IR 05000317/2013008
| ML13310A554 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Calvert Cliffs  |
| Issue date: | 11/05/2013 |
| From: | Schroeder D L Reactor Projects Branch 1 |
| To: | Gellrich G H Constellation Energy Nuclear Group |
| Schroeder D L | |
| References | |
| IR-13-008 | |
| Download: ML13310A554 (16) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION I 2100 RENAISSANCE BOULEVARD, SUITE 100 KING OF PRUSSIA, PENNSYLVANIA 19406-2713 November 5, 2013 Mr. George H. Gellrich, Vice President Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Constellation Energy Nuclear Group, LLC
1650 Calvert Cliffs Parkway Lusby, MD 20657-4702
SUBJECT: CALVERT CLIFFS NUCLEAR POWER PLANT - NRC PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION AND RESOLUTION INSPECTION REPORT
05000317/2013008 AND 05000318/2013008
Dear Mr. Gellrich:
On September 27, 2013, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2. The enclosed report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on September 27, 2013, with you and other members of your staff.
This inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to identification and resolution of problems and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and conditions of your license. Within these areas, the inspection involved examination of selected procedures and representative records, observations of activities, and interviews with personnel.
Based on the samples selected for review, the inspectors concluded that Constellation was generally effective in identifying, evaluating, and resolving problems. Constellation personnel identified problems and entered them into the corrective action program (CAP) at a low threshold. Constellation prioritized and evaluated issues commensurate with the safety significance of the problems and corrective actions were generally implemented in a timely manner.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Managem ent System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web Site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA RPowell for/
Daniel L. Schroeder, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 1
Division of Reactor Projects
Docket Nos: 50-317 and 50-318 License Nos: DPR-53 and DPR-69
Enclosure: Inspection Report 05000317/2013008 and 05000318/2013008 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ
- ML13310A554 SUNSI Review Non-Sensitive Sensitive Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available OFFICE RI/DRP RI/DRP RI/DRP NAME SBarber/SB RPowell/RP DSchroeder/RP for DATE 11/1/13 11/5/13 11/5/13
Enclosure 1 U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION I
Docket Nos: 50-317 and 50-318
License Nos: DPR-53 and DPR-69
Report No: 05000317/2013008 and 05000318/2013008
Licensee: Constellation Energy Nuclear Group, LLC (Constellation)
Facility: Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 (CCNPP)
Location: Lusby, MD
Dates: September 9 - 13, 2013 September 23 - 27, 2013
Team Leader: S. Barber, Senior Project Engineer, Division of Reactor Projects (DRP)
Inspectors: H. Gray, Senior Reactor Inspector, Division of Reactor Safety E. Torres, Resident Inspector, DRP S. McCarver, Reactor Inspector, DRP
Approved by: Daniel L. Schroeder, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 1 Division of Reactor Projects
Enclosure 2
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
IR 05000317/2013008 and 05000318/2013008; 09/09/2013 - 09/27/2013; Calvert Cliffs Nuclear
Power Plant, Units 1 and 2 (CCNPP); Biennial Baseline Inspection of Problem Identification and Resolution.
This NRC team inspection was performed by one resident inspector and three regional inspectors. No findings were identified during this inspection. The NRC' s program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 4, dated December 2006.
Problem Identification and Resolution
The inspectors concluded that Constellation was generally effective in identifying, evaluating, and resolving problems. Constellation personnel identified problems, entered them into the CAP at a low threshold, and prioritized issues commensurate with their safety significance. In most cases, Constellation appropriately screened issues for operability and reportability, and performed causal analyses that appropriately considered extent of condition, generic issues, and previous occurrences. The inspectors also determined that Constellation typically implemented corrective actions to address the problems identified in the CAP in a timely manner. The inspectors concluded that, in general, Constellation adequately identified, reviewed, and applied relevant industry operating experience to Calvert Cliffs operations. In addition, based on those items selected for review, the inspectors determined that Constellation self-assessments and audits were thorough.
Based on the interviews the inspectors conducted over the course of the inspection, observations of plant activities, and reviews of individual CAP and employee concerns program issues, the inspectors did not identify any indications that site personnel were unwilling to raise safety issues nor did they identify any conditions that could have had a negative impact on the site's safety conscious work environment.
3
REPORT DETAILS
OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)
4OA2 Problem Identification and Resolution
This inspection constitutes one biennial sample of problem identification and resolution as defined by Inspection Procedure 71152. All documents reviewed during this inspection are listed in the Attachment to this report.
