ML20008D481
| ML20008D481 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 06/13/1989 |
| From: | PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE |
| To: | |
| References | |
| OL-I-MAG-112, NUDOCS 9003050200 | |
| Download: ML20008D481 (14) | |
Text
%
T-M&G-]/ 5 3a y
do - WJ[Of t i --
ER 3.
- Page :
d[/3((7 00CKETED EMERGENCY RESPONSE PRDCEDURE COVER FAWRC A.
IDENTIFICATION.
90 JAN 18 P4 52 NUKBER
'ER 5.4 REVISION,prner 48 ert.>ryu
.j rupL!M i,speytq i
TITLE PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS e
+
.l ORIGINATOR M. J. Bovino 1.
Does this procedure / procedure revision:
t 7
a.
Make changes in the facility as described in the I
l-Yes @ No-FSAR7 b.
Make changes in procedures as described in the l
l Yes-No FSAR?
Involve tests or experiments not' described in l
l Yes % No
-e.
the FSAR?
d.
Involve changes to the existing Operating License i IYes @;No or require additional license requirements?
2.
If any of the above questions are answered m, a safety evaluation per NHY Procedure 11210 is required.
B..
INDEPENDENT REVIEW TITLE SIGNATURE DATE
. EmaE.has. km 4 a. S t C.
RADIOLOGICAL ASSESSMENT MANAGER APPROVAL SIGNATURE DATE 1An n, Ad _ tsw y
D.
SORC REVIEW SORC MEETING NO.
83~ $R E.
APPROVAL AND IMPLEMENTATION
%%C 42a\\n
_ m ezee STAT 10CthNA APPROVED DATE EFFECTIVE DATE ER 8.6A Rev. 4 9003050200 090613 PDR ADOCK 05000443
- O PDR j Q h n k' w
i
,, e
.j 4 ER]3.E-P3ge '] ~
7./[
Rev. 06 CONTENTS AND' REVISION STATUS-s g CONTENTS PAGE )
Rev. :'
COVER 3
CONTENTS-AND-REVISION STATUS 2
08-1.0 OBJECTIVES 3
08' 2.0. RESPONSIBILITIES 3
'2.1 RESPONSE MANAGER 3
2.2' SITE EMERGENCY DIRECTOR 1j 3
'l 2.3 EOF.' COORDINATOR 3
2.4 HEALTH PHYSICS COORDINATOR 3
3e0 PRECAUTIONS 3
4.0 PREREQUISITES 4
08 5.0 ACTIONS' I
4
6.0 REFERENCES
4 1
7.0 -ATTACHMENTS
- i l
i Figure'1, Protective Action Recommendation Checklist
.5 08 6
08 Figure 2, Plume Exposure Protective Action Flow Chart
'i for Site Area Emergency
-7 08 l
Figure.3, Plume Exposure Protective Action. Flow Chart 1
for General Emergency 8
08 Figure 4, Plume Exposure Protective Action 1
Recommendation Criteria Flowchart
{
9 08 Figure 5, Downwind Affected Towns Reference Chart
. 1 10 08 ER S.4A, Plume Exposure Protective Action Recommendation 08 (PAR) Worksheet k
4
Q IR 5.4 PaSe 3 Rev. 08
.' g-PROIECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATIONS I'
l.0 OBJECTIVES
, This procedure provides guidance for determining Protective Action Recommendations (PARS) to be. made to of f site authorities for the plume exposure pathway.
2.0 RESPONSIBILITIES 2.1 RESPONSE MANAGER-i Responsible for authorizing PARS from the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF).
2.2 SITE EHERGENCY DIRECTOR j
Responsible for authorizing PARS prior to activation of the Emergency Operations Facility (EOF).
2.3 EOF COORDINATOR Responsible for implementing this procedure for the evaluation of radiologi-l i
cal and plant data, determining PARS and providing recommendations to the Response Manager at the EOF.
2.4 REALTH PHYSICS COORDINATOR Responsible for implementing this procedure for the evaluation of radiologi-cal and plant data, determining PARS and providing' recommendations to the Site Emergency Director prior to activation of the EOF, I
j 3.0 PRECAUTIONS s
I 3.1 Protective Action Recommendations shall be transmitted to state-authorities and the NHY Off site Response Organization (ORO) within 15 a
minutes of determination.
1 Protective action recommendations should be reviewed against I
3.2 protective actions actually implemented prior to re-issuing an updated recommendation.
3.3 The Site Emergency Director should transfer his responsibility under this procedure to the Response Manager-as soon as the EOF activation is complete.
