Text

Bell Bend Nuclear Power Plant COL, Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report (Remp), within Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report (Reor), Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Units 1 & 2, PPL Susquehanna, LLC, Berwick, PA, for
	ML093340218
Person / Time
Site:	Susquehanna, Bell Bend
Issue date:	06/27/2008
From:	; PPL Bell Bend, Susquehanna
To:	; Office of New Reactors
Shared Package
ML093270273	List: ML093280550; ML093280551; ML093280552; ML093280561; ML093340218; ML093340219; ML093340221; ML093340231;
References
	BNP-2009-356
	Download: ML093340218 (99)
	v • d • e

--

/

For Information Only Appendix E v

=

volume of sample analyzed (liters)

e.

y

=

chemical yield of the mount or sample counted DF

=

decay factor from the collection (milk/vegetables) or midpoint of compositing period (water/charcoal cartridges) to the mid-count time E

=

efficiency of the counter for the 1-131 betas.

4.66 =

sigma level Note: Efficiency is determined by co~nting an 1-131 standard.

Calculation of the MDC 4.66 (R; MDe=

VI 2.22(V)(y)(DF)(E) e e

2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report E-14

/

For Information Only Appendix E v

=

volume of sample analyzed (liters)

e.

y

=

chemical yield of the mount or sample counted DF

=

decay factor from the collection (milk/vegetables) or midpoint of compositing period (water/charcoal cartridges) to the mid-count time E

=

efficiency of the counter for the 1-131 betas.

4.66 =

sigma level Note: Efficiency is determined by co~nting an 1-131 standard.

Calculation of the MDC 4.66 (R; MDe=

VI 2.22(V)(y)(DF)(E) e e

2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report E-14

Appendix E RADIOCHEMICAL DETERMINATION OF 1-131 IN MILK AND WATER SAMPLES FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY First, iodide carrier is added to either a two-kilogram sample aliquot of milk or water.

For water, the next step is to add sodium hypochlorite, followed by hydroxylamine hydrochoride, and finally sodium bjsulfite to convert all of the iodine in the sample to iodide.

After sufficient time for equilibration of the stable iodide carrier, anion exchange resin is added to the sample to extract the iodide from the sample aliquot. The iodide ion is subsequently removed from the resin using sodium hypochlorite. It is then reduced to elemental iodine and transferred from the aqueous phase to the toluene. The iodine is then reduced to iodide using sodium bisulfite and back extracted into the aqueous phase. Once in the aqueous phase, the iodide is precipitated as cuprous iodide following the addition of cuprous chloride.

Another aliquot of sample may be used, if activity is detected in the sample, to detennine the original stable iodide content of the sample using a specific-ion electrode.

This information would then be used to correct the chemical yield detennined from mass of the dried precipitate.

The driedprecipitateis then counted using a beta/gamma coincidence counter.

CALCULA TION OF SAMPLE ACTIVITY Where:

A = activity concentration (pCill)

G = gross count at the end of the sample counting interval (t) t = sample counting interval B = background count rate (cpm)

A = decay constant for 1-131 min-Ii 2.22 = dpm/pCi V = volume of sample (1) y = chemical yield (recovery) of the iodide 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report For I nformat i on Onl y Appendix E RADIOCHEMICAL DETERMINATION OF 1-131 IN MILK AND WATER SAMPLES FRAMATOME ANP

. ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY First, iodide carrier is added to either a two-kilogram sample aliquot of milk or water.

For water, the next step is to add sodium hypochlorite, followed by hydroxylamine hydrochoride, and finally sodium bisulfite to convert all of the iodine in the sample to iodide.

After sufficient time for equilibration of the stable iodide carrier, anion exchange resin is added to the sample to extract the iodide from the sample aliquot. The iodide ion is subsequently removed from the resin using sodium hypochlorite. It is then

reduced to elemental iodine and transferred from the aqueous phase to the toluene. The iodine is then reduced to iodide using sodium bisulfite and back extracted into the aqueous phase. Once in the aqueous phase, the iodide is precipitated as cuprous iodide following the addition of cuprous chloride.

Another aliquot of sample may be used, if activity is detected in the sample, to detennine the original stable iodide content of the sample using a specific-ion electrode.

This information would then be used to correct the chemical yield detennined from the.

mass of the dried precipitate.

The driedprecipitateis then counted using a beta/gamma coincidence counter.

CALCULA TION OF SAMPLE ACTIVITY

.... (G _

B J*A. *(

2* A *t * (f+ B J

=

t

+

t A & -e-h )*2.22 *V *y

D

E & -e-h )*2.22 *V

y

D

E Where:

E-15 A = activity concentration (pCill)

G = gross count at the end of the sample counting interval (t) t = sample counting interval B = background count rate (cpm)

A = decay constant for 1-131 (5.987E*5 min-Ii 2.22 = dpm/pCi V = volume of sample (1) y. = chemical yield (recovery) of the iodide

. 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report

For Information Only Where:

Appendix E D = decay factor (e-AT) where A is the decay constant for 1-131 and T is the decay period from sample collection (milk) or the mid-point of the sample compositing period (water) to the mid-point of the counting interval E = is the 1-131 beta/gamma counting efficiency (cpmJdpm)

CALCULATION OF MDC MDC = minimum detectable activity concentration (pCill) 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report E-16 For Information Only Where:

Appendix E D = decay factor (e-AT) where A is the decay constant for 1-131 and T is the decay period from sample collection (milk) or the mid-point of the sample compositing period (water) to the mid-point of the counting interval E = is the 1-131 beta/gamma counting efficiency (cpmJdpm)

CALCULATION OF MDC 4.66

X't

Jf.

MDC - & -e-At)*2.22 *V

Y

D* E MDC = minimum detectable activity concentration (pCill) 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report E-16

For Informa ti on Only Appendix E DETERMINATION OF TRITIUM IN WATER BY LIQUID SCINTILLATION COUNTING TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES & PPL'S CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY MEASUREMENTS LAB ORA TORY Ten milliliters of water is mixed with liquid scintillation material and counted for (typically 200 minutes to determine its activity.

where:

CALCULATION OF THE SAMPLE ACTIVITY FOR TRITIUM C

=

Rb

=

2.22

=

net activity random uncertainty total counts from sample count time for sample (minutes) background count rate of counter (cpm) dpm pCi V

initial volume before enrichment (liters)

E

=

efficiency of the counter for tritium (cpmJdpm).

Calculation of the MDC 4.66~R' MDC=

t (2.22)(V)(E)*

Note that PPL's Corporate Environmental Radioactivity Measurements Laboratory incorporates a decay factor (D) in the denominators of these expressions to account for the small amount of radioactive decay between sample collection and sample counting.

2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report For Informa ti on Only Appendix E DETERMINATION OF TRITIUM IN WATER BY LIQUID SCINTILLATION COUNTING TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING.

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES & PPL'S

. CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY.

MEASUREMENTS LAB ORA TORY Ten milliliters of water is mixed with. liquid scintillation material and counted ** for (typically 200 minutes to determine its activity.

where:

CALCULATION OF THE SAMPLE ACTIVITY FOR TRITIUM C

=

Rb

=

2.22

=

C

-'+Rb

~

h"' -R. ] + 2 t t 2.22(V)(E) *. 2.22(V)(E)

net activity random uncertainty total counts from*sample

. count time for sample (minutes) background count rate of counter (cpm) dpm pCi V

initial volume before enrichment (liters)

E

=

efficiency of the counter for tritium (cpmJdpm).

Calculation of the MDC 4.66~R' MDC=

t (2.22)(V)(E)*

Note that

PPL's Corporate Environmental Radioactivity Measurements Laboratory incorporates a decay factor (D) in the denominators of these expressions to account for the small amount of radioactive decay between sample collection and sample counting.

E-17 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report

Appendix E DETERMINATION OF GAMMA EMITTING RADIOISOTOPES TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES &

FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY &

PPL'S CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY Gamma emitting radionuclides are detennined with the use of a lithium-drifted germanium (Ge(Li>>

and high purity germanium detectors with high resolution spectrometry in specific media, such as, air particulate filters, charcoal filters, milk, water, vegetation, soil/sediments, biological media, etc. Each sample is prepared and counted in standard geometries such as one liter or four liter wrap-around Marinelli containers, 300 ml or 150 ml bottles, two-inch filter paper source geometries,etc.

The analysis of each sample consists of calculating the specific activities of all detected* radionuclides as well as the minimum detectable concentration for a standard list of nuclides. The germanium detection systems are calibrated for each standard geometry using certified radionuclide standards traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology.

CALCULATION OF THE SAMPLE ACTIVITY

[C-B]

2..JC+B Net pCi I vol or mass = 2. 22(V)(E)(GA)DF)(t) 2.22(V)(E)(GA)(DF)(t) where:

c

=

net acti vity random uncertainty, area, in counts, of a spectral region containing a gamma emission of the nuclide of interest Note (1): If the detector exhibits a peak in this region when counting a blank, the counts from that peak are subtracted from C before using the above equation.

Note (2): If no peaks are exhibited, the counts in the channels where the predominant peaks for gammas from selected radionuclides would be expected are summed for C and used in the calculation of "net" activity.

2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Fo r Informa tion

Only Appendix E

. DETERMINATION OF GAMMA EMITTING RADIOISOTOPES TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES &

. FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY &

PPL'S CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY Gamma emitting radionuclides are detennined with the use of a lithium-drifted germanium (Ge(Li>>

and high purity germanium detectors with high resolution spectrometry in specific media, such as, air particulate filters, charcoal filters, milk,

. water, vegetation, soil/sediments, biological media, etc. Each sample is prepared and counted in standard geometries such as one liter or four liter wrap-around Marinelli containers, 300 ml or 150 ml bottles, two-inch filter paper source geometries,etc.

The analysis of each sample consists of calculating the specific activities of all detected* radionuclides as well as the minimum detectable concentration for a standard list of nuclides. The germanium detection systems are calibrated for each standard geometry using certified radionuclide standards traceable to the National Institute of Standards and Technology..

CALCULATION OF THE SAMPLE ACTIVITY

[C-B]

2..JC+B Net pCi I vol or mass =

+---------

. 2.22(V)(E)(GA)DF)(t) 2.22(V)(E)(GA)(DF)(t) where:

c

=

net acti vity random uncertainty, area, in counts, of a spectral region containing a gamma emission of the nuclide of interest Note (1): If the detector exhibits a peak in this region when counting a blank, the counts from that peak are subtracted from C before using the above equation.

Note (2): If no peaks are exhibited, the counts in the channels where the predominant peaks for gammas from selected radionuclides would be expected are summed for *C and used in the calculation of "net" activity.

2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report E-18

For I n f orma tion Only Appendix E B

=

Note:

t

=

2.22 =

V

=

E

=

GA

=

background counts,in the region of interest, calculated by fitting a straight line across the region connecting the two adjacent regions.

If no peak exists in a region from which a "net" activity is being calculated,background is represented by the average of the counts in one channel from each side of that region.

counting interval of sample (minutes) dpmJpCi volume or mass of sample analyzed efficiency of counter at the energy region of interest gamma abundance of the nuclide at the gamma emission energy under consideration DF

= decay factor from sample collection time or midpoint of sample collection (air I-131) to ritidpoint of the counting interval Calculation of theMDC The width of the region around the energy where anemission is expected is calculated differently for MDCs than it is for the width of a peak that is actually identified.

Consequently, the value of B used in the two equations may differ.

The analyst's judgment is exercised in the decision to report an activity.

The agreement between various spectral lines of the same nuclide, and possible interference from other nuclides, are considered in this decision.

E-19 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report For I n f orma tion Only AppendiX E B

=

Note:

t

=

2.22 =

V

=

E

=

GA

=

background counts,in the region of interest, calculated by fitting a straight line across the region connecting the two adjacent regions.

If no peak exists in a region from which a "net" activity is being calculated,background is represented by the average of the counts in one channel from each side of that region.

counting interval of sample (minutes)

/

dpmJpCi volume or mass of sample analyzed efficiency of counter at the energy region of interest gamma abundance of the nuclide at the gamma emission energy under consideration DF

= decay factor from sample collection time or midpoint of sample collection (air I-131) to ritidpoint of the counting interval Calculation of theMDC MDC( C*/ 1

)=

4.66JB I vo or mass p

2.22( V )( E )( GA)( DF )( t )

The width of the region around the energy where anemission is expected is calculated differently for :MDCs than it is for the width of a peak that is actually identified.

Consequently, the value of B used in the two equations may differ..

The analyst's judgment is exercised in the decision to report an activity.

The agreement between various spectral lines of the same nuclide, and possible interference from other nuclides, are considered in this decision.

E-19 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report

For Information Only APPENDIXF 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report For Information Only APPENDIXF F*l 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report.

F b ~ Informa ti on Only AppendixF Exceptions to the SSES Technical Requirements occurred In the monitoring of the following media: drinking water, surface water, air, fruits & vegetables and ambient radiation monitoring. These exceptions involved sample collections that did not take place for the required periods due to sampling equipment problems and various environmental conditions (drought, Canadian forestfires,snow) that impacted sample collection.

These exceptions are discussed in this appendix and specifically documented in the tables of Appendix 1.

Drinking Water Sampling at the Danville Municipal Water Facility, monitoring location 12H2, proceeded flawlessly during almost the entire year of 2002, with only one exception.

The single exception occurred during the week of July 29 through August 5, the first week of the August compositing period. Inadequate sample volume was found in the ACS collection tank at the end of this weekly sampling interval. The reason for the inadequate volume was due to a Danville Water Co. "treated water line" valve malfunction. It is not known when the valve malfunctioned during the referenced week.

A grab sample was collected for analysis to represent the weekly composite. The Danville Water Co. notified SSES that the treated line valve was repaired and operable at 1000 hours0.0116 days 0.278 hours 0.00165 weeks 3.805e-4 months on August 6, 2002. ACS operability was verified on August 6, 2002 at 1632. Technically, there were no malfunctions of the ACS at this location during 2002.

Sampling at this location was routine (as expected) for 98% of the year.

Surface Water Monitoring at control location 6S6, the SSES River Water Intake Structure, and indicatorlocatiori 2S7 or its alternate location6S7, the SSES Cooling Tower Blowdown Discharge (CTBD) to the Susquehanna River, are the only environmental surveillance's of surface water required by SSES Technical Specifications. The other SSES REMP routine indicator surface water monitoring location on the Susquehanna River, which is downstream from the SSES discharge to the river, and the monitoring location at LTA W are not required. They have been monitored to provide added assurance that the environment is not being compromised by radiological releases resulting from the SSES operation.

Sampling at locations 6S6 and 2S7 or 6S7 is required to be perfonned by the collection of aliquots at time intervals that are small compared to the compositing period.

Composite samples from these locations are required to be analyzed monthly and are expected to be representative of the streams from which they are collected.

Problems occurred in 2002 with the automatic composite sampler (ACS) at sampling location 6S6 during portions of the following collection periods: February 4, through February 25, 2002 and May 6, through May 20, 2002.

Sample collectors discovered 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report F-2 F b ~ Informa ti on Only AppendixF Exceptions to the SSES Technical Requirements occurred 'In the monitoring of the following media: drinking water, surface water, air, fruits & vegetables and ambient '

radiation monitoring. These exceptions involved sample collections that did not take place for the required periods due to sampling equipment problems and various environmental conditions (drought, Canadian forestfires,snow) that impacted sample collection.

These exceptions are discussed in this appendix and specifically documented in the tables of Appendix 1.

Drinking Water Sampling at the Danville Municipal Water Facility, monitoring location 12H2,.

proceeded flawlessly during almost the entire year of 2002, with only one exception.

The single exception occurred during the week of July 29 through August 5, the first week of the August compositing period. Inadequate sample volume was found in the ACS collection tank at the end of this weekly sampling interval. The reason for the inadequate volume was due to a Danville Water Co. "treated water line" valve

,malfunction. It is not known when the valve malfunctioned during the referenced week.

A grab sample was collected for analysis to represent the weekly composite. The Danville Water Co. notified SSES that the treated line valve was repaired and operable at 1000 hours0.0116 days 0.278 hours 0.00165 weeks 3.805e-4 months on August 6, 2002. ACS operability was verified on August 6, 2002 at 1632. Technically, there were no malfunctions of the ACS at this location during 2002.

Sampling at this location was routine (as expected) for 98% of the year.

Surface Water Monitoring at control location 6S6, the SSES River Water Intake Structure, and '

indicatorlocatiori 2S7 or its alternate location6S7, the SSES Cooling Tower Blowdown Discharge (CTBD) to the Susquehanna River, are the only environmental surveillance's of surface water required by SSES Technical Specifications. The other SSES REMP.

routine indicator surface water monitoring location on the Susquehanna River, which is downstream from the SSES discharge to the river, and the monitoring location at LTA W are not required. They have been monitored to provide added assurance that the environment is not being compromised by radiological releases resulting from the SSES operation.

Sampling at locations 6S6 and 2S7 or 6S7 is required to be perfonned by the collection of aliquots at time intervals that are small compared to the compositing period.

Composite samples from these locations are required to be analyzed monthly and are expected to be representative of the streams from which they are collected.

Problems occurred in 2002 with the automatic composite sampler (ACS) at sampling location 6S6 during portions of the following collection periods: February 4, through February 25, 2002 and May 6, through May 20, 2002.

Sample collectors discovered 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report F-2

For Informati on Only Appendix F low flow through the ACS due to rising river level causing debris and silt build-up on intake screens. Initially, the ACS. sample flow rate was adjusted to insure sufficient volume was collected. Preventive maintenance was performed on the ACS (cleaned lines) and the sample flow rates were reset to 1.5 gpm.

Analysis could not be performed on the biweekly composite sample from sample location6S6 (control) for the monitoring period March 25, through April 8, 2002. The referenced sample bottle leaked during shipment to the analysis laboratory, resulting in inadequate volume for analysis. The ACS at monitoring location 6S6 operated routinely (as expected) for approximately 96% of 2002.

No malfunctions of the ACS at monitoring location 6S6 required the collection of grab samples during 2002.

Surface water samples could not be taken at ACS location 2S7 on November 28; 2002 from 0011 to 1133 due to frozen sample lines. The heat trace on the sample lines failed due to an electrical breaker trip. The heat trace problem was corrected and the sample collection was resumed at 1133 hours0.0131 days 0.315 hours 0.00187 weeks 4.311065e-4 months .

There was adequate volume for sample requirements. The ACS atmonitoring location 2S7 operated routinely (as expected) for approximately 98.8% of 2002.

Reasons for exceptions to REMP air sampling during 2002 included the following: loss of electrical power to air sampling stations, air sample equipment problems (timers, ball valves) and environmental impacts (Canadian forest fires, winter storm).

Electrical power to the air sampling station at monitoring location 3S2 was interrupted for about 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months on July 16, 2002, during the monitoring period from July 10 through July 17, 2002. There was a wide area power outage during the referenced time period.

Power was restored to the air sampling equipment and adequate sample volume was achieyed for the monitoring period.

Electrical power to the air sampling station at monitoring location 13S6was lost on December 25, 2002 due to a winter storm. Power was restored to the air sampling equipment on December 27, 2002 at 1254. Adequate sample volume was collected during the monitoring period.

The sample pump at monitoring station 12El experienced a ball valve misalignment during the monitoring period from February 13 through February 20,2002. Low sample volume was obtained,during the sample period due to the ball valve misalignment. The.

ball valve was reset and the airflow was verified to be satisfactory following the reset.

The sample pump timer box failed at monitoringstation 12S1 during the monitoring period from March 20 through March 27, 2002. The timer box was replaced. The' monitoring hours were calculated based on the sample start and stop times.

2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report For I n f o rma ti on Only.

Appendix F low flow through the ACS due to rising river level causing debris and silt build-up on intake screens. Initially, the ACS. sample flow rate was adjusted to insure sufficient

volume was collected. Preventive maintenance was performed on the ACS (cleaned.

lines) and the sample flow rates were reset to 1.5 gpm.

Analysis could not be performed on the biweekly composite sample from sample location6S6 (control) for the monitoring period March 25, through April 8, 2002. The referenced sample bottle leaked during shipment to the analysis laboratory, resulting in inadequate volume for analysis. The ACS at monitoring location 6S6 operated routinely (as expected) for approximately 96% of 2002.

No malfunctions of the ACS at monitoring location 6S6 required the collection of grab samples during 2002.

Surface water samples could not be taken at ACS location 2S7 on November 28; 2002 from 0011 to 1133 due to frozen sample lines. The heat trace on the sample lines failed..

due to an electrical breaker trip. The heat trace problem was corrected and the sample collection was resumed at 1133 hours0.0131 days 0.315 hours 0.00187 weeks 4.311065e-4 months .

There was adequate volume for sample requirements. The ACS atmonitoring location 2S7 operated routinely (as expected) for approximately 98.8% of 2002..

. \\

Reasons for exceptions to REMP air sampling during 2002 included the following: loss of electrical power to air sampling stations, air sample equipment problems (timers, ball.

valves) and environmental impacts (Canadian forest fires, winter storm).

Electrical power to the air sampling station at monitoring location 3S2 was interrupted for about 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months on July 16, 2002,during the monitoring period from July 10 through July 17, 2002. There was a wide area power outage during the referenced time period.

. Power was restored to the air sampling equipment and adequate sample volume was achieyed for the monitoring period.

Electrical power to the air sampling station at monitoring location 13S6was lost on December 25, 2002 due to a winter storm. Power was restored to the air sampling equipment on December 27, 2002 at 1254. Adequate sample volume was collected during the monitoring period.

The sample pump at monitoring station 12El experienced a ball valve misalignment during the monitoring period from February 13 through February 20,2002. Low sample volume was obtained.during the sample period due to the ball valve misalignment. The.

ball valve was reset and the airflow was verified to be satisfactory following the reset.

The sample pump timer b()x failed at monitoringstation 12S1 during the monitoring period from March 20 through March 27, 2002. The timer box was replaced. The*

monitoring hours were calculated based on the sample start and stop times.

F*3 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report

For Informa ti on Only AppendixF The sample pump at monitoring location 12S1 was unable to obtain >1.9 cfm during the monitoring period from July 31 through August 7, 2002.

The sample pump. was replaced and sample flow was adjusted to 2.2 cfrn.

Adequate sample volume was obtained during the referenced monitoring period.

During the monitoring period of October 23 through October 30, 2002, the sample pump timer at monitoring location 12S1 failed to record the time from the previous sample period. The timer was replaced. Adequate volume was collected during the sample period.

{ Allowable sample period durations were exceeded at monitoring locations 6G 1 and SG 1 (control locations) during the monitoring period of December IS through.December 25, 2002. The cause of the delay in sample collection was unsafe road conditions due to a winter storm. The sample at~onitoring location 6Gl was collected on December 27, 2002 at 1043 and the sample at SG 1 was collected on December 27, 2002 at 0959.

All stations were impacted during the monitoring period of July 3 through July 10, 2002 due to the Canadian forest fires. The forest fires resulted in excess loading of the particulate filters resulting in low airflow. Adequate sample volume was obtained at all monitoring stations during the referenced monitoring period.

Collectively, the air sampling equipment at the six air monitoring locations operated routinely (as expected) for more than 99% of 2002 in spite of the exceptions noted above.

Fruits & Vegetables.

Due to the drought conditions in August 2002, only 600 grams of green beans were obtained from the control sample location 13G2. This quantity was an insufficient sample size to send to both the Primary analysis laboratory (PPL Susquehanna, ILC Corporate Environmental Radiological Monitoring Laboratory) and the interlaboratory split analysiS laboratory (Framatome ANP).

Following discussions between PPL Susquehanna, LLC and Framatome ANP personnel, the sample was sent to Framatome ANP for analysis.

Ambient Radiation Monitoring Exceptions occurred to the monitoring of ambient radiation during each quarterly monitoring period of 2002.

The first quarterly monitoring period was January 14 through April IS, 2002. The TLD's at location 2B4 were missing during the collection for the referenced monitoring period. The second quarterly monitoring period was April 17 through July IS, 2002. The TLD's at location 12E1 were wet and unable to process.

The third quarterly monitoring period was July 16 through October 17, 2002. The TID's at location 7G2 were wet and unable to process.

The fourth quarterly monitoring period was October 15, 2002 through January 31, 2003. The TLD's at location 3G4 were wet and unableto process.

2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report F-4 For Informa ti on Only AppendixF The sample pump at monitoring location 12S1 was unable to obtain >1.9 cfm during the monitoring period from July 31 through August 7, 2002.

The sample pump was replaced and sample flow was adjusted to 2.2 cfrn. ' Adequate sample volume was obtained during the referenced monitoring period.

During the monitoring period of October 23 through October 30, 2002, the sample pump timer at monitoring location 12S1 failed to record the time from the previous sample period. The timer was replaced. Adequate volume was collected during the sample period.

{ Allowable sample period durations were exceeded at monitoring locations 6G 1 and SG 1 (control locations) during the monitoring period of December IS through.December 25, 2002. The cause of the delay in sample collection was unsafe road conditions due to a winter storm. The sample at~onitoring location 6Gl was collected on December 27, 2002 at 1043 and the sample at SG 1 was collected on December 27, 2002 at 0959.

All stations were impacted during the monitoring period of July 3 through July 10, 2002 due to the Canadian forest fires. The forest fires resulted in excess loading of the particulate filters resulting in low airflow. Adequate sample volume was obtained at all monitoring stations during the referenced monitoring period.

Collectively, the air sampling equipment at the six air monitoring locations operated routinely (as expected) for more than 99% of 2002 in spite of the exceptions noted above.

Fruits & Vegetables.

Due to the drought conditions in August 2002, only 600 grams of green beans were obtained from the control sample location 13G2. This quantity was an insufficient.

sample size

to send to both the Primary analysis laboratory (PPL Susquehanna, ILC Corporate Environmental Radiological Monitoring Laboratory) and the interlaboratory split analysiS laboratory (Framatome ANP).

Following discussions between PPL Susquehanna, LLC and Framatome ANP personnel, the sample was sent to Framatome ANP for analysis.

Ambient Radiation Monitoring Exceptions occurred to the monitoring of ambient radiation during each quarterly monitoring period of 2002.

The first quarterly monitoring period was January 14 through April IS, 2002. The TLD's at location 2B4 were missing during the collection for the referenced monitoring period. The second quarterly monitoring period was April 17 through July IS, 2002. The TLD's at location 12E1 were wet and unable to process.

The third quarterly monitoring period was July 16 through October 17, 2002. The TID's at location 7G2 were wet and unable to process.

The fourth quarterly monitoring period was October 15, 2002 through January 31, 2003. The TLD's at location 3G4 were wet and unableto process.

2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report F-4

For Information Only APPENDIXG 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report For Information Only APPENDIXG 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report G*l

For Info rmation Only Appendix G The. averages for indicator and control locations reported in the Summary of Data Table, which summarizes the entire year's results for the SSES REMP, were calculated using all measured values, when available,whether or not they were reported in Appendix I tables. Values below the MDCs, even zeroes and negatives, were part of the averaging process for these analysis results. It should be noted that all measured results were not available for primary gamma analyses performed by PPL's CERML. This lab's gamma spectrometric software does not permit measured results less than the MDCs to be reported. When no measured results are available in these cases, "LLD" is reported.

Preferably, the averages reported in the Summary of Data table for sample media that are normally collected continuously are determined using only results from continuously collected samples. Occasionally, grab samples are taken for these media when equipment malfunctions or other anomalies preclude or otherwise perturb routine continuous sampling. These grab samples are taken to minimize the time periods when no sampling is being performed, or, in some instances, when continuous sampling is considered to be nonrepresentative.

Because grab samples are snapshots of the media over brief periods, it is preferable not to average the analysis results of these samples with those for continuously collected composite. samples. However, when equipment malfunctions are protracted, relatively large periods of time could be entirely unrepresented by averages if the results from grab sample analyses are not considered.

Allowing analysis results for grab samples to be weighted equally with those representing relatively large periods of time would tend to bias the resulting averages unjustifiably towards the conditions at the times that the grabs are obtained. Averages obtained in this way might less accurately reflect the conditions for the combined period of continuous sampling and grab sampling than if only the results from continuous.

sampling were used. On the other hand, using weighting factors for the analysis results of grab samples derived from the actual time it takes to collect those samples would lead to the grab sample analysis results having a negligible effect on the overall average and not justifying the effort involved.

Grab samples collected in lieu of normal continuous sampling are typically obtained at regular intervals corresponding to the intervals (weekly) at which the continuously collected samples would usually be retrieved for eventual compositing. For example, grab samples are collected once a week but may be composited monthly in place of continuously collected samples that would normally be retrieved weekly and composited monthly. Since each grab sample is used to represent an entire week, albeit imperfect, it is reasonable to weight the analysis results the same. Thus, the results of one weekly grab are given approximately one-fourth the weight of the results for a monthly composite sample collected continuously for each of the four weeks in a month. Similarly, the analysis results of a composite of four weekly grab samples would carry the same weight as the analysis results for a composite of four weeks of continuously collected sample.

2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report For Info rma tion Only

\\

Appendix G The. averages for indicator and control locations reported in the Summary of Data Table, which summarizes the entire year's results for the SSES REMP, were calculated using all measured values, when available, whether or not they were reported in Appendix I tables. Values below the MDCs, even zeroes and negatives, were part of the averaging process for these analysis results. It should be noted that all measured results were not available for primary gamma analyses performed by PPL's CERML. This lab's gamma spectrometric software does not permit measured results less than the MDCs to be reported. When no measured results are available in these cases, "LLD" is reported..

Preferably, the averages reported in the Summary of Data table for sample media that are normally collected continuously are determined using only results from continuously collected samples. Occasionally, grab samples are taken for these media when

. equipment malfunctions or other anomalies preclude or otherwise perturb routine continuous sampling. These grab samples are taken to minimize the time periods when.

no sampling is being performed, or, in some instances, when continuous sampling is considered to be nonrepresentative.

Because grab samples are snapshots of the media over brief periods, it is preferable not to average the analysis results of these samples with those for continuously collected composite. samples. However, when equipment malfunctions are protracted, relatively large periods of time could be entirely unrepresented by averages if the results from grab sample analyses are not considered.

Allowing analysis results for grab samples to be weighted equally with those representing relatively large periods of time would tend to bias the resulting averages unjustifiably towards the conditions at the times that the grabs are obtained. Averages obtained in this way might less accurately reflect the conditions for the combined period of continuous sampling and grab sampling than if only the results from continuous.

sampling were used. On the other hand, using weighting factors for the analysis results of grab samples derived from the actual time it takes to collect those samples would lead to the grab sample analysis results having a negligible effect on the overall average

and not justifying the effort involved.

Grab samples collected in lieu of normal continuous sampling are typically obtained at regular intervals corresponding to the intervals (weekly) at which the continuously collected samples would usually be retrieved for eventual compositing. For example, grab samples are collected once a week but may be composited monthly in place of continuously collected samples that would normally be retrieved weekly and composited monthly. Since each grab sample is used to represent an entire week, albeit imperfect, it is reasonable to weight the analysis results the same. Thus, the results of one weekly grab are given approximately one-fourth the weight of the results for a monthly composite sample collected continuously for each of the four weeks in a.

month. Similarly, the analysis results of a composite of four weekly grab samples would carry the same weight as the analysis results for a composite of four weeks of continuously collected sample.

2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report G*2 e

e

tWG

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 2002 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY; PENNSYLVANIA Reporting Period:

December 26, 2001 to January 31, 2003 Page 1 of 13 ANALYSIS AND LOWER liMIT NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATHwAY TOTAL NUMBER OF All. INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITHIDGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUfINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECnON MEAN (3)

NAME MEAN (3)

MEAN (3)

REPORTED

~UNIT OF MEASUREMENfl PERFORMED!12

~U.Dl ~ 2l RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION.

RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENl'S~ 42 Ambient Radiation TLD 332 1.90E+01 (302 / 302) 982 3.85E+OI (4/4) 1.81E+OI (30 /30) 0 (mRlstd. qtr.)

(1.29E+01 4.03E+0l) 0.2 mi S

(3.67E+01 4.03E+01)

(1.43E+01

2. 16E+01)

Surface Water Gross Beta 48 4

5.39E+OO (36 136) 287 9.56E+00 (12 / 12) 2.93E+00 (12 / 12) 0 (pCill)

(1.03E+OO 1.82E+OI) 0.1 mi NNE (5.35E+00 1.82E+Ol)

(2.8IE-OI 8.14E+00)

Tritium 48 2000 1.36E+03 (36 / 36) 2s1 3.89E+03 (12 / 12) 3.58E+OI (12 / 12) 0

(-5.38E+OI 1.03E+(4) 0.1 mi NNE (8.04E+Ol 1.03E+04)

(-2.60E+OO L14E+02)

Iodine-l31 86 6.21E-01 (62 /62) 287 1.06E+OO (25 /25) 4.55E-OI (24 /24) 0

(-1.70E-OI 4.70E+00) 0.1 nu NNE (7.ooE-02 4.70E+OO)

(-2.70E-OI 2.32E+(0)

GanunaSpec K-40 48

-5.64E-Ol (36 (36)

LTAW 4.08E+00 (12/ 12)

-3.27E+00 (12 / 12) 0

(-2.80E+OI 3.60E+0l) on site NE-ESE (-2.30E+OI 3.60E+OI)

(-3.60E+OI 2.40E+Ol)

Mn-54 48 15

-2.19B-Ol (36 (36) 686

-l.02E-01 (12/ 12)

-I.02E-Ol (12/12) 0 (4.60E+OO 3.30E+OO) 0.8 mi ESE

(-1.20E+00 UOE+OO)

(-1.20E+00 LlOE+OO)

Co-58 48 15

-2.52E-Ol (36 /36) 287 8.75E-02 (12 / 12)

-8.46E-OI (12 / i2) 0

(-2.20E+00 1.60E+(0) 0.1 mi NNE

(-9.00E-OI 1.60E+00)

(-2.IOE+00 L20E+00)

Fe-59 48 30 2.44E-OI (36 /36) 2S7 9.60E-OI (12/ 12)

-2.85E-01 (12 / 12) 0

(~5.40E+00 4.60E+(0) 0.1 mi NNE

(-4.40E+OO 2.90E+00)

(-4.30E+00 3.00E+OO)

Co-60 48 15 2.24E-01 (36 /36) 287 4.82E-Ol (12/12) 2.53E-OI. (12 / 12) 0 (4.90E+00 3.00E+00) 0.1 mi NNE

(-3.00E-0!

- L80E+00)

(-1.10E+00 9.00E-OI)

Zn-65 48 30

-1.24E+00 (36 /36) 6S6

-7.90E-Ol (12 / 12)

-7.90E-OI (12 / 12) 0

(-l.42E+Ol 8.00E+00) 0.8 mi ESE

(-5.00E+OO 3.20E+00)

(-5.ooE+OO 3.20E+00)

I I

Tj 0

I-i tWG H

~

rn 0

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR SSES

~

OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM* 2002 OJ rt NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM EWCTRIC STATION f-'.

LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY; PENNSYLVANIA 0

~

Report1ng Period:

December 26, 2001 to January 31, 2003 0

~

Page 1 of 13 f-'

ANALYSIS AND LOWERUMIT NUMBER OF MEDRJMOR PAniwAY TOTAL NUMBER OF ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITHIDGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUfINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN (3)

NAME MEAN (3)

MEAN (3)

REPORTED

~UNIT OF MEASUREMENfl PERFORMED Pl

~U.Dl ~2l RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION -

RANGE RANGE MEASURE.MENl'S~ 4l Ambient Radiation TLD 332 1.90E+.Ol (302 1302) 9S2 3.85E+.Ol (4/4) 1.81E+.01 (30 130) 0 (mRlstd. qlr.)

(1.29E+.Ol 4.03E+.Ol) 0.2 mi S

(3.67E+.Ol 4.03E+.Ol)

(1.43E+Ol -

2.16E+Ot)

Surface Water Gross Beta 48 4

5.39E+.00 (36 136) 2S7 9.56E+.00 (12 1 12) 2.93E+.00 (12 1 12) 0 (pCill)

(1.03E+.00 1.82E+.Ol) 0.1 mi NNE (5.35E+.00 l.S2E+.OI)

(2.8IE-Ol

8. 14E+.00)

Tritium 48 2000 1.36E+.03 (36 136) 2s1 3.S9E+.03 (12 1 12) 3.58E+.Ol (12 1 12) 0

(-5.38E+.Ol 1.03E+.(4) 0.1 mi NNE (8.04E+.Ol 1.03E+.(4)

(-2.60E+OO 1.I4E+02)

Iodine-131 86 6.21E-Ol (62 162) 2S7 1.06E+.00 (25 125) 4.55E-Ol (24 124) 0

(-1.70E-Ol 4.70E+.00) 0.1 mi NNE (7.ooE-02 4.70E+.00)

(-2.70E-Ol 2.32E+00)

Ganuna Spec K-40 48 -

-5.64E-Ol (36 136)

LTAW 4.08E+.00 - (12 1 12)

-3.27E+00 (12 1 12) 0

(-2.80E+.Ol 3.60E+Ol) on site NE-ESE

(-2.30E+.Ol 3.60E+.Ol)

(-3.60E+.Ol 2.40E+Ol) -

I I

Mn-54 48 15

-2. 19E-0 1 (36 136) 6S6

-L02E-Ol (121 12)

-1.02E-Ol (12/12) 0

(-4.60E+OO 3.30E+00)

O.S mi ESE

(-1.20E+00 1.10E+.00)

(-1.20E+.00 1.10E+.00)

Co-58 48 15

-2.52E-Ol (36 136) 2S7 8.75E (12 1 12)

-8.46E-Ol (12 1 i2) 0

(-2.20E+00 1.60E+00) 0.1 mi NNE

(-9.00E-Ol 1.60E+00)

(-2. IOE+.00 1.20E+00)

Fe-59 48 30 2.44E-Ol (36 136) 2S7 9.60E-Ol (121 12)

-2.85E-Ol (12/12) 0

(~5.40E+.00 4.60E+.00) 0.1 mi NNE

(-4.40E+00 2.90E+.00)

(-4.30E+.00 3.00E+.00)

C0-60 48 15 2.24E-01 (36 136) 2S7 4.82E-Ol (12 1 12) 2.53E-Ol (12 1 12) 0

(-4.90E+00 3.00E+00) 0.1 mi NNE

(-3.00E-01 1.80E+00)

(-1.10E+.00 9.00E-Ol)

Zn-65 48 30

-1.24E+00 (36 136) 6S6

-7.90E-01 (12 1 12)

-7.90E-01 (12 1 12) 0

(-1.42E+Ol 8.00E+00) 0.8 mi ESE

(-5.00E+00 3.20E+.00)

(-5.ooE+00 3.20E+00)

I I

13*3

TABLEG

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOWGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 2002 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC StATION WCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Repoiting Period:

December 26, 2001 to January 31, 2003 Page 2 of13 ANALYSIS AND LOWERLIMIT MEDIUM OR PATHWAY ror AL NUMBER OF AIL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WlTHIDGHEST MEAN SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECUON MEAN (3)

NAME MEAN (3)

(UNIT OFMEASUREMENf) PERFORMED ~ 1)

~llD) (ll RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE Surface Water (cont.)

Zr-95 48 30 1.68E-Ol (36 I 36)

LTAW

4. 17E-Ol (12 I 12)

(pCill)

(-4.30E+00 3.90E+00) on site NE-ESE

(-2.90E+00 3.20E+00)

Nb-95 48 15

-8.10E-02 (36 136) 685 3.92E-Ol (12 I 12)

(-3.40E+00 3.00E+00)

(9.00E-Ol mi ESE

(-1.20E+00 2.10E+00)

Cs-134 48 15

-4.92E-02 (36 I 36) 685 3.18E-oi. (12 I 12)

(-1.70E+00 1.60E+00)

(9.00E-Ol mi ESE

(-2.ooE-01 1.10E+00)

Cs-137 48 IS

-2.02E-Ol (36 I 36) 6S5

-8.17E-02 (12 i 12)

(-2.70E+00 2.00E+00)

(9.00E-Ol mi ESE

(-2.00E+00 1.80E+00)

Ba-140 48 60 5.12E-02 (361 36) 686 6.65E-Ol (12 I 12)

(-4.00E+00 5.40E+00)

(S.OOE-Ol mi ESE

(-2.IOE+00 5.40E+00)

La-140 4S 15 5.23E-02 (36 I 36) 6S6 7.67E-Ol (12 I 12)

(-4.70E+00 6.20E+00)

(8.ooE-01 mi ESE

(-2.40E+00 6.20E+00)

CONrROL LOCATION MEAN (3)

RANGE 1.69E-Ol (12 I 12)

-(2.20E+00 2.00E+00) 1.98E-Ol (12 I 12)

-(1.40E+00 2.30E+00) 6.54E-02 (12 I 12)

-(1.50E+00 1.90E+00)

-2.79E-Ol (12 I ~2)

-(1.90E+00 1.40E+00) 6.65E-Ol (12 I 12)

-(2.10E+00 5.40E+00) 7.67E-Ol (12 I 12)

-(2.40E+00 6.20E+00)

NUMBER OF NONROUl'lNE REPORTED MEASUREMENTS(4) 0 0

0 0

Q-4 J o r:

H

~

TABLEG

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING.PROGRAM - 2002 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC 81' ATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Repoi1ing Period:

December 26, 2001 to

. January 31, 2003 Page 2 of13 ANALYSIS AND LOWER LIMIT NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATHWAY TOrAL NUMBER OF AIL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITHIDGHBST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINP.

SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN (3)

NAME

MEAN (3)

MEAN (3)

REPORTED

~UNIT OFMEASUREMENf~ PERFORMED P2

~llD~ (22 RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS~42 Sunsce Water (cont.)

Zr-95 48 30 1.68E-Oi (36 /36)

LTAW

4. 17E-Ol (12/ 12)

. 1.69E-01 (12/ 12) 0 (pCi/l)

(-4.30E+OO 3.90E+OO) on site NE-ESE

(-2.90E+OO 3.20E+OO)

-(i.20E+OO 2.00E+OO)

Nb-95 48 15

-8.10E-02 (36 /36) 6S5 3.92E-Ol (12 / 12) 1.98E-Oi (12 / 12) 0

( -3.40E+OO 3,OOE+OO)

(9.00E-Ol mi ESE

(-1.20E+OO 2.10E+OO)

-(1.40E+OO 2.30E+OO)

Cs-134 48 15

-4.92E-02 (36 /36) 6S5 3.18E-01 (12 / 12) 6.54E-02 (12 / 12) 0

(-1.70E+OO 1.60E+OO)

(9.00E-Ol mi ESE

(-2.00E-Ol 1.1 OE+OO)

-(1.50E+OO 1.90E+OO)

Cs-137 48 18

-2.02E-Ol (36 /36) 6S5

-8. 17E-02 (12 / 12)

-2.79E-Ol (12 /12) 0

(-2.70E+OO 2.00E+OO)

(9.00E-Ol mi ESE

(-2.00E+OO 1.80E+OO)

-(1.90E+OO 1.40E+OO)

.Ba-140 48 60 5.12E-02 (36/36) 6S6 6.65E-Ol (12/ 12) 6.65E-Ol (12 / 12) 0

( -4.00E+OO 5.40E+OO)

(8.00E-Ol mi ESE

(-2.lOE+OO 5.40E+OO).

-(2.10E+OO 5.40E+OO)

La-140 48 15 5.23E-02 (36 /36) 6S6 7.67E-Ol (12 I 12) 7.67E-Ol (12 I 12) 0

(-4.70E+OO 6.20E+OO)

(8.00E-Ol mi ESE

(-2.40E+OO 6.20E+OO)

-(2.40E+OO 6.20E+OO) 0-4

LEG

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 2002 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Reporting Period:

December 26, 2001 to January 31, 2003 Page 30f13 ANALYSIS AND LOWERllMIT NUMBER OF MEDIuM OR PATIlW AY nJf AL NUMBER OF AIL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITHIDGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN (3)

NAME MEAN (3).

MEAN (3)

REPORTED

~UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED! 1)

!UD)!2l RANGE DIST ANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENrS!4)

Potable Water Gross Alpha 13 2.42E-Ol (13 1 13) 12H2 2.42E-Ol (13 1 13)

Only indicator 0

(pCiJI)

(-4. 88E-0 1 1.11E+OO) 26 mi WSW

(-4.88E-Ol 1.1lE+OO) stations sampled for thismediwn.

Gross Beta 13 4

2.75E+00 (13 1 13) 12H2 2.75E+OO (13/13) 0 (9.54E-OI

4. 56E+00) 26 mi WSW (9.54E-Ol 4.56E+00)

IO<f.inc..131 26 2.21E-Ol (26/26) 12H2

.2.21E-Ol (26 126) 0

(-3.30E-Ol 7.70E-Ol).

26 mi WSW

(-3.30E-OI 7.70E-OI)

Tritiwn 13 2000 5.57E+Ol (13 I 13) 12H2 5.57E+OI (13 I 13) 0

(-2. 69E+0 I 4.66E+02) 26 mi WSW

(-2. 69E+OI

4. 66E+02)

Gamffia Spec K-40 13

-2.98E+OO. (13 I 13) 12H2

-2.98E+OO (13 I 13) 0

(-3.30E+OI l.30E+OI) 26 ini WSW

(-3.30E+OI

1. 30E+0 1)

Mn-54 13 15

-2. 95E-0 1 (13 I 13) 12H2

-2.95E-OI (13 1 13) 0

(-2.IOE+OO 7.40E-OI) 26 mi WSW

(-2.IOE+OO 7.40E-Ot)

Co-58 13 15

-5.67E-OI (13 1 13) 12H2

-5.67E-Ol (13 1 13) 0

(-2.20E+OO 3.00E-OI) 26 mi WSW

(-2.20E+OO 3.00E-Ol)

Fe-59 13 30 3.65E-OI (13 /13) 12H2 3.65E"01 (13 I 13) 0

(-2.90E+00 2.80E+OO) 26 mi WSW

(-2.90E+00 2.80E+00)

Co-60 13 15

-2.28E-02 (13 I 13) 12H2

-2. 28E-02 (13 I 13) 0

(-2.10E+OO 1.00E+OO) 26 mi WSW

(-2.10E+OO l.OOE+OO)

Zn-65 13 30

" 1.17E+OO (13 I 13) 12H2

-l.l7E+OO (13 I 13) 0

(-4.70E+OO 3.IOE+OO) 26 mi WSW

(-4.70E+OO 3.10E+oO)

Zr-95 13 30

-HIE-Ol (13 I 13).

12H2

-3:6JE-OI (13 I 13) 0

(-4.50E+00 2.90E+OO) 26 mi WSW

(-4.50E+OO 2.90E+OO) 0-5 Ij 0

i"i

.LEG H

J H'l 0

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR SSES

~

OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 2002 OJ rt NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION f-'.

LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA 0

1 Reporting Period:

December 26, 2001 to January 31, 2003 0

1 Page 30f13 f-'

ANALYSIS AND WWERUMIT NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATIIW AY TOTAL NUMBER OF

. All, INDICATOR LOCATIONS '

LOCATION WITIIIDGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUI1NB SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN (3)

NAME MEAN (3)

MEAN (3)

REPORTED

~UNlT OF MEASUREMENT~ PERFORMED !l)

~LLD~ \\ll RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS(4)

Potable Water Gross Alpha 13 2.42E-Ol. (13 1 13) 12H2 2.42E-Ol (13 /13)

Only indicator 0

(pCiJI)

(-4. 88E-OI 1.11E+00) 26 rni WSW (4.88E-01

1.11E+00) stations sampled for this medium.

Gross Beta 13 4

2.7SE+00 (i3 1 13) 12H2 2.7SE+00 (131 13) 0 (9.S4E-OI 4.S6E+00) 26 rni. WSW (9. S4E-0 1 4.S6E+00)

Iodirie-131 26 2.21E-OI (26126) 12H2 2.21E-Ol (26 126),

0

(-3.30E-Ol 7.70E-01) 26 rni WSW

(-3.30E-Ol 7.70E-OI).

Tritium

13 2000 5.57E+Ol (13 1 13) i2H2

'. 5.57E+Ol (13 I 13) 0

(-2.69E+Ol

4. 66E+02) 26 rni WSW

(-2. 69E+Ol

4. 66E+02)

Gamma Spec.

K40 13

-2. 98E+00 (13 1 13) 12H2

-2.98E+00 (13 I 13) 0

(-3.30E+Ol 1.30E+Ol) 26 rni WSW

(-3.30E+Ol

1. 30E+0 1)

Mn-S4 13 IS

-2.95E-Ol (13 1 13) 12H2

-2. 95E-0 1 (13 113) 0

(-2.IOE+OO 7.40E-01) 26 rni WSW

(-2. IOE+00 7.40E-Ol)

Co-58 13 15

-S.67E-OI (13 1 13) 12H2

-S.67E-Ol (13 I 13) 0

(-2,20E+OO 3.00E-OI) 26 rni WSW

(-2.20E+OO 3.00E-Ol).

Fe-S9 13 30 3.65E-Ol. (13 l13) 12H2 3.65E.Ol (13 I 13) 0

(-2.90E+00 2.80E+00) 26 rni WSW

(-2.90E+00 2.80E+00)

. Co-60 13 IS

-2.28E-02. (13 1 13) 12H2

-2.28E-02 * (13 1 13) 0

(-2.IOE+OO 1.00E+00) 26 mi. WSW

(-2.10E+00.

1.00E+OO)

Zn-65 13 30

-1.l7E+00 (13 1 13) 12H2

-l.l7E+OO (13 I 13) 0 (4.70E+00 3.lOE+OO) 26 rni WSW (4.70E+00 3.lOE+00)..

Zr-95 13 30

-3:61E-OI (13 1 13).

12H2.

-3:61E-Ol (13 1 13) 0

(-4.S0E+00 2.90E+OO) 26 rni WSW

(-4.S0E+OO 2.90E+00) 0-5

TABLEG

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORiNG PROGRAM - 2002 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZE}{NE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Reporting Period:

December 26, 2001 to January 31, 2003 Page 4 of13 ANALYSIS AND LOWERllMlT NUMBER OF MEDillM OR PATIIW AY TOTALNUMBER OF AIL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION wrm mGHEST MEAN CONI'ROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPlED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN (3)

NAME MEAN (3)

MEAN (3)

RBPOImID (UNITOFMEASUREMEN!) PERFORMED(1)

(UD)(2)

RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION

. RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENrS(4)

Potable Water (cont)

Nb-95 12 15 2.35E-Ol (12 I 12)

(pCiIl)

(-1.10E+00 -

2.30E+00)

Cs-l34 12 15 1.9lE-01 (12 I 12)

(-1.10E+00 1.40E+00)

Cs-137 12 18

-4.53E-01 (12 I 12).

(-1:60E+oo 7.00E-Ol)

Ba-l40 12 60

-1.24E+00 (12 I 12)

(-5.10E+00 1.70E+00)

La-140 12 15

-1.44E+oo (12 I 12)

(-5.9OE+00 -

2.ooE+00) 12H2 26 12H2 26 12H2 26 mi WSW mi WSW mi WSW 2.35E-Ol (12 I 12)

(-1.10E+00 2.30E+00) 1.91E-01. (12 I 12)

(-1.10E+00 1.40E+00)

-4.53E-Ol (12 I 12)

(-1.60E+00 7.00E-Ol) 12H2

-1.24E+00 (12/12) 26 mi WSW

(-5.10E+00 1.70E+00) 12H2.

-1.44E+OO (12 112) 26 mi WSW

(-5.90E+00 2.ooE+00)

Only indicator o

stations sampled for this medium o

o o

o (HI "Ij o r.:

H

~

H1 o

~

rt f-'. o

~

o

~

I-'

ANALYSIS AND MEDlliM OR PATHWAY TOfALNUMBER SAMPLED OF ANALYSES (UNIT OFMEASURE.MEND PERFORMED (1)

Potable Water (cont)

Nb-9S 12 (pCiIl)

Cs-l34 12 Cs-137 12 Ba-l40 12 La-140 12 TABLEG

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORiNG PROGRAM - 2002 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZE}{NE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Reporting Period:

December 26, 2001 to January 31, 2003 Page 4 0(13 LOWERllMlT OF AlL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATIONWITHffiGHEST MEAN DETECTION MEAN (3)

NAME MEAN (3)

(UD)(2)

RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION

. RANGE 15 2.3SE-OI (12/ 12) 12H2 2.35E-Ol (12 / 12)

(-l.lOE+OO -

2.30E+OO) 26 mi WSW

(-1.l0E+OO -

2.30E+OO)

IS 1.9IE-OI (12 / 12) 12H2 1.9IE-Ol. (12/ 12)

(-l.lOE+OO 1.40E+OO) 26 mi WSW

(-1.10E+OO 1.40E+OO) 18

-4.S3E-Ol (12 / 12) 12H2

-4.S3E-Ol (12 / 12)

(-L60E+OO 7.00E-Ol) 26 mi WSW

(-1.60E+OO 7.00E-Ol) 60

-1.24E+OO (12 / 12) 12H2

-1.24E+OO (12 / 12)

(-5.10E+OO I.70E+OO) 26 mi WSW

(-5. IOE+OO 1*70E+OO) 15

-l.44E+OO (12 / 12) 12H2.

-l.44E+OO (12/12)

(-5.9<iE+OO -

2.00E+OO) 26 mi WSW

(-S.90E+OO 2.00E+OO)

CONI'ROL LOCATION MEAN (3)

RANGE Only indicator stations sampled for this medium NUMBER OF NONROUTINE RBPOImID MEASUREMENTS(4) o o

o o

o 0-6 "J o r:

H

~

H1 o

. ~

P1 rt f-'. o

~

o

~

I-'

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR SSES OPERA TIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 2002 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Reporting Period:

December 26, 2001 to January 31, 2003 Page Sof13 ANALYSIS AND LOWER UMlT NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATHWAY Tar AL NUMBER OF AIL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION wrrnHiGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUl1NE SAMPrnD OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN (3)

NAME MEAN (3)

MEAN (3)

REPORTED

~UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED ~ 1)

~UD)~2l RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS~4l Fish GanunaSpec (pCilkg wet)

K-40 15 3.64E+03 (8/8)

LTAW 3.9OE+03 (1 / 1) 3.78E+03 (7/7) 0 (3.1SE+03

4. 37E+03) on site NE-ESE (3.9OE+03 3.9OE+03)

(3.04E+03

4. 83E+03)

Mn-S4 15 130 2.1SE-OI (5 /8) 2H

4. 14E+00 (4/7) 4.14E+00 (4/7) 0

(-LlSE+OI S.98E+00) 30 mi NNE

(-1.98E+00 1.07E+Ol)

Co-58 15 130

-7.77E+00 (S/8)

LTAW

-3.57E+00 (1 / 1)

-3.82E+00 (4/7) 0

(-1.78E+Ol 1.1SE+00) on site NE-ESE (-3.S7E+00

-3.S7E+00) (-I.S7E+Ol 3.40E+00)

Fe-59 15 260

-5.00E-OI (5/8)

IND 3.50E+00 (4 /7)

-1.24E+Ol (4/7) 0

(-1.6SE+Ol 2.22E+Ol) 0.9-1.4 mi ESE

(-S.70E+00 2.22E+Ol)

(-4.74E+Ol 1.04E+Ol)

Co-60 15 130 4.90E-Ol (5/8) 2H 2.88E+00 (4 /7) 2.88E+00 (4/7) 0

(-9.70E+00 4.99E+00) 30 mi NNE

(-S.21E+00 1.IOE+OI)

(-S.21EfOO 1.10E+Ol)

Zn-6S 15 260

-1.30E+OI (5/8)

LTAW

-4. 17E+00 (I / I)

-2.42E+Ol (4/7) 0

(-4:12E+Ol O.OOE+OO) on site NE-ESE (-4.17E+00

-4. 17E+00) (-4. 84E+O 1 1.07E+00)

Zr-95 15

-3.08E+00 (5 I 8)

LTAW 9.S8E+00 (1 / 1) 3.87E+00 (4 /.7) 0

(-9.33E+00 9.S8E+00) on site.

NE-ESE (9.58E+00

9. 5 8E+00)

(-3.S3E+00

1. 17E+OI)

Nb-95 6

<LLD (0/3)

<LLD (0/3) 0 Cs-l34 IS 130

-L50E+00 (5/8)

LTAW

-1.09E+00 (I / 1)

-2. 17E+OI (4/7) 0

(-Ll2E+OI

2. 89E+00) on site NE-ESE (-1.09E+00

-1.09E+00) (-6.78E+Ol 7.59E-OI)

Cs-137 15 ISO

-4.16E+00 (5/8)

LTAW 4.21E+00 (1 /1) 1.73E+00 (4/7) 0

(-1.40E+OI 4.21E+00) on site NE-ESE (4.21E+00

4. 21E+00)

(-9.66E+00

9. 23E+00)

Ba-140 15

-1.27E+Ol (5/8)

LTAW S.43E+OI (1 / I) 4.99E+Ol (4/7) 0

(-1. 27E+02 5.43E+OI) on site NE-ESE (5.43E+OI S.43E+Ol)

(2.41E+00 1.26E+02)

La-140 15

-1.71E+Ol (5/8)

IND

-1.60E+OI (4/7)

-2.79E+Ol (4/7) 0

(-2. 87E+0 1

-8.36E+00) 0.9-1.4 mi ESE

(-2. 87E+0 1

-8.36E+00) (-1.14E+02 6.25E+01) 0-7 j

0 I-i EG H

i:J t-h 0

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR SSES

~

OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM. 2002 ill rt NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION 1-'.

LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA 0

i:J Reporting Period:

December 26, 2001 to January 31, 2003 0

i:J Page Sof13 I-'

, ANALYSIS AND LOWERUMIT NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATHWAY Tar AL NUMBER OF ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONfROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN (3)

NAME MEAN (3)

MEAN (3)

REPORTED

~UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED !12 IUD)\\2l RANGE DlST ANCE AND DIRECTION

. RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENfS\\4l Fish GanunaSpec (pCilkg wet)

K-40 15.

3.64E+03 (S / S)

LTAW 3.90E+03 (1 It) 3.7SE+03 (7/1) 0 (3. 15E+03 4.37E+03) on site NE-ESE (3.90E+03 3.90E+03)

(3.04E+03

4. 83E+03)

Mri-54 15 130

2. 15E-Ol (5/ S) 2H 4.14E+OO (4/1) 4.14E+00 (4/1) 0

(-Ll5E+Ol

5.9SE+OO) 30 mi NNE

(-1.9SE+OO 1.07E+Ol)

(-1.9SE+00 1.07E+Ol)

Co-58 IS 130

-7.71E+00 (S j 8)

LTAW

-3.S7E+OO. (I / I)

-3.82E+00 (4/1) 0

(-1.78E+Ol

1. ISE+OO) on site NE-ESE (-3.57E+OO

-3.57E+OO)

(-1.57E+OI

.3.40E+00)

Fe-S9 IS 260

-5.00E-OI (5/ S)

IND 3.S0E+00 (4 /1).

-1.24E+Ol (4/1) 0

(-1.65E+Ol 2.22E+Ol) 0.9-1.4 rni ESE

(-5.70E+00 2.22E+Ol)

(-4.74E+Ol

. l.04E+Ol)

Co-60 15 130 4.90E-Ol (5/8) 2H

2. 88E+OO (4/1)

2. 88E+OO (4/1) 0

(-9.70E+OO 4.99E+00) 30 mi NNE

(-5.21E+00 1.lOE+Ol)

(-S.21E+OO 1.10E+OI)

Zn-65 15 260

-1.30E+OI (5 /8)

LTAW

-4.17E+OO (I / 1)

-2.42E+Ol (4/1) 0

(-4. 12E+Ol O.OOE+OO)

011 site NE-ESE (-4.17E+OO.

-4.17E+OO) (-4.84E+OI 1.07E+00)

Zr-95 IS

-3.0SE+OO (5 IS)

LTAW 9.5SE+00 (I / I) 3.S7E+OO (4 /.1) 0

(-9.33E+00 9.5SE+00) on site.

NE-ESE (9.5SE+00 9.SSE+00)

(-3.S3E+OO 1.17E+OI)

Nb-9S 6

<LLD (0/3)

<LLD (0/3) 0 Cs-l34 15 130

-t.50E+OO (5 IS)

LTAW

-1.09E+00 (I / I)

-2.17E+OI (4/1) 0

(-Ll2E+Ol 2.S9E+00).

on site NE-ESE (-L09E+00

-L09E+00) (-6.7SE+OI 7.S9E-0l).

Cs-137 IS 150

-4.16E+00 (5 / S)

LTAW.

4.2IE+OO (I /1)

L73E+00 (4/1) 0

(-1.40E+Ol 4.21E+OO) on site NE-ESE (4.21E+OO

4. 2 lE+OO)

(-9.66E+00 9.23E+00)

Ba-140 15

-L27E+OI (5/8)

LTAW 5.43E+OI (I / I) 4.99E+Ol (4/1) 0

(-L21E+02 S.43E+Ol) on site NE-ESE (5.43E+01 5.43E+Ol)

(2.41E+00 l.26E+02)

La-140 15

-L7IE+Ot (5 /8)

IND

-L60E+Ol (4/1)

-2.79E+Ol (4/1) 0

(-2.S7E+OI

-S.36E+OO) 0.9-1.4 rni ESE

(-2. 87E+0 1

-S.36E+00) (-1.l4E+02 6.25E+01) 0-7

TABLEG

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 2002 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Reporting Period:

December 26, 2001 to January 31, 2003 Page 6 of 13 ANALYSIS AND LOWER IlMIT NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATHWAY TarAL NUMBER OF AIL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION wrrnmGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUI'INE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN (3)

NAME MEAN (3)

MEAN (3)

REPOlITBD IUNIT OFMEASUREMENl') PERFORMED III

\\llDll2l RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS(4)

Sediment GarnmaSpec (pCilkg dry)

Be-7 6

5.03E+Ol (4 J 4) 2B 4.41E+02 (2 J 2) 4.41E+02 (2/2) 0 (8.9OE-02 2.00E+02) 1.6 mi NNE (I. 63E+00 8.81E+02)

(1.63E+00

8. 8 1E+02)

K40 6

4. 35E+03 (3/4) 7B 1.30E+04 (1 12) 9.61E+03 (2/2) 0 (1.03E+(H 1.30E+04) 1.2 mi SE (1.30E+04 1.30E+04)

(1.S2E+Ol I. 92E+04)

Mn-54 6

2. 76E+00 (4/4) 7B 5.50E+00 (2 J 2)

-6.59E+00 (2/2) 0 (1.41E-06 1.10E+Ol) 1.2 mi SE (1.41E-06 1.10E+Ol)

(-1.32E+Ol

1. 43E-02)

Co-58 6

4.50E+00 (4/4)

LTAW 8:37E-04 (1 1 1)

-1.94E+Ol (2/2) 0

(-1.80E+Ol

9. 58E-03) on site NE-ESE (1.41E-06 8.37E-04)

(-3.89E+Ol 1.15E-02)

Fe-59 6

5.51E+00 (4/4) 7B 1.10E+Ol (2/2)

-2.66E+Ol. (2 1 2) 0 (3. 15E-04 2.20E+Ol) 1.2 mi SE (5. 85E-04 2.20E+Ol)

(-5.32E+Ol

2. 94E-02)

Co-6O 6

-7.47E-Ol (4/4) 2B 6.85E+00 (2 1 2)

6. 85E+00 (2 J 2) 0

(-3.00E+00 -

7.68E-03) 1.6 mi NNE (6.93E-03 1.37E+Ol)

(6.93E-03 1.37E+Ol)

Zn-65 6

2. ooE+O 1 (4/4) 7B

4. ooE+O 1 (2/2) 4.90E-02 (2/2) 0 (3. 18E-02 8.00E+Ol) 1.2 mi SE (3. 18E-02 8.00E+Ol)

(4. 59E-02 5.21E-02)

Zr-95 5

6.27E+00 (4/4) 7B 1.25E+Ol (2/2)

2. 24E-02 (1 1 1) 0 (6.47E-04 2.50E+Ol) 1.2 mi SE (6.47E-04 2.50E+Ol)

(2.24E-02 2.24E-02)

Nb-95 6

-5. 23E+00 (4/4)

LTAW 4.23E-02 (lIt) 1.59E-02 (2/2) 0

(-2.IOE+Ol 4.23E-02) on site NE-ESE (4.23E-02

4. 23E-02)

(O.OOE+oo

3. 17E-02)

Cs~l34 6

150

4. 26E+00 (4/4) 7B 8.51E+00 (2 J 2) 5.06E+00 (2/2) 0 (1.63E-02 1.70E+Ol) 1.2 mi SE (1. 63E-02 1.70E+Ol)

(2.78E-02 1.01E+Ol)

Cs-137 6

180 1.88E+Ol (4/4) 2B 6.96E+0' (2/2) 6.96E+Ol (2 J 2) 0 (1. 23E-02 7.50E+Ol) 1.6 mi NNE (1.14E-Ol 1.39E+02)

(1.14E-Ol

1. 39E+02)

Ba-l40 6

2.75E+Ol (4/4) 7B 5.50E+Ol (212) 2.41E+Ol (2 / 2) 0 (1.6OE-03 1.10E+02) 1.2 mi SE (4. 54E-02 1.10E+02)

(1. 61E-03 4.82E+Ol) 13-8

'Tj 0

t-j H

s H1.

TABLEG 0

~

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR SSES OJ OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM* 2002 rt NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION f-':

0 LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

s Reporting Period:

0 December 26, 2001 to January 31, 2003.

s f-'

Page 6 of 13 ANALYSIS AND LOWER LIMIT NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATHWAY Tar AL NUMBER OF AIL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITHffiGHESf MEAN

. CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN (3)

NAME MEAN (3)

MEAN (3)

REPORTED

~UNIT OF MEASURBMF.NI') PERFORMED ~ 1~

~llDl ~2l RANGE DlST ANCB AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASURBMENTS~4l Sediment GanunaSpec (pCillcg dry)

B(}-7 6

5.03E+Ol (4/4) 2B 4.4IE+02 (2/2) 4.4IE+02 (2/2) 0

. (8.90E-02 2.00E+02) 1.6 mi NNE (1. 63E+00 8.81E+02)

(1. 63E+00

8. 81E+02)

K-40 6

4. 35E+03 (3/4) 7B 1.30E+04 (1 /2) 9.61E+03 (2/2) 0 (1.03E+(1l 1.30E+04) 1.i mi SE (1.30E+04 1.30E+04)

(1.52E+Ol

1. 92E+04)

Mn-54 6

2. 76E+00 (4/4) 7B 5.S0E+00 (2/2)

-6.59E+00 (2/2) 0 (1.41E-06 1.10E+Ol) 1.2 mi SE (1.4IE-06 1.10E+Ol)

(-1.32E+Ol 1.43E-02)

Co-58 6

-4.50E+00 (4/4)

LTAW 8:37E-04 (1 I 1)

-1.94E+Ol (2/2) 0

(-1.80E+Ol

9. 58E-03) on site NE-ESE (1.41E-06 8.37E-04)

(-3.89E+Ol 1.1SE-02)

Fe-59 6

5.SlE+00 (4/4) 7B 1.1 OE+O 1 (2/2)

-2.66E+Ol. (2 12) 0 (3.1SE-04 2.20E+Ol) 1.2 mi SE

. (5.85E-04 2.20E+Ol)

(-S.32E+Ol

2. 94E-02)

Co-6O 6

-7.47E-Ol (4/4) 2B 6.85E+00 ' (2/2) 6.8SE+00 (2/2) 0

(-3.00E+00 -

7.68E-03) 1.6 mi NNE (6.93E-03 1.37E+Ol)

(6.93E-03 1.37E+Ol)

Zn-65 6

2. ooE+O 1 (4/4) 7B

4. ooE+O 1 (2/2) 4.90E-02 (2/2) 0 (3. 18E 8.00E+Ol) 1.2 mi SE (3. 18E-02 8.00E+Ol)

(4.59E-02 5.2IE-02)

Zr-95 5

6. 27E+00 (4/4) 7B 1.25E+Ol (2/2)

. 2.24E-02 (1 I 1) 0 (6.47E-04 2.50E+Ol) 1.2 mi SE (6.47E-04 2.50E+Ol)

(2.24E-02

2. 24E-02)

Nb-95 6

-5. 23E+oo (4/4)

LTAW

4. 23E-02 (1 1 1) 1.59E-02 (2/2) 0

(-2.10E+Ol 4.23E-02) on site NE-ESE (4.23E-02

4. 23E-02)

(O.OOE+OO

3. 17E-02)

Cs~l 34 6

150

4. 26E+00 (4/4) 7B 8.51E+00 (2/2) 5.06E+00 (2/2) 0 (1.63E-02 1.70E+Ol) 1.2 mi SE (1. 63E-02 1.70E+Ol)

(2.78E-02 1.0IE+01)

Cs-137 6

180

1. 88E+01 (4/4) 2B

6. 96E+O 1 (2/2) 6.96E+Ol (2/2) 0 (1. 23E-02 7.50E+Ol) 1.6 mi NNE (1.14E-Ol 1.39E+02)

(1.14E-Ol

1. 39E+02)

Ba-l40 6

2.75E+Ol (4/4) 7B 5.50E+Ol (2/2) 2.41E+Ol. (2 12) 0 (1.6OE-03 1.10E+02) 1.2 mi SE (4. 54E-02 1.10E+02)

(1. 6 1E*03

. 4.82E+Ol)

(

0-8

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 2002 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY; LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Reporting Period:

December 26, 2001 to January 31, 2003 Page 7 of 13 ANALYSIS AND LOWER llMlT NUMBER OF MEDIUMORPA1HWAY Tar AL NUMBER OF AU. INDICATOR LOcATIONS LOCATION wrmmGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUfINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECI10N MEAN (3)

NAME MEAN (3)

MEAN (3)

REPORTED

~UNIT OF MEASUREME~ PERFORMED ~1l

~unl~21 RANGE DlSf ANCE AND DIRECI10N RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTs~41 Sediment (cont)

La-140 6

-1.48E+OI (3/4) 12F l.32E+OO (1 I I)

-4.90E+Ol. (2 12) 0 (pCilkg dry)

(-4.60E+OI l.32E+OO) 6.9 mi WSW (1.32E+OO 1.32E+OO)

(-9.90E+OI 9.S8E-Ol)

Ra-226 5

L56E+OO (3/3) 2B

1. 64E+03 (2/2)

1. 64E+03 (2/2) 0 (l.SSE+OO L51E+OO) 1.6 mi NNE (l.SlE+OO

.28E+03)

(1.SlE+OO 3.28E+03)

Th-228 5

1. 83E+OO (3/3) 2Ii 7.41E-t02 (2/2) 7.4lE+02 (2/2) 0 (S.12E-OS 4.3IE+OO) 1.6 mi NNE (2. 73E+OO 1.48E+03)

(2.73E+OO 1.48E+03)

Ground Water GanunaSpec (PCiIl)

K-40 36 3.33E+OO (24/24) 2S2 4.2SE+OO (12 I 12) 8.33E-02 (12 I i2) 0

(-2.20E+Ol 4.70E+OI) 0.9 mi NNE

(-l.90E+OI 4.70E+OI)

(-1.90E+OI 3.70E+Ol)

Mn-S4 36 15

-2.2IE-01 (24 124) liP3 3.S8E-Ol (12 I 12) 3.S8E-OI (12 I 12) 0

(-2.70E+00 l.90E+OO)

S.2 mi WSW

(-L50E+00 2.30E+00)

(-L50E+00 2.30E+OO)

Co-S8 36 15

-3.29E-Ol (24 I 24) 2S2 l.33E-01 (12 I 12)

-2.83E-Ol (12 I 12) 0

(-2.90E+00 1.60E+OO) 0.9 mi NNE

(-1.00E+OO 1.60E+OO)

(-3.30E+OO 2.20E+00)

Fe-S9 36 30

-7.S0E-02 (24/24) 4S4 4.00E-OI (12 I 12)

-6. 17E~01 (12 I 12) 0

(-4.90E+OO 3.50Ei-OO) 0.5 mi ENE

(-3.60E+OO 3.S0E+OO)

(-4.40E+OO 2.S0E+00)

Co-60 36 IS

1. 83E-Ol (24 I 24) 2S2 4.92£-01 (12 112)

-3.S0E-Ol (12 i 12) 0

(-2.20E+00 2.20E+00) 0.9 mi NNE

(-LlOE+OO 2.20E+OO)

(-3.60Et-OO 2.50E+OO)

Zn-6S 36 30

-1.39E+OO (24 I 24) 12F3 1.28E+OO (12 I 12) 1.28E+OO. (12 I 12) 0

(-l.OOE+OI 9.00E+00) 5.2 rni WSW

(-6.00E+00 2.00E+OI)

(-3.60E+OO 2.00E+OI)

Zr-9S 36 30 1.33E-OI (24 I 24) 4S4

7. I 7E-0 I (12 I 12)

-9.08E-Ol (12 I 12) 0

(-S.70E+OO S.80E+OO) 0.5 rni El'JE

(-1.60E+OO S.80E+OO)

(-S.20E+OO 3.10E+00)

Nb-9S 36 IS

-4. 92E-0 I (24 124) 128 l.17E-OI (12/12) t.I7E-OI (12 I 12) 0

(-3.40E+OO 1.90E+OO) 5.2 mi WSW

(-3.20E+OO 2.80E+00)

(-3.20E+OO 2.80E+OO)

Cs-l34 36 IS 2.17E-Ol (24 I 24) 12F3 3.00E-Ol (12 112) 3.00E-Ol (12 I 12) 0

(-2.S0E+OO 2.60E+OO) 5.2 mi WSW

(-1.30E+OO 2.60E+OO)

(-1.30E+OO 2.60E+OO) j 0

I-i

,.EG H

i:J t-h I

0

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR SSES

~

OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 2002 ill rt NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION 1-'.

0 LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA i:J Reporting Period:

December 26, 2001 to January 31, 2003 0

i:J Page 7 of13 I-'

ANALYSIS AND WWERllMlT NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATHWAY Tar AL NUMBER OF AU INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WTI1IIDGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUfINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN (3)

NAME MEAN (3)

MEAN (3)

REPORTED

~UNIT OF MEASUREME!::!!) PERFORMED ~ll (ILDl\\2)

RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENI'S( 4)

Sediment (COni)

, La-140 '

6

-1.48E+Ol (3/4) 12F 1.32E+00 (1 I 1)

-4,9OE+Ol ' (2 12) 0 (pCilkg dry)

(-4.60E+01

' 1.32E+00) 6.9 mi WSW (1.32E+00 1.32E+00)

(-9.90E+01 9.58E-01)

Ra-226,

5 1.56E+00 (3/3) 2B 1.64E+03 (2/2)

1. 64E+03 (2/2) 0 (1.55E+00 1.51£+00) 1.6 mi NNE (1.5lE+00

, 3.28E+03)

(1.51E+00 3.28E+03)

Th-228 5

1.83E+00 (3/3) 2.8 7.4lE+02 (2/2) 7.41E+02 (2/2) 0 (5. 12E-05 4.31E+00) 1.6 mi NNE (2. 73E+00 1.48E+03)

(2.73E+OO 1.48E+03)

Ground Water GanunaSpec (PCiIl)

K-40 36 3.33E+00 (24/24) 2S2 4.25E+00 (12 I 12) 8.33E-02 (12 I i2) 0

(-2.20E+Ol 4.70E+Ol) 0.9 mi NNE

(-1.90E+Ol 4.70E+01)

(-1.9OE+Ol 3.70E+Ol)

Mn-54 36 15

-2.21E-01 (24/24) 1iP3 3.58E-oi (12 I 12) 3.58E-01 (12 I 12) 0

(-2.70E+00 1.9OE+00) 5.2 mi WSW

(-1.50E+00

' 2.30E+00)

(-1.50E+00 '

2.30E+00),

Co-58 36 15

-3.29E-01 (24/24) 2S2 1.33E-Ol (12/12)

-2.83E-01 (12 I 12) 0

(-2.90E+00 -

1.6OE+00) 0.9 '

mi NNE

(-1.ooE+OO 1.6OE+00)

(-3.30E+00 2.20E+00)

Fe-59 36 30

-7.50E-02 (24/24) 4S4 4.ooE-01, (12 I 12)

-6.11£-01 (12 I 12),

0

(-4.90E+00 3.50E+00) 0.5 mi ENE

(-3.60E+00 3.50E+00), (-4.40E+00 2.50E+00)

Co-60 36 15

1. 83E-Ol (24/24) 2S2

4. 92E-0 1 (12 I 12)

-3.50E-01 (12 i 12) ---

0

(-2.20E+00 2.20E+00) 0.9 mi NNE

(-1.10E+00 2.20E+00), (-3.6OE+00 2.50E+00)

Zn-65 36 30

-1.39E+00 (24 124) 12F3 1.2SE+00 (12 I 12) 1.2SE+00,(12 I 12) 0

, (-1.00E+Ol 9.ooE+00) 5.2 mi WSW

(-6.ooE+00 2.ooE+Ol)

(-3.6OE+00 2.00E+Ol)

Zr-95 36 30 1.33E-01 (24/24),

4S4

7. 17E-Ol (12 I 12)

-9.0SE-Ol (12 I 12) 0

(-5.70E+00 5.80E+00) 0.5 mi Er-m

(-1.60E+00 5.80E+00)

(-5.20E+00 3.10E+00)

Nb-95 36 15

-4.92E-Ol (24/24) 12F3 1.11£-01 (12/12) 1.11£-01 (12 I 12) 0

(-3.40E+00 1.9OE+00) 5.2 mi,WSW

(-3.20E+00 2.80E+00)

Cs-l34,

36 15.

2.J7E-Ol (24/24) 12F3 3.00E-OI (12 I 12) 3.ooE-01 (12 I 12) 0

(-2.50E+00 2.60E+00),

5.2 mi WSW

(-1.30E+00 2.60E+00)

O*g

TABLEG

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 2002 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Reporting Period:

DeceDiber 26, 2001 to January 31,2003 Page 8 of 13 ANALYSIS AND WWERLIMlT NUMBER OF MEDIUMORPATIlWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF AlL INDICATOR WCATIONS WCA TION WlTII HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL WCA TION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OFANALYSFS DETECTION MEAN (3)

NAME MEAN (3)

MEAN (3)

REPORTED

~1T OF MEASUREMEN:!)

PERFORMED \\ll CUD) \\2l RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS~4}

Ground Water (cont)

Cs-137 36 18

-5.08E-Ol (24 1 24) 2S2

-1.75E-Ol (12/12)

-5.ooE-01 (12 1 12) 0 (pCi/)

(-2.50E+OO 1.70E+00) 0.9 mi NNE

(-1.20E+OO 1.70E+00)

(-2.60E+00 2.10E+OO)

Ba-140 36 60

-5.ooE-02 (24 1 24) 12F3 1.15E+00 (12 I 12) 1.15E+00 (12 1 12) 0

(-7.30E+00 4.30E+OO) 5.2 mi WSW

(-1.80E+00 3.80E+OO)

(-1.80E+OO 3.80E+OO)

La-140 36 15

-5.83E-02 (24 1 24) 12F3 1.33E+00 (12 112) 1.33E+00 (12 1 12) 0

(-8.4OE+00 4.90E+00) 5.2 mi WSW

(-2.ooE+OO 4.40E+00)

(-2.00E+OO 4.4OE+OO)

H-3 36 2000 7.77E+Ol (24/24) 4S4 1.17E+02 (12 1 12) 6.26E+Ol (12 1 12) 0

(-6.29E+Ol 2.83E+02) 0.5 mi ENE (O.ooE+OO 2.83E+02)

(-4.27E+Ol 2.07E+02)

Air Particulates Gross Beta 306 10 1.56E+Ol (204 1204) 3S2 1.66E+Ol (51 151).

1.36E+01 (102 1 102) 0 (E-03 pCilm3)

(1.ooE+OO 3.04E+OI) 0.5 mi NE (5.10E+Ol 6.60E+OO)

(5.ooE-01 2.69E+01)

AlrJodine 1-\\3l 318 70 2.23E-04 (52/212) 6Gl 6.60E-04 (13 153) 4.42E-04 (26 1 106) 0 (E-03 pCi/m3)

(-4.67E-03 1.0IE-02) 13.5 mi ESE (5.30E+01

-1.96E-03)

(-2.08E-03 6.99E-03)

Air Particulates Gamma Spec Quarterly Composite Be-7 24 1.37E+02 (16 1 16) 13S6 2.57E+02 (4/4) 9.37E+Ol (8 18) 0 (E-03 pCilm3)

(7.ooE+01 7.28E+(2) 0.4 mi W

(9.17E+Ol 7.28E+02)

(7.54E+Ol 1.23E+(2)

K-40 24

-7.60E-02 (4 116) 13S6 9.29E+OO (1/4) 1.50E+OO (3/8) 0

(-8.3IE+OO 9.29E+OO) 0.4 mi W

(9.29E+OO 9.29E+OO)

(2.16E-Ol 2.86E+OO)

Mn-54 24 1.85E-01 (4 I 16) 12S1 3.28E-01 (1 14)

-8.98E-02 (2 I 8) 0 (4.25E-02 3.28E-Ol) 0.4 mi WSW (3.28E-Ol 3.28E-01)

(-1.37E-01

-4.26E-02) trj 0

t-j H

~

H1 TABLEG 0

~

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR SSES OJ OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 2002 rt NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION f-'.

0 LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

~

0 Reporting Period:

DeceDiber 26, 2001 to January 31,2003

~

f-'.

Page 8 of 13

. ANALYSIS AND WWERLIMlT NUMBER OF MEDIUMORPATIlWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF AlL INDICATOR WCATIONS WCA TION WlTII HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL WCA TION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OFANALYSFS DETECTION MEAN (3)

NAME MEAN (3)

MEAN (3)

REPORTED

~1T OF MEASUREMEN:!)

