B14829, Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept for Jan-Dec 1993

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept for Jan-Dec 1993
ML20029C956
Person / Time
Site: Haddam Neck File:Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Co icon.png
Issue date: 12/31/1993
From: Opeka J
CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER CO., NORTHEAST UTILITIES SERVICE CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
B14829, NUDOCS 9405030082
Download: ML20029C956 (88)


Text

. NI#"~')Northeast i 7 8 " " 8" " "" h"' Cf

  • jj@'

Utilities System 8

Noriheast uiititie, service company P.O. Box 270 Ilartforal. CT 06141 0270 (203) 665-5000 April 26, 1994 Docket No. 50-213 B14829 Re:

10CFR50. 4 (b) (1)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention:

Document Control Desk Washington, D r.'

20555 Haddam Neck Plant Annual Radioloaical Environmental Operatina Report In accordance with the requirements of the Haddam Neck Radiological Effluent Monitoring Manual, an implementing document of the Haddam Neck Technical Specifications, two (2) copies of the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report are herewith submitted.

Copies of this report are being distributed in accordance with 10CFR50.4 (b) (1).

Very truly yours, CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY 11 J. F. Op6KA)

L Executive Vice President cc:

T. T. Martin, Region I Administrator A. B. Wang, NRC Project Manager, Haddam Neck Plant

.i W. J..Raymond, Senior Resident Inspector, Haddam Neck Plant 1

9405030002 931231 PDR ADOCK 05000213 A

I R

PDR

/

M14M Rf1 i A4

hkh $ $hk hh h h$$ fbO;h(h ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT JANUARY 1,1993 - DECEMBER 31,1993 4

A

,. - " r#"

....adm L:D W' W l%. ?e. f V' ~w= eWjpib'ye p 4,.m

' "..',$A#

\\

fa.. m. s ;,,. >...,.

,,s.~ y.m

>f)

-. if

. ep,

y..<..,5 ~

1,r"# ' '

'9$'.. k;.! f},-

9

,w..

.,. :.-r

' h' 2.

.. > ;: * ],j',

' f,,, }<.

i L,, _gl;; j f, W. ;.,.

~ '

va j$

.e

  • .pl.,.

,,. g c.' f

,s

_s.

s.

e, g..'

j w.

~

.r '

i' y*.
q,gG - - *t g..

4

,t.

t, 3:.

3.

a.4 %~ s; 1

L

..?

4 m..

.g 5.. g.:.

r:

~. _

c

44. y g;
c x i s.

.3

- 7 t.... r.

s.

~

u.

- t

-.. m.,e..

,o

^

N

- p...b,.,,

,9

~ - '

n; q?

^

}\\.~'

N ' o....g

~

4

-e c

s.

i 0 - l g,

e.

fL ue I

CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY HADDAM, CONNECTICUT

=.,

-c---

y

..c.

.-v.

r

..m

10 da 8""' 8"A " 37 Northeast I

j

' Utilities System Nonhe.n uso swa company P.O. Box 270 llartford, CT 061410270 (203) 665-5000 April 26, 1994 Docket No. 50-213 B14829 Re:

10CFR50. 4 (b) (1)

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention:

Document Control Desk I-Washington, DC 20555 Haddam Neck Plant Annual Radioloaical Environmental Operatina Reoort In accordance with the requirements of the Haddam Neck I

Radiological Effluent Monitoring Manual, an implementing document of the Haddam Neck Technical Specifications, two (2) copies of-the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report _are herewith submitted.

Copies of this report are being distributed I

in accordance with 10CFR50.4 (b) (1).

Very truly yours, CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY h-11Yr J.

F. OpaKA) _

L I

Executive Vice President cc:

T. T. Martin, Region I Administrator.

A. B. Wang, NRC Project Manager, Haddam Neck Plant W. J. Raymond, Senior Resident Inspector, Haddam Neck Plant I

I I

I g

HADDAM NECK STATION RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT PERIOD JANUARY 1,1993 - DECEMBER 31,1993 DOCKET NO. 50-213 LICENSE NO. DPR-61 e

PREPARED FOR THE CONNECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY HADDAM, CONNECTICUT c-BY THE -

NORTHEAST UTILITIES SERVICE COMPANY.

BERLIN, CONNECTICUT,

e TABLE OF CONTENTS (4

?

Paae No.

1.0 Summary 1-1 2.0 Program Description 2-1 2.1 Sampling Schedule and Locations 2-1 2.2 Samples Collected During Report Period 2-7 3.0 Radiochemical Results 3-1 3.1 Summary Table 3-1 3.2 Data Tables 3-14

\\

i 4.0 Discussion of Results 4-1 5.0 Off-Site Dose Equivalent Commitments 5-1

-I 6.0 Discussion 6-1 Appendix A - Cow and Goat Census for 1993 A-1 I

Appendix B - Northeast Utilities QA Program B-1 l

Appendix C - Summary of EPA Interlaboratory Comparisons C-1 I

Ic

L 1.0

SUMMARY

The radiological environmental monitoring program for the Haddam Neck Plant

/

was continued for the period January through December 1993, in compliance with the Radiological Effluent Monitoring and Off-Site Dose Calculation Manual.

This annual report was prepared for the Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power l

Company (CYAPCO) by the Radiological Assessment Branch of the Northeast Utilities Service Company (NUSCO). All sample collections and preparations are performed by the Production Operations Services Laboratory. Gamma exposure measurements were performed by NUSCO at the Production Operations Services Laboratory. Gamma exposure measurements were performed by NUSCO at the Production Operations Services Laboratory.

All remaining laboratory analyses were performed by the primary contractor, Teledyne isotopes, Inc.

Yankee Atomic Environmental Laboratory was used to independently check on the primary contractor's laboratory as cart of the i

overall quality assurance program.

Radiological analyses were performed with gamma exposure measuring devices and on samples of air particulates and iodine, milk, broad leaf vegetation, well water, fruits, vegetables, river water, bottom sediment, shellfish, and fish. In evaluating the results of these analyses it is necessary to consider the variability of radionuclide uptake in environmental media. This variability is dependent on many factors, including plant release rates, meteorology, number and size of nuclear weapon tests, seasonal variability of fallout, soil characteristics, farming practices, and feed type.

Significant variations in measured levels of radioactivity could be caused by any one of these factors. Therefore, these factors need to be considered in order to properly explain any variations.

The predominant radioactivity, indicated by the results, was that from nonplant (not Haddam Neck) sources, such as fallout from nuclear weapons tests and naturally occurring radionuclides. As typical of previous years, plant related radioactivity was observed at some of the on-site gamma monitoring locations and in several other enviror4 mental samples. These include tritium in well water at the on-site location, tritium in river water near the East Haddam Bridge, cobalt-60, and cesium-137 in bottom sediment from near the end of the canal, cobalt-58 and cobalt-60 in shellfish downstream of the discharge canal, and cesium-137 in fish.

As usual, cesium-137 and strontium-90 were measured in both cow and goat milk. These levels are a result of nuclear weapons testing in the 1960s and not the result of plant operation. This can be concluded based on the facts that:

insufficient quantities of these isotopes have been released by the plant to I

account for the measured concentrations, chemically similar and plant related cesium-134 and strontium-89 have not been detected and comparable levels of cesium-137 and strontium-90 were detected prior to initial plant operation.

1-1

L

(

The radiation dose (dose equivalent commitment) to the general public from the plant's discharges has been evaluated by two methods. One method utilizes the measured station's discharges and conservative transport models and the other utilizes the measured concentrations of radioactivity in the environmental l

media.

i The maximum whole body dose (station boundary) that could occur to a member of the general public wras 0.55 millirem from airborne effluents, 0.26 millirem from direct exposure, and 0.20 millirem from liquid discharges for a total whole body dose of 1.0 millirem. The average dose to a member of the public residing within 50 miles of the plant is 0.00023 millirem These doses are 4.0 percent and 0.00092 percent of the standards as set by the Environmental Protection Agency on the maximum allowable dose to an individual of the general public. These standards are a small fraction (less than 10 percent) of the 280 mrem per year normal background radiation and are designed to be inconsequential in regard to public health and safety. Plant l

related doses are even a smaller fraction of the natural background; they are less than 10 percent of the variation in natural background in Connecticut.

Therefore, for the above stated reasons, the plant related doses have insignificant public health consequences.

l i

(

/

l a-a+

~

1-2 f

l-L L

e' -

2.0 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 2.1 Samolino Schedule and Locations L

The sample locations and the sample types and frequency of analysis are s

given in Table 2-1 and 2-2 and Figures 2.1 and 2.2. The program as I

described here includes both required samples as specified in the Radiological Effluent Monitoring and Off-Site Dose Calculation Manual and any extra samples.

L J

f~

-i b

r

\\

[

2-1 g

L 4

TABLE 2-1 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SAMPLING LOCATIONS The following lists the environmental sampling locations and the types of samples obtained at each location.

L9&Rti.3 9

Direction & Distance From N_Mmbg Hgmn Release Point *

  • Semote Tvpf.s 1 -l
  • On-site - Mouth of Discharge 1.1 Mi, ESE TLD Canal 2-1 Haddam-Park Rd.

0.8 Mi,S TLD f

3-1 Haddam-Jail Hill Rd.

0.8 Mi, WSW TLD 4-1 Haddam-Ranger Rd.

1.8 Mi, SW TLD, Air Particulate, lodine 5-1 On-site-Injun Hollow Rd.

0.4 Mi, NW TLD, Air Particulate, lodine 61 On-site-Substation 0.5 Mi, NE TLD, Air Particulate, lodine, Veg.

7-1 Haddam 1.8 Mi, SE TLD, Air Particulate, lodine 8-1 East Haddam 3.1 Mi, ESE TLD, Air Particulate, lodine 9-1 Higganum 3.2 Mi, WNW TLD, Air Particulate, lodine 4.3 Mi, WNW TLD, Air Particulate, lodine 10-1 Hurd Park Rd.

2.8 Mi, NNW TLD 11 C Middletown 9.0 Mi, NW TLD 12 C Deep River 7.1 Mi, SSE TLD 13 C North Madison 12.5 Mi, SW TLD, Air Particulate, lodine 14 C Colchester 10.5 Mi, NE TLD 15-1 On-site Wells 0.8 Mi, ESE Well Water

(

16 C Well-State Highway Dept. E. Haddam 2.8 Mi, SE Well Water 17 C Fruits & Vegetables Beyond 10 Miles Vegetation 18-l Site Boundary 0.4 Mi, NW Vegetation 19-1 Cow Location #1 5.5 Mi, ENE Milk 20-1 Cow Location #2 6.0 Mi, NW Milk 21 1 Cow Location #3 8.0 Mi, WNW Milk 22 C Cow Location #4 11.0 Mi, ENE Milk 23-C Goat Location #1 17.0 Mi, NE Milk 24-1 Goat Location #2 4.5 Mi, N Milk 251 Fruits & Vegetables Within 10 Miles Vegetation 26-1 CT River-Near intake 1.0 Mi, WNW Fish 27 C CT River-Higganum Light 4.0 Mi, WNW Shellfish 28-1 CT River-E. Haddam Bridge 1.8 Mi, SE Bottom Sediment, River Water 28-X CT River E. Haddam Bridge 1.8 Mi, SE Shellfish 291 Vicinity of Discharge Bottom Sediment, Fish 30-C CT River - Middletown 9.0 Mi, NW River Water, Bottom Sediment 7.6 Mi, NW Fish 31-1 Mouth of Salmon River O.8 Mi, ESE Shellfish 40-X Near intake Structure 0.1 Mi, SSW TLD 41-X Picnic Area 0.3 Mi, WNW TLD 42-X Environmental Trail 0.1 Mi, NW TLD 43-X Moodus - Rts 149 & 151 2.5 Mi, ENE TLD

[

(

2-2 m

IABLE 2-1 (Cont'd)

Location Direction & Distance From Sp_mnple_Tynga Number Name Release Point *

  • r 4

44-X Shailerville, Horton Rd.

1.0 Mi, SE TLD 4 5-X Old Waste Gas Sphere Fence 0.1 Mi, E TLD 46-X Discharge Canal Fence 0.2 Mi, SE TLD 47-X info Center 0.1 Mi, WNW TLD k

'l = Indicator C - Control X - Extra - nonrequired sample

  • *The release points are the stack for terrestrial locations and the end of the discharge canal for aquatic locations.

5

/

F

4 TABLE 2-2 J

HADDAM NECK RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM Sampling &

Exposure Pathway Number of Collection and/or Samole Locations Freauency Tvoe & Freauency of Analysis l a.

Gamma Dose -

14 Monthly Gamma Dose Monthly Environmental TLD

}

1 b.

Gamma Dose -

27 Quarterly '*)

N/A

L Accident TLD 2.

Airborne 7

Continuous Gross Beta - Weekly Particulate sampler - weekly Gamma Spectrum - Quarterly on filter change composite (by location), & on individual sample if gross beta is greater than 10 times the mean of the weekly control j

stations gross beta results 3.

Airborne lodine 7

Continuous 1-131-Weekly sampler - weekly I

canister change 4.

Vegetation 4

One sample near Gamma Isotopic, Sr-89 and Sr-90 on middle & one near each sample end of growing season 5.

Milk 6

Monthly Gamma Isotopic,1131, Sr-89 & Sr-90 on each sample 6.

Well Water 2

Quarterly Gamma Isotopic & Tritium on each sample 7.

Bottom Sediment 3

Ouarterly Gamma Isotopic 8.

River Water 2

Ouarterly Sample -

Quarterly - Gamma isotopic & Tritium Indicator is Continuous Composite; f

Background is composite of Six weekly Grab l

Samples 9.

Fish - Bullheads &,

3 Quarterly Gamma Isotopic - Quarterly

[

when available, Perch or other edible fish 10.

Shellfish 2

Quarterly Gamma Isotopic - Quarterly r

(a) Accident monitoring TLDs to be dedosed at least quarterly l

I l

I 2-4

~

_~

X

-~%

/

\\---

\\

FIGURE 2.1

\\

~ ~ '

p-i

'g g

j-Scale North

/\\

l

?1

\\,

('

y

(

(j_

'N

-~

(

)