.1 Assessment of Corrective Action Program Effectiveness
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed the procedures that described Constellation Energy Nuclear Group, LLC's (CENG) corrective action program (CAP) at Calvert Cliffs. To assess the effectiveness of the CAP, the inspectors reviewed performance in three primary areas:
problem identification, prioritization and evaluation of issues, and corrective action implementation. The inspectors compared performance in these areas to the requirements and standards contained in 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, "Corrective Action," and CNG-CA-1.01-1000, "Corrective Action Program." For each of these areas, the inspectors considered risk insights from the station's risk analysis and reviewed condition reports selected across the seven cornerstones of safety in the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process. Additionally, the inspectors attended multiple Plan-of-the-Day, Condition Report Screening, and Management Review Committee meetings. The inspectors selected items from the following functional areas for review: engineering, operations, maintenance, emergency preparedness, radiation protection, chemistry, physical security, and oversight programs.
- (1) Effectiveness of Problem Identification
In addition to the items described above, the inspectors reviewed system health reports, a sample of completed corrective and preventative maintenance work orders, completed surveillance test procedures, operator logs, and periodic trend reports. The inspectors also completed field walkdowns of various systems on site, such as the emergency diesel generators, station battery 11, 12, 21 and 22 rooms, component cooling head tanks, component cooling pump rooms, service water head tanks, refueling water tanks to ensure that observable deficiencies were documented.
Additionally, the inspectors reviewed a sample of condition reports (CRs) written to document issues identified through internal self-assessments, audits, emergency preparedness drills, and the operating experience program. The inspectors completed this review to verify that Constellation entered conditions adverse to quality into their CAP as appropriate.
- (2) Effectiveness of Prioritization and Evaluation of Issues
The inspectors reviewed the evaluation and prioritization of a sample of CRs issued since the last NRC biennial Problem Identification and Resolution inspection completed in September 2011. The inspectors also reviewed CRs that were assigned lower levels of significance that did not include formal cause evaluations to ensure that they were properly classified. The inspectors' review included the appropriateness of the assigned significance, the scope and depth of the causal analysis, and the timeliness of 4 resolution. The inspectors assessed whether the evaluations identified likely causes for the issues and developed appropriate corrective actions to address the identified causes. Further, the inspectors reviewed equipment operability determinations, reportability assessments, and extent-of-condition reviews for selected problems to verify these processes adequately addressed equipment operability, reporting of issues to the NRC, and the extent of the issues.
- (3) Effectiveness of Corrective Actions The inspectors reviewed Constellation's completed corrective actions through documentation review and, in some cases, field walkdowns to determine whether the actions addressed the identified causes of the problems. The inspectors also reviewed CRs for adverse trends and repetitive problems to determine whether corrective actions were effective in addressing the broader issues. The inspectors reviewed Constellation's timeliness in implementing corrective actions and effectiveness in precluding recurrence for significant conditions adverse to quality. The inspectors also reviewed a sample of CRs associated with selected non-cited violations (NCVs) and findings to verify that Constellation's personnel properly evaluated and resolved these issues. The inspectors also reviewed a sample of CRs associated with selected NCVs, findings, and licensee event reports to verify that Constellation personnel properly evaluated and resolved these issues. In addition, the corrective action review was expanded to five years to evaluate Constellation's actions related to system performance issues identified for the 125 VDC system.
b. Assessment
- (1) Effectiveness of Problem Identification Based on the samples selected, the inspectors determined that, in general, Constellation identified problems and entered them into the CAP at a low threshold. Constellation personnel at Calvert Cliffs initiated approximately 23,000 CRs between September 2011 and September 2013. Based on the samples reviewed, the inspectors determined that Constellation trended equipment and programmatic issues, and appropriately identified problems in CRs. The inspectors verified that conditions adverse to quality identified through this review were entered into the CAP as appropriate. Additionally, inspectors concluded that personnel were identifying trends at low levels. In general, inspectors did not identify any issues or concerns that had not been appropriately entered into the CAP for evaluation and resolution. In response to several questions and minor equipment observations identified by the inspectors during plant walkdowns, Constellation personnel promptly initiated CRs and/or took immediate action to address the issues.
5
- (2) Effectiveness of Prioritization and Evaluation of Issues The inspectors determined, based on the samples selected, that Constellation, in general, appropriately prioritized and evaluated issues commensurate with the safety significance of the identified problem. CRs were screened for operability and reportability, categorized by significance, and assigned to a department for evaluation and resolution. The inspectors observed the various CR screening and management review groups and noted that they considered equipment operability and reportability, human performance issues, radiological safety concerns, repetitiveness, adverse trends, and potential impact on safety conscious work environment (SCWE) during the conduct
of these reviews.
Items reviewed by the inspectors during the inspection were categorized for evaluation and resolution commensurate with the significance of the issues. Guidance provided by Constellation procedure, CNG-CA-1.01-1000, "Corrective Action Program," for categorization appeared sufficient to ensure consistent implementation based on the sample of CRs reviewed by the inspectors. In general, issues were appropriately screened and prioritized commensurate with their safety significance.
