ML20137B013

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Annual SALP Rept Re Facility for Feb 1984 - Apr 1985.Category 1 Assigned in Area of Mgt Involvement & Control in Assuring Quality
ML20137B013
Person / Time
Site: Susquehanna, 05000000
Issue date: 06/05/1985
From: Mccorkle G
NRC OFFICE OF NUCLEAR MATERIAL SAFETY & SAFEGUARDS (NMSS)
To: Joyner J
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML20136E841 List:
References
FOIA-85-668 NUDOCS 8511260163
Download: ML20137B013 (2)


Text

____

J

.7 UNITED STATES

[

k'",

wAsmuorow, p. c.zossa NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

)

r..

%,..... ;; y l

.L

)

y 'g A. -* 4 n :

1

.',.,jyy 5. gggg

&. m.

a.-

j 4

SGPR:RFS s :- -

i

~ '

.n

mt-

.- -:,50-387/388~

4 7 qlf q.g.=

.:: ~.: :*q: y.5Q.. :.. r::....dy.w

... ~.nst::

syy

y. gf:

MEMORANDUM FOR: James H. Joyner, Chief Nuclear Material and SG Branch Region I

... FROM:

George W. McCo'rkle, Chief Power Reactor SG Licensing Branch Division of Safeguards, NMSS

SUBJECT:

SALP INPUT - SUSQUEHANNA 1 & 2 (February 1, 1984 - April 30, 1985)

Enclosed is our annual SALP report for the subject facility.

George. McCorkle, Chief Power Reactor SG Licensing' Branch Division of Safeguards, HMSS

Enclosure:

As stated

\\

cc:

C. Thomas, SSPB, NRR

~

4R@udfpitBf23NRID CONTACT:

R. F. Skelton, NMSS 42-74770 i

.)

h12 3 851031 SHOLLYB5-668 PDR h~~

c

..... - :-,e d,..5'-

." m..

= - )..

'X50487/388

) -::W M

.bb '.9.5N-T.m.u;r.-@*.:tcQldy $YY-25$QIl~-M,,.yg$g.

SALP'. REPORT 2..

%.".@T.;.hy.y. L::'2:.Q&$MN gy?N&,

SUSQUEHANNA 1 & 2

.-(_y. 9.

,yy.:.-e.;

.\\ &;"g...:y,....wn --fs.'R.A:.:;.% h.t.

.':f.[.c.... : y 5.u ?..; < ~ *.'Q.g... 4.a.yg4z.y32-g.c.

jpgy.

yo

? :.syy :a....;.,. ;.

- g;,..

.. Criterin Category 7...le-

-(.

2,....,

,1j. l.

Management Involvement n'nd Control in Assuring Quality *

.;-[,

1

,7,.,

4

.y..

g.-

. ps.c.

There was consistent evidenc s.e-of prior planning by.mtility

'.'y.

.. i- :

.=-

-(including corporate level) management.

  • Responses regarding safeguards matters were technically sound and consistent, demonstrating the existence of well developed policies and W..

..W

..~

procedures for control of security related activities.

2. - Approach to Re' solution of Technical Issues from a Safety, 1

. Standpoint

~

Solutions to technical safeguards problems were sound,.

timely and conservative, indicating a clear understanding of the. issues.

3.

Responsiveness to NRC Initiatives 1

Resolutions were submitted. proiptly, and in most cases were acceptable the fi.rst time.

4.

EEforcement. History

,'?

N/A 5.

Reporting and Analysis of Reportable Events O

N/A 6.

Staffing (Including Management)

~

1 Security Organization positions and responsibilities are well defined.

The security staff is considered to be more than ample to implement the facility physical p'rotection program.

7.

Training and Qualification Effectiveness N/A O

sier-w.