\\. \\

l <ms N% ipM catcwsTER i

fl

--~

i

~__

s

~~~

~ 2 '~""""""

~

2c-

\\

[

'"~ ",_

j gnneton'[,h

--~

l s

.g

~

guSEJ9 Mil-(\\

\\.

\\

anonAM

,, s. fd

>v/r- #'

g M

s

\\.

Y

g. r f' 1,

\\

.f.

s.

s s

~~

j

~

/1

(

\\

t v /{ l

m, N

.(

\\

G

-W g k s [j/

_\\

i g

j

\\

i

\\

9,,<

x R

N S T,H A i

N HADDAM NECK PLANT AQUATIC (o) AND WELL WATER (a) SAMPLE STATIONS \\-a.

t

\\h

\\

k 1

., //,s

,a,

\\

Ns

~

i i

-n N

$ 4-l iI Gt !

L zV i

)_5 j

! t,rx \\[M g

m r

9 't $

1

./ r E

'y'

[' '

' 'U E

,m 0

e\\

\\

O

\\

m b

5

~

th ***

s

/

'~~

x

't t

x Qp}g? s\\t g

n: v

)xN e

x,/r

.g

.e 1

y f ~ - ~u l

gZ

~,.- k E lW r$

\\

e a l D--.

E" e,,

j

,p e,

s c gg r -

7 7

W - p g,g, g

kWx E l'i I

N l

[ w\\

'N....

i,

~

~

i

\\

t II.

l l

~ % s, 1

\\

I i

', a P

\\

/

l e

./

=q 3%

/

S\\ {8 l'

Di j

s '.-

%\\ t N

,t

,,c

. \\\\

),,

y,\\

,1

,/

\\

2-6

L 2.2 Samoles Collected Durina Reoort Period

/

I The following table summarizes the number of samples of each type collected during the present reporting period:

I Number of Number of Samole Tymn Reauired Samoles Extra Samoles

[

Gamma Exposure (TLD) 168 96 Air Particulates 364 0

Air lodino 364 0

Dairy Milk 48 0

Goat Milk 24 0

Pasture Grass 0

0 Well Water 8

0 Fruit & Vegetables 8

0 J

Broad Leaf Vegetation 4

12 River Water 7

0 Bottom Sediment 12 0

Fish 24 0

Shellfish 8

4 Total All Types 1,039 112 1

l1

G 3.0 RADIOCHEMICAL RESULTS i

.I i

3.1 Summary Table in accordance with the Radiological Effluent Monitoring Manual (REMM), Section 1

[

F.1, a summary table of the radiochemical results has been prepared and is-LL presented in Table 3-1.

In the determination of the mean, the data was handled as recommended by the-1 Health and Safety Laboratory, Idaho and NUREG/CR-4007 (Sept.1984): all valid '

{

data, including negative values and zeros were used in the determination of the mean (see Part 3.2).

{

l A more detailed analysis of the data is given in Section 4.0 where a discussion j

of the variations in the data explains many aspects that are not evident in the

{

Summary Table because of the basic limitation of data summaries.

N 3

-]

i i

l

)

.j i

i I

'l 15 3-1

TABLE 3-1 PAGE 3-2 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROLRAM

SUMMARY

CONNECTICUT YAPd(EE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY, HAEDAM NECK PLANT DOCKET 50-213 i

JANUARY - DECEMBER 1993

{

ANALYSIS AND LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR L ATION WITH HIGHEST ANHUAL MEAN CONTROL W OF NEDIUM OR TOTAL NUMBER OF LOCATIONS

. TINFE LOCAT]ONS NRM PATHWAY OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN DISTANCE MEAN MEAN (C)

SAMPLED PERFORMED (LLD) (A)

(RANGE)(B)

AND DIRECTION (RANGE)(B)

(RANGEl(B)

CANMA DOSE 120, 48 (D) 1.5 7.5 LOC # 14C 8.4 7.5 0

(UR/HR)

( 5.5 -

8.91 10.5 MILES NE

( 6.8 -

9.39

( 5.8 -

9.3)

AIR RR 57 0.01 (E) 0.018 LDC # 9 0.011 0.010 0

PARTICULATE BNA (e.000 - 8.825) 3.2 MILES WNW (0.001 - 0.023)

(0.001 - 0.024)

AND 10 DIME EPCI/M3)

GE(LI) 312.52 s.87 8.000 LOC s 6 0.000 e.000 0

I-131

(-8.808 -

8.088) 0.5 MILES NE

(-8.008 -

0.908)

(-0.008 -

0.007)

GEtLI) 24, 4 e.103 LOC a 4 0.109 0.107 0

BE-7

( 8.081 - 8.129) 1.8 MILES SW

( 0.896 - 8.129)

( 8.101 - 8.113)

C0-6e 0.0e0 LOC a 6 0.000 0.000 0

( 0.000 -

8.000) 8.5 MILES NE

( 0.000 -

0.000)

( 0.000 -

0.000)

ZR-95 8.808 LOC e 7 0.000 0.000 0

(-0.001 -

0.081) 1.8 MILES SE

( 0.000 -

0.001)

(-0.001 -

0.001)

NB-95 e.000 LOC 8 7 0.000 0.000 0

( 0.000 - 0.000) 1.8 MILES SE

( 0.000 -

0.000)

( e.000 -

0.000) l l

RU-103

-0.000 LOC 5 9 0.000 0.000 0

(-e. eel - e.001) 3.2 MILES WNW

( 0.00s - e.000)

( 0.00s - 0.0:0)

CS-134 0.85 (F) 0.000 LOC 5 5 0.000 0.000 0

(-0.001 -

8.080) 0.4 MILES NW

( 0.000 -

0.000)

( O.000 -

0.080)

CS-137 0.06 e.000 LOC 8 13C e.000 0.000 0

( 0.000 -

0.000) 12.5 MILES SW

( 8.800 -

0.000)

( e.000 - e.000) l l

MILK SR 36.12 G.3 LOC 8 21 0.4 0.2 0

l (DAIRY)

SR-89

(-8.8 -

2.1) 8.0 MILES WNW

(-8.2 - 1.59

(-1.1 -

1.1) l (PC1/L)

SR-90 1.8 LOC 5 29 2.6 2.0 9

( 0.9 -

3.5) 6 MILE *, NW

( 2.1 -

3.5)

( 1.3 -

2.4) i C

_____.__.___m__

TABLE 3-1 PAGE 3-3 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

l COMMECTICUT YANKEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY, HADDAM NECK PLANT I

DOCKET 50-213 JANUARY - DECEMBER 1993 ANALY5IS AND LOWER LIM 11 ALL INDICATOR IOCATION WITH HIGHEST A)# DUAL MEAN CONTROL 5 0F MEDIUM OR TOTAL NUMBER OF LOCATIONS

~~TDCATION B, LOCAJONS NRM T

PATHWAY OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN DISTANCE MEAN

& AN (C)

SAMPLED PERf0RMED (LLD1 (A1 (RANGEI(B)

AND DIRECTION (RANGEI(B)

(RANGEI(BI ig 1

-e.el LOC a 21

-e.se

-e.el o

( -0.16 -

0.08) 8.0 MILES WNW

( -0.16 -

S.08)

( -0.07 -

0.08)

GE(LI) 36.12 15

-0.2 LOC 3 21 0.1

-0.2 0

l 05-134

( -3.0 -

1.6) 8.8 MILES WNW

( -2.7 -

1.5)

( -5.8 -

3.0) i CS-137 18 1.8 LOC e 21 2.6 a.7 0

( -5.7 - 11.2) 8.0 MILES WNW

(

-0.8 - 11.23

( -5.5 -

6.5)

BA-140 78

-8 LOC 5 20 0

-1 0

( 7) 6 MILES NW

( 5)

( 5)

LA-149 25 9.4 tcC a 21 1.2

-0.0 8

( -4.4 -

3.0) 8.0 MILES WNW

(

-0.8 -

2.6)

( -3.0 -

2.0) i GOAT MILK SR 12.12 0.1 LOC B 24 0.1

-0.4 0

l (PCI/L)

SR-89

(-1.4 -

1.5) 4.5 MILES M

(-1.4 -

1.5)

(-2.5 -

1.0) l I

SR-98 4.8 LOC e 24 4.8 2.1 0

j

( 3.2 - 11.8) 4.5 MILES M i 3.2 - 11.8)

( 1.3 -

3.8) l IODINE 12.12 1

-0.01 LOC 8 23C

-0.01

-0.01 0

I-131

( -0.15 -

8.16) 17 MILES NE

( -0.14 -

8.11)

( -0.14 -

8.11)

GE(LI) 12.12 15 0.8 LOC # 24 0.0

-0.7 0

CS-154

( -2.5 -

1.9) 4.5 MILES N

( -2.5 -

1.9)

( -6.2 -

0.9)

CS-137 18 5.s LOC s 23C 14.s 14.e e

( -S.O - 11.9) 17 MILES NE

(

1.1 -

38.6)

(

1.1 -

38.6)

BA-14e.

78 2

LOC 3 24 2

-0 0

( 11) 4.5 MILES N

( 11)

( 6)

LA-140 25

-0.4 LOC e 23C

-0.1

-0.1 0

( -3.9 -

2.11 17 MILES ME

( -2.0 -

3.2)

( -2.0 -

3.2)

.. V TABLE 3-1 PAGE 3-4 ENVIR0petENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUNMARY C0petECTICUT YAPetEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY, HADDAM NECK PLANT DOCKET 50-213 JANUARY - DECEMBER 1993 ANALYSIS AND LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATION WITH HIGHEST APW4UAL MEAN CONTROL 8 OF MEDIUM OR TOTAL NUMBER OF LOCATIONS

. LOCATION 5, LOCATIONS NRtt PATHWAY OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN DISTANCE MEAN MEAN (C)

SAMPLED PERFORMED tLLD) iAI (RANGEItB)

AND DIRECTION IRANGEIIB) tRANGE)iB)

CROUNDWATER GE f t.t )

4. 4 15 0.3 LOC B 15 0.3

-1.5 8

(PCI/L) 194-54 I -8.9 -

1.0) 8.8 MILES ESE E

-8.9 -

1.0)

( -3.4 -

-e.4)

CD-s8 15

-8.5 LOC # 15

-0.5

-2.7 0

t -2.1 -

3.5) 0.8 MILES ESE t -2.1 -

8.3)

( -7.1 -

-e.8)

CD-60 15 0.8 LOC 3 16C 0.5 0.5 8

t -1.1 -

1.2) 2.8 MILES SE t -0.6 -

1.1) t

-0.6 -

1.1)

I-131

-3 LOC 8 16C 1

1 e

( 2) 2.8 MILES SE E 4)

( 4)

CS-134 15 0.5 LOC # 16C e.7 0.7 8

t 8.8 -

1.1) 2.8 MILES SE t -0.8 -

2.4)

( -0.8 -

2.4)

CS-137 18

-8.9 LOC # 16C 0.8 0.8 e

t -5.2 -

1.4) 2.8 MILES SE I

0.9 -

1.5) 1 0.0 -

1.5)

BA-149

-68

-3 LOC S 16C 1

1 9

I 3) 2.8 MILES SE I 1) 1 1)

LA-140 68 1

LOC # 15 1

0 0

t 4) 8.8 MILES ESE E 4)

( 1)

TRITIUM

4. 4 2998 2513 LOC 8 15 2513 49 e

H-3

(

889 -

5430)

's.8 MILES ESE E

889 -

5438) t 24 -

115)

FRUITS AND GEtLI)

4. 4 8.05 LOC # 25 S.05 0.05 8

VEGETABLES BE-7 I 0.00 - 0.17)

(19 MILES

( 0.00 - S.17)

( 6.80 - 0.14)

(PCI/G)

K-48 2.56 LOC 2 25 2.56 2.18 0

[

t 1.10 -

6.45)

<10 MILES I 1.10 -

6.45)

( 8.95 - 4.64) i l

- )M-54

-0.000 LOC 8 17C 0.881 e.801 e

t-0.002 - 8.998)

>18 MILES 4 0.000 -

8.803)

.t 0.800 - 0.083)

_ i a-

_----_._m__a-___._-___--____________._

_ _ _ _. - _ - _ - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ - _ _ - _ _ - - - _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ - _ _ - ~ - _ _ - - - - _ _ _.

- w w-v w-w--

r v um.

r-a rm r~ W TABLE 3-1 PACE 3-5 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROCRAM

SUMMARY

CONNECTICUT YAMtEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY, HADDAM MECK PLANT DOCKET 50-213 JANUARY - DECEMBER 1995 ANALYSIS AND LOidER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATION WITH HIGHE5T ANNUAL HEAN CONTROL 5 OF MEDIUM DR TOTAL NLHBER OF LOCATIONS LOCATION B, LOC A TJONS NRM PATHWAY OF ANALYSES DETECTION HMT DISTANCE MEAN MEAN (C)

SAMPLED PERFORMED (LLD) (A)

(RANGE)(B)

AND DIRECTION (RANGEl(B)

(RANGEl(B)

C0-58

-0.081 LOC 8 17C

-0.001

-e.001 e

j t-0.003 -

9.081)

>10 MILES t-0.004 - 0.003) t-8 084 - S.803)

CO-68

-0.000 LOC 5 ITC 0.001 0.001 e

t-8.003 -

8.892)

>10 MILES

( 0.000 - 9.003)

( 0.000 - 0.093) 2R-95 e.887 LOC s 25 a.807 0.001 e

t 8.994 - 0.010)

<10 MILES

( 0.084 - 8.010)

(-0.001 - 0.004)

NB-95 0.999 LOC B 17C 8.982 8.802 0

(-8.001 -

9.901)

>18 MILES i 9.401 -

0.004) t 0.001 -

0.004)

RU-le3 8.888 LOC 5 17C 0.001 0.001 8

(-8.881 -

0.802)

>10 MILES

( 0.000 -

8.003) t 8.000 -

8.883)

I-131' 9.06 (C)

-0.000 LOC 8 25

-0.008

-0.001 0

(-8.007 - 9.911)

(18 MILES

(-0.007 -

4.011) t-8.007 -

0.001)

CS-134 9.06

-0.801 LOC 8 17C 8.001 0.001 0

(-0.905 - 0.081)

>10 MILES t-0.001 -

0.084)

(-8.801 -

8.004)

CS-137 0.08 0.083 LDC 5 25 0.083 0.001 0

( e.001 -

8.885)

<10 MILES

( 0.001 -

8.005) t 9.000 -

0.001) i RA-226

-0.052 LOC # 17C 0.082 0.982 0

1

(-8.122 - 0.909)

>19 MILES

(-0.027 -

8.059)

(-8.027 - 0.059) l TM-228

-0.007 LOC # 17C 0.001 0.001 0

t-0.924 - 8.000)

>10 MILES t-0.991 -

0.004)

(-0.001 - 0.004) l I

BROADLEAF pf_( LI I 14.

1.21 LOC # 6 1.21 O

VEGETATION BE-7 i 8.21 - 3.20) 0.5 MILES NE t e.43 - 3.20)

{

. I (PCI/G) j 1

K-48 2.68 LOC 8 6 2.85

)

e

( c.93 - 4.69) 0.5 MILES NE t 1.55 - 4.69)

(

-- t rn 1 -- u u -- u-~u ~ W ' U ~ W- ~ U U '~1 J~ U ~~~ W U ~'

TABLE 3-1 PAGE 3-6 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CONNECTICUT YAPECEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY, HADDAM NECK PLANT DOCKET 58-213 JANUARY - DECEMBER 1993 ANALYSIS AND LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN CONTROL 8 OF l

MEDIUM OR TOTAL NUMBER OF LOCATIONS LOCATION 5 LOCATIONS NRM l

PATHWAY OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN DISTANCE MEAN HUR (C)

SAMPLED PERFORMED (LLD) (A)

(RANGEltB)

AND DIRECTION (RANGEllB)

(RANGEllB)

MH-54 e.001 LOC # 6 0.002

)

e

(-8.805 -

0.006) 8.5 MILES NE t-0.803 -

8.006)

(

CO-58

-0.801 LOC # 18

-0.001 O

t-8.809 - 0.005) 0.4 MILES NW t-8.007 -

0.003)

(

I CD-60 8.881 LOC e 6 8.001

)

a t-8.883 -

8.094) 8.5 MILES NE t-8.001 -

0.804)

(

ZR-95

-0.004 LDC a 6 0.001

)

e t-0.832 -

3.089) 0.5 MILES NE t-8.007 -

0.009)

(

NB-95 8.001 LOC 5 6 0.081 0

1-9.482 -

9.885) 0.5 MILES HE I 8.000 -

0.005)

(

)

RU-183

-0.081 LOC s 6

-e.000

)

O t-8.986 - 8.086) 8.5 MILES NE t-0.881 - e.002)

(

1-131 0.86

-0.001 LOC S 18 8.004

)

8

(-8.015 - 8.813) 8.4 MILES NW I-8.819 - 0.013)

(

CS-134 4.86

-e.sel LOC a 6

-0.081

)

O t-9.812 - 0.005) 8.5 MILES NE t-8.012 -

0.005)

(

CS-137 0.98 0.836 LOC # 18 0.046

)

e

( 8.000 - 8.141) 0.4 MILES NW t 0.008 - 0.141)

(

RA-226

-0.098 LOC S 18

-0.069

}

O t-8.349 -

0.058) 8.4 MILES NW

(-0.144 -

0.050)

(

TH-228 8.004 LOC # 6 8.006

)

O t-0.013 - 8.e43) 0.5 MILES NE t-0.013 -

0.043)

(

2IVER WATER GEELI)

4. 3 6

LOC a 28 6

-25 e

(PCI/L)

K-40 t 39) 1.8 MILES SE t 39)

( -11)

ll l

Ili lill' I

Il lI il ll ll c

7 3

FM)

ORC s

0 e

0 0

e 0

0 0

0 0

0 E

N(

G 5

A P

)

)

)

)

)

)

1

)

)

)

)

)

7

)

1 1

2 5

5 5

1 9

2 8

8 0

8

)

1 0

0 2

1 2

S B

3 0

e LN t

5 1

3 8

6 8

1 1

0 OON) 7 6

3 1

4. -
0. -
0. -

RIAE 0-0-

0-0-

1-TTEG 9

0 0

1 2

NAHN 8

6 1

9 2

1 2

1 3

1 OC A

1 1

0 0

CO R

0 0

8 s

1 6

L

(

0 0

t

(

(

t

.(

(

t 1

(

(

(

(

)

)

)

3

)

)

8

)

)

0 5

5 5

1

)

)

)

7

)

1 1

N 9

6 8

6 5,

0 0

T A

)

1 2

0 2

1 2

N E

B 0

8 8

A M

(

6 5

3 8

6 6

1 1

0 YL N) 7 4

3 7

4. -
0. -
0. -

RP L

AE 0-0-

0-0-

1-2-

A A

EG 9

0 0

MK U

MN 2

7 1

9 2

1 2

1 5

1 1

2 MC N

A 2

4 8

8 UE N

R 0

0 9

0 1

8 SM A

(

8 0

t t

t t

MM T

i t

t

(

t t

t AA S

t RD E

GD H

OA G

RH I

P H

, 3 GY 9 H

NN 9 T

IA 1 I

N A

W W

RP W

, O E

E W

W W

W E

W E

/

N N

DM3R 5

I S

S CN CN CN CN S

CN S

N CW CW TO1E N

ET 8

8 0

0 0

0 8

0 8

9 7

7 1IC2B ONCC 2S 2S 3S 3S 3S 3S 2S 3S 2S 2S 2S 2S N

M IONE E

E E

E E

E E

E E

E E

E 3OR0E TIAR

  1. L aL 2L eL 5L eL BL
  1. L
  1. L 8L 5L sL ME5C ATTI I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I I

I E W E CASD CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM LLOTD OCI O

O O

O O

O O

O O

O O

O BAPE LODD L8 L8 L

L L

L L8 L

L8 Le L4 L4 AC K-L M 0

0 8

0 0

TICC A

1 1

1 1

GIOY 9

9 9

9 9

OMDR LO A OT U IA N

)

D A

)

)

)

)

)

8

)

)

AE J H

9 5

7 3

6 3

)

)

7

)

1 0

RE D

9 6

8 6

6 0

0 K

TS

)

1 2

0 2

1 LN AN B

1 0

0 AA CO l

6 5

2 6

8 6

1 s

1-TY IINl 9

4 2

7 N

DTAE 0-0-

0-2-

e-e-

2-

1. -
e. -
0. -

ET NAEG 9

0 0

MU ICMN 2

7 8

9 7

7 2

8 5

9 9

2 NC O

A 4

2 1

4 0

0 OI LL R

e 0

0 0

5 5

RT L

(

0 0

IC A

t t

t I

VE t

t

(

t 8

(

t NM 1

EN O

C T

I N

M O)

)

I IA H

)

L T(

(

H FC

(

0 ROE) 0 0

E TD 0

0 0

0 e

2 0

0 W EL 3

3 3

3 4

1 3

2 O DL L

(

3 DR NES 4

ABED 4

tSE 8

SWYM 4

7 0

0 INLR 4

8 8

1 3

3 4

4 M

4 8

S AO 5

5 6

3 1

1 1

1 U

)6 5

5 YLNF 1

I3 I4 LAAR M

O O

S S

A A

T L

4 O

9 AT E

M C

C 1

C C

B L

IH EK C

NOFP R

E ATO T

G P

ROYD T)

AE NG MWL ME/

UHP OMI ITM TIC DAA TDP EPS OE(

M BS llll lf;lI;l

TABLE 3-1 PACE 3-8 EhvIROPetENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CONNECTICUT YAPGCEE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY, HADDAM NECK PLANT DOCKET 50-213 JANUARY - DECEMBER 1993 ANALYSIS AND LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR ATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAL MEAN CONTROL 5 CF MEDIUM 04 TOTAL NUMBER OF LOCATIONS

' TTDR B, LOCAR ONS NRM PATHWAY OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN DISTANCE MEAN MEAN (C)

. SAMPLED PERFORMED fLLDI (A)

(RANGE)(BB AND DIRECTION (RANGEI(B1 (RANGE)fB)

CO-60 8.02 LOC 3 29 8.04 0.81 0

(-8.83 -

0.18) e MILES N/A

(-0.00 -

0.10)

(-0.01 -

0.01)

ZR-95

-8.60 LOC 8 27C 0.00 0.00 8

(-8.04 - 0.93) 4 MILES WNW

(-0.02 -

0.02)

(-0.02 -

0.82) 1 NB-95 0.08 LOC 8 29 8.81 8.01 8

1

(-0.00 -

8.82) 8 MILES N/A

(-8.00 -

0.02)

( 0.00 - 9.81)

I-131 3.01 LOC 8 29 0.02 0.00 0

(-9.01 -

0.82) 8 MILES N/A

( 0.01 -

8.02)

( 0.00 -

0.01)

CS-134 8.15 0.00 LOC s 28 0.00 0.80 0

( 8.00 -

0.02) 1.8 MILES SE

( 0.88 -

0.02)

( 9.80 -

0.00)

CS-137 4.18 0.15 LOC # 29 0.21 0.09 8

( 8.00 -

8.43) e MILES N/A

( 0.00 -

8.45)

( 0.86 - 8.14)

RA-226 9.87 LOC 5 27C 1.31 1.31 0

( 8.00 - 1.69) 4 MILES WNW

( 1.06 -

1.58)

( 1.06 -

1.58)

TH-228 8.60 LOC # 27C 3.64 8.68 0

( e.43 -

8.78) 4 MILES WNW

( 0.48 -

1.00)

( t.48 -

1.00)

SHELLFISH ggfLI)

8. 4 9.04 LOC 8 28 0.05 0.05 0

(PCI/C)

DE-7

(-8.08 -

0.13) 1.8 MILES SE E 8.02 -

0.08)

(-0.01 -

8.13)

K-40 8.1 LDC # 31 0.3

-0.0 0

(-9.3 -

0.4) 0.8 MILES ESE

( 9.5 -

0.4)

(-0.3 - e.2)

CR-51

-0.03 LOC 9 31

-0.01

-0.86 9

(-0.08 -

8.06) 8.8 MILES ESE

(-0.98 -

0.06)

(-8.10 -

0.00)

O G

h

e M

WK8 Ogu

.Zw W

G r

.E W

aF. <,.

m m

am m

m m

a s

e.n s.n am p

.4

.4 e4

,4 4

.e4

.4 o.

(

N e

i a

f Q

Tm h p.e d W t

t t

e 1

.I t

9 4

.I 4

4 H-W Z ate t.

eN a.

N e M.

i e

e4 e.

QU te.

yQ g

d t

.s.r a

u.6

.e.e

.e a

e s

e

[

w w

e.r r

s w-w

.e w

w i

sm n=

mm m

m.

m am m

an s

am s

['

M.

s.n e

M e

.4 e

.4

,4 N

e.4

.Z p

g

=

T W

W E

e.4 a.e e.4 I

w

>s E *m

/

kL a

aW W

.e t

g t

.e B

g t

I t

.e 6

l 4

t WH u

z N

M u

W x

w 5x w

w w

w w

w w

w w

w w

w M

k W

l I

L H

A Z

= M Ex>

O.'

Z-

/

M<

es M

5 W

W W

m e.

2 w

W W

H M

W M

W Q

-6ME M

W

.M

.M

.M U

W W

U

.M

.M W

U

,4 W z

W-

~

r4MUNg 02UU NM NM NM NM NM MM MM NM NM MM NM NM

  • L

-02W W

W W

W W

W W

W W

W W

W M

-.W

--<=

.a

.W

.a

.a

.a

.a

.a

.a WHW

<-->4

>4 M

M M

M

>4 M

M M

M M

M d.s$-a 8*ca 8*

8*

8*

85 85 85 85 8,5 85 8*

8*

85 8,0

< W W

s, s.

-Mu s.

s.

s, s.

s.

s s.

s.

s.

s,

<u c.

@M OE

.k

.e O 4

0-D M<

z o

m m

m

<W M.

M.

N.

.4

.W o

s m

..e

.e u

m.

-M

=

Q-5W m

4 4

t W-z.W

., M l

B 8x t-

. M.

as a

w Mu gw w

w w

=

w w

w w

w w

=

=

l M

Z E Om H P4 4 A > = =

WW M

M 4

N.

M.4 M

k O W ah e4 e4 s.

N.

.g W

>= O 8

e i

e t

e 7 WJ I

e e

e e

a O Qs a

w Q.

4WM 4

WQ MW g

e M

>E M

4

(

.J w 4

ln 4A M

e

.M.e p

,4 M

<O en M

60 se o-4 e4 e

,M

>.J E b e

s e

.e p

3 e

i M

i e

i 4

e s<<k Z

Q W

O E

a

.K k W

E U

b O

N N

E As

.g e4 O

2 O' 4 A

< >= Q NO>O

<W A.,

M-r O.E M WLM a

K

\\

t__]

w m

FM3.

Vvt J w.

rT TD~v m m r

TABLE 3-1 PAGE 3-18 ENVIRONMENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM SLRetARY CONNECTICUT YAN EE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY, HADDAM NECK PLANT DOCKET 50-233 JANUARY - DECEMBER 1993 AMALYSI5 AND LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR L OC ATION WIIH HIGHEST APMJAL MEAN CONTROL 5 0F MEDIUM CR TOTAL NUMBER GF LOCATIONS N KTION 5 LOCATIONS NRM PATHWAY OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN DISTANCF MEAM HEAN (C)

SAMPLED PERFORMED (LLD) (A)

(RANGEl(B)

AND DIRECTION (RANGEl(B)

(RANGEltB)

CS-137 8.15 8.00 LOC e 28 0.00 e.as 0

( 0.es -

0.01) 1.8 MILES SE t 0.00 -

0.01)

(-0.00 -

0.01)

I RA-226 0.28 LCHC 5 28 0.31 0.11 e

t-8.19 -

9.63) 1.8 MILES SE t-0.18 -

0.63)

( 0.00 - e.31)

TH-228 4.21 LDC 8 31 8.22 S.22 e

( 0.13 - 8.27) 0.8 MILES ESE

( 0.16 -

8.27)

( 5.17 -

0.29)

FISH GE(LI) 16. 8 0.01 LOC 8 26 e.02

-0.02 0

(ALL TYPES)

BE-7

(-0.97 -

0.89) 1 MILES WNW

(-9.07 -

0.09)

(-0.08 -

0.06)

(PC1/G)

K-40 3.0 LDC 8 29 3.1 2.9 0

4 1.9 - 4.1)

O HILES N/A

( 2.1 -

4.1) i 2.1 -

3.7)

CR-51 5.00 LDC S 26 9.01

-8.03 0

(-0.10 -

8.06) 1 MILES WNW

(-8.10 -

0.06)

(-0.06 - -0.00) 194-5 4 0.13 0.00 LOC 8 30C e.00 e.00 0

t-8.02 -

9.81) 9.9 MILES NW I-0.80 -

0.01)

(-0.00 -

0.81)

C0-58 0.13

-0.00 LOC 5 26 0.00

-0.00 0

(-0.01 -

0.01) 1 MILES WNW

(-0.01 -

0.01)

(-0.01 -

8.00)

FE-59 8.26

-0.00 LOC # 29 0.00 0.00 0

(-0.02 -

8.02) 8 MILES N/A

(-0.01 -

0.02)

(-0.02 - 0.01)

CO-60 0.13 0.00 LOC 8 30C 0.00 0.00 0

t-0.01 - 0.81) 9.8 MILES NW

( S.80 -

0.01)

( 9.00 -

0.01) l ZN-65 0.26 0.01 LOC 5 26 0.01

-0.00 e

t-0.01 - 0.03) 1 MILES WNW

(-0.01 -

0.83)

(-0.03 -

9.82) l

r IM vv3 Tm

.c D

\\

r-u T F ~Um I VD T1 m

F' TABLE 3-1 PAGE 3-11 ENVIROWtENTAL RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CONNECTICUT Yale (EE ATOMIC POWER COMPANY, HADDAM NECK PLANT DOCKET 50-213 JANUARY - DECEMBER 1993 ANALYSIS AND LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR OCATION WITH HIGHEST AMUAL NEAN CONTROL 5 OF MEDIUM OR TOTAL NUMBER OF LOCATIONS TTON 5, LOCATIONS MRM PATHWAY OF ANALYSES DETECTION MEAN DISTANCE MEAN REIN (C)

SAMPLED PERFORMED (LLD) (A)

(RANGEl(B)

AND DIRECTION (RANGEl(B)

(RANGE)(B)

ZR-95

-0.88 LDC 5 30C 8.00 e.se e

(-0.02 -

9.82) 9.0 MILES NW

(-0.01 -

8.02)

(-0.01 -

0.42)

NS-95

-0.80 LOC 5 30C 9.00 9.00 0

(-0.e5 -

0.81) 9.0 MILES NW

( 0.00 -

8.01)

( e.00 -

9.91)

RU-103 0.88 LOC 8 29 0.99 0.00

(-9.01 -

8.81) 0 MILES N/A

(-0.01 -

0.01)

(-0.00 -

0.00)

RU-les 0.81 LOC a 29 0.01

-0.el 0

(-8.06 -

0.09)

O MILES N/A

(-0.06 -

0.09)

(-9.03 -

8.05' AG-110M

-0.00 LOC 3 30C

-0.00

-0.00 0

(-8.92 -

0.81) 9.8 MILES MW

(-0.01 -

8.01)

(-0.01 -

0.01) 1-131

-0.01 LOC e 30C

-0.00

-0.00 0

(-0.53 -

8.92) 9.8 MILES NW

(-0.01 -

0.81)

(-0.81 -

8.01) l CS-134 s.13

-e.se LOC e sec o.c0 o.00 0

)

(-0.01 - 0.01) 9.8 MILES NW

(-0.00 -

0.01)

(-0.08 -

0.01) l I

CS-137 0.15 0.03 LOC 8 26 0.83 0.02 0

( 9.00 - 8.87) 1 MILES WNW

( 8.81 -

0.07)

( 8.00 -

0.09)

RA-226

-0.13 LOC e 29

-0.03

-0.15 0

(-8.61 -

0.18) e MILES N/A

(-0.25 - 8.14)

(-8.37 -

0.80)

I TH-228

-0.81 LOC # 26

-0.81

-0.01 0

1

(-0.94 -

8.01) 1 MILES WNW

(-0.03 - e.01)

(-0.04 -

0.01) l l

Em i

r

[

[

EOOTNOTES f

A.

For Ge(Li) measurements the MDL's ~. LLD + 2.33. For all others, MDL = 2 x o background. These MDL's are based on the absence of large amounts of interfering activity (excluding naturally occurring radionuclides). Deviations by about factors of 3 s

to 4 can occur.

The LLD is the smallest concentration of radioactive material in a sample that will be detected with 95% probability with a 5% probability of falsely concluding that a blank observation represents a "real" signal.

L For a particular measurement system (which may include radiochemical separation):

[

s 4.66 S3 LLD =

E

  • V
  • 2.22
  • Y + exp (-A At)

I where LLDis the lower limit of detection as defined above (as pCi per unit mass or volume)

[

S,is the standard deviation of the background counting rate or of the counting rate of a blank sample as appropriate (as counts per minute)

L Ris the counting efficiency (as counts per transformation)

Fis the sample size (in units of mass or volume) 2.22 is the number of transformation per minute per picocurie Yis the fractional radiochemical yield (when applicable)

I A is the radioactive decay constant for the particular radionuclide At is the elapsed time between sample collection (or end of the sample collection period) and time of counting it should be recognized that LLD is defined as Loriori /before the fact / limit representing the capability of a measurement system and not as a costeriori (after the fact) limit for a particular measurement.

3-12

L.

e L

~

[

FOOTNOTES (Cont'd)

Analyses shall be performed in such a manner that the stated LLDs will be achieved L

under routine conditions. Occasionally background fluctuations, unavoidably small sample sizes, the presence of interfering nuclides, or other uncontrollable circumsthoces may render these a pliori LLDs unachievable. In such cases, the contributing factors, will y

Q be identified and described in the AnnualRadiologicalEnvironmentalOperating Report.

B.

Analytical results are handled as recommended by HASL (" Reporting of Analyt/ cal g

L Results from HASL, " letter by Leo B. Higginbotham) and NUREG/CR-4007 (Sept.1984).

Negative values were used in the determination of mean, e

L C.

Nonroutine reported measurements (NRM's). These are results of samples that exceed the report levels of Yable E-2 of the RadiologicalEffluent Monitoring Manual.

D.

First number is the number of indicator measurements, the second is the number of control measurements.

L E.

Assuming 270 m / paper r

F.

Assuming 1080 m' G.

LLD for leafy vegetables.

lL H.

LLD from the end of the sample period.

w L

fs L

3-13 L

[

[

3.2

[!als Tables The data reported in this section are strictly counting statistics. The reported l

error is two times the standard deviation of the not activity. Unless otherwise noted, the overall error (counting, sample size, chemistry, errors, etc.) is estimated to be 2 to 5 times that listed.

Because of counting statistics, negative values, zeros and numbers below the Minimum Detectable Level (MDL) are statistically valid pieces of data. For the

(

purposes of this report, in order to indicate any background biases, all the valid data are presented. In instances where zeros are listed after significant digits, g

this is an artifact of the computer data handling program.

L Data are given according to sample type as indicated below.

1.

Gamma Exposure Rate 2.

Air Particulates, Gross Beta Radioactivity p

3.

Air Particulates, Weekly 1-131 L

4.

Air Particulates, Quantitative Gamma Spectra 5.

Air Particulates, Quarterly Strontium' r

6.

Soil' L

7.

Milk - Dairy Farms 8.

Milk - Goat Farms

[

9.

Pasture Grass

  • 10.

Well Water 11.

Reservoir Water

  • 12.

Fruits & Vegetables 13.

Broad Leaf Vegetation 14.

River Water 15.

Bottom Sediment 16.

Shellfish 17.

Fish r

N This type of sampling or analysis was not performed, therefore there is no f

table.

L

{

3-14

CONNECTICUT YANKEE 1993 TABLE 1 PAGE 3-15 NONTHLY CAMMA EXPOSURE RATE (UR/HR) a L0 CATIONS PERIOD 1

2 3

4 5

6 7

8 9

le 11C I

JAM 93 6.7

.8 6.4

.1 6.3

.2 6.1

.2 7.8

.I 7.9

.2 6.6

.e 7.5

.2 6.8

.1 8.6

.1 8.2

.1 I

FEB 93 6.3

.e 5.7

.e A 6.1

.1 6.1

.1 7.1

.2 6.9

.2 6.2

.8 7.6

.1 6.4

.e 8.1

.1 7.3

.1 MAR 95 5.6

.8 A 5.5

.e A 5.9

.e 5.6

.2 7.2

.1 6.4

.3 6.1

.1 7.0

.7 6.0

.1 7.6

.1 7.5

.e i

l APR 95 6.3

.e A 6.4

.1 6.4

.1 6.5

.8 7.4

.1 7.2

.1 6.1

.e A 8.1

.1 6e

.1 7.9

.1 A 7.8

.1

]

MAY 93 6.9

.1 6.7

.1 6.7

.2 6.3

.1 8.2

.1 8.e

.3 6.7

.1 S.1

.e 7.0

.1 8.3

.3 8.7

.1 1

JUN 93 7.3

.e 7.e

.3 6.8

.1 6.7

.e 8.2

.1 7.5

.2 6.2

.e 8.6

.1 7.0

.1 8.3

.1 8.4

.1 JUL 93 7.4

.2 7.2

.e 7.1

.2 6.7

.1 8.8

.e 8.3

.3 7.1

.1 8.6

.1 7.5

.2 8.3

.e 9.1

.2 AUG 93 7.3

.1 7.8

.2 6.9

.1 6.8

.e 8.4

.3 7.7

.2 6.6

.8 8.8

.4 7.2

.1 8.3

.1 8.7

.e l

SEP 93 7.7

.2 7.4

.2 7.5

.1 7.9

.e 8.6

.e 8.3

.1 7.1

.2 8.7

.9 7.8

.1 8.6

.2 8.8

.e DCT 93 7.3

.1 7.1

.2 7.3

.1 6.9

.1 8.4

.8 7.8

.2 6.5

.1 8.9

.1 7.3

.e 8.6

.2 8.9

.4 l

NOV 93 7.1

.8 6.9

.1 7.e

.1 e.6

.5 8.4

.e 8.3

.3 7.e

.2 8.5

.e 7.4

.1 8.7

.2 8.9

.e t

I DEC 93 7.2

.e 6.8

.3 7.2

.5 6.9

.1 8.8

.e 7.7

.2 6.5

.1 8.7

.4 7.4

.2 8 8.8

.1 8.6

.2 PERIOD 12C 15C 14C 4eX 41X 42X 43X 44X 45X 46X 47X JAN 93

~E. 8

.4 6.7

.6 8.2

.e 7.9

.e 6.2

.1 18.5

.3 7.7

.e 6.8

.e 9.8

.e 7.1

.2 8.5

.2 FEB 93 6.1

.3 6.e

.1 7.5

.e 6.9

.e A 5.0

.1 9.6

.1 7.1

.e 6.5

.e 9.3

.2 6.8

.e 7.6

.4 i

MAR 93 6.2

.5 5.8

.8 6.8

.e 6.7

.1 5.8

.1 9.4

.2 6.9

.8 6.1

.e 8.7

.e 6.2

.2 7.0

.2 APR 93 6.4

.1 6.1

.e 8.1

.e A 7.1

.e 4.6

.e A 9.7

.2 7.5

.0 6.8

.8 9.4

.e 6.9

.8 8.1

.3 MAY 93 6.4

.4 6.6

.e 8.9

.e 6.8

.e 6.2

.1 18.7

.3 8.2

.1 7.8

.8 18.1

.e 7.5

.e 9.1

.1 JUN 93 7.8

.1 6.4

.e 8.6

.1 18.1

.1 5.8

.2 15.6

.6 8.1

.8 7.2

.1 12.1

.3 8.1

.1 13.3

.2 JUL 93 7.0

.1 6.9

.1 9.3

.e 8.2

.3 5.8

.8 13.5

.3 8.5

.1 7.6

.0 11.4

.3 8.1

.1 11.4

.1 AUG 93 7.1

.e 6.6

.8 8.8

.1 7.5

.e 5.9

.1 11.7 1

8.3

.2 7.6

.1 18.6

.8 7.9

.e 9.9

.2 SEP 93 7.3

.e 7.1

.1 8.S

.8 7.8

.8 6.4

.2 18.9

.4 8.1

.1 7.7

.5 11.1

.6 8.4

.4 8.7

.2 DCT 93 7.1

.2 6.5

.1 8.7

.2 7.7

.e 6.1

.1 11.6 1

8.3

.e 7.7

.1 10.7

.e 7.9

.1 8.9

.2 NOV 93 7.1

.3 6.7

.1 8.8

.1 7.3

.e 5.7

.1 10.5

.1 8.3

.2 7.4

.e 10.6

.1 7.7

.1 8.8

.8 DEC 93 7.3

.3 6.6

.e 8.6

.1 7.7

.e 5.9

.2 18.2

.4 8.2

.1 7.4

.2 18.8

.1 7.8

.1 8.6

.2 l

1 m Values 11 stem are the average of two TLDs.

Errors listed are I sigma.

A: Single TLD result B: Location (9) haa 5een permanenfly changed io 4.3 M1., WNW.

1 I

L 4

M 4

M W

G4L 4

Y saMMMN MMNM MMMNN NNNM MNNN NNNNN e t emoe neee oneen seem mean menee g

w

m. e. o.

sNe e m e e.

n. e. e. e.
s. o. o. n e e s.
e. e. m m e.

o m

e+

.eO.e o

e

.e..

.. e.e

.o.e

...e.e.

e M.

I MmMM Neff 24NNN MemM emNf MNmWe e

MMMM eMMM MMMom meeN ceMe Meoeo a

m e n. o.

e. m. e. o. c. o. m o e.
e. m. m. e.

G. o. e m.

m. e s. s e a

e e e e

e i ease emme esmee some SeOS Gemme saNMMN MMNM NMNNN NNNN NNNN MNNNN s tweee emme eneoe eGee eeen onnee t%S9ee S. G O W e W S o u.

S. S S S e o O S.S fwSOSS 9999 99999 9999o 9999 g + e s e e e e e e o e e e e

e e e e e e

9999 99999 9

ep t

MANN PNfN feeMM MmfM e#N4 MfdeM MMMM eMMM MMooS meeM emme NeoOM 4

O O. m e.

s. e e m M e s. s e.

e e o e e e e seem SOSS G. e. o n, e a

e e

e e e e s e

6 9999 OSSO SOOOO SOSS 9999e 998S9 4e e

e M

WM t a.N M N. N M. M. N M.

M M. N N. N N N N. M.

N N N. N.

NNNNN h

e o e.

o.

ee eemme WW Z

s N e e. m. e.

e e e e e e+

e

a. m. e. s. emees e m. m. e.

e m o s.

m a m. m e.

Q pu

[

4 Q

twSeSG 9999 99999 9999 9999 e9999 9

e = =

e e e

N O e

i Ma M @t C

W Om a feeM effM f4MMM MAMM NfNM Nm4@e aM4E >

e MMem eMMM MMMoe meeM meMS Meese L

m>w%

e

e. m, m e.
s. e. e. m. o. o S e. e e e n e.
e. m. m. e. e m e n e.

n (g

M q

g e

e e

e e e e e e e M44Q 4

OSSS 9993 99999 90ee WOOG 99999 W

LHL U Ww We Q

laMMMM MMNM MMMNN NNNM MNNN NNNNN M

a eseem enom eeece enos Geom emees 44 d

i N O. S e e.

g +

e e S. e. e m.

9999,9 e m. m. e.

W S e. e.

SOpee e

e e

e e e e e IwSSee 9993 99999 OSSS 9996 69999 t

Q Nt ME I

MNMM

@#2N 4eMNN femM e4NN

  1. fdee e

MMMM eMMM MMMee weeM MeMe OOome M

B S. e G G SOSe 99999 GeS9 9899 e m e O. S.

t e e e e e o e e

e e e e e e e e e e e

o f

a 9999 meOS 99999 9999 9999 99999 CO e=NMMM MMNM MMNNN NNNM MNNN NNNNN MOc e scene some memem seem emme emeen

  • D i % e e s e.

meme m e n. e. e.

c o. m. o.

e s. s, o m o o m e.

t + e n e e e e e e e

e e

e e e e e

twesee 9999 Seeme 9990 SSee S9999 8

40 hw 4

MmeN emMM meemm N4Mt

    1. MM eMNNe 49 NM e

MMoM eMMM MMMee meeM eeMe emees a

O P S O.

9999 09999 9999 6

e e e e e e = =

S. e. e. S.

SeeOS 5

h I

e e e e e e e e O

M 4

SOSO 3999

  1. GOSS 9999 9990 99999 w

S saMMMM MMNM MMNNN NNNM NNNN NNNNN M

e omese meeO maeme meme seen seems t%SeOS

  1. GOS 99999e 9999 9999 968S9 emot Speg t w S S G' S S e O S S.

6+

  • e e
  • *
  • e
  • = e *

= * * *

      • e e e e e 9999 99999 Q

8 Mt G

8 NAMM etmM 4WMNN ON4N dmMf eNN4e h >

e MMMM MMMM MMMee eeen mene Meeem D>

M S

9999e 9999 99998 eWee SWOO e

a e e e e

e e e e o e e o e G e m. m. e a

e 0

9999 9999

  1. S999 SeBe SOeg 99999 LQ e s e

h M

i Ng#

4 DMS taNMNN MMNM NMNNN NNNM MNNO NNNNN 34 W

I tecem emme emees emme OOOM comme he

(

W 0 % S e. W. e e # S. O G. S S e. t e

e e e

e e o e

)

e, owSSSS 99e9 99999e 9999 9992 89999 SQ*

g 6 + e e

e e

e g

g.

esem Goem eGeWe t

4 I

w ft M

t M4MN PNMN 4eMff Mf4N SNMo eMNee

  • MO 9 C W

s MMMM eMMM MMMee enom MOM 4 MeeMe 3

e e 9 9. 9 G e S G.

e. O. S o S 9999 3OM Q

t S e e M.

O m e. O. S, e

e e e e e e e e e v>W M

t OSSS 9999 99999 9999 99BM SOces G3Q e e e e e q

Mu Q08 MOO OZe fMem MW4N Me2Ne MNe4 MeNf MNfMe as MMa eMMN meMN eeMNN eMMN eMMN eeMNN MOS KZZK meDN mEEME NEEN es se wet 4444 WWWW 45454 LLLL 4444

@4n LW4 7777 whh6 EEEEE 4444 KgEE f

l l

)

i N

M t

W 44 A

(

taNMNN NNNNM NNNM NNMM NNMMM NMMN s ameen seeee emme emee mesme eeen e N e. e e m e s. e. e. m O. s o s

s. e m. e.

c o m e. m

e. m m e se e e e

e e e e e

G e m e.e e e e e e e g.wenee menee egee OSee 9995 Me 6

heem MmeMe Mede enN4 sepMN PWem e meme eMeMM Moom emed McNMM MMcM I

eeme 99999 Semea e m. m. e.

m. e. n. e. e. m. e. m. e.

6 e m. m. e.

m e s. s. e.

esse p

e e e e e e

EGOS SeeSe Gees taNMNN NNNMM NNMM NNMM NNMMM MMMM e femme necem meSe emme emene meee 6 % e. e. c. e.

e. m. e. s. e.

e s. s. e.

m. e. e. s.
e. m e. n. e.

G. e. e. s.

3 +

e e

swomme Gemee esce Gees Saees seee t

[

et e

@NC4 NMNMe NONO

@MNN meMMM ONM4 s

eMee eMMMM MMeM eMem MMNMM NNMM

e. m. m e 3

meese Gees t

Oces meese egee*

9999=

99999 emme 6

=

  • a e * * *
  • *
  • e emme emoem Sees 4

e M

e=NMNN NNNNM NNNM NNMM NMMMM MMMM MM i ensom emece emme esem emene emme WM Z

I % e m. e. e.

G e e. s. e.

m. e e e.
e. m. m e
m. e. m e s
e. e. G. e My a+

e e

e e e

e e e e

44 O

aweges e9998 Sees seem Somes Geme 9

N O e

C Ma M es W OM e 4cNN meNe4 Geme eMee CNNNe emNe

+

sM4C H e

Seem eMeeM emeM eMMM eMNMM MMed L

Ske%

I 9999 G. e. m e e.

a. g e. s.

S. O. S e.

s. c. e. n. e.
e. m. m. e.

e 4g M 4 g

e e

M44W e Game SeeGG emme SeOS Weese mees W

b>L U

Ww em O

e=NMNN NNMMM NNMM MNMM NMMMM MMMM M

eemene eweem meme emme emese meme 4M J

s%

e e

e, e s e. s.

e. m. e. e. m. e. m. m. e. m. e. m. e. e. m. m. e. e. e. s. s. e.

=

tweSee eeSee Game meet meeSe Seem t

No E

s geNN WN@ee Be4N eNMM 4M4M4 Shef s

eMee eMeeM MeeM MMON eMNMM NMMM M

e. m. m. e. e. s. e. e. m.
e. m m.e e e W e.

9 0. e. 9 9 S. e. e. m.

i g

e e e e e

g a eeee Semme eSee same OOmee WeGe O

e gaNMNN NNNMM NMMM MNMM MMMMM MMMM M

e eeeee emeem meee eeen oomme seem 3 % e e. m. e.

99999

e. s. o. m.
e. m. e. e t
s. e. e s.

9999 y + e e e e e a

=

4wesee 99999 9999 etee messe Gees M

s hw el SM a Neef

  1. NONA Me4M eMeM MNted eM4N Vg n meee OMOMM MMeM eMMM MMNMM MNOM n

G e. W. e.

e e o e e e o e t

Seeee 9993 e m m e.

samme s e m.e h

g e

Q M e OSee S#eeme esse emee e9999 esse W

e e e e e n o e e e e

e M

s*NMNN NMMMM NNNM NNMM MMMMM NMMM eseeme memem meme seem mosee emme 8 % e. e. m. e.

e. e. e. c. e.

S. e. e. m.

8999 99999 m e m e.

3+

e e e e e e IwSSee emene SOSe eSee meses Seem g

4 8 m We e MeNW 4MePC SefN OSNS NOMMN emet h C e

Seee OMMMM MeeM Mnem MMNMM MNMM D>O

(

M

e. m. m e.
e. m. e. e. s.
e. e. e. e.

e m. m. e.

e. m. e. s. e
e. g e. e.

>4 e

e e

e e

e mees emeOS Seet esse OSmee eSee LT M

$GM t=NMNN NNNMM NNMN NNMM NMMMM MMMN

,8 W

..meem eSeem esce Seem emeSe Seem 4 % e e m. e S.e.m.m.e.

c. o. m. e.
s. a. m. e.

G. e. e. s. e.

S. o. m. e.

Sua Wg a+

- e e

g e E

9weeSe meSce Gees GeSe 9999e Seet 4

e m

80 i

NN#4 NMee@

Nede meMM-emmM4 Meet

  • M s seem eMeMM Meem eMMM eMNMM NMMM

$0*

4

e. m m e s e e e. m.
s. e. e s S O. S. e.

G. e. s e s.

S. e. e s D DS 3

e e e

= +

e e e e

g M

8 Sese seees seem seem ensee esem g

M M

u Que a

sa W

OZt 4Ned Ne4Me N@eN fNC$

MCmNe JMSN MMt eMMN e#MNM eMNN eMMN meMNN eMNN GA8 GG LLbb

>>MW UUUU M4m* *

  • WZe DD WWWW U

OO O WWWW W

AWG 44444 MMMM Q

ZZ 2 QQQQ J

e

I M

l e

M W

G4 tammem mmmm 4422m 2444 4 Nom

  1. fefm I

1 ememo meee oceem seee DNMe menee e % e. e. s. e.

m. e. e. m. c. o. m. m. e.
s. e. e. m.
m. e. e. n.
s. e. m. e. e.

e+

gowesee toes eseem emme emme esame Me i

NMfM etNe McNee MNNN MMNO MNMN4 1

000m ocoa emese eeen meee samme

n. e. e. e.
m. e. e. e.
e. e. e. e. s.
m. e. e. m.
o. e. e. n.
m. o. n. e. o.

e I

