ML20008D481
| ML20008D481 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 06/13/1989 |
| From: | PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE |
| To: | |
| References | |
| OL-I-MAG-112, NUDOCS 9003050200 | |
| Download: ML20008D481 (14) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:% , T- M&G-]/ 5 . 3 a ! #. y t i -- do - WJ[Of ER 3. - Page : d[/3[[7 00CKETED EMERGENCY RESPONSE PRDCEDURE COVER FAWRC A. IDENTIFICATION. 90 JAN 18 P4 52 NUKBER 'ER 5.4 REVISION,prner 48 ert.>ryu .j i TITLE rupL!M i,speytq PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS ' e +
.l ORIGINATOR M. J. Bovino t
- 1. Does this procedure / procedure revision: '
7
- a. Make changes in the facility as described in the FSAR7 I l-Yes @ No-
- b. Make changes in procedures as described in the FSAR? l l Yes- No
-e. Involve tests or experiments not' described in the FSAR? l l Yes % No
- d. Involve changes to the existing Operating License i or require additional license requirements? IYes @;No 2.
If any of the above questions are answered m , a safety evaluation per
- NHY Procedure 11210 is required.
B.. INDEPENDENT REVIEW TITLE SIGNATURE DATE
. EmaE.has . km 4 a. S t C.
RADIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT MANAGER APPROVAL
' SIGNATURE DATE y
1An n, Ad _ tsw - D. SORC REVIEW SORC MEETING NO. 83~ $R E. APPROVAL AND IMPLEMENTATION
%%CSTAT 10CthNA 42a\n APPROVED DATE
_ m ezee EFFECTIVE DATE ER 8.6A Rev. 4 9003050200 090613 PDR ADOCK 05000443
-O PDR j Q h n k' .;
w i
,,e
.j 4 ER]3.E- P3ge '] ~
,. Rev. 06 7./[s g CONTENTS AND' REVISION STATUS-CONTENTS PAGE ) Rev. :'
COVER - 3 CONTENTS-AND-REVISION STATUS 2 08-1.0 OBJECTIVES 3 08' 2.0. RESPONSIBILITIES 3
'2.1 RESPONSE MANAGER 3 ,
2.2' SITE EMERGENCY DIRECTOR 1j 3 'l 2.3 EOF.' COORDINATOR 3 2.4 HEALTH PHYSICS COORDINATOR 3 3e0 PRECAUTIONS 3 4.0 PREREQUISITES 4 08 - 5.0 ACTIONS' I 4
6.0 REFERENCES
, 4 ,.
1 7.0 -ATTACHMENTS -i l i Figure'1, Protective Action Recommendation Checklist .5 08 ! 6 08
'i!
Figure 2, Plume Exposure Protective Action Flow Chart for Site Area Emergency -7 08 l 1 Figure.3, Plume Exposure Protective Action. Flow Chart ' for General Emergency 8 08 Figure 4, Plume Exposure Protective Action 1 { Recommendation Criteria Flowchart 9 08 Figure 5, Downwind Affected Towns Reference Chart 10 1 08 ER S.4A, Plume Exposure Protective Action Recommendation 08 (PAR) Worksheet k 4
Q IR 5.4 PaSe 3
.' g- Rev. 08 PROIECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS I'
l.0 OBJECTIVES
, This procedure provides guidance for determining Protective Action Recommendations pathway. (PARS) to be. made to of f site authorities for the plume exposure 2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 RESPONSE MANAGER-i Responsible (EOF). for authorizing PARS from the Emergency Operations Facility 2.2 SITE EHERGENCY DIRECTOR j
ResponsibleFacility Operations for authorizing (EOF). PARS prior to activation of the Emergency 2.3 EOF COORDINATOR i Responsible for implementing this procedure for the evaluation of radiologi- l cal and plant data, determining PARS and providing recommendations to the Response Manager at the EOF. 2.4 REALTH PHYSICS COORDINATOR Responsible for implementing this procedure for the evaluation of radiologi- ; cal and plant data, determining PARS and providing' recommendations to the I Site Emergency Director prior to activation of the EOF, j 3.0 PRECAUTIONS s I 3.1 Protective Action Recommendations shall be transmitted to state-authorities and the NHY Off site Response Organization (ORO) within 15 a 1 minutes of determination. 3.2 I Protective action recommendations should be reviewed against protective
. actions actually implemented prior to re-issuing an updated recommendation.