PERFORMED \\ll CUD) \\2l RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS~4}

Ground Water (cont)

Cs-137 36 IS

-S.OSE-Ol (24 I 24) 2S2

-USE-Ol (12/12)

-S.OOE-Ol (12 I 12) 0 (pCiII)

(-2.S0E+OO 1.70E+OO).

0.9 mi NNE

(-1.20E+OO 1.70E+OO)

(-2.60E+OO 2.10E+OO)

Ba-140 36 60

-S.OOE-02 (24 I 24) 12F3 l.lSE+OO (12/12) l.lSE+OO (12 I 12) 0

(-7.30E+OO 4.30E+OO)

S.2 mi WSW

(-l.SOE+OO 3.S0E+OO)

(-I.S0E+OO 3.S0E+OO)

La-140 36 IS

-S.S3E-02 (24 124) 12F3 l.33E+OO (12 I 12) 1.33E+OO (12 I 12) 0

(-8.40E+OO 4.90E+OO)

S.2 mi WSW

(-2.00E+OO 4.40E+OO)

H-3 36 2000 7.77E+Ol (24/24) 4S4 1.17E+02 (12 I 12) 6.26E+Ol (12 I 12) 0

(-6.29E+Ol 2.83E+02)

O.S mi ENE (O.OOE+OO 2.S3E+02)

(-4.27E+Ol 2.07E+02)

Air Particulates Gross Beta 306 10 1.56E+OI (204 1204) 3S2 1.66E+OI (51 151).

1.36E+0l (102 I 102) 0 (E-03 pCilm3)

(l.OOE+OO 3.04E+OI)

O.S mi NE (5.l0E+OI 6.60E+OO)

(5.00E-OI 2.69E+OI)

Air Iodine 1-\\3l 31S 70 2.23E-04 (52/212) 6Gl 6.60E-04 (13 153) 4.42E-04 (26 I 106) 0 (E-03 pCi/m3)

(-4.67E-03 1.0IE-02) 13.S mi ESE (S.30E+OI

-1.96E-03)

(-2.0SE-03 6.99E-03)

Air Particulates GanunaSpec Quarterly Composite Be-7 24 1.37E+02 (16 I 16) 13S6 2.S7E+02 (4/4) 9.37E+Ol (S IS) 0 (E-03 pCilm3)

(7.00E+OI 7.2SE+(2) 0.4 mi W

(9.l7E+Ol 7.2SE+02)

(7.54E+Ol 1.23E+(2)

K-40 24

-7.60E-02. (4 116) 13S6 9.29E+OO (1/4)

I.S0E+OO (3 IS) 0

(-S.3IE+OO 9.29E+OO) 0.4 mi W

(9.29E+OO 9.29E+OO)

(2.l6E-01 2.86E+OO)

Mn-54 24 l.S5E-0l (4 I 16) 12S1 3.2SE-0l (1 14)

-S.9SE-02 (2 I S) 0 (4.25E-02 3.2SE-OI) 0.4 mi WSW (3.2SE-OI 3.2SE-0l)

(-1.37E-01

-4.26E-02)

G* IO

"LEG

SUMMARY

OF DAT A FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 2002 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Rep0rtini Period:

December 26. 2001 to January 31. 2003 Page 9 of13 ANALYSIS AND LOWERLlMIT NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH IDGHEST MEAN coNTROL LOCATION NONROUllNE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN (3)

NAME MEAN (3)

MEAN (3)

REPORTED

~UNIT OFMEASUREMENT~ PERFORMED Pl

~LLD~ \\ i~

RANGE DlST ANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS~4~

Air Particulates (cont)

Quarterly Composite Co-58 24

-4.64E-02 (4 / 16) 3S2 4.65E-02 (1/4)

-7. 35E~03 (2/8) 0 (E-03 pCilm3)

(-1.53E-Ol 4.65E-(2) 0.5 mi NE (4.65E-02 4.65E-02)

(-2.72E-02 1.25E-02)

Fe-59 24

-9.70E-02 (4 / 16) 3S2 9.74E-Ol (1 /4)

-5. 84E-02 (2 / 8) 0

(-1.l7E+00 9.74E-Ol) 0.5 mi NE (9.74E-Ol

1)

(-8.89Ec02

~2.78E-02)

Co-6O 24 6.98E-02 (4/ 16) 13S6 1.49E-Ol (1 /4) 5.35E-02 (2/8) 0

(-3. 15E-02 L49EcOl) 0.4 mi W

(1.49E-Ol 1.49E-Ol)

(4.52E-02

6. 18E-02)

Zn-65 24

-1.97E-Ol (4/ 16) 12El 2.84E-02 (1 /4)

-1.92E-Ol (2/8) 0

(-3.94E-Ol 2.84E~02) 4.7 mi WSW (2. 84E-02

2. 84E-02)

(-3.26E-Ol

-5.76E-02)

Zr-95 18

<LLD (0 / 12)

<LLD (0/6) 0 Nb-95 24 O.OOE+oo (4 / 16) 601 O.ooE+oo (114)

O.ooE+00 (2/8) 0 (O.OOE+oo O.ooE+oo) 13.5 mi ESE (O.OOE+oo O.OOE+OO)

(O.OOE+OO O.OOE+oO)

Cs-l34 24 50 O.OOE+OO (4 / 16) 12El 5.48E-02 (1 14) 1.36E-02 (2/8) 0

(-5.76E+00 5.48E-02) 4.7 mi WSW (5.48E-02 5.48E-02)

(-2.08E-02 4.79E-02)

Cs-137 24 60

-1.09E+OO (4 / 16) 12EI 6.04E-02 (1 14) 1.01E-02 (2 I 8) 0

<-4.47E+00 6.04E-02) 4.7 mi WSW (6.04E-02 6.04E-02)

(-2. 28E-02 4.30E-02)

Ba-140 24

-3.80E+Ol (4/ 16) 12E1 (1 14)

-3 ~76E+00 (2/8) 0

(-1.7lE+02 2.02E+Ol) 4.7 mi WSW (2.02E+Ol 02E+Ol)

(-6.50E+00

-1.02E+00)

La-140 24

-1.55E+Ol (4 I 16) 12S1

-1.40E+00 (1 14)

-3.7lE+00 (2/8) 0

(-5.30E+Ol

-1.40E+00) 0.4 mi WSW

(-1.40E+00

-1.40E+00) (-5.03E+00

-2.38E+OO) 0 t-j

.LEG H

~

H1 0

SUMMARY

OF DATA FORSSES

~

OPERA TIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 2002 PJ (1"

NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION f-'.

0 LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

.. ~

Reporting Period:.

December 26, 2001 to January 31, 2003 0

~

Page 9 ofl3

~

ANALYSIS AND LOWERUMlT NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATHWAY Tar AL NUMBER OF AlL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITHlliGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED.

OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN (3)

NAME MEAN (3)

MEAN (3)

REPORTED IUNIT OFMEASUREMENT~ PERFORMED !1}

1ll.D~ ~2~

RANGE DlST ANCE AND DIRErnON RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS~4}

Air Particu)ates(cont)

Quarterly Composite Co-58 24

. -4.64E-02 (4 / 16) 3S2 4.65E-02 (1 /4)

. -7.35E-03 (2/8) 0 (E-03 pCi/m3)

(-1.53E-OI 4.65E-(2).

0.5 mi NE (4.65E-02 4.65E-02)

(-2.72E-02 1.25E-02)

Fe-59 24

-9.70E-02 (4 / 16) 3S2 9.74E-OI (I /4)

-5. 84E-02

.(2 I 8) 0

(-l.17E+00 9.74E-OI) 0.5 mi NE (9. 74E-0 1 I)

. (-8.89Ec02

~2.78E-02)

Co-60 24

6. 98E-02 (4/ 16) 13S6 1.49E-Ol (I /4) 5.35E-02 (2/8) 0

(-3. 15E-02 L49E~OI) 0.4 mi W

(1.49E-OI 1.49E-Ol)

. (4.52E-02.

6. 18E-02)

Zn-65 24

-1.97E-OI (4 / 16) 12El

2. 84E-02 (I i 4)

-1.92E-OI (2/8) 0

(-3.94E-Ol

2. 84E~02) 4.7 mi WSW (2. 84E-02

2. 84E-02)

(-3,26E-Ol

-5.76E-02)

Zr-95 18

<LLD (0 / 12)

<LLD (0/6) 0 Nb-95 24 O.OOE+OO (4/16).

601 O.ooE+OO (I /4)

O.OOE+oo (218) 0 (O.OOE+OO -

O.OOE+OO) 13.5 mi ESE (O.OOE+OO O.OOE+oo)

(O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO)

Cs-l34 24 50 O.OOE+OO (4 / 16) 12EI 5.48E-02 (1 /4) 1.36E-02 (2/8) 0

(-5. 76E+00 5.48E-02) 4.7 mi WSW (5.48E-02 5.48E-02)

(-2.08E-02

4.79E-02)

Cs-137 24 60

-1.09E+OO (4 / 16) 12E1 6.04E-02 (1 /4) 1.01E-02 (2/8) 0

(-4.47E+00 6.04E-02) 4.7 mi WSW (6.04E-02 6.04E-02).

(-2. 28E-02 4.30E-02)

Ba-140 24

-3.80E+Ol (4 / 16) 12E1 2.02E+Ol (I /4)

-3: 76E+00 (2 /8) 0

(-1.7IE+02

2. 02E+0 1) 4.7 mi WSW (2. 02E+0 1

2.02E+Ol)

(-6.50E+00

-1.02E+00)

La-140 24

-1.55E+01 (4 / 16)

. 12S1

-1.40E+00 (I /4)

-3.71E+00 (2/8) 0

(-5.30E+01

-1.40E+00) 0.4 mi WSW

(-1.40E+00. -

. -1.40E+00) (-5.03E+00

-2.38E+00)

(3-11

Ij 0

I-i H

~

H1 0

TABLEG

. ~

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR SSES OJ OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 2002 rt NAME OF F.ACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION f-'.

0 LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

~

0 Reporting Period:

December 26, 2001 to January 31, 2003

~

I-'

Page 10 of13 ANALYSIS AND LOWERUMIT NUMBER OF MEDIUM ORPATIIWAY Tar AL NUMBER OF AU. INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH InGHBST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN (3)

NAME MEAN (3)

MEAN (3)

REPORTED

~UNIT OF MEASUREMENf) PERFORMED ~1~

~LI.D~ !2)

RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENrS~41 Milk 1-131 76

-9.95E-02 (58 / 58) 10D2 1.92E-Ol (18 / 18) 1.68E-02 (18 / 18) 0 (pCiIJ.)

(4.90E+OO -

2.60E+OO) 3.1 mi SSW

(-l.OOE+OO 2.60E+OO)

(-2. 20E-O t 1.80E-Ot)

GamrnaSpec K-40 76 1.40E+03 (58 / 58)

IODl 1.43E+03(18 / 18) 1.34E+03 (18 / 18) 0 (l.24E+03 l.60E+03) 3 mi SSW (L30E+03 1.60E+03)

(1.19E+03 l.47E+03)

Mfi-54 76

-L21E-Ol (58 /58) 1003 c3.75E-02 (8/8)

-3.HE-Ol (18 /18) 0 (4.60E+OO 3.70E+00) 3.5 mi SSW

(-L60E+00 2.40E+OO)

(-2.20E+00 2.50E+OO)

Co-58 76

-3.95E-Ol (58 / 58) 1003

-U5E-Ol (8/8)

-6.00E-Ol (18 / 18) 0

(-4.20E+00 5.50E+00) 3.5 mi SSW

(-3.10E+00 2.30E+00)

(-430E+00 2.00E+OO)

Fe-59 76 6.78E-Ol (58 /58) 10D2 1.42E+OO (18 / 18) 2.22E-Ol (18 / 18)

O

(-1.30E+01.

1. 20E+0 1) 3.1 mi SSW

(-1.30E+01 1.20E+Ol)

(-7.00E+OO 7.40E+00)

Co-60 76 431E-02 (58 / 58) 12B2

. 8.29E-Ol (14 / 14)

-6.11E-02 (18 / 18) 0 (4.70E+00 4.00E+OO) 1.7 mi WSW

(-1.50E+OO 4.00E+00)

(-2.80E+00 2.40E+00)

Zn-65 76

-6.45E-01 (58 / 58) 1001 9.83E-Ol (18 / 18)

9. 83E-01 (18 / 18) 0

(-9.00E+OO 1.40E+Ol) 14 mi SSW

(-8.00E+OO L30E+Ol)

(-8.00E+00 1.30E+Ol)

Zr-95 76 3.02E-Ol (58 / 58) 12B2 7.93E-Ol (14 / 14) 2.22E-Ol (18 / 18) 0

(-7.10E+OO 6.90E+00) 1.7 mi WSW (4.40E+OO 5.70E+OO)

(4.50E+OO 3.90E+OO)

Nb-95 76

-3.48E-Ol (58 / 58) 1001 8.33E-02 (18 / 18) 8.33E-02 (18 / 18) 0 (4.50E+OO -

2.70E+OO) t4 mi SSW

(-1.70E+00 3.20E+OO)

(-l.70E+00 3.20E+OO)

Cs-l34 76 15 1.45E-01 (58 / 58) 1001 6.67E-Ol (18 /18) '

6.67E-Ol (18 / 18) 0

(-3.90E+00 3.60E+00) 14 mi SSW

(-2.80E+00 3.80E+OO)

(-2.80E+OO 3.80E+OO)

Cs-137 76 18 4.34E-01 (58 / 58) 1001 9.28E-Ol (18 / 18) 5.6lE-01 (18 /18) 0

(-3.20E+OO 4.00E+OO) 3 mi SSW

(-1.60E+00 4.00E+00)

(-2.40E+00 3.20E+OO)

Ba-140 76 60 2.43E-Ol (58 / 58) 10D2

5. 28E-0 1 (18 / 18).

-3.83E-Ol (18 / 18) 0

("3.70E+00 5.30E+OO) 3.1 IIii SSW

(-3.60E+00 5.30E+OO)

(4.50E+00 2.60E+OO)

La-I40 76 15 2.71E-Ol (58 /58) 10D2 6.06E-Ol (18 / 18) 4.28E-01 (18 / 18) 0 (4.20E+OO 6.10E+OO) 3.1 mi SSW (4.20E+OO 6.10E+OO)

(-5.10E+00

-. 3.00E+OO)

(3-12 Ij

.0 r:

H

~

H1 0

TABLEG

. ~

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR SSES P1 OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM* 2002 rt NAME OF F.ACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION f-'-

0 LOCATION OF FACIUTY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

~

0 Reporting Period:

December 26, 2001.. to January 31, 2003

~

I-'

Page 10 of13 ANALYSIS AND LOWERllMIT NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATHWAY TOfALNUMBER OF All INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITHffiGHBST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN (3)

NAME MEAN (3)

MEAN (3)

REPORTED

~UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED ~ll

~LLDl!2l RANGE DlsrANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENl'S~ 4)

Milk 1-131 76

-9.95E-02 (58 158) 1OD2 1.92E-Ol (18 / 18) 1.68E-02 (18 / 18) 0 (pCiIl)

(-4.90E+oo -

2.6OE+00) 3.1 mi SSW

(-1.ooE+OO 2.6OE+OO)

(-2. 20E-0 1 1.80E-Ol)

GamrnaSpec K-40 76 1.40E+03 (58 /58)

IODl 1.43E+03 (18 / 18)

1. 34E+03 (18 / 18) 0 (1.24E+03 1.6OE+03) 3 mi SSW (1.30E+03 1.60E+03)

(1.19E+03 1.41£+03)

Mfi..54 76

-1.21E-Ol (58 /58) 1003 c3.75E-02 (8/8)

-3. llE-OI (18 / 18) 0

(-4.60E+00 3.70E+00) 3.5 mi SSW

(-1.60E+00 2.4OE+00)

(-2.20E+00 2.50E+00)

Co-58 76

-3.95E-Ol (58 /58) 1003

-1.75E-Ol (8/8)

-6.ooE-01 (18 / 18) 0

(-4.20E+00 5.50E+00) 3.5 mi SSW

(-3.10E+00 2.30E+00)

(-4.30E+00 2.00E+00)

Fe-59 76 6.78E-Ol (58 /58) 10D2 1.42E+00 (18 / 18) 2.22E-Ol (18 I 18)

O *

(-1.30E+Ol.

1. 20E+0 1) 3.1 mi SSW

(-1.30E+01 1.20E+Ol)

(-7.ooE+00 7.4OE+00)

Co-60 76 4.31E-02 (58 /58) 12B2

. 8.29E-Ol (14 / 14)

-6. 11E-02 (18 / 18) 0

(-4.70E+00 4.00E+00)

-1.7 mi WSW

(-1.50E+00 4.ooE+00)

(-2.80E+00 2.40E+00)

Zn-65 76

-6.45E-Ol (58 158) 10Gl 9.83E-Ol (18 / 18)

9. 83E-01 (18 / 18) 0

(-9.00E+00 1.40E+Ol) 14 mi SSW

(-8.ooE+00 1.30E+Ol)

(-8.00E+00 1.30E+Ol)

Zr-95 76 3.02E-Ol (58 /58) 12B2 7.93E-Ol (14 / 14) 2.22E-Ol (18 / 18) 0

(-7.10E+00 6.90E+00) 1.7 mi WSW

(-4.40E+00 5.70E+00)

(-4.50E+00 3.90E+00)

Nb-95 76

-3.48E-Ol (58 /58) 10Gl 8.33E-02 (18 / 18) 8.33E-02 (18 / 18) 0

(-4.50E+00 2.70E+00) 14 mi SSW

(-1.70E+00 3.20E+00)

(-1.70E+00

3.20E+00)

Cs-l34 76 15 1.45E-Ol (58 /58) lOG!

6.61£-01 (18 /18) 6.61£-01 (18 / 18) 0

(-3.90E+00 3.60E+00) 14 mi SSW

(-2.80E+00 3.80E+00)

Cs-137 76 18 4.34E-Ol (58 /58) 10m 9.28E-Ol (18 / 18) 5.6lE-Ol (18 / 18) 0

(-3.20E+00 4.00E+00) 3 mi SSW

(-1.60E+00 4.00E+00)

(-2.40E+00 3.20E+00)

Ba-140 76 60 2.43E-Ol (58 /58)

IOD2 5.28E-Ol (18 / 18).

-3.83E-Ol (18 / 18) 0

("3.70E+00 5.30E+00) 3.1 IIii SSW

(-3.60E+00 5.30E+00)

(-4.50E+00 2.60E+00)

La-14O 76 15 2.71E-Ol (58 /58) 1OD2 6.06E-Ol (18 / 18)

-4.28E-Ol (18 / 18) 0

(-4.20E+00 6.10E+00) 3.1 mi SSW

(-4.20E+00 6.10E+00). (-5.IOE+00 -

3.ooE+00)

(3-12

j 0

t-j

_LEG H

~

rn

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 2002 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Reporting Period:

Dec:ember 26, 2001 to January 31, 2003 Page 11 or 13 ANALYSIS AND LOWER UMIT NUMBBROF MEDIUMORPATIlWAY Tar AL NUMBER OF AlL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH lllGHESf MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN (3)

NAME MEAN (3)

MEAN (3)

REPORTED

~UNIT OF MEASUREMENr) PERFORMED! I}

~LLDi (2)

RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS(4)

Soil GanunaSpec (pCilkg dry)

K-40 8

1.33E+04 (6/6) 13S6 1.65E+04 (2/2) 8.32E+03 (2/2)

O (1.05E+04

1. 76E+04) 0.4 mi W

(1.54E+04 1.76£+04)

(7.43£+03 9.io£+03)

Mn-54 8

6. 83E+00 (6/6) 12S1 2.40£+01 (2/2)

-1.35£.+01 (2/2) 0

(-9.00£+00 2.60E+Ol) 0.4 mi WSW (2. 20E+0 1 2.60£+01)

(-2.90£+01 2.00£+00)

Co-58 8

-3. 17E+00 (6/6) 12S1 7.50E+00 (2/2)

-1.85£+01 (2/2) 0

(-1.10£+01 2.30E+Ol) 0.4 rni WSW

(-8.00E+00 2.30E+Ol)

(-2.ooE+01

-1.70E+01)

Fe-59 8

-2.08£+01 (6/6) 3S2 6.00£+00 (2/2)

-3.45E+Ol (2/2) 0

(-1.10£+02 l.ooE+Ol) 0.5 rni NE (2.00£+00 1.00E+Ol)

(-8.00£+01 1.10E+Ol)

Co-60 8

5.00£-01 (6/6) 8Gl

1. 20E-+ 0 1 (2 (2) 1.20E-+Ol (2/2) 0

(-1.20£-+01 1.40£-+01) 12 mi SSE (6.ooE+00 1.80£-+01)

(6.00£+00 1.80E+Ol)

Zn-65 8

1.33E+00 (6/6) 13S6 4.50E+Ol (2/2)

-2.25£+01 (2/2) 0

(-5.00£+01 1.10E+02) 0.4 rni W

(-2.00£+01 1.10£+02)

(-2.50E+Ol

-2.00£+01)

Zr-95 8

5.50£+00

(<5/6) 13S6 1.75E+Ol (2/2)

1. 20E+0 1 (2/2) 0

(-4.10£+01 3.80£+01) 0.4 rni W

(1.20£+01 2.30E+Ol)

(9.00£+00 1.50E+Ol)

Nb-95 8

-1.55E+Ol (6/6) 12S1 6.00E+00 (2/2)

-1.90£+01 (2 /2) 0

(-6. 20E+0 1 8.00E+00) 0.4 mi WSW (4.ooE+00 8.00E+00)

(-2.80£+01

-1.ooE+Ol)

Cs-134 8

-1.43£+01 (6/6) 13S6

-3.ooE+00 (2/2)

-4.50£+00 (2/2) 0

(-2.70£+01

-1. 00£+00) 0.4 mi W

(-5.00E+00

-1.00£+00) (-8.00£+00

-1.00£+(0)

Cs-137 8

1.87E+Ol (6/6) 8Gl 8.65E+Ol (2/2)

.8.65£+01 (2/2) 0

(-5.00E+00 4.9OE+Ol) 12 mi SSE (8.20E+Ol 9.lOE+Ol)

(8.20E+Ol 9.10E+Ol)

Ba-140 8

-4.67E+Ol (6/6) 13S6

-2.50£+01 (2/2)

-3.00£+01 (2/2) 0

(-1.50E+02 O.OOE+OO) 0.4 mi W

(-5.00£+01 O.OOE+OO)

(-9. ooE+O 1 3.00E+Ol)

La-140 8

1. 37E+0 1 (6/6) 12S1 8.00£+01 (2/2)

6. ooE+O 1 (2/2) 0

-(6.lOE+Ol 1.40E+02) 0.4 flu WSW (2.00E+OI 1.40E+02)

(5.ooE+Ol 7.ooE+Ol) j 0

I-i

_LEG H

. i:J t-h 0

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR SSES

~

OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM* 2002 ill

rt NAME OF FACILITY; SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION 1-"

0 LOCATION OF FACILITY; LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

i:J Reporting Period:

December 26, 2001 to January 31, 2003 0

i:J Page 11 of13 I-'

ANALYSIS AND LOWERl1MIT NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATIiWAY Tar AL NUMBER OF AIL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITIIlllGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUITNE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN (3)

NAME MEAN (3)

MEAN (3)

REPORTED

~UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED ~ 1)

~W>l~2l RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENrS~4l Soil

. Ganuna Spec (pCilkg dry)

K-40 8

1. 33E+04 (6 I 6) 13S6 1.65E+04.

(2 I 2) 8.32E+03 (i 12) 0 (1.05E+04 1.76E+04) 0.4 mi W

(1.54E+04.

1.76E+04)

(7.43E+03 9.20E+03)

Mn-54 8

6.83E+00 (6/6) 12S1 2.40E+Ol (2/2)

-1.35£+01 (2/2) 0

(-9.00E+00 2.6OE+Ol) 0.4 mi WSW (2. 20E+0 1 2.60E+OI)

(-2.90E+OI

. 2.00E+00)

Co-58 8

-3.17E+00 (6 I 6) 12S1 7.50E+00 (2/2)

-1. 85E+Ol (2/2) 0

(-1.I0E+Ol i.30E+Ol) 0.4 mi WSW

(-8.00E+00 2.30E+Ol)

(-2.00E+01

-1.70E+01)

Fe-59 8

-2.08E+OI (6/6) 3S2 6.00E+00 (2/2)

-3.45E+OI (2/2) 0

(-1.I0E+02 1.00E+OI) 0.5 mi NE (2.ooE+00 1.00E+OI)

(-8.00E+OI 1.1 OE+O I)

Co-60 8

5.00E-OI (6/6) 8Gl 1.20E+OI (2 (2) 1.20E+Ol (2/2) 0

(-1.20E+OI 1.40E+Ol) 12 mi SSE (6.ooE+00 1.80E+OI)

(6.ooE+00 1.80E+Ol)

Zn-65

. 8 '

1.33E+00 (6/6) 13S6 4.50E+OI (2/2)

-2.25E+OI (2/2) 0

(-5.ooE+01 I.IOE+02) 0.4

mi W

(-2.00E+OI I.1OE+02)

(-2.50E+01

-2. OOE+O I)

Zr-95 8

5.50E+00

<<(1/6) 13S6 1.75E+OI (2/2) 1.20E+OI (2/2) 0

(-4.10E+OI 3.80E+Ol) 0.4 mi W

(1.20E+01 2.30E+Ol)

(9.ooE+00 1.50E+Ol)

Nb-95

8

-1.55E+Ol (6/6) 12S1 6.00E+00 (2/2)

-1.9OE+Ol (2/2) 0

(-6.20E+Ol 8.00E+00) 0.4 mi WSW (4.ooE+00 8.00E+OO)

(-2. 80E+0 I

-1.00E+OI)

Cs-l34 8

-1.43E+Ol (6 I 6) 13S6

-3.ooE+00 (2/2)

-4.50E+00 (2/2) 0

(-2.70E+OI

-1.ooE+oo) 0.4 mi W

(-5.00E+OO

-1. OOE+oo) (-8.00E+00

-1.00E+OO)

Cs-137 8

1.87E+Ol (6/6) 8Gl 8.65E+OI (2/2)

.8.65E+Ol (2/2) 0

(~5.00E+00 4.9OE+Ol) 12 mi SSE (8.20E+OI 9.IOE+Ol)

(8.20E+Ol 9.10E+Ol)

Ba-140

. 8

-4.67E+Ol (6/6) 13S6

-2.50E+OI (2/2)

-3.00E+Ol (2/2) 0

(-1.50E+02 O.OOE+oo) 0.4 mi W

(-5.ooE+01 O.OOE+OO)

(-9.ooE+Ol 3,OOE+OI)

La-140 8

1.37E+01 (6/6) 12S1 8.00E+Ol (2 I 2)

6. ooE+O I (2/2) 0

-(6.IOE+Ol 1.40E+02).

0.4 mi. WSW (2.00E+{1l 1.40E+02)

(5.ooE+Ol

. 7.00E+Ol)

G*13

TABLEG

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 2002 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Repoiiing Period:

January 31, 2003 December 26; 2001 to Page 12 oC13 ANALYSIS AND LOWERUMIT NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATIlW AY Tar AL NUMBER OF AIL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITHIllGHEST MEAN

~NTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETEGTION MEAN (3)

NAME MEAN (3)

MEAN (3)

REPORTED (UNIT OFMEASUREMENT2 PERFORMED !12 (LLDl(2l RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS(42 Soil (com)

Ra-226 0

0 (pCiJkg dIy)

Th-22B B

??6E+02 (6/6) 13S6 9.3IE+02 (2/2)

6. 79E+02 (2/2) 0 (6.30E+02

9. 34E+02) 0.4 rni W

(9.2BE+02

9. 34E+02)

(6.0BE+02 7.50E+02)

Food/Garden Crops Oamma Spec (pCiJkg wet)

Be-?

5 B.47E+OO (I /3) 1302 B.49E+OO (I

2)

B.49E+OO (1/2) 0 (B.47E+OO B.47E+OO) 16 rni W

(B.49E+OO B.49E+OO)

(B.49E+OO B.49E+00)

K-40 5

2.55E+03 (3 / 3) 1302 3.03E+03 (2/2) 3.03E+03 (2/2) 0 (1. 64E+03

3. 94E+03) 16 rni W

(2. 62E+03 3.43E+03)

Mn-54 5

1.02E+OO (1/3) 1302 3.12E+OO (I /2)

3. 12E+OO (I /2) 0 (1.02E+OO 1.02E+OO) 16 rni W

(3. 12E+OO

3. 12E+00)

(3.12E+OO

3. 12E+OO)

Co-5B 5

B.52E-OI (I /3) lIDI B.52E-Ol (I / 1)

(1 /2) 0 (B.52E-Ol B.52E-Ol) 3.3 rni SW (B.5~-Ol B.52E-Ol)

(-1.90E+OO

-1.90E+OO)

Fe-59 5

-l.06E+OO (I /3) 1302 4.0BE-Ol (1/2)

(1 /2) 0

(-1.06E+OO

-1.06E+OO) 16 rni W

(4.0BE-Ol 4.0BE-Ol)

Co-60 5

2.0BE+OO (I /3) 11.01 2.0BE+OO (1 / 1) 6.29E-OI (1 /2) 0 (2.0BE+OO 2.0BE+OO) 3.3 rni SW (2.0BE+OO 2.0BE+00)

(6. 29E-O 1 6.29E-Ol)

Zn-65 5

-B.07E+OO (1 /3) 1302

-2. 61E+OO (1/2)

-2.61E+OO (1 /2) 0

(-B.07E+OO

-B.07E+OO) 16 rni VI

(-2.61E+OO

-2.61E+OO) (-2.61E+OO

-2.61E+OO)

Zr-95 5

-1.57E-OI (1 /3) 1302

9. 27E-O 1 (1 /2) 9.27E-Ol (I /2) 0

(-1.57E-Ol

-1.57E-Ol) 16 rni W

(9. 27E-O 1 9.27E-Ol)

(9.27E-Ol 9:27E-Ol)

Nb-95 5

O.OOE-i-OO (1 / 3) 1302 O.OOE+OO (1/2)

O.OOE+OO (1/2) 0 (O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO) 16 rni W

(O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO)

(O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO) 1 131 5

-B.29E+OO (1/3) 1302

4. 17E+OO (1/2)

4. 17E+OO (112) 0

(-B.29E+OO

-B.29E+OO) 16 rni W

(4. 17E+OO

4. 17E+OO)

(4. 17E+OO

4. 17E+OO)

Ij o -

r:

H

. :;J H1 TABLEG 0

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR SSES

~

OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM* 2002 rt NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION f-'_.

0 LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA

J Reporting Period

_ January 31, 2003 -

0 December 26; 2001 to

J i-'

Page 12 oC13 ANALYSIS AND LOWBRIJMIT NUMBER OF MEDIUMORPATIlWAY

Tar AL NUMBER OF AIL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITHIDGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETEGITON MEAN (3)

NAME MEAN (3)

MEAN (3)

REPORTED

~UNIT OFMEASUREME!::ill PERFORMED !1~

~LLDl ~2l RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE.

MEASUREMENTS(4l SoU (cont)

Ra-226 0

0 (pCiJkg dIy)

Th-22B B

7.76E+02 (6/6) 13S6 9.31E+02 (2/2)

6. 79E+02 (2/2) 0 (6.30E+02

9. 34E+02) 0.4 rni W

(9.2BE+02

9. 34E+02)

(6.0BE+02 7.50E+02)

Food/Garden Crops Oanuria Spec (pCiJkg wet)

Be-7 5

B.47E+OO (1 /3) 1302 B.49E+OO (1

2) -

B.49E+OO (l/2) 0 (B.47E+OO B.47E+OO) 16 rni W

(B.49E+OO B.49E+OO)

(B.49E+OO B.49E+00)

K-40 5

2.55E+03.. (3 I 3) 1302 3.03E+03 (2/2) 3.03E+03 (2/2) 0 (1. 64E+03

3. 94E+03) 16 rni W

(2. 62E+03 3.43E+03)

Mn-54 5

1.02E+OO (l/3) 1302

3. 12E+00 (1 12)

3. 12E+OO (1 12) 0 (1.02E+OO 1.02E+OO) 16 rni W

(3. 12E+OO

3. 12E+00)

(3. 12E+OO

3. 12E+OO)

Co-5B 5

B.52E-Ol (1 13) 1101

. B.52E-Ol (1 I 1)

-l.90E+OO (1 12) 0 (B.52E-Ol B.52E-Ol) 3.3 rni SW (B.5ZE-Ol B.52E-Ol)

(-l.90E+OO

-1.90E+OO)

Fe-59 5

-l.06E+OO (1 13) 1302 4.0BE-Ol (l/2) 4.0BE*Ol (1 12) 0

(-l.06E+OO

-l.06E+OO) 16 rni W

(4.0BE-Ol.

4.0BE-Ol)

(4.0BE-Ol 4.0BE-Ol)

. Co-60 5

2.0BE+OO (1 13) 11P1

. 2.0BE+OO (1 I 1) 6.29E-Ol (1 12) 0 (2.0BE+OO 2.0BE+OO) 3.3 rni SW (2.0BE+OO 2.0BE+OO)

(6. 29E-O 1

. 6.29E-01)

Zn-65.

5

-B.07E+OO (1 13) 1302

-2.61E+OO (1 /2)

-2.61E+OO (1 12) 0

(-B.07E+OO

-B.07E+OO) 16 rni VI

(-2.61E+OO.

-2.61E+OO) (-2.61E+00

-2.61E+OO).

Zr-95 5

-1.57E-OI (1 13) 1302

9. 27E-O 1 (1 12) 9.27E-Ol (1 12) 0

(-1.57E-Ol -

-1.57E-Oi) 16 rni W

(9.27E-Ol 9.27E-Ol)

(9.27E-Ol 9:27E-Ol)

N1>-95 5

O.OOE-i-OO - (1 13) 1302 O.OOE+OO (1/2)

O.OOE+OO (1/2) 0 (O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO) 16 rni W

(O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO)

(O.OOE+OO O.OOE+OO) 1-131 5

-B. 29E+OO (1 13) 1302

4. 17E+OO (1/2)

4. 17E+OO (112) 0

(-B.29E+OO

-B.29E+00) 16 rni W

(4. 17E+OO

4. 17E+OO)

(4. 17E+OO

4. 17E+OO)

Q*14

e e

TABLEG

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 2062 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Reporting Period:

December 26,2001 to JanuarY 31, 2003 Page 13 of13 ANALYSIS AND LOWERUMIT MEDIUM OR PATHWAY Tar AL NUMBER OF AIl.. INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITHlUGHEST MEAN SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN (3)

NAME MEAN (3)

~UNITOFMEASUREMENTl PERFORMED~l)

~ll.Dl ~21 RANGE mSI ANCEAND DIRECTION' RANGE Food/Garden Crops (COlU)

(pCi/kg wet)

Cs-l34 S

1.60E+OO (I 13)

IIDI 1.60E+OO

'(1 I I)

(1.60E+OO 1.60E":OO) 3.3 mi SW (1.60E+OO 1.60E+OO)

Cs-137 S

-2.45E-OI (1 13) 1302 1.16E+OO (1 12)

(-2.4SE-OI

-2.45E-Ol) 16 mi W

(1.l6E+OO 1.16E+OO)

Ba-140 5

-1.39E+OI (1 13) 1302

1. 59E+Ol (I 12)

(-1.39E+Ol

-1.39E+Ol) 16 mi W

(1.S9E+OI 1.S9E+OI)

La-140 5

-S.S5E+OO (1/3) 1302

2. 23E+OO (1/2)

(-S.SSE:"OO

-S.SSE+OO) 16 mi W

(2.23E+OO 2.23E+OO)

1. The total number of analysis does not include duplicates, splits, or repeated analyses.

2. The Technical Requirement LLD's are shown when. applicable.

3. The means are based on all available measured results.. When possible, this inCludes those below the MDCs as well as those above them

4. USNRC reporting levels are specified in the Technical Requirements.

0 t-j e..

.H

~

H1 0

~

Pl rt f-'.

0

~

0

~

f-'

NUMBER OF CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE MEAN (3)

REPORTED RANGE MEASUREMENTS(41 1.04E+OO (I 12) 0 (1.04E+OO l.04E+OO) 1.16E+OO (1/2) 0 (1.16E+OO 1.16E+OO) l.59E+OI (1 12) 0 (1.S9E+OI 1.S9E+Ol) i.23E+OO (1 12) 0 (2. 23E+OO

2. 23E+OO) e TABLEG

SUMMARY

OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM - 2002 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Reporting Period:

December 26,*2001 to January 31, 2003 ANALYSIS AND LOWERLIMIT MEDIUMORPATHWAY TOfALNUMBER OF SAMPLED OF ANAL YSBS DETBCflON AlL INDICATOR LOCATIONS MEAN (3)

Page 13 of13 LOCATION WITIIlllGHEST MEAN NAME.

MEAN (3)

(UNIT OF MEASUREMENT)

PERFORMED ( 1)

(llD) (2)

RANGE DlST ANCEAND DIRECITON RANGE FoodlGarden Crops (cont)

(pCilkg wet)

Cs-l34 S

I.60E+OO. (1 /3) llDI I.60E+OO (1 / 1)

(t.60E+OO 1.60E+OO) 3.3 mi SW (L60E+OO 1.60E+OO)

Cs-137 S

-2ASE-Ol (1 /3) 1302 1.l6E+OO (1 /2)

(-2.4SE-Ol

-i.4SE-Ol) 16 mi W

(1.16E+OO I.I6E+OO)

Ba-140 S

-1.39E+Ol (1/3) 1302 l.59E+Ol (1 /2) ::

(-1.39E+Ol

-1.39E+Ol) 16 mi W

(1.59E+Ol L59E+Ot)

La-140 S

-S.SSE+OO (1/3) 13G2

2. 23E+OO (1 i 2)

(-S.SSE+OO

-S.55E+OO).

16 mi W

(2.23E+OO

2. 23E+OO)

. L The total munber of analysis doesnot include duplicates, splits, or repeated analyses.

2. The Technical Requirement LLD's are shown when appliCable.

3. The means are based on all available measured results.. When possible, this includes those below the MDCs as well as those above them

4. USNRC reporting levels are specified in the Technical Requirements.

CONTROL LOCATION MEAN (3)

RANGE I.04E+OO (1 /2)

(L04E+OO l.04E+OO) 1.l6E+OO (1 /2)

(1.16E+OO 1.16E+OO)

I.S9E+Ol (1 /2)

(l.S9E+Ol*

l.59E+Ol) i.23E+OO (1 /2)

(2. 23E+OO

2. 23E+OO)

e.

NUMBER OF NONROUTINE REPORTED MEASUREMENTS(4) o o

o o

Q*15

For Information Only APPENDIXH f

2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report 8-1 For Information Only APPENDIXH 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report 8-1

For Information Only Appendix H The data presented in the following tables were included if specific analysis results routinely exceeded the applicable MDCs in 2002 and/or routinely may have done so in previous years. The comparisons may be useful for observing any step changes that may occur in the environment over a wide area. However, the importance attached to these comparisons should be tempered by the understanding that changes in methods of analysis, typical MDCs achieved by the analyses, and averaging methods over the years may to blur the picture in some cases.

2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report H-2 For Information Only Appendix H The data presented in the following tables were included if specific analysis results routinely exceeded the applicable MDCs in 2002 and/or routinely may have done so in previous years. The comparisons may be useful for observing any step changes that may occur in the environment over a wide area. However, the importance attached to these comparisons should be tempered by the understanding that changes in methods of.

analysis, typical MDCs achieved by the analyses, and averaging methods over the years may tend* to blur the picture in some cases.

2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report H-2

For Information Only Appendix H AMBIENT RADIATION MONITORING TABLEHI

_~tE?~~:~~Ifi),JN~~~~IJ£~~I~~(~~SI~j)'h~~~'j1EP:s~(mBils~mfJft~)'~~~

Location Indicator Control Period Operational Operational 2002 Range 18.5-19.2 14.7~20.8 15.0-17.9 14.8-20.8 Mean 18.9 18.1 19.0 16.3 17.9 18.1 AOUA TIC PA THWA Y MONITORING TABLEH2

~;£1~~S~~QE~'¥~~R~~R~iSS;j!fj'j,~~&~"oo[(;Y'l]n~S~(p:~Vi)~~~&1~~fl5.~1~!~~~:

Location Indicator Control Period Operational.

Operational 2002 2002 3.2-4.9 3.0-7.7 2.9-5.2 2.8-6.7 Mean 3.8 5.6 5.4 4.0 3.8 2.9 TABLEH3 Location Indicator Control Period Pre-Op Operational Pre-Op Operational 2002 2002 Range 0.24-0.37 0.06-0.60 0.29-0.43 0.03-1.0 Mean 0.29 0.30 0.61 0.36 0.31 0.43 TABLEH4 Location Indicator Control Period Operational Pre-Op Operational 2002 2002 Range 101-122 126-1217 119-319

-239 -+212 Mean 109 531 1,363 171 53 36.1

1990 results were not averaged with 1982-01 data because the validity of the 1990 values is questionable in some instances. Laboratory analysis error is suspected. See the 1990 Annual Report.

