ML093340221
| ML093340221 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Susquehanna, Bell Bend  |
| Issue date: | 05/06/2005 |
| From: | Shriver B PPL Bell Bend, Susquehanna |
| To: | Office of New Reactors |
| Shared Package | |
| ML093270273 | List: |
| References | |
| BNP-2009-356 | |
| Download: ML093340221 (166) | |
Text
Brltt T. McKinney Vice President-Nudear Site Operations MAY 062005 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Mail Station OPI-17 Washington, DC 20555 PPL Susquehanna, LLC 769 Salem Boulevard Berwick, PA 18603 Tel. 570.542.3149 Fax 570.542.1504 btmckinney@pplweb.com SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECT~C STATION ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT PLA-5894 Docket Nos. 50-387 and 50-388 The Susquehanna SES Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report is hereby submitted for the calendar year 2004 in accordance with Technical Specification Section 5.6.2.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Rocco R. Sgarro, Manager, Nuclear Regulatory Affairs at (610) 774-7552.
Sincerely, Attachments copy: Mr. A. J. Blarney, NRC Sr. Resident Inspector Mr. S. J. CoIlins, NRC Region I, Regional Administrator Mr. J. T. Furia, NRC Region I, Senior Health Physicist Mr. R. V. Guzman, NRC Project Manager Mr. R. Janati, DEPIBRP Brltt T. McKinney Vice President-Nudear Site Operations MAY 062005 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Mail Station OPI-17 Washington, DC 20555 PPL Susquehanna, LLC 769 Salem Boulevard Berwick, PA 18603 Tel. 570.542.3149 Fax 570.542.1504 btmckinney@pplweb.com SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECT~C STATION ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT PLA-5894 Docket Nos. 50-387 and 50-388 The Susquehanna SES Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report is hereby submitted for the calendar year 2004 in accordance with Technical Specification Section 5.6.2.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Rocco R. Sgarro, Manager, Nuclear Regulatory Affairs at (610) 774-7552.
Sincerely, Attachments copy: Mr. A. J. Blarney, NRC Sr. Resident Inspector Mr. S. J. CoIlins, NRC Region I, Regional Administrator Mr. J. T. Furia, NRC Region I, Senior Health Physicist Mr. R. V. Guzman, NRC Project Manager Mr. R. Janati, DEPIBRP Brltt T. McKinney Vice President-Nudear Site Operations MAY 062005 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Mail Station OPI-17 Washington, DC 20555 PPL Susquehanna, LLC 769 Salem Boulevard Berwick, PA 18603 Tel. 570.542.3149 Fax 570.542.1504 btmckinney@pplweb.com SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECT~C STATION ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT PLA-5894 Docket Nos. 50-387 and 50-388 The Susquehanna SES Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report is hereby submitted for the calendar year 2004 in accordance with Technical Specification Section 5.6.2.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Rocco R. Sgarro, Manager, Nuclear Regulatory Affairs at (610) 774-7552.
Sincerely, Attachments copy: Mr. A. J. Blarney, NRC Sr. Resident Inspector Mr. S. J. CoIlins, NRC Region I, Regional Administrator Mr. J. T. Furia, NRC Region I, Senior Health Physicist Mr. R. V. Guzman, NRC Project Manager Mr. R. Janati, DEPIBRP
Susq'lJ~ta'~I""astean1
- Electfl'~;Station
,,~"~~ <;
Units 1;;'~'&2 2004 ANNUAL <REPORT Annual Radiological t
Environmental
, ~"-."~7~.~. __ ~._..,~
Op~r~~ln.g
... '.~:::: ;~_:c::;, ':.~.. >.~.,;.~.. ':;~ ;.. '.~. ~>~;~.~,e p.grt ~.
Susq'lJ~ta'~I""astean1
- Electfl'~;Station *.
,,~"~~ <;
Units 1;;'~'&2 *f
(.~-.'
2004 ANNUAL <REPORT Annual Radiological t
Environmental
, ~"-."~7~.~. __ ~._..,~
Op~r~~ln.g
... '.~:::: ;~_:c::;, ':.~.. >.~.,;.~.. ':;~ ;.. '.~. ~>~;~.~,e p.grt ~.
SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION
\\J UNITS 1 and 2 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report January 1 Through December 31, 2004 Prepared by:
. Reviewed by:
R. E. Doebler, Chemistry Support Supervisor - SSES B. E. Rhoads, Manager - Plant Chemistry PPL Susquehanna,llC 769 Salem Boulevard Berwick. Pennsylvania 18603 r
i SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION
\\J UNITS 1 and 2 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report January 1 Through December 31, 2004 Prepared by:
. Reviewed by:
R. E. Doebler, Chemistry Support Supervisor - SSES B. E. Rhoads, Manager - Plant Chemistry PPL Susquehanna,llC 769 Salem Boulevard Berwick. Pennsylvania 18603 r
i
\\..../
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY
AND CON~USIONS........................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................... 6 AMBIENT RADIATION MONITORING.............................................................................. 17 AQUATIC PATIiW A Y MONITORING................................................................................ 21 A'lMOSPHERIC PATIiW AY MONITORING.............................................................. ;....... 34
'TERRES1RIAL PATHWAY MONITORING....................................................................... 38 GROUND WA1'ER MONITORING....................................................................................... 43 REF'ERENCES......................................................................................................... :.............. 45 APPENDICES A.
2004 REMP SAMPLE COLLECfION, ANALYSIS TYPE, A-I ANALYTICAL METHODS, PROGRAM CHANGES AND EXCEPTIONS B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
- 1.
J.
~. -
2004 REMP MONITORING SCHEDULE (SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS)
B-1 2004 REMP MONITORING LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS C-l 2004 LAND USE CENSUS RESULTS D-I INTENTIONAlLY LEFf BLANK E-l INTENTIONAlLY LEFf BLANK F-l 2004 SSES REMP
SUMMARY
OF DATA G-l COMPARISON OF INDICATOR AND CONTROL 2004 H-l REMP ANNUAL MEANS FOR SELECTED MEDIA ANALYSIS RESULTS WITH MEANS FROM PREOPERATIONAL AND PRIOR OPERATIONAL PERIODS SPECIFIC ANALYSIS RESULTS TABULATED BY MEDIA AND SAMPLING PERIOD PERFORMANCE
SUMMARY
FOR THE RADIO ANAL YSES OF SPIKED ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE 1v1EDIA - 2004 I-I 1-1
\\..../
TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY
AND CON~USIONS........................................................................................ 1 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................................... 6 AMBIENT RADIATION MONITORING.............................................................................. 17 AQUATIC PATIiW A Y MONITORING................................................................................ 21 A'lMOSPHERIC PATIiW AY MONITORING.............................................................. ;....... 34
'TERRES1RIAL PATHWAY MONITORING....................................................................... 38 GROUND WA1'ER MONITORING....................................................................................... 43 REF'ERENCES......................................................................................................... :.............. 45 APPENDICES A.
2004 REMP SAMPLE COLLECfION, ANALYSIS TYPE, A-I ANALYTICAL METHODS, PROGRAM CHANGES AND EXCEPTIONS B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
- 1.
J.
~. -
2004 REMP MONITORING SCHEDULE (SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS)
B-1 2004 REMP MONITORING LOCATION DESCRIPTIONS C-l 2004 LAND USE CENSUS RESULTS D-I INTENTIONAlLY LEFf BLANK E-l INTENTIONAlLY LEFf BLANK F-l 2004 SSES REMP
SUMMARY
OF DATA G-l COMPARISON OF INDICATOR AND CONTROL 2004 H-l REMP ANNUAL MEANS FOR SELECTED MEDIA ANALYSIS RESULTS WITH MEANS FROM PREOPERATIONAL AND PRIOR OPERATIONAL PERIODS SPECIFIC ANALYSIS RESULTS TABULATED BY MEDIA AND SAMPLING PERIOD PERFORMANCE
SUMMARY
FOR THE RADIO ANAL YSES OF SPIKED ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE 1v1EDIA - 2004 I-I 1-1
\\J LIST OF FIGURES Figure Numbers Title Page
- 1.
Exposure Pathways to Humans 10
- 2.
2004 no Monitoring Locations within One Mile of the SSES 11
- 3.
2004 no Monitoring Locations from One to Five Miles of the 12 SSES
- 4.
2004 TLD Monitoring Locations Greater than Five Mi1es from the 13 SSES
- 5.
2004 Environmental Sampling Locations within One Mile of the 14 SSES
- 6.
2004 Environmental Sampling Locations from One to Five Miles of
'IS the SSES
\\"._/
- 7.
2004 Environmental Sampling Locations Greater than Five Miles 16 from the SSES
- 8.
Ambient Radiation Leve]s Based on no Data 20
- 9.
Gross Beta Activity in Surface Water 31
- 10.
Tritium Activity in Surface Water 32
- 11.
Gross Beta Activity in Drinking Water 33
- 12.
Gross Beta Activity in Air Particulates 37
- 13.
Iodine-131 Activity in Milk 42 ii
\\J LIST OF FIGURES Figure Numbers Title Page
- 1.
Exposure Pathways to Humans 10
- 2.
2004 no Monitoring Locations within One Mile of the SSES 11
- 3.
2004 no Monitoring Locations from One to Five Miles of the 12 SSES
- 4.
2004 TLD Monitoring Locations Greater than Five Mi1es from the 13 SSES
- 5.
2004 Environmental Sampling Locations within One Mile of the 14 SSES
- 6.
2004 Environmental Sampling Locations from One to Five Miles of
'IS the SSES
\\"._/
- 7.
2004 Environmental Sampling Locations Greater than Five Miles 16 from the SSES
- 8.
Ambient Radiation Leve]s Based on no Data 20
- 9.
Gross Beta Activity in Surface Water 31
- 10.
Tritium Activity in Surface Water 32
- 11.
Gross Beta Activity in Drinking Water 33
- 12.
Gross Beta Activity in Air Particulates 37
- 13.
Iodine-131 Activity in Milk 42 ii
SUMMARY
AND CONCLUSIONS Radiological Dose Impact This report on the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program covers the period January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004.
During that period, 1388 analyses were performed on 850 samples at 37 sampling locations. Additionally, 253 TLD direct radiation measurements were performed at 58 locations around the site.
In assessing all the data gathered and comparing with SSES pre-operational data, it was concluded that the operation of SSES had no adverse radiological impact on the health and safety of the public or the environment.
The total whole body dose from both ingested radionuclides and direct radiation from SSES Operations is negligible compared to the public's exposure from natural background radiation, medical irradiation, and radiation from consumer products of more than 300 milliremlyear effective dose-equivalent.
The following graph compares public dose from SSES operation to that from other sources of radioactivity and radiation.
COMPARISON OF PERCENT OF AVERAGE ANNUAL PUBLIC EFFECTIVE DOSE-EQUIVALENT FROM OTHER SOURCES WITH THAT FROM THE SSES
~s
<0.01 Medical 14%
Natural Background 81%
5%
Sources for the values provided, with the exception of Susquehanna, are the following from NCRP Report #93 (1987): Tables 2.4 (Natural Background), 5.1 (Consumer Products), and 7.4 (M edical).
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report 1
cOl
SUMMARY
AND CONCLUSIONS Radiological Dose Impact This report on the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program covers the period January 1, 2004 through December 31, 2004.
During that period, 1388 analyses were performed on 850 samples at 37 sampling locations. Additionally, 253 TLD direct radiation measurements were performed at 58 locations around the site.
In assessing all the data gathered and comparing with SSES pre-operational data, it was concluded that the operation of SSES had no adverse radiological impact on the health and safety of the public or the environment.
The total whole body dose from both ingested radionuclides and direct radiation from SSES Operations is negligible compared to the public's exposure from natural background radiation, medical irradiation, and radiation from consumer products of more than 300 milliremlyear effective dose-equivalent.
The following graph compares public dose from SSES operation to that from other sources of radioactivity and radiation.
COMPARISON OF PERCENT OF AVERAGE ANNUAL PUBLIC EFFECTIVE DOSE-EQUIVALENT FROM OTHER SOURCES WITH THAT FROM THE SSES
~s
<0.01 Medical 14%
Natural Background 81%
5%
Sources for the values provided, with the exception of Susquehanna, are the following from NCRP Report #93 (1987): Tables 2.4 (Natural Background), 5.1 (Consumer Products), and 7.4 (M edical).
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report 1
cOl
Summary and Conclusions Ambient Gamma Radiation Environmental direct radiation measurements were performed quarterly on and around the SSES site using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs).
The maximum direct radiation dose from SSES operation to a member of the public was approximately 0.0388 mrem for all of2004. This dose represents approximately 0.16% of the 25-mrem whole-body SSES Technical Requirements (TRO 3.11.3) limit for all SSES sources of radioactivity and radiation.
Aquatic Environment Surface water and drinking water samples were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta, tritium, iodine-I3l, and gamma emitting nuclides. Drinking water samples were also analyzed for concentrations of gross alpha Gross alpha and beta activities detected were consistent with those reported in previous years.
Iodine-I31 activity was detected in 10 of36 surface water samples. The activity was slightly above the MDC.
Evidence indicates that it is there only as the result of the discharge of medical waste to the Susquehanna or Lackawanna Rivers through sewage treatment plants upstream of the SSES.
Iodine-I31 was not reported to have been discharged with water released from the SSES to the Susquehanna River during 2004.
Tritium activity attributable to SSES operation was detected in the aquatic 2
pathway to man. The maximum dose from the ingestion of tritium was estimated at the nearest downriver municipal water supplier via the drinking water pathway and near the outfall of the SSES discharge to the Susquehanna River via the fish pathway. The maximum whole body and organ doses due to tritium identified via REMP samples is approximately 0.0015 mremlyear. This dose is less than one-tenth of one percent of the dose guidelines stated in 10 CFR 50, Appendix 1.
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Summary and Conclusions Ambient Gamma Radiation Environmental direct radiation measurements were performed quarterly on and around the SSES site using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs).
The maximum direct radiation dose from SSES operation to a member of the public was approximately 0.0388 mrem for all of2004. This dose represents approximately 0.16% of the 25-mrem whole-body SSES Technical Requirements (TRO 3.11.3) limit for all SSES sources of radioactivity and radiation.
Aquatic Environment Surface water and drinking water samples were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta, tritium, iodine-I3l, and gamma emitting nuclides. Drinking water samples were also analyzed for concentrations of gross alpha Gross alpha and beta activities detected were consistent with those reported in previous years.
Iodine-I31 activity was detected in 10 of36 surface water samples. The activity was slightly above the MDC.
Evidence indicates that it is there only as the result of the discharge of medical waste to the Susquehanna or Lackawanna Rivers through sewage treatment plants upstream of the SSES.
Iodine-I31 was not reported to have been discharged with water released from the SSES to the Susquehanna River during 2004.
Tritium activity attributable to SSES operation was detected in the aquatic 2
pathway to man. The maximum dose from the ingestion of tritium was estimated at the nearest downriver municipal water supplier via the drinking water pathway and near the outfall of the SSES discharge to the Susquehanna River via the fish pathway. The maximum whole body and organ doses due to tritium identified via REMP samples is approximately 0.0015 mremlyear. This dose is less than one-tenth of one percent of the dose guidelines stated in 10 CFR 50, Appendix 1.
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report
Fish samples were analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides. Concentrations of naturally occurring K-40 were consistent with those detected in previous years. No fission or activation products were detected in fish.
Sediment samples were analyzed for concentrations of gamIIla emitting nuclides. Cesium-137 was observed in sediment and attributed to non-SSES sources (residual fallout from atmospheric weapons testing).
Concentrations of naturally occurring K-40, radium-226, and actinium-thorium-228 were found consistent with those detected in previous years.
Atmospheric Environment Air particulate samples were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta and.
gamma emitting nuclides. Cosmogenic.
Be-7 was detected at levels consistent with those detected in previous years.
Air iodine samples were analyzed for concentrations of iodine-131. All results were less than the MDC.
Terrestrial Environment Soil samples were analyzed 'for concentrations of gamma emitting.
nuclides. Cesium-137 was observed in soil and attributed to non-SSES sources (residual fallout from atmospheric weapons testing). Concentrations of naturally occurring K-40 were consistent with those detected in previous years. Concentrations of naturally occurring radium-226, and actinium-thorium-228 were consistent V
with those of previous years.
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Summary' and Conclusions Cow milk samples were analyzed for concentrations ofiodine-131 as well as other gamma emittipg nuclides. All iodine results were less than the MDC.
Concentrations of naturally occumng' K-40 were consistent with those detected in previous years. N~ fission or activation products \\vere detected.
Potatoes were briefly irrigated at one '
location in June 2004 using Susquehanna River water. These were sampled during the harvest season and analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides. Concentrations of.
miturally occumng K-40 were found consistent with those in previous years.
No fission or activation products were detected.
Ground 'Vater' Ground water samples were analyzed for concentrations oftrithini arid gamma emitting nuclides. Tritium activity above MDC was detected in 1 of 36 samples at control location 12F3. No fission or activation products were detected.
3 Fish samples were analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides. Concentrations of naturally occurring K-40 were consistent with those detected in previous years. No fission or activation products were detected in fish.
Sediment samples were analyzed for concentrations of gamIIla emitting nuclides. Cesium-137 was observed in sediment and attributed to non-SSES sources (residual fallout from atmospheric weapons testing).
Concentrations of naturally occurring K-40, radium-226, and actinium-thorium-228 were found consistent with those detected in previous years.
Atmospheric Environment Air particulate samples were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta and.
gamma emitting nuclides. Cosmogenic.
Be-7 was detected at levels consistent with those detected in previous years.
Air iodine samples were analyzed for concentrations of iodine-131. All results were less than the MDC.
Terrestrial Environment Soil samples were analyzed 'for concentrations of gamma emitting.
nuclides. Cesium-137 was observed in soil and attributed to non-SSES sources (residual fallout from atmospheric weapons testing). Concentrations of naturally occurring K-40 were consistent with those detected in previous years. Concentrations of naturally occurring radium-226, and actinium-thorium-228 were consistent V
with those of previous years.
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Summary' and Conclusions Cow milk samples were analyzed for concentrations ofiodine-131 as well as other gamma emittipg nuclides. All iodine results were less than the MDC.
Concentrations of naturally occumng' K-40 were consistent with those detected in previous years. N~ fission or activation products \\vere detected.
Potatoes were briefly irrigated at one '
location in June 2004 using Susquehanna River water. These were sampled during the harvest season and analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides. Concentrations of.
miturally occumng K-40 were found consistent with those in previous years.
No fission or activation products were detected.
Ground 'Vater' Ground water samples were analyzed for concentrations oftrithini arid gamma emitting nuclides. Tritium activity above MDC was detected in 1 of 36 samples at control location 12F3. No fission or activation products were detected.
3
Summary and Conclusions Relative Radionuclide Activity Levels in Selected Media Some media monitored in the environment are significant for the numbers of gamma-emitting radionuc1ides routinely measured at levels exceeding analysis MDCs.
Sediment in the aquatic pathway and soil in the terrestrial pathway are two such media.
The following graphs show the relative activity contributions for the types of gamma-emitting radionuc1ides reported at levels above the analysis MDCs in sediment and soil at indicator locations during 2004.
4 AQUATIC PATHWAY PERCENT TOTAL GAMMA ACTIVITY Manmade:
SSES 0.0%
SEDIMENT TERRESTRIAL PATHWAY PERCENT TOTAL GAMMA ACTIVITY SOIL O.or.
Naturally occurring radionuc1ides accounted for 99.8 % of the gamma-emitting activity in both sediment and soil in 2004. Man-made radionuc1ides of SSES origin accounted for 0.0% of the gamma-emitting activity in sediment during 2004. Man-made radionuclides of non-SSES origin account for the rest of the gamma-emitting activity in sediment and soil during 2004.
Generally, the activity for naturally occurring radionuc1ides reported in sediment and soil dwarfs the activity of the man-made radionuc1ides.
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Summary and Conclusions Relative Radionuclide Activity Levels in Selected Media Some media monitored in the environment are significant for the numbers of gamma-emitting radionuc1ides routinely measured at levels exceeding analysis MDCs.
Sediment in the aquatic pathway and soil in the terrestrial pathway are two such media.
The following graphs show the relative activity contributions for the types of gamma-emitting radionuc1ides reported at levels above the analysis MDCs in sediment and soil at indicator locations during 2004.
4 AQUATIC PATHWAY PERCENT TOTAL GAMMA ACTIVITY Manmade:
SSES 0.0%
SEDIMENT TERRESTRIAL PATHWAY PERCENT TOTAL GAMMA ACTIVITY SOIL Naturally occurring radionuc1ides accounted for 99.8 % ofthe gamma-emitting activity in both sediment and soil in 2004. Man-made radionuc1ides of SSES origin accounted for 0.0% of the gamma-emitting activity in sediment during 2004. Man-made radionuc1ides of non-SSES origin account for the rest of the gamma-emitting activity in sediment and soil during 2004.
Generally, the activity for naturally occurring radionuc1ides reported in sediment and soil dwarfs the activity of the man-made radionuc1ides.
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report
Radionuclides Contributing to Dose from SSES Operation Of the three man-made radionuclides reported in the environment by the SSES REMP (i.e. H-3, 1-131 and Cs-137), tritium is the only radionuclide attributable to SSES operation.
The whole body and organ dose to members of the public attributable to tritium identified in REMP blowdown samples was 0.0015 mrem.
Tritium was included in the dose calculation because it was identified in the REMP samples of water being discharged to the river. The concentration of tritium in the water and the volume of water discharged were used to determine the amount of tritium released. The presumed exposure
."-./
pathways to the public from this radionuclide were drinking water taken from the Susquehanna River at Danville, P A, and eating fish caught near the SSES discharge to the river.
This assumption is based on the fact that tritium does not emit gamma radiation and the beta radiation emitted by tritium is not sufficiently penetrating to reach an individual on the shore.
2004 Radiological Em'ironmental Monitoring Report Summan' and Conclusions 5
Radionuclides Contributing to Dose from SSES Operation Of the three man-made radionuclides reported in the environment by the SSES REMP (i.e. H-3, 1-131 and Cs-137), tritium is the only radionuclide attributable to SSES operation.
The whole body and organ dose to members of the public attributable to tritium identified in REMP blowdown samples was 0.0015 mrem.
Tritium was included in the dose calculation because it was identified in the REMP samples of water being discharged to the river. The concentration of tritium in the water and the volume of water discharged were used to determine the amount of tritium released. The presumed exposure
."-./
pathways to the public from this radionuclide were drinking water taken from the Susquehanna River at Danville, P A, and eating fish caught near the SSES discharge to the river.
This assumption is based on the fact that tritium does not emit gamma radiation and the beta radiation emitted by tritium is not sufficiently penetrating to reach an individual on the shore.
2004 Radiological Em'ironmental Monitoring Report Summan' and Conclusions 5
RadiologiCal Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP)
The SSES is located on an approximately 1500-acre tract along the Susquehanna River, five miles northeast of Berwick in Salem Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania. The:
area around the site is primarily rural,.
consisting predomiriately of forest and agricultural hinds.. {More specific information on the demography, hydrology, meteorology, and land use characteristics of the area in the vicinity of the SSES can be found in the
. Environmentat'Report (Reference 1)"
the Final Safety Analysis Report (Reference 2), and'the Final Environmental Statement (Reference 3) for the SSES.)
The SSES implements the REMP in accordance with Technical Specifications, Technical Requirements Manual and the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, which are based on the design objeCtives in 10CFR Part 50' Appendix I, Sections IV.B.2;IV.B.3,'
and IV.C.
.~
The REMP supplements the results of the radioactive effluent-monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of.
radioactive materials and levels of radiation in the environment are not :,'>,
higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and modeling of:
the environment in the vicinity of the SSES.
Key objectives of the SSES REMP are as follows:
- Document compliance with SSES REMP Technical Requirements radiological environmental surveillances Verify proper implementation of SSES radiological effluent controls Identify, measure, and evaluate trends of radiomiclide '
concentrations in environmental pathways near SSES Assess impact of SSES Effluents on the environment and the public PPL has maintained a Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program
, (REMP) in the vicinity of the existing Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Units 1 and 2 since April, 1972, prior to construction of both units and ten years prior to the initial operation of Unit 1 in
~eptember, 1982. The purpose of the preoperational REMP (April, 1972 to September," 1982) was to establish a baseline for radioactivity in the local enviroriment that could be compared with the radioactivity levels observed in various environmental media throughout the operational lifetime of the SSES. This comparison faciJitates assessments of the radiological impact of the SSES operation.
2004 Radiological ED\\'ironmental Monitoring Report 6
RadiologiCal Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP)
The SSES is located on an approximately 1500-acre tract along the Susquehanna River, five miles northeast of Berwick in Salem Township, Luzerne County, Pennsylvania. The:
area around the site is primarily rural,.
consisting predomiriately of forest and agricultural hinds.. {More specific information on the demography, hydrology, meteorology, and land use characteristics of the area in the vicinity of the SSES can be found in the
. Environmentat'Report (Reference 1)"
the Final Safety Analysis Report (Reference 2), and'the Final Environmental Statement (Reference 3) for the SSES.)
The SSES implements the REMP in accordance with Technical Specifications, Technical Requirements Manual and the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual, which are based on the design objeCtives in 10CFR Part 50' Appendix I, Sections IV.B.2;IV.B.3,'
and IV.C.
.~
The REMP supplements the results of the radioactive effluent-monitoring program by verifying that the measurable concentrations of.
radioactive materials and levels of radiation in the environment are not :,'>,
higher than expected on the basis of the effluent measurements and modeling of:
the environment in the vicinity of the SSES.
Key objectives of the SSES REMP are as follows:
- Document compliance with SSES REMP Technical Requirements radiological environmental surveillances Verify proper implementation of SSES radiological effluent controls Identify, measure, and evaluate trends of radiomiclide '
concentrations in environmental pathways near SSES Assess impact of SSES Effluents on the environment and the public PPL has maintained a Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program
, (REMP) in the vicinity of the existing Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Units 1 and 2 since April, 1972, prior to construction of both units and ten years prior to the initial operation of Unit 1 in
~eptember, 1982. The purpose of the preoperational REMP (April, 1972 to September," 1982) was to establish a baseline for radioactivity in the local enviroriment that could be compared with the radioactivity levels observed in various environmental media throughout the operational lifetime of the SSES. This comparison faciJitates assessments of the radiological impact of the SSES operation.
2004 Radiological ED\\'ironmental Monitoring Report 6
Introduction Potential Exposure Pathways The three pathways through which radioactive material may reach the public from nuclear power plants are the atmospheric, terrestrial, and aquatic pathways. (Figure 1 depicts these pathways for the intake of radioactive materials.)
Mechanisms by which people may be exposed to radioactivity and radiation in the environment vary with the pathway.
Three mechanisms by which a member of the public has the potential to be exposed to radioactivity or radiation from nuclear power plants such as the SSES are as follows:
inhalation (breathing) ingestion (eating and drinking), and whole body irradiation directly from a plant or from immersion in the radioactive effluents.
REMPScope The scope of the SSES REMP was developed based on the NRC's Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position on radiological environmental monitoring, as described in Revision 1, November 1979 (Reference 4). However, the REMP conducted by PPL for the SSES exceeds some of the monitoring suggested by the NRC's branch technical position, in tenns of the number of monitoring locations, the frequency of certain monitoring. the types of analyses required for the samples, and the achievable analysis sensitivities.
During the operational period of the SSES, two different categories of monitoring locations, called control and indicator locations, were established to further assist in assessing the impact of the station operation. Control1ocations are located at sites where it is considered' unlikely that radiation or radioactive material from nonnal station operation would be detected. Indicator locations are sited where it is expected that radiation and radioactive material that might originate from the station would be most readily detectable.
Control locations for the atmospheric and terrestrial pathways are more than 10 miles from the station. Preferably, the controls also are in directions from the station less likely to be exposed to wind blowing from the station than are the indicator locations. Control_
locations for the aquatic pathway, the Susquehanna River, are upstream of the station's discharge to the river.
Indicator locations are selected primarily on the basis of proximity to the station, although factors such as meteorology, topography, and sampling practicality also are considered.
Indicator locations for the atmospheric and terrestrial pathways are typically less than 10 miles from the station.
Most often, they are within 5 miles of the station. Indicator locations in the Susquehanna River are downstream of the station's discharge. Monitoring results from indicator locations are compared with results from control locations. These comparisons are made to discern any differences in the levels andlor types of radioactive material and/or radiation that might exist between indicators and controls and that could be attributable to the station.
7 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Introduction Potential Exposure Pathways The three pathways through which radioactive material may reach the public from nuclear power plants are the atmospheric, terrestrial, and aquatic pathways. (Figure 1 depicts these pathways for the intake of radioactive materials.)
Mechanisms by which people may be exposed to radioactivity and radiation in the environment vary with the pathway.
Three mechanisms by which a member of the public has the potential to be exposed to radioactivity or radiation from nuclear power plants such as the SSES are as follows:
inhalation (breathing) ingestion (eating and drinking), and whole body irradiation directly from a plant or from immersion in the radioactive effluents.
REMPScope The scope of the SSES REMP was developed based on the NRC's Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position on radiological environmental monitoring, as described in Revision 1, November 1979 (Reference 4). However, the REMP conducted by PPL for the SSES exceeds some of the monitoring suggested by the NRC's branch technical position, in tenns of the number of monitoring locations, the frequency of certain monitoring. the types of analyses required for the samples, and the achievable analysis sensitivities.
During the operational period of the SSES, two different categories of monitoring locations, called control and indicator locations, were established to further assist in assessing the impact of the station operation. Control1ocations are located at sites where it is considered' unlikely that radiation or radioactive material from nonnal station operation would be detected. Indicator locations are sited where it is expected that radiation and radioactive material that might originate from the station would be most readily detectable.
Control locations for the atmospheric and terrestrial pathways are more than 10 miles from the station. Preferably, the controls also are in directions from the station less likely to be exposed to wind blowing from the station than are the indicator locations. Control_
locations for the aquatic pathway, the Susquehanna River, are upstream of the station's discharge to the river.
Indicator locations are selected primarily on the basis of proximity to the station, although factors such as meteorology, topography, and sampling practicality also are considered.
Indicator locations for the atmospheric and terrestrial pathways are typically less than 10 miles from the station.
Most often, they are within 5 miles of the station. Indicator locations in the Susquehanna River are downstream of the station's discharge. Monitoring results from indicator locations are compared with results from control locations. These comparisons are made to discern any differences in the levels andlor types of radioactive material and/or radiation that might exist between indicators and controls and that could be attributable to the station.
7 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report
In 2004, the SSES REMP collected 850
. I samples at 37 locations and perfonned 1,388 analyses. In addition, the REMP monitors ambient radiation levels using thennoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) at 58 indicator and control locations, making as many as 253 radiation level measurements each year. The media monitored and analyses perfonned are summarized in the table below:
Figures 2 through 7 display the REMP 1LDs and sampling locations in the vicinity of the SSES. Appendix C provides directions, distances, and a brief description of each of the locations in Figures 2 through 7.
REMP Monitoring Sensitivity Detection of radiation and radioactive material from the SSES in the environment is complicated by the presence of naturally occurring radiation and radioactive materials from both terrestrial and cosmic sources. Man-made radiation and radioactive material from non-SSES sources, such as nuclear fallout from previous nuclear weapons tests and medical wastes, also can make Introduction identification of SSES radiation and radioactive material difficult. Together, this radiation and radioactive material present background levels from which an attempt is made to distinguish relatively small contributions from the SSES. This effort is further complicated by the natural variations that typicaUy occur from both monitoring location to location and with time at the same locations.
The naturally occurring radionuclides potassium-40, beryllium-7, radium-226, thorium-228, and tritium are routinely observed in certain environmental media. Potassium-40 has been observed in a11 monitored media and is routinely seen at readily detectable levels in such media as milk, fish, fruits vegetables. Seasonal variations in beryllium-7 in air samples are regularly' observed. Man-made radionuclides, such as cesium-137 left over from nuclear weapons testing are often observed as well. In addition, the radionuclide tritium, produced by both cosmic radiation interactions in the upper atmosphere as well as man~made (nuclear weapons), is another radionuclide typically observed.
SSESREMP TYjlc of Monitoring Media Monitored Gross Alpha Activity Drinking Water Gross Beta Activity All Waters, except Ground Water, and Air Particulates Gamma-Emittin~ RadionucIide Activities All Media Tritium Activity All Waters Jodine-131 Activity Surface Water. Drinking Water. Air & Milk Exposure Rates Ambient Radiation Levels (by TI.D) 2004 Radiological Em'ironmental Monitoring Report 8
In 2004, the SSES REMP collected 850
. I samples at 37 locations and perfonned 1,388 analyses. In addition, the REMP monitors ambient radiation levels using thennoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs) at 58 indicator and control locations, making as many as 253 radiation level measurements each year. The media monitored and analyses perfonned are summarized in the table below:
Figures 2 through 7 display the REMP 1LDs and sampling locations in the vicinity of the SSES. Appendix C provides directions, distances, and a brief description of each of the locations in Figures 2 through 7.
REMP Monitoring Sensitivity Detection of radiation and radioactive material from the SSES in the environment is complicated by the presence of naturally occurring radiation and radioactive materials from both terrestrial and cosmic sources. Man-made radiation and radioactive material from non-SSES sources, such as nuclear fallout from previous nuclear weapons tests and medical wastes, also can make Introduction identification of SSES radiation and radioactive material difficult. Together, this radiation and radioactive material present background levels from which an attempt is made to distinguish relatively small contributions from the SSES. This effort is further complicated by the natural variations that typicaUy occur from both monitoring location to location and with time at the same locations.
The naturally occurring radionuclides potassium-40, beryllium-7, radium-226, thorium-228, and tritium are routinely observed in certain environmental media. Potassium-40 has been observed in a11 monitored media and is routinely seen at readily detectable levels in such media as milk, fish, fruits and* -
vegetables. Seasonal variations in beryllium-7 in air samples are regularly' observed. Man-made radionuclides, such as cesium-137 left over from nuclear weapons testing are often observed as well. In addition, the radionuclide tritium, produced by both cosmic radiation interactions in the upper atmosphere as well as man~made (nuclear weapons), is another radionuclide typically observed.
SSESREMP TYjlc of Monitoring Media Monitored Gross Alpha Activity Drinking Water Gross Beta Activity All Waters, except Ground Water, and Air Particulates Gamma-Emittin~ RadionucIide Activities All Media Tritium Activity All Waters Jodine-131 Activity Surface Water. Drinking Water. Air & Milk Exposure Rates Ambient Radiation Levels (by TI.D) 2004 Radiological Em'ironmental Monitoring Report 8
Introduction Radioactivity levels in environmental media are usually so low that their measurements, even with state-of-the-art measurement methods, typically have significant degrees of uncertainty associated with lhem.(Reference 5) As a result, expressions are often used when referring to these measurements that convey information about the levels being measured relative to the measurement sensitivities. Terms such as "minimum detectable concentration" (MDC) are used for this purpose. The formulas used to calculate MDCs may be found in procedures referenced in Appendix A.
The methods of measurement for sample radioactivity levels used by PPL's contracted REMP radioanalytical laboratories are capable of meeting the analysis sensitivity requirements found in the SSES Technical Requirements.
9 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report I
Introduction Radioactivity levels in environmental media are usually so low that their measurements, even with state-of-the-art measurement methods, typically have significant degrees of uncertainty associated with lhem.(Reference 5) As a result, expressions are often used when referring to these measurements that convey information about the levels being measured relative to the measurement sensitivities. Terms such as "minimum detectable concentration" (MDC) are used for this purpose. The formulas used to calculate MDCs may be found in procedures referenced in Appendix A.
The methods of measurement for sample radioactivity levels used by PPL's contracted REMP radioanalytical laboratories are capable of meeting the analysis sensitivity requirements found in the SSES Technical Requirements.
9 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report I
11~--"
Exposure PaJ,~war-s.\\ to..-IJum~ns
,':' ", p:J":;-(j,:<n<- "'\\-:! "; "'"
"",,*\\:,,-*;:/,~.. :*,:c:c~;:;,',:;::~:.'*6as~olls*:Emueni<,'>~.' ',:','
,.. ~
~. '.'
~
~ -
~.. -
'\\
Uquid
~
EfDuent Direct Irradiation Figure 1 11~--"
Exposure PaJ,~war-s.\\ to..-IJum~ns
,':' ", p:J":;-(j,:<n<- "'\\-:! "; "'"
"",,*\\:,,-*;:/,~.. :*,:c:c~;:;,',:;::~:.'*6as~olls*:Emueni<,'>~.' ',:','
,.. ~
~. '.'
~
~ -
~.. -
'\\
Uquid
~
EfDuent Direct Irradiation Figure 1
FIGURE 2 2004 TLD MONITORING LOCATIONS WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE SSES Co?;7 FIGURE 2 2004 TLD MONITORING LOCATIONS WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE SSES Co?7
FIGURE 3 2004 TLD MONITORING LOCATIONS FROM ONE TO FIVE MILES FROM THE SSES FIGURE 3 2004 TLD MONITORING LOCATIONS FROM ONE TO FIVE MILES FROM THE SSES
FIGURE 4 2004 TLD MONITORING LOCATIONS GREATER THAN FIVE MILES FROM THE SSES FIGURE 4 2004 TLD MONITORING LOCATIONS GREATER THAN FIVE MILES FROM THE SSES
FIGURE 5 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING LOCATIONS WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE SSES CO(y FIGURE 5 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING LOCATIONS WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE SSES 1 MILE CO(y
FIGURE 6 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING LOCATIONS FROM ONE TO FIVE MILES FROM THE SSES C07 Q
(lake Fltneerest Oem U
FIGURE 6 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING LOCATIONS FROM ONE TO FIVE MILES FROM THE SSES t,.
- ~,.,
~,; - - - --
-.. " Sticksti ff Mc<xrta.,rTf'I
- /..
C07
FIGURE 7 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING LOCATIONS GREATER THAN FIVE MILES FROM THE SSES FIGURE 7 2004 ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING LOCATIONS GREATER THAN FIVE MILES FROM THE SSES
Ambient Radiation Monitoring AMBIENT RADIATION MONITORING INTRODUCTION The primary method for the SSES REMP's measurement of ambient radiation levels is the use of thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs).
The TLDs are crystals (calcium sulfate) capable of detecting and measuring low levels of radiation by absorbing a portion of the radiation's energy that is incident upon them and storing the captured energy until the TLDs are processed (read). Processing involves heating the TLDs to release their stored energy in the form oflight and measuring the intensity of the light that they emit. The intensity of the emitted light is proportional to the amount of radiation to which they were exposed.
Calibration of the TLD processors
, permits a reliable relationship to be established between the light emitted and the amount of radiation dose received by the TLDs. The result,
permits accurate measurements of the ambient radiation in the environment.
Environmental TLDs are continually "
exposed to natural radiation from the,""
ground (terrestrial radiation) and from the sky (cosmic) radiation. In addition, they also may be exposed 'to man-made',
radiation. Most of the environmentai TLD's natural radiation exposure comes from sources in ~he'grou~d. 'Th~se, "
terrestrial sources vary naturally with "
time due to changes in soii moisture'"
snow cover,' etc. The' natural-radiation' picture is complicated because the,,',
factors affecting radiation reaching the.
TLDs from the ground vary differently with time from one location to another due to locational differences in such factors as soil characteristics (amounts of organic matter, partic1e'size, etc.),
drainage opportunities, and exposure to sunlight. Environmental TLDs can also be affected by direct radiation (shine),
from the SSES turbine buildings during' operation, radwas!e transfer and storage, and radioactive gaseous effiuents from the SSES.
. Unfortunately, TLDs do not have any inherent ability to indicate the source of the radiation to which they are exposed.
The placement of numerous TLDs in the environment can facilitate decision'-
making about the possible radiation sources to which TLDs are exposed.
However, a method for evaluating TLD data is still required. 'The SSES REMP relies on a statist!cally based approach to simultaneously compare indicator TLD data with control TLD data and operational TLD data with preoperational TLD data. This approach permits the flagging of environmental TLD doses that might' have been produced by both man-made' sources of radiation, as well as natural radiation sources. It also provides a means for attributing a portion of the total TLD dose to SSES operation if appropriate.
Interpretation of environmental TLD results is described in PPL Nuclear Engineering Study, EC-ENVR-1012 (Revision 0, January 1995).
2004 En\\'ironmental Radiological Monitoring Report 17 Ambient Radiation Monitoring AMBIENT RADIATION MONITORING INTRODUCTION The primary method for the SSES REMP's measurement of ambient radiation levels is the use of thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs).
The TLDs are crystals (calcium sulfate) capable of detecting and measuring low levels of radiation by absorbing a portion of the radiation's energy that is incident upon them and storing the captured energy until the TLDs are processed (read). Processing involves heating the TLDs to release their stored energy in the form oflight and measuring the intensity of the light that they emit. The intensity of the emitted light is proportional to the amount of radiation to which they were exposed.
Calibration of the TLD processors
, permits a reliable relationship to be established between the light emitted and the amount of radiation dose received by the TLDs. The result,
permits accurate measurements of the ambient radiation in the environment.
Environmental TLDs are continually "
exposed to natural radiation from the,""
ground (terrestrial radiation) and from the sky (cosmic) radiation. In addition, they also may be exposed 'to man-made',
radiation. Most of the environmentai TLD's natural radiation exposure comes from sources in ~he'grou~d. 'Th~se, "
terrestrial sources vary naturally with "
time due to changes in soii moisture'"
snow cover,' etc. The' natural-radiation' picture is complicated because the,,',
factors affecting radiation reaching the.
TLDs from the ground vary differently with time from one location to another due to locational differences in such factors as soil characteristics (amounts of organic matter, partic1e'size, etc.),
drainage opportunities, and exposure to sunlight. Environmental TLDs can also be affected by direct radiation (shine),
from the SSES turbine buildings during' operation, radwas!e transfer and storage, and radioactive gaseous effiuents from the SSES.
. Unfortunately, TLDs do not have any inherent ability to indicate the source of the radiation to which they are exposed.
The placement of numerous TLDs in the environment can facilitate decision'-
making about the possible radiation sources to which TLDs are exposed.
However, a method for evaluating TLD data is still required. 'The SSES REMP relies on a statist!cally based approach to simultaneously compare indicator TLD data with control TLD data and operational TLD data with preoperational TLD data. This approach permits the flagging of environmental TLD doses that might' have been produced by both man-made' sources of radiation, as well as natural radiation sources. It also provides a means for attributing a portion of the total TLD dose to SSES operation if appropriate.
Interpretation of environmental TLD results is described in PPL Nuclear Engineering Study, EC-ENVR-1012 (Revision 0, January 1995).
2004 En\\'ironmental Radiological Monitoring Report 17
Ambient Radiation Monitoring Scope Direct radiation measurements were made using Panasonic 71 OA readers and Panasonic UD-814 (calcium sulfate) thermo luminescent dosimeters (TLD).
During 2004, the SSES REMP had 48 indicator, 5 control and 5 special interest TLD locations. Refer to Table C 1 and C2 for TLD measurement locations. The TLD locations are placed on and around the SSES site as follows:
A site boundary ring (i.e. an inner ring) consisting of 18 locations (1 S2, 2S3, 3S2, 4S3, 5S7, 6S4, 6S9, 7S6, 8S2, 9S2, 10S2, 11S3, 12S3, 13S2, 13S5, 15S5, 16S1 and 16S2) near and within the site perimeter representing fence post doses from a SSES release.
An outer distance ring consisting of 30 locations (ID5, 2S2, 2F1, 3S3, 3E1,
4S6, 4E2, 5S4, 5E2,6E1, 7S7, 7E1,
8A3, 8D3, 9B1, 9D4, lOS1, lOD1,
11S7, 11E1, 12S1, 12S7, 12D2, 12E1,
13S6, 13E4, 14S5, 14D1, 15F1 and 16F1) extending approximately 5 miles from SSES. These TLD's are designed to measure possible exposures to c1ose-in population.
The balance of ten locations represent the control and special interest areas such as population centers, schools, etc.
The five control locations are 3G4, 4G 1, 7G1, 12G1 and 12G4. The five special interest locations are 6A4, 15A3, 16A2, 8B2 and 1 OB3.
The specific locations were determined according to the criteria presented in the NRC Branch Technical Position on Radiological Monitoring (Revision 1, November 1979).
18 Monitoring Results TLDs The TLDs were exchanged quarterly and processed by the SSES Health Physics Dosimetry Group. Average ambient gamma radiation levels measured by environmental TLDs generally remained constant throughout 2004, as shown in the bar graph below.
2004 REMP Quarterly TLD Averages 25.0,-----,-----------,
..: 20.0
~ 15.0
'C Wi ii? 10.0 E
5.0 0.0 2
3 4
Calendar Quarters Indicator environmental TLD results for 2004 were examined quarterly on an individual location basis and compared with both current control location results and preoperational data. Very small SSES exposure contributions were identified during 2004 at twelve onsite locations as follows: 1 S2, 6S4, 6S9, 7S6, 9S2, 10S2, 11S3, 12S3, 12S4, 13S2, 13S5, and 16S2.
The highest, estimated, gamma radiation dose of 3.88E-02 rnrem for all of 2004 was at location 9S2. This dose is approximately 0.16% of the 25 rnrem whole-body SSES Technical Requirements (TRO 3.11.3) limit for all SSES sources of radioactivity and radiation.
- Indicator
- Control 2004 Environmental Radiological Monitoring Report C03A Ambient Radiation Monitoring Scope Direct radiation measurements were made using Panasonic 71 OA readers and Panasonic UD-814 (calcium sulfate) thermo luminescent dosimeters (TLD).
During 2004, the SSES REMP had 48 indicator, 5 control and 5 special interest TLD locations. Refer to Table C 1 and C2 for TLD measurement locations. The TLD locations are placed on and around the SSES site as follows:
A site boundary ring (i.e. an inner ring) consisting of 18 locations (1 S2, 2S3, 3S2, 4S3, 5S7, 6S4, 6S9, 7S6, 8S2, 9S2, 10S2, 11S3, 12S3, 13S2, 13S5, 15S5, 16S1 and 16S2) near and within the site perimeter representing fence post doses from a SSES release.
An outer distance ring consisting of 30 locations (ID5, 2S2, 2F1, 3S3, 3E1,
4S6, 4E2, 5S4, 5E2,6E1, 7S7, 7E1,
8A3, 8D3, 9B1, 9D4, lOSl, lOD1,
11S7, 11E1, 12S1, 12S7, 12D2, 12E1,
13S6, 13E4, 14S5, 14D1, 15F1 and 16F1) extending approximately 5 miles from SSES. These TLD's are designed to measure possible exposures to c1ose-in population.
The balance of ten locations represent the control and special interest areas such as population centers, schools, etc.
The five control locations are 3G4, 4G 1, 7G1, 12G1 and 12G4. The five special interest locations are 6A4, 15A3, 16A2, 8B2 and 1 OB3.
The specific locations were determined according to the criteria presented in the NRC Branch Technical Position on Radiological Monitoring (Revision 1, November 1979).
18 Monitoring Results TLDs The TLDs were exchanged quarterly and processed by the SSES Health Physics Dosimetry Group. Average ambient gamma radiation levels measured by environmental TLDs generally remained constant throughout 2004, as shown in the bar graph below.
2004 REMP Quarterly TLD Averages 25.0,-----:-------------,
..: 20.0
~ 15.0
'C Wi ii? 10.0 E
5.0 0.0 2
3 4
Calendar Quarters Indicator environmental TLD results for 2004 were examined quarterly on an individual location basis and compared with both current control location results and preoperational data. Very small SSES exposure contributions were identified during 2004 at twelve onsite locations as follows: 1 S2, 6S4, 6S9, 7S6, 9S2, 10S2, 11S3, 12S3, 12S4, 13S2, 13S5, and 16S2.
The highest, estimated, gamma radiation dose of 3.88E-02 rnrem for all of 2004 was at location 9S2. This dose is approximately 0.16% of the 25 rnrem whole-body SSES Technical Requirements (TRO 3.11.3) limit for all SSES sources of radioactivity and radiation.
- Indicator
- Control 2004 Environmental Radiological Monitoring Report CO?;A
Refer to the following for results of TLD measurements for 2004:
Figure 8, trends quarterly TLD results for both preoperational and operational periods Appendix G, Table G Summary of Data Table, page 1 of 13 shows the averages for TLD indicator and control locations for the entire year.
Appendix H, Table HI, page H-3 shows a comparison of the 2004 mean indicator and control TLD results with the means for the preoperational and operational periods at the SSES.
Appendix I, Table 1-1, page 1-2 shows TLD results for all locations for each quarter of 2004.
2004 Environmental Radiological Monitoring Report Ambient Radiation Monitoring 19 Refer to the following for results of TLD measurements for 2004:
Figure 8, trends quarterly TLD results for both preoperational and operational periods Appendix G, Table G Summary of Data Table, page 1 of 13 shows the averages for TLD indicator and control locations for the entire year.
Appendix H, Table HI, page H-3 shows a comparison of the 2004 mean indicator and control TLD results with the means for the preoperational and operational periods at the SSES.
Appendix I, Table 1-1, page 1-2 shows TLD results for all locations for each quarter of 2004.
2004 Environmental Radiological Monitoring Report Ambient Radiation Monitoring 19
FIGURE 8 - AMBIENT RADIATION LEVELS Exposure Rate (mRJSTD Qtr)
BASED ON TLD DATA 50 ~----------------------~----------------------------------------------------~
45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5
PRE OPERA TIONAL OPERATIONAL Unit2 Criticality
/
O +-~~~--~~~~--~~~~--~~~~~~~~~~--~~~~--~~~~--~~~~
(\\",
(\\~
(\\"
~
~
~
Indicator Control FIGURE 8 - AMBIENT RADIATION LEVELS Exposure Rate (mRlSTD Qtr)
BASED ON TLD DATA 50 ~----------------------~---------------------------------------------------.
45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5
PRE OPERA TIONAL OPERATIONAL Unit2 Criticality
/
O +-~~~--~~~~~--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~--~~~~~~~~~
(\\",
(\\~
(\\"
~
~
~
Indicator Control
Aquatic Pathway Monitoring INTRODUCTION In 2004 the SSES REMP monitored the following media in the aquatic pathway:
surface water, drinking water, fish, and' sediment;< Some of the media (e.g.,
drinking 'water and fish) provide information that can be especially useful to the estimation of possible dose to the public from potentially ingested radioactivity, if detected. Other media, such as sediment, can be useful for.
trending radioactivity levels in the aquatic pathway, primarily,because of their tendency to assimilate certain materials that might enter the surface water to which they are exposed. The results from monitoring all of these media provide a picture of the aquatic pathway that is clearer than that which <
could be obtained if one or more were not included in the REMP.
Fruits or vegetables that are grown in fields inigated with surface water would also be, in the aquatic pathway. The.
land use census (Reference 11) conducted in 2004 looked at farms
\\vithin 10 miles downstream of the.
SSES. The Lupini Farm in Mifflinville <
(12F7) briefly inigated potatoes in June 2004 using Susquehanna River water.' '
No other fields within 10 miles downriver of Susquehanna SES were inigated in 2004.
The aquatic pathway in the vicinity of the SSES is the Susquehanna River.
Monitoring of all of. the aquatic media,.
except drinking water, is conducted -'.
both downstream and upstream of the).
location from which occasiona1 SSES.
2000 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report low.:.level radioactive discharges enter the river. The upstream monitoring locations serve as controls to provide data for companson with downstream monitoring results. The potential exists for radioactive material that might be present in SSES airborne releases to enter the Susquehanna River upstream of the plant through either direct deposition (e.g., settling or washout) or by way of ~noff from deposition on land adjacent to the river. However, direct deposition and runoff are considered to be irisignificant as means of entry for SSES radioactivity into the Susquehanna River when compared to
!iquid discharges under normal conditions.
Lake Took-a-'Vhile (LTAW), which is located in PPL's Riverlands Recreation Area adjacent to the Susquehanna River. is also considered to be part of the aquatic pathway for monitoring purposes. Although it is not in a position to receive water discharged to the river from the SSES. it can receive storm runoff from the SSES. Storm runoff from the SSES site should not normally contain< any measurable radioactivity from the plant. However, the SSES REMP, consistent with other aspects of aquatic monitoring and the REMP, in general, goes beyond its requirements by monitoring LtAW. <
21 Aquatic Pathway Monitoring INTRODUCTION In 2004 the SSES REMP monitored the following media in the aquatic pathway:
surface water, drinking water, fish, and' sediment;< Some of the media (e.g.,
drinking 'water and fish) provide information that can be especially useful to the estimation of possible dose to the public from potentially ingested radioactivity, if detected. Other media, such as sediment, can be useful for.
trending radioactivity levels in the aquatic pathway, primarily,because of their tendency to assimilate certain materials that might enter the surface water to which they are exposed. The results from monitoring all of these media provide a picture of the aquatic pathway that is clearer than that which <
could be obtained if one or more were not included in the REMP.
Fruits or vegetables that are grown in fields inigated with surface water would also be, in the aquatic pathway. The.
land use census (Reference 11) conducted in 2004 looked at farms
\\vithin 10 miles downstream of the.
SSES. The Lupini Farm in Mifflinville <
(12F7) briefly inigated potatoes in June 2004 using Susquehanna River water.' '
No other fields within 10 miles downriver of Susquehanna SES were inigated in 2004.
The aquatic pathway in the vicinity of the SSES is the Susquehanna River.
Monitoring of all of. the aquatic media,.
except drinking water, is conducted -'.
both downstream and upstream of the).
location from which occasiona1 SSES.
2000 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report low.:.level radioactive discharges enter the river. The upstream monitoring locations serve as controls to provide data for companson with downstream monitoring results. The potential exists for radioactive material that might be present in SSES airborne releases to enter the Susquehanna River upstream of the plant through either direct deposition (e.g., settling or washout) or by way of ~noff from deposition on land adjacent to the river. However, direct deposition and runoff are considered to be irisignificant as means of entry for SSES radioactivity into the Susquehanna River when compared to
!iquid discharges under normal conditions.
Lake Took-a-'Vhile (LTAW), which is located in PPL's Riverlands Recreation Area adjacent to the Susquehanna River. is also considered to be part of the aquatic pathway for monitoring purposes. Although it is not in a position to receive water discharged to the river from the SSES. it can receive storm runoff from the SSES. Storm runoff from the SSES site should not normally contain< any measurable radioactivity from the plant. However, the SSES REMP, consistent with other aspects of aquatic monitoring and the REMP, in general, goes beyond its requirements by monitoring LtAW. <
21
Scope Surface Water Surface water was routinely sampled from the Susquehanna River at one indicator location (6S5) and one control location (6S6) at the SSESRiver Water' Intake during 2004. Sampling also took place at the following additional indicator locations: ~he SSES discharge line to the river (2S7/6S7) and Lake Took-A-While (LTAW).
Drillkillg Water Drinking water samples were collected at location 12H2, the Danville Municipal Water Authority's treatment facility on the Susquehanna River, in 2004. Treated water is conected from the end of the processing flowpath, representing finished water that is suitable for drinking. This is the nearest point downstream of the SSES discharge to the River at which drinking water is obtained. No drinking water control location is sampled. For all intents and purposes, control surface water sampling locations would be suitable for comparison.
Fish Fish were sampled from the Susquehanna River in the spring and fall of 2004, at one indicator location, IND, downstream of the SSES liquid discharge to the River and one control location, 2H, sufficiently upstream to essentially preclude the likelihood that fish caught there would spend any time below the SSES discharge. In addition, fish were also sampled in the fall from PPL's Lake Took-a-While, location LTA \\V. This location is not downstream of the SSES discharge. It is sampled because of its potential for 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Aquatic Pathway Monitoring receiving runoff from the SSES.
LTAW is considered an indicator location.
Sedimellt Sediment sampling was performed in the spring and fall at indicator locations 7B and 12F and control location 2B on the Susquehanna River. In addition, sediment was also obtained from location LTAW.