3.4 The Health Physics Coordinator should ensure that all actions taken in I
accordance with this procedure'are reported to the EOF Coordinator-upon EOF
{
activation.
l
,e ER 5.4
- pag, 7)-
Rev. 2s 4.0. PREREQUISITES
-4.1 A Site Area Emergency or General Emergency has been declared
(
4.2 The Technical Support Center (TSC) is activated, i
- 5. 0 ACTIONS Follow the actions identified by Figure 1, Protective Action Recommendation I
Checklist.
6.0 REFERENCES
6.1 Recommendations for General Emergencies, May 4,USNRC I 1983.
6.2 EPA-520/1-75-001, Actions for Nuclear IncidentsManual of Protective Action Guides and Protectiv e
4 h.
.-Y*,
ER_5.-
Page $'
l r :.g Rev. 05 i'
FIGURE i Page 1 of-2 PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATION CHECKLIST TSC ACTIONS HEALTH PHYSICS COORDINATOR:
INITIAL WHEN COMPLETED 1.
Assume responsibility for the Plume Exposure Protective
' Action Recommendation (PAR) process.
u 2.
Implement the applicable steps in Section 1 of Form ER 5.4A, Plume Exposure Protective Action Recommendation (PAR)
Worksheet.
3.
Complete Form ER 2.0B, State Notification Fact Sheet, with l
the PAR results.
4.
Review the results with the Site Emergency Director (SED) and i
obtain his-authorization.
5.
Continue to review conditions and update the PAR until the EOF has been activated.
~
1 SITE EMERGENCY DIRECTOR:
1.
Authorize the PAR by signature in Block 6 of Form ER 2.08.
2.
Notify the States 'and the NHY ORO via the Nuclear Alert.
I System (NAS) at 414 or via commercial telephone at (603) 433-1491.
Document the action using Form ER 2.0B.
1 5
i
'l 1
E ft
ER
}.*
?3ge-s Rev. Os
'Q FIGURE 1 Page 2 of :
PROTECTIVE ACTION RECOMMENDATION CHECKLIST EOF ACTIONS EOF COORDINATOR:
INITIAL
'w' HEN COMPLETED 1.
Assume responsibility for the Protective Action Recommendation-(PAR) process.
0-2.
Implement the opplicable steps in Section 1 of Form ER 5.4A, Plume Exposure Protective Action Recommendation (PAR)
Worksheet,
,j 3.
Complete Form ER 2.08, State Notification Fact Sheet, with
.i j
the PAR results.
j 4
Review the results with the Response Manager and obtain his i
authorization.
5.
Notify the appropriate state and NHY ORO personnel present
{
the EOF of the PAR results and give them a copy of Form at l
ER 2.0B.
.1 6.
Give Form ER 2.0B to the Corporate Support Manager, k
7.
Continue to review conditions and update the PAR until the event is terminated.
j
}
8.
When the evaluation process above results in no PAR, carefully j
review the-station conditions and prognosis with the Response j
Manager and Technical Assistant. ' Depending on the results of this review, consider issuing a precautionary PAR that is appropriate to the station prognosis.
i RESPONSE KANAGER:
Authorize the PAR by signature in Block 6 of Form ER 2.0B.
CORPORATE SUPPORT MANAGER:
i
=i Notify. the States and the NHY ORO via the Nuclear Alert System l
(NAS) of the Form ER 2.0B information.
-l=
i
(
4
,gp*
j
'ER 5.u Page Rev. 08-t
-FIGURE 2 C
_P!.UME EXPOSURE PROTECTIVE ACTION FLOWCHART u.,
FOR SITE AREA EXERGENCY I'
i SAE U
h UNMITIGATED S-RED.C-ORANGE xNO NO PROTECTIVE
"~
2-ORANdE.Z-RED ACTION RECOMMENDATION EXIST?
YES
\\
IS TODAY BETWEEN MAY 15 NO AND-SEPTEMBE.
1 v.
157 5,
q N
- g YES Q
RECOMMEND - EVACUATION n.
OF:HAMPTON AND W
SEABROOK BEACHES AND CLOSING SALISBURY J
BEACH, PARKER RIVER i
NATIONAL WILDLIFE REFUGE ON PLUM : ISLAND, i
AND PLUM ISLAND BEACH z
PROJECT DOSES AS DIRECTED BY SECTION 2 OR SECTION 3 0F FORM ER-5.4A l
Q 1 01 5..
Page e
. j Rev. ;d
[
FIG;;RE 3 L
p PLL'ME EXPOSt'RE PROTECTIVE ACTION FLOWCHART TOR GENERAL Ew.ERGENCY GENEA4 EMERGENCY r
IS CONTINUE DOSE YES POST LOCA NO ASSESSMENT MONITOR USING SECTION i'
> Esse R/HRt 2 OR 3 0F r
m FORM ER-5.4 A N
POST LOCA NO MONITOR
>10.000 R/HR7 (2)
YES 0).!F POST LOCA MONITORS FAIL.MAKE p
DECISION USING HATCH MONITOR RECOMMENO EVACUATION OF SEABROOK.
READING OF 4.000mR/HR.
HAMPTON.HAMPTON FALLS. SOUTH HAMP10N. KENSINGTON. NORTH HAMPTON.
(2).!F P06T LOCA MONITORS FAIL.MAKE SALISBURY. AMESBURY. AND. TOWNS DECISION USINO HATCH MONITOR 00HNWINO TO 18 MILES. (3)
REA0 LNG OF 8.000mR/HR.
(3).THIS INCLUDES RECOMMENDING CLOSING ON FORM ER 2.08 THE PAhKER RIVER NATIONAL WILOLIFE NOTE:
REFER TO FIGURE 5 FOR TOWNS 00WNWINO.
REFUGE ON PLUM ISLAND AND PLUM ISLAND BEACH BETWEEN MAY 15 AND SEPTEMBER 15.
RECOMMEND EVACUATION OF SEABROOK.
HAMPTON.HAMPTON FALLS.Atgt I
(4).THIS INCLUDES RECOMMENDING CLOSING TOWNS 00WNWINO TO 5 MILTS. (4)
RECOMMENO SHELTER ALL OTHER AREAS SALISBURY BEACM. PARKER RIVER NATIONAL WILOLIFE REFUGE ON
\\
WITHIN EPZ LISTED ON FORM 2.0B PLUM ISLAND AND PLUM ISLAND BEACH -
)-
BETWEEN MAY 15 AND SEPTEMBER 15.
NOTE: REFER TO FIGURE 5 FOR TOWNS 00WNWINO.
AN AUTOMATIC PAR SHOULO HAVE. ALREADY BEEN ISSUED BY THE STED.
- (SHELTER 9-2 MILES,5 MILES 00WNWlND WITH BEACH EVACUATION AND CLOSING OURING THE SUMMER BETWEEN MAY 1$ AND SEPTEMBER 15).
NHY_EPLAN:EP070032.DGN;1_
F 3
t U
I f. 'h b
hghf
(
5 g ny:l w t j 3 !g
!!D E
e
^
EShhS I
gd
$$$$8s! eg $
g Ei'llEb*18 lM is
=,
of i
1 s
u 8
E 4-d
%=(sQ d5 saE 5 e5s W;! g.y r;c r Ek, E*fes KEEE 5
G5:
5 ~s'g" h ~9
--s 6
ll"l E
NIlifli
~
- s e
s see c a llst E
xggs e
gk!!S dr,hs E
d 5~
- 3 h
e g,e!n
.s m s s.
ex.
~,
~r i m
e s!!!
l
_-*3 2
- siI,
,=
s!
gg3pse is c:
e 9
c!Ily@ E N
[O dE t'w,= *~g t3 h, b $f wW E d
w I
! [ g
,. E
-l rse-s s
s$
$ 5 Y
C c
w rsa g e
,g m
m m
b 9
e' c
Y Sl 9
g wt*
5-
-_k2 $!
58 IWit004043:Nvig3 Awy r
e
Q ER 5.a Page Rev. M FIG"RE 5 DOWA'IND AFEECTED TOWNS REFERENCE CHART Sector (Degrees)
Affected Towns 2-5 Wind Coming From Miles Downwind Affected Towns 5-10 Miles Downwind N (348 - 11.5)
Salisbury Newburyport, Newbury, W.
Newbury NNE (11.5 - 34)
Salisbury, Amesbury Merrimac, W.
Newbury, Newbury, Newburyport NE (34 - 56.5)
Amesbury, Salisbury S. Hampton, Newton, Merrimac, W. Newbury, Newbury, Newburyport ENE (56.$ - 79)
Ame sbury, S. Hampt on, E. Kingston, Newton, Merrimac, Kensington, Salisbury W. Newbury, Newburyport E (79 - 101)
Kensington, S. Hampton, Brentwood, Exeter, E. Kingston.,
Amesbury, Saliobury Kingston, Newton, Merrimac ESE (101 - 123)
S. Hampton, Kensington Exeter, Brentwood, Kingston, E. Kingston, Newton SE (123 - 145.5)
Kensington N. Hampton, Stratham, Exeter, Brentwood, E. Kingston, Kingston, Newfields SSE (145.5 - 168)
Kensington, Exeter, Stratham, Greenland, Newfields S (168 - 191.5)
N. Hampton Exeter, Stratham, Greenland, Portsmouth, Rye, Newfields, New Castle SSW (191.5 - 214)
N. Hampton Stratham, Greenland, Portsmouth, Rye, New Castle SW (214 - 237.5)
N. Hampton Rye, Portsmouth, New Castle WSW-(237.5 - 259)
North Hampton, Rye W (259 - 281.5)
WNW (281.5 - 303)
Salisbury NW (303 - 325.5)
Salisbury Newbury, Newburyport NNW (325.5 - 348)
Salisbury Newburyport, Newbury
- ~ j' j
t I
2 PLUME EXPOSURE. FRO?EC*1VE ACTION RECOMMENDATION (PAR) WORKEHEET
?