H-3 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report For Information Only Appendix H AMBIENT RADIATION MONITORING 0

TABLEHI

_~tEr~ilJ.:~~Ifi),N~~ij~jJS:~~I~j(~~SI~j)'~~~~'j1EP:s~(mmSJl1~fJ%f~)~~~

Location Indicator Control Period Pre*Op Operational Pre*Op Operational 1978*81 1982*01 2002 1978*81 1982*01 2002 Range 18.5-19.2 14.7~20.8 15.0-17.9 14.8-20.8 Mean 18.9 18.1 19.0 16.3 17.9 18.1 AOUA TIC PA THWA Y MONITORING '

TABLEH2

~?£1~~S~<iQE~'¥~~R~~RQiSS;j!E;];,~~&~}oo[(;Y'lj1n~st(p:~Vi)~~~(~~~f~~1~!~~~:

Location Indicator

' Control Period Pre-Op Operational '

Pre-Oj)

Operational 1978-81 1982*01 2002 '

1978-81 1982-01 2002 Ran2e' 3.2-4.9 3.0-7.7 2.9-5.2 2.8-6.7 Mean 3.8 5.6 5.4 4.0 3.8 2.9 TABLEH3 Location Indicator Control Period Pre-Op Operational Pre-Op Operational 1979-81 1982-01 2002 1979-81 1982-01 2002 Range 0.24-0.37 0.06-0.60 0.29-0.43 0.03-1.0 Mean 0.29 0.30, 0.61 0.36 0.31 0.43 TABLEH4 Location Indicator Control Period Pre-Op Operational Pre-Op Operational 1978*81 1982*01*

2002 1978*81 1982*01*

2002 Range 101-122 126-1217 119-319

-239 -+212 Mean 109 531 1,363 171 53 36.1 '

1990 results were not averaged with 1982-01 data because the validity of the 1990 values is questionable in some instances. Laboratory analysis error is suspected. See the 1990 Annual Report.

H-3 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report

For Information Onl y APDendixH TABLEH7 TABLEH8 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report H-4 For Information Onl y APDendixH 1.5 TABLEH7 TABLEH8 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report H-4

For Information Only AppendixH TABLEH9 TABLER 10 TABLEH 11 Location Indicator Control Period 1984 - 01

2002 1984 - 01

2002 Ran2e 0.9.,. 1.7 O.S - 1.4 Mean 1.1 1.6 1.1 2.1

Th-232 was reported instead of Th-228 in 1990.

TABLE H 12 Location Indicator Control Period Pre-Op Operational Pre-Op Operational 1978-81 1982-01 2002 1978-81 1982-01 2002 Ran2e 0.OS-0.15 0.O4~0.17 0.08-0.21 0.06-0.21 Mean 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.11 0.11 0.13 H-S 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report For Information Only AppendixH TABLEH9

. TABLER 10 TABLER 11 Location Indicator Control Period 1984 - 01

2002 1984 - 01*

2002 Ran2e 0.9.,. 1.7 0.8 - 1.4 Mean 1.1 1.6 1.1 2.1

Th-232 was reported instead of Th-228 in 1990.

TABLE H 12

Location Indicator Control Period Pre-Op Operational Pre-Op Operational 1978-81 1982-01 2002 1978-81 1982-01 2002 Ran2e 0.08-0.15 0.O4~0.17 0.08-0.21 0.06-0.21 Mean 0.10 0.09 0.06 0.11 0.11 0.13 H-S 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report

For Information Only AppendixH ATMOSPHERIC PA THWA Y MONITORING TABLEH 14

1990 results were not averaged with 1982-01 data because the validity of the 1990 values is questionable in some instances. Laboratory analysis error is suspected. See the 1990 Annual Report.

TERRESTRIAL PATHWAY MONITORING TABLEH15 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report For Information Only AppendixH ATMOSPHERIC PA THWA Y MONITORING TABLEH 14

1990 results were not averaged with 1982-01 data because the validity of the

,,1990 values is questionable in some instances. Laboratory analysis error is suspected. See the 1990 Annual,Report.

TERRESTRIAL PATHWAY MONITORING TABLEH15 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report H*6

For Information Only Appendix H TABLEH 16 r~~~~it:~~~t~~~*@i~~~m~s~Qm~B.~)JU1!JM~Z~'~~:~:'~.~iMt~lfi~Si(6~V~mmt)i~t~@~;f!t~~!~:~~)~~qf~~f¥,~~

Location Indicator Control Period Operational Operational 1979&81 2002 1979&81 2002 Range 0.8 - 1.3 0.8 - 2.5 0.8 -1.2 1.0 - 2.2 Mean 1.1 1.6 o

1.0 1.7 o

TABLEH17 Period TABLEH 18 Location Indicator Control Period Operational Operational 2002 2002 Ran2e 0.5 - 0.7 0.05 - 0.5 0.2 - 1.2 0.1 - 1.2 Mean 0.6 0.2 0.02 0:7 0.4 0.09 TABLEH 19 Location Indicator Control Period Operational Operational 2002 2002 Ran2e 1222-1500 1241-1422 1273-1500 1247-1472 Mean 1325 1329 1403 1390 1331 1338 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report For Information Only Appendix H TABLEH 16 r~~:g~£~~~~t~~~~@i~t~m~s~Qm~B.~JJU1!JM~Z~'6~:~:'~,~~lfi~S~(<<~v~mmt)l~~t@~f!t~~f~:~~)~~~f~~f¥,~~

Location Indicator Control Period Pre*Op,

Operational Pre*Op Operational 1979&81

' 1984*01 2002 1979&81 1984*01 2002 Range 0.8 - 1.3,

0.8 - 2.5

, 0.8 -1.2 1.0 - 2.2 Mean 1.1 1.6 o

1.0 1.7 o

TABLEH17,

,Period TABLEH 18 Location Indicator Control Period Pre*Op Operational Pre* Of!

Operational 1979&81 1982*01 2002

1979&81 1982*01 2002 Ran2e 0.5 - 0.7 0.05 - 0.5 0.2 - 1.2 0.1 - 1.2 Mean 0,6 0.2 0.02 0:7 0.4 0.09 TABLEH 19 Location Indicator Control Period Pre*Op Operational Pre*Op Operational 1978*81 1985*01 2002 1978*81 1985*01 2002

,Ran2e 1222-1500 1241-1422 1273-1500 1247-1472 Mean 1325 1329 1403 1390 1331 1338 H*'

2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report

For Inforuation Only AppendixH TABLE H20

i;=;;~~~

1990 results were not averaged with 1982-01 data because the validity of the 1990 values is questionable in some instances. Laboratory analysis error is suspected. See the 1990 Annual Report.

TABLEH21 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report For Inforuation Only AppendixH TABLE H20

1990 results were not averaged with 1982-01 data because the validity of the

1990 values is questionable in some instances. Laboratory analysis error is suspected. See the 1990 Annual Report.

TABLEH21 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report H*8

For Information Only APPENDIX I 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report For Information Only

\\

APPENDIX I 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report 1*1

For Informat i on Only Appendixl Results of analyses are generally reported in the following tables to two significant figures. Random uncertainties of counting are reported to the same decimal place as the result.

Calculated values for analysis results are reported with the random uncertainty of counting at two standard deviations (2S), determined by considering both the sample and background count rates. The uncertainty of an activity is influenced by the volume or mass of the sample, the background count rate, the count times, the method used to round off the value obtained to reflect its degree of significance, and other factors. The uncertainties of activities determined by gamma spectrometric analyses are also influenced by the relative concentrations of the radionuclides in the sample, the energies

. and intensities of the gammas emitted by those radionuclides, and the assumptions used in selecting the radionuclides to be quantitatively detennined.

Results reported as less than <<) in these tables are below the minimum detectable concentrations (MDCs). The MDC is an estimate of the detection capabilities of the overall measurement method, taking into account not only the counting system, but also the characteristics of the sample being counted. When the MDC is used as the level to decide whether or not to enter a measured value into a table, there is a 50% chance that the value will be entered. when the actual sample activity is equivalent to the MDC.

There is only a five percent chance that a value representing a fluctuation in background activity will be entered as sample activity in such an instance.

Measured values for the activities of specific radionuclides, such as the man-made gamma-emitting radionuclides beryllium-7 and cesium-137, only appear in the following tables for each specific medium when the levels that are measured exceed the MDC values forthose measurements and those radionuclides are actually identified as present in the samples. Measured values for the analyses that are not radionuclide specific, such as gross alpha and beta analyses, also are presented in the tables for

. specific media only when the levels that are measured actually exceed the MDCs.

2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report e

For Informat i on Only Appendixl Results of analyses are generally reported in the following tables to two significant figures. Random uncertainties of counting are reported to the same decimal place as the result.

. Calculated values for analysis results are reported with the random uncertainty of counting at two standard deviations (2S), determined by considering both the sample and background count rates. The uncertainty of an activity is influenced by the volume or mass of the sample, the background count rate, the count times, the method used to round off the value obtained to reflect its degree of significance, and other factors. The uncertainties of activities determined by gamma spectrometric analyses are also influenced by the relative concentrations of the radionuclides in the sample, the energies

. and intensities of the gammas emitted by those radionuclides, and the assumptions used in selecting the radionuclides to be quantitatively determined.

Results reported as less than <<) in these tables are below the minimum detectable concentrations (MDCs). The MDC is an estimate of the detection capabilities of the overall measurement method, taking into account not only the counting system, but also the characteristics of the sample being counted. When the MDC is used as the level to decide whether or not to enter a measured value into a table, there is a 50% chance that the value will be entered. when the actual sample activity is equivalent to the MDC.

There is only a five percent chance that a value representing a fluctuation in background activity will be entered as sample activity in such an instance.

Measured values for the activities of specific radionuc1ides, such as the man-made gamma-emitting radionuclides beryllium-7 and cesium-137, only appear in the following tables for each specific medium when the levels that are measured exceed the MDC values forthose measurements and those radionuclides are actually identified as present in the samples. Measured values for the analyses that are not radionuclide specific, such as gross alpha and beta analyses, also are presented in the tables for

. specific media only when the levels that are measured actually exceed the MDCs.

2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report e*

e

Location ONSlTE IS2 +

2S2 2S3 ~

3S2 3S3 3S4 +

4S3 +

4S6 SS4 SS7 +

6S4 +

6S9 +

7S6 +

7S7 8S2 +

9S2 lOS1 +

lOS2 lOS3 I1S3 +

llS7 ENVIRONMENTAL THERMO~INESCENT SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELE First Quarter 01114102 to 04/18/02 20.4 +/- 1.0 16.9 +/- 1.0 18.6 +/- 1.0 17.0 +/- 1.6 16.5 +/- 0.8 16.4 +/- 1.0 21.0 ~ 1.6 17.7 +/- 0.4 IS.9 +/- 0.8 16.9 +/- 0.8 24.9 +/- 2.0 23.5+/- 2.0 22.0 +/- 2.2 17.1 +/- 1.6 21.3 +/- 1.0 37.7 +/- 3.3 16.1 +/- 1.2 28.S +/- 2.2 IS.8 +/- 1.0 24.9 +/- 2.6 18.4 +/- 1.2 Results (1 ) are in mRlstd. qtr (2) +/- 2S (3)

Second Quarter 04/17/02 to 07/18/02 23.7 +/- 1.6 16.5 +/- 1.0 21.5 +/- 1.2 16.9 +/- 0.8 16.4 +/- 1.4 16.7 +/- 0.6 21.8 +/- 1.4 16.8 +/- 0.8 16.0. +/- 1.4 17.4 +/- 0.4 25.2.+/- 1.4 24.1 +/- 1.8 23.8 +/- 1.4 16.8 +/- 0.6 21.6 +/- 0.6 39.3 +/- 3.4 16.2 +/- 0.6 29.8 +/- 1.0 16.0 +/- 1.0 25.9 +/- 0.8 18.0 +/- 1.2 Third Quarter 07/16102 to 10/17/02 21.9 +/- 1.2 16.6 +/- 1.2 20.7 +/- 1.4 16.5 +/- 1.2 16.8 +/- 1.4 16.2 +/- 0.8 20.9 +/- 1.4 17.4 +/- 0.8 15.2 +/- 2.9 16.1 +/- 1.4 24.8 +/- 0.8 21:8 +/- 1.2 16.5 +/- 1.2 22.8 +/- 2.2 36.7 +/- 3.2 16.7 +/- 0.6 29.2 +/- 1.4 16.0 +/- 1.0 24.8+/- 1.6 18.0 +/- 1.0 Fourth Quarter 10/15/02 to 01131103 21.6 +/- 1.0 15.6 +/- 0.7 19.6 +/- 1.0 16.2 +/- 1.6 15.3 +/- 0.3 20.4 +/- 1.2 16.1 +/- 1.0 14.8 +/- 0.9 IS.4 +/- 0.7 24.2 +/- 2.2 23.4 +/- 0.7 22.9 +/- 1:7 16.0 +/- 0.7 24.0+/- 2.1 40.3 +/-2.1 15.5 +/- 1.0 28.2 +/- 2.8 15.0 +/- 0.5 23.8 +/- 1.4 17.5 +/- 1.2

+

Location ONSITE 1S2 +

2S2 2S3 ~

3S2 3S3 3S4 +

4S3 +

4S6 5S4 5S7 + "

6S4 +

6S9 +

7S6 +

7S7 8S2 +

9S2 +

lOS1 +

10S2 lOS3 l1S3 + "

l1S7 ENVIRONMENTAL THERMO.~~CENT DOSIMETRY RESULTS "

SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 First Quarter 01/14/02 to 04118102 2004 +/- 1.0 16.9 +/- 1.0 18.6 +/- 1.0 "17.0 +/- 1.6 16.5 +/- 0.8 1604 +/- 1.0 21.0 +/- 1.6 17.7 +/- 004 15.9 +/- 0.8 16.9 +/- 0.8 24.9 +/- 2.0 23.5+/- 2.0 22.0 +/- 2.2 17.1 +/- 1.6 21.3 +/- 1.0 37.7 +/- 3.3 16.1 +/- 1.2 28.5 +/- 2.2 15.8 +/- 1.0 24.9 +/- 2.6 1804 +/- 1.2 Results (I ) are in mRlstd. qtr (2) +/- 2S (3)

" Second Quarter 04/17102 to 07/18102

" 23.7 +/- 1.6 16.5 +/- 1.0 21.5 +/- 1.2 16.9 +/- 0.8 16.4 +/- 1.4 16.7 +/- 0.6

" 21.8 +/- 104 16.8 +/- 0.8 16.0 +/- 104 17.4 +/- 004 25.2+/- 1.4 24.1 +/- 1.8 23.8 +/- 1.4 16.8 +/- 0.6 21.6 +/- 0.6 39.3 +/- 304 16.2 +/- 0.6 29.8 +/- 1.0 16.0 +/- 1.0 25.9 +/- 0.8 18.0 +/- 1.2 Third Quarter 07/16/02 to 10/17/02 21.9 +/- 1.2 16.6 +/- 1.2 20.7 +/- 104 16.5 +/- 1.2 "

16.8 +/- 104 16.2 +/- 0.8 20.9 +/- 104 "

1704 +/- 0.8 15.2 +/- 2.9 16.1 +/- 1.4 24.8 +/- 0.8 23.5 +/- "2.6 21.8 +/- 1.2 16.5 +/- 1.2

""22.8 +/- 2.2 36.7 +/- 3.2 16.7 +/- 0.6

" 29.2 +/- 104 16.0 +/- 1.0 24.8 "+/- 1.6 18.0 +/- 1.0 Fourth Quarter 10/15/02 "to 01/31103 21.6 +/- 1.0 15.6 +/- 0.7 19.6 +/- 1.0 16.2 +/- 1.6 15.3 +/- 0.3 15.8 +/- 0.7 "

20.4 +/- 1.2 16.1 +/- 1.0 14.8 +/- 0.9 1504 +/- 0.7 24.2 +/- 2.2 23.4 +/- 0.7 22.9 +/- 1.1' 16.0 +/- 0.7 "

24.0+/- 2.1 40.3 +/-2.1 15.5 +/- 1.0 28.2 +/- 2.8 15.0 +/- 0.5 23.8 +/- 1.4 17.5 +/- 1.2 1-3

Location 12S1 1283 +

12S4 12S5 12S6 12S7 13S2 +

13S4 13S5 13S6 14S5 +

14S6 15S5 +

16S1 +

16S2 +

TABLEI-l ENVIRONMENTAL THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY RESULTS SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STA nON - 2002 Flrst Quarter 01/1410210 04118102 18.4 +/- 1.4 22.4 +/- 2.0 22.7 +/- 2.2 20.0 +/- 1.6 21.4 +/- 1.0 15.8 +/- 1.0 21.8 +/- 1.0 22.8+/- 2.0 24.5 +/- 1.4 21.6 +/- 2.2 20.8 +/- 1.4 19.7 +/- 1.6 19.0 +/- 1.4 20.1 +/- 1.8 21.5 +/- 1.4 Results (1) are in mRIstd. qtr (2) +/- 2S (3)

Second Quarter 04117102 to 07118102 19.0 +/- 0.8 22.3 +/- 1.2 22.8 +/-1.0 20.5 +/- 0.8

.21.3 +/- 1.8 15.5 +/- 1.0 23.2 +/- 1.6 22.0 +/- 0.8 24.0 +/- 1.0 21.5 +/- 1.0 21.7 +/- 0.8 20.5 +/- 1.4 19.8 +/- 0.8 22.5 +/- 1.4 22.7 +/- 1.0 Third Quarter 07/16/02 to 10117/02 17.9 +/- 1.2 21.0 +/- 1.4 16.3 +/-0.8 23.1 +/- 1.4 22.0 +/- 1.6 23.8 +/- 0.4 20.7 +/- 1.2 21.4 +/- 2.2 19.1 +/- 1.4 19.0 +/- 0.4 21.2 +/- 1.6 21.4 +/- 1.8 See the comments at the end of this table.

Fourth Quarter 10/1S/02 to 01/31/03 17.7 +/-.0.9 21.5 +/- 1.0 22.0 +/- 1.2 19.0 +/- 1.0 19.6 +/- 1.0 15.2. +/- 0.5 23.6 :!: 1.4 21.8 0.7 23.2. +/- 1.0 20.5+/- 1.0 19.4 +/- 1.7 18.8 +/- 0.9 17.8 +/- 1.0 20.6 +/- 1.2 21.7 +/- 1.5 Location 1281 12S3 +

12S4 12S5 12S6 12S7 13S2 +

1384 13S5 1386 1485 +

1486 1585 +

1681 +

1682 +

TABLE I-I ENVIRONMENTAL THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY RESULTS SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 First Quarter 01114102.0 04118102.

18.4 +/- 1.4 22.4 +/- 2.0 22.7 +/- 2.2 20.0 +/- 1.6 21.4 +/- 1.0 15.8 +/- 1.0 21.8 +/- 1.0 22.8+/- 2.0 24.5 +/- 1.4 21.6 +/- 2.2 20.8 +/- 1.4 19.7 +/- 1.6 19.0 +/- 1.4 20.1 +/- 1.8 21.5 +/- 1.4 Results (1) are in mRlstd. qtr (2) +/- 2S (3)

Second Quarter.

04117102 to 07118102 19.0 +/- 0.8 22.3 +/- 1.2 22.8 +/-1.0 20.5 +/- 0.8

.21.3 +/- 1.8 15.5 +/- 1.0 23.2 +/- 1.6 22.0 +/- 0.8 24.0 +/- 1.0 21.5 +/- 1.0 21.7 +/- 0.8 20.5 +/- 1.4 19.8 +/- 0.8 22.5 +/- 1.4 22.7 +/- 1.0

. Third Quarter 07/16/02 to. 10117/02 17.9 +/- 1.2 22.2 +/- 1.4 22.7 +/- 1.4

20.1 +/- 1.0 21.0 +/- 1.4 16.3 +/-0.8

- 23.1 +/- 1.4 22.0 +/- 1.6 23.8 +/- 0.4 20.7 +/- 1.2 21.4 +/- 2.2 19.1 +/- 1.4 19.0 +/- 0.4 21.2 +/- 1.6 21.4 +/- 1.8 See the comments at the end of this table.

Fourth Quarter 10/15/02 to 01131103 17.7 +/-.0.9 21.5 +/- 1.0 22.0 +/- 1.2 19.0 +/- 1.0 19.6 +/- 1.0 15.2. +/- 0.5 23.6 :!: 1.4 21.8 +/-: 0.7 23.2. +/- 1.0 20.5+/- 1.0 19.4 +/- 1.7 18.8 +/- 0.9 17.8 +/- 1.0 20.6 +/- 1.2 21.7 +/- 1.5 1-4

Location 0-1 MILE OFFSITE 6A4 +

8A3 15A3 16A2 MILES OFFSlTE IBI 2B3 +

2B4 5B3 7B2 8B2 +

9Bl 10B2 10B3 10B4 12B4 13Bl 14B3 +

15Bl 16B2 MILES OFFSITE llCI ENVIRONMENTAL THERMO.~CENT DOSIMETRY RESULTS SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION ~ 2002 First Quarter 01114102 to 041111102 20.2 +/- 2.0 16.4 +/- 0.8 18.2 +/- 1.0 15.9 +/- 1.4 17.S +/- 1.2 li6 +/- 1.2 (S) 15.7 +/- 1.2 16.6 +/- 1.6 17.2 +/- 1.2 16.6 +/- 1.0 14.0 +/- 1.0 16.S +/- 1.4 18.6 +/- 2.0 17.4 +/- 0.8 17.6 +/- 1.8 18.4 +/- 1.2 17.3 +/- 1.4 15.9 +/- 1.4 21.1 +/- 1.2 Results (1) are in mRlstd. qtT (2) +/- 2S (3)

Second Quarter 04/17/02 to 07/18/02 19.3 +/- 1.6 16.1 +/- 0.8 18.8 +/-T4 16.2 +/- 1.0 17.1 +/- 1.0 17.2 +/- 1.0 17.3 +/-O.6 15.2 +/- 1.2 16.1 +/- 0.8 16.5 +/- 1.2 16.1 +/- 1.0 13.4 +/- 1.0 16.S +/- 3.0 18.3 +/- 1.2 17.0 +/- 0.4 17.0 +/- 1.4 17.2 +/- 1.0 16.8 +/- 0.4 IS.9 +/- 1.0 19.9 +/- 0.8 Third Quarter 07/16/02 to 10/17/02 19.1 +/- 1.4 16.0 +/- 1.0 18.3 +/- 1.2 16.0 +/- 1.0 16.6 +/- 1.4 16.8 +/- 1.0 17.2 +/- 1.2 IS.4 +/- 0.6 16.1 +/- 0.8 16.3 +/- 1.4 15.5 +/- 1.2 13.S+/- 1.4 15.5 +/- 1.2 17.9 +/- 2.0 16.5 +/- 1.4 17.4 +/- L4 17.6 +/- 1.0 17.2 +/- 1.2 16.4 +/- 2.0.

20.2+/- 1.4 See the comments at the end of this table.

Fourth Quarter 10/15/02 to 01131103 18.6 +/- 0.7 15.4 +/- 1.2 17.0 +/- 0.5 15.2 +/- 0.7 15.6 +/- 1.0 16.4 +/- 0.7 16.3 +/- 0.5 15.5 +/- 0.7 16.0 +/-0.9 15.6 +/- 0.7 15.0 +/- 0.7 12.9 +/- 0.9 15.2 +/- 1.9 16.S +/- 0.7 IS.7 +/- 0.2 16.4 +/- 0.9 16.6 +/- 0.9 15.9 +/- 1.2 14.9 +/- 1.2 18.8 +/- L{)

Location 0-1 MILE OFFSITE 6A4+

8A3 ISA3 16A2 1*2 MILES OFFSITE.

IBI 2B3 +

2B4 SB3 7B2 8B2 +

9Bl lOB2 10B3 lOB4 12B4 13Bl 14B3 +

ISBI

. 16B2 2*3 MILES OFFSITE llCI

.... EI-l ENVIRONMENTAL THERMOillrINESCENT DOSIMETRY RESULTS SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION ~ 2002 First Quarter 01114102. to 04118102 20.2 +/- 2.0 16.4 +/- 0.8 18.2 +/- 1.0 15.9 +/- 1.4 17.5 +/- 1.2 17.6 +/- 1.2 (5)

IS.7 +/- 1.2 16.6 +/- 1.6 17.2 +/- 1.2 16.6 +/- LO 14.0 +/- 1.0 16.S +/- 1.4 18.6 +/- 2.0 17.4 +/- 0.8 17.6 +/- 1.8 18.4 +/- 1.2 17.3 +/- 1.4 15.9 +/- 1.4 21.1 +/- 1.2 Results (1) are in mRlstd. qtr (2) +/- 2S (3)

Second Quarter 04117/02 to 07/18/02 19.3 +/- 1.6 16.1 +/- 0.8 18.8 +/-"1.4 16.2 +/- 1.0 17.1 +/- 1.0 17.2 +/- 1.0 17.3 +/-0.6 IS.2 +/- 1.2 16.1 +/- 0.8 16.5 +/- 1.2 16.1 +/- 1.0 13.4 +/- 1.0 16.5 +/- 3.0 18.3 +/- 1.2 17.0 +/- 0.4 17.0 +/- 1.4 17.2 +/- 1.0 16.8 +/- 0.4 IS.9 +/- 1.0 19.9 +/- 0.8 Third Quarter 07/16/02 to. *10/17/02 19.1 +/- 1.4 16.0 +/- 1.0 18.3 +/- 1.2 16.0 +/-1.0 16.6 +/- 1.4 16.8 +/- 1.0 17.2 +/- 1.2 15.4 +/- 0.6

. 16.1 +/- 0.8

. 16.3 +/- 1.4 IS.5 +/- 1.2 13.5.+/- 1.4 15.S +/- 1.2 17.9 +/- 2.0 16.5 +/- 1.4 17.4 +/- lA 17.6 +/- 1.0 17.2 +/- 1.2 16.4 +/- 2.0 **

20.2+/- 1.4 See the comments at the end of this table.

Fourth Quarter 10115/02 to 01131103 18.6 +/- 0.7 IS.4 +/- 1.2 17.0 +/- 0.5 15.2 +/- 0.7 15.6 +/- 1.0 16.4 +/- 0.7 16.3 +/- 0.5 \\.

IS.5 +/- 0.7 16.0 +/-0.9 IS.6 +/- 0.7 IS.0 +/- 0.7 12.9 +/- 0.9 IS.2 +/- 1.9

16.5 +/- 0.7 15.7 +/- 0.2 16.4 +/- 0.9 16.6 +/- 0.9 IS.9.+/- 1.2 14.9 +/- 1.2 18.8 +/- LO 1-5 Tj 0

~

H

~ -!

rn 0

~

OJ rt f-'.

0

~

0

~

I-'

LOcation MILES OFFSITE IDS +

601 803 +

904 +

1001 +

1202 1401 MILES OFFSITE 3E1 4E2 SE2 +

6E1 +

7E1 +

11E1 +

12El +

13E4 +

MILES OFFSITE 2Fl +

8F2 12F2 15Fl +

16Fl +

ENVIRONMENTAL THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY RESULTS Fant Quarter 01114102 to 04118/02 20.2 +/- 2.0 20.1 +/- 1.4 18.3 +/- 1.8 19.1 +/- 1.0 18.8 +/- 1.8 21.0 +/- 4.2 19.4 +/- 1.2 16.8 +/- 1.0 19.5 +/- 2.2 18.5 +/- 1.0 20.4 +/- 1.4 19.2 +/- 1.4 16.0 +/- 0.8 16.6 +/- 1.2 21.0 +/- 1.2 17.8 +/- 1.4 17.0 +/- 2.2 18.7 +/- 1.0 19.7 +/- 1.0 20.8 +/- 1.4 SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC 2002 Results (1) are in mRlstd. qtr (2) +/- 25 (3)

Second Quarter 04/17102 to 07/18/02 18.7 +/- 1.4 19.3 +/- 1.6 17.4 +/- 0.8 18.0 +/- 1.2 17.S +/- 0.6 19.9 +/- 1.2 18,9 +/- 0.8 IS.2 +/- 0.8 18.5 +/- 2.4 17.5 +/-1.0 21.S +/- 1.2 18.6 +/- 0.8 15.5 +/- 0.8 (S) 20.7+/- 1.0 17.6 +/- 0.8 16.4 +/- 1.4 i8.4+/- 1.4 19.4 +/- 0.8 20.0 +/- 1.0 Third Quarter 07/16/02 to 10117102 19.2 +/- 1.8 19.2 +/- 1.2 18.2 +/- 1.0 18.8 +/- 1.0 17.2 +/- 1.0 20.0 +/- 1.2 19.5 +/- 1.0 16.2 +/- 1.2 18.8 +/- 0.6 17.8 +/- 1.8 19.7 +/- 1.4 18.7 +/- 1.4 15.0 +/- 1.0 16.8 +/- 0.8 20.6 +/- 2.6 17.7 +/- 0.6 17.0 +/- 1.2 18.4+/- 1.0 19.7 +/- 1.0 20.4 +/- 1.6 See the comments at the end of this Fourth Quarter 10115/02 to 01131103 17.6 +/- O.S 17.9 +/- 1.4 16.6 +/-.0.7 17.1 +/- 1.0 17.0 +/- 0.9 19.0 +/- O.S 17.1 +/- 1.4 14.5 +/- 1.0 18.3 +/- 1.0 17.1 +/- 1.7 19.4 +/- 1.4 17.8 +/- 0.7 14.1 +/- 0.5 15.8 +/- 0.9 19.2 +/- O.S 16.7 +/- 1.0 16.3 +/- O.S 17.2 +/- 1.2 18.1 +/- 0.5 19.2 +/- 1.4

. LOcation 3-4 MILES OFFSITE IDS +

6Dl 8D3 +

9D4 +

lODl +

12D2 14Dl

. 4-5 MILES OFFSITE 3El 4E2 SE2 +

6EI +

7El +

lIEI +

12El +

13E4 +

5-10 MILES OFFSITE

. 2Fl +

8F2 12F2 15Fl +

16Fl +

. TABLEI-1...

ENVIRONMENTAL THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETR.Y RESULTS.

Fmt Quarter 01114102 to 04118/02 20.2 +/- 2.0 20.1 +/- 1.4 18.3 +/- 1.8 19.1 +/- 1.0 18.8 +/- 1.8 21.0 +/- 4.2 19.4 +/- 1.2 16.8 +/- 1.0 19.5 +/- 2.2 18.5 +/- 1.0 20.4 +/- 1.4 19.2 +/- 1.4 16.0 +/- 0.8 16.6 +/- 1.2 21.0 +/- 1.2 17.8 +/- 1.4

. 17.0 +/- 2.2 18.7 +/- 1.0 19.7 +/- 1.0 20.8 +/- 1.4 SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results (1) are in mRlstd. qtr (2) +/- 28 (3)

Second Quarter 04/17102 to

.07/18/02

18.7 +/- 1.4 19.3 +/- 1.6 17.4 +/- 0.8 18.0 +/- 1.2 17.5 +/- 0.6 19.9 +/- 1.2 18.9 +/- 0.8 IS.2 +/- 0.8 18.5 +/- 2.4 17.5 +/-1.0 21.S +/- 1.2 18.6 +/- 0.8 15.5 +/- 0.8 (5) 20.7+/- 1.0 17.6 +/- 0.8 16.4 +/- 1.4 i8.4+/- 1.4 19.4 +/- 0.8 20.0 +/- 1.0 Third Quarter.

07/16/02 to 10117102 19.2 +/- 1.8 19.2 +/- 1.2 18.2 +/- 1.0 18.8 +/- 1.0 17.2 +/- 1.0 20.0 +/- 1.2 19.5 +/- 1.0 16.2 +/- 1.2 18.8 +/- 0.6 17.8 +/- 1.8 19.7 +/- 1.4 18.7 +/- 1.4 15.0 +/- 1.0 16.8 +/- 0.8 20.6 +/- 2.6 17.7 +/- 0.6 17.0 +/- 1.2 18.4+/- 1.0 19.7 +/- 1.0 20.4 +/- 1.6 See the comments at the end of this table.

. 0

.. Fourth Quarter 10115/02. to 01131103 17.6 +/- 0.5

. 17.9 +/- 1.4 16.6 +/-.0.7 17.1 +/- 1.0 17.0 +/- 0.9 19.0 +/- O.S 17.1 +/- 1.4 14.5 +/- 1.0 18.3 +/- 1.0 17.1 +/- 1.7 19.4 +/- 1.4 17.8 +/- 0.7 14.1 +/- 0.5 15.8 +/- 0.9 19.2 +/- 0.5 16.7 +/- 1.0 16.3 +/- 0.5 17.2 +/- 1.2 18.1 +/- 0.5 19.2 +/- 1.4 1*6

ENVIRONMENTAL THERMO.~~CENTDOSlMETRY RESULTS SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Location 10-20 MILES 3G4 4Gl+

6Gl 7Gl +

7G2 SGI 12Gl +

12G4 First Quarter 01/14/02 to 04/18102 20.2 +/- 1.4 21.4 +/- I.S 21.6 +/- 1.4 17.S +/- 1.4 19.1 +/- 1.2 IS.6 +/- 1.4 16.0 +/- 0.6 19.4 +/- 0.6 See the comments at the end of this table.

Location Indicator Average (6)

Control Average (6)

COMMENTS 19.3 +/- 13.4 IS.9 +/- 3.6 Results (l)are in mRlstd. qtr (2) +/- 2S (3)

Second Quarter 04/17/02 to 07/18102 18.7 +/- 1.0 20.7 +/- 1.6 21.0 +/- O.S 16.9 +/- 0.8 17.7 +/- 0.6 15.2 +/- 1.2 15.7 +/- 1.4 19.1 +/- 1.0 19.3 +/- 10.3 IS.1 +/- 3.1 Third Quarter 07/16/02. to 10/17102 18.1 +/- 1.0 19.9 +/- 1.6 20.1 +/- O.S 17.2 +/- 1.6 (S) 14.9 +/- 0.2 16.1 +/- 1.4 19.7 +/- l.6 19.0 +/- 12.1 IS.0 +/- 3.4 Fourth Quarter 10115/02 to 01/31/03 (5)

IS.9 +/- 0.5 19.7 +/- 1.0 16.3 +/- 1.0 16.4 +/- 0.7 14.3 +/- 0.9 IS.5 +/- 0.7 IS.3 +/- 1.5 IS.3 +/- 9.6 17.1 +/- 2:5 (I) Individual monitor location results are nonnaUy the average of the elemental doses of six calcium elements from the two TLDs assigned to each monitoring location.

(2) A standard (std.) quarter (qtr.) is considered to be 91.25 days. Results obtained for monitoring periods of other durations are nonnalized by multiplying them by 91.25/x, where x is the actual duration in days of the period.

(3) Uncertainties for individual monitoring location results are two standard deviations of the elemental dOses of six cillcium elements from the two TLDs assigned to each monitoring location, representing the variability between the elemental doses of each of the six TLD elements.

(4) TLDs were not in the field at this monitoring location during this quarter. Refer to Appendix A of this report for an explanation of program changes totheREMP.

(5) No measurement could be made because the TLDs were lost, stolen, or damaged.

(6) Uncertainties associated with quarteriy indicator and control averages are two standard deviations, representing the variability between the results of the individual monitoring locations.

(7) Data were invalidated for this period because of an unacceptably high coefficient of variation among element readings.

+ ODCM -listed locations.

~

E 1-1 ENVIRONMENTAL THERMOL INESCENTDOSIMETRY RESULTS Location 10-20 MILES 3G4 4Gl+

6Gl 7Gl+

7G2 SGI.

12Gl +

12G4 First Quarter 0V14/02 to 04/18102 20.2 +/- 1.4 21.4 +/- I.S 21.6 +/- 1.4 17.5 +/- 1.4 19.1 * +/- 1.2 15.6 +/- 1.4 16.0 +/- 0.6

19.4 +/- 0.6 See the comments at the end of this table.

Location Indicator

. Average (6)

Control Average (6)

COMMENTS 19.3 +/- 13.4 18.9 +/- 3.6 SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results (1) are in mRIstd. qtr (2) +/- 2S (3)

Second Quarter 04117102 to 07/18102 IS.7 +/- 1.0 20.7 +/- 1.6 21.0 +/- 0.8 16.9 +/- 0.8

- 17.7 +/- 0.6

15.2 +/- 1.2 15.7 +/- 1.4 19.1 +/- 1.0 19.3 +/- 10.3 18.1 +/- 3.1 Third Quarter 07116/02 to 10/17/02 IS.1. +/- 1.0 19.9 +/- 1.6 20.1 +/- 0.8 17.2 +/- 1.6 *

(5) 14.9 +/- 0.2 16.1 +/- 1.4 19.7 +/- 1.6 19.0 +/- 12.1 IS.0 +/- 3.4 Fourth Quarter 10115/02 to 01131/03 (5) 18.9 +/- 0.5 19.7 +/- 1.0 16.3 +/- 1.0

16.4 +/- 0.7 14.3 +/- 0.9 15.5 +/- 0.7 18.3 +/- 1.5 IS.3 +/- 9.6.

17.1 +/- 2,5 (I) Individual monitor location results are nonnally the average of the elemental doses of six calcium elements from the two TLDs assigned to each monitoring location.

(2) A standard (std.) quarter (qtr.) is considered to be 91.25 days. Results obtained for monitoring periods of other durations are nonnalized by multiplying them by 9 I.25/x, where x is the actual duration in days of the period.

(3) Uncertainties for individual monitoring location results are two standard deviations of the elemental doses of six ciilcium elements from the two TLDs assigned to each monitoring location, representing the variability between the elemental doses of each of the six TLD elements.

(4) TLDs were not in the field at this*monitoring location during this quarter. Refer to Appcndix A of this report for an explanation of program changes totheREMP.

(5) No measurement could be made because the TLDs were lost, stolen, or damaged.

(6) Uncertainties associated with quarterly indicator and control averages are two standard deviations, representing the variability between the results of the individual monitoring locations.

(7) Data were invalidated for this period because of an unacceptably high coefficient of variation among element readings.

.. + ODCM -listed locations.

0 t-j H

~

H1 0

~.

PJ

. (1' f-'.

0

~

0

~

I--'

1-7

TABLEI-i GROSS BETA, TRITIUM, AND GAMMA SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF SURFACE WATER SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in pCiIliter: +/- 2S LOCATION COLLECTION DATE TRITIUM GR-BETA OTHER ACTIVITY COMMENTS 6S6 12/31101 02104/02

<99 3.1 +/-0.6 2S7 12/31/01 02/04/02 188 +/- 63 5.4 +/- 1.0 6S5 01107102 02/04/02

<99 1.5 +/- 0.7 LTAW 01/14/02 246+/-62 2.1 +/- 0.7 6S6 02/04/02 03/04/02

<95 8.1 +/- 1.0 2S7 02/04102 03/04/02

<95 10.2 +/- 0.8 6S5 02111102 03/04/02

<95 2.3 +/- 0.6 LTAW 02111102 159 +/- 64 2.1 +/- 0.6 656 03/04/02 04101102

<96 0.3 +/- 0.6 2S7 03/04/02 04101/02 4468 +/- 100 7.5 +/- 0.8 6S5 03/11/02 04101102

<96 2.2 +/- 0.6 LTAW 03111/02 219 +/- 60 2.9 +/- 0.7 6S6 04/01/02 04/29/02

<93 2.1 +/- 0.6 6S7 04/01102 04/29/02 9955 +/- 134 5.6 +/- 0.8 6S5 04/08/02 04129102 161 +/- 59 3.0 +/- 0.6 LTAW 04/15/02 187 +/- 60 1.0 +/- 0.7 6S6 04/29102 06/03/02

<96 2.2 +/- 0.7 2S7 04/29102 06/03/02 262 +/- 61.2 7.1 +/- 0.8 6S5 05/06/02 06/03/02 105 +/- 59 1.4 +/- 0.8 LTAW 05/13102 190 +/-59 2.1 +/- 0.6 6S6 06/03/02 07/01/02

<97 4.0 +/- 0.9 2S7 06/03/02 07/01102 4241 +/- 98 7.0 +/- 0.8 6S5 06/10/02 07/01102

<97 3.4 +/- 0.6 LTAW 06/10/02 134 +/- 61 3.5 +/- 0.6 Comments:

Refer to Appendix F of this report for additional details regarding exception.SSES Technical Requirements for sampling and analyses

'Tj 0

t-j H

J TABLEI-i H1 0

GROSS BETA, TRITIUM, AND GAMMA SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF SURFACE WATER

~

OJ SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 rt f-'.