e emme me se ce ese eees el to stuet a=NN4N NNNM NNMff MmNN MefN MfmMN s necem emme eemme seem ween samme eN e, e. e. e. m.

e. m. m. e. n. e. m. m. e. e. e. e. n.
e. s. o. m.

p o. s. e. e.

lI

.weeme emme seems esos seem emeem t

@ t a

MMNN MNoM NNMee fMMM MMNM MMONN e

egen eene seene eseo emos moeem a

e. m. m. e.
e. e. e. n.
e. m. e. n e
e. m. e. e.
m. e. e. s.

99999 a

e e e

eeme ecce etoes sete es eO 6 IWee

.e=@med

@mme 42222 mm4k Ome4 ffefm 4

.eees

.e.e n e eseos mese eNMe mesee e % e. e. m. e.

meeee Ocee 90e0 eseem O. m. e. e. m.

m. e. e. n.
e. m. m. e. s. e. e. e. e.

M e+

W ewesee eeOS Z

E e

M M" Me I

OE O e

NMfM ofNe McNee MMMe MMNe MNMN4 O

MON I

emee esos oceem emme eeen meese C

MM M e

m. e. e. e.
s. o. m. e.
e. m. e. e. m. e.sp e.e.
e. e. n. e.

O. c. e e. n.

M w g e

c wwk H e meet es te et see e see se te stees 4

8 7.

  • N 4k 4

WOM taMNMN MNNN MMNNN NNet NemN NMNNM M

MM U e emeee seen eeeem eWee

  1. Mee meese I

mM e N. e. e. e. n.

m. e. s. e.
e. m. e. e. n.
e. s. c. e.
c. o. m. o.
c. o. m. m. e.

M e o

e (M

ewomem ewee estes emme seem seese a

e Ne e

MeMe eNMe Mfeme MMMf Mete MMNMN a.

e meme seem emewe ones seem emeem e

m. e. m. e.
s. o e.. m. e.
e. s. e. e. e.
e. s. e. m.
e. m. e m e.. e.

S. e. e. e. e.

E lI ie mese

,e seese 8.3e e

eseos M

f emmmem mmme 44mmm em4N 4eed Mmefe e

e smoee oeen meeee eeen eNMe oeces CO e %, e. e. m. e.

n. e. e. e.
e. e. e. e. e.
s. e. e. n.
s. e. e. m.
m. e. e. n. e.

O*

e I

twesee seem meece peOS Saee esmee

  1. 4 t

es e

e NMfM emNe McMoo NMMC MMee MN4Ne a

B esem emme emees emme seem seeme he e

e. e. n. e.
o. m. o. s.
e. m. e. e. m. m. e. e. m. m. e. a. n.
m. e. n. e. e.

em e

gg a

nome et se mesee ases esse etees e

I e h O

M cammem mmmm 44mme em4N 4ted mmN#4 4 seese seem moeem same ONMe mesee e

e N e. e. m. e.

s. e. e. m.
m. e. m. o. s. e. m. m. e. e. m. m. e. m. e. s. e. s.

M e+

Iweses 9909 ememe 9998 mese emete 4

ee Q

R 4

NMfM emNe McNee NMMM MMee MNMNm a eeen emme samme emme emme eseem a

m. e. m. o.
e. e. n. e.
o. m. o. n. e.
s. o. m. e.
m. e. m. o. s. e. e. m. e.

a g

i Seet me se eseem a ese en se eteet Ah M>

A 4

h e

saW44m mate fm4ff meef 4MNe 244Mf 64 M

a seeem eees emmen meee emme seese sem I

e N e. e. e. m.

S. O. S. O.

e. m. e. m. e.
m. e. m. e.
e. m. m. e.
m. e. m. e. s.

>m 3 0 y

W twesem esem seese esem eems samme he W

4 ft Sya 3 e e

4MNf M#eN fMNee fNmW 4MMm 4NmNM

=

e mo#@

eeem meece some come maeme m

e

e. e. n e.
e. m. e. e
e. m. e. o. s.

e m. m.e.

e. m. m. e. a m. o. n. e.

e

,I n

e e

toes ease es se e some gC*

ed e

esse meme e

H R

e M

U C e fMe@

Me4N MemN9 WNW4 Mekf MkfM9 JJ w

O e

eMMN eeMN SOMNN eMMN eMMN meMNN MM e I

w..

roe EEEE emme NEkKK mukk M4m wZ4 4444 wwww 4 444 LAAL 44 U

Aw' 7771 bbub E EEE 4444 EE I

1

~

1!

1 il

- j' r

m r

m

-r 9

1 3

E m

L h.

G A

r P

a.

h m

~

a r

h m.

r

. )6665 75454 3536 3594 53456 4665

. - 0080 08000 0000 0000 00080 0006 0000 0000 00000 0000 C /0000 0.e.0 0 0

+

(a080 00000 0000 0880 00000 00e0 3.

a 1

3633 72055 0101 2611 51825 22l2 0008 90000 0800 9800 00008 08e0 0000 98000 0800 9000 80000 8 0. e. 0 00-S00 000-9 88 80088 9

s-

.)2423 22523 2242 2362 22542 2322 m.

0080 00000 0080 9000 88080 3000

./0080 00000 0000 0090 88000 8000

+

(0800 00000 90SS 0000 0008e S089 9.

l228 12112 1111 121l 01911 0112 e008 80000 9808 080a 00000 0988 m

._ s.000

0. C. 0. s.

98000 9809 00800 0808 00 8-800-9-

00980 0-0 r

- )6665 76454 3546 4585 54656 4766 6

0080 00008 0800 0000 80908 8080

- /0889 00000 8008 0000 80800 9000 m

S c

+

E (0998 000e0 0909 0003 00S00 0000 e

N)

M D

r IS 8

DM O 3533 72055 0201 2712 51825 2212 g

3O/

8000 00009 0800 0000 80088 9800 n

I1 I 8080 08000 0400 0800 50980 9800 i

E C t

LEP T 88-800 0S0-0 08 a8Se9 0

0-r m

BM(

a AR A

t TO1

. )3252 43322 2323 2252 32222 2433 s

B3 C 0000 00808 0980 0000 80008 0000 R1

. /0000 88000 0880 0808 89000 0080 W

I-0

. +

N AI (0080 98008 89S0 888S 80804 8880 W

L 7

m 1221 41022 8101 2301 31011 1101 9980 00098 0000 0808 03088 8000 1

r 0988 90890 8090 8098 00084 9800 M

80-S88 089-8 80 08088 9

9-3 4

. )6676 76455 3546 4595 54457 4776 m

8809 00000 8888 8098 09088 0000 no

. /8989 00000 8808 8098 00609 0808 ot r

. +

i

. 4S908 S0080 0800 8088 e0900 0909 td ce 6

ng 3633 820s5 0291 3712 52035 2212 sun 0009 080e0 0000 9008 00490 8080 yfa m

0008 000.s.8 0080 0889 88089 8889 alh dac 00-008 800-8 98 88S80 8

8-m r

f y

opl

. )6776 86555 3546 4585 54456 4876 mt 0880 08000 0898 0098 00080 0008 eun

. /0908 08080 0980 0888 08080 8808 lpe

. +

p n m

. (0908 09000 8890 8e08 98080 9808 uma oum r

5 cur 3654 62066 0291 2712 51825 2212 ce 8000 00800 8888 8008 e8880 e008 aap 0008 00880 8004 0008 s.9000 s.008 v

y n 90-080 800-0 00 e9080 e

S-bye m

5 be 9

y b r

9

.)4847 35655 4373 4615 36944 3445 rd 1

0090 90880 8008 0019 08180 0000 ees

. /8000 80080 0908 0008 08000 0000 vsa

+

uh E

(99S0 00000 0e00 9008 98000 0808 ya E

4 ac)

K m 9 m

N 2530 25123 1211 1454 02112 8116 e(

A 0000 00008 0000 8000 08900 0000 sm e

Y 0090 00088 0098 0000 08909 8380 eun tlo T

00 0-004-0-

00 04 9-8 aoi U

d vt C

a I

B ewc m

T l&o C

DG.

6296 29639 7487 4285 18529 6307 pLL E

ON.

0112 08123 9122 8112 00122 0122 m ;

N II at N

RD LLLL GGGGG PPPP TTTT VVVVV CCCC SAB O

EN.

UUUU UUUUU EEEE CCCC OOOOO EEEE C

PE-JJJJ AAAAA SSSS ODDO NNNNN DDDD m

-r x

l, i[lIr l!

1 I

i eafmffMMt eacNeefde e

a seeeroes esesomeee I

N aNeemomme e%emomeen e + e. m. o. s. o. m. e.

M e.e e. e. m. e. e. n. e.

e a

M Maw et emeneae fe Seeeeee W

MI Me G

e B f 8 4

p1 We A

es someeMe ut eseMeON e meeseem e

eMMoMee s

emeeeem e momeoes e

e. n. e. m. m. e. e.
e. m. o. o. m. m. e.

]

e a

e i emoomme i one e.

t i e

i j

saMMMMNNM tamWMmeMf atemeseem a eFNeeN4M tNoemeGee sNoMemooM e + e. m. o. m. e. o. n.

e e. e. c. o. m. m. e. e.

e+

e me momenom fe emeseem ee Me a e e e ce de Ke MNoMeem et somemme I

e omoseee o

NaNNNNg e

meeeeem a meeMeee

m. e. c. o. m. e m.
m. e. m. o. e. o. s.

s s

c e

e t

esseeem o meeeece e

e i a e 1

I tamA44mfN t=NNMNMMN 4 emomemme e seJeeeeee M

eNeuseeee aNeeeeeem a

a. e. m. e. c. e. e. m.

N e. o. m. e. o.m. o. e.

e+

e+

He es meseeen Mt seesees W@

M et M1 W

e e a e 44 W We Mt I

4

=

Ns M4NAMe#

ue NOMMeMM f

(M M

e meeeeee e meeemoe ME e emeeece

ememese WMWN e
e. s. e. e. m. s. e.

e

e. m. e. e. e. e. m.

aMuM e

v ekw J

e seeeeem e esecese 44L 1

WLMw 4

i N

E M

4 4

u I

t=NNMNMMN taMNNNNMN eteeeeeem e seeeewam DNemesses eNeeeeeem a

  • S. o. m. e. s. m. e.

t e m e. m. e. m. e. m.

aw (tw et seeeees me seeeeem 40 Mt e e t 4 O'

Ms ue eMfNoMM us eMeNoMe i

eeemeem e semeses e meseene a memeose e

m. e. e. e. e. e. n.

m.e. e.e.e.e.e.

i e

g e ememene e comamme I

I

.m.em.N..

e=MoMMete eIMMMMMMM s eMMMMeeM eNemeseem e % e.m.e.e.s. e. e.

s e e. e. m. e. s. m. o.

M s+

dew i

j e

Noweaseese es emeense e

e e Me M

We e l I

e5 Qt e

eefkMMN es enemese i

J W

e eeMeeee a

emeneem W

e M. o. M M. e. e.M.

i meeeeem e

e 9 9 9 9.e. 9 9 e

emmeGee e

4 f

a Steesee.

I e

Au M

El El H

08 06 u

Me Q

Me u

ke fe4NcPM H e, fm4 Neem Me M

4 M

e e

u at a.

I A

r

)

j

'Iill)lilllIjl!iil!

1:

l!!

1 ill lll J_

.z 1

a

. )4554446

. l677s68s w

1 etees00 o4ee00e 2

. /eetee00

. /e8ee00e 3. ( e. s. e. s. e. 0. e.

+ s. 8. e. e. 9 0. S.

. +e 3

1.(

e eeee6e 4.

s0ee80e E

l.

1-G U

A E.

65see76 R

ee40s8e C

w P

lle0e8t e8ess08 eet0e0e e0eee80

s. s. s. o. s. 8. s.
s. 0. s. o. s. 0 8

. eee00ee

. s0ees89

. )3433234

. )38*e563

. eeseeee 11e98e4

. /s8eee8e

. /11ieel1

. + e. 0. e. e. s. 0. s.

+ 8 0. e. s. e. e. 8 e

(

4te0eesee 5

8s8ee08 9

1 B-N.-

l23es22 A.

305ee20 B.

eseto8e 1732372 teeec8t 1801se8

s. s. s. s. e. 8. s.
e. 0 0. e. e. S. 8

. eeee8e8 e0ee88b

~

. )S667456

. l22z2212 Oeeese8 e0eee0s 2

/eteeee0

. /e0ee80e

. + s. s. s. s. s. s. 8 7. ( e. 0. e. s. 0 0. e.

. + s R

. (

ST 5

3

. eeeeee8 8ee008 EQ S

9 1

T A-E R.

Z ee38le4 S.

8L

)

C.

sesee0i 4UA3 llseesS esess0s CRM

. eeeeees

. oeeee0e EIT/

Y

s. s. s. e. s. S. o.
c. S. s. S. o. 0. e.

LTC1 BREC L

. ee8s0e0

. eeee800 AAPP TPS4 A

RA N

IM AM A

AC

- )2222222

. )2222l22 st88es9 e8see0e

. /ee9eee0

. /s8eee00

. + e. s. 9. s. S. s. 8

+ e.8.e.s.s. 0 8

.(

4

. 0eeeeee 3(eeeee0e 8

6 1

O..

S.

C.

esleest C.

s3ee8sl eeesses eets8ee

- 0eeeese esee0et

0. s. s. e. s. e. e.
s. e. s. e. 0. s. s.

. 8eeee8s

. eeee08e

. )6877352

. Ie1e2l2l

. - 1211112 l1l1l1l

. /e8sse8e

. / e. 8. e. 0. e. e. e.

+ s. 8. e. e. S. 0. s.

3

+

6.t 9

7.(eeaeeSe 0

eeeee08 9

E.

1 1

B.

U.

353e313 R

e2ss6e1 E

ea82121 z1enee3 E

l.l.1 1 1 1 1 e8eees8 K

s. 8. s. e. s. e. 8 N

e88888e A

e.0ee808 Y

TV T'

N.

N.

O.

O C

I.

C I

C E

T.

4567893 T

4567893 N

A 1

N C

A 1

C.

O O

L O

C L

i_

.l l

illIl(

Ii ltl 1

il l

C

is i

,--r,-.m.

e-~

..~..

N e semeseem eemooemee I

N eNameemos e%eeeeeem e + e. m. e. e. e. e. m.

e + e. m. e. s. o. m. e.

e Mew Hew M

ce Gemeeem f6 999esee i

W Mt Me O

e 4 4 e 6

i 4

pe We t

A se emmeNNe ut madeMee 4

MeMeese e

seeMeem a

secuene e oneseem

m. e. s. e. e. e. m.

e g e m e.n.e.e.

e 6

. +

e t

aseeems e omoseem 6

8 e

?

{

l eammmNmNN saMmeteNe e emeneseo e INdNmNN#

e%eemmeOS 4NMemeece e + e. m. e. e. m. e. o.

e

  • m.e.n.e.m.m.e.

ew Sow me meessee

@e emeseen We Me i

e e e e l

Go 46 l

ze ememeNo me meeeee.

1 e

meeeeee e MMemm&m i

o eenemoe s Neeemme 1

e. w. e. e. m. m. e.
e. e. e. e. e. e. e.

1 4

e i

e l

5 seeeeem e secesse p

e e i i 3

.ll l

snk&44444 s*NNNMNNM e seeeeeen t emessees M

eNeoeeems e%eemeses s

  • e. c. e. e. m. e. s.

e + e. c. o. m. e. n. e.

g aw New MW me seeseee ma memesse i

WW M Pe Mt i

I e e s a 4e W ge me I

U Hs NNeeeMe Un NMMeeeM 4

(M M

e esseMem i esposee EE e momeeme e escoone WM>N e

m. o. m. e. e. e. s.
e. s. e. e. e. m. s.

a i

abuM e

e 1

OKWU d

i eseceee e esseese 1

44AL s

e N

-LM-4 E

2 M

4 4

I l

E enNNNMNmN s~NNNMNMM e emeseeem eemeeeece eNeeeeeme s%eemesee s + e. m. o. m. m. e. s.

g e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e.

t+

Iw I

et emeseem me semenee i

es Me e 4 e 4 t

8e Me a momeNNM ce emeeNeo e eenemme e seeeeem a mesesse e meneese

m. a. m. m. e. e. s.

a e

e. m. e. e. m. m. e.

f e

e i esemese e meneemo a

emeeNMmeN eanN#MeeM eeMMMMMMM e eMMeMMMM e%ememene e N e. m. e. s. e. e. m.

e + e. m. e. s. e. e. e.

M e+

dew e

ha=Semeeee et e999999 P

e e Mt M

We e e et De 6

@dM@fMN Et deeMeNG W

e NMeeeeN 4

emmemee W

e M M O.M M M.M e esmeeee I

e S.999999 6

Seemose 4

e e meeeeem e e

.j s:

s:

)

U

...~..M

...~..M I

M.

Me W

-e I

8:

8:

i 44 M

(#

M u

a.

a, 4

ll

\\

\\

--- _ ----- _ -A

r l

t i

r l

taf444mme a=NMemefe m

e seeeeeee e neMeeMoe N

eNoenemme s%eeeeems m e. e. m. e. e. e. c. e.

M s. e. 0 0 0 0 0. m.

e+

e+

em Os seeeeem te necesse W

Me Me Q

e e e e 4

So wi ke MeeeeMe us meneee4 s eewomeo e

emoemee e emmeene e

seemmee

e. a. s. e. e. e. e.
s. e. e. e. m. e. n.

e e

se meeeeen e

acomene t

I I

saNt#mmNm safMNeMcN s eeemenee e efemmeeN eNoeemoso eNMMNMMMM e.+ e. m. o. e. m. e. s.

e s. e. c. o. m. e. n. e.

a+

i ma emeemse ge seemene te Ma e s e e e

de Zn NeemNMe ce nommeMe e emeeeee o mqq#4mq e eeeeeen e

momeone

e. m. e. m. e. e. m.
s. o. m. m. e. n. e.

e i

i e emenese a

U.eeeeee e

i e

i l

l i

l emmNem4f4

+aMNNMNMN a seeeeese e emeeemme q

e%eeeeeem e%ememoem e.+ e.e.e.e.e.e.e.

N,.e e.e.e.e.e. e.n.

e g

e He es seeeeem mi seeeeee l

WW M el Me i

s 1 5 e j

di w me ce i

O

=

Na MNmemeN us McNeNoM 4 4m e

e meeeeee e

meeeeen er e enemeem o esemene wMe%

e

e. m. m. e. n. e. e.
e. m. e. n. e. e. s.

e awyM i

e etWu a

e seemoes e

mesecee 44AL i

NAMw 4

]

k E

M 4

4 q

.i saMNNNMMN e=MNNNNMN

)

  1. senemmen e eemeemme i

eNeeeeeem s%emoemme i + e.e.e.e.e.e.e.

.e s. e. m. e. s. s. e. e.

J' e+

s es seemoso Ae seemsee j

4e Ms j>

e e e s Qs ei

{

un Menemen un McNeNee

)

a emeenee e menemos e eameeee a menemme l

e

m. e. s. s. e. e. m.
e. e. e. m. e. n. e.

i s

d a

e seeeece e memesmo I

i a

emeNeNeem emeMetete a eMMNMMoM e eMMemeem eNeemesom a N e. e. e. e. e. m. s.

4 s. e. e. s. e. e. u. e.

i+

e e+

e Neweeposee me messeem O

e e He M

we e a et De e 4MetamM se afmesee W

e endreen e

MmeneeM

e. M. e. e. e. e. M.

w e

e seeeeem e

a

e. s. e. c. e. e. m.

e emeseem s

e e esseeme e

e s:

a:

u M.

u M.

u w

he fm4 Neem we em4 Neem Me M

4e M

8:

8:

s.

se

- ~. _ - -.

M M

M M

M W 8 M; MM M&

W8M MM MM CONNECTICUT YANKEE 1293 PAGE 3-24 i

l THIS PAGE LEFT BLANK INTENTIONALLY l

l l

l l

h

.-.O..

V

_.F CONNECTICUT YANKEE.1993 TABLE 7 PAGE 3-25 DAIRY MILK (PCI/LI COLLECTION LDCATION DATE SR-89

$R-99 1-131 CS-134 CS-137 8A-140 LA-14e

(+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-l

(+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

t+/.3 19 81/12/93 e.0 1.E 1.4 e.2 0.e3 0.12 1.2 1.9 1.8 2.0 3

6 2.4 2.4 19 82/89/93 0.1 e

1.1 0.1 0.07 8.08

-0.3 1.7 8.5 1.8

-5 6

3.0 2.8 19 93/e9/95

-0.2 4

0.9 0.1

-0.05 s.le

~2.3 1.8 1.8 1.8

-3 6

1.8 2.7 19 e4/06/93

-e.7 0.9 8.2

-0.06 e.e7

-3.0 1.7 1.8 1.8

-5 7

0.3 2.9 19 e5/le/93

-0.3 S.4 1.4 0.2

-0.14 0.11

-1.8 1.6 3.2 1.8

-1 6

-4.4 2.3 19 06/07/93

-e.8 1.8 1.6 e.2 0.87 e.11

-e.5 1.4 e.e 1.5 2

4

-0.9 1.4 19 97/97/93 8.9 1.3 1.5 0.2 0.01 0.11 1.8 1.9 8.e 2.0 2

-1.6 2.3 19 08/10/93 8.5 1.8 1.2 0.1

  • e.e4 e.89

-1.8 1.7 0.0 1.9

-e 6

e.e 1.9 19 99/13/95 0.8 1.6 1.1 0.2

-0.01 0.13 0.7 1.4

-5.7 1.7

-4 5

0.7 2.1 19 10/13/93 e.5 1.6 1.1 0.2 0.88 0.12 1.6 1.9 e.e 1.9 1

6 1.5 2.5 19 11/08/93 e.5 1.2 1.1 e.2 8.81 0.88

-e.5 2.1 2.6 2.2 2

8 3.4 2.4 19 12/14/93 1.3 1.5 1.3 0.2

-0.84 0.15 0.2 1.8 1.1 1.8

-e 5

-h 9

2.0 20 81/12/93

-0.3 1.3 2.2 0.2

-0.02 e.le 1.2 1.7 7.4 3.4

-1 5

-1.2 2.1 2e e2/e9/95

-0.7 8.7 2.4 0.3

-0.02 0.11 e.5 2.s 7.8 3.5 1

6

-0.2 2.6

)

?9 83/09/93

-0.1 1.5 2.2 0.3

-0.02 0.88 8.4 1.8 6.3 3.1

-3 6

-1.1 2.2 20 e4/06/95

-0.2 1.5 3.1 e.2 0.01 0.88 8.6 1.6

-1.5 2.3 e

6 e.5 2.7 20 05/18/93 0.2 8.4 2.6 8.2

-e.02 e.08

-0.4 1.5 0.0 1.6 3

5 e.3 2.0 20 86/07/93 0.8 1.6 3.5 0.3 e.06 0.08

-0.3 1.8 0.0 2.1

-1 5

-1.8 1.5 2e 87/07/93 8.1 1.2 2.7 8.2

-0.08 0.10

-0.2 1.8 0.0 1.9 5

6 1.8 2.5 20 88/10/93 0.6 1.4 2.8 e.2

-0.04 0.09

-0.2 1.9 e.e 1.9

-1 6

1.3 2.2 2e 09/13/93 0.5 1.3 2.7 e.2

-0.06 0.11

-2.5 2.2 1.7 2.3

-4 8

e.9 3.8 28 10/13/93 2.1 2.3 2.1 0.3

-0.04 0.89

-1.2 1.4 1.6 1.9 4

5 1.9 2.2 2e 11/08/93 8.9 1.7 2.5 0.2 8.05 0.07

-e.3 1.6 6.1 3.5

-4 5

-1.s 2.4 20 12/14/93 8.4 S.6 2.4 e.2 0.03 0.11

-1.3 1.5 e.e 1.6 3

5

-0.6 1.6 21 81/12/93 1.4 2.1 1.5 0.2

-0.98 0.12 1.4 1.8 8.6 3.6

-3 6

2.6 2.5 21 02/89/93 8.2 9.4 1.5 8.2 0.03 e.le 1.3 1.8 e.0 1.9 7

7 2.1 2.6 21 83/09/93

-0.2 1.8 1.6 8.2 0.87 e.09

-e.2 1.8 0.0 1.9

-2 6

1.5 2.7 21 04/06/93 0.6 1.5 1.5 0.2

-0.00 0.10 e.6 1.6 e.8 2.1 0

6 1.4 2.8 21 95/1e/93 0.2 S.5 1.4 0.2

-0.81 0.18 e.2 1.7 e.s 1.9

-1 6

-0.6 2.5 21 e6/07/93 1.5 1.7 2.0 e.2 0.98 0.08

-2.7 1.8 1.1' 1.9

-2 5

e.e 1.9 21 87/07/93 0.0 1.5 1.7 8.2 0.05 e.le 1.5 1.9 11.2 4.1

-2 6

1.5 2.6 21 08/10/93 0.2 1.2 2.1 e.2 e.e5 0.10

-0.0 1.6 4.6 2.2

-2 5

-0.1 1.9 21 89/13/93 8.8 1.6 1.6 8.2

-0.03 e.le

-0.6 1.6 2.2 1.7

-7 6

2.2 2.4 21 10/13/93

-0.1 1.5 2.1 0.2

-0.16 e.13

-0.2 1.7

-0.8 2.5 2

6 2.8 2.6 21 11/e8/93 e.1 1.5 1.6 8.2

-e.86 0.08

-0.5 1.9 1.8 1.9 5

7

-e.8 2.6 21 12/14/93 0.6 1.7 1.4 e.2 0.05 0.13

-0.1 1.8 1.7 2.0

-2 6

2.5 2.8 1

E.

u o

m m

'~~~L-J V

f"'"

CONNECTICUT YANKEE 1993 TABLE 7 PAGE 3-26 DAIRY MILK IPCI/LI COLLECTION LDCATION DATE SR-89 SR-99 I-131 CS-134 CS 137

....-_-140...._..

BA LA-14e

(+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

(+/.)

22C 01/12/93 9.4 1.5 1.6 e.2

-0.86 0.10

-0.1 1.7 2.3 1.9

-2 5

0.0 2.6 22C 02/e9/93 0.2 e.3 1.3 e.2 0.01 0.99

-0.8 1.7

-5.5 2.1

~5 5

-1.3 2.3 22C 03/09/93

-0.2 1.5 1.8 8.2

-0.07 8.10

-0.5 1.7 0.0 1.8

-3 6

-0.1 2.2 22C 04/06/93 0.1 1.7 2.0 8.2 0.02 0.08 8.8 1.8 1.7 1.8 8

7

-1.0 2.7 22C e5/10/93

-0.5 0.6 2.4 0.2 0.98 8.le 3.0 2.4 6.5 2.4 4

8

-3.0 2.9 22C 06/07/93

-1.1 1.9 2.3 0.2 0.03 0.89 0.9 1.9 0.8 2.0 1

5 0.2 1.9 22C 01/07/93 e.1 1.5 2.4 8.3

-0.83 0.13

-1.7 1.8

-1.8 2.0 5

6 8.8 2.6 22C 88/10/93 1.1 1.5 2.3 0.3

-0.02 e.11 1.8 2.0 2.0 2.1 8

6 1.5 2.5 22C 09/13/93 8.9 2.3 1.6 0.2

-0.04 0.09

-5.8 1.6

-0.8 2.1

-13 6

1.9 2.6 22C 10/13/93 0.2 1.8 2.1 e.2

-0.02 0.10 9.3 1.9 0.9 2.1 8

6 1.1 2.8 22C 11/88/93 0.2 1.3 2.3 8.2

-0.05 0.99

-0.3 1.6 1.8 1.9 2

6

-1.4 2.2 22C 12/14/93 8.6 1.6 1.9 8.2 0.07 0.16 e.8 2.1 2.6 2.3

-0 7

2.0 2.8

{

r L

L A

N N

N N

N O

M E

CONNECTICUT YANKEE 1995 TABLE 8 PACE 3-27 GOAT *$ MILK (PC1/L)

COLLECTIDM LOCATION DATE SR-89

... -- -.- 9 0 SR

---...-154..-----

I-131 CS CS-137 BA-14e LA-14e

(+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

t+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

23C el/12/95

-1.1 2.0 1.3 s.3

-8.e5 9.11

-1.3 1.7 11.s 3.4 6

