Letter Sequence Approval |
|---|
|
Initiation
- Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request
- Acceptance...
|
MONTHYEARML0309300582003-03-31031 March 2003
Decommissioning Funding Status Reports
Project stage: Request
ML0316102672003-06-0909 June 2003
RAI, Proposed Amendment Request Regarding the Application for Stretch Power Uprate
Project stage: RAI
ML0323104242003-08-0505 August 2003
Generic Letter 2003-01: Control Room Habitability 60-Day Response
Project stage: Request
ML0322605422003-08-0707 August 2003
Response to Generic Letter 2003-01: Control Room Habitability - 60-Day Response
Project stage: Request
ML0322605132003-08-0707 August 2003
60-Day Response to Generic Letter 2003-01: Control Room Habitability
Project stage: Request
ML0323104142003-08-11011 August 2003
Generic Letter 2003-01: Control Room Habitability 60-Day Response
Project stage: Request
ML0907202342003-09-16016 September 2003
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safety Review of Stretch Power Uprate Amendment
Project stage: Approval
ML0320902152003-09-16016 September 2003
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safety Review of Stretch Power Uprate Amendment
Project stage: Approval
ML0327507002003-10-0707 October 2003
RAI, Amendment Request Regarding Application for Stretch Power Uprate
Project stage: RAI
ML0406201432003-10-0909 October 2003
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safety Review of Stretch Power Uprate Amendment
Project stage: Approval
ML0331801122003-11-0505 November 2003
October 2003 Monthly Operating Report for Kewaunee
Project stage: Request
ML0333001622003-11-25025 November 2003
Generic Letter 2003-01: Control Room Habitability - Response to Commitments
Project stage: Request
ML0332300162003-12-10010 December 2003
Review of License Amendment Request 195, Stretch Power Uprate
Project stage: Approval
ML0331000602003-12-16016 December 2003
Environmental Assessment, Stretch Power Uprate
Project stage: Other
ML0334503782004-01-0707 January 2004
Request for Withholding Information from Public Disclosure, WCAP-15821-P, MB9031
Project stage: Withholding Request Acceptance
ML0401606962004-01-26026 January 2004
Review of License Amendment Request No. 195, Stretch Power Uprate
Project stage: Approval
ML0404204182004-01-30030 January 2004
Responses to NRC Clarification Questions on Responses to Requests for Additional Information Regarding License Amendment Request 195, Stretch Power Uprate
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML0403304672004-01-30030 January 2004
Nuclear Management Company, LLC, Application for Technical Specification Improvement to Eliminate Requirements for Hydrogen Recombiners and Hydrogen/Oxygen Monitors Using the Consolidated Line Item Improvement Process
Project stage: Request
ML0404906872004-02-0909 February 2004
Responses to NRC Clarification Questions on Responses to RAIs Regarding License Amendment Request 195, Stretch Power Uprate
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML0406503782004-02-20020 February 2004
Responses to NRC RAI Regarding License Amendment Request 195, Stretch Power Uprate
Project stage: Response to RAI
ML0404306332004-02-27027 February 2004
License Amendment No. 172, Authorizing an Increase in the Licensed Reactor Core Power Level of 6.0 Percent from 1673 Megawatts Thermal to 1772 Megawatts Thermal
Project stage: Other
ML0413405112004-03-23023 March 2004
Corrective Action Program No. 020538 - Enclosure 2
Project stage: Request
ML0409302272004-05-13013 May 2004
Letter, Clarification to Issuance of Amendment 172, Stretch Power Uprate
Project stage: Approval
ML0416600042004-06-16016 June 2004
Correction to Issuance of Amendment No. 172, Stretch Power Uprate (Tac No. MB9031)
Project stage: Approval
ML0616403402006-03-20020 March 2006
Redacted Version of the Update to the Chapter 13 of the Safety Analysis Report of the Kansas State University Triga Research Reactor
Project stage: Request
ML0610102642006-03-30030 March 2006
Kansas State Univ - Update to Chapter 11, Appendix a of the Proposed Safety Analysis Report for the K-State Triga Mark II Nuclear Research Reactor
Project stage: Request
ML0612801932006-07-0505 July 2006
Letter to Mr. P. Michael Whaley from Brian Thomas Determination of Acceptability and Sufficiency for Docketing & Opportunity for a Hearing the Application from KSU for Renewal of the Facility License for KSU Nuclear Reactor Facility
Project stage: Other
2003-09-16
[Table View] |
Text
October 9, 2003 MEMORANDUM TO: James E. Dyer, Director Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:
John T. Larkins, Executive Director
/RA/
Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards
SUBJECT:
KEWAUNEE NUCLEAR POWER PLANT - ADVISORY COMMITTEE ON REACTOR SAFETY REVIEW OF STRETCH POWER UPRATE AMENDMENT (TAC NO. MB9031)
During the 505th meeting of the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards, September 10-13, 2003, the Committee considered the recommendation made in a memorandum to me dated September 16, 2003, from Ledyard B. Marsh, NRR, that the Committee not review the stretch power uprate request from the Kewaunee Nuclear Power Plant (KNPP) licensee. The memo characterized the KNPP power uprate request as essentially a six percent stretch power uprate with minor modifications. The Committee has decided to accept your staffs recommendation and not review the KNPP power uprate request.
The Committee agrees with the additional amplifying criteria provided in the September 16 memo for Committee involvement in power uprates reviews. Your staff will continue to notify the Committee of all power uprate requests above five percent. However, when the staff believes that the license amendment request is not complex and does not involve important changes or potentially higher impacts to the plant, the staff will describe the proposed changes in its recommendation that the Committee not become involved in the licensing review. For power uprate requests of less than five percent, if the uprate request does involve important changes to the plant or potentially higher impacts, or if it presents novel issues that the staff believes might benefit from Committee participation, then the staff will inform the Committee and invite it to participate in the review.
The Committee does not expect a written response to this memorandum.
cc:
T. Marsh, NRR J. Lamb, NRR T. Harris, NRR W. Ruland, NRR L. Raghavan, NRR