Sampling Surface Water Weekly water samples were collected at indicator location 6S5 for both biweekly and monthly compositing.
Location 6S5 was considered a backup for locations 2S7 and 6S7 in the event that water could not be obtained from the automatic samplers at these locations. Routine samples for 6S5 were collected from a boat, unless ri ver conditions prohibited boating. When this occurs, samples are collected from an alternate shoreline site lOCated below the Susquehanna SES discharge diffuser. The shoreline samples are collected at the Wetlands Cottage area, approximately 100-150 yards down river from the 6S5 site.
Indicator locations 2S7 and 6S7, the SSES Cooling Tower Blowdown Discharge (CTBD) line, and control location 6S6, the SSES River Water Intake structure, were time -
proportionally sampled using automatic continuous samplers. The samplers were typicaIly set to obtain 30-60 ml aliquots every 20-25 minutes. Weekly, the water obtained by these samplers was retrieved for both biweekly and monthly compositing.
22 j'
Scope Surface Water Surface water was routinely sampled from the Susquehanna River at one indicator location (6S5) and one control location (6S6) at the SSESRiver Water' Intake during 2004. Sampling also took place at the following additional indicator locations: ~he SSES discharge line to the river (2S7/6S7) and Lake Took-A-While (LTAW).
Drillkillg Water Drinking water samples were collected at location 12H2, the Danville Municipal Water Authority's treatment facility on the Susquehanna River, in 2004. Treated water is conected from the end of the processing flowpath, representing finished water that is suitable for drinking. This is the nearest point downstream of the SSES discharge to the River at which drinking water is obtained. No drinking water control location is sampled. For all intents and purposes, control surface water sampling locations would be suitable for comparison.
Fish Fish were sampled from the Susquehanna River in the spring and fall of 2004, at one indicator location, IND, downstream of the SSES liquid discharge to the River and one control location, 2H, sufficiently upstream to essentially preclude the likelihood that fish caught there would spend any time below the SSES discharge. In addition, fish were also sampled in the fall from PPL's Lake Took-a-While, location LTA \\V. This location is not downstream of the SSES discharge. It is sampled because of its potential for 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Aquatic Pathway Monitoring receiving runoff from the SSES.
LTAW is considered an indicator location.
Sedimellt Sediment sampling was performed in the spring and fall at indicator locations 7B and 12F and control location 2B on the Susquehanna River. In addition, sediment was also obtained from location LTAW.
Sampling Surface Water Weekly water samples were collected at indicator location 6S5 for both biweekly and monthly compositing.
Location 6S5 was considered a backup for locations 2S7 and 6S7 in the event that water could not be obtained from the automatic samplers at these locations. Routine samples for 6S5 were collected from a boat, unless ri ver conditions prohibited boating. When this occurs, samples are collected from an alternate shoreline site lOCated below the Susquehanna SES discharge diffuser. The shoreline samples are collected at the Wetlands Cottage area, approximately 100-150 yards down river from the 6S5 site.
Indicator locations 2S7 and 6S7, the SSES Cooling Tower Blowdown Discharge (CTBD) line, and control location 6S6, the SSES River Water Intake structure, were time -
proportionally sampled using automatic continuous samplers. The samplers were typicaIly set to obtain 30-60 ml aliquots every 20-25 minutes. Weekly, the water obtained by these samplers was retrieved for both biweekly and monthly compositing.
22 j'
Aquatic Pathway Monitoring The other surface water monitoring location, LTAW, was grab sampled once each month.
Drinking Water Treated water was time-proportionally sampled by an automatic sampler. The,
sampler was typically set to obtain three 12-ml aIiquots every twenty minutes.
Week1y, the water obtained by th,is sampler was retrieved for both biweekly and monthly compo siting.
Fish Fish were obtained by electrofishing.
Electrofishing stuns the fish and allows, '
them to float to the surface so that those of the desired species and sufficient size can be sampled. Sampled fish include '
recreation ally important species, such as smallmouth bass, and also channel catfish and shorthead redhorse. The fish are filleted and the edible portions are kept for analysis.
Sediment Shoreline sediment was collected to depths of four feet of water.
Sample Preservation and Analysis SlIrface and Drinking Water Surface and drinking water samples./,
were analyzed monthly for beta,.
gamma-emitting radionuclides, and tritium activities. Biweekly composite samples were analyzed for 1-131, activity. In addition, drinking water "",
samples were analyzed for gross alpha. "
activity.
23 Sediment and Fish Fish 'are frozen until shipment. All '
samples are a~alyzed by gamma spectroscopy for the activities of any gamma emitting radionuclides that may' be present.
Monitoring Results Surface Water Refer to the fonowing for results of surface water analyses for 2004:
Figure 9 trends gross beta activities separately for surface water indicator and control locations quarterly from 1975 through 2004.
Appendix G, Table G page l-and 2 of 13 shows a summary of the 2004 surface water data.
Appendix H, Tables H 2 through H 4 shows comparisons of gross beta, iodine-131 and tritium monitoring results against past years data.
Appendix I, Tables 1-2 and 1-3 shows specific results of gross beta,,
tritium, gamma spectroscopic and iodine-131 analyses of surface water samples.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requires that averages of the activity levels for indicator environmental,monitoring locations and for control environmental monitoring locations of surface water, as well as.
other monitored media, be reported to the NRC annually. Data from the following three surface water monitoring locations were averaged
. 2004 Radiological Em'ironmcntal Monitoring Report Aquatic Pathway Monitoring The other surface water monitoring location, LTAW, was grab sampled once each month.
Drinking Water Treated water was time-proportionally sampled by an automatic sampler. The,
sampler was typically set to obtain three 12-ml aIiquots every twenty minutes.
Week1y, the water obtained by th,is sampler was retrieved for both biweekly and monthly compo siting.
Fish Fish were obtained by electrofishing.
Electrofishing stuns the fish and allows, '
them to float to the surface so that those of the desired species and sufficient size can be sampled. Sampled fish include '
recreation ally important species, such as smallmouth bass, and also channel catfish and shorthead redhorse. The fish are filleted and the edible portions are kept for analysis.
Sediment Shoreline sediment was collected to depths of four feet of water.
Sample Preservation and Analysis SlIrface and Drinking Water Surface and drinking water samples./,
were analyzed monthly for beta,.
gamma-emitting radionuclides, and tritium activities. Biweekly composite samples were analyzed for 1-131, activity. In addition, drinking water "",
samples were analyzed for gross alpha. "
activity.
23 Sediment and Fish Fish 'are frozen until shipment. All '
samples are a~alyzed by gamma spectroscopy for the activities of any gamma emitting radionuclides that may' be present.
Monitoring Results Surface Water Refer to the fonowing for results of surface water analyses for 2004:
Figure 9 trends gross beta activities separately for surface water indicator and control locations quarterly from 1975 through 2004.
Appendix G, Table G page l-and 2 of 13 shows a summary of the 2004 surface water data.
Appendix H, Tables H 2 through H 4 shows comparisons of gross beta, iodine-131 and tritium monitoring results against past years data.
Appendix I, Tables 1-2 and 1-3 shows specific results of gross beta,,
tritium, gamma spectroscopic and iodine-131 analyses of surface water samples.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) requires that averages of the activity levels for indicator environmental,monitoring locations and for control environmental monitoring locations of surface water, as well as.
other monitored media, be reported to the NRC annually. Data from the following three surface water monitoring locations were averaged
. 2004 Radiological Em'ironmcntal Monitoring Report
together as indicators for reporting purposes: one location (6S5) on the Susquehanna River downstream of the SSES, Lake-Took-a While (LTA W) adjacent to the river, and the SSES cooling tower bIowdown discharge (crBD) line to the river (2S7).
Technically, the CTBD line is not part of the environment. The CTBD line is a below ground pipe to which the public has no access, contrary to the other environmental monitoring locations on the Susquehanna River to which the public does have access. However, currently there is no automatic composite sampling of an indicator location on the Susquehanna River, so the CTBD line from the SSES is included as an indicator monitoring location in the radiological environmental monitoring program.
Most of the water entering the Susquehanna River through the SSES CTBD line is simply water that was taken from the river upstream of the SSES, used for cooling purposes without being radioactively contaminated by SSES operation, and returned to the river.
Batch discharges of relatively small volumes of slightly radioactively contaminated water are made to the river through the SSES CTBD at times throughout each year.
The water is released from tanks of radioactively contaminated water on site to the CTBD and mixes with the noncontaminated water already present in the CTBD. Flow rates from the tanks containing radioactively contaminated water being discharged to the crBD vary based on the radioactivity 1evel of the batch release.,In addition, the minimum flow rate for the returning 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Aquatic Pathway Monitoring water in the crBD is maintained at a flow rate of 5,000 gpm or higher. These requirements are in place to ensure adequate dilution of radioactively contaminated water by the returning noncontaminated water in the CTBn prior to entering the river.
At the point that crBn water enters the river, additional, rapid dilution of the discharged water by the river is promoted by releasing it through a diffuser. The diffuser is a large pipe with numerous holes in it that is positioned near the bottom of the river.
CTBD discharges exit the diffuser through the many holes, enhancing the mixing of the discharge and river waters. The concentrations of contaminants are reduced significantly as the discharged water mixes with the.
much larger flow of river water. The mean flow rate of the Susquehanna River in 2004 was approximately 9,150,000 gpm. This is more than 1,800 times the 5,000 gpm; required minimum flow rate through the crBD for discharges to be permitted. The crBD average flow during 2004 was 8,818 gpm. Based on the average river flow and the average crBD flow during 2004, Jiquid discharges from the SSES where diluted by approximately a factor of 1,000.
The amounts of radioactively contaminated water being discharged are small. Nevertheless, sensitive analyses of the water samples can often detect the low levels of certain types of radioactivity in the CTBD water following dilution. Though the levels of radioactivity measured in the CTBD water are generally quite low, they tend to be higher than those in the river 24 l'
together as indicators for reporting purposes: one location (6S5) on the Susquehanna River downstream of the SSES, Lake-Took-a While (LTA W) adjacent to the river, and the SSES cooling tower bIowdown discharge (crBD) line to the river (2S7).
Technically, the CTBD line is not part of the environment. The CTBD line is a below ground pipe to which the public has no access, contrary to the other environmental monitoring locations on the Susquehanna River to which the public does have access. However, currently there is no automatic composite sampling of an indicator location on the Susquehanna River, so the CTBD line from the SSES is included as an indicator monitoring location in the radiological environmental monitoring program.
Most of the water entering the Susquehanna River through the SSES CTBD line is simply water that was taken from the river upstream of the SSES, used for cooling purposes without being radioactively contaminated by SSES operation, and returned to the river.
Batch discharges of relatively small volumes of slightly radioactively contaminated water are made to the river through the SSES CTBD at times throughout each year.
The water is released from tanks of radioactively contaminated water on site to the CTBD and mixes with the noncontaminated water already present in the CTBD. Flow rates from the tanks containing radioactively contaminated water being discharged to the crBD vary based on the radioactivity 1evel of the batch release.,In addition, the minimum flow rate for the returning 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Aquatic Pathway Monitoring water in the crBD is maintained at a flow rate of 5,000 gpm or higher. These requirements are in place to ensure adequate dilution of radioactively contaminated water by the returning noncontaminated water in the CTBn prior to entering the river.
At the point that crBn water enters the river, additional, rapid dilution of the discharged water by the river is promoted by releasing it through a diffuser. The diffuser is a large pipe with numerous holes in it that is positioned near the bottom of the river.
CTBD discharges exit the diffuser through the many holes, enhancing the mixing of the discharge and river waters. The concentrations of contaminants are reduced significantly as the discharged water mixes with the.
much larger flow of river water. The mean flow rate of the Susquehanna River in 2004 was approximately 9,150,000 gpm. This is more than 1,800 times the 5,000 gpm; required minimum flow rate through the crBD for discharges to be permitted. The crBD average flow during 2004 was 8,818 gpm. Based on the average river flow and the average crBD flow during 2004, Jiquid discharges from the SSES where diluted by approximately a factor of 1,000.
The amounts of radioactively contaminated water being discharged are small. Nevertheless, sensitive analyses of the water samples can often detect the low levels of certain types of radioactivity in the CTBD water following dilution. Though the levels of radioactivity measured in the CTBD water are generally quite low, they tend to be higher than those in the river 24 l'
Aquatic Pathway Monitoring downstream of the SSES. Most radionuclides discharged from the SSES CTBD are at such low levels in the downstream river water that, even with the sensitive analyses perfonned, they cannot be detected.
When the'radioactivity levels from the CTBD samples throughout the year are ' '
averaged with those obtained from actual downstream monitoring locations, the result is an overall
. indicator location average that is too high to be representative of the actual average radioactivity levels of the downstream river water. As the following discussions are reviewed, consideration should be given to this inflation of average radioactivity levels from the inclusion of CTBD (location 2S7/6S7) results i~ the indicator data that is averaged.
Surface Water Gross Beta Monthly samples from all surface water locations were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta activity (Table 1-2). The 2004 indicator values '
ranged from 1.14 to 15.9 pein,'
compared to 2.42 to 15.9 peill for 2003.
Comparison of the '2004 mean gross beta activity of 5.7 peill for all indicator locations to the average of the annual control mean of 4.0 pCin for pre-operational years suggests activity,
detected slightly above the preoperational control.
Surface Water Iodille-131 i;"
Bi-weekly samples from surface water locations (except monthly for the LTA W) were analyzed for, concentrations ofiodine-131'activity (Table 1-3). The 2004 indicator vaiues ranged from -0.3 to 1.39 pei/)
compared to.:..0.11 to 1.91 for 2003.
Comparison of the 2004 mean iodine-131 activity of 0.49 pein for all indicator locations 'to the average of the annual control mean of 0.36 pCill for pre-operational years suggests activity detected slightly above the preoperational control.
Throughout the course of a year, iodine-131 is typicaIly measured at levels in excess of analysis.MDCs in some samples obtained from control surface water monitoring locations on the Susquehanna River upstream of the SSES as well as indicator locations downstream of the SSES. As determined by measurements of samples obtained by the SSES REMP, the mean iodine-131 activity level from, the CTBD for a)) of 2004 was approximately 0.75 pCi/} compared to the control mean of 0.36 pCi/} for 2004.
Iodine-131 from the discharge of
, medical wastes into the Susquehanna River upstream of the SSES is drawn into the SSES cooling tower basins through the SSES River Water Intake Structure. It is reasonable to assume that concentration of the already existing iodine-131 in the cooling tower basins occurs as it does for other substances found in the river. For example, the SSES routinely assumes concentration factors in the basin for calcium of four to five times the concentrations in the river water entering the basins,' based on past measurements. This concentrating effect occurs because of the evaporation of the water in the basins, leaving behind most dissolved and suspended.
materials in the unevaporated water remaining in the basins. If a 2S
- 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Aquatic Pathway Monitoring downstream of the SSES. Most radionuclides discharged from the SSES CTBD are at such low levels in the downstream river water that, even with the sensitive analyses perfonned, they cannot be detected.
When the'radioactivity levels from the CTBD samples throughout the year are ' '
averaged with those obtained from actual downstream monitoring locations, the result is an overall
. indicator location average that is too high to be representative of the actual average radioactivity levels of the downstream river water. As the following discussions are reviewed, consideration should be given to this inflation of average radioactivity levels from the inclusion of CTBD (location 2S7/6S7) results i~ the indicator data that is averaged.
Surface Water Gross Beta Monthly samples from all surface water locations were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta activity (Table 1-2). The 2004 indicator values '
ranged from 1.14 to 15.9 pein,'
compared to 2.42 to 15.9 peill for 2003.
Comparison of the '2004 mean gross beta activity of 5.7 peill for all indicator locations to the average of the annual control mean of 4.0 pCin for pre-operational years suggests activity,
detected slightly above the preoperational control.
Surface Water Iodille-131 i;"
Bi-weekly samples from surface water locations (except monthly for the LTA W) were analyzed for, concentrations ofiodine-131'activity (Table 1-3). The 2004 indicator vaiues ranged from -0.3 to 1.39 pei/)
compared to.:..0.11 to 1.91 for 2003.
Comparison of the 2004 mean iodine-131 activity of 0.49 pein for all indicator locations 'to the average of the annual control mean of 0.36 pCill for pre-operational years suggests activity detected slightly above the preoperational control.
Throughout the course of a year, iodine-131 is typicaIly measured at levels in excess of analysis.MDCs in some samples obtained from control surface water monitoring locations on the Susquehanna River upstream of the SSES as well as indicator locations downstream of the SSES. As determined by measurements of samples obtained by the SSES REMP, the mean iodine-131 activity level from, the CTBD for a)) of 2004 was approximately 0.75 pCi/} compared to the control mean of 0.36 pCi/} for 2004.
Iodine-131 from the discharge of
, medical wastes into the Susquehanna River upstream of the SSES is drawn into the SSES cooling tower basins through the SSES River Water Intake Structure. It is reasonable to assume that concentration of the already existing iodine-131 in the cooling tower basins occurs as it does for other substances found in the river. For example, the SSES routinely assumes concentration factors in the basin for calcium of four to five times the concentrations in the river water entering the basins,' based on past measurements. This concentrating effect occurs because of the evaporation of the water in the basins, leaving behind most dissolved and suspended.
materials in the unevaporated water remaining in the basins. If a 2S
- 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report
concentration factor of four for iodine-131 were to be applied to the 2004 mean iodine-131 activity level for the control samples from the Susquehanna River, a mean concentration of 1.44 pCilJiter for iodine-131 in the basin water and the water being discharged from the basins would be expected. The actual 2004 mean of 0.75 pCi/1 for the CTBD mean is about half the expected mean.
Because iodine-131 is radioactive, unlike the calcium that has been measured. iodine-131 is removed from the water while it is in the basins through the radioactive decay process.
Thus, it might be expected that the net concentration factor for iodine-131 would be somewhat less than that for calcium, considering this ad<ditional removal process. The extent to which the iodine-131 concentration factor is less than that for calcium would depend on the mean residence time for the water in the basins compared to iodine-131's radioactive half-life - the greater the ratio of the mean residence time to the half-life, the smaller the concentration factor. A mean residence time for water in the basins is expected to be about two days. This is only about one-fourth of the approximately eight-day half-life of iodine-131. Thus, radioactive decay would not be expected to reduce the concentration factor for iodine-131 by a large amount.
Therefore. the difference between the 2004 mean iodine-131 activity of about 0.75 pCill in the CTBD and the 2004 mean iodine-I31 activity for the control location of 0.36 pCi/1 should be the result of concentration in the basins.
fodine-131 was not reported in water 200~ Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Aquatic Pathway Monitoring discharged from the SSES to the Susquehanna River during 2004.
Surface Water Tritium Monthly samples from all surface water locations were analyzed for concentrations of tritium activity (Table 1-2). Tritium was detected in both the indicator and control locations above MOC. The 2004 indicator values ranged from -71.5 to 18400 pCW compared to -35.4 to 16,600 for 2003.
Comparison of the 2004 mean tritium activity of 1,575 pC in for all indicator locations to the average of the annual preoperational control mean of 171 pCin indicates a contribution of tritium activity from the SSES.
Refer to Figure 10 which trends Tritium activity levels separately for surface water indicator and control locations <
from 1972 through 2004.
The much higher levels of tritium observed in the CTBD line (location 2S7/6S7), when averaged with the low levels from ihe downstream Jocation 6S5 sample analysis results distort the real environmental picture. The mean tritium activity level from indicator location 6SS for 2004 was 67.2 pCi/Jiter, which is Jess than the mean tritium activity of 75.7 pCi/1 for the control location and is within the range of prior operational and preoperational periods.
Tritium activity levels reported for 2S716S7 are from the discharge line prior to dilution in the river. The highest quarterly average tritium activity reported at 2S7/6S7 during 2004 was approximately 7,888 pCi/liter for the first quarter. This is well below the 26 concentration factor of four for iodine-131 were to be applied to the 2004 mean iodine-131 activity level for the control samples from the Susquehanna River, a mean concentration of 1.44 pCilJiter for iodine-131 in the basin water and the water being discharged from the basins would be expected. The actual 2004 mean of 0.75 pCi/1 for the CTBD mean is about half the expected mean.
Because iodine-131 is radioactive, unlike the calcium that has been measured. iodine-131 is removed from the water while it is in the basins through the radioactive decay process.
Thus, it might be expected that the net concentration factor for iodine-131 would be somewhat less than that for calcium, considering this ad<ditional removal process. The extent to which the iodine-131 concentration factor is less than that for calcium would depend on the mean residence time for the water in the basins compared to iodine-131's radioactive half-life - the greater the ratio of the mean residence time to the half-life, the smaller the concentration factor. A mean residence time for water in the basins is expected to be about two days. This is only about one-fourth of the approximately eight-day half-life of iodine-131. Thus, radioactive decay would not be expected to reduce the concentration factor for iodine-131 by a large amount.
Therefore. the difference between the 2004 mean iodine-131 activity of about 0.75 pCill in the CTBD and the 2004 mean iodine-I31 activity for the control location of 0.36 pCi/1 should be the result of concentration in the basins.
fodine-131 was not reported in water 200~ Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Aquatic Pathway Monitoring discharged from the SSES to the Susquehanna River during 2004.
Surface Water Tritium Monthly samples from all surface water locations were analyzed for concentrations of tritium activity (Table 1-2). Tritium was detected in both the indicator and control locations above MOC. The 2004 indicator values ranged from -71.5 to 18400 pCW compared to -35.4 to 16,600 for 2003.
Comparison of the 2004 mean tritium activity of 1,575 pC in for all indicator locations to the average of the annual preoperational control mean of 171 pCin indicates a contribution of tritium activity from the SSES.
Refer to Figure 10 which trends Tritium activity levels separately for surface water indicator and control locations <
from 1972 through 2004.
The much higher levels of tritium observed in the CTBD line (location 2S7/6S7), when averaged with the low levels from ihe downstream Jocation 6S5 sample analysis results distort the real environmental picture. The mean tritium activity level from indicator location 6SS for 2004 was 67.2 pCi/Jiter, which is Jess than the mean tritium activity of 75.7 pCi/1 for the control location and is within the range of prior operational and preoperational periods.
Tritium activity levels reported for 2S716S7 are from the discharge line prior to dilution in the river. The highest quarterly average tritium activity reported at 2S7/6S7 during 2004 was approximately 7,888 pCi/liter for the first quarter. This is well below the 26
Aquatic Pathway !tlonitoring NRC reporting levels for quarterly average activity levels of 20.000 pCilliter when a drinking water pathway exists or 30,000 pCi/liter when no drinking water pathway exists.
The tritium activity reported in the CTBD line from location 2S7/6S7 is attributable to the SSES. Refer to the "Dose from the Aquatic Pathway" discussion at the end of this section for additional infonnation on the projected dose to the population from tritium and other radionuclides in the aquatic pathway attributable to the SSES.
No radionuclides were detected in surface water samples above MDC, with the exceptions of potassium-40 and iodine-131.
Drinking Water Drinking water was monitored during 2004 'at the Danville Water Company's facility 26 miles WSW of the SSES on the Sus'quehanna River at location 12H2.
There are no known drinking water:
supplies in Pennsylvania on the Susquehanna River upstream of the
'SSES 'and therefore no drinking water control monitoring locations. Danville.
drinking water analysis results may be compared to the results for surface water control monitoring locations.,,
Refer to the following for results of ',)_
surface water analyses for 2004:
Figure 11 trends gross beta activity, levels for drinking water location 12H2 from 1977 through 2004; No.
gross beta activity in drinking water during 2004 is attributed to liquid 27 discharges from the SSES to the
Appendix G. Table G page 3 and 4 of 13 shows a summary of the 2004 "
drinking water data.
Appendix H. Table H 5 through H 7 shows comparisons of gross alpha.
gross beta and tritium activity in drinking water for 2004 against past years' data.
Appendix I, Table 1-4 shows specific results of gross beta, gross alpha. tritium and iodine-131 analyses of drinking water Drinking Water Gross AlpJza Monthly samples from the"12iI2-drinking water location were'analyzed '
for concentrations of gross alpha activity (Tables 1-4 Appendix I). No alpha activity was detected above:MDC for 2004. The 2004 values ranged from
-0.492 to 0.844 pCill compared to
-0.654 to 1.37 for 2003.
Drinkillg Water Gross Beta Monthly samples from the 12H2 drinking \\vater location were analyzed '
for concentrations of gross beta activity (Table 1-4). -Beta activity was detected.'
in the 12H2 location above :MOe for, 2004. The 2004 values ranged from 0.735 to 3.09 pCin compared to 0.898 to 4.26 for 2003.
Gross beta activity has been monitored in drinking water since 1977. Gross beta activity is typically measured at levels exceeding the MDCs in drinking water samples. The 2004 mean gross beta activity of 1.9 pCill is below the mean gross beta activity of 2.3 for 2003
, 2004 Radiological Enl'ironmcntal Monitoring Report I
\\....J Aquatic Pathway !tlonitoring NRC non*routine reporting levels for quarterly average activity levels of 20.000 pCilliter when a drinking water pathway exists or 30,000 pCi/liter when no drinking water pathway exists.
The tritium activity reported in the CTBD line from location 2S7/6S7 is attributable to the SSES. Refer to the "Dose from the Aquatic Pathway" discussion at the end of this section for additional infonnation on the projected dose to the population from tritium and other radionuclides in the aquatic pathway attributable to the SSES.
No gamma*emitting radionuclides were detected in surface water samples above MDC, with the exceptions of potassium-40 and iodine-131.
Drinking Water Drinking water was monitored during 2004 'at the Danville Water Company's facility 26 miles WSW of the SSES on the Sus'quehanna River at location 12H2.
There are no known drinking water:
supplies in Pennsylvania on the Susquehanna River upstream of the
'SSES 'and therefore no drinking water control monitoring locations. Danville.
drinking water analysis results may be compared to the results for surface water control monitoring locations.,,
Refer to the following for results of ',)_
surface water analyses for 2004:
Figure 11 trends gross beta activity, levels for drinking water location 12H2 from 1977 through 2004; No.
gross beta activity in drinking water during 2004 is attributed to liquid 27 discharges from the SSES to the
Appendix G. Table G page 3 and 4 of 13 shows a summary of the 2004 "
drinking water data.
Appendix H. Table H 5 through H 7 shows comparisons of gross alpha.
gross beta and tritium activity in drinking water for 2004 against past years' data.
Appendix I, Table 1-4 shows specific results of gross beta, gross alpha. tritium and iodine-131 analyses of drinking water Drinking Water Gross AlpJza Monthly samples from the"12iI2-drinking water location were'analyzed '
for concentrations of gross alpha activity (Tables 1-4 Appendix I). No alpha activity was detected above:MDC for 2004. The 2004 values ranged from
-0.492 to 0.844 pCill compared to
-0.654 to 1.37 for 2003.
Drinkillg Water Gross Beta Monthly samples from the 12H2 drinking \\vater location were analyzed '
for concentrations of gross beta activity (Table 1-4). -Beta activity was detected.'
in the 12H2 location above :MOe for, 2004. The 2004 values ranged from 0.735 to 3.09 pCin compared to 0.898 to 4.26 for 2003.
Gross beta activity has been monitored in drinking water since 1977. Gross beta activity is typically measured at levels exceeding the MDCs in drinking water samples. The 2004 mean gross beta activity of 1.9 pCill is below the mean gross beta activity of 2.3 for 2003
, 2004 Radiological Enl'ironmcntal Monitoring Report
but is within the range of the preoperational ( 1977-81) values of 2.2 to 3.2 pC/I.
Drinking Water Iodine-131 Bi-weekly samples from the 12H2 drinking water location were analyzed for concentrations of iodine-131 activity (Table 1-4). No iodine-131 activity was detected in drinking water samples above :MOCs for 2004. The 2004 values ranged from - 0.17 to 0.49 pCi/1 compared to - 0.16 to 0.58 for 2003.
Drinkillg Water Tritillm Monthly samples from the 12H2 drinking water location were analyzed for concentrations of tritium activity (Table 1-4). Tritium activity was detected above:MOC in 3 out of 12 drinking water samples in 2004. The 2004 values ranged from -17.5 to 195 pCill compared to -7.67 to 193 for 2003.
The 2004 mean tritium aciivity of 74.1 pCin for drinking water was higher than the mean tritium activity of 64 pCi/1 for 2003 but is less than the preoperational (1977-81) values of 101 to 194 pCi/1.
The 2004 mean tritium activity level for drinking water is less than the 2004 mean tritium activity level of 75.7 pCi/J for the surface water control location.
Drinking Water Gamma Spectroscopic With the exception of potassium-40, no gamma-emitting radionuclides were detected in drinking water samples above the MDC..
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Aquatic Pathway it/onitoring Fish Refer to the following for results of fish analyses for 2004:
Table G page 5 of 13 shows a summary of the 2004 fish data.
Table H 8 shows comparisons of potassium-40 monitoring results against past years data.
Table 1-5 shows specific results of gamma spectroscopic analyses of fish.
Fish Gamma Spectroscopic Semi-annual samples from the indicator (IND) and control (2H) fish locations were analyzed for concentrations of gamma activity (Table 1-5).
Three species of fish were sampled at each of one indicator location and one control location on the Susquehanna River in April 2004 and again in October 2004. The species included the following: small mouth bass, channel catfish and shorthead redhorse.
In addition, one largemouth bass was sampled from PPL's LT A W in October 2004. A total of 13 fish were collected and analyzed.
The only gamma-emitting radionuclide reported in excess of analysis :MOCs in fish during 2004 was naturally occurring potassium-40. The 2004 values ranged from 2,920 to 4,120 pClkg compared to 1,300 to 4,389 for 2093. The 2004 indicator and control means for the activity levels of potassium-40 in fish were 3,531 pCilkg and 3,475 pCilkg, respectively.
Naturally occurring potassium-40 in fish is not attributable to the liquid discharges from the SSES to the Susquehanna River.
28 but is within the range of the preoperational ( 1977-81) values of 2.2 to 3.2 pC/I.
Drinking Water Iodine-131 Bi-weekly samples from the 12H2 drinking water location were analyzed for concentrations of iodine-131 activity (Table 1-4). No iodine-131 activity was detected in drinking water samples above :MOCs for 2004. The 2004 values ranged from - 0.17 to 0.49 pCi/1 compared to - 0.16 to 0.58 for 2003.
Drinkillg Water Tritillm Monthly samples from the 12H2 drinking water location were analyzed for concentrations of tritium activity (Table 1-4). Tritium activity was detected above:MOC in 3 out of 12 drinking water samples in 2004. The 2004 values ranged from -17.5 to 195 pCill compared to -7.67 to 193 for 2003.
The 2004 mean tritium aciivity of 74.1 pCin for drinking water was higher than the mean tritium activity of 64 pCi/1 for 2003 but is less than the preoperational (1977-81) values of 101 to 194 pCi/1.
The 2004 mean tritium activity level for drinking water is less than the 2004 mean tritium activity level of 75.7 pCi/J for the surface water control location.
Drinking Water Gamma Spectroscopic With the exception of potassium-40, no gamma-emitting radionuclides were detected in drinking water samples above the MDC..
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Aquatic Pathway it/onitoring Fish Refer to the following for results of fish analyses for 2004:
Table G page 5 of 13 shows a summary of the 2004 fish data.
Table H 8 shows comparisons of potassium-40 monitoring results against past years data.
Table 1-5 shows specific results of gamma spectroscopic analyses of fish.
Fish Gamma Spectroscopic Semi-annual samples from the indicator (IND) and control (2H) fish locations were analyzed for concentrations of gamma activity (Table 1-5).
Three species of fish were sampled at each of one indicator location and one control location on the Susquehanna River in April 2004 and again in October 2004. The species included the following: small mouth bass, channel catfish and shorthead redhorse.
In addition, one largemouth bass was sampled from PPL's LT A W in October 2004. A total of 13 fish were collected and analyzed.
The only gamma-emitting radionuclide reported in excess of analysis :MOCs in fish during 2004 was naturally occurring potassium-40. The 2004 values ranged from 2,920 to 4,120 pClkg compared to 1,300 to 4,389 for 2093. The 2004 indicator and control means for the activity levels of potassium-40 in fish were 3,531 pCilkg and 3,475 pCilkg, respectively.
Naturally occurring potassium-40 in fish is not attributable to the liquid discharges from the SSES to the Susquehanna River.
28
Aquatic Pathway Monitoring Sediment Refer to the following for results of sediment analyses for 2004:
Appendix G, Table G pages 6 and 7 of 13 shows a summary of the 2004 '
sediment data.
Appendix H, Tables H 9,10,11 and 12 shows comparisons of potassium-40, radium - 226, thorium - 228, and cesium - 137 monitoring results against past years' data.
Appendix I, Table 1-6 shows specific results of gamma spectroscopic analyses of sediment samples.
Sedimellt Gamma Spectroscopic Semi-annual samples from al1 sediment locations were analyzed for concentrations of gamma activity (Table 1-6). Natural1y occurring potassium-40, radium-226, and thorium-228 were measured at activity levels above :MDCs in aU shoreline sediment sampJes in 2004. The naturally occurring radionuclides in sediment are not attributable to the Jiquid discharges from the SSES to the Susquehanna River.
Cesium-137 was measured at activity levels exceeding analysis :MDCs in 1 of 8 shoreline sediment sample analyses in 2004. The 2004 indicator and control means for cesium-137 activity levels in sediment were 22 pCilkg and 66 pCilkg.
The 2004 indicator and control means are Jess than the average of corresponding annual means for both prior operational as well as 29 preoperational years. The cesium-137 in sediment is attributed to residual' fa))out from past atmospheric nuclear weapons tests.
Dose from the Aquatic Patlnvay Tritium was the only radionuclide identified in 2004 by the SSES REMP in the aquatic pathway that was attributable to SSES operation and also included in the pathway to man..
The total tritium activity released from the SSES for the year was estimated based on REMP monitoring results for use in projecting maximum doses to the public.
~. _
The annual mean activity level of tritium in the CTBD line (monitoring
. location 2S7\\6S7) for 2004 was 4,483 pCi/I. The annual mean activity level for the river upstream of the SSES (monitoring location 6S6) was approximately 76 pein. Thus, the difference in the mean activity levels for.
these two locations was about 4407 pCin. The annual mean flow rate for the CTBD line was 8,818 gpm. Using the proper unit conversions and multiplying 8,818 gpm times 4,407 pCill yieJds a value of 77.3 curies for the estimate of tritium released from SSES during 2004. This estimate is 15.2 curies more than the amount of tritium detennined by effluent monitoring to have been released to the river by the SSES in 2004.
Given the total tritium activity released, the maximum whole-body and organ doses to hypothetical exposed individuals in four age groups (adult, 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Aquatic Pathway Monitoring Sediment Refer to the following for results of sediment analyses for 2004:
Appendix G, Table G pages 6 and 7 of 13 shows a summary of the 2004 '
sediment data.
Appendix H, Tables H 9,10,11 and 12 shows comparisons of potassium-40, radium - 226, thorium - 228, and cesium - 137 monitoring results against past years' data.
Appendix I, Table 1-6 shows specific results of gamma spectroscopic analyses of sediment samples.
Sedimellt Gamma Spectroscopic Semi-annual samples from al1 sediment locations were analyzed for concentrations of gamma activity (Table 1-6). Natural1y occurring potassium-40, radium-226, and thorium-228 were measured at activity levels above :MDCs in aU shoreline sediment sampJes in 2004. The naturally occurring radionuclides in sediment are not attributable to the Jiquid discharges from the SSES to the Susquehanna River.
Cesium-137 was measured at activity levels exceeding analysis :MDCs in 1 of 8 shoreline sediment sample analyses in 2004. The 2004 indicator and control means for cesium-137 activity levels in sediment were 22 pCilkg and 66 pCilkg.
The 2004 indicator and control means are Jess than the average of corresponding annual means for both prior operational as well as 29 preoperational years. The cesium-137 in sediment is attributed to residual' fa))out from past atmospheric nuclear weapons tests.
Dose from the Aquatic Patlnvay Tritium was the only radionuclide identified in 2004 by the SSES REMP in the aquatic pathway that was attributable to SSES operation and also included in the pathway to man..
The total tritium activity released from the SSES for the year was estimated based on REMP monitoring results for use in projecting maximum doses to the public.
~. _
The annual mean activity level of tritium in the CTBD line (monitoring
. location 2S7\\6S7) for 2004 was 4,483 pCi/I. The annual mean activity level for the river upstream of the SSES (monitoring location 6S6) was approximately 76 pein. Thus, the difference in the mean activity levels for.
these two locations was about 4407 pCin. The annual mean flow rate for the CTBD line was 8,818 gpm. Using the proper unit conversions and multiplying 8,818 gpm times 4,407 pCill yieJds a value of 77.3 curies for the estimate of tritium released from SSES during 2004. This estimate is 15.2 curies more than the amount of tritium detennined by effluent monitoring to have been released to the river by the SSES in 2004.
Given the total tritium activity released, the maximum whole-body and organ doses to hypothetical exposed individuals in four age groups (adult, 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report
teenager, child, and infant) were detennined according to the methodology of the Offsite Dose Calculation manual using the RETDAS computer program. This is in accordance with SSES Technical Requirement 3.11.4.1.3.
The maximum dose obtained from the ingestion of tritium was estimated at the nearest downriver municipal water supplier via the drinking water pathway and near the outfall of the SSES discharge to the Susquehanna River via the fish pathway. The maximum whole body and organ doses (child) were each calculated as 0.0015 mrem.
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Aquatic Pathway M01litoring
-...J 30 teenager, child, and infant) were detennined according to the methodology of the Offsite Dose Calculation manual using the RETDAS computer program. This is in accordance with SSES Technical Requirement 3.11.4.1.3.
The maximum dose obtained from the ingestion of tritium was estimated at the nearest downriver municipal water supplier via the drinking water pathway and near the outfall of the SSES discharge to the Susquehanna River via the fish pathway. The maximum whole body and organ doses (child) were each calculated as 0.0015 mrem.
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Aquatic Pathway M01litoring
-...J 30
pCi/Liter FIGURE 9 - GROSS BETA ACTIVITY IN SURFACE WATER 20 ~----------------~----------------------------------------------~
18 PREOPERA TIONAL OPERA TIONAL 16 14 12 10 8
6 4
2 o+---------------~~----------------------------------~----------~
-2
-4 +-~~~~~~~--r_~~~~~~~~~--~~~~~~~~~~--~~~
t-,'"
t-,f\\,
""f\\,~
~"
~",
~",
""rf'
~"
~",
~",
~f\\,
~~
~"
~",
~",
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
Indicator -
Control pCi/Liter FIGURE 9 - GROSS BETA ACTIVITY IN SURFACE WATER 20 ~----------------~----------------------------------------------~
18 PREOPERA TIONAL OPERA TIONAL 16 14 12 10 8
6 4
2 o+---------------~~----------------------------------~----------~
-2
-4 +-~~~~~~~--r_~~~~~~~~~--~~~~~~~~~~--~~~
t-,">
t-,f\\,
""f\\,~
ft,"
ft,'"
ft,">
""rfJ
~"
~",
~">
~f\\,
~~
~"
~",
~">
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
Indicator -
Control
FIGURE 10 - TRITIUM ACTIVITY IN SURFACE WATER pCi/Liter 3000 ~----------------------~------------------------------~~------------,
PREOPERATIONAL OPERATIONAL 2500 2000 1500 Unit 2 1000
-500 +-~~~~~~~--~~~~~~~~~~~--~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
t..'V t..b.
t..'o t..'b
~~
~
{'
~
~
~
Indicator Control Cll FIGURE 10 - TRITIUM ACTIVITY IN SURFACE WATER pCi/Liter 3000,-----------------------~------------------------------~~----------~
PREOPERATIONAL 2500 2000 1500 1000 OPERATIONAL Unit 2 Criticality
~
-500 +-~~~~~~~~--~~~~~~~~~~--~~,_~~~~~~~~--~~~
t.."'-f t..b4 t..'o t..'b
~~
~
{'
~
{'
~
Indicator Control ell
c
(
FIGURE 11 - GROSS BETA ACTIVITY IN DRINKING WATER
(
pCi/Lifcr 10~------------~~--------------------------------------------------~
9 PREOPERATIONAL OPERATIONAL 8
7 6
5 4
3 2
1 O+-~~~~~~~~--r-T-~-r~--r-~~~~--~~~~
__ ~T-~-r~--r-T t>."
~
c
(
FIGURE 11 - GROSS BETA ACTIVITY IN DRINKING WATER
(
pCi/Lifcr 10~------------~~--------------------------------------------------~
9 PREOPERATIONAL OPERATIONAL 8
7 6
5 4
3 2
1 O+-~~~~~~~~--r-T-~-r~--r-~~~~--~~~~
__ ~T-~-r~--r-T t>."
~
Atmospheric Pathway Monitoring INTRODUCTION Atmospheric monitoring by the SSES REMP involves the sampling and analysis of air. Because the air is the first medium that SSES vent releases enter in the pathway to man, it is fundamental that it be monitored.
Mechanisms do exist for the transport of airborne contaminants to other media and their concentration in them. 'For example, airborne contaminants may move to the terrestrial environment and concentrate in milk. Concentrations of.:
radionuclides 'can make the sampling' and analysis of media like milk more sensitive approaches for the detection of radionuciides, such as iodine-13I, in the pathway to man than the monitoring of air directly.'
also samples milk; refer to the Terrestrial Pathway Monitoring section of this report.)
Nevertheless, the sensitivity of air monitoring can be optimized by the proper selection of sampling techniques and the choice of the proper types of analyses for the collected samples.
Scope Air samples were collected on particulate filters and charcoal cartridges at indicator locations 3S2, 12S1, 13S6 and 12EI, and control locations 6Gl and 8Gl.
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Sampling and Analysis Air The SSES REMP monitored the air at four indicator locations and two control loc~ltions during 2004. The SSES Technical Requirements require monitoring at only a total of five sites.
Monitoring is required at three locations at the SSES site boundary in different sectors with the greatest predicted sensitivities for the detection of SSES releases. Monitoring must be performed at the community in the vicinity of the SSES with the greatest predicted sensitivity. A control10cation that is expected to be unaffected by any routine SSES releases must be monitored.
Airborne particulates were collected on glass fiber filters using low volume (typicaUy 2.0 to 2.5 cfm sampling rates) air samplers that run contiriuously. Air iodine samples were collected on charcoal cartridges, placed downstream of the particulate filters.
Particulate filters and charcoal cartridges were exchanged weekly 'at, the air monitoring sites. Sampling times were recorded on elapsed-time ~eters.
Air sample volumes for particulate filters and charcoal cartridges were..
measured with dry-gas meters.
Air filters were analyzed weekly for gross beta activity, then composited quarterly and 'analyzed fort~e activities of gamma-emitting radionuclides. The.
charcoal cartridges were analyzed weekly for iodine-131.
34 Atmospheric Pathway Monitoring INTRODUCTION Atmospheric monitoring by the SSES REMP involves the sampling and analysis of air. Because the air is the first medium that SSES vent releases enter in the pathway to man, it is fundamental that it be monitored.
Mechanisms do exist for the transport of airborne contaminants to other media and their concentration in them. 'For example, airborne contaminants may move to the terrestrial environment and concentrate in milk. Concentrations of.:
radionuclides 'can make the sampling' and analysis of media like milk more sensitive approaches for the detection of radionuciides, such as iodine-13I, in the pathway to man than the monitoring of air directly.' *(pPL also samples milk; refer to the Terrestrial Pathway Monitoring section of this report.)
Nevertheless, the sensitivity of air monitoring can be optimized by the proper selection of sampling techniques and the choice of the proper types of analyses for the collected samples.
Scope Air samples were collected on particulate filters and charcoal cartridges at indicator locations 3S2, 12S1, 13S6 and 12EI, and control locations 6Gl and 8Gl.
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Sampling and Analysis Air The SSES REMP monitored the air at four indicator locations and two control loc~ltions during 2004. The SSES Technical Requirements require monitoring at only a total of five sites.
Monitoring is required at three locations at the SSES site boundary in different sectors with the greatest predicted sensitivities for the detection of SSES releases. Monitoring must be performed at the community in the vicinity of the SSES with the greatest predicted sensitivity. A control10cation that is expected to be unaffected by any routine SSES releases must be monitored.
Airborne particulates were collected on glass fiber filters using low volume (typicaUy 2.0 to 2.5 cfm sampling rates) air samplers that run contiriuously. Air iodine samples were collected on charcoal cartridges, placed downstream of the particulate filters.
Particulate filters and charcoal cartridges were exchanged weekly 'at, the air monitoring sites. Sampling times were recorded on elapsed-time ~eters.
Air sample volumes for particulate filters and charcoal cartridges were..
measured with dry-gas meters.
Air filters were analyzed weekly for gross beta activity, then composited quarterly and 'analyzed fort~e activities of gamma-emitting radionuclides. The.
charcoal cartridges were analyzed weekly for iodine-131.
34
Atmospileric Pathway lUonitoring Monitoring Results Air Particulates Refer to the following for results of air particulate analyses for 2004:
Figure 12 trends gross beta activities' separately for air particulate indicator and control locations from 1974 through 2004.
- Appendix G, Table G pages 5, 8 and 9 of 13 shows a summary of the 2004 air particulate data.
Appendix H, Tables H 13 and 14 shows comparisons of gross beta and BeryIIium-7 monitoring results against past years data.
- Appendix I, Table 1-8 shows specific sample results of gross beta analyses for air particulate filters.
Air Particulate Gross Beta Weekly samples from all air particulate filter locations were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta activity (Table 1-8). Gross beta activity was observed at all locations above MDC for 2004. The 2004 values, both indicator and control, ranged from 3.S1E-3 to 3.66E-2 pCilm3, ~ompared to 3.59E-3 to 3. 17E-2 pCi/m for 2003.
The 2004 mean gross beta activity of 1.39E-2 pCi/m3for all indicator location compares to the average of the annual preoperational control mean of 6.20E-2 pCi/m3 indicates activity detected below the preoperational control. In addition a comparison of the 2004 weekly indicator mean for beta activities of 1.39E-2 pCilm3 compared to the 2004 control locations of 1.30E-2 3S pCilm3 indicates no appreciable effects from the operation of SSES~
Gross beta activity is normally measured at levels in excess of the analysis MDCs on the fiber filters. The highest gross beta activity levels that have been measured during the operational period of the SSES were obtained in 1986 foHowing the Chemobyl accident in the former Soviet Union.
Note that prior to SSES operation,.
before 1982, the unusually high gross beta activities were generally attributable to fallout from atmospheric nuclear weapons tests. Typical gross beta activities measured on air particulate filters are the result oE naturally occurring radionuclides associated with dust particles suspended in the sampled air. They are thus terrestrial in origin.
The SSES Technical Requirements Manual requires radionuclide analysis if any weekly gross beta result was greater than ten times the yearly mean of control sample results. This condition did not occur during 2004.
Air Particulate Gamma Spectroscopic Quarterly gamma spectroscopic measurements of composited filters often show the naturally occurring radionuclide beryllium-7. Occasionally, other naturally occurring radionuclides, potassium-40 and radium-226, are also observed. Beryllium-7 is cosmogenic in origin, being produced by the interaction of cosmic radiation with the earth's atmosphere. The other two 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Atmospileric Pathway lUonitoring Monitoring Results Air Particulates Refer to the following for results of air particulate analyses for 2004:
Figure 12 trends gross beta activities' separately for air particulate indicator and control locations from 1974 through 2004.
- Appendix G, Table G pages 5, 8 and 9 of 13 shows a summary of the 2004 air particulate data.
Appendix H, Tables H 13 and 14 shows comparisons of gross beta and BeryIIium-7 monitoring results against past years data.
- Appendix I, Table 1-8 shows specific sample results of gross beta analyses for air particulate filters.
Air Particulate Gross Beta Weekly samples from all air particulate filter locations were analyzed for concentrations of gross beta activity (Table 1-8). Gross beta activity was observed at all locations above MDC for 2004. The 2004 values, both indicator and control, ranged from 3.S1E-3 to 3.66E-2 pCilm3, ~ompared to 3.59E-3 to 3. 17E-2 pCi/m for 2003.
The 2004 mean gross beta activity of 1.39E-2 pCi/m3for all indicator location compares to the average of the annual preoperational control mean of 6.20E-2 pCi/m3 indicates activity detected below the preoperational control. In addition a comparison of the 2004 weekly indicator mean for beta activities of 1.39E-2 pCilm3 compared to the 2004 control locations of 1.30E-2 3S pCilm3 indicates no appreciable effects from the operation of SSES~
Gross beta activity is normally measured at levels in excess of the analysis MDCs on the fiber filters. The highest gross beta activity levels that have been measured during the operational period of the SSES were obtained in 1986 foHowing the Chemobyl accident in the former Soviet Union.
Note that prior to SSES operation,.
before 1982, the unusually high gross beta activities were generally attributable to fallout from atmospheric nuclear weapons tests. Typical gross beta activities measured on air particulate filters are the result oE naturally occurring radionuclides associated with dust particles suspended in the sampled air. They are thus terrestrial in origin.
The SSES Technical Requirements Manual requires radionuclide analysis if any weekly gross beta result was greater than ten times the yearly mean of control sample results. This condition did not occur during 2004.
Air Particulate Gamma Spectroscopic Quarterly gamma spectroscopic measurements of composited filters often show the naturally occurring radionuclide beryllium-7. Occasionally, other naturally occurring radionuclides, potassium-40 and radium-226, are also observed. Beryllium-7 is cosmogenic in origin, being produced by the interaction of cosmic radiation with the earth's atmosphere. The other two 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report
gamma-emitting radionuclides originate from soil and rock.
Beryllium-7 was measured above analysis MDCs for all quarterly composite samples in 2004. The 2004 indicator and control means for beryllium-7 activity were pCilm3 and 8.79E-2 pCilm3, respectively. BerylIium-7 activity levels for each 2004 calendar quarter at each monitoring location are presented in Table 1-9 of Appendix I. Comparisons of2004 bery1lium-7 analysis results with previous years may be found in Table of Appendix H.
No other gamma-emitting radionuclides were reported for air in 2004.
Beryllium-7 is not attributable to SSES operation.
Air Particulate Iodine lodine-131 has been detected infrequently from 1976, when it was first monitored, through 2004. Since operation of the SSES began in 1982, iodine-131 has only been positively detected in air samples in 1986 due to the Chernobyl accident. No iodine':'131 was reported for the 2004 air monitoring results.
2004 Radiological Em'ironmental Monitoring Report Atmospheric Pathway Monitoring 36 gamma-emitting radionuclides originate from soil and rock.
Beryllium-7 was measured above analysis MDCs for all quarterly composite samples in 2004. The 2004 indicator and control means for beryllium-7 activity were 9.16E-2*
pCilm3 and 8.79E-2 pCilm3, respectively. BerylIium-7 activity levels for each 2004 calendar quarter at each monitoring location are presented in Table 1-9 of Appendix I. Comparisons of2004 bery1lium-7 analysis results with previous years may be found in Table H*14 of Appendix H.
No other gamma-emitting radionuclides were reported for air in 2004.
Beryllium-7 is not attributable to SSES operation.
Air Particulate Iodine lodine-131 has been detected infrequently from 1976, when it was first monitored, through 2004. Since operation of the SSES began in 1982, iodine-131 has only been positively detected in air samples in 1986 due to the Chernobyl accident. No iodine':'131 was reported for the 2004 air monitoring results.
2004 Radiological Em'ironmental Monitoring Report Atmospheric Pathway Monitoring 36
FIGURE 12 - GROSS BETA ACTIVITY IN AIR PARTICULATES E-03 pCi/M3 500 ~--------------------~----------------------------------------------------~
450 400 A
- 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0
t\\1:>.
~
PRE OPERA TIONAL o
E
~
F UNIT2 OPERATIONAL CHERNOBYL 4/26/86 CRITICALITY I CHINESE WEAPONS TEST A - 06/17/74 B - 09/26/76 C - 11/17/76 D - 09/17/77 E - 03/14/78 F -10/15/80 Indicator Control elL-FIGURE 12 - GROSS BETA ACTIVITY IN AIR PARTICULATES E-03 pCi/M3 500 ~--------------------~----------------------------------------------------~
450 400 A
- 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0
t\\1:>.
~
PRE OPERA TIONAL o E
~
F UNIT2 OPERATIONAL CHERNOBYL 4/26/86 CRITICALITY I CHINESE WEAPONS TEST A - 06/17/74 B - 09/26/76 C - 11/17/76 D - 09/17/77 E - 03/14/78 F -10/15/80 Indicator Control elL.-
Terrestrial Pathway Monitoring INTRODUCTION The following media were monitored in the Terrestria1 Pathway in 2004: soil, milk, fruits and vegetab1es.
Soil can',be it great accumulator of man-made radionuclides that enter it. The extent of the accumulation in the soil depends of course on the amount of the radioriuclides reaching it, but it also depends on the chemical nature of those radionuclides'and the particular characteristics of the soil. For example, the element cesium, and, therefore, cesium-137 can be bound very tightly to clay in soils. The amount of clay in soil f' can vary greatly from one location to another. In'clay soils, cesium-137 may" move very slowly and also may be taken up very slowly in plants as they absorb soil moisture.
Any medium, such as soH, that tends to accumulate radioactive materials can, also provide more sensitivity for radionucHde detection in the
,environment than those media that don't.' Such a medium facilitates the early identification of radionuclides in the environment, as well as awareness of changes that subsequently may occur in the environmental levels of the identified radionuclides. '
The SSES REMP samples soil near four of the six REMP air-sampling stations.
The purpose for soil sampling near. the air sampling sites is to make it easier to correlate air sampling results with soil sampling results if any SSESrelated radioactive material were found in 2004 Radiological Em'ironmcntal Monitoring Rep?~t either medium. Sampling is performed at different depths near the surface to help provide information on how '
recently certain radioactive materials may have entered the soil. Sampling at more than one depth also may help ensure the detection of materials that.
move relatively quickly through the soil.
Such quick-moving materials may have already passed through the topmost layer of soil at the time of sampling.
Milk was sampled at four locations and fruit and vegetable samples were obtained at one location in 2004. SSES Technical Requirements require that the',
SSES REMP sample milk at the three most sensitive monitoring locations near the SSES and one control location,.
distant from the SSES. SSES Technical Requirements only require that fruit and
, vegetables be sampled at locations irrigated by Susquehanna River water from points downstream of the SSES discharge to the River. There are only three 10cations within 10 miles downstream of the SSES that have been known to irrigate with water from the Susquehanna River during unusually dry periods. These locations do not.
irrigate every year. The Lupini Farm in MifflinviJ]e (l2F7) briefly irrigated '
potatoes in June 2004 using Susquehanna River water. No other fields within 10 miles downriver of Susquehanna SES were irrigated in 2004, including the Lupini Farm "Route 93 Nescopeck Field" (llD2), Chapin Faim "Drake Field" (11F2), and Zehner Farm (lIDl) because wet weather prevailed much of the spring and 38 Terrestrial Pathway Monitoring INTRODUCTION The following media were monitored in the Terrestria1 Pathway in 2004: soil, milk, fruits and vegetab1es.
Soil can',be it great accumulator of man-made radionuclides that enter it. The extent of the accumulation in the soil depends of course on the amount of the radioriuclides reaching it, but it also depends on the chemical nature of those radionuclides'and the particular characteristics of the soil. For example, the element cesium, and, therefore, cesium-137 can be bound very tightly to clay in soils. The amount of clay in soil f' can vary greatly from one location to another. In'clay soils, cesium-137 may" move very slowly and also may be taken up very slowly in plants as they absorb soil moisture.
Any medium, such as soH, that tends to accumulate radioactive materials can, also provide more sensitivity for radionucHde detection in the
,environment than those media that don't.' Such a medium facilitates the early identification of radionuclides in the environment, as well as awareness of changes that subsequently may occur in the environmental levels of the identified radionuclides. '
The SSES REMP samples soil near four of the six REMP air-sampling stations.