6

-1.7 2.1 23C 32/09/93

-2.5 s.6 3.8 s.3 e.se 8.e9 8.9 1.5 7.8 2.8 e

4

-e.1 1.4 23C 33/89/95

-e.3 1.2 2.2 8.2 s.11 0.13

-0.9 1.6 1.1 2.1

-2 4

-1.4 1.8 23C e4/s6/93

-e.7 1.7 1.5 0.3 0.02 e.e9 9.4 1.9 11.3 4.0

-9 6

1.3 2.8 23C 85/1s/93 s.1 1.1 1.9 s.1 s.85 0.10

-0.5 1.6 19.7 4.s

-1 6

-0.7 2.6 25C 06/87/93 S.5 1.4 2.7 8.2

-0.82 0.08

-e.2 2.s 9.8 3.2

-0 6

-2.8 1.8 23C 07/07/93

-0.4 1.1 2.s e.2 e.s6 0.18

-6.2 1.7 11.3 3.5

-2 5

0.6 2.2 23C 88/10/93

-8.2 1.5 2.1 0.3

-0.04 s.15 0.2 1.5 16.3 2.9 1

4 1.6 1.8 23C 89/13/93 0.1 1.2 1.4 8.1

-0.83 0.09 e.e 1.9 14.1 4.3

-5 5

-0.7 2.0 23C 1e/13/93

-1.7 2.2 1.5 e.3

-e.83 0.11 0.9 2.8 15.9 4.2

-3 6

3.2 2.8 23C 11/08/93 s.5 2.5 2.5 m.3

-e.14 e.le

-1.3 1.8 13.6 4.2

-e 6

e.4 2.5 23C 12/14/93 los 3.3 1.9 e.3

-e.e9 0.12 e.7 1.6 12.5 2.8 1

4

-1.2 1.4 24 81/12/93 1.2 1.8 3.8 8.3

-e.12 s.le 1.9 2.5 8.8 2.4 11 8

-3.9 2.5 24 e2/89/93

-1.8 8.7 5.9 8.3

-0.08 e.88 e.5 1.7 7.7 3.8 9

5

-2.2 1.6 24 83/09/93 9.s 1.6 4.5 9.3 e.88 8.13

-0.9 1.7 7.1 3.2 6

5

-1.0 1.9 24 e4/96/93

-1.4 2.0 3.5 0.3 0.08 e.e9

-0.1 1.7 18.8 3.7 3

6

-2.6 2.0 24 85/10/95

-e.1 2.4 4.0 e.3 0.02 0.10 1.1 2.1 2.6 2.1 1

7

-1.6 2.3 24 e6/07/93

-e.7 1.8 4.9 e.3 8.81 0.09

-2.5 1.6 4.9 2.3 e

5 2.1 1.7 24 07/97/93

-0.4 1.3 3.5 9.3

-0.15 8.16

-1.6 1.8

-e.0 2.1

-3 6

2.0 2.5 24 08/10/93 8.8 1.3 3.2 0.2

-e.e4 e.11

-0.3 1.3 4.8 2.5

-1 4

0.9 1.6 24 09/13/93 1.5 1.9 4.2 0.5 s.81 8.12

-0.3 14 6.6 2.8

-2 4

1.8 1.5 24 10/13/93 e.5 2.3 4.e 0.3 8.16 e.16 1.6 1.8 S.8 2.1 3

6 8.9 2.2 24 11/e8/93 1.0 2.4 4.5 0.3

-8.12 0.08 8.8 1.7 11.9 3.5 6

6 e.6 2.4 24 12/14/93 e.6 4.7 11.8 s.7

-e.09 e.17

-8.1 1.4 4.6 2.2 4

4

-0.3 1.3

CONNECTICUT YANKEE 1993 TABLE le WELL WATER PAGE 3-28 (PCI/L)

COLLECTION LOCATION DATE K-4e

...... _- 51 HN-54 C0-58 CR FE C0-60 ZM-65

.._____-59_..__.

(+/-)

(+/-)

t+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

15 e3/08/93 0

26 8

17 0.6 1.4

-0.1 1.5 2.4 3.4 0.3 1.4

-0.2 2.9 15 96/21/93

-8 24

-17 13

-0.9 1.6

-2.1 1.5 2.8 3.3 1.2 1.7

-1.6 3.4 15 09/28/93

-22 25 8

15 1.0 1.3 8.3 1.4

-0.3 2.9

-0.3 1.3 4.1 3.2 15 12/2e/93

~46 24

-15 14 e.6 1.3

-0.3 1.3 0.5 2.8

-1.1 1.1 1.9 2.8 16C 83/98/93

-62 33

-le 15

-0.8 1.3

-0.8 1.5 8.3 3.1 0.9 1.4 1.9 3.s 16C e6/21/93.

G 45

-19 17

-3.4 1.9

-7.1 2.0 e.e 4.1

-0.6 2.0

-0.8 4.4 lbC 09/29/93 e

29

-le 12

-0.4 1.2

-1.6 1.3

-0.6 2.8 e.7 1.2 0.8 2.7 ItC 12/20/93

-27 36 5

14

-1.4 1.3

-1.4 1.5 1.7 3.3 1.1 1.4 8.8 3.2 COLLECTION LOCATION DATE ZR-95 NS-95 RU RU-le6 1-131 CS-134 CS-137

..._-103_.._.

(+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

(*/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

15 85/08/93

-0.5 3.8 0.0 1.7 9.4 1.9

-4 12

-2 5

1.1 1.5 s.0 1.6 15 06/21/93 0.e 3.3 e.e 2.1 0.0 1.7 5

15 2

2 8.8 1.7

-5.2 2.1 15 09/20/93 1.5 2.8 s.0 1.7 8.4 1.7 e

12

-4 4

s.0 1.4 0.0 3.6 15 12/28/93 e.7 2.8 e.6 1.4 1.3 1.7

-le 11

-8 4

s.3 1.4 1.4 1.5 16C 03/es/93 1.0 3.1 0.0 1.7 8.6 1.8 e

13 1

5 8.e-1.4 1.1 1.4 16C e6/21/93

-3.6 3.9 0.0 2.9 1.3 2.1

-7 18 1

3 2.4 2.2 9.4 2.2 16C 39/28/93 8.8 2.9 0.8 1.4

-0.1 1.5

-8 12

-5 3

-0.8 1.3 1.5 1.4 16C 12/20/93 3.6 3.0 e.e 1.8 0.7 1.7

-23 12 4

4 e.5 1.6 e.8 1.6 a

N NE M

E O'

NE p'

CONNECTICUT YANKEE 1995 TABLE 18 PAGE 3-29 WELL WATER IPCI/L1 COLLECTIOP LOCATION DATE BA-140 LA-140 BI-214 TH H-3

--.....-228..--..

(+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

15 e3/08/93

-1 8

1.5 3.7

-68.6 35.8

-5.1 2.9 2848 160 15 86/21/93

-7 5

-1.9 1.9

-57.e 36.4 s.8 3.7 5438 240 15 99/28/93

-7 6

3.9 3.1

-87.3 33.7 1.8 2.8 889 130 15 12/20/93 3

6 0.8 2.9

-43.2 38.8 0.0 3.2 893 134 16C 03/08/93

-1 8

a.0 2.9

-lel 27.0 9.9 2.6 115 78 16C e6/21/93 1

6 1.3 2.8

-15.5 45.s a.e 5.0 32 115 16C 09/2e/93 1

6

-0.5 2.3 14.4 26.4 9.0 2.4 24 93 16C 12/28/93 1

7

-0.3 2.7

-1.0 29.4 8.0 2.6 25 97 I

l l

l 1

I I

e M

e sa eMmN MfNN ta NNNM emmC M

e e eeee Meee e t M M M t4 MMNN e%

emes eN m o e. m

e. s. c e.
m. e e. m 49 +

W 6 4 Q

es=

emme* meme esw G e' n e" emme*

4 me Me L

4 e I e I

we NMNH MNed pt mMmM PMfm 61 eene esos ee N o rJ e McNe

s. e. e. m. e. e. e. e.
m. e. m. e.m. e. s. e.

e e

e e

i emme nome I

emeo emme 4

e 6

I I e 1 6 6

!I la MMNM #NMM ta fMNM WNMM

e emme emme i e eeen seem eN m e s. e.
s. e. e. m.

eN

o. e. e. m. e. e e e*

e+

H6 +

Saw esem emme etw eseo seem me Mi s a e i Os feMM MMeM De Es e MM eMMN We Game come me seem meen i

e

e. e. e n.

e m. e. e.

m e. e. e. e s e e.

e e

I

  • +

e neme eene e

meme emee e

I e

e a t

t e em MMNM fNMM ta fMNM fNMM e e emos eeme e e mees ecom I N

e. m. m. e.e. m. m e.

eN

e. m. e. e. m. e. m. e.

e+

  1. +

few emme meme me=

eems ease me

@ t

  • 6 e i Te emeM eneN pa fMMM enMM Ei eeen eeee ze emme Game e
m. o. e. m.c. o. e. m.
e. m. e. e. o. o. c. e.

a 3

e t

ease meeg e

mese meeg t

e e

I em MMNM XMNM em CMf4 &#4N s e

s. e e m.

e m m. e.

e i emme meee aN eN

e. W. e. e. m. e. m. e.

a + esee mese e+

Me=

dew 0000 mees M

me es W

e I

  • 1 Ja Ne Ne OMMX efee e*

Us OMNM MNMM Na emoc Meee 4H e

e. m. m. e.e. m. m. e.

w o. e. s. m. e. m. e.

iI e

NW3 e

Mw a

emme emme o

emee mees QM I

e a

e I e

e e

WWW WD3 m4HG 1 a 4M9@ fMM4 en OMXC Mfkk H N 1 e f M e. M.

4. M. M. M.

e b emme Moce MM t N

  • +

I N

0. e. 9 0 e m m. e HU a+

meee meme 1 +

ML ew mt=

ease meme-De es 4a k

4e e a w

a e 2e MMoo CM4@

ut femf WMe4 Ne meme onee

4. N. e. 4
f. M. M. m.
s. e. e. m. e. a. s. e.

e e

i e

iI e

fMoM 4MMM e

esse seee 1

4 4

t ta 4MNM fMed se fMNM mNMM e i

e. e. n. e. e. m. e. e.

e e emme seen t N sN ii

e. m. m. e.e. s. e. m.

a+

emme emeo e+

e=

ee=

come esse hs de e I e I we Qt emme MNMe es feNM emeN Us seem esem i,

M. e. m. e.

e. m. e. M.
m. e. m. e.m. e. e. s.

e e

e e

mome swee e

eoes seem e

i 8

i s

e i

M M

e M

-*w M

e w

w a

w e

WM w 2M w e

WM w 2M w I

UkMO UNMG e

WMG UNMO We DKwd 4kw4 we swd 4WW4 As WWWW Zwas As wam Ewas

>e Head MeL Pe

>$AM McAM He W3A4 A3A er w2A4 ADAM M

e J44U M44 I

w44U M44U j

e e

u a

e a

m l

t t

e W

1 M

e M

M a

M M

1 be bi i

MMMM MMMM M

e MMMM MMMM w

w H

t tete ette kwe ette tepe kw6 NNNN NNNN UMt NNNN NNNN l

UMt 44MN 24MM w(4 44MN m4MM w49 MMNN MMNN JQt MMNN MMNN wQt NNNN NNNN 4

i NNNN NNNN a

4 44PP 44PP Q

q 44Pe 44SP W

O e emme mees U e emme emeo B

~

8; 5;

V Me UUUU Ms UUUU w

>e NWNN mmmm we NNNN mmmm i

4t MMMM NNNN 4e MMMM NNNN 8:

8:

di de

lllII I4llll c_

t

~

v 1

3

. )

6245 r345 3

ee00 e000 1./

e. s. 8 0
e. 0 0 0 E

+

G 4

eeee e0ee A

1(

P E-813l 32l3 C-008e 8so8 008.s.

9. e. c. 8 000e
e. e e 8

. )

5254 7344

. )

1111 3122 0e00 es0e 0030 0800

- /

0.s.00

s. e. 0 0

. / 0080 0800 8- +

- +

4-(

8ee0 ec00 0-(

0000 0800 9-1 A-e113

.032 5302 8412 R.

~

L-S000 0001 S.

8000 2e02

e. e. 0 0 0000
e. 0 0 0 8000 e000 0e80 e000 8e00

~

- )

4581 782

. )

3243 6244 1001 1011 4000 0000 w

e./

0000 8000

. / 9000 0000

+

. +

4(

eee0 8e00 9.(

e000 008e 1-8 A..

5328

.357 R-0002 1213 B.

0081 i0e8 S-0000 0000 0000

c. 0 0 8 0008 0000 000e e000 ee08 0000

- )

4123 5233

- )

6245 7355 0080 8008 8se0 000e 8

- / 0080 8000

/

8. e. S. 0 0 0 0. e.

7- +

+

3-(

8080 0000 2.(

0ee0 0e0e S

1.-

2 E

L)

S.

01l0 5231 H-8149 0304 C.-

T.-

B.

00e0 0000 8088 0002 AT 00.s.0 0080 8 0 0. e.

0 0. e. 0 2TW 1E esc 0 0080 0080 800e GT EEE LVW B

AEG

)

4i23 5233

. )

8678 6117 T /

8st8 0800 6246 7355 SI 3/

8. e. e. 8 0000

- / 8000 8 0 0. e.

TC 4 +

6+

IP

(

8ee0 0ee8 2-(

8ee0 00ee U(

1.

2-R S.-

4sl3 50ls A-97l2 8072 F

C.

0se0 80e0 R-52l1 3052

8. c. e. 0 8 0. e. 8
e. 8. e. 8 8 0. e.1 8ee0 e.eee 000e 000e

-)

7356 0356

. )

4s79 5069 m.

0000 1s88 2o11 2111

/

8000

8. e. 8. e.

. /

8. c. 0 0 0088

+

4.+

1t e0e8 8eee 4.(

0eee 00ee 1.-

1 3-7e1l 1l74 5372 0811 E.

I.

8e8e 1e09 C

81e1 2830

8. s. 8. s.

8.s.08 9 9. e. 8 0000 08es ee00 ee0e 00e0 S

S S

S E

E E

E EI E NI E EI E MI E CRSG CRSC CRSG CRSG E

UREA AREA E.

UREA AREA P.

TELB

=ELB P

TELB NELB Y

TBPS IBPS Y.

TBPB 1BPB T.

EWPA PWPA T.

EWPA PWPA 3

LAAC SAAC LAAC SAAC 9

R R

R R

9 T

T T

T 1

S S

M N -.

S S

a_

D.

O.

E I

3333 3,533 I

3333 3333 E

TE.

9999 999 TE.

9999 9999 K

CT.

//// ////

CT.

//// ////

~

N EA 6612 5633 EA 6612 5633 A

LD.

1122 1122 LD.

1122 1122 L

//// ////

Y L

//// ////

O.

6699 6699 O.

6699 6699 T

C.

e000 e980 C.

ee00 eee0 U

C I

N.

N.

T O.

D C

I.

CCCC I

CCCC

~_

E T.

77T7 5555 T

7777 5555 C

N A.

11I1 2222 A

1111 2222 N

C.

O O-O.

C L-L.

lIcl'llll1lllllli l1(

Illl llllll lIll!!l,IIl

=

Illll1)'

llIl1iIl 23 3

EG A

P

)

l51348 8475172 03 l121191 1111181 01

/

e. 8 0. e. 8 8..

0 0 0. o. 0 8. e.

00 e

9.t 0

8 ee80 0e080 e8 5

E 4948734 i413366 55 F.

8e0e008 e00e0e 10 90

e. e. 0. s. 8 0. e.

S. 0. e. s. 0. e. 0 000Seee e00e000 e0 M.

~

m m.

569664

5. 8 0 e 0 0 e68r535 s5

_ ) 00080.4 0

w e.

0 0 0. e. 0 0..e0. e. 0. s. 8 8 0

e..

_ /

e

_ +

5 h.

8_(

3e0e08e 8e0a88e e8 O

2395.s4 z237l11 58 C.

e

8. o. e. 8 0 0

A 0ee0ee8 e.

00e.0 e0 0e 0 0. e. e. e. e. e.

e0e888e eo0e0 e0

. )

5696634 5676535 6

8 0

0s00e e8ee008 0

/

0 8 0. e. e. 0..

e. e. S. s. 0 0 8 00

. +

4.(

880e00 eeee000 00 5

N.

326l312 s454345 82 M.

8 8. e. e. 0 9..e

e. e. 8. e. 0 0. e.

88ee08 e808090 00 00 M

eSe9e0 e0ee008 0e D

I)

T.

AT TW 3E

_ )

5685535 4576436 04 1GT

0. e. 8 8 8 8. e.

0 0 0. e. 0. e. 8 00 EE

/

h_

EVW

+ 88e90ee 800e89e 88 1.(

L BFC 5._

AA/

R TE1 23725l.

LC C_

..41Se35 07 DP o 0 0

8. e..

8 0. o. s. 0. e.

8088 89 A(

O e0e e0o08e 0

R B

. )

9866751 1803637 43

. - 1241422 1262231 24

. /

+ 089ee8e 898se0e 88

~

9

(

4 K.

3725988 3,702636 32 648028 87 976563..

1241422 8242231 24 d

h_

e mro

)

3170192 4e42157 3e f

1111113 1.l.1 1 1 2 1

1. l.

r

/

e

+ ee80088

.90ee88 0e p

7(

t o

E.

n B

7312158 2196734 46 2456682 4 2 8 5.e.5 7 42 er 1900813 18e0121 0e e

w 3

9 s

9 e

1 s

M.

y D.

3333333 333333 33 l

E I

9999999 3,999999 99 a

E TE.

/////// /////// //

n CT.

7859428 705942e e9 a

KNA EA_

2210222 221e222 22 LD_

/////// /////// //

m Y

456789e 456789e 55 u

LO _

ee08e0l 9e8908l 88 i

T C _

t U

C no N

I O

r T

t C

I.

XX S

N T

6666666 8888888 22 E

N A.

1111111 44 C

A O

O_

C L-

r lI1Illl!l' K

A 33 MP 3

ECA 8543238 38965e2 14

. )

4685533 45654S4

,5 e 0 e 3

e. 8

. e.

0. e. e. e.

88

/

e. 0 8 0. e 6_+

ee eee0e8e e8 e_(

l_

U.

323s133 8277s2s e3 R.

174z432 1345e2e e2 e e

0. s. e. s.
s. 0 e 8 0
e. e. e.
e. 8. e. e
e. 9. e 0e_ee e e_

eee

_ )

67077e5 579754s s6 001ees0 e 0es0e e0 3._ /

0. e. 0. e.. e. 8
e. 0 0 0. e. 0. e.

.0

+

e(

088e ee e0e0e0e e0 l.

e.6 5. e 0 e2412 s1 2

el s

U.

.ll11.se R.

0 e0 so e e 0 0

0. s.
s. 0
8. e. c... e e.
s. e. 0 8..

.ee ee 80eeees 67e6s45 5687545 06

._ )

0.. e.. e e e s e. s. s. e. e. s.0. s.

ele eeeee8o 0e

e. s. s

_ /

_ +

5(

080 ee seee0o 08 9_

0.0 e5s.9 s24.s3, se 04 B_

e80ees oe N_

0e9e e

8 0. s. c, e.

8

0. s. 8. e. e. s. 8 s
o..

N e8e.

ee e888eee 0

O I)

T.

AT TW 3E

. )

e493389 e465872 e2 ee l11118l

.1 1GT l 1 1 1 1. s e

e. 8 0 8 0. e. e.

00 EE

. /

e. e. 8 EVW

. +

.eeee

. e.890ee 00

.. e 5_(

L BFG 9_

AA/

189 7sl 18352s4 31.4 R_

TEI 080 e0e 11 83ee LC I_

DP s 8 e

0. s.

e

e. 8 8. e. s.
0. e.

90 0 8 8. e.

A(

.se_ae e e.

O

.0a R

B 2514489 056528e t4

. )

1121100 11111el e1 e e 9 0. e. e.

e. 9 88.o.

008

0. s

/+

e0ee ee 5.(

ee8ee0 6

N_

687 928 s114433 11 I.

101.

8e

s. 8 0. e.. s 1 1

.e00 e11e1 8

. e. e.

8 000 0ee

... es0esee e

.8 de e

w

. )

6795644 57865e5 e7 f

08ee.e8 eee8eee e r

e s s. s. s.

s e.

e

. /

0 8.e. e. 8 s s

e. e. e. 8 p

. +

0See e.

eee e

0.(

t 6._

o D.

3l4 101 s213212 57 n

C.

8. 0 e

se8e es0se0s 0

e. s. e. e. 0. e.

e 0 0 0

. e.

r

s. e. 0. e. s.

0e 80 e

8e4ee0e w

39 s

9 e

1 s

N.

y O

333.333 9999,33 3,9 35333 3

l E

I 999 $99 99 a

//////,,

n E

TE_

////.

/.5942e 705,/42i 7

.s a

C T._

KN 221s222 2210222 EA.

2,,

m 2

A

/////// ///////

LD.

e08e89e 4567 456789e 55 u

Y LO.

8l e.88e l 8e i

T C.

t U

n C

o I

N.

r T

O.

t C

,x S

I 6666666 8888888 22 T

EN A.

1111111 4

N C.

A O

O L

C 1llltlll1lljl tlIt llllllll!llIilll,lI illi1t 1

1

M W

Q 4L Im MMme@46 N.Neede se eeMmeme SM MMMMooe.

et e.e.e.e e e e e e. e. e. e m e m.

6%

Me+

e e o e o e e a

few Seceses eseceee SS Mt 6 i W4 MMWfMM@ M4eMe4m 4P We emomeem meneeem se me S. e. g e. e. s. e i

5859999 e

e e

e e e 1

SSemeen meeeeee me 1

I e e t i t

t I

i la MeNeede defNNmM ee mammeeN se i

eeMeeem.

I t 0e99999 G. e.

l GN B.e.e 9 9 9 et+

Gemeee e e e e

e e e e o e O

en l

few emeemme Me t 9 40 MNONNMM NefeeNN mM j

at MeeMeeM emmeene ne 9999999 ee e e e. m. e O S i

o e e e e e e e e e e

i esemeem emeOSee se f

4 4 4 4

9 0 4 6

I la.NM4Mfe CMNo MM eM a e MNfNNMN MNMNMMM oN IN S e e m. e. G. e e m e e. m. m e e e em me4 e e e

e e e e e few 9999909 eeeeeee em M4 5 B 49 4Ne44Mt NMe f N eM 98 NOMMene MeMGMeM MM 9 0 e. 9 9

e. S. e. m. e, e O.

e, e i

S 6

e e

e e

3 S

meeeeee Beeeeee me O

I e

a e

e e ee t t e

Ma W e 4H W3 MW e*

NNe44eg emN@mfN MN MON a e McNeeMw MMMesem Ne WW GN e m.e t e e m 9 9 9 9 9. e. 9 e o 9e w)3 Ng +

e e e e a e e W

Mew eseSees GemeGee 99 M60 Me 44%

t 4 MWM Mt NefeCOM N4M S.O fe U

ua Nemeeeo fMesome Ne b

4 SepoOOe eeMeese N o.

I w

.em e s e.e e.oSeeee

.e l

e e e e o

e e e e e e g

S e

I a

i l

.No Nis mN.Nef.

4 i-ooMet emeseem eo j

t.

e% eeeeeee oeWomeo em ft +

e e e e e e e e o. e e a e e e MIw SemeOSS emeOSee me M9 4 6 Me NNNNWMM fMNeNem eN UI meeMeon seeemse se OS.eSeee 9 5.S.9 9 9 9 ee i

e e

e e e e e e e e e e

S99e999 GemeeGG Se e

t t

i e

e e e a

-MN.NNM eM.NeN eM el MMNMMON OMMMMO Se 9% e e W o o. m. e Mtw emmenee Seeeeeee se eseeses e+

  • 4. e e

e e e * *

  • e e en Ms Mt 9 l OmMG@$N eMeM MM WM OMeeee mMMMems Me Mt e m.e,e s. e S e m. e. t e ee
m. e.

g S

8 i

e e e e e e e e e 4

e SeeSe eme#SeS se 0

0 $ t 6 4 4 0

3 3

e n

9 M

n a

~

M. M. M M M M. M MMMMMMM MM M

te eee W

H W

kW4

%%%%%%N 'NNNNNNN UMt NedefNe NemefNO me W e( t NNMONNN N N e4 S N N N NN I

ww

%%%%%%% NNNNNNN %%

J l

fm4 Neem fm4 Nee 9 mm Q

t SeemeeM emeemeM em M

M V

6 B

30 M

I l

MM MS WM M

l W

kt 4444444 @@@@@@c NN 48 MMMMMMM ff

=

8:

u st l

I i

l

[

lIlIl;iil4 il iI4 i'

O 55 3

ECAP A A A A AA

- )

s658 l e628 4 le1e i 201e 0

. /

e. 0 0. e.. S.
e. 0. e. e.

0

. +

e.(

e0ae e 00e0 e 9

R.

e,18 2

1629 1 S.

5422 4 7516 4 1951 1 2022

. e..

0eee e e0e0 e A A A A AA

-)

524a 7 8525 7 2

1 4121 e 21.

l e.

. e...

e.. e. e.. S.

- /

- +

9-(

ee9e e eee8 s 8-R 414e e e518 2 S.

6242.

Se2e 8 0 0. e. e...

e. e. 8. e.

8

. ee0e 0

N 0eee O

I)

T.

AT TW 5E

- )

117e8s7 9l5196a ss 1CT 111l1ee 8l11e0e sl EE

- /

8 8. e. e. 0. e. s.

8. e. 9 8. e. 8. s.
e. e.

EVW 8+

L 2-(

8eee0ee 09eee08 e8 BFG 2-AA/

H 5e4s5 s9eese2 94 TEI 4e1e1 s LC T.

o e8eeeee e1 DP

8. s.
s. 8. e. s.
e. 8. e. s. e. s. c.
e. e.

A(

O eeeee88 seeeeee ee R

B

- l 2711559 415e684 e4 2271e 91419b8 te 1111.l.

7 91119. e. 8

s. l.

- /

.9 6+

2-(

0.eese0 8eeeeee ee 2-5,925e5 4679582 21 A-9 48e69 4775857 e2 R-

e. 2 5 8. s. e. 8 1 8 0.e.1 9 8 65 9ee0900 eee00e0 e0 de mro

- )

5565416 9647e17 s9 f

e.

55522

8. e. 9. e. e. 0. e.
s. 8 e

44 2545522 e5 r

4/

. e. e. 8 e.

+

p 4E ee888e8 eeee8Se ee 1-i o

E-e665S57 2115849 56 it C-l 1. 8 e 0 e e24251 e 4 1. 0 0 0 0 0525 11 e.

e8..

e. e.

e r

000e

. e0eee00 ee e

8 m.

w 5

9 s

9 e

1 s

N.

y O

5555555 55 55 l

99,55555 E

I 9,99999 9999 99 a

TE.

/////// /////// //

n E

CT 7859429 795*'2e ee a

KN EA.

221e222 221e222 22 A

LD.

/////// /////// //

m L

4567890 456789e 55 i

Y O

e8e0e 1 908e081 ee l

T C

i U

n C

o N

I r

D.

T i

C I.

6666666 8888888 22 xX 5

T.

EN A.

1111111 44 N

C.

A O

O C

L.

x_

llIi!IIf'1lfl[I ll i[ljlll!

Il!!!illllll' (lll}

Ir

~

w u v w-1 CopedECTICUT YApetEE 1993 TABLE 14 PAGE 3-36 RIVER WATER (PCI/L)

COLLECTION CD

....___-59__

FE

._-_-__-60____..

LOCATION DATE K-49 CR-51 P94-54 C0-58

(+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

28 82/88/93

-38 25 12 42 1.0 1.5 s.8 2.1

-4.3 5.3 8.8 1.7 28 85/1s/93 16 26

-29 34 e.7 1.5

-0.7 1.8 4.4 5.3

-8,5 1.4 28 87/12/93 e

39 64 72

-0.2 1.5 2.5 2.7 5.7 8.2

-9.8 1.2 28 11/08/93 39 22

-48 34 8.9 1.4

-0.7 1.7 4.1 5.1 8.7 1.3 3ec 01/25/93

-34 28

-11 26

-0.8 1.5 0.5 1.8 8.8 4.5 0.1 1.6 3ec S4/19/93

-31 24

-24 28 1.1 1.4

-8.2 1.5

-8.4 3.7 8.5 1.4 39C 10/25/93 m

-11 45

-9 23 1.2 1.7

-8.6 1.9 1.0 4.6 0.4 1.7 COLLECTION RU I-131 ZR NS-95 RU-103

___.___-le6__.___

_....._-95_.

.___.__-65.__...

ZM LOCATION DATE

(+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

28 02/08/93

-0.4 3.2

-2.9 4.4 1.8 2.4 0.2 3.6 1

14

-49 126 28 05/10/93 9.9 3.4

-5.8 3.7 2.5 2.2 2.3 3.3

-9 13

-38 73 28 87/12/93

-3.2 3.1 2.8 5.8 8.9 2.9 s.e 5.2 le 14 0

1210 28 11/e8/93

-1.6 2.7

