Text

Ferm, Uniti 2 - Issuance of Amendment Revise Technical Specifications by Relocating Surveillance Frequencies to Licensee Control in Accordance with Technical Specification Task Force Traveler 425, Revision 3
	ML15155B416
Person / Time
Site:	Fermi
Issue date:	07/14/2015
From:	Jennivine Rankin; Plant Licensing Branch III
To:	Fessler P; DTE Electric Company
	Rankin J
References
	TAC MF4859
	Download: ML15155B416 (142)
	v • d • e

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 July 14, 2015 Mr. Paul Fessler Senior Vice President and Chief Nuclear Officer DTE Electric Company Fermi 2 - 210 NOC 6400 North Dixie Highway Newport, Ml 48166

SUBJECT:

FERMI 2 - ISSUANCE OF AMENDMENT RE: REVISE TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS BY RELOCATING SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCIES TO LICENSEE CONTROL IN ACCORDANCE WITH TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION TASK FORCE TRAVELER 425, REVISION 3 (TAC NO. MF4859)

Dear Mr. Fessler:

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission has issued the enclosed Amendment No. 201 to Facility Operating License No. NPF-43 for the Fermi 2 facility. The amendment consists of changes to the technical specifications (TSs) in response to your application dated September 16, 2014, as supplemented by letter dated April 17, 2015.

The amendment revises the TS by relocating specific surveillance frequencies to a licensee-controlled program. The changes are based on U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission approved TS Task Force (TSTF) Change Traveler TSTF - 425, Revision 3, "Relocate Surveillance Frequencies to Licensee Control - RITSTF [Risk-Informed TSTF] Initiative 5b."

A copy of our safety evaluation is also enclosed. The Notice of Issuance will be included in the Commission's biweekly Federal Register notice.

~jk'--~-

()-

Jennivine K. Rankin, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch 111-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-341

Enclosures:

1. Amendment No. 201 to NPF-43

2. Safety Evaluation cc w/encls: Distribution via ListServ

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 DTE ELECTRIC COMPANY DOCKET NO. 50-341 FERMI 2 AMENDMENT TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE Amendment No. 201 License No. NPF-43

1. The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (the Commission) has found that:

A. The application for amendment by the DTE Electric Company (DTE, the licensee) dated September 16, 2014, as supplemented by letter dated April 17, 2015, complies with the standards and requirements of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended (the Act), and the Commission's rules and regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I; B. The facility will operate in conformity with the application, the provisions of the Act, and the rules and regulations of the Commission; C. There is reasonable assurance (i) that the activities authorized by this amendment can be conducted without endangering the health and safety of the public, and (ii) that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations; D. The issuance of this amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public; and E. The issuance of this amendment is in accordance with 10 CFR Part 51 of the Commission's regulations and all applicable requirements have been satisfied.

2. Accordingly, the license is amended by changes to the Technical Specifications as indicated in the attachment to this license amendment and paragraph 2.C.(2) of Facility Operating License No. NPF-43 is hereby amended to read as follows:

Enclosure 1

Technical Specifications and Environmental Protection Plan The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 201, and the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B, are hereby incorporated into this license. DTE Electric Company shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan.

3. This license amendment is effective as of its date of issuance and shall be implemented within 120 days.

HE NUCLEAR REGULA TORY COMMISSION

. el n, Chief Plan icensing Branch 111-1 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Attachment:

Changes to the Facility Operating License and Technical Specifications Date of Issuance: July 14, 2015

ATTACHMENT TO LICENSE AMENDMENT NO. 201 FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-43 DOCKET NO. 50-341 Replace the following pages of the Facility Operating License and Appendix A Technical Specifications with the attached revised pages. The revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain marginal lines indicating the areas of change.

REMOVE INSERT License Page 3 License Page 3 Replace the following pages of the Appendix A Technical Specifications with the attached revised pages. The revised pages are identified by amendment number and contain marginal lines indicating the areas of change.

REMOVE INSERT 3.1-6 3.1-6 3.1-10 3.1-10 3.1-13 3.1-13 3.1-17 3.1-17 3.1-19 3.1-19 3.1-21 3.1-21 3.1-22 3.1-22 3.1-25 3.1-25 3.2-1 3.2-1 3.2-3 3.2-3 3.2-4 3.2-4 3.3-4 3.3-4 3.3-5 3.3-5 3.3-6 3.3-6 3.3-7 3.3-7 3.3-7a 3.3-13 3.3-13 3.3-14 3.3-14 3.3-15 3.3-15 3.3-19 3.3-19 3.3-20 3.3-20 3.3-20a 3.3-23 3.3-23 3.3-26 3.3-26 3.3-29 3.3-29 3.3-33 3.3-33 3.3-40 3.3-40

REMOVE INSERT 3.3-40a 3.3-48 3.3-48 3.3-48a 3.3-53 3.3-53 3.3-54 3.3-54 3.3-61 3.3-61 3.3-65 3.3-65 3.3-69 3.3-69 3.3-69a 3.3-72 3.3-72 3.3-76 3.3-76 3.4-2 3.4-2 3.4-6 3.4-6 3.4-8 3.4-8 3.4-10 3.4-10 3.4-15 3.4-15 3.4-17 3.4-17 3.4-20 3.4-20 3.4-22 3.4-22 3.4-24 3.4-24 3.4-27 3.4-27 3.4-29 3.4-29 3.5-4 3.5-4 3.5-5 3.5-5 3.5-6 3.5-6 3.5-7 3.5-7 3.5-9 3.5-9 3.5-10 3.5-10 3.5-11 3.5-11 3.5-13 3.5-13 3.5-14 3.5-14 3.6-2 3.6-2 3.6-6 3.6-6 3.6-14 3.6-14 3.6-15 3.6-15 3.6-16 3.6-16 3.6'-18 3.6-18 3.6-19 3.6-19 3.6-21 3.6-21 3.6-24 3.6-24 3.6-26 3.6-26 3.6-31 3.6-31 3.6-32 3.6-32 3.6-34 3.6-34 3.6-36 3.6-36 3.6-39 3.6-39 3.6-41 3.6-41

REMOVE INSERT 3.6-42 3.6-42 3.6-46 3.6-46 3.6-50 3.6-50 3.7-2 3.7-2 3.7-4 3.7-4 3.7-5 3.7-5 3.7-9 3.7-9 3.7-13 3.7-13 3.7-15 3.7-15 3.7-17 3.7-17 3.7-18 3.7-18 3.7-19 3.7-19 3.8-3 3.8-3 3.8-4 3.8-4 3.8-5 3.8-5 3.8-6 3.8-6 3.8-7 3.8-7 3.8-8 3.8-8 3.8-9 3.8-9 3.8-14 3.8-14 3.8-15 3.8-15 3.8-17 3.8-17 3.8-18 3.8-18 3.8-18a 3.8-23 3.8-23 3.8-24 3.8-24 3.8-27 3.8-27 3.8-29 3.8-29 3.9-2 3.9-2 3.9-4 3.9-4 3.9-5 3.9-5 3.9-8 3.9-8 3.9-9 3.9-9 3.9-11 3.9-11 3.9-14 3.9-14 3.10-5 3.10-5 3.10-8 3.10-8 3.10-11 3.10-11 3.10-12 3.10-12 3.10-15 3.10-15 3.10-17 3.10-17 3.10-20 3.10-20 3.10-21 3.10-21 3.10-23 3.10-23 5.0-19a 5.0-19a

(4) DTE Electric Company, pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40 and 70, to receive, possess, and use at any time any byproduct, source and special nuclear material such as sealed neutron sources for reactor startup, sealed sources for reactor instrumentation and radiation monitoring equipment calibration, and as fission detectors in amounts as required; (5) DTE Electric Company, pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40 and 70, to receive, possess, and use in amounts as required any byproduct, source or special nuclear material without restriction to chemical or physical form, for sample analysis or instrument calibration or associated with radioactive apparatus or components; and (6) DTE Electric Company, pursuant to the Act and 10 CFR Parts 30, 40 and 70, to possess, but not separate, such byproduct and special nuclear materials as may be produced by the operation of the facility.

C. This license shall be deemed to contain and is subject to the conditions specified in the Commission's regulations set forth in 10 CFR Chapter I and is subject to all applicable provisions of the Act and to the rules, regulations, and orders of the Commission now or hereafter in effect; and is subject to the additional conditions specified or incorporated below:

(1) Maximum Power Level DTE Electric Company is authorized to operate the facility at reactor core power levels not in excess of 3486 megawatts thermal (100% power) in accordance with conditions specified herein and in Attachment 1 to this license. The items identified in Attachment 1 to this license shall be completed as specified. Attachment 1 is hereby incorporated into this license.

(2) Technical Specifications and Environmental Protection Plan The Technical Specifications contained in Appendix A, as revised through Amendment No. 201, and the Environmental Protection Plan contained in Appendix B, are hereby incorporated into this license. DTE Electric Company shall operate the facility in accordance with the Technical Specifications and the Environmental Protection Plan.

(3) Antitrust Conditions DTE Electric Company shall abide by the agreements and interpretations between it and the Department of Justice relating to Article I, Paragraph 3 of the Electric Power Pool Agreement between DTE Electric Company and Amendment No. 201

Reactivity Anomalies 3.1.2 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.1.2.1 Verify tore reactivity difference between Once within the monitored reactivity and the predicted 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months after reactivity is within +/- 1% Lik/k. reaching equilibrium conditions following startup after fuel movement within the reactor pressure vessel AND In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.1*6 Amendment No. Ja4 201

Control Rod OPERABILITY 3.1.3 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.1.3.1 Determine the position of each control rod. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.1.3. 2 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOTE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Not required to be performed until 31 days after the control rod is withdrawn and THERMAL POWER is greater than the LPSP of the RWM.

Insert each withdrawn control rod at least In accordance one notch. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.1.3.3 Verify each control rod scram time from In accordance fully withdrawn to notch position 06 is with

~ 7 seconds. SR 3.1.4.1, SR 3.1.4.2, SR 3 .1. 4. 3, and SR 3.1.4.4 SR 3.1.3 .4 Verify each control rod does not go to the Each time the withdrawn overtravel position. control rod is withdrawn to "full out" position AND Prior to declaring control rod OPERABLE after work on control rod or CRD System that could affect coupling FERMI

UNIT 2 3.1*10 Amendment No. !J4, +/-79, 201

Control Rod Scram Times 3.1.4 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.1.4.2 Verify, for a representative sample, each In accordance tested control rod scram time is within the with the limits of Table 3.1.4*1 with reactor steam Surveillance dome pressure ~ 800 psig. Frequency Control Program SR 3.1.4.3 Verify each affected control rod scram time Prior to is within the limits of Table 3.1.4*1 with declaring any reactor steam dome pressure. control rod OPERABLE after work on control rod or CRD System that could affect scram time SR 3.1.4.4 Verify each affected control rod scram time Prior to is within the limits of Table 3.1.4*1 with exceeding reactor steam dome pressure ~ 800 psig. 40% RTP after fuel movement

.within the associated core cell AND Prior to exceeding 40% RTP after work on control rod or CRD System that could affect scram time FERMI

UNIT 2 3.1*13 Amendment No. fl,~. -197, 201

Control Rod Scram Accumulators 3.1.5 ACTIONS (continued)

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME

c. One or more control C.l Verify all control Inunediately upon rod scram accumulators rods associated with discovery of inoperable with inoperable charging water reactor steam dome accumulators are header pressure pressure < 900 psig. fully inserted. < 940 psig

-AND C.2 Declare the 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months associated control rod inoperable.

D. Required Action and D. 1 * * - - - - - - NOTE * --* * * * *

associated Completion Not applicable if all Time of Required inoperable control Action B.l or C.l not rod scram met. accumulators are associated with fully inserted control rods .

Place the reactor Immediately mode switch in the shutdown position.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3 .1. 5.1 Verify each control rod scram accumulator In accordance pressure is ~ 940 psig. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.1-17 Amendment No. !J4, 201

Rod Pattern Control 3.1.6 ACTIONS (continued)

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME B. Nine or more OPERABLE B. 1 * * * * * * - *NOTE* * * * * -* *

control rods not in Rod worth minimizer compliance with the (RWM) may be bypassed prescribed withdrawal as a11 owed by sequence. LCD 3 . 3 . 2 . 1.

Suspend withdrawal of Immediately control rods.

AND B.2 Place the reactor 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months mode switch in the shutdown position.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.1.6.1 Verify all OPERABLE control rods comply In accordance with the prescribed withdrawal sequence. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.1* 19 Amendment No. 64, 201

SLC System 3.1. 7 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.1. 7.1 Verify available volume of sodium In accordance pentaborate solution is within the limits with the of Figure 3.1.7*1. Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.1. 7 .2 Verify temperature of sodium pentaborate In accordance solution is ~ 48°F. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.1. 7 .3 Verify temperature of pump suction piping In accordance is ~ 48°F. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.1. 7 .4 Verify continuity of explosive charge. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.1. 7. 5 Verify the concentration of boron in In accordance solution is within the limits of with the Figure 3. 1. 7-1. Surveillance Frequency Control Program AND Once within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months after water or boron is added to solution AND Once within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months after solution temperature is restored ~ 48°F (continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.1-21 Amendment No. 134, 201

SLC System 3.1. 7 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.1. 7.6 Verify each SLC subsystem manual valve in In accordance the flow path that is not locked, sealed, with the or otherwise secured in position is in the Surveillance correct position. or can be aligned to the Frequency correct position. Control Program SR 3 .1. 7. 7 Verify each pump develops a flow rate In accordance

~ 41.2 gpm at a discharge pressure with the

~ 1215 psig. Inservice Testing Program SR 3.1. 7 .8 Verify flow through one SLC subsystem from In accordance pump into reactor pressure vessel. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.1. 7. 9 Verify all piping between storage tank and In accordance explosive valve is unblocked. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program AND Once within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months after solution temperature is restored ~ 48°F SR 3.1. 7 .10 Verify sodium pentaborate enrichment is Prior to

~ 65 atom percent B*lO. addition to SLC tank FERMI

UNIT 2 3.1-22 Amendment No. -+/-J4, 201

SDV Vent and Drain Valves 3.1.8 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.1.8.1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *NOTE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Not required to be met on vent and drain valves closed intermittently for testing under administrative control.

Verify each SDV vent and drain valve is In accordance open. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.1.8. 2 Verify each SDV vent and drain valve: In accordance with the

a. Closes in ~ 30 seconds after receipt Surveillance of an actual or simulated scram Frequency signal; and Control Program

b. Opens when the actual or simulated scram signal is reset.

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.1-25 Amendment No. +/-d4, 201

APLHGR 3.2.1 3.2 POWER DISTRIBUTION LIMITS 3.2.1 AVERAGE PLANAR LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE CAPLHGR)

LCO 3.2.1 All APLHGRs shall be less than or equal to the limits specified in the COLR.

APPLICABILITY: THERMAL POWER~ 25% RTP.

ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. Any APLHGR not within A.I Restore APLHGR(s) to 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months limits. within limits.

B. Required Action and B.1 Reduce THERMAL POWER 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months associated Completion to < 25% RTP.

Time not met.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3. 2.1.1 Verify all APLHGRs are less than or equal Once within to the limits specified in the COLR. 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months after

~ 25% RPT AND In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI - UNIT 2 3.2-1 Amendment No. 134, 201

MCPR 3.2.2 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.2.2.1 Verify all MCPRs are greater than or equal Once within to the limits specified in the COLR. 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months after

~ 25% RTP AND In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.2.2.2 Determine the MCPR limits. Once within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days 0.02 hours 1.190476e-4 weeks 2.7396e-5 months after each completion of SR 3.1.4.1 AND Once within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days 0.02 hours 1.190476e-4 weeks 2.7396e-5 months after each completion of SR 3.1.4.2 AND Once within 72 hours8.333333e-4 days 0.02 hours 1.190476e-4 weeks 2.7396e-5 months after each completion of SR 3.1.4.4 FERMI - UNIT 2 3.2-3 Amendment No . .JJ4, 201

LHGR 3.2.3 3.2 POWER DISTRIBUTION LIMITS 3.2.1 LINEAR HEAT GENERATION RATE (LHGR)

LCO 3.2.3 All LHGRs shall be less than or equal to the limits specified in the COLR.

APPLICABILITY: THERMAL POWER~ 25% RTP.

ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. Any LHGR not within A.1 Restore LHGR(s) to 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months 1i mi ts. within limits.

