IR 05000280/2015502

From kanterella
Revision as of 12:06, 22 January 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
IR 05000280/2015502; 05000281/2015502; on 2/9/2015 - 2/13/2015; Surry Power Station, Unit 1 and 2; Exercise and Baseline Inspection
ML15071A219
Person / Time
Site: Surry  Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 03/12/2015
From: Bonser B R
NRC/RGN-II/DRS/PSB1
To: Heacock D A
Virginia Electric & Power Co (VEPCO)
Linda K. Gruhler 404-997-4633
References
IR 2015502
Download: ML15071A219 (11)


Text

March 12, 2015

Mr. DavidPresident and Chief Nuclear Officer Virginia Electric and Power Company Surry Power Station, Units 1 & 2 Innsbrook Technical Center 5000 Dominion Boulevard Glen Allen, VA 23060

SUBJECT: SURRY POWER STATION - U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS INSPECTION REPORT 05000280/2015502 05000281/2015502

Dear Mr. Heacock:

On February 12, 2015, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Surry Power Station. The enclosed inspection report (IR) documents the inspection results that were discussed on February 12, 2015, with Mr. Lane and members of the plant staff. The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations, and with the conditions of your license. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.

Based on the results of this inspection, no findings were identified.

In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, "Public inspections, exemptions, requests for withholding," of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its Enclosure, and your response if any, will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room, or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS)component of NRC's Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS); accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,/RA/

Brian R. Bonser, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-280 and 50-281 License Nos. DPR-32 and DPR-37

Enclosure:

IR 05000280/2015502 and 05000281/2015502

w/Attachment:

Supplementary Information cc: Distribution via Listserv

SUMMARY

Inspection Report (IR) 05000280/2015502; 05000281/2015502; 2/9/2015 - 2/13/2015; Surry

Power Station, Unit 1 and 2; Exercise and Baseline Inspection This report covers an announced inspection by two emergency preparedness inspectors, one physical security inspector, one health physicist, and two resident inspectors. No findings of significance were identified. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process."

REPORT DETAILS

REACTOR SAFETY

Cornerstone:

Emergency Preparedness 1EP4 Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes

a. Inspection Scope

Since the last NRC inspection of this program area, Revision 60 was made to the Radiological Emergency Plan. The licensee determined that in accordance with 10 CFR 50.54(q), the Plan continued to meet the requirements of 10 CFR 50.47(b), and Appendix E to 10 CFR Part 50. The inspectors reviewed the change and sampled implementing procedure changes made between August 2014 and December 2014, to evaluate for potential reductions in the effectiveness of the Plan. As this review was not documented in a Safety Evaluation Report (SER) and does not constitute formal NRC approval of the changes, these changes remain subject to future NRC inspection in their entirety. The inspection was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure (IP) 71114, Attachment 04, "Emergency Action Level and Emergency Plan Changes." The applicable planning standards of 10 CFR 50.47(b), and its related requirements in 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, were used as reference criteria.

The inspectors reviewed various documents that are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the emergency action level (EAL) and emergency plan changes on an annual basis.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1EP7 Exercise Evaluation - Hostile Action Event

a. Inspection Scope

Title 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.2.j, requires in part that nuclear power reactor licensees, in each 8-calendar-year exercise cycle, provide the opportunity for their emergency response organization (ERO) to demonstrate proficiency in the key skills necessary to respond to a hostile action (HA) directed at the plant site. The licensee designed the February 10, 2015, exercise to satisfy that requirement, and the NRC inspected the HA event exercise to assess the licensee's ability to effectively implement their emergency plan during a HA event, and adequately protect public health and safety.

The exercise evaluation consisted of the following reviews and assessments:

  • The adequacy of the licensee's performance in the biennial exercise, conducted on February 10, 2015, was reviewed and assessed regarding the implementation of the Risk-Significant Planning Standards (RSPS) in 10 CFR 50.47 (b)(4), (5), (9), and (10) which address emergency classification, offsite notification, radiological assessment, and protective action recommendations, respectively.
  • The overall adequacy of the licensee's emergency response facilities (ERFs) with regard to NUREG-0696, "Functional Criteria for Emergency Response Facilities," and Emergency Plan commitments. The facilities assessed were the Control Room Simulator, Secondary Alarm Station (SAS), Incident Command Post (ICP), the Remote Mustering Area, and the Central Emergency Operations Facility (CEOF).
  • A review of other performance areas, such as the ERO recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control, including interactions with site security staff, intra- and inter-facility communications; prioritization of mitigation activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies, including local law enforcement agencies; staffing and procedure adequacy; and the overall implementation of the emergency plan and its implementing procedures.
  • The adequacy of the licensee's post-exercise critiques, to evaluate licensee self-assessment of its ERO performance during the February 10, 2015, exercise to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Subsection IV.F.2.g.

The inspectors reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis.

b. Findings

No findings were identified. 1EP8 Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review

a. Inspection Scope

Prior to the inspection activity, the inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario submitted to the NRC using IP 71114.08, "Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review," to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the emergency plan as required by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14).

The inspectors reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment to this report. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

OTHER ACTIVITIES

4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors sampled licensee submittals relative to the performance indicators (PIs)listed below for the period July 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014. To verify the accuracy of the PI data reported during that period, PI definitions and guidance contained in Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI) 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," Revision 7, was used to confirm the reporting basis for each data element.

Emergency Preparedness Cornerstone

  • Emergency Response Organization Drill/Exercise Performance (DEP)
  • Emergency Response Organization Readiness (ERO)
  • Alert and Notification System Reliability (ANS) For the specified review period, the inspectors examined data reported to the NRC, procedural guidance for reporting PI information, and records used by the licensee to identify potential PI occurrences. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PIs for the ERO and DEP through review of a sample of drill and event records. The inspectors reviewed selected training records to verify the accuracy of the PI for ERO drill participation for personnel assigned to key positions in the ERO. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PI for ANS reliability through review of a sample of the licensee's records of periodic system tests. The inspectors also interviewed the licensee personnel who were responsible for collecting and evaluating the PI data. Licensee procedures, records, and other documents reviewed within this inspection area are listed in the

. This inspection satisfied three inspection samples for PI verification on an annual basis.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit

On February 12, 2015, the lead inspector presented the inspection results to Mr. Lane and other members of the plant staff. The inspectors confirmed that no proprietary information was provided during the inspection.

ATTACHMENT:

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION