ML20357A102
| ML20357A102 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook  |
| Issue date: | 08/13/2018 |
| From: | Chuck Zoia Operations Branch III |
| To: | Indiana Michigan Power Co |
| Zoia C | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17164A385 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML20357A102 (1) | |
Text
- Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Date of Examination:
Initials Item
- Task Description
- ~
~
a b* c**
w t.
_R
b-. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with SectionD.1 of ES-401 or ES--401 N and whether all KJA categories are appropriately sampled.
-'ii/ .. p OtH l ('
I i -' ctr} j I
T ~
T C. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. {.J 'i' Ir,~
E
- d. As_sess whether the justificatio_ns for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
N
-'i" Cf' ~ I
- 2. a. Using Form ES-301 -5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of I normal evolutions, instrument.and component failures, technical specifications, and major lf s
I t ransients. ,; lctAt M b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u mix of applicants *in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at C-f A least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T . applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
'{~
r>>t 0
C. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R
quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in Section D.S. "Specific Instructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"' of ES-301 (including <f'
- ,J overlap).
~
- 3. a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) The-outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w among the safety functions as specified on the form.
A (2) Task repetition from the last two NRG examinations is within the limits specified on the form.
L. (3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).
K (4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form. l f!
T (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area 1~
H tasks meets the criteria on the form.
R 0 b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
u (1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.
G (2) At least one task is new or significantly modified.
11 lf ~
H (3) No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRG licensing examinations.
- c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. 1-J <./. ~
I
- 4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
-r" l/ ~
G E b. Assess whethe_r the 10 CFR 55.41 , 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. ~.J l f1 N ,,
E
- c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. -;{ {/ .
/!4IW'7 R. d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRG exams. - ;.,/ ~
A L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. -r lf' ,__
- f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level {RO or SRO). ,, ' <-/J I~
Date
,'oM . r,~oted Name/~
~~ - /' . ~
- a. Author 0
?. !N/!'I
- b. Facility Reviewer (*) z .}1_.;tJ C. NRC's Chief E_x aminer (#) '1-17* I?
- d. NRC Supervisor ,[t, , ).2(/HJ
- Not applicable for NRG-prepared examination outlines.
- The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.
ES-201, Page 30 of 32 d: I )Nile - -p. v*farJ """