The purpose for soil sampling near. the air sampling sites is to make it easier to correlate air sampling results with soil sampling results if any SSESrelated radioactive material were found in 2004 Radiological Em'ironmcntal Monitoring Rep?~t either medium. Sampling is performed at different depths near the surface to help provide information on how '
recently certain radioactive materials may have entered the soil. Sampling at more than one depth also may help ensure the detection of materials that.
move relatively quickly through the soil.
Such quick-moving materials may have already passed through the topmost layer of soil at the time of sampling.
Milk was sampled at four locations and fruit and vegetable samples were obtained at one location in 2004. SSES Technical Requirements require that the',
SSES REMP sample milk at the three most sensitive monitoring locations near the SSES and one control location,.
distant from the SSES. SSES Technical Requirements only require that fruit and
, vegetables be sampled at locations irrigated by Susquehanna River water from points downstream of the SSES discharge to the River. There are only three 10cations within 10 miles downstream of the SSES that have been known to irrigate with water from the Susquehanna River during unusually dry periods. These locations do not.
irrigate every year. The Lupini Farm in MifflinviJ]e (l2F7) briefly irrigated '
potatoes in June 2004 using Susquehanna River water. No other fields within 10 miles downriver of Susquehanna SES were irrigated in 2004, including the Lupini Farm "Route 93 Nescopeck Field" (llD2), Chapin Faim "Drake Field" (11F2), and Zehner Farm (lIDl) because wet weather prevailed much of the spring and 38
summer during 2004 as identified by the 2004 Land Use Census (Reference II).
No requirement exists for the SSES REMP to monitor soil. All monitoring of the terrestrial pathway that is conducted by the SSES REMP in addition to milk and certain fruit and vegetables is voluntary and reflects PPL's wi1lingness to exceed regulatory requirements to ensure that the public and the environment are protected.
Scope Soil Soil was sampled in September 2004 in accordance with its scheduled annual sampling frequency, at the following four REMP air sampling locations, 3S2, 12S1, 13S6, and 8Gl. Location 8Gl was a control sampling location; the remaining sampling sites were indicator locations.
Twelve soil plugs were taken at selected spots at each monitoring location. -The plugs were separated into "top" (0-2 inches) and "bottom" (2-6 inches) segments. Each set of top and bottom segments was composited to yield 2 soil samples from each location for analysis.
Since there are four monitoring locations, a total of 8 soil samples were analyzed in 2004.
Milk Milk was sampled at least monthly at the following four locations in 2004:
lOD1, IOD2, 12B2 and lOG!.
Milk was sampled semi-monthly from April through October when cows were more likely to be on pasture. Locations lODl, lOD2, and 12B2 are believed to 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Terrestrial Pathway Monitoring be the most sensitive indicator sites available for the detection of radionuclides released from the SSES.
Location 10GI is the control location.
Since there are four monitoring locations, a total of 76 cow milk samples were collected in 2004.
Fruits alld Vegetables Potatoes were sampled during the harvest season at one location near the SSES. One sample was collected at location 12F7, which was irrigated with Susquehanna River water from downstream of the SSES during 2004.
There are often years with adequate rainfall when no irrigation is performed.
Sample Preservation. _
and Analysis All media in the terrestrial pathway are _
analyzed for the activities of gamma-emitting radionuclides using gamma spectroscopy. The other analysis that is routinely performed is the radiochemical analysis for iodine-131 in milk.
Monitoring Results Refer to the following for results of the terrestrial pathway analyses for 2004:
Figure 13 trends iodine-131 activities separately for milk indicator and control locations from 1977 through 2004.
Appendix G, Table G pages 10 through 13 shows a summary of the 2004 terrestrial monitoring results for milk, soil, and irrigated food crop data.
39
..* ~
summer during 2004 as identified by the 2004 Land Use Census (Reference II).
No requirement exists for the SSES REMP to monitor soil. All monitoring of the terrestrial pathway that is conducted by the SSES REMP in addition to milk and certain fruit and vegetables is voluntary and reflects PPL's wi1lingness to exceed regulatory requirements to ensure that the public and the environment are protected.
Scope Soil Soil was sampled in September 2004 in accordance with its scheduled annual sampling frequency, at the following four REMP air sampling locations, 3S2, 12S1, 13S6, and 8Gl. Location 8Gl was a control sampling location; the remaining sampling sites were indicator locations.
Twelve soil plugs were taken at selected spots at each monitoring location. -The plugs were separated into "top" (0-2 inches) and "bottom" (2-6 inches) segments. Each set of top and bottom segments was composited to yield 2 soil samples from each location for analysis.
Since there are four monitoring locations, a total of 8 soil samples were analyzed in 2004.
Milk Milk was sampled at least monthly at the following four locations in 2004:
lOD1, IOD2, 12B2 and lOG!.
Milk was sampled semi-monthly from April through October when cows were more likely to be on pasture. Locations lODl, lOD2, and 12B2 are believed to 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Terrestrial Pathway Monitoring be the most sensitive indicator sites available for the detection of radionuclides released from the SSES.
Location 10GI is the control location.
Since there are four monitoring locations, a total of 76 cow milk samples were collected in 2004.
Fruits alld Vegetables Potatoes were sampled during the harvest season at one location near the SSES. One sample was collected at location 12F7, which was irrigated with Susquehanna River water from downstream of the SSES during 2004.
There are often years with adequate rainfall when no irrigation is performed.
Sample Preservation. _
and Analysis All media in the terrestrial pathway are _
analyzed for the activities of gamma-emitting radionuclides using gamma spectroscopy. The other analysis that is routinely performed is the radiochemical analysis for iodine-131 in milk.
Monitoring Results Refer to the following for results of the terrestrial pathway analyses for 2004:
Figure 13 trends iodine-131 activities separately for milk indicator and control locations from 1977 through 2004.
Appendix G, Table G pages 10 through 13 shows a summary of the 2004 terrestrial monitoring results for milk, soil, and irrigated food crop data.
39
..* ~
Terrestrial Pathway Monitoring Appendix H, Tables HIS through 19 show comparisons of terrestrial,.
pathway monitoring results against.'
past years' data.
- Appendix I, Tables 1-10 through 12.
shows results of specific sample analyses for te~estrial pathway media.
The only man-made radionuclides normally expected at levels in excess of analysis MDCs in the terrestrial pathway are strontium-90 and cesium-137. Both of these radionuclides are present in the environment as a residual from previous atmospheric nuclear weapons testing. Strontium-90 analyses are not now routinely performed for any media samples in the terrestrial pathway. Strontium-90 activity would be expected to be found in milk. SSES Technical Requirements do not require that milk be analyzed for strontium-90.
Strontium-90 analyses may be performed at any time if the results of other milk analyses would show detectable levels of fission product activity which might suggest the SSES as the source.
Cesium-137 normally has been measured in excess of analysis in most soil samples.
Certain naturally occurring radionuclides are also routinely found above analysis MDCs in terrestrial pathway media. Potassium-40, a primordial and very long-lived radionuclide, which is terres.trial in
. origin, is observed in all terrestrial pathway media. Other naturally occurring radionucIides often observed 40 are thorium-228 and radium-226 in soil, and beryllium-7 in fruits and vegetables.
Soil Annual samples from the SG1, 3S2, 12S1 and 13S6 soil locations were analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides (Table 1-11). The following gamma-emitti:ng radionucHdes are routine]y measured in soil at levels exceeding analysis MDCs:.
naturally occurring potassium-40, thorium-228 and man-:-made cesium-137. The 2004 analysis results were similar to those for previous years. No other gamma-emitting radionuclides were reported at levels above analysis MDCs.
The 2004 means for indicator and control1ocation sample potassium-40 activity were 14.5 pCi/g and 9.3
. respectively. This is not the result of SSES operation because the potassium-40 is naturally occuriing.
The 2004 means for indicator and control location sample thorium-228 activity were 1.0 pCi/g and 0.7 pCi/g, respectively. Thorium-228 in soil is not the result of SSES operation because it is naturally occurring..
The 2004 means for indicator and control location sample ces~um-137 activity were 0.03 pCi/g and 0.11 pCi/g, respectively. The 2004 indicator values ranged from -0.015 to 0.076 pCilg, compared to -0.021 to 0.096 pCi/g for 2003. Cesium-137 in soil, although man-made, is not from the operation of the SSES. It is residual fallout from previous atmospheric.
nuclear weapons testing.
2004 Radiological Em'ironmcntal Monitoring Report Terrestrial Pathway Monitoring Appendix H, Tables HIS through 19 show comparisons of terrestrial,.
pathway monitoring results against.'
past years' data.
- Appendix I, Tables 1-10 through 12.
shows results of specific sample analyses for te~estrial pathway media.
The only man-made radionuclides normally expected at levels in excess of analysis MDCs in the terrestrial pathway are strontium-90 and cesium-137. Both of these radionuclides are present in the environment as a residual from previous atmospheric nuclear weapons testing. Strontium-90 analyses are not now routinely performed for any media samples in the terrestrial pathway. Strontium-90 activity would be expected to be found in milk. SSES Technical Requirements do not require that milk be analyzed for strontium-90.
Strontium-90 analyses may be performed at any time if the results of other milk analyses would show detectable levels of fission product activity which might suggest the SSES as the source.
Cesium-137 normally has been measured in excess of analysis MDCs* in most soil samples.
Certain naturally occurring radionuclides are also routinely found above analysis MDCs in terrestrial pathway media. Potassium-40, a primordial and very long-lived radionuclide, which is terres.trial in
. origin, is observed in all terrestrial pathway media. Other naturally occurring radionucIides often observed 40 are thorium-228 and radium-226 in soil, and beryllium-7 in fruits and vegetables.
Soil Annual samples from the SG1, 3S2, 12S1 and 13S6 soil locations were analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclides (Table 1-11). The following gamma-emitti:ng radionucHdes are routine]y measured in soil at levels exceeding analysis MDCs:.
naturally occurring potassium-40, thorium-228 and man-:-made cesium-137. The 2004 analysis results were similar to those for previous years. No other gamma-emitting radionuclides were reported at levels above analysis MDCs.
The 2004 means for indicator and control1ocation sample potassium-40 activity were 14.5 pCi/g and 9.3 pCi/g,*
. respectively. This is not the result of SSES operation because the potassium-40 is naturally occuriing.
The 2004 means for indicator and control location sample thorium-228 activity were 1.0 pCi/g and 0.7 pCi/g, respectively. Thorium-228 in soil is not the result of SSES operation because it is naturally occurring..
The 2004 means for indicator and control location sample ces~um-137 activity were 0.03 pCi/g and 0.11 pCi/g, respectively. The 2004 indicator values ranged from -0.015 to 0.076 pCilg, compared to -0.021 to 0.096 pCi/g for 2003. Cesium-137 in soil, although man-made, is not from the operation of the SSES. It is residual fallout from previous atmospheric.
nuclear weapons testing.
2004 Radiological Em'ironmcntal Monitoring Report
Milk Semi-monthly or monthly samples from all milk locations were analyzed for concentrations of iodine-I31 and gamma emitting nuclide activity (Table 1-10). No detectable iodine-131 activity above MDC was observed at any location for 2004. The 2004 indicator values ranged from -0.9 to 0.54 pCifl, compared to -0.17 to 0.44 pCill for 2003. Iodine-I31 has been chemically separated in milk samples and counted routinely since 1977. Refer to Figure 13 which trends iodine-131 activity in milk for indicator and control locations separately from 1977 through 2004.
The preoperational years 1976, 1978, and 1980 were exceptional years in the sense that iodine-131 activity was observed in excess of MDCs due to faHout from atmospheric nuclear weapons testing. Iodine-131 activity was also measured at levels exceeding MDCs in milk samples in 1986 in the vicinity of the SSES as a result of the Chemobyl incident.
With the exception of the naturally occurring potassium-40, no gamma-emitting radionuclides were measured in excess of analysis MDCs in 2004.
The 2004 means for indicator and control location sample potassium-40 activity were 1,401 pCiniter and 1,455 pCilJiter, respectively. The potassium-40 activity in milk is not attributable to SSES operation because it is naturally occurring.
Fruits alld Vegetables One potato sample was col1ecled from the 12F7location and analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclide activity (Table 1-12). NaturaHy 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Terrestrial Pathway Monitoring occurring potassium-40 at 3.95 pCi/g was the only gamma-emitting radionuclide measured in fruits and vegetables at an activity level above MDC during 2004. An other nuclides were less than the MOC.
Potassium-40 in fruits and vegetables is not attributable to SSES operation because it is a naturally occurring radionucIide.
41 Milk Semi-monthly or monthly samples from all milk locations were analyzed for concentrations of iodine-I31 and gamma emitting nuclide activity (Table 1-10). No detectable iodine-131 activity above MDC was observed at any location for 2004. The 2004 indicator values ranged from -0.9 to 0.54 pCifl, compared to -0.17 to 0.44 pCill for 2003. Iodine-I31 has been chemically separated in milk samples and counted routinely since 1977. Refer to Figure 13 which trends iodine-131 activity in milk for indicator and control locations separately from 1977 through 2004.
The preoperational years 1976, 1978, and 1980 were exceptional years in the sense that iodine-131 activity was observed in excess of MDCs due to faHout from atmospheric nuclear weapons testing. Iodine-131 activity was also measured at levels exceeding MDCs in milk samples in 1986 in the vicinity of the SSES as a result of the Chemobyl incident.
With the exception of the naturally occurring potassium-40, no gamma-emitting radionuclides were measured in excess of analysis MDCs in 2004.
The 2004 means for indicator and control location sample potassium-40 activity were 1,401 pCiniter and 1,455 pCilJiter, respectively. The potassium-40 activity in milk is not attributable to SSES operation because it is naturally occurring.
Fruits alld Vegetables One potato sample was col1ecled from the 12F7location and analyzed for concentrations of gamma emitting nuclide activity (Table 1-12). NaturaHy 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Terrestrial Pathway Monitoring occurring potassium-40 at 3.95 pCi/g was the only gamma-emitting radionuclide measured in fruits and vegetables at an activity level above MDC during 2004. An other nuclides were less than the MOC.
Potassium-40 in fruits and vegetables is not attributable to SSES operation because it is a naturally occurring radionucIide.
41
c c
(
FIGURE 13 - IODINE-131 ACTIVITY IN MILK 100 pCi/Liter CHINESE 90 WEAPONS TEST A- 09/12177 PRE-B - 03/14178 OPERATIONAL OPERATIONAL C -10/15/80 80 70 -
60 so 40 A
CHERNOBYL 30 4/26/86 20 -
UNIT 2 10 CRITICAL Y B
C
+
n Do o
C!2lndlcator ClControl c
c
(
FIGURE 13 - IODINE-131 ACTIVITY IN MILK 100 pCi/Liter CHINESE 90 WEAPONS TEST A- 09/12177 PRE-B - 03/14178 OPERATIONAL OPERATIONAL C -10/15/80 80 70 -
60 so 40 A
CHERNOBYL 30 4/26/86 20 -
UNIT 2 10 CRITICAL Y B
C
+
n Do o
C!2lndlcator ClControl
Ground Water Monitoring INTRODUCTION Normal operation of the SSES does not involve the release of radioactive material to ground water directly or indirectly through the ground. As a result, there are no effluent monitoring data to compare with REMP ground water monitoring results. Ground water could conceivably become contaminated by leakage or spills from the plant or by the washout or deposition of radioactive material that:
might be airborne. If deposited on the '
ground, precipitation/soi] moisture could aid in the movement of radioactive materials through the ground to water that could conceivably be pumped fofdrinking purposes. No use of ground water for irrigation near the SSES has been identified.
Because routine SSES operation releases primarily tritium and, to a lesser extent, isotopes of xenon and krypton to the air, no radionuclides attributable to SSES operation are expected to be observed in ground water. Iodine and particulate releases to the air are negligible. Gaseous xenon and krypton tend to remain airborne; deposition or washout of these would be expected to be very minimal. Tritium would be the most likely radionuclide to reach the ground with precipitation and, if not lost to streams (surface water) by runoff, move readily through the soil to the ground water.
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Scope Ground water in the SSES vicinity was sampled monthly at 2 indicator locations (2S2 and 4S4) and one control location (12F3) during 2004.
With the exception of location 4S4, untreated ground water was sampled.
Untreated means that the water has not undergone any processing such a"s filtration. chlorination. or softening. At location 4S4, the SSES Training Center, well water actually is obtained from on-site and piped to the Training Center after treatment. This 'sampling is perfoimed as a check to ensure that water has not been ni.dioactively contaminated. Sampling is performed at the Training Center to facilitate the sample collection process.
Sample Preservation &
Analysis Ground water samples were analyzed for "gamma':'emitting radionuc1ide and tritium activities. Gamma spectrometric ana1yses of ground water began in '1979 and tritium analyses in 1972; both prior to SSES operation.
43 Ground Water Monitoring INTRODUCTION Normal operation of the SSES does not involve the release of radioactive material to ground water directly or indirectly through the ground. As a result, there are no effluent monitoring data to compare with REMP ground water monitoring results. Ground water could conceivably become contaminated by leakage or spills from the plant or by the washout or deposition of radioactive material that:
might be airborne. If deposited on the '
ground, precipitation/soi] moisture could aid in the movement of radioactive materials through the ground to water that could conceivably be pumped fofdrinking purposes. No use of ground water for irrigation near the SSES has been identified.
Because routine SSES operation releases primarily tritium and, to a lesser extent, isotopes of xenon and krypton to the air, no radionuclides attributable to SSES operation are expected to be observed in ground water. Iodine and particulate releases to the air are negligible. Gaseous xenon and krypton tend to remain airborne; deposition or washout of these would be expected to be very minimal. Tritium would be the most likely radionuclide to reach the ground with precipitation and, if not lost to streams (surface water) by runoff, move readily through the soil to the ground water.
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Scope Ground water in the SSES vicinity was sampled monthly at 2 indicator locations (2S2 and 4S4) and one control location (12F3) during 2004.
With the exception of location 4S4, untreated ground water was sampled.
Untreated means that the water has not undergone any processing such a"s filtration. chlorination. or softening. At location 4S4, the SSES Training Center, well water actually is obtained from on-site and piped to the Training Center after treatment. This 'sampling is perfoimed as a check to ensure that water has not been ni.dioactively contaminated. Sampling is performed at the Training Center to facilitate the sample collection process.
Sample Preservation &
Analysis Ground water samples were analyzed for "gamma':'emitting radionuc1ide and tritium activities. Gamma spectrometric ana1yses of ground water began in '1979 and tritium analyses in 1972; both prior to SSES operation.
43
Grollnd Water Monitoring Monitoring Results,
Tritium activity levels in ground water have typically been observed to be lower than in surface water. A noticeable decline occurred between 1992 and 1993. Fewer measurements were above the analysis sensitivities in 1993 than in 1992.
Gamma-emitting radionucHdes in excess of MDCs have been found in only a few samples in all the years that these analyses have been performed.
The naturally occurring radionuclides potassium-40 and thorium-228 have been measured above their MDCs occasionally in ground water.
Potassium-40 was reported in 1979, 1981.1985, 1991,1992. 1993, and 1997. Thorium-228 was found in 1985 and 1986. The man-made radionuclide cesium-137 has been detected only occasionally since 1979. Its' presence has always been attributed to residual fallout from previous atmospheric nuclear weapons tests.
Results for the 2004 specific ground water sample analyses may be found in Table 1-7 of Appendix I. A summary of the 2004 ground water monitoring data may be located in Appendix G.
Comparisons of 2004 monitoring results for tritium with those of past years may be found in Table H 20 of Appendix H.
During 2004, tritium was measured above MDC in one sample at control location 12F3 at a concentration of 128 pCin. The activity was slightly above the detection limit. The 2004 indicator values ranged from -44.3 to 123 pC/],
compared to -67.4 to 193 pC/l for 2003.
44 The 2004 mean tritium activity levels for indicator and control monitoring locations were 49 pCill and 20 pCi/l, respectively. Both the 2004 indicator and control mean tritium activity levels are within the range of the corresponding averages of annual mean for prior operational years. The 2004 indicator mean tritium activity is lower than the corresponding range for preoperational years. The 2004 control mean is also below the range of the corresponding means for preoperational years.
All other nuclides were less than the MDC. No radioactivity contributions to ground water from the SSES were identifiable in 2004.
20M Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report
\\
}
~'
\\.J Grollnd Water Monitoring Monitoring Results,
Tritium activity levels in ground water have typically been observed to be lower than in surface water. A noticeable decline occurred between 1992 and 1993. Fewer measurements were above the analysis sensitivities in 1993 than in 1992.
Gamma-emitting radionucHdes in excess of MDCs have been found in only a few samples in all the years that these analyses have been performed.
The naturally occurring radionuclides potassium-40 and thorium-228 have been measured above their MDCs occasionally in ground water.
Potassium-40 was reported in 1979, 1981.1985, 1991,1992. 1993, and 1997. Thorium-228 was found in 1985 and 1986. The man-made radionuclide cesium-137 has been detected only occasionally since 1979. Its' presence has always been attributed to residual fallout from previous atmospheric nuclear weapons tests.
Results for the 2004 specific ground water sample analyses may be found in Table 1-7 of Appendix I. A summary of the 2004 ground water monitoring data may be located in Appendix G.
Comparisons of 2004 monitoring results for tritium with those of past years may be found in Table H 20 of Appendix H.
During 2004, tritium was measured above MDC in one sample at control location 12F3 at a concentration of 128 pCin. The activity was slightly above the detection limit. The 2004 indicator values ranged from -44.3 to 123 pC/],
compared to -67.4 to 193 pC/l for 2003.
44 The 2004 mean tritium activity levels for indicator and control monitoring locations were 49 pCill and 20 pCi/l, respectively. Both the 2004 indicator and control mean tritium activity levels are within the range of the corresponding averages of annual mean for prior operational years. The 2004 indicator mean tritium activity is lower than the corresponding range for preoperational years. The 2004 control mean is also below the range of the corresponding means for preoperational years.
All other nuclides were less than the MDC. No radioactivity contributions to ground water from the SSES were identifiable in 2004.
20M Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report
\\
}
~'
\\.J
References
- 1.
Pennsylvania Power and Light Company, "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Environmental Report, Operating License Stage," May 1978.
- 2.
Pennsylvania Power and Light Company, "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Final Safety Analysis Report".
- 3.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, "Final Environmental Statement Related to the Operation of Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2," Docket Nos. 50-387 and 50-388, June 1981.
- 4.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "An Acceptable Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program," Radiological A~sessment Branch Technical Position, November 1979, Revision 1.
- 5.
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, "Environmental Radiation Measurement," NCRP Report No. 50, Washington, D.C.,
December 27, 1976.
- 6.
Oakley, D.C., "Natural Radiation Exposure in the United States," ORP/SID 72-1 Office of Radiation Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., June 1972.
- 7.
Denham, D.H., Roberts, M.C., Novitsky, W.M., Testa, E.D., "Investigation of Elevated Cesium-137 Concentrations in Small Game in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania:' Proceedings of Papers presented at Health Physics Society Tenth Midyear Topical Symposium, October 11-13, 1976, pgs. 271-279.
- 8.
Currie L.A., uLower.Limit of Detection: Definition and Elaboration of a Proposed Position for Radiological Effluent and Environmental Measurements,"
NUREG/CR-4007, September 1984.
- 9.
PPL, "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, 2003 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report," April 2004.
- 10. PPL, "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Radioactive Effluent Release Report,"
Data Period: January - December 2004, April 2004.
- 11. Ecology m, "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station. 2004 Land Use Census,"
November 2004.
- 12. PPL, "Engineering Study, EC-ENVR-I012 (Revision 0, January 1995),"
Interpretation of Environmental TLD Results.
20~ Radiological ERl'ironmental Monitoring Report
.4S References
- 1.
Pennsylvania Power and Light Company, "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Environmental Report, Operating License Stage," May 1978.
- 2.
Pennsylvania Power and Light Company, "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Final Safety Analysis Report".
- 3.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, "Final Environmental Statement Related to the Operation of Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Units 1 and 2," Docket Nos. 50-387 and 50-388, June 1981.
- 4.
United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, "An Acceptable Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program," Radiological A~sessment Branch Technical Position, November 1979, Revision 1.
- 5.
National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements, "Environmental Radiation Measurement," NCRP Report No. 50, Washington, D.C.,
December 27, 1976.
- 6.
Oakley, D.C., "Natural Radiation Exposure in the United States," ORP/SID 72-1 Office of Radiation Programs, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., June 1972.
- 7.
Denham, D.H., Roberts, M.C., Novitsky, W.M., Testa, E.D., "Investigation of Elevated Cesium-137 Concentrations in Small Game in Luzerne County, Pennsylvania:' Proceedings of Papers presented at Health Physics Society Tenth Midyear Topical Symposium, October 11-13, 1976, pgs. 271-279.
- 8.
Currie L.A., uLower.Limit of Detection: Definition and Elaboration of a Proposed Position for Radiological Effluent and Environmental Measurements,"
NUREG/CR-4007, September 1984.
- 9.
PPL, "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, 2003 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report," April 2004.
- 10. PPL, "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, Radioactive Effluent Release Report,"
Data Period: January - December 2004, April 2004.
- 11. Ecology m, "Susquehanna Steam Electric Station. 2004 Land Use Census,"
November 2004.
- 12. PPL, "Engineering Study, EC-ENVR-I012 (Revision 0, January 1995),"
Interpretation of Environmental TLD Results.
20~ Radiological ERl'ironmental Monitoring Report
.4S
APPENDIX A
\\.."",-,.1 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report A-I APPENDIX A
\\.."",-,.1 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report A-I
Appendix A
,REIVIP Sample Collection; Analyses and Methods
\\.J An independent consulting gtoup, Ecology working at Susquehanna's Environmental' Laboratory~ which is located approximately miles east of the SSES, collects and processes samples. Samples are brought'to the laboratory, stored, and shipped to two
- outside independent analytical laboratories. The foHowing table summarizes the REMP sample 'collectioruanalyses by independent' laboratories during 2004. Note that TBE
,represents'Teledyne Brown Engineering, E-LAB represents Framatome ANP and E-ID represents Ecology ill, Inc. :
SOURCE OF REl\\1P DATA FOR MONITORING YEAR 2004
,Sample
' Analysis Analysis Collection Analytical Medium Frequency_
Procedure Number Procedure Number Ambient
" TID Quarterly SSES, HP-TP-205 SSES,HP-TP-159 &
Radiation
- 190
'Air
' Gross Beta Wee~y E-ID, Appendix 2 TBE-200S Gross Alpha and/or Beta Activity in Various Matrices Air:
1-131 Weekly E-ID, Appendix 2 TBE-2012 Radioiodine in Various Matrices Air Gamma Quarterly E-ID, Appendix 2
' " TBE-2oo7 Gamma Emit~ing Radioisotope Analysis Surface Gross Beta Monthly E-ill, Appendix 3, 4, TBE-200S Gross Water 6,&7 Alpha ~nd/or Beta Activity in V~~us
\\ t
.~"
Matrices: '
Drin~ng,
Gross Beta Monthly
, E-ID, Appendix 5 TBE-2008Gross
'&Gross Alpha and/or Beta Water Alpha
,Activit yin Various,
'j Matrices All Waters Tritium Monthly E':ID. Appendix 3,4, TBE-2010 Tritium 5,6,7& 8 and Carbon-14 Analysis by Liquid
f
,'\\!,
'Scintillation' Surface &.
Gamma Monthly E-ill, Appendix 3,4, E-LAB-305 ",
Drinking 5,6, & 7 Preparation of Water Environmental and Bioassay Media for Ana1ysis of Gamma Ray Emitters 2004 Radiological Environmental MC?nit.o.~ing Rep0l:1,_
Appendix A
,REIVIP Sample Collection; Analyses and Methods
\\.J An independent consulting gtoup, Ecology m, working at Susquehanna's Environmental' Laboratory~ which is located approximately % miles east of the SSES, collects and processes samples. Samples are brought'to the laboratory, stored, and shipped to two
- outside independent analytical laboratories. The foHowing table summarizes the REMP sample 'collectioruanalyses by independent' laboratories during 2004. Note that TBE
,represents'Teledyne Brown Engineering, E-LAB represents Framatome ANP and E-ID represents Ecology ill, Inc. :
SOURCE OF REl\\1P DATA FOR MONITORING YEAR 2004
,Sample
' Analysis Analysis Collection Analytical Medium Frequency_
Procedure Number Procedure Number Ambient
" TID Quarterly I
SSES, HP-TP-205 SSES,HP-TP-159 &
Radiation
- 190
'Air
' Gross Beta Wee~y E-ID, Appendix 2 TBE-200S Gross Alpha and/or Beta Activity in Various Matrices Air:
1-131 Weekly E-ID, Appendix 2 TBE-2012 Radioiodine in Various Matrices Air Gamma Quarterly E-ID, Appendix 2
' " TBE-2oo7 Gamma Emit~ing Radioisotope Analysis Surface Gross Beta Monthly E-ill, Appendix 3, 4, TBE-200S Gross Water 6,&7 Alpha ~nd/or Beta Activity in V~~us
\\ t
.~"
Matrices: '
Drin~ng,
Gross Beta Monthly
, E-ID, Appendix 5 TBE-2008Gross
'&Gross Alpha and/or Beta Water Alpha
,Activit yin Various,
'j Matrices All Waters Tritium Monthly E':ID. Appendix 3,4, TBE-2010 Tritium 5,6,7& 8 and Carbon-14 Analysis by Liquid
f
,'\\!,
'Scintillation' Surface &.
Gamma Monthly E-ill, Appendix 3,4, E-LAB-305 ",
Drinking 5,6, & 7 Preparation of Water Environmental and Bioassay Media for Ana1ysis of Gamma Ray Emitters 2004 Radiological Environmental MC?nit.o.~ing Rep0l:1,_
A*2
Appendix A Sample Analysis Analysis Collection Analytical Medium Frequency Procedure Number Procedure Number Ground Gamma E-ill, Appendix. 8 E-LAB-305 Water
. Preparation of
. Environmental and Bioassay Media for
. Analysis of Gamma Ray Emitters.
Surface &
1-131 Monthly E-ill, Appendix. 4, 5, E-LAB-340 Drinking 6, and 7 Detennination of Water Iodine-131 in,
Environmental Media Using Anion '.
~change Chromatography
. Milk Gamma Monthlyl E-ill, Appendix 9 E-LAB-305 Semi-Monthly Preparation of Environmental and Bioassay Media Analysis of Gamma Ray Emitters Milk 1-131 Monthlyl E-ill, Appendix 9 E-LAB-340 Semi-Monthly Determination of Iodine-131 in Environmental Media Using Anion Exchange Chromatography Fish Gamma Semi-Annually E-ill, Appendix. 11 TBE-2007 gamma
. (SpringlFall)
Emitting Radioisotope' Analysis Sediment Gamma Semi-Annually E-ill, Appendix 12 TBE-2007 gamma (SpringlFaU)
Emitting Radioisotope Analysis Fruits &
Gamma In Season E-m, Appendix 13 TBE-2007 gamma Vegetables (when irrigated)
Emitting Radioisotope Analysis 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Appendix A Sample Analysis Analysis Collection Analytical Medium Frequency Procedure Number Procedure Number Ground Gamma Monthly*
E-ill, Appendix. 8 E-LAB-305 Water
. Preparation of
. Environmental and Bioassay Media for
. Analysis of Gamma Ray Emitters.
Surface &
1-131 Monthly E-ill, Appendix. 4, 5, E-LAB-340 Drinking 6, and 7 Detennination of Water Iodine-131 in,
Environmental Media Using Anion '.
~change Chromatography
. Milk Gamma Monthlyl E-ill, Appendix 9 E-LAB-305 Semi-Monthly Preparation of Environmental and Bioassay Media for*
Analysis of Gamma Ray Emitters Milk 1-131 Monthlyl E-ill, Appendix 9 E-LAB-340 Semi-Monthly Determination of Iodine-131 in Environmental Media Using Anion Exchange Chromatography Fish Gamma Semi-Annually E-ill, Appendix. 11 TBE-2007 gamma
. (SpringlFall)
Emitting Radioisotope' Analysis Sediment Gamma Semi-Annually E-ill, Appendix 12 TBE-2007 gamma (SpringlFaU)
Emitting Radioisotope Analysis Fruits &
Gamma In Season E-m, Appendix 13 TBE-2007 gamma Vegetables (when irrigated)
Emitting Radioisotope Analysis A*3 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report
Appendix A Sample Analysis Analysis Collection Analytical l\\'Iedium
.. I ***. 'FrequenCY;
'Procedure Number Procedure Nuniber Soil Gamma Annually E-ID, Appendix 14 Pn!paration of, Environmental and Bioassay Media for Analysis of Gamma Ray Emitters
,I (
L.
PROGRAl\\1 CHANGES:
Direct Radiation Monitoring Eighty-four TLD monitoring locations were utiUzed for direct radiation measurements'.
during 2003. A reduction of twenty-six TLDs in the field was implemented 102004. 'As a result fifty-eight TLDs were utilized in the field for direct radiation monitoring in 2004.
The elimination ofTLDs was due to the'proximity of other TLD monitoring locations to the deleted sites and the range of distances from the SSES at which some of the' TLDs are located. The extra 26 TLD locations did not provide additional benefit and were deleted, from the monitoring progra~ in 2004.
Air Monitoring
, There were no changes to the air monitoring program during 2004.
Surface 'Vater and Drinking Water Monitoring 1n 2004lhe frequency ofl-131 analysis for surface and drinking water samples was revised from bi-weekly to monthly (on a two week composite sample). The monitoring.
locations affected by this change are as follows:
Locations:
6S6 2S7/6S7 6SS 12H2
==
Description:==
River Water Intake Line Cooling TowerBIowdown Discharge Outfall Area Danville Water Authority Additionally, performance of monthly 1-131 analysis on LTAW samples has been deleted.
l\\1i1k l\\lonitoring There were no changes to the milk-monitoring program in 2004.
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report I
I Appendix A Sample Analysis Analysis Collection Analytical l\\'Iedium
.. I ***. 'FrequenCY;
'Procedure Number Procedure Nuniber Soil Gamma Annually E-ID, Appendix 14 E*LAB-30S Pn!paration of, Environmental and Bioassay Media for Analysis of Gamma Ray Emitters
,I (
L.
PROGRAl\\1 CHANGES:
Direct Radiation Monitoring Eighty-four TLD monitoring locations were utiUzed for direct radiation measurements'.
during 2003. A reduction of twenty-six TLDs in the field was implemented 102004. 'As a result fifty-eight TLDs were utilized in the field for direct radiation monitoring in 2004.
The elimination ofTLDs was due to the'proximity of other TLD monitoring locations to the deleted sites and the range of distances from the SSES at which some of the' TLDs are located. The extra 26 TLD locations did not provide additional benefit and were deleted, from the monitoring progra~ in 2004.
Air Monitoring
, There were no changes to the air monitoring program during 2004.
Surface 'Vater and Drinking Water Monitoring 1n 2004lhe frequency ofl-131 analysis for surface and drinking water samples was revised from bi-weekly to monthly (on a two week composite sample). The monitoring.
locations affected by this change are as follows:
Locations:
6S6 2S7/6S7 6SS 12H2
==
Description:==
River Water Intake Line Cooling TowerBIowdown Discharge Outfall Area Danville Water Authority Additionally, performance of monthly 1-131 analysis on LTAW samples has been deleted.
l\\1i1k l\\lonitoring There were no changes to the milk-monitoring program in 2004.
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report I
I
I Appendix A Ground Water Monitoring There were no changes to the ground water monitoring program during 2004.
Fruits & Vegetables There were no changes to the fruits and vegetable program during 2004.
. Soil Monitoring There were no changes to the soil monitoring program in 2004.
Sediment 1\\fonitoring There were no changes to the sediment monitoring program in 2004.
Fish Monitoring There were no changes to the fish monitoring program in 2004.
A-S 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report I
Appendix A Ground Water Monitoring There were no changes to the ground water monitoring program during 2004.
Fruits & Vegetables There were no changes to the fruits and vegetable program during 2004.
. Soil Monitoring There were no changes to the soil monitoring program in 2004.
Sediment 1\\fonitoring There were no changes to the sediment monitoring program in 2004.
Fish Monitoring There were no changes to the fish monitoring program in 2004.
A-S 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report
Appendix A PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS Exceptions are listed below:
- 1.
Suiface water 1-131 low level results for locations 2S7 (Cooling Tower:
- 2.
Blowdown discharge). 6S5 (River sample), and 6S6 (River Water Intake) were unacceptable for the following samples:
- 04/06/2004 - 0412012004 6S6 Unable to achieve MOC level due to low chemical yield
- 04/06/2004..:04/20/2004.
Unable to achieve MOC level due to low chemical yield
- 04/06/2004 - 04/20/2004 6S5 Unable to.achieve MOC level due to low
'ch~mic'al yield
- Required MOC's were not met:'Prariultonecorrective action #CR04-09 initiated to investigate cause. The affected analysis results were not incorporated into Appendix I, Table G.
. r "
Surface water auto composite sampler at location 2S7 ( Cooling Tower Blowdown discharge) was out of service during the following periods:
08110/2004 - 0811712004 due to electronics failure Corrective Action:
Samples were taken from the backup composite sampler location
- 3.
Surface water auto composite sampler at location 6S6 (River Intake) was out of service during the fonowing periods:
11130/2004 -12107/2004 due to blocked sample line caused by debris from high river level.' \\ '..
Corrective Grab sample was ta~en at alternate location 5S9.
- "..'
- , { "" i ; ~ "
. 200~ Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Appendix A PROGRAM EXCEPTIONS Exceptions are listed below:
- 1.
Suiface water 1-131 low level results for locations 2S7 (Cooling Tower:
- 2.
Blowdown discharge). 6S5 (River sample), and 6S6 (River Water Intake) were unacceptable for the following samples:
- 04/06/2004 - 0412012004 6S6 Unable to achieve MOC level due to low chemical yield
- 04/06/2004..:04/20/2004. *2S7 Unable to achieve MOC level due to low chemical yield
- 04/06/2004 - 04/20/2004 6S5 Unable to.achieve MOC level due to low
'ch~mic'al yield
- Required MOC's were not met:'Prariultonecorrective action #CR04-09 initiated to investigate cause. The affected analysis results were not incorporated into Appendix I, Table G.
. r "
Surface water auto composite sampler at location 2S7 ( Cooling Tower Blowdown discharge) was out of service during the following periods:
08110/2004 - 0811712004 due to electronics failure Corrective Action:
Samples were taken from the backup composite sampler location 6S7.*,.
- 3.
Surface water auto composite sampler at location 6S6 (River Intake) was out of service during the fonowing periods:
11130/2004 -12107/2004 due to blocked sample line caused by debris from high river level.' \\ '..
Corrective Action:*' Grab sample was ta~en at alternate location 5S9.
- "..'
- , { "" i ; ~ "
. 200~ Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report A*6
Appendix A
- 4.
Milk sample 1-131 low level results for locations I OD 1, 10D2 and lOG 1 could riot be analyzed by the laboratory for the fonowing reasons:
- 06/20/2004-Location 10D2 due to curdled milk unable to be analyzed
- 08/02/2004 - Location lOG 1 due to curdled milk unable to be analyzed
- 09/0112004 - Location 10Dl and IOD2 due to curdled milk unable to be analyzed
- The affected milk analyses were not incorporated into Appendix I or G.
- 5.
TLD measurement results for locations 15A3, 12D2, and 16A2 could not be analyzed for the following reasons:
2nd Quarter 2004 -
3rd Quarter 2004 -
4th Quarter 2004-15A3 and 12D2 were lost in the field, no data.
16A2 lost in the field, no data.
ID5 and IIEI were water damaged, not able to process.
In 2004 the SSES REMP ~verall performance was as follows:
Sample Collection 850 of 850 samples were collected.
Sample Analysis 1388 of 1395 analyses were performed on 850 samples.
TLD Direct Radiation Measurements 253 of258 TLD measurements were analyzed.
Each discrepancy was reviewed to understand the causes of the program exception.
Sampling analysis deficiencies were reviewed with the responsible individuals to prevent recurrence. Occasional equipment breakdowns were unavoidable. For 2004 the surface water automatic composite samples (2S7 and 6S6) each operated 358 of365 days ofthe year at 98% operability. All other sampling equipment operated without any breakdowns for 100% of the year.
.\\-7 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report
.\\...J Appendix A
- 4.
Milk sample 1-131 low level results for locations I OD 1, 10D2 and lOG 1 could riot be analyzed by the laboratory for the fonowing reasons:
- 06/20/2004-Location 10D2 due to curdled milk unable to be analyzed
- 08/02/2004 - Location lOG 1 due to curdled milk unable to be analyzed
- 09/0112004 - Location 10Dl and IOD2 due to curdled milk unable to be analyzed
- The affected milk analyses were not incorporated into Appendix I or G.
- 5.
TLD measurement results for locations 15A3, 12D2, and 16A2 could not be analyzed for the following reasons:
2nd Quarter 2004 -
3rd Quarter 2004 -
4th Quarter 2004-15A3 and 12D2 were lost in the field, no data.
16A2 lost in the field, no data.
ID5 and IIEI were water damaged, not able to process.
In 2004 the SSES REMP ~verall performance was as follows:
Sample Collection 850 of 850 samples were collected.
Sample Analysis 1388 of 1395 analyses were performed on 850 samples.
TLD Direct Radiation Measurements 253 of258 TLD measurements were analyzed.
Each discrepancy was reviewed to understand the causes of the program exception.
Sampling analysis deficiencies were reviewed with the responsible individuals to prevent recurrence. Occasional equipment breakdowns were unavoidable. For 2004 the surface water automatic composite samples (2S7 and 6S6) each operated 358 of365 days ofthe year at 98% operability. All other sampling equipment operated without any breakdowns for 100% of the year.
.\\-7 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report
.\\...J
APPENDIXB 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report APPENDIXB 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report B*l
\\.J AppendixB TABLEt (page 1 of 2)
- Annual Analy"tical Schedule for the PPL Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Radiological Enyironmental Monitoring Program - 2004 No. of Sample "';
Analysis Media & Code Locations Freq.(a)
Analyses Required Freg. (b) t Airborne 6
W
,I'
!;,Gross Beta (c)
W Particulates
'.¥.
' Gamma Spectrometry, '
, Airborne Iodine 6
W I-J31 W
,~l' J : ;. '.'Gamma Spectrometry SA Sediment 4
~' ~.'. i'.!
Fish 2
' SA
'Gamma Spectrometry SA 1
A
,'. (on edible portion)
A Surface Water (d) 5 WforMC
,Gross Beta M
, '-. Gamma Spectroscopy M
- i.
'Tritium M
- WforBWC, I~131 (once per month)
M Well (ground) 3 M
Gamma Spectroscopy M
Water Tritium M
Drinking Water: (e)
~!,
1 WfoiMC Gross Alpha M
~ ~:,
..,Gross Beta M
... Gamma Spectrometry M
Tritium M
W for,BWC '-I-131,(once per month)
M Cow Milk 4(f)
M,swl" 1-131 SM,M Gamma Spectrometry SM,M Food Products (g) 1 A
~
~
- j '.,' ; r J '-l ' '.' Gamma Spectrometry A
(potatoes)
Soil 4
A Gamma Spectrometry A
Direct Radiation 58 Q
TLD Q
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report B-2
\\.J AppendixB TABLEt (page 1 of 2)
- Annual Analy"tical Schedule for the PPL Susquehanna Steam Electric Station Radiological Enyironmental Monitoring Program - 2004 No. of Sample "';
Analysis Media & Code Locations Freq.(a)
Analyses Required Freg. (b) t Airborne 6
W
,I'
!;,Gross Beta (c)
W Particulates
'.¥.
' Gamma Spectrometry, '
, Airborne Iodine 6
W I-J31 W
,~l' J : ;. '.'Gamma Spectrometry SA Sediment 4
~' ~.'. i'.!
Fish 2
' SA
'Gamma Spectrometry SA 1
A
,'. (on edible portion)
A Surface Water (d) 5 WforMC
,Gross Beta M
, '-. Gamma Spectroscopy M
- i.
'Tritium M
- WforBWC, I~131 (once per month)
M Well (ground) 3 M
Gamma Spectroscopy M
Water Tritium M
Drinking Water: (e)
~!,
1 WfoiMC Gross Alpha M
~ ~:,
..,Gross Beta M
... Gamma Spectrometry M
Tritium M
W for,BWC '-I-131,(once per month)
M Cow Milk 4(f)
M,swl" 1-131 SM,M Gamma Spectrometry SM,M Food Products (g) 1 A
~
~
- j '.,' ; r J '-l ' '.' Gamma Spectrometry A
(potatoes)
Soil 4
A Gamma Spectrometry A
Direct Radiation 58 Q
TLD Q
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report B-2
Appendix B (a).
W = weekly. BW = bi-weekly (once per month), BWC = bi-weekly composite, M
monthly, SM = semi-monthly, Q = quarterly, QC = quarterly composite, SA
semi-annualIy, A = annually, MC = monthly composite.
(b)
Codes are the same as for sample frequency.,
(c)
If the gross beta activity were greater than 10 times the yearly mean of the control sample, gamma analysis would be perfonned on the individual filter. Gross beta analysis was perfonned 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or more fonowing filter change to anow for radon and thorium daughter decay.
(d)
Locations 6S6, 6S7, and2S7 are automatic composite samplers such that ti~e proportional sampling was perfonned at these locations the entire year. Samples are collected weekly for bi-weekly composite and monthly composite samples.
Location 6S5 is a sample from the Susquehanna River location downriver of the SSES discharge diffuser. Station 6S5 was grab sampled weekly. An alternate shoreline site located below the SSES discharge diffuser is used when river conditions prohibit boating. The shoreline samples are collected at the Wetlands Cottage area, approximately 100-150 years downriver from the 6S5 site. LTAW was grab sampled monthly.
(e)
Water from location 12H2 was retrieved weekly. Composite samples of the weekly collections at this location were made both monthly (MC) and biweekly (BWC) for analysis. Sampling at 12H2 was perfonned using an automatic composite sampler (ACS) that was operated in the time-proportional mode.
(f)
Locations 10D!, IOD2, 10GI, and 12B2 were sampled semi-monthly from April through October when cows are on pasture, monthly otherwise.
(g)
Location (12F7) briefly irrigated potatoes in June 2004 using Susquehanna River water (no other fields within 10 miles downriver of Susquehanna SES were irrigated in 2004.
B-3 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Appendix B (a).
W = weekly. BW = bi-weekly (once per month), BWC = bi-weekly composite, M
monthly, SM = semi-monthly, Q = quarterly, QC = quarterly composite, SA
semi-annualIy, A = annually, MC = monthly composite.
(b)
Codes are the same as for sample frequency.,
(c)
If the gross beta activity were greater than 10 times the yearly mean of the control sample, gamma analysis would be perfonned on the individual filter. Gross beta analysis was perfonned 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> or more fonowing filter change to anow for radon and thorium daughter decay.
(d)
Locations 6S6, 6S7, and2S7 are automatic composite samplers such that ti~e proportional sampling was perfonned at these locations the entire year. Samples are collected weekly for bi-weekly composite and monthly composite samples.
Location 6S5 is a sample from the Susquehanna River location downriver of the SSES discharge diffuser. Station 6S5 was grab sampled weekly. An alternate shoreline site located below the SSES discharge diffuser is used when river conditions prohibit boating. The shoreline samples are collected at the Wetlands Cottage area, approximately 100-150 years downriver from the 6S5 site. LTAW was grab sampled monthly.
(e)
Water from location 12H2 was retrieved weekly. Composite samples of the weekly collections at this location were made both monthly (MC) and biweekly (BWC) for analysis. Sampling at 12H2 was perfonned using an automatic composite sampler (ACS) that was operated in the time-proportional mode.
(f)
Locations 10D!, IOD2, 10GI, and 12B2 were sampled semi-monthly from April through October when cows are on pasture, monthly otherwise.
(g)
Location (12F7) briefly irrigated potatoes in June 2004 using Susquehanna River water (no other fields within 10 miles downriver of Susquehanna SES were irrigated in 2004.
B-3 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report
APPENDIXC 2004 Radiological Enl'iromnental Monitoring Report C-l APPENDIXC 2004 Radiological Enl'iromnental Monitoring Report C-l
~
AppendixC TABLECI (page 1 of 5)
TLD Locations for the SSES Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - 2004 Less Than One Mile from the SSES{a).. See Figure 2 Location Distance Direction Description Code(a)
(miles)
IS2 0.2 N
Perimeter Fence 2S2 0.9 NNE Energy Infonnation Center 2S3 0.2 NNE; Perimeter Fence 3S2
' 0.5 NE SSES Backup Met Tower 3S3.
0.9.
NE ANSP Riverlands Garden
...4S3 0.2 ENE Post, West of SSES APF '
4S6 0.7 ENE Riverlands 5S4 O.S West of Environmental Laboratory 5S7 0.3 E
Perimeter Fence 6S4 0.2 ESE
. Perimeter Fence (north) 6S9
.- 0.2 ESE Perimeter Fence (south) 7S6 0.2 SE Perimeter Fence' 7S7 0.4 SE End of Kline's Road SS2 0.2 SSE Perimeter Fence 9S2 0.2 S
Security Fence 10S1 0.4 SSW Post - south of switching station 10S2 0.2 SSW Security Fence 11S3 0.3 SW SecurityFence 11S7 0.4
.SW SSES Access Road Gate #50 12S1 0.4 WSW SSES West Building 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report C-2
~
AppendixC TABLECI (page 1 of 5)
TLD Locations for the SSES Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - 2004 Less Than One Mile from the SSES{a).. See Figure 2 Location Distance Direction Description Code(a)
(miles)
IS2 0.2 N
Perimeter Fence 2S2 0.9 NNE Energy Infonnation Center 2S3 0.2 NNE; Perimeter Fence 3S2
' 0.5 NE SSES Backup Met Tower 3S3.
0.9.
NE ANSP Riverlands Garden
...4S3 0.2 ENE Post, West of SSES APF '
4S6 0.7 ENE Riverlands 5S4 O.S E*
West of Environmental Laboratory 5S7 0.3 E
Perimeter Fence 6S4 0.2 ESE
. Perimeter Fence (north) 6S9
.- 0.2 ESE Perimeter Fence (south) 7S6 0.2 SE Perimeter Fence' 7S7 0.4 SE End of Kline's Road SS2 0.2 SSE Perimeter Fence 9S2 0.2 S
Security Fence 10S1 0.4 SSW Post - south of switching station 10S2 0.2 SSW Security Fence 11S3 0.3 SW SecurityFence 11S7 0.4
.SW SSES Access Road Gate #50 12S1 0.4 WSW SSES West Building 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report C-2
AppendixC TABLECI (Page2ofS)
TLD Locations for the SSES Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - 2004 Less Than One Mile from the SSES(a) - See Figure 2 Location Distance Direction Description Code (a)
(miles) 12S3 0.4 WSW Perimeter Fence 13S2 0.4 W
Perimeter Fence 13SS 0.4 W
Perimeter Fence 13S6 0.4 W
Fonner Laydown Area - west of Confer's Lane 14SS O.S WNW Beach Grove Road/Confer's Lane ISS5 0.4
. NW Perimeter Fence 16S1 0.3
~(east) 16S2 0.3 (west) 6A4*
0.6 ESE Restaurant (U.S. Route 11)
SA3 0.9 SSE PPL Wetlands Sign (U. S. Route 11)
ISA3*
0.9 NW Hosler Residence 16A2*
O.S NNW Benkinney Residence C-3 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report AppendixC TABLECI (Page2ofS)
TLD Locations for the SSES Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - 2004 Less Than One Mile from the SSES(a) - See Figure 2 Location Distance Direction Description Code (a)
(miles) 12S3 0.4 WSW Perimeter Fence 13S2 0.4 W
Perimeter Fence 13SS 0.4 W
Perimeter Fence 13S6 0.4 W
Fonner Laydown Area - west of Confer's Lane 14SS O.S WNW Beach Grove Road/Confer's Lane ISS5 0.4
. NW Perimeter Fence 16S1 0.3
~(east) 16S2 0.3 (west) 6A4*
0.6 ESE Restaurant (U.S. Route 11)
SA3 0.9 SSE PPL Wetlands Sign (U. S. Route 11)
ISA3*
0.9 NW Hosler Residence 16A2*
O.S NNW Benkinney Residence C-3 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report
AppendixC TABLECI (page 3 of5)
TLD Locations for the SSES Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - 2004 From One to Five Miles from the SSES(a) - See Fi~re 3 Location Distance Direction Description Code (a)
(miles) 8B2*.
1.4
. SSE Lawal1 Residence 9Bl 1.3 S
Transmission Line - east of Route 11 10B3*
1.7 SSW Casteklnc.
105 4.0 ShickshinnylMocanaqua Sewage Treatment PIt.
803 4.0 SSE MowI)' Residence 904 3.6 S
Count!)' Folk Store 1001 3.0 SSW R. & C. R}'!!!an Fann
~.. -
1202 3.7 WSW.
Dagostin Residence 14DI 3.6
. WNW Moore~s HiUll\\1ingle Inn Roads Intersection 3El 4.7 NE Webb Residence - LUly Lake '
4E2 4.7 ENE Ruckles HiIlIPond Hill Roads Intersection 5E2 4.5 E
BIossFann 6El 4.7 ESE S1. James Church 7El 4.2 SE Harwood Transmission Line Pole #2 lIEI 4.7 SW Thomas Residence 12El 4.7 WSW' Berwick Hospital 13E4 4.1 W
Kessler Farm 12S7 1.1 WSW Kisner Residence 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report C-4 AppendixC TABLECI (page 3 of5)
TLD Locations for the SSES Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - 2004 From One to Five Miles from the SSES(a) - See Fi~re 3 Location Distance Direction Description Code (a)
(miles) 8B2*.
1.4
. SSE Lawal1 Residence 9Bl 1.3 S
Transmission Line - east of Route 11 10B3*
1.7 SSW Casteklnc.
105 4.0
- N ShickshinnylMocanaqua Sewage Treatment PIt.
803 4.0 SSE MowI)' Residence 904 3.6 S
Count!)' Folk Store 1001 3.0 SSW R. & C. R}'!!!an Fann
~.. -
1202 3.7 WSW.
Dagostin Residence 14DI 3.6
. WNW Moore~s HiUll\\1ingle Inn Roads Intersection 3El 4.7 NE Webb Residence - LUly Lake '
4E2 4.7 ENE Ruckles HiIlIPond Hill Roads Intersection 5E2 4.5 E
BIossFann 6El 4.7 ESE S1. James Church 7El 4.2 SE Harwood Transmission Line Pole #2 lIEI 4.7 SW Thomas Residence 12El 4.7 WSW' Berwick Hospital 13E4 4.1 W
Kessler Farm 12S7 1.1 WSW Kisner Residence 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report C-4
Appendix C TABLECI (Page 4 of 5)
TLD Locations for the SSES Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - 2004 Greater than Five I\\tliles from the SSES(a) - See Figure 4 Location Distance Direction Description Code (a)
(miles) 2Fl 5.9 NNE St. Adalberts Cemetery 15Fl 5.4 mv Zawatski Fann 16Fl 7.8 NNW Hidlay Residence. ~
3G4**
17 NE.
Wilkes Barre Service Center 4Gl**
14.
ENE Mountaintop - Crestwood Industrial Park 7Gl**
14 SE Hazleton PP&L Complex 12Gl**
15 WSW PPL Service Center, Bloomsburg 12G4**
10 WSW Naus Residence c-s 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report i
"-..J Appendix C TABLECI (Page 4 of 5)
TLD Locations for the SSES Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - 2004 Greater than Five I\\tliles from the SSES(a) - See Figure 4 Location Distance Direction Description Code (a)
(miles) 2Fl 5.9 NNE St. Adalberts Cemetery 15Fl 5.4 mv Zawatski Fann 16Fl 7.8 NNW Hidlay Residence. ~
3G4**
17 NE.
Wilkes Barre Service Center 4Gl**
14.