B. Required Action and B.1 Reduce THERMAL POWER 4 hours associated Completion to< 25% RTP.

Time not met.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.2.3.1 Verify all LHGRs are less than or equal Once within to the limits specified in the COLR. 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months after

? 25.%' RPT AND In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.2*4 Amendment No. l-J4, 201

RPS Instrumentation 3.3.1.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *NOTES* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

1. Refer to Table 3.3.1.1*1 to determine which SRs apply for each RPS Function.

2. When a channel is placed in an inoperable status solely for performance of required Surveillances, entry into associated Conditions and Required Actions may be delayed for up to 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months provided the associated Function maintains RPS trip capability.

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3 . 3 . 1. 1. 1 Perform CHANNEL CHECK. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 3 . 1. 1. 2 Perform CHANNEL CHECK. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 3 . 1. 1. 3 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *NOTE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Not required to be performed until 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months after THERMAL POWER ~ 25% RTP.

Verify the absolute difference between In accordance the average power range monitor (APRM) with the channels and the calculated power is Surveillance s 2% RTP, while operating at~ 25% RTP. Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 3 . 1. 1. 4 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *NOTE* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Not required to be performed when entering MODE 2 from MODE 1 until 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months after entering MODE 2.

Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program (continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.3*4 Amendment No. +/-J4, 201 -

RPS Instrumentation 3.3.1.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3. 3. 1. 1. 5 Perform CHANNEL Functional Test. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 3 . 1. 1. 6 Verify the source range monitor (SRM) and Prior to fully intermediate range monitor (!RM) channels withdrawing overlap. SRMs from the core SR 3 . 3 . 1. 1. 7 .................. NOTE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . I Only required to be met during entry into MODE 2 from MODE 1.

Verify the IRM and APRM channels overlap. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 3 . 1. 1. 8 Calibrate the local power range monitors. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 3 . 1. 1. 9 Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program (continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.3*5 Amendment No ..ia4, 201

RPS Instrumentation 3.3.1.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3 . 3. 1. 1. 10 Verify the trip unit setpoint. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3. 3. 1. 1. 11 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *NOTES* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

1. Neutron detectors are excluded.

2. For Function l.a not required to be performed when entering MODE 2 from MODE 1 until 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months after entering MODE 2.

Perform CHANNEL CALIBRATION. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 3 . 1. 1. 12 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOTE* * * * * * * * -* * -* -* * --

For Function 2.a, not required to be performed when entering MODE 2 from MODE 1 until 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months after entering MODE 2.

Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3. 3. 1. 1. 13 Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program (continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.3-6 Amendment No.-134, 196,201

RPS Instrumentation 3.3.1.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.3.1.1.14 Perform CHANNEL CALIBRATION. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.3.1.1.15 Perform LOGIC SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.3.1.1.16 Verify Turbine Stop Valve-Closure and In accordance Turbine Control Valve Fast Closure with the Functions are not bypassed when THERMAL Surveillance POWER is~ 29.5% RTP. Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 3. 1. 1. 17 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *NOTE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Neutron detectors are excluded.

Verify the RPS RESPONSE TIME is within In accordance 1i mi ts. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3. 3. 1. 1. 18 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *NOTE* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Neutron detectors are excluded.

Perform CHANNEL CALIBRATION. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program (continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.3-7 Amendment No.134, 139, 151 +/-96,201

RPS Instrumentation 3.3.1.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3. 3. 1.1. 19 Perform LOGIC SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.3 . 1. 1. 20 Verify OPRM is not bypassed when APRM In accordance Simulated Thermal Power is ~ 27.5% and with the recirculation drive flow is < 60% of Surveillance rated recirculation drive flow. Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.3*7a Amendment No. 201

SRM Instrumentation 3.3.1.2 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS

* * -* * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *NOTE* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Refer to Table 3.3.1.2*1 to determine which SRs apply for each applicable MODE or other specified conditions.

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3 . 3. 1. 2. 1 Perform CHANNEL CHECK. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 3. 1. 2 . 2 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOTES* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

1. Only required to be met during CORE ALTERATIONS.

2. One SRM may be used to satisfy more than one of the following.

Verify an OPERABLE SRM detector is In accordance located in: with the Surveillance

a. The fueled region; Frequency Control Program

b. The core quadrant where CORE ALTERATIONS are being performed, when the associated SRM is included in the fueled region; and

c. A core quadrant adjacent to where CORE ALTERATIONS are being performed, when the associated SRM is included in the fueled region.

SR 3. 3. 1. 2. 3 Perform CHANNEL CHECK. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program (continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.3-13 Amendment No. -!J.4, 201

SRM Instrumentation 3.3.1.2 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3. 3. 1. 2. 4 ******************NOTE*******************

Not required to be met with less than or equal to four fuel assemblies adjacent to the SRM and no other fuel assemblies in the associated core quadrant.

Verify count rate is: In accordance

a. ~ 3.0 cps: or with the Surveillance

b. ~* 0.7 cps when signal-to-noise ratio Frequency is ;:: 20: 1. Control Program SR 3 . 3 . 1. 2. 5 * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * *NOTE* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Signal-to-noise ratio not required to be determined when SRM count rate is

3.0 cps Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST and In accordance determination of signal-to-noise ratio. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 3. 1. 2 .6 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *NOTES* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

1. Signal-to-noise ratio not required to be determined when SRM count rate is

3.0 cps

2. Not required to be performed until 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months after IRMs on Range 2 or below.

Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST and In accordance determination of signal-to-noise ratio. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program (continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.3*14 Amendment No. +/-J4, 201

SRM Instrumentation 3.3.1.2 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3. 3. 1. 2. 7 ----------------*

NOTES* * * * * * * * * * * -* * -* -*

1. Neutron detectors are excluded.

2. Not required to be performed until 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months after IRMs on Range 2 or below.

Perform CHANNEL CALIBRATION. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.3-15 Amendment No. -ld4, 201

Control Rod Block Instrumentation 3.3.2.1 ACTIONS (continued)

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME E. One or more Reactor E.1 Suspend control rod I1JV11ediately Mode Switch- Shutdown withdrawal.

Position channels AND inoperable.

E.2 Initiate action to Immediately fully insert all insertable control rods in core cells containing one or more fuel assemblies.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * -* * * -* * -NOTES* * * * * * * * * * * -* -----* -----* * * * * * * * * * * *

1. Refer to Table 3.3.2.1*1 to determine which SRs apply for each Control Rod Block Function.

2. When an RBM channel is placed in an inoperable status solely for performance of required Surveillances. entry into associated Conditions and Required Actions may be delayed for up to 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months provided the associated Function maintains control rod block capability.

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3. 3. 2. 1. 1 * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * --* NOTE -* -* * -* -* * * * * * * * --*

Not required to be performed until 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months after any control rod is withdrawn at

~ 10% RTP in MODE 2.

Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program (continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3 .3-19 Amendment No. -134, 201

Control Rod Block Instrumentation 3.3.2.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3. 3. 2. 1. 2 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOTE* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * ....

Not required to be performed until 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months after THERMAL POWER is ~ 10% RTP in MODE 1.

Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 3. 2. 1. 3 Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 3 . 2 . 1. 4 * --* * --* ----* * --*

NOTE ------* ----* * --* -* -

Not required to be performed until 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months after reactor mode switch is in the shutdown position.

Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.3.2.1.5 Verify the RBM is not bypassed when In accordance THERMAL POWER is ~ 30% RTP. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program (continued)

FERMI - UNIT 2 3.3-20 Amendment No. +/-J.4, 201

Control Rod Block Instrumentation 3.3.2.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.3.2.1.6 -------------* ----NOTE -------------------

Neutron detectors are excluded.

Perform CHANNEL CALIBRATION. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3. 3. 2 . 1. 7 Verify control rod sequences input to the Prior to RWM are in conformance with the declaring RWM prescribed withdrawal sequence. OPERABLE following loading of sequence into RWM FERMI - UNIT 2 3.3-20a Amendment No. 201

Feedwater and Main Turbine High Water Level Trip Instrumentation 3.3.2.2 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.3.2.2.1 Perform CHANNEL CHECK. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.3.2.2.2 Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.3.2.2.3 Perform CHANNEL CALIBRATION. The In accordance Allowable Value shall be s 219 inches. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.3.2.2.4 Perform LOGIC SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL TEST In accordance including valve actuation. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI - UNIT 2 3.3-23 Amendment No. +/-64, 201

PAM Instrumentation 3.3.3.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS

NOTE ---------------* ---------------------

These SRs apply to each Function in Table 3.3.3.1-1.

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.3.3.1.1 Perform CHANNEL CHECK. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.3.3.1.2 Perform CHANNEL CALIBRATION. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI - UNIT 2 3.3-26 Amendment No. ~~* ~* -lSQ, 201

Remote Shutdown System 3.3.3.2 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.3.3.2.1 Perform CHANNEL CHECK for each required In accordance instrumentation channel. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.3.3.2.2 Verify each required control circuit and In accordance transfer switch is capable of performing with the the intended function. Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.3.3.2.3 Perform CHANNEL CALIBRATION for each In accordance required instrumentation channel. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.3*29 Amendment No. i:d4, 201

ATWS-RPT Instrumentation 3.3.4.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS

----* * * ----* ---* --* -* * --* -* ---* * -* * -NOTE -* --* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

When a channel is placed in an inoperable status solely for performance of required Surveillances, entry into associated Conditions and Required Actions may be delayed for up to 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months provided the associated Function maintains ATWS*RPT trip capability.

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3 . 3. 4. 1. 1 Perform CHANNEL CHECK. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 3 . 4. 1. 2 Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3. 3. 4 . 1. 3 Perform CHANNEL CALIBRATION. The In accordance Allowable Values shall be: with the Surveillance

a. Reactor Vessel Water Level-Low Low, Frequency Level 2: ~ 103.8 inches: and Control Program

b. Reactor Vessel Pressure-High:

~ 1153 psig.

SR 3. 3. 4. 1. 4 Perform LOGIC SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL TEST In accordance including breaker actuation. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.3-33 Amendment No. J.J4, 201

ECCS Instrumentation 3.3.5.l SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS

-* --* -* * -* * -* * * --* -------* * --* * --* * * -NOTES ---* -* * * * * -* -* * -----* ---* * ----* -----

1. Refer to Table 3.3.5.1-1 to determine which SRs apply for each ECCS Function.

2. When a channel is placed in an inoperable status solely for performance of required Surveillances. entry into associated Conditions and Required Actions may be delayed as follows: (a) for up to 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months for Function 3.c; and (b) for up to 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months for Functions other than 3.c and 3.f provided the associated Function or the redundant Function maintains ECCS initiation capability.

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3 . 3 . 5 . 1. 1 Perform CHANNEL CHECK. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 3 . 5 . 1. 2 Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 3 . 5 . 1. 3 Verify the trip unit setpoint. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 3 . 5 . 1. 4 Perform CHANNEL CALIBRATION. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 3 . 5 . 1. 5 Perform LOGIC SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program (continued)

FERMI - UNIT 2 3.3-40 Amendment No. +/-J4, 201

ECCS Instrumentation 3.3.5.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.3.5.1.6 Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI - UNIT 2 3.3-40a Amendment No. 201

RCIC System Instrumentation 3.3.5.2 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS

--* --------* * * -* --* * * * --* --* --* -* * * * -NOTES * -* * -* * * * * * -* * * * * -* -* * * -* * ---* ---* * *

1. Refer to Table 3.3.5.2-1 to determine which SRs apply for each RCIC Function.

2. When a channel is placed in an inoperable status solely for performance of required Surveillances, entry into associated Conditions and Required Actions may be delayed as follows: (a) for up to 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months for Function 2; and (b) for up to 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months for Functions 1 and 3 provided the associated Function maintains RCIC initiation capability.

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.3.5.2.1 Perform CHANNEL CHECK. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.3.5.2.2 Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.3.5.2.3 Verify the trip unit setpoint. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.3.5.2.4 Perform CHANNEL CALIBRATION. In accordance with the Surveillcince Frequency Control Program SR 3.3.5.2.5 Perform LOGIC SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program (continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.3-48 Amendment No. -l:J4. 201

RCIC System Instrumentation 3.3.5.2 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.3.5.2.6 Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI - UNIT 2 3.3-48a Amendment No. 201

Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation 3.3.6.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *NOTES* * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * *

1. Refer to Table 3.3.6.1*1 to determine which SRs apply for each Primary Containment Isolation Function.

2. When a channel is placed in an inoperable status solely for performance of required Surveillances, entry into associated Conditions and Required Actions may be delayed for up to:

a. 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months for Function 5.a when testing non-redundant circuitry that results in loss of isolation capability associated with this Function, provided Functions 5.b, 5.c, and 5.e are OPERABLE;

b. 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months for Function 5 (other than non-redundant circuitry of 5.a) grovided the associated Function maintains isolation capability.

6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months for Function 5.c provided Function 5.b is OPERABLE in the affected room:

c. 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months for Functions 1, 2, 6,and 7, provided the associated Function maintains isolation capability; and

d. 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months for Functions 3 and 4, provided the associated Function maintains isolation capability.

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3 . 3 . 6 . 1. 1 Perform CHANNEL CHECK. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 3 . 6. 1. 2 Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3. 3. 6. 1. 3 Verify the trip unit setpoint. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3. 3. 6. 1. 4 Perform CHANNEL CALIBRATION. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program (continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.3-53 Amendment No. ~I. -+/--7J, -189, 201

Primary Containment Isolation Instrumentation 3.3.6.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SR 3. 3. 6. 1. 5 Perform LOGIC SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 3 . 6 . 1. 6 Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3. 3. 6. 1. 7 Verify the Main Steam Line Isolation In accordance Instrumentation DC Output Relays response with the time allows the overall ISOLATION SYSTEM Surveillance RESPONSE TIME to remain within limits. Frequency Control Program FERMI - UNIT 2 3.3-54 Amendment No. t,if, '* 201

Secondary Containment Isolation Instrumentation 3.3.6.2 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOTES * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

1. Refer to Table 3.3.6.2*1 to determine which SRs apply for each Secondary Containment Isolation Function.

2. When a channel is placed in an inoperable status solely for performance of required Surveillances, entry into associated Conditions and Required Actions may be delayed for up to 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months provided the associated Function maintains secondary containment isolation capability.

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.3.6.2.1 Perform CHANNEL CHECK. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.3.6.2.2 Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.3.6.2.3 Verify the trip unit setpoint. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.3.6.2.4 Perform CHANNEL CALIBRATION. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.3.6.2.5 Perform LOGIC SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.3*61 Amendment No . .:+/-J4, 201

LLS Instrumentation 3.3.6.3 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *NOTE* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Refer to Table 3.3.6.3*1 to determine which SRs apply for each Function.

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.3.6.3.1 Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.3.6.3.2 Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST for In accordance portion of the channel outside primary with the containment. Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.3.6.3.3 Perform CHANNEL CALIBRATION. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.3.6.3.4 Perform LOGIC SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.3-65 Amendment No. 64, 201

CREF System Instrumentation 3.3.7.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * *

NOTES * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

1. Refer to Table 3.3.7.1*1 to determine which SRs apply for each CREF Function.

2. For Functions 1, 2, and 3, when a channel is placed in an inoperable status solely for performance of required Surveillances, entry into associated Conditions and Required Actions may be delayed for up to 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months provided the associated Function maintains CREF initiation capability.

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3 . 3 . 7 . 1. 1 Perform CHANNEL CHECK. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3. 3 . 7 . 1. 2 Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 3 . 7 . 1. 3 Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with. the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 3 . 7 . 1. 4 Verify the trip unit setpoint. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3. 3. 7. 1. 5 Perform CHANNEL CALIBRATION. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program (continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.3-69 Amendment No. -134, 201

CREF System Instrumentation 3.3.7.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.3.7.1.6 Perform LOGIC SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.3*69a Amendment No. 201

LOP Instrumentation 3.3.8.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS

....... -....... -....... --* * * * -* -* * * --NOTE* * * -* -* * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* *

Refer to Table 3.3.8.1*1 to determine which SRs apply for each LOP Function.

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3. 3. 8. 1. 1 Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3. 3.8. 1. 2 Perform CHANNEL CALIBRATION. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3. 3.8 . 1. 3 Perform LOGIC SYSTEM FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.3*72 Amendment No. !J.4, 201

RPS Electric Power Monitoring 3.3.8.2 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.3.8.2.1 * * * * * "* * * * * * * * * * *

NOTE* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Only required to be performed prior to entering MODE 2 or 3 from MODE 4. when in MODE 4 for ~ 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months .

Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR . 3.3.8.2.2 Perform CHANNEL CALIBRATION. The In accordance Allowable Values shall be: with the Surveillance

a. Overvoltage ~ 132 V. Frequency Control Program

b. Undervoltage ~ 108 V.

c. Underfrequency ~ 57 Hz.