3.3 The Site Emergency Director should transfer his responsibility under this procedure complete. to the Response Manager-as soon as the EOF activation is 3.4 I The Health Physics Coordinator should ensure that all actions taken in accordance activation. with this procedure'are reported to the EOF Coordinator-upon EOF { l
,e ER 5.4 pag, 7)-
Rev. 2s 4.0 . PREREQUISITES
-4.1 A Site Area Emergency or General Emergency has been declared
( 4.2 The Technical Support Center (TSC) is activated, i
- 5. 0 ACTIONS Follow the actions Checklist. identified by Figure 1, Protective Action Recommendation I
6.0 REFERENCES
6.1 Recommendations for General Emergencies, 1983. May 4,USNRC I 6.2 EPA-520/1-75-001, Actions for Nuclear IncidentsManual of Protective Action Guides e and Protectiv 4 h.
Y*,
;
ER_5.- Page $' l r : .g Rev. 05 i' ' FIGURE i Page 1 of- 2 PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATION CHECKLIST TSC ACTIONS HEALTH PHYSICS COORDINATOR: INITIAL WHEN COMPLETED
- 1. Assume responsibility for the Plume Exposure Protective u
' Action Recommendation (PAR) process.
2. Implement the applicable steps in Section 1 of Form ER 5.4A, Plume Exposure Protective Action Recommendation (PAR) Worksheet. 3. Complete Form ER 2.0B, State Notification Fact Sheet, with l the PAR results.
- 4. Review the results with the Site Emergency Director (SED) and i obtain his-authorization.
- 5. Continue to review conditions and update the PAR until the EOF has been activated. ~
1 SITE EMERGENCY DIRECTOR:
- 1. Authorize the PAR by signature in Block 6 of Form ER 2.08.
- 2. Notify the States 'and the NHY ORO via the Nuclear Alert. ;
I System (NAS) at 414 or via commercial telephone at (603) 433-1491. Document the action using Form ER 2.0B. 1 5 i
'l 1
E ft
ER }.* ?3ge-s Rev. Os
'Q FIGURE 1 Page 2 of :
PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATION CHECKLIST EOF ACTIONS EOF COORDINATOR: INITIAL
'w' HEN COMPLETED
- 1. Assume responsibility for the Protective Action Recommendation-(PAR) process.
0-2.
- , Implement the opplicable steps in Section 1 of Form ER 5.4A, Plume Exposure Protective Action Recommendation (PAR)
Worksheet, , j
- 3. j Complete Form ER 2.08, State Notification Fact Sheet, with the PAR results. .i j
4 i Review the results with the Response Manager and obtain his authorization.
- 5. Notify the appropriate state and NHY ORO personnel present
- at the EOF of the PAR results and give them a copy of Form {
ER 2.0B. l
.1 6.
Give Form ER 2.0B to the Corporate Support Manager, k
- 7. Continue to review conditions and update the PAR until the event !
is terminated. j ,
}
8. When the evaluation process above results in no PAR, carefully j review the- station conditions and prognosis with the Response j Manager and Technical Assistant. ' Depending on the results of ' this review, consider issuing a precautionary PAR that is appropriate to the station prognosis. i RESPONSE KANAGER: Authorize the PAR by signature in Block 6 of Form ER 2.0B. CORPORATE SUPPORT MANAGER: i
=i Notify. the States and the NHY ORO via the Nuclear Alert System (NAS) of the Form ER 2.0B information. l
-l=
i ( 4
- ,gp* j
'ER 5.u Page
- Rev. 08-t
-FIGURE 2 !
C u., _P!.UME EXPOSURE PROTECTIVE ACTION FLOWCHART FOR SITE AREA EXERGENCY I' i SAE ! U h UNMITIGATED ' S-RED.C-ORANGE
"~ " xNO NO PROTECTIVE 2-ORANdE.Z-RED ACTION RECOMMENDATION ;
EXIST? YES "
\
IS TODAY BETWEEN , MAY 15 NO AND-1 SEPTEMBE.
- v. 157 5, .
q ' N
- g YES I Qn.
RECOMMEND - EVACUATION i OF:HAMPTON AND l W SEABROOK BEACHES AND
$ CLOSING SALISBURY i J BEACH, PARKER RIVER i NATIONAL WILDLIFE i REFUGE ON PLUM : ISLAND, l
$ AND PLUM ISLAND BEACH z
l l PROJECT DOSES AS DIRECTED BY SECTION 2 OR SECTION 3 0F FORM ER-5.4A l
Q <
.j ,
1 01 5.. Rev. ;d Page e [ FIG;;RE 3 L ' p PLL'ME EXPOSt'RE PROTECTIVE ACTION FLOWCHART TOR GENERAL Ew.ERGENCY GENEA4 EMERGENCY r IS CONTINUE DOSE YES POST LOCA ASSESSMENT NO MONITOR : USING SECTION i' ' > Esse R/HRt 2 OR 3 0F r m FORM ER-5.4 A N POST LOCA NO MONITOR .