Results in pCiIliter +/- 2S 0

J 0

LOCATION COLLECTION DATE TRITIUM GR-BETA OTHER ACTIVITY COMMENTS

J f-'

6S6 12/31101 02/04/02

. <99 3.1 +/-0.6

2S7 12/31/01 02/04/02 188 +/- 63 5.4 +/- 1.0 6S5 01107102 02/04/02

<99 1.5 +/- 0.7 LTAW 01/14/02 246+/-62 2.1 +/- 0.7 6S6 02/04/02 03/04/02

<95 8.1 +/- 1.0 2S7 02/04102 03/04/02

<95 10.2 +/- 0.8 6S5 02111102 03/04/02

<95 2.3 +/- 0.6 LTAW 02111102 159 +/- 64 2.1 +/- 0.6 656 03/04/02 04101102

<96 0.3 +/- 0.6 2S7 03/04/02 04101/02 4468 +/- 100 7.5 +/- 0.8 6S5 03/11/02 04101102

<96 2.2 +/- 0.6 LTAW 03111/02

219 +/- 60 2.9 +/- 0.7 6S6 04/01/02 04/29/02

<93 2.1 +/- 0.6 6S7 04/01102 04/29/02 9955 +/- 134 5.6 +/- 0.8 6S5 04/08/02 04129102 161 +/- 59 3.0 +/- 0.6 LTAW 04/15/02 187 +/- 60 1.0 +/- 0.7 6S6 04/29102 06/03/02

<96 2.2 +/- 0.7 2S7 04/29102 06/03/02 262 +/- 61.2 7.1 +/- 0.8 6S5 05/06/02

06/03/02 105 +/- 59 1.4 +/- 0.8 LTAW 05/13102 190 +/-59 2.1 +/- 0.6 6S6 06/03/02 07/01/02

<97 4.0 +/- 0.9 2S7 06/03/02 07/01102 4241 +/- 98 7.0 +/- 0.8 6S5 06/10/02 07/01102 *

<97 3.4 +/- 0.6 LTAW 06/10/02 134 +/- 61 3.5 +/- 0.6

. Comments:

'Refe.ppendiX F of this report for additional details regarding exceptiO. SSES Technical Requirements for sampling and analyses..

)*8

T.EI-2 GROSS BETA, TRITIUM,'ANDGAMMA SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF SURFACE WATER SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in pCiIliter +/- 2S LOCATION COLLECTION DATE TRITIUM GR-BETA OTHER ACTIVITY COMMENTS 6S6 07/01102 07/29/02

<97 2.2 +/- 0.6 2S7 07/01102 07/29/02 3425 +/- 91 8.2 +/- 0.8 6S5 07/08/02 07/29/02

<97 3.5 +/- 0.7 LTAW 07/15/02 154 +/- 59 5.1 +/- 0.7 6S6 07/29/02 08/26/02 d06 3.4 +/- 0.5 2S7 07/29/02 08/26/02 2156 +/- 88 11.9 +/- 0.5 6S5 08/05/02 08126102 2Q7 +/- 67 8.7 +/- 0.5 LTAW 08112/02 207 +/- 60 4.2 +/-0.7 6S6 08/26/02 09/30/02

.. <97 3.4 +/- 0.9 2S7 08/26/02 09/02/02 2343 +/- 83 11.0+/- 1.4 6S5 09/02/02 09/30/02

<97 3.5 +/- 0.7 LTAW 09/09/02 105 +/- 62 5.1 +/- 0.5 6S6 09/30/02 10/28/02 12 +/-75 2.4 +/-1.3 2S7 09/30/02 10/28/02 925 +/- 24 11.0 +/- 2.4 6S5 10/07/02 10/28/02 13 +/-70 3.1 +/- 1.3 LTAW 10/14/02 61 +/- 89 3.1 +/- 1.8 6S6 10/28/02 12102/02.

-2.6 +/- 90 2.2 +/- 1.2 2S7 10/28/02 12/02/02 1030+/- 245 18.0 +/- 2.8 6S5 11/04/02 12/02/02 9.4 +/- 81 2.0 +/- 1.2 LTAW 11111/02 117 +/- 86 5.7 +/- 1.6 6S6 12/02/02

. 12/30/02 114+/- 82 1.8 +/- 1.3 2S7 12102/02 12/30/02 179 +/- 97 11.0 +/- 2.5 6S5 12109/02 12/30/02 122 +/- 83 3.0+/- 1.4 LtAW 12116/02 90+/-87 4.9 +/-1.6 Comments:

Refer to Appendix F of this report for additional details regarding exceptions to SSES Technical Requirements for sampling and analyses.

Tj 0

I-i T.EI-2 H

~

rn 0

GROSS BETA, TRITIUM,ANDGAMMA SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OFSURFACE WATER

~

SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 OJ rt Results in pCiIliter +/- 2S f-'.

0

)::J 0

LOCATION COLLECTION DATE TRITIUM GR-BETA OTHER ACTIVITY COMMENTS

~

f-'

6S6 07/01102

. 07/29/02

<97 2.2 +/- 0.6 2S7 07/01102 07/29/02 3425 +/- 91 8.2 +/-*0.8 6S5 07/08/02 07/29/02

<97 3.5 +/- 0.7 LTAW 07115102 154 +/- 59 5.1 +/- 0.7 6S6.

07/29/02 08/26/02

<:106 3.4 +/- 0.5 2S7 07/29/02 08126102 2156 +/- 88 11.9 +/- 0.5 6S5 08/05/02 08/26/02 2Q7 +/- 67 8.7 +/- 0.5 LTAW 08112102 207 +/- 60 4.2 +/-0.7 6S6 08/26/02 09130102

<97 3.4 +/- 0.9 2S7.

08/26/02 09/02/02 2343 +/- 83 11.0+/- 1.4 6S5 09/02102 09/30/02.

<97 3.5 +/- 0.7 LTAW 09/09/02 105 +/- 62 5.1 +/- 0.5 6S6 09130102 10128102 12 +/-75 2.4 +/-1.3 2S7 09/30/02 10/28/02.

925 +/- 24 11.0 +/- 2.4 6S5 10/07/02 10/28/02 13.+/- 70 3.1 +/- 1.3

. LTAW 10114/02 61 +/- 89 3.1 +/- 1.8 6S6 10/28/02 12102/02

-2.6 +/- 90 2.2 +/- 1.2 2S7 10/28/02 12/02/02 1030+/- 245 18.0 +/- 2.8

. 6S5 11104/02 12102/02 9.4 +/- 81 2.0 +/- 1.2 LTAW 11111102 117 +/- 86 5.7 +/- 1.6 6S6 12/02/02

. 12/30/02 114 +/- 82 1.8 +/- 1.3 2S7 12102102 12/30/02 179 +/- 97.

11.0 +/- 2.5 6S5 12/09/02 12130102 122 +/- 83 3.0+/- 1.4 LTAW 12116/02 90+/-87 4.9 +/-1.6 Comments:

Refer to Appendix F of this report for additional details regarding exceptions to SSES Technical Requirements for sampling and analyses..

1-9

LOCATION COLLECTION DATE 6S6 12/31101-01114/02 2S7 12/31101-01114/02 6S5 01107/02-01114/02 6S6 01114/02-01/28/02 6S7 01114/02-01128/02 6S5 01/21102-01128/02 LTAW 111412002 6S6 01/28/02-02111102 2S7 01/28102-02111102 6S5 02/04/02-02/11102 LTAW 2/1112002 6S6 02/11/02-02125/02 2S7 02111102-02/25/02 6S5 02/18/02-02125102 6S6 02/25/02-03/11102 2S7 02/25/02-03/11102 6S5 03/04/02-03/11/02 LTAW 3/1112002 6S6 03/11102-03125102 2S7 03111102-03125102 6S5 03/18/02-03125/02 6S6 03/25/02-04108102 6S7 03/25/02~04/08/02 6S5 04/01102-04108102 LTAW 4/15/2002 Comments:

IODINE-13l ANALYSES OF SURFACE WATER SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in pCiIliter +/- 2S COMMENTS

-.01+/-.18

.21 +/-.28

.09 +/-.17

.04 +/-.33

.19 +/-.24

.22 +/-.18

.04+/-.11

.23 +/-.27

.39 +/-.32

.32 +/-.26

-.02 +/-.18

. 24 +/-.28

.02 +/- 0.3

.15 +/-.21

.38 +/-.33

.36 +/-.34

.41 +/-.30

.08 +/-.17

.16 +/-.28

.11 +/-.26

.24 +/-.27

.38 +/-.28

.13 +/-.2j

.41 +/-.33

-.01 +/-.17 F of this report for addttional details regarding SSESTechn\\cal Requirements for sampling and analyses.

1-10 LOCATION COLLECTION DATE 6S6 12/31101-01114/02.

2S7 12/31101-01114/02 6S5 01/07/02-01114/02 6S6 01/14/02-01128/02 6S7 01114/02-01128/02.

6S5 01121102-01128/02 LTAW 111412002 6S6 01128/02-02111102 2S7 01128/02-02111102 6S5 02104/02-02/11102 LTAW

. 2111/2002 6S6 02/11102-02125102 '

2S7 02/11102-02/25/02 6S5 02/18/02-02/25/02 6S6 02/25/02-03/11/02 2S7 02125/02-03111102 6S5 03/04/02-03/11102 LTAW 3/1112002 6S6 03/11102-03/25102 2S7 03111102-03/25102 6S5 03/18/02-03125/02 6S6 03/25/02-04108102 6S7 03125102.04108102 6S5 04/01/02-04/08/02 LTAW 4/15/2002 Comments:

TABLEI-3.

IODlNE-131 ANALYSES OF SURFACE WATER SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in pCiIliter +/- 2S 1-131 COMMENTS

-.01+/-.18

.21 +/-.28

.09 +/-.17

.04+/-.33

.19 +/-.24

.22 +/-.18

.04 +/-.11

.23 +/-.27

.39 +/-.32

.32 +/-.26

-.02 +/-.18

.24+/-.28

.02 +/- 0.3

.15+/-.21

. 38 +/-.33

.36 +/-.34

.41 +/-.30

.08 +/-.17

.16 +/-.28

.11 +/-.26

.24 +/-.27

.38 +/-.28

.13 +/-.23

.41 +/-.33

-.01 +/-.17

'Retel"ppendix F of this report tor additional details regarding exceptio. SSES Technical Requirements tor sampling and analyses.

. 1-10

LOCATION COLLECTION DATE 6S6 04/08/02-04/22/02 2S7 04/08/02-04/22/02 6S5 04/15/02-04/22/02 6S6.

04/22/02-05/06/02.

2S7 04/22/02-05/06/02 6S5 04/29/02-05106/02 LTAW 5/13/2002 6S6 05106/02-05120/02 2S7 05/06/02-05120/02 6S5 05/13/02-05/20/02 6S6 05/20/02-06/03/02

. 2S7 05120102-06103102 6S5 05127/02-06/03/02 6S6 06/03/02-06/17/02 6S7 06/03/02-06/17/02 6S5 06/10/02-06/17/02 LTAW 6/lO/2002 6S6 06/17/02-07/01/02 2S7 06117/02-07/01/02 6S5 06/24/02-07/01/02 6S6 07/01102-07/15102 2S7 07/01102-07/15102 6S5 07/08/02-07/15/02

. LTAW 7/15120021 Comments:

lODINE-131 ANALYSES OF SURFACE WATER SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in pCilliter +/- 2S 1-131 COMMENTS

.01 +/-.21 '

.07 +/-.19

-.06 +/-.13

.19 +/-.29 1.2 +/-.29

.. 16 +/-.25

-.17+/-.23

-.27+/-.42

.28 +/- 0.4 O.O+/-.24

.63 +/-.63

.33 +/-.52

.02 +/-.47

.19 +/- ~25 U +/-.37

.24 +/-.28

.02+/-.23

.06 +/-.28

.38 +/-.31

.32 +/-.31

.76 +/-. ~5

/

1.0 +/-.39

.32 +/-.32 0.1 +/-.25

Refer to Appendix F of this report for additional details regarding exceptions to SSES Technical Requirements for sampling and analyses.

1-11 LOCATION COLLECTION DATE 6S6 04/08/02-04/22/02 2S7 04/08/02-04/22/02 6S5 04/15/02-04122/02 6S6.

04/22/02-05106/02.

2S7 04/22/02-05/06/02 6S5 04129/02-05106102 LTAW 5/1312002 6S6 05/06/02-05120/02 2S7 05/06/02-05120/02 6S5 05/13/02-05/20/02 6S6 05/20/02-06/03/02 2S7 05/20/02-06/03/02 6S5 05/27/02-06/03/02 6S6

. 06/03/02-06117102 6S7 06/03/02-06/17/02 6S5 06/10/02-06/17/02 LTAW

' 6/10/2002 6S6 06/17/02-07/01/02 2S7 06/17/02-07/01102 6S5 06/24/02-07/01/02 6S6 07/01102-07/15/02 2S7 07/01102-07/15/02 6S5 07/08102-07/15/02 LTAW 7/15120021 Comments:

T.EI-3.

IODINE-131 ANALYSES OF SURFACE WATER SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in pCilliter +/- 2S 1-131 COMMENTS

.01 +/-.21 '

.07 1:.19

-.06 +/-.13

.19 +/-.29 1.2+/-.29

.16 +/-.25

-.17+/-.23

-.27+/-.42

.. 28 +/-.0.4 O.O+/-.24

.63 +/-.63

.33 +/-.52

.02+/-.47

.19 +/-.25 U+/-.37

.24 +/-.28

.02+/-.23

.06+/-.28

.38 +/-.31

.32 +/-.31

.76 +/-.35 1.0 +/-.39 '

.32 +/-.32 0.1 +/-.25

Refer to Appendix F of this report for additional details regarding exceptions to SSES Technical Requirements for sampling and analyses.

i I-U

LOCATION 6S6 2S7 6S5 6S6 2S7 6S5 LTAW 6S6 2S7 6S5 6S6 2S7 6S5 LTAW 6S6 2S7 6S5 6S6 2S7 6S5 6S6 2S7 6S5 LTAW Comments:

COLLECTION DATE 07/15/02-07/29/02 07/15/02-07/29/02 07122102-07129102 07/29/02-08/12/02 07/29/02-08112102 08/05/02-08/12/02 8/1212002 08112/02-08/26/02 08/12/02-08126102 08/19/02-08/26/02 08126102-09109102 08/26/02-09/09102 09/02102-09/09/02 91912002 09/09/02-09123/02 09/09/02-09123/02 09116/02-09/23/02 09123/02-10/07/02 09/23/02-10/07/02 09/30/02-10107/02 10/07/02-10121/02 10/07/02-10/21102 10/14/02-10/21102 10/14/2002 ANALYSES OF SURFACE WATE~

SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in pCilliter +/- 2S 1-131 COMMENTS

.37 2.3 +/-.52

.67 +/-.32 1.5 +/- 0.4

.98 +/-.43

.15 +/-.21 1.1 +/-.46 3.2 +/-.74 1.5 +/-.61 0.9+/-.44 2.6 +/- 0.7 2.4 +/-.63 O.O+/-.18 2.3 +/-0.8 4.7 +/- 1.2 3.9 +/- 1.1 0.9 +/-.46 2.6 +/-.66 1.0 +/-.55

.67 +/-.37 1.2 +/-.44

.53 +/-.35

.16+/-.28 Refe, Appendix F of this report for addHional details regarding exceptiO. SSES Technical Requirements for.sampling and analyses.

LOCATION.

6S6 2S7 6S5 6S6 2S7 6S5 LTAW 6S6 2S7 6S5 6S6 2S7 6S5 LTAW 6S6 2S7 6S5 6S6 2S7 6S5 6S6 2S7 6S5 LTAW Comments:

COLLECTION DATE 07/15/02-07/29/02 07/15/02-07/29/02 07122102-07/29/02 07/29/02-08112102 07/29/02-08112/02 08/05/02-08/12/02 8/1212002 08/12/02-08/26/02 08/12/02-08126102 08/19/02-08/26/02 08126102-09109102 08/26/02-09/09102 09/02102-09/09/02 91912002 09/09/02-09/23/02 09/09102-09/23/02 09/16/02-09123/02 09123/02-10/07/02 09/23/02-10/07/02 09/30/02-10/07/02 10/07/02-10/21/02 10/07/02-10/21102 10114/02-10121102 10/14/2002 TABLE 1*3 IODINE*131 ANALYSES OF SURFACE WATE~

SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in pCiIliter +/- 2S 1*131 COMMENTS

-.08 +/-.25

.92+/-.37 2.3 +/-.52

.67 +/-.32 1.5 +/- 0.4

.98 +/-.43

.15 +/-.21 1.1 +/-.46 3.2 +/-.74 1.5 +/-.61 0.9+/-.44 2.6 +/- 0.7 2.4 +/-.63 0.0 +/-.18 2.3 +/-0.8 4.7 +/- 1.2 3.9 +/- 1.1 0.9 +/-.46 2.6 +/-.66 1.0 +/-.55

.67 +/-.37 1.2 +/-.44

.53 +/-.35

.16+/-.28 o Refe. Appendix F of this report for addHionai details regarding exceptio. SSES Technical Requirements for.sampling and analyses.

1*12

LOCATION COLLECTION DATE 6S6 10/21/02-11/04/02 2S7 10/21/02-11104102 6S5 10/28/02-11104/02 LTAW 11111/2002 6S6 11l04/0~- 111 18/02 2S7 11104/02-11/18/02 6S5 11111102-11118/02 6S6 11/18/02-12/02/02 2S7 11118102-12102102 6SS 11/25/02-12/02/02 6S6 12/02/02-12/16/02 2S7 12/02/02-12/16/02 6SS 12/09102-12116/02 LTAW 12/16/2002 6S6 12/16/02-12/30/02 2S7 -

12/16/02-12/30/02 6S5 12123/02-12/30/02 Comments:

IODINE-131 ANALYSES OF SURFACE WATER SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in pCi!Jiter +/- 2S 1-131 COMMENTS

.12 +/-.26

.SI +/-.34

.84 +/- 0.4

.24 +/-.28

.78 +/-.47 1.3 +/-.S2 1.2 +/-.S8

.07 +/-.18 0.8 +/-.42

.29 +/-.31

.45 +/-.32

.82 +/-.38

.43 +/-.38 0.4 +/-.36

.14 +/- 0.2

.36 +/-.25

.09 +/- 0.2 to Appendix F of this report for additional details reg~rding exceptions to SSE's Technical Requirements for s~mpling and analyses.

1-13 1j o t-j H

J H1 o

~

rt f-'-

o

J o

J I-'

LOCATION COLLECTION DATE 6S6 10/21102-11104/02 2S7 10/21/02-11104/02 6S5 10/28/02-11/04/02 LTAW 1111112002 6S6 11104/0~-11I18/02 2S7 11104/02-11118102 6S5 11111102-11/18102 6S6 11118/02-12/02/02 2S7 11/18/02-12102/02 6S5

' 11/25102-12/02/02 6S6 12/02102-12116102 2S7 12/02/02-12/16/02 6S5 12109/02-12/16/02 LTAW

. 12116/2002 6S6 12116/02-12130/02 2S7 12/16/02-12/30/02 6S5 12/23/02-12/30/02 Comments:

T.EI.3 IODINE*131 ANALYSES OF SURFACE WATER SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in pCilliter +/- 2S 1*131 COMMENTS

.12 +/-.26

.51 +/-.34

.84 +/- 0.4

.24 +/-.28

.78 +/-.47 1.3 +/-.52 1.2 +/-.58

.07 +/-.18 0.8 +/-.42

.29 +/-.31

.45 +/-.32

.82 +/-.38

.43 +/-.38 0.4+/-.36

.14 +/- 0.2

.36 +/-.25

.09+/-0.2

Refer to Appendix F of this report for additional details regarding exceptions to SSE'S Technical Requirements for s!impling and analyses.

Ij 0

i"i H

~

H"l 0

.~

OJ rt

.f-'.

0

~

0

~

. f-'

1-13

TABLE 1-4 GROSS ALPHA, GROSS BETA, TRITIUM, IODINE-131 SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF DRINKING WATER SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in pCiIliter +/- 2S LOCATION COLLECTION DATE GR-ALPHA GR-BETA TRITIUM OTHER ACTIVITY COMMENTS 12H2 12131/01 ~ 02/04/02 3.3 +/-0.7

<99 12H2 q2l4/02 - 03104/02 0.5 +/- 0.5 1.8 +/- 0.6

<95 12H2 03/04/02 - 04/01102 0.2+/-0.5

<96 12H2 04/01102 - 04/29/02 1.1+/-0.6 2.6+/-0.9

<93 12H2 04129/02 - 06103/02

-0.5 +/- 0.4 2.2+/-0.6

<96 12H2 06/03/02 - 07/01102 0.8 +/-0.7 3.5 +/-0.9

<97 12H2 07/01102 - 07129/02 0.2+/-0.6 3.9 +/-0.7

<97 12H2 8/512002 0.4 +/- 0.7 4.6 +/-0.9 466 +/- 63 12H2 8/6/02 - 8126/02 0.3 +/-0.6 3.5 +/-0.7

<106 12H2 08/26/02 - 09/30102

.06 +/-0.6 3.9 +/-0.7

<97 12H2 09/30/02 - 10128102

.00 +/- 0.8 2.0 +/- 1.3

-6.9 +/- 78 12H2 10/28/02 - 12/02102

-.32 +/-.78

.95 +/- 1.4 270+/- 90 12H2 12/02/02 - 12/30102

.72 +/- 1.0 2.3 +/- 1.2 34 +/- 79 Comments:

Refer to Appendix F of this report for additional details regarding exceptions to SSES Technical Requirements for sampling and analyses.

TABLE 1*4 GROSS ALPHA, GROSS BETA, TRITIUM, IODINE*131 GAMMA* SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF DRINKING WATER SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002.

Results in pCiIliter +/- 2S LOCATION COLLECTION DATE GR*ALPHA GR*BETA

TRITIUM OTHER ACTIVITY COMMENTS 12H2 12131101

02/04/02

.14 +/-0.5 3.3 +/-0.7

<99 12H2 q2l4/02 - 03104/02

0.5 +/- 0.5 1.8 +/- 0.6

<95 12H2

. 03/04/02 - 04/01102 0.2+/- 0.5

<96 12H2 04/01/02 - 04129102 1.1+/-0.6 2.6+/-0.9

<93 12H2 04/29/02 - 06/03/02

-0.5 +/- 0.4 2.2+/-0.6

<96 12H2 06/03/02 - 07/01/02 0.8 +/-0.7 3.5 +/-0.9

<97 12H2 07/01102 - 07129/02 0.2+/-0.6 3.9 +/-0.7

<97 12H2 8/512002 0.4 +/- 0.7 4.6 +/-0.9 466 +/- 63 12H2 8/6/02 - 8/26/02 0.3 +/-0.6 3.5 +/-0.7

<106 12H2 08/26/02 - 09/30/02

.06 +/-0.6 3.9 +/- 0.7.

<97 12H2 09/30/02 - 10128102

.00 +/- 0.8 2.0 +/- 1.3

-6.9 +/- 78 12H2 10/28/02 - 12/02102

-.32 +/-.78

.95 +/- 1.4.

270+/- 90 12H2 12102/02 - 12/30/02

.72 +/- 1.0 2.3 +/- 1.2

. 34 +/-79 Comments:.

Refer to Appendix F of this report for additional details regarding exceptions to SSES Technical Requirements for sampling and analyses.

e e

1*14 e

LOCATION IND IND IND 2H 2H 2H IND IND IND IND 2H 2H 2H 2H LTAW GROSS BETA AND SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF FISH SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC ST A TlON - 2002 Results in pCi/gm (wet) +/- 2S SAMPLE TYPE COLLECTION DATE K-40 Channel Catfish 04/15/02 - 04/16/02 3.4 +/- 0.1 Smallmouth Bass 04/18/02 - 04/18/02 3.1 +/-.OS Shorthead Redhorse 04/18/02 - 04/18/02 3.2 +/-.OS Smallmouth Bass 04124/02 - 04124/02 3.5 +/-.09 Shorthead Redhorse 04/24/02 - 04124/02 3.1 +/- 0.1 Channel Catfish 04124/02 - 04124/02 3.1+/-.08 Smallmouth Bass 10123/02 ~ 10123/02 4.5 +/-0.4 Channel Catfish 10123/02 - 10123/02 4.3 +/- 0.4 Shorthead Redhorse 10/23/02 - 10123/02 3.0 +/-.45 Shorthead Redhorse 10/23/02 - 10123/02 4.S +/-O.6 Smallmouth Bass 10/10/02 - 10/11102 4.4 +/-.26 Channel Catfish 10/10/02 - 10/11/02 3.7 +/-.06 Shorthead Redhorse 10/10/02 - 10/11102 3.5 +/-A4 Short head Redhorse 10/10/02.; 10/11/02 3.9 +/-.27 Largemouth Bass 10115/02 - 10/15/02

'3.9 +/-.26 COMMENTS T.EI-S GROSS BETA AND GAMMA* SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF FISH SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002.

Results in pCi/gm (wet) +/- 2S LOCATION SAMPLE TYPE COLLECTION DATE K-40 COMMENTS IND

. Channel Catfish 04/15/02 - 04/16/02 3.4 +/- 0.1 IND Smallmouth Bass.

04118/02 - 04118/02 3.1 +/-.os IND Shorthead Redhorse 04/18/02 - 04/18/02

. 3.2 +/-.OS 2H Smallmouth Bass 04124/02 - 04124/02 3.5 +/-.09 2H Shorthead Redhorse 04124/02 - 04124/02 3.1 +/- 0.1 2H Channel Catfish 04124/02 - 04124/02

3.1+/-.OS IND Smallmouth Bass 10123/02 ~ 10123/02 4.5 +/-0.4 IND Channel Catfish 10/23/02 - 10/23102 4.3 +/- 0.4 IND Shorthead Redhorse 10/23/02 - 10/23/02 3.0 +/-.45 IND Shorthead Redhorse 10/23/02 - 10123102 4.S +/-O.6 2H Smallmouth Bass 10/10/02 - 10/11102 4.4 +/-.26 2H Channel Catfish 10/10/02 - 10/11/02 3.7 +/-.06 2H Shorthead Redhorse 10/10/02 - 10/11102

. 3.5 +/-A4 2H Sh.orthead Redhorse 10/10/02 - 10/11/02 3.9 +/-.27 LTAW Largemouth Bass 10/15102 - 10/15/02 T9+/-.26 1-15

r

TABLE 1*6 GAMMA

SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF SHORELINE SEDIMENT

. SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Resuits in pCi/gm(dry) +/- 2S LOCATION COLLECTION DATE K*40 Cs-137 Ra*226 TH*228

. OTHER ACTIViTY 2B 4/1112002 lS.2 +/-.20

.11 +/-.00S 1.S +/-.16 2.7 +/- 1.0 7B 411112002 12.S+/-.lS

.OS +/-.006 1.S +/-.12

<1.0 12F 411112002 10+/- O.IS

.05 +/-.007 1.6 +/-.13 2.2+/-0.9

LTAW 4/1112002 IS +/-.16

<.01 1.6 +/-.13

<.OOOOS 2B 10/22/2002 19 +/- 1.0

.13 +/-.04 3.3+/-0.9 1.S +/-.16 7B 10/2212002 16 +/- O.S

.75 +/-.05 3.4+/-0.S 1.3 +/-.IS 12F 10/22/2002 14 +/- 0.9

.09 +/-.04.

2.4+/-0.S 1.4 +/-.16 LTAW 10122/2002 16 +/-0.6

.. 007 +/-.01 2.3+/-0.5 1.3 +/-.S6 e

e.

r.

1-16

LOCATION 12F3 2S2 4S4 Treated 12F3 2S2 4S4 Treated

. 12F3 2S2 4S4 Treated 12F3 2S2 4S4 Treated 12F3 2S2 4S4 Treated 12F3 2S2 4S4 Treated 12F3 2S2 4S4 Treated 12F3 2S2 4S4Treated T.EI-7 TRITIUM AND GAMMA. SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF GROUND WATER SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in pCi/liter +/- 2S COLLECTION DATE TRITIUM OTHER ACTIVITY 111412002 123 +/- 60 K-40: 69 +/- 39 111412002 l23 +/- 60 K-40: 68 +/- 27 1114/2002 154 +/- 60 211112002

<102 211112002

<102 3/1112002 110 +/-59 3/1112002

<94 3/1112002 137 +/- 59 411512002

<95 4/15/2002

<95 411512002 160 +/- 60 5/1312002

<93 5/1312002 109 +/- 58 511312002 136 +/- 58 6/1012002

<97 6/1012002

<97 711512002 103 +/-59 7/15/2002 232 +/- 60 7/1512002 282 +/- 61 8/1212002 207 +/-60 8/1212002 155 +/- 60 8/1212002 129 +/- 59

. 1-17 e

LOCATION 12F3 2S2 4S4 Treated 12F3 2S2 4S4 Treated

. 12F3 2S2 4S4 Treated 12F3 2S2 4S4 Treated 12F3 2S2 4S4 Treated 12F3 2S2 4S4 Treated 12F3 2S2 4S4 Treated 12F3 2S2 4S4Treated T.EI-7 TRITIUM AND GAMMA. SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF GROUND WATER SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in pCilliter +/- 2S COLLECTION DATE TRITIUM OTHER ACTIVITY 111412002 123 +/- 60 K-40: 69 +/- 39.

1114/2002 123 +/- 60 K-40: 68 +/- 27 111412002

154 +/- 60 211112002

<102 211112002

<102 3/1112002 110 +/-59 3/1112002

<94 3/1112002 137 +/- 59 411512002

<95

.4/15/2002

<95 4/1512002 160 +/- 60

5/1312002

<93 5/13/2002 109 +/- 58

. 511312002 136 +/- 58 6/1012002

<97 6/1012002

<97 7/1512002 103 +/-59 7/15/2002 232 +/-60 7/1512002 282 +/- 61 8/12/2002 207 +/-60 8/1212002*.

155 +/- 60

'- 8/1212002 129 +/- 59 e.

. 1-17 "J o r:

. H

~

H1 o

~

rt f-'-o

~

o

~

I-'

LOCATION 12F3 2S2 4S4 Treated 12F3 2S2 4S4 Treated 12F3 2S2 4S4 Treated 12F3 2S2 4S4 Treated TABLE 1-7 TRITIUM AND GAMMA

SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF GROUND WATER SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in pCiIliter +/- 2S COLLECTION DATE TRITIUM OTHER ACTIVITY 9/912002

<101 9/912002

<100 9/9/2002

<101 10114/2002

-42.7 +/- 84 10/14/2002

-53 +/- 85 10/14/2002 59+/-86 1111112002 52+/-82 1111112002

-63 +/- 85 11111/2002 83 +/-77 12116/2002 40+/-83 12116/2002

-43 +/- 81 12116/2002 82+/-84 1-18

LOCATION 12F3 2S2 484 Treated 12F3 282 484 Treated 12F3 282 4S4 Treated 12F3 2S2 4S4 Treated

. TABLE 1-7 TRITIUM AND GAMMA'" SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF GROUND WATER SUSQuEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in pCiIliter +/- 2S.

COLLECTION DATE TRITIUM OTHER ACTIVITY 9/912002

<101 9/9/2002

<100 91912002

<101 10/14/2002

-42.7 +/- 84 10/14/2002

-53 +/- 85 10/14/2002 59+/-86 1111112002 52+/-82

1111112002

-63 +/- 85 1111112002 83 +/-77 12116/2002 40+/-83 12/16/2002

-43 +/- 81 1211612002 82+/-84 1-18

GROSS BETA ANALYSES AIR PARTICULATE FILTERs SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in E-03 pCilCu. M. +/- 2S COLLECTION MONTH DATE 6Gl 8Gl 3S2 12El 12S1 13S6 COMMENTS i

JAN 12/26/01 - 01102/02 14 +/- 0.5 16 +/- 0.5 19 +/- 0.5 17 +/-.05 19 +/-0.5 19 +/- 1.0 01102/02 - 01109/02 15 +/- 0.5 16 +/- 0.5 20 +/- 0.5 18 +/- 0.5 20 +/-0.5 18 +/- 1.0 01/09/02 - 01116/02 13 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 12 +/- 0.5 15 +/- 0.5 15 +/- 0.5 01116/02 - 01123/02 14 +/- 0.5 16 +/- 0.5 19 +/- 0.5 18 +/- 0.5 19 +/- 0.5 17 +/- 0.5 01123/02 - 01130/02 14 +/- 1.0 15 +/- 0.5 24 +/- 0.5 23 +/- 1.0 19 +/- 0.5 17 +/- 1.0 FEB 01130/02 - 02/06/02 14 +/- 0.5 15 +/- 0.5 21 +/- 0.5 20 +/- 0.5 10 +/- 0.5 7 +/- 0.5 02/06/02 - 02/13/02 16 +/- 1.0 17 +/- 0.5 22 +/- 0.5 21 +/- 0.5 22 +/- 0.5 18 +/- 1.0 02/13/02 - 02/20/02 10 +/- 0.5 12 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 1.0 14 +/- 0.5 11 +/- 0.5 02120/02 - 02/27/02 13 +/- 0.5 13 +/- 0.5 17 +/- 0.5 16 +/- 0.5 15 +/- 0.5 13 +/- 0.5 02/27/02 - 03/06/02 15+/- 1.0 16 +/- 0.5 23 +/- 1.0 22 +/- 0.5 18 +/- 0.5 16 +/- 0.5 MAR 03/06/02 - 03/13/02 20 +/- 1.0 20 +/- 0.5 28 +/- 1.0 24 +/- 0.5 24 i: 1.0 22 +/- 1.0 03/13/02 - 03120102 6 +/- 0.5 9 +/- 0.5 13 +/- 0.5 11 +/- 0.5 12 +/- 0.5 9 +/- 0.5 03120/02- 03/27/02 to +/- 0.5 12 +/- 0.5 16 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 16 +/- 0.5 12 +/- 0.5 03/27/02- 04103/02 12,+/- 0.5 15 +/- 0.5 18 +/- 0.5 15 +/-0.5 15+/- 0.5 12 +/- 0.5 APR 04/03/02 - 04/10/02 to +/- 0.5 12 +/- 0.5 15 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 13 +/- 0.5 11 +/- 0.5 04/10/02 - 04/17/02 to +/- 0.5 13 +/- 0.5 22 +/- 1.0 21 +/- 1.0 14 +/- 0.5 11 +/- 0.5 04/17/02 - 04/24/02 12 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 16 +/- 0.5 16 +/- 0.5 16 +/- 0.5 12 +/- 0.5 04/24102 - 05101/02 to +/- 0.5 to +/- 0.5 15 +/- 0.5

+/- 0.5 12+/- 0.5 10 +/- 0.5 MAY 05/01102 - 05/08/02 6 +/- 0.5 12 +/- 0.5 12 +/- 0.5 12 +/- 0.5 12 +/- 0.5 5 +/- 0.5 05/08/02 - 05/15/02 9 +/- 0.5 11 +/- 0.5 11 +/- 0.5 29 +/- 0.5 11+/- 0.5 11 +/- 0.5 05/15/02 - OS/22/02 10 +/- 0.5 4 +/- 0.5 10 +/- 0.5 10 +/- 0.5 10 +/- 0.5 3 +/-0.5 05/22/02 - 05/29/02 13 +/- 0.5 13 +/- 0.5 13 +/- 0.5 0.5 13 +/- 0.5 13 +/- 0.5 JUN 05/29/02 - 06/05/02 S +/- 0.5 13 +/- 0.5 13 +/- 0.5 13 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 7.0 +/- 0.5 06/05102 - 06/12/02 11 +/- 0.5 17 +/- 0.5 15 +/- 0.5 10 +/- 0.5 15 +/- 0.5 15 +/- 0.5 06/12/02 - 06119102 0.5 +/- 0.5 6 +/- 0.5 7 +/- 0.5 7 +/- 0.5 S+/- 0.5 1.0 +/- 0.5 06/19/02 - 06126102 24 +/- 0.5 23 +/- 0.5 23 +/- 0.5 26 +/- 0.7 23 +/- 0.5 24 +/- 0.5 06126/02 - 07/03/02 IS+/- 0.5 18 +/- 0.5 11.3 +/- 0.5 20 +/-0.5 i3 +/- 1.0 IS +/- 0.5 Comments:

Refer to Appendix F of this report for additional details regarding exceptions to SSES Technical Requirements for s~mpling and analyses..

1-19

'Tj

0 t-j T

1-8 H

s GROSS BETA ANALYSES AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS H1 0

SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002

~

Results in E-03 pCilCu. M. +/- 2S OJ rt f-'.

COLLECTION 0

s MONTH DATE 6Gl 8Gl 3S2 12El l2S1.

13S6 COMMENTS*

0 i

s f-'

JAN 12126/01 - 01/02/02 14 +/- 0.5 16 +/- 0.5 19 +/- 0.5 17 +/-.05 19 +/-0.5 19 +/- 1.0 01102/02 - 01109/02 15 +/- 0.5 16 +/- 0.5 20 +/- 0.5 18 +/- 0.5 20 +/-0.5 18 +/- 1.0.

01/09/02 - 01116/02 13 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 12 +/- 0.5 15 +/- 0.5 15 +/- 0.5 01116/02 - 01123/02 14 +/- 0.5 16 +/- 0.5 19 +/- 0.5 18 +/- 0.5 19 +/- 0.5 17 +/- 0.5 01123/02 - 01130/02 14 +/- 1.0 15 +/- 0.5 24 +/- 0.5 23 +/- 1.0 19 +/- 0.5 17 +/- 1.0 FEB 01130/02 - 02/06/02 14 +/- 0.5 15 +/- 0.5 21 +/- 0.5 20 +/- 0.5

10 +/- 0.5 7 +/- 0.5 02/06/02 - 02/13/02 16 +/- 1.0 17 +/- 0.5 22 +/- 0.5 21 +/- 0.5 22 +/- 0.5 18 +/- 1.0 02/13/02 - 02/20/02 10 +/- 0.5 12 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 1.0 14 +/- 0.5.

11 +/- 0.5 02120102 - 02127/02

. 13 +/- 0.5 13 +/- 0.5 17 +/- 0.5 16 +/- 0.5 15 +/- 0.5 13 +/- 0.5 02/27/02 - 03/06102 15+/- 1.0 16 +/- 0.5 23 +/- 1.0 22 +/- 0.5.

18 +/- 0.5 16 +/- 0.5 MAR 03/06/02 - 03/13/02 20 +/-. 1.0

20 +/- 0.5 28 +/- 1.0 24 +/- 0.5.

24 +/- 1.0 22 +/- 1.0 03/13/02 - 03/20/02 6 +/- 0.5 9 +/- 0.5 13 +/- 0.5 11 +/- 0.5 12 +/- 0.5 9 +/- 0.5 03120102 - 03/27/02 10 +/- 0.5 12 +/- 0.5 16 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 16 +/- 0.5 12 +/- 0.5 03127102- 04103/02 12,+/- 0.5 15 +/- 0.5 18 +/- 0.5 15 +/-0.5 15+/- 0.5 12 +/- 0.5 APR 04/03/02 - 04/10/02 10 +/- 0.5 12 +/- 0.5 15 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 13 +/- 0.5 11 +/- 0.5 04/10/02 - 04/17/02 10 +/- 0.5 13 +/- 0.5 22 +/- 1.0 21 +/- 1.0 14 +/- 0.5 11 +/- 0.5 04/17/02 - 04/24/02 12 +/- 0.5

. 14 +/- 0.5 16 +/- 0.5 16 +/- 0.5 16 +/- 0.5 12 +/- 0.5 04124/02 - 05/01102 10 +/- 0.5 10 +/- 0.5 15 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 12+/- 0.5 10 +/- 0.5 MAY 05/01/02 - 05108/02 6 +/- 0.5 12 +/- 0.5 12 +/- 0.5 12 +/- 0.5 12 +/- 0.5 5 +/- 0.5 05/08/02 - 05/15/02 9 +/- 0.5 11 +/- 0.5 11 +/- 0.5 29 +/- 0.5 1l+/- 0.5 11 +/- 0.5 05/15/02 - 05/22/02 10 +/- 0.5 4 +/- 0.5 10 +/- 0.5 10 +/- 0.5 10 +/- 0.5.

3 +/-.0.5 05122102 - 05129/02 13 +/- 0.5

13 +/- 0.5 13 +/- 0.5

-8 +/- 0.5 13 +/- 0.5 13 +/- 0.5 -

JUN 05/29/02 - 06/05102 8 +/- 0.5 13 +/- ().5 13 +/- 0.5 13 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 7.0 +/- 0.5 06/05/02 - 06/12/02 11 +/- 0.5 17 +/- 0.5 15 +/- 0.5 10 +/- 0.5.

15 +/- 0.5 15 +/- 0.5 06/12/02 - 06119102 0.5 +/- 0.5 6 +/- 0.5 7 +/- 0.5 7 +/- 0.5 8+/- 0.5 1.0 +/- 0.5 06119/02 - 06/26/02 24 +/- 0.5 23 +/- 0.5 23 +/- 0.5 26 +/- 0.7 23 +/- 0.5 24 +/- 0.5

_ 06/26/02 - 07/03/02 18+/- 0.5 18 +/- 0.5 11.3 +/- 0.5 20 +/-0.5 i3 +/- 1.0 18 +/- 0.5.