SR 3.3.8.2.3 Perform a system functional test. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.3*76 Amendment No. +/-a4, 201

Recirculation Loops Operating 3.4.1 ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. Recirculation jet pump A.l Declare recirculation 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months loo~ flow mismatch not loop with lower flow:

wit in limits. "not in operation."

B. No recirculation loops B.l Be in MODE 3. 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months operating.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.4.1.1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *NOTE* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Not required to be performed until 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months after both recirculation loops are in operation.

Verify recirculation loop jet pump flow In accordance mismatch with both recirculation loops in with the operation is: Surveillance Frequency

a. ~ 10% of rated core flow when Control Program operating at < 70% of rated core flow:

and

b. ~ 5% of rated core flow when operating at ~ 70% of rated core flow.

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.4*2 Amendment No. t'Jr. !J-9, 201

Jet Pumps 3.4.2 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.4.2.1 * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * *NOTES- * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

1. Not required to be performed until 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months after associated recirculation loop is in operation.

2. Not required to be performed until 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months after> 25% RTP.

Verify at least two of the following In accordance criteria (a, b, or c) are satisfied for with the each operating recirculation loop: Surveillance Frequency

a. Recirculation loop drive flow versus Control Program recirculation pump speed differs by s 10% from established patterns.

b. Recirculation loop drive flow versus total core flow differs bys 10% from established patterns.

c. Each jet pump diffuser to lower plenum differential pressure differs by ~ 20%

from established patterns, or each jet pump flow differs by ~ 10% from established patterns.

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.4*6 Amendment No. 134, 201

SRVs 3.4.3 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.4.3.1 Verify the safety function lift setpoints In accordance of the required SRVs are as follows: with the Inservice Number of Setpoint Testing Program SRVs Cpsig) 5 1135 +/- 34.05 5 1145 +/- 34.35 5 1155 +/- 34.65 Following testing, lift settings shall be within +/- 1%.

SR 3.4.3.2 Verify each required SRV is capable of In accordance being opened. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.4*8 Amendment No. -lJ4 0, 201

RCS Operational LEAKAGE 3.4.4 ACTIONS (continued)

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME B. Unidentified LEAKAGE B.l Reduce LEAKAGE to 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months increase not within within limits.

limit.

-OR B.2 Verify source of 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months unidentified LEAKAGE increase is not service sensitive type 304 or type 316 austenitic stainless steel.

c. Required Action and C.1 Be in MODE 3. 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months associated Completion Time of Condition A -AND or B not met.

C.2 Be in MODE 4. 36 hours4.166667e-4 days 0.01 hours 5.952381e-5 weeks 1.3698e-5 months

-OR Pressure boundary LEAKAGE exists.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.4.4.1 Verify RCS unidentified and total LEAKAGE In accordance and unidentified LEAKAGE increase are with the within limits. Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI - UNIT 2 3.4-10 Amendment No. ~. 201

RCS leakage Detection Instrumentation 3.4.6 ACTIONS (continued)

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME F. Required Action and F.1 Be in MODE 3. 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months associated Completion Time of Condition A, -AND B, C, D, or E not met.

F.2 Be in MODE 4. 36 hours4.166667e-4 days 0.01 hours 5.952381e-5 weeks 1.3698e-5 months G. All required leakage G.1 Enter LCO 3.0.3. Immediately detection systems inoperable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.4.6.l Perform a CHANNEL CHECK of required primary In accordance containment atmosphere gaseous with the radioactivity monitoring system. Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.4.6.2 Perform a CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST of In accordance required leakage detection instrumentation. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.4.6.3 Perform a CHANNEL CALIBRATION of required In accordance leakage detection instrumentation. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.4*15 Amendment No. lJ4 180, 201

RCS Specific Activity 3.4.7 ACTIONS (continued)

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME B. Required Action and B.1 Determine DOSE Once per 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months associated Completion EQUIVALENT I-131.

Time of Condition A not met. AND OR B.2.1 Isolate all main 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months steam lines.

Reactor Coolant specific activity OR

> 4.0 µCi/gm Dose EQUIVALENT I-131. B.2.2.1 Be in MODE 3. 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months AND B.2.2.2 Be in MODE 4. 36 hours4.166667e-4 days 0.01 hours 5.952381e-5 weeks 1.3698e-5 months SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3 . 4. 7 . 1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOTE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Only required to be performed in MODE 1.

Verify reactor coolant DOSE EQUIVALENT In accordance 1*131 specific activity is ~ 0.2 µCi/gm. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.4*17 Amendment No. :J:J4, 201

RHR Shutdown Cooling System-Hot Shutdown 3.4,8 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.4.8.1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOTE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Not required to be met until 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months after reactor steam dome pressure is less than the RHR cut in permissive pressure.

Verify one RHR shutdown cooling subsystem In accordance or recirculation pump is operating. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.4*20 Amendment No. -+/-J4. 201

RHR Shutdown Cool i ng System- Cold Shutdown 3.4.9 ACTIONS (continued)

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME B. No RHR shutdown B.1 Initiate action to Immediately cooling subsystem in restore one RHR operation. shutdown cooling subsystem or one AND recirculation pump to operation.

No recirculation pump in operation. AND B.2 Verify reactor 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months from coolant circulating discovery of no by an alternate reactor coolant method. circulation AND B.3 Monitor reactor Once per hour coolant temperature.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.4.9.1 Verify one RHR shutdown cooling subsystem In accordance or recirculation pump is operating. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.4-22 Amendment No. :+/-J4, 201

RCS P/T Limits 3.4.10 ACTIONS (continued)

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME C. * * * * * * * *

NOTE * * * * * * * *

C.l Initiate action to Immediately Required Action C.2 restore parameter(s) shall be completed if to within limits.

this Condition is entered. AND C.2 Determine RCS is Prior to Requirements of the acceptable for entering MODE 2 LCO not met in other operation. or 3 than MODES 1, 2, and 3.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3 . 4 . 10 . 1 - - - * * * - - - - * - - - - - - * *NOTE* * * * * * * * * * * * * -* * * * *

Only required to be performed as applicable during RCS heatup and cooldown operations and RCS inservice leak and hydrostatic testing.

Verify RCS pressure. RCS temperature, and In accordance RCS heatup and cooldown rates are within with the the limits specified in the PTLR. Surveillance Frequency" Control Program (continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.4-24 Amendment No. ~. +/-&8 ~. 201

RCS PIT Limits 3.4.10 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3. 4. 10 . 7 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOTE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Only required to be performed when tensioning the reactor vessel head bolting studs.

Verify reactor vessel flange and head In accordance flange temperatures are within the limits with the specified in the PTLR when the reactor Surveillance vessel head bolt studs are under tension. Frequency Control Program SR 3.4.10.8 *******************NOTE********************

Not required to be performed until 30 minutes after RCS temperature ~ 80°F in MODE 4.

Verify reactor vessel flange and head In accordance flange temperatures are within the limits with the specified in the PTLR. Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3. 4. 10 . 9 * - - - * * * - * * * * * - - * - - *NOTE -* * * * * * * -* -* * * * --* *

Not required to be performed until 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months after RCS temperature ~ 100°F in MODE 4.

Verify reactor vessel flange and head In accordance flange temperatures are within the limits with the specified in the PTLR. Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.4-27 Amendment No. !J4, +/-08 -+/-99, 201

Reactor Steam Dome Pressure 3.4.11 3.4 REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM (RCS 3.4.11 Reactor Steam Dome Pressure LCO 3.4.11 The reactor steam dome pressure shall be~ 1045 psig.

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1 and 2.

ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. Reactor steam dome A.1 Restore reactor steam 15 minutes pressure not within dome pressure to 1imit. within limit.

B. Required Action and 8.1 Be in MODE 3. 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months associated Completion Time not met.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.4.11.l Verify reactor steam dome pressure is In accordance

~ 1045 psig. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI - UNIT 2 3.4-29 Amendment No. +/-J4, 201

ECCS-Operat i ng 3.5.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3. 5.1.1 Verify correct voltage and breaker In accordance alignment to the LPCI swing bus. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3. 5.1.2 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *NOTE* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

When LPCI is placed in an inoperable status solely for performance of this SR, or when the LPCI swing bus automatic throwover scheme is inoperable due to EDG-12 being paralleled to the bus for required testing, entry into associated Conditions and Required Actions may be delayed up to 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months for completion of the required testing.

Perform a functional test of the LPCI swing In accordance bus automatic throwover scheme. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3. 5.1. 3 Verify, for each ECCS injection/spray In accordance subsystem, the piping is filled with water with the from the pump discharge valve to the Surveillance injection valve. Frequency Control Program (continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.5-4 Amendment No. -1J4, 201

ECCS-Operating 3.5.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3. 5.1.4 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOTE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Low pressure coolant injection CLPCI) subsystems may be considered OPERABLE during alignment and operation for decay heat removal with reactor steam dome pressure less than the Residual Heat Removal (RHR) cut-in permissive pressure in MODE 3, and for 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months after exceeding the RHR cut-in permissive pressure in MODE 3, if capable of being manually realigned and not otherwise inoperable.

Verify each ECCS injection/spray subsystem In accordance manual, power operated. and automatic valve with the in the flow path, that is not locked, Surveillance sealed, or otherwise secured in position, Frequency is in the correct position. Control Program SR 3. 5.1. 5 Verify primary containment pneumatic supply In accordance pressure is ~ 75 psig. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3. 5.1.6 Verify the RHR System power operated cross In accordance tie valve is open. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3. 5.1. 7 Verify each recirculation pump discharge In accordance valve cycles through one complete cycle of with the full travel or is de-energized in the Surveillance closed position. Frequency Control Program (continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.5-5 Amendment No. +/-J4, 201

ECCS-Operati ng 3.5.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.5.1.8 Verify the following ECCS pumps develop the In accordance specified flow rate against a system head with the corresponding to the specified reactor Inservice pressure. Testing SYSTEM HEAD Program NO. CORRESPONDING OF TO A REACTOR SYSTEM FLOW RATE PUMPS PRESSURE OF Core Spray ~ 5725 gpm 2 ~ 100 psig LPCI ~ 10,000 gpm 1 ~ 20 psig SR 3. 5.1. 9 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *NOTE* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Not required to be performed until 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months after re~ctor steam pressure and flow are adequate to perform the test.

Verify, with reactor pressure~ 1045 and In accordance

~ 945 psig, the HPCI pump can develop a with the flow rate ~ 5000 gpm against a system head Inservice corresponding to reactor pressure. Testing Program SR 3 .5. 1. 10 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *NOTE* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Not required to be performed until 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months after reactor steam pressure and flow are adequate to perform the test.

Verify, with reactor pressure ~ 215 psig, In accordance the HPCI pump can develop a flow rate with the

~ 5000 gpm against a system head Surveillance corresponding to reactor pressure. Frequency Control Program (continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.5*6 Amendment No. !J4 184, 201

ECCS-Operati ng 3.5.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3. 5. 1. 11 * --------* ---* -* ---NOTE --* * ----* -* ---------

Vessel injection/spray may be excluded.

Verify each ECCS injection/spray subsystem In accordance actuates on an actual or simulated with the automatic initiation signal. Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 5. 1. 12 - - - - * * - - - * * * * - - - - - -NOTE - - * - - - * - - - - - * * * * * * -

Valve actuation may be excluded.

Verify the ADS actuates on an actual or In accordance simulated automatic initiation signal. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.5.1.13 Verify each ADS valve opens when manually In accordance actuated. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3. 5. 1. 14 * --------* ----* * --* NOTE * - - - * * * - * - - - * * * * * * * -

ECCS instrumentation response times are not required to be measured.

Verify ECCS RESPONSE TIME is within limits. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI - UNIT 2 3.5-7 Amendment No. +/-34 ~. 201

ECCS- Shutdown 3.5.2 ACTIONS (continued)

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME D. Required Action C.2 D.l Initiate action to Inunediately and associated restore secondary Completion Time not containment to met. OPERABLE status.

AND D.2 Initiate action to Immediately restore one standby gas treatment subsystem to OPERABLE status.

AND D.3 Initiate action to Immediately restore isolation capability in each required secondary containment penetration flow path not isolated.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.5.2.1 Verify, for each required low pressure In accordance coolant injection (LPCI) subsystem, the with the suppression pool water level is Surveillance

~ -66 inches. Frequency Control Program (continued)

FERMI - UNIT 2 3.5-9 Amendment No. -!J4, 201

ECCS - Shutdown 3.5.2 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.5.2.2 Verify, for each required core spray (CS) In accordance subsystem, the: with the Surveillance

a. Suppression pool water level is Frequency

~ -66 inches; or Control Program

b. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *NOTE* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Only one required CS subsystem may take credit for this option during OPDRVs.

Condensate storage tank water level is

~ 19 ft.

SR 3.5.2.3 Verify correct voltage and breaker In accordance alignment to the LPCI swing bus. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.5.2.4 Verify, for each required ECCS In accordance injection/spray subsystem, the piping is with the filled with water from the pump discharge Surveillance valve to the injection valve. Frequency Control Program (continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.5-10 Amendment No. +/-J4, 201

ECCS- Shutdown 3.5.2 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.5.2.5 * * * * * -* -----* * * -* * -NOTE * * * * * ---* * -* * * * * --* -

LPCI subsystem(s) may be considered OPERABLE during alignment and operation for decay heat removal if capable of being manually realigned and not otherwise inoperable.

Verify each required ECCS injection/spray In accordance subsystem manual, power operated, and with the automatic valve in the flow path, that is Surveillance not locked, sealed, or otherwise secured in Frequency position, is in the correct position. Control Program SR 3.5.2.6 Verify each required ECCS pump develops the In accordance specified flow rate against a system head with the corresponding to the specified reactor Inservice pressure. Testing SYSTEM HEAD Program NO. CORRESPONDING OF TO A REACTOR SYSTEM FLOW RATE PUMPS PRESSURE OF cs ~ 5725 gpm 2 ~ 100 psig LPCI ~ 10,000 gpm 1 ~ 20 psig SR 3.5.2.7 * --* * -* * * -* * * * -* --* NOTE * * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * *

Vessel injection/spray may be excluded.

Verify each required ECCS injection/spray In accordance subsystem actuates on an actual or with the simulated automatic initiation signal. Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3. 5-11 Amendment No. -lJ4 -184, 201

RCIC System 3.5.3 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.5.3.1 Verify the RCIC System piping is filled In accordance with water from the pump discharge valve to with the the injection valve. Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.5.3.2 Verify each RCIC System manual, power In accordance operated, and automatic valve in the flow with the path, that is not locked, sealed, or Surveillance otherwise secured in position. is in the Frequency correct position. Control Program SR 3.5.3.3 * * * * * * * - * * * * * * * * - *

NOTE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Not required to be performed until 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months after reactor steam pressure and flow are adequate t9 perform the test.

Verify, with reactor pressure ~ 1045 psig In accordance and ~ 945 psig, the RCIC pump can develop a with the flow rate ~ 600 gpm against a system head Surveillance corresponding to reactor pressure. Frequency Control Program SR 3.5.3.4 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *NOTE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Not required to be performed until 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months after reactor steam pressure and flow are adequate to perform the test.

Verify, with reactor pressure~ 200 psig, In accordance the RCIC pump can develop a flow rate with the

~ 600 gpm against a system head Surveillance corresponding to reactor pressure. Frequency Control Program (continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.5-13 Amendment No. -+/-J4, 201

RCIC System 3.5.3 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.5.3.5 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *NOTE* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Vessel injection may be excluded.

Verify the RCIC System actuates on an In accordance actual or simulated automatic initiation with the signal. Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.5*14 Amendment No. la4, 201

Primary Containment 3.6.1.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3. 6. 1. 1. 2 Verify drywell to suppression chamber In accordance differential pressure does not decrease with the at a rate > 0.2 inch water gauge per Surveillance minute tested over a 10 minute period at Frequency an initial differential pressure of Control Program 1 psid.

AND

* * * * *NOTE* * * *

Only required after two consecutive tests fail and continues until two consecutive tests pass 9 months SR 3 . 6. 1. 1. 3 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *NOTE* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Only required to be performed after safety/relief valve operation with the suppression chamber average water temperature ~ 160°F and reactor coolant system pressure > 200 psig.

