 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g ..p WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 v h +.... CHAIRMAN Februaryi27, 1987 The Honorable Samuel S. Stratton United States House of Representatives Washington, D. C. 20515
Dear Congressman Stratton:
Thank you for your letter of February-6, 1987 commenting on the proposed-rule which the NRC staff recently forwarded to the Commission for its consideration. That proposal. calls for a change in the Commission's emergency planning rules. It addresses those rare instances in which a state or local government elects not to participate in the emergency planning process for a nuclear power plant. It provides that non-participation would not necessarily preclude issuance of an operating license to the plant. Under the proposal a utility plan would be evaluated against a series of acceptance criteria, including the existence of measures designed to compensate for the non-participation of the state or locality in the planning process. The Commission determined on February 76, 1987-to issue the croposed rule for public comment. Your letter, as well as others which we have received from elected nublic officials, will be given careful consideration. Your letter will be placed in the record of the rulemaking. Sincerely, ble tv. W 7 ando W. Ze.,.1 ~. _.
l [j9. UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ) 3 j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 e o February 27, 1987 CHAIRMAN The Honorable Beverly B. Byron Unitsd States House of Representatives Washington, D. C. 20515
Dear Congresswoman Byron:
Thank you for your letter of February 6, 1987 commenting on the proposed rule which'the NP.C staff recently forwarded to the Commission for its consideration. That proposal calls for a change in the Commission's emergency planning rules. It addresses those rare instances in which a state or local government elects not to participate in the emergency planning process for a nuclear power plant. It provides that non-participation would not necessarily preclude issuance of an operating license to the plant. Under the proposal a utility plan would be evaluated against a series of acceptance criteria, including the existence of measures designed to compensate for the non-participation of the state or locelity in the planning process. The Commission determined on February ?6, 1987 to issue the proposed rule for public comment. Your letter, as well as others which we have received from elected oublic officials, will be given careful consideration. Your letter will be placed in the record of the rulemaking. Sincerely, Lando W. Ze , Jr
e.
- [
o - UNITED STATES -[" NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION s-, 5 .j W ASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 %.....M CHAIRMAN February 27, 1987 The Honorable Michael G. Oxley United States House of Representatives Washington, D. C. 20515
Dear Congressaan Oxley:
Thank you for your letter of February 6, 1987 commenting on the proposed rule which the NRC staft recently forwarded.to the Commission for its consideration. That proposal calls for a change in the Commission's emeroency planning rules. It addresses those rare instances in which a state or local governmer.t elects not to participate in the emergency planning process for a nuclear. power plant. It provides that non-participation-would not necessarily preclude issuance of an operating license-to the plant. Under the proposal a utility plan would be evaluated against a series of acceptance criteria, including the existence of measures designed to ~ compensate for the non-participation of the state or locality in the planning process. The Commission determined on February 26, 1987 to. issue the proposed rule for public comment. Your letter, as well as others which we have received from elected public officials, will be given careful consideration. Your letter will be placed in the record of the rulemaking. Sincerely, I 4v. k Lando W. 7' ch, 4 4 i
p"' Ag_ j UNITED STATES 4 .,04 f' g NUCLEAR REGiJLATORY COMMISSION l W ASHINGTON, D. C. 205S5 L f' e ,o$- %,e ' CHAIRMAN February.27, 1987 The Honorable Thomas J. Bliley, Jr. United States Houseoof Representatives Washington, D. C. 20515
Dear Congressman 8111ey:
Thank you for your letter of February 6, 1.987 commentino on the proposed rule which the NRC staff recently forwarded to the Conmission for its consideration. That oroposal calls for a change in the-Commission's emergency planning rules. It addresses those rare instances in which a state or local government elects not to participate in the emergency planning process for a nuclear power olant. It provides that non-participation would not necessarily preclude issuance of an operating license to the plant. Under the proposal a utility plan would be evaluated against a series of acceptance criteria, including.the existence of measures designed to compensate for the non-participation of the state or locality in the planning process. The Commission determined on February 26, 1987 to issue the proposed rule for public comment. Your letter, as well as others which we have received from elected public officials, will be given careful consideration. Your letter will be i placed in record of the rulemaking. Sincerely, g s~Lo w.1 C Lando U. Ze , Jr. l
- 4L a
put:oq'o d UNITED STATES 8" - g' t, NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION {.- / $ WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 d,8' S' %, % d +....s CHAIRMAN ebruary 27, 1987 The Honorable Jerry Lewis United States House of Reoresentatives Washington, D. C. 20515
Dear Congressnan Lewis:
Thank you for your letter of February 6, 1987 commenting on the proposed rule which the NRC staff recently forwarded to the Commission for its consideration. That proposal calls for a change in the Commission's emergency planning rules. It addresses those rare instances in which a state or local government elects not to participate in the emergency planning process'for a nuclear power plant. It provides that non-participation would not necessarily preclude issuance of an operating license to the plant. Under the proposal a utility plan would be evaluated againr.t a series of acceptance criteria, including the existence of measures designed to compensate for the non-participation of the state or locality in the planning process. The Commission determined on February 26, 1987 to issue the proposed rule for public comment. Your letter, as well as others which we have received from elected public officials, will be given careful consideration. Your letter will be placed in the record of the rulemaking. Sincerely, s l Lando W. Zec, Jr i l l' L l I