The inspectors reviewed a sample of root cause analyses with included common cause analyses, apparent cause analyses, and a number of individual CR evaluations. For the evaluations reviewed, the inspectors noted that Constellation's evaluations were generally thorough and appropriately considered extent of condition, generic issues, and previous occurrences.
- (3) Effectiveness of Corrective Actions The inspectors concluded that corrective actions for identified deficiencies were typically timely and adequately implemented. The inspectors also concluded that Constellation performed in-depth effectiveness reviews for significant issues to verify that implemented corrective actions were effective. The inspectors' review of the CR disposition documentation and verification of corrective action implementation showed that Constellation routinely developed adequate corrective action as evidenced by the lack of repetitive events. The inspectors also reviewed corrective actions for the 125 VDC
system for the last five years to evaluat e Constellation's actions for various system performance issues and noted comprehensive actions for significant issues, and reasonable corrective actions for minor issues.
c. Findings
No findings were identified.
.2 Assessment of the Use of Operating Experience (OE)
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed a sample of CRs associated with review of industry OE to determine whether Constellation appropriately evaluated the OE information for applicability to Calvert Cliffs and had taken appropriate actions, when warranted. The inspectors also reviewed evaluations of OE documents associated with a sample of NRC generic communications to ensure that Constellation adequately considered the 6 underlying problems associated with the issues for resolution via their CAP. In addition, the inspectors observed various plant activities to determine if the station considered industry OE during the performance of routine and infrequently performed activities.
b. Assessment The inspectors determined that Constellation appropriately considered industry OE
information for applicability, and used the information for corrective and preventive actions to identify and prevent similar issues when appropriate. The inspectors determined that OE was appropriately applied and lessons learned were communicated and incorporated into plant operations and procedures when applicable. The inspectors also observed that industry OE was routinely discussed and considered during the conduct of condition report screening meetings and pre-job briefs.
c. Findings
No findings were identified.
.3 Assessment of Self-Assessments and Audits
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed a sample of audits, including the most recent audit of the CAP, departmental self-assessments, and assessments performed by independent organizations. These reviews were performed to determine if problems identified through these assessments were entered into the CAP when appropriate and whether corrective actions were initiated to address identified deficiencies. The effectiveness of the audits and assessments was evaluated by comparing audit and assessment results against self-revealing and NRC-identified observations made during the inspection.
b. Assessment The inspectors concluded that self-assessments, audits, and other internal Constellation assessments were generally critical, probing, thorough, and effective in identifying issues. The inspectors observed that these audits and self-assessments were completed in a methodical manner by personnel knowledgeable in the subject matter. The audits and self-assessments were completed to a sufficient depth to identify issues that were entered into the CAP for evaluation. In general, corrective actions associated with the identified issues were implemented commensurate with their safety significance.
c. Findings
No findings were identified.
4. Assessment of Safety Conscious Work Environment
a. Inspection Scope
During interviews with station personnel, the inspectors assessed the safety conscious work environment at Calvert Cliffs. Specifically, the inspectors interviewed personnel to determine whether they were hesitant to raise safety concerns to their management 7 and/or the NRC. The inspectors also interviewed the station Employee Concerns Program coordinator to determine what actions are implemented to ensure employees were aware of the program and its availability with regards to raising safety concerns. The inspectors reviewed the Employee Concerns Program files to ensure that Constellation entered issues into the CAP, when appropriate.
b. Assessment During interviews, Calvert Cliffs staff expressed a willingness to use the CAP to identify plant issues and deficiencies and stated that they were willing to raise safety issues. The inspectors noted that no one interviewed stated that they personally experienced or were aware of a situation in which an individual had been retaliated against for raising a safety issue. All persons interviewed demonstrated an adequate knowledge of the CAP and the Employee Concerns Program. Based on these limited interviews, the inspectors concluded that there was no evidence of an unacceptable safety conscious work environment and no significant challenges to the free flow of information.
c. Findings
No findings were identified.
4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit
On September 27, 2013, the inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. George Gellrich, Site Vice President, and other members of the Calvert Cliffs staff. The inspectors confirmed that proprietary information was reviewed by inspectors during the course of the inspection, that any proprietary information that was reviewed was returned to Constellation, and that the content of this report includes no proprietary information.
