Text

2005 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report
	ML061380637
Person / Time
Site:	Crystal River
Issue date:	05/08/2006
From:	Franke J; Progress Energy Carolinas
To:	; Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
	3F0506-02
	Download: ML061380637 (58)
	v • d • e

Progress Energy Crystal River Nuclear Plant Docket No. 50-302 Operating License No. DPR-72 Ref: ITS 5.7.1.1(b)

May 8, 2006 3F0506-02 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555-0001

Subject:

Crystal River Unit 3 - 2005 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

Dear Sir:

Florida Power Corporation, doing business as Progress Energy Florida, Inc., hereby submits the 2005 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for Crystal River Unit 3 (CR-3) in accordance with the CR-3 Improved Technical Specifications, Section 5.7.1.1(b) and Section 6.6 of the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual (ODCM). The data provided in the attached report is consistent with the objectives outlined in the ODCM, and includes all radiological environmental samples taken during the report period from January 1, 2005 through December 31, 2005.

If you have any questions regarding this submittal, please contact Mr. Paul Infanger, Supervisor, Licensing and Regulatory Programs at (352) 563-4796.

General Manager JAF/ff Attachment xc:

NRR Project Manager Regional Administrator, Region II Senior Resident Inspector

-I Progress Energy Florida, Inc.

Crystal River Nuclear Plant 15760 W. Power Line Street Crystal River, FL 34428 L-5 A009

PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC.

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NUMBER 50-302 / LICENSE NUMBER DPR-72 ATTACHMENT ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT 2005

PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC.

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT 2005

TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction ii I.

Summary Description of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program.

1 II.

Land-Use Census.10 III.

Interlaboratory Comparison Program.11 IV.

Analytical Results.13 A. Airborne Pathway.13 Statistical Summary.14 B. Direct Radiation.23 Statistical Summary.24 C. Waterborne Pathway.27

1. Seawater................................................................................ 27 Statistical Summary.28

2.

Ground Water.27 Statistical Summary.32

3.

Drinking Water....................

27 Statistical Summary....................

35

4.

Shoreline Sediment....................

27 Statistical Summary....................

38 D. Ingestion Pathway....................

41

1. Carnivorous Fish....................

41 Statistical Summary....................

42

2. Oysters.....................

41 Statistical Summary....................

45

3.

Broad Leaf Vegetation....................

41 Statistical Summary....................

48

4.

Watermelon and Citrus....................

41 Statistical Summary....................

52 i

INTRODUCTION This report is submitted as required by Technical Specification 5.7.1. 1(b) to the Crystal River Facility Operating License No. DPR-72, and Section 6.6 of the Offsite Dose Calculation Manual.

The following information is required to be included in this report:

Data Summaries Interpretations Unachievable LLDs An analysis of trends An assessment of any observed impact of plant operation on the environment NOTE:

If harmful effects or evidence of irreversible damage are detected by the monitoring, the report shall provide an analysis of the problem and a planned course of action to correct it.

Summarized and tabulated results of all radiological environmental samples taken during the report period, in the format of Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position, Revision 1, November, 1979 NOTE:

If some results are not available for inclusion, the report shall note and explain the reason for the missing results. The missing results shall be submitted as soon as possible in a supplementary report.

A summary description of the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program A map of all sampling locations keyed to a table giving distances and directions from the reactor Land-use census results Interlaboratory Comparison Program results ii

I.

SUMMARY

DESCRIPTION OF THE RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM The analytical results of the Crystal River Unit 3 (CR-3) operational Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for 2005 are contained in this report. The operational program began on January 1, 1977 just prior to initial criticality, which was achieved on January 14, 1977.

Sampling of the facility environs is performed by the Florida Department of Health, Bureau of Radiation Control.

The State also performs the required analyses, participates in the Interlaboratory Comparison Program, and performs the annual land-use census. Prior to 1990, the program was split between the Department of Health and the University of Florida. The transition to the State performing all of the programs sampling and analysis in 1990 is evident in several of the trend graphs, most notably oysters and carnivorous fish, and is due to the State using less sensitive measurement techniques for several of the pathways which were formerly evaluated by the University of Florida.

Sample station locations are given in Table I-1 and Figures I-2, -3, and -4. Sample frequency and analysis type may be determined from Table 1-2. Figure I-1 illustrates the relevant exposure pathways.

Except for air sample gross beta results and direct radiation measurements, most of the analytical results are below the lower limit of detection (LLD) of the sample. Sample LLDs are generally much lower than the required "a priori" LLD. When measurable results are reported, the values are also usually less than the required "a priori" LLD.

The results of the 2005 REMP have been compared to previous years' results. This comparison, in part illustrated by the trend graphs of Section IV, shows no evidence of consistent long-term increasing trends in any of the sample media. However, radioactive material is routinely quantified in sediment samples which are taken in the discharge canal near the liquid release discharge point. In general, these results verify the effectiveness of in-plant measures for controlling radioactive releases.

Trend graphs illustrate the mean measured concentration of a particular radionuclide for the year. When measurable results are not obtained, the highest sample LLD is plotted. LLD and measured values are plotted on the same line to best illustrate any trend. As shown on each graph's key, shaded boxes indicate LLD values, while open boxes indicate measured values.

Statistical summary pages are provided for each medium or pathway. Measured values are reported in terms of a mean and range. In addition, the number of measured values versus samples obtained is reported. For example, the following entry 15 (249/256)

(4 - 35) in the "All Indicator Locations" column would be interpreted as indicating a mean measured value of 15, with measured values ranging from 4 to 35. (249/256) means that out of 256 samples 249 were measured values.