Perform an external visual examination of Once prior to the suppression chamber. entry into MODE 2 or 3 from MODE 4 FERMI

UNIT 2 3.6*2 Amendment No. JJ4, 201

Primary Containment Air Lock 3.6.1.2 ACTIONS (continued)

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME D. Required Action and D.1 Be in MODE 3. 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months associated Completion Time not met. AND D.2 Be in MODE 4. 36 hours4.166667e-4 days 0.01 hours 5.952381e-5 weeks 1.3698e-5 months SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3 . 6 . 1. 2 . 1 ------------------NOTES ------* -----* -----

1. An inoperable air lock door does not invalidate the previous successful performance of the overall air lock leakage test.

2. Results shall be evaluated against acceptance criteria applicable to SR 3 . 6. 1. 1. 1.

Perform required primary containment air In accordance lock leakage rate testing in accordance with the with the Primary Containment Leakage Rate Primary Testing Program. Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program SR 3. 6. 1. 2. 2 Verify only one door in the primary In accordance containment air lock can be opened at a with the time. Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI - UNIT 2 3.6-6 Amendment No . .iJ.4, 201

PC I Vs 3.6.1.3 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3. 6 . 1. 3. 1 -* -* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOTE * * -* * -* * * * * * * * * -*

Not required to be met when the isolation valves for one purge or containment pressure control supply line and one purge or containment pressure control exhaust line are open for inerting, de*

inerting, pressure control, ALARA or air quality considerations for personnel entry, or Surveillances that require the valves to be open.

Verify each drywell and suppression In accordance chamber purge system and containment with the pressure control isolation valve is Surveillance closed. Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 6 . 1. 3 . 2 * * * * * * --* --* * -* * *

NOTES -* -* -* * * * * * * * * * * *

1. Valves and blind flanges in high radiation areas may be verified by use of administrative means.

2. Not required to be met for PCIVs that are open under administrative controls.

Verify each primary containment isolation In accordance manual valve and blind flange that is with the located outside primary containment and Surveillance is not locked, sealed, or otherwise Frequency secured and is required to be closed Control Program

during accident conditions is closed.

(continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.6-14 Amendment No. +/-34, 201

PC I Vs 3.6.1.3 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3 . 6. 1. 3 . 3 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -*

NOTES --* * * * * * * * * * * * * *

1. Valves and blind flanges in high radiation areas may be verified by use of administrative means.

2. Not required to be met for PCIVs that are open under administrative controls.

Verify each primary containment Prior to isolation manual valve and blind flange entering MODE 2 that is located inside primary or 3 from containment and is not locked, sealed, MODE 4 if or otherwise secured and is required to primary be closed during accident conditions is containment was closed. de* inerted while in MODE 4, if not performed within the previous 92 days SR 3 . 6 . 1. 3 . 4 Verify continuity of the traversing In accordance incore probe (TIP) shear isolation valve with the explosive charge. Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 6. 1. 3 . 5 Verify the isolation time of each power In accordance operated automatic PCIV, except for with the MSIVs, is within limits. Inservice Testing Program (continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.6*15 Amendment No. lJ4, 201

PC IVs 3.6.1.3 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3 . 6. 1. 3 . 6 Perform leakage rate testing for each In accordance primary containment purge valve with with the resilient seals. Surveillance Frequency Control Program AND Once within 92 days after opening the valve SR 3 . 6 . 1. 3 . 7 Verify the isolation time of each MSIV In accordance is ~ 3 seconds and ~ 5 seconds. with the Inservice Testing Program SR 3 . 6. 1. 3 . 8 Verify each automatic PCIV actuates to In accordance the isolation position on an actual or with the simulated isolation signal. Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 6 . 1. 3. 9 Verify a representative sample of In accordance reactor instrumentation line EFCVs with the actuates on a simulated instrument line Surveillance break to restrict flow. Frequency Control Program SR 3. 6. 1. 3 . 10 Remove and test the explosive squib from In accordance each shear isolation valve of the TIP with the System. Surveillance Frequency Control Program (continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.6*16 Amendment No. ltl- 137, 201

Primary Containment Pressure 3.6.1.4 3.6 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 3.6.1.4 Primary Containment Pressure LCO 3.6.1.4 Primary containment pressure shall be~ *0.10 psig and

~ +2.0 psig.

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, and 3.

ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. Primary containment A.1 Restore primary 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months pressure not within containment pressure limit. to within limit.

B. Required Action and B.1 Be in MODE 3. 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months associated Completion Time not met. -AND B.2 Be in MODE 4. 36 hours4.166667e-4 days 0.01 hours 5.952381e-5 weeks 1.3698e-5 months SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3 . 6 . 1. 4. 1 Verify primary containment pressure is In accordance within limit. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.6*18 Amendment No. +/-d4, 201

Drywell Air Temperature 3.6.1.5 3.6 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 3.6.1.5 Drywell Air Temperature LCO 3.6.1.5 Drywell average air temperature shall be~ 145°F.

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, and 3.

ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. Drywell average air A.1 Restore drywe 11 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months temperature not within average air limit. temperature to within limit.

B. Required Action and 8.1 Be in MODE 3. 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months associated Completion Time not met. -AND B.2 Be in MODE 4. 36 hours4.166667e-4 days 0.01 hours 5.952381e-5 weeks 1.3698e-5 months SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.6.1.5.1 Verify drywell average air temperature is In accordance within limit. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.6*19 Amendment No. la4, 201

LLS Valves 3.6.1.6 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3. 6. 1. 6. 1 Verify each LLS valve opens when manually In accordance actuated. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3. 6 . 1. 6. 2 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOTE* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Valve actuation may be excluded.

Verify the LLS System actuates on an In accordance actual or simulated automatic initiation with the signal. Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.6-21 Amendment No. -1a4 0, 201

Reactor Building-to-Suppression Chamber Vacuum Breakers 3.6.1.7 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3. 6. 1. 7. 1 * * -* * * * * * * * -* * * -*

NOTES -* * * -* * -* * * * * * * * * *

1. Not required to be met for vacuum breakers that are open during Surveillances.

2. Not required to be met for vacuum breakers open when performing their intended function.

Verify each vacuum breaker is closed. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 6 . 1. 7 . 2 Perform a functional test of each vacuum In accordance breaker. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 6. 1. 7 . 3 Verify the opening setpoint of each In accordance vacuum breaker is s 0.5 psid. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.6-24 Amendment No. -lJ4 -194, 201

Suppression Chamber-to-Drywell Vacuum Breakers 3.6.1.8 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3. 6. 1. 8 . 1 ----- --- --* -* * * --*NOTES * * * * -* * -* * * * * * -* * *

1. Not required to be met for vacuum breakers that are open during Surveillances.

2. Not required to be met for vacuum breakers open when performing their intended function.

Verify each vacuum breaker is closed. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 6. 1. 8. 2 Perform a functional test of each vacuum Prior to breaker. entering MODE 2 or 3 from MODE 4 if not performed in the previous 92 days AND Within 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months after any discharge of steam to the suppression chamber from the SRVs SR 3. 6. 1. 8 . 3 Verify the opening setpoint of each In accordance vacuum breaker is ~ 0.5 psid. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.6*26 Amendment No. -+/-J4, 201

Suppression Pool Average Temperature 3.6.2.1 ACTIONS (continued)

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME E. Suppression pool E. l Depressurize the 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months average temperature reactor vessel to

> 120°F. < 200 psig.

AND E.2 Be in MODE 4. 36 hours SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3 . 6. 2. 1. 1 Verify suppression pool average In accordance temperature is within the applicable with the limits. Surveillance Frequency Control Program AND 5 minutes when performing testing that adds heat to the suppression pool FERMI

UNIT 2 3.6-31 Amendment No. +/-34, 201

Suppression Pool Water Level 3.6.2.2 3.6 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 3.6.2.2 Suppression Pool Water Level LCO 3.6.2.2 Suppression pool water level shall be ~ -2 inches and

s: +2 inches.

APPLICABILITY: MODES 1, 2, and 3.

ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. Suppression pool water A. l Restore sup~ression 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months level not within pool water evel to limits. within limits.

B. Required Action and B.l Be in MODE 3. 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months associated Completion Time not met. -AND B.2 Be in MODE 4. 36 hours4.166667e-4 days 0.01 hours 5.952381e-5 weeks 1.3698e-5 months SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.6.2.2.1 Verify suppression pool water level is In accordance within limits. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3. 6*32 Amendment No. lM, 201

RHR Suppression Pool Cooling 3.6.2.3 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.6.2.3.1 Verify each RHR suppression pool cooling In accordance subsystem manual, power operated, and with the automatic valve in the flow path that is Surveillance not locked, sealed, or otherwise secured Frequency in position is in the correct position or Control Program can be aligned to the correct position.

SR 3.6.2.3.2 Verify each RHR pump develops a flow rate In accordance

~ 10,000 gpm through the associated heat with the exchanger while operating in the Inservice suppression pool cooling mode. Testing Program FERMI - UNIT 2 3.6-34 Amendment No. +/-d4 +/-9-+/-, 201

RHR Suppression Pool Spray 3.6.2.4 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.6.2.4.1 Verify each RHR suppression pool spray In accordance subsystem manual, power operated, and with the automatic valve in the flow path that is Surveillance not locked, sealed, or otherwise secured Frequency in position is in the correct position or Control Program can be aligned to the correct position.

SR 3.6.2.4.2 Verify each RHR pump develops a flow rate In accordance

~ 500 gpm through the heat exchanger and with the suppression pool spray sparger while Inservice operating in the suppression pool spray Testing Program mode.

FERMI - UNIT 2 3.6-36 Amendment No. -134, 201

Primary Containment Oxygen Concentration 3.6.3.1 3.6 CONTAINMENT SYSTEMS 3.6.3.1 Primary Containment Oxygen Concentration LCO 3.6.3.1 The primary containment oxygen concentration shall be

< 4.0 volume percent.

APPLICABILITY: MODE 1 during the time period:

a. From 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months after THERMAL POWER is > 15% RTP following startup, to

b. 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months prior to reducing THERMAL POWER to < 15% RTP prior to the next reactor shutdown.

ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. Primary containment A.l Restore oxygen 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months oxygen concentration concentration to not within limit. within limit.

B. Required Action and B.1 Reduce THERMAL POWER 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months associated Completion to~ 15% RTP.

Time not met.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3 . 6 . 3 . 1. 1 Verify primary containment oxygen In accordance concentration is within limits. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.6-39 Amendment No. lb~. *99, 201

Secondary Containment 3.6.4.1 ACTIONS (continued)

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME D. Secondary containment * * * * * * * * * * * -NOTE* * * -* * * * * * * *

inoperable during LCO 3.0.3 is not applicable.

movement of recently irradiated fuel assemblies in the D.l Suspend movement of Immediately secondary containment recently irradiated or during OPDRVs. fuel assemblies in the secondary containment.

AND 0.2 Initiate action to Immediately suspend OPDRVs.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.6.4.1.1 Verify secondary containment vacuum is In accordance

~ 0.125 inch of vacuum water gauge. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program (continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.6*41 Amendment No. fit/. -144, 201

Secondary Containment 3.6.4.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3. 6. 4. 1. 2 -* * * * * * -* * * ---*

NOTE -* ---------* * * - --* -*

Not required to be met for one railroad bay access door until:

a. 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months after opening for entry, exit, or testing; and

b. 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months after opening for new fuel receipt activities provided the other door remains OPERABLE and closed.

Verify all secondary containment In accordance equipment hatches, pressure relief doors with the and railroad bay access doors are closed Surveillance and sealed. Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 6. 4. 1. 3 Verify one secondary containment access In accordance door in each access opening is closed. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.6.4.1.4 Verify steam tunnel blowout panels are Prior to closed. entering MODE 2 or 3 from MODE 4 if not performed in the previous 31 days SR 3 . 6. 4. 1. 5 Verify each standby gas treatment (SGT) In accordance subsystem will draw down the secondary with the containment to ~ 0.25 inch of vacuum Surveillance water gauge in ~ 12 minutes. Frequency Control Program SR 3. 6.4. 1. 6 Verify each SGT subsystem can maintain In accordance

~ 0.25 inch of vacuum water gauge in the with the secondary containment for 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months at a Surveillance flow rate ~ 3000 cfm. Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.6*42 Amendment No. 12'K. .ieG, 201

SCI Vs 3.6.4.2 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.6.4.2.1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *NOTES* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

1. Valves and blind flanges in high radiation areas may be verified by use of administrative means.

2. Not required to be met for SCIVs that are open under administrative controls.

Verify each secondary containment In accordance isolation manual valve and blind flange with the not locked, sealed, or otherwise secured Surveillance that is required to be closed during Frequency accident conditions is closed. Control Program SR 3.6.4.2.2 Verify the isolation time of each power In accordance operated automatic SCIV is within limits. with the Inservice Testing Program SR 3.6.4.2.3 Verify each automatic SCIV actuates to In accordance the isolation position on an actual or with the simulated actuation signal. Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.6-46 Amendment No. -!J4, 201

SGT System 3.6.4.3 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.6.4.3.1 Operate each SGT subsystem for ~ 10 In accordance continuous hours with heaters operating. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.6.4.3.2 Perform required SGT filter testing in In accordance accordance with the Ventilation Filter with the VFTP Testing Program (VFTP).

SR 3.6.4.3.3 Verify each SGT subsystem actuates on an In accordance actual or simulated initiation signal. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.6.4.3.4 Verify each SGT filter cooler bypass In accordance damper can be opened and the fan started. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.6-50 Amendment No. 134, 201

RHRSW System 3.7.1 ACTIONS (continued)

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME D. Required Action and D.l * * * * * * * *NOTE* ---* * -* -

associated Completion LCO 3.0.4.a is not Time of Condition A, applicable when B, or C not met. entering MODE 3 .

Be in MODE 3. 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months E. Both RHRSW subsystems E.1 * * * * * * * *NOTE* * * * * * * *

inoperable for reasons Enter applicable other than Conditions and Condition B. Required Actions of LCO 3.4.8 for RHR shutdown cooling made inoperable by RHRSW System .

Restore one RHRSW 8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months subsystem to OPERABLE status.

F. Required Action and F.l Be in MODE 3. 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months associated Completion Time of Condition E -AND not met.

F.2 Be in MODE 4. 36 hours4.166667e-4 days 0.01 hours 5.952381e-5 weeks 1.3698e-5 months SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3. 7.1.1 Verify each RHRSW manual, power operated, In accordance and automatic valve in the flow path, that with the is not locked, sealed, or otherwise secured Surveillance in position, is in the correct position or Frequency can be aligned to the correct position. Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.7 *2 Amendment No. -lJ4 194, 201

EECW/EESW System and UHS 3.7.2 ACTIONS (continued)

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME D. Required Action and D.l Be in MODE 3. 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months associated Completion Time of Condition A. AND B, or C not met.

D.2 Be in MODE 4. 36 hours4.166667e-4 days 0.01 hours 5.952381e-5 weeks 1.3698e-5 months OR Both EECW/EESW subsystems inoperable for reasons other than Condition A.

OR UHS inoperable for reasons other than Conditions A and B.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.7.2.1 Verify the water level of each UHS In accordance reservoir, and the average water level of with the each of the two reservoirs, are ~ 25 ft. Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.7.2.2 Verify the average water temperature of In accordance each reservoir, and combined average water with the temperature of the two reservoirs, are Surveillance

s; 80°F. Frequency Control Program (continued)

FERMI - UNIT 2 3.7-4 Amendment No. 134, 201

EECW/EESW System and UHS 3.7.2 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.7.2.3 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOTE* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Fast speed testing not required to be performed during icing periods.

Operate each cooling tower fan on slow In accordance speed and on fast speed, each for with the

~ 15 minutes. Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3. 7 .2 .4 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOTE* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Isolation of EECW flow to individual components does not render EECW System inoperable.

Verify each EECW/EESW subsystem and UHS In accordance manual, power operated, and automatic valve with the in the flow paths servicing safety related Surveillance systems or components, that is not locked, Frequency sealed, or otherwise secured in position, Control Program is in the correct position.

SR 3.7.2.5 Verify each EECW/EESW subsystem actuates on In accordance an actual or simulated initiation signal. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.7*5 Amendment No. -!J4, 201

CREF System 3.7.3 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.7.3.1 Operate each CREF subsystem for ~ 15 In accordance continuous minutes with heaters operating. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.7.3.2 * * * * * * * ~ * * * * * * * * * *NOTE* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

When the CREF system is made inoperable in MODE 1, 2, or 3 solely for VFTP required surveillances. entry into associated Conditions and Required Actions may be delayed for up to 6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months .

Perform required CREF filter testing in In accordance accordance with the Ventilation Filter with the VFTP Testing Program CVFTP).

