Text

^

z ~.

M.1. LEWIS

$504 BRADFORD TERR.

DEA,, PA.19148 Charles M. Trammel, III Office NRR SO -II k n$3 Dear oirs omethingabout10CFR50.$&(x)and(y)troublemegreatly.

s These paragraphs seem to be an attack upon the single failure criterion. This problem is even discussed on Page 15 of the Notice of " final rule."

I would very much appreciate a further airing.

Since "the rule assumes that special circumstandes have occurred", d&enn't that make those catagories of specall sircumstances litigable.

For instance 2 safety grade solenoids failed at Limerick. Doesn't that make the issue of common mode failure of all solenoids litigable?

I would appreciate a speedy reply to this most immediate concern.

Very truly yours,

'q

/

l Y/',/' '-- &[Qh.,-

a

'/

t I

g"i LEWIS g gg DFORD TERR.

I ptinA, PA.1 i

l

\\

8306020380 830526 PDR ADOCK 05000352 1

H PDR ff0

- - - _. _,...

ML20084M850