I

TABLE I-1 PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. - CR3 - 2005 SAMPLE STATION LOCATIONS SAMPLE MEDIA STATION ID DIRECTION APPROX. DISTANCE (Miles)

TLD C60 C61 C62 C63 C64 C65 C66 C67 C68 C69 C41 C70 C71 C72 C73 C27 N

NNE NE ENE E

ESE SE SSE S

SSW SW WSW WNW NW NNW W

0.88 0.92 1.17 0.87 0.80 0.33 0.36 0.33 0.27 0.31 0.43 0.74 0.58 0.30 0.74 0.41 C18 C03 C04 C74 C75 C76 C08 C77 C09 C78 C14G Col C79 C47-Control C07*

C40*

C46*

N NNE NE ENE E

ESE SE SSE S

WSW W

NW NNW ESE ESE E

N 5.3 4.89 5.95 5.13 3.99 5.61 5.66 3.39 3.23 4.59 2.53 4.8 4.97 78 7.67 3.48 0.37

TLDs not required by ODCM. Deployed at air sample locations.

2

SAMPLE MEDIA AIR SEAWATER GROUND WATER DRINKING WATER SHORELINE SEDIMENT FISH & OYSTERS BROAD LEAF VEGETATION WATERMELON CITRUS TABLE I-1 (CONT'D)

PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. - CR3 - 2005 SAMPLE STATION LOCATIONS STATION ID DIRECTION C07 ESE C18 N

C40 E

C41 SW C46 N

C47-Control ESE C14H NW C14G W

C13-Control WSW C40-Control E

C07-Control ESE C10-Control ESE C18-Control N

C09-Control S

C14H NW C14M W

C14G W

C29 W

C30-Control WSW C48A N

C48B NNE C47-Control ESE C04 NE C19 ENE DISTANCE (Miles) 7.7 5.3 3.5 0.4 0.4 78 0.1 2.5 4.6 3.6 7.4 6.0 5.3 3.2 0.1 1.2 2.5 2.5 3.4 0.4 0.9 78 13 9.6 3

TABLE 1-2 PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. - CR3 - 2005 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM SAMPLE MEDIA

OF STATIONS FREQUENCY ANALYSIS LLD' TLD Air Iodine 33*

6 Air Particulate 6

Seawater 3

Quarterly Weekly Weekly Quarterly Monthly Monthly Semiannual Semiannual Quarterly Quarterly y Dose 1-131 Gross B y Spec:

Tritium y Spec:

Cs-134 Cs-137 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-Nb-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-La-140 2

0.07 pCi/m3 0.01 0.05 0.06 3000 pCi/L 15 30 15 15 30 15 1

15 18 15 2000 pCi/L 2

200 pCi/L Ground Water 1

Drinking Water 3

Tritium y Spec:

Shoreline Sediment 4

Semiannual y Spec:

Cs-134 Cs-137 150 pCi/kg 180

Includes 3 stations which are not required by the ODCM

'The maximum "a priori" LLD 2Same as Seawater y Spec 3When available 4During harvest 5Same as broad leaf vegetation 4

TABLE 1-2 (Cont'd)

PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. - CR3 - 2005 SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROGRAM SAMPLE MEDIA

OF STATIONS FREQUENCY ANALYSIS LLD' Carnivorous Fish and Oysters Broad Leaf Vegetation Watermelon Citrus 2

Quarterly y Spec:

Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 130 pCi/kg 260 130 130 260 130 150 60 pCi/kg 60 80 3

Monthly3 y Spec:

1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 1

Annual4 y Spec:

y Spec:

Annual4

'The maximum "a priori" LLD 2Same as Seawater r Spec 3When available 4During harvest 5Same as broad leaf vegetation 5

Airborne Releases Liuid Release External Radiation Sea 1

r Sediments water Animals Man FIGURE I-1: Environmental Media and Exposure Pathways 6

Cis LAKE ROUSSEAU C04 CROSS FLORIDA BARGE CANAL US 19 C19 C4RA C4RR FPC PROPERTY LINE C13 C3a CRYSTAL RIVER C09 FIGURE I-2: Environmental Monitoring Sample Stations (non-TLDs) 7

-p A

C60 C62 ql I

til oo.

0~i 00 0

0 04 C63 C69 8

C18 LAKE ROUSSEAU col C04 CROSS FLORIDA BARGE CANAL 19 C74 FPC PROPERTY LINE C75 C76 CRYSTAL RIVER C07 en9 Ces KING'S BAY FIGURE 1-4: Environmental Monitoring TLD Locations (off site) 9

II. LAND-USE CENSUS A land-use census was conducted during July. The purpose of this census is to identify the nearest residences, vegetable gardens, and potential milk-producing animals within a five mile radius of the nuclear plant. The distance in miles and bearing in degrees for each receptor type in each of the sixteen sectors is summarized below.

SECTOR NEAREST NEAREST NEAREST RESIDENCE GARDEN MILK ANIMAL N

4.46@20 4.77@20 NNE 3.95 @ 150 4.88 @ 170 NE 3.84 @ 540 ENE 3.43 @ 600 E

2.40 @ 920 ESE 4.24 @ 1020 SE 4.90 @ 1330 SSE 3.53 @ 1490 SSW SW WSW W

WNW NW 4.77 @ 3230 NNW 4.60 @ 3390

No suitable sites were located within 5 miles.

10

FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH - INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON PROGRAM DATA The EPA crosscheck program ceased operation at the end of 1998. To meet the requirements for a crosscheck program, the Florida Department of Health participates in the Department of Energy's Mixed-Analyte Performance Evaluation Program (MAPEP).

The following units are used for each of the four media:

Air Filters:

Soil:

Vegetation:

Water:

Bq/sample Bq/Kg Bq/sample Bq/L Analytical performance is based on historical analytical capabilities for individual analyte/matrix pairs.

Acceptable performance is designated by an "A".

Acceptable with warning is designated by a "W".

Performance which is not acceptable is designated by an "N".