Comments:

Refer to Appendix F of this report for additional details regarding exceptions to SSES Technical Requirements for sflmpling and analyses. -

1-19

'Tj 0

t-j H

TABLEI-S

~

rn GROSS BETA ANALYSES OF AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS 0

~

SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 PJ It Results in E-03 pCi/Cu. M. +/- 2S 1-'-

0 COLLECTION

~

0 MONTH DATE 6Gl 8Gl 3S2 12El 12S1 13S6 COMMENTS

~

f-'

JUL 07/03/02 - 07/10102 20 +/- 0.5 9 +/- 0.5 16 +/- 0.5 15 +/- 0.5 17 +/- 0.5 20 +/- 0.5 07110/02 - 07/17/02 12 +/- 0.5 12 +/- OS 9 +/- 0.5 13 +/- 0.5 6 +/- 0.5 24 +/- 0.5 07/17/02 - 07/24/02 27 +/- 0.5 18 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 24 +/- 0.5 25 +/- 0.5 27 +/- 0.5 07124/02 - 07/31102 13 +/- 0.5 12 +/- 0.5 7 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 7 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 AUG 07/31/02 - 08/07/02 14 +/- 0.5 18 +/- 0.5 21 +/- 0.5 19 +/- 0.5 22 +/- 0.5 15 +/- 0.5 08/07/02 - 08/14/02 17 +/- 0.5 20 +/- 0.5 30 +/- 0.5 30 +/- 0.5 21 +/- 0.5 15 +/- 0.5 08114102 - 08/21/02 13 +/- 0.5 18 +/- 0.5 26 +/- 0.5 24 +/- 0.5 21 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 08/21102 - 08/28/02 13 +/- 0.5 16 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 10 +/- 0.5 13 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 SEP 08/28/02 - 09/04/02 5 +/- 0.5 9 +/- 0.5 9 +/- 0.5 8 +/- 0.5 10 +/- 0.5 4 +/- 0.5 09/04/02 - 09/11102 16 +/- 0.5 18 +/- 0.5 20 +/- 0.5 18 +/- 0.5 20 +/- 0.5 16 +/- 0.5 09/11/02 - 09/18/02 7 +/- 0.5 12 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 14+/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 8 +/- 0.5 09118/02 - 09/25/02 13 +/- 0.5 18 +/- 0.5 20 +/- 0.5 18 +/- 0.5 21 +/- 1.0 14 +/- 0.5 09/25/02 - 10/02/02 12 +/- 0.6 20 +/- 0.5 21 +/- 0.5 20 +/- 0.5 21 +/- 0.5 15 +/- 0.5 OCT 10/02/02 - 10/09/02 15 +/- 1.7 15 +/- 1.7 16 +/- 1.7 18 +/- 1.8 17 +/- 1.7 17 +/- 1.8 10/09/02 - 10/16102 6 +/- 1.0 6 +/- 1.0 8 +/- 1.5 6 +/- 1.0 11 +/- 1.6 8 +/- 1.0 10/16/02 - 10/23/02 14 +/- 1.6 14 +/- 1.6 14 +/- 2.0 15 +/- 1.7 15 +/- 1.7 14 +/- 1.6 10/23/02 - 10/30/02 8 +/- 2.0 12 +/- 2.0 14 +/- 2.0 11 +/- 2.0 13 +/-2.0 11 +/- 2.0 NOV 10/30/02 - 11106/02 19 +/- 2.5 19 +/- 2.5 20 +/- 2.6 22 +/- 2.6 21 +/- 2.7 20 +/- 2.6 11/06/02 - 11113/02 19 +/- 2.6 21 +/- 2.7 22 +/- 2.8 21 +/- 2.8 24 +/- 3.0 23 +/- 2.8 11/13102 - 11/20/02 13 +/- 2.0 14 +/- 2.0 13 +/- 2.3 12 +/- 2.2 13 +/- 2.3 14 +/- 2.2 11120/02 - 11126/02 16 +/- 2.4 24 +/- 2.9 19 +/- 2.8 20 +/- 2.6 20 +/- 2.8 20 +/- 2.7 DEC 11126/02 - 12104/02 12 +/- 1.9 4 +/- 2.0 12 +/- 2.0 13 +/- 2.0 14 +/- 2.0 15 +/- 2.0 12/04/02 - 12111102 15 +/- 2.0 14 +/- 2.0 19 +/-2.6 19 +/- 2.5 20 +/- 2.6 18 +/- 2.4 12/11102 - i2/18/02 15 +/- 2.5 15 +/- 2.5 14+/- 2.3 14 +/- 2.1 14 +/- 2.3 13 +/- 2.1 12/18/02 - 12/26/02 11 +/- 1.8 11 +/- 1.8

+/- 2.2 13 +/- 2.0 13 +/- 2.1 13 +/- 2.2 12/26/02 - 01i02/02 18 +/- 2.8 19 +/- 2.8 20 +/- 2.9 24 +/- 2.8 22 +/- 2.8 23 +/- 3.0 Comments:

. *BefewppendiX F of this report for additional details regarding exceptiO. SSES Technical Requirements for sampling and analyses.

1-20

'"Ij 0

1-1 H

TABLE 1*8 *

~

1'+1 GROSS BETA ANALYSES OF AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS 0

~

SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 rt Results in E-03 pCilCu. M. +/- 2S 1-"

0 COLLECTION

~

0 MONTH DATE 6Gl 8Gl 3S2 12El 12S1 13S6 COMMENTS

~

f-'

JUL 07/03/02 - 07/10102 20 +/- 0.5 9 +/- 0.5 16 +/- 0.5 15 +/- 0.5 17 +/- 0.5 20 +/- 0.5 07/10/02 - 07/17/02 12 +/- 0.5 12 +/- OS 9 +/- 0.5 13 +/- 0.5 6 +/- 0.5 24 +/- 0.5 07117102 -07124/02 27 +/- 0.5 18 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 24 +/- 0.5 25 +/- 0.5 27 +/- 0.5 07124/02 - 07/31102 13 +/- 0.5 12 +/- 0.5 7 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 7 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 AUG 07/31102 - 08/07/02 14 +/- 0.5 18 +/- 0.5 21 +/- 0.5 19 +/- 0.5 22 +/- 0.5 15 +/- 0.5 08/07/02 - 08/14/02 17 +/- 0.5 20 +/- OS 30 +/- 0.5 30 +/- 0.5 21 +/- 0.5 15 +/- 0.5 08114102 - 08/21102 13 +/- 0.5 18 +/- 0.5 26 +/- 0.5 24 +/- 0.5 21 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 08/21102 - 08/28/02 13 +/- 0.5 16 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 10 +/- 0.5 13 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 SEP 08/28/02 - 09/04/02 5 +/- 0.5 9 +/- 0.5 9 +/- 0.5 8 +/- 0.5 10 +/- 0.5 4 +/- 0.5 09/04/02 - 09/11/02 16 +/- 0.5 18 +/- 0.5 20 +/- 0.5 18 +/- 0.5 20 +/- 0.5 16 +/- 0.5 09/11102 - 09/18/02 7 +/- 0.5 12 +/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 14+/- 0.5 14 +/- 0.5 8 +/- 0.5 09/18102 - 09/25/02 13 +/- 0.5 18 +/- 0.5 20 +/- 0.5 18 +/- 0.5 21 +/- 1.0 14 +/- 0.5 09/25/02 - 10/02/02 12 +/- 0.6 20 +/- 0.5 21 +/- 0.5 20 +/- 0.5 21 +/- 0.5 15 +/- 0.5 OCT 10/02/02 - 10/09/02 15 +/- 1.7 15 +/- 1.7 16 +/- 1.7 18 +/- 1.8 17 +/- 1.7

. 17 +/- 1.8 10/09/02 - 10/16/02 6 +/- 1.0 6 +/- 1.0 8+/- 1.5 6 +/- 1.0 11 +/- 1.6 8 +/- 1.0 10/16/02 - 10/23/02 14 +/- 1.6 14 +/- 1.6 14 +/- 2.0 15 +/- 1.7 15 +/- 1.7 14 +/- 1.6 10123/02 - 10/30/02 8 +/- 2.0 12 +/- 2.0 14 +/- 2.0 11 +/- 2.0 13 +/- 2.0.

11 +/- 2.0 NOV 10/30102 - 11106/02 19 +/- 2.5 19 +/- 2.5 20 +/- 2.6 22 +/- 2.6 21 +/- 2.7.

20 +/- 2.6 11/06/02 - 11113/02 19 +/- 2.6 21 +/- 2.7 22 +/- 2.8 21 +/- 2.8 24 +/- 3.0 23 +/- 2.8 11/13/02 - 11/20/02 13 +/- 2.0 14 +/- 2.0 13 +/- 2.3 12 +/- 2.2 13 +/- 2.3 14 +/- 2.2 11120/02 - 11126/02

. 16 +/- 2.4 24 +/- 2.9 19 +/- 2.8 20 +/- 2.6 20 +/- 2.8 20 +/- 2.7 DEC 11126/02 - 12104/02 12 +/- 1.9 4 +/- 2.0 12 +/- 2.0 13 +/- 2.0 14 +/- 2.0 15 +/-2.0 12/04/02 - 12/11/02 15 +/- 2.0 14 +/- 2.0 19 +/-2.6 19 +/- 2.5 20 +/- 2.6 18 +/- 2.4 12/11102 - 12/18/02 15 +/- 2.5 15 +/- 2.5 14+/- 2.3 14 +/- 2.1 14 +/- 2.3 13 +/- 2.1 12/18/02 - 12/26/02 11 +/- 1.8 11 +/- 1.8

.12 +/- 2.2 13 +/- 2.0 13 +/- 2.1 13 +/- 2.2 12126102 - 0002/02 18 +/- 2.8 19 +/- 2.8 20 +/- 2.9 24 +/- 2.8 22 +/- 2.8 23 +/- 3.0 Comments:.

. *RefewppendiX F of this report for additional de,ails regarding excePtiO. SSEST echnical Requirements for sampling and analyses.

1*20

LOCATION 6Gl 8Gl 3S2 12El 12S1 13S6 6Gl 8GI 3S2 12El 12S1 13S6 6Gl 8Gl 3S2 12El 12S1 13S6 6GI 8GI 3S2 12EI 12S1 13S6 T.EI-9 SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF COMPOSITED AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in E-03 pCi/Cu, M. +/- 2S COLLECTION DATE Be-7 K-40 OTHER ACTIVITY 01/03/02 - 3128102

~O +/-.3.0 o 1I03/02 - 3/28/02 91 +/- 3:0 01/03/02 - 3128102 102 +/- 3.0 01103/02 - 3/28/02 87 +/- 2.8 0 1I03/02 - 3/28/02 101 +/- 3.0 01103/02 - 3/28/02 92+/- 3.0 3/30/02 - 7/03/02 108 +/- 3.6 3/30/02 - 7/03/02 92 +/- 3.6 3/30/02 -7/03/02 102 +/- 3.7 3/30102 - 7/03/02 121 +/- 4.6 3/30/02 - 7/03/02 97+/- 3.7 3/30/02 - 7/03/02 110 +/- 4.7 7/03/02 - 10/02/02 104 +/- 3.2 7/03/02 - 10/02102 123 +/- 3.8 7/03/02 - 10/02102 123 +/- 3.5 7/03/02 - 10/02/02 109 +/- 3.7 7/03102 - 10/02/02 90+/- 3.7 7/03/02 - 10/02/02 99 +/- 3.6 10/02/02 ~ 1102103 '

76 +/- 4.6 10/02/02 - 1102103 76 +/- 6.2 10/02/02 - 1102103 72 +/- 3.6 10/02/02 - 1/02103 70+/- 4.7 10/02102 - 1102/03 94 +/- 3.1 Mn-54 0.33 +/- 0.1 10/02/02 - 1102103 728 +/-40 1-21 j

LOCATION 6G1 8GI 3S2 12El

12S1 13S6.

6Gl 8GI.

3S2 12EI 12S1 13S6

. 6Gl

801 3S2 12El 12S1 13S6 601 801

3S2 12EI 12S1

. 13S6 T.EI-9

GAMMA

SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF COMPOSITED AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in E-03 pCi/Cu, M. +/- 2S COLLECTION DATE Be-7 K-40 OTHER ACTIVITY 01/03/02 - 3/28/02 80 +/-.3.0 01/03/02 - 3/28/02 91 +/- 3:0 01/03/02 - 3/28/02 102 +/- 3.0 01/03/02 - 3/28/02.

87 +/- 2.8

.' 01/03/02 - 3128102 101 +/- 3.0 01103/02 - 3/28/02 92 +/- 3.0.

3/30/02 - 7/03/02 108 +/- 3.6 3/30/02 - 7/03/02 92 +/- 3.6 3/30/02 -7/03/02 102 +/- 3.7 3/30102 - 7/03/02 121 +/- 4.6 3/30/02 - 7/03/02

. 97+/- 3.7 3/30/02 - 7/03102 11O:i: 4.7 7/03/02 - 10/02/02 104 +/- 3.2 7/03/02 - 10/02/02 123 +/- 3.8 7/03/02 - to/02l02 123 +/- 3.5 7/03/02 - 10/02/02 109 +/- 3.7 7/03/02 - 10/02/02 90+/- 3.7 7/03/02 - 10/02/02 99 +/- 3.6 10/02/02 ':'1/02/03 76 +/- 4.6 10/02102 - 1102103 76 +/- 6.2 10/02/02 - 1102103 72 +/- 3.6 10/02/02 - 1/02/03 70 +/- 4.7 10/02102 - 1102/03 94 +/- 3.1 Mn-54 0.33 +/- 0.1 10/02/02' - 1102103 728 +/-40

. 1-21

LOCATION 10Gl lODl IOD2 IOD3 lOG I lODl 10D2 10D3 lOG 1 lODI lOD2 lOD3 lOG 1 lODI 10D2 10D3 lOG 1 lODI lOD2 lOD3 12B2 10Gl lODI lOD2 lOD3 12B2 AND SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF MILK SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in pCiIliter +/- 2S COLLECTION DATE K-40 OTHER ACTIVITY 01108/02 l4oo+/- 110 01/08/02 14oo+/- 110 01108/02 1290 +/- 110 01108/02 1420+/- 100 02/05/02 14oo+/- 110 02/05/02 1470 +/- 130 02/05102 1330 +/- 140 02/05/02 1460 +/- 150 03/04/02 1290 +/- 140 03/04/02 1410 +/- 100 03/04/02 14oo+/- 100 03/04/02 1240 +/- 120 04/08/02 1330 +/- 110 04/08/02 1200+/- 130 04/08/02 1340 +/- 150 04/08/02 1310+/- 120 04/22102 1370 +/- 110 04/22/02 1520 +/- 160 04/22102 1320 +/- 150 04/22/02 1400 +/- 110 04/22102 1420+/- 110 05/06/02 1300+/- 110 05/06/02 1300 +/- 130 05/06/02 1360 +/- 150 05/06/02 1480 +/- 160 05/06/02 1420+/- 110 COMMENTS 1-22 LOCATION 10G1 lOD1 lOD2 1003 lOG 1 lOD1 1002 1003 lOG 1 1001 1002 lOD3 lOG 1 lODI 1002 1003 lOG 1 1001 1002 1003.

12B2 10Gl 1001 IOD2 1003 12B2 TABLE 1-10 IODINE-131, AND GAMMA* SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF MILK SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in pCiIliter +/- 2S COLLECTION DATE K-40 OTHER ACTIVITY 01108/02 1400+/- 110 01/08/02 14oo+/- 110

01108/02 1290 +/- 110 01108/02 1420+/- 100 02/05102 1400 +/- 110 02/05102 1470 +/- 130 02/05102 1330 +/- 140 02/05102 1460 +/- 150 03/04102 1290 +/- 140 03/04/02 1410 +/- 100 03/04/02 1400+/- 100 03/04/02 1240 +/- 120 04/08/02 1330 +/- 110 04/08/02 12oo+/- 130 04/08/02 1340 +/- 150 04/08/02 131O+/- 120 04/22102 1370 +/- 110 04/22/02 1520 +/- 160 04122102 1320 +/- 150 04/22102 1400+/- 110 04/22/02 1420 +/- 110 05106/02 13oo+/- 110 05106/02 1300+/- 130 05106/02 1360 +/- 150

05106/02 1480 +/- 160.

05106/02 1420+/- 110 COMMENTS 1-22 "J

. 0 1-1 H

~

H1.

0

~

rt f-'.

o

~

o

~

f-'

LOCATION lOG 1 1001 1002 1003 12B2 lOG 1 1001 1002 1003 12B2 lOG 1 1001 1002 1003 12B2 10GI 1001 1002 12B2 lOG!

1001 1002 12B2 IODINE-131, AND SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF MILK SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in pCi/liter +/- 2S COLLECTION DATE K-40 OTHER ACTIVITY 05/20/02 1260 +/- 110 05120102 1370 +/- 130 05/20/02 1330 +/- 150 05120102 1350 +/- 150 05/20/02 1320 +/- 110 06/05102 1350 +/- 150 06/05/02 1420 +/- 91 06/05/02 1560 +/- 110 06/05/02 1340 +/- 130 06/05/02 1360 +/- 110 06/20/02 1300 +/-11O 06120/02 1600 +/- 160 06/20/02 1480 +/- 150 06/20/02 1360+/- 150 06/20/02 1510+/- 110 07/07/02 l380+/- 110 07/07/02 1330 +/- 150 07/07/02 1320 +/- 150 07/07/02 1340+/- 110 07/22/02 1190 +/- 140 07/22/02 1420 +/- 150 07/22/02 1340 +/- 150 07/22/02 1350 +/- 110 COMMENTS

\\.

1-23 LOCATION lOG}

lODl lOD2 lOD3 12B2 lOG 1 lODI lOD2 10D3 12B2

lOG I lODI lOD2 lOD3 12B2 10GI 10DI lOD2 12B2 lOGl lODI lOD2 12B2 Tal-lO IODINE-l3l, AND GAMMA* SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF MILK SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in pCiIliter +/- 2S COLLECTION DATE K-40 OTHER ACTIVITY 05/20/02 1260 +/- 1I0

. 05120102 1370 +/- 130 05/20/02 1330 +/- 150 05/20/02 1350 +/- 150 05/20/02 1320+/- 110 06/05102 1350 +/- 150 06/05/02.

1420 +/- 91 06/05/02 1560 +/- 110 06/05/02 1340 +/- 130 06/05/02 1360 +/- 110 06120102.

1300 +/- 110 06120102 1600+/- 160 06/20/02 1480 +/- 150 06/20/02 1360+/- 150 06/20/02 151O+/-11O 07/07/02 1380 +/- 110 07/07/02 1330 +/- 150 07/07/02 1320 +/- 150 07/07/02 1340 +/- 110 07/22/02 1190 +/- 140 07/22/02 1420 +/- 150 07/22/02 1340 +/- 150 07/22/02 1350+/- 1I0 COMMENTS 1-23

TABLE IODINE-131, AND GAMMA

SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF MILK SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in pCilliter +/- 2S LOCATION COLLECTION DATE OTHER ACTIVITY 10GI 08/05/02 1360 +/- 110 1001 08/05/02 1510 +/- 130 1002 08/05/02 1370 +/- 150 12B2 08/05/02 1370+/- 150 lOG 1 08/19/02 1208 +/- 96 1001 08119102 1390+/- 110 1002 08/19/02 1500 +/- 110 12B2 08/19/02 1470 +/- 110 lOG1 09/04/02 1360 +/- 120 1001 09104/02 1410 +/- 160 1002 09/04102 1470 +/- 170 12B2 09/04/02 1380 +/- 120 lOG 1 09/19/02 1410 +/- 110 1001 09/19/02 1390 +/- 110 1002 09/19102 1400 +/- 110 12B2 09119102 1390 +/- 130 lOG 1 10/06/02 1325 +/- 90 1001 10/06102 1520 +/- 160 1002 10/06/02 1391 +/- 84 12B2 10/06/02 1449 +/- 84 COMMENTS 1-24

TABLE 1-10 IODINE-131, AND GAMMA* SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF MILK,

SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in pCilliter +/- 2S

, LOCATION COLLECTION DATE K-40 OTHER ACTIVITY COMMENTS lOG 1 08/05/02 1360 +/- 110 1001 08/05/02 1510 +/- 130 1002,

08/05/02 '

1370 +/- 150 12B2 08/05/02 1370+/- 150 lOG 1 08119102 1208 +/- 96 1001 08/19/02 1390 +/- 110 1002 08/19/02 ',,

1500 +/- 110 12B2 08119102 1470 +/- 110 lOGI 09/04102 1360 +/- 120 1001 09104/02 1410 +/- 160 1002 09/04102 1470 +/- 170 12B2 09/04/02 1380 +/- 120 lOG 1 09/19/02 1410 +/- 110 1001 09/19/02 1390 +/- 110 1002

' 09/19102 1400+/- 110 12B2 09/19/02 1390 +/- 130 lOG 1 10/06/02 1325 +/- 90 1001 10/06102 1520 +/- 160 '

1002 10/06/02 1391 +/- 84 12B2 10/06/02 1449 +/- 84

, 1-24

LOCATION lOG 1 lODI 10D2 12b2 lOGI lODI lOD2 l2B2 IOGI 10DI lOD2 l2B2 TA.~.10 IODINE-131, AND SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF MILK SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in pCiIliter +/- 2S COLLECTION DATE OTHER ACTIVITY 10/21102 1470 +/- 110 10/21102 1430 +/- 120 10/21102 1400 +/- 160 10/21/02 1350+/- 110 11104/02 1340 +/- 130 11104/02 1410+/-11O 11104/02 1380 +/- 100 11104/02 1320 +/- 110 12/09/02 1370 +/- 120 12/09/02 1410 +/- 110 12/09/02 1380 +/- 110 12/09/02 1480 +/- 120 COMMENTS

'Tj o

t-j H

~

rn LOCATION lOG 1

1001 1002 12b2 lOG I 1001 1002 12B2 IOGI 1001 1002 12B2 TA.~.10 IODINE-13I, AND GAMMA* SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF MILK SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in pCiIliter +/- 2S COLLECTION DATE K*40 OTHER ACTIVITY 10/21102 1470 +/- 110 10/21102 1430 +/- 120 10/21102 1400 +/- 160 10/21102 1350 +/- 110 11/04/02 1340 +/- 130 11104/02 141O+/-11O 11/04/02 1380 +/- 100 11/04/02 1320 +/- 110 12/09/02 1370 +/- 120

12/09/02 1410 +/- 110 12/09/02

. 1380 +/- 110.

12/09/02 1480 +/- 120 COMMENTS 1*25

LOCATION COLLECTION DATE 8GITOP 09/18/02 8Gl BOT 09118102 3S2 TOP 09118102 3S2BOT 09/18/02 12S1 TOP 09/18/02 12S1 BOT 09/18/02 13S6TOP 09/18/02 13S6BOT 09/18/02 TABLE 1-11 SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSEs OF SOIL SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in pCi/gm (dry) +/- 2S K-40 Cs-137 9.2 +/- 1.1

.08 +/-.053 7.4 +/-.64

.09 +/-,03 11.6 +/- 0.8

.02 +/-.08 13.4 +/- 0.7

-.005 +/-.02 10.5 +/- 1.2

.04+/-.05 11.5 +/- 1.1

.05 +/-.04 17.6 +/- 1.0

.001 +/-.02 15.4 +/- 1.0

005 +/-.03 Ra-226 Th-228

.75 +/- ~140

.61 +/-.090

.71 +/-.085

.81 +/-.076

.63 +/-.130

.65 +/-.120

.93 +/-.092

.93 +/-.099 1-26 *

"J o r.:

H

~

H1 o

~

rt f-'-o

~

o

~

I-'

LOCATION

. COLLECTION DATE SGITOP 09/1S/02 SG1 BOT 09/1S/02 3S2 TOP 09/18102

3S2BOT 09/18/02 12S1 TOP 09/18/02 12S1 BOT 09/18/02 13S6TOP 09/18/02 13S6BOT 09/18/02 TABLE 1-11 GAMMA* SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSEs OF SOIL SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in pCi/gm (dry) +/- 2S K-40 Cs-137 '

9.2 +/- 1.1

.OS +/-.053 7.4 +/-.64

.09 +/-,03 11.6 +/- O.S

.02 +/-.08 13.4 +/- 0.7

-.005 +/-.02 10.5 +/- 1.2 *

.04+/-.05 11.5 +/- 1.1

.05 +/-.04 17.6 +/- 1.0

.001 +/-.02 15.4 +/- 1.0

005 +/-.03 Ra-226 Th-228

.75 +/- ~140

.61 +/-.090

.71 +/-.OS5

.81 +/-.076

... 63 +/-.130

.65 +/-.120

.93 +/-.092

.93 +/-.099 1-26

1'.1-12 GAMMA* SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES 0 OD PRODUCTS (FRUITS AND VEGETABLES)

SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002 Results in pCi/gm (wet) +/- 2S LOCATION SAMPLE TYPE COLLECTION DATE K-40 OTHER ACTIVITY 12F7 Green Beans 08/14/02 2.1 +/-.08 12F7 Potato 08121102 3.9 +/- 0.09 13G2 Potato 09110/02 3.4 +/- 0.2 13G2

-Pumpkin 10/16/02 2.6 +/-O,ll

. Comments:.

Refer to Appendix F of this report for additional details regarding exceptions to SSES Technical Requirements for sampling and analyses.

1-27

'Tj o

t-j H

~

H1 o

~

OJ rt f-'.

o

~

o

~

1'.1-12.

GAMMA* SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES 0 OD PRODUCTS (FRUITS AND VEGETABLES)

SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2002

. Results in pCi/gm (wet) +/- 2S LOCATION SAMPLE TYPE COLLECTION DATE K-40 OTHER ACTIVITY 12F7 Green Beans 08/14/02 2.1 +/-.08 12F7 Potato 08121102 3.9 +/- 0.09 13G2 Potato 09110/02 3.4 +/- 0.2 13G2

. Pumpkin 10/16/02 2.6 +/-O,ll

. Comments:.

Refer to Appendix F of this report for additional details regarding exceptions to SSES Technical Requirements for sampling and analyses.

1-27

TABLE TYPICAL

MINIMUM DETECTABLE CONCENTRATIONS OF NUCLIDES SEARCHED FOR BUT NOT FOUND BY GAMMA SPECTROMETRY IN THE VICINITY OF SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, 2002 Nuclide Mo-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zo-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 Ru-l03 1-131 Cs-134 Ba-140 La-140 Ce-14 Nuclide Mo-54 Fe-59 Co-60 Zo-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 Ru-103 1-131 Cs-134 Ba-140 La-140 Ce-14 Fish Sediment Surface Water Ground Water Potable Water (pCi/g wet)

(pCi/g dry)

(pCi/I)

(pCi/I) 0.019 0.088 3.8 4.3 3.0 0.023 0.043 0.019 0.046 0.039 0.023 0.026 0.075 0.021 0.024 0.100 20.0 0.040 0.036 Air Particulate Milk Fruit/Veg.

Soil pCi/m3)

(pCi/I)

(pCi/g wet)

~Ci{g_ dry) 0.32 4.7 0.009.

0.037

.TABLEI.13 TYPICAL

MINIMUM DETECTABLE CONCENTRATIONS OF NUCLIDES SEARCHED FOR BUT NOT FOUND BY GAMMA SPECTROMETRY IN THE VICINITYOF SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, 2002 Fish Sediment Surface Water Ground Water Potable Water Nuclide (pCi/g wet)

(pCi/g dry)

(pCi/I)

Mn-54 0.019

0.088 3.8 4.3 3.0 Co-58 0.023 Fe-59 0.043 Co-60 0.019 Zn-65 0.046 Zr-95 0.039 Nb-95 0.023 Ru-103 0.026 1-131 0.075 Cs-134 0.021 Cs-137 0.024 Ba-140 0.100 20.0 "La-140 0.040 Ce-14 0.036 Air Particulate Milk Fruit/Veg.

Soil Nuclide (10-3 pCi/m3)

(pCi/I)

(pCi/g wet)

(pCi/g dry)

Mn-54 0.32 4.7 0.009 0.037 Co-58 Fe-59 Cb-60 Zn-65 Zr-95 Nb-95 Ru-103 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 Ce-14 1-28

For Information Only

~ ' '.

APPENDIXJ 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report J-1 For Information Only

~ ' '.

APPENDIXJ 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report J-1

For Information Only Appendix J The data in the tables that follow show how well Framatome ANP'EnvironmentalLaboratory, Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services (TBE) and PPL's Corporate Environmental Radioactivity Measurements Laboratory (CERML) performed in the analysis of radioactively spiked media. PPL's CERML terminated REMP sample analysis after the third quarter of 2002. TBE rephlced PPL'sCERML for all REMP fourth quarter sample analysis. The fourth quarter was the only time period TBE provided REMP sample analysis in 2002. Tables J-1 through 1-5 provide the performance results for Framatome ANP. Tables J-7 through 1-11 provide the performance results for TBE. Inaddition to the Analytics' spikes analyzed as part of PPL's REMP Laboratory Spike Program (Tables 1-3 and 1-9), Framatome ANP and TBE analyzed spikes procured independently from Analytics as part of their respective Quality Control Spike Programs (Tables J-2 and J-8), as well as spikes prepared as part of the following programs:

1. The Proficiency Testing Program of Environmental Resource Associates (Tables I-I and 1-7)

2. The Quality Assessment Program of DOE's Environmental Measurements Laboratory (Tables 1-4 and 1-10)

3. The Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP) of the DOE (Tables 1-5 and J-11)

It should be noted that program #1 above only provides spiked water for analyses. No other media are included in the spikes provided by this program. Also, it should be noted that the levels of activity in spikes of different media prepared for program #2 tend to be relatively high.

They are relatively high compared to the levels of activity in the spikes prepared by AnalJ.1ics as part of its Environmental Cross Check Program and for PPL's REMP Laboratory Spike Program.

The following characteristics are important for the spiked environmental media:

1. When practical, the level of activity in, at le,ast, some of the spiked environmental media should be within the range between required analysis sensitivities for the SSES REMP and the Reporting Levels, if applicable, of the NRC.

2. The spikes should be preserved in a manner as similar as possible to the way that actual samples of those media are prepared.

3. The variety of radionuclides with which environmental media are spiked should be as extensive as practical, including as many as of the activation and fission products that could be detected in the vicinity of the SSES as reasonable.

The spiked environmental media prepared by Analytics according to the requirements of PPL's '

, REMP Laboratory Spike Program are intended to incorporate characteristics #1, #2, and #3 to the greatest degree that is practical.

2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report J-2 For Information Only Appendix J The data in the tables that follow show how well Framatome ANP'EnvironmentalLaboratory, Teledyne Brown Engineering Environmental Services (TBE) and PPL's Corporate Environmental Radioactivity Measurements Laboratory (CERML) performed in the analysis of radioactively spiked media. PPL's CERML terminated REMP sample analysis after the third quarter of 2002. TBE replaced PPL'sCERML for all REMP fourth quarter sample analysis. The fourth quarter was the only time period TBE provided REMP sample analysis in 2002. Tables J-1 through 1-5 provide the performance results for Framatome ANP. Tables J-7 through 1-11 provide the performance results for TBE. Inaddition to the Analytics' spikes analyzed as part of PPL's REMP Laboratory Spike Program (Tables 1-3 and 1-9), Framatome ANP and TBE

, analyzed spikes procured independently from Analytics as part of their respective Quality Control Spike Programs (Tables J-2 and J-8), as well as spikes prepared as part of the following programs:

1. The Proficiency Testing Program of Environmental Resource Associates (Tables I-I and 1-7)

' 2. The Quality Assessment Program of DOE's Environmental Measurements Laboratory (Tables 1-4 and 1-10)

3. The Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP) of the DOE (Tables 1-5 and J-11)

, It should be noted that program #1 above only provides spiked water for analyses. No other media are included in the spikes provided by this program. Also, it should be noted that the levels of activity in spikes of different media prepared for program #2 tend to be relatively high.

They are relatively high compared to the levels of activity in the spikes prepared by AnalJ.1ics as part of its Environmental Cross Check Program and for PPL's REMP Laboratory Spike Program.,

, The following characteristics are important for the spiked environmental media:

1. When practical, the level of activity in, at le,ast, some of the spiked environmental media should be within the range between required analysis sensitivities for the SSES REMP and the Reporting Levels, if applicable, of the NRC.

2. The spikes should be preserved in a manner as similar as possible to the way that actual samples of those media are prepared.

3. The variety of radionuclides with which environmental media are spiked should be as extensive as practical, including as many as of the activation and fission products that could be detected in the vicinity of the SSES as reasonable.

The spiked environmental media prepared by Analytics according to the requirements ofPPL's '

,REMP Laboratory Spike Program are intended to incorporate characteristics #1, #2, and #3 to the greatest degree that is practical.

2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report J-2

For Informat i on Only Appendix J Table J-6 provides the results of PPL' s CERML in the analyses of spiked environmental media.

prepared by Analytics as part of PPL's REMP Laboratory Spike.Program. Note that CERML does not analyze spikes as part of any other program.

The criterion for the acceptability of the analyses results for the spikes prepared as part of the PPL REMP Laboratory Spike Program (Tables J-3 & J-9) have been established by PPL. They are based on criteria that were originally developed by the NRC. The NRC bases these criteria on an empirical relationship that combines prior experience and accuracy needs. As the resolution of the measurement process improves (relative measurement uncertainty becomes smaller), the criteria for determining acceptability becomes tighter. Conversely, as the resolution of the process becomes poorer (relative measurement uncertainty becomes bigger), the criteria are widened.

The criteria for acceptability of DOE programs (EML's and MAPEP's programs - Tables J-4, J-5, J-I0 and J-11) are based on coiitrollimitsbasedon percentiles of historic data distributions.

Note that comment numbers at the extreme right side of the tables denotes unacceptable results in Tables J-l through J-ll. Discussions relevant to these comment numbers follow the presentations of the data, as applicable.

J-3 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report For Informat i on Only Appendix J Table J-6 provides the results of PPL' s CERML in the analyses of spiked environmental media.

prepared by Analytics as part of PPL's REMP Laboratory Spike.Program. Note that CERML

does not analyze spikes as part of any other program.

The criterion for the acceptability of the analyses results for the spikes prepared as part of the PPL REMP Laboratory Spike Program (Tables J-3 & J-9) have been established by PPL. They are based on criteria that were originally developed by the NRC. The NRC bases these criteria on an empirical relationship that combines prior experience and accuracy needs. As the resolution of the measurement process improves (relative measurement uncertainty becomes smaller), the criteria for determining acceptability becomes tighter. Conversely, as the resolution of the process becomes poorer (relative measurement uncertainty becomes bigger), the criteria are widened.

The criteria for acceptability of DOE programs (EML's and MAPEP's programs - Tables J-4, J-5, J-I0 and J-11) are based on coiitrollirnitsbasedon percentiles of historic data distributions.

Note that comment numbers at the extreme right side of the tables denotes unacceptable results in Tables J-l through J-ll. Discussions relevant to these comment numbers follow the

. presentations of the data, as applicable.

J-3 2002 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report

Ij 0

"r; TA.J.l H

~

H1 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOCIATES (ERA) 0

~

PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM - 2002 rt FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LABORATORY f-"

0 (Page 1 of 1)

~

0

~

, I-'

Identification ERA Known Framatome FramatomtiJERA MonthIYear No.

Medium Units Nuclide Result (a)

Results (a)

Ratio Jamiary-02 12030105 Water pCiIl Sr-89 43.7 72.1 1.65 (I) pCiIl Sr-90 25,2 27.6 1.10 pCiIl Gr. Alpha:

45.7 58.4 1.28 pCill Or. Beta 16.3 16.9 1.04 May-02 Rad-49 Water pCiIl 1-131 14.7 19.5 1.33 (2) pCiIl Co-60 39.1 39,5 1.01 pCill Cs-134 17.1 17.1 1.00 pCi/l Cs-137 52.1 53.6 1.03 pCill H-3 17400.0 17100.0 0,98 pCiIl Or. Alpha 22,8 26.8 1.18 pCill Or. Beta 189.0 174.0 0.92 pCiIl

'Sr-89 31.7 31.1 0,98 PCill Sr-90 28.3 28.6 1.01 August-Q2.

Rad-50 Water pCiIl 8a-133 80.0 74.9 0.94 pCill Co-60 23.3 24.5 1.05 pCill Cs-134 71.7 73.0 1.02 pCiIl Cs-137 214.0 228,0 1.07 (3) pCiIl Zn-65 95.7 95,6 1.00 pCill Gr. Alpha 58.8 69.9 1.19 pCiIl Gr. Beta 21-9 23.1 1.05 pCill Sr-89 29.0 26.3 0.91 pCiIl

. Sr-90 36.4 33.3 0.91 November-02 Rad-51 Water pCiIl H-3 10200.0 10100.0 0.99 pCiIl 1-131 6.76 6,83 1.01 J-4

')

(a) Results are the average of three measurements, reported in units of pC ill.

(b) Per guidelines of the EPA'S National Standard~for Water Proficiency Testing Criteria Document, December 1998_

Tj 0

' 1-1 TA.J~l H

~

rn.

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOCIATES (ERA) 0

~

PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM - 2002 OJ rt FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LABORATORY f-'.

0 (Page 1 of 1)

~

0

~

. f-'

Identification ERA Known Framatome FramatomeJERA MonthlYear No.

Medium Units Nuclide Result (a)

Results (a)

Ratio January-02 12030105 Water pCiJI Sr-89 43.7 72.1 1.65 (I) pCiJI Sr-90 25,2 27.6 1.10 pCiJI Gr. Alpha 45.7 58.4 1.28 pCill Gr. Beta 16.3 16.9 1.04 May-02 Rad-49 Water pCiIl 1-131 14.7 19.5 1.33 (2) pCiJI Co-60 39.1 39.5 1.01 pCill Cs-134 17.1 17.1 1.00 pCitl Cs-137 52.1 53.6 1.03 pCill H-3 17400.0 17100.0 0.98 pCiJI Gr. Alpha 22.8 26.8 1.18 pCill Gr. Beta 189.0 174.0 0.92 pCiIl Sr-89 31.7 31.1 0.98 PCiJI Sr-90 28.3 28.6

\\.01 August-02 Rad-50 Water pCiJI

. Ba-133 80.0 74.9 0.94 pCiIl Co-60 23.3 24.5

\\.05 pCill Cs-134 71.7 73.0 1.02 pCiJI Cs-1 37 214.0 228.0 1.07 (3) pCiJI Zn-65 95.7 95.6 1.00 pCiJI Gr. Alpha 58.8 69.9 1.19 pCiJI Gr. Beta 2\\.9 23.1 1.05 pCill Sr-89 29.0 26.3 0.91 pCiJI

. Sr-90 36.4 33.3 0.91 November-02 Rad-51 Water pCiIl H-3 10200.0 10100.0 0.99 pCiIl 1-131 6.76 6.83 1.01 1-4 (a) Results are the average of three measurements, reported in units of pCill.

(b) Per guidelines of the EPA'S National Standard~Jor Water Proficiency Testing Criteria Document, December 1998.

1 COMMENTS The equations used to calculate the sample activity were all independently verified to be correct. No problems were identified with sample documentation. The chemists were trained to process strontium samples expeditiously and to utilize the full IS-day yttrium-90 in-growth period.

2 Equipmentproblem with iodide probe identified. When sample was re-analyzed with new iodide probe, mean result was 14.5 pCi/L, a bias of -1.4%.

3 No problems identifed via test data evaluation using internal calibrations. The grand mean of the RAO-50 test compared favorably (1 % bias) with the Framatome ANP result yet indicated a significant bias from the ERA stated known. No actions were taken based on the favorable QC history for Cs-137.

./

J-5

'Tj o

t-j H

~

rn o

~

rt f-'-

o

~

o

~

f-'

1 COMMENTS The equations used to calculate the sample activity were aU independently verified to be correct. No problems were identified with sample documentation. The chemists were trained to process strontium samples expeditiously and to utilize the full IS-day yttrium-90 in-growth period.

2 Equipmentproblem with iodide probe identified. When sample was re-analyz~d with new iodide probe, mean result was 14.5 pCiIL, a bias of -1.4%.

3 No problems identifed via test data evaluation using internal calibrations. The grand inean of the RAD-50 test compared favorably (l % bias) with.

the Framatome ANP result yet indicated a significant bias from the ERA stated known. No actions were taken based on the favorable QC history for Cs-137.

e*

J-5

'Tj 0

T.J-2 ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2002 FRAMATOME ANP QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM t-j H

~

Jrn 0

~

PJ FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY c-r f-'.

(Page 1 of 5).

0

~

0

~

f-'

. Analytics Identification Calculated Frnmatome. Frnmatomei Analytics.

MonthlYear No.

Medium Units Nuclide Results Results Ratio March-02 E3096-186 Milk pei/l 1-131 LL

90 99 1.10 pCi/1

. Ce-141 29 32 1.10

. pCill Cr-51 241

. 262 1.09

.pCi/1 Cs-134 110.