O $ Mitsgm 8( . j{ UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION g W ASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 j 3."-
- . p
% *...,p$ . February 27, 1987 CHAIRMAN The Honorable Richard A. Gephardt United States House of Representatives Washington,.D. C. 20515
Dear Congressman Gephardt:
Thank you for your letter of February 6, 1987 commenting on the proposed rule which the NRC staff recently forwarded to the Commission for its consideration. That proposal calls for a change in-the Commission's energency planning rules. It addresses those rare instances in which a state or local government elects not to participate in the emergency planning process for a nuclear power plant. It provides that non-participation would not-necessarily preclude issuance of an operating license to the plant. Under the proposal a utility plan would be evaluated against a series of acceptance criteria, including the existenca of measures desianed to compensate for the non-participation of the state or locality in the planning process. The Commission determined on February 26, 1087 to issue the proposed rule for public comment. Your letter, as well as others which we have received from elected public officials, will be given careful consideration. Your letter will be placed in the record of the rulenaking. Sincerel f, i W. ( Lando W. Ze , il l l l
t poucg 4 k UNITED STATES -c, g - NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION -{ -5*
- ' j W ASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
,,o[ s. CHAIRMAN February 27, 1987 .The Honorable George J. Hochbrueckner United States House of Representatives Washington, D. C. ?.0515
Dear Congressman Hochbrueckner:
Thank you for your letter of February 6, 1987 commenting on the proposed rule which.the NRC staff recently forwarded to the Commission for its consideration. That proposal calls for a change in tha Commission's emergency planning rules. It addresses those rare instances in which a state or local government elects not to participate in_the amergency planning process for a nuclear power. plant. It provides that non-participation would not necessarily preclude issuance of an operating license to the plant. Under the proposal a utility plan would be evaluated against a series of acceptance criteria, including the existence of measures designed to compensate for the non-participation _of the state or locality in the planning process. The Commission determined on February 26, 1987 to issue the proposed rule for public comment. Your letter, as well as others which we have received from elected public officials, will be given careful consideration. Your letter will be placed in the record of the rulemaking. Sincerely, hh w. M l.ando W. Zeg', J
1 g. A %-k UNITED STATES _p NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION I n j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 e %,*****M February 27, 1987 CHAIRMAN The Honorable Thomas J. Downey linited States House of Representatives Washington, D. C. 20515
Dear Congressman Downey:
Thank you for your letter of February 6, 1987 commenting on the proposed rule which the NRC staff.recently forwarded to the Commission for its consideration. That proposal calls for a change in the Commission's emergency planning rules. It addresses those rare instances in which a state or local government elects not to participate in the emergency plannina process for a nuclear power plant. It provides that non-participation would not necessarily preclude issuance of an operating license to the plant, linder the proposal a utility plan would be evaluated against a series of acceptance criteria, including the existence of measures designed to compensate for the non-participation of the state or locality in the planning process. The Commission determined on February 26, 1987 to issue the proposed rule for oublic comment. Your letter, as well as others which we have received from elected public officials, will be given careful consideration. Your letter will be placed in the record of the rulemaking. Sincerely, ) A^ndo Gv. I I.ando W. Zec.,.lr.
c s 0 K'ag'oi 5 UNITED STATES 6 [. 'l NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION J E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 o% o$ +.... CHAIRMAN February.27, 1987 The Honorable Robert J. Mrazek linit.ed States House of Representatives Washington, D. C. 20515
Dear Congressman Mrazek:
Thank you for your letter of February 6, 1987 commenting on the proposed rule which the NRC staff recentiv forwarded to the Commission for its consideration. That proposal calls for a change in the Commission's emergency planning rules. It addresses those rare instances in which a state or local government elects not to participate in the emergency planning process for a nuclear power plant. It provides that non-participation would not necessarily preclude issuance of an operating license to the plant. Under the proposal e utility plan would be evaluated against a series of acceptance criteria, including the existence of measures designed to compensate for the non-participation of the state or locality in the planning process. The Commission determined on February 26, 1987 to issue the proposed rule for public comment. Your letter, as well as others which we have received from elected public officials, will be given careful consideration. Your letter will be placed in the record of the rulemaking. Sincerely, 4. Lando W. Zec,.i r
's. f* "%e4[q UNITED STATES ,pg y .- {. " wc g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON D. C. 20555 p 4,..**s/ CHAIRMAN February-27,_1987 The Honorable Nicholas Mavroules -United States House of Representatives Washington, D. C. 20515
Dear Congressman Mavroules:
Thank you for your letter of February 6, 1987 commenting on the proposed rule which the NRC staff recently forwarded to the Commission.for its consideration. That proposal calls for a change in the Commission's emergency planning rules. It addresses those rare instances in which a state or local government elects not to participate in the emergency planning process for a nuclear power plant. It provides that non-participation would not necessarily preclude issuance of an operating license to the plant. Under the proposal a utility plan would be evaluated against a series of acceptance criteria, including the existence of measures designed to compensate for the non-participation of the state or locality in the planning process. The Commission determined on February 26, 1987 to issue the proposed rule for public comment. Your letter, as well as others which we have received from elected public officials, will be given careful consideration. Your letter will be placed in the record of the rulenaking. Sincerely, d[ sv. Lando W. Ze h,il --}}