ML061000134

From kanterella
Revision as of 06:40, 14 March 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

GALL AMP: XI.S5, Masonry Wall Progam (Audit Worksheet GALL Report AMP)
ML061000134
Person / Time
Site: Vermont Yankee File:NorthStar Vermont Yankee icon.png
Issue date: 03/22/2006
From: Morgan M
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DLR/RLRC
To:
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
morgan M NRR/NRC/DLR/RLRC, 415-2232
Shared Package
ML060950189 List: ... further results
References
%dam200611, TAC MC9668
Download: ML061000134 (5)


Text

AUDIT WORKSHEET GALL REPORT AMP PLANT: ______________________________

LRA AMP: __________________________ REVIEWER: ______________________

GALL AMP: XI.S5, Masonry Wall Program DATE: __________________________

Program Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Element Program A. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) IE Bulletin (IEB) 80- Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Description 11, "Masonry Wall Design," and NRC Information Notice (IN) Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

87-67, "Lessons Learned from Regional Inspections of Licensee Actions in Response to IE Bulletin 80-11," constitute an acceptable basis for a masonry wall aging management program (AMP). IEB 80-11 required the identification of Comment:

masonry walls in close proximity to, or having attachments from, safety-related systems or components, and the evaluation of design adequacy and construction practice. NRC IN 87-67 recommended plant-specific condition monitoring of masonry walls and administrative controls to ensure that the evaluation basis developed in response to NRC IEB 80-11 is not invalidated by (1) deterioration of the masonry walls (e.g., new cracks not considered in the reevaluation), (2) physical plant changes such as installation of new safety-related systems or components in close proximity to masonry walls, or (3) reclassification of systems or components from non-safety-related to safety-related.

Important elements in the evaluation of many masonry walls during the NRC IEB 80-11 program included (1) installation of steel edge supports to provide a sound technical basis for boundary conditions used in seismic analysis and (2) installation of steel bracing to ensure containment of unreinforced masonry walls during a seismic event. Consequently, in addition to the XI.S5 Masonry Wall Program 1

Program Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Element development of cracks in the masonry walls, loss of function of the structural steel supports and bracing would also invalidate the evaluation basis.

B. The objective of the masonry wall program is to manage Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No aging effects so that the evaluation basis established for each Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

masonry wall within the scope of license renewal remains valid through the period of extended operation. Since the issuance of NRC IEB 80-11 and NRC IN 87-67, the NRC promulgated 10 CFR 50.65, the Comment:

Maintenance Rule. Masonry walls may be inspected as part of the Structures Monitoring Program (XI.S6) conducted for the Maintenance Rule, provided the ten attributes described below are incorporated.

The attributes of an acceptable Masonry Wall Program are described below.

1. Scope of A. The scope includes all masonry walls identified as performing Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Program intended functions in accordance with 10 CFR 54.4. Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Comment

2. Preventive A. No specific preventive actions are required. Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Actions Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Comment:

3. Parameters A. The primary parameter monitored is wall cracking that could Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Monitored/ potentially invalidate the evaluation basis. Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Inspected Comment:

XI.S5 Masonry Wall Program 2

Program Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Element

4. Detection of A. Visual examination of the masonry walls by qualified Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Aging Effects inspection personnel is sufficient. The frequency of inspection is Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

selected to ensure there is no loss of intended function between inspections. The inspection frequency may vary from wall to wall, depending on the significance of cracking in the evaluation basis. Unreinforced masonry walls, which have not been Comment:

contained by bracing, warrant the most frequent inspection, because the development of cracks may invalidate the existing evaluation basis.

5. Monitoring A. Trending is not required. Monitoring is achieved by periodic Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No and Trending examination for cracking. Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Comment:

6. Acceptance A. For each masonry wall, the extent of observed cracking of Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Criteria masonry and degradation of steel edge supports and bracing is Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

not to invalidate the evaluation basis. Corrective actions are taken if the extent of cracking and steel degradation is sufficient to invalidate the evaluation basis. An option is to develop a new evaluation basis that accounts for the degraded condition of the Comment:

wall (i.e., acceptance by further evaluation).

7. Corrective A. As discussed in the appendix to this report, the staff finds the Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Actions requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

address the corrective actions.

Comment:

8. A. As discussed in the appendix to this report, the staff finds the Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Confirmation requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Process address the confirmation process.

Comment:

XI.S5 Masonry Wall Program 3

Program Auditable GALL Criteria Documentation of Audit Finding Element

9. A. As discussed in the appendix to this report, the staff finds the Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Administrative requirements of 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, acceptable to Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

Controls address the administrative controls.

Comment:

10. Operating A. Since 1980, masonry walls that perform an intended function Consistent with GALL AMP: Yes No Experience have been systematically identified through licensee programs Document(s) used to confirm Criteria:

in response to NRC IEB 80-11, USI A-46, and 10 CFR 50.48.

NRC IN 87-67 documented lessons learned from the NRC IEB 80-11 program, and provided recommendations for administrative controls and periodic inspection to ensure that Comment:

the evaluation basis for each safety-significant masonry wall is maintained. Whether conducted as a stand-alone program or as part of structures monitoring for MR, a masonry wall AMP that incorporates the recommendations delineated in NRC IN 87-67 should ensure that the intended functions of all masonry walls within the scope of license renewal are maintained for the period of extended operation.

XI.S5 Masonry Wall Program 4

EXCEPTIONS Item Program Elements LRA Exception Description Basis for Accepting Exception Documents Reviewed Number (Identifier, Para.# and/or Page #)

1.

2.

ENHANCEMENTS Item Program Elements LRA Enhancement Description Basis for Accepting Enhancement Documents Reviewed Number (Identifier, Para.# and/or Page #)

1.

2.

DOCUMENT REVIEWED DURING AUDIT Document Number Identifier (number) Title Revision and/or Date 1.

2.

3.

4.

XI.S5 Masonry Wall Program 5