ENE Mountaintop - Crestwood Industrial Park 7Gl**
14 SE Hazleton PP&L Complex 12Gl**
15 WSW PPL Service Center, Bloomsburg 12G4**
10 WSW Naus Residence c-s 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report i
"-..J
Appendix C TABLE'CI (pageS ofS)
TLD Locations for the SSES Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - 2004 "
a)
All distances from the SSES to monitoritig lOCations are measured from the,
standby gas treatment vent at 442001N34 1 17 (pa. Grid System). The location codes are based on both distance and direction from the SSES. The letters in the location codes indicate if the monitoring locations are on site (within the site boundary) or, if they are not on ~ite, the approximate distances of the locations from the SSES as described below:
S - on site A - 20miles Special interest areas
imaginary circle on a map of the,SSES and its :vicinity, ~ith the SSES. at the center of the circle. The middle of sector 1 is directed due north (N). Moving clockwise from sector 1, the sector immediately adjacent to sector 1 is sector 2, the middle of which is directed due norih, northeast ~). Continuing to move clockviise, the sector numbers increase to 16, 'Yhich is the north, nort~west sector.
- Ii..
The numbers following the lettersiit'the location codes are used to differentiate sampling locations found in the same sectors at approximately the same distances from the SSES.
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report C-6 Appendix C TABLE'CI (pageS ofS)
TLD Locations for the SSES Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program - 2004 "
a)
All distances from the SSES to monitoritig lOCations are measured from the,
standby gas treatment vent at 442001N34 1 17 (pa. Grid System). The location codes are based on both distance and direction from the SSES. The letters in the location codes indicate if the monitoring locations are on site (within the site boundary) or, if they are not on ~ite, the approximate distances of the locations from the SSES as described below:
S - on site A - 20miles Special interest areas
imaginary circle on a map of the,SSES and its :vicinity, ~ith the SSES. at the center of the circle. The middle of sector 1 is directed due north (N). Moving clockwise from sector 1, the sector immediately adjacent to sector 1 is sector 2, the middle of which is directed due norih, northeast ~). Continuing to move clockviise, the sector numbers increase to 16, 'Yhich is the north, nort~west sector.
- Ii..
The numbers following the lettersiit'the location codes are used to differentiate sampling locations found in the same sectors at approximately the same distances from the SSES.
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report C-6
Appelldix C TABLEC2 (Page 1 of 4)
Sampling Locations for the SSES Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program -:- 2004 Less Than One :Mile from the SSES(a) - See Figure 5 Location Code(a)
Distance Direction Description (miles)
- .i}',
- *i~~,!~;>;.<*~;f:,;'i,.':';~;::SURFACE~WA L*t:::'!;~**::;,.~:: :!i: 1:,,',,;-~r;'.;'~:,:'~::;:Ft;"'>
2S7 0.1 NNE Cooling Tower Blowdown Line 6S5 0.9 ESE Outfall Area 6S6 0.8
' ESE River Water Intake Line 6S7 0.4 ESE Cooling Tower Blowdown Line (alternate for 2S7)
LTAW 0.7 NE-ESE Lake Took-A-While (on site)
":\\',~i~;:~~~:"~:~C' ::~, FISH(b}f.~~~*
';~;~;:::--.'.,,'~1!:,,;if;.;~ ;':!J~*,,\\!t.::.>'
LTAW 0.7 NE-ESE Lake Took-A-While (on site)
- ,~
- '
- :: ~f:l'!r:
- ';,".i~;
~i:
,.::*>'SEDlMENT(cL:;'i:'~
- ,,;;':;,'J(~' ~.;"::~!;\\';,;:'i:\\:{;~(:'~,;. ;,.:~,.;
LTAW 0.7 NE-ESE Lake Took-A-WhiJe (on site)
- .!;~"
- ~
-"~;~:~
i'.::,~,~.;~:-~' ;:':':;:/:~~;~'; ;;;t~~
,,~:"~::';:,;~
- ,>
- ~;AIR;~.~~:::::;; :,~: :~:". ~
';.~W';:,~::':;*:'~*:'r~:'.'~,,;j~~.: ;-;;;-~
3S2 0.5 NE SSES Backup Meteorological Tower 12S1 0.4 WSW SSES West Building "
13S6 0.4
'W Fonner Laydown Area, West of Confers Lane
- "'
- *r\\,~r~,:-f';~~'::-~~*c'*
SOII:.'
--,!~
"~*,:;;;;-l~;;t:~:;
- ,.,:;,:"'~
'~.
3S2 0.5 NE SSES Backup Meteorological Tower 12S1 0.4 WSW SSES West Building 13S6 0.4 W
Fonner Laydown Area, West of Confers Lane C-7 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Appelldix C TABLEC2 (Page 1 of 4)
Sampling Locations for the SSES Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program -:- 2004 Less Than One :Mile from the SSES(a) - See Figure 5 Location Code(a)
Distance Direction Description (miles)
- ~:. :;;:r:;:.,t ',L ;.i}',:*i~~,!~;>;.<*~;f:,;'i,.':';~;::SURFACE~WA TER;-:;: L*t:::'!;~**::;,.~:: :!i: 1:,,',,;-~r;'.;'~:,:'~::;:Ft;"'>,1,;"
- ,' '7i 2S7 0.1 NNE Cooling Tower Blowdown Line 6S5 0.9 ESE Outfall Area 6S6 0.8
' ESE River Water Intake Line 6S7 0.4 ESE Cooling Tower Blowdown Line (alternate for 2S7)
LTAW 0.7 NE-ESE Lake Took-A-While (on site)
,0, :;:::~\\::~,:,':;~!t:,:
- 1:;;
c' ':, ":\\',~i~;:~~~:"~:~C' ::~, FISH(b}f.~~~* '.:,:" ';: ';~;~;:::--.'.,,'~1!:,,;if;.;~ ;':!J~*,,\\!t.::.>' ]:';' :~ :;:t:"-5; LTAW 0.7 NE-ESE Lake Took-A-While (on site)
';: ;;,~:'::: ~f:l'!r: ;;';; :';,".i~; 'f::';".":
~i:, :/',,.::*>'SEDlMENT(cL:;'i:'~ ',';.\\.': ::,,;;':;,'J(~'... ~.;"::~!;\\';,;:'i:\\:{;~(:'~,;. ;,.:~,.;
LTAW 0.7 NE-ESE Lake Took-A-WhiJe (on site)
- .!;~"
- ~... _, -"~;~
- ~ ((',:: i'.::,~,~.;~:-~' ;:':':;:/:~~;~'; ;;;t~~..,,,~:"~::';:,;~ '/i ;,>:~;AIR;~.~~:::::;; :,~: :~:". ~ i' 0;;;.,::,,> ';.~W';:,~::':;*:'~*:'r~:'.'~,,;j~~.: ;-;;;-~
~,,~~ :i; 3S2 0.5 NE SSES Backup Meteorological Tower
.0 12S1 0.4 WSW SSES West Building "
13S6 0.4
'W Fonner Laydown Area, West of Confers Lane
';;':.';;,. ; ;I"~'~'" ~.:'", -: '":, ;"':*r\\,~r~,:-f';~~'::-~~*c'*
':.' r 1!_,~. __
.~ *
~'_ ":"." -: '. f -.'_ J.'-
SOII:.'.. *..~.,"
J,,'
- t:.:
--,!~ ":'",.-.'!;:--,
"~*,:;;;;-l~;;t:~:;.. :"'. : J:
' 'i" c.::.:;:,:,,:'.'.., :\\\\"
,:~. ~::, ',~ :,.,:;,:"'~ ':.;:.t,:;'!;',',
'~.
3S2 0.5 NE SSES Backup Meteorological Tower 12S1 0.4 WSW SSES West Building 13S6 0.4 W
Fonner Laydown Area, West of Confers Lane C-7 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report
f TABLEC2 (page 2 of 4)
Sampling LoCations for the SSES.
Appendix C Radiolo ical Environmental Monitorin Pro ram - 2004 Less Than One Mile from the SSES(a}.. See Fi re 5 Distance Direction
. Description (miles) 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report c-s f
TABLEC2 (page 2 of 4)
Sampling LoCations for the SSES.
Appendix C Radiolo ical Environmental Monitorin Pro ram - 2004 Less Than One Mile from the SSES(a}.. See Fi re 5 Distance Direction
. Description (miles) 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report c-s
Appendix C TABLEC2.
(Page 3 of4)
Sampling Locations for the SSES Radiolo ical Environmental Monitorin Pro ram - 2004 Greater than Five Miles from the SSES(a)
- See Fi re 7 Direction Description PPL SFC - Humbolt Industrial Park
\\.J 12F3 5.2 wsw Berwick Water Com an 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Appendix C TABLEC2.
(Page 3 of4)
Sampling Locations for the SSES Radiolo ical Environmental Monitorin Pro ram - 2004 Greater than Five Miles from the SSES(a)
- See Fi re 7 Direction Description PPL SFC - Humbolt Industrial Park
\\.J 12F3 5.2 wsw Berwick Water Com an 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report
:-:-:':-~-----------------.. '" --. -,----
Appendix C TABLEC2 (Page 4 of4)
Sampling Locations for the SSES Radiolo~ical Environmental Monitoring Program - 2004 a)
All distances from the SSES to monitoring locations are measured from the standby gas treatment vent at 442001N34117 (pa. Grid System. The location codes are based on both distance and direction from the SSES. The letters in the location codes indicate if the monitoring 1ocations are on site (within the site boundary) or, if they are not on site, the approximate distances of the locatioris from the SSES as described below:
S - on site A- <1 mile B 2 miles C 3 miles D 4 miles E-4-5 miles F 10 miles G 20 miles H- >20miles The numbers preceding the letters in the location codes provide the directions of the monitoring locations from the SSES by indicating the sectors in which they are located. A total of 16 sectors (numbered 1 through 16) equally divide an imaginary circle on a map of the SSES and its vicinity, with the SSES at the center of the circle. The middle of sector 1 is directed due north (N). Moving clockwise from sector 1, the sector immediately adjacent to sector 1 is sector 2, the iniddle of which is directed due north, northeast (NNE). Continuing to move clockwise, the sector numbers increase to 16, which is the north, northwest sector.
The numbers following the letters in the location codes are used to differentiate sampling locations found in the same sectors at approximately the same distances from the SSES.
b)
No actual1ocation is indicated since fish sampled from the Susquehanna River at or below the SSES discharge diffuser:fish are also sampJed from LTAW.
c)
No permanent locations exist; sampJes are taken based on avaiJabiJity.
Consequently, it is not necessary to assign a number following the 1etter in the location code.
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report C-}o
:-:-:':-~-----------------.. '" --. -,----
Appendix C TABLEC2 (Page 4 of4)
Sampling Locations for the SSES Radiolo~ical Environmental Monitoring Program - 2004 a)
All distances from the SSES to monitoring locations are measured from the standby gas treatment vent at 442001N34117 (pa. Grid System. The location codes are based on both distance and direction from the SSES. The letters in the location codes indicate if the monitoring 1ocations are on site (within the site boundary) or, if they are not on site, the approximate distances of the locatioris from the SSES as described below:
S - on site A- <1 mile B 2 miles C 3 miles D 4 miles E-4-5 miles F 10 miles G 20 miles H- >20miles The numbers preceding the letters in the location codes provide the directions of the monitoring locations from the SSES by indicating the sectors in which they are located. A total of 16 sectors (numbered 1 through 16) equally divide an imaginary circle on a map of the SSES and its vicinity, with the SSES at the center of the circle. The middle of sector 1 is directed due north (N). Moving clockwise from sector 1, the sector immediately adjacent to sector 1 is sector 2, the iniddle of which is directed due north, northeast (NNE). Continuing to move clockwise, the sector numbers increase to 16, which is the north, northwest sector.
The numbers following the letters in the location codes are used to differentiate sampling locations found in the same sectors at approximately the same distances from the SSES.
b)
No actual1ocation is indicated since fish sampled from the Susquehanna River at or below the SSES discharge diffuser:fish are also sampJed from LTAW.
c)
No permanent locations exist; sampJes are taken based on avaiJabiJity.
Consequently, it is not necessary to assign a number following the 1etter in the location code.
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report C-}o
APPENDIXD 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report APPENDIXD 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report
AppendixD 2004 LAND USE CENSUS RESULTS The SSES Technical Requirements requi're that a census be' conducted annually during, the growing season to determine the'IOcation of the nearest milk animal, residence 'and garden greater than 50 m2: (approx. 500,ft2) producing broad ] eaf.vegetati on' within a distance of 8 km (approx. 5 miles) in each of the 16 meteorological sectors surrounding the SSES. To comply with this requirement, a land-use census was conducted for the SSES during 2004.
SUMMARY
OF CHANGES FROM 2003 TO 2004 Residence Census:
The residence 'census was conducted from 11 'August through 15 September 2004.
. Distances of the nearest residences from theSusquehanna'SES in the 16 different, sectors ranged from 0.5 (J.Futoma, sector 7) to 2.1 miles (R. Barberi, sector 4), with an average of approximately 1.0 miles. :.
Changes from the 2003 census are as follows:
- 1)
F. Michael (Sector 12).@ 1.~ mile rep]a~ed W. Kisner (deceased) @ 1.1 mne.
- 2)
H. Long (Sector 15) @ 0.8,mile replaced.L. HidIay (residence unoccupied) @.
0.8 mile.
Garden Census:
The garden census was conducted from 11 August through 15 September 2004.
Distances of the nearest gardens from the Susquehanna SES in the 16 different sectors ranged from 0.6 miles (T. Scholl, sector 7) to 4.0 miles (P. Culver, sector 16), with an average of 1.9 miles. Changes from the 2003 census in gardens had no, impact on the:
intended sampling of fruits and vegetables during 2004. Because of the milk monitoring that is perfonned, there is no requirement to sample from gardens that have a potential for the deposition of activity by' way of the airborne pathway.
\\
Changes from the 2003 census are 'as follows:
- 1)
M. Zaletko (Sector 8) @ 1.6 mi1~ replacedD. Dawson (no garden this year) @
1.5 mile.
- 2)
F. Michael (Sector 12) @ 1.3 mile replaced W. Kisner (deceased) @1.1 mile.
- 3)
P. Moskaluk (Sector 14) @ 1.3 ~i1e had a garden in 2004;'but not in 2603.
Dairy Animal Census:
.,1 ;
Ten dairy animal sites were identified in the census conducted from 12 through 18 August 2004. The number of sites were the same as in 2003. 90ws were present at all '
sites; no dairy goats were found.
,:.-,i" i
- . r,i.
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report D-2 AppendixD 2004 LAND USE CENSUS RESULTS The SSES Technical Requirements requi're that a census be' conducted annually during, the growing season to determine the'IOcation of the nearest milk animal, residence 'and garden greater than 50 m2: (approx. 500,ft2) producing broad ] eaf.vegetati on' within a distance of 8 km (approx. 5 miles) in each of the 16 meteorological sectors surrounding the SSES. To comply with this requirement, a land-use census was conducted for the SSES during 2004.
SUMMARY
OF CHANGES FROM 2003 TO 2004 Residence Census:
The residence 'census was conducted from 11 'August through 15 September 2004.
. Distances of the nearest residences from theSusquehanna'SES in the 16 different, sectors ranged from 0.5 (J.Futoma, sector 7) to 2.1 miles (R. Barberi, sector 4), with an average of approximately 1.0 miles. :.
Changes from the 2003 census are as follows:
- 1)
F. Michael (Sector 12).@ 1.~ mile rep]a~ed W. Kisner (deceased) @ 1.1 mne.
- 2)
H. Long (Sector 15) @ 0.8,mile replaced.L. HidIay (residence unoccupied) @.
0.8 mile.
Garden Census:
The garden census was conducted from 11 August through 15 September 2004.
Distances of the nearest gardens from the Susquehanna SES in the 16 different sectors ranged from 0.6 miles (T. Scholl, sector 7) to 4.0 miles (P. Culver, sector 16), with an average of 1.9 miles. Changes from the 2003 census in gardens had no, impact on the:
intended sampling of fruits and vegetables during 2004. Because of the milk monitoring that is perfonned, there is no requirement to sample from gardens that have a potential for the deposition of activity by' way of the airborne pathway.
\\
Changes from the 2003 census are 'as follows:
- 1)
M. Zaletko (Sector 8) @ 1.6 mi1~ replacedD. Dawson (no garden this year) @
1.5 mile.
- 2)
F. Michael (Sector 12) @ 1.3 mile replaced W. Kisner (deceased) @1.1 mile.
- 3)
P. Moskaluk (Sector 14) @ 1.3 ~i1e had a garden in 2004;'but not in 2603.
Dairy Animal Census:
.,1 ;
Ten dairy animal sites were identified in the census conducted from 12 through 18 August 2004. The number of sites were the same as in 2003. 90ws were present at all '
sites; no dairy goats were found.
,:.-,i" i
- . r,i.
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report D-2
AppendixD Irrigation Inigated fruits and vegetables were monitored at one indicator location during 2004. No other fields within 10 miles down river of Susquehanna SES were irrigated in 2004, including the Lupini Farm. "Route 93 Nescopeck Field" (11D2), Chapin Farm "Drake Field" (lIF2), and Zehner Farm (llD!) because wet weather prevailed much of the spring and summer.. The Lupini Farm (12F7) in Mifflinville briefly irrigated potatoes in June 2004 using the Susquehanna River water.
TABLE 1 Nearest residence, garden, and dairy animal in each of the 16 meteorological sectors within a 5-mile radius of the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, 2004.
SECTOR DIRECTION RESIDENCE 1
N 1.3 mi 2
NNE 1.0mi 3
NE 0.9 mi 4
ENE 2.1 mi 5
E 1.4 mi 6
ESE 0.5 mi 7
SE 0.5 mi 8
SSE 0.6mi 9
S 1.0mi 10 SSW 0.9 mi 11 SW 1.5 mi 12 WSW 1.3 mi 13 W
1.2 mi 14 WNW 0.8 mi 15 NW 0.8mi 16 NNW 0.6mi a Chickens raised for consumption at this location.
b Ducks raised for consumption at this location.
C Eggs consumed from chickens at this location.
d Geese raised for consumption at this location.
e Pigs raised for consumption at this location.
r Turkeys raised for consumption at this location.
NEAREST GARDEN 3.2mi 2.3 mi i 2.7 mi 2.4 mi a,c,d,r,t' 1.8 mi a,c, 2.5 mi 0.6mi 1.6mi 1.1 mi 1.2mi 1.9 mi 1.3 mi '
1.2 mi 1.3 mi 1.8 mi 4.0mi g Fruits/vegetables raised for consumption at this location.
h Rabbits raised for consumption at this location.
- i Beef cattle raised for consumption at this location.
NEAREST DAIRY ANIMAL
>5.0 mi
>5.0 mi
>5.0 mi
>5.0 mi 4.5 mi g 2.7 mi
>5.0 mi
>5.0 mi
>5.0mi 3.0 mi a,b,c,d,e,g
>5.0mi 1.7 mi g,i 5.0mi
>5.0mi
>5.0 mi 4.2 mi 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report J'
0 AppendixD Irrigation Inigated fruits and vegetables were monitored at one indicator location during 2004. No other fields within 10 miles down river of Susquehanna SES were irrigated in 2004, including the Lupini Farm. "Route 93 Nescopeck Field" (11D2), Chapin Farm "Drake Field" (lIF2), and Zehner Farm (llD!) because wet weather prevailed much of the spring and summer.. The Lupini Farm (12F7) in Mifflinville briefly irrigated potatoes in June 2004 using the Susquehanna River water.
TABLE 1 Nearest residence, garden, and dairy animal in each of the 16 meteorological sectors within a 5-mile radius of the Susquehanna Steam Electric Station, 2004.
- NEAREST SECTOR DIRECTION RESIDENCE 1
N 1.3 mi 2
NNE 1.0mi 3
NE 0.9 mi 4
ENE 2.1 mi 5
E 1.4 mi 6
ESE 0.5 mi 7
SE 0.5 mi 8
SSE 0.6mi 9
S 1.0mi 10 SSW 0.9 mi 11 SW 1.5 mi 12 WSW 1.3 mi 13 W
1.2 mi 14 WNW 0.8 mi 15 NW 0.8mi 16 NNW 0.6mi a Chickens raised for consumption at this location.
b Ducks raised for consumption at this location.
C Eggs consumed from chickens at this location.
d Geese raised for consumption at this location.
e Pigs raised for consumption at this location.
r Turkeys raised for consumption at this location.
NEAREST GARDEN 3.2mi 2.3 mi i 2.7 mi 2.4 mi a,c,d,r,t' 1.8 mi a,c, 2.5 mi 0.6mi 1.6mi 1.1 mi 1.2mi 1.9 mi 1.3 mi '
1.2 mi 1.3 mi 1.8 mi 4.0mi g Fruits/vegetables raised for consumption at this location.
h Rabbits raised for consumption at this location.
- i Beef cattle raised for consumption at this location.
NEAREST DAIRY ANIMAL
>5.0 mi
>5.0 mi
>5.0 mi
>5.0 mi 4.5 mi g 2.7 mi
>5.0 mi
>5.0 mi
>5.0mi 3.0 mi a,b,c,d,e,g
>5.0mi 1.7 mi g,i 5.0mi
>5.0mi
>5.0 mi 4.2 mi D*3 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report J'
0
j Goats raised for consumption at this location.*
k Pheasants raised for consumption at this location.
- I Sheep raised for consumption at this location.
Appendix D
- No locations were identified as raising rabbits, goats, and pheasants during 2004.
2004 Radiological Em'ironmcntal Monitoring Report D-4 j Goats raised for consumption at this location.*
k Pheasants raised for consumption at this location.
- I Sheep raised for consumption at this location.
Appendix D
- No locations were identified as raising rabbits, goats, and pheasants during 2004.
2004 Radiological Em'ironmcntal Monitoring Report D-4
APPENDIXE 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report E-l APPENDIXE 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report E-l
APPENDIXF F-l 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report APPENDIXF F-l 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report
APPENDIXG 2004 Radiological Enl'ironmental Monitoring Report APPENDIXG 2004 Radiological Enl'ironmental Monitoring Report G*l
AppendixG The averages for indicator a~d control locations reported in the Summary of Data Table, which summarizes the entire year's results for the SSES REMP, were calculated using
. all measured values, when available, whether or not they were reported in Appendix I tables. Values below the MDCs, even zeroes and negatives, were part of the averaging proces's for these analysis results. When no measured results are available in these cases, "LLD" is reported.
Preferably, the averages reported in,~he,SummaryofData table for sample media that are normally col1ected continuously are determined using only results frorri continuously collected samples. Occasionally, grab samples are taken for these media when equipment malfurictions or other an0r!talies preclude or otherwise perturb routine.'
continuous sampling. These grab samples are taken to minimize the time periods when no sampling is being performed, or, in some iflstances, when continuous sampling is considered to be nonrepresentative.
Because grab samples. are snapshots of the media over brief periods, it is preferable not to average'the analysis results of these.~ampJes with those for continuously collected composite samples. However. when equipmen~ malfunctions are protracted, relatively' Jarge periods of time could be entirely unrepresented by averages if the results from grab sample analyses are not considered.
Allowing analysis results for grab samples to be weighted equally with those representing relatively large periods of time would tend to bias the resulting averages,
unjustifiably towards the conditions at the times that the grabs are obtained. Averages obtained in this way might less accurately reflect the conditions for the combined period of continuous sampling and grab sampling than if only the results from continuous sampling were used. On the other hand, using weighting factors for the analysis results of grab samples derived from the actual time it ~akes to collect those samples would lead to the grab sample analysis results having a negligible effect on the overall average and not justifying the effort involved.
Grab samples collected in lieu of normitJ continuous sampling are typically obtained at regular intervals corresponding to the intervals (weekly) at which the continuously collected samples would usually be retrieved for eventual compositing. For example, grab samples are collected once a week but may be composited monthly in place of continuously collected samples that would normally be retrieved weekly and composited monthly. Since each grab sample is used to represent an entire week, albeit imperfect, it is reasonable to weight the analysis results the same. Thus, the results of one weekly grab are given approximately one-fourth the weight of the results for a monthly composite sample collected continuously for each of the four weeks in a month. Similarly, the analysis results of a composite of four weekly grab samples would carry the same weight as the analysis results for a composite of four weeks of continuously collected sample.
2004 Radiological ED\\'ironmental Monitoring Report AppendixG The averages for indicator a~d control locations reported in the Summary of Data Table, which summarizes the entire year's results for the SSES REMP, were calculated using
. all measured values, when available, whether or not they were reported in Appendix I tables. Values below the MDCs, even zeroes and negatives, were part of the averaging proces's for these analysis results. When no measured results are available in these cases, "LLD" is reported.
Preferably, the averages reported in,~he,SummaryofData table for sample media that are normally col1ected continuously are determined using only results frorri continuously collected samples. Occasionally, grab samples are taken for these media when equipment malfurictions or other an0r!talies preclude or otherwise perturb routine.'
continuous sampling. These grab samples are taken to minimize the time periods when no sampling is being performed, or, in some iflstances, when continuous sampling is considered to be nonrepresentative.
Because grab samples. are snapshots of the media over brief periods, it is preferable not to average'the analysis results of these.~ampJes with those for continuously collected composite samples. However. when equipmen~ malfunctions are protracted, relatively' Jarge periods of time could be entirely unrepresented by averages if the results from grab sample analyses are not considered.
Allowing analysis results for grab samples to be weighted equally with those representing relatively large periods of time would tend to bias the resulting averages,
unjustifiably towards the conditions at the times that the grabs are obtained. Averages obtained in this way might less accurately reflect the conditions for the combined period of continuous sampling and grab sampling than if only the results from continuous sampling were used. On the other hand, using weighting factors for the analysis results of grab samples derived from the actual time it ~akes to collect those samples would lead to the grab sample analysis results having a negligible effect on the overall average and not justifying the effort involved.
Grab samples collected in lieu of normitJ continuous sampling are typically obtained at regular intervals corresponding to the intervals (weekly) at which the continuously collected samples would usually be retrieved for eventual compositing. For example, grab samples are collected once a week but may be composited monthly in place of continuously collected samples that would normally be retrieved weekly and composited monthly. Since each grab sample is used to represent an entire week, albeit imperfect, it is reasonable to weight the analysis results the same. Thus, the results of one weekly grab are given approximately one-fourth the weight of the results for a monthly composite sample collected continuously for each of the four weeks in a month. Similarly, the analysis results of a composite of four weekly grab samples would carry the same weight as the analysis results for a composite of four weeks of continuously collected sample.
2004 Radiological ED\\'ironmental Monitoring Report
Appendix G The last three (3) pages of Appendix G are corrections to the 2000, 2002 and 2003 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports Appendix G.
The corrections to the 2002 and 2003 Appendix G are: 1) under the LOCATION WITH THE HIGHEST MEAN column for air particulates - Gross Beta, the range of data has been revised. The previously reported r~nge was calculated incorrectly due to a spreadsheet error; 2) the air iodine results previously reported were not in the correct units (E-03 pCi/m3)~ thus the values were reported 1,000 times lower than the correct values. Air iodine results from the analysis laboratory are reported in pCi/ml. The analysis laboratory results for air iodine were not multiplied by 1,000 to correspond with the units reported in the Appendix G table.
The corrections to the 2000 Appendix G are: 1) under the ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS MEAN column for air particulates - Gross Beta, the mean value and corresponding range have been revised; 2) under the LOCATION WITH THE HIGHEST :MEAN column. for air particulates - Gross Beta~ the location, mean and corresponding range have been revised; 3) the air iodine results previously reported were not in the correct units (E-03 pCi/m3), thus the values were reported 1,000 times lower than the correct values. Air iodine results from the analysis laboratory are..
reported in pCilm3* The analysis laboratory results for air iodine were not multiplied by 1,000 to correspond with the units reported in the Appendix G table. All air iodine sample results for 2000, 2002, and 2003 were less than LLD. After correction the results are consistent with previous SSES operational history.
The corrections outlined above do not impact any conclusions documented in the referenced reports.
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Appendix G The last three (3) pages of Appendix G are corrections to the 2000, 2002 and 2003 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Reports Appendix G.
The corrections to the 2002 and 2003 Appendix G are: 1) under the LOCATION WITH THE HIGHEST MEAN column for air particulates - Gross Beta, the range of data has been revised. The previously reported r~nge was calculated incorrectly due to a spreadsheet error; 2) the air iodine results previously reported were not in the correct units (E-03 pCi/m3)~ thus the values were reported 1,000 times lower than the correct values. Air iodine results from the analysis laboratory are reported in pCi/ml. The analysis laboratory results for air iodine were not multiplied by 1,000 to correspond with the units reported in the Appendix G table.
The corrections to the 2000 Appendix G are: 1) under the ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS MEAN column for air particulates - Gross Beta, the mean value and corresponding range have been revised; 2) under the LOCATION WITH THE HIGHEST :MEAN column. for air particulates - Gross Beta~ the location, mean and corresponding range have been revised; 3) the air iodine results previously reported were not in the correct units (E-03 pCi/m3), thus the values were reported 1,000 times lower than the correct values. Air iodine results from the analysis laboratory are..
reported in pCilm3* The analysis laboratory results for air iodine were not multiplied by 1,000 to correspond with the units reported in the Appendix G table. All air iodine sample results for 2000, 2002, and 2003 were less than LLD. After correction the results are consistent with previous SSES operational history.
The corrections outlined above do not impact any conclusions documented in the referenced reports.
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report G*3
~~.,
TABLEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRA..\\f
- 2004 NAMROFFACILITY: SUSQUEIJANNASTEAMELECTRICSTATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Reporting Pertoe!:
Detember 29, 2003 to January Ui,200S Page lort3 ANALYSIS AND WWERllMIT r..'UMDEROP MEDIUMORPAnrwAY TOTALNtThIDnR OF AlL INDICATOR LOCAnONS LOCAnoNwrmmGlIBST~mAN CONrROL LOCAnoN NONROUI1NB SAMI'IJID.
OF ANAL YSE.~
mrrncnoN l>mAN(3)
NMm t.mAN(3) l>mAN(3)
REPORTED (UNrrOFMEASUREMENn rnRFORMED~l!
~ll.Dl (2)
RANGE DlSTANCR AND DlREcnON RANGE RANGE
~mASUREMENrS!4}
Ambient Ra1118t1on TLO 253 2,OSB+OI (2301230) 9S2 4.56B+OI (4/4) 1.98B+01 (23 123) 0 (mRlstd. qtr.)
(1.46B+Ol S.10B+Ol) 0.2 rni 8
(4.28E+01
- 5.10B+0l)
(1.60E+Ol 2.36B+01)
Surfate Water GrossBrta 49 4
5.73B+OO (36 136) 2S7 1.10E+Ot (12/12) 2.84B+OO (13 I 13) 0 (pOn)
(1.14E+OO 1.59E+OI) 0.1 rni NNE (6.5SE+OO t.59E+01)
(6. lOE-O I 7.35E+OO)
Tritium 49 2000 l.SSE+03 (36/36) 2S7 4.4SB+03 (12 1(2) 7.S7B+OI (13 113) 0
(.7.1SB+Ol 1.84E+04) 0.1 rni NNE (2.60E+02 1.84E+04)
(.1.57E+0I 2.44E+(2)
Iodine-131 36 4.93E-OI (22/24) 2S7 7.46E-OI (11/12) 3.S9E-OI (11 112) 0
(.3.00E-OI 1.39E+OO) 0.1 rni NNE (I.OOE-02 1.39E+OO)
(.1.00E-02 7.40E-Ol)
GammaSpee
,K-40 49
. ~3.89E-Ol (36/36)
. 686 6.23B+OO (13 113) 6.23E+OO (13 It3) 0 2.10E+Ol)
O.!
rni ESE
(.t.l0E+OI 2.90E+01)
(.l.lOE+OI 2.90B+0l)
. Mn-S4 49 IS
.3.70E-OI (36/36) 6S5
.1.05E-OI (12/12)
(I3it3) 0
(-3. I OE+OO 1.40E+OO) 0.9 rni ESE
(.1.20E+OO 9.00E-01) 1.50E+OO)
Co-58 49 15
-4.52E-Ol (36 /36) 656
.2.66E-Ol. (13 113)
(13 I 13) 0
(.2.40E+OO t.20E+OO)
O.S rni ESE
(-1.30E+OO 7.00E-Ol)
(-1.30E+OO 7.00E-Ol)
Fe-59 49 30 3.07E-OI (36/36) 6SS 1.63E+OO (12/12) 2.4SE-02 (13 /13) 0
(-1.18E+OI 7.30E+OO) 0.9 rni ESE
(-2.30E+OO 3.90E+OO)
(-4.70E+OO 4.90E+OO) co-em 49 15 4.98E-02 (36/36)
LTAW 2.75E-Ol (12/12)
(13 / (3) 0
(.1.70E+OO 1.70E+OO) onsite.
(.1.7~E+OO
. 1.70E+OO). (-1.40E+OO S.OOE-OI)
. Zn-65 49 30 1.93E-02 (36' 36)
LTAW 8.75E-Ol (12/12)
-1.24E+OO (13 " (3) 0 (4.40E+OO
!.OOE+OO) on site NE.ESl? (.3.20E+OO
- 8.00E+OO)
(-4.20E+OO 1.70E+OO)
('
co.
('
~~.,
TABLEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRA..\\f
- 2004 NAMROFFACILITY: SUSQUEIJANNASTEAMELECTRICSTATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Reporting Pertoe!:
Detember 29, 2003 to January Ui,200S Page lort3 ANALYSIS AND WWERllMIT r..'UMDEROP MEDIUMORPAnrwAY TOTALNtThIDnR OF AlL INDICATOR LOCAnONS LOCAnoNwrmmGlIBST~mAN CONrROL LOCAnoN NONROUI1NB SAMI'IJID.
OF ANAL YSE.~
mrrncnoN l>mAN(3)
NMm t.mAN(3) l>mAN(3)
REPORTED (UNrrOFMEASUREMENn rnRFORMED~l!
~ll.Dl (2)
RANGE DlSTANCR AND DlREcnON RANGE RANGE
~mASUREMENrS!4}
Ambient Ra1118t1on TLO 253 2,OSB+OI (2301230) 9S2 4.56B+OI (4/4) 1.98B+01 (23 123) 0 (mRlstd. qtr.)
(1.46B+Ol S.10B+Ol) 0.2 rni 8
(4.28E+01
- 5.10B+0l)
(1.60E+Ol 2.36B+01)
Surfate Water GrossBrta 49 4
5.73B+OO (36 136) 2S7 1.10E+Ot (12/12) 2.84B+OO (13 I 13) 0 (pOn)
(1.14E+OO 1.59E+OI) 0.1 rni NNE (6.5SE+OO t.59E+01)
(6. lOE-O I 7.35E+OO)
Tritium 49 2000 l.SSE+03 (36/36) 2S7 4.4SB+03 (12 1(2) 7.S7B+OI (13 113) 0
(.7.1SB+Ol 1.84E+04) 0.1 rni NNE (2.60E+02 1.84E+04)
(.1.57E+0I 2.44E+(2)
Iodine-131 36 4.93E-OI (22/24) 2S7 7.46E-OI (11/12) 3.S9E-OI (11 112) 0
(.3.00E-OI 1.39E+OO) 0.1 rni NNE (I.OOE-02 1.39E+OO)
(.1.00E-02 7.40E-Ol)
GammaSpee
,K-40 49
. ~3.89E-Ol (36/36)
. 686 6.23B+OO (13 113) 6.23E+OO (13 It3) 0
(*3.600+01 2.10E+Ol)
O.!
rni ESE
(.t.l0E+OI 2.90E+01)
(.l.lOE+OI 2.90B+0l)
. Mn-S4 49 IS
.3.70E-OI (36/36) 6S5
.1.05E-OI (12/12)
.1.I9E*Ot (I3it3) 0
(-3. I OE+OO 1.40E+OO) 0.9 rni ESE
(.1.20E+OO 9.00E-01)
(*l.OOE+OO 1.50E+OO)
Co-58 49 15
-4.52E-Ol (36 /36) 656
.2.66E-Ol. (13 113)
- 2.66E-01 (13 I 13) 0
(.2.40E+OO t.20E+OO)
O.S rni ESE
(-1.30E+OO 7.00E-Ol)
(-1.30E+OO 7.00E-Ol)
Fe-59 49 30 3.07E-OI (36/36) 6SS 1.63E+OO (12/12) 2.4SE-02 (13 /13) 0
(-1.18E+OI 7.30E+OO) 0.9 rni ESE
(-2.30E+OO 3.90E+OO)
(-4.70E+OO 4.90E+OO) co-em 49 15 4.98E-02 (36/36)
LTAW 2.75E-Ol (12/12)
- 3.18E-Ol (13 / (3) 0
(.1.70E+OO 1.70E+OO) onsite.
NE*ESE
(.1.7~E+OO
. 1.70E+OO). (-1.40E+OO S.OOE-OI)
. Zn-65 49 30 1.93E-02 (36' 36)
LTAW 8.75E-Ol (12/12)
-1.24E+OO (13 " (3) 0 (4.40E+OO
!.OOE+OO) on site NE.ESl? (.3.20E+OO
- 8.00E+OO)
(-4.20E+OO 1.70E+OO)
ANALYSIS AND MEDIUM ORPATIlWAY TOTALNmWER SAMPLED OF ANALYSES (UNIT OF MEMUREMENl) PERl:ORMED {I!
Surfate Water (conl) 49 (pClI1) t-'b-95 49 Cs-134 49 Cs-137 49 49 49
(
TABLEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FORSSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM-2004 NAMEOFFACILlTY: SUSQUEllANNASTEAMELECTRICSTATlON LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Reporting Period:
December 29, 2003 to January 26, 2005 PageloflJ LOWERlJMIT OF AIL INDICATOR LOCAnONS LOCAnoNwmtlRGHEST MIlAN DlITECllON MEAN (3)
NA.\\fll MEAN (3)
(UD!(2!
RANGE DISTANCE AND D1REGnON RANGE 30
-6.98B-Ol (36/36) 257 2.41E-Ol (121 12) 2.50E+00)
(l.OOE-OI mi NNE
(.1.70£+00 -
2.50E+00) 15
-4.67£-01 (36/36) 257 2.90E-Ol (12/12) 4.40E+00)
(1.ooE-Ol mi NNE
(.1.70E+00 4.40E+00) 15 2.91B-Ol (36/36) 6S5 4.11E-Ol (12/12) 2.30E+00)
(9.ooE-Ol "U
ESE 2.30E+00) 18
-7.78E..02 (36/36) 2S7 1.75E-Ol (12 I 12) 2.30E+00)
(1.ooE-OI mi NNE 1.90E+00) 60
-6.04E..02 (36/36)
LTAW 1.92£-01 (12/12) 4.60E+00) onsile NE-ESE
(.3.10£+00 4.60E+00) 15 (36' 36)
LTAW 2.08E.oI (12 I 12)
(-6.30E+OO S.30E+00) on site NE-BSE
(.3.60£+00 5.30E+00) c NmWEROF CONTROLLOCAnON NONROtmNB MEAN(l)
REPORTED RANGE MEMUREMENfS!4!
1.28E-Ol (13 113) 0
(.3.ooE+00 4.50E+00)
-5.94£-01 (13 113) 0
(-2.40E+00 2.50E+00)
(13 I 13) 0
(.2. 70E+00 2.60E+00)
(13 I 13) 0 6.ooE-Ol)
(13 113) 0
(-6.00£+00 4.ooE+00)
(13 113) 0
(-6.90£+00 4.50IJ,+00)
(
ANALYSIS AND MEDIUM ORPATIlWAY TOTALNmWER SAMPLED OF ANALYSES (UNIT OF MEMUREMENl) PERl:ORMED {I!
Surfate Water (conl)
Zr*95 49 (pClI1) t-'b-95 49 Cs-134 49 Cs-137 49 Da*140 49 La*140 49
(
TABLEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FORSSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM-2004 NAMEOFFACILlTY: SUSQUEllANNASTEAMELECTRICSTATlON LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Reporting Period:
December 29, 2003 to January 26, 2005 PageloflJ LOWERlJMIT OF AIL INDICATOR LOCAnONS LOCAnoNwmtlRGHEST MIlAN DlITECllON MEAN (3)
NA.\\fll MEAN (3)
(UD!(2!
RANGE DISTANCE AND D1REGnON RANGE 30
-6.98B-Ol (36/36) 257 2.41E-Ol (121 12)
(*5.70£+00 2.50E+00)
(l.OOE-OI mi NNE
(.1.70£+00 -
2.50E+00) 15
-4.67£-01 (36/36) 257 2.90E-Ol (12/12)
(*3.10£+00 4.40E+00)
(1.ooE-Ol mi NNE
(.1.70E+00 4.40E+00) 15 2.91B-Ol (36/36) 6S5 4.11E-Ol (12/12)
(*2.ooE+00 2.30E+00)
(9.ooE-Ol "U
ESE
(*2.ooE+oo
- 2.30E+00) 18
-7.78E..02 (36/36) 2S7 1.75E-Ol (12 I 12)
(*2.50£+00
- 2.30E+00)
(1.ooE-OI mi NNE
(*8.ool!-Ol 1.90E+00) 60
-6.04E..02 (36/36)
LTAW 1.92£-01 (12/12)
(*5.50£+00
- 4.60E+00) onsile NE-ESE
(.3.10£+00
- 4.60E+00) 15
- 7.56E..02 (36' 36)
LTAW 2.08E.oI (12 I 12)
(-6.30E+OO
- S.30E+00) on site NE-BSE
(.3.60£+00
- 5.30E+00) c NmWEROF CONTROLLOCAnON NONROtmNB MEAN(l)
REPORTED RANGE MEMUREMENfS!4!
1.28E-Ol (13 113) 0
(.3.ooE+00
- 4.50E+00)
-5.94£-01 (13 113) 0
(-2.40E+00 2.50E+00)
- 3.76E.oJ (13 I 13) 0
(.2. 70E+00
- 2.60E+00)
- 3.88E-OI (13 I 13) 0
(*1.90E+00
- 6.ooE-Ol)
- 1.27£'01 (13 113) 0
(-6.00£+00
- 4.ooE+00)
- 1.5lE-01 (13 113) 0
(-6.90£+00
- 4.50IJ,+00)
(
TADLEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIROmmNT AL MOl\\lTORING PROGRAM - 2004 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY. PENNSYLVANIA Rtportlng Ptriod:
DrC'tmbrr 29, 2003 to January 2tl, 2005 Page3ort3 ANALYSIS AND LOWERUMIT NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATHWAY TOfALNmffiER OF AIL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION wrm mGIlEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUI'll'."B SAMPLED OFANALYSBS DETI!CIlON MEAN (3)
NAMB l-IDAN(3) l-mAN(3)
REPORTED (UNIT OF l-IDASUREMENr) PERFORMED ~ll (UD~(2)
RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE l-IDASUREMENTS(4)
(.
('
(
TADLEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIROmmNT AL MOl\\lTORING PROGRAM - 2004 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY. PENNSYLVANIA Rtportlng Ptriod:
DrC'tmbrr 29, 2003 to January 2tl, 2005 Page3ort3 ANALYSIS AND LOWERUMIT NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATHWAY TOfALNmffiER OF AIL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION wrm mGIlEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUI'll'."B SAMPLED OFANALYSBS DETI!CIlON MEAN (3)
NAMB l-IDAN(3) l-mAN(3)
REPORTED (UNIT OF l-IDASUREMENr) PERFORMED ~ll (UD~(2)
RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE l-IDASUREMENTS(4)
Potable Water Gross Alpha 12 I.4SE*01 (12/12) 12112 1.45E-OI (12 112)
Only indicator 0
(pCiA)
(4.92E-OI
- 8.44B*OI) 26 mi WSW (4.92E*Ol
- B.44E*OI)
.stations sampled for this medium.
Gross Beta 12 4
1.9IE+00 (12/12) 12H2 1.9IE+00 (12 I 12) 0 (7.3SE-Ol -
3.(l9R+00) 26 mi WSW (7.3SR-Ol 3.09B+00)
Iodi.ne-I31 12 1
1.40E-Ol (12/12) 12H2 1.40E-01 (12/12) 0
(.1.70B-OI
- 4.90E*OI) 26 mi WSW
(-1.70E*Ol
- 4.90E*Ol)
Tritium 12 2000 7.41E+OI (12/t2) t2112 7.4lE+0l (t2 It2) 0
(*1.7SE+Ol
- 1.95E+02) 26 mi WSW
(*1.75E+OI
- 1.95E+02)
Gamma Spec K40 12
- 6.8SE-Ot (12112) 12112
- 6.BSE*OJ (12/12) 0
(*1.S0E+Ol -
1.10E+Ol) 26 mi WSW
(*1.50E+Ol -
1.10E+Ol)
Mn-54 12 IS
-1.SSE*OJ (12/12) 12112
- l.SSE-Ol (12/12) 0
(-1.30E+00 8.00E-0l) 26 mi WSW
(*1.30E+OO
- B.OOE-OI)
Co-58 12 IS 4.40B-Ol (12 I 12) 12H2 4o40E-Ot (12 I 12) 0
(*1.S0E+OO 1.20B+OO) 26 mi WSW
(.1.S0E+OO ' -
1.20E+00)
Fc,.59 12 30 1.06B+00 (12/t2) 12112 1.06E+00 (12/12) 0 (4.IOE+OO -
3.80E+00) 26 mi WSW (4.10B+00 -
3.80E+OO)
Co-50 12 15 1.94B-01 (12/12) 12H2 1.94B-Ol (12/12) 0
(*1.30E+OO 1.80E+00) 26 mi WSW
(*t.30E+00
- 1.80E+OO)
Zn-6S 12 30
- 6.8m-OJ (12/12) 12112
- 6.Sm-OI (12/12) 0
(-S.lOE+oo
- B.50B+OO) 26 mi WSW
(-B.IOE+oo
- S.50E+00)
Zr*95 12 30
-3.72B*Ol (12/t2) 12H2
-3.72E-Ot (12/12) 0 (4.20E+00
- 3.10E+00) 26 mi WSW (4.20B+OO *
- 3. I OE+OO)
ANALYSIS AND MEDIUM OR PATIIWAY Tar ALNUMBER SAMPLED OFANALYSBS
!UNlTOFMBASUREMENT) PERFORMBDPl Potable Water (cont)
Nb-95 12 (pCiIl)
Cs-l34 12 Cs-137 12 Ua-140 12 12 TAULEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FORSSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING
- W04 NAME OF l<'ACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF }t'ACILITY: LUZm{NE COUNTY. PEr--,...SYLVANIA RellOrting Period:
December 29. :WO) to January 26. :WOS Page" of 13 LOWERllMlT OF AlLJNDICATORLOCATIONS LOCATION 'Wmr IIIGlIBST MEAN DEl'ECTION MEAN (3)
N~m
.. mAN (3)
(llD)(2)
RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE 15
-So4IE-OI (12/12) 12H2
-5.4lE-0i (12 112)
(-2.70E+00 -
6.00E-OI) 26 mi WSW
(-2.70E+00 -
6.00E-OI) 15 2.92E-Ol (12/12) 12112 2.92E-Ol (12/12)
(-1.ooE+oo 2.40E+00) 26 mi WSW
(-1.00E+00 2.40E+00) 18
-lo4lE-Ol (12 J 12) 12H2
-1.4lE-OI (12/12)
(-1.80E+00 1.ooE+00) 26 mi WSW
(-1.80E+00 -
l.ooE+OO) 60 2.28E+00 (12 I 12) 12H2 2.28E+00 (12/12)
(-3.IOE+00 7.50E+00) 26 mi WSW
(-3.10E+00 7.50E+00) 15 2.60E+OO (12 1 12) 12H2 2.60E+oo (12/12)
(-3.60E+00 -
8.60E+00) 26 mi WSW
(-3.60E+00 -
8.60E+00) t.'UMBEROF CONIROLLOCATION NONROUllNB
.. mAN (3)
REPORTED RANGE MEA<;UREMENTS~4l Only indicator 0
stations sampled for this medium.
0 a
0 0
ANALYSIS AND MEDIUM OR PATIIWAY Tar ALNUMBER SAMPLED OFANALYSBS
!UNlTOFMBASUREMENT) PERFORMBDPl Potable Water (cont)
Nb-95 12 (pCiIl)
Cs-l34 12 Cs-137 12 Ua-140 12 La*140 12
('
TAULEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FORSSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM* :W04 NAME OF l<'ACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF }t'ACILITY: LUZm{NE COUNTY. PEr--,...SYLVANIA RellOrting Period:
December 29. :WO) to January 26. :WOS Page" of 13 LOWERllMlT OF AlLJNDICATORLOCATIONS LOCATION 'Wmr IIIGlIBST MEAN DEl'ECTION MEAN (3)
N~m
.. mAN (3)
(llD)(2)
RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE 15
-So4IE-OI (12/12) 12H2
-5.4lE-0i (12 112)
(-2.70E+00 -
6.00E-OI) 26 mi WSW
(-2.70E+00 -
6.00E-OI) 15 2.92E-Ol (12/12) 12112 2.92E-Ol (12/12)
(-1.ooE+oo 2.40E+00) 26 mi WSW
(-1.00E+00 2.40E+00) 18
-lo4lE-Ol (12 J 12) 12H2
-1.4lE-OI (12/12)
(-1.80E+00 1.ooE+00) 26 mi WSW
(-1.80E+00 -
l.ooE+OO) 60 2.28E+00 (12 I 12) 12H2 2.28E+00 (12/12)
(-3.IOE+00 7.50E+00) 26 mi WSW
(-3.10E+00 7.50E+00) 15 2.60E+OO (12 1 12) 12H2 2.60E+oo (12/12)
(-3.60E+00 -
8.60E+00) 26 mi WSW
(-3.60E+00 -
8.60E+00)
- c.
t.'UMBEROF CONIROLLOCATION NONROUllNB
.. mAN (3)
REPORTED RANGE MEA<;UREMENTS~4l Only indicator 0
stations sampled for this medium.
0 a
0 0
Q*7
- c.
TABLEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAJ4 ENVlROmmNT AL MONITORING 2004 NAl\\m OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAJ\\.f ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Reponing Perioll:
Derember 19, 2003 to January 26, 1005 PlI2t 5 or 13 ANALYSIS AND LOWERUMlT NUMBER OF MEDIUMORPATIlWAY TOTALNUMIU!R OF AU. INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATIONWnllInGIlESTloffiAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUl1NB SAMPLED OFANALYSns DETECOON MEAN (3)
NA\\ffi lomAN (3)
MEAN (3)
RnPORTI!D
~UNlT OF lomAC;URnMnNT) PERFORMED ~1!
(UD~(2)
RANGn DISTANCB AND DIRECOON RANGn RANGn MEASUREMENrS!4~
c*
(
C TABLEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAJ4 ENVlROmmNT AL MONITORING PROGRAM* 2004 NAl\\m OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAJ\\.f ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Reponing Perioll:
Derember 19, 2003 to January 26, 1005 PlI2t 5 or 13 ANALYSIS AND LOWERUMlT NUMBER OF MEDIUMORPATIlWAY TOTALNUMIU!R OF AU. INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATIONWnllInGIlESTloffiAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUl1NB SAMPLED OFANALYSns DETECOON MEAN (3)
NA\\ffi lomAN (3)
MEAN (3)
RnPORTI!D
~UNlT OF lomAC;URnMnNT) PERFORMED ~1!
(UD~(2)
RANGn DISTANCB AND DIRECOON RANGn RANGn MEASUREMENrS!4~
Fish OammaSpec (pCi/kg wet)
K-40 t3 3.53E+03 (1/7)
LTAW 3.68E+03 (tIl) 3ABE+03 (6/6) 0 (2.92E+03 -
4.12E+03) o.n site NE*ESE {3.68E+03
- 3.6BE+03)
(2.74E+03
- 4.10E+03)
Mn-54 13 130
- 7. 19E*Ot (1/7) 2I1
- 1. 11E+Ol (6/6) 1.11E+Ot (6/6) 0
(.B.54E+00 -
6.79E+00) 30 rni NNE
(-1.77B+00 -
3.25E+0I)
(-1.77B+00 -
3.25E+Ol)
Co-58 13 130
-6.02E+00 (1/7)
INn
-4.26E+00 (6/6)
-1.52B+Ol (6/6) 0
(-2.12B+OI
~
2.30E+OI) 0.9-1.4 rni ESE
(*2.12B+Ol
- 2.30E+Ol)
(-4.l4E+Ol
-. 2.20E+01)
Fe-59 13 260
- 2.68E+Ol (1/7)
LTAW 2.64E+Ol (1 II)
-S.83E+00 (6/6) 0
(-7.36E+Ot -
2.64E+01) on site NB-ESE (2.64E+Ol
- 2.64E+Ol)
(-3.ooE+Ol -
9.66E+OO)
Co-GO 13 130 2.03E+oo (1/7)
INn 3.S5E+00 (6/6) 3.OOE+OO (6/6) 0
(-7.06E+00
- 1.61E+01)'
0.9-1.4 mi ESE
(*1.22E+OO
- 1.61E+Ol)
(.9.mm~oO -
2.80E+OI),
Zn-65 13 260 6.40E+00 (1/7)
LTAW 1.04E+Ol (I 11)
-3.32E+Ol (6/6) 0
(-205E+Ol -
5.72E+0I) on site NE*ESE (1.04E+Ot l.04E+OI)'
(-9.06E+Ol
- 1.12B+OI)
Zr*9S 13 1.60E+oo (1/7)
LTAW 2.02E+Ot (I II)
S.03E+00 (6/6) 0
(.2.42E+01 -
2.02E+01) on site NE-ESE (2.02B+01 -
2.02E+01)
(-3.41E+Ol 5.33E+Ol)
Nb-95 13
-4.29E+OO (1/7) 2H 1.37E+Ol (6/6) 1.37E+Ol (616) 0
(-3.0BE+01 1.68E+01) 30 mi NNE
(-6.t6E+00
- 3.61E+Ol)
(.6.16E+00
- 3.61E+0l)
Cs-l34 13 130
-2.69E-OJ (1/7)
IND
-2.50B-02 (616)
-1.32E+Ol (6/6) 0
(-S.4tE+oo
- S.90E+oo) 0.9-1.4 rni ESE* (*S.41E+00
- S.90E+OO)
(-2.48E+Ol
- 3.54E+OO)
Cs*137 13 150 4.60E+OO (1/7)
IND 4'62E+OO (6/6) 4.S9E+OO (6 (6) 0
(.t.87E+Ol
- 2.27E+01) 0.9-1.4
.mi ESE, (.t.87E+Ol
- 2.27E+Ol)
(-t.47E+0l -
2.59E+OI)
Ba*140 13 1.14E+02 (1/7)
IND 1.46E+02 (6/6) 2.92E+01 (6/6) 0
(-8.05E+OI
- 2.86E+02) 0.9-1.4 rni
- ESE, (I.92E+Ol -
2.86E+02)
(.gJ)6E+Ot -
9.78E+01)
La*t40 13
- S.29E+00 (1/7)
IND
-3.68E+OO (616)
- t.89E+0 1 (6/6) 0
(-3.60E+Ol 1.79E+01) 0.9*104 rni ESE.
(.2.SBE+Ol -
1.79E+Ol)
(-g.29E+Ol 3.35E+Ol)
Q*s
TAllLEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FOIl SSES Ol)ERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 2004 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEIIANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION 01<'.'ACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA H.eportiug Period:
December 29, 2003 to January 26. 200S Page 60f13 ANALYSIS AND LOWBRIDtrr NUMBER OF MEDIUM ORPATIIWAY TOTALNmIDER OF AlL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATIo.~wrrnmOlmsr MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROtmNB SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN (3)
NAME.
MEAN (3)
MEAN (3)
REPORTED (UNIT OF MEA.smmMIl.NTI PERFORMED !'!
~11J) (2)
RANGE!