Results for February 2005:

Media Nuclide Air Air Air Cs-134 Cs-137 Gross Beta Soil Soil Cs-134 Cs-137 Result 2.94 2.44 0.35 763 368 3.39 4.00 302.8 334.2 251.9 533.0 114.7 325.6

% Bias

-16.2 8.0 17.8 0.5 16.8

-32.2

-27.0 8.1 1.0 0.4 7.5

-9.7

-1.9 Acceptance Range 2.6 - 4.56 1.58 - 2.94 0.15 - 0.45 531.30 - 986.70 220.50 - 409.50 3.50- 6.50 2.88 - 5.34 196.00 - 364.00 231.70 - 430.30 175.70 - 326.30 347.20 - 644.80 88.90- 165.10 232.40 - 431.60 Flag A

A A

Vegetation Vegetation Cs-134 Cs-137 Water Water Water Water Water Water H-3 Mn-54 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 11

Results for August 2005:

Media Nuclide Result

% Bias Acceptance Range Flag Air Cs-134 4.04 4.9 2.70 - 5.01 A

Air Cs-137 3.55 9.9 2.26 - 4.20 A

Air Gross Beta 0.95 14.9 0.55 - 1.22 A

Soil Cs-134 570 0.4 397.60- 738.40 A

Soil Cs-137 499 13.7 307.30- 570.70 A

Vegetation Cs-134 3.75

-8.31 2.86 - 5.32 A

Vegetation Cs-137 4.74

-12.71 3.80 - 7.06 A

Water H-3 556.4 5.6 368.90- 685.10 A

Water Mn-54 420.7 0.6 292.60- 543.40 A

Water Co-60 261.0 0.0 182.70 - 339.30 A

Water Zn-65 351.5 6.5 231.00 - 429.00 A

Water Cs-134 166.9

-0.1 116.90 - 217.10 A

Water Cs-137 326.4

-2.0 233.10 - 432.90 A

12

IV-A. AIRBORNE PATHWAY Air samples are taken at five locations in the vicinity of the plant. The control location is 78 miles ESE of the plant, at the State Bureau of Radiation Control in Orlando.

Table IV-A. 1 provides a statistical summary of the analytical results for 311 gross beta samples and 312 iodine samples.

Tables IV-A.2 and IV-A.3 provide the results for each weekly air sample.

Three hundred and eleven particulate samples were analyzed for gross beta activity, all of which had measurable activity. The average indicator concentration was 17 pCi/1000 m3 with a range of 5 to 47 pCi/1000 m3. The average indicator concentration since 1996 was in the range of 15 to 17 pCillOOO M3. The control location concentration for 2005 averaged 17 pCi/1000 m3, with a range of 8 to 43 pCi/1000 m3.

Three hundred and twelve samples were analyzed for iodine activity, with none having measurable activity.

Quarterly composite data are summarized in Table IV-A.4. Measurable quantities of cesium were not identified. The highest cesium LLD was 1.9 pCi/1000 m3 for cesium 134.

The gross beta LLD of 0.01 pCi/m3 was not attained for air sample station C46 for the sample period ending June 14d due to a disconnected hose. Also, at station C46, there was a loss of about 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> of sample collection for the sample period ending November 1 1i due to pump failure.

13

TABLE IV-A.1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2005 MEDIUM OR ANALYSIS AND NUMBER OF PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED OF ANALYSES OF DETECTION MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN REPORTED (UNITS)

PERFORMED (LLD)'

RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS AIRBORNE IODINE (pCi/m3)

AIRBORNE PARTICULATES (pCi/lOOOm3 for Gross B, pCi/1000m3 for y Spec) y Spec 312 1-131 Gross B 311 y Spec 24 Cs-134 Cs-137 0.012 6.4 0.8 0.8

<LLD 17 (259/260)

(5-47)

< LLD 17 (52/52)

(8-43) 0 0

C18 5.2@o0 19 (52/52)

(7-44)

< LLD

< LLD 0

0

'The 'a priori' LLD which meets or exceeds the requirements of Table 2-9 of the CR-3 ODCM.

14

X6 TABLE IV-A.2 PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. - CR3 - 2005 pCi/m3 IODINE - 131 IN AIR COLLECTION DATE C07 C18 C40 C41 C46 C47 01-04 01-11 01-18 01-25

<.01

<.02

<.02 02-01 02-07 02-14 02-21

<.02

<.01

<.02

<.03

<.01

<.02

<.03

<.01

<.02

<.03

<.01

<.02

<.03

<.02

<.01

<.02

<.03

<.01

<.01 03-01 03-07 03-14 03-21 03-28

<.02

<.02 04-05 04-12 04-19 04-26

<.03

<.02

<.01

<.01 15

TABLE IV-A.2 (Cont'd)

PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. - CR3 - 2005 pCi/m3 IODINE - 131 IN AIR COLLECTION DATE C07 C18 C40 C41 C46 C47 05-03 05-10 05-17 05-23 05-31 06-06 06-14 06-27

<.01

<.02

<.01

<.03

<.02

<.01

<.02

<.01

<.02

<.01

<.03

<.02

<.01

<.02

<.01

<.02

<.01

<.03

<.02

<.01

<.02

<.01

<.02

<.01

<.03

<.02

<.01

<.02

<.01

<.02

<.01

<.03

<.02

<.01

<.02

<.01

<.02

<.01

<.03

<.02

<.01

<.02

<.01

<.01 07-05 07-12 07-19 07-26 08-02 08-08 08-15 08-23 08-31 16

. I

, s TABLE IV-A.2 (Cont'd)

PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. - CR3 - 2005 pCi/m 3 IODINE - 131 IN AIR COLLECTION DATE C07 C18 C40 C41 C46 C47 09-06 09-12 09-20 09-27

<.02

<.01

<.01 10-04 10-11 10-18 10-26

<.01

<.02

<.01

<.02

<.01

<.02

<.01

<.02

<.01

<.02

<.01

<.02

<.01

<.02

<.01

<.02

<.01

<.01 11-01 11-08 11-15 11-21 11-29

<.01

<.02

<.02 12-06 12-12 12-19 12-27

<.01

<.01 17

TABLE IV-A.3 PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. - CR3 - 2005 pCi/lOOOm 3 GROSS B IN AIR COLLECTION DATE C07 C18 C40 C41 C46 C47 01-04 01-11 01-18 01-25 19 12 15 17 02-01 02-07 02-14 02-21 9

15 15 23 21 13 16 28 13 16 24 23 14 18 18 15 17 15 21 19 23 21 10 13 16 15 10 26 16 9

23 9

14 18 18 13 17 20 19 10 17 26 16 15 10 26 03-01 03-07 03-14 03-21 03-28 10 25 17 15 12 15 15 26 19 9

21 16 19 19 10 20 22 24 12 12 23 25 14 20 19 16 17 17 15 21 23 04-04 04-12 04-19 04-26 14 12 18 21 18

lI TABLE IV-A.3 (Cont'd)

PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. - CR3 - 2005 pCi/1900m 3 GROSS B IN AIR COLLECTION DATE C07 C18 C40 C41 C46 C47 05-03 05-10 05-17 05-23 05-31 17 14 17 15 15 06-06 06-14 06-20 06-27 11 10 11 11 19 14 22 15 22 9

9 14 8

10 18 8

19 19 7

24 22 7

15 13 15 5

15 13 9

17 10 6

18 13 16 17 5

24 16 7

14 16 18 16 16 10 10 17 10 7

16 8

14 20 12 20 22 7

18 12 16 18 16 10 18 10 7

15 9

13 18 8

26 19 12 17 17 21 10 17 12 10 15 9

4 22 9

9 16 8

13 10 9

07-05 07-12 07-19 07-26 11 9

13 11 08-02 08-08 08-15 08-23 08-31 16 11 24 14 9

19

Si TABLE IV-A.3 (Cont'd)

PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. - CR3 - 2005 pCi/lOOOm3 GROSS R IN AIR COLLECTION DATE C07 C18 C40 C41 C46 C47 09-06 09-12 09-20 09-27 27 19 39 12 10-04 10-11 10-18 10-26 11 5

26 19 26 18 44 13 15 12 24 23 22 28 22 17 30 21 26 15 30 20 14 47 15 13 8

27 22 16 20 24 12 22 20 15 21 29 25 14 42 15 14 7

22 19 21 18 22 17 25 28 22 14 28 21 13 45 13 11 10 24 20 18 21 24 18 25 25 24 19 23 16 12 43 11 11 8

26 20 21 15 21 18 21 24 14 12 34 11-01 11-08 11-15 11-21 11-29 26 21 20 19 24 12-06 12-12 12-19 12-27 24 19

15 30 20

1 TABLE IV-A.4 PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. - CR3 - 2005 pCi/1090m 3 y EMITTERS IN QUARTERLY COMPOSITES OF AIR PARTICULATES STATION NUCLIDE FIRST QUARTER SECOND QUARTER THIRD QUARTER FOURTH QUARTER C07 Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 C18 Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 C40 Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 155

<15

<0.7

<0.7 170

<22

<0.9

<1.0 174

<23

<1.2

<0.9 151

<23

<1.3

<0.9 168

<21

<1.7

<1.6 184

<20

<1.4

<0.9 129

<22

<1.3

<1.2 151

<26

<1.2

<1.2 141

<23

<1.2

<1.2 154

<24

<1.6

<1.1 137

<19

<0.7

<1.2 163

<25

<1.2

<1.0 165

<26

<1.7

<1.5 173

<20

<1.1

<0.8 144

<18

<1.0

<1.0 146

<31

<1.1

<1.4 151

<20

<0.9

<0.9 132

<5

<0.7

<0.6 173

<27

<1.3

<1.0 184

<33

<1.9

<1.3 137

<20

<1.0

<0.9 149

<28

<1.5

<1.3 188

<24

<1.0

<0.9 182

<29

<0.9

<1.2 C41 Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 CS-137 C46 Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 C47 Be-7 K-40 Cs-134 Cs-137 21

I

't Airborne 01 0.1 0.01 P0

'0 I.

_,Is

/

-X 0.0001 -

i0 I

E e

1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 I-131

- - E - -Cs-137 -- E1-- I-131 LLD - - * - -Cs-137 LLD 22

IV-B. DIRECT RADIATION Direct radiation measurements (using TLDs) were taken at seventeen locations (stations C60 through C73 and station C27) within one mile of the plant, at fifteen locations ranging from 2.8 to 6.3 miles from the plant, and at one control location 78 miles from the site. One-hundred and thirty-two TLDS were collected during 2005.

The highest on-site dose was 107 mrem/yr at station C71 (WNW at 3600 feet). Station C71 was relocated in 1992 due to construction of the helper cooling towers on the former site. The new location has a higher background radiation level due to being closer to the storage pond for Units 4 & 5 fly ash, which produces a higher external radiation component than normal levels of natural background. The second highest on-site dose was 67 mrem/yr at station C65 (ESE at 1740 feet).

The highest off-site dose was 64 mrem/yr at station C40 (east at 3.5 miles). The control station (C47) dose was 49 mrem/yr.

The average for all stations (except control) was 54 mrem/yr for 2005, 58 mrem/yr for 2004, and 58 mrem/yr for 2003.

Direct radiation results are similar to previous years and show no change of significance.