SR 3.7.3.3 Verify each CREF subsystem actuates on an In accordance actual or simulated initiation signal. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.7.3.4 Perform required CRE unfiltered air In accordance inleakage testing in accordance with the with the Control Room Envelope Habitability Program. Control Room Envelope Habitability Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.7*9 Amendment No. -134, +/-92, -198, 201

Control Center AC System 3.7.4 ACTIONS (continued)

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME E. Required Action and * * * * * * * * * * *NOTE* * * * * * * * * * * * *

associated Completion LCO 3.0.3 is not applicable Time of Condition B not met during E.1 Suspend movement of Immediately movement of recently recently irradiated irradiated fuel fuel assemblies in assemblies in the the secondary secondary containment containment.

or during OPDRVs.

ANO E.2 Initiate actions to Immediately suspend OPDRVs.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.7.4.1 Verify the control room air temperature is In accordance

~ 95°F. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.7*13 Amendment No. ~ft' . .l;~. ill, 201

Main Condenser Offgas 3.7.5 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.7.5.1 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *NOTE* -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Not required to be performed until 31 days after any main steam line not isolated and SJAE in operation.

Verify the gross radioactivity rate of the In accordance noble gases is s 340 mCi/second with the after decay of 30 minutes. Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.7.5.2 Verify the gross radioactivity rate of the Once within noble gases is s 340 mCi/second 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months after a after decay of 30 minutes. ~ 50.% increase in the nominal steady state fission gas release after factoring out increases due to changes in THERMAL POWER level FERMI

UNIT 2 3.7*15 Amendment No. -la4, 201

Main Turbine Bypass System and Moisture Separator Reheater 3.7.6 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.7.6.1 Verify each main turbine bypass valve opens In accordance at least 5%. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.7.6.2 Verify one complete cycle of each main Once after each turbine bypass valve. entry into MODE 4 SR 3.7.6.3 Perform a system functional test. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.7.6.4 Verify the TURBINE BYPASS SYSTEM RESPONSE In accordance TIME is within limits. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.7-17 Amendment No . .l.Z'K. ~. 201

Spent Fuel Storage Pool Water Level 3.7.7 3.7 PLANT SYSTEMS 3.7.7 Spent Fuel Storage Pool Water Level LCO 3.7.7 The spent fuel storage pool water level shall be~ 22 ft over the top of irradiated fuel assemblies seated in the spent fuel storage pool racks.

APPLICABILITY: During movement of irradiated fuel assemblies in the spent fuel storage pool.

ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. Spent fuel storage A.1 * * * * * * * *NOTE* * * * * * * *

pool water level not LCO 3.0.3 is not within limit. applicable.

Suspend movement of Immediately irradiated fuel assemblies in the spent fuel storage pool.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.7.7.1 Verify the spent fuel storage pool water In accordance level is ~ 22 ft over the top of irradiated with the fuel assemblies seated in the spent fuel Surveillance storage pool racks. Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.7-18 Amendment No. -!J4. 201

EOGSW System 3.7.8 3.7 PLANT SYSTEMS 3.7.8 Emergency Diesel Generator Service Water (EOGSW) System LCO 3.7.8 Four EOGSW subsystems shall be OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY: When associated EOG is required to be OPERABLE.

ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. One or more EDGSW A.1 Declare associated Immediately subsystems inoperable. EOG(s) inoperable.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.7.8.1 Verify each EOGSW subsystem manual, power In accordance operated, and automatic valve in the flow with the path, that is not locked, sealed, or Surveillance otherwise secured in position, is in the Frequency correct position. Control Program SR 3.7.8.2 Verify each EDGSW subsystem pump starts In accordance automatically when the associated EOG with the starts. Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.7-19 Amendment No. -lJ.4, 201

AC Sources-Operating 3.8.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.8.1.1 Verify correct breaker alignment and In accordance indicated power availability for each with the offsite circuit. Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3. 8.1.2 * * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * -* NOTES * -* * * * * -* * * * * * * * * * *

1. All EOG starts may be preceded by an engine prelube period and followed by a warmup period prior to loading.

2. A modified EOG start involving idling and gradual acceleration to synchronous speed may be used for this SR as recommended by the manufacturer.

Verify each EOG starts and achieves steady In accordance state voltage ~ 3950 V and s 4580 V and with the frequency~ 58.8 Hz and s 61.2 Hz. Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.8.1.3 * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * *

NOTES- * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * * *

1. EOG loadings may include gradual loading as recommended by the manufacturer.

2. Momentary transients below the load limit do not invalidate this test.

3. This Surveillance shall be conducted on only one EDG at a time.

Verify each EOG is synchronized and loaded In accordance and operates for ~ 60 minutes at a load with the

~ 2500 kW. Surveillance Frequency Control Program (continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.8-3 Amendment No. J.'1?* -+/-78 -lSJ, 201

AC Sources-Operating 3.8.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.8.1.4 Verify each day tank contains ~ one hour In accordance supply of fuel oil. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.8.1.5 Check for and remove accumulated water from In accordance each day tank. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.8.1. 6 Verify each fuel oil transfer system In accordance operates to automatically transfer fuel oil with the from storage tanks to the day tanks. Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.8.1. 7 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOTE* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

All EOG starts may be preceded by an engine prelube period and followed by a warmup period prior to loading.

Verify each EOG starts from standby In accordance condition and achieves: with the Surveillance

a. In :s; 10 seconds. voltage~ 3950 V and Frequency frequency ~ 58.8 Hz; and Control Program

b. Steady state voltage ~ 3950 V and s 4580 V and frequency ~ 58.8 Hz and

s; 61.2 Hz.

SR 3.8.1.8 Verify each EOG rejects a load greater than In accordance or equal to its associated single largest with the post-accident load, and following load Surveillance rejection, the frequency is :s; 66.75 Hz. Frequency Control Program (continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.8*4 Amendment No. 134,178,183, .igs, 201

AC Sources-Operating 3.8.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.8.1.9 Verify each EOG does not trip and voltage In accordance is maintained s 5267 V during and following with the a load rejection of ~ 2850 kW. Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 8. 1. 10 * * * * - * * * * * * - * - * - - *

NOTE -- * * * -* * * * -* * * * * * -*

All EOG starts may be preceded by an engine prelube period.

Verify on simulated loss of offsite power In accordance signal: with the Surveillance

a. De-energization of emergency buses; Frequency Control Program

b. Load shedding from emergency buses; and

c. EOG auto-starts and:

1. energizes permanently connected loads in ~ 10 seconds,

2. energizes auto-connected shutdown loads through load sequencer,

3. maintains steady state voltage

~ 3950 V ands 4580 V,

4.

maintains steady state frequency

~ 58.8 Hz and ~ 61.2 Hz, and

5. supplies permanently connected and auto-connected shutdown loads for

~ 5 minutes.

(continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.8*5 Amendment No. j.'jj., fffi. 78 ~.

201

AC Sources-Operating 3.8.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3. 8. 1. 11 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *NOTE* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

All EOG starts may be preceded by an engine prelube period.

Verify on an actual or simulated Emergency In accordance Core Cooling System (ECCS) initiation with the signal each EOG auto-starts and: Surveillance Frequency

a. In ~ 10 seconds after auto-start and Control Program during tests, achieves voltage

~ 3950 V and frequency ~ 58.8 Hz;

b. Achieves steady state voltage ~ 3950 V and~ 4580 V, and frequency~ 58.8 Hz and ~ 61.2 Hz; and

c. Operates for ~ 5 minutes.

SR 3.8.1.12 Verify each EDG's automatic trips are In accordance bypassed on an actual or simulated with the emergency start signal except: Surveillance Frequency

a. Engine overspeed; Control Program

b. Generator differential current;

c. Low lube oil pressure;

d. Crankcase overpressure; and

e. Failure to start.

(continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.8*6 Amendment No. flf. -l-78 ~. 201

AC Sources-Operating 3.8.l SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3 . 8. 1. 13 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *NOTE* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Momentary transients outside the load range do not invalidate this test.

Verify each EOG operates for ~ 24 hour2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months s: In accordance with the

a. For all but the final ~ 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months loaded Surveillance

~ 2500 kW and s 2600 kW: and Frequency Control Program

b. For the final ~ 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months of the test loaded ~ 2800 kW and s 2900 kW.

SR 3.8.1.14 - * - * - * * - * * - - * * * * - - *NOTES-******************

1. This Surveillance shall be performed within 5 minutes of shutting down the EOG after the EOG has operated

~ 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months loaded ~ 2500 kW or until operating temperatures have stabilized.

Momentary transients below the load limit do not invalidate this test.

2. All EOG starts may be preceded by an engine prelube period.

Verify each EOG starts and achieves: In accordance with the

a. In s 10 seconds, voltage ~ 3950 V and Surveillance frequency ~ 58.8 Hz; and Frequency Control Program

b. Steady state voltage ~ 3950 V and s 4580 V and frequency ~ 58.8 Hz and s 61.2 Hz.

(continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.8*7 Amendment No. ;(ff, -+/-18 +/-83, 201

AC Sources-Operating 3.8.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.8.1.15 Verify each EOG: In accordance with the

a. Synchronizes with offsite power source Surveillance while loaded with emergency loads upon Frequency a simulated restoration of offsite Control Program power;

b. Transfers loads to offsite power source; and

c. Returns to standby status.

SR 3.8.1.16 Verify interval between each sequenced In accordance load block is within+/- 10% of design with the interval for each load sequencer timer. Surveillance Frequency Control Program (continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.8*8 Amendment No. -164, 201

AC Sources-Operating 3.8.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3 . 8 . 1. 17 ------------------* NOTE - --------------* * ---

All EDG starts may be preceded by an engine prelube period.

Verify, on simulated loss of offsite power In accordance signal in conjunction with an actual or with the simulated ECCS initiation signal: Surveillance Frequency

a. De-energization of emergency buses; Control Program

b. Load shedding from emergency buses; and

c. EDG auto-starts and:

1. energizes permanently connected loads in ~ 10 seconds,

2. energizes auto-connected emergency loads through load sequencer.

3. achieves steady state voltage

~ 3950 V and~ 4580 V,

4. achieves steady state frequency

~ 58.8 Hz and ~ 61.2 Hz, and

5. supplies permanently connected and auto-connected emergency loads for ~ 5 minutes.

SR 3 . 8 . 1. 18 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

NOTE- -------------------

All EDG starts may be preceded by an engine prelube period.

Verify, when started simultaneously each In accordance EOG achieves, in~ 10 seconds, frequency with the

~ 58.8 Hz. Surveillance Frequency Contra l Program FERMI - UNIT 2 3.8-9 Amendment No. 111* 78 -!8J, 201

Diesel Fuel Oil and Starting Air 3.8.3 ACTIONS (continued)

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME D. Required Action and D.1 Declare associated Immediately associated Completion EOG inoperable.

Time not met.

OR One or more required EDGs with diesel fuel oil. or starting air subsystem not within limits for reasons other than Condition A, B, or C.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.8.3.1 Verify each required EOG fuel oil storage In accordance tank contains~ a 7 day supply of fuel. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.8.3.2 Verify each required EDG fuel oil In accordance properties of new and stored fuel oil are with the tested in accordance with. and maintained Emergency within the limits of. the Emergency Diesel Diesel Generator Fuel Oil Testing Program. Generator Fuel Oil Testing Program (continued)

FERMI - UNIT 2 3.8-14 Amendment No. +/-34,-188 201

Diesel Fuel Oil and Starting Air 3.8.3 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.8.3.3 Verify each required EOG air start receiver In accordance pressure is ~ 215 psig. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.8.3.4 Check for and remove accumulated water from In accordance each required EOG fuel oil storage tank. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.8*15 Amendment No. 134, 201

DC Sources-Operating 3.8.4 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.8.4.1 Verify battery terminal voltage is In accordance

~ 125.7 Von float charge. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.8.4.2 Verify no visible corrosion at battery In accordance terminals and connectors. with the Surveillance OR Frequency Control Program Verify each battery:

a. Cell-to-cell and terminal connection resistance is ~ 1.5E-4 ohm; and

b. Total cell-to-cell and terminal connection resistance is s 2.7E-3 ohm.

SR 3.8.4.3 Verify battery cells, cell plates. and In accordance racks show no visual indication of physical with the damage or abnormal deterioration that could Surveillance degrade battery performance. Frequency Control Program SR 3.8.4.4 Remove visible corrosion and verify battery In accordance cell to cell and terminal connections are with the coated with anti-corrosion material. Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.8.4.5 Verify each battery: In accordance with the

a. Cell-to-cell and terminal connection Surveillance resistance is ~ 1.5E*4 ohm; and Frequency Control Program

b. Total cell*to*cell and terminal conhection resistance is s 2.7E*3 ohm.

(continued)

FERMI - UNIT 2 3.8-17 Amendment No. 1-JI. -+/-Je +/-99, 201

DC Sources-Operating 3.8.4 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.8.4.6 Verify each required battery charger In accordance supplies~ 100 amps at~ 124.7 V for with the

~ 4 hours4.62963e-5 days 0.00111 hours 6.613757e-6 weeks 1.522e-6 months . Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3 . 8 . 4 . 7 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * - * * *

NOTE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * -

The performance discharge test in SR 3.8.4.8 may be performed in lieu of the service test in SR 3.8.4.7.

Verify battery capacity is adequate to In accordance supply, and maintain in OPERABLE status. with the the actual or simulated emergency loads for Surveillance the design duty cycle when subjected to a Frequency battery service test. Control Program (continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.8*18 Amendment No. !J4., 199, 201

DC Sources-Operating 3.8.4 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3. 8. 4.8 * -* * * * * * * * * * -* * * * * * *NOTE -* * -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

This Surveillance shall not be performed in MODE 1, 2, or 3. However. credit may be taken for unplanned events that satisfy this SR.

Verify battery capacity is ~ 80% of the In accordance manufacturer's rating when subjected to a with the performance discharge test. Surveillance Frequency Control Program AND 12 months when battery shows degradation or has reached 85% of expected life with capacity < 100% of manufacturer's rating AND 24 months when battery has reached 85% of the expected life with capacity ~ 100% of manufacturer's rating FERMI

UNIT 2 3.8-18a Amendment No. 201

Battery Cell Parameters 3.8.6 ACTIONS (continued}

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME B. Required Action and B.l Declare associated Immediately associated Completion battery inoperable.

Time of Condition A not met.

OR One or more batteries with average electrolyte temperature of the representative cells not within limits.

OR One or more batteries with one or more battery cell parameters not within Table 3.8.6*1 Category C values.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.8.6.1 Verify battery cell parameters meet In accordance Table 3.8.6*1 Category A limits. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program (continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.8*23 Amendment No. +/-a4 201

Battery Cell Parameters 3.8.6 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.8.6.2 Verify battery cell parameters meet In accordance Table 3.8.6-1 Category B limits. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program AND Once within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months after battery discharge

< 105 v AND Once within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months after battery overcharge

> 145 v SR 3.8.6.3 Verify average electrolyte temperature of In accordance representative cells is > 70°F. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI - UNIT 2 3.8*24 Amendment No. fl,f,. . .+/-J6 -199., 201

Distribution Systems-Operating 3.8.7 ACTIONS (continued)

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME B. One or more required B.1 Restore DC electrical 2 hours2.314815e-5 days 5.555556e-4 hours 3.306878e-6 weeks 7.61e-7 months DC electrical power power distribution distribution subsystem(s) to -AND subsystems inoperable. OPERABLE status.

16 hours1.851852e-4 days 0.00444 hours 2.645503e-5 weeks 6.088e-6 months from discovery of failure to meet LCO

c. Required Action and C.l * * * * * * * *NOTE* * * * * * *

associated Completion LCO 3.0.4.a is not Time of Condition A applicable when or B not met. entering MODE 3.

Be in MODE 3. 12 hours1.388889e-4 days 0.00333 hours 1.984127e-5 weeks 4.566e-6 months D. Two or more required D.1 Enter LCD 3.0.3. Immediately electrical power distribution subsystems inoperable that result in a loss of function.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.8.7.1 Verify correct breaker alignments and In accordance voltage to required AC and DC electrical with the power distribution subsystems. Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.8*27 Amendment No. la4 !94, 201

Distribution Systems-Shutdown 3.8.8 ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. (continued) A.2.3 Initiate action to Immediately sus~end operations wit a potential for draining the reactor vessel.

AND A.2.4 Initiate actions to Immediately restore required AC and DC electrical power distribution subsystems to OPERABLE status.