DIST ANCB AND DIREcnON RANGE RANGE
~mASUREMENfS!4!
TAllLEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FOIl SSES Ol)ERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM* 2004 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEIIANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION 01<'.'ACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA H.eportiug Period:
December 29, 2003 to January 26. 200S Page 60f13 ANALYSIS AND LOWBRIDtrr NUMBER OF MEDIUM ORPATIIWAY TOTALNmIDER OF AlL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATIo.~wrrnmOlmsr MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROtmNB SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN (3)
NAME.
MEAN (3)
MEAN (3)
REPORTED (UNIT OF MEA.smmMIl.NTI PERFORMED !'!
~11J) (2)
RANGE!
DIST ANCB AND DIREcnON RANGE RANGE
~mASUREMENfS!4!
Sediment OammaSpec (pCilkg dry)
Be-7 8
I.07E+02 (6/6) 2B S.S6E+02 (2/2)
S.S6E+02 (2/2) 0
(-1.04E+02 -
S.70E+02) 1.6 mi NNE (l.33E+OO -
1.llE+03)
(1.33E+OO -
- 1. llE+03)
K-40 8
1.31E+04 (6/6)
LTAW 1.S1E+04 (2/2) 1.48E+04 (2/2) 0 (9.39E+03.
1.S4E+04) onsile NE*ESE (1.49E+04 -
1.S3E+04)
(1.36E+04 -
1.60E+04)
Mn-S4 8
6.54E+OO (6 J 6) 7B l.03E+Ol (2/2)
S.68E+OO (2/2) 0
(-9.61E+OO -
1.19E+Ol) 1.2 mi SE (S.72E+OO
- 1.19E+Ol)
(S.S4E-Ol 1.OSE+Ol)
Co-58 8
-1.17E+0l (6/6) 2B 2.7SE+OO (2/2) 2.78E+OO (2/2) 0
(-3.S7E+Ol 3.34E+OO) 1.6 mi NNE (S.72E+OO 5.8SE+OO)
(-2.S2E-Ql S.8SE+OO)
Fe-59 8
-2.24E+Ol (6/6) 2B 2.68E+Ol (2/2) 2.6&E+Ol (2/2) 0
(*1.20E+02 -
2.S1E+0l) 1.6 1m NNE (1.40E+Ol 3.9SE+Ol)
(l.40E+Ol 3.9SE+01)
Co-60 8
1.40E+OO (6/6) 12F I.08E+Ol (2/2) 8.S7E+OO (2/2)
- 0
(-1.46E+Ol 1.27E+01) 6.9 mi WSW (B.93E+OO 1.27E+Ol)
(*9.87E+OO 2.76E+OI)
Zn-6S S
9.S7E+OO (6/6) 7B 3.91E+OI (2/2) 1.49E+Ol (2/2) 0
(*S.29E+Ol S.73E+Ol) 1.2 mi SE (2,09E+OI
- S.73E+OI)
(9.48E+OO -
2.04E+Ol)
Zr-9S S
- 9. 13E+OO (6/6)
LTAW 4.t7E+OI (2/2) 8.8SE*Ot (2/2) 0
(*2.61E+OI
- 8. 17E+OI) on site NE*ESE (l.67E+OO -
S.l7E+Ol)
(.2.39E+OO.
- 4. 16E+OO)
Nb-9S 8
-3.19E+OO (6/6)
.12F 1.29E+Ol (2/2)
-l.l7E+Ol (2/2) 0
(*3.67E+Ol -
3.33E+0l) 6.9 mi WSW
(*7.S2E+OO 3.33E+OI)
(*2.75E+Ol 4.01E+OO)
Cs*l34 8
150
- 1.61E+OO (6/6) 2B B.27E+OO (2/2)
S.27E+OO (2/2) 0
(*1.48E+Ol 1.7SE+OI) 1.6 mi NNE (S.93E+oo
- 1.06E+OI)
(S.93E+OO l.06E+OI)
Cs-137 S
180 2.19E+Ol (6/6) 7B
- 7. 19E+Ol (2/2) 6.SSE+Ol (2/2) 0
(*2.02E+OI I.03E+02) 1.2 mi SE (4.08E+Ol
- 1.03E+02)
(3.96E+OI 9.20E+Ol)
Ba*140 8
- 9.07E+Ol (6/6) 78 4.60E+Ol (2/2)
- 1.46E+02 (2/2) 0
(*S.63E+02 8.36E+Ol) 1.2 mi SE (3.4lE+Ol -
S.78E+OI)
(.2.20E+02 -
-7.23E+Ol)
(HI
(
- c.
(
C~*
TADLEG SUJ\\IMARY OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVlROmmNT AL MONITORING PROGRAM. 2004 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEUANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Reporting Perioel:
Duember 29, 2003 to January 26, 2005 Page70rtJ ANALYSIS AND LOWERUMlT NUMDEROF MEDIUM OR PATlIWAY Tar AI. NUMDER OF AU. INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WInI InOHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONRounrm SAMPLED' OF ANALYSES DIrrECflON MHAN(3)
NA1>ffi MEAN (3) l.ffiAN(3)
REPORTED (UNIT OFl.ffiASUREMENn PERFORMED (1)
(UD)(2)
RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECflON RANGE RANGl!
l.ffiAStJRIThffiNTS( 4~
c*
(
C~*
TADLEG SUJ\\IMARY OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVlROmmNT AL MONITORING PROGRAM. 2004 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEUANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Reporting Perioel:
Duember 29, 2003 to January 26, 2005 Page70rtJ ANALYSIS AND LOWERUMlT NUMDEROF MEDIUM OR PATlIWAY Tar AI. NUMDER OF AU. INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WInI InOHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONRounrm SAMPLED' OF ANALYSES DIrrECflON MHAN(3)
NA1>ffi MEAN (3) l.ffiAN(3)
REPORTED (UNIT OFl.ffiASUREMENn PERFORMED (1)
(UD)(2)
RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECflON RANGE RANGl!
l.ffiAStJRIThffiNTS( 4~
Sediment (cont)
La.t40 8
-1.16E+OI (6 16) 2B S.13E+oo (2/2)
S.13E+oo (2/2) 0 (pCilkg dry)
(.6.72E+Ol -
S.04E+01) 1.6 rei NNE
(-3.32E*OI 1.06E+OI)
(-3.32B-Ol 1.06E+OI)
Ra*226 8
2.29E+03 (6 16) 2B 2.88E+03 (2/2) 2.88E+03 (212) 0 (I.99E+03 -
2.60B+03) 1.6 rei NNE (1.99E+03 -
3.76E+03)
(1.99E+03 -
3.76E+03)
TIl-228 8
2.60E+03 (6/6)
LTAW 3.39E+03 (2/2) 3.llE+03 (2/2) 0'"
(1. 14B+03 -
- 3. 6 lE+03) an site NE-ESB (3.J6E+03
- 3.6IE+03)
(1.29E+03
- 4.92E+03)
Ground Water OammaSpec (pCiII)
K-40 36 7.50&01 (24/24) 252 3.50E+oo (12 112)
-1.ooE+OI (12/12) 0
(-3.tOE+OI -
4.S0E+01) 0.9 rei NNE
(-3.1 OE+O 1 -
4.S0E+01)
(-3.80E+OI
- 9.ooE+OO)
Mn-S4
'36 15
-S.25E-Ot (24/24) 12F3 '
7.7SE-02 (12/12) 7.7SE-02 (12/ i2) i*
0
(-2.30E+oo
- 2.50E+OO)
S.2 mi WSW
(-2.10E+oo
- 2.30E+oo)
(-2.10E+OO
- 2.30E+OO)
Co-58 36 IS
-6.54E-OI (24/24) 12F3 4.17E-Ol (12/12) 4.17E-OI (12/12).
0
(-3.80E+oo I.SOE+OO) 5.2 mi WSW
(-4.ooE-OI 2.IOE+00)
(-4.ooE-OI
- 2.lOE+oo)
Fe-S9 36 30 1.38E-OI (24/24) 4S4 4.50E-OI (12/12)
- 1.70E+OO (12/12) 0
(-S.10E+00 6.lOE+00)
O.S mi ENE
(-S.tOEtoo 6.lOEtoo)
(-l.30EtOI 2.30EtOO)
Co-60 36 IS O.ooE+oo (24124) 12F3 2.4SE-Ol. (12/12) 2ASE*OI (12/12) 0
(-2.20E+oo -
2.40E+00) 5.2 mi WSW
(-2.20E+oo
- 2.30E+00)
(.2.20E+00 -
2.300+00)
Zn-6S 36 30
.2.SSE+00 (24/24) 12F3
-4.17E-02 (12 112)
-4.17E-02 (12/12) 0
(-l.08E+01 -
7.S0E+OO) 5.2 mi WSW
(-l.01E+Ol 5.10E+OO), (-2.20E+00 -
5.10E+00)
Zr-9S 36 30
- t.88E-OI (24/24) 454 7.50E-02 (12112)
-6.42E-Ol (12 fl2) 0
(-S.80Etoo
- 4.70E+OO) 0.5
.mi ENE (4.40Etoo -
4.70E+oo)
(-S.50E+00
- 4.40E+OO)
I Nb-95 36 IS
-1.96E-OI (24124) 4S4
. 3.33E*02 (12/12)
-S.08E*OI (12/12) 0 (4.90E+oo -
3.ooE+00) 0.5 mi ENE j
(-2ooE+oo
- 3.ooE+00)
(-2.40E+oo -
2.00E+oo)
CS-I34 36 IS 2.46E-01 (24124) 4S4 l.09E+oo (12112)
S.5lE-OI (12/12) 0
(-2.50E+oo
- 3.90E+oo) 0.5 mi ENE. (.1.60B+oo -
3.90E+OO)
(-3.20EtOO -
2.30E+00) 0*10
TAOLEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 2004 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATIONOFFACILlTY: LU"lERNECOUNTY,PENNSYLVANIA Reporting l'eriod:
December 29, 2003 to January 26. 200S l'age8or13 ANALYSIS AND LOWERUMIT NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PA TUWA Y TOTAL NUMBER OF ALL lNDlCATOR LOCA nONS LOCA nON WmllllGllEST MEAN CONTROL LOCA nON NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN (3)
NAME MEAN (3)
MEAN (3)
RBI'ORTED TAOLEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM* 2004 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATIONOFFACILlTY: LU"lERNECOUNTY,PENNSYLVANIA Reporting l'eriod:
December 29, 2003 to January 26. 200S l'age8or13 ANALYSIS AND LOWERUMIT NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PA TUWA Y TOTAL NUMBER OF ALL lNDlCATOR LOCA nONS LOCA nON WmllllGllEST MEAN CONTROL LOCA nON NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN (3)
NAME MEAN (3)
MEAN (3)
RBI'ORTED
!UNIT OF MEASUREMr:.N!l PERFORMED!'!
!UD!!2!
RANGE DISTANCE AND DIREC'TlON RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS!4!
Ground Water (cont)
Cs-131 36 18
-1.61E-Ol (24/24) 4S4 2.00E-OI (12/12)
-2.50E-Ol (12/12) 0 (pCill)
(-2.608+00 -
2.308+00) 0.5 mi EN8
(-1.508+00.
1.908+OO)
(-2.20E+OO -
2.008+00)03-140 36 60 2.088-02 (24/24) 252 4.25E-Ol (12/12) 1.50E-02 (12/12) 0
(-3.008+00 3.908+00) 0.9 mi NN8
(-3.008+00 3.908+00)
(*2.508+00 3.806+00) 1..:1*140 36 15
- 3.338-02 (24/24) 252 5.088*01 (12 1 12) 9.116-02 (12/12) 0
(-3.408+00 4.508+OO) 0.9 mi NNE
(-3.408+00 4.508+OO)
(-2.908+00 4.408+(0)
H-3 36 2000 4.858+01 (24/24) 4S4 1.618+01 (12 112) 1.958+01 (12/12) 0
(-4.43E+01 1.23E+02) 0.5 mi ENE
(-2.568+00.
1.238+02)
(*5.908+01 1.288+02)
Air Particulates GrossBCla 312 10 1.398+01 (208 1208) 12EI 1.42E+OI (52/52) 1.30E+OI (104 11(4) 0 (8-03 pCilm3)
(3.5IE+OO. 3.66E+Ol) 4.1 mi WSW (6.468+00 3.66E+Ol)
(4.42E+00.
2.298+01)
Air Iodine 1-131 312 70 3.818-02 (208 12OS) 1251 3.368-01 (52/52)
-3.708*02 (104 11(4) 0 (8-03 pCilm3)
(-8.17E+OO 6.808+00) 0.4 mi WSW
(*8.136+00 5.236+(0)
(*8.138+00. 6.766+00)
Air I'articulates Gamma Spec Quarterly Composite Be-7 24 9.168+01 (16 116) 12E1 9.546+01 (4/4) 8.798+01 (S/S) 0 (6-03 pCilm3)
(5.68E+Ol 1.326+02) 4.1 mi WSW (8.316+01 1.166+02)
(7.31E+OI I.09E+02)
K-40 24
.I.OSE+OO (16/16) 3S2 1.61E+OO (4/4) 1.3IE+OO (S 18) 0
(-I.34E+01 1.756+00) 0.5 mi NE
(-1.886+00 1.756+(0)
(-6.86E+00 7.596+(0)
Mn*S4 24 3.886-02 (16/16) 12EI 1.318-01 (4/4) 1.70E-02 (8/8) 0
(*2.306-01 2.646-01) 4.1 mi WSW (3.736-02 2.64E-OI)
(-1.43E-OI 1.38E-Ol) a*1I
(
TABLEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 2004 NAMEOFFACILITY: SUSQUEIIANNA STF.AMELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Repot1lng Period:
Dl'C'ember 29, 2003 to January 26, 200S Page 9 of.3 ANALYSIS AND LOWERUMlT NmmEROF MEDttJMORPATIIWAY TarALNmmER OF AlL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION wrmmGHEST MBAN CONfROLLOCATION NONROtmNB SA.\\fl'I.El)
OF ANALYSES DIITECIlON MBAN(3)
NMffi
" MEAN(3) tffiAN(3)
RBroRTIID (UNIT OFMEASUREMEN1) PERFORMED ~ll (llDl!2)
RANOB DISTANCE AND DlRECI10N RANOB RANGE MBASURl!MENI"S~4!
(
("
C" TABLEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM* 2004 NAMEOFFACILITY: SUSQUEIIANNA STF.AMELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Repot1lng Period:
Dl'C'ember 29, 2003 to January 26, 200S Page 9 of.3 ANALYSIS AND LOWERUMlT NmmEROF MEDttJMORPATIIWAY TarALNmmER OF AlL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION wrmmGHEST MBAN CONfROLLOCATION NONROtmNB SA.\\fl'I.El)
OF ANALYSES DIITECIlON MBAN(3)
NMffi
" MEAN(3) tffiAN(3)
RBroRTIID (UNIT OFMEASUREMEN1) PERFORMED ~ll (llDl!2)
RANOB DISTANCE AND DlRECI10N RANOB RANGE MBASURl!MENI"S~4!
Air Pat1lctdntts (cont)
Quarterly Composite Co-58 24 4.20B*02 (16/16) 12Bl t.62B*Ol (4/4) 3.67B*02 (fl/ 8) 0 (B*OJ pCtIm3)
(*3.78B-0l
- 3.73B-0l) 4.7 mi WSW
(-1.93B-Ol -
3.73E.Ql)
(*3.28B-Ol
- 3.32B-OI)
Fe-59 24
- 7.87B*02 (16/16) 12B!
7.&)E*Ot (4/4)
-4.36B-Ot (8/8) 0
(.2.43B+00
- 1.48B+00) 4.7 mi WSW (3.23B*Ol *
- 1)
(-t.S9B+oo
- 1.00B+00)
CO-:60 24 4.9SB*02 (161 16) 12Bl IA9B*Ot (4/4) 4.54E*02 (SI8) 0
(-9.91B-02
- 4.ooE-0I) 4.7 mi WSW (9.60B*02 -
- 2. 19B*OI)
(*1.2GB*OJ -
2.92B-Ol) iri-6S 24
-4.63E-Ol (16/16)
SOl 9.84B*02 (4/4)
.2.49B*Ot (S/8) 0
(-t.96B+00
- 1.39B-OI) 12 mi SSB
(-3.56B-OI -
3.8gB.OI)
(-l.23B+oo
- 3.8gB.OI) 2'i~9S' 24
-6.76B-02 (16/16) 1151 1.66B-OI (4/4) 8.05B-02 (8/8) 0
(*S.SlB.Ql
- 4.74B-Ol) 004 rot WSW
(-1.47B-02
- 4.22B-Ot)
'(.3. 15E*Ol
- S.3lB*O1) 7.69B-02 Nb-95 24 (16 1 16) 1151 1.43B-Ot (4/4) 1.06B.0I (8/S) 0
(-3.10B*Ot.. S.33B*Ol) 0.4 mi WSW
(.2.63B.OJ -
4.20B*Ol)
(-2.9SB*Ol -
3.07B-0l)
Cs-I34 24 SO 7.69E*02 (16/16)
Sot 3.85E-02 (4/4)
.1.07B*Ol (8/8) 0
(-7.79E*01 -
1.79B*0l) 12 mi SSE
(-1.59B*01 -
2.50B*OI)
(-8.27B*Ot
- 2.50B*01)
Cs*137.
24 60 3.5SB-02 (16/t6) 115t 1.40E*Ot (4/4)
-4.33E-02 (S /8) 0
(-t.74E*OI
- 3.76B.Ol) 0.4 mi WSW
(-7.16B~02
- 3.7GB-OI)
(.1.89E-01
- 5.19E-02)
Ba-140 24 5.4GE+00 (16/16) 3S2 7.SSE+00 (4/4) 2.6SB-0I (8 IS) 0
(-1.S2B+Ol
- 2.29E+01)
O.S mi NB
(-l.44B+oo
- 1.97B+0l)
(-3.53E+0l
- 2.S4E+Ol)
La-140 24
-g.80B-Ot (16 116) 1151 2.33E+00 (4/4)
-3.06B*OJ (11/11) 0
(-1.36B+Ol
- 9.06B+00) 0.4 mi WSW
(-6.9tE-Ot -
S.24B+OO)
(-l.S8B+01
- I.S3E+01)
Q*12
TABLEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FORSSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORlr-;G PROGRAM - 2004 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY. PENNSYLVANIA Rellorting Period:
December 29, 2003 to January 26, 200S l'age 10 of 13 ANALYSIS AND LOWERIlMlT NUMBER OF MEDIUMORPATIIWAY TOfALNmmER OF All. INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATIONwrrnmGllBSTMEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINB SAMPLED OF ANALYSES Dl!TEcnON MEAN (3)
NAME MEAN (3)
MBAN(3)
RBl'ORTED (UNIT OP MBMUREM!§!:!!:! PERFORMED! Il (llD) (2)
RANGE nIsr ANCB M'I) nIRECTlON RANGE RANGB MBA.'iUREMENf~4~
Milk 1-131 72 4.59E-03 (54/54) 12B2 5.39E-02 (19/19) 1.46E-02 (18 118) 0 TABLEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FORSSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORlr-;G PROGRAM - 2004 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY. PENNSYLVANIA Rellorting Period:
December 29, 2003 to January 26, 200S l'age 10 of 13 ANALYSIS AND LOWERIlMlT NUMBER OF MEDIUMORPATIIWAY TOfALNmmER OF All. INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATIONwrrnmGllBSTMEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINB SAMPLED OF ANALYSES Dl!TEcnON MEAN (3)
NAME MEAN (3)
MBAN(3)
RBl'ORTED (UNIT OP MBMUREM!§!:!!:! PERFORMED! Il (llD) (2)
RANGE nIsr ANCB M'I) nIRECTlON RANGE RANGB MBA.'iUREMENf~4~
Milk 1-131 72 4.59E-03 (54/54) 12B2 5.39E-02 (19/19) 1.46E-02 (18 118) 0 (pCiJl)
(-9.ooB-01 5.40B-Ol) 1.7 mi WSW
(-1.9OB-Ol -
5.40E-Ol)
(-2.70E 3.9OE-OI)
OanunaSpec K-40 76 1.40E+03 (57 157) lOGI 1.45E+03 (19/19) 1.45E+03 (19 I 19) 0 (1.15E+03 1.57E+03) 14 mi SSW (1.28E+03 -
1.62E+03)
(I.28E+03 -
1.62E+03)
Mn-54 76
-9.41£-02 (57/57) 12B2
-3.68B-02 (19/19)
-1.42E+00 (19/19) 0
(-3.50E+00 -
4.20E+OO) 1.7 mi WSW
(-3.50E+00 2.20E+00)
(-7.70E+00 3.70E+00)
Co-58 16
-1. llE-01 (57/57)
IOGI 9.47E*02 (19/19) 9.47E-02 (19/19) 0
(-3.70E+00 -
5.IOE+00) 14 mi SSW
(-2.60E+oo 3.50E+oo)
(-2.60E+oo -
3.50E+00)
Fe-59 76 8.72E-OI (57/57)
IOGI
- 2. 18E+00 (19/19)
- 2. 18E+00 (19/19) 0
(-&.ooE+OO 1.40E+Ol) 14 mi SSW
(-2.ooE+oo 1.00£+01)
(-2.ooE+oo -
1.00£+01)
Co-60 76 1.72E-Ol (57/57) 12B2 6.47E-Ol (19/19)
.2.89E-01 (19/19) 0
(-4.10E+00.
4.10E+00) 1.7 mi WSW
(*3.70E+00. 4.10E+00)
(*3.30E+00 -
3.50E+00)
Zn-65 76
-1.02E+00 (57/57) toOl 5.42E*Ol (19/19)
- 8.95E-Ol (19/19) 0
(-1.22E+OI 1.30£+01) 3 mi SSW
(-1.22£+01 1.10£+01)
(-9.ooE+00 -
1.00£+01)
Zr*95 76
-6. 16B-01 (57/57) 1002 1.42E*Ol (19/19)
-9.32E-Ol (19/19) 0
(-7.20E+00 8.90£+00) 3.1 mi SSW
(-5.50£+00.
6.50E+00)
(-5.50E+00 -
3.20£+00)
Nb-95 76
-2.54E-Ol (57 157) 1001 5.26E-03 (19/19)
-2.95£-01 (19 J 19) 0
(-5.10E+OO 6.00£+00) 3 mi SSW
(-5.IOe+00 6.00£+00)
(-3.20E+00 -
3.70£+00)
Cs*l34 76 15 1.46£*01 (57/57) 10D2 4.OSE-Ol (19/19) 3.16£-02 (19/19) 0
(-3.80E+.00 3.60£+00) 3.1 mi SSW
(-3.40E+00 -
3.40E+00)
(*2.30£+00 -
2.40£+00)
Cs-137 76 18
-1.09E*Ol (57/57) 1001 3.37E-Ol (19/19) 1.00£-01 (19/19) 0
(-5.10£+00 -
4.10£+00) 3 mi SSW
(-1.30E+00 3.60£+00)
(-3.60E+00 -
4.50E+00)
Ba-140 76 60 2.63£.02 (57/57) 1001 6.58E-Ol (19/19) 1.74£-01 (19119) 0
(-4.20E+00 -
5.00£+00) 3 mi SSW
(-3.00£+00 -
2.70E+00)
(-3.70E+00 -
2.90E+oo)
La-140 76 15 3.33E-02 (57/57) 1001 7.58£-01 (19/19)
- 2. 16E-OI (19/19) 0
(-4.80£+00 - *5.10E+OO) 3 mi SSW
(*3.40£+00 3.10£+00)
(-4.30E+00 -
3.30E+00)
(
- c.
- c.
TABLEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 2004 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Reporting Period:
Det'ember 29, 2003 10 January 26, 2005 Page 11 oft3 ANALYSIS AND LOWER UMlT NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATIIWAY TOfALNUMDER OF AlLlNDJCATOR LOCATIONS LOC'ATIONWrrnmGHESTMBAN CONTROLLOC'ATION NONROU1lNE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DrrrncnoN MEAN (3)
NAME MEAN 0)
MEAN (3)
Rl!PORTED (UNlTOFMEASUREMENn PERFORMED~ll CUD~~2)
RANGE DISTANCI! AND DIRECITON RANGE RANGE MEASURI!M1!NrS~ 4l
(.
(00 C'
TABLEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM* 2004 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Reporting Period:
Det'ember 29, 2003 10 January 26, 2005 Page 11 oft3 ANALYSIS AND LOWER UMlT NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATIIWAY TOfALNUMDER OF AlLlNDJCATOR LOCATIONS LOC'ATIONWrrnmGHESTMBAN CONTROLLOC'ATION NONROU1lNE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES DrrrncnoN MEAN (3)
NAME MEAN 0)
MEAN (3)
Rl!PORTED (UNlTOFMEASUREMENn PERFORMED~ll CUD~~2)
RANGE DISTANCI! AND DIRECITON RANGE RANGE MEASURI!M1!NrS~ 4l Soil Gamma Spec (pCilkg dry)
K-40 8
1.45E+04 (6/6) 1386 1.73E+04 (2/2) 9.27E+03 (2/2) 0 (I.20E+04 1.8SE+(4) 0.4 mi W
(1.60E+04 1.8SE+04)
(8.14E+03 l.04E+04)
Mn-S4 R
1.10E+01 (6/6) 13S6 1.80E+OI (2/2)
-1.IOE+Ol (2/2) o~
(-4.ooE+oo -
2.ooE+01) 0.4 00 W
(1.70E+OI I.90E+Ol)
(-230E+OI U)OE+oo)
Co-58 8
-I.02E+OI (6/6) 1281
-6.00E+00 (2/2)
-2.45E+OI (2/2) 0
(-2.60E+Ol. O.ooE+oo) 0.4 00 WSW
(-8.ooE+00 * -4.ooE+oo) (-2.90E+Ol * *2.ooE+Ol)
Fe-59 8
6.ooE+00 (6/6) 1386 2.35E+Ol (2/2)
-230E+Ol (2/2) 0
(-3.50E+Ol. 6.20E+01) 0.4 00 W
(-1.50E+01
- 6.20E+01)
(-4.500+01
.1.ooE+OO)
Co-60 8
- 5. 17E+00 (6/6) 382 l.ooE+OI (2/2) 250E+00 (2/2) 0
(-1.20E+Ol I.S0E+Ol)
O.S 00 NE (6.ooE+00
- 1.40E+01)
(-1.ooE+oo
- 6.ooE+00)
Zn-6S 8
2.48E+01 (616) 80!
9.IOE+0I (2/2)
- 9. 1 OE+Ol (2/2) 0
(-4.10E+Ol -
7.ooE+01) 12 mi SSE (8.ooE+OI
- t.02E+0z)
(8.ooE+Ol
- 1.00E+02)
Zr-95 8
-299E+03 (6/6) 801 255E+OI (2/2) 255E+OI (2/2) 0
(-8.30E+03
-2ooE+01) 12 mi SSE (l.ooE+Ol -
4.10E+01)
(1.ooE+OI -
4.10E+01)
Nb-95 8
-5.50E+00 (616) 1281 9.ooE+00 (2/2)
-2.50E+00 (2/2) o*
(-260E+Ol 1.70E+Ol) 0.4 00 WSW (l.ooB+oo -
1.70E+Ol)
(-1.70E+0I 1.20E+0I)
Cs-l34 g
1.23E+Ol (6/6) 1281 4.35E+Ol (2/2)
-1.95E+Ol (2/2) 0
(-3.ooE+Ol 6.40E+Ol) 0.4 00 WSW (2.30E+Ol 6.40E+Ol)
(-3.S0E+OI
-l.ooE+oo)
Cs-137 g
273E+OI (6/6) gOt
- 1. llE+02 (2/2) 1.1IE+02 (2/2) 0
(-1.50E+Ol 7.60E+Ol) 12
.00 SSE (7.80E+Ol
- 1.43E+02)
(7.80E+Ot 1.43E+02)
I Ba*140 8
6.33B+ot (6/6) 3SZ 1.30E+02 (2/2) 250E+01 (2/2) 0
(-8.00E+01 -
250E+02) 0.5 00 NE, (1.ooE+Ol -
250E+02)
(*5.ooE+01 1.008+02)
La* 140 8
-5.17E+OO (6/6) 801 1.20E+Ol (2/2) 1.20E+OI (2/2) 0
(-2408+01 3.008+01) 12 00 SSE.
(l.ooE+OI -
1.40E+01)
(l.ooE+Ol 1.40E+OI)
TADLEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 2004 NAME 01<' FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Reporting Period:
December 29, 1003 to Jalluary 26, 2005 I'age 12 of 13 ANALYSIS AND LOWERUMIT NmmEROF MEDIUM ORPATllWAY TOTALNmmER OF AIL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITn InGlIESTMBAN CONt'ROLLOCATION NONROUI1NE SAMl'LED OF ANALYSES DE.TF.CUON MEAN (3)
NAME MBAN(3)
MnAN(3)
REPORTED (UNIT OPMBA... IIREMENn PERFORMED !Il (Un~(2)
RANGE D1SfANCE AND DIREcrlON RANGE RANGE MBASUREMENTg4!
Soil TADLEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM* 2004 NAME 01<' FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Reporting Period:
December 29, 1003 to Jalluary 26, 2005 I'age 12 of 13 ANALYSIS AND LOWERUMIT NmmEROF MEDIUM ORPATllWAY TOTALNmmER OF AIL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITn InGlIESTMBAN CONt'ROLLOCATION NONROUI1NE SAMl'LED OF ANALYSES DE.TF.CUON MEAN (3)
NAME MBAN(3)
MnAN(3)
REPORTED (UNIT OPMBA... IIREMENn PERFORMED !Il (Un~(2)
RANGE D1SfANCE AND DIREcrlON RANGE RANGE MBASUREMENTg4!
Soil (com)
Ra*226 0
0 (pCilkg dry)
TIl*228 8
- 9. 89E+02 (6/6) 13S6
- 1. 15E+03 (212) 7.07E+02 (2/2) 0 0.70E+02
-. 1.18E+03) 0.4 mi W
(1. llE+03
- 1. 18E+03)
(6.44E+02 7.70E+02)
Food/Garden Crops GaIJUna Spec (pCiIkg weI)
De-7
-2.70E+Ol (1/1) 12F7
.2.70E.Ol (I I) 0
(*2.70E+OI -
-2. 70E+OI) 8.3 mi WSW
(-2.70E+Ol
-2.70E+Ol)
K-40 3.95E+03 (1/1) 12F1 3.95E+03 (l I I) 0 (3.95E+03 -
3.95E+03) 8.3 mi WSW (3.95E+03 -
3.95E+03)
Mn:-54 2.22E+00 (1/1) 12F1 2.22E+00 (1/1) 0 (2.22E+00 2.22E+00) 8.3 mi WSW (2.22E+00 -
2.22E+00)
Co-58 4.83E*Ol (Ill) 12F1 4.83E*Ol (1 11) 0 (4.83E 4.83E*01) 8.3 mi WSW (4.83E*Ol -
4.83E*01)
Fe-59
-2.22E+00 (Ill) 12F1
-2.22E+OO (111) 0
(*2.22E+00 -
-2.22E+OO) 8.3 mi WSW
(-2.22E+00 -
-2.22E+OO)
Co-60 1.46E+00 (111) 12F1 1.46E+00 (1 11) 0 (1.46E+OO 1.46E+00) 8.3 mi WSW (l.46£+00 1.46£+00)
Zu-65
- 1.48E+OI (1 II) 12F1
-1.48E+OI (III) 0
(-1.48E+OI
-1.48£+01) 8.3 mi WSW
(-1.48£+01 -
-1.48£+01)
Zr*95 2.79£+00 (1/1) 12F1 2.79£+00 (1 11) 0 (2.79E+00 2.79E+00) 8.3 mi WSW (2.79E+00 -
2.79£+00)
Nb-95 8.93E+00 (Ill) 12F1 8.93E+00 (111) 0 (8.93E+00 8.93E+00) 8.3 mi WSW (8.93£+00 -
8.93E+00) 1-131
-1.35E+Ol (Ill) 12F1
-1.35£+01 (l/1) 0
(-1.35E+Ol -
-1.35£+01) 8.3 mi WSW
(-1.35£+01. -1.35£+01)
(
c.,
ANALYSIS AND MEDIUM ORPAnIWAY Tar ALNUMBER SAMI'LED OF ANALYSES (UNITOFl>mASUREMENf)
PERFORMED~l}
"TADLEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM. 2004 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATIONOFFACILlTY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Reportin2 Period:
December 29, 2003 to January 26, 2005 Pllge 13 or 13 LOWERUMIT OF AIL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATIONWrmInGHP.sTMEAN DlrrEcnON MEAN (3)
NAME.
MEAN (3)
(llD!(2~
RANGB DISTANCB AND DIREcnON RANGB I. The total number of analyses does not include duplicates. splits. or repeated analyses.
- 2. The Teclmical Requirement LLD's are shown when applicable.
- 3. The means are based on all available measured results. When possible. this includes those below the MDC! as well as those above them.
- 4. USNRC reporting levels arc specified in the Technical Requirements.
NUMBER OF CONTROL LOCATION NONROUI'lNB
~mAN(3)
REroRTED RANGB MEASUREMENTS(4)
ANALYSIS AND MEDIUM ORPAnIWAY Tar ALNUMBER SAMI'LED OF ANALYSES (UNITOFl>mASUREMENf)
PERFORMED~l}
FoO!lIGnrclen Crops (cont)
(pCiJkg wet)
Cs-l34 Cs-t37 Ba-140 La* 140 "TADLEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM. 2004 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATIONOFFACILlTY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Reportin2 Period:
December 29, 2003 to January 26, 2005 Pllge 13 or 13 LOWERUMIT OF AIL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATIONWrmInGHP.sTMEAN DlrrEcnON MEAN (3)
NAME.
MEAN (3)
(llD!(2~
RANGB DISTANCB AND DIREcnON RANGB
-1.09E+Ol (1/1) 12F7
- 1.09E+Ol (l/l)
(*I.09E+Ol
-1.09E+OI) 8.3 rni WSW
(.I.09E+OI
-1.09E+Ol)
- 6.33E*Ol (1/1) 12F7
-6.33E*Ol (1/1)
(-6.33E-Ol
-6.33E*Ol) 8.3 rni WSW
(*6.33E*Ol
-6.33E*Ol) 2.59E+Ol (I 11) 12F7 2.59E+OI (Ill)
(2.S9E+0I 2.S9E+Ol) 8.3 mi WSW (2.S9E+OI 2.59E+Ol)
-4.53E-01 (l/l) 12F7
-4.53E-Ol (I II)
(-4.S3E-Ol
-4.S3E*0l) 8.3 rni WSW
(-4.S3E-OI
-4.S3E.Ol)
I. The total number of analyses does not include duplicates. splits. or repeated analyses.
- 2. The Teclmical Requirement LLD's are shown when applicable.
- 3. The means are based on all available measured results. When possible. this includes those below the MDC! as well as those above them.
- 4. USNRC reporting levels arc specified in the Technical Requirements.
NUMBER OF CONTROL LOCATION NONROUI'lNB
~mAN(3)
REroRTED RANGB MEASUREMENTS(4) 0 0
0 0
THE FOLLOWING THREE PAGES ARE CORRECTIONS TO THE ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORTS - APPENDIX G j
u I
\\J THE FOLLOWING THREE PAGES ARE CORRECTIONS TO THE
- 2000,2002,2003 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORTS - APPENDIX G
TADLEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 2000 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Reporting Period:
Dec:ember 28, 1999 to January 17,2001 P8geRor13 ANALYSIS AND LOWER LIMIT NUM13EROF l-ffiDIDMOR PATIIWAY TOTALNUMDER OF AU INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WmnnGJIEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROtmN'B SAMPLED OPANAlYSES DETECTION MEAN 0)
NMm MEAN (3)
MEAN (3)
REPORTED
~IT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED !1}
Q:LDl!2l RANGE Dl'ST ANCE AND DIRECTION RANGB RANGE MEASUREMENTS(41 CORRECTION TO 2000 APPENDIX G C"
(
C TADLEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FOR SSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM* 2000 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNE COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA Reporting Period:
Dec:ember 28, 1999 to January 17,2001 P8geRor13 ANALYSIS AND LOWER LIMIT NUM13EROF l-ffiDIDMOR PATIIWAY TOTALNUMDER OF AU INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WmnnGJIEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROtmN'B SAMPLED OPANAlYSES DETECTION MEAN 0)
NMm MEAN (3)
MEAN (3)
REPORTED
~IT OF MEASUREMENT) PERFORMED !1}
Q:LDl!2l RANGE Dl'ST ANCE AND DIRECTION RANGB RANGE MEASUREMENTS(41 Ground Water (cont)
Cs-137 49 18 I.34E+OO (39) 282
. 1.56E+OO (10) 1.22E+OO (10) 0 (pCi/I)
(-1.40E+00 - 4.40E+OO) 0.9 mi NNE
(-1.20E+OO - 4.25E...oo)
(-1.20E+OO-4.82E+OO)
Ba-140 48 60
-3.30E-OJ (39) 484 2.48E...oo (JO) 6.11E-OI (9) 0
(-8.80E+Ol - 2.35E+(1) 0.5 mi ENE
(-1.00E+Ol - 2.35E+Ol)
(-9.50E+OO - 1.10E+Ol)
La-140 49 15
-9.47E-Ol (39) 4S5 2.92E+OO (9)
-3.33E+OO (10) 0
(-3.11E+Ol - 8.70E+OO) 0.5 mi ENE
(-3.00E+OO* 8.70E+OO)
(-1.908+01 - 3.50E+OO)
H-3 60 2000 4.54E+Ol (48) 484 8.60E+Ol (12) 2.80E+Ol (12) 0
(-5.96E+Ol-2.05E+02) 0.5 mi ENE (O'{)()E+OO - 2.05E+(2)
(-5.94E+01 - 9.65E+Ol)
Air P8rticulate~
Omss Bem 520 JO 1.47E+Ol (416) 584 1.78E+Ol (52) l.31E+Ol (104) 0 (E-03 pCi/m3)
(1.00E+OO - 1.90E+o2) 0.8 mi E
(5.40E+OO - 1.90E+(2)
(4.60E+OO - 2.80E+(1)
Air Jndine 1-131 399 70
-2.92E+OO (319) 10S3
-1.52E+OO (40)
-3.32E+OO (80) 0 (8-03 pCi/m3)
(-8.9GE+Ol - 5.80E+OO) 0.6 mi SSW
(-3.51E+Ol - 3.50E+OO)
(.8.29E+01 - 5.00E+00)
Air PflrtiClllate~
Gamma Spec Quarterly Composite Be..7 39 8.84E+Ol (31) 3S2 9.36E+Ol (4) 8.22E+Ol (8) 0 (E-03 pCi/m3)
(6.22E+Ol - I.25E+02) 0.5 mi NE (7.47E+Ol - l.t9E+(2)
(5.85E+Ol-1.00E+(2)
K40 30 1.43E+OO (24) 13S6 9.08E+00 (3) 3.7GE+OO (6) 0
(-9.50E+OO - 2.$08+01) 0.4 mi W
(*2.10B-OI - 2.50E+(1)
(-3.00E+OO - 2.80E+01)
Mn-$4 30 1.59E-02 (24) 601 5.608-02 (3) 4.83E-02 (6) 0
(-1.20E-Ol - 1.50E-Ol) 13.$
mi ESE (2.90E 9.90E-02)
(.1.80E 9.908-02)
CORRECTION TO 2000 APPENDIX G 0*10
TA8LEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FOR SSF..8 OPF.RA TIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 2002 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEIIANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION I,OCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNF. COUNTY. PENNSYINANIA R~portlng Period:
December 26,2001 to January 31, 2003 Page8of13 ANAL. YSIS AND LOWERUMIT NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF AlL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION wml InGHFSTMEAN CONTROL LOCA nON NONROtJ11NE SAMrLEO OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN (3)
NAME l'vfEAN(3}
MEAN(3}
REPORTED
~IT OF Mr>ASUREMr::!m rERFORMED C1}
<U.D)f2}
RANGE DlSTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE l'vfEASUREMENTS!41 CORRECTION TO 2002 APPENDIX G C"
c*
(
TA8LEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FOR SSF..8 OPF.RA TIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM* 2002 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEIIANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION I,OCATION OF FACILITY: LUZERNF. COUNTY. PENNSYINANIA R~portlng Period:
December 26,2001 to January 31, 2003 Page8of13 ANAL. YSIS AND LOWERUMIT NUMBER OF MEDIUM OR PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF AlL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION wml InGHFSTMEAN CONTROL LOCA nON NONROtJ11NE SAMrLEO OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN (3)
NAME l'vfEAN(3}
MEAN(3}
REPORTED
~IT OF Mr>ASUREMr::!m rERFORMED C1}
<U.D)f2}
RANGE DlSTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE l'vfEASUREMENTS!41 Ground Water (cont)
Cs*137 36 18
-S.08B-01 (24/24) 282
-1.7513*01 (12/12)
-5.0013*01 (12/12) 0 (pCill)
(-2.50E-f.00 1.7013+(0) 0.9 mi NNE
(-1.20E+OO 1.70E+00)
(-2.6013+00 2.10E+OO)83-140 36 60
-5.0013*02 (24/24) 128 1.1513+00 (12 I 12) 1.1513+00 (12/12) 0
(-7.30E+OO 4.3013+00) 5.2 mi WSW
(-1.80E+OO.
3.80E-f.00)
(-1.80B+OO 3.80E-f.00)
La*140 36 IS
-5.83B-02 (24/24) 128 1.3313+00 (12 I 12)
J.33B+OO (121 J2) 0
(-8.40E+OO 4.90E+00) 5.2 mi WSW
(-2.ooE+OO 4.4013+(0)
(-2.ooE+OO. 4.4013+(0)
H*3 36 2000 7.7713+01 (24/24) 484 1.1713+02 (12/12) 6.2613+01 (121 J2) 0
(-6.292+01 2.832+02) 0.5 mi ENE (0.002+00 -
2.83E+02)
(-4.212+01 2.072+02).
Air Particulates Gross Deta 306 10 1.562+01 (204/204) 382 Ui62+0t (SI 151) 1.362+01 (102 1102) 0 (13*03 pCi/m3)
(1.0013+00 3.0413+01) 0.5 mi NE (6.60E+OO -
3.0013+01)
(5.ooB-01 2.692+01)
Air Iodine 1*131 318 70 2.23B-0I (521212) 601 6.60B-01 (13 153) 4.42B-Ol (26 I 1(6) 0 (B-03 pCUm3)
(-4.6713+00 1.0113+01) 13.5 mi ESE
(-1.9613+00 -
6.992+00)
(-2.0813+00 6.9913+00)
Air Particulates Gamma Spec Quarterly Composite De-7 24 1.3713+02 (16/16) 1356 2.5713+02 (4/4) 9.37E+Ol (8/8) 0 (13*03 pCi/ml)
(1.0013+01 7.2813+02) 0.4 mi W
(9.1713+01 7.288+02)
(7.5413+01 1.2313+02)
K-40 24
-7.60E-02 (4 I 16) 13S6 9.2913+00 (1/4) 1.50E+00 (3/8) 0
(-8.31E-f.00 9.2913+00) 0.4 mi W
(9.29E+00 -
9.29E+OO)
(2.16E-OI 2.8613+(0)
Mn*54 24 I.SSE-OI (4/16) 12S1 3.28&01 (1/4)
-8.9813-02 (2/8) 0 (4.25B-02 3.28B-OJ) 0.4 mi WSW (3.28B-01 3.28B-0I)
(-1.3713-01
-4.26B-02)
CORRECTION TO 2002 APPENDIX G G-I
TABLEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FORSSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING 2003 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATIONOFFACILITY: LUZERNECOUNTY,PF.NNSYLVANJA Reporting Period:
D<<embcr 30, 2002 to January 30, 2004 Page8ofJ3 ANALYSIS AND LOWER LIMIT NUM8EROF MEDIUM OR PATIIWAY TOTALNUM8ER OF AU. INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION wml JII0lJF.ST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTlNE SAMM.ED OF ANALYSES DIITECllON MEAN (3)
NAME MEAN (3)
MEAN (3)
REPORTED (UNIT OF MEASUREM!a!!!l PERFORMED (l!
(W))G,2 RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS!.. !
CORRECTION TO 2003 APPENDIX G c
c C
TABLEG
SUMMARY
OF DATA FORSSES OPERATIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM* 2003 NAME OF FACILITY: SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION LOCATIONOFFACILITY: LUZERNECOUNTY,PF.NNSYLVANJA Reporting Period:
D<<embcr 30, 2002 to January 30, 2004 Page8ofJ3 ANALYSIS AND LOWER LIMIT NUM8EROF MEDIUM OR PATIIWAY TOTALNUM8ER OF AU. INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION wml JII0lJF.ST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTlNE SAMM.ED OF ANALYSES DIITECllON MEAN (3)
NAME MEAN (3)
MEAN (3)
REPORTED (UNIT OF MEASUREM!a!!!l PERFORMED (l!
(W))G,2 RANGE DISTANCE AND DIRECTION RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS!.. !
Ground Water (cont)
Cs-137 36 18
-1.28B-Ol (24/24) 152
-1.148-01 (12/12)
-3.7SE-Ol (12/12) 0 (pCill)
(.1.70E-+OO 1.40E+00) 0.9 mi NNE
(-1.70E+OO 1.40E+00)
(-2.20E+OO 1.20E-+OO)
B3-140 36 60
-2.67E-OI (24/24) 454 6.08B-01 (12 112) 1.08E-OI (12 112) 0
(-S.20E-+OO 3.00E-+OO) 0.5 mi ENE
(.1.80E+OO -
2.6OE+OO)
( -4.80E+OO -
5.108+(0)
La-t40 36 IS
. *2.96E-01 (24/24) 454 7.00E*Or (12 112) l.lSE*OJ (12/12) 0
(.6.00E+OO -
3.40E-+OO) 0.5 mi ENE
(.2. I OE+OO -
3.00E+OO)
(*5.508+00 5.80E+OO)
H-3 36 2000 S.44E+OI (24/24) 4S4 8.438+01 (12 112) 1.74E+0I (12/12) 0
(-6.74E+01 1.938+(2) 0.5 ml ENB
(-2.46B+00 -
1.93E+(2)
(-8.84E+o1 8.86E+OI)
AII' Particulates Gross Beta 312 10 1.46E+Ot (208 /208) 352 t.5IB+01 (52' 52) 1.348+01 (104 1104) 0 (B-03 pCi/m3)
(3.59E-+OO -
3.17E+(1) 0.5 ml NE (4.9IB+OO.-
3.02E+01)
(3.16E+OO -
3.IOE+OI)
AII' Iodine 1*131 312 70 6.OlB-Ot (208/208) 352 8.29B-0I (52/52)
-6.44E-02 (104 1104) 0 (E-03 pCi/m3)
(-5.27E+OO 5.97E+OO) 0.5 mi NE
(-2.79B+OO 4.59E+00)
(-3.748+00 6.30E+OO)
AII' Particulates Gamma Spec Quarterly Composite De-7 24 9.06E+01 (16/16) 12S1 9.t OE+O 1 (4/4)
S.2 IE+O I (8/S) 0 (E-03 pCi/m3)
(6.70E+01 I.IlE+02) 0.4 mi WSW (7.65E+0l.
1.06E+02)
(6.63E+0l 9.34E+01)
K-40 24 1.298-+00 (16 116) 352 2.21E+OO (4' 4) 9.20E-Ol (8/8) 0
( -4.94E-+OO 4.04E+(0)
O.S mi NE (2.27E-Ol 4.04E+(0)
(-5.79E+00 -
4.66E+(0)
Mn-S4 24 3.63B-02 (16/}6) 6Gt 1.10B-Ot (4/4) 9.23E-02 (8/8) 0
(-6.98B-02 2.23E-OI) 13.5 mi ESE
(-5.75E-02 3.29E-OI)
(-5.758-02 3.29E-01)
CORRECTION TO 2003 APPENDIX G
()'10
APPENDIXH I..
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report APPENDIXH I..
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report H*t
Appendix H The data presented in the following tabJes were included if specific analysis results routinely exceeded the applicable MDCs in 2004 and/or routinely may have done so in previous years. The comparisons may be useful for observing any step changes that may occur in the environment over a wide area. However, the importance attached to these comparisons should be tempered by the understanding that changes in methods of analysis, typical MDCs achieved by the analyses, and averaging methods over the years may tend to blur the picture in some cases.
2004 Radiological Environmentall'tJonitoring Report H-2
.w
\\.. J Appendix H The data presented in the following tabJes were included if specific analysis results routinely exceeded the applicable MDCs in 2004 and/or routinely may have done so in previous years. The comparisons may be useful for observing any step changes that may.
occur in the environment over a wide area. However, the importance attached to these comparisons should be tempered by the understanding that changes in methods of analysis, typical MDCs achieved by the analyses, and averaging methods over the years may tend to blur the picture in some cases.
2004 Radiological Environmentall'tJonitoring Report H-2
.w
\\.. J
Appendix 11 A1\\ffiIENT RADIATION l\\10NITORING TABLEHI
Location Indicator Period Pre-Op Operational 1978-81 1982-03 2004 Range 18.5-19.2 14.7-20.8 l\\fean 18.9 18.3 20.8 AQUATIC PATHWAY l\\fONITORING TABLEH2 Control Pre-Op Operational 1978-81 1982-03
,2004 15.0-17.9 14.8-20.8 16.3 18.0 19.8
/"SURFACE WATER GROSS'BETA ACTIVITIES{pCiIl)'*'*~:.:,~
Location Indicator Control Period Pre-Op Operational Pre-Op Operational 1982-03 2004 1982-03 2004 Ran~e~9 3.0-7.7 2.9-5.2 2.4-6.7 Mean 3.8 5.6 5.7 4.0 3.7 2.8 TABLEH3 WATER IODINE.. 131 ACTIVITIES { CiIJ).
Location Indicator Control Period' Pre-O o erational Pre-O o erational 2004 1979-81 1982-03 2004 Ran e 0.24-0.37 0.06-0.61 Mean 0.29 0.32 O.
'TABLEH4 '
~:,'. SURFACE WATER TRITIUM ACTIVITIES (pCiIl) ~:::.
Location Indicator Control Period Operational
'Pre-Op Operational 2004 1978-81 2004 Range 101-122 126-1576 119-319
-239 -+212 l\\lean 109 621 1.575 171 51 76
- 1990 results were not averaged with 1982-01 data because the validity of the 1990 values is questionable in some instances. Laboratory analysis error is suspected. See the 1990 Annual Report.
2004 Radiological Em'ironmental Monitoring Report Appendix 11 A1\\ffiIENT RADIATION l\\10NITORING TABLEHI
Location Indicator Period Pre-Op Operational 1978-81
' 1982-03 2004 Range 18.5-19.2 14.7-20.8 l\\fean 18.9 18.3 20.8 AQUATIC PATHWAY l\\fONITORING TABLEH2 Control Pre-Op Operational 1978-81 1982-03
,2004 15.0-17.9 14.8-20.8 16.3 18.0 19.8
'. /"SURFACE WATER GROSS'BETA ACTIVITIES{pCiIl)'*'*~:.:,~....
Location Indicator Control Period Pre-Op Operational Pre-Op,
Operational 1978*81 1982-03 2004 1978*81 1982-03 2004 Ran~e~9 3.0-7.7 2.9-5.2 2.4-6.7 Mean 3.8 5.6 5.7 4.0 3.7 2.8 TABLEH3
",,',SURFACE WATER IODINE.. 131 ACTIVITIES { CiIJ).
Location Indicator
. Control Period' Pre-O o erational Pre-O o erational 1979*81 1982*03 2004 1979-81 1982-03 2004 Ran e 0.24-0.37 0.06-0.61 Mean 0.29 0.32 O.
'TABLEH4 '
,:,.'7;',.' ~:,'. SURFACE WATER TRITIUM ACTIVITIES (pCiIl) ~:::. '," " '.'f~!.;:* :.'
Location Indicator Control Period Pre*Op
, Operational
'Pre-Op Operational 1978*81
. '1982-03'!',:.
2004 1978-81
'1982*03*
2004 Range 101-122 126-1576 119-319
-239 -+212 l\\lean 109 621 1.575 171 51 76
- 1990 results were not averaged with 1982-01 data because the validity of the 1990 values is questionable in some instances. Laboratory analysis error is suspected. See the 1990 Annual Report.
11*3 2004 Radiological Em'ironmental Monitoring Report
Appendix 11 TABLE 115 DRINKING,WATER GROSS ALPHA ACTIVITIES (pCi/l)~~/:;:;~;~'\\.:,**;
Period Preoperational Operational 1980 - 81 1982-03 2004 Ran~e 0.1-10.0 l\\1ean 1.3 1.3 0.14 TABLE 11 6 DRINKING' WATER GROSS nETA.ACTIVITIES*(pCi/lY.i,.j;)*~*, ~:;,(?,:
Period Preoperational Operational 1977 - 81 1982 - 03 2004 Ran~e 2.2 - 3.2 2.1 - 5.4 Mean 2.7 3.1 1.9 TABLE 11 7 Period Preoperational Operational 1977 -81 1982 - 03 2004 Ranee 101-194
-247 - +220 Mean 132 62 74 TABLEH8 Location Indicator Control Period Pre-O o erational 0
o erational 1982-03 2004 1982~03.
2004 3.1.- 5.3 2.8 - 3.6 3.1 - 4.2 3.7 3.5 3.2 3.5 200~ Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Appendix 11 TABLE 115 DRINKING,WATER GROSS ALPHA ACTIVITIES (pCi/l)~~/:;:;~;~'\\.:,**;..
Period Preoperational Operational 1980 - 81 1982-03 2004 Ran~e 0.1-10.0 l\\1ean 1.3 1.3 0.14 TABLE 11 6
.. :.. :,' DRINKING' WATER GROSS nETA.ACTIVITIES*(pCi/lY.i,.j;)*~*, ~:;,(?,:
Period Preoperational Operational 1977 - 81 1982 - 03 2004 Ran~e 2.2 - 3.2 2.1 - 5.4 Mean 2.7 3.1 1.9 TABLE 11 7 DRINKlNG,WATERTRITIUMACTIVITIES'(pCill),>:'.::.:?/~. ' '
Period Preoperational Operational 1977 -81 1982 - 03 2004 Ranee 101-194
-247 - +220 Mean 132 62 74 TABLEH8 Location Indicator Control Period Pre-O o erational Pre* 0 o erational 1977*81 1982-03 2004 1977*81 1982~03.
2004 3.1.- 5.3 2.8 - 3.6 3.1 - 4.2 3.7 3.5 3.2 3.5 200~ Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report H*4
Appendix H SEDIMENT POTASSIUM;40ACTIVITIES T,~'j:~,';.,O;;::
Location' Indicator, Control Period Pre-Op Operational '
Pre-Op' Operational 1978-81
,2004
' 2004 Range 8.6-10.4 7.4-13.6 7.5-11.0 6.2-13.0 Mean 9.3 10.8
- 13.1 7.7 10.6 14.8 TABLEH10
'SEDIME:ST RADIUM';226 ACTIVITIES Location Indicator Control Period Pre-Op, Operational '
Operational 1978-81
'2004 1982-03
'2004 Range 0.5-0.7 0.5-2.4 0.6-1.9 0.4-2.1 Mean 0.6 1.5 2.3 0.7 1.5 2.9 TABLEH11 I
SE[JIl\\1ENTTHORIlM~228ACTIVIT]ES-(pCilgdrYl~::';':~
"~'::::
Location Indicator
, Control" Period 1984~03*'
, ':2004 1984 - 03*
2004 Range no 3.2 v *.,
0.8 -3.0 Mean 1.2 2.6 1.2 3.1
- Th-232 was reported instead of Th-228 in 1990.