23

TABLE IV-B RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2005 MEDIUM OR PATHWAY SAMPLED (UNITS)

DIRECT RADIATION (mrem/yr)

ANALYSIS AND TOTAL NUMBER OF ANALYSES PERFORMED NUMBER OF LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE OF DETECTION MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN REPORTED (LLD)

RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS y DOSE 132 15 54 (1281128)

(33 - 120)

C71 0.6 @ 2960 107 (414)

(91 - 120) 49 (4/4)

(45 - 52) 0 24

TABLE IV-B.1 PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. - CR 2005 mrem/yr y Dose TLDSTATION IQuarter 1

2 3

4 Col C03 C04 C07*

C08 C09 C14G C18 C27 C40*

C41 C46*

C47 (CONTROL)

C60 C61 C62 C63 C64 C65 C66 C67 C68 C69 C70 C71 C72 C73 C74 C75 C76 C77 C78 C79 46 46 46 43 46 45 53 49 70 60 57 55 51 59 60 63 57 59 70 63 45 43 43 42 44 45 54 49 64 59 56 56 51 55 57 60 56 58 70 64 56 57 65 59 109 62 53 43 53 51 39 46 49 38 48 45 54 52 43 49 50 66 61 39 39 41 36 38 49 47 45 49 49 54 53 52 56 57 42 45 42 41 42 57 51 53 62 50 62 61 54 67 55 56 60 59 63 120 50 53 55 53 91 57 58 66 60 109 62 52 41 52 49 60 50 41 49 45 64 54 41 52 49 39 44 49 33 41 45 39 40 48

TLDs not required by the ODCM.

Quarterly values are multiplied by 4 to obtain an equivalent yearly dose.

25

IAI Direct Radiation 100 I-a 10 I.2 1

ELl E

C/

n

/°

\\\\,

I - -.

I 1980 1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002 2004 26

IV-C. WATERBORNE PATHWAY To evaluate the waterborne pathway, samples are taken of seawater, ground water, drinking water, and shoreline sediment.

1. Monthly seawater grab samples are taken at two locations in the discharge canal (C14G and C14H) and at one control location (C 13) near the mouth of the intake canal. Of twenty-four indicator samples, eleven had measurable tritium at an average concentration of 1067pCi/L as compared to eight measurable samples with an average of 5294 pCi/L in 2004.

The sample with the highest concentration of tritium, 7041 pCi/L, was obtained in October at station C 14G near the mouth of the discharge canal. The seawater tritium activity is consistent with the concentration of tritium in the liquid waste stream and the release times of waste tanks. Two control station samples contained tritium at an average concentration of 135 pCi/L. The 2004 control station results averaged 104 pCi/L.

Gamma spectral analysis was performed on thirty-six samples, none of which showed measurable amounts of the gamma emitters of interest.

2.

Semiannual ground water samples are taken at one location, station C40, located approximately 3.5 miles east of CR-3.

Gamma spectral and tritium analyses are performed on both samples. Al results were less than the detection limits.

Since plant startup, all results, except for the results of one 1985 tritium analysis, have been less than LLD. The required sensitivity for measuring tritium in ground water is 2000 pCi/L. Analysis of ground water in the vicinity of CR-3 is done at a sensitivity of approximately 130 pCi/L for tritium and less than 10 pCi/L for select gamma emitters.

3.

Quarterly drinking water samples are drawn from three locations: the Crystal River City Hall (C07), the Days Inn Motel (C10), and the Yankeetown City Well (C18). All samples were collected and analyzed for gamma emitters and tritium.

None of the samples yielded measurable activities of tritium or the required gamma emitters. The measurement sensitivity for drinking water samples are the same as those for ground water samples.

4.

Semiannual shoreline sediment samples are taken at three indicator locations in the discharge canal (C14H, C14M, C14G) and one control location (C09) at Fort Island Gulf Beach. Of the six indicator samples, two had measurable amounts of cesium-137. Cobalt-60 was not detected in 2005 samples (The average cobalt-60 concentration at the indicator locations ranged from 30 to 389 pCi/L from 1998 through 2004). The average cesium-137 concentration at the indicator locations was 38 pCi/L. These results are similar to previous years' results. None of the samples taken at Fort Island Gulf Beach, the control location, indicated measurable amounts of cobalt or cesium.

27

TABLE IV-C.1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY. FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31. 2005 MEDIUM OR ANALYSIS AND NUMBER OF PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED ANALYSES OF DETECTION MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN REPORTED (UNITS)

PERFORMED (LLD)'

RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS SEAWATER Tritium 36 131 1067 (11/24)

C14G 1617 (7/12) 135 (2/12) 0 (pCi/L)

(79-7041) 2.5 @ 2700 (181-7041) y Spec 36 Mn-54 3

<LLD

<LLD 0

Fe-59 6

<LLD

<LLD 0

Co-58 3

<LLD

< LLD 0

Co-60 4

<LLD

<LLD 0

Zn-65 7

< LLD

<LLD 0

Zr-Nb-95 6

<LLD

<LLD 0

1-131 4

<LLD

<LLD 0

Cs-134 4

<LLD

<LLD 0

Cs-137 4

<LLD

<LLD 0

Ba-La-140 9

<LLD

<LLD 0

'The "a priori' LLD which meets or exceeds the requirements of Table 2-9 of the CR-3 ODCM.

28

TABLE TV-C.l.a PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. - CR3 - 2005 pCiIL y EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN SEAWATER STATION MONTH H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-Nb-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-La-140 C13 JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

< 126 207 + 28

< 127 281 + 30 159 + 26 239 + 33

< 136 194 + 32

< 136 250 + 34

< 145 252 + 32

< 132 255 + 32

< 148 304 + 29 111+ 7 161 + 37

< 146 282 + 25

< 157 271 + 36

< 149 230 + 27

<3

<7

<4

<7

<4

<9

<5

< 10

<5

<4

<8

<6

<9

<4

<8

<5

<8

<4

<7

<4

<9

<3

<6

<4

<8

<3

<8

<4

<7

<3

<7

<4

<7

<3

<9

<5

< 10

<3

<2

<5

<3

<6

<4

<3

<8

<4

<10

<3

<7

<4

<8

<6

<8

<7

<6

<5

<7

<4

<7

<6

<4

<5

<4

<5

<4

<3

<4

<3

<4

<5

<3

<4

<5

<4

<3

<5

<4

<5

<4

<3

<4

<7

<6

<8

<10

<15

<9

<6

<11

<10

<5

<10

<8 C14G JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

< 126 220 + 29

< 127 265 + 31 197 + 27 219 + 21

< 136 202 + 30 2116 + 46 215 + 27 854+34 215+30

< 132 269 + 27 520 + 32 266 + 30 413 + 32 189 + 31 7041 + 132 292 + 29 181 + 52 380 + 33