AND A.2.5 Declare associated Immediately required shutdown cooling subsystem(s) inoperable and not in operation.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.8.8.1 Verify correct breaker alignments and In accordance voltage to required AC and DC electrical with the power distribution subsystems. Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI - UNIT 2 3.8-29 Amendment No. +/-J.4, 201

Refueling Equipment Interlocks 3.9.1 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3. 9.1.1 Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST on each of In accordance the following required refueling equipment with the interlock inputs: Surveillance Frequency

a. All-rods-in, Control Program

b. Refuel platform position,

c. Refuel platform fuel grapple. fuel loaded,

d. Refuel platform fuel grapple not fully retracted position,

e. Refuel platform frame mounted hoist, fuel loaded, and

f. Refuel platform monorail mounted hoist, fuel loaded.

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.9*2 Amendment No. 164, 201

Refuel Position One-Rod-Out Interlock 3.9.2 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.9.2.1 Verify reactor mode switch locked in Refuel In accordance position. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.9.2.2 -----* --* * -* --*

NOTE -* * * * * -* * * * * -----* * * *

Not required to be performed until 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months after any control rod is withdrawn.

Perform CHANNEL FUNCTIONAL TEST. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI - UNIT 2 3.9-4 Amendment No. ~. 201

Control Rod Position 3.9.3 3.9 REFUELING OPERATIONS 3.9.3 Control Rod Position LCO 3.9.3 All control rods shall be fully inserted.

APPLICABILITY: When loading fuel assemblies into the core.

ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. One or more control A. l Suspend loading fuel Immediately rods not fully assemblies into the inserted. core.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.9.3.1 Verify all control rods are fully inserted. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.9-5 Amendment No. +/-a4, 201

Control Rod OPERABILITY-Refueling 3.9.5 3.9 REFUELING OPERATIONS 3.9.5 Control Rod OPERABILITY-Refueling LCO 3.9.5 Each withdrawn control rod shall be OPERABLE.

APPLICABILITY: MODE 5, ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. One or more withdrawn A.l Initiate action to Immediately control rods fully insert inoperable. inoperable withdrawn control rods.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.9.5.1 -* * -* * * * * * * * * * -* *

NOTE --* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Not required to be performed until 7 days after the control rod is withdrawn.

Insert each withdrawn control rod at least In accordance one notch. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.9.5.2 Verify each withdrawn control rod scram In accordance accumulator pressure is ~ 940 psig. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI - UNIT 2 3.9-8 Amendment No. -l-J4, 201

RPV Water Level 3.9.6 3.9 REFUELING OPERATIONS 3.9.6 Reactor Pressure Vessel (RPV) Water Level LCO 3.9.6 RPV water level shall be~ 20 ft 6 inches above the top of the RPV flange.

APPLICABILITY: During movement of irradiated fuel assemblies within the RPV, During movement of new fuel assemblies or handling of control rods within the RPV, when irradiated fuel assemblies are seated within the RPV.

ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. RPV water level not A. l Suspend movement of Immediately within limit. fuel assemblies and handling of control rods within the RPV.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.9.6.1 Verify RPV water level is ~ 20 ft 6 inches In accordance above the top of the RPV flange. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.9*9 Amendment No. -+/-a4, 201

RHR-High Water Level 3.9.7 ACTIONS (continued)

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME B. Required Action and B.l Suspend loading Immediately associated Completion i rradi ated fue 1 Time of Condition A assemblies into the not met. RPV.

AND B.2 Initiate action to Immediately restore secondary containment to OPERABLE status.

AND B.3 Initiate action to Immediately restore one standby gas treatment subsystem to OPERABLE status.

AND B.4 Initiate action to Immediately restore isolation capability in each required secondary containment penetration flow path not isolated.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.9.7.1 Verify the RHR shutdown cooling subsystem In accordance is capable of decay heat removal. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.9-11 Amendment No. +/-a4. 201

RHR-Low Water Level 3.9.8 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.9.8.1 Verify one RHR shutdown cooling subsystem In accordance or recirculation pump is operating. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.9.8.2 Verify each RHR shutdown cooling subsystem In accordance is capable of decay heat removal. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.9*14 Amendment No. -134, 201

Reactor Mode Switch Interlock Testing 3.10.2 ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. (continued) A.3.1 Place the reactor 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months mode switch in the shutdown position.

OR A. 3. 2 * * * * * * *

NOTE * * * * * * * *

Only applicable in MODE 5.

Place the reactor 1 hour1.157407e-5 days 2.777778e-4 hours 1.653439e-6 weeks 3.805e-7 months mode switch in the refuel position.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.10.2.1 Verify all control rods are fully inserted In accordance in core cells containing one or more fuel with the assemblies. Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.10.2.2 Verify no CORE ALTERATIONS are in progress. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.10*5 Amendment No. +/-34, 201

Single Control Rod Withdrawal-Hot Shutdown 3.10.3 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.10.3.l Perform the applicable SRs for the required According to LCOs. the applicable SRs SR 3. 10. 3. 2 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *NOTE* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Not required to be met if SR 3.10.3.1 is satisfied for LCO 3.10.3.d.1 requirements.

Verify all control rods, other than the In accordance control rod being withdrawn. in a five by with the five array centered on the control rod Surveillance being withdrawn, are disarmed. Frequency Control Program SR 3.10.3.3 Verify all control rods, other than the In accordance control rod being withdrawn, are fully with the inserted. Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.10*8 Amendment No. -134, 201

Single Control Rod Withdrawal-Cold Shutdown 3.10.4 ACTIONS (continued)

CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME B. One or more of the B.l Suspend withdrawal of Immediately above requirements not the control rod and met with the affected removal of associated control rod not CRD.

insertable.

AND B.2.1 Initiate action to Immediately fully insert all control rods.

OR B.2.2 Initiate action to Immediately satisfy the requirements of this LCO.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.10.4.1 Perform the applicable SRs for the required According to LCOs. the applicable SRs SR 3. 10 . 4 . 2 * * - * - - - * * * * - * * * - - *

NOTE -* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Not required to be met if SR 3.10.4.1 is satisfied for LCO 3.10.4.c.l requirements.

Verify all control rods, other than the In accordance control rod being withdrawn, in a five by with the five array centered on the control rod Surveillance being withdrawn, are disarmed. Frequency Control Program (continued)

FERMI - UNIT 2 3.10*11 Amendment No. 1J4, 201

Single Control Rod Withdrawal-Cold Shutdown 3.10.4 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.10.4.3 Verify all control rods, other than the In accordance control rod being withdrawn, are fully with the inserted. Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3. 10 . 4 .4 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOTE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Not required to be met if SR 3.10.4.1 is satisfied for LCO 3.10.4.b.l requirements.

Verify a control rod withdrawal block is In accordance inserted. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3 .10-12 Amendment No. -ld4. 201

Single CRD Removal-Refueling 3.10.5 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.10. 5.1 Verify all control rods, other than the In accordance control rod withdrawn for the removal of with the the associated CRD, are fully inserted. Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.10.5.2 Verify all control rods, other than the In accordance control rod withdrawn for the removal of with the the associated CRD, in a five by five array Surveillance centered on the control rod withdrawn for Frequency the removal of the associated CRD, are Control Program disarmed.

SR 3.10.5.3 Verify a control rod withdrawal block is In accordance inserted. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.10.5.4 Perform.SR 3.1.1.1. According to SR 3.1.1.1 SR 3.10.5.5 Verify no CORE ALTERATIONS are in progress. In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI - UNIT 2 3.10-15 Amendment No. 164, 201

Multiple Control Rod Withdrawal-Refueling 3.10.6 ACTIONS CONDITION REQUIRED ACTION COMPLETION TIME A. (continued) A.3.1 Initiate action to Immediately fully insert all control rods in core cells containing one or more fuel assemblies.

OR A.3.2 Initiate action to Immediately satisfy the requirements of this LCO.

SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.10.6.1 Verify the four fuel assemblies are removed In accordance from core cells associated with each with the control rod or CRD removed. Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3.10.6.2 Verify all other control rods in core cells In accordance containing one or more fuel assemblies are with the fu 11 y inserted. Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.10*17 Amendment No. -lJ4, 201

SOM Test-Refueling 3.10. 7 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.10.7.1 Perform the MODE 2 applicable SRs for LCO According to 3.3.1.1, Functions 2.a, 2.d. and 2.e of the applicable Table 3.3.1.1-1. SRs SR 3. 10 . 7. 2 - --* -------* - ----* -NOTE - --* * -----* -------*

Not required to be met if SR 3.10.7.3 satisfied.

Perform the MODE 2 applicable SRs for According to LCO 3.3;2.l, Function 2 of Table 3.3.2.1-1. the applicable SRs SR 3. 10 . 7. 3 * * * * * * * --* ---* ----* NOTE - * * ----* * --* ---- --- -

Not required to be met if SR 3.10.7.2 satisfied.

Verify movement of control rods is in During control compliance with the approved control rod rod movement sequence for the SOM test by a second licensed operator or other qualified member of the technical staff.

SR 3.10.7.4 Verify no other CORE ALTERATIONS are in In accordance progress. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program (continued)

FERMI

UNIT 2 3.10-20 Amendment No. -1J4, 201

SOM Test-Refueling 3.10.7 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS (continued)

SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.10.7.5 Verify each withdrawn control rod does not Each time the go to the withdrawn overtravel position. control rod is withdrawn to "full out" position AND Prior to satisfying LCO 3.10.7.c requirement after work on contra1 rod or CRD System that could affect coupling SR 3.10.7.6 Verify CRD charging water header pressure In accordance

~ 940 psig. with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.10*21 Amendment No. -134, 201

T4803F601, Nitrogen Inerting Drywell Air Purge Inlet Supply Valve 3.10.8 SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS SURVEILLANCE FREQUENCY SR 3.10.8.1 Verify penetration X26 outboard isolation * * * * * *NOTE* * * *

valves T4800F407 and T4800F408 are closed SR 3.0.2 is not and deactivated. applicable.

In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program SR 3. 10 . 8 . 2 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

NOTE * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *

Results shall be evaluated against acceptance criteria applicable to SR 3 . 6 . 1. 1. 1.

Perform leakage rate testing for primary * * * * * *NOTE* * * *

containment purge valves with resilient SR 3.0.2 is not seals on penetration X26. applicable.

In accordance with the Surveillance Frequency Control Program FERMI

UNIT 2 3.10*23 Amendment No. ~. 201

Programs and Manuals 5.5 5.5 Programs and Manuals 5.5.14 Control Room Envelope Habitability Program (continued)

d. Measurement. at designated locations, of the CRE pressure relative to all external areas adjacent to the CRE boundary during the pressurization mode of operation by one subsystem of the CREF System, operating at the flow rate required by the VFTP, at a Frequency of 18 months on a STAGGERED TEST BASIS. The results shall be trended and assessed every 18 months.

e. The quantitative limits on unfiltered air inleakage into the CRE. These limits shall be stated in a manner to allow direct comparison to the unfiltered air inleakage measured by the testing described in paragraph c. The unfiltered air inleakage limit for radiological challenges is the inleakage flow rate assumed in the licensing basis analyses of DBA consequences. Unfiltered air inleakage limits for hazardous chemicals must ensure that exposure of CRE occupants to these.hazards will be within the assumptions in the licensing basis.

f. The provisions of SR 3.0.2 are applicable to the Frequencies for assessing CRE habitability, determining CRE unfiltered inleakage, and measuring CRE pressure and assessing the CRE boundary as required by paragraphs c and d, respectively.

5.5.15 Surveillance Frequency Control Program This program provides controls for the Surveillance Frequencies.

The program shall ensure that Surveillance Requirements specified in the Technical Specifications are performed at intervals sufficient to assure the associated Limiting Conditions for Operation are met.

a. The Surveillance Frequency Control Program shall contain a list of Frequencies of those Surveillance Requirements for which the Frequency is controlled by the program.

b. Changes to the Frequencies listed in the Surveillance Frequency Control Program shall be made in accordance with the NEI 04-10, "Risk-Informed Method for Control of Survei 11 ance Frequencies," Revision 1.

c. The provisions of Surveillance Requirements 3.0.2 and 3.0.3 are applicable to the Frequencies established in the Surveillance Frequency Control Program.

FERMI

UNIT 2 5.0*19a Amendment No. J:.98, 201

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 SAFETY EVALUATION BY THE OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION RELATED TO AMENDMENT NO. 201 TO FACILITY OPERATING LICENSE NO. NPF-43 DTE ELECTRIC COMPANY FERMI 2 DOCKET NO. 50-341

1.0 INTRODUCTION

By application dated September 16, 2014 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS) Accession No. ML14259A564), as supplemented by letter dated April 17, 2015 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15107A407), DTE Electric Company (DTE, the licensee) requested changes to the Technical Specifications (TSs) for Fermi 2. The proposed change would modify the Fermi 2 TSs by relocating specific surveillance frequencies to a licensee controlled program in accordance with Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 04-10, Revision 1, "Risk-Informed Technical Specifications Initiative 5b, Risk-Informed Method for Control of Surveillance Frequencies" (ADAMS Accession No. ML071360456). The proposed change is consistent with the adoption of Nuclear Regulatory Commission-approved Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF) Standard Technical Specifications (STS) Change Traveler TSTF-425, Revision 3, "Relocate Surveillance Frequencies to Licensee Control-RITSTF

[Risk-Informed TSTF] Initiative 5b" (ADAMS Accession No. ML090850642). When implemented, TSTF-425 relocates most periodic frequencies of TS surveillances to a licensee controlled program, the Surveillance Frequency Control Program (SFCP), and provides requirements for the new program in the administrative controls section of the TSs. All surveillance frequencies can be relocated except:

Frequencies that reference other approved programs for the specific interval (such as the In-Service Testing Program or the Primary Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program);

Frequencies that are purely event-driven (e.g., "each time the control rod is withdrawn to the 'full out' position");

Frequencies that are event-driven, but have a time component for performing the surveillance on a one-time basis once the event occurs (e.g., "within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days 0.00667 hours 3.968254e-5 weeks 9.132e-6 months after thermal power reaching <::: 95% RTP"); and Frequencies that are related to specific conditions (e.g., battery degradation, age and capacity) or conditions for the performance of a surveillance requirement (e.g., "drywell to Enclosure 2

suppression chamber differential pressure decrease").

A new program is added to TSs Section 5.5, "Programs and Manuals" as TS 5.5.15. The new program is called the SFCP and describes the requirements for the program to control changes to the relocated surveillance frequencies. The TS Bases for affected surveillances are revised to state that the frequency is controlled under the SFCP. The proposed licensee changes to Section 5.5 of the TSs to incorporate the SFCP include a specific reference to NEI 04-10, Revision 1, as the basis for making any changes to the surveillance frequencies once they are relocated out of the TSs.

In a letter dated September 19, 2007 (ADAMS Accession No. ML072570267), the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff approved NEI Topical Report (TR) NEI 04-10, Revision 1, as acceptable for referencing in licensing actions to the extent specified and under the limitations delineated in NEI 04-10, Revision 1, and the safety evaluation (SE) providing the basis for NRC acceptance of NEI 04-10, Revision 1.

The supplement dated April 17, 2015, provided additional information that clarified the application, did not expand the scope of the application as originally noticed, and did not change the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC of the Commission) staff's original proposed no significant hazards consideration determination as published in the Federal Register on November 12, 2014 (79 FR 67199).

2.0 REGULATORY EVALUATION

2.1 Applicable Commission Policy Statements In the "Final Policy Statement: Technical Specifications for Nuclear Power Plants" published in the Federal Registeron July 22, 1993 (58 FR 39132), the NRC addressed the use of Probabilistic Safety Analysis (PSA, currently referred to as Probabilistic Risk Assessment or PRA) in STS. In this 1993 publication, the NRC states, in part:

The Commission believes that it would be inappropriate at this time to allow requirements which meet one or more of the first three criteria [of 10 CFR 50.36) 1 to be deleted from Technical Specifications based solely on PSA (Criterion 4).

However, if the results of PSA indicate that Technical Specifications can be relaxed or removed, a deterministic review will be performed.

The Commission Policy in this regard is consistent with its Policy Statement on "Safety Goals for the operation of Nuclear Power Plants," 51 FR 30028, published on August 21, 1986. The Policy Statement on Safety Goals states in part, "* *

probabilistic results should also be reasonably balanced and supported through use of deterministic arguments. In this way, judgments can be made*** about the degree of confidence to be given to these [probabilistic] 2 estimates and assumptions. This is a key part of the process for determining the degree of regulatory conservatism that may be warranted for particular decisions.

1 This clarification is not part of the original policy statement.

2 The Federal Register Notice 58 FR 39135 (Alteration in Original) explains the brackets.

This defense-in-depth approach is expected to continue to ensure the protection of public health and safety."