>10.000 R/HR7 (2)
YES p 0).!F POST LOCA MONITORS FAIL.MAKE DECISION USING HATCH MONITOR RECOMMENO EVACUATION OF SEABROOK. READING OF 4.000mR/HR. HAMPTON.HAMPTON FALLS. SOUTH HAMP10N. KENSINGTON. NORTH HAMPTON. (2).!F P06T LOCA MONITORS FAIL.MAKE SALISBURY. AMESBURY. AND. TOWNS DECISION USINO HATCH MONITOR 00HNWINO TO 18 MILES. (3) REA0 LNG OF 8.000mR/HR. W HIN EPZ LI O (3).THIS INCLUDES RECOMMENDING CLOSING ON FORM ER 2.08 THE PAhKER RIVER NATIONAL WILOLIFE NOTE: REFER TO FIGURE 5 FOR TOWNS 00WNWINO. REFUGE ON PLUM ISLAND AND PLUM ISLAND BEACH BETWEEN MAY 15 AND SEPTEMBER 15. RECOMMEND EVACUATION OF SEABROOK. HAMPTON.HAMPTON FALLS.Atgt I (4).THIS INCLUDES RECOMMENDING CLOSING TOWNS 00WNWINO TO 5 MILTS. (4) ' SALISBURY BEACM. PARKER RIVER RECOMMENO SHELTER ALL OTHER AREAS NATIONAL WILOLIFE REFUGE ON \ WITHIN EPZ LISTED ON FORM 2.0B PLUM ISLAND AND PLUM ISLAND BEACH -
)- BETWEEN MAY 15 AND SEPTEMBER 15.
NOTE: REFER TO FIGURE 5 FOR TOWNS 00WNWINO. AN AUTOMATIC PAR SHOULO HAVE. ALREADY BEEN ISSUED BY THE STED.
- (SHELTER 9-2 MILES,5 MILES 00WNWlND WITH BEACH EVACUATION AND CLOSING OURING THE SUMMER BETWEEN MAY 1$ AND SEPTEMBER 15).
NHY_EPLAN:EP070032.DGN;1_
F
- - .
3 t U I f . 'h b ( 5 hghf E 3 !g !!D g ny:l we t j
^ ;
" ! EShhS I -
gd
$$$$8s! eg $
g
' =, of Ei'llEb*18 i s
8 u E lM 4- is $ d 1
.- e5s W;! g.y Ek, -
%=(sQ r;c d5 r saE 5 5 G5: - E*fes KEEE
- --s -
~s'g" h .-
~9 . .
ll"l
- 6 5
~
E
$ *s e ....
; see NIlifli c a s .!
E e llst xggs
! #3 gk!!S
. E m
dr,hs
~,
e d ex5~ .
.s m s s . -
h g,e!n!!
- l
*3 ~r2 i e
- ,=
siI, s! s! c: 9 e gg3pse is c!Ily@ E N dE , [O t'w
- =
t3 *~g w wW E d h, b
$f
! IE
,. ! [g
-l rs
. . e-s- _ -
s Y C
- c-
,g m s$$5 rsa w g
e . m m b 9 e' c 9 gY Sl wt* 5-58
-_k2 $! ,
IWit004043:Nvig3 Awy - r e
Q ER 5.a Page Rev. M FIG"RE 5 DOWA'IND AFEECTED TOWNS REFERENCE CHART Sector (Degrees) Affected Towns 2-5 Wind Coming From Miles Downwind Affected Towns 5-10 Miles Downwind N (348 - 11.5) Salisbury Newburyport, Newbury, W. Newbury NNE (11.5 - 34) Salisbury, Amesbury Merrimac, W. Newbury, Newbury, Newburyport NE (34 - 56.5) Amesbury, Salisbury S. Hampton, Newton, Merrimac, W. Newbury, Newbury, Newburyport ENE (56.$ - 79) Ame sbury, S. Hampt on, Kensington, Salisbury E. Kingston, Newton, Merrimac, W. Newbury, Newburyport E (79 - 101) Kensington, S. Hampton, Amesbury, Saliobury Brentwood, Exeter, E. Kingston., Kingston, Newton, Merrimac
- ESE (101 - 123) S. Hampton, Kensington Exeter, Brentwood, Kingston, E. Kingston, Newton SE (123 - 145.5) Kensington N. Hampton, Stratham, Exeter, Brentwood, E. Kingston, Kingston, Newfields SSE (145.5 - 168) -
Kensington, Exeter, Stratham, Greenland, Newfields S (168 - 191.5) N. Hampton Exeter, Stratham, Greenland, Portsmouth, Rye, Newfields, New Castle SSW (191.5 - 214) N. Hampton Stratham, Greenland, Portsmouth, Rye, New Castle SW (214 - 237.5) N. Hampton Rye, Portsmouth, New Castle WSW-(237.5 - 259) - North Hampton, Rye W (259 - 281.5) - WNW (281.5 - 303) Salisbury - NW (303 - 325.5) Salisbury Newbury, Newburyport NNW (325.5 - 348) Salisbury Newburyport, Newbury
- ~ j' ,
j t I 2 PLUME EXPOSURE. FRO?EC*1VE ACTION RECOMMENDATION (PAR) WORKEHEET
?