-1.1 3.8

-4.5 1.9 1.2 3.8 1

12

-38 119 30C 01/25/93 1.8 3.7 8.8 4.8 0.0 2.1 0.7 4.3 16 16 29 22 1

30C 84/19/93 2.1 3.0

-1.5 3.1 3.2 1.9

-0.6 2.8 0

13 2

13 30C 18/25/93 m 2.3 3.8 3.6 4.3 8.0 2.0

-0.6 2.5

-1 15

-9 15 i

i w Third quarter sample from location (30C) was lost in transport.

- _ _ _______J

CONNECTICUT YANKEE 1995 TA8tE 14 PACE 3-37 RIVER WATER (PCI/L)

COLLECTION LOCATION DATE CS-154 CS

...... _- 137_....

_______-14e__....

BA

....__-148____.__

LA

.._____-226....__

RA TH-228

(+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

(+/-)

28 82/08/93 0.4 1.6 1.6 1.6 8

6 2

26

-37.1 35.9

-0.5 3.0 28 45/10/93 2.3 1.7 e.8 1.5 6

4e 8

19

-15.1 35.8

-4.5 2.9 28 07/12/93

-0.7 1.5 0.2 1.4 e

238

-18 92

-12.1 26.6 0.8 2.4 28 11/08/93 0.2 1.3

-5.7 1.7

-22 52 e

25

-8.4 26.2 4.8 2.4

{

30C el/25/93 0.6 1.6 2.1 1.8

-2 19 8

9 21.9 44.7 3.0 3.8

)

30C 04/19/95 S.2 1.4 1.6 1.5

~3 13 2

6

-71.8 58.1 3.4 3.3 30C 10/25/95 a 1.5 1.8 1.1 1.9

-12 16

-1 7

-25.4 32.9

-3.1 2.9 COLLECTION 1

LOCATION DATE H-3 I

(+/-)

l 28 02/08/93 414 92 28 05/10/93 678 137 1

28 07/12/93 57 95 28 11/08/93

-45 99 30C 01/25/95

-13 74 30C 04/19/93 71 118 30C 10/25/93 m

-5 91 l

u Third quarter sample from location (39C) was lost in transport.

l

a 4

M W

4&

la MMNN MMMN MMNN ta MMee MMNe PMNO ee

e. s e. m. e. m. m. e.e e. n. e.

M. M. e. e.

M. M. H O.

e. M o e.

a e t %

4%

e+

eene eene eene 46 + eeee Deee meme etw OI w

@l Mf e e e i k

WI

@l N

wa NMed WeNN emee ee fame NMMM MMeN I

e. m. m. e.s. e. e. m. e. s. s. e.
e. m. e. e.O.M. e. e.

O. N. e. m.

t 4

g O

esse eene esem e

seem esse mese 9

8 8 6 I E 9 t 6 I

t 8 1 8 5 t t t I e a.

e a.

MMMM MMMM MMMM NMMM MMNM MMMM e e. e. s.

e. m. m. e.e. m. m. e.
e. m. m. e.a. g e. s.
e. e. n. e.

e eN e

g N l

t + emme mese emeo me+

nome seco emme ebw etw da Ms e e e e 8:

2:

l NMee eNMM MMee eeMe eMeM MMMe D. o. e. s.

e. e. e. m. e. m. e. e.
s. e. e. e. e. e. n. e. s. e. e. n.

p g

j i

S000 Seem esse a

mees emme eene 4

I e

a t a e e e e e e

t e e I

e f

l l

na MMMM MMMM MMMM em NMMM MMNM MMMM 4 e

e. e. n. e. s. e. e. m. e. m. m. e.
e. m. m. e.s. e. e. s. e. e. O. O.

e e 3%

t%

t + emme meme Goes e+

emee esse sees I w mew t

et e e e a Ze et Ee MMMM emme eneM Ee Omen amee NMee e

s. e. e. m. e. m. m. e.m. e. s. e.
s. e. e. n. s. e. e. m. e. m. m. e.

e t

3 I

etee mees Sees e

emme mese spee t

6 9 1 6 1

4 Ha 2-WW

)

WEB Im MMOM meMN eNet sa fMMN MMMM NMNN MM i e M. M. M. M.

M. M. M. M.

e. M. e. e.
e. m. m. e.e. m. m. e.e. s. s. e.

i e Q>

eN g%

WWE i+ esse emme esse te mese mese esse JMQ Mtw ms=

i e

$f et t

(EQ

  • a e t MON ki ae WM ut MNMM fNMe NeMe No eNeN eMee OMMM kW t

M. e. m. e.

e. M. e. H.

O. O. M. s.

e. s. s. e. e. m. m. e.o. e. s. e.

e QA t

s Gw 4

seem esse seem e

emme seem emme e

e e

a e s

e a e e a

a a

e e

f. e. #. 4 N. O. N. 4
e. m. m. e.

la sa MMMN MMMM MMNN t a a t

e. m. m. e.e. e. n. e. s. p e. e.

t% MMee eMMe MMMe og e*

e+

esse emme some aw maw el 46 ee e e e 4 24 M1 Na feNo emeM NNNM

e.,. e. M.
e. f. d. e.

M. e. #. M.

9 9 9. e.

e. t. e. e.
m. o. m. e.

i e

a e

t men 4 deMM ette meme meme emes I

M MM M

e e

e la MMee NMfM eMe, ea NMMM MMMM MMNM a e M. M. M. M.

M. N. M. M.

e. M. e. e.
m. e. s. e. s. e. e. m.o. s. o. s.

a e s%

sg e+

esse some emme e+

esom Sees seem ew as.

NO 40 ee t t W8 Q4

  1. 1 M4kt MMfe meNe us MMMM eMen ee@M e
e. M. e. o.

N. f. N. e.

e. e. M. e.
s. e. e. m.e. m. m. e.e. M. e. e.

s i

a s

some sees esse e

esse mese esse a

e a

e e

Mee M

b.

h a,

MMMM MMMM MMMM MMMM MMMM MM,MM W

eeee eeem e,e.

M Fee, ette M

e ee WW

%%%% NNNN %%%N kWt NNNN NNNN N%%N W

Q M e' g

MMOM eMSM emeM UMa emeM CMed eMON Z

w<e eNNN ONNN eNNN W

9771 7577 7685 LT

. / e001 8000 0000 4.+

s.008 0000 0800 ELE LUW 3.(

B8 e008 ee00 0e0e AC 1

TH/

S..

SI C.

3384 l110 1104 IC 1080 e100 0008 FP 0080 s.000 0000

(

e-

- - e8 -

8-

. )

. - 3277 2e78 5184

. / 5113 2l12 2121

. +

8088

0. e. 0 8
e. 8 0 0 1

(

3 s0ee 9eee s88e 1-8963 2483 8194 I.

11e8 e8e1 8108 00.s.8 88.S.0 8008 e8 99e-9-

s

.)

. - 1883 9788 98e5 M./

1001 8800 e0l8 e +

8800 l

0 0. e. 0

s. 0. e. 8

(

0ee8 S08e e0ee I.

G..

5152 36s2 l72t A.

8800 s0l0 e0ee 8800

e. 0. e. 0
s. 0. s. s.

- 0e 80- -

ee8-3 9

9 1

N.

O.

3353 3333 3333 E

I 9999 9999 9999 E

TE

//// //// ////

K CT.

6832 6832 6927 N

EA.

8212 8212 e211 A

LD

//// //// ////

Y L

1470 1470 1471 O

0801 0801 0091 T

C U

C I

N.

T O.

C I.

cCCC E

T.

6666 9999 e000 A.

2222 2222 3333 e

p C.

O O

C L

llliI!liilIl II 44

_ )

6159 8842 6936

. )

2959 8e80 7874 3

1111 1211 1111 6466 6955 0b56 9/ 8 0. e. c.

8088 0888

. / 0880

0. e. 8 8
0. e. 8 9 6.+

E

+

G

(

88e0 a0e8 8e88 8808 e0e0 888e e_(

A 5

l_

P E.

618e 1132 7843 U

e6e0 7144 2388 F_

R.

e91l 8108 8002 62l0 5845 8340

s. 8 0. e.

8008 0800 0 8. e. 0 8 8. e. 8

8. e. 9 0 e80e 8e80 e000 See8 e88e 8e80 6578 8966 7867

. )

8688 9277 8979

_ )

0008 8ee0 8080 880e 81e8 0e89

_ /

0 0. e. 9 8080 8000 3_/

8 8 0. e.

0 8. e. 8 0.s.89

_ +

+

8_(

00e8 880s 0880 e_

000e s80e ee90 5_

lt O.-

2518 221l 2011 U_

8811 1614 1104 C.

R_

8008 000e e000 8e08 088s 0008 8008 0 0 0. e.

s.000

e. s. 0 8 0 8 8. e.

0000 80e9 0008 8e00 0e0e ee8e S080

. )

6577 7e65 6867

_ )

7588 8e66 7868 0080 0l00 0008 6000 0le0 800e 4/

0. e. 0 0 0 0 0. e.

8080

_ /

8000

0. e. s. 0 800.s.

+

_ +

(

8e8e 8ee0 e88e 800e ee8e 8808 5._

5_(

9 M.

2416 4e13 4944 B_

7304 3s2s 8415 M_

0081 8e08 8000 N_

4000 8e0e 8000 0088 8.s.08 8080 0008

8. e. 0. s.

8000 000e 0e80 08S0 ee08 0e08 80e0

_ )

7577 8965 6868

- )

5e57 813l 6636 8800 0608 0880 1l11 121l 1111

. /

_ /

0. e. 8 8 8 0 8. e.

0 0. e. 0

. + e880 8008 e080

_ +

1.(

0e0e e0ee e0e0 5

5_(

9_

M

)

R.

2562 8702 3562 R_

9654 e81e 7e94 T

BRW C_

I_

18ee e80l 1l00

8. e. 0. e.
e. 0. e. 0 8 8. s. S.

S. 8 8. e.

0. e. 0 0 8800 7E 1HT e8e0 000e 00e0 80ee e080 8e0e TE E0W L-BHG AS/

. )

7281 8157 7780

. )

5179 6942 6745 TII 3323 2432 3223 1111 1111 1111 FC

. /

. / 0880 8880 0008 P

. + e8ee e00e e8e0

. +

(

. (

5.(

0e80 e08e 000e 8.

4 6

4 8408 6658 8188 K

9742 7836 7294 7

1102 8088 e091 6181 7856 6778 8808 0889 s.088 3323 2432 3223 80e8 0ee0 008e

. )

7576 8965 6757

. )

7579 8865 7867 0088 8800 8880 888e 0180 8e80

_ /

. /

e. 8 8. s.
e. S. e. 0 0000

_ + 0000 e0e0 8088

_ +

_ (

8_t eSee Se0e eeO0 7_

6_

E._

9227 0115 4830 O.

2156 1ls6 4es4 B_

C.

s880 0le8 0le0

e. e. 0 8 0008 0800
e. 8. e. 0
0. e. e. 8
0. e. e. 0 e000 8000 0e0e e00e eeSe eee8 L

L E

L E

L RSHH PHPP EIPH RSHH PHPP EIPH E.

USCC RCRR KGRC E_

USCC RCRR KGRC P

TARR ARAA IEAR P_

TARR ARAA IEAR Y

XBEE CECC PUCE T

I PP P

L P Y._

XBEE CECC PUCE I PP P

L P T.

3 M

B M

B 9

9 1

N N.

O _

E O.

3333 3333 3333 I

3333 3~

33 3333 E

I 9999 9999 9999 TE.

9999 9799 9999 K

TE.

//// //// ////

CT 4937 6832 8132 CT.

//// / /// ////

N A

EA_

1211 0212 1212 EA.

4937 4832 8132 Y

LD

//// //// ////

LD_

1711 0212 1212 L

//// //// ////

L 1471 1470 157e O _

l471 1470 157e T

O.

00e1 eee1 ee0l C _

eee1 0881 0 eel U

C.

C I

N.

N T

O_

C I-cccc O.

I.

cccc T __

6666 9999 eeee E

A 2222 2222 3333 T_

6666 9999 eeee N

A 2222 2222 3333 N

C.

C C

L O

O O

L.

(

iI

.llIl

>Ill

{I!Illlllls lllilillL) llLllll

lllI, tI:lIh

l1j i1j1s 1i)ll ll ll1 34

_ )

3042

321, 2695 21 1111 3

1111 1.90.

8098 8./

e. 8 0 0

. +

t ee08 99 8088 c

2._ (

2 AP 215 6179 s342 H_

7.41.

0139 o122 T.

0 0..

000.s.

s.008 0

e00e 00 0000

. )

4118

.72.

1211 5262 391.

2816 1111 1211 1111 6./

+

2.(

080s 400 0000 2._

2590 1828 4435 A._

558 0235 210.6 8187 R.

2012 1864 000e

.00 0000 621 3989

.)

5167 111u 1018 1111

./

8808 0 8..

0000 7.+

3.(

a08s 88 0808 1

9581 003.

7038 S.

5223 033 2028 C_

3.09.

0808 8000 0800 00 8900 7678 8276 7868

. )

0000

.100 0000 4._ /

0080

.900 0809

+

3.(

0080 90.

0809 1

I.

011 101o S.

6631 1.00.

T C.

e009 8088 8RW s.008

. 8 0..

0080 7E 1HT sSS0 90 80S0 TE EOW L-BHG AS/

. )

9189 5258 4244 TII 1112 2211 1212 FC

. / 9 0 0. e.

08 0000 P

. +

e800 09 0000 1.(

t 3

1 9292

.502 5211 9093 00 9101 I.

3.00.

9098 8909 000C 0S.

0009

. )

8799

,287 9979 8000

.19 8009

. / 8000 89 0899 M.+

8800 0S e000 0.(

1 1

7236 3514 2113 m

8001 28 8180 G.

A.

e. 0 8 0. 0 0.. 9080 09e0 e00 0089 L

E L

RSHH PHPP EIPH E

USCC RCRR KGRC TARR ARAA IEAR P.

XBEE CECC PUCE Y.

T.

I PP P

L P M

B 3

9 9

1 NO E

I 3333 3333 3333 9999

,99, 9999 TE.

E CT

//// ///, ////

tM EA.

4937 6832 8132 A

LD 1211 2 1212

.21, Y

L

////

///.

////

O.

1471 47 1570 1.981 T

C.

0091 0001 U

C N

I O

TC I.

CCCC 6666

,999 880S T

E M

A.

2222 2222 333S M

C.

O OC L.

ll' Fj-ll'

.1

4.0 plSCUSSION OF RESULTS This section summarizes the results of the analyses of environmental media sampled.

NUSCO has carefully examined the data throughout the year and has presented in this section all cases where plant related radioactivity could be detected and compared the results with previous environmental surveillance data. The fuel failures experienced during the previous two operational cycles which caused positive plant indications have since been cleaned up and eliminated. Thus, few impacts of plant operation were observed in environmental media during 1993. Subsections contained describe each particular media or potential exposure pathway. The dose commitments from these plant-related exposures is insignificant and is explained in Section 5.

Naturally occurring nuclides such as Be-7, K-40, Ra-226 and Th-228 were detected in numerous samples. Be-7, which is produced by cosmic processes, was observed i

predominantly in airborne and vegetation samples. Ra-226 and Th-228 results were i

L variable and are generally at levels higher than plant related radionuclides.

Cs-137 and Sr-90 were observed at levels similar to those of past years. In general, the r

L detectable levels of Cs-137 and Sr-90 were the result of atmospheric nuclear weapons testing of years past.

Gamma Exoosure Rate (Table 1)

)

Gamma exposure from all sources including cosmic and other natural and artificial radioactivity is measured over periods of approximately one month using CaF (Mn)

{

thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). These dosimeters are strategically placed at a number of on-site locations, as well as at inner and outer off-site locations. Glass bulb type TLDs such as these, are subject to inherent self-irradiation which has been experimentally measured for each dosimeter. The results, shown in Table 1 have been adjusted for this effect. The range of this correction for field dosimeters is O.4pR/hr to 2.0 pR/hr, with a mean of approximately 1 pR/hr.

L Examination of the data for 1993 reveals the same trends as that of previous years; gamma exposure rates did not differ significantly for the off-site inner and outer ring locations. Four on-site locations within the plant's site boundary were the only locations showing any plant effects.

The environmental trail (location 42X) shows an average increase of 4.0 pR/hr over its historical normal background for the period June through July. Over this same period, the location near the intake structure (location 40X), the old waste gas sphere fence -

(location 45X) and the info center (location 47X) show average increases of 2.0 R/hr, 4

1.8 R/hc, and 3.9 pR/hr, respectively. These increases were caused by plant refueling activities. During this period the RWST was drained down. The increases were due to the lack of water in the RWST which normally provides shielding from the gamma shine 4-1

ll l

produced by contained crud and deposited radionuclides. The two largest increases g

noted in the environmental program TLDs were both located on the north side of the y

station. The other two locations showed only a slight increase due to their physical location and distance from the RWST source. Because locations 42X and 47X aie areas which are accessible to the public, the possible dose commitment, even though insignificant, from this plant related exposure is explained in Section 5.

Air Particulates and lodine (Table 2,3,4 A-D and 5)

Air is continuously sampled at seven inner ring and two outer ring locations by passing it through glass #iber particulate filters. These are collected weekly and analyzed for gross beta radioactivity. Results are shown on Figure 4-1 and Table 2.

I Gross beta activity remained at levels similar to that seen over the last decade. Inner j

and outer ring monitoring locations showed no si nificant variation in measured

]

C activities. This indicates that any plant contribution is not measurable.

{

1 Charcoal cartridges are included at all of the air particulate locations for the collection of iodine. No detectable levels of I-131 were seen in the 1993 charcoal samples. This l

Is confirmed by the absence of I-131 in any of the milk samples. Milk from cows and goats is a much more sensitive indicator of I-131 presence in the environment.

The weekly air particulate filters are composited quarterly for gamma spectral analyses.

The results, as shown in Tables 4A-4D, indicate the presence of naturally occurring Be-7, which is produced by cosmic processes. Positive results for all the other isotopes are attributable to statistical fluctuations in counting. These analyses indicate the lack of plant offects.

Table 5 in past years was used to report the measurement of Sr-89 and Sr-90 in quarterly composited air particulate filters. These measurements are not required by the Radiological Effluent Monitoring Manual (REMM) V i have been discontinued.

Previous data has shown the lack of detectable station ac, (y in this media. This fact,

{

and the fact that milk samples are a much more sensitive.1dicator of fission product existence in the environment, prompted the decision for discontinuation. In the event of widespread plant contamination or specini event such as the Chernobyl incident, these measurements may be made.

Snil (Table 6)

I Soll samples are special samples not required by the REMM. Previous data has shown the lack of detectable station activity in this media resulting in discontinuing these samples. In the event of widespread plant contamination or special studies, these sample would be collected.

4-2 Il

1 1

?

\\

Cow Milk (Table 7) i

/

Analysis of milk samples is generally the most sensitive indicator of fission product existence in the terrestrial environment. This, in combination with the fact that

{

consumption of milk is significant, results in this pathway usually being the most critical 1

from the plant release viewpoint. This pathway also shows significant amounts of I

nuclear weapons testing fallout. Therefore, this media needs to be evaluated very carefully when trying to determine if there are any plant effects.

Sr-90 was observed in nearly all samples; all results were below 4 pCi/l. Detailed analysis of previous data has concluded that these levels of Sr-90 are from weapons testing and are not plant related (see Section 6.0 for details to this argument). Sr-89 L

was not detected ir, any of the samples above its MDL. This isotope is usually released i

from the ment in quantitles similar to those of Sr-90, indicating that Sr-90 is the result I

of weapuns tening and not from the plant. Sr-89 is only detected in these samples during episodes of fresh fallout from weapons testing.

Cs-137 usually shows the same tendencies as Sr-90. Results for 1993 are similar to those of the past fifteen years.

Detailed analysis has concluded that these l

concentrations are most likely the result of fallout from previous weapons testing (see Section 6.0 for details). Cs-134 was not observed above detectable levels in any of the samples, further confirming the absence of plant effects. Although not listed on Table f

7, the only other nuclide detected by gamma spectrometry was naturally occurring K-i 40.

All samples showed a lack of I-131 detectable above the MDL of 0.5 pCi/l. These results are consistent with previous year's results, f

Goat Milk (Table 8) l Depending on the feeding habits, goat milk can be a more sensitive indicator than cow-i i

milk of fission products in the environment. This is due to the metabolism of these animals. Similar to the results of the cow milk samples, these show significant amounts l

l of nuclear weapons testing fallout.

Sr-90 and Cs.137 were observed in most samples, with values similar at both locayuns.

l l

In previous years (1977 - 1983) the controllocation had significantly higher valuet than 1

[

the indicator location.

This difference in results between locations decreased substantially with a change in farms in 1983. The difference in results demonstrate the variability in the uptake of fallout levels among various farms. This variability is caused L

