ML060230016

From kanterella
Revision as of 23:05, 23 November 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Various Checklists for the Point Beach Initial Examination - November 2005
ML060230016
Person / Time
Site: Point Beach  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/07/2005
From: Walton R
NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:
Shared Package
ML053610144 List:
References
50-266/05-301, 50-301/05-301, ES-201, ES-201-1 50-266/05-301, 50-301/05-301
Download: ML060230016 (20)
v • d • e


Text

-.

VARIOUS CHECKLISTS FOR THE POINT BEACH INITIAL EXAMINATION - NOVEMBER 2005

ES-201 Examination Preparation Checklist Form ES-201-1 Zacility: '?R1ii-I L A u \ .d 2

, Date of Examination: II /7/2005 leveloped by: Written - Facility k? NRC 2 / I Operating - Facility 3 NRC r I I Target Chief Date' Task Description (Reference) Examiner's Initials

-180 1. Examination administration date confirmed (C.1.a: C.2.a and b) &t"tw I 7Is lo F Picw

~~

-120 r 2 NRC examiners and facility contact a s s L e d (c 1 d, c 2 e)

-120 3. Facility contact briefed on security and other requirements (C.2.c) ~ [ ( J Oe SX 0

-120 4. Corporate notification letter sent (C.2.d) 711?[0.S sr\3

(-75) 6. Integrated examination outline(s) due, including Forms ES-201-2, ES-201-3.

ES-301-1. ES-301-2, ES-301-5. ES-D-1's. ES-401-1/2. ES-401-3, and 6 1221w 5 ES-401-4. as applicable (C.1.e and f; C.3.d)

(-70) v. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e))

(-45) 8. Proposed examinations (including written. walk-through JPMs. and scenarios, as applicable), supporting documentation (including Forms SI2 6 (Zobr ES-301-3. ES-301-4. ES-301-5. ES-301-6. and ES-401-6. and any Form ES-201-3 updates). and reference materials due (C.1.e. f, g and h: C.3.d)

-30 9. Preliminary license applications (NRC Form 398's) due (C.l.1; C.2.g; ES-202)

-14 10. Final license applications due and Form ES-201-4 prepared (C.1.l; C.2.i; ES-202)

\O((LlZJq

-14 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee review (C.2.h; C.3.n ow L3

-14 I 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1.j: C.2.f and h; C.3.9) iIOi2oiDg &!\I

-7 13. Written examinations and operating tests approved by NRC supelvisor (C.2.i; C.3.h)

-7 14. Final applications reviewed: 1 or 2 (if > l o ) applications audited to confirm qualifications /eligibility; and examination approval and waiver letters sent (C.2.i; Attachment 4: ES-202. C.2.e: ES-204)

-7 15. Proctoring/written exam administration guidelines reviewed (I\\

with facility licensee (C.3.k) pd

-7 16. Approved scenarios. job performance measures, and questions distributed to NRC examiners (C.3.i) )$$

_. .

case 0as.s in coord.nation with the facil ty licensee

[Applies only] (Does not apply) to examinations prepared by tne NRC ES-201, Page 24 of 27

Point Beacn'biuclear Plant EXAMINATION SECURITY AGREEMENT (EVALUATORS OR OTHERS INVOLVED)

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the examination(s) scheduled for the week(s) of

/,I,h5y & P/lq lo$'

as of the date of my signature. 1 agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by an Operations Training Supervisor. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by an Operations Training Supervisor (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the PBNP procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations anaor an enforcement action against me or PBNP. I will immediately report to facility management any indications or suggestions that e x m a t i o n security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the examinations adrmnistered during the week(s) of I / / 7 /Oi d- / I //IJ/05-From the date that I entered into tlus security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or drovide u e d u d c e feedback to those applicants who were administered these examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by an Operating Training Supervisor.

PlUNTEDNAh4E JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

1. 0 5
2. 05
3. L G
4. w 5 ~ _
5. OS /C57-QD-

_ _ ~

6. cs I. c c3 m 5 ,

-

8. c- CI
9. c3A S-eQ @e:-
10. LO __

..

11.

/I z'-,J, 12.

13.

14.

15.

NOTES:

PBF-6805 Rcferencc(s): TI 3.0 and TI 9.0 Revision 4 Ol/l1/05 File: A8.16.13

Point Beacn buclear Plant EXAMINATION SECURITY AGREEMENT (EVALUATORS OR OTHERS INVOLVED)

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the examination(s) scheduled for the week(s) of / I / 7 (4&, (fP/ 05 as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by an Operations Training Supervisor. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these examinations from this date until completion of examination administration,except as specifically noted below and authorized by an Operations Training Supervisor (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the PBNP procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or PBNP. I will immediately report to facility management any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the examinations administered during the week(s) of I I / 7 /9;~ + 1, //.i,WFrom the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide perfu-ce feedback to those applicants who were administered these examinations, except as specifically noted below arid authorized by an Operating Training Supervisor.

JOB TITLE /RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 1.

-.

7 3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

IO.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

NOTES:

PBF-6805 Reference(s): TI 3.0 and TI 9.0 Revision4 01/11/05 File: A8.16.13

~

Nuclear Management Company The Limited Security Agreement is used for those personnel having limited knowledge of Exam Sensitive Material but do not have unrestricted access to Primary and Secondary Containment.

1. Pre-Examination (Review FP-T-SAT-71, Attachment 1 for pre-job briefing requirements) 1 I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC a examination scheduled for the date(s) of ffed 7 - N O # 14.Los6sof the date of my signature. I agree that I will nznowingly divulge any information about this examination to any persons who have not been authorized by an Operations Training Supervisor. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those individuals scheduled to be administered this examination from this date until completion of this examination administration.

Acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if I do not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback to an examinee. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in NMC procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of.the examination andlor an enforcement action against my facility or me. I will immediately report to the Exam Project Manager any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

. .

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concemingthe.examination administered during the date(s) of ,wv7 -mvl8. ulos . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of this examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those individuals who were administered this examination.

Furthemore, I agree to NOT discuss any aspects associated with the contents of this examination with @ J J examinee until the completion of their examination administration. I further understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examination andlor enforcement action against the facility licensee or me.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 1 J ~ KJ P~ F ~ - - I

-2 &L

- - I c

-A-5 #&a /%//an 6 Mg/L .AbPKA Page 1 of 2 ... .

-

. . ~

. . ,

, QF-1071-02 Rev 0 (FP-T-SAT-71) cornme0 m NM -

N"UCI..,&&<*"S. 1 Nuclear Management Company LIMITED SECURITY AGREEMENT The Limited Security Agreement is used for those personnel having limited knowledge of Exam Sensitive Material but do not have unrestricted access to Primary and Secondary Containment.

PRINTED NAME DATE NOTE

7. fife #a W
  • A "/.& 2
a. /lzLas-

-- 3

9. n*7- I A Ireclc 7%L $ &- 3 IO. /I-/Y-CX 3
11. &, 3
12. iwcc kC&xa& &fi- 5 17 I ".

--

14 - -

15 --

Page 2 of 2

personnelhaving limied knowledge of Exam Sensiliva~Ma!erlaibufda no1have unrestricted jr, .

chment 1for@.piobbriefingrequirements):

ec[alized knowledge a b u t liiietcw. NAG 2t.T examinationscheduled fop the dald(s) ot ignalure. Iagree thatlwfit-not knowinglydivulge any informationabout this examination to any persons who ffq$qi16!been aulhwized by an 0.piralion.sTralning Shpennsor. lunderstand that Iam not lo inslrud. evaluat~OP provide performance feedb~c~fathose individuals scheduled lo be administered this examinationfrom this dale until completion of this examinallonadministration.

Aclin$&a

    • ih s/mulator booth operator or dommunicalor is acceptable it Ido not select the lraining content or provide direct or indirect feedback lo an e x h e e . Furthermore, Iam aware of the physicalsecurity rn&sures and requirements (as documentedin NMO procedures} and LL undekf{hd that violallon of Ihe conditions @this agreement may result in cancellation d.lhe examination and/or an enforcement aclion against my k;idliiy gr me. i will irnmedialely report la ihe Exam PmjeGt Manager any indications or suggedionqthat examination security may havzabaen *:

0 Ln mmpromtsed.

4 i

2. post-ExaminaHon

..

To the best of my knowledge, Idid not divulge lo any unauthorizedpersons any information ~ncwnirig,bhe.examination administered during the dale@)of 7 ,mvlg. 200 z . From the dale that Ientered into this security agreement unlil the.completion of this examinalion soministrag. I did 301 instruct. evaluate, or provide perlomanbe feedback l o those individuals who were administered (his examination.

Furthamara. I agree to L?91:dlscuss any aspects asmdaled wlth the contents of this examinalin wilh ANY examinee unlil lhe completion of their examination adminislration. Ifurther understand that violation of the conditions of (his agreement may resull in cancellation 01the m examination andlor enforcement a c t i n against the facility l i c e p e or me.

U m

m m PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE m

m m

N m I. Ju dd Kern- -- I 2...4m L*z &L rT)

N

.. 3. /r7 ,IkC/?&Lf~

m rl

4. ..oc \ 7 !&l*Pv\

-7 - --I-3m M / h n,#&7 *a

.

N

.LD m

5.

6. /VE/L .MMA -  : .. I. .

j/dd II.ZtJ a N ..

4 Page 1 of 2 . ., ,.~.

!

.-

.. .~ ~

.., .. ~

~.

... ... , .

,dl07142 Rev. 0 (FP-1-SAT-71) I

- Nuckar Management dmpany LIMITED SECURITY AOREEMEV

..

N The Limited Security Agreement is used for lhose personnel having llmlted knowledge d Exam access to Primary and Secondary Containmenl.

S@lihMaterial but do MIhave unreskicled 1

rn

-n

>

x (Rovlew FP-TSAT-71, Atlachmonll for prejob a k f i requlracents) :

-4

1. -& l I 2 u

0

-4 I acknowledge that Ihave scheduled for the dale(s) of -4

-

NooJ ? No< 18,11S6s of about this examlnation to any persons W

0 co who have not been svaluale. or pmvide perhmnance 0 feedback to those of lhis examination adminisIralion.

Acting 85 a sirnthlorbodh operator or communicator is direct or W e c t feedback to an examinee.furlhenore, i am aware Of ihe phpical in MhlC procedures) 6:d understand that vidatii of the conditions of this an enforcement aclii agahsl my racilily or me. 1 wl lmmediateiy report io lhe Exam Projecl Manager any indimlions or suggesH&s that examination secucily may h w been ~ z compromised, z z

2. Post-Examlnatlon I

'I c

0 r-m

>

II To the best of my knowledge. 1 did not divulge Eo any unauthorized penms any information conrank'@the,examination administered during the

  • date(@ of p'?-mvta, -5 , From the date lhat Ientered Into this security agreement until t$ completiin of lhs examination >

z adrninistralion,l did no1 hnstrud, evaluate. or provide performancefeedback l o those individualswh were administered lhis examineiion. Ti Furthermore. Iegree to a d i s c u s s any aspects associatedwilh the contenls 01 lhis examination

,P ANY examinee until the completion Of their examination administrelion. I further understand that vidation oflhe conditions d lhis result in cancellation of @e examinationandlor enforcemenl action against the facility lice.nsee or me.

PRINTEO NAME JOB TITLE I RESPONSlBlLtlY SIGNATURE (7) DATE 1 SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE 0

0

.