< 149 243 + 30

<3

<6

<4

<7

<3

<7

<5

<8

<3

<2

<5

<3

<6

<5

<3

<8

<5

<8

<4

<3

<6

<3

<7

<4

<3

<6

<4

<8

<3

<4

<7

<4

<7

<4

<3

<6

<4

<7

<3

<6

<4

<8

<3

<8

<4

<8

<3

<7

<3

<8

<4

<7

<4

<7

<6

<3

<4

<6

<4

<3

<7

<5

<4

<6

<4

<5

<3

<4

<6

<4

<3

<5

<4

<3

<6

<4

<6

<4

<6

<4

<6

<4

<3

<6

<4

<8

<3

<5

<7

<4

<10

<3

<13

<3

<5

<3

<10

<3

<8

<4

<3

<7

<3

<9 29

TABLE IV-C.la (CONT'D)

PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. - CR3 - 2005 pCi/L y EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN SEAWATER STATION MONTH H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-Nb-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-La-140 C14H JAN 79 + 23 243 + 20

<2

<5

<3

<6

<4

<3

<6 FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

<127 247 + 35

<3

<6

<4

<9

<135 256+21

<2

<3

<5

<3

<5 91+ 26 187 + 28

<2

<3

<8

<4

<7

<136 228 +28

<3

<7

<4

<8

<145 276 + 30

<3

<7

<3

<7

<137 278 + 32

<3

<4

<7

<4

<7

<148 262 + 29

<3

<8

<4

<6 153 + 27 224 + 27

<4

<6

<4

<7 88 + 46 256 +32

<3

<8

<4

<6

<157 288+ 34

<3

<7

<4

<7

<149 262 + 32

<3

<4

<8

<4

<9

<6

<4

<3

<10

<5

<3

<5

<6

<5

<4

<5

<4

<3

<12

<6

<4

<3

<11

<7

<4

<3

<4

<9

<6

<3

<4

<11

<5

<4

<3

<7

<6

<5

<3

<6

<4

<3

<7

<6

<4

<3

<7 30

Seawater 10000 _

1000 00100 10 1,,i X WK______________

G

-- W-1

_1 I

I I

I l I 1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 H-3 -3

- Cs-134 - - O - -Cs-137 ---H-3 LLD -_n - Cs-134 LLD - - * - -Cs-137 LLD 31

TABLE IV-C.2 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2005 MEDIUM OR ANALYSIS AND NUMBER OF PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED ANALYSES OF DETECTION MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN REPORTED (UNITS)

PERFORMED (LLD)'

RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS GROUND Tritium 2 131 None

<LLD 0

WATER (pCi/L)

Y Soec 2 Mn-54 3

None

<LLD 0

Fe-59 6

None

<LLD 0

Co-58 3

None

<LLD 0

Co-60 4

None

<LLD 0

Zn-65 7

None

<LLD 0

Zr-Nb-95 6

None

<LLD 0

1-131 4

None

<LLD 0

Cs-134 4

None

<LLD 0

Cs-137 4

None

<LLD 0

Ba-La-140 9

None

<LLD 0

'The "a priori" LLD which meets or exceeds the requirements of Table 2-9 of the CR-3 ODCM.

32

S.

TABLE IV-C.2.a PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. - CR3 - 2005 pCi/L y EMITTERS AND TRITIUM IN GROUND WATER STATION NUCLIDE FIRST HALF SECOND HALF C40 H-3 Mn-54 Fe-59 Co-58 Co-60 Zn-65 Zr-Nb-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-La-140 K-40

<126

<3

<5

<3

<2

<7

<4

<3

<10 47 + 18

<147

<5

<8

<5

<9

<7

<5

<4

<15

<60 33

4, Ground Water 1000 100 10 I

" X X--.--

X x

xU

- O -- H--3 0 -

C s 1 3 U -- H L D -- U-,

/C s -1 3 7 L, 34

TABLE IV-C.3 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA DOCKET NO. 50-302 JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2005 MEDIUM OR ANALYSIS AND NUMBER OF PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED ANALYSES OF DETECTION MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN REPORTED (UNITS)

PERFORMED (LLD)'

RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS DRINKING Tritium 12 131 None

<LLD 0

WATER (pCiIL) y Spec 12 Mn-54 3

None

<LLD 0

Fe-59 6

None

<LLD 0

Co-58 3

None

<LLD 0

Co-60 4

None

< LLD 0

Zn-65 7

None

<LLD 0

Zr-Nb-95 6

None

< LLD 0

1-131 4

None

<LLD 0

Cs-134 4

None

<LLD 0

Cs-137 4

None

<LLD 0

Ba-La-140 9

None

<LLD 0

'The 'a priori' LLD which meets or exceeds the requirements of Table 2-9 of the CR-3 ODCM.

35

11 TABLE IV-C.3.a PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. - CR3 - 2005 pCi/L y EMITTERS AND TRITIIM IN DRINKING WATER STATION DATE H-3 K-40 Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Zn-Nb-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-La-140 C07 01-05

< 124

<57

<4 04-12

< 136

<37

<3 07-05

< 132

<62

<4 10-11

< 144

<56

< 4

<4

<7

<4

<8

<2

<5

<2

<5

<4

<7

<4

<6

<3

<7

<4

<8

<7

<4

<2

<3

<6

<4

<5

<3

<4

<11

<3

<6

<4

<8

<4

< 13 CIO 01-05

<124

<40

<2

<5

<3

<5 04-12

<136

<60

<3

<8

<4

<7 07-05

< 132

<76

<5

<3

<9

<4

<9 10-11

<144

<46

<3

<2

<7

<4

<7

<5

<3

<5

<3

<4

<7

<4

<5

<3

<7

<4

<13

<4

<9

<3

<10 C18 01-05

< 124

<36

<2

<5

<2

<5 04-12

< 136

<56

<4

<7

<5

<8 07-05

<132

<24

<I

<3

<2

<3 10-11

<144

<38

<2

<4

<3

<5

<4

<3

<2

<6

<7

<4

<12

<2

<3

<4

<2

<3

<7 36

Drinking Water 10000 1000 100 0.