'TABLEH 12 SEDIMENT,CESIUM~137.ACTIVITIES dryr;:;~',
Location Indicator,
'Control Period Operational Pre-Op Operational 1978-81
,2004 1978-81 1982-03 ' :2004 Range 0.08-0.15 0.04-0.17 '
0.08-0.21 0.06-0.21 Mean 0.10 0.08 0.02 0.11 0.11 0.07 2004 RadiologicaJ Environmental Monitoring Report Appendix H TABLEH*9
- ,;-C',:' ~.':.:: SEDIMENT POTASSIUM;40ACTIVITIES (pCilg'dry);:.),<,<
T,~'j:~,';.,O;;::
Location' Indicator, Control Period Pre-Op Operational ' :,
Pre-Op'
', Operational 1978-81 1982*03
,2004 1978*81 1982*03
' 2004 Range 8.6-10.4 7.4-13.6 7.5-11.0 6.2-13.0 Mean 9.3 10.8
- 13.1 7.7 10.6 14.8 TABLEH10
'SEDIME:ST RADIUM';226 ACTIVITIES (pCilgdrjrr":,::-:
',':~,::: ;,.:',,,~.
Location Indicator Control Period Pre-Op, Operational '
Pre*Op Operational 1978-81 1982*03
'2004 1978*81*
' 1982-03
'2004 Range 0.5-0.7 0.5-2.4 ;
0.6-1.9 0.4-2.1 Mean 0.6 1.5 2.3 0.7 1.5 2.9 TABLEH11 I
SE[JIl\\1ENTTHORIlM~228ACTIVIT]ES-(pCilgdrYl~::';':~
"~':::: ':-', ':-
'0 Location Indicator "
, Control" Period 1984~03*'
, ':2004 1984 - 03*
2004 Range no 3.2 v *.,
0.8 -3.0 Mean 1.2 2.6 1.2
- 3.1
- Th-232 was reported instead of Th-228 in 1990.
, 'TABLEH 12
.",,:.,,;, '. '" SEDIMENT,CESIUM~137.ACTIVITIES (pCilg dryr;:;~', '.,,::,,,,- "
Location
" Indicator,,,:
'Control Period
' Pre*Op
, Operational Pre-Op Operational 1978-81 1982*03 i,,2004 1978-81 1982-03 ' :2004 Range 0.08-0.15 0.04-0.17 '
0.08-0.21 0.06-0.21 Mean 0.10 0.08 0.02 0.11 0.11 0.07 H*S 2004 RadiologicaJ Environmental Monitoring Report
Appendix H ATl\\'IOSPHERIC PATHWAY MONITORING TABLEH 13
,Location Indicator Control Period Pre-O o erational Pre-O o erational,
2004 2004 24-97 13 - 28.8 24 -102 12-27.7 61 16.3 14 62 15.5 13 TABLEH 14
'~:, '>,~,<~ AIR}-A'RTf CULA'TE 'BERyLljth\\1.'i.tcTIVrrn!S cE~3' pciim3:t:
Location Indicator Control Period Pre-Opi
' Operational Operational 1978-81 2004 1982-03*
2004 Ran2e 69 - 81 50 - 137 59-85 49 - 126 Mean 76 95 92 72 88 88
- 1990 results were not averaged wi~~ 1982-01 data because the validity of the 1990 values is questionable in some instances. Laboratory analysis error is suspected. See the 1990 Annual Report.
TERRESTRIAL PATHWAY MONITORING TABLEH15
. SOIL POTASSIUM.;40 ACTIVITIES (pCilg dry) "
Location Indicator Control Period Pre-Op Operational Pre-Op Operational 1979&81 2004 1979&81 1984-03 2004
'Range 9.2 - 9.7 9.4-15.3 9.1-11.0 7.4-14.1 l\\'fean 9.5 11.9 14.5 10.1 10.5 9.3 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Appendix H ATl\\'IOSPHERIC PATHWAY MONITORING TABLEH 13
,Location Indicator Control Period Pre-O o erational Pre-O o erational,
1978*81 1982*03 2004 1978*81 1982*03 2004 24-97 13 - 28.8 24 -102 12-27.7 61 16.3 14 62 15.5 13 TABLEH 14
'~:, '>,~,<~ AIR}-A'RTf CULA'TE 'BERyLljth\\1.'i.tcTIVrrn!S cE~3' pciim3:t:
Location Indicator Control Period Pre-Opi
' Operational Pre*Op Operational 1978-81 1982*03*
2004 1978*81 1982-03*
2004 Ran2e 69 - 81 50 - 137 59-85 49 - 126 Mean 76 95 92 72 88 88
- 1990 results were not averaged wi~~ 1982-01 data because the validity of the 1990 values is questionable in some instances. Laboratory analysis error is suspected. See the 1990 Annual Report.
TERRESTRIAL PATHWAY MONITORING TABLEH15
...'. SOIL POTASSIUM.;40 ACTIVITIES (pCilg dry) "
Location Indicator Control Period Pre-Op Operational Pre-Op Operational 1979&81 1984*03 2004 1979&81 1984-03 2004
'Range 9.2 - 9.7 9.4-15.3 9.1-11.0 7.4-14.1 l\\'fean 9.5 11.9 14.5 10.1 10.5 9.3
~ '!'
~
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report II*6 f
.... -..-/
Appe1ldix H TABLEH 16
- SOIL RADIUM.;.226 ACTIVITIES (pCilg dry) ~'.:
Location Indicator Control Period Pre-Op Operational Pre-Op Operational 1979&81 1984~03*
2004*
1979&81
~. :1984-03 2004 Ranee 0.8 -1.3 0.8 -2.5 0.8 -1.2
'1.0 - 2.2 Mean 1.1 1.6 ND 1.0 1.7 ND
- Radium-226 was not detected (NO) in 2002, 2003, or 2004.
TABLEH17 SOILTIIORIUM~228 ACTIVITIES (pCilgdry);
Location Indicator Control Period Pre-Op Operational Pre-Op Operational 1979&81 1984-03 2004 1979&81 1984-03 2004 Range 0.9 -1.3 0.8-2.0 0.7 - 2.4 Mean 1.1 1.6
].0
].0 1.0 0.7 TABLEH18 ACTIVITIES (pCile'c:lry)'
Location Indicator Control Period Operational
. Pre-Op Operational 1979&81 2004 1979&81 1982-03 2004 Ranee 0.5 - 0.7 0.02 - 0.45 0.2 - 1.2 0.07 -1.2 Mean 0.6 0.21 0.03 0.7 :
0.37 0.11 TABLEH 19 ASSIU_\\1:~40 ACTIVITIES (,)CiIJ),.. -:~.:.
Location Indicator Control Period Pre-Op Operational Pre-Op Operational 1978-81 1985-03. 2004 1978-81 1985-03 2004 Ranee 1222-1500 1241-1422 1273-1500 1247-1472 Mean 1325 1335.2 1401 1390 1334.7 1455 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report Appe1ldix H TABLEH 16
- :,:::; ~ :;:';~':,,; :,.
- SOIL RADIUM.;.226 ACTIVITIES (pCilg dry) ~'.:... ' "::.,":.... :.
Location Indicator Control Period Pre-Op Operational Pre-Op Operational 1979&81 1984~03*
2004*
1979&81
~. :1984-03 2004 Ranee 0.8 -1.3 0.8 -2.5 0.8 -1.2
'1.0 - 2.2 Mean 1.1 1.6 ND 1.0 1.7 ND
- Radium-226 was not detected (NO) in 2002, 2003, or 2004.
TABLEH17
. ; ~.. SOILTIIORIUM~228 ACTIVITIES (pCilgdry);, ;'.' --:..
t Location Indicator Control Period Pre-Op Operational Pre-Op Operational 1979&81 1984-03 2004 1979&81 1984-03 2004 Range 0.9 -1.3 0.8-2.0 0.7 - 2.4 Mean 1.1 1.6
].0
].0 1.0 0.7 TABLEH18
.,...... :.. (.. ::.. ~ "".:. '" /SOIL*CESIUM.;137 ACTIVITIES (pCile'c:lry)'
...... ~';,.,', :. ~:....
~'
Location Indicator Control Period Pre*Op Operational
. Pre-Op Operational 1979&81 1982*03 2004 1979&81 1982-03 2004 Ranee 0.5 - 0.7 0.02 - 0.45 0.2 - 1.2 0.07 -1.2 Mean 0.6 0.21 0.03 0.7 :
0.37 0.11 TABLEH 19
- '
- ***.. l\\flLK POT ASSIU_\\1:~40 ACTIVITIES (,)CiIJ),.. -:~.:. ):' ";
Location Indicator Control Period Pre-Op Operational Pre-Op Operational 1978-81 1985-03. 2004 1978-81 1985-03 2004 Ranee 1222-1500 1241-1422 1273-1500 1247-1472 Mean 1325 1335.2 1401 1390 1334.7 1455 H*'
. 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report
AppendixH TABLE H20
~-;.--
GROUNDWATERTRJiTIUM ACTIVITIES (CiII)~';-
Location Indicator Control Period
'0 erational o erational-2004 2004
-206 - +180 117-119
-206 -+260 101 58.6 49 118 65.1 20 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report AppendixH TABLE H20
,', ~-;.-- '-. GROUNDWATERTRJiTIUM ACTIVITIES (CiII)~';-
Location Indicator Control Period Pre*O
'0 erational o erational-1980*81 1982*03 2004 1982*03 2004 94*109
-206 - +180 117-119
-206 -+260 101 58.6 49 118 65.1 20 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report H*8
I:.
APPENDIX I FSPECiFiG;,ANArYSfSfREsilliTSj:ABifLWfED~BY3~.
r:~~;'~~!'~~}~~i:~,~~8:'~MEDIA~wND~;S*MBLIN;G':~:PERi6D\\*}~~ti~:{(i1~t:f~:.~,,(1.
~~tt;t~~;oa.~.,.,.
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report I
- I:.
APPENDIX I FSPECiFiG;,ANArYSfSfREsilliTSj:ABifLWfED~BY3~.
r:~~;'~~!'~~}~~i:~,~~8:'~MEDIA~wND~;S*MBLIN;G':~:PERi6D\\*}~~ti~:{(i1~t:f~:.~,,(1.
~~tt;t~~;oa.~.,.,. __ ~: __ ~~.~
....,,~",,","... ~J.'_::'~;',. ___ ~""t..._~... ____, "....-.._.. ~:.~:;~~.:r~::~!;;::[J.:
t
., ;.. ~
l,
. I'.,
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report 1*1
Appendixl Results of analyses are generally reported in the following tables to two significant figures. Random uncertainties of counting are reported to the same decimal place as the result.
Calculated values for analysis results are reported with the random uncertainty of counting at two standard deviations (2S), determined by considering both the sample and background count rates. The uncertainty of an activity is influenced by the volume or mass of the sample, the background count rate, the count times, the method used to round off the value obtained to reflect its degree of significance. and other factors. The uncertainties of activities determined by gamma spectrometric analyses are also influenced by the relative concentrations of the radionuclides in the sample, the energies and intensities of the gammas emitted by those radionuclides, and the assumptions used in selecting the radionuclides to be quantitatively determined.
Results reported as less than <<) in these tables are below the minimum detectable concentrations (MDCs). The MOCis an estimate of the dete~tion capabilities of the overall measurement method, taking into account not only the counting system, but also the characteristics of the sample being counted. When the MOC is used as the level to decide whether or not to enter a measured value into a table, there is a 50% chance that the value will be entered when the actual sample activity is equivalent to the MOC.
There is only a five percent chance that a value representing a fluctuation in background activity will be entered as sample activity in such an instance.
Measured values for the activities of specific radionuclides, such as the man-made gamma-emitting radionucJides beryllium-7 and cesium-137, only appear in the following tables for each specific medium when the levels that are measured exceed the MOe values for those measurements and those radionuclides are actually identified as present in the samples. Measured values for the analyses that are not radionucIide specific, such as gross alpha and beta analyses, also are presented in the tables for specific media only when the levels that are measured actually exceed the MOCs.
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report 1-2 Appendixl Results of analyses are generally reported in the following tables to two significant figures. Random uncertainties of counting are reported to the same decimal place as the result.
Calculated values for analysis results are reported with the random uncertainty of counting at two standard deviations (2S), determined by considering both the sample and background count rates. The uncertainty of an activity is influenced by the volume or mass of the sample, the background count rate, the count times, the method used to round off the value obtained to reflect its degree of significance. and other factors. The uncertainties of activities determined by gamma spectrometric analyses are also influenced by the relative concentrations of the radionuclides in the sample, the energies and intensities of the gammas emitted by those radionuclides, and the assumptions used in selecting the radionuclides to be quantitatively determined.
Results reported as less than <<) in these tables are below the minimum detectable concentrations (MDCs). The MOCis an estimate of the dete~tion capabilities of the overall measurement method, taking into account not only the counting system, but also the characteristics of the sample being counted. When the MOC is used as the level to decide whether or not to enter a measured value into a table, there is a 50% chance that the value will be entered when the actual sample activity is equivalent to the MOC.
There is only a five percent chance that a value representing a fluctuation in background activity will be entered as sample activity in such an instance.
Measured values for the activities of specific radionuclides, such as the man-made gamma-emitting radionucJides beryllium-7 and cesium-137, only appear in the following tables for each specific medium when the levels that are measured exceed the MOe values for those measurements and those radionuclides are actually identified as present in the samples. Measured values for the analyses that are not radionucIide specific, such as gross alpha and beta analyses, also are presented in the tables for specific media only when the levels that are measured actually exceed the MOCs.
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report 1-2
TARLE ENVIRONMENTAL TIIERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY RESULTS SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC 2004 Results (1) are in mRlstd. qtr (2) +/- 2S (3)
First Quarter Second Quarter ThIrd Quarter Fourth Quarter 01/27/04 to 04/23/04 04/21/04 to 07/21/04 07/20104 to 10/27/04 10/26/04 to 01/26/05 I.ocation ONSITE 152 21.7 :t 1.3 24.2 :t 1.2 23.7 :t 2.1 25.9 :t 0.8 252 18.1 :f:: 1.7 20.0 :f:: 1.5 18.0 :f:: 1.7 22.3 :f:: 1.6 253 19.8 :f:: 0.9 21.5 :f:: 1.4 21.2 :f:: 1.4 24.4 :f:: 2.2 352 18.0 :f:: 0.9 17.6 :f:: 2.2 16.7 :f:: 1.0 19.3 :f:: 1.0 353 17.9 :f:: 0.9 17.7 :f:: 1.2 15.2 :f:: 1.8 19.5 :f:: 1.2 354 17.7 :f:: 0.4 (8)
(8)
(8) 453 22.8 :f:: 0.6 21.8 :!: 1.6 21.8 ::I: 1.7 25.1 ::I: 2.4 456 18.5 ::I: 1.3 17.9 :!: 0.6 16.0 :f:: 2.3 20.5 :f:: 0.8 554 16.6 ::I: 0.9 16.7 :!: 1.0 15.7 :f:: 1.6 18.6 :!: 1.6 557 17.6 ::I: 0.9 18.0 :!: 1.6 16.5 ::I: 0.7 19.0 ::I: 2.0 6S4 25.9 ::I: 1.7 26.9 :I: 2.2 25.1, ::!: 1.7 28.5 :I: 1.6 659 24.7 ::I: 1.1 25.4 ::t: 2.6 25.0 ;;I: 2.0 28.7 ::t: 2.2
.7S6 24.9 ::t: 0.9 26.0 ::t: 3.4 24.0 ;;I: 2.0 28.0 ::I: 1.6 7S7 18.7 ::I: 1.7 18.6 ::t: 1.0 16.3 ::!: 1.6 19.4 ::t: 1.0 8S2 25.0 ::t: 0.9 25.4 ::t: 2.2 23.7 ;;I: 1.3 27.1 ::t: 2.6 9S2 42.8 ::t: 2.8 43.8 ::I: 4.3 44.7 ::I: 3.3 51.0 ::!: 5.6 10S1 18.4 ::!: 0.4 17.4 ::!: 1.0 16.1 ::!: 2.0 19.6 ::!: 0.8 10S2 31.8 ::!: 2.8 31.8 ::!: 2.6 30.7 ::!: 2.5 34.4 +/- 2.8 10S3 17.5 :t 1.3 (8)
(8)
(8) 11S3 27.5 ::!: 2.1 27.3 ::!: 1.8 25.7 :!: 1.4 28.6 +/- 1.6 11S7 20.0 ::!: 0.9 19.2 ::!: 1.4 18.7 :t 1.4 21.3 +/- 2.0
('
c' c*,
TARLE 1*1 ENVIRONMENTAL TIIERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY RESULTS SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION* 2004 Results (1) are in mRlstd. qtr (2) +/- 2S (3)
First Quarter Second Quarter ThIrd Quarter Fourth Quarter 01/27/04 to 04/23/04 04/21/04 to 07/21/04 07/20104 to 10/27/04 10/26/04 to 01/26/05 I.ocation ONSITE 152 21.7 :t 1.3 24.2 :t 1.2 23.7 :t 2.1 25.9 :t 0.8 252 18.1 :f:: 1.7 20.0 :f:: 1.5 18.0 :f:: 1.7 22.3 :f:: 1.6 253 19.8 :f:: 0.9 21.5 :f:: 1.4 21.2 :f:: 1.4 24.4 :f:: 2.2 352 18.0 :f:: 0.9 17.6 :f:: 2.2 16.7 :f:: 1.0 19.3 :f:: 1.0 353 17.9 :f:: 0.9 17.7 :f:: 1.2 15.2 :f:: 1.8 19.5 :f:: 1.2 354 17.7 :f:: 0.4 (8)
(8)
(8) 453 22.8 :f:: 0.6 21.8 :!: 1.6 21.8 ::I: 1.7 25.1 ::I: 2.4 456 18.5 ::I: 1.3 17.9 :!: 0.6 16.0 :f:: 2.3 20.5 :f:: 0.8 554 16.6 ::I: 0.9 16.7 :!: 1.0 15.7 :f:: 1.6 18.6 :!: 1.6 557 17.6 ::I: 0.9 18.0 :!: 1.6 16.5 ::I: 0.7 19.0 ::I: 2.0 6S4 25.9 ::I: 1.7 26.9 :I: 2.2 25.1, ::!: 1.7 28.5 :I: 1.6 659 24.7 ::I: 1.1 25.4 ::t: 2.6 25.0 ;;I: 2.0 28.7 ::t: 2.2
.7S6 24.9 ::t: 0.9 26.0 ::t: 3.4 24.0 ;;I: 2.0 28.0 ::I: 1.6 7S7 18.7 ::I: 1.7 18.6 ::t: 1.0 16.3 ::!: 1.6 19.4 ::t: 1.0 8S2 25.0 ::t: 0.9 25.4 ::t: 2.2 23.7 ;;I: 1.3 27.1 ::t: 2.6 9S2 42.8 ::t: 2.8 43.8 ::I: 4.3 44.7 ::I: 3.3 51.0 ::!: 5.6 10S1 18.4 ::!: 0.4 17.4 ::!: 1.0 16.1 ::!: 2.0 19.6 ::!: 0.8 10S2 31.8 ::!: 2.8 31.8 ::!: 2.6 30.7 ::!: 2.5 34.4 +/- 2.8 10S3 17.5 :t 1.3 (8)
(8)
(8) 11S3 27.5 ::!: 2.1 27.3 ::!: 1.8 25.7 :!: 1.4 28.6 +/- 1.6 11S7 20.0 ::!: 0.9 19.2 ::!: 1.4 18.7 :t 1.4 21.3 +/- 2.0
(*3
J.ocation 1251 1253 1254 1255 12S6 12S7 1352 1354 1355 13S6 1455 1456 1555 1651 1652 ENVIRONMENTAL TIlERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY RESULTS SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC 2004 Results (1) are in mRlstd. qtr (2) +/- 2S (3)
First Quarter 5econd Quarter Third Quarter 01/27/04 to 04/23104 04121/04 to 07/21/04 07/20/04 to 10/27/04 20.3 +/- 1.3 20.4 :t 1.6 18.5 :t 1.5 24.9 +/- 1.3 26.2 :t 2.0 22.6 +/- 2.2 25.9 +/- 1.7 (8)
(8) 22.3 +/- 0.6 (8)
(8) 22.5 :t 1.5 (8)
(8) 17.9 :t 1.3 17.1 :t 1.0 15.8 +/- 1.3 25.9 +/- 3.2 24.0 +/- 1.2 23.8 +/- 3.3 24.0 +/- 1.9 (8)
(8) 25.7 +/- 2.1 24.4 +/- 2.4 24.5 +/- 2.4 22.2 +/- 1.5 22.2 +/- 2.2 21.8 +/- 1.8 22.9 +/- 1.1 22.3 +/- 3.0 20.4 +/- 1.2 21.3 +/- 1.3 (8)
(8) 19.4 +/- 1.7 20.1 +/- 1.0 19.3 +/- 1.5 20.5 +/- 1.1 23.4 +/- 3.0 22.2 +/- 1.5 22.9 +/- 1.7 23.3 +/- 0.4 22.9 +/- 1.6 See the comments at the end of this table.
Fourth Quarter 10126/04 to 01/26/05 21.6 :t 1.2 26.0 +/- 1.2 (8)
(8)
(8) 18.3 +/- 2.2 27.8 +/- 2.0 (8) 27.5 +/- 2.4 25.0 +/- 1.4 23.7 +/- 0.8 (8) 21.7 +/- 1.6 24.4 +/- 1.2 26.1 :t 0.8 1-4
(
J.ocation 1251 1253 1254 1255 12S6 12S7 1352 1354 1355 13S6 1455 1456 1555 1651 1652 TABLEI*l ENVIRONMENTAL TIlERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY RESULTS SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION* 2004 Results (1) are in mRlstd. qtr (2) +/- 2S (3)
First Quarter 5econd Quarter Third Quarter 01/27/04 to 04/23104 04121/04 to 07/21/04 07/20/04 to 10/27/04 20.3 +/- 1.3 20.4 :t 1.6 18.5 :t 1.5 24.9 +/- 1.3 26.2 :t 2.0 22.6 +/- 2.2 25.9 +/- 1.7 (8)
(8) 22.3 +/- 0.6 (8)
(8) 22.5 :t 1.5 (8)
(8) 17.9 :t 1.3 17.1 :t 1.0 15.8 +/- 1.3 25.9 +/- 3.2 24.0 +/- 1.2 23.8 +/- 3.3 24.0 +/- 1.9 (8)
(8) 25.7 +/- 2.1 24.4 +/- 2.4 24.5 +/- 2.4 22.2 +/- 1.5 22.2 +/- 2.2 21.8 +/- 1.8 22.9 +/- 1.1 22.3 +/- 3.0 20.4 +/- 1.2 21.3 +/- 1.3 (8)
(8) 19.4 +/- 1.7 20.1 +/- 1.0 19.3 +/- 1.5 20.5 +/- 1.1 23.4 +/- 3.0 22.2 +/- 1.5 22.9 +/- 1.7 23.3 +/- 0.4 22.9 +/- 1.6 See the comments at the end of this table.
Fourth Quarter 10126/04 to 01/26/05 21.6 :t 1.2 26.0 +/- 1.2 (8)
(8)
(8) 18.3 +/- 2.2 27.8 +/- 2.0 (8) 27.5 +/- 2.4 25.0 +/- 1.4 23.7 +/- 0.8 (8) 21.7 +/- 1.6 24.4 +/- 1.2 26.1 :t 0.8 1-4
(
TAlu.. E ENVIRONMENTAL TIIERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY RESULTS SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC 2004 Results (l) are in mRlstd. qtr (2) +/- 2S (3)
First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter 01/27/04 to 04/23/04 04/21/04 to 07/21/04 07/20/04 to 10/27/04 10/26/04 to 01/26/05 Location MILE OFFSITE 6A4 21.7 +/- 0.6 20.5 +/- 1.0 18.7 +/- 1.8 22.4 +/- 1.6 BA3 IS.5 :t 1.5 17.4 :t 1.0 16.2 :t 1.3 19.7 :t 1.4 15A3 18.9 :t 0.9 (4)
IS.3 +/- 1.7 21.S +/- 1.1 16A2 16.3 +/- 1.3 17.1 +/- 1.0 (4) 18.5 +/- 1.2 MILE..C:; OFFSITE 1B1 18.9 +/- 0.9 (8)
(8)
(8) 283 1.1 (8)
(8)
(8) 2B4 19.5 :!: 1.9
. (8)
(8)
(8) 583 17.9 :!: 0.9 (8)
(8)
(8) 782 18.6 :!: 1.5 (8)
(8)
(8) 8B2 18.6 :t 1.5 17.9 +/- 1.0 16.6 +/- 1.5 19.7 +/- 1.0 981 17.2 :!: 1.1 17.7 +/- 1.2 16.0 +/- 1.3 18.8 +/- 1.4 10B2 14.6 +/- 1.7 (8)
(8)
(8) 10B3 18.4 +/- 1.3 17.5 +/- 1.2 15.7 +/- 0.7 18.8 +/- 1.2 10B4 20.1 +/- 2.4 (8)
(8)
(8) 12B4 18.6 +/- 0.6 (8)
(8)
(8) 13B1-18.0 +/- 1.5 (8)
(8)
(8) 14B3 19.0 :t 0.6 (8)
(8)
(8) 15B1 18.1 +/- 0.9 (8)
(8)
(8) 1682 17.2 +/- 1.1 (8)
(8)
. (8)
MILES OFFSITE 11C1 21.1 +/- 2.1 (8)
(8)
(8)
See the comments at the end of this table.
('
(
- c.
0,.
TAlu.. E 1*1 ENVIRONMENTAL TIIERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY RESULTS SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION* 2004 Results (l) are in mRlstd. qtr (2) +/- 2S (3)
First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter 01/27/04 to 04/23/04 04/21/04 to 07/21/04 07/20/04 to 10/27/04 10/26/04 to 01/26/05 Location 0*1 MILE OFFSITE 6A4 21.7 +/- 0.6 20.5 +/- 1.0 18.7 +/- 1.8 22.4 +/- 1.6 BA3 IS.5 :t 1.5 17.4 :t 1.0 16.2 :t 1.3 19.7 :t 1.4 15A3 18.9 :t 0.9 (4)
IS.3 +/- 1.7 21.S +/- 1.1 16A2 16.3 +/- 1.3 17.1 +/- 1.0 (4) 18.5 +/- 1.2 1*2 MILE..C:; OFFSITE 1B1 18.9 +/- 0.9 (8)
(8)
(8) 283 19.0*:!: 1.1 (8)
(8)
(8) 2B4 19.5 :!: 1.9
. (8).
(8)
(8) 583.
17.9 :!: 0.9 (8)
(8)
(8) 782 18.6 :!: 1.5
. (8)
(8)
(8) 8B2 18.6 :t 1.5 17.9 +/- 1.0 16.6 +/- 1.5 19.7 +/- 1.0 981 17.2 :!: 1.1 17.7 +/- 1.2 16.0 +/- 1.3 18.8 +/- 1.4 10B2 14.6 +/- 1.7 (8)
(8)
(8) 10B3 18.4 +/- 1.3 17.5 +/- 1.2 15.7 +/- 0.7 18.8 +/- 1.2 10B4 20.1 +/- 2.4 (8)
(8)
(8) 12B4 18.6 +/- 0.6 (8)
(8)
(8) 13B1-18.0 +/- 1.5 (8)
(8)
(8) 14B3 19.0 :t 0.6 (8)
(8)
(8) 15B1 18.1 +/- 0.9 (8)
(8)
(8) 1682 17.2 +/- 1.1 (8)
(8)
. (8) 2*3 MILES OFFSITE 11C1 21.1 +/- 2.1 (8)
(8)
(8)
See the comments at the end of this table.
I*S
TABLE ENVIRONMENTAL TIIERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY RESULTS SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC 2004 Results (1) are in mRlstd. qtr (2) +/- 2S (3)
First Quarter Second Quarter third Quarter Fourth Quarter 01/27/04 to 04/23104 04/21/04 to 07/21/04 07/20/04 to 10/27/04 10126/04 to 01/26/05 J.ocation 3-4 MILES OFFSITR 105 21.1 +/- 0.9 20.3 +/- 2.0 18.9 +/- 1.7 (S) 601 22.3 +/- 2.2 (8)
(8)
(8) 803 19.8 +/- 1.5 19.4 +/- 1.4.
17.6 +/- 1.3 20.9 +/- 1.6 904 20.7 +/- 1.3 20.2 +/- 1.4 18.2 +/- 1.2 21.4 +/- 2.6 1001 20.4 +/- 0.9 18.6 +/- 2.0 17.6 +/- 1.7 21.0 +/- 1.2 1202 21.0 +/- 1.7 (4) 19.3 +/- 1.8 22.2 +/- 2.0 1401 19.1 +/- 1.5 20.3 +/- 1.2 18.2 +/- 1.0 21.2 +/- 1.2 4-5 MILES OFFSITR 3E1 17.9 +/- 1.8 16.6 +/- 1.2 14.9 +/- 0.7 18.7 +/- 0.4 4E2 21.3 +/- 0.9 19.7 +/- 1.2 18.8 +/- 1.9 21.0 +/- 1.0 5E2 20.3 +/- 1.8 18.9 +/- 1.4 17.7 +/- 1.0 21.8 +/- 2.6 6E1 22.S +/- 1.3 20.7 +/- 1.6 20.1 +/- 1.3 23.4 +/- 1.8 7El 20.9 +/- 2.4 19.2 +/- 1.8 18.1 +/- 1.6 21.6 +/- 1.6 l1E1 17.6 +/- 1.3 17.2 +/- 1.2 IS.0 +/- 1.4 (S) 12E1 18.0 +/- 0.9 18.1 +/- 2.3 16.3 +/- 1.3 19.4 +/- 0.8 13E4 21.6 +/- 1.7 21.S +/- 1.0 19.5 +/- 2.5 23.2 +/- 2.0 MILK" O...... SITE 2F1 19.1 +/- 0.9 19.2 +/- 1.4 17.4 +/- 1.4 20.6 +/- 1.6 8F2 18.5 +/- 1.3 (8)
(8)
(8) 12F2 20.0 +/- 1.3 (8)
(8)
(8) 15F1 20.0 +/- 1.7 20.7 +/- 1.5 19.1 +/- 1.3 21.8 +/- 1.0 16F1 21.1 +/- 2.1 21.9 +/- 0.6 19.6 +/- 1.8 22.5 +/- 1.5 See the comments at the end of this table.
TABLE 1*1 ENVIRONMENTAL TIIERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY RESULTS SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION* 2004 Results (1) are in mRlstd. qtr (2) +/- 2S (3)
First Quarter Second Quarter third Quarter Fourth Quarter 01/27/04 to 04/23104 04/21/04 to 07/21/04 07/20/04 to 10/27/04 10126/04 to 01/26/05 J.ocation 3-4 MILES OFFSITR 105 21.1 +/- 0.9 20.3 +/- 2.0 18.9 +/- 1.7 (S) 601 22.3 +/- 2.2 (8)
(8)
(8) 803 19.8 +/- 1.5 19.4 +/- 1.4.
17.6 +/- 1.3 20.9 +/- 1.6 904 20.7 +/- 1.3 20.2 +/- 1.4 18.2 +/- 1.2 21.4 +/- 2.6 1001 20.4 +/- 0.9 18.6 +/- 2.0 17.6 +/- 1.7 21.0 +/- 1.2 1202 21.0 +/- 1.7 (4) 19.3 +/- 1.8 22.2 +/- 2.0 1401 19.1 +/- 1.5 20.3 +/- 1.2 18.2 +/- 1.0 21.2 +/- 1.2 4-5 MILES OFFSITR 3E1 17.9 +/- 1.8 16.6 +/- 1.2 14.9 +/- 0.7 18.7 +/- 0.4 4E2 21.3 +/- 0.9 19.7 +/- 1.2 18.8 +/- 1.9 21.0 +/- 1.0 5E2 20.3 +/- 1.8 18.9 +/- 1.4 17.7 +/- 1.0 21.8 +/- 2.6 6E1 22.S +/- 1.3 20.7 +/- 1.6 20.1 +/- 1.3 23.4 +/- 1.8 7El 20.9 +/- 2.4 19.2 +/- 1.8 18.1 +/- 1.6 21.6 +/- 1.6 l1E1 17.6 +/- 1.3 17.2 +/- 1.2 IS.0 +/- 1.4 (S) 12E1 18.0 +/- 0.9 18.1 +/- 2.3 16.3 +/- 1.3 19.4 +/- 0.8 13E4 21.6 +/- 1.7 21.S +/- 1.0 19.5 +/- 2.5 23.2 +/- 2.0 5*10 MILK" O...... SITE 2F1 19.1 +/- 0.9 19.2 +/- 1.4 17.4 +/- 1.4 20.6 +/- 1.6 8F2 18.5 +/- 1.3 (8)
(8)
(8) 12F2 20.0 +/- 1.3 (8)
(8)
(8) 15F1 20.0 +/- 1.7 20.7 +/- 1.5 19.1 +/- 1.3 21.8 +/- 1.0 16F1 21.1 +/- 2.1 21.9 +/- 0.6 19.6 +/- 1.8 22.5 +/- 1.5 See the comments at the end of this table.
1*6
- c.
c
(
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
Location MILES 3G4 4G1 6G1 7G1 7G2 8G1 12G1 12G4 T(~LEI-l ENVIRONMENTAL TIIERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY RESULTS SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC 2004 First Quarter 01127104 to 04123/04 21.2 +/- 2.0 22.8 +/- 2.2 22.2 +/- 1.1 18.9 +/- 1.1 18.9 +/- 1.1 17.2 +/- 1.3 17.5 +/- 0.9 20.7 +/- 1.3 Results (1) are in mRlstd. qtr (2) +/- 2S (3)
Second Quarter 04121104 to 07121/04 20.0 +/- 1.6 21.1 +/- 1.8 (8) 18.4 +/- 1.6 (8)
(8) 17.9 +/- 1.0 20.2 +/- 0.6 Third Quarter 07120104 to 10/27104 19.3 +/- 1.2 19.3 +/- 1.3 (8) 17.3 +/- 1.4 (8)
(8) 16.0 +/- 0.5 19.3 +/- 2.3 See the comments at the end of this table.
Location Indicator Average (6)
Control Average (6)
COMMENTS 20.8 +/- 12.8 19.9 +/- 4.1 21.2 +/- 12.6 19.9 +/- 12.3 19.5 +/- 3.1 18.2 +/- 3.3 Fourth Quarter 10/26/04 to 01/26/05 23.5 +/- 2.0 23.6 +/- 1.0 (8) 21.0 +/- 1.4 (8)
(8)
. 18.9 +/- 1.8 22.1 +/- 1.4 23.2 +/- 12.6 21.8 +/- 3.5 Individual monitor location results are normally the average of the elemental doses of six calcium elements from the two TLOs assigned to each monitoring location.
A standard (std.) quarter (qtr.) is considered to be 91.25 days. Results obtained for monitoring periods of other durations are normalized by multiplying them by 91.25/x. where x is the actual duration in days of the period.
Uncertainties for individual monitoring location results are two standard deviations of the elemental doses of six calcium elements from the two TLOs assigned to each monitorin glocation, representing the variability between the elemental doses of each of the six TLO elements.
TLOs were not in the field at this monitoring location during this quarter. Refer to Ap.,endix A of this report for an explanation of program changes to the REMP.
No measurement could be made because the TLOs were lost. stolen or damaged.
Uncertainties associated with quarterly indicator and control averages are two standard deviations, representing the variability between the results of the individual monitoring locations.
Oata were invalidated for this period because of an unacceptably high coefficient of variation among element readings (not applicable for 2004 data).
Extra TLOs, not required by TRMJOOCM (i.e. do not provide additional benefit) and were deleted from the monitoring program.
1-7 (1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
Location 10*20 MILES 3G4 4G1 6G1 7G1 7G2 8G1 12G1 12G4 T(~LEI-l ENVIRONMENTAL TIIERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETRY RESULTS SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION* 2004 First Quarter 01127104 to 04123/04 21.2 +/- 2.0 22.8 +/- 2.2 22.2 +/- 1.1 18.9 +/- 1.1 18.9 +/- 1.1 17.2 +/- 1.3 17.5 +/- 0.9 20.7 +/- 1.3 Results (1) are in mRlstd. qtr (2) +/- 2S (3)
Second Quarter 04121104 to 07121/04 20.0 +/- 1.6 21.1 +/- 1.8 (8) 18.4 +/- 1.6 (8)
(8) 17.9 +/- 1.0 20.2 +/- 0.6 Third Quarter 07120104 to 10/27104 19.3 +/- 1.2 19.3 +/- 1.3 (8) 17.3 +/- 1.4 (8)
(8) 16.0 +/- 0.5 19.3 +/- 2.3 See the comments at the end of this table.
Location Indicator Average (6)
Control Average (6)
COMMENTS 20.8 +/- 12.8 19.9 +/- 4.1 21.2 +/- 12.6 19.9 +/- 12.3 19.5 +/- 3.1 18.2 +/- 3.3 Fourth Quarter 10/26/04 to 01/26/05 23.5 +/- 2.0 23.6 +/- 1.0 (8) 21.0 +/- 1.4 (8)
(8)
. 18.9 +/- 1.8 22.1 +/- 1.4 23.2 +/- 12.6 21.8 +/- 3.5 Individual monitor location results are normally the average of the elemental doses of six calcium elements from the two TLOs assigned to each monitoring location.
A standard (std.) quarter (qtr.) is considered to be 91.25 days. Results obtained for monitoring periods of other durations are normalized by multiplying them by 91.25/x. where x is the actual duration in days of the period.
Uncertainties for individual monitoring location results are two standard deviations of the elemental doses of six calcium elements from the two TLOs assigned to each monitorin glocation, representing the variability between the elemental doses of each of the six TLO elements.
TLOs were not in the field at this monitoring location during this quarter. Refer to Ap.,endix A of this report for an explanation of program changes to the REMP.
I No measurement could be made because the TLOs were lost. stolen or damaged.
Uncertainties associated with quarterly indicator and control averages are two standard deviations, representing the variability between the results of the individual monitoring locations.
Oata were invalidated for this period because of an unacceptably high coefficient of variation among element readings (not applicable for 2004 data).
Extra TLOs, not required by TRMJOOCM (i.e. do not provide additional benefit) and were deleted from the monitoring program.
1-7
.~
TABLE 1-2 GROSS BETA, TRITIUM,AND GAMMA SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF SURFACE WATER SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC ST AnON - 2004 Results in pCilliter +/- 25 LOCATION COLLECTION DATE TRITIUM GR-BETA OTHER ACTIVITY COMMENTS 6S6 12129/03 01/26/04 136:1: 82
<1.78 2S7 12129103 01/26/04 405 :1:94 9.3 :I: 2.2 6S5 12129103 01/26/04
<132 2.6 ::I: 1.8 LTAW 01/12104 243 :1:84 3.8 :I: 1.4 6S6 01126/04 03/01/04
<130
<2.2 K-40 46.2+/-26 2S7 01/26/04 03/01/04 12400 :I: 243 11.9 :I: 2.7 K-40 175+/-32 6S5 02102104 03/01104
< 130 2.3 :I: 1.5 LTAW 02109/04 187 ::1:86 3.4 ::t: 1.6 6S6 03/01/04 03/29/04
<126 2.8 ::t: 1.1 2S7' 03/01/04 03/29/04 9730 :1:225 8.5 :!: 1.8' 6S5 03/08/04 03/29/04
< 134 4.4 :I: 1.3 LTAW 02109104 329 :1:94 3.2 :!: 1.5 6S6 03/29/04 04127/04
<126 2.5 :I: 1.2 2S7 03/29/04 04/27/04 18400:1:287 6.6 :I: 1.7 6S5 04/06/04 04/27/04 205:1:84 4.6 :!: 1.4 LTAW 04112104 169:1:85 '
2.8 :I: 1.4 6S6 04/27104 06/01/04
<132
<2.3 2S7 04/27/04 06/01/04' 390 :1:94 7.8 :I: 2.5 6S5 05/04/04 06/01/04
<133
<2.3 LTAW 05110104 161 ::t: 132 3.7 :I: 1.9 6S6 06/01/04 06/29/04
<128 2.3 :I: 1.4 2S7 06/01104 06/29/04 3090 :I: 141 11.1 :I: 2.6 6S5 06/08/04 06/29/04
<126
<2.1 LTAW 06114104
<134 2.3 :!: 1.5 1-8
("
('
C,'
.~.,
.~..
TABLE 1-2 GROSS BETA, TRITIUM,AND GAMMA SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF SURFACE WATER SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC ST AnON - 2004 Results in pCilliter +/- 25 LOCATION COLLECTION DATE TRITIUM GR-BETA OTHER ACTIVITY COMMENTS 6S6 12129/03 01/26/04 136:1: 82
<1.78 2S7 12129103 01/26/04 405 :1:94 9.3 :I: 2.2 6S5 12129103 01/26/04
<132 2.6 ::I: 1.8 LTAW 01/12104 243 :1:84 3.8 :I: 1.4 6S6 01126/04 03/01/04
<130
<2.2 K-40 46.2+/-26 2S7 01/26/04 03/01/04 12400 :I: 243 11.9 :I: 2.7 K-40 175+/-32 6S5 02102104 03/01104
< 130 2.3 :I: 1.5 LTAW 02109/04 187 ::1:86 3.4 ::t: 1.6 6S6 03/01/04 03/29/04
<126 2.8 ::t: 1.1 2S7' 03/01/04 03/29/04 9730 :1:225 8.5 :!: 1.8' 6S5
' 03/08/04 03/29/04
< 134 4.4 :I: 1.3 LTAW 02109104 329 :1:94 3.2 :!: 1.5 6S6 03/29/04 04127/04
<126 2.5 :I: 1.2 2S7 03/29/04 04/27/04 18400:1:287 6.6 :I: 1.7 6S5 04/06/04 04/27/04 205:1:84 4.6 :!: 1.4 LTAW 04112104 169:1:85 '
2.8 :I: 1.4 6S6 04/27104 06/01/04
<132
<2.3 2S7 04/27/04 06/01/04' 390 :1:94 7.8 :I: 2.5 6S5 05/04/04 06/01/04
<133
<2.3 LTAW 05110104 161 ::t: 132 3.7 :I: 1.9 6S6 06/01/04 06/29/04
<128 2.3 :I: 1.4 2S7 06/01104 06/29/04 3090 :I: 141 11.1 :I: 2.6 6S5 06/08/04 06/29/04
<126
<2.1 LTAW 06114104
<134 2.3 :!: 1.5 1-8
TABLE 1-2 GROSS BETA, TRITIUM, AND GAMMA SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF SURFACE WATER SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECfRIC STATION - 2004 Results in pCUliter +/- 2S LOCATION COLLECTION DATE TRITIUM GR-BETA OTHER ACTIVITY COMMENTS 656 06129/04 07/27/04
<127 5.1 +/- 1.6 257 06129104 07/27/04 260 +/-85 15.9 +/- 3.0 655 07/061.04 07/27/04
<127 4.2 +/- 1.5 LTAW 07/12104
<121
<2.1 656 07/27/04 08/24/04
<135 3.7 +/- 1.5 657 07/27/04 08/24/04 3870 +/- 158 13.5 +/- 2.7 655 08103/04 08/24/04
<134
<2.0 LTAW 08/09/04 261 +/-84 3.7 +/- 1.7 656 08/24/04 09/28104 244 +/-83 7.4 % 1.7 257 08/24/04 09/28/04 3850 +/- 154 14.5 +/- 2.6 655 08/29/04 09/28/04 167 +/-80 5.4 +/- 1.6 09/13/04 174 5.9 +/- 1.7 6S6 09/28/04 11/02104
<132 1.9 % 1.2 257 09/28/04 11/02104 322 +/-89 11.7 +/- 2.4 655 10/05104 11/02104
<132 2.3 % 1.3 LTAW 10111/04
<143 2.4 +/- 1.3 656 11/02104 11/30/04 156 % 79 2.8 +/- 1.5 257 11/02104 11/30/04 312+/- 85 13.0 +/- 2.7 655 11/02104 11/30/04 186 +/- 79 3.5 % 1.5 LTAW 11115104 192+/-88 2.7 % 1.7 656 12107/04 12128104
<133
<2.0 257 11/30/04 12128104 518+/- 101 8.2 % 2.2 655 12107104 12128/04
<135 2.9 +/- 1.4 LTAW 12106/04
<130
. <1.7 1-9 TABLE 1-2 GROSS BETA, TRITIUM, AND GAMMA SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF SURFACE WATER SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECfRIC STATION - 2004 Results in pCUliter +/- 2S LOCATION COLLECTION DATE TRITIUM GR-BETA OTHER ACTIVITY COMMENTS 656 06129/04 07/27/04
<127 5.1 +/- 1.6 257 06129104 07/27/04 260 +/-85 15.9 +/- 3.0 655 07/061.04 07/27/04
<127 4.2 +/- 1.5 LTAW 07/12104
<121
<2.1 656 07/27/04 08/24/04
<135 3.7 +/- 1.5 657 07/27/04 08/24/04 3870 +/- 158 13.5 +/- 2.7 655 08103/04 08/24/04
<134
<2.0 LTAW 08/09/04 261 +/-84 3.7 +/- 1.7 656 08/24/04 09/28104 244 +/-83 7.4 % 1.7 257 08/24/04 09/28/04 3850 +/- 154 14.5 +/- 2.6 655 08/29/04 09/28/04 167 +/-80 5.4 +/- 1.6
- LTAW 09/13/04 174 5.9 +/- 1.7 6S6 09/28/04 11/02104
<132 1.9 % 1.2 257 09/28/04 11/02104 322 +/-89 11.7 +/- 2.4 655 10/05104 11/02104
<132 2.3 % 1.3 LTAW 10111/04
<143 2.4 +/- 1.3 656 11/02104 11/30/04 156 % 79 2.8 +/- 1.5 257 11/02104 11/30/04 312+/- 85 13.0 +/- 2.7 655 11/02104 11/30/04 186 +/- 79 3.5 % 1.5 LTAW 11115104 192+/-88 2.7 % 1.7 656 12107/04 12128104
<133
<2.0 257 11/30/04 12128104 518+/- 101 8.2 % 2.2 655 12107104 12128/04
<135 2.9 +/- 1.4 LTAW 12106/04
<130
. <1.7 1-9 c
TABLE IODINE-131 ANALYSES OF SURFACE WATER SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECfRIC STATION - 2004
(..
co
(
TABLE 1*3 IODINE-131 ANALYSES OF SURFACE WATER SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECfRIC STATION - 2004 Results in pCilliter +/- 2S LOCATION COLLECTION DATE 1-131 COMMENTS 6S6 01/05/04 - 01119104
<0.40 2S7 01105/04 - 01/19/04
.76 +/-.45 SS5 01112104 - 01/19/04
.68+/-.34 SS6 02102104
- 02116/04
<.90 2S7 02102104
- 02116/04
<.93 6S5 02109/04
- 02116/04
<.90 6SS 03/01/04*03/15/04
<.73 2S7 03/01/04 - 03/15/04
<.73 SS5 03/08/04
- 03115/04
<.96 6S6 04/06/04
- 04120104 1.6 +/-1.8 "Refer to Appendix A for exceptions 2S7 04/06/04
- 04/20/04.
1.6 +/- 2.1
- Refer to Appendix A for exceptions 6S5 04/13/04
- 04/20/04 1.1 +/- 1.6
- Refer to Appendix A for exceptions 6S6 05/04/04 - 05/18/04
.S3+/-.44 2S7 05/04/04 - 05/18/04
.93 +/-.67 6S5 05111104 - 05/18/04
<.63 6S6 06/08/04 ~ 06/22104
<.82 2S7 06/08/04
- 06/22/04 1.39 +/-.79 6S5 06/15/04 - 06/22/04 1.0+/-.49 6S6 07/06/04 - 07/20/04
<.90 6S7 07/06/04
- 07/20/04 1.0 +/-.75 6S5
. 07/13/04
- 07/20/04
<.79 1-10
TABLE IODINE-131 ANALYSES OF SURFACE WATER SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECfRIC STATION - 2004 Results in pCilliter +/- 2S LOCATION COLLECTION DATE COMMENTS TABLE 1*3 IODINE-131 ANALYSES OF SURFACE WATER SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECfRIC STATION - 2004 Results in pCilliter +/- 2S LOCATION COLLECTION DATE 1*131 COMMENTS 6S6 08/03/04
- 08/17/04
<.59 6S7 08/03104 - 08117/04 1.32 %.84 6S5 08110/04*08117/04
<.55 6S6 09/07/04*09/21104
<.70 2S7 09/07/04*09/21104
<.82 6S5 09114/04 - 09/21/04
<.57 6S6 10/05/04
- 10119/04
<.68 2S7 10/05/04
- 10/19/04 1.29%.77 6S5 10/12104
- 10119/04
<.49 6S6 11102104 - 11/16/04
<.99 2S7 11/02104*11116104
<.88 6S5 11/09/04
- 11/16/04
<.92 6S6 12107104 -12121/04
<.72 6S7 12107104 -12121/04
<.79 6S5 12114104 - 12121/04
<.63 1*11
(
TABLE 1.4 GROSS ALPHA, GROSS BETA, TRITIUM, IODINE-131 GAMMA
- SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF DRINKING WATER SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC 2004 Results in pCilliter +/- 2S TABLE 1.4 GROSS ALPHA, GROSS BETA, TRITIUM, IODINE-131 GAMMA
- SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF DRINKING WATER SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION* 2004 Results in pCilliter +/- 2S LOCATION COLLECTION DATE GR*ALPHA GR*BETA TRITIUM OTHER ACTIVITY COMMENTS 12H2 12129/03*01/26/04
<1.76
<1.94
<133 12H2 01/26/04 - 03/01/04
<1.78
<2.21
<130 12H2 03/01 /04 - 03/29/04
<1.76
<1.83
<128 12H2 03129/04
- 04/26/04
<0.68
<1.74
<127 12H2 04/26/04*06/01/04
<1.21
<1.89
<126 12H2 06/01/04 - 06/29/04
<1.66 2.27 +/- 1.3
<120 12H2 06/29/04* 07/27/04
<1.42
<2.27
<124 12H2 07/27/04 - 08/24/04
<1.62 2.20+/- 1.3
<126 12H2 08/24/04
- 09/28/04
<1.53 3.09+/- 1.3 167 +/-78 12H2 09/28/04
- 11/02104
<1.55 1.95:1: 1.0
<131 12H2 11/02104
- 11/30/04
<1.45 2.65+/-1.34 195 +/-80 12H2 11/30/04
- 12128/04
<1.71 2.15:1: 1.3 168 +/-79 1*12
TABLE 1-5 GAMMA SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF FISH SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2004 Results in pCi/gm (wet) +/- 2S
TABLE GAMMA
- SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF SHORELINE SEDIMENT SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2004 Results in pCi/gm (dry) +/- 2S LOCATION COLLECTION DATE K-40 Cs-137 Ra-226 TH-228 OTHER ACTIVITY 28 5/24/2004 16.0:1: 2.3
<.11 3.76 :1:2.5 4.92:1: 2.0 AC-228 1.13:1:.46 78 5/24/2004 13.2:1: 2.1
<.09
<1.37
<1.26 AC-228 1.08:1:.39 12F 5/24/2004 10.6:1:.1.6
<.10
<2.0 2.67:1: 1.6 AC-228 1.22:1:.39 LTAW 5/24/2004 14.9:1: 1.9
<.08
<2.1 3.61:1: 1.S AC-228 1.23 :1:.38 28 10/11/2004 13.6:1: 1.1
<.OS 1.99:1:.86
<.S1 AC-228 1.2S:I:.23 78 10111/2004 1S.4:1: 1.2
.10:1:.05 2.60:1: 1.2
<1.01 AC-228 1.16:1: 0.3 12F 10/11/2004 9.39 :1:.92
<O.OS 2.36:1: 1.1 3.17:1: 1.1 AC-228 1.01 :I:.19 LTAW 10/11/2004 1S.3:1: 1.2
<.OS 2.17:1: 1.1 3.15:1: 1.1 AC-228 1.21 :I:.24 1-14 c:'
C"
("
TABLE 1*6 GAMMA
- SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF SHORELINE SEDIMENT SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2004 Results in pCi/gm (dry) +/- 2S LOCATION COLLECTION DATE K-40 Cs-137 Ra-226 TH-228 OTHER ACTIVITY 28 5/24/2004 16.0:1: 2.3
<.11 3.76 :1:2.5 4.92:1: 2.0 AC-228 1.13:1:.46 78 5/24/2004 13.2:1: 2.1
<.09
<1.37
<1.26 AC-228 1.08:1:.39 12F 5/24/2004 10.6:1:.1.6
<.10
<2.0 2.67:1: 1.6 AC-228 1.22:1:.39 LTAW 5/24/2004 14.9:1: 1.9
<.08
<2.1 3.61:1: 1.S AC-228 1.23 :1:.38 28 10/11/2004 13.6:1: 1.1
<.OS 1.99:1:.86
<.S1 AC-228 1.2S:I:.23 78 10111/2004 1S.4:1: 1.2
.10:1:.05 2.60:1: 1.2
<1.01 AC-228 1.16:1: 0.3 12F 10/11/2004 9.39 :1:.92
<O.OS 2.36:1: 1.1 3.17:1: 1.1 AC-228 1.01 :I:.19 LTAW 10/11/2004 1S.3:1: 1.2
<.OS 2.17:1: 1.1 3.15:1: 1.1 AC-228 1.21 :I:.24 1-14
(~.
TABLE TRITIUM AND GAMMA'" SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF GROUND WATER SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC 2004 Results in pCiI1iter +/- 2S LOCATION COLLECTION DATE TRITIUM OTHER ACTIVITY
'12F3 111212004
<123 252 1/1212004
<124 454 Treated 111212004
<124 12F3 219/2004
<133 252 219/2004
<134 454 Treated 219/2004
<133 12F3 3/15/2004 128 +/-72 252 3/15/2004
<120
. 454 Treated 3/15/2004
<120 12F3 4/1212004
<125 252 411212004,
<126 454 Treated 4/1212004
<123 12F3 5110/2004
<132 252 5/10/2004
<132 454 Treated 511012004
<121 12F3 6/14/2004
<119 252 6/14/2004
<131 454 Treated 6/14/2004
<132 12F3 7/1212004
<123 252 7/1212004
<124 454 Treated 711212004
<124 12F3 8/9/2004
<124 252 8/9/2004
<123 454 Treated 8/9/2004
<121 1-15 C"
(~.
c' TABLE I*'
TRITIUM AND GAMMA'" SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF GROUND WATER SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION* 2004 Results in pCiI1iter +/- 2S LOCATION COLLECTION DATE TRITIUM OTHER ACTIVITY
'12F3 111212004
<123 252 1/1212004
<124 454 Treated 111212004
<124 12F3 219/2004
<133 252 219/2004
<134 454 Treated 219/2004
<133 12F3 3/15/2004 128 +/-72 252 3/15/2004
<120
. 454 Treated 3/15/2004
<120 12F3 4/1212004
<125 252 r
411212004,
<126 454 Treated 4/1212004
<123 12F3 5110/2004
<132 252 5/10/2004
<132 454 Treated 511012004
<121 12F3 6/14/2004
<119 252 6/14/2004
<131 454 Treated 6/14/2004
<132 12F3 7/1212004
<123 252 7/1212004
<124 454 Treated 711212004
<124 12F3 8/9/2004
<124 252 8/9/2004
<123 454 Treated 8/9/2004
<121 1-15
TABLE TRITIUM AND GAMMA
- SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF GROUND WATER SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2004
(~
(
TABLE I*'
TRITIUM AND GAMMA
- SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF GROUND WATER SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2004 Results in pCilliter +/- 2S LOCATION COLLECTION DATE TRITIUM OTHER ACTIVITY 12F3 9/1312004
<126 2S2 9/1312004
<126 4S4 Treated 9113/2004
<131 12F3 10/11/2004
<133 2S2 10/11/2004
<133 4S4 Treated 10/11/2004
<132 12F3 11/15/2004
<133 2S2 11/15/2004
<134 4S4 Treated 11/15/2004
<134 12F3 1211312004
<129 2S2 12113/2004
<124 4S4 Treated 1211312004
<104*
- H*3 Sample rerun result
(~..