N 0

0 N

Point Beac'ri k c l e a r Plant EXAMINATION SECURITY AGREEMENT (EVALUATORS OR OTHERS INVOLVED)

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the examination(s)scheduled for the week(s) of of the date of my signature. I agree that 1 will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons by an Operations Training Supervisor. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specificallynoted below and authorized by an Operations Training Supervisor (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the PBNP procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andor an enforcement action against me or PBNP. I will immediately report to facility management any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the examinations administered during the week(s) of

/1/7/a>-# T/o, . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or p v i d e performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by an Operating Training Supervisor.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (I) DATE SIGNATUW2) DATE NOTE 1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

I I .

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

NOTES:

PBF-6805 Reference(s): TI 3.0and TI 9.0 Revision 4 01/11/05 File: A8.16.13

Point Be& ,is' Nuclear Plant EXAMINATION SECURITY AGREEMENT (EVALUATORS OR OTHERS INVOLVED)

1. Pre-Examination I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the examination@)scheduled for the week(s) of 1 ' / 7 / 0 F - "/Ia/o,f,fthedateofmy signature. 1 agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information about these examinationsto any persons who have not been authorized by an Operations Training Supervisor. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants scheduled to be administered these examinations from this date until completion of examination administration, except as specifically noted below and authorized by an Operations Training Supervisor (e.g., acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback). Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requirements (as documented in the PBNP procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations and/or an enforcement action against me or PBNP. I will immediately report to facility management any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning the examinations administered during the week@)of

' 1 /7/0>-f { I / / 7h3: From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those applicants who were administered these examinations, except as specifically noted below and authorized by an Operating Training Supervisor.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (I) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE PBF-6805 Reference(s): TI 3.0 and TI 9.0 Revision 4 01/11/05 File: A8.16.13

I B&,?

1 Point Be&:,,*Ndclear Plant - .

F N

EXAMINATION SECURITY AGREEMENT m (EVALUATORS OR OTHERS INVOLVED) t7 N

1.

r I acknowledge that1 have acquired specialized knowledge about the examination(s) scheduled Tor lhc week(s) OF ' / 7 l 0 ' - - I I / r a / ~ ~ r l h e d a ~ o f m y ..

F w

signature. I agree thrl 1 will no1 knowingly divulge any information about these examinalions lo any persons who have not bcm aulhorized by an Operations Training m Supervisor. 1 undersland that I am not lo inslnict. evaluate. or providc performance fccdback to thou: applicanls scheduled to be iuiminislered these examinations from this date until complelion of examination administration. except as specifically noted below and authorized by an Operalions Training Supervisor (e.g.. acting as LD a silnulator booth operalor or communicatori s acceptable if the individual does not select the training content or providc direct or indirect feedback). Fuahermore, I N am aware orthe physical security measures and requiremenk (as documented in the PBNP procedures) and understand that violalion ofthe conditions ofthis W m

w e m c n l mayresull in cancellalion ofthe exminationsandlor an enforcement action against mc or PBNP. I will immediately report lo facility management any m m

indications orseggcslions that examination security may have been compromised. W D

m

2. Post-ExamLnation i

I TOI h c best ormy knowledge, I did no1 divulge to any unauthorized personsany inlormation concerning Ihe ewaminalions administered during ihe wcck(s) of 7 / d > 1 # # / 7/4:

I From the date (hat 1 cntcred inlo this secwily agreement unlil the completion orexatnipation adminksalion. I did not inslruc?.rraluale, ot pmvidc pcrfomance ecdback 40 those applicanls who were administered lhese examinations.except as specifically noted below and wthorized by afi Operaling

'liaining Supervisor.

~

PRINTED NAME

. ~_.. , --

t .

'

4, -

,.>.

point ae&!Q Nuclear Plant p In/?

m n

c

.. .