'SECTION 1 PARS Based'en Classification / Plant Condition
- 1. SITE AREA EKERGENCY
- s. Does a critical safety function review show the following (check if appropriate) f
- l. Unmitigated S = Red Indication +
- 2. Unmitigated H = Red indication
- 3. Unmitigated P = Red Indication 4 Unaltigated Z = Red Indication e
- 5. Unuitigated C = Orange Indication
- 6. Unmitigated Z = Orange Indication b.
b Determine PAR based on Figure 2 and go to Step 3.
;
- 2. GENERAL ENERGENCY
- a. Post LOCA Monitors 4/hr ,
R/hr '
- b. Hatch Monitors R/hr i
- c. Determine PAR based on Figure 3.
- 3. Wind direction (from) degrees '
- 4. Determine downwind affected towns using Figure 5. '
- 5. Document the PAR ande on Form ER 2.08. 1 6.
RP Coordinator / EOF Coordinator SECTION 2 PARS Based on METPAC Printout (as implemented per Procedure ER 5.3) 1. Determine appr'opriate Projected Release Duration (e.g., 2, 4, 6 or 8 hrs). NOTE - If any area is recommended to be evacuated, then recommend sheltering the rest of the EPZ. ,
- 2. Document the PAR on Form ER 2.08.
3. EOF Coordinator ER 5.4A Rev. 08 Page 1 of 3
)
t k
, SECTICS 3 t PARS Based on HP-41 Program Printout (as implemented per Procedure ER 5.7) !
- 1. Div;da the projected dose rates for whole body and thyroid at 0.6 mile !
and 2.0 miles from the HP-41 Program by 1000 and enter values into { Table 3.1. Table 3.1 Dose Re.tes (Rem /Hr) i Distance Whole Body Thyroid (infant) ) , 0.6 mi 2.0 mi
- 2. Determine the direction that the wind is blowing from and record below.
Wind Direction (from) degrees
- 3. Select the appropriate evacuation time, t ,
from Table 3.2 below: (circle one time for 0.6 mile downwind criteria and one time for 2 miler downwind). Review the appropriate weather condition and seasonal time I before making final selections: NOTE - (1) The evacuation time used for 0.6 dose calculations recog-nizes the time that it takes to evacuate the entire EPZ i out to 2 miles and the affected downwind 2-5 mile area. ' (2) The evacuation time used for 2.0 dose calculations recog- ' nises the time that it takes to evacuate the entire EPZ out to 5 miles and the affected downwind 5-10 mile area. Table 3.2 EVACUATION TIME t, (IN HOURS) DISTANCE DOWNWIND 0.6 MILE 2 MILES SEASON WINTER SUMMER WINTER SUMMER ( 9/ 8-5/ 21 ) (5/22-9/7) (9/8-5/21) (5/22-9/7) NORMAL WEATHER ' *
- ADVERSE WEATHER (Extreme fog, 5.42 7.75 5.75 rain, or snow) 8.08 ER 5.4A Rev. 08 Page 2 of 3
~s I>
- 4. Determine the assumed duration of release, tr; record the value in the space provided; tr hours. ;
- 5. i calculate the " Projected Dose", D ; " Shelter Dose," D s, end " Evacuation
- Dose," De below.
equations ; using the information ,in Table 3.1, 3.2, Step d and the l a. Dp (Whole Body) = tr x Whole Body Dose Rate Dp (Thyroid) =t r x Thyroid Dose Rate b. D, (Whole Body) = 0.9 x Dp (whole Body) , D, (Thyroid) = l-(0.5/t,) x Dp (Thyroid) p c. D, (Whole Body) a t, x Whole Body Dose Rate D, (Thyroid) = t, x Thyroid Dose Rate Table 3.3 D p (Rea) D, (Rem) 0, (Rem) WB THY WB THY WB l THY 0.6
- 2.0 NOTE - If any area is recommended to be evacuated, then recommend sheltering the ' rest of the EPZ.
- 6. Compare results against Figure 4, Plume Exposure Protective Action l
Recommendation Criteria Flowchart and using Figure 5 determine the affected towns. Record results below: i
+ l j
l 1 1 7. RP Coordinator ER 5.4A Rev. 08 Page 3 of 3 J}}