IR 05000325/1973006

From kanterella
Revision as of 13:42, 19 December 2024 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
RO Insp Rept 50-325/73-06 on 731002-05.No Violations Noted. Major Areas Inspected:Licensee Action on Previously Identified Enforcement Matters,Piping Documentation & NDT Personnel Qualification Procedures
ML20044C491
Person / Time
Site: Brunswick Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/26/1973
From: Crossman W, Mcfarland C
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II)
To:
Shared Package
ML20044C467 List:
References
FOIA-92-569 50-325-73-06, 50-325-73-6, NUDOCS 9303230130
Download: ML20044C491 (5)


Text

..

,...

.

.

.

. -..-

~.

...

-

.-

.3-

~

.f

' e'*

%

UNITED STATES

!

+

9 #g ATOMIC ENERGY COMMISSION

! i.gh *

!

DIRECTORATE OF REGUIATORY OPERATIONS-l g'$

/,, -

.y REGION ti - SutT E 818 t

l

2M PE ACHT R EE-ST RE ET. NORT MwEST

  1. 147gs 0%

,

g,.

ATL4NTA.GEoRGaa 30303

)

i

!

i

!

RO Irspection Report No. 50-325/73-6

'

.,

t

Licensee: Carolina Power and Light Company

336 Fayetteville Street

Raleigh, North Carolina 27602

.i Facility Name:. Brunswick 1 l

Docket No.:

50-325

'

License No.:

CPPR-68 Category :

A2 l

t i

Location: Southport, North Carolina

(

)'

Type of License:- 821 Mwe, BWR, G-E j

l Type of Inspection: Routine, Unannounced, Construction i

>

'

t Dates of Inspection: October 2-5, 1973

!

!

Dates of Previous Inspection: September 11-13, 1973 Inspector-in-Charge:

W. D. Kelley, Reactor Inspector-i Engineering Section, Facilities.. Construction Branch

Acconpanying Inspectors: None i

-!

Other Accompanying Personnel:

.J.

C. Bryant, Senior Inspector

!

Engineering Section, Facilities i

Construction Branch, October 4,5 only i

.

Principal Inspector:

-

I]

A#-l(97

.-

C. R. McFarland, Reactor Inspector Date i

Facilities Section,' Facilities Construction Branch.

..

i

!

Reviewed'6y:s

  • T W

/d

-

'

'

g W. A'~ Grossman, Senior Inspector, Facilities Section

'Dats i

.

Facilities Construction Branch t

i

!

!

I r

'

i'I e

--

t i

9303230130 930202 PDR FOIA

'

t O'fEALI92-569 '. PDR I

'

..

.

... _

-

,

,

.,, - ~. <,

. -.,.,

-

. _.,,

-

... "

'

.

_ -. _ _.

_

.:

.

,

,

RO Rpt. No. 50-325/73-6-2-i

,

SUlt4ARY OF FINDINGS

,

1.

Enforcement Action A.

Violations j

None B.

Safety Items

!

None II.

Licensee Action on Previous 1v Identified Enforcement Matters A.

Violations None

'

B, Safety Items t

None

,

.

'

III. New Unresolved Items None IV.

Status of Previous 1v Reported Unresolved Items At the conclusion of this inspection, three items remain unresolved.

73-3/2 Piping Documentation

?

The licensee and Brown and Root, Inc. (B&R) are auditing all completed weld joints to insure that complete documentation

,

exists for each weld joint. The licensee has revised quality j

control procedure F-33, " Control of Welding and Associated -

Procedures," to insure closer control and to prevent lost

documentation. This item remains open.

!

- l 73-3/5 NDT Personnel Oualification Procedures

!

B&R has issued NDT procedures, " Personnel Qualification and Certification Policy" and " Personnel-. Training, Qualification.

!

and Certification Procedure No.1".

This item is closed.

'

t 73-1/1 Verification of Nuclear Valves to Design Specifications (RO:11

'

Letters Dated June 30, 1972 and February 16, 1973)

t The licensee has not completed his program of measurement of all-

.

valves.

Item remains open.

(Details 1)

,

".

4,

.

...

._=

-

.

.

-

.

...

RO Rpt. No. 50-325/73-6-3-

,

f 73-1/2 Limitorque valve Operator Failure (RO:II Letter Dated December 4, 1972)

'

t Site corrective work by Limitorque and Carolina Power and Light Company (CP&L) continues.

Item remains open.

V.

Design Changes I

None VI. Unusual Occurrences None

VII. ' Other Significant Findings N. J. Chiangi has been employed by CP&L as QA Manager, Construction.

VIII. Management Interview The inspectors met with G. M. Simpson, CP&L QC Specialist, Raleigh, to appraise him of the general areas of inspection and findings as noted in this report.

,

I J

a f

.

k

k

9 I

.

',

b

-

i

.!

-

'

i

'

e,

-,

.

...

.

. -

.

_

.

.

. -

-

.

-

.

RO Report No. 50-325/73-6 I-1 DETAILS I Prepared by:

J

./

/

' /

/6"/f'[3 W.

D.' Kelley, Reactor Ipspector Date Engineering Section Facilities Construction Branch

Dates of Inspection: October 2-5, 1973 Reviewed by:

56_b

///MN I J. t. Brysnt, Senior Inspector Date

, Engineering Section Facilities Construction Branch 1.

Persons Contacted a.

Carolina Power and Light Company (CP&L)

F. R. Coburn - Project QC Specialist R. G. Strickland - QC Specialist (Mechanical)

b.

Contractor Organizations

Brown and Root, Inc. (B&R)

i W. L. West - QA Manager R. A. Slater - QA Receiving and Release Inspector 2.

Verification of Nuclear Valves to Design Specifications CP&L has not completed preparation of their valve wall thickness verification program for Brunswick Units 1 and 2.

The inspector reviewed with CP&L the valve wall thickness verification requirements of RO:Il letters of June 30, 1972, and February 16, 1973.

The license stated that the program would be completed and made

-

available to the inspector on a subsequent inspection.

The program will include the following steps.

t a.

The list of valves requiring wall thickness verification will be

'

sent to CP&L-Engineering for review and verification that it contains all reactor coolant pressure boundary valves greater than 1 1/4 inches in size in water lines and greater than 2 1/2 inches in steam lines.

t b.

The ultrasonic wall thickness verification procedure vill be revised to include inaccuracy of measurements of nonparallel

i.

!

i e

i

.

-

.

.

.

._

.

'

.

. -

.

..

,

RO Report No. 50-325/73-6 I-2

,

surfaces plus a more detailed description of number and location

,

of wall thickness verification measurements to be made based on

!

minimum wall thickness as well as valve size.

!

c.

The method and accuracy of valve wall thickness verification by mechanical means will be described and included in a procedure.

d.

The documentation of the thickness verification measurements will be reviewed by a person knowledgeable in valve manufacturing i

to determine that it is adequate for verifying that the valve

,

meets the purchase specification as amended by 10 CFR 50,

paragraph 50.55(a), " Codes and Standards."

,

h

!

i

,

,

D f

t

!

i

I

l

,