by many factors, including feeding habits (amount of stored feed, etc.), soil L

characteristics, farming practices (tillage and quality of fertilization and land -

management), and feed type. For a comp lete discussion of the problem see Section 6.0. As typical of periods lacking fresh fallout, no detectable Sr-89 was seen in these 4-3 i

l

samples. The absence of Sr-89 and Cs-134 confirm that the levels of Sr-90 and Cs-137 are caused by previous weapons fallout.

All samples showed a lack of I-131 detectable above the MDL of 0.5 pCi/l. These i

results are consistent with previous years' results. The only occasions when this

]

nuclide has been detected are those immediately following atmospheric testing of nuclear weapons and the Chernobyl accident.

Pasture Grass (Table 9)

When the routine mi!k samples are unavailable, samples of pasture grass are required as a replacement. The.ie samples may also be taken to further investigate the levels of radioactivity in milk. In samples of past years, no plant effects were seen in this media.

There were no pasture grass samples taken in 1993.

Well Water (Table 10)

Activity in this media results from either soluble plant evfluents permeating through the -

ground or the leaching of naturally occurring nuclides from the soil and rock. H-3 was detected in these samples, at levels similar to previous years.

i As usual the on-site wells (location 15) exhibited plant ielated H-3 significantly above j

background levels. This plant effect results from the wells being located within an area -

(

influenced by the water in the discharge canal and H-3 having the ability to readily-

)

follow the flow of ground water. Off-site concentrations are much lower. This pathway i

does not result in any dose consequence since the water from these wells is used only in process streams at the station.

1 1

l Reservoir Water (Table 11)

Reservoir water samples are special samples not required by the REMM. Previous data has shown the lack of detectable station activity in this media. This fact and the

[

extremely unlikely possibility of observing routine plant effluents in this media has resulted in discontinuing these samples.

In the event of - widespread plant contamination, these samples may be collected.

Fruits and Veaetables (Table 12)

Similar to past years, this media did not show any plant effects. Concentrations of.

Sr-90 in these samples existed at levels comparable to past years and is due to fallout.

Naturally, occurring K-40 was detected in all samples. Since there was no fresh fallout, l

no other nuclides were detected.

4-4

Broad Leaf Veoetation (Table 13)

Concentrations of Sr-90 and Cs-137 in these samples are at levels comparable to past years and are due to fallout. Historically, this media has shown early indication of I-131 release from the plant from both unplanned releases and normal operations. Therefore, to enhance program monitoring effectiveness, samples of broadleaf vegetation are collected monthly during the growing season, April-October, even though requirements are to collect twice a year.

in May after a small unplanned release of iodine, two special broadleaf smples were taken on site within the predominant wind direction. No indication of plant-related i

radioactivity was observed.

River Water (Table 14) l These samples are collected on a quarterly basis; the sampling procedure is different at the control and indicator locations. Weekly grab samples of the first six weeks of each j

quarter are composited at the control station (Middletown -location 30C). Continuous l

samples, collected for the entire quarter, are utilized at the indicator station (East Haddam Bridge - location 28).

)

Tritium was observed above background levels at the indicator location in the first and second quarter samples. These elevated levels are attributable to plant operation. The levels measured are comparable to those seen in years past. Because this nuclide only emits low energy beta particles and river water is not a source of drinking water, the dose consequence resulting from these levels is insignificant. Fish consumption is the r'

only media through which the population encounters dose from H-3 in liquid effluents.

The dose consequence of the H-3, although not routinely measured in fish, is calculated i

based upon the measured effluents and appropriate dispersion models (NRC approved computer code LADTAP). In order to verify these calculations, a special program of measuring H-3 in fish samples had been performed. The result of these analyses indicated that the effluent calculations are conservative. The dose consequences, discussed in Section 5.0, are insignificant.

Bottom Sediment (Table 15) 7: ant related levels of Co-60 were observad at indicator location (Area of Plant Discharge -location 29). These levels are comparable to those observed in past years.

Cs-137 was observed in both the indicator and the control locations at levels similar to past years. The Cs-137 levels at the control location are due to fallout and are at or lower than levels seen at the indicator locations, a portion of the Cs-137 in the indicator samples is likely due to plant operation.

Shellfish (Table 16) 4-5 i

g

I b

(-

Plant related Co 58 and Co-60 were observed in one sample taken from East Haddam Bridge (location 28X). No other activity was observed except for the naturally occurring radionuclides. Because this media is not a source of consumption, other media (e.g.,

(

fish results) are utilized in the determination of dose consequences.

Fish Bullheads (Table 17A)

{

Cs-137 was observed in both the indicator and the controllocations at levels similar to past years. Even though Cs-134 was not observed, a portion of the Cs-137 in these

[-

samples could be due to plant operation. No other activity was observed except for the naturally occurring radionuclides. Dose consequences were calculated based on the detected concentrations. The results of the calculations are shown in Section 5.0.

Fish-Perch and Other Tvoes (Table 178)

These fish samples exhibit similar results as the bullhead samples.

Cs-137 was detectable at both indicator and controllocations. The dose consequence, though very l

minimal, is discussed in Section 5.0.

1 4-6 J

wr e

e

~

-Figure 4-1 CY AIR' PARTICULATE Gross Beta fladioactivity pC1/m3

- 0.02 t

l($1ndicators B Controls) 2

,?

~

0.015

' :/.

./..

)

,/ '

/; :-

/'

,. 2 : -

'h -'

t 0.01

~

~

Y Y?

]0.'

A

- 4

. u:

0.005

~ ^

-. - a.

' ~

~

- g.

)

1-1 V

I,,

-g 1;

~.

.; l l:

,l :

._ l l.c

.- g ;.

- l; g-

.g

.l'.

l

_;- l <.

Jan Feb uer Apr lley Jun Jul AuC Sep Oct Nov Dec 1993 Average error of these values is 0.003

_ ___i. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - -

._a___ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ -

___-.___a.--

__=__:__-a~h a

_C

_A_%-.---^---'-^-

L' I

L 5.0 OFF-SITE DOSE EQUIVALENT COMMITMENTS The off-site dose consequences (dose equivalent commitments) of the statk i

radioactive liquid and airborne effluents have been evaluated using tu methods.

The first method utilizes the stations' measured radioactive discharges as input parameters into conservative models to simulate the transport mechanism through the environment to man. This results in the computation of the maximum doses to individuals and the O to 50 mile population dose. The rest,lts of these computations have been submitted to the L

NRC in the Annual Radioactive Effluent Report written in accordance with the Radiological Effluent Monitoring Manual, Section F.2.

The second method utilizes the actual measurements of the concentrations of radioactivity in y

various environmental media (e.g., milk, fish) and then computes the dose consequences resulting from the consumption of these foods.

The first method, which is usually conservative (i.e., computes higher doses L

than that which actually occur), has the advantage of approximating an upper p

limit to the dose consequences. This is important in those cases vwhere the L

actual dose cannot be measured because they are so small as to be wel, below the capabilities of conventional monitoring techniques. The results of both r

methods are compared in Table 5.1. For gaseous releases, no plant related L

detectable activity was observed in any sampling media. The less-than values given for Method 2 are the doses which would be calculated if the annual r

average activity was equal to the minimum detectable level. Although the liquid releases are also low, traces of plant related activity were detected in fish, shellfish, bottom sediment, well water, and river water samples.

The doses presented in Table 5.1 are the maximum doses to an individual for specific pathways to man. That is, the dose is calculated at the location of

[

maximum effect from the plant effluents for that pathway and for the critical age group. For example, the external gamma dose is calculated at the site A

boundary which has the least meteorological dispersion. The calculations result in maximum total doses to an individual of: 1.0 mrem whole body to an adult, 0.19 mrem to a child's thyrold, and 0.28 mrem to a teen's liver. The calculated doses for all other locations and other age groups will be less than those shown

[

on Table 5.1.

The average dose to an individual within 50 miles from the site cannot be

(

calculated using the second method. However, Method 1 yields the following results fer the period January - December 1993 for the average individual:

I ANNUAL AVERAGE WHOLE BODY DOSE :

DUE TO AIRBORNE EFFLUENTS = 0.00019 mrem DUE TO LIQUID EFFLUENTS = 0.000041 mrem 5-1

E Thus, it can be seen that the average whole body dose to an individual is much less than the maximum whole body dose to an individual as shown in Table 5.1.

In..er to provide perspective on the doses in Table 5.1, the standards for 1993 on the allowable maximum dose to an individual of the general public are I

given in 40CFR190 as 25 mrei.i thole body,75 mrem thyroid, and 25 mrem

[-

any other organ. These standards are a fraction of the normal background I

radiation dose of 280 mrem per year and are designed to be inconsequential in regard to public health and safety. Since plant related doses are even a smaller fraction of natural background, they have insignificant public health consequences, in fact, the plant related doses to the maximum individual are less than 10% of the variation in natural background in Connecticut.

L 1

F u

L

(

5-2 k

a

w w

ru m v

v v

TABLE 5.1 COMPARISON OF DOSE CALCULATION METHODS HADDAM NECK STATION JANUARY - DECEMBER 1993 ANNUAL DOSE IMILLIREM)

PATHWAY ORGAN METHOD 1"'

METHOD 2"'

AIRBORNE EFFLUENTS 1.

External Gamma Dose Max. In.i28-Whole Body 0.55 ND

Whole Body 'S' N/A 0.26 2.

a.

Inhalation Max. Ind.i2: - Thyroid 0.083 NAD'", < 0.6 b.

Vegetables Max. Ind.i2' - Liver O.15 NAD c.

Goat's Milk Max. Ind." - Thyroid 0.013 NAD, < 1.8 LIQUID EFFLUENTS 1.

Fish Max. Ind. - Whole Body 0.20 0.035 Max. Ind. - Liver 0.28 0.055 (1) Method 1 uses measured station discharges and meteorological data as input parameters to conservative transport to man f

models. Method 2 uses actual measured concentrations in environmental media.

(2) Maximum individual-The maximum individual dose is the dose to the most critica: age group (teen for inhalation, infant for milk, and child for vegetables), at the location of maximum concentration of plant related activity. The dose to the average individualis much less than the maximum individual dose. The doses for inhalation and vegetable consumption assume that the individual rssides at the point of maximum quarterly dose. Therefore, his residence is subject to variation for conservatism.

(3) NAD - No activity detected above the minimum detectable level. The less-than value reported is the yearly dose corresponding to the MDL.

(4) The plant effects were so small that they could not be distinguished from fluctuations in natural background.

(5) The individual dose at the accessible on-site location of maximum measured exposure from plant-related activities, 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> of-exposure per week during the effected months June through July were assumed.

=

6.0 DISCUSSION The evaluation of the effects of station operation on the environment requires the

(

careful consideration of many factors. Those factors depend upon the media being effected. They include station release rates, effluent dispersion, occurrence of nuclear weapons tests, seasonal variability of fallout, local environment, and locational

(

variability of fallout. Additional factors affecting the uptake of radionuclides in milk include soll conditions (mineral content, pH, etc.), quality of fertilization, quality of land management (e.g., irrigation), pasturing habits of animals, and type of pasturage. Any

[

of these factors could cause significant variations in the measured radioactivity. A failure to consider these factors could cause erroneous conclusions.

Consider, for example, the problem of deciphering the effect of station releases on the.

radioactivity measured in milk samples. This is an important problem because this product is widely consumed and fission products readily concentrate in this media.

Some of these fission products, such as 1-131 and Sr-89 are relatively short-lived.

Therefore they result from either plant effluents, recent nuclear weapons tests or recent nuclear incidents (e.g. Chernobyl). Sr-89's lifetime is longer than 1-131's, therefore it must be remembered that it will remain around for much longer periods of time.

Problems are caused by the long lived fission products, Sr-90 and Cs-137. These r

isotopes are still remaining from the high weapons testing era of the 1960's. This L

results in significant amounts of Sr-90 and Cs-137 appearing in milk samples.

Distinguishing between this " background" of fallout activity and plant effects is a l

difficult problem.

In reviewing the Sr-90 and Cs-137 measured in cow and goat milk in the areas around i

[

the Millstone and Haddam Neck stations, a casual observer could notice that in some l

l cases the levels of these isotopes are higher at farms closer to the station than at those l

further away from the stations. The stations effluents might at first appear to be

{

responsible. However, the investigation of the following facts prove this conclusion wrong.

l

[

1.

The stations accurately measure many fission products, including Sr-90 and Cs-137 in their releases. Based on these measurements and proven models developed by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, concentrations in the environment can be calculated. These calculations (generally conservative, see 1 Section 5.0) show that insufficient quantities of Sr-90 and Cs-137 have been released from the stations to yield the measured concentrations in milk.

2.

Over the many years of plant operation, Sr-89 has often been released in comparable quantity to Sr-90. Since they are chemically similar, comparable

{

levels should have been detected in milk in the Sr-90 was plant related. No plant related Sr-89 has ever been detected in milk samples.

f 6-1 l

l

{

3.

Similar to Sr-89, Cs-134 can be used as an indication of plant related Cs-137.

Although not as conclusive as Sr-89, the lack of any measurable Cs-134 in any of the milk samples suggests that the Cs-137 is not plant related. This is further confirmed by the evaluation of the air particulate data. The only occurrences of detectable Cs-134 in milk resulted from the Chernobylincident.

h 4.

Since dairy milk sampling began in the 1960's, years prior to plant operation, the a immediate station areas have always shown higher lovels of weapons fa!!out j related Sr-90 and Cs-137 (see Figures 6-1 and 6-2).

The ratio of activity l

[

between the locations has not changed with plant operation. All areas show the same significant decrease in radioactivity since the 1964 Nuclear Test Ban j Treaty.

]

5.

Local variability of Sr-90 and Cs-137 in milk is common throughout the United States. Due to the variability in soil conditions, pasturing methods, rainfall, etc.,

it is the rule rather than the exception. Therefore, it is not surprising that certain farms have higher levels of radioactivity than other farms. In fact, there are -

some cases where the farms further from the station have higher Sr-90 and..,

F L

Cs-137 values than the farms that are closer to the station (e.g., see pre-1984 Haddam Neck Goat Milk data.)

6.

The Millstone goat farm with the highest levels of Sr-90 and Cs-137 has also-experienced the highest levels of short-lived activity from the 1976 and 1977 Chinese Tests and the 1986 Chernobyl accident. This indicates that for some unknown reason this farm has the ability for higher reconcentration. Special' studies performed at this and other farms failed to find any link to the plant.

