ML060050554

From kanterella
Revision as of 08:31, 29 October 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Notification of McGuire Nuclear Station Component Design Bases Inspection-NRC Inspection Report 05000369/2006007 & 05000370/2006007
ML060050554
Person / Time
Site: McGuire, Mcguire  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/05/2006
From: Ogle C R
NRC/RGN-II/DRS/EB1
To: Peterson G R
Duke Energy Corp
References
IR-06-007
Download: ML060050554 (5)


See also: IR 05000369/2006007

Text

January 5, 2006Duke Energy CorporationATTN:Mr. G. R. PetersonVice President

McGuire Nuclear Station12700 Hagers Ferry Road

Huntersville, NC 28078-8985SUBJECT:NOTIFICATION OF MCGUIRE NUCLEAR STATION COMPONENT DESIGNBASES INSPECTION-NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000369/2006007 AND

05000370/2006007Dear Mr. Peterson:

The purpose of this letter is to notify you that the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)Region II staff will conduct a component design bases inspection at your McGuire NuclearStation during the weeks of March 20-24, 2006, April 3-7, 2006, and April 17-21, 2006. Theinspection team will be led by Larry Mellen, a Senior Reactor Inspector from the NRC's

Region II Office. This inspection will be conducted in accordance with the baseline inspectionprocedure, Procedure 71111.21, Component Design Bases Inspection, issued December 2,

2005.The inspection will evaluate the c

apability of risk significant / low margin components to functionas designed and support proper system operation. The inspection will also include a review ofselected operator actions, operating experience, and modifications. During a telephone conversation on January 4, 2006, I confirmed with Ms. K. Crane of yourstaff, arrangements for an information gathering site visit and the three-week onsite inspection.

The schedule is as follows:*Information gathering visit: Week of March 6, 2006.*Onsite weeks: March 20, 2006; April 3, 2006; and April 17, 2006.The purpose of the information gathering visit is to meet with members of your staff to identifyrisk-significant components and operator actions. Information and documentation needed to

support the inspection will also be identified. Mr. Rudy Bernhard, a Region II Senior ReactorAnalyst, may accompany Mr. Mellen and the inspection team during the information gathering

visit to review probabilistic risk assessment data and identify risk significant components whichwill be examined during the inspection.The enclosure lists documents that will be needed prior to the information gathering visit.Please contact Mr. Mellen prior to preparing copies of the materials listed in the enclosure.

DEC2The inspectors will try to minimize your administrative burden by specifically identifying onlythose documents required for the inspection preparation. During the information gathering visit, the team leader will also discuss the following inspectionsupport administrative details: office space, suplemental documents requested to be made

available to the team in the Region II office prior to the inspection preparation week of March

13, 2006; arrangements for site access; and the availability of knowledgeable plant engineeringand licensing personnel to serve as points of contact during the inspection.In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and itsenclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public DocumentRoom or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's document system(ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. If you have any questions regarding theinformation requested or the inspection, please contact Mr. Mellen at (404) 562-4531 or me at

(404) 562-4605.Sincerely,/RA/Charles R. Ogle, ChiefEngineering Branch 1

Division of Reactor SafetyDocket Nos.: 50-369, 50-370License Nos.: NPF-9, NPF-17Enclosurecc w/enc/: (See page 3)

DEC3cc w/encl:C. J. Thomas

Regulatory Compliance Manager (MNS)

Duke Energy Corporation

Electronic Mail DistributionR. L. Gill, Jr., M

anagerNuclear Regulatory Issues

and Industry Affairs

Duke Energy Corporation

526 S. Church Street

Charlotte, NC 28201-0006Lisa VaughnAssociate General Counsel

Duke Energy Corporation

526 South Church Street

Mail Code EC 07H

Charlotte, NC 28201-1244Anne CottinghamWinston & Strawn LLP

Electronic Mail DistributionBeverly Hall, Acting DirectorDivision of Radiation Protection

N. C. Department of Environmental

Health & Natural Resources

Electronic Mail DistributionCounty Manager of Mecklenburg County720 East Fourth Street

Charlotte, NC 28202Peggy ForceAssistant Attorney General

N. C. Department of Justice

Electronic Mail Distribution

_________________________OFFICERII:DRSRII:DRSRII:DRSSIGNATURENAMEC. OgleM. ErnstesR. MooreDATE1/ /20061/ /20061/ /20061/ /20061/ /20061/ /20061/ /2006

E-MAIL COPY? YESNO YESNO YESNO YESNO YESNO YESNO YESNO

EnclosureINFORMATION REQUEST FOR MC GUIRE NUCLEAR STATION COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTIONPlease provide the information electronically in ".pdf" files, Excel, or other searchable format onCDROM. The CDROM should be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use. Information in "lists" should contain enough information to be easily understood to someone

who has a knowledge of pressurized water reactor technology.1.Risk ranking of components from your site specific probabilistic safety analysis (PSA)sorted by Risk Achievement Worth (RAW) and sorted separately by Birnbaum

Importance. If possible, please provide a correlation between actual plant componentsin plain language, and RAW values.2.Provide a list of the top 500 cutsets from your PSA.

3.Risk ranking of operator actions from your site specific PSA sorted by RAW. Providecopies of your human reliability worksheets for these items.4.If you have an External Event or Fire PSA Model, provide the information requested inItems 1 and 2 for external events and fire.5.Any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and calculations with low designmargins (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or pressure, diesel generator

close to design required output, heat exchangers close to rated design heat removal,

MOV risk-margin rankings, etc.).6.A list of the last two years of operating experience evaluations, modifications, andcorrective actions sorted by component or system.7.Information of any common cause failure of components experienced in the last 5 yearsat your facility.