ML102950236

From kanterella
Revision as of 13:34, 20 August 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
E-Mail from Burritt to O'Hara Et Al., Branch 3 Status 4/29/10
ML102950236
Person / Time
Site: Salem  PSEG icon.png
Issue date: 04/29/2010
From: Burritt A L
NRC Region 1
To: Conte R J, Gray H, O'Hara T L
Engineering Region 1 Branch 1
References
FOIA/PA-2010-0334
Download: ML102950236 (5)


Text

Zlev, Tracey From: Sent: To:

Subject:

Attachments:

Burritt, Arthur Thursday, April 29, 2010 5:17 PM OHara, Timothy; Conte, Richard; Gray, Harold; Balian, Harry; Cline, 'Leonard; DeBoer, Joseph; Douglas, Christopher; Ennis, Rick; Johnson, Jonathan; Kern, Ludwig; Miller, Ed;Moore, Ross; Patel, Amar; Raymond, William; Schroeder, Daniel; Turilin, Andrey; Welling, Blake Branch 3 Status 4/29/10 B3-Status 4-29-10doc See attached The following are the remaining open AFW inspection questions as of a few days-ago* Verify hydro/pressure test is code compliant

-O'Hara, determined approach was acceptable, received test records but still needs to verify test results. PSEG will also provide the leak check procedure by 4/27 am.Smart samples o Verify repairs to the control air system elbow that was replaced (how will PSEG certify the repair) -O'Hara, PSEG adding more detail to description of document, to provide by 4/27 PM o Verify control air extent of condition

-O'Hara o Backfill procedure reviews to verify coating and backfill cure times -O'Hara, PSEG to provide by 4/27 pm o Verify control air clamping material -O'Hara, PSEG to provide supporting document 4127 am o AFW pipe weld records -O'Hara, PSEG to assess status'of documents by 4/27 pm* Design records for as installed AFW piping on Unit 1 & 2 not found h*Mnewm n In tft usrexd was fetww In accordance wfth the rJo~e Einmpiions 171S~ IMM"M- d A-tc )03 1 p t 0 Y Outside of Scope BRANCH 3 DAILY STATUS 4/29/10 4 Highlighted items were discussed at DRPIDRS Coordination meeting T. .BOLD items are new Outside OT Scope W,,,, Coerae7Da X>O Af666,7- 'AL2=2of3>O.11L:

AL3=IX>io.J7N3 AFW follow-up issues* Verify hydro/pressure test is code compliant

-O'Hara, determined approach was acceptable, received test records but still needs to verify test results. PSEG will also provide'the leak check procedure 4127 am.* Evaluate the 50.59 for AFW modifications

-Scroeder reviewed no significant technical concerns or Issues* Smart samples o Verify repairs to the control air system elbow that was replaced (how will PSEG certify the repair) -O'Hara, PSEG adding more detail to description of document, to provide by 4127 PM o Verify control air extent of condition

-O'Hara o Backfill procedure reviews to verify coating and backfill cure times -O'Hara, PSEG to provide by 4/27 pm o Verify control air clamping material -O'Hara, PSEG to provide supporting document 4/27 am o AFW pipe weld records -O'Hara, PSEG to assess status of documents by 4/27 pm Degraded Equipment* Design records for as installed AFW piping on Unit 1 & 2 not found Outside of Scope Outside of Scope A2 AFW Testinq -PSEG determined that they did not perform ASME code required pressure drop test for the buried sections of the S22 and 24 headers.9 Confirm the PSEG risk assessment to delay AFW testing for 1 year is reasonable

-Cahill, complete, no concerns* Evaluate if performing a risk assessment to meet Technical Specification 4.0.5 is appropriate if a test was never performed verses missed -Conte/Ennis

-discussions ongoing, no apparent ongoing compliance issues.Operability, Initial assessment Unit 2 was that it is in better condition based on newer piping; 1994 inspection that identified intact coating; and ISI code gives more allowance to an operating unit (can take credit for up to 90% of the yield Stress).* Evaluate the Unit 2 AFW extent of condition operability assessment

-Schroeder no significant technical issues or concerns 4 Confirm the finite element analysis for the Unit 1 as found condition is acceptable including the use of appropriate methods and assumptions

-Gray, O'Hara, and HQ reviewed, no significant technical issues or concerns Outside of Scope~A0.0onavi iteMS Ulu L!Status Board Items: Salem 1, AFW buried piping generic communications Outside of Scope t

Outside of Seope 2