Text

^

, z ~.

, , . M.1. LEWIS

$504 BRADFORD TERR.

DEA,, PA.19148 Charles M. Trammel , III Office NRR SO n$3

-II k Dear oirs s omethingabout10CFR50.$&(x)and(y)troublemegreatly.

These paragraphs seem to be an attack upon the single failure criterion. This problem is even discussed on Page 15 of the Notice of " final rule."

I would very much appreciate a further airing.

Since "the rule assumes that special circumstandes have occurred", d&enn't that make those catagories of specall sircumstances litigable.

For instance 2 safety grade solenoids failed at Limerick. Doesn't that make the issue of common mode failure of all solenoids litigable?

I would appreciate a speedy reply to this most immediate concern.

Very truly yours, 'q

/ l a Y/',/' '-- &[Qh . ,-

'/

t I g"i LEWIS g gg DFORD TERR.

I ptinA, PA.1 i

l

\

8306020380 830526 PDR ADOCK 05000352 1 H PDR ff0

. - . . . . . _ - . . - - - - _ . _ , . . .

ML20084M850