EXAMINATION SECURITY AGREEMENT (EVALUATORS OR OTHERS INVOLVED) . ".

ul P

1. Pre-Exnnioatlon -

N I acknowledge h a t I have acquired specialized knowledge about the exaninalion(s) scheduled for the week(s\o //7 I lor - I r /~8/%'0fihe date ofmy 5

signature. 1 agree thsl1 will no( knowingly divulge lnyidomtallon about lhese examinations to any p o ~who  ; havenot been aulhorized by an QeIaliMs Train%

SupmOsor. I mdenlad IhI not lo insbuc.6 evaluate, or provide performance feedback rothose applicants scbedded lo be adninislered these exarojnations Z of exndnation administration. c x q t as specificallynoled below and nutholized by an Operalions Training Sopervia (e.& acting=

From h i s dab until ~ a p l c t i o n asimulalorbooihoperator o r ~ ~ ~is arceplable l c ~ Khe r indivldual docs not seleclrhe bainingmnlemtorproGrovidedim1or indim3 fwdbaJr). PwlheSmO% 1 em aH.arsorthephysicalsecuri~mlneasuresand requimen&(asdocuncntcdin LhePBW p~ures)andundenlandQlatviolationofQe~dilions agreement may result io cancellation oflheexaminaliom andlor an enforcanent action againsl me 0rFBNP. I rvill irnmdiakly nporilofaeiity maoagementany indiealionsor suggestions iba~examinntion security may have been compromised.

ofthis

-s ul

  • 5
2. Post-Examinah'oq 2

>

-

-

I z

1did not di\vIge to anynnaulhorized persoos any infomation conccming lhe minalions adminilcored dnring Ihe weekis) of D tie date that 1 e n : d intothls security agreement until (he compldion ofex ation ndtzii;;&an, 1 did tul k s t v ~ & a d iori ~'*

provide @omence feedback to h e applicwtr who wtm rdminiskrcd lhcse examinations,cncep! as below and aalhorlz6d by an Opemhg TrainingSupervisor.

PRINTEDNAME JOB TITLE IRESP~SIBILlTY SlGNATURE(1) fl SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

__-

PJ3M&os Revision4 Ol/fimS File: M16.13

Nuclear Management Company

1. Pie-Examination (Review FP-T-SAT-71, Attachment 1 for pre-job briefing requirements) . :

I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the 5 luPC ZCf examination(s) scheduled for the date@)of uod 7 - ~ o d / e , as of the date of my signature. I agree that I will n?knowingly divulge any information about these examinations to any persons who have not been authorized by an Operations Training Supervisor. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate, or provide.

performance feedback to those individuals scheduled to be administered these examinations from this date until completion of examination administration. Acting as a simulator booth operator or communicator is acceptable if I do not select the training content or provide direct or indirect feedback to an examinee. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measures and requifements (as documented in NMC procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may result in cancellation of the examinations andlor an enforcement action against my facility or me. I will immediately report to the Exam Project Manager any indications or suggestions that examination security may have been compromised.

2. Post-Examination To the best of my knowledge, I did not divulge to any unauthorized persons any information concerning $e examinations administered during the date@) of ~ . e v 7 - w 1 s . ~ S . From the date that I entered into this security agreement until the completion of examination administration, I did not instruct, evaluate, or provide performance feedback to those individuals who w e e administered these examinations.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY r\ SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE Page 1 of 2

QF-1071-01 Rev 0 (FP-T-SAT-71)

NM-C0rnrni"ed 10 Nu**, E.s*,*nrr, 1 Nuclear Management Company MASTER SECURITY AGREEMENT

~

I The Master Security Agreement is used for those personnel having both knowledge of Exam Sensitive Material and unrestricted access to Primary and Secondary Containment.

PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBILITY SIGNATURE (1) DATE SIGNATURE (2) DATE NOTE

9. -

10.

11.

12.

13.

14.

15.

