ML20148F248

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submits Inspector Evaluation of Insp Rept 50-029/74-08. Discusses Facility Environ Monitoring Program.Proposes Tech Specs Re Radiological Analyses & Sampling Frequencies
ML20148F248
Person / Time
Site: Yankee Rowe
Issue date: 08/07/1974
From: Bores R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
To: Stohr J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML20148F240 List:
References
NUDOCS 8011040729
Download: ML20148F248 (3)


See also: IR 05000029/1974008

Text

_

-

i

,

h.

-

...l2.:_ =

a

9

.

'

'

AUG 7

1974

J. P. Stohr, Environmental and Special Programs Section'

...

Directorate of Regulatory Operations, Region I

e

I

.

'

INSPECTOR'S EVALUATION

-

INSPECTION REPORT : 0. 50-29/74-08

%

YANKEE NUCLEAR P0,'JER STATION

.

This inspection' revealed that Yankee Rowe has been conducting some

. .[

radiological monitoring of the environs'for the past number of years

'

=

and since January 1974 had essentially followed the radiological pro-

-

..j

.

gram in its Proposed Environmental Technical Specifications (ETS).

  1. j

.

Unfortunately, in the nonradiological area almost nothing is being

R

g.

done.

That is, the plant has not been monitoring the chemical releases

.H

y

from the plant and has done little in the line of impingement and entrain-

5

,

ment studies. The licensee had. Aquatic, Inc. perform some temperature

studies on the river and review fish catches by fishermen in preparation

M

-

for.the upcccing hearing for a discharge permit.

The licensee appears

~

to be willing to wait to see what requirements are going to be imposed

-

in this area and then try to implement'them.

.

The Nuclear Services group, Westboro, appears to be well involved with

'

the environmental programs at-each of the Yankee Plants.

They have

~

made a number of recommendations for Yankee Rowe, although the plant

ji

,

'

has not yet acted on them.

Specifically, Westboro rece= ended that

F ..

(1) Rowe stop bringing environmental samples into the plant to

i ~

count alpha and beta prior to having Teledyne analyze them.

This

y.

practice was still being done.

The plant H.P. said that if the samples

F

.wcre subsequently lost prior to Teledyne's analysis, at least the

.

preliminary data would be available.

The H.P. has been trying to get

additional equipment to be used only for these analyses, but was un-

successful in getting mon 2y to do this so far.

(2) Uestboro had recc= ended

that additicnal instrumentation to measure wind speed and wind direction

be added to the mec. tower at the 140 foot 1cyc1 and that a data reduc-

tion system be installed to handle the met. data at YNPS.

These recem-

mendations were made ebevt 6 months ago and have not yet been acted on

-

'

by the plant.

.

In the radiological area YNPS has a number of good practices worth noting

here.

(1) Yankee Rowe has gone to a 2-inch deep charcoal cartridge for

increased organic iodine co11cetion efficiency and is having the collection

efficiencies verified on each batch of charcoal.

(2) Ya: Wee has been

co11ceting suf ficient =edia from each location such that a portion cf it

can be stored on site (if not perishibic) for future use, reference

or replacement if the sample is lost before analysis.

m

..

.

l

l

. . . .

,,

_

l

j

.

-

- - -

m

.

'

'

f

_2_

.

. . . ,

s'

a

.

.

-_

Yankee does have some tend'ency to accept radiological results from-

Teledyne at face value.

A number of apparent anonalies ucre pointed-

.

'

out.by the inspector'during the inspection.

A few are listed below

-

as exampics:

(1) Bi-214 uns reported in river water sanples from

ond location in successive months as 270 picocuries/1 and 510 pico-

.

curies /1, respectively, and yet the gross alpha activity was reported

-

as less'than 0.5'picoeuries/1.

(31-214 and two of its short-lived

daughter products are alpha emitters.)

(2) Ra-226 was reported in

s

,

9

vegetation at levcis greater than the K-40, yet the gross ' alpha

' ' ;

activity. reported was approximately 1/30 of the reported Ra-226

activitites.

(3) Air particulates activity concentrations at the

,

control station (13 miles away) were on occasion higher than the

s

'

concentrations measured in the plant vent stack.

(4)'Sr-90 in

maple syrup was reported as 0.41 picoeuries/ml. While I have no

E

evidence otherwise, this level appears very high.

(Cs-137 levels

..

"

were reported as 0.1 picoeuries per liter and K-40 at 2.4 pico-

$

curies per liter.)

If'the Sr-90 numbers are valid, maple syrup

could be a major pathway for population exposure.

(5) Several

of the MDA's quoted by Teledyne appear'very low for the techniques

used. For example, 1-131 in milk had a quoted MDA of 0.5 picoeuries/1.

H

Yet the contractor uses only a 200 minute beta count time and a

.... Si

2-liter sample.

Regulatory Guide 4.3 uses 1000 minute counts and a

E

4-liter sample in its example of how to meet the 0.5 2 25% level.

l

i

Following are recomendations that should be forwarded for action:

p ==

,

-

.

(1) Cet Technicial Specifications for Yankee Rowe.

ff

.

(2) With respect to the Proposed Technical Specifications and FSAR.

,'

h[-

(a) There are several inconsistencies as to how airborne iodine is

to be analyzed. This should be clarified.

'

I

(b) Sr-89 .tnalyses should be performed on each of the media requiring

,

Sr-90 analyses. The media effccted included:

air particulates,

-

water, maple syrup, soil sediments, vegetation (terrestrial and

aquatic), milk and fish.

p

(c) The frequency of gross alpha analyses should be locked in, rather

i

p

than the present case of "uhen present in the release." The latter

'

often leads to confusion bet'.'cen the licensee and contractor as to

>

what is required.

It vould be batter to state a mininum frequency,

,

if gross alpha analyses are desired.

(d) The licensee currently campics soil and vel;ctation at eight locations

triannually and river sedimeats at nine locations triannually.

.

a=

e

.4es-

+-%

. , ,

,w-

g

9

c

,w

~+

wr

.mi

--+-.4

---

-

..

'

.

.

3

..

,

.5

.,

,

,

.

?:

-Since soil and

.c sa ples are expected to show the long tcrn changes

of environ = cat

.vity, I would suggest that both the frequer.cy of

sampling and *

, ber of locations could be reduced, if the licensec

'

desired to i*

m

/'6<C

,

.

=

.

R.'J. Borcs

"

Radiation'Fpecialist

i:.'. :::-

p:.'

'~

.

p

cc:

Strecter

y

l.:.

b

2.

,

.

-

.

~

9

,

- -

,,

'

.

.

9

m.

i

h '.^'...

p

.

.

.

4

.

e

.

~

.

.

B

g.

-

.

p

r-

,

l

.

.e

/

,

t

.

c

/

-

. _ _ _ _ . .

,