E Based on these facts, the observation that the station effluents are responsible is obviously false. The cause must be one or more of the other variables.

E E

[

6-2

[?

Northeast Utilities has carefully examined the data throughout the year and has -

{

presented in this report all cases where plant related radioactivity can be detected. An-analysis of the potential exposure to the population from any plant related activity has

{

been performed and shows that in all cases the exposure is insignificant.

~

Throughout the year, the Connecticut Department of environmental Protection performs.

p a parallel environmental program under contract with the Nuclear Regulatory.

Commission. On a regular basis, the results of their' analyses are compared to' the results from this program's analyses. The comparisons are tracked and used as a cross-f reference to verify measured plant activity. During 1993, both programs showed similar -

results.

{

As in previous years, this data is being submitted.to, and will be reviewed by the appropriate regulatory bodies such as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Environmental Protection Agency and Connecticut Department of Environmental.

(;-

Protection.

{

{

(

[

6-3

q ll'l!i l

a_

e

,g 3

1 b

9

+

h t

i l

.p k u 9

1 k i a l M e i

r d r e M a ae e a r.

l o

o et 9

o a s 8

P d l g

d l T a i C H u

@(G 7

o+

8 A *~'

w%

s f

s Y'*

5 8

b' l

o \\..'n+

k 2

7 n

38 x

i M

0 4

n" n

0,

+

1 ny 8

i i's W s

Or\\

9

+

n b

7 E-

?'

d~

.- h R

y 7

A

. o 7

E o'r Y

u i

lo x

w%

2 5

t 7

\\.

n o'/l<+-

or d

7 3

t S

e.

w%

6,,

t 1

7 s

Q,i'\\

f,&

96 s'

x O

,+'

v,

\\

'i

\\

c a h

sN.

7 4

t's'.i h

6

\\

\\

q\\

56 e

r e

t 3

i 8

L

/

1 C

p 1

t 6

o 5

O 3

j t

m

.1

,llli

!l!Illl1l l

l!t!li!

ltl!

E N

3 b'I 9 k

i l

mu 4i 9 1

a k

l E e i

r M

a

?

d e

e n

l o

wt 9

?i 8 s

P 1

1

@i TC u

O-bi 7 8

e%

5 i 8

~

K 1

83 L

E I

3 1

8 M

1 N

N I

9 I

79 2

e7

%=

G g3 EF u

r R

7 A

i 7

E 1

g'_

Y M

E e%

O 5

U 7

I S

R_

S E

37 C

4 k'

Y m%

K,p"'+

1 7

9 M

8 c=

qNW v

.oj 7

t' 6

E

\\

5 6

O r

i e

t 36 L

E

/

i Cp 1

d 6

0 on

,n n

o o

0 a

N 0

o a

e 4

1 i

i E

I

[

e L.

I b

APPENDIX A z

P L

COW AND GOAT CENSUS FOR 1993

(

)

2 t

?~

A-1

_______.m______

_____m___________

i e

Dairy Cows Within 15 Miles of Connecticut Yankee As of December 1993 Direction Distance Name and Address

  1. of Cows NNE 14 M Robert K. Gasper 65 694 Gilead Street Hebron, CT 06248 NNE 14 M Hills Farm 125 527 Gilead Street

[

Hebron, CT 06248 NNE 14 M Mapieleaf Farm, Inc.

169 750 Gilead Street Hebron, CT 06248 NNE 14 M Gordon N. Rathburn 36 Martin Road Hebron, CT 06248 1

NNE 14.5 M Douglas Porter 127 RFD #1 Hebron, CT 06248

)

r NE 4.5 M John Dill 14 3

I 127 Waterhole Rd.

l Colchester, CT 06415

-East Hampton-NE 14 M Victor Botticello 28 Levita Road Lebanon, CT 06249 ENE

.5 M Grandpa Hill Farm 40 R.S. Cone Box 251 i

East Haddam, CT 06423 ENE 11 M Richard Swider 40 g

{-

Route 85 Colchester, CT 06415 l

ENE 14 M Robert Avery 27 Rathburn Hill Road Colchester, CT 06415

- Salem -

ENE 14.5 M Walter Makarevich 0

Geer Road Lebanon, CT 06249 (out of business)

Dairy Cows Within 15 Miles of Connecticut Yankee As of December 1993 Direction -

Distance Name and Address

  1. of Cows E

11.5 M Salem Valley Farm Dairy 35 h'

Eugene Wilczewski Darling Road Salem, CT 06415 E

13 M Garry Vaill 0

Forsythe Road Salem, CT 06415 (call next year)

E 14 M Stuart Gadbois 200 Route 82 Salem, CT 06415 S

2.9 M Norman C. Manning 1

530 Plains Road Haddam, CT 06438 SE 11 M Tiffany Farms 80 Sterling City Road Old Lyme, CT 06371 l

- Lyme -

l SE 12 M J. Ely Harding 50 Ashlawn Farm Old Lyme, CT 06371

- Lyme -

1 SW 14.5 M Sugarloaf Farm 26 154 Beaver Head Road North Guilford, CT 06437 1

WSW 8M Michael Dwyer 34 Route 17 Durham, CT 06492 1

- Wallingford -

WSW 8M Robert Raudat 43 Old Durham Road Killingworth, CT 06417 WSW 11 M Raymond Wimler 191 Guilford Road Durham, CT 06422

~l i

WSW 14 M

- Cella Brothers 98 l

Whirlwind Hill

)

2 No. Brandford Street

(.

Wallingford, CT 06492

{

V L'

I Dairy Cows Within 15 Miles of Connecticut Yankeg As of December 1913

(

Direction Dhtanga Name and Address

  1. of Cows WSW 15 Co Ag Farm, Inc.

220 4

['

Walter Augur & George Cooke 180 Northford Road Wallingford, CT 06492 l

W 8.5 M Richard Rowe 28 Box 4, Higganum Road

)

Durham, CT 06422 W

11.5 M Friendly Acres Diary Farm 25-Tony Caltabiano Parmalee Hill Road L

Durhar1, CT 06422 i

W 14 M North Farms 28

[

Walter Werbiski 1069 Farms Road Wallingford, CT 06492 l

W 14.5 M Charles Greenback & Sons, Inc.

118 Box 451, Route 68 Durham, CT 06422 WNW 7M Calvin Harvey 35 55 Tryon Street Middletown, CT 06457 i

WNW 8M Richard Brock 25 787 Ridge Road Middletown, CT 06457 WNW 12 M John Kolman 29 Meriden Road Middletown, CT 06457 WNW 12 M Walnut Hill Farm 90 William & Thomas Mintz Jackson Hill Road Middlefield, CT 06455 WNW 15 M Bilger Brothers 23 Hickory Grove Farm 705 Westfield Road Meriden, CT 06450


.-----____--.__--.-----------_----.--------_-_--,-------------__---_------.------__a.---___

---,.,,-wo,

{I.

I 1

Dairy Cows Within 15 Miles of Connecticut Yankee As of December 1993 I

Direction Distance Name and Address

  1. of Cows NW 6M Edward Hills 25 Brooks Road Middletown, CT OS457 NW 13 M Higgins Farm, Inc.

62 837 Ridgewood Road Middietown, CT 06457 NW 15 M Wenceslaus & Jean Backiel 31 E-Riverside Farm RFD #2 Berlin, CT 06067

- Rocky Hill -

NW 15 M John W. Meisterling 49 Box 385, France Street Rocky Hill, CT 06067 NNW 14 M Roaring Brook Farm 0

Henry Killam I

77 Tryon Street (sold out)

South Glastonbury, CT 06073

- Glastonbury -

I I

I I

- - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

I DAIRY GOATS WITHIN 20 MILES OF CONNECTICUT YANKEE AS OF DECEMBER 1393 I

l DIRECTION DISTANCE NAME AND ADDRESS

  1. GOATS N

4.5 M Philip Bourdon 23-164 Young Street East Hampton, CT 06424 N

15 M

Joan & Thomas Kemble 5

581 Thompson Street Glastonbury, CT 06033 NNE 12 M Louise Sage

-5 155 Reidy Hill Road Hebron, CT 06248 NNE 16 M

Joan Bowers 2

/

350 Wall Street L-Hebron, CT 06248 NNE 16 M

Kathy Waters 30 Burnt Hill Road Hebron, CT 06248 NE 16 M Barbara Nadeau O'

Clubhouse Road Lebanon, CT 06249 NE 17 M Lynn Miller 70 Goshen Hill Road Lebanon, CT 06249 i

NE 8M Johnathan & Elizabeth Gilman 2

178 Cato Corner Road Colchester, CT. 06415 SSE 10 M Laura Parker

-5 95 Plains Road Essex, CT 06426

.____ ____ u- _ __________-_____

__________________----z--------____--_-:--_-_________z______________;

)

i DAIRY GOATS WITHIN 20 MILES OF CONNECTICUT YANKEE AS OF DECEMBER 1993 DIRECTION DISTANCE NAME AND ADDRESS

  1. GOATS NE 14.5 M Sharon Stewart 6

Old Colchester Rd.

1 Lebanon, CT l

l l

E 12 M Anne B. Henrici 4

Round Hill Road q

Salem, CT 06415 q

ESE 13 M Dave & Pam Richards 285 Grassy Hill Road Lyme, CT 06371 SE 19.5 M Mrs. John Mingo 7

69 Spithead Road Waterford, CT 06385 l

l SE 15.8 M George Scacciaferro 3

338 Boston Post Road East Lyme, CT 06333 S

11.5 M Victor Trudeau 5

174 Horse Hill Road Westbrook, CT 06498 W

4.8 M Pat Mannetho Jacoby Road Higganum, CT 06441 W

14.5 M Robert Pogomore 0

177 Williams Road Wallingford, CT 06492 W

DAIRY GOATS WITHIN 20 MILES OF CONNECTICUT YANKEE AS OF DECEMBER 1993 DIRECTION DISTANCE NAME AND ADDRESS

  1. GOATS

[

'l W

15.3 M Jim & Mary Hall Pettack 19 1000 North Farms Road Wallingford, CT 06492 WNW 19 M Daniel Nitkowski 3

46 Fitch Avenue Meriden, CT 06450 NNW 14 M Dorothy Joba 8

171 Ferry Lane S. Glastonbury, CT 06073 NNW 15 M Donald Reid 12 1654 Main Street Glastonbury, CT 06033 4

  • UNABLE TO CONTACT AS LY THIS Tntl TOTAL NUMBER Of GOAT ARELMTED FOR THM CENSUS.

y i

.. j l

t l..

L-APPENDIX B NORTHEAST UTILITIES QA PROGRAM i

B-1

Northeast Utilities Service Company (NUSCO), acting as the agent for both the Northeast Nuclear Energy Company (NNECO) and the Connecticut Yankee Atomic Power Company (CYAPCO), maintains a quality assurance (OA) program as part of the radiological environ-montal monitoring program (REMP). The OA program consists of contractor appraisals and quality control samples.

Appraisals are conducted of the primary (Teledyne Isotopes) and secondary (Yankee Atomic) radicanalysis contractors, of the Production Operations Support Laboratory (POSL), and of the NUSCO Radiological Engineering Section (RES). A REMP evaluation form is completed for each appraisal and discrepancies are tracked on a separate form until corrective action is taken. Each contractor, POSL, and RES are also audited by other organizations including other customers of the contractors and Northeast Utilities Quality Assessment Services of POSL and RES.

There are three types of quality control samples. They are:

1.

Duplicate analyses of actual surveillance samples and TLDs. For samples this type of quality control allows an evaluation of the contractor's precision or reproducibility of results. Duplicate TLD measurements at eight locations with TLDs of different design are made and readout at the NUSCO Personal Dosimetry Laboratory to verify the l

reliability of POSL's environmental TLD readings.

2.

Cross-check analyses of actual surveillance samples with more than one laboratory; e.g., Yankee Atomic Environmental Laboratory. This intercomparison allows the determination of what agreement the primary contractor has with another laboratory.

4 3.

Analyses of " spiked" samples and TLDs. This type of quality control allows a check on the accuracy of results for contractor's sample radioanalyses and for POSL's TLD readings.

The number and type of quality control samples are given in Table 1. In general, the objective was to obtain between 10 and 20 percent of the samples as quality control samples.

The results should satisfy acceptance criteria as defined in NUSCO Radiological Assessment Branch Procedure RAB 31," Quality Control of the Environmental TLD Monitoring Program,"

and in Procedure RAB 3-2," Quality Control of Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program." An investigation is conducted of any result or trend which does not satisfy acceptance criteria.

The NUSCO OA Program is not the only OA Program which monitors the primary contractor sample radioanalyses performance. Other programs include:

1.

Teledyne isotopes' internal OA program.

2.

Teledyne isotopes' participation in EPA's Environmental Radioactivity Laboratory intercomparison Studies Program.

3.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission State of Connecticut Independent Verification Program.

Primary contractor participation in the EPA Intercomparison Studies Program is required by plant technical specifications and the results of this program are contained in Appendix C.

weisxm B-2

The NUSCO OA Program indicated that, in general, the Teledyne isotopes' environmental radiological analysis program was adequate. Of the fourteen (14) investigations opened in 1993 for analyses which did not satisfy criteria, eight (8) were closed before the end of the year. Because Teledyne isotope has not been retained as the environmental radioanalysis contractor beyond 1993, the remaining open investigations have been closed. The new contractor, Yankee Atomic, had one quality control sample which failed criteria in 1993. The investigation of this quality control sample result has been closed.

The NUSCO QA Program indicated that the environmental TLD results were reliable. For twelve months of measurements the duplicate TLDs averaged 4.0 percent higher than the environmental TLDs with a range of 14.6 percent to -1.8 percent. For ten months (August and December excluded) the spiked TLDs averaged 2.5 percent below the spiked value with a range of -9.4 percent to 0.6 percent. August and December spike results exceeded the acceptance criteria. Investigation of the August test revealed that the TLD reader required a recalibration. Reader calibration was performed shortly after the spike test and it was determined that the normal environmental TLD readout was not affected by the reader j

malfunction. The reason for the December spike test failure has not yet been determined.

)

Preliminary investigation indicates that there may be an error with the spiking of the TLDs and j

not with the POSL readout.

i l

I i

1 j

1

'I Il B-3

{

i


_-------_---a

..I TABLE 1 NUMBER OF QUALITY CONTROL' SAMPLES 1993

.)

. NUMBER OF NUMBER OF SAMPLE TYPE

_OC SAMPLES

_ ROUTINE SAMPLES

  • TLDs 136 526 Milk - Strontium 43 117 Milk lodine 11 117 Milk - Oamma 25 117 Water - Gamma 12 22 Water - Tritium 12 22 Fish / invertebrate 6

108 Vegetation / Aquatic Flora / Bottom Sediment 4

84 Air Particulate Gross Beta 12 830 lodine 9

780 Gamma 8

60 l

{

  • An additional program is performed by the contractor.

i

{

a - Total for both Millstone and Connecticut Yankea y

1 R

j i

i

[

l weisx o.'

B-4

'l c

l r.

L' r

APPENDIX C t

]

L

[

SUMMARY

OF EPA INTERLABORATORY COMPARISONS rL.

L r

c-1 1

n,,,,,

r,,

G

[

U.S. INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM 1993 (ENVIRONMENTAL)

YANKEE

{

DATE MEDIA NUCLIPE EPA (a)

TELEDYNE(b)

ATOMIC (b) 1/15/93 Water Sr-89 15.012.9 12.7 1.2 12.011.7 Sr-90 10.012.9 8.3 i 1.2 12.3 0.6 1/29/93

. er Beta 44.012.9 52.0 i 1.0(c)

No Result 2/5/93 W ater 1-131 100.015.8 106.7 i 5.8 109.3 i 5.5 3/5/93 Water Ra-226 9.8 i 0.9 7.7i0.1(d)

No Result Ra-228 18.512.7 19.312.3 No Result I

4/20/93 W ater Beta 177 15.6 150.0 i 0.0 No Result Sr-89 41.0 i 2.9 35.311.5 No Result Sr-90 29.012.9 27.3 i 0.6 No Result Co-60 39.0 i 2.9 40.713.5 No Result Cs-134 27.012.9 23.7 i 1.5 No Result Cs-137 32.0 i 2.9 34.312.1 No Result Ra-226 24.9 i 2.1 19.0 i 1.0 (d)

Ra-228 19.0 i 2.8 18.3 i 0.6 6/11/93 W ater Co-60 15.0 i 2.9 16.3 1.5 No Result 2n-65 103.0 5.8 121.312.1(e)

No Result Ru-106 119.0 6.9 106.3 i 15.9 No Result r

Cs-134 5.0 i 2.9 5.7 i 0.6 No Result L

Cs 137 5.0 i 2.9 6.7 i 0.6 No Result Ba 133 99.0 i 5.8 104.3 i 9.3 No Result

[

6/4/93 Water H-3 9844 568 9367 153 106031452 7/16/93 Water Sr 89 34.0 i 2.9 31.7 i 2.5 No Result-Sr 90 25.012.9 24.0 i 0.0 No Result F

7/23/93 Water Beta 43.0 i 2.9 42.712.5 42.712.9

.)

8/27/93 Air Filter Beta 47.012.9 49.0 i 1.7 46.0 i 0.0 Cs 137 9.0 0.6 9.7 iO.6 9.0 1.0 1

9/17/93 Water Ra-226 14.9 i 1.3 15.310.6 No Result

"{

1 Ra 228 20.4 i 2.9 20.711.2 No Result L

9/24/93 Milk Sr-89 30.0 i 2.9 35.7

  • 3.5 20.0 i 1.7 Sr-90 25.0 i 2.9 24.0 7.0 22.7 i 1.7

{

l-131 120.0 i 6.9 127.0 i 6.0 119.7 i 2.1 Cs-137 49.0 2.9 50.7 1.2 48.710.6' K

1679i48 1620i17 1692 2.9 10/8/93 W ater 1-131 117.0 i 6.9 103.3 i 5.8 118.7 i 14.1 w eu w' C-2

E U.S. INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM 1993 (ENVIRONMENTAL)

YANKEE

{

DATE MEDIA NUCLIPE EPA (a)

TELEDYNE(b)

ATOMIC (b) 10/19/93 W ater Beta 58.0 i 5.8 51.313.2 No Result Sr-89 15.012.9 15.011.0 12.710.6

(

Sr 90 10.0 2.9 10.0 i 0.0 8.7 i 0.6 Co-60 10.012.9 12.011.0 9.7 1 0.6 Cs-134 12.0 i 2.9 9.0 i 1.0 9.7 0.6

[

Cs-137 10.0 i 2.9 12.7 i 2.5 10.6 i 0.6 10/29/93 W ater Beta 15.012.9 15.712.1 17.3 i 1.5

(

11/5/93 W ater H-3 7398i427 69001100 71641387 11/12/93 W ater Co 60 30.012.9 28.7 i 2.9 30.0 i 1.7 Zn-65 150.0 i 8.7 152.019.2 152.3 i 1.2 Ru-106 201.0 i 11.5 177.3 5.5 165.714.5 Cs-134 59.0

  • 2.9 53.314.9 57.3 i 0.6 Cs-137 40.012.9 41.3 i 3.1 42.010.0 Ba-133 79.014.6 69.3 i 3.1 80.0 i 1.7 FOOTNOTES

{

Units are pCl/ liter for water and milk, except K is in mg/iiter. Air particulate filters are in units of total pCI.

l (a)

EP known value i standard error of the mean (1 sigma).

[

(b)

Average of three analyses i one standard deviation of the three analytical results. If the average value is not within the EPA value i three times EPA standard deviations it is outside of EPA control limits.

(c)

By oversight, the special self-absorption curve which had been previously derived using EPA water and Cs-137 standard was not used.

(d)

The counting data and backgrounds were verified. Possibly some efficiencies used were erroneously high, causing low values. A less likely cause is an error in dilution. New Ra 226 standards will be prepared. Closer monitoring of out of control efficiencies will be done and extra care in preparation of the sample will be maintained.

]

('.

(o)

The calculations were checked and found to be correct. The results of six gamma emitting isotopes were reported to the EPA. The results of four were within one (1) normalized deviation; a fifth, within j

two (2) normalized deviations. Only the Zn 65 average was outside the control limits. There is no l

{

reason why one isotope should be outside the control limits, while five other isotopes were within j

control limits.

{

i

{

u m a cei C-3

' " -