NOTES:

Page 2 of 2

I ES-401 Record of Rejected WAS Form ES-401-4 1 thin Tier 2 of RO outline.

rie with WAS>2.5 NUREG-1021. Revision 9

Point Beach Nuclear Plant Methodology for developing outline:

The written examination outline was generated in conjunction with the individual initiating the Point Beach written examination outline. The technique used was similar to that described in NUREG-I 021, Rev. 9, ES-401, Attachment 1.

Numbered poker chips and began with number of applicable chips for Tl/Gl for RO (22). Selected Chip from 1-6 to determine where to start with K1, K2, etc. Once we had determined which K or A value to begin with, we began drawing chips from the 1-22 chips representing the systems. When the first system was drawn, the AI was assigned, second system, A2, third system, G, and so forth until 18 systems had been selected.

EAPE or System Categories which were not applicable to Point Beach were eliminated prior to sampling within the groups. We proceeded in this fashion until all systems had been assigned for Tier 1 and 2, Groups 1 and 2. We then performed this same method for the applicable SRO systems, with the exception of T2/G2, in which we selected the systems first (to see if Fuel Handling would be selected, it was not) then assigned the A2 or G by random selection of the first and alternating for the remaining 2 systems selected.

We then selected 2 or 4 chips to determine which Tier 3 categories would be sampled three times, chips 1 and 3 were selected, giving us three for 2.1, two for 2.2, three for 2.3 and two for 2.4. We then selected one chip of four to determine which Generic category would NOT be sampled twice for the SRO. Chip 3 was selected.

Once all of the K, A or G had been determined, the Topics were selected. Chips bearing the topic numbers for topics with IR12.5 were placed in the basket and randomly selected. If the K or A category was found not to have any topics with sufficient IR, a new K or A category was randomly selected. When this was done, Tiers and Groups 1 and 2 were transferred to the ES-401-2 Category totals form. We discovered that we were below the minimum acceptable number of K6 Topics. We then went back to T2/GI and randomly selected one system that had K6 items that were 52.5. CVCS was selected and the K1 topic that had been selected was replaced with a randomly selected K6 topic.

Finally, we randomly selected the RO Tier 3 questions by placing chips in the basket to represent each of the topics and drew chips until the required number of chips with the appropriate IR had been selected. We did this for each of the RO areas and then did the same for the SRO, also screening for 10CFR55.43 applicability.

WA Suppression Report:

Suppressed WAS include all specific to only B/W or C/E Plants for Tl/G2, the Ice Condenser System (025) for T2/G1 and Containment Iodine Removal (027) for T2/G2.

Additionally, any WAS with IR of <2.5 were reviewed and suppressed (not placed in basket for selection) if it was determined that no site specific priority existed for the statement. WA Statements identified in NUREG 1021, Rev 9, ES-401 Attachment 2, section 1 which are specifically allowed to be rejected or suppressed without explanation or justification were also excluded from the random sampling process as desired.

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1 Quality Checklist 1.

Item Description Clean answer sheets copied before grading

-

eve1 RO-a Initials S R O ~

C

2. Answer key changes and question deletions justified and documented
3. Applicants' scores checked for addition errors (reviewers spot check > 25% of examinations)
1. Grading for all borderline cases (80 *2% overall and 70 or 80, as applicable, +4% on the SRO-only) reviewed in detail
5. All other failing examinations checked to ensure that grades are justified
6. Performance on missed questions checked for training deficiencies and wording problems; evaluate validity of questions missed by half or more of the applicants Printed NamelSignature
a. Grader /2/z/c5- I NRC i \- 30 -05
b. Facrhty Reviewerr)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*) I?.(+%
d. NRC Supervisor (*)

(') The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 5 of 5

ES-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-I Quality Checklist I

l Printed NamelSignature Date H a. Grader NPC

b. ad@ Reviewerr)

//- 30-05 a

c. NRC Chief Examiner r) ,212 10 s d NRC Supervisor (*)

~~~~~

(") The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.

ES-403, Page 5 of 5

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML060230016&oldid=2197105"