1*16
COLLECTION MONTH,' DATE JAN 12130/03 -1fl 04 1flI04-.1114/04 1114/04 -1/21/04 1121104 -1/28/04
- 6G1, 13.7 +/- 2.1 16.8 +/- 2.5 6.97 +/- 1.8 14.1 +/- 2.2 FEB 1/28104 - 214/04, 11;4 +/- 2.3 214/04,- 2111/04-- 13.5 +/- 2.3 2111/04. - 2118/04. 20.1 +/- 2.6 2118/04 - 2125/04 21
+/- 2.6,
'~~::\\,-, ~. ~.
MAR 2125/04 - 3/3/04 '
3/3/04.; 3/10/04.',
3/10/04 - 3117/04 3/17/04 - 3/24/04 3/24/04-3/31/04' APR 3/31/04 -:4flI04 4fl 104 - 4114104 4/14/04 - 4/21104 4/21/04 - 4/28/04 MAY 4/28/04 - 5/05/04 5/5104 - 5/12104 5112104 - 5/19/04 5/19/04 - 5/26/04 I
, t'
JUN 05/26/04.; 612104 6/2104 - 6/9/04:
619/04,- 6116/04 6/16/04 - 6/23/04 6/23/04 - 6/30/04 14.9 +/- 2.3 9.7~ +/- 1.9 9.5'.. +/- 2.1; 12.6 :I: 2.1 11~8 :I: 2.2 J
- :-' J 5.7 +/- 2.0 10.7 :I: 2.0 14.5 +/- 2.4 8.2 +/- 2.0 11~4 +/- 2.1 18.2 +/- 2.6 15.0 +/- 2.5 15.7 +/- 2.6 9.2 +/- 2.0 11.0 +/- 2.3 12.4 +/- 2.2 9.8 +/- 2.1 13.0 +/- 2.4 J ~;
T{ ~1*8 GROSS BETA ANALYSFS OF AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC 2004 Results in E-03 pCilCu. M. +/- 2S
',8G1 22.9 £2.5, 15.3' +/-' 2.3' 6.4 +/- 1.6 10.0 +/- 2~1 14.2 +/- 2.3 11.9 +/- 2.2 21.2 +/- 2.7 15.7 +/- 2.4 15.3 +/- 2.4
+/- 1~9 10.6 :1:'2.2 11.6 +/- 2.1 13.2 +/- 2.3 4;4', +/- 2:0 11~8 +/-'2.0 16.1 +/- 2.5 8.0 +/- 2.0 12.7 +/- 2.2 19.5 +/- 2.7 13.4 +/- 2.4 13.3 +/- 2.5 13.0 +/- 2.3 10.7 +/- 2.3 11.5 +/- 2.1 10.7 +/- 2.2 12.5 +/- 2.3 352 17.0 £2.3 18.8;+/-'2.6 9.2 +/- 1.9 13.4 £2Ji 15.4 +/- 2.3 15.4 +/- 2.3 20.5 +/- 2.8 24.2 +/- 2.9 17.7, +/- 2.5 12.2 +/- 2.2 12.9 £2.4 10.5 +/- 2.1 12.7, :1:'2.3 4.4: +/- 2.0 12.2 +/- 2.1' 16.4 +/- 2.6 9.8 +/- 2.2 13.9 +/- 2.3 17.2 +/- 2.7 17.8 +/- 2,6 15.0 +/-'2.4 10.5 +/- 2.0 11.1 +/- 2.2 11.9 +/- 2.1 10.7 +/- 2.1 12.1 +/- 2.2 12E1 17.2 +/-2.2 18.3', +/- 2.0 9.4 +/- 1.8 14.T +/-'2.4 12S1:,
17.6 +/- 2.2 20.3 +/- 2.5' 9.4 +/- 1.9 14.5 +/- 2:3 12.8 +/- 2.2,
. 13.6, +/- 2.3 15.1' +/- 2.4 15.7 +/- 2.5 21.6 +/- 2.7 19.0 +/- 2.6 22.2 +/- 2.7 21.3 +/- 2.7 17.1, +/- 2.4 12.4 +/- 2.1:
10.8 +/- 2.2 12.0 +/- 2.2 14.4' +/- 2.4 6.5 +/- 2.2 14.8 +/- 2.3 15.2 +/- 2.5 10.8 +/- 2.1 11.2 +/- 2.1 17.8 +/- 2.7 13.9 +/- 2.2 12.7 +/- 2.2 9.8 +/- 1.9 12.0 +/- 2.1 10.9 +/- 1.9 11.7 +/- 2.1 13.2,+/- 2.2 14.4 +/- 2.3 12.6 +/- 2.1:
11.8 +/- 2.2 13.9 +/- 2.2 12.5 £2.2 3.5 :t: 2 11.5 :t: 2.0 15.5 :t: 2.5 10.0 +/- 2.2 12.9 +/- 2.2 17.1 +/- 2.5 17.1 :t:2.6 13.2 :t: 2.4 9.7 i :t: 2.0 12.4 :t: 2.3 11.8 +/- 2.1 8.5 +/- 2.1 12.7 +/- 2.4
, 13S6 16.7,+/- 2.2 19.8 :t: 2.6 8.6 +/- 1.9 11.9 +/- 2.0 12.2 +/- 2.1 14.4 +/- 2.3 19.2 +/- 2.7 19.9 +/- 2.7 14.9 +/- 2.4, 11.2 +/- 2.1 9:6 +/- 2.2 12.8 +/- 2.3 15.7 +/- 2.5 3.9 :t: 2.1 11.0 +/- 2.1 14.2 +/- 2.3 9.9 +/- 2.1 12.3 +/- 2.0 18.6 +/- 2.7 15.8 +/- 2.5 13.0 :t: 2.4 9.2 +/- 2.0 9.7 +/- 2.1 14.3 +/- 2.3 10.7 +/- 2.2 14.7. +/- 2.4 COMMENTS
(
COLLECTION MONTH,' DATE JAN 12130/03 -1fl 04 1flI04-.1114/04 1114/04 -1/21/04 1121104 -1/28/04 I 6G1, :
13.7 +/- 2.1 16.8 +/- 2.5 6.97 +/- 1.8 14.1 +/- 2.2 FEB 1/28104 - 214/04, 11;4 +/- 2.3 214/04,- 2111/04-- 13.5 +/- 2.3 2111/04. - 2118/04. 20.1 +/- 2.6 2118/04 - 2125/04 21
+/- 2.6,
'~~::\\,-, ~. ~.
MAR 2125/04 - 3/3/04 '
3/3/04.; 3/10/04.',
3/10/04 - 3117/04 3/17/04 - 3/24/04 3/24/04-3/31/04' APR 3/31/04 -:4flI04 4fl 104 - 4114104 4/14/04 - 4/21104 4/21/04 - 4/28/04 MAY 4/28/04 - 5/05/04 5/5104 - 5/12104 5112104 - 5/19/04 5/19/04 - 5/26/04 I
, t'
JUN 05/26/04.; 612104 6/2104 - 6/9/04:
619/04,- 6116/04 6/16/04 - 6/23/04 6/23/04 - 6/30/04 14.9 +/- 2.3 9.7~ +/- 1.9 9.5'.. +/- 2.1; 12.6 :I: 2.1 11~8 :I: 2.2 J
- :-' J 5.7 +/- 2.0 10.7 :I: 2.0 14.5 +/- 2.4 8.2 +/- 2.0 11~4 +/- 2.1 18.2 +/- 2.6 15.0 +/- 2.5 15.7 +/- 2.6 9.2 +/- 2.0 11.0 +/- 2.3 12.4 +/- 2.2 9.8 +/- 2.1 13.0 +/- 2.4 J ~;
T{ ~1*8 GROSS BETA ANALYSFS OF AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION* 2004 Results in E-03 pCilCu. M. +/- 2S
',8G1 22.9 £2.5, 15.3' +/-' 2.3' 6.4 +/- 1.6 10.0 +/- 2~1 14.2 +/- 2.3 11.9 +/- 2.2 21.2 +/- 2.7 15.7 +/- 2.4 15.3 +/- 2.4 9.4* +/- 1~9 10.6 :1:'2.2 11.6 +/- 2.1 13.2 +/- 2.3 4;4', +/- 2:0 11~8 +/-'2.0 16.1 +/- 2.5 8.0 +/- 2.0 12.7 +/- 2.2 19.5 +/- 2.7 13.4 +/- 2.4 13.3 +/- 2.5 13.0 +/- 2.3 10.7 +/- 2.3 11.5 +/- 2.1 10.7 +/- 2.2 12.5 +/- 2.3 352 17.0 £2.3 18.8;+/-'2.6 9.2 +/- 1.9 13.4 £2Ji 15.4 +/- 2.3 15.4 +/- 2.3 20.5 +/- 2.8 24.2 +/- 2.9 17.7, +/- 2.5 12.2 +/- 2.2 12.9 £2.4 10.5 +/- 2.1 12.7, :1:'2.3 4.4: +/- 2.0 12.2 +/- 2.1' 16.4 +/- 2.6 9.8 +/- 2.2 13.9 +/- 2.3 17.2 +/- 2.7 17.8 +/- 2,6 15.0 +/-'2.4 10.5 +/- 2.0 11.1 +/- 2.2 11.9 +/- 2.1 10.7 +/- 2.1 12.1 +/- 2.2 12E1 17.2 +/-2.2 18.3', +/- 2.0 9.4 +/- 1.8 14.T +/-'2.4 12S1:,
17.6 +/- 2.2 20.3 +/- 2.5' 9.4 +/- 1.9 14.5 +/- 2:3 12.8 +/- 2.2,
. 13.6, +/- 2.3 15.1' +/- 2.4 15.7 +/- 2.5 21.6 +/- 2.7 19.0 +/- 2.6 22.2 +/- 2.7 21.3 +/- 2.7 17.1, +/- 2.4 12.4 +/- 2.1:
10.8 +/- 2.2 12.0 +/- 2.2 14.4' +/- 2.4 6.5 +/- 2.2 14.8 +/- 2.3 15.2 +/- 2.5 10.8 +/- 2.1 11.2 +/- 2.1 17.8 +/- 2.7 13.9 +/- 2.2 12.7 +/- 2.2 9.8 +/- 1.9 12.0 +/- 2.1 10.9 +/- 1.9 11.7 +/- 2.1 13.2,+/- 2.2 14.4 +/- 2.3 12.6 +/- 2.1:
11.8 +/- 2.2 13.9 +/- 2.2 12.5 £2.2 3.5 :t: 2 11.5 :t: 2.0 15.5 :t: 2.5 10.0 +/- 2.2 12.9 +/- 2.2 17.1 +/- 2.5 17.1 :t:2.6 13.2 :t: 2.4 9.7 i :t: 2.0 12.4 :t: 2.3 11.8 +/- 2.1 8.5 +/- 2.1 12.7 +/- 2.4
, 13S6 16.7,+/- 2.2 19.8 :t: 2.6 8.6 +/- 1.9 11.9 +/- 2.0 12.2 +/- 2.1 14.4 +/- 2.3 19.2 +/- 2.7 19.9 +/- 2.7 14.9 +/- 2.4, 11.2 +/- 2.1 9:6 +/- 2.2 12.8 +/- 2.3 15.7 +/- 2.5 3.9 :t: 2.1 11.0 +/- 2.1 14.2 +/- 2.3 9.9 +/- 2.1 12.3 +/- 2.0 18.6 +/- 2.7 15.8 +/- 2.5 13.0 :t: 2.4 9.2 +/- 2.0 9.7 +/- 2.1 14.3 +/- 2.3 10.7 +/- 2.2 14.7. +/- 2.4 c
COMMENTS 1*11
TABLE 1-8 GROSS BETA ANALYSES OF AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECfRIC STATION - 2004 Results in E-03 pCilCu. M. +/- 2S COLLECTION MONTH DATE 6G1 8G1 3S2 12El 12Sl l3S6 COMMENTS JUL 6/30/04
- 7 n 104 16.2 +/- 2.5 15.1 +/- 2.5 16.4 +/- 2.5 16.5 +/- 2.4 16.1 :t 2.6 13.6 :t 2.4 7fll04 - 7114/04 6.0 +/- 1.9 8.3 +/- 2.0 7.1 +/- 2.0 8.0 +/- 2.0 7.6 :t 2.0 7.6 :t 2.0 7/14/04 - 7/21/04 12.8 +/- 2.3 12.9 +/- 2.3 12.2 +/- 2.2 12.0 +/- 2.1 13.0 :t 2.3 11.4 +/- 2.2 7/21/04 - 7/28/04 12.4 +/- 2.3 13.9 +/- 2.3 14.0 +/- 2.2 15.1 +/- 2.3 13.5 +/- 2.3 17.1 +/- 2.5 AUG 7/28/04 - 8/4104 14.5 +/- 2.3 12.3 :t 2.1 13.3 :t 2.1 14.5 :t 2.2 12.4 :t 2.1 16.3 +/- 2.4 8/4/04 - 8/11104 14.0 :t 2.3 14.4 +/- 2.3 13.9 +/- 2.2 36.6 +/- 3.2 12.3 :t 2.2 12.8 +/- 2.3 8/11/04 - 8/18/04 13.7 +/- 2.2 15.0 :t 2.3 13.1 +/- 2.1 '
14.7 +/- 2.2 15.6 ::I:: 2.3 14.0 +/- 2.3 8/18/04 - 8125104 18.1 +/- 2.7 19.2 +/- 2.6 18.3 +/- 2.5 13.7 +/- 2.3 18.9 +/- 2.7 19.4 +/- 2.8 8/25/04 - 9/1104, 13,1 +/- 2.3 12.2 :t 2.2 14.0 +/- 2.2 13.8 :t 2.2 15.5 ::I:: 2.4 14.2 +/- 2.4 SEP 9/1104 - 9/8/04 12.3 +/- 2.3 13.7 +/- 2.4 13.5 +/- 2.2 14.0 +/- 2.3 12.3 ::I:: 2.2 15.4 +/- 2.6 9/8104 - 9115/04 10.6 +/- ###
11.2 :t 2.1 10.1 :t 2.0 9.4 :t 1.9 10.7 :t2.1 9.7 +/- 2.1 9/15/04 - 9/22104 9.9 +/- 2.1 9.6 +/- 2.0 9.9 +/- 2.1 9.8 +/-2.0 11.9 +/- 2.1 11.6 +/- 2.4 9/22104 - 9/29/04 20.9 +/- 2.7 18.0 :t 2.4 23.0 +/- 2.9 22.2 +/- 2.6 22.2 :t 2.6 20.4 +/- 2.6 OCT 9/29/04 - 10/6/04 14.0 :t 2.2 13.2 +/- 2.3 13.1 +/- 2.3 15.2 :t 2.3 12.6 :t 2.1 13.1 ::I:: 2.2 1 016104 ~ 10/13104 19.6 :t 2.6 19.9 :t 2.7 21.7 :t 2.8 18.9 :t 2.6 18.1 :t 2.4 22.4 :t 2.8 10/13/04 - 10/20/04 9.4 +/- 2.1 9.8 +/- 2.1 10.4 :t 2.2 10.7 +/- 2.1 12.0 ::I:: 2.1 11.2 +/- 2.3 10/20/04 - 10/27/04 7.2 +/- 1.9 10.8 ::I:: 2.2 8.2 :t 2.0 10.0 +/- 2.0 9.6 :t 1.9 10.2 +/- 2.2 NOV 10/27/04 -11/03 04 10.9 +/- 2.1 12.9 ::I:: 2.3 14.1 ::I:: 2.5 14.7 :t 2.4 15.0 ::I:: 2.6 13.2 +/- 2.3 11/3104 - 11/10/04 12.1
- I:: 2.3 12.0 ::I:: 2.3 12.3 :t 2.3 11.0 +/- 2.1 12.7 +/- 2.4 10.4 +/- 2.2 11110104 -11117/04 10.7 +/- 2.0 14.5 +/- 2.3 16.7 +/- 2.4 14.5 +/- 2.3 16.9 :t 2.5 17.2 +/- 2.4 11/17104 -11/24/04 16.8 +/- 2.5 17.2 +/- 2.6 20.4 +/- 2.8 21.5 +/- 2.8 24.1 +/- 3.0 22.8 +/- 2.9 11/24104 -1211104 10.4 +/- 2.1 9.3 +/- 2.1 8.6 +/- 2.1 10.2 +/- 2.1 8.1
+/- 2.1 9.0 +/- 2.1 DEC 1211104 - 1218104 14.1 +/- 2.2 14.8 +/- 2.3 16.2 +/- 2.4 16.6 :t'2.4 15.0 :t 2.4 15.9 :t: 2.4 1218/04 - 12115/04 7.6 :t 1.8 9.0 :t 2.0 7.6 :t 1.9 7.9 :t ll.9 8.5 :t 2.0 9.7 +/- 2.1 12115/04 -12121/04 13.7 +/- 2.4 15.4 +/- g.5 14.9 :t 2.5 15.5 :t: 2.5 16.7 :t 2.6 15.2 :t: 2.5 12121104 -12128104 12.3 :t: 2.2 13.5 :t 2.2 13.7 :t 2.3 13.8 :t'2.3 13.3 :t 2.3 13.3 :t 2.3' TABLE 1-8 GROSS BETA ANALYSES OF AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECfRIC STATION - 2004 Results in E-03 pCilCu. M. +/- 2S COLLECTION MONTH DATE 6G1 8G1 3S2 12El 12Sl l3S6 COMMENTS JUL 6/30/04
- 7 n 104 16.2 +/- 2.5 15.1 +/- 2.5 16.4 +/- 2.5 16.5 +/- 2.4 16.1 :t 2.6 13.6 :t 2.4 7fll04 - 7114/04 6.0 +/- 1.9 8.3 +/- 2.0 7.1 +/- 2.0 8.0 +/- 2.0 7.6 :t 2.0 7.6 :t 2.0 7/14/04 - 7/21/04 12.8 +/- 2.3 12.9 +/- 2.3 12.2 +/- 2.2 12.0 +/- 2.1 13.0 :t 2.3 11.4 +/- 2.2 7/21/04 - 7/28/04 12.4 +/- 2.3 13.9 +/- 2.3 14.0 +/- 2.2 15.1 +/- 2.3 13.5 +/- 2.3 17.1 +/- 2.5 AUG 7/28/04 - 8/4104 14.5 +/- 2.3 12.3 :t 2.1 13.3 :t 2.1 14.5 :t 2.2 12.4 :t 2.1 16.3 +/- 2.4 8/4/04 - 8/11104 14.0 :t 2.3 14.4 +/- 2.3 13.9 +/- 2.2 36.6 +/- 3.2 12.3 :t 2.2 12.8 +/- 2.3 8/11/04 - 8/18/04 13.7 +/- 2.2 15.0 :t 2.3 13.1 +/- 2.1 '
14.7 +/- 2.2 15.6 ::I:: 2.3 14.0 +/- 2.3 8/18/04 - 8125104 18.1 +/- 2.7 19.2 +/- 2.6 18.3 +/- 2.5 13.7 +/- 2.3 18.9 +/- 2.7 19.4 +/- 2.8 8/25/04 - 9/1104, 13,1 +/- 2.3 12.2 :t 2.2 14.0 +/- 2.2 13.8 :t 2.2 15.5 ::I:: 2.4 14.2 +/- 2.4 SEP 9/1104 - 9/8/04 12.3 +/- 2.3 13.7 +/- 2.4 13.5 +/- 2.2 14.0 +/- 2.3 12.3 ::I:: 2.2 15.4 +/- 2.6 9/8104 - 9115/04 10.6 +/- ###
11.2 :t 2.1 10.1 :t 2.0 9.4 :t 1.9 10.7 :t2.1 9.7 +/- 2.1 9/15/04 - 9/22104 9.9 +/- 2.1 9.6 +/- 2.0 9.9 +/- 2.1 9.8 +/-2.0 11.9 +/- 2.1 11.6 +/- 2.4 9/22104 - 9/29/04 20.9 +/- 2.7 18.0 :t 2.4 23.0 +/- 2.9 22.2 +/- 2.6 22.2 :t 2.6 20.4 +/- 2.6 OCT 9/29/04 - 10/6/04 14.0 :t 2.2 13.2 +/- 2.3 13.1 +/- 2.3 15.2 :t 2.3 12.6 :t 2.1 13.1 ::I:: 2.2 1 016104 ~ 10/13104 19.6 :t 2.6 19.9 :t 2.7 21.7 :t 2.8 18.9 :t 2.6 18.1 :t 2.4 22.4 :t 2.8 10/13/04 - 10/20/04 9.4 +/- 2.1 9.8 +/- 2.1 10.4 :t 2.2 10.7 +/- 2.1 12.0 ::I:: 2.1 11.2 +/- 2.3 10/20/04 - 10/27/04 7.2 +/- 1.9 10.8 ::I:: 2.2 8.2 :t 2.0 10.0 +/- 2.0 9.6 :t 1.9 10.2 +/- 2.2 NOV 10/27/04 -11/03 04 10.9 +/- 2.1 12.9 ::I:: 2.3 14.1 ::I:: 2.5 14.7 :t 2.4 15.0 ::I:: 2.6 13.2 +/- 2.3 11/3104 - 11/10/04 12.1
- I:: 2.3 12.0 ::I:: 2.3 12.3 :t 2.3 11.0 +/- 2.1 12.7 +/- 2.4 10.4 +/- 2.2 11110104 -11117/04 10.7 +/- 2.0 14.5 +/- 2.3 16.7 +/- 2.4 14.5 +/- 2.3 16.9 :t 2.5 17.2 +/- 2.4 11/17104 -11/24/04 16.8 +/- 2.5 17.2 +/- 2.6 20.4 +/- 2.8 21.5 +/- 2.8 24.1 +/- 3.0 22.8 +/- 2.9 11/24104 -1211104 10.4 +/- 2.1 9.3 +/- 2.1 8.6 +/- 2.1 10.2 +/- 2.1 8.1
+/- 2.1 9.0 +/- 2.1 DEC 1211104 - 1218104 14.1 +/- 2.2 14.8 +/- 2.3 16.2 +/- 2.4 16.6 :t'2.4 15.0 :t 2.4 15.9 :t: 2.4 1218/04 - 12115/04 7.6 :t 1.8 9.0 :t 2.0 7.6 :t 1.9 7.9 :t ll.9 8.5 :t 2.0 9.7 +/- 2.1 12115/04 -12121/04 13.7 +/- 2.4 15.4 +/- g.5 14.9 :t 2.5 15.5 :t: 2.5 16.7 :t 2.6 15.2 :t: 2.5 12121104 -12128104 12.3 :t: 2.2 13.5 :t 2.2 13.7 :t 2.3 13.8 :t'2.3 13.3 :t 2.3 13.3 :t 2.3'
(*18 c
(
ThLEI.9 GAMMA'" SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF COMPOSITED AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECfRIC STATION - 2004 Results in E-03 pCi/Cu. M. +/- 2S ACTIVITY C
ThLEI.9
(
GAMMA'" SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF COMPOSITED AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECfRIC STATION - 2004 Results in E-03 pCi/Cu. M. +/- 2S LOCATION COLLECTION DATE Be-7 K*40 OTHER ACTIVITY 6G1 12130/03
- 3/31/04 80.2:t9.25
<3.19 8G1 12130/03*3/31/04 73.6:t8.57
<2.36 382 12130/03
- 3/31/04 78.3 :t3.S
<0.94 12E1 12130/03*3/31/04 89.4:t 11.1
<4.63 1281 12130103
- 3/31/04 77.4 :t4.79
<3.79 1386 12130103
- 3/31104 79.3:t3.40
<1.84 6G1 3/31/04*6/30/04 105:t 12.6
<6.62 8G1 3/31/04*6/30104 109:t 13.3
<6.68 382 3/31/04*6/30/04 132:t 16.2
<10.7 12E1 3/31/04*6/30/04 116:t 13.3
<8.96 12S1 3/31/04*6/30/04 120:t 18.5
<13.9 13S6 3/31/04*6/30/04 108+/- 17.4
<11.5 6G1 6/30/04 - 9/29/04 89.3 +/- 11.6
<9.32 8G1 6/30/04
- 9129104 91.5:t 10.8
<4.28 382 6/30/04
- 9129104 9S.3:t 10.9
<3.95 12E1 6/30/04
- 9/29/04 93.1 :t 11.6
<3.27 1281 6/30/04
- 9/29/04 99.7:t 10.2
<5.48 1386 6/30/04
- 9/29/04 56.8:t 11.1
<10.3 6G1 9/29/04 - 12128/04 78.5:t 14.3
<10.9 8G1 9/29/04 - 12128/04 75.5:t 11.6
<7.81 382 9/29/04
- 12128/04 74.8:t 16.1
<14.3 12E1 9/29/04 - 12128104 83.1 +/- 12.2
<2.79 12S1 9/29/04
- 12128/04 81.9:t 13.5
<10.5 13S6 9/29/04 - 12128/04 75.9 :t 12.0
<10.2 1*19
LOCATION 10Gl 1001 1002 12B2 10Gl 100'1 1002 1282 10G1 1001 1002 1282 l'O"G1 1001 1002 1282 10G"1 1001 1002 1282 10Gl 100"1 1002 1282" 10G1 TABLE IODINE-I3I, AND GAMMA'" SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF MILK SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2004 COLLECTION DATE 01/05/04 01/05/04 01/05/04 01105104 02103/04 02103164 02103/04 02103/04 03/08/04
'03108/04
'03/08/04
'03iOB/04
'o4i05/04 04/05104 04/05/04 04/05/04 04i1'9/04
'04119/04 04/19/04 04119104
'05103/0'4
'05/03/04 05103104 05/03/04' 05/19/04 Results in pCiniter +/- 2S K-40 1420 +/- 160 1320 +/- 130 1350 +/- 140 1420 +/- 160 1460 % 110 1350 % 130 1380 % 150 1440 % 110 1620;';150 1470:i: 150 1420"% '140 1530 % 140 1480 % '110 1440 % 110 13'60 % 110 1440 % 160 1460 % 140 1460 +/- 140 f 440 %160.
1540% -140 1440 % 110 1480 +/-:110 1250 +/-: 120 1500 +/- 160 1520 % 170 OTHER ACTIVITY COMMENTS c
LOCATION 10Gl 1001 1002 12B2 10Gl 100'1 1002 1282 10G1 1001 1002 1282 l'O"G1 1001 1002 1282 10G"1 1001 1002 1282 10Gl 100"1 1002..
1282",
10G1
(
TABLE 1*10 IODINE-I3I, AND GAMMA'" SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF MILK SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2004 COLLECTION DATE 01/05/04 01/05/04 01/05/04 01105104 02103/04 02103164 02103/04 02103/04 03/08/04
'03108/04
'03/08/04
'03iOB/04
'o4i05/04 04/05104 04/05/04 04/05/04 04i1'9/04
'04119/04 04/19/04 04119104
'05103/0'4
'05/03/04 05103104 05/03/04' 05/19/04 Results in pCiniter +/- 2S K-40 1420 +/- 160 1320 +/- 130 1350 +/- 140 1420 +/- 160 1460 % 110 1350 % 130 1380 % 150 1440 % 110 1620;';150 1470:i: 150 1420"% '140 1530 % 140 1480 % '110 1440 % 110 13'60 % 110 1440 % 160 1460 % 140 1460 +/- 140 f 440 %160.
1540% -140 1440 % 110 1480 +/-:110 1250 +/-: 120 -.
1500 +/- 160 1520 % 170 OTHER ACTIVITY COMMENTS c
TABLE IODINE-131, AND GAMMA
- SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF MILK SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECfRlC 2004 Results in
+/- 2S LOCATION 1001 1002 1282 10Gl 1001 1002 1282 10Gl 1001 1002 1282 10Gl 1001 1002 1282 10G1 1001 1002 1282
(
TABLE 1*10 IODINE-131, AND GAMMA
- SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF MILK SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECfRlC STATION* 2004 Results in pCilliter +/- 2S COLLECTION DATE K-4O OTHER ACTIVITY COMMENTS 05119/04 1550 +/- 150 05/19/04 1380 +/- 130 05119104 1460 +/- 130 06/03/04 1520 +/- 110 06/03/04 1430 +/- 130 06/03/04 1450 +/- 130 06/03/04 1510 +/- 130 06/20/04 1467 +/ 06/20/04 1370 +/- 110 06/20/04 1150+/- 120
- Refer to Appendix A for exceptions 06/20/04 1430 +/- 130 07/06/04 1350 +/- 150 07/06/04 1520+/- 140 07/06/04 1250 +/- 140 07/06/04 1450 +/- 160 07119104 1430 +/- 190 07119/04 1220 +/- 190 07119/04 1410+/- 160 07119/04 1350 +/- 150
(
(
10G1 1001 1002 1282 10G1 1001 1002 1282 10G1 1001 1002 1282 10<31 1001 1002 1282 1001 1002 1282 TABLE IODINE-131, AND GAMMA'" SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF MILK SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2004 Results in pCilliter +/- 2S OTHER ACTIVITY COMMENTS
- Refer to Appendix A for exceptions
- Refer to Appendix A for exceptions "Refer to Appendix A for exceptions c
LOCATION 10G1 1001 1002 1282 10G1 1001 1002 1282 10G1 1001 1002 1282 10<31 1001 1002 1282 10(3'1 1001 1002 1282
( "
TABLE 1*10 IODINE-131, AND GAMMA'" SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF MILK SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2004 Results in pCilliter +/- 2S OTHER ACTIVITY COMMENTS
- Refer to Appendix A for exceptions
- Refer to Appendix A for exceptions "Refer to Appendix A for exceptions 1*22
LOCATION 10Gl 1001 1002 12B2 10Gl 1001 1002 12B2 10Gl 1001 1002 12B2
(,
TABLE AND GAMMA'" SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF MILK SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELEcrRIC STATION - 2004 Results in pCUliter +/- 2S COLLECTION DATE K-40 OTHER ACTIVITY COMMENTS 10/18104 1370:t 110 10/18104 1460:t 130 10/18104 1310:t 150 10/18/04 1210:t 120 11/08/04 1580:t 160 11/08/04 1420:t 160 11/08104 1370:t 160 11108/04 1360:t 150 12106104 1460:t 130 12106104 1570:t 140 12106104 1360:t 130 12106104 1300:t 120
(
(
1-23 r
LOCATION 10Gl 1001 1002 12B2 10Gl 1001 1002 12B2 10Gl 1001 1002 12B2
(,
TABLE 1*10 IODlNE*131, AND GAMMA'" SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF MILK SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELEcrRIC STATION - 2004 Results in pCUliter +/- 2S COLLECTION DATE K-40 OTHER ACTIVITY COMMENTS 10/18104 1370:t 110 10/18104 1460:t 130 10/18104 1310:t 150 10/18/04 1210:t 120 11/08/04 1580:t 160 11/08/04 1420:t 160 11/08104 1370:t 160 11108/04 1360:t 150 12106104 1460:t 130 12106104 1570:t 140 12106104 1360:t 130 12106104 1300:t 120
(
(
1-23 r
c
(
(
TABLE 1.11 SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF SOIL SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2004 Results in pCifgm (dry) +/- 25 LOCATION COLLECTION DATE K-40 Cs-137 Th-228 8G1TOP 9/15/2004 10.4 +/- 1.3 0.14+/-.06 0.77 +/-.15 8G1BOT 9115/2004 8.1 +/-.61 0.078+/-.028 0.B4+/-.08 3S2TOP 9/15/2004 13.9 +/- 1.1 0.07B+/-.041 0.98 +/-.12 3S2BOT 9/15/2004 14.1 +/- 1.1
<.OB 1.01 +/-.12 12S1 TOP 9/15/2004 12.4 +/-.95.
<.05 0.77 +/-.11 12S1 BOT 911512004 12.0 +/-0.82
<.04 0.88 +/-.09 13SBTOP 9/15/2004 18.5 +/- 1.0
<.05 1.18 +/-.19 13SB BOT 9/15/2004 1B.0+/-.03
<.06
<.23 1-24 c
(
(
TABLE 1.11 GAMMA* SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF SOIL SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION - 2004 Results in pCifgm (dry) +/- 25 LOCATION COLLECTION DATE K-40 Cs-137 Th-228 8G1TOP 9/15/2004 10.4 +/- 1.3 0.14+/-.06 0.77 +/-.15 8G1BOT 9115/2004 8.1 +/-.61 0.078+/-.028 0.B4+/-.08 3S2TOP 9/15/2004 13.9 +/- 1.1 0.07B+/-.041 0.98 +/-.12 3S2BOT 9/15/2004 14.1 +/- 1.1
<.OB 1.01 +/-.12 12S1 TOP 9/15/2004 12.4 +/-.95.
<.05 0.77 +/-.11 12S1 BOT 911512004 12.0 +/-0.82
<.04 0.88 +/-.09 13SBTOP 9/15/2004 18.5 +/- 1.0
<.05 1.18 +/-.19 13SB BOT 9/15/2004 1B.0+/-.03
<.06
<.23 1-24
(
(
TABLE GAMMA* SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF FOOD PRODUCTS (FRUITS AND VEGETABLES)
SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELEcrRIC STATION - 2004 Results in pCi/gm (wet) +/- 2S LOCATION SAMPLE TYPE COLLECTION DATE OTHER ACTIVITY
. 12F7 Potato 09/01/04 3.95 :f:.28
(
(
(
TABLE 1*12 GAMMA* SPECTROSCOPIC ANALYSES OF FOOD PRODUCTS (FRUITS AND VEGETABLES)
SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELEcrRIC STATION - 2004 Results in pCi/gm (wet) +/- 2S LOCATION SAMPLE TYPE COLLECTION DATE K*40 OTHER ACTIVITY
. 12F7 Potato 09/01/04 3.95 :f:.28
(
1*25
(
(
TABLE J.l3 TYPICA'~ MINIMUM DETECTABLE CONCENTRATIONS OF NUCLIDES SEARCHED FOR BUT NOT FOUND BY GAMMA SPECTROMETRY IN TIlE VICINITY OF SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION. 1004 Fish Sediment Surface Water Ground Water Potable Water Nuclide (pef/g wet)
(pel/g dry)
(pCIn)
(pCIn)
(pCIn)
Mn-54 0.019 0.028 2.9 4.1 1.7 Co-58 0.023 0.035 2.1 4.6 1.8 Fe-59 0.050 0.110 5.1 10.2 8.3 Co-60 0.015 0.028 3.3 5.3 2.5 Zn-65 0.028 0.071 7.8 14.4 6.7 Zr-95 0.020 0.070 6.4 7.8 5.4 Nb-95 N/A N/A 4.3 5.8 3.2 Ru-l03 N/A N/A 4.9 5.3 2.6 1-131 0.100 0.173 15.4 8.1 13.2 Cs-134 0.010 0.032 2.3 5.2 2.6 Cs-137 0.015 0.033 2.4 4.8 2.5 8a-140 0.300 0.310 7.8 9.0 9.2 La-140 0.040 0.100 12.1 10.1 10.2 Ce-141 N/A N/A 6.8 7.8 6.8 Air Particulate Milk FrulUVeg.
Soli Nuclide (E-3 pCi/m3)
(peln)
(pel/g wet)
(pCI/g dry)
Mn-54 0.33 5.5 0.008 0.037 Co-58 0.51 5.1 0.008 0.039 Fe-59 2.31 12.4 0.032 0.993 Co-60 0.28 5.7 0.009 0.055 Zn-65 0.75 13.4 0.025 0.176 Zr-95 0.88 7.7 0.016 0.995 Nb-95 N/A 6.1 N/A.
0.071 Ru-l03 N/A 5.2 N/A 0.051 1-131 70.3 8.2 0.019 0.097 Cs-134 0.27 4.8 0.OQ7 0.057 Cs-137 0.29 4.4 0.068 0.047 8a-140 36.2 6.7 0.055 0.255 La-140 11.5 7.8 0.016 0.11 Ce-141 N/A 8.1 N/A 0.078
(
1-26
(
(
TABLE J.l3 TYPICA'~ MINIMUM DETECTABLE CONCENTRATIONS OF NUCLIDES SEARCHED FOR BUT NOT FOUND BY GAMMA SPECTROMETRY IN TIlE VICINITY OF SUSQUEHANNA STEAM ELECTRIC STATION. 1004 Fish Sediment Surface Water Ground Water Potable Water Nuclide (pef/g wet)
(pel/g dry)
(pCIn)
(pCIn)
(pCIn)
Mn-54 0.019 0.028 2.9 4.1 1.7 Co-58 0.023 0.035 2.1 4.6 1.8 Fe-59 0.050 0.110 5.1 10.2 8.3 Co-60 0.015 0.028 3.3 5.3 2.5 Zn-65 0.028 0.071 7.8 14.4 6.7 Zr-95 0.020 0.070 6.4 7.8 5.4 Nb-95 N/A N/A 4.3 5.8 3.2 Ru-l03 N/A N/A 4.9 5.3 2.6 1-131 0.100 0.173 15.4 8.1 13.2 Cs-134 0.010 0.032 2.3 5.2 2.6 Cs-137 0.015 0.033 2.4 4.8 2.5 8a-140 0.300 0.310 7.8 9.0 9.2 La-140 0.040 0.100 12.1 10.1 10.2 Ce-141 N/A N/A 6.8 7.8 6.8 Air Particulate Milk FrulUVeg.
Soli Nuclide (E-3 pCi/m3)
(peln)
(pel/g wet)
(pCI/g dry)
Mn-54 0.33 5.5 0.008 0.037 Co-58 0.51 5.1 0.008 0.039 Fe-59 2.31 12.4 0.032 0.993 Co-60 0.28 5.7 0.009 0.055 Zn-65 0.75 13.4 0.025 0.176 Zr-95 0.88 7.7 0.016 0.995 Nb-95 N/A 6.1 N/A.
0.071 Ru-l03 N/A 5.2 N/A 0.051 1-131 70.3 8.2 0.019 0.097 Cs-134 0.27 4.8 0.OQ7 0.057 Cs-137 0.29 4.4 0.068 0.047 8a-140 36.2 6.7 0.055 0.255 La-140 11.5 7.8 0.016 0.11 Ce-141 N/A 8.1 N/A 0.078
(
1-26
\\
~
APPENDIXJ 2004 Radiological Em'ironmcntal Monitoring Report J-l
\\
~
APPENDIXJ 2004 Radiological Em'ironmcntal Monitoring Report J-l
Appendix J The data in the tables that foll~w show how well Frarnatome ANP Environmental Laboratory and Teledyne Brown Engineering Envirorimental SerViCes'(TBE) performed in the analysis of radioactively spiked media. Tables J~l through J~5 provide the performance results for FraImitome ANP.' Tables J.6through 'J-10'provide the performance results for TBE. In addition to' the AnaI.Ytjcs~spikes analyz.ed as part ofPPL'sREMP Laboratory Spike Piogrrim (Tables J-3 and J-8);Framatome ANP and TBE analyzed spikes procured independently from Analytics as '
part of their resp'ective Quality Control Spike Programs (Tables J-2 and J-7), as wellas spikes prepared a's part of the following prognlriis: ".:, 'I::'"
- 1. The Proficiency Testing Program 'of Enviri:;riinentiResource Associates (Tables J-l and 1-6),
1
~ >
~: ~
- <.!. 01.
- 2. The Qua1ity Assessment Program of DOE's Environmental Measurements Laboratory (EML)
, (Tables 1-4, and 1-9)
- ~ ".'.
- 3. The Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP) of the DOE (Tables 1-5 and, 1-10)
It should be noted that program #1 above'only provides spiked water for analyses. 'No other... '
media are included in the spikes provided by this program. Also, it should be noted that the levels of activity in spikes of different media prepared for program #2 tend to be: relatively high.
They are relatively high compared to the levels of activity in the spikes prepared by Analytics as part of its Environmental Cross Check Program and for PPL's REMP Laboratory Spike Program.
The following characteristics are important for the spiked environmental media:
- 1. When practical, the level of activity in. at least, some of the spiked environmental media
, should be within the range between required analysis sensitivities for the SSES REMP and the Reporting Levels, if applicable, of the NRC.
- 2. The spikes should be preserved in a manner as similar as possible to the way that actual samples of those media are prepared.
- 3. The variety of radionuclides with which environmental media are spiked should be as extensive as practica1, incJuding as many as of the activation and fission products that cou1d be detected in the vicinity of the SSES as reasonable.
The spiked environmental media prepared by Analytics according to the requirements of PPL's REMP Laboratory Spike Program are intended to incorporate characteristics #1, #2, and #3 to the greatest degree that is practical.
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report :
J-2 Appendix J The data in the tables that foll~w show how well Frarnatome ANP Environmental Laboratory and Teledyne Brown Engineering Envirorimental SerViCes'(TBE) performed in the analysis of radioactively spiked media. Tables J~l through J~5 provide the performance results for FraImitome ANP.' Tables J.6through 'J-10'provide the performance results for TBE. In addition to' the AnaI.Ytjcs~spikes analyz.ed as part ofPPL'sREMP Laboratory Spike Piogrrim (Tables J-3 and J-8);Framatome ANP and TBE analyzed spikes procured independently from Analytics as '
part of their resp'ective Quality Control Spike Programs (Tables J-2 and J-7), as wellas spikes prepared a's part of the following prognlriis: ".:, 'I::'"
- 1. The Proficiency Testing Program 'of Enviri:;riinentiResource Associates (Tables J-l and 1-6),
1
~ >
~: ~
- <.!. 01.
- 2. The Qua1ity Assessment Program of DOE's Environmental Measurements Laboratory (EML)
, (Tables 1-4, and 1-9)
- ~ ".'.
- 3. The Mixed Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP) of the DOE (Tables 1-5 and, 1-10)
It should be noted that program #1 above'only provides spiked water for analyses. 'No other... '
media are included in the spikes provided by this program. Also, it should be noted that the levels of activity in spikes of different media prepared for program #2 tend to be: relatively high.
They are relatively high compared to the levels of activity in the spikes prepared by Analytics as part of its Environmental Cross Check Program and for PPL's REMP Laboratory Spike Program.
The following characteristics are important for the spiked environmental media:
- 1. When practical, the level of activity in. at least, some of the spiked environmental media
, should be within the range between required analysis sensitivities for the SSES REMP and the Reporting Levels, if applicable, of the NRC.
- 2. The spikes should be preserved in a manner as similar as possible to the way that actual samples of those media are prepared.
- 3. The variety of radionuclides with which environmental media are spiked should be as extensive as practica1, incJuding as many as of the activation and fission products that cou1d be detected in the vicinity of the SSES as reasonable.
The spiked environmental media prepared by Analytics according to the requirements of PPL's REMP Laboratory Spike Program are intended to incorporate characteristics #1, #2, and #3 to the greatest degree that is practical.
2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Report :
J-2
AppendixJ The criteria for the acceptability of the analyses results for the spikes prep~d as part of the PPL REMP Laboratory Spike Program (Tables 1-3 & 1-~) have been established by PPL. They are
\\..-:
based on criteria that were originally developed by the NRC. The NRC bases these criteria on an empirical relationship that combines prior experience and accuracy neeqs. As the resolution of the measurement process improves (relative meas~rement uncertainty becomes smaller), the criteria for detennining acceptability become tighter.,Conversely, as the resolution of the process becomes poorer (relative measurement uncertainty becomes bigger), the criteria are widened.
The criteria for acceptability of DOE programs (EML's and MAPEP's programs - Tables 1-4, I-5,1-9 and 1-10) are based on control limits based on percentiJes of historic data distributions.
Note that comment numbers at the extreme right side of the tables denote unacceptable results in Tables 1-1 through 1-10. Discussions relevant to these comment numbers follow the presentations of the data, as applicable.
Radionuclide concentration results not available (due to curdled milk sample, not acceptable for gamma and I-l3Ilow level analysis) and therefore not included in Table 1-8 for the folJowing:
Analytics Sample Number: E4307-186 (spiked milk).
J-3 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Rep~rt AppendixJ The criteria for the acceptability of the analyses results for the spikes prep~d as part of the PPL REMP Laboratory Spike Program (Tables 1-3 & 1-~) have been established by PPL. They are
\\..-:
based on criteria that were originally developed by the NRC. The NRC bases these criteria on an empirical relationship that combines prior experience and accuracy neeqs. As the resolution of the measurement process improves (relative meas~rement uncertainty becomes smaller), the criteria for detennining acceptability become tighter.,Conversely, as the resolution of the process becomes poorer (relative measurement uncertainty becomes bigger), the criteria are widened.
The criteria for acceptability of DOE programs (EML's and MAPEP's programs - Tables 1-4, I-5,1-9 and 1-10) are based on control limits based on percentiJes of historic data distributions.
Note that comment numbers at the extreme right side of the tables denote unacceptable results in Tables 1-1 through 1-10. Discussions relevant to these comment numbers follow the presentations of the data, as applicable.
Radionuclide concentration results not available (due to curdled milk sample, not acceptable for gamma and I-l3Ilow level analysis) and therefore not included in Table 1-8 for the folJowing:
Analytics Sample Number: E4307-186 (spiked milk).
J-3 2004 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Rep~rt
ENvrnONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOCIA TES (E~A)
- PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM - 2004 FRAMATOME ANP ENvrnONMENTAL SERVICES LABORATORY (page 1 of2)
Identmcatlon ERA Known Framatome FramatomelERA ERA MonthlYear No.
Medium Units Nuclide Result (a)
Results (a)
Ratio Control LImits (b)
Evaluation (a) Results are the average of three measurements, reported in units of pCiJI.
(b) Per guidelines of the EPA'S National Standards for Water Proficiency Testing Criteria Document. December 1998.
J-4 TABLEJ*l ENvrnONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOCIA TES (E~A)
- PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM - 2004 FRAMATOME ANP ENvrnONMENTAL SERVICES LABORATORY (page 1 of2)
Identmcatlon ERA Known Framatome FramatomelERA ERA MonthlYear No.
Medium Units Nuclide Result (a)
Results (a)
Ratio Control LImits (b)
Evaluation May-04 Rad-S7 Water pCiJI Gross Alpha 38.8 34 0.88 22.0-55.6 Acceptable pCin Gross Beta 59.6 57.8 0.97 42.3*76.9 Acceptable pCiJI Tritium 30900 31200 1.01 25600-36200 Acceptable pCiJI Ba-133 101 98.6 0.98 83.5*118 Acceptablo pCiJI Cs*134 50.5 49.8 0.99 41.8-59.2 Acceptable pCiJI Cs*137 82.5 82.4 1.00 73.8-91.2 Acceptable pCiJI Co-60 41.6 40.5 0.97 32.9-50.3 Acceptable pCiJI Zn-6S 75.2 75.6 1.01 62.2-88.2 Acceptable*
pCiJI 1-131 25.1 26.4
- 1.05 19.9-30.3 Acceptable November-04 Rad*S9 Water pCiJI Gross Alpha 31.7 27.7 0.87 18.0-45.4 Acceptable pCiJI Gross Beta 36.3 32.9 0.91 27.6-45.0 Acceptable pCiJI Tritium 20700 21300 1.03
. 17100*24300 Acceptable pCin Ba*133 78.4 76.3 0.97 64.8*92.0 Acceptable pCiJI Cs*134 42.9 42.4 0.99 34.2-51.6 Acceptable pCiJI Cs*137 60.1 61.2 1.02 51.4*68.8 Acceptable pCiJI Co-60 11.7 116 9.91 3.04-20.4 (1) pCiJI Zn*65 50.9 52 1.02 42.1-59.7 Acceptable pCiJI.
1-131
- 22.1 20.2 0.91 16.9-27.3 Acceptable (a) Results are the average of three measurements, reported in units of pCiJI.
(b) Per guidelines of the EPA'S National Standards for Water Proficiency Testing Criteria Document. December 1998.
J-4
TABLEJ-l ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOCIATES (ERA)
PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM - 2004 FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LABORATORY (Page2of2)
COMMENTS
. Analyzed value of 11.6 pCiIl was entered into ERA database as 116 pCiIl.
(
J-S TABLEJ-l ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOCIATES (ERA)
PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM - 2004 FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES LABORATORY (Page2of2)
COMMENTS
. Analyzed value of 11.6 pCiIl was entered into ERA database as 116 pCiIl.
(
J-S
TABLEJ-2 ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 FRAMATOME ANP QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY LL = radiochemical separation analysis TABLEJ-2 ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 FRAMATOME ANP QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY (page 1 of 6)
Analytlcs Framatomel Identification Calculated Framatome Analytlcs QuarterNear No.
Medium Units Nuclide Results Results Ratto 1sV04 E4061-1G2 Milk pCiIl 1-131LL*
n.7 83.G 1.08 pCiIl 1-131 n.7 n.73 1.00 pCiIl Ce-141 85.2 92 1.08 pCIII
' Cr-51 327 314 0.96 pCiIl Cs-134 90 88.7 0.99 pCIII Cs-137.
185 188.6 1.*02 pCiIl Co-58 112 115 1.03 pCiIl Mn*54 114 114.7 1.01 '
-~.~
pCiIl Fe-59 56.8 59.7 "
1:05 pCiIl Zn*65 143 145.5 1.02
- pCiIl, Co-SO 153(
154.8 1.of
~, '~
lsV04 E4057-162 Water pCiIl Gr:Alpha 74.5 72.3:
0.97 pCiIl '
Gr. Beta 301 '
285.7 0:95 lsV04 E4058-162 Water pCiIl 1-131, 90.2 94 '
1.04 pCiIl 1-131LL*
90.2 88,7' 0.98 pCiIl Ce-141 85 87.5 1.03 pCIII Cr-S1 326 335 1.03 pCIII' Cs-134' 89.7 86 0.96 pCIII Cs-137 185 185.6 1.00 pCIII Co-58 ;
112 113.2 1.01 pCiIl.
Mn-54 114 112.3 0.99 pCiIl Fe-59 56.7 60.8*
1.07
-, - pCiIl Zn-65 143 149.1..
1.04 pCiIl Co-GO*
153 151.4 0.99 lsV04 E4059-162 Water pCiIl Sr-89 I
123 107.7 0.88 pCiIl Sr-90 14.5' 14.85 1.02 lsV04 E4060*162 AP Filter pCi' '
- ' Gr. Alpha I 58.9 48.09 0.82 pCI
, Gr. Beta 218 231.1 1.06
'; ".. '(
l j' j r
- 1-131 LL = radiochemical separation analysis J*6
ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK 2004 FRAMATOME ANP QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY (page 2 of 6) 31 LL = radiochemical separation analysis c
(
TABLEJ*2 ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 FRAMATOME ANP QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY (page 2 of 6)
AnaJytlcs Framatomel Identification Calculated Framatomo Analytlcs OuarterNear No.
Medium Units Nuclide Results Results Ratio 151104 E406H62 Milk pCiII 1-131 77.7 77.73 1.00 pCiII 1-131ll*
77.7 83.6
.1.08 pCiII Ce-141 85.2 92 1.08 pCiII Cr~51 327 314 0.96 pCiII Cs-l34 90 88.7 0.99 pCiII C5-137 185 188.6 1.02 pCiII Co-58 112 115 1.03 pCiII Mn-54 114 114.7 1.01 pCiII Fe-59 56.8 59.7 1.05 pCiII Zn-65 143 145.5 1.02 pCiII C0-60 153 154.8 1.01 151104 E4062*162 Milk pCiII Sr-89 103 86.2 0.84 pCiII Sr-90 12.1 12.7 1.05 2ndI04 E4182-162 Water pCiII H-3 11900 11680 0.98 2ndlO4 E4183-162 AP Filler pCi Gr. Alpha 48.8 46.8 0.96 pCI Gr. Beta 160 156 0.98
- 1-) 31 LL = radiochemical separation analysis 1-7 c
(
(
ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACflVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 FRAMATOME ANP QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM; FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY (page 3 of 6) :
,I, LL = radiochemical separation analysis
(
TABLEJ*2 ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACflVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 FRAMATOME ANP QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM; FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY (page 3 of 6) :
Analytlcs Framatomel Identification Calculated Framatome Analytlcs QuarterNear No.
MedIum Units Nuclide Results Results Ratio 2nd/04 E4184A-162 Filter pCI Ce-141 88.3 86 0.97 pCI Cr-51 128 127 0.99 pCI Cs*l34 56.9 54 0.95 pCI
'Cs-137 87.8 90 1.03 pCI Co-58 26 27 1.04 pCI' Mn-54 39.7
'42 1.06 pCI Fe-59 25.1 27 1.08 pCI' Zn-65 56 62 1.11 p~1 Co-60 96.8 92 0.95
- ",,
- - ~ i ~ ;.
.... '1 2ndlO4 E4185-162
- Alter, pCI Sr-89 (1) pCI Sr-90 (1) 2nd/04 E4186-162 Milk pCiII 1-131 58.2 55 0.95 pCill r*131ll*
58.2 59 1.01 pCiII Ce-141 157 165 1.05 pCiII Cr-51 228 241 1.06 pCiII CS-l34 101 99 0.98 pCiII Cs-137 156 157 1.01 pCiII Co-58 46.2 46 1.00 pCiII Mn-54 70.5 73 1.04 pCiII
' Fe-59 44.5 48 1.08 pCiII
' Zn-65 99.3 100 1.01 pCiII
. Co-SO 172 175 1.02
,I,
- 1-131 LL = radiochemical separation analysis J-8
ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 FRAMATOME ANP QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM FRAMATOMEANPENVIRONMENTALLABORATORY (Page 4 of 6) radiochemical separation analysis TABLEJ*2 ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 FRAMATOME ANP QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM FRAMATOMEANPENVIRONMENTALLABORATORY (Page 4 of 6)
Analytics Framatomel Identification Calculated Framatome Analytlcs auarterNear No_
Medium Units Nuclide Results Results Ratio 3rdlO4 E4269-162 Water pCi/I Gr. Alpha 42.7 41.3 0.97 pCi/I Gr. Beta 225 214 0.95 3rdlO4 E427()'162 Water pCW 1-131LL" 70.8 67.8 0.96 pCW 1*131 70.8 70.5 1.00 pCW Ce*141 250 258 1.03 pCW Cr-51 223 230 1.03 pCi/I Cs-134 96.4 93.4 0.97 pCi/I Cs-137 215 217 1.01 pCi/I Co-58 94.6 93.4 0.99 pCi/I Mn-54 181 181 1.00 pCi/I Fe-59 91.6 95.2 1.04 pCW Zn-65 178 180 1.01 pCi/I Co-GO 125 126 1.01 3rdlO4 E4271-162 APFilter pCi Gr. Alpha 36.8 38.3 1.04 pCI Gr. Beta 194 191 0.96 3rdlO4 E4272-162 Milk pCW 1-131LL" 83.5 79.4 0.95 pCW
'-131 83.5 81.1 0.97 pCW Ce-141 235 240 1.02 pCW Cr-51 210 214 1.02 pCW Cs-l34 90.6 89.5 0.99 pCW Cs-137 202 204 1.01
'pCW Co-58 89 90.9 1.02 pCW Mn-S4 171 173 1.01 pCW Fe-59 86.1 91.3 1.06 pCi/I Zn*65 167 169 1.01 pCi/I Co-50 118 116 0.98 3rd104 E4273-162 Milk pCi/I Sr-89 102 99.2 0.97 pCi/I Sr-90 24.5 23.4 0.96 3rdl04 E434()'162 Filter(2) pCI Sr-89
.152 151 0.99 pCI Sr:90' 58.8 53.5 0.91
- 1-131 u.. = radiochemical separation analysis
(.
("
J-9
ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 FRAMATOME ANP QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM FRAMATOMEANPENVIRONMENTALLABORATORY LL = radiochemical separation analysis c'
("
(.