V

-G--

=_

-- U O ~~~~

/w a--

~~~-G-°

--H3 --0--

Cs-13_ _-x _-xLD _-U -xCi---3xL-D 10 1

0.1 37

I l TABLE IV-C.4 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2005 MEDIUM OR ANALYSIS AND NUMBER OF PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED ANALYSES OF DETECTION MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN REPORTED (UNITS)

PERFORMED (LLD)'

RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS SHORELINE y Spec 8 SEDIMENT (pCi/kg)

Cs-134 7

<LLD

<LLD 0

Cs-137 7

38 (2/6)

C14M 38 (2/2)

<LLD 0

(3343) 1.2 @ 2760

'The "a priori" LLD which meets or exceeds the requirements of Table 2-9 of the CR-3 ODCM.

38

TABLE IV-C.4.a PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. - CR3 - 2005 pCi/kg y EMITTERS IN SHORELINE SEDIMENT STATION PERIOD Co-58 Co-60 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 Ra-226 C09 First Half

< 13

<11

< 18

< 16 1074 + 81 667 + 20 SecondHalf

<11

<13

<15

<11 590+98 416+ 13 C14H First Half

<8

<9

<11

<11 1472 + 63 1489 + 29 SecondHalf

<10

< 15

<12

<16 1550 + 91 909 + 30 C14M First Half

< 13

< 19

< 15 43 + 6 1303+ 94 901 + 23 Second Half

<12

<20

<16 33 + 8 935 + 101 1060 + 20 C14G FirstHalf

<7

<8

<7 156 + 54 985 + 10 Second Half

<11

< 12

< 13 391 + 59 1036 + 30 C09 is the control station at Ft. Island Beach. C14H, C14M, & C14G are discharge canal stations.

39

Shoreline Sediment 1000 100 0D L.

-13 n

N

//

El I

I

\\

1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Cs-134 - -

-- Cs-137 Cs-134 LLD - -

Cs-137 LLD 10 I

40

IV-D. INGESTION PATHWAY To evaluate the ingestion pathway, samples are taken of fish, oysters, broad leaf vegetation, citrus, and watermelon.

1. Quarterly carnivorous fish samples were taken at two locations: C29 at the end of the discharge canal, and C30, the control location near the mouth of the intake canal. None of the required radionuclides were found in measurable quantities. The highest cesium-137 LLD for station C29 was 31 pCi/kg. Naturally occurring potassium-40 was quantified in all eight samples at concentrations near 3000 pCi/kg.

2. Quarterly oyster samples were taken at the same locations as fish samples, C29 and C30. Of the isotopes required to be evaluated, none indicated measurable amounts of radioactivity. However, silver-i lOnm was quantified in one sample at C29, with a concentration of 758 pCi/kg.

3.

Monthly broad leaf vegetation samples were taken at two indicator locations, C48A and C48B, and one control location, C47. Three of twenty-four indicator samples had measurable amounts of cesium-137 with an average concentration of 22 pCi/kg and a range of 13 to 30 pCi/kg. This is similar to recent years results. Eight of twelve control station samples had measurable amounts of cesium-137 with an average of 72 pCi/kg and a range of 21 to 177 pCi/kg.

4.

Citrus samples are taken at station C19 and watermelon samples were obtained at station C04. None of the required radionuclides were found in measurable quantities in watermelon, but Cs-137 was quantified at 51 pCi/kg in the citrus sample.

41

TABLE IV-D.1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2005 MEDIUM OR ANALYSIS AND NUMBER OF--

PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED ANALYSES OF DETECTION MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN REPORTED (UNITS)

PERFORMED (LLD)'

RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS CARNIVOROUS y Spec 8 FISH (pCi/kg)

Mn-54 16

<LLD

<LLD 0

Fe-59 28

<LLD

<LLD 0

Co-58 15

< LLD

<LLD 0

Co-60 16

<LLD

<LLD 0

Zn-65 32

<LLD

<LLD 0

Cs-134 16

<LLD

<LLD 0

Cs-137 18

< LLD

<LLD 0

'The 'a priori' LLD which meets or exceeds the requirements of Table 2-9 of the CR-3 ODCM.

42

TABLE IV-D.l.a PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. - CR3 - 2005 pCi/kg y EMITTERS IN CARNIVOROUS FISH STATION QUARTER Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 C29 1

2 3

4

<20

<13

<12

<14

<40

<20

<26

<19

<53

<14

<23

<10

<23

< 15

<41

<33

<74

< 19

<38

<22

<41

<19

<37

<25

<30

<24

<20 2552 + 201

<16

<33

<15

<13 2634 + 144

<14

<26

<12

<12 2534 + 132

<26

<38

<22

<24 2591 + 193

<42

<61

<34

<38 2336 + 294

<23

<52

<22

<21 2784 + 199

<29

<50

<26

<28 2725 + 209

<25

<41

<22

<18 2510 + 215 C30 1

2 3

4 43

Carnivorous Fish 100 C

U 10 1

1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

--O-- Cs-134 --

--- Cs-137 -

Cs-134 LLD - - U - - Cs-137 LLD 44

TABLE IV-D.2 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2005 MEDIUM OR ANALYSIS AND NUMBER OF PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED ANALYSES OF DETECTION MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN REPORTED (UNITS)

PERFORMED (LLD)'

RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS OYSTERS y Spec 8 (pCi/kg)

Mn-54 16

<LLD

< LLD 0

Fe-59 28

<LLD

< LLD 0

Co-58 15

< LLD

<LLD 0

Co-60 16

<LLD

<LLD 0

Zn-65 32

<LLD

< LLD 0

Cs-134 16

< LLD

<LLD 0

Cs-137 18

< LLD

<LLD 0

'The "a priori" LLD which meets or exceeds the requirements of Table 2-9 of the CR-3 ODCM.

45

TABLE IV-D.2.a PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. - CR3 - 2005 pCi/kg y EMITTERS IN OYSTERS STATION QUARTER Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 C29 1

<6

<13

<7

<14

<6

<6 1052 + 57 2

<11

<25

<13

<24

<13

<14 816 + 97 3

<12

<24

<14

<30

<14

<13 662 + 97 4

<23

<20

<39

<25

<46

<26

<30 1421 + 121 C30 1

<6

<14

<7

<14

<7

<6 1612 + 70 2

<9

<22

<10

<23

<10

<10 1024+90 3

<16

<19

<40

<17

<43

<19

<16 982 + 131 4

<21

<44

<22

<47

<19

<21 1356 + 134 Ag-110m was quantified in one sample taken at station C29, near the end of the discharge canal.

The concentration was 758 pCi/Kg (November 2Id) 46

Oysters 100 a-

.0 10 1

1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005

-C--

Cs-137 -Ut-Cs-137 LLD 47

TABLE IV-D.3 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2005 MEDIUM OR ANALYSIS AND NUMBER OF PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED (UNITS)

OF ANALYSES OF DETECTION MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN REPORTED PERFORMED (LLD)Y RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS BROAD LEAF VEGETATION y Spec 36 (pCi/kg) 1-131 8

<LLD

<LLD 0

Cs-134 8

<LLD

<LLD 0

Cs-137 8

22 (3/24)

C48A 24 (2/12) 77 (8/12) 0 (13-30) 0.4@R 0° (21-177)

'The 'a priori" LLD which meets or exceeds the requirements of Table 2-9 of the CR-3 ODCM.

48

a, I

TABLE IV-D.3.a PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. - CR3 - 2005 pCi/kg OF y EMITTERS IN BROAD LEAF VEGETATION STATION MONTH 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 C47 C48A JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

<12

<14

<10

<14

<11

<14

<15

<24

<8

<20

<14

<19

<11

<20

<12

<16

<15

<13

<16

<30

<19

<12

<19

<14

<6

<10

<20

<14

<16

<17

<9

<19

<21

<16

<26

<17

<24

<17

<14

<22

<19

<22

<17 96 + 8 131 + 13 21 + 3 177 + 10

<21

<14

<20 46 + 8 29 + 8 71 + 5 45 + 8

<20

<26

<15

<21 30 + 6

<19

<18

<17 18 + 8

<25

<19

<22 2766 + 149 2560 + 171 3172 + 150 3746 + 78 3132 + 142 2953 + 200 5323 + 171 3290 + 206 4240 + 220 4242 + 219 3444 + 104 3226 + 195 6580 + 237 6287 + 288 7245 + 204 6579 + 270 5956 + 212 8232 + 292 7461 + 226 7281 + 221 6469 + 273 7019 + 293 5796 + 247 6923 + 275 49

b.

$'I TABLE IV-D.3.a (CONT'D)

PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. - CR3 - 2005 pCi/kg OF y EMITTERS IN BROAD LEAF VEGETATION STATION MONTH I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 C48B JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC

<14

<8

<7

<15

<14

<12

<20

<5

<13

<14

<15

<9

<15

<17

<19

<11

<19

<5

<11

<19

<18

<13 13 + 4

<8

<13

<14

<12

<19

<5

<13 3720 + 192 2403 + 189 2770 + 163 4009 + 108 3123 + 108 2957 + 179 3054 + 178 2373 + 167 2478 + 138 2646 + 196 2905 + 71 2654 + 140 50

upS I Broad Leaf Vegetation 1000 100 0.

10 1

1980 1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 I-131

-- v - -Cs-137 I-131 LLD -- * - -Cs-137 LLD 51

, *, V I

TABLE IV-D.4 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

CRYSTAL RIVER UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-302 CITRUS COUNTY, FLORIDA JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 2005 MEDIUM OR ANALYSIS AND NUMBER OF PATHWAY TOTAL NUMBER OF LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR LOCATIONS LOCATION WITH HIGHEST MEAN CONTROL LOCATION NONROUTINE SAMPLED ANALYSES OF DETECTION MEAN NAME MEAN MEAN REPORTED (UNITS)

PERFORMED (LLD)'

RANGE DISTANCE & BEARING RANGE RANGE MEASUREMENTS WATERMELON y Spec I (pCi/kg) 1-131 8

<LLD None 0

Cs-134 8

<LLD None 0

Cs-137 8

<LLD None 0

CITRUS y Spec I (pCi/kg) 1-131 8

<LLD None 0

Cs-134 8

<LLD None 0

Cs-137 8

51(1/1)

C19 51(1/1)

None 0

9.6 2 570

'The 'a priori" LLD which meets or exceeds the requirements of Table 2-9 of the CR-3 ODCM.

52

)

A &w '

TABLE IV-D.4.a PROGRESS ENERGY FLORIDA, INC. - CR3 - 2005 pCi/kg OF y EMITTERS IN WATERMELON AND CITRUS STATION MONTH 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 K-40 C04-Watermelon June

<4

<6 1320 + 57 C19-Citrus January

<6

<5 51 + 4 1537 + 63 53

3F0506-02, 2005 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

Contents

Text

Subject:

Dear Sir:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

3F0506-02, 2005 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report

Text

Subject:

Dear Sir:

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search