'SECTION 1 PARS Based'en Classification / Plant Condition 1.
SITE AREA EKERGENCY Does a critical safety function review show the following (check if f
s.
appropriate) l.
Unmitigated S = Red Indication
+
2.
Unmitigated H = Red indication 3.
Unmitigated P = Red Indication 4
Unaltigated Z = Red Indication e
5.
Unuitigated C = Orange Indication 6.
Unmitigated Z = Orange Indication b.
Determine PAR based on Figure 2 and go to Step 3.
b 2.
GENERAL ENERGENCY a.
Post LOCA Monitors 4/hr R/hr b.
Hatch Monitors R/hr i
c.
Determine PAR based on Figure 3.
3.
Wind direction (from) degrees 4.
Determine downwind affected towns using Figure 5.
5.
Document the PAR ande on Form ER 2.08.
1 6.
RP Coordinator / EOF Coordinator SECTION 2 PARS Based on METPAC Printout (as implemented per Procedure ER 5.3) 1.
Determine appr'opriate Projected Release Duration (e.g., 2, 4, 6 or 8 hrs).
NOTE - If any area is recommended to be evacuated, then recommend sheltering the rest of the EPZ.
2.
Document the PAR on Form ER 2.08.
3.
EOF Coordinator ER 5.4A Rev. 08 Page 1 of 3
)
t k
SECTICS 3 t
PARS Based on HP-41 Program Printout (as implemented per Procedure ER 5.7) 1.
Div;da the projected dose rates for whole body and thyroid at 0.6 mile
{
and 2.0 miles from the HP-41 Program by 1000 and enter values into Table 3.1.
Table 3.1 Dose Re.tes (Rem /Hr) i Distance Whole Body Thyroid (infant)
)
0.6 mi 2.0 mi 2.
Determine the direction that the wind is blowing from and record below.
Wind Direction (from) degrees 3.
Select the appropriate evacuation time, t from Table 3.2 below:
(circle one time for 0.6 mile downwind criteria and one time for 2 miler downwind). Review the appropriate weather condition and seasonal time I
before making final selections:
NOTE - (1) The evacuation time used for 0.6 dose calculations recog-nizes the time that it takes to evacuate the entire EPZ out to 2 miles and the affected downwind 2-5 mile area.
i (2) The evacuation time used for 2.0 dose calculations recog-nises the time that it takes to evacuate the entire EPZ to 5 miles and the affected downwind 5-10 mile area.
out Table 3.2 EVACUATION TIME t, (IN HOURS)
DISTANCE DOWNWIND 0.6 MILE 2 MILES WINTER SUMMER WINTER SUMMER SEASON
( 9/ 8-5/ 21 )
(5/22-9/7)
(9/8-5/21)
(5/22-9/7)
NORMAL WEATHER ADVERSE WEATHER (Extreme fog, 5.42 7.75 5.75 8.08 rain, or snow)
ER 5.4A Rev. 08 Page 2 of 3
~s I>
4.
Determine the assumed duration of release, tr; record the value in the space provided; tr hours.
5.
calculate the " Projected Dose", D ; " Shelter Dose," D, end " Evacuation i
Dose," D ; using the information,in Table 3.1, 3.2, Step d and the s
e equations below.
l a.
Dp (Whole Body) = tr x Whole Body Dose Rate Dp (Thyroid)
=t x Thyroid Dose Rate r
b.
D, (Whole Body) = 0.9 x Dp (whole Body)
D, (Thyroid)
= l-(0.5/t,) x Dp (Thyroid)
D, (Whole Body) a t, x Whole Body Dose Rate p
c.
D, (Thyroid)
= t, x Thyroid Dose Rate Table 3.3 Dp (Rea)
WB THY WB THY WB l
THY 0.6 2.0 NOTE - If any area is recommended to be evacuated, then recommend sheltering the ' rest of the EPZ.
l 6.
Compare results against Figure 4, Plume Exposure Protective Action Recommendation Criteria Flowchart and using Figure 5 determine the affected towns.
Record results below:
i
+
l j
7.
RP Coordinator ER 5.4A Rev. 08 Page 3 of 3 J