TABLEJ.2 ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 FRAMATOME ANP QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM FRAMATOMEANPENVIRONMENTALLABORATORY (page 5 of 6)
Analytlcs Framatomel Identlf1catlon Calculated Framatome Anatyttcs QuarterNear No.
Medium Units Nucflde Results Results Ratio 4thl04 E4380-162 Water pCIII H-a 8060 8327 1.03 4thlO4 E4381*162
. Filter pCI Sr-89 92.3 87.7 0.95 pCI Sr-90 10,6 8.78 0.83 4thl04 E4382*162 Filter pCI Gr.Alpha 29.5 24.9 0.84 pCI Gr. Beta 204 223 1.09 4thl04 E4383*162 Filter pCI Ce*141 80.3 75.6 0.94 pCI Cr-51 189 201 1.06 pCI Cs-134 84.7 82.4 0.97 pCI Cs-137 62.9 68.8 1.09 pCI Co-58 72.9 75.3 1.03 pCI Mn-54 67.7 76.3 1.13 pCI Fe-59 60.5 69.8 1.15 pCI Zn-65 97.7 109 1.12 pCi Co-60 87.1 85.1 0.98
'4thlO4 E4384-162 Milk pCIII 1-131ll*
66,7 64.2 0.96 pCIII
'-131 66.7 69,0 1.03 pCIJI Ce*141 155 154 0.99 pCIJI Cr-51 379 385 1.02 pCIII C5*134 170 167 0.98 pCIJI Cs-137 126 132 1.05 pCIJI Co-58 146 147 1.01 pCIJI Mn-54 136 144 1.06 pCIJI
'Fe-59 121 129 1.07 pCIJI Zn-65 196-197 1.01 pCIJI C0-60 175 In 1.01 4thl04.
E4412-162
- Water,
. pCIII' o Sr-89.'
"98.1
. 90.9' 0.93 pCIJI Sr*90 11.3 9.33 0.83
- 1*131 LL = radiochemical separation analysis 1*10
ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 FRAMATOME ANP QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM FRAMATOMEANPENVIRONMENTALLABORATORY (page 6 of 6)
COMMENTS (1) Problems encountered in filter dissolution. filter (2) Replacement filter for lost 2nd quarter filter.
(
TABLEJ*2 ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 FRAMATOME ANP QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM FRAMATOMEANPENVIRONMENTALLABORATORY (page 6 of 6)
. COMMENTS (1) Problems encountered in filter dissolution. filter re*ordered.
(2) Replacement filter for lost 2nd quarter filter.
(
(
J-ll
TABLEJ-3 PPL REMP lABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANALYI1CS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK.
2004 FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL lABORATORY (page loCS)
(a) Counting error is two Itftndru-d deviations.
('
(
TABLEJ-3 PPL REMP lABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANALYI1CS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK. PROGRAM* 2004 FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL lABORATORY (page loCS)
Identification Analytic.
Framatome FramatomelAnalytlcs MonthIYear No.
Medium Units Nuclide Calculated Results (a}
Results (a}
Ratio March*04 E4073.186 Sediment, pCilkg Ce-141 150:1: 5 157:1: 15 1.05 pCilkg Cr-S1 576:1: 19 586:1: 42 1.02 pCVkg Cs*134 159:1: 5 160':1: 6 1.01 pCilkg Cs-137 432:1: 14 452 :1:9 1.05 pCilkg CO-58 198 :1:7 195 :1:7 0.98' pCilkg Mn*54 201:1: 7 191 :I: 12 0.95 pCilkg Fe-59 100 :1:3 107:1: 8' 1.07 pCilkg Zn*65 252 :1:8 261 :I: 11 1.04' pCilkg Co-GO, 270 :1:9 268 :1:'6 0.99 March-04 E4069-186 Milk pCiII
/*131.'.
91 £3 88-~3 0:97 pClIl 0e-141 '
95:ti3' ;
98':t'4 1.03 pblll Cr*S1 363 :1:'12 37!f:l:26 f.03 pClIl Cs-134 100 :1:3 95 :1:4 0.95 pCiII Cs~137 206 :7 208 :1:'6' 1:01 pClIl Co-58 125':4 128:1:'5 1.02 pClIl Mn*54 '
127: 4 130:1: 5 1.02 pCiII Fe-59 63 :1:2 64:1: 6 1.02 pClIl Zn*65 159: 5 163:1: 9 1.03 pClIl.
Co-GO 170 :1:6 168 :t 4 0.99
, I March*04 E4070*18G AP Filter pCl Ce-141 72 :1:3 65 :1:1 0'.90 pCl Cr*51 278: 10 267:1: 10 0.97 pCl Cs*134 76 +/-3 69 +/- f....,-,
0.91
~
pCl Cs-137 157 +/-5 157:t 2 1.00 pCl Co-58 95 :1:3 94:1:2 0.99' pCl Mn-54 97 :3 98 :1:2 1.01 pCl Fe-59'. '
48 :1:2 53 :t 2 1.10
, -pCl Zn*65 ';'
121 +/- 4 121 :t 4 1.00 pCl'
,Co-GO 130:1: 5 119:1: 2 0.92 (a) Counting error is two Itftndru-d deviations.
1*12
TABLEJ-3 PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANAL YTlCS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVlTY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY (Page 2ofS)
(a) mot is two ltaudatd deviations.
r TABLEJ-3 PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANAL YTlCS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVlTY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY (Page 2ofS)
Identification Anelytlcs Framatome FrametomeJAnalytics MonthIYeer No.
Medium Units Nuclide Caloulated Results (a)
Resulls(a)
Ratio March*04 E4071-186 AP FUter pCI Ce-141 79 :3 73: 1 0.92 pCl Cr-51 301 :I: 11 290 :9 0.96 pCl Cs134 83 :1:3 75: 1 0.90 pCl Cs-137 171: 6 173 :3 1.01 pCI Co-58 104: 4 102: 2 0.98 pCI Mn-54 105: 4 106:1: 2 1.03 pCI Fe-59 52 :2 57:t 2 1.10 pCl Zn-55 132 :t 5 139:1: 4 1.05 pCI Co-GO 141: 5 126 :1:2 0.91 March-D4 E4072*186 AP Filter pCI Ce-141 78 :3 65: 1 0.83 pCl Cr*51 300:11 259: 9 0.86 pCI Cs-134 83: 3 59 :t 1 0.83 pCl Cs-137 170 +/- 6 155: 2 0.91 pCl Co-58 103: 4 92: 2 0.89 pCl Mn-54 105: 4 97: 2 0.92 pCl Fe-59 52:t 2 49 :t 2 0.94 pCl Zn-G5 131 :t 5 125 :t 4 0.95 pCI Co-60 141:t 5 116 ":t 2 0.82 June-04 E4205-186 Charcoal Filler pCI 1-131 90 :3 r-97 :1:3 1.07 June-04 E420G-186 Charcoal Filter pCl 1*131 83 :3 90 :1:3 1.09 June-04 E4207-186 Charcoal Filter pCl 1-131 76-:1:3 87:t 3 1.13 (a) C
":ug mot is two ltaudatd deviations.
J*13 r
TABLEJ-3 PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACllVTl'Y CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 FRAMATOMB ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY (page 3 of5)
(II) Counting error is two standard deviations.
c TABLEJ-3 PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACllVTl'Y CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 FRAMATOMB ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY (page 3 of5)
Identlfioatlon Analytlcs Framatonle Framatomel Analytlcs MonthNeer No.
Medium Units Nuclide Calculated Results (a)
Results (8)
Rallo September.04 E4311-186 Milk pClII 1-131 76 :t:3 82:t: 17 1.08 pClII Ce-141 518:1: 17 50S :t: 10 0.98 pClII Cr*51 463 :t: 15 481 :t: 47 1.04 pClII CS-134 200 :t:7 197 :t:6 0.99 pClII CS-137 445 :t: 15 448:t:8 1.01 pClII Co-58 196 :1:7 195:t: 6 0.99 pClII Mn*54 376:1: 13 388:t:8 1.03 pClII Fe-59, 190:1: 6 199 :1:8 1.05 pClII Zn*65 '
370 :1:12 374 :1:'13 1.01 '
pClII Co-60 260 ':t:9,'
261:1: 5 '
1.00 '
~
. September.04 E4312-f86 Charcoal Filler pCl 1-131 75 :t:3 82 :1:6 1.09 Seplember*04 E4313-186 Charcoal FIller PCI 1-131 '
83':1:3 95:1:6' 1.14 September.04 E43f4-186 Charcoal FIlter pCl 1-131 70 :1:2 82 :1:6*
1.17' Oetober*04 E4342-186 Milk pClII 1-131 79 :1:3 76:1: 14 0.96 pClII Ce-141 89 :1:3 95:1: 13 1.07 pClII Cr-51 '
2790:1: 93 2870:1: 130 1.03 pClII C$o134 69 :t:2 62':1:9 0,90.
pClII C$o137 158:1: 5 150:1: 13 0.95 pClII Co-58 50 +/-2 42':1:9 0.84 pClII Mn-54 124 +/-4 124:t: 12 1.00 pClII Fe-59 40:t: 1..
37 +/- 13 '
0,93 pClII Zn-65 119 ;t 4 '
109 :1:21
" 0.92 pCliJ CO-60 91 +/-3 84 :t:8 0.92 I
(II) Counting error is two standard deviations.
J-14
TABLEJ-l PPL REMP lABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOAcnVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 FRAMATOMBANP ENVlRONMENTALLADORATORY (pagc4ofS)
Identification Analytlcs Framatome FramatomelAnalytios MonthlYear No.
Medium Units Nuclide Calculated Results (a)
Results (a)
Ratio December-04 E4417-185 Milk pCi/I 1-131 71 :t:2 65 :t:9 0.92 pCi/I Ce-141 167 :t:8 154:t: 6 0.98 pCi/I Cr-51 410 :t: 21 392:t:36 0.96 pCi/I Cs-134 184 :t:9 173 :t:6 0.94 pCi/I Cs-137 136 ;t 7 137 :t:5 1.01 pCi/I Co-58 158:t: 8 152 :t:5 0.96 pCi/I Mn-54 147 :t:7 152 :t:5 1.03 pCi/I Fe-59 131 : 7 132 ;t 7 1.01 pCi/I Zn-65 212 :t: 11 204:t: 10 0.96 pCi/I C0-60 189 :t:9 185 :4 0.98 December-04 E4418-185 AP Filter pCl Ce-141 70 :2 63 :t:3 0.90 pCi Cr-51 165:t: 6 152 :t: 19 0.98 pCl Cs-134 74;t 3 66 :3 0.89 pCl Cs-137 55;t 2 56 :4 1.02 pCi Co-58 64 :t:2 64 :t:4 1.00 pCi Mn-54 59 :2 60 :t:4 1.02 pCl Fe-59 53 :t:2 57 :t:5 1.08 pCl lo-65 85 :3 93 :t:8 1.09 pCl C0-60 76 :t:3 67 :3 0.88 E4419-186
. AP Filter pCl Ce-141 77 :t:3 67 :t:3 0.B7 pCl Cr-51 182:t: 6 193 :t: 18 1.06 pCl Cs-134 82 :t:3 76 :t:3 0.93 pCi CS-137 61 ;t 2 62 :t:4 1.02 pCl Co-58 70 :t:2 68 :t:4 0.97 pCl Mn-54 65 :t:2 67 :t:4 1.03 pCl Fe-59 58 :t:2 64 :t:5 1.10 pCi Zn-65 94:t: 3 106:t: 8 1.13 pCl C0-60 84 :t:3 75 :t:3 0.89 (a) 0- "'iog error is two standard deviation&.
(,
(
I-IS r
TABLEJ-l PPL REMP lABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOAcnVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 FRAMATOMBANP ENVlRONMENTALLADORATORY (pagc4ofS)
Identification Analytlcs Framatome FramatomelAnalytios MonthlYear No.
Medium Units Nuclide Calculated Results (a)
Results (a)
Ratio December-04 E4417-185 Milk pCi/I 1-131 71 :t:2 65 :t:9 0.92 pCi/I Ce-141 167 :t:8 154:t: 6 0.98 pCi/I Cr-51 410 :t: 21 392:t:36 0.96 pCi/I Cs-134 184 :t:9 173 :t:6 0.94 pCi/I Cs-137 136 ;t 7 137 :t:5 1.01 pCi/I Co-58 158:t: 8 152 :t:5 0.96 pCi/I Mn-54 147 :t:7 152 :t:5 1.03 pCi/I Fe-59 131 : 7 132 ;t 7 1.01 pCi/I Zn-65 212 :t: 11 204:t: 10 0.96 pCi/I C0-60 189 :t:9 185 :4 0.98 December-04 E4418-185 AP Filter pCl Ce-141 70 :2 63 :t:3 0.90 pCi Cr-51 165:t: 6 152 :t: 19 0.98 pCl Cs-134 74;t 3 66 :3 0.89 pCl Cs-137 55;t 2 56 :4 1.02 pCi Co-58 64 :t:2 64 :t:4 1.00 pCi Mn-54 59 :2 60 :t:4 1.02 pCl Fe-59 53 :t:2 57 :t:5 1.08 pCl lo-65 85 :3 93 :t:8 1.09 pCl C0-60 76 :t:3 67 :3 0.88 December*04 E4419-186
. AP Filter pCl Ce-141 77 :t:3 67 :t:3 0.B7 pCl Cr-51 182:t: 6 193 :t: 18 1.06 pCl Cs-134 82 :t:3 76 :t:3 0.93 pCi CS-137 61 ;t 2 62 :t:4 1.02 pCl Co-58 70 :t:2 68 :t:4 0.97 pCl Mn-54 65 :t:2 67 :t:4 1.03 pCl Fe-59 58 :t:2 64 :t:5 1.10 pCi Zn-65 94:t: 3 106:t: 8 1.13 pCl C0-60 84 :t:3 75 :t:3 0.89 (a) 0- "'iog error is two standard deviation&.
(,
(
I-IS r
MonthlVear Oeeemoor-04 (a) Counting error is two ltlloolU'd deviations.
PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANAL Y11CS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOAC11VITY CROSS CHECK 2004 FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY (page S o(5)
Identification Analytlcs Frematome No.
Medium Units Nuclide Calculated Results (8)
Results (a)
E4420-186 AP Filter pCl Ce-141 101 :t 4 91 :t: 4 pCl Cr-S1 237 :t:8 224:t: 21 pCl CS-134 106 :t 4 94 :1:3 pCl CS-137 79 :1:3 79 :1:4 pCl Co-58 92 :1:3 91:1: 4 pCl Mn-54 85 :1:3 91 :I: 4 pCI.
Fe-59 76 :1:3 85 :t:5 pCl Zn-65 123 :t 4 136 :1:9 pCl C0-60 109 :t:4 102:1: 4
(
Framatomal Analytlos Ratio 0.90 0.95 0.89 1.00 0.99 1.07 1.12 1.11 0.94 J-16 MonthlVear Oeeemoor-04 (a) Counting error is two ltlloolU'd deviations.
TARLEJ*3 PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANAL Y11CS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOAC11VITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM* 2004 FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY (page S o(5)
Identification Analytlcs Frematome No.
Medium Units Nuclide Calculated Results (8)
Results (a)
E4420-186 AP Filter pCl Ce-141 101 :t 4 91 :t: 4 pCl Cr-S1 237 :t:8 224:t: 21 pCl CS-134 106 :t 4 94 :1:3 pCl CS-137 79 :1:3 79 :1:4 pCl Co-58 92 :1:3 91:1: 4 pCl Mn-54 85 :1:3 91 :I: 4 pCI.
Fe-59 76 :1:3 85 :t:5 pCl Zn-65 123 :t 4 136 :1:9 pCl C0-60 109 :t:4 102:1: 4
(
Framatomal Analytlos Ratio 0.90 0.95 0.89 1.00 0.99 1.07 1.12 1.11 0.94 J-16
(
(
(
TABLEJ-4 DOE - ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY (EML)
QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (QAP)
FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY (Page 1 of 1)
Identification EMLKnown Framatome FramatomelEML MonthNear No.
MedIum Units NuclJde Results Results Ratio March-04 Soil 8q1kg K-40 539 596 1.11 Soil 8q1kg Sr-gO 51 47 0.92 Soil Bqlkg Cs-137 1323 1515 1.15 Soil 8qlkg Ac-Th-228 49 51 1.03 Vegetation 8q1kg K-40 720 752 1.04 Vegetation Bqlkg.
Co-60 14 15 1.03 Vegetation Bqlkg Cs-137 585 593 1.01 Water BqJI H-3 187 219 1.17 Water Bq/I Co-60 163 154 0.94 Water 8qn Cs-137 52 48 0.93
- EML has notified the industry that QAP 60 (March 2004) was the final set or samples to be issued.
J-t7
(
(
(
TABLEJ-4 DOE - ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY (EML)
QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (QAP)
FRAMATOME ANP ENVIRONMENTAL LABORATORY (Page 1 of 1)
Identification EMLKnown Framatome FramatomelEML MonthNear No.
MedIum Units NuclJde Results Results Ratio March-04 QAP60*
Soil 8q1kg K-40 539 596 1.11 Soil 8q1kg Sr-gO 51 47 0.92 Soil Bqlkg Cs-137 1323 1515 1.15 Soil 8qlkg Ac-Th-228 49 51 1.03 Vegetation 8q1kg K-40 720 752 1.04 Vegetation Bqlkg.
Co-60 14 15 1.03 Vegetation Bqlkg Cs-137 585 593 1.01 Water BqJI H-3 187 219 1.17 Water Bq/I Co-60 163 154 0.94 Water 8qn Cs-137 52 48 0.93
- EML has notified the industry that QAP 60 (March 2004) was the final set or samples to be issued.
J-t7
DOE - MAPEP -
MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM FRAMATOMEANPENVmONMENTALLABORATORY (Page 1 of 1)
'CR 04-17 Issued by Framatome to document result for which fell in the "waming" range with a -20.8% bias (limit of ::t:20% for waming).
"False positive results were measured by Framatoma.
(
(
(
TABLEJ*5 DOE - MAPEP - 04*12 MIXED ANALYTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM FRAMATOMEANPENVmONMENTALLABORATORY (Page 1 of 1)
Identlficatlon MAPEP Known Framatome FramatomeIMAPEP MonthNear No.
Medium Units Nuclide Results Results Ratio Evaluation May*04 04-RdF12 Filter Bq Sr-90 0.83 0.75 0.90 Agreement MaY*04 04-MaS12 Soil Bqlkg Am-241 67 59.5 0.89 Agreement Son Bqlkg Cs*134 414 455 1.10 Agreement Soil Bq/kg Cs-137 836 893 1.07 Agreement Soil Bqlkg Co-57 400 420 1.05 Agreement Soli Bqlkg Co*60 518 567 1.09 Agreement Soil Bqlkg Mn*54 485 534 1.10 Agreement Soil Bq/1<g Pu*238 35.4 38.33 1.08 Agreement Soil Bqlkg Pu-239/240 41.8 41.66 1.00 Agreement Soil Bq/kg K*40 604 666 1.10 Agreement Soil Bq/kg Sr-90 False Positive Test 2.3::1:1.2 NlA Agreement**
Soli Bqlkg Zn*65 699 781 1.12 Agreement May-04 04-MaW12 Water BqJI Am-241 0.59 0.5202 0.88 Agreement Water BqJI Cs*134 208 197 0.95 Agreement Water Bq/l.
Cs-137 250 232 0.93 Agreement Water BqJI Co-57 185 170.6 0.92 Agreement Water BqJI Co-60 183 157.4 0.97 Agreement Water 8qJ1 H*3 82.9 87 1.05 Agreement Water 8qll Mn-54 267 257 0.96 Agreement Water BqJI Pu-238 1.27 0.984 0.77 Waming" Water BqJI Pu-239/240 False Positive Test 0.0070::1: 0.0048 N/A Agreement..
Water BqJI Te*99 10.4 10.66 1.03 Agreement Water 8qJ1 Zn*65 208 207 1.00 Agreement
'CR 04-17 Issued by Framatome to document result for Pu*238 which fell in the "waming" range with a -20.8% bias (limit of ::t:20% for waming).
"False positive results were measured by Framatoma.
J*18
TABLEJ-6 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOCIATES (ERA)
PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM - 2004 TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (TBE)
(Page 1 of2)
(a) Results are the average of three measurements. reported'in unitS of pC iii; (b) Per guidelines of the EPA'S National Standards for Water Proficiency Testing Criteria Document. December 1998.
(e) ERA evaluation: A=acceptable. Reported result faUs within the Warning Limits. NA=not acceptable *. Reported result falls outside of the Control Limits. CE=eheck for Error. 'W=aeceptable with warning. Reported 'result fatls within the Control Limits and outside of the Warning Limit.
(
c C'
TABLEJ-6 ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOCIATES (ERA)
PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM - 2004 TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (TBE)
(Page 1 of2)
Identification ERA Known THE THElERA ERA Month/Year No.
MedIum UnIts Nuclide Result (a)
ResuUs (a)
Ratio Control Limits (b)
Evaluation (e)
May. 2004 Rad-57 Water pCilL Sr-89 45.9 139 3,03 37.2 - 54.6 (1) pCiIL Sr-90 11.6 11.3 0.97 2.94 -20.3 A
pCilL Ba-133 101 93.9 0.93 83.5 - 118 A
pCilL Cs-134 50.5 43.3 0.S6 41.8 *59.2 A
pCilL Cs-137 82.5 79.3 0.96 73.S - 91.2 A
pCilL Co-60 41.6 42.4 1.02 32.9 -50.3 A
pCiIL Zn-65 75.2 81.9 1.09 62.2*88.2 A
pCilL Gr-A 38.8 39.9 1.03 22.0-55.6 A
pCiIL Gr-B 59.6 62.5 1.05 42.3 -'76.9 A
pCiIL H-3 30900 33500 1.08 25600 - 36200 A
August. 2004 Rad-5S Water pCiIL 1-131 9.29 9.09 0.98 5.83 - 12.8 A
December. 2004 Rad-59 Water pCilL Sr-89 45.7 44.0 0.96 37.0- 54.4 A
pCilL Sr-90 36.6 35.3 0.96 27.9 - 45.3 A
pCilL Ba-133 78.4 73.9 0.94 64.8 - 92.0 A
,,~.
pCilL Cs-134 42.9 37.8 0.88 34.2-51.6 A
, pCilL Cs-137 60.1 58.3 0.97*
51.4 - 68.8 A
pCiIL Co-60 11.7.
11.5.
'0.98*
3.04-20.4*
A pCiIL Zn-65 50.9 51.3 1.01 42.1-59.7 A
pCiIL Gr-A
- 31.7 23.9 0.75 18.0-45.4 W
pCilL Gr-B 36.3 33.9 0.93 27.6-45.0 A
pCiIL 1-131 22.1' 19.2 0.87 16.9-27.3 A
pCiIL H*3 20700 22900 1.11 17100 - 24300 A
(a) Results are the average of three measurements. reported'in unitS of pC iii; (b) Per guidelines of the EPA'S National Standards for Water Proficiency Testing Criteria Document. December 1998.
(e) ERA evaluation: A=acceptable. Reported result faUs within the Warning Limits. NA=not acceptable *. Reported result falls outside of the Control Limits. CE=eheck for Error. 'W=aeceptable with warning. Reported 'result fatls within the Control Limits and outside of the Warning Limit.
1-19
EN~IRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOCIATES (ERA).
PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM - 2004'.
TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (TBE)
(Page 2 of 2)
COMMENTS The strontium-89 amount was counted without the absorber. When recounted using the absorber, the Sr-89 result of 41.5 pCi/1 agreed well with the ERA known value of 45.9 pCill. NCR 04-13 generated by TBE to investigate condition.
(
(
J-20 r
TABLEJ*6 EN~IRONMENTAL RESOURCE ASSOCIATES (ERA).
PROFICIENCY TESTING PROGRAM - 2004'.
TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (TBE)
(Page 2 of 2)
COMMENTS The strontium-89 amount was counted without the absorber. When recounted using the absorber, the Sr-89 result of 41.5 pCi/1 agreed well with the ERA known value of 45.9 pCill. NCR 04-13 generated by TBE to investigate condition.
(
(
J-20 r
TABLEJ-'
ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACfIVITY CROSS CHECK 2004 TELEDYNE QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (Page 1 of5)
(
(
(
TABLEJ-'
ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACfIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM* 2004 TELEDYNE QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (Page 1 of5)
Anafytfcs Identlffcation Calculated TBE TBElAnalYtlcs MonthNear No.
MedIum Units Nuclide Results Results Ratio Evaluation {1}
March. 2004 E4128-396 Milk pCi/I Sr-89 103 91 0.88 A
pCi/I
- Sr~90 12 13 1.08 A
March. 2004 E4129-396 Milk pCi" 1--1~1 78 n
0.99 A
pCi/I, Ce-141
- 85.
n 0.91 A
, ~ *." ~ r pCi/I Cr-51 327 340 1.04 A.
pCi/I C5-134 90 76 0.84 A
pCi/I Cs-137 185 176 0.95 A*
pCfII :
- C0.58 112 1.01 113-A pCfll 1 Mn-54 114.:
110' 0.96 A
. pCi/I
- Fe-59 57 65 1.14 A
pCfII Zn-65 143 :
132:
0~92.
A pCIJI C0:.60 153 144 0.94*
A I'
March,2004 E413D-396 Charcoal pCI 1-131 97 88 0.91 A
March,2004 E4131-396 AP
- pCi, Ce-141 88 87 0.99 A
pCI' Cr-51 338 325 0.96.
A pCI C5-134 93 87, 0.94 A
pCi C5-137 192 185 0.96 A
pCI Co-58 116 117 1.01 A
pCI
. Mn-S4 118,-
, 105 0.89-A,'
pCI Fe-59
. 59,
59 1.00 A
pCi Zn-65
. 146 179 1.21 W
pCi C0-60 159 145 0.91 A
pCI Fe-55 114 142 1.25 W
J-21
ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACflVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 TELEDYNE QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (Page 2 of5)
TABLEJ-7 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACflVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 TELEDYNE QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (Page 2 of5)
Analytics Identification Calculated TBE TBEIAnalytlcs MonthlYear No.
Medium Units Nuclide Results Results Ratio Evaluation {1}
June, 2004 E4213-396 Milk pCUI Sr-89*
87.7 77.9 0.89 A
Sr-90 12.7 12.0 0.94 A
June,2004 E4214-396 Milk pCUI 1-131' 58.2 53.7 0.92 A
pCUI Ce-141 157 145 0.92 A
pCUI Cr-51 228 212 0.93 A
pCUI Cs-l34 101 85.2 0.84 A
pCUI Cs-137 156 145 0.93 A
pCUI Co-58 46.2 45.7 0.99 A
pCUI Mn-54 70.5 68.2 0.97 A
pCUI Fe-59 44.5 44.4 1.00 A
pCUI 20-65 99.3 102 1.03 A
pCUI Co-60 172 162 0.94 A
June. 2004 E4216-396 AP pCI Ce-141 118 116 0.98 A
pCi Cr*51 172 160 0.93 A
pCI Cs-l34 76.3 68.6 0.90 A
pCI Cs*137 118 108 0.92 A
pCI Co-58 39.4 33.1 0.84 A
pCI Mn-54 53.3 51.1 0.96 A
pCI Fe*59 33.6 44.0 1.31 (2) pCI Zn-65.
75.1 69.1 0.92 A
pCI Co-60 130
.. 123 0.95 A
pCI Fe-55 104 100 0.96 A
June. 2004 E4215-396 Charcoal pCI 1*131 82.0 71.8 0.88 A
I
(
(
(
J*22 r
ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACfIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 TELEDYNE QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (Page 3 of5)
(
(
c TABLEJ*7 ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACfIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 TELEDYNE QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (Page 3 of5)
Analytlcs Identification Calculated TBE TBElAnalytfcs MonthNear No.
Medium UnIts Nuclide Results Results Ratio Evaluation {1}
September, 2004 E4323-396 Milk pCIII Sr~89 102 94 0.92 A
pCIII Sr-90 24.5 24.0.
0.98 A
September, 2004 E4324-396 Milk pCIII 1-131 83.5.,
81.9 0.98 A
pCIII Ce-141 235 214*
0.91 A
pCIII Cr-51 2tO 196 0.93 A
. pCIII Cs-134.
90.6 77.3 0.85 A
pCIII Cs-137 202 192 0.95 A
pCIII C()-58 )
89.0 86.2*
0.97 A:
pClII.
171
- 163, 0.95 A
pCIII*
Fe-59**
86.1
'87.4, 1.02 A.
pCIII ZO-6!>.
167
- 168, 1.01 A
pClII C0-60*
118 108 0.92 A
September, 2004 E4326*396 AP Filter pCI Ce-141 148 149 1.01 A
pCI Cr-51 132 122 0.92 A
pCi Cs-134 57.1 50.3 0.88 A
pCI C8-137 127 112 0.88 A
pCI Co-58 56.0 55 0.98 A
pCI Mn-54 108.0 102 0.94 A
pCi Fe-59 54.2 48 0.88 A
pCI Zn*65 106 111 1:05 A
pCI C0-60 74.1
. 69..
0.93 A
September, 2004 E4325*396 Charcoal pCI 1-131
.74.9 70.3 0.94 A
,j t
)*23
ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACfIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 TELEDYNE QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (Page 4 of5) r TABLEJ*7 ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACfIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 TELEDYNE QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (Page 4 of5)
Analytlcs Identification Calculated TBE TBElAnalytlcs Month/Year No.
Medium Units Nuclide Results Results Ratio Evaluation ~1}
October, 2004 E4407-396 Milk pCiII Sr-89 98.6 91.7 0.93 A
pCiII Sr*90 11.3 11.9 1.05 A
October, 2004 E4408-396 Milk pCUl 1-131 66.7 58.3 0.87 A
pCiII Ce*141 155 140 0.90 A
pCiII Cr-51 379 374 0.99 A
pCiII Cs-l34 170 143 0.84 A
pCUl Cs-137 126 120 0.95 A
pCiII Co-56 146 140 0.96 A
pC ill Mn-54 136 135 0.99 A
pCiII Fe-59
- 121 124 1.02 A
pCiII.
Zn~65 196 196 1.01 A
pCiII C0-60 175 166 0.95 A
October, 2004 E441D-396 AP Filter pCi Ce-141 79.1 n.o 0.97 A
pCi Cr-51 187 156 0.83 A
pCi C~-l34 83.5 76.6 0.92 A
pCI Os-137 62.0 58.9 0.95 A
pCI Co-58 71.8 68.6 0.96 A
pCi Mn-54 66.7 63.2 0.95 A
pCi Fe-59 59.7 652 1.09 A
pCI Zn-65 96.3 99.7 1.04 A
pCi C0-60 85.9 80.1 0.93 A
October, 2004 E4409A-396 Charcoal pCi 1*131 83.3 80.9 0.97 A
(
c
(
r
ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACfIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 TELEDYNE QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (page 5 of 5)
COMMENTS on TBE Internal ac limits: A= Acceptable. Reported result falls within ratio limits of 0.80-1.20.
W-Acceptabte with warning. Reported result falls within 0.70-0.80 or 1.20-1.30. N = Not Acceptable. Reported result falls outside the ratio limits of < 0.70 and> 1.30.
2 The Analytics filter had very low activity and was counted longer than two days. This resulted In poor accuracy as demonstrated by the very large error term. Dan Montgomery of Analytlcs concurred that, with the low counts and large error, the results were reasonably accurate and would not be considered a failed cross check at 1.31 for an environmental level sample.
NCR 04-16 generated by TBE to investigate condition.
J-25
(
(
TABLEJ*7 ANALYTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACfIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 TELEDYNE QUALITY CONTROL SPIKE PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (page 5 of 5)
COMMENTS 1
Analytics evaluation based on TBE Internal ac limits: A= Acceptable. Reported result falls within ratio limits of 0.80-1.20.
W-Acceptabte with warning. Reported result falls within 0.70-0.80 or 1.20-1.30. N = Not Acceptable. Reported result falls outside the ratio limits of < 0.70 and> 1.30.
2 The Analytics filter had very low activity and was counted longer than two days. This resulted In poor accuracy as demonstrated by
(
the very large error term. Dan Montgomery of Analytlcs concurred that, with the low counts and large error, the results were reasonably accurate and would not be considered a failed cross check at 1.31 for an environmental level sample.
NCR 04-16 generated by TBE to investigate condition.
J-25
(
c C
PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY,CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (Page 1 of6)
(a) Counting error is two standard deviations.
J.26
(
c C
TABLEJ*8 PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY,CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (Page 1 of6)
Identification Anatytlcs TBE TBE! Analytlcs MonthNear No."
Medium Units Nuclide Calculated Results {a}
Results {a}
Ratro Evaluatlon~21 March-04 E4067-186 Sediment pClJkg Ce-141 150'+/- 5 187 +/- 29 1.25 A
pClJkg Cr-51 576 +/- 19 622 +/- 134 1.08 A
pClJkg Cs-l34 159 +/-5 150'+/- 12 0.94 A
pClJkg Cs-137 432 +/- 14 453 +/-20 1.05 A
pCi/kg Co-58, 198 +/- 7:
212 +/- 18 1.07 A
pCi/kg Mn-54 201 +/-7 218'+/- 18' 1.08 A
pClJkg Fe-59 100,+/-3 113:£25 1.13 A
pClJkg Zn*65 252 +/-'8 305'+/-28 1.21' A
- . r'!'.
- :.;,-.
,~ ~;
pClJkg Co-60, 270'£9' 282'+/-'13 1.04 A'
March-04 E4063-186 Milk pC11I
,1-,131 91 +/-3 70'£ 16 o.n W
pCIII Ce-141 95 +/-'3' 97 +/- 15 1.02 A
pCi/I Cr-51 363 +/- 12 260 +/- 91 0.72 W
pCi/I Cs-134 100 +/-3 78 +/-8 0.78 W
pC11I Cs-137 206 +/-7 192 +/- 18 0.93' A
pCiIJ Co-58 125 +/-4 123 +/-14 0.98 A
pCiIJ Mn*54 127 +/-4 114 +/- 14 0.90 A
pCiIJ Fe-59 63 +/-2 65 +/- 16 1.03 A
pC11I Zn-65 159 +/-5 143 +/- 24 0.90 A
pCiIJ Co-60 170 +/- 6 153 +/- 11 0.90 A
March-04 E4064*186 AP Filter pCI' Ce-14f' 60:i: 2 n+/-13 1.28 W
pCI Cr-51 231 +/-8 228+/-n 0.99' A
pCI CS-134 64 +/-2 62 +/-8 0.97 A
pCI Cs-137'. '
131 +/- 5 122 +/- 12 0.93 A
pCI.
Co-58 79,+/-3, 73 +/-9 0.92 A
, pCI Mri*S4 81 +/- 3,
,74.3 +/- 1 0.92 A
pCl
'Fe-59 40 +/- 1 52.6 +/- '14 '
1.32 N(3) pCi' Zn*65 ',.
'101 +/-'4 109 +/- 18 1.08 A
pCI Co-60 108 +/-4 108 +/- 9 1.00 A
(a) Counting error is two standard deviations.
J.26
TABLEJ-8 PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (Page 2 of 6)
(a) Counting error is lWO standard deviations.
(
(
c J-27 r
TABLEJ-8 PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (Page 2 of 6)
Identification Analytlcs TBE TBElAnalytics MonthIYear No.
Medium Units Nuclide Calculated Results (a)
Results (a)
Ratio Evaluatlon(2)
March-04 E4065-186 AP Filter pCI Ce-141 61 +/- 2 62.7 +/- 12 1.03 A
pCI Cr-51 235+/- 8 234 +/- 72 1.00 A
pCI Cs-l34 65+/-2 60.6:t 6 0.93 A
pCI CS-137 134 +/- 5 129:t 11
.0.96 A
pCI Co-58 81 :t 3 n.8 +/- 10 0.96 A
pCI Mn-54 82:t 3 73+/- 9 0.89 A
pCI Fe-59 41 :t 1 39:t 12 0.95 A
pCI 20-65 103 +/-4 92:t 16 0.89 A
pCI Co-60 110 +/- 4 98 +/- 8 0.89 A
March-04 E4066-186 AP Filter pCI Ce-141 62:t 2 66.6 +/- 13 1.07 A
pCI Cr-51 237+/-8 220 +/- 62 0.93 A
pCI Cs-l34 65 +/-2 58.4:t 7 0.90 A
pCI Cs-137 135 +/- 5 126 :t12 0.93 A
pCI Co-58 82 +/-3 76 +/- 12 0.93 A
pCI Mn-54 83:t 3 83:t 12 1.00 A
pCI Fe-59 41 +/- 1 44.4 +/- 13 1.08 A
pCI 20-65 104 +/- 4 115 +/-*14 1.11 A
pCI Co-60 111:t4 112 +/- 17 1.01 A
March-04 E4068-186 Water pCI/I H*3 4700 +/- 300 5070 +/- 163 1.08 A
June-04 E4202-186 Charcoal pCI 1-131 82.9 :i:3 84.6:t 5 1.02 A
June-04 E4203-186 Charcoal pCI 1-131 n-i.3 82.1 :t 3 1.07 A
June-04 E4204-186 Charcoal pCI 1-131 89.B:t 3 93.9:t 5 1.05 A
(a) Counting error is lWO standard deviations.
(
(
c J-27 r
(
c C
PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 3 of (a) Counting error is two standard deviations.
(
c C
TABLEJ*8 PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (page 3 of 6)
Identification Analytlcs
' TBE TBEI Analytlcs MonthlYear No.
Medium Units Nuclide Calculated Results (a}
Results (a}
RatTo Evalustfon(2}
September-04 E4307-186 Milk pCI/1 1-131 76 +/-3 0.00 (1) pCI/1 Ce-141 518 +/- 17 0.00 (1) pC11I Cr*51 463 +/- 15 0.00 (1) pCI/1 Cs*134 200 +/-7 0.00' (1) pCI/1 Cs-137.
445 +/- 15 0.00 (1) pCI/1 Co-58 196 +/- 7 0.00 (1) pCI/1 Mn*54 376+/-'13 0.00 (1) pCl/1 Fe-59:
190+/- 6.
0.00 (l) pCl/1 Zn*65 370+/- 12,'
0.00, (1"
l' \\,~
I,,"$.,,r" pCI/1 Co-SO i 260 +/-9 0.00*
(1)
September-04 E4308*186 Charcoal pCL 1*131'*
74.7 +/- 3' 77+/- 2 1.04 A
September-04 E4309-186 Charcoal pCI 1-131 83.1 +/- 3 89 +/- 4 1.07 A
September-04 E4310-186 Charcoal pCI 1-131 71.5 +/- 2 78'+/-3 1.09 A
October*04' E4339*186 Milk pCI/1 1-131 79 +/-3 78.4 +/- 3 0.99 A'
pCI/1 Ce*141 89,+/-3.
81.2+/-6 '
0.91 A
- pCIII, Cr*S1 2790 +/- 93 2560 £63 0.92 A
pCI/1.
Cs*134 69 +/-2 58.4 +/-'4 0.85 A
pCI/1 Cs-137 158 +/- 5 '
140 +/- 7 0.89 A
pCI/1' CO:-S8:
SO+/-2 46.6+/- 6 0.93 A
pCI/1 Mn-54 124 +/-'4 '
116 +/- 6 0.94 A
pCl/1
' Fe-59 40 +/- 1 40.3 +/- 7 1.01 A
pCI/1 Zn-65
.119 +/-.,.
116 +/- 10 0.97 A
pCI/1 "
Co-60 91.+/- 3. ; ~.'.
84.6 +/-'~
0.93 A
October-04 E4341-186 Water
'pC~
H*3 2180 +/- 73 2180 +/- 172 1.00 A
(a) Counting error is two standard deviations.
J*28
TABLEJ-8 PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANAL YTlCS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACfIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (Page 4 of 6)
(a) Counting error is two standard deviations.
(
(
(
TABLEJ-8 PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANAL YTlCS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACfIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (Page 4 of 6)
Identification Analytlcs TBE TBElAnalytics MonthlYear No.
Medium Units Nuclide Calculated Results {a}
Results {al Ratio Evaluatlon{2}
December-04 E4413-186 Milk pCVI 1-131 71-+/- 2 57.5 +/- 2 0.81 A
pCVI "
Ce-141 167 +/-.8 157 +/- 10 0.94 A
pCVI Cr-51 410 +/- 21 404 +/- 46 0.99 A
pCVI Cs-134 184 +/- 9 160 +/- 5 0.87 A
pCVI Cs-137 136 +/- 7 136 +/- 7 1.00 A
pCVI Co-58 158 +/- 8 153 +/- 8 0.97 A
pCVI Mn*54 147 +/- 7 148 +/- 7 1.01 A
pCiII Fe-59 131 +/- 7 129 +/- 10 0.98 A
pCVI Zn*65 212 +/- 11 212 +/- 14 1.00 A
pCVI Co-GO 189 +/- 9 180 +/- 6 0.95 A
December-04 E4414-186 AP Filter pCI Ce-141 115+/-4 112 +/- 8 0.97 A
pCI Cr-51 271 +/- 10 290 +/- 47 1.07 A
pCI Cs-134 121 +/- 4 109 +/-4 0.90 A
pCI Cs-137 90+/-3 85.7 +/- 6 0.95 A
pCI Co-58 104 +/- 4 93.7 +/- 6 0.90 A
pCI Mn*54 97 +/- 3
- 88+/- 7
- 0.91
-A pCI Fe-59 87 +/-3 85.2 +/- 9 0.98 A
pCI Zn-65 140 +/- 5 131 +/- 11 0.94 A
pCI Co-60 125 +/- 4 122 +/- 5 0.98 A
December-04 E4415*186 AP Filter pCI Ce-141 99 +/-3 89.2 +/- 8 0.90 A
pCI Cr-51 234 +/-8 223 +/- 38 0.95 A
pCI Cs-l34 105 +/-4 97.1 +/- 4 0.92 A
pCI Cs-137 78 +/- 3 72.3 +/- 5 0.93 A
pCI Co-58 90 +/- 3 81.5 +/- 6 0.91 A
pCI Mn*54 84 +/-3 80.2 +/- 6 0.95 A
pCI Fe-59 75 +/-3 81.4 +/- 10 1.09 A
pCI Zn*65 121"+/- 4 114 +/- 10 0.94 A
pCI Co*GO 108 +/-4 102 +/-5 0.94 A
(a) Counting error is two standard deviations.
(
(
J*29
(
(
c c
TABLEJ.8 PPL REMP LAB ORA TORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (pageS of 6)
_r (a) Counting error is two standard deviations.
J-30
(
c c
TABLEJ.8 PPL REMP LAB ORA TORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (pageS of 6)
Identification Analytlcs TBE TBE/Analytlcs MonthNear No.
Medium Units Nuclide Calculated Results {a}
Results {a}
Ratio Evaluatlon(2)
Dacember-04 E4416-186 AP Riter pCi Ce-141 128 +/- 5 122 +/- 15 0.95 A
pCi Cr-51 301 +/- 11 277 +/- 85 0.92 A
pCI Cs-134 135 +/- 5 124 +/- 10 0.92 A
pCI Cs-137 100 +/- 4 101 +/- 14 1.01 A
pCI Co-56 116 +/- 4 102 +/- 12 0.8a A
pCl Mn-54 108 +/- 4 113 +/- 12 1.05 A
pCI Fe-59 96 +/-3 96 +/- 16 1.00 A
pCI Zn-65 155 +/- 5 145 +/- 25 0.94 A
pCI C0-60 139 +/- 5 121 +/- 11 0.87 A
_r
,~
,~
\\.
(a) Counting error is two standard deviations.
J-30
(
TABLEJ-8 PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (Page 60f6)
COMMENTS 1
Milk sample E4307-186 could not be analyzed for gamma and 1-131 (low level) analyses due to curdled milk.
2 TBE evaluation: A = acceptable, W = acceptable with warning, N = not acceptable.
3 NCR 05-04 generated by Teledyne to document condition.
(
(
(
TABLEJ-8 PPL REMP LABORATORY SPIKE PROGRAM ANAL YTICS ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOACTIVITY CROSS CHECK PROGRAM - 2004 TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (Page 60f6)
COMMENTS 1
Milk sample E4307-186 could not be analyzed for gamma and 1-131 (low level) analyses due to curdled milk.
2 TBE evaluation: A = acceptable, W = acceptable with warning, N = not acceptable.
3 NCR 05-04 generated by Teledyne to document condition.
(
(
J*31
(
c C
TABLEJ-9 ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY (EML)
QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (QAP)
TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES 1 of 1-32
(
c C
TABLEJ-9 DOE* ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY (EML)
QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (QAP)
TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (Page 1 of 2)
IdentJfJcatJon EMLKnown TBE TBElEML MonthNear No.
Medium Units Nuclide Result Results Ratio Evaluatlon{3}
March,2004 QAP60 AP Filter Bq Co-60 35.4 33.5 0.95 A
(QAP 0403)
Bq Sr-90 1.76 1.8 1.02 A
Bq Cs-134 18.2 18.7 1.03 A
Bq Cs-137 26.4 24.8 0.94 A
Bq Gr-A 1.2 1.8 1.50 (1)
Bq Gr-B 2.85 2.88 1.01 A
Soil Bqlkg K-40 539 583 1.08 A
. ~': -:' ;,*';,," ~.,
f, *** ~,'
, I * ~
Bqikg - _ "-Sr-90 ":iL
"'50r'
". 42.1 0.83 A
Bqlkg Cs-137 1323 1429 1.08 A
Bqlkg 81-212 50.43 52.6 1.04 A
'Bqlkg
,. Pb-212 47.73 50.1 1.05 A
Bqlkg 81-214 58.4 57.6 0.99 A
Bqlkg Pb-214 61.0 61.4 1.01 A
Bqlkg.,
Ac-228 49.0 49.4 1.01 A
Bqlkg Th-234 84.0..
114.9
,1.37
' (2)
Vegetation Bqlkg K*40 720.0 807.5 1.12 A
Bqlkg Co-60..
14.47 14.2 0.98 A
8q1kg Sr-90 734.0 685 0.93 A
Bqlkg Cs*137 584.67 637.3 1.09 A
Water BqJ1 Co-60 163.2 159.7 0.98 A
BqJ1 Sr-gO.
4.76' 4.74 1.00 A
BqJ1 Cs-137 51.95 50.6 0.97 A
" BqJ1 Gi*A 326.0 394.0 1.21 W
Bqll Gr-B "
1170.0 1200.0 1.03 A
1-32
DOE - ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY (EML)
QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (QAP)
TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (Page 2 of 2)
COMMENTS 1
Incorrect efficiency used. When recalculated with the correct efficiency, the Gross Alpha activity of 1.16 8q1fi1ter compared well with the value of 1.2 8q1fi1ter. NCR 04-14 generated byTBE to investigate condition.
2 DOElEML evaluated as acceptable at the calculated ratio.
3 DOElEML evaluation: A=acceptable, W=acceptable with warning. N=nol acceptable.
(
(
(
J-33 TABLEJ*9 DOE - ENVIRONMENTAL MEASUREMENTS LABORATORY (EML)
QUALITY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM (QAP)
TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (Page 2 of 2)
COMMENTS 1
Incorrect efficiency used. When recalculated with the correct efficiency, the Gross Alpha activity of 1.16 8q1fi1ter compared well with the value of 1.2 8q1fi1ter. NCR 04-14 generated byTBE to investigate condition.
2 DOElEML evaluated as acceptable at the calculated ratio.
3 DOElEML evaluation: A=acceptable, W=acceptable with warning. N=nol acceptable.
(
(
(
J-33
MIXED ANAL Yrn PERFORMANCE EVALUA nON PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (TBE)
(Page 1 of3)
J-34
(
c C
TABLEJ*I0 DOE*MAPEP' MIXED ANAL Yrn PERFORMANCE EVALUA nON PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (TBE)
(Page 1 of3), :
Identification MAPEP Known THE MonthlYear No.
Medium Units Nuclide Result
,Results Control LImits Evaluatlon{ 4}
January, 2004 03-W11 Water pCI/J Cs-134 8.70E+03 7.81E+03 6081 '*11,313 A
pCI/J Cs-137 3.35E+03 3.21E+03, 2346 - 4357 A
pCI/J, Co-57, 4.68E+03 4.43E+03 3273-6078 A
pCW Co-60 3.29E+03 3.27E+03 2304-4279 A
pCIJI H-3, ~
1.02E+04 1.15E+04 7170 ~ 13,316 A
~ "
- I pCI/J Fe-55 3.54E+03 3.44E+03 2478'- 4603 A
pCI/J Mn-S4 4.19E+03 4.12E+03 2932-5446 A'
pCI/J NI-63, '.',r 1.99E+03' 3.48 E+3, 1394-2589 N(1) pCI/J Zn:S5 ",,,
8.65E+03:
8.20E+03-6054 ; 11,243 A,
pCI/J Sr-90-';'1 4.78E+02' 4.43E+02' 334.9 - 621 ~9 A'
pCI/J Tc-99,
778.4
' '643.2-545-1012 A
pCI/J Pu-238
, :40.3'
". '33.8 28.1 - 52.4 A
pCiII PU-239/240 64.6 57.8' 45.1 - 84.1 A-pC11I U-234/233 63.5 67 44.6-82.7 A
pCIJI U-238
,S5.7
,65.7 46 -85.4 A
July. 2004 MaW12 Water pCiII Am-241 15.9 16.8 11.4 - 21.1 A.
pC11i Cs-134 5.62E+03 4.78E+03 3925 -7308 A
pCIJI Cs-137 6.76E+03 6.41E+03 4730- 8784 A
pCiII Co-SO 4.41E+03 4.32E+03 3084-5725 A
pCiII H-3' "
2.24E+03 2.95E+03 1570 - 2916 N(2) pCI/J Mn-54
.,7.22E+03 7.08E+03 5051 - 9381 A
pCIII NI-63 2.70E+03 3.76E+03 1892 - 3514 N(3) pCIII Sr-90 2.00E+02 1.84E+02 132-246 A
pCIJI Tc-99 281 242 189-351 A
pC11I Zn-65 5.62E+03 5.8SE+03 3935-7308 A
"CiII Pu-238 '[
3.35E+01
'2.97E+01 '
22.7 - 42.2 A
pCIII,
. U-234/233." 3.24E+00 ', *4.00E+00 2.16-4.32 W
pCill U-238
.,.t*., '. '25.4 2S.4 17*31.S A
J-34
TABLEJ~10 MIXED ANAL YTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (TBE)
(Page 2 of3)
(
(
).35 C.
TABLEJ~10
. DOE*MAPEP MIXED ANAL YTE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (TBE)
(Page 2 of3)
Identification MAPEl' Known THE MonthlY ear No.
Medium Units Nuclide Result Results Control Limits Evaluatlon{4l July. 2004 GrW12 Water pCiII Gr-A 3.35E+01 2.26E+01
>0.0- 64.9 A
pCiII Gr-B 1.10E+02 1.34E+02 55.4-166.2 A
.2.7 2.6 1.89 - 3.51 A
Bq Cs-134 7.84E+01 5.92E+01 54.9 - 101.9 W
Bq Cs-137 5.30E+01 5.05E+01 37.8-70.3 A
Bq Co-60.
6.35E+01 6.16E+01 43.5-80.8 A
Bq Mn-54 8.19E+01 8.27E+01 56.8-10S.4 A
Bq Sr-90 2.24E+01 2.46E+01 15.1 - 28.1 A
Bq Zn-65 1.11E+02 1.22E+02 75.7 *140.5 A
Bq Pu-238 3.51 3.43 2.43 -4.59 A
Bq Pu-239/240 2.43 2
1.62-3.24 A
Bq U-234/233 5.68 5.92 4.0S-7.30 A
Bq U-238 5.95 5.65 4.05-7.84 A
July. 2004 GrF12 AP Bq Gr-A 1.00E+01 3.41E+00
>0.0-21.6 A
Gr-B 3.27E+01 3.62E+01 16.2 :'-48.6 A
July, 2004 MaS12 Soit pCVkg Am-241 1.81E+03 1.73E+03 1267*2353.
A pCVkg Cs-134 1.12E+04 8.86E+03 7840 - 14,560 W
pCVkg Cs'*137 2.26E+04 2.12E+04 15,820 - 29A05 A
- pCVkg, Co-60 1.40E+04 1.38E+04 9800.-.18.200 A
pCiII<g Mn-54 1.31E+04 1.29E+04 9170 -17,030 A
pCVkg Ni-63 9.6SE+03 7.92E+03 6755 - 12,545 A
pCiII<g Pu-238 9.57E+02 7.32E+02 670*1244 W
pCVkg Pu-239/240 1.13E+03 64.6 791 - 1300 N(5) pCiII<g K-40 1.63E+04 1.6SE+04 11,427 - 21,222 A
pCVkg Te-99 3.18E+03 1.41E+03 2226 - 4134 N(6) pCiII<g U-234/233 1.00E+03 3.62E+02 700*1300 N(5) pCiII<g U-238 1.05E+03 3.59E+02 735-1365 N(5) pCVkg Zn-65 1.89E-+;04 1.96E+04 13,230
- 24,570 A
(
(
).35 C.
MIXED ANAL YTE PERFORMANCE EV ALUATION PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (TBE)
(Page 3 of 3)
COMMENTS 1
Ni-63 result determined to be an anomaly, specific only to this sample. NCR generated by Teledyne to document condition.
2 All raw data looked normal for the sample. Evaluating the results based on the +/- 541 pCIII uncertainty, the result easily overlaps the known value at the 95% confidence level. The sample was rerun with a larger aliquot to improve accuracy and lower the uncertainty.
The rerun result of 2,605 +/- 209 pCIII agrees with the known value of 2,240 pCIII. NCR generated by Teledyne to document condition.
4 The rerun result of 2,700 pCIII agrees well with the known value of 2,702 pCIII. NCR 04-18 generated by TeJedyne to document condition.
DOEIMAPEP evaluation: A=acceptable,.W=acceptable with warning, N=not acceptable.
5 Non-leachable U and Pu were present in the soil. The sample was rerun and the results agreed with the known values. NCR 04-20 generated by Teledyne to document condition.
6 Special rinses for samples with high Uranium and Co-60 was used on these samples. Reran without these rinses yielded Tc-99 results of 2,757, 2,311, and 2,651 pClIKg which were within the acceptance criteria. NCR 04-21 generated by Teledyne to document condition.
c c
TABLEJ*I0 DOE*MAPEP MIXED ANAL YTE PERFORMANCE EV ALUATION PROGRAM TELEDYNE BROWN ENGINEERING ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES (TBE)
(Page 3 of 3)
COMMENTS 1
Ni-63 result determined to be an anomaly, specific only to this sample. NCR 04*11 generated by Teledyne to document condition.
c 2
All raw data looked normal for the sample. Evaluating the results based on the +/- 541 pCIII uncertainty, the result easily overlaps the known value at the 95% confidence level. The sample was rerun with a larger aliquot to improve accuracy and lower the uncertainty.
The rerun result of 2,605 +/- 209 pCIII agrees with the known value of 2,240 pCIII. NCR 04*19 generated by Teledyne to document condition.
. 3 4
The rerun result of 2,700 pCIII agrees well with the known value of 2,702 pCIII. NCR 04-18 generated by TeJedyne to document condition.
DOEIMAPEP evaluation: A=acceptable,.W=acceptable with warning, N=not acceptable.
5 Non-leachable U and Pu were present in the soil. The sample was rerun and the results agreed with the known values. NCR 04-20 generated by Teledyne to document condition.
6 Special rinses for samples with high Uranium and Co-60 was used on these samples. Reran without these rinses yielded Tc-99 results of 2,757, 2,311, and 2,651 pClIKg which were within the acceptance criteria. NCR 04-21 generated by Teledyne to document condition.
1-36