The Commission will continue to use PSA, consistent with its policy on Safety Goals, as a tool in evaluating specific line item improvements to Technical Specifications, new requirements, and industry proposals for risk-based Technical Specification changes.

Approximately two years later the NRC provided additional detail concerning the use of PRA in the "Final Policy Statement: Use of Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Nuclear Regulatory Activities" published in the FR (60 FR 42622, August 16, 1995). In this publication, the NRC states, in part:

The Commission believes that an overall policy on the use of PRA methods in nuclear regulatory activities should be established so that the many potential applications of PRA can be implemented in a consistent and predictable manner that would promote regulatory stability and efficiency. In addition, the Commission believes that the use of PRA technology in NRC regulatory activities should be increased to the extent supported by the state-of-the-art in PRA methods and data and in a manner that complements the NRC's deterministic approach.

PRA addresses a broad spectrum of initiating events by assessing the event frequency. Mitigating system reliability is then assessed, including the potential for multiple and common cause failures. The treatment therefore goes beyond the single failure requirements in the deterministic approach. The probabilistic approach to regulation is, therefore, considered an extension and enhancement of traditional regulation by considering risk in a more coherent and complete manner.

Therefore, the Commission believes that an overall policy on the use of PRA in nuclear regulatory activities should be established so that the many potential applications of PRA can be implemented in a consistent and predictable manner that promotes regulatory stability and efficiency. This policy statement sets forth the Commission's intention to encourage the use of PRA and to expand the scope of PRA applications in all nuclear regulatory matters to the extent supported by the state-of-the-art in terms of methods and data.

Therefore, the Commission adopts the following policy statement regarding the expanded NRC use of PRA:

(1) The use of PRA technology should be increased in all regulatory matters to the extent supported by the state-of-the-art in PRA methods and data and in a manner that complements the NRC's deterministic approach and supports the NRC's traditional defense-in-depth philosophy.

(2) PRA and associated analyses (e.g., sensitivity studies, uncertainty analyses, and importance measures) should be used in regulatory matters, where

practical within the bounds of the state-of-the-art, to reduce unnecessary conservatism associated with current regulatory requirements, regulatory guides, license commitments, and staff practices. Where appropriate, PRA should be used to support the proposal for additional regulatory requirements in accordance with 10 CFR 50.109 (Backfit Rule). Appropriate procedures for including PRA in the process for changing regulatory requirements should be developed and followed. It is, of course, understood that the intent of this policy is that existing rules and regulations shall be complied with unless these rules and regulations are revised.

(3) PRA evaluations in support of regulatory decisions should be as realistic as practicable and appropriate supporting data should be publicly available for review.

(4) The Commission's safety goals for nuclear power plants and subsidiary numerical objectives are to be used with appropriate consideration of uncertainties in making regulatory judgments on the need for proposing and backfitting new generic requirements on nuclear power plant licensees.

2.2 Applicable Regulations In Title 1O of the Code of Federal Regulations (1 O CFR) Section 50.36, the NRC established its regulatory requirements related to the content of TSs. Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.36, TSs are required to include items in the following five specific categories related to station operation:

(1) safety limits, limiting safety system settings, and limiting control settings; (2) limiting conditions for operation; (3) Surveillance Requirements; (4) design features; and (5) administrative controls. As stated in 10 CFR 50.36(c)(3), "Surveillance requirements are requirements relating to test, calibration, or inspection to assure that the necessary quality of systems and components is maintained, that facility operation will be within safety limits, and that the limiting conditions for operation will be met."

These categories will remain in the TSs. The new TS SFCP provides the necessary administrative controls to require that surveillances relocated to the SFCP are conducted at a frequency to assure that the necessary quality of systems and components is maintained, that facility operation will be within safety limits, and that the limiting conditions for operation will be met. Changes to surveillance frequencies in the SFCP are made using the methodology contained in NEI 04-10, Revision 1, including qualitative considerations, results of risk analyses, sensitivity studies and any bounding analyses, and recommended monitoring of structures, systems, and components (SSCs), and are required to be documented.

Existing regulatory requirements, such as 10 CFR 50.65, "Requirements for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants," and 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI (corrective action program), require licensee monitoring of surveillance test failures and implementing corrective actions to address such failures. One of these actions may be to consider increasing the frequency at which a surveillance test is performed. In addition, the SFCP implementation guidance in NEI 04-10, Revision 1, requires monitoring the performance of SSCs for which surveillance frequencies are decreased to assure reduced testing does not adversely impact the SSCs.

2.3 Applicable Regulatory Guidelines and Review Plans Regulatory Guide (RG) 1.174, "An Approach for Using Probabilistic Risk Assessment in Risk-Informed Decisions on Plant-Specific Changes to the Licensing Basis" (ADAMS Accession No. ML100910006), describes a risk-informed approach, acceptable to the NRC, for assessing the nature and impact of proposed permanent licensing-basis changes by considering engineering issues and applying risk insights. This regulatory guide also provides risk acceptance guidelines for evaluating the results of such evaluations.

RG 1.177, "An Approach for Plant-Specific, Risk-Informed Decisionmaking: Technical Specifications" (ADAMS Accession No. ML100910008), describes an acceptable risk-informed approach specifically for assessing proposed TS changes.

RG 1.200, "An Approach for Determining the Technical Adequacy of Probabilistic Risk Assessment Results for Risk-Informed Activities" (ADAMS Accession No. ML090410014),

describes an acceptable approach for determining whether the quality of the PRA, in total or the parts that are used to support an application, is sufficient to provide confidence in the results, such that the PRA can be used in regulatory decision making for light water-reactors.

General guidance for evaluating the technical basis for proposed risk-informed changes is provided in Chapter 19, Section 19.2, "Review of Risk Information Used to Support Permanent Plant-Specific Changes to the Licensing Basis: General Guidance," of the NRC Standard Review Plan (SRP), NUREG-0800 (ADAMS Accession No. ML071700658). Guidance on evaluating PRA technical adequacy is provided in Chapter 19, Section 19.1, "Determining the Technical Adequacy of Probabilistic Risk Assessment for Risk-Informed License Amendment Requests After Initial Fuel Load" {ADAMS Accession No. ML12193A107). More specific guidance related to risk-informed TS changes is provided in SRP Section 16.1, "Risk-Informed Decisionmaking: Technical Specifications," (ADAMS Accession No. ML070380228}, which includes changes to surveillance test intervals (i.e., surveillance frequencies) as part of risk-informed decisionmaking. Section 19.2 of the SRP references the same criteria as RG 1.177 and RG 1.174 and states that a risk-informed application should be evaluated to ensure that the proposed changes meet the following key principles:

The proposed change meets the current regulations, unless it explicitly relates to a requested exemption.

The proposed change is consistent with the defense-in-depth philosophy.

The proposed change maintains sufficient safety margins.

When proposed changes result in an increase core damage frequency or risk, the increase(s) should be small and consistent with the intent of the Commission's Safety Goal Policy Statement.

The impact of the proposed change should be monitored using performance measurement strategies.

3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION

The licensee's adoption of TSTF-425, Revision 3, provides for administrative relocation of applicable surveillance frequencies, and provides for the addition of the SFCP to the administrative controls of TSs. TSTF-425, Revision 3, also requires the application of NEI 04-10, Revision 1, for any changes to surveillance frequencies within the SFCP. The licensee's application for the changes proposed in TSTF-425, Revision 3, included documentation regarding the PRA technical adequacy consistent with the requirements of RG 1.200. In accordance with NEI 04-10, Revision 1, PRA methods are used, in combination with plant performance data and other considerations, to identify and justify modifications to the surveillance frequencies of equipment at nuclear power plants. This is in accordance with guidance provided in RG 1.174 and RG 1.177 in support of changes to surveillance test intervals.

3.1 Review Methodology RG 1.177 identifies five key safety principles required for risk-informed changes to TSs. Each of these principles is addressed by NEI 04-10, Revision 1.

3.1.1 The Proposed Change Meets Current Regulations 10 CFR 50.36(c)(3) provides that TSs will include surveillances which are "requirements relating to test, calibration, or inspection to assure that necessary quality of systems and components is maintained, that facility operation will be within safety limits, and that the limiting conditions for operation will be met." The licensee is required by its TSs to perform surveillance tests, calibration, or inspection on specific safety-related equipment (e.g., reactivity control, power distribution, electrical, and instrumentation) to verify system operability. Surveillance frequencies, currently identified in TSs, are based primarily upon deterministic methods such as engineering judgment, operating experience, and manufacturer's recommendations. The licensee's use of NRG-approved methodologies identified in NEI 04-10, Revision 1, provides a way to establish risk-informed surveillance frequencies that complements the deterministic approach and supports the NRC's traditional defense-in-depth philosophy.

The surveillances themselves would remain in the TSs, as required by 10 CFR 50.36(c)(3).

This change is analogous with other NRG-approved TS changes in which the surveillance requirements are retained in TSs, but the related surveillance frequencies are relocated to licensee-controlled documents, such as surveillances performed in accordance with the In-Service Testing Program and the Primary Containment Leakage Rate Testing Program.

Thus, this proposed change complies with 10 CFR 50.36(c)(3) by retaining the requirements relating to test, calibration, or inspection to assure that the necessary quality of systems and components is maintained, that facility operation will be within safety limits, and that the limiting conditions for operation will be met.

The regulatory requirements in 10 CFR 50.65 and 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, and the monitoring required by NEI 04-10, Revision 1, ensure that surveillance frequencies are sufficient to assure that the requirements of 10 CFR 50.36 are satisfied and that any performance deficiencies will be identified and appropriate corrective actions taken. The licensee's SFCP ensures that surveillance requirements specified in the TSs are performed at intervals sufficient to assure the

above regulatory requirements are met. Thus, this proposed change meets the first key safety principle of RG 1.177 by complying with current regulations.

3.1.2 The Proposed Change Is Consistent With the Defense-in-Depth Philosophy The defense-in-depth philosophy, the second key safety principle of RG 1.177, is maintained if:

A reasonable balance is preserved among prevention of core damage, prevention of containment failure, and consequence mitigation.

Over-reliance on programmatic activities to compensate for weaknesses in plant design is avoided.

System redundancy, independence, and diversity are preserved commensurate with the expected frequency, consequences of challenges to the system, and uncertainties (e.g.,

no risk outliers). (Because the scope of the proposed methodology is limited to revision of surveillance frequencies, the redundancy, independence, and diversity of plant systems are not impacted.)

Defenses against potential common cause failures are preserved, and the potential for the introduction of new common cause failure mechanisms is assessed.

Independence of barriers is not degraded.

Defenses against human errors are preserved.

The intent of the General Design Criteria in 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix A, is maintained.

TSTF-425, Revision 3, requires the application of NEI 04-10, Revision 1, for any changes to surveillance frequencies within the SFCP. NEI 04-10, Revision 1, uses both the core damage frequency (CDF) and the large early release frequency (LERF) metrics to evaluate the impact of proposed changes to surveillance frequencies. The guidance of RG 1.174 and RG 1.177 for changes to CDF and LERF is achieved by evaluation using a comprehensive risk analysis, which assesses the impact of proposed changes including contributions from human errors and common cause failures (CCFs). Defense-in-depth is also included in the methodology explicitly as a qualitative consideration outside of the risk analysis, as is the potential impact on detection of component degradation that could lead to an increased likelihood of CCFs. Both the quantitative risk analysis and the qualitative considerations assure a reasonable balance of defense-in-depth is maintained to ensure protection of public health and safety, satisfying the second key safety principle of RG 1.177.

3.1.3 The Proposed Change Maintains Sufficient Safety Margins The engineering evaluation that will be conducted by the licensee under the SFCP when frequencies are revised will assess the impact of the proposed frequency change to assure that sufficient safety margins are maintained. The guidelines used for making that assessment will include ensuring the proposed surveillance test frequency change is not in conflict with approved industry codes and standards or adversely affects any assumptions or inputs to the safety analysis, or, if such inputs are affected, justification is provided to ensure sufficient safety margin will continue to exist.

The design, operation, testing methods, and acceptance criteria for SSCs, specified in applicable codes and standards (or alternatives approved for use by the NRC) will continue to be met as described in the plant licensing basis (including the Updated Final Safety Analysis

Report and bases to TSs), since these are not affected by changes to the surveillance frequencies. Similarly, there is no impact to safety analysis acceptance criteria as described in the plant licensing basis. Thus, safety margins are maintained by the proposed methodology, and the third key safety principle of RG 1.177 is satisfied.

3.1.4 When Proposed Changes Result in an Increase in CDF or Risk, the Increases Should Be Small and Consistent with the Intent of the Commission's Safety Goal Policy Statement RG 1.177 provides a framework for evaluating the risk impact of proposed changes to surveillance frequencies which requires identification of the risk contribution from impacted surveillances, determination of the risk impact from the change to the proposed surveillance frequency, and performance of sensitivity and uncertainty evaluations. TSTF-425, Revision 3, requires application of NEI 04-10, Revision 1, in the SFCP. NEI 04-10, Revision 1, satisfies the intent of RG 1.177 requirements for evaluation of the change in risk, and for assuring that such changes are small by providing the technical methodology to support risk informed technical specifications for control of surveillance frequencies.

3.1.4.1 Quality of the PRA The quality of the licensee's PRA must be commensurate with the safety significance of the proposed TS change and the role the PRA plays in justifying the change. That is, the higher change in risk or the greater the uncertainty in that risk from the requested TS change, or both, the more rigor that must go into ensuring the quality of the PRA.

RG 1.200 provides regulatory guidance for assessing the technical adequacy of a PRA. The current revision (Revision 2) of this RG endorses (with comments and qualifications) the use of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME)/American Nuclear Society (ANS)

RA-Sa-2009, "Addenda to ASME RA-S-2008 Standard for Level 1/Large Early Release Frequency Probabilistic Risk Assessment for Nuclear Power Plant Applications," NEI 00-02, "PRA Peer Review Process Guidelines" (ADAMS Accession No. ML061510619 and ML063390593), and NEI 05-04, "Process for Performing Follow-On PRA Peer Reviews Using the ASME PRA Standard" (ADAMS Accession No. ML083430462).

The licensee has performed an assessment of the PRA models used to support the SFCP using the guidance of RG 1.200 to assure that the PRA models are capable of determining the change in risk due to changes to surveillance frequencies of SSCs, using plant-specific data and models. Capability Category II of the endorsed PRA standard is the target capability level for supporting requirements for the internal events PRA for this application. Any identified deficiencies to those requirements are assessed further to determine any impacts to proposed decreases to surveillance frequencies, including the use of sensitivity studies where appropriate, in accordance with NEI 04-10, Revision 1.

Based on Enclosure 2 to the application dated September 16, 2014, and as clarified in the response to Request for Additional Information (RAI) 3 and 5 dated April 17, 2015, development of the Fermi 2 internal events PRA is summarized below:

From February 2010 to August 2012, the internal events PRA was upgraded (as defined

in Section 1-5.4 of ASME/ANS RA-Sa-2009) to meet the RG 1.200 requirements for all model aspects including initiating events, success criteria, component data, system modeling, human reliability analysis (HRA), internal flooding, and Level 2/LERF. The resulting model was identified as the draft FermiV9 PRA.

In August 2012, an industry PRA certification peer review of the draft FermiV9 PRA was performed using the NEI 05-04 PRA peer review process, PRA standard ASME/ANS RA-Sa-2009, and RG 1.200, Revision 2. This peer review was a full-scope review of all supporting requirements of the PRA standard. Table 2 of Enclosure 2 to the application dated September 16, 2014, lists the findings and observations (F&Os) from this peer review that did not meet Capability Category II.

In April 2013, a PRA model update (version FermiV9) was completed to resolve the F&Os identified by the peer review in August 2012. No PRA upgrades were instituted into the FermiV9 model following the August 2012 peer review. All changes made to the model to resolve the F&Os identified in Table 2 of Enclosure 2 to the application were defined as PRA maintenance, because there were no new methodologies or significant changes in scope or capability that affected the significant accident sequences.

Therefore, no further peer reviews were required on the FermiV9 model. The NRC staff finds that all F&Os were properly assessed and dispositioned in regard to this application.

In February 2014, the licensee completed upgrading the HRA dependency analysis using a new methodology to support development of the Fermi 2 fire PRA and seismic PRA. The resulting model was identified as the FermiV10 PRA. In February 2014, a focused-scope peer review of the HRA dependency analysis in the FermiV1 O PRA was performed using PRA standard ASME/ANS RA-Sb-2009 and Regulatory Guide 1.200, Revision 2. The peer review team found that the HRA dependency analysis met Capability Category II for all evaluated supporting requirements.

