IR 05000254/1998024
| ML20199E943 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Quad Cities  |
| Issue date: | 01/14/1999 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20199E935 | List: |
| References | |
| 50-254-98-24, 50-265-98-24, NUDOCS 9901210141 | |
| Download: ML20199E943 (2) | |
Text
. .. . - . - - . . - .-. .-, . . . . _ _ _ - - -.-. . . . .
.
U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION 111
, Docket Nos: 50-254;50-265 l License Nos: DPR-29; DPR-30
I I Report Nos: 50-254/98024(DRS); 50-265/98024(DRS)
l Licensee: Commonwealth Edison Company (Comed) !
Facility: Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 i Location: 22710 206'" Avenue North l Cordova,IL 61242 l
l Dates: December 14-18,1998 l
l Inspector: Terry J. Madeda, Physical Security Inspector l
l l Approved by: James R. Creed, Chief, Plant Support Branch 1 l Division of Reactor Safety i
l i
I
<
Ehclosure Cent i
. Is Decontrollod 9901210141 990114 PDR ADOCK 05000254 G PDR
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ . .
.
s
'
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY i
j Quad Cities Nuclear Power Station, Units 1 and 2 NRC Inspection Reports 50-254/98024; 50-265/98024 This inspection reviewed plant support activities relating to the physical protection of the Quad
Cities facility. The report evaluated security activities related to security plan changes, security training and qualifications, security training records, management effectiveness and controls, audit and self assessment activities, problem analysis and corrective actions, and follow up to
.
a previous inspection findin e The inspector determined that two security plan changes that were implemented by the licensee since December 1997 did not decrease the effectiveness of the security pla (Section S3)
e Security training activities were accurately documented and conducted in an appropriate and sound manner. (Section SS)
e Licensee audit and self-assessment activities regarding the security program were
, properly implemented. The licensee's plant wide problem identification and corrective action tracking program was generally effective. However, discrepancies were identified in the security area regarding the documentation of security equipment failures. Licensee action was initiated to address this issue. The licensee's security department's intemal corrective action tracking system was effective. (Section S7)
e The inspector identified a violation in which armed response force personnel were routinely assigned fire watch duties that prevented them from immediately responding to security events. Licensee security management's effectiveness and controls were not effective in this case because they did not recognize that response capabilities had been reduced. Effective and timely corrective action was implemented. (Section S8.1)
2 *" O*" ,.
e
~ c y g C',% t ') -