103 0.94 pCill Cs-137 240 248 1.03 pCi/l Mn-54 202 224 1.11 pCill.

Fe~59 104 112 1.08

. pCi/l.

Zn-65 199 215 1.08 pCi/l Co-60 142 144 1.01 March-02 E3097~186 Charcoal pCilFilter 1-131 77 74 0.96 E3098-186 Charcoal pCilFilter.

1-13 I 69 65 0.94 E3099-186 Charcmil pCilFilter 1-131 87 91 1.05 March-02 E3023-162 Water pCill Gr. Alpha 53 56.7 1.07 E3023-162 Water pCi/1 Gr. Beta 313 310.3 0.99 E3024-162 Water pCill 1-131 61 54.5

. 0.89 pCill 1-131 LL

61 63.4 1.04 pCiII Ce-14\\

242 239.4 0.99 pCi/l Cr-51 198 175.7 0.89 pCill Cs-134 91 87.8 0.96 pCifl Cs-137 197 197.7 1.00 pCiII Mn-54.

166 168.5 1.02 pCi/1

. Fe-59 86 87.6 1.02 pCiIl Zn-65 164 157.2 0.96 pCill Co-60 i17 114.6 0.98 J-6

1-13 I LL = radiochemical seperation analysis T.J.2 ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM* 2002 FRAMATOME ANP QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY (Page 1 of 5).

. Analytics Identification Calculated Framatome Framatome/ Aoalytics.

MontblYear No.

Medium Units Nuclide Results Results Ratio March-02 E3096-186 Miik pCiIl 1-131 LL

90 99 1.10 pCill

. Ce-141 29 32 1.10

. pCiIl Cr-51 241

. 262 1.09

.pCill Cs-134 110.

103 0.94 pCi/l Cs-137 240 248 1.03 pCiIl Mn-54 *.

202 224 1.11 pCi/l Fe~59 104 112 1.08 pCiIl Zn-65 199 215 1.08 pCiIl Co-60 142 144 1.01 March-02 E3097~186 Charcoal pCilFilter 1-t3t 77 74 0.96 E3098-186 Charcoal pCilRlter *

. 1-131 69 65 0.94 E3099-186 Charcoal pCilFilter 1-131 87 91 1.05 March-02 E3023-162 Water pCill Gr. Alpha 53 56.7 1.07 E3023-162 Water pCill Gr. Bela 313 310.3 0.99 E3024-162 Water pCill 1-l3l 61 54.5 0.89 pCill 1-131 LL

61 63.4.

1.04 pCiIl Ce-141 242 239.4 0.99 pCiIl Cr-51 198 175.7 0.89 pCill Cs-134 91 87.8 0.96 pCi/l Cs-t37 197 197.7 1.00 pCiIl Mn-54 166

168.5 1.02 pCill

. Fe-59 86 87.6 1.02 pCill Zn-65 164 157.2 0.96 pCi/l Co-60 117 114.6 0.98 J-6

1-131 LL = radiochemical seperation analysis

. TABLEJ-2 ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2002 FRAMATOME ANP QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LAB ORA TORY MontbIYear Identification No.

Medium March-02 E3025-162 Soil March-02 E3026-162

- AP Filter March-02 E3027-162 Milk

'" 1-131 LL = radiochemical seperation analysis e.

Tj o t-j H

s H1 o

.~

Pl co f-'-

o

s o

s I-'

. TABLEJ-2 ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2002 FRAMATOME ANP QUALITY CONfROL SPIKE PROGRAM FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY (Page 2 of5)

. Analytics Identification No.

Calculated Framatome Framatome/ Analytics MontbIYear Medium Units Nuclide Results Results Ratio March-02 E3025-l62 Soil pCi/kg Ce-141 383 350.7 0.92 pCi/kg AcTh-228 448.3 (I) pCi/kg Cr-51 314 274 0.87 pCi/kg Cs-134 143 136.6 0.96 pCi/kg Cs-137 439 405.7 0.92 pCi/kg Mn-54 263 245.8 0.93 pCi/kg Fe-59 136 140.2 1.03 pCi/kg Zn-65 259 248.1 0.96 pCi/kg C<HiO 185 168.1 0.91 March-02 E3026-162 AP Filter pCi Gr. Alpha 23 21.8 0.95 pCi Gr. Beta 136 149 1.10 March-02 E3027-162 Milk pCill I-13l 92 87.9 0.96 pCiII 1-131 LL

92 93 1.01 pCill Ce-141 326 317.8 0.97 pCill Cr-51 267 277 1.04 pCiII Cs-l34 122 119 0.98 pCiII Cs-137 266 271.2 1.02 pCiII Mn-54 224 231.2 1.03 pCill Fe-59 116 123.6 1.07 pCiII Zn-65 221 225.9 1.02 pCill Co-60 158 152.9 0.97 1-7

1-131 LL = radiochemical seperation analysis e.

T~J.2.. '

ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENT AL RADI~TIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM '- 2002 FRAMA TOME ANP QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM FRAMA TOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LAB ORA TORY (Page 3 of 5)

Identification Analytics Calculated Results Framatome Framatome/ Analytics MonthlYear No.

Medium Units Nuclide ResultS Ratio March-02 E3028-162 Milk pCiIl 83 79.9 0.96 pCi/1 27 24.7 0.91 June-02 E3148-162 Water pCiII H-3 6970 6970 1.00 June-02 E3149-162 Water pCi!1 Sr-89 64.

42 0.66 (2)

Water pCi/1 Sr-90 39 36 0.92 June-02 E3150-162 AP Filter pCi Gr. Alpha (3) pCi Gr. Beta (3)

June-02 E3151-162 AP Filter pCi Ce-141 61 59 0.97 pCi Cr-51 160 165 1.03 pCi Cs-134 82 77 0.94 pCi Cs-137 62 64 1.03 pCi Co.58 68 68 1.00 pCi Mn-54 65 69 1.06 pCi 55 62 1.13 pCi Zn-65 122 131 1.07 pCi Co.60 85 82 0.96 June-02 AP Filter pCi 48

41.

0,85

1-131 u.. '" radiochemical seperation analysis Ij 0 r:

H

~

H1 0

~

rt f-"

0

~

0

~

I-'

Tj 0

I-i H

~

rn 0

~

OJ rt f-' -

0

~

0

~

f-'

I I

1-131 LL;: radiochemical seperatioD analysis

TABLEJ-2 ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2002 FRAMATOME ANP QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM -

FRAMATOMEANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY MonthlYear Identification No.

Medium June-02 September-02 September-02 September-02 E3153-162 E3288-162 E3288-162 E3289-162 Milk Water Water Water

1-131 LL = radiochemical seperation analysis Ij o "i

H

~

H1 o

~

rt f-'-o

~

o

~

I-'

TABLEJ-2 ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2002 FRAMATOME ANP QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM FRAMATOMEANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY (Page 4 of5)

Analytics Identification Calculated Framatoine. Fi"amatomeJ Analytics MonthlYear No.

Medium Units Nuclide Results.

Results Ratio June-02 E3153-162 Mille pCill 1-13l 87 88 1.01 pCiIl 1-131 LL

87 85 0.98 pCill Ce-141 90 86 0.96 pCiIl Cr-51 235 230 0.98 pCiIl Cs-134 120 121

. 1.01 pCiIl Cs-137

. 91

' 89 0.98

. pCill Co-58 100 100 1.00 pCill Mn-54 95 91 1.02

. pCiIl Fe-59 81 83 1.02 pCiIl Zn~65 180 179 0.99 pCiIl Co-60 125 127 1.02 September-02 E3288-162 Water pCiIl Gr. Alpha 92 73 0.79 September-02 E3288-162 Water pCiIl Gr. Beta 239 2~

0.85 September-02 E3289-162 Water pCiIl 1-131 79 68 0.86 pCill 1-131 LL

79 71 0.97 pCill Ce-141 214 209 0.98 pCiIl Cr-Sl 304 289 0.95

pCiIl Cs-134 176 169 0.96 pCill Cs-137 169 167.

0.99 pCiIl CO-58 130 129 0.99 pCill Mn-S4 204 206 1.01 pCiIl Fe-59 119 118 0.99 pCill Zn-6S 251 251 1.00 pCiIl Co-60 199 187 0.94 J-9

1-131 LL = radiochemical seperation analysis H

~

rn o

~

rt 1-'" o

~

o I

~

T.J~2 ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2002

, FRAMA TOME ANP QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM

~TOMEANPENVmONMENTALLABORATORY (Page 5 of 5)

.' Analytics Identification Calculated Framatome Framatomel AnalytlcS MonthlYear No.

'Medium Units Nuclide Results Results Ratio Septernber-02 E3291-162 AP Filter pCi Gr. Alpha 59 58 0.98 pCi Gr. Beta 155 144 0.93 E3292-162 Milk pCill 1-131 80,

79 0.99 pCi/l 1-131 LL

80

77 0.96 pCill Ce-141 '

160

156 0.98 pCill Cr~51 227 231 1.02 pCill Cs-134 132 128 0.97 pCill Cs-137 127 122 0.96 pCill Co-58 97 95 0.98 pCill Mn-54 152.

151 0.99 pCi/1 Pe-59 89 94 1.06 pCi/1 Zn-65 187 180 0.96 pCi/1 C0-60 149 142 0.95 Septernber-02 E3293-162 Milk pCill Sr-89 92 84 0.91 pCill Sr-90 39 36 0.92 1-10

1-131 LL = radiochemical seperation analysis Tj 0

t-j H

s H1 0

~

Pl co f-'.

0

s 0

s I-'

T.J~2.

ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2002

. FRAMA TOME ANP QUALITY CONtROL SPIKE PROGRAM

~TOMEANPENVmONMENTALLABORATORY (Page 5 of 5)

.. Analytics Calculated Framatome Framatomel AnalytlcS MontbIYear Identffication No.

. Medium Units Nuclide Results Results Ratio September-02 E3291-162 AP Filter pCi Gr. Alpha.

59.

58 0.98 pCi Gr. Beta 155 144 0.93 September-02 E3292-162 Milk pCill 1-131 80.

79 0.99 pCi/1 1-131 LL

80

77 0.96 pCill Ce-141 160

156 0.98 pCill Cr-51 227 231 1.02 pCill Cs-134 132 128 0.97

pCill Cs-137 127 122 0.96 pCi/l Co-58 97 95 0.98 pCill Mn-54.

152.

151 0.99 pCi/l Fe-59 89 94 1.06 pCill Zn-65 187 180 0.96 pCi/l Co-60 149 142 0.95 September-02 E3293-162 Milk pCill Sr-89 92 84 0.91 pCill Sr-90 39 36 0.92 1-10

1-131 LL = radiochemical seperation analysis Tj o

1-i H

s H1 0

~

Pl co f-'.

0

s 0

s I-'

. COMMENTS 1

. Analysis not performed by Analytics.

2 Investigation performed due to failure for Sr-89. The activity ratios or Sr-89 and Sr-90 were lower than normally provided.

Analytics has been contacted to ensure the ratios are in the normal expected ranges.

This sample was not processed in the normal time frame, causing an excessive decay correction to the Sr-89 data. The processing staff has been reminded of the need to address client and'QC samples expeditiously. The Sr-89/Sr-90 QC samples are now being processed during non-peak REMP times (ie; betweeillate fall and early spring).

3 Filters damaged during sample preparation. No results issued..

J-11 0

Ij o t-i H

~

H1 o

~

rt f-" o

~

o

~

I-'

. COMMENTS 1

. Analysis not performed by Analytics.

2 Investigation performed due to failure for Sr-89. The activity ratios or Sr-89 and Sr-90 were lower than normally provided.

Analytics has been contacted to ensure the ratios are in the normal expected ranges.

This sample was not processed in the normal time frame, causing an excessive decay correction to the Sr-89 data. The processing staff has been reminded of the need to address client and**QC samples expeditiously. The Sr-89/Sr-90 QC samples are now being processed during non-peak REMP times (ie; between late fall and early spring).

3 Filters damaged during sample preparation. No results issued..

J-11

T.J-3 PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2002 FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY (Page 1 of 4)

Identification..

Analytics Framatome MonthlYear No.

. Medium Units Nitdide Calculated Results (8)

Results (a)

March-02 E3100-186 Sediment pCi/kg Ce-141 383 :t 13 407 +/- 76 pCilkg

. Cr-Sl 314 :t 11 342 +/- 540 pCilkg Cs-l34 143 +/- 5 129 +/- 20 pCilkg Cs-137 439 +/- 15 425 +/- 28 pCilkg Mn-54 263 +/- 9 254 +/- 55 pCi/kg Fe-59 136 +/- 5 152 :t 69.

pCilkg

, Zn-65 259 +/- 9 250 +/-43 pCilkg Co-60 '

185 :t 6

'. 174 +/- 17,

March-02 E3096-186 Milk

. pCill.

1-131 90 +/- 3 99 +/- 4 pCiIl Ce-141 294 +/- 10 322 +/- 7 pCill.

Cr-51 241 +/- 8 262 +/- 28 pCiIl Cs-l34 1J0 +/- 4 104 +/- 4 pCiIl Cs-137 240 +/- 8 248 :t 6 pCi/l Mn-54 202 +/- 7 224 +/- 5 pCiIl Fe-59 104 +/- 3 112 +/- 6 pCiIl 199 :t 7 215 +/- 9 pCiIl Co-60 142 +/- 5 144 +/- 3.

. E3097-186 Charcoal Filter pCi 1-131 77 +/- 3 74 +/- 6.

E3098-186 Charcoal Filler pCi 1-131 68 +/- 2 65 +/- 7 E3099-186 Charcoal Filter pCi 1-131 87 +/- 3 91 :t 7 (a) Counting error is two standard deviations, Framatomel Analytics Ratio 1.06 1.09 0.90 0.97 0.97 1.12 0.97 0.94 1.09 1.10 1.09 0.95 1.03 1.11 1.08 1.08 1.01 0.96 0.96 1.05 Tj o t-j H

s H1 o

~

ro f-'.

. 0

s o

s I-'

Tj 0

1-i T.J-3 H

J H1 0

PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM

~

ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2002 Pl co FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY f-'.

, 0 (Page 1 of 4).

J 0

J I-'

Identification Analytics Framatome Framatomel Analytics Month/Year No.

' Medium Units Nuclide Calculated Results (a)

Results (a)

Ratio March-02 E3100-186 SedimeiJt pCi/kg Ce-141 383 :t 13 407 +/- 76 l.06

'pCi/kg

. Cr-51 314 :t 11 342 :t 540 1.09 pCi/kg Cs-l34 143 :t 5 129 :t 20 0.90 pCi/kg Cs-137 439 :t 15 425 :t: 28 0.97 pCi/kg Mn-54 263 :t: 9 254 +/- 55 0.97 pCi/kg Fe-59 136 :t: 5 152 :t: 69 1.12 pCilkg

. Zn-65 259 :t 9 250 :t43 0.97 pCi/kg Co-60' 185 :t 6

' 174 :t 17

0.94 March-02 E3096-186 Milk pCill.

1-131 '

9O:t: 3 99 :t: 4 1.09 pCiIl Ce-141 294 :t 10 322 :t 7 1.10.

pCill.

Cr-51 241 :t: 8 262 :t 28

' 1.09 pCiIl Cs-l34 110 :t 4 104:t: 4 0.95 pCiIl Cs-137 240 :t 8 248 :t 6 1.03 pCiIl Mn-54 202 +/- 7 224 +/- 5 l.11 pCiIl Fe-59 104 :t 3 112 +/- 6 1.08 pCiIl ZIl-65 199 +/- 7 215 +/- 9 1.08 pCiIl Co-60 142 :t 5

. 144 :t: 3 1.01 March-02

. E3097-186 ChaJcoal Filter pCi 1-131 77 +/- 3 74 +/- 6 0.96 E3098-186 ChaJcoal Filter pCi 1-131 68 +/- 2 65 :t 7 0.96 E3099-186 Charcoal Filter pCi 1-131 87 :t 3 91 :t 7 1.05 I~ 12 (a) Counting error is two standard deviations.

Ij 0 r:

H TABLEJ-3

~

H1 0

PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM

~

ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2002 rt FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENT AL LABORATORY f-'.

0

~

(Page 2 of 4) 0

~

I-'

Identification Analytics Framatome Framatomel Analytics.

MontblYear No.

Medium Units Nuclide Calculated Results (a)

Results (a)

Ratio June-02 E3138-186 APFilter pCi Ce-141 75 :!: 3 67 +/- 4 0.89 pCi Cr-Sl 198 :!: 7 205 +/- 34 1.04 pCi Csl34 101 :!: 4 87 :!: 3 0.86 pCi Cs-137 76 +/- 3 72 :!: 3 0.95 pCi Co-58 84 +/- 1 80 +/- 4 0.95 pCi Mn-54 80 +/- 3 82 +/- 4 1.03 pCi Fe-59 67 +/- 2 72 +/- 7 1.07 pCi Zn-6S 150 +/- 5 143 :!: 8 0.95 pCi Co-60 104 +/- 4 94 +/- 3 0.90 June-02 E3139-186 AP Filter pCi Ce-141 81 :!: 2 75 +/- 3 0.93 pCi Cr-Sl 211 :!: 6 204 +/- 13 0.97 pCi Csl34 108 :!: 3 102 :!: 2 0.94 pCi Cs-137 82 +/- 3 84:!: 4 1.02 pCi Co-58 90 +/- 1 89 +/- 4 0.99 pCi Mn-54 85 :!: 2 91 :!: 4 1.07 pCi Fe-59 72 +/- 2 79 +/- 6 1.10 pCi Zn-6S 161 +/- 4 172 +/- 8 1.07 pCi Co-60 III +/- 4 106 +/- 3 0.95 June-02 E3140-186 AP Filter pCi Ce-141 78 :!: 2 67 +/- 4 0.86 pCi Cr-Sl 203 :!: S 194 +/- 33 0.96 pCi Csl34 104 :!: 3 93 +/- 3 0.89 pCi Cs-137 79 :t 3 78 :t 4 0.99 pCi Co-S8 86 +/- 1 83 +/- 4 0.97 pCi Mn-S4 82 +/- 2 90 +/- 4 1.10 pCi Fe-S9 69 +/- 2 74 +/- 6 1.07 pCi Zn-6S ISS +/- 4 163 +/- 9 1.05 pCi Co-60 107 +/- 4 98 +/- 3 0.92 1-13 (a) Counting error is two standard deviations.

e.

TABLEJ-3 PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2002 FRAMATOME ANP

ENVIRONMENT AL LABORATORY (Page 2 of 4)

Identification Analytics Framatome

. Framatomel Analytics MontblYear No.

Medium Dnits Nuclide Calculated Results (a).

Results (a)

Ratio June-02 E3138-186 APFilter pCi Ce-141 75 +/- 3 67 +/- 4 0.89 pCi Cr-51 198 +/- 7 205 +/- 34 1.04 pCi Csl34 101 +/- 4 87 +/- 3 0.86 pCi Cs-137 76 +/- 3 72 +/- 3 0.95 pCi Co-58 84 +/- 1 80 +/- 4 0.95 pCi Mn-54 80 +/- 3 82 +/- 4 1.03 pCi Fe-59 67 +/- 2 72 +/- 7 1.07 pCi Zn-65 150 +/- 5 143 +/- 8 0.95 pCi Co-60 104 +/- 4 94 +/- 3 0.90 June-02 E3139-186 APFilter pCi Ce-141 81 +/- 2 75 +/- 3 0.93 pCi Cr-51 211 +/- 6 204 +/- 13 0.97 pCi Csl34 108 +/- 3 102 +/- 2 0.94.

pCi Cs-137 82 +/- 3 84 +/- 4 1.02 pCi Co-58 90 +/- 1 89 +/- 4 0.99 pCi Mn-54 85 +/- 2 91 +/- 4 1.07 pCi Fe-59 72 +/- 2 79 +/- 6 1.10 pCi Zn-65 161 +/- 4 172 +/- 8 1.07 pCi Co-60 111 +/- 4 106 +/- 3 0.95 June-02 E3140-186 APFilter pCi Ce-141 78 +/- 2 67 +/- 4 0.86 pCi Cr-51 203 +/- 5 194 +/- 33 0.96 pCi Csl34 104 +/- 3 93 +/- 3 0.89 pCi Cs-137 79 +/- 3 78 +/- 4 0.99 pCi Co-58 86 +/- 1 83 +/- 4 0.97 pCi Mn-54 82 +/- 2 90 +/- 4 1.10 pCi Fe-59 69 +/- 2 74 +/- 6 1.07 pCi Zn:65 155 +/- 4 163 +/- 9 1.05 pCi Co-60 107 +/- 4 98 +/- 3 0.92 J-13 (a) Counting error is two standard deviations.

MontllfY ear June-02 September-02 Oeccmber-02 TAeJ-3 PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2002 FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY Identification No.

Medium E3141-186 Charcoal Filter E3142-186 Charcoal" Filter E3143-186 Charcoal Filler E3388-186 Milk E3515-186 Milk (a) Counting error is two stailctard deviations.

Tj 0

t-j H

s H1 0

~ "

Pl rT f-'.

0

s 0

s I-'

Mont1tIY ear 1uoo-02 September-02 December-02 TAeJ-3 PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2002 FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY (Page 3 of 4)

Identification.

Analytics Framatome No.

Medium Units Nuclide Calculated Results (a).

Results (a)

E3141-186 Charcoal Filter pCi 1-131 94 +/- 3 96 :t 9 E3142-186 Charcoal Filter pCi 1-131 85 :t 3 92 +/- 9 c

E3143-186 Charcoal Filter pCi 1-131 99 :t 3.

104 :t 9 E3388-186 Milk pCiIl 1-131 78 :t 4 76 :t 4 pCi/l Ce-141 216 +/- 11 216 :t 7 pCi/l Cr-51 307 :t 15 306 :t 31 pCi/l Cs-134 178 :t 9 174 +/- 5 pCiIl Cs-137 171 :t 9 171:t5 pCiIl Co-58 131 :t 7 133 +/- 5 pCiIl Mn-54 206 +/- 10 207 :t 6 pCi/l Fe:.59 120 :t 6 118 :t 6 pCi/l Zn-65 254 :t 13 260 :t 10 pCi/l Co-60 201.:t 10 193 :t 4 E3515-186 MiJlc pCi/l 1-131 92 +/-5 99 :t 8 pCi/l Ce-141 126 :t 6 129 +/- 7 pCi/l Cr-51 391 +/- 20 424 :t 35

. pCiIl Cs-l34 112 :t 6 106 :t 5 pCiIl Cs-137 248 +/- 12 251 :t 6.

pCiIl Co-58 157 :t 8 156 :t 5 pCiIl Mn-54 160 :t 8 161 :t 5 (a) Counting error is two stanrui.rd deviations.

Tj 0

1-i H

s H1 0

~

Pl rT f-'.

0

s 0

s I-'

FramatomeJ Analytics Ratio 1.02 1.08 1.05 0.97 1.00 1.00 0.98 1.00

. 1.02 1.00 0.98 1.02 0.96 1.08 1.02 1.08 0.95 1.01 0.99 1.01 1-14

MonthlYear Decernber-02 Decernber-02 TABLEJ-3 PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2002 FRAMATOMEANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY Identification No.

E3515-186 E3516-186 E3517-186 E3518-186 Medium Milk.

Charcoal Filter Charcoal Filter Charcoal Filter Units pCi/l pCiJl pCi/l pCi pCi pCi (Page 4 of 4)

. Analytics Framatome Nuclide Calculated Results !a)

Results (a).

Fe,.59 81 +/- 4 88 +/- 5 Zn-65 202 +/- 10 203 :t 9 Co-60 186 +/- 9 184 +/- 4 1-131 89 +/- 4

+/-

1-131 96 +/- 5

+/-

1-131 84 +/- 4

t (a) co. error is two standard deviations.

FranuitomeJ Analytics Ratio 1.09 1.00 0.99 (1)

(1 )

(1)

]-15

'Tj o

t-j H

~

rn o

~

It f-' -

o

~

o

~

f-'

MonthlYear December-02 December-02 TABLEJ-3 PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2002 FRAMATOMEANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY Identification No.

E3515-186 E3516-186 E3517-186 E3518-186 Medium Milk.

Charcoal Filter Charcoal Filter Charcoal Filter Units pCiA pCi/l pCiA pCi pCi pCi (Page 4 of 4)

. Analytics Framatome Nuclide Calculated Results (a)

Results (a).

Fe-59 81 :t 4 88.:t 5 Zn-65 202:t 10 203 :t 9 Co-60 186 :t 9 184 :t 4 1-131 89 :t 4

t 1-131 96 :t 5

t 1-131 84 :t 4

t

.. (a) co. error is two standard deviations.

Framatome/ Analytics Ratio 1.09 1.00 0.99 (1)

(1 )

(1)

]-15

J 0

t-j e"

e

" H

s H1 0

~

Pl co f-'-

0 COMMENTS

s 0

s I-'

Framatome ANP unable to analyze samples. Charcoal cartridges damaged during shipment from Analytics.

J-16 J

0 1-i

' H

s H1 0

~

Pl co f-'-

0 COMMENTS

s 0

s I-'

Framatome ANP unable to analyze samples_ Charcoal cartridges damaged during shipment from Analytics_

J-16

Ij 0

I-i H

. TABLEJ-4

~

H1 DOE - ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY (EML) 0

~

QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (QAP)

OJ rt FRAMA TOME ANPENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY f-'.

0 (Page 1 of 3)

~

0

~

I-'

Identification EMLKnOWD Framatome FramatomeJEML MonthIYear No.

Medium Units Nuclide Results Results Ratio March-02 QAP56 AP Filter Bq Am-24 I 0.088 0.094 1.07 Bq C0-60 30.520 29.700 0.97 Bq Cs-137 28.230 28.400 1.01 Bq Gr. Alpha 0.534 0.504 0.94 Bq Gross Beta 1.300 1.174.

0.90 Bq Mn-54 38.530 38.700 1.00 Bq Pu-238 0.057 0.056 0.98 Bq Pu-239 0.187 0.183 0.98 Bq Sr-90 4.832 4.100 0.85 March-02 QAP56 Soil

. Bq/kg AcTh-228 51.167 46.700 0.91 Bqlkg Am-241 10.927 13.000 1.19 Bq/kg Cs-137 1326.670 1321.600 1.00 Bqlkg K-40 621.670 586.500 0.94 Bqlkg Pu-239 19.098 20.860 1.09 Bqlkg Sr-90 53.756 50.700 0.94 Bqlkg U-234 93.885 87.200 0.93 Bqlkg U-238 96.778 91.700 0.95 March-02 QAP56 Vegetation Bqlkg Am-241 2.228 2.230 1.00 Bqlkg Cm-244 1.320 1.190 0.90 Bq/kg C0-60 11.230.

10.650 0.95 Bqlkg Cs-137 313.667 317.100 1.01 Bqlkg K-40 864.330 855.000.

0.99 Bqlkg Pu-239 3.543 3.310 0.93 Bqlkg Sr-90 586.280 517.000 0.88 1-17 Ij 0 r:

H

-TABLEJ-4

~

H1 DOE - ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY (EML) 0

~

QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (QAP)

-p, rt FRAMATOME ANPENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY f-'.

0 (Page 1 of 3)

~

0

~

I-'

Identification EMLKnown Framatome FramatomeJEML MonthIYear No.

Medium Units Nuclide Results Results Ratio March-02 QAP56 AP Filter Bq Am-24 I 0.088 0.094 1.07 Bq C0-60 30.520 29.700 0.97 Bq Cs-137 28.230 28.400 1.01 Bq Gr. Alpha 0.534 0.504 0.94 Bq Gross Beta 1.300 1.174 -

0.90 Bq Mn-54 38.530 38.700 1.00 Bq Pu-238 0.057 0.056 0.98 Bq Pu-239 0.187 0.183 0.98 Bq Sr-90 4.832 4.100 0.85 March-02 QAP56 Soil

-Bqlkg

-AcTh-228 51.167 46.700 0.91 Bqlkg Am-241 10.927 13.000 1.19 Bq/kg Cs-137 1326.670 1321.600 1.00 Bqlkg K-40 621.670 586.500 0.94 Bqlkg Pu-239 19.098 20.860 1.09 Bqlkg Sr-90 53.756 50.700 0.94 Bqlkg U-234 93.885 87.200 0.93 Bqlkg U-238 96.778 91.700 0.95 March-02 QAP56 Vegetation Bqlkg Am-241 2.228 2.230 1.00 Bqlkg Cm-244 1.320 1.190 0.90 Bq/kg C0-60 11.230 -

10.650 0.95 Bq/kg Cs-137 313.667 317.100 1.01 Bqlkg K-40 864.330 855.000 -

0.99 Bqlkg Pu-239 3.543 3.310 0.93 Bqlkg Sr-90 586.280 517.000 0.88 1-17

Ij 0

I-i T

J-4 '

H

~

DOE - ENVmONMENT AL MEA REMENTS LABORATORY (EML)

H1 0

QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (QAP)

~

OJ FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY rt f-'.

(Page 20f3) 0

~

0

~

I-'

Identification EMLKnown Framatome FramatomelEML MontbIYear No.

Medium Units Nuclide Results Results Ratio March-02 QAP56 Wa!er Bq/l Am-24 I 1.474 1.507 1.02 Bq/l 00-60 347.330 350.300 1.01 Bqll Cs-137 56.067 55.300 0.99 Bqll Gr. Alpha 375.000 281.000 0.75 (1)

Bq/l Gr. Beta 1030.000 951.000 0.92 Bqll H-3 283.700 309.000 1.09 Bqll Pu-238 0.490 0.676 1.38 (2)

March-02 QAP56 Water Bq/l Sr-90 7.579 6.260 0.83 (3)

Bqll U-234 1.402 1.310 0.93 Bqll U-238 1.381 1.310 0.95 September-02 QAP57 AP Filters Bq Co-60 23 23.195 1.01 Bq Cs-137 32.5

. 33.4 1.03 Bq Gr: Alpha 0.287 0.269 0.94 Bq Gr. Beta 0.871 o.78~

0.90 Bq Mn-54 52.2 51.68 0.99 Bq Sr-9O 5.561 4.82 0.87 September -02 QAP57 Soil Bq/kg AcTh-228 42.3 41 0.97 Bq/kg Am-241 6.767 6.43 0.95 8q/kg Cs-137 829.33 857 1.03 8q/kg K-40 637.7 628.8 0.99

. Bqlkg Pu-238 19.203 17.21

" 0.90 Bqlkg Pu-239 12.903 12.47 0.97 J-18 Ij 0 r:

". T.J-4" H

~

DOE - ENVmONMENT AL MEA REMENTS LABORATORY (EML)

H1 0

QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (QAP)

~

FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY rt f-'.

(Page 2of3) 0

~

0

~

I-'

Identification EMLKnown Framatome FramatomelEML Month/Year No.

Medium Units Nuclide Results Results Ratio March-02 QAP56 Wa!er 8q/l Am-24 I 1.474 1.507 1.02 Bq/l 00-60 347.330 350.300 1.01 Bqll Cs-137 56.067 55.300 0.99 Bqll Gr. Alpha "

375.000 281.000 0.75 (1) 8q/l Gr. Beta 1030.000 951.000 0.92 Bqll H-3 283.700 309.000 1.09 Bqll Pu-238 0.490 0.676 1.38 (2)

Marcb-02 QAP56 Water Bq/l Sr-90 7.579 6.260 0.83 (3)

Bqll U-234 1.402

\\.310 0.93 Bqll U-238 1.381

\\.310 0.95 September-02 QAP57 AP Filters Bq Co-60 23 23.195 1.01 Bq Cs-137 32.5

" 33.4 1.03 Bq Gr: Alpha 0.287 0.269 0.94 Bq Gr. Beta 0.871 o.78~

0.90 Bq Mn-54 52.2 51.68 0.99 Bq Sr-9O 5.561 4.82 0.87 September -02 QAP57 Soil Bqllcg AcTh-228 42.3 41 0.97 Bqllcg Am-241 6.767 6.43 0.95 Bqllcg Cs-137 829.33 857 1.03 Bqllcg K-40 637.7 628.8 0.99 Bq!kg Pu-238 19.203 17.21

"" 0.90 Bq!kg Pu-239 12.903 12.47 0.97 J-18

MontbIYear 5eptember-02 September-02 TABLEJ~4.

DOE - ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY (EML)

. QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (QAP)

FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY Identification No.

QAP57 QAP57 Medium Vegetation Water Units BqI1 DqI1 BqI\\

Bqll BqI1 Bqll Dqll Bqll Bqll DqJl Bqli Bq/l BqI1 (Page 3 of 3)

Nuclide Co-60 Cs-137 K-40 Am-24 1 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 Gr. Alpha Or. Beta H-3 Pu-238 Pu-239 Sr-90 EMLKnown Framatome Results Results 9.66 10.74 300.67 314.4 1480 1555 3.043 2.842 268.57 257.2 60.2 60.7 81.43 79.7 210 156.7 900 808.7 227.3

.252.1 4.331 3.981 2.07 2.008 8.69 7.77 FriunatomeJEML Ratio 1.11 1.05 1.05 0.93 0.96 1.01 0.98 0.75 0.90 1.11 0.92 0.97 0.89 J-19 (4)

'Tj o

~

H

l H1 o

~.

OJ rT p.

. 0

l o

l I-'

MonthlY ear September-02

$eptember-02 TABLEJ~4.

DOE - ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY (EML)

. QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (QAP)

FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY Identification No.

QAP57 QAP57 Medium Vegetation Water Units BqI1 BqI1 Bq/I Bqll BqII BqII Bqll Bqll Bqll Bq/I Bq/i Bqll BqI1 (Page 3 of 3)

Nuclide C0-60 Cs-137 K-40 Am-241 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs~ 137 Gr. Alpha Gr. Beta H-3 Pu-238 Pu-239 Sr-90 EMLKnown Framatome Results Results 9.66 10.74 300.67 314.4 1480 1555 3.043 2.842 268.57 257.2 60.2 60.7 81.43

79.7 210 156.7 900 808.7 227.3

.252.1 4.331 3.981 2.07 2.008 8.69 7.77 FramatomelEML Ratio 1.11 1.05 1.05 0.93 0.96 1.01 0.98 0.75 (4) 0.90 1.11 0.92 0.97 0.89 J-19

COMMENTS Low bias evaluated and determined there were no noted deficiencies.

2 High bias identified. The Pu-239 in the sample was evaluated as "Acceptable." The sample documentation is being reviewed to identify the potential presence of a contaminant in the Pu~238 spectraliegion.

3 Low bias ideTltified. Over 25% of the laboratories participating in this test received a "Warning" evaluation. No deficiencies in the processing documentation could be identified.

4 Low bias identified. A review of the special DOE calibration (single point, Th-230) is being perforined due to the second consecutive "Warning" evaluation._

1-20

'rj.

0 t-j H

~

H1 0

~

OJ rt f-'-

0

~

0

~

f-'

e**

COMMENTS 1

Low bias evaluated and determined there were no noted deficiencies.

2 High bias identified. The Pu-239 in the sample was evaluated as "Acceptable." The sample documentation is being reviewed to identify the potential presence of a contaminant in the Pu~238 spectraliegion.

3 Low bias ideTltified. Over 25% of the laboratories participating in this test received a "Warning" evaluation. No deficiencies in the processing documentation could be identified.

4 Low bias identified. A review of the special DOE calibration (single point, Th-230) is being perforined due to the second consecutive "Warning" evaluation._

J-20

. 'rj.

0 t-j H

~

H1 0

~

OJ rt f-'-

0

~

0

~

f-'

Tj o

t-j H

TABLEJ:'S

s H1 0

DOE-MAPEP

~

MIXED ANAL YTE PERFORMANCE EV ALUA nON PROGRAM Pl co

~TOMEANPENVmONMENTALLABORATORY f-'.

0

s (Page 1 of 1) 0

s I-'

Identification MAPEP Known Framatome FramatomeJMAPEP MonthIYear No.

Medium Units Nuclide Results Results Ratio Evaluation March-02 01 -W9 Water 8q1Kg Mn-54 246 247.33 1.01 Agreement 8q/Kg Co-57 143 137.52 0.96 Agreement 8q/Kg Co-60 141 142.08 1.01 Agreement 8q/Kg Cs-134 28.5 28.26 0.99 Agreement Bq/Kg Cs-137 286 270.23 0.94 Agreement 8q1Kg Am-24 1 1.19 1.152 0.97 Agreement Bq/Kg Ni-63 88.3 123.85 1.40 Not Acceptable (1) 8q1Kg Pu-238 0.0456 FalSe Positive (2) 8q/Kg Pu-239/40 2.99 2.944 0.98 Agreement 8q1Kg Sr-90 4.8 3.83 0.80 Warning (3) 8q/Kg U-233/34 0.98 1.014 1.03 Agreement 8q1Kg U-238 7.8 7.89 1.01 Agreement 8q1Kg Zn-65 67.3 70.58 1.05 Agreement 02-S9 Soil 8q1Kg Am-241 43.5 43.48 1.00 Agreement 8q/Kg Cs-134 862 929.8 1.08 Agreement 8q/Kg Cs-137 III 113.8 1.03 Agreement 8q/Kg Co-57 246 258.6 1.05 Agreement 8q1Kg Co-60 87.5 96.3 1.10 Agreement 8q/Kg Mn-54 546 596.4 1.09 Agreement 8q/Kg Pu-238 33.3 34.43 1.03 Agreement 8q/Kg Pu-239/40 72.9 73.96 1.01 Agreement 8q/Kg K-40 652 661 1.01 Agreement 8q/Kg Zn-65 809 878.9 1.09 Agreement 01-W9 Water 8q1Kg Ni-63 88.3 83.9 0.95 Agreement (1) 8q1Kg Pu-238 False Pos. Check Non-Positive Agreement (2) 8q1Kg Pli-239/40 3

3 0.94 Agreement (2)

J-21 Tj o

1-i H

TABLEJ:'S

s H1 0

DOE-MAPEP '

~

MIXED ANAL YTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM Pl co

~TOMEANPENVmONMENTALLABORATORY f-'.

0

s (Page 1 of 1) 0

s I-'

Identification MAPEP Known Framatome FramatomeJMAPEP MonthIYear No.

Medium Units Nuclide Results Results Ratio Evaluation

. March-02 0l-W9 Water Bq/Kg Mn-54 246 241.33 1.01 Agreement Bq!Kg Co-51 143 131.52 0.96 Agreement Bq/Kg Co-60 141 142.08 1.01 Agreement Bq/Kg Cs-134 28.5 28.26 0.99 Agreement BqfKg Cs-131 286 210.23 0.94 Agreement Bq/Kg Am-241

1.19 1.152 0.91 Agreement Bq/Kg Ni-63 88.3 123.85 1.40 Not Acceptable (1)

Bq/Kg Pu-238 0.0456 FalSe Positive (2)

Bq/Kg Pu-239f40 2.99 2.944 0.98 A~eement Bq!Kg Sr-90 4.8 3.83 0.80 Warning (3)

Bq/Kg U-233f34 0.98

\\.014 1.03 Agreement Bq!Kg U-238 7.8 7.89 1.01 Agreement Bq!Kg Zn-65 67.3 70.58 1.05 Agreement 02-S9 Soil Bq/Kg Am-241 43.5 43.48 1.00 Agreement.

Bq/Kg Cs-J34 862 929.8 1.08 Agreement Bq/Kg Cs-137 III 113.8 1.03 Agreement BqIKg Co-57 246 258.6 1.05 Agreement Bq!Kg Co-60 87.5 96.3 1.10 Agreement

. Bq/Kg Mn-54 546 596.4 1.09 Agreement Bq!Kg Pu-238 33.3 34.43 1.03 Agreement BqIKg Pu-239f40 72.9 13.96 1.01 Agreement Bq!Kg K-40

. 652 661 1.01 Agreement Bq/Kg Zn-65 809 878.9 1.09 Agreement 01-W9 Water Bq!Kg Ni-63 88.3 83.9 0.95 Agreement (I)

BqfKg Pu-238 False Pos. Check Non-Positive '

Agreement (2)

Bq!Kg Pti-239/40 3

3 0.94 Agreement (2)

J-21

1 COMMENTS High bias identified.. A Framatome internal process check was analyzed in August 2002 and resulted in acceptable bias of<-2%. A re-performance of the MAPEP sample was also successfully performed. Results identified below sample 02-S9.

2 Review of alpha spectrum revealed slight contamination breakthrough of other sample analytes. Measurements personnel have been re-trained on spectral review requirements. The MAPEPsample was re-processed successfully. Results identified below sample 02-S9.

3 Low bias identified. Only one analysis resultwas available for this sample due to an error in processing by the chemist.

No problems were noted with the documentation of this sample that would explain a low bias.

1-22 I

COMMENTS 1

High bias identified.. A Framatome internal process check was analyzed in August 2002 and resulted in acceptable bias of<-2%. A re-performance of the MAPEP sample was also successfully performed. Results identified below sample 02-S9.