Based on the licensee's assessments using the currently applicable PRA standard and revision of RG 1.200, combined with the evaluation and disposition of the F&Os, the NRC staff concludes that the level of PRA quality is sufficient to support the evaluation of changes proposed to surveillance frequencies within the SFCP, and is consistent with Regulatory Position 2.3.1 of RG 1.177.

3.1.4.2 Scope of the PRA The licensee is required to evaluate each proposed change to a relocated surveillance frequency using the guidance contained in NEI 04-10, Revision 1, to determine its potential impact on risk (CDF and LEAF) from internal events, fires, seismic, other external hazards, and shutdown conditions. In cases where a PRA of sufficient scope or quantitative risk models were unavailable, the licensee uses bounding analyses, or other conservative quantitative evaluations. A qualitative screening analysis may be used when the surveillance frequency impact on plant risk is shown to be negligible or zero.

The licensee has an internal events PRA (which includes internal flooding) for Fermi 2. As discussed in the previous section, the internal events PRA is of sufficient quality to support the

SFCP. The licensee will use this model to perform quantitative evaluations to support the development of changes to surveillance frequencies in the SFCP in accordance with NEI 04-10, Revision 1.

The licensee is currently developing an internal fire PRA for Fermi 2 that will meet the guidance in RG 1.200. Until the fire PRA is completed, internal fire events will be addressed using the Fire-Induced Vulnerability Evaluation (FIVE) consistent with NEI 04-10, Revision 1. The FIVE was developed in the Fermi 2 Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE) submitted in response to the NRC Generic Letter 88-20, Supplement 4, "Individual Plant Examination of External Events (IPEEE) for Severe Accident Vulnerabilities" (Legacy ADAMS Accession No. 9106270324) .. The NRC staff's review of the Fermi 2 IPEEE is described in an SE dated July 5, 2000 (ADAMS Accession No. ML15168A200), and concluded that the licensee's IPEEE process is capable of identifying the most likely severe accidents and severe accident vulnerabilities. The licensee's approach to evaluate surveillance frequency changes relative to internal fires is acceptable in accordance with NEI 04-10, Revision 1.

The licensee is currently developing a seismic PRA for Fermi 2 that will meet the guidance in RG 1.200. Until the seismic PRA is completed, seismic events will be addressed using the Seismic Margins Analysis (SMA) consistent with NEI 04-10, Revision 1. The SMA was developed in the Fermi 2 IPEEE submitted in response to NRC Generic Letter 88-20, Supplement 4. The NRC staff's review of the Fermi 2 IPEEE is described in an SE dated July 5, 2000, and concluded that the licensee's IPEEE process is capable of identifying the most likely severe accidents and severe accident vulnerabilities. The licensee's approach to evaluate surveillance frequency changes relative to seismic events is acceptable in accordance with NEI 04-10, Revision 1.

Other external hazards (including high winds, tornados, external floods, transportation accidents, nearby facility accidents, and release of onsite chemicals) will be addressed using the licensee's external hazards analysis for Fermi 2 consistent with NEI 04-10, Revision 1. The external hazards analysis was peer reviewed in April 2014 using PRA standard ASME/ANS RA-Sb-2009 and RG 1.200, Revision 2, and found to meet Capability Category II for all evaluated supporting requirements. The licensee's approach to evaluate surveillance frequency changes relative to other external hazards is acceptable in accordance with NEI 04-10, Revision 1.

By letter dated April 17, 2015, the licensee responded to an RAI regarding shutdown events. In response to RAI 2, the licensee explained that Fermi 2 does not currently have a shutdown PRA. However, the licensee explained that the guidance in NEI 04-10, Revision 1, will also be applied for shutdown events. This includes the use of the Fermi 2 shutdown safety program developed in support of NUMARC 91-06 (ADAMS Accession No. ML14365A203) consistent with NEI 04-10, Revision 1. This is an acceptable approach in accordance with NEI 04-10, Revision 1.

Through the application of NEI 04-10, Revision 1, the licensee's evaluation methodology is sufficient to ensure the scope of the risk contribution of each surveillance frequency change is properly identified for evaluation, and is consistent with Regulatory Position 2.3.2 of RG 1.177.

3.1.4.3 PRA Modeling The licensee's methodology includes the determination of whether the SSCs affected by a proposed change to a surveillance frequency are modeled in the PRA. Where the SSC is directly or implicitly modeled, a quantitative evaluation of the risk impact may be carried out.

The methodology adjusts the failure probability of the impacted SSCs, including any impacted CCF modes, based on the proposed change to the surveillance frequency. Where the SSC is not modeled in the PRA, bounding analyses are performed to characterize the impact of the proposed change to the surveillance frequency. Potential impacts on the risk analyses due to screening criteria and truncation levels are addressed by the requirements for PRA technical adequacy consistent with guidance contained in RG 1.200, and by sensitivity studies identified in NEI 04-10, Revision 1.

Thus, through the application of NEI 04-10, Revision 1, the Fermi 2 PRA modeling is sufficient to ensure an acceptable evaluation of risk for the proposed changes in surveillance frequency, and is consistent with Regulatory Position 2.3.3 of RG 1.177.

3.1 .4.4 Assumptions for Time Related Failure Contributions The failure probabilities of SSCs modeled in PRAs may include a standby time-related contribution and a cyclic demand-related contribution. For those SSCs that are impacted by the surveillance test interval change, the licensee assumes their failure probabilities to be standby time-related in order to obtain the maximum test-limited risk contribution. This is consistent with RG 1.177, Section 2.3.3, which permits separation of the failure rate contributions into demand and standby for evaluation of surveillance requirements. If the available data do not support distinguishing between the standby time-related failures and demand failures, then the total failure probability is conservatively assumed to be standby time-related.

The SSC failure rate (per unit time) is assumed to be unaffected by the change in test frequency, and will be confirmed by the required monitoring and feedback implemented after the change in surveillance frequency is implemented. The process requires consideration of qualitative sources of information with regards to potential impacts of test frequency on SSC performance, including industry and plant-specific operating experience, vendor recommendations, industry standards, and code-specified test intervals. Thus, the process is not reliant upon risk analyses as the sole basis for the proposed changes.

The potential benefits of reduced surveillance frequency, including reduced downtime, lesser potential for restoration errors, reduction of potential for test-caused transients, and reduced test-caused wear of equipment, are identified qualitatively, but not quantitatively assessed.

Thus, through the application of NEI 04-10, Revision 1, the licensee has employed reasonable assumptions with regard to extensions of surveillance test intervals, and is consistent with Regulatory Position 2.3.4 of RG 1.177.

3.1.4.5 Sensitivity and Uncertainty Analyses NEI 04-10, Revision 1, requires sensitivity studies to assess the impact of uncertainties from key assumptions of the PRA, uncertainty in the failure probabilities of the affected SSCs, impact on the frequency of initiating events, and any identified deviations from Capability Category II of the

PAA standard. Where the sensitivity analyses identify a potential impact on the proposed change, revised surveillance frequencies are considered, along with any qualitative considerations that may bear on the results of such sensitivity studies. Required monitoring and feedback of SSC performance once the revised surveillance frequencies are implemented will also be performed. Thus, through the application of NEI 04-10, Revision 1, the licensee has appropriately considered the possible impact of PAA model uncertainty and sensitivity to key assumptions and model limitations, and is consistent with Regulatory Position 2.3.5 of RG 1.177.

3.1.4.6 Acceptance Guidelines The licensee will quantitatively evaluate the change in total risk (including internal and external events contributions) in terms of CDF and LEAF for both the individual risk impact of a proposed change in surveillance frequency and the cumulative impact from all individual changes to surveillance frequencies using the guidance contained in NRG-approved NEI 04-10, Revision 1, in accordance with the TS SFCP. Each individual change to surveillance frequency must show a risk impact below 1E-6 per year for change to CDF, and below 1E-7 per year for change to LEAF. These are consistent with the acceptance criteria of RG 1.174 for very small changes in risk. Where the RG 1.174 acceptance criteria are not met, the process either considers revised surveillance frequencies which are consistent with RG 1.174 or the process terminates without permitting the proposed changes. Where quantitative results are unavailable for comparison with the acceptance guidelines, appropriate qualitative analyses are required to demonstrate that the associated risk impact of a proposed change to surveillance frequency is negligible or zero. Otherwise, bounding quantitative analyses are required which demonstrate the risk impact is at least one order of magnitude lower than the RG 1.174 acceptance guidelines for very small changes in risk. In addition to assessing each individual SSC surveillance frequency change, the cumulative impact of all changes must result in a risk impact less than 1E-5 per year for change to CDF, and less than 1E-6 per year for change to LEAF, and the total CDF and total LEAF must be reasonably shown to be less than 1E-4 per year and 1E-5 per year, respectively.

These values are consistent with the acceptance criteria of RG 1.174, as referenced by RG 1.177 for changes to surveillance frequencies. The NRC staff interprets this assessment of cumulative risk as a requirement to calculate the change in risk from a baseline model utilizing failure probabilities based on the surveillance frequencies prior to implementation of the SFCP, compared to a revised model with failure probabilities based on changed surveillance frequencies. The NRC staff further notes that the licensee includes a provision to exclude the contribution to cumulative risk from individual changes to surveillance frequencies associated with insignificant risk increases (less than 5E-8 CDF and 5E-9 LEAF) once the baseline PAA models are updated to include the effects of the revised surveillance frequencies.

The quantitative acceptance guidance of RG 1.174 is supplemented by qualitative information to evaluate the proposed changes to surveillance frequencies, including industry and plant-specific operating experience, vendor recommendations, industry standards, the results of sensitivity studies, and SSC performance data and test history. The final acceptability of the proposed change is based on all of these considerations and not solely on the PAA results. Post implementation performance monitoring and feedback are also required to assure continued reliability of the components. The licensee's application of NEI 04-10, Revision 1, provides

acceptable methods for evaluating the risk increase associated with proposed changes to surveillance frequencies, consistent with Regulatory Position 2.4 of RG 1.177. Therefore, the proposed methodology satisfies the fourth key safety principle of RG 1.177 by assuring any increase in risk is small consistent with the intent of the Commission's Safety Goal Policy Statement.

3.1.5 The Impact of the Proposed Change Should Be Monitored Using Performance Measurement Strategies The licensee's adoption of TSTF-425, Revision 3, requires application of NEI 04-10, Revision 1, in the SFCP. NEI 04-10, Revision 1, requires performance monitoring of SSCs whose surveillance frequency has been revised as part of a feedback process to assure that the change in test frequency has not resulted in degradation of equipment performance and operational safety. The monitoring and feedback includes consideration of maintenance rule monitoring of equipment performance. In the event of degradation of SSC performance, the surveillance frequency will be reassessed in accordance with the methodology, in addition to any corrective actions which may apply as part of the maintenance rule requirements. The performance monitoring and feedback specified in NEI 04-10, Revision 1, is sufficient to reasonably assure acceptable SSC performance and is consistent with Regulatory Position 3.2 of RG 1.177. Thus, the fifth key safety principle of RG 1.177 is satisfied.

3.2 Addition of Surveillance Frequency Control Program to Administrative Controls The proposed amendment would add the SFCP to the TSs Section 5.5, "Programs and Manuals." Specifically, new TS 5.5.15, "Surveillance Frequency Control Program," would read as follows:

Surveillance Frequency Control Program This program provides controls for the Surveillance Frequencies. The program shall ensure that Surveillance Requirements specified in the Technical Specifications are performed at intervals sufficient to assure the associated Limiting Conditions for Operation are met.

a. The Surveillance Frequency Control Program shall contain a list of Frequencies of those Surveillance Requirements for which the Frequency is controlled by the program.

b. Changes to the Frequencies listed in the Surveillance Frequency Control Program shall be made in accordance with NEI 04-10, "Risk-Informed Method for Control of Surveillance Frequencies," Revision 1.

c. The provisions of Surveillance Requirements 3.0.2 and 3.0.3 are applicable to the Frequencies established in the Surveillance Frequency Control Program.

The proposed program is consistent with the model application of TSTF-425. The NRC staff concludes that the proposed addition of this section in the TS adequately identifies the scope of

the SFCP and defines the methodology to be used in a revision of SR frequencies. Therefore, the proposed TS change is acceptable.

3.3 TS Bases Changes DTE's application dated September 16, 2014, provided proposed changes to the TS Bases to be implemented with the associated TS chages. These pages were provided for information only and will be revised in accordance with the Technical Specifications Bases Control Program (Section 5.5.10) of the Fermi 2 TS.

3.4 Summary and Conclusions The NRC staff has reviewed the licensee's proposed relocation of some surveillance frequencies to a licensee-controlled document, and controlling changes to surveillance frequencies in accordance with a new program, the SFCP, identified in Section 5.5, "Programs and Manuals," of the TSs. The SFCP and TS Section 5.5 references NEI 04-10, Revision 1, which provides a risk-informed methodology using plant-specific risk insights and performance data to revise surveillance frequencies within the SFCP. This methodology supports relocating surveillance frequencies from TSs to a licensee-controlled document, provided those frequencies are changed in accordance with NEI 04-10, Revision 1.

The proposed licensee adoption of TSTF-425, Revision 3, and risk-informed methodology of NEI 04-10, Revision 1, as referenced in Section 5.5 of the TSs, satisfies the key principles of risk-informed decision making applied to changes to TSs as delineated in RG 1.177 and RG 1.174, in that:

The proposed change meets current regulations;

The proposed change is consistent with defense-in-depth philosophy;

The proposed change maintains sufficient safety margins;

Increases in risk resulting from the proposed change are small and consistent with the Commission's Safety Goal Policy Statement; and

The impact of the proposed change is monitored with performance measurement strategies.

The regulation in 10 CFR 50.36(c) discusses the categories that will be included in TSs. The regulation in 10 CFR 50.36(c)(3) discusses the specific category of Surveillance Requirements and states: "Surveillance requirements are requirements relating to test, calibration, or inspection to assure that the necessary quality of systems and components is maintained, that facility operation will be within safety limits, and that the limiting conditions for operation will be met." The NRC staff finds that with the proposed relocation of surveillance frequencies to an owner-controlled document and administratively controlled in accordance with the TS SFCP, the licensee continues to meet the regulatory requirement of 10 CFR 50.36, and specifically, 10 CFR 50.36(c)(3), Surveillance Requirements.

4.0 STATE CONSULTATION

In accordance with the Commission's regulations, the Michigan State official was notified of the proposed issuance of the amendment. The State official had no comments.

5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION

The amendment changes a requirement with respect to the installation or use of a facility component located within the restricted area as defined in 10 CFR Part 20 or changes the surveillance requirements. The NRC staff has determined that the amendment involves no significant increase in the amounts, and no significant change in the types, of any effluents that may be released offsite, and that there is no significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. The Commission has previously issued a proposed finding that the amendment involves no significant hazards consideration and there has been no public comment on such finding (79 FR 67199). Accordingly, the amendment meets the eligibility criteria for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c){9}. Pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b),

no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the issuance of the amendment.

6.0 CONCLUSION

The Commission has concluded, based on the considerations discussed above, that: (1) there is reasonable assurance that the health and safety of the public will not be endangered by operation in the proposed manner, (2) there is reasonable assurance that such activities will be conducted in compliance with the Commission's regulations, and (3) the issuance of the amendment will not be inimical to the common defense and security or to the health and safety of the public.

Principal Contributor: T. Hilsmeier Date: July 14, 2015

ML151558416 *via memo OFFICE DORL/LPL3-1/PM DORL/LPL3-1/LA DRA/APLA/BC DSS/STSB/BC NAME JRankin MHenderson SF for SRosenberg RElliott DATE 6/16/2015 6/15/2015 5/29/2015 6/23/2015 OFFICE OGG DORL/LPL/3-1 /BC DORL/LPL3-1/PM /~

'> ,,, .. wuu NAME BMizuno DPelton JRankin d '"',' '

DATE 7/02/2015 7/14/2015 7/14/2015

v t e Letter Sequence Approval
TAC:MF4859, Relocate Surveillance Frequencies to Licensee Control - RITSTF Initiative 5B (Approved, Closed)
Initiation Request, Request Acceptance... Administration Questions 20 March 2015 Answers 17 April 2015 Results Approval Other:
MONTHYEAR2015-03-20 [Table View]

ML15155B416

Text

SUBJECT:

Dear Mr. Fessler:

Enclosures:

Attachment:

1.0 INTRODUCTION

2.0 REGULATORY EVALUATION

3.0 TECHNICAL EVALUATION

4.0 STATE CONSULTATION

5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL CONSIDERATION

6.0 CONCLUSION

Navigation menu

Search