2

Review of alpha spectrum revealed slight contamination breakthrough of other sample analytes. Measurements personnel have been re-trained on spectral review requirements. The MAPEPsample was re-processed successfully. Results identified below sample 02-S9.

3 Low bias identified. Only one analysis result was available for this sample due to an error in processing by the chemist.

No problems were noted with the documentation of this sample that would explain a low bias.

J-22

'Tj 0

t-j H

s H1 0

~

OJ rt f-'-

0

s 0

s f-'

MonthlY ear March-02 March-02 March-02 March-Ol TABLEJ-6 PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2002 PPL'S CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY (Page 1 of3)

Identification Analytics CERML No.

Medium Units Nuclide Calculated Results (a)

Results (a)

E3095-186 Water pCiJl H-3 10026 % 334 9736 % 133 E3091-186 Charcoal Filter pCi 1-131 77 % 3 74 +/- 2 E3092-186 Charcoal Filter pCi 1-131 68 +/- 2 65.+/- 2 E3093-186 Charcoal Filter pCi 1-131 87 +/- 3 81 +/- 2 E3094-186 Soil pCilkg Ce-141 383 +/- 13 369 +/- 9 pCiIkg Cr-51 314 +/- 11 302 +/- 42 pCilkg Cs-l34 143 +/- 5 127 +/- 7 pCilkg Cs-137 439 +/- 15 456 +/- 8 pCilkg Mn-54 263 +/- 9 280 +/- 7 pCilkg Fe-59 136 +/- 5 138 +/- 9 pCilkg Zn-65 259+/-9 277 +/- 15 pCilkg Co-60 185 +/- 6 175 +/- 5 E3090-186 Milk pCiJl 1-131 90 +/- 3 93 +/- 10 Ce-141 294 +/- 10 249 +/- 8 Cr-Sl 241 +/- 8 208 +/- 35 Cs-134 110 +/- 4 92 +/- 5 Cs-137 240 +/- 8 237 +/- 7 Mn-54 202 +/- 7 209 +/- 6 Fe-59 104 +/- 3 116 +/- 9 Zn-65 199 +/- 7 208 +/- 11 Co-60 142 % 5 143 +/- 6 (a) co. error is two standard deviations.

CERMIl Analytics Ratio 0.97 0.96 0.96 0.93 0.96 0.96 0.89 1.04 1.06 1.01 1.07 0.95 1.03 0.85 0.86 0.84 0.99 1.03 1.12 1.05 1.01 J:23

'Tj o

~

H

l

. H1 o

~

rT 1-" o

l o

l I-'

MonthlYear March-02 March-02 March-02 March-Ol TABLEJ-6 PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM.

ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2002 PPL'S CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY (Page 1 of 3)

Identification Analytics CERML No.

Medium Units Nuclide Calculated Results (a)

Results (a)

E3095-186 Water pCiIl H-3 10026 % 334 9736 % 133 E3091-186 Charcoal Filter pCi 1-131 77 % 3 74 % 2 E3092-186 Charcoal Filter pCi 1-131 68 % 2 65.% 2 E3093-186 Charcoal Filter pCi 1-131 87 :to 3 81 +/- 2 E3094-186 Soil pCi/kg Ce-141 383 % 13 369 % 9 pCiIkg Cr-51 314 % 11 302 +/- 42 pCiJkg Cs-l34 143 +/- 5 127 % 7 pCi/kg Cs-137 439 % 15 456 % 8 PCi/kg Mn-54 263 % 9 280 +/- 7 pCilkg Fe-59 136 % 5 138 +/- 9 pCilkg ffi.65 259 +/- 9 277 +/- 15 pCiJkg Co-60 185 +/- 6 175 +/- 5 E3090-186 Milk pCiIl 1-131 90 +/- 3 93 % 10 Ce-141 294 +/- 10 249 +/- 8 Cr-51 241 % 8 208 % 35 Cs-134 110 % 4 92 % 5 Cs-137 240 +/- 8 237 +/- 7 Mn-54 202 % 7 209 % 6 Fe-59 104 % 3 116 % 9 ffi.65 199 % 7 208 +/- 11 Co-60 142 % 5 143 +/- 6 (a) co. error is two standard deviations.

CERMIJ Analytics Ratio 0.97 0.96 0.96 0.93 0.96 0.96 0.89 1.04 1.06 1.01 1.07 0.95 1.03 0.85 0.86 0.84 0.99 1.03 1.12 1.05 1.01 J:23

Ij 0

r:

T.J-6 H

~

H1 PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM 0

~..

ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACfIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2002 OJ rt PPL'S CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY f-"

0 (page 2 of3)

~

0

~

. I-'

Identification Analytics CERML CERMIJ Analytics MonthlYear No.

Medium Units Nuclide Calculated Results (a)

Results (a)

Ratio June-02 E3132-186 APFilter pCi Ce-141 87 +/- 2 81 +/- 2 0.93 pCi Cr-51 228 +/- 6

.213 +/- 16 0.93 pCi Csl34 1171:3 92 +/- 2 0.79 (I) pCi Cs-137 88 +/- 3 92 +/- 2 1.05 pCi Co-58 97 +/- I 98 +/- 3 1.01 pCi Mn-54 92 +/- 3 96 +/- 3 1.04 pCi Fe-59 78 +/- 2 89 +/- 4 1.14 pCi Zri-65 174 +/- 5 193 +/- 6 Lli pCi Co-60 121 +/- 4 116 +/- 2 0.96 June-02 E3133-186 APFilter pCi Ce-141 93 +/- 2 82 +/- 2 0.88 pCi Cr-51 244 +/-4.

214 +/- 16 0.88 pCi Csl34 125' +/- 2 94 +/- 2 0.75 (2) pCi Cs-137 95 +/- 2 92 +/- 2 0.97 pCi Co-58 104 +/- I 98 +/- 3 0.94 pCi Mn-54 99 +/- 2 95 +/- 3 0.96 pCi Fe-59 84 +/- 1 92 +/- 5.

1.10 pCi Zn-65 186 +/- 3 193 +/- 6 1.04 pCi Co-60 129 +/- 3 123 +/- 3 0.95 June-02 E3134-186 AP Filter pCi Ce-141 57 +/- 3 53 +/- 2 0.93 pCi Cr-51

'.1.

150 +/- 8

)50 +/- IS 1.00 pCi Csl34 77 +/- 4 60 +/- 2 0.78 (3) pCi Cs-137 58 j: 3 61 +/- 2 1.05 pCi Co-58 64 +/- 2 65 :t 2 1.02 pCi Mn-54 61 +/- 3 67 +/- 2 1.10 pCi Fe-59 51 +/- 3 65 :t 4 1.27 pCi Zn-65 114 +/- 6 130 +/- 5 1.14 pCi Co-60 79 +/- 5 82 +/- 2 1.04 J-24 (a) Counting error is two staIidard deviations.

Tj 0

I-i T.J-6 H

~

rn PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM 0

~

ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACfIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2002 OJ rt PPL'S CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY f-'.

0 (page 2 of3)

. ~

0

~

. f-'

Identification Analytics CERML CERMlJAnaJytics MonthlYear No.

Medium Units Nuclide Calculated Results (a)

Results (a).

Ratio June-02 E3132-186 APFilter pCi Ce-141 87 ::t 2 81

2 0.93 pCi Cr-Sl 228 :t 6

.213::t 16 0.93 pCi Csl34 117 :t 3 92 :t 2 0.79 (I) pCi Cs-137 88 ::t 3 92

2 LOS pCi Co-S8 97

1 98 :t 3 1.01 pCi Mrt-54 92 :t 3 96:1: 3 1.04 pCi Fe-S9 78 :t 2 89 ::t 4 1.14 pCi Zri-65 174 :t 5 193 +/- 6 Lll pCi Co-60 121 :t 4 116

2 0.96 June-02 E3133-186 APFilter pCi Ce-141 93 +/- 2 82 +/- 2 0.88 pCi Cr-SI 244 *4.

214

16 0.88 pCi Csl34 12S' +/- 2 94 +/- 2 0.75 (2) pCi Cs-137 95 :t 2 92 :t 2 0.97 pCi Co-58

104*1 98

3 0.94 pCi Mrt-54 99

2 95 :t*3 0.96 pCi Fe-59 84

1 92 :t 5 1.10 pCi Zn-6S 186

3 193

6

. L04 pCi Co-6O 129

3 123 :t 3 0.95 June-02 E3134-186 AP Filter pCi Ce-141 57 :t 3 53 :t 2 0.93 pCi Cr-51

.\\

150

8 150

15 LOO pCi Csl34 77 :t 4 60 +/- 2 0.78 (3) pCi C~-137 58 :!: 3 61

2 1.05 pCi Co-58 64 :!: 2 65 :!: 2 1.02 pCi Mrt-S4 61

3 67 :t 2 1.10 pCi Fe-59 51 :t 3

65. :!: 4 1.27 pCi Zn-65 114 :t 6 130 :!: 5 1.14 pCi Co-60 79 :t 5 82 :!: 2 1.04 J-24 (a) Counting error is two staIidard deviations.

MonthlYear June.-02 September-02 September-02 TABLEJ-6 PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM-2002 PPL'S CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY (Page 3 of3)

Identiftcation Analytics CERML No.

Medium -

Units Nuclide Calculated Results (a)

Results (a)

E3135-186 Charcoal Filter pCi 1-131 98 :t 3 95 :t 3 E3136-186 CharcOal Filter pCi 1-131 94 :t 3 90 :t 3 E3137-186 Charcoal Filter pCi 1-131 93 :t 3 89 :t 3 E3386-186 Milk pCi/l 1-131 78 :t 4 78 :t 3 pCill Ce-141 216 :t 11 203 :t 10 pCi/l Cr-51 307 :t 15 318 :t 14 pCi/l Cs-l34 178 :t 9 156 :t 9 pCi/l Cs-137 171 :t 9 178 :t 8 pCi/l Co-58 131 :t 7 141 :t 7 pCi/l Mn-54 206 :t 10 233 :t 9 pCi/l Fe-59 120 :t 6 136 :t 5 pCi/l Zn-65 254 :t 13 270 :t 13 pCi/l Co-60 201 :t 10 203 :t 10 E3387~186 Water pCi/l H-3 12000 :t 600 12034 :t 145 (a) CountiDg error is two standard deviations.

CERMLI Analytics Ratio 0.97 0.96 0.96 1.00.

0.94 1.04 0.88 1.04 1.08 1.13 1.13 1.06 1.01 1.00 J-25 Tj 0 -

t-j H

s H1 o

~

co f-'-

o

s o

s I-'

MonthlYear June.-02 September-02.

September-02 TABLEJ-6

. PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM-2002 PPL'S CORPORATE ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTMTY MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY (page 3 of 3)

Identittcation Analytics CERML No.

Medium

Units Nuclide Calculated Results (a)

Results (a)

E313S-186 Charcoal Filter pCi 1-131 98 :t 3 95 :t 3 E3136-186 Charcoal Filter pCi 1-131 94 :t 3 90 :t 3 E3137-186 Charcoal Filter pCi 1-131 93 :t 3 89 :t 3 E3386-186 Milk pCiIl 1-131 78 :t 4 78 :t 3 pCill Ce-141 216 :t 11 203 :t 10 pCi/l Cr-Sl 307 :t IS 318 :t 14 pCi/l Cs-l34 178 :t 9 156 :t 9 pCi/l Cs-137 171 :t 9 178 :t 8 pCi/l Co-58 131 :t 7 141 :t 7 pCi/l Mn-54 206 :t 10 233 :t 9 pCi/l Fe-59 120 :t 6 136 :t 5 pCi/l z.n..6S 254 :t 13 270 :t 13 pCi/l Co-60 201 :t 10 203 :t 10 E3387~186 Water pCi/l H-3 12000 :t 600 12034 :t 145 (a) CountiDg error is two standard deviations.

CERMIJ Analytics Ratio 0.97 0.96 0.96 1.00 0.94 1.04 0.88 1.04 1.08 1.13 1.13 1.06 1.01 1.00 J-25

COMMENTS 1

An unacceptably low level of Cs-134 was reported for the analysis of this spiked air particulate filter. This exception was reported to CERML's Manager by email on August 9, 2002. An investigation of this occurrence was requested.

Under-reporting for Cs-134 in multiple environmental media by both TBE and CERML has been recognized before. Procedural steps have been. established to compensate for under reporting of actual sample analysis results if Cs-134 is identified at levels in excess of analysis MDCs.

2 An unacceptably low level of Cs-134 was reported for the analysis of this spiked air particulate filter. This exception was reported to CERML's Manager by email on August 9, 2002. An investigation of this occurrence was requested.

Under-reporting for Cs-134 in multiple environmental media by both TBE and CERML has been recognized before. Procedural steps have been established to compensate for under reporting of actualsaIpple analysis results if Cs-134 is identified at levels in excess of analysis MDCs.

3 An unacceptably high level of Cs-134 was reported for the analysis of this spiked air particulate filter. This exception was reported to CERML's Manager by email on August 9, 2002. An investigation of this occurrence was requ~sted.

Procedural steps ~ave been established to compensate for under reporting of actual sample analysis results if Cs-134 is identified at levels in excess of analysis MDCs.

1-26 hj 0

J-l H

J t":h 0 i rt 1-'-

0

J 0

J I-'

COMMENTS 1

An unacceptably low level of Cs-134 was reported for the analysis of this spiked air particulate filter. This exception was reported to CERML's Manager by email onAugust9.2002.Aninvestigation of this occurrence was requested.

Under-reporting for Cs-134 in multiple environmental media by both TBE and CERML has been recognized before. Procedural steps have been established to compensate for under reporting of actual sample analysis results if Cs-134 is identified at levels in excess of analysis MDCs.

2 An unacceptably low level of Cs-134 was reported for the analysis of this spiked air particulate filter. This exception was reported to CERML's Manager by email on August9,2002. An investigation of this occurrence was requested.

Under-reporting forCs-134 in multiple environmental media by both TBE and CERML has been recognized before. Procedural steps have been established to compensate for under reporting of actuals"arpple analysis results if Cs-134 is identified at levels in excess of analysis MDCs.

3 An unacceptably high level of Cs-134 was reported for the analysis of this spiked air particulate filter. This exception "

was reported to CERML's Manager by email on August9,2002. An investigation of this occurrence was requested.

Procedural steps ~ave been established to compensate for under reporting of actual sample analysis results if Cs-134 is identified at levels in excess of analysis MDCs.

J-26

TABLEJ-7 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOCIATES. (ERA)

PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM-2002 TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,(TBE)

(page 1 of 1)

Identification ERA Known TBE

'TBFJERA MonthIYear No.

MediUm Units Nuclide Result (a)

Results (a)

Ratio May-02 Rad-49 Water pCi/l Or-Beta 189 162 0.86 pCi/l Co-60 39.1 39.3 1.01 pCi/l Cs-134 17.1 15.5 0.91 pCi/l Cs-137 52.1 52.2 1.00 pCi/l Sr-89 31.7 27.2 0.86 pCill Sr-90 28.3 25.1 0.89 pCi/l 1-131 14.7 13.35 0.91 pCi/l H-3 17400 14600 0.84 November-02 Rad-51 Water pCi/l H-3 10200 10100 0.99 pCi/l 1-131 6.76 7.94 1.17 pCi/l Or-Beta 330 280 0.85 pCi/l Sr-89 47.6 41.7 0.88 pCi/l Sr-90 7.56 6.75 0.89 pCill Co-60 104 122 1.17 pCi/l Cs-134 55.5 60.0 1.08 pCi/l Cs-137 117 140 1.20 (a) Results are the average of three measurements, reported in units of pCi/l.

J-27 Ij 0

i"i H

~

' TABLEJ-7 '

H1 0

ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOCIATES,(ERA)

. ~

PROFICIENCY TESTING ' PROGRAM-2002 OJ rt f-'.

TELEDYNE BROWN ENGlNEERING. ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES,(TBE) 0

~

(page 1 of 1) 0

~

f-'

Identification ERA Known TBE

'TBFJERA MontblYear No.

Mediiun Units Nuclide Result (a)

Results (a)

Ratio May-02 Rad-49 Water pCi/l Gr-Beta 189 162 0.86 pCi/l Co-60 39.1 39.3

' 1.01 pCi/l Cs-134 17.1 15.5 0.91 pCi/l Cs-t37 52.1 52.2 1.00 pCi/l Sr-89 31.7 27.2 0.86 pCill Sr-90 28.3 25.1 0.89 pCi/l 1-131 14.7 13.35 0.91 pCi/l H-3 17400 14600 0.84 November-02 Rad-51 Water pCi/l H-3 10200 10100 0.99 pCi/l 1-131 6.76 7.94 1.17 pCi/l Gr-Beta 330 280 0.85 pCi/l Sr-89 47.6 41.7 0.88 pCi/l Sr-90 7.56 6.75 0.89 pCill Co-60 104 122 1.17 pCi/l Cs-134 55.5 60.0 1.08 pCi/l Cs-137 117 140 1.20 (a) Results are the average of three measurements, reported in uhits of pCi/l.

J-27

Ij 0

r:

TAJ-s H

~

H1 ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2002 0

~

TELEDYNE QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM rt TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES f-'.

0 (Page 1 of 2).

~

0

~

I-'

Analytlcs Identification Calculated TBE TBFJ AnalyticS MonthIYear No.

Medium Units Nuclide

. Results Results Ratio August~02 AI6018-55 Water.

peill Sr-89 4.99E-03 4.12E-03 0.83 pCill Sr-90 2.64E-04 2.43E-04 0.92 A 16020-SS Water pCill H-3 2.00E-03 1.93E-03 0.97 September-02 AIS989-148 Water pCiII Sr-89 4.99E-03 4.02E-03 0.81 pCill Sr-90 2.64E-04 2.49E-04 0.94 September-02 E3324-396 Milk pCiII Sr-89 92 106.

LIS pCiIl Sr-90 39 39

.1.00

.. September-02 E332S-396 Milk pCiIl

]-131 80 84 LOS pCiII Ce-141 160.

168 LOS pCiII Cr-Sl 227 210.5 0.93 pCill Cs-134 132 127 0.96 pCi/1 Cs-137 127 136 1.07 pCi/1 Co-S8 97 93 0.96 pCiIl Mn-54 152 165 1.09 pC ill Pe-59 89 90 1.01 pCill Zn-65 187 196 1.05 pC ill Co-60 149 147 0.99 September -02 E-3327-396 AP Pilter pCi Ce-141 110 115 1 ~05 pCi Cr-51 156 163.6 1.0S pCi Cs-134 90 79 0.88 pCi Cs-J37 87 95 1.09 pCi Co-58 67 71 1.06 pCi Mo-54 104 118 1.13 pCi Fe-59 61 76 1.25 pCi Zo-65 130 155 Ll9 pCi Co-60 102 108 1:06

(

J-28 Ij 0

r:

TAJ-8 H

~

H1 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSSCHECK PROGRAM - 2002 0

~

TELEDYNE QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM rt TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES f-'.

0 (Page 1 of 2).

~

0

~

I--'

Analytics Identification Calculated THE TBFJ AnalyticS MonthlYear No.

Medium

. Units.

Nuclide Results Results Ratio

. August~02 A16018-S5 Water.

pCill Sr-89 4.99E-03 4.12E-03 0.83 pCiIl Sr-90 2.64E-04 2.43E-04 0.92 A 16020-S5 Water pCill H-3 2.00E-03 L93E-03 0.97 Scptember-02 A15989-148 Water pCiIl Sr-89 4.99E-03 4.02E-03 0.81 j>Cill Sr-90 2.64E-04 2.49E-04 0.94 September-02 E3324-396 Milk.

pCiIl Sr-89 92 106.

US pCiIJ Sr-90 39 39 1.00 S.eptember -02 E3325-396 Milk pCiII 1-131 80 84 LOS

. pCiIl Ce-141 160 168 LOS pCiIJ Cr-SI 227 210.5 0.93 pCiIl Cs-134 132 127 0.96 pCi/1 Cs-137 127 136 1.07 pCi/1 Co-58 97

.93 0.96 pCiII Mn-S4 152 165 1.09 pCill Fe-59 89 90

. 1.01 pCill Zn-6S 187 196 1.05 pCiIJ Co-60 149 147 0.99 Septeinber -02 E-3327-396 AP Filter pCi Ce-141 110 115 1 ~05 pCi Cr-S1 156 163.6 1.05 pCi Cs-134 90 79 0.88 pCi Cs-137 87 95 1.09 pCi Co-S8 67 71 1.06 pCi Mo-54 104 118 1.13 pCi Fe-59 61 76 1.25 pCi Zo-65

.130 155 1.19 pCi Co-60 102 108 1:06

(

J-28

TABLEJ-8 ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2002 TELEDYNE QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (Page 2 of 2)

Analytics Identification Calculated TBE TBFJ Analytics Month/Year No.

Medium Units Nuclide Results Results Ratio September-02 E3326-396 Charcoal Filter pCi 1-131 85 73 0.86 December-02 E3520-396 Milk pCiIl Sr-89 68 88 1.29 (1) pCiII Sr-90 38 40 1.05 December -02 E352 1-396 Milk pCiII 1-131 86 97 1.13 pCiIl Ce-141 III 136 1.23 (1) pCiIl Cr-51 346 347 1.00 pCiIl Cs-134 99 97 0.98 pCiIl Cs-137 220 229 1.04 pCiIl Co-58 139 143 1.03 pCiIl Mn-54 142 162 1.14 pCiII Fe-59 72 80 1.11 pCiII Zn-65 178 217 1.22 (1) pCiII Co-60 164 172 1.05 December-02 E3523-396 AP Filter pCi Ce-141 128 108 0.84 pCi Cr-51 398 370 0.93 pCi Cs-134 114 79 0.69 (2) pCi Cs-137 253 226 0.89 pCi Co-58 160 141 0.88 pCi Mn-54 163 152 0.93 pCi Fe-59 83 89 1.07 pCi Zn-65 206 196 0.95 pCi Co-60 189 170 0.90 E3522-396 Charcoal Filter pCi 1-131 96 84 0.88 J-29 Ij o

i'i H

~

TABLEJ-8

. H'l 0

ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2002

~

TELEDYNE QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM OJ rt f-'.

TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 0

~

(Page 2of2) 0

~

f-'

Analytlcs Identification Calculated TBE TBFJ Analytics MonthlYear

. No.

Medium Units NucUde Results Results Ratio September-02 E3326-396 Charcoal Filter pCi 1-131 85 73 0.86 December-02 E3520-396 Milk pCiII Sr-89 68 88 1.29 (1)

. pCiII Sr-90 38 40 1.05 December-02 E3521-396 Milk pCiII

1-131 86 97 1.13 pCiII Ce-141 111 136 1.23 (1) pCiII Cr-51 346 347 1.00 pCiII Cs-134 99 97 0.98

. pCiII Cs-137 220 229 1.04 pCiII Co-58 139 143 1.03 pCiII Mn-54 142 162 1.14

. pCiII Fe-59 72 80 1.11 pCiII Zn-65 178 217 1.22 (1) pCiII Co-60 164 172 1.05 December-02 E3523-396 AP Filter pCi Ce-141 128 108 0.84 pCi Cr-51 398 370 0.93 pCi Cs-134 114 79 0.69 (2) pCi Cs-137 253 226 0.89 pCi Co-58 160 141 0.88 pCi Mn-54 163 152 0.93.

pCi Fe-59 83 89 1.07 pCi Zn-65 206 196 0.95 pCi Co-60 189 170 0.90 December-02 E3522-396 Charcoal Filter pCi 1-131 96 84 0.88 J-29

. COMMENTS 1

High bias identified. Evaluation of results requested by PPL via email on April 29, 2003.

2 Coincidental summing resulted in low Cesium-134 activity. Elimination ofthe coincidental summing resulted in an activity of 110 pCL No further action required:

j 1-30 J

0 r:

H

~

H1 0

~

OJ

("t.

1-'-

0

~

0

~

I-'

Tj 0

I-i H

~

rn 0

~

OJ rt -

f-' -

. COMMENTS 0

~

0

~

1 High bias identified. Evaluation of results requested by PPL via email on April 29, 200:3.

f-'

2 Coincidental summing resulted in low Cesium-134 activity. Elimination of the coincidental summing resulted in an activity of 110 pCi.

No further action required:

J-30

1j 0

t-j H

TABLEJ-9

.::J H1 0

PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM

~

ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2002 Pl rt f-'.

TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL. SERVICES 0

J (Page 1 of 1) 0

J I-'

Identification All8lytics TBE TBFJ Analytics Mooth/Year No.

Medllim Units Nuclide Calculated Results (a)

Results (a)

Ratio December-02 E3511-186

. Milk pCiIl 1-131 92 +/- 5 91 +/- 8 0.99 pCiIl Ce-141 126 +/- 6

+/-

(1) pCiIl Cr-51 391 +/- 20

+/-

(1) pCiIl Cs-134 112 +/- 6 103 +/- 5 0.92 pCiIl Cs-137 248 +/- 12 264 +/- 9 1.06 pCiIl Co-58 157 +/- 8 157 +/- 7 1.00 pCiIl Mn-54 160 +/- 8 168 +/- 7 1.05 pCiIl Fe-59 81 +/- 4.

94 +/- 14 1.16 pCiIl Zn-65 202 +/- 10 236 +/- 13 1.17 pCiIl Co-60 186 +/- 9 201 +/- 8 1.08 December-02 E3512-186 Charcoal Filter pCi 1-131 89 +/- 4 94 +/- 4 1.06 E3513-186 Charcoal Filter pCi 1-131 84 +/- 4 91 +/- 3 1.08

.E3514-186 Charcoal Filter pCi 1-131 96 +/- 5 97 +/- 3 1.01 J-31 (a) counting error is two standard deviations Ij 0

i"i H

TABLEJ*9

. ~

H1 0

PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM

~

ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM* 2002 OJ rt f-'.

TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 0

~

(Page 1 of 1) 0

~

f-'

Identification AnaJytics TBE TBFJ AnaJytics Month/Year No.

Medilim Units Nuclide Calculated Results (a)

Results (a)

Ratio December-02 E351l-186 Milk pCiII 1-131 92 +/- 5 91 +/- 8 0.99 pCiII Ce-141 126 +/- 6

+/-

(1) pCiII Cr-51 391 +/- 20

+/-

(1) pCiII Cs-134 112 +/- 6 103 +/- 5 0.92 pCiII Cs-137 248 +/- 12 264 +/- 9 L06 pCiII Co-58 157 +/- 8 157 +/- 7 LOO pCiII Mn-54 160 +/- 8 168 +/- 7 LOS pCiII Fe-59 81 +/- 4

94 +/- 14 1.16 pCiII Zn-65 202 +/- 10 236 +/- 13 1.17 pCiII Co-60 186 +/- 9 201 +/- 8 1.08 December-02 E3512-186 Charcoal Filter pCi 1-131 89 +/- 4 94 +/- 4 1.06 E3513-186 Charcoal Filter pCi 1-131 84 +/- 4 91 +/- 3 L08 E3514-186 Charcoal Filter pCi 1-131 96 +/- 5 97 +/- 3 LOI

. J-31 (a) counting error is two standard deviations

'Tj 0

t-j H

~

H1 0

~

OJ rt

. COMMENTS f-'-

0

~

0 1

No results were reported for Ce-141 or Cr-51 for the analysis of this spiked miik on the TBE analysis sheets.

~

f-'

This exception was reported to TBE via email fromPPLonApril22.2oo3.Aninvestigation of this occurrence was requested.

J-32

'Tj 0

t-j H

~

H1 0

~

OJ rt

. COMMENTS f-'-

0

~

0 1

No results were reported for Ce-141 or Cr-51 for the analysis of this spiked miik on the TBE analysis sheets.

~

f-'

This exception was reported to TBE via email fromPPLon April 22,2003. An investigation of this occurrence was requested.

J-32

Ij 0 r:

H

~

H1 0

ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY (EML)

~

QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (QAP) rt f-"

TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 0

~

(Page 1 of 2) 0

~

I-'

Identification EMLKnown TBE TBFJEML MonthlY ear.

No.

Medium Units Nuclide Result (a)

Results (a)

Ratio June-02 QAP-56 AP Filter Bq Co-60 30.52 31.7 1.04 Bq Cs ~ 137 28.23 30.4 1.08 Bq Or-Beta 1.30 1.21 0.93 Bq Mn-54 38.53 38.3 0.99 Bq Sr-90 4.832 4.68 0.97 June-02 QAP-56 Soil Bq/kg Ac-228 51.167 50 0.98 Bq/kg Bi-212 53.43 35.9 0.67 (I)

Bq/kg 8i-214 53.933 46.3 0.86

. Bq/kg Csc137 1326.67 1300 0.98 8q/kg K-40 621.67 608 0.98 8q/kg Pb-212 51.1 49.4 0.97 Bq/kg Pb-214 54.367 49.1 0.90 Bq/kg Sr-90

.53.756 46.6 0.87 June-02 QAP-56 Vegetation 8q/kg C0:-60 11.23 11.7 1.04 Bq/kg Cs-137 313.667 346 1.10 Bq/kg K-40

. 864:33 952 1.10 Bq/kg Sr-90 586.28 477 0.81 June-02 QAP-56 Water Bqll Co-60 347.33 367 1.06 Bqll

. Cs-134 3.357 2.93 0.87 8qll Cs-137 56.067 59.6 1.06 Bqll Or-Beta 1030 895 0.87 Bqll H-3 283.7 285 1.00 Bqll Sr-90 7.579 5.78 0.76 (I)

J-33 Tj 0

.1-1 H

TABLEJ-IO

~

rn 0

DOE - ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY (EML)

~

QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (QAP)

OJ rt f-'.

TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 0

~

(Page 1 of 2) 0

~

f-'

Identification EMLKnown TBE TBEJEML MonthlY ear.

No.

Medium Units Nuclide Result (a)

. Results (a)

Ratio

June-02 QAP-56 AP Filter Bq Co-60 30.52 31.7 1.04 Bq Cs~ 137 2S.23 30.4 LOS Bq Or-Beta 1.30 1.21 0.93 Bq Mn-54 3853 38.3 0.99 Bq Sr-90 4.832 4.68 0.97 June-02 QAP-56 Soil Bq/kg Ac-228 5Ll67 50 0.98 Bq/kg Bi-2I2 53.43 35.9 0.67 (1)

Bq/kg Bi-214 53.933 46.3 0.86 Bq/kg Cs~137 1326.67 1300 0.98 Bq/kg K-40 621.67 608 0.98 Bq/kg Pb-212 5Ll 49.4 0.97 Bq/kg Pb-214 54.367 49.1 0.90 Bq/kg Sr-90

.53.756 46.6 0.87 June-02 QAP-56 Vegetation Bq/kg C<r60 11.23 11.7 1.04 Bq/kg Cs-137 313.667 346 1.10 Bq/kg K-40

. 864:33 952 1.10 Bq/kg Sr-90 586.28 477 0.81 June-02 QAP-56 Water Bqll Co-60 347.33 367 1.06 Bqll

. Cs-134 3.357 2.93 0.87 Bqll Cs-137 56.067 59.6 1.06 Bqll Or-Beta 1030 895 0.S7 Bqll H-3 283.7

285 1.00 Bqll Sr-90 7.579 5.78 0.76 (1)

J-33

TA.J-I0 DOE - ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY (EML)

QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (QAP)

TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES

~

(page 1 of 2)

~

Identification EMLKnown TBE TBEJEML MonthlYear No.

Medium Units Nuclide Result (a)

Results (3)

Ratio June-02 QAP-56 AP Filter Bq Co-60 30.52 31.7 1.04 Bq Cs-137 28.23 30.4 1.08 Bq Or-Beta 1.30 1.21 0.93 Bq Mn-54 38.53 38.3 0.99 Bq Sr-90 4.832 4.68 0.97 June-02 QAP-56 Soil Bq/kg Ac-228 51.167 50 0.98 Bq/kg Bi-212 53.43 35.9 0.67 (1)

Bq/kg Bi-214 53.933 46.3 0.86 Bq/kg Cs-137 1326.67 1300 0.98 Bq/kg K-40 621.67 608 0.98 Bq/kg Pb-212 51.1 49.4 0.97 Bq/kg Pb-214 54.367 49.1 0.90 Bq/kg Sr-90 53.756 46.6 0.87

\\.

June-02 QAP-56 Vegetation Bq/kg Co-60 11.23 11.7 1.04 Bq/kg Cs-137 313.667 346 1.10 Bq/kg K-40 864.33

. 952 1.10 Bq/kg Sr-90 586.28 477 0.81 June-02 QAP-56 Water Bq/l Co-60 347.33 367 1.06 Bq/l Cs-134 3.357 2.93 0.87 Bq/l Cs-137 56.067 59.6 1.06 Bq/l Or-Beta 1030 895 0.87 Bq/l H-3 283.7 285 1.00 Bq/l Sr-90 7.579 5.78 0.76 (1)

J-33 0

t-j TA.J-IO H

~

H1 0

DOE - ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY (EML)

~

QUAUTY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (QAP)

PJ r-r f-'.

TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 0

~

(page 1 of 2) 0

~

I-'

Identification EMLKnown TBE TBFJEML Month/Year No.

Medium Units Nuclide Result (a)

Results (a)

Ratio June-02 QAP-56 AP Filter Bq Co-60 30.52 31.7.

1.04 Bq Cs-137 28.23 30.4 L08 Bq Gr-Beta 1.30 1.21 0.93 Bq Mn-54 38.53 38.3 0.99 Bq Sr-90 4.832 4.68 0.97 June-02 QAP-56 Soil Bq/kg Ac-228 51.167 50 0.98 Bq/kg Bi-212 53.4~

35.9 0.67

.. (1)

Bq/kg Bi-214 53.933 46.3 0.86 Bq/kg Cs-137 1326.67 1300 0.98 Bq/kg K-40

. 621.67.

608 0.98 Bq/kg Pb-212 5l.1 49.4 0.97 Bq/kg Pb-214 54.367 49.1

0.90 Bq/kg Sr-90 53.756 46.6.

0.87 June-02 QAP-56 Vegetation Bq/kg Co-60 11.23 11.7 1.04 Bq/kg Cs-137 313.667 346 1.l0 Bq/kg K-40 864.33 952 1.10 Bq/kg Sr-90 586.28 477 0.81 1une-02 QAP-56 Water Bq!\\

Co-60 347.33 367 1.06 Bq!\\

Cs-134 3.357 2.93 0.87 Bq/l Cs-137 56.067 59.6 1.06 Bq!\\

Gr-Beta 1030 895 0.87 Bq/l H-3 283.7 285 1.00 Bqll

, Sr-90 7.579 5.78 0.76 (1) 1-33

Ij 0

I-i H

TABLEJ-IO

. ~

H1 0

DOE - ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY (EML)

~

QUAUTY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (QAP).

OJ rt TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 0

~

(page 2 of 2) 0

~

I-'

Identification EMLKnown TBE TBFJEML MontblYear No.

Medium Units Nuclide

. Result (a)

Results (a)

Ratio December-02 QAP57 AP Filter 8q Co-60 23.0 24.1 LOS 8q Cs-137 32.5 36.1 1.11 8q Gr-8eta 0.871 0.813 0.93 8q

. Mn-54 52.2 58.3 1.12 8q Sr-90 5.561 5.86 1.05 December-02 QAP57 Soil 8q1kg 8i-212 45.93 23.2 0.51 (1) 8q/kg 8i-214 33.63 32.4 0.96 8q/kg Cs-137 829.33 835 1.01 8q/kg K-40 637.67 671 1.05 8q/kg Pb-212 43.43 42.00 0.97 8q/kg Pb-214 35.2 44.46 1.26 8q/kg Sr-90 41.16 41.00 1.00 December-02 QAP57 Vegetation 8q/kg Co-60 9.66 11.5 1.19 8q/kg Cs-137 300.67 345 1.15 8q/kg K-40 1480 1690 1.14 8q/kg Sr-90 476.26 457 0.96 December-02 QAP57 Water Bqn Am-241 3.043 2.89 0.95 8qn Co-60

. 268.67 303 1.13 8qn Cs-134 60.2 59 0.98 Bqn Cs-137 81.43 85.8 1.05 8qn Gr-Beta 900 817 0.91 8qn.

H-3 227.3 353 1.55 (2) 8qn Sr-90 8.69 8.58 0.99 J-34 Ij 0 r:

H TABLEJ-IO

. ~

H1 0

DOE - ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY (EML)

~

QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (QAP).

rt TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 0

~

(page 2 of 2) 0

~

I-'

Identification EMLKnown TBE TBFJEML MonthlYear No.

Medium Units Nuclide *

. Result (a)

Results (a)

Ratio December-02 QAP57 AP Filter 8q Co-60 23.0 24.1 LOS 8q Cs-137 32.5 36.1 1.11 8q Gr-8eta 0.871 0.813 0.93 8q

. Mn-54 52.2 58.3 1.12 8q Sr-90 5.561 5.86 LOS December-02 QAP57 Soil 8q1kg 8i-212 45.93 23.2 0.51 (1) 8q/kg 8i-214 33.63 32.4 0.96 8q/kg Cs-137 829.33 835 LOI 8q/kg K-40 637.67 671 1.05 8q/kg Pb-212 43.43 42.00 0.97 8q/kg Pb-214 35.2 44.46 1.26

8q/kg Sr-90 41.16 41.00 1.00 December-02 QAP57 Vegetation Bq/kg Co-60 9.66 11.5 1.19 Bq/kg Cs-137 300.67.

345 1.15 Bq/kg K-40 1480 1690 1.14.

8q/kg Sr-90 476.26 457 0.96 December-02 QAP57 Water Bqn Am-241 3.043 2.89 0.95 Bqn Co-60

. 268.67 303 1.13 8qn Cs-134 60.2 59 0.98 Bqn Cs-137 81.43 85.8 1.05 Bqn Gr-Beta 900 817 0.91 Bqn.

H-3 227.3 353 1.55 (2) 8qn Sr-90 8.69 8.58 0.99 J-34

COMMENTS

/

1 Low bias identified. Evaluation of results requested by PPL via email on April 29, 2003.

2 High bias identified. Evaluation of results requested by PPL via email on April 29, 2003.

J-35 Ij o r:

H

~

H1 o

~

OJ rt f-' -o

~

o

~

I-'

COMMENTS 1

Low bias identified. Evaluation of results requested by PPL via email on April 29, 2003.

2 High bias identified. Evaluation of results requested by PPL via email on April 29, 2003.

J-35

MIXED ANAL YTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (TBE)

(Page 1 of 1)

Identification MAPEPKnoWD TBE TBFlMAPEP MontblYear No.

Medium Units Nuclide Result (a)

Results (a)

Ratio March-02 01-W9 Water pCiIl Mn-54 246 253 1.03 pCiIl Co-57 143 141 0.99 pCiIl C0-60 141 143 1.01 pCiIl Cs-134 28.5 26.0 0.91 pCiIl Cs-137 286 270 0.94 pCiIl Sr-90 4.8 4.71 0.98 August-02 02-S9 Soil pCi/kg Mn-54 546 679 1.24 pCi/kg Co-57 246 289 1.17 pCi/kg Co-60 87.5 109 1.25 pCi/kg Cs-134 862 948 1.10.

pCi/kg Cs-137 111 131 1.18 pCi/kg Zn-65 809 1020 1.26 pCi/kg K-40 652 722 1.11 Evaluation Agreement Agreement Agreement Agreement Agreement Agreement Warning Agreement Warning Agreement Agreement Warning Agreement (1)

(I)

J-36 TABLEJ-ll DOE,;MAPEP MIXED ANAL YTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM.

TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (TBE)

(Page 1 of 1)

Identification MAPEPKnoWD TBE TBFJMAPEP MontblYear No.

Medium Units Nuclide Result (a)

Results (a)

Ratio Evaluation March-02 01-W9 Water pCiIl Mn-S4 246 253 1.03 Agreement pCiIl Co-57 143 141 0.99

. Agreement pCiIl Co-60 141 143 1.01 Agreement pCiIl Cs-134 28.5 26.0 0.91 Agreement pCiIl Cs-137 286 270.

0.94 Agreement pCiIl Sr-90 4.8 4.71 0.98

.. Agreement August-02 02-S9 Soil pCi/kg Mn-54 546 679 1.24 Warning (1) pCi/kg Co-57 246 289 1.17 Agreement pCi/kg Co-60 87.5 109 1.25 Warning (1) pCi/kg Cs-134 862 948 1.10 Agreement pCi/kg Cs-137 111 131 1.18 Agreement pCi/kg Zn-65 809 1020 1.26 Warning (1) pCi/kg K-40 652 722 1.11 Agreement J-36

Tj 0

t-j H

s H1 0

COMMENTS

~

ro f-'-

0 High bias identified: Evaluation of results requested by PPL via email on April 29,2003.

s 0

s I-'

J-37

. ~

Tj 0

1-i H

s H1 0

~

COMMENTS Pl ro f-'-

0 High bias identified: Evaluation of results requested by PPL via email on April 29, 2003.

s 0

s I-'

J-37

ML093340218

Contents

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

ML093340218

Text

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search