ATTACHMENT:
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
Licensee personnel
- G. Gellrich, Site Vice President
- M. Flaherty, Plant General Manager
- S. Henry, Manager, Operations
- D. Lauver, Director, Licensing
- D. Dellario, Manager, Engineering
- H. Daman, Manager, Maintenance
- M. Jones, Director, Performance Improvement Unit
- C. Neyman, Senior Engineering Analyst, Licensing
- J. Schoolcraft, Performance Improvement Unit
- J. Phifer, Senior Analyst, Quality and Performance Assessment
- S. Loeper, Principal Engineer, System Engineering
- E. Kreahling, Principal Engineer, System Engineering
- R. Jones, Supervisor, Engineering Programs
- C. Grooms, General Supervisor, Operations Support
- L. Smith, General Supervisor, Engineering Asset Management
- G. Dare, Senior Engineering Analyst, System Engineering
- M. Major, Senior Engineering Analyst, System Engineering
- R. Bleacher, Operations Technical Writer
- J. Gaines, General Supervisor Shift Operations
- P. Beavers, General Supervisor Operations Training
- R. Stark, Design Engineer
- J. Wynn, System Engineer
- C. Conover, Chemistry Supervisor
- J. Stone, Supervisor Engineering
LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED
Opened and Closed
None
LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED
Section 4OA2: Identification and Resolution of Problems
- Audits and Self-Assessments
- SEC-12-01-C, Security, Access Authorization & Fitness For Duty Programs
- SEC-13-01-C, Access Authorization & Fitness For Duty Programs
- OPS-12-01-C, Nuclear Operations Program
- SA-2012-000003, OE Program Focused Self-Assessment
- SA-2012-000005, Department Corrective Action Review Team (DCART) Effectiveness Self-Assessment Attachment
- SA-2013-000119, EPRI guidelines for diesel generator Sulfate, feed and bleed strategies
- MAI-13-01-C, Maintenance Program Audit
- CHE-13-01-C, Chemistry Program
- BM-2012-00032, Benchmark on Emergency Preparedness, post Seismic
- BM-2011-00225, Benchmark on Water Treatment to reduce corrosion
- BM-2013-00119, Benchmark on Closed Cooling Water chemistry
Condition Reports
(CRs)
- 2013-007311
- 2013-007318
- 2013-007337
- 2013-007377
- 2013-007379
- 2013-007626
- 2008-001434
- 2009-004927
- 2010-009891 2010-010103
- 2010-010486
- 2010-011675
- 2011-003061
- 2011-003714 2011-004110
- 2011-005150
- 2011-005197
- 2011-005536
- 2011-005604 2011-006211
- 2011-006679
- 2011-006836
- 2011-006838
- 2011-008317
- 2011-009223 2011-009544
- 2011-010259
- 2011-010294
- 2011-010518
- 2011-010612
- 2011-011302
- 2011-011345
- 2011-011569
- 2012-000894
- 2012-000895
- 2012-001027
- 2012-001140 2012-001294
- 2012-002079
- 2012-002344
- 2012-004150
- 2012-004225 2012-004279
- 2012-004280
- 2012-004281
- 2012-004282
- 2012-004370
- 2012-004552
- 2012-004578
- 2012-004615
- 2012-004936
- 2012-004971
- 2012-005108
- 2012-005425
- 2012-005686
- 2012-005789
- 2012-005791 2012-005793
- 2012-005794
- 2012-005795
- 2012-005796
- 2012-005797
- 2012-005798
- 2012-006059
- 2012-006199
- 2012-006574
- 2012-006926
- 2012-007079
- 2012-007098
- 2012-007099
- 2012-007427
- 2012-007570
- 2012-009031
- 2012-009077 2012-009564
- 2012-009838
- 2012-009976
- 2012-009977
- 2012-010499
- 2012-010578 2012-010579
- 2012-010581
- 2012-010581
- 2012-010583 2012-010584
- 2012-011499
- 2013-000481 2013-000752
- 2013-001208
- 2013-001909
- 2013-003275
- 2013-003346
- 2013-003825
- 2013-003857
- 2013-004073 2013-004141
- 2013-004322
- 2013-004554
- 2013-004967
- 2013-005357
- 2013-005410
- 2013-005427
- 2013-005598
- 2013-005657
- 2013-005740
- 2013-005853
- 2013-006072
- 2013-006074
- 2013-006130
- 2013-006142
- 2013-006244
- 2013-006274
- 2013-006276
- 2013-006283
- 2013-006334
- 2013-006371
- 2013-006732
- 2013-006995
- 2013-007069
- 2013-007091
- 2013-007123
- 2013-007233
- 2013-007239
- 2013-007254
- 2013-007256
- 2013-007263
- 2013-007271
- 2013-007275
- 2013-007276
- Attachment
- 2013-007281
- 2013-007282
- 2013-007283
- 2013-007284
- 2013-007286
- 2013-007288
- Identified during this inspection
- Non-Cited Violations and Findings 05000317/318/2011005-01, CCNPP Did Not Adequately Prescribe and Implement Procedures Associated with Protected Equipment 05000318/2012004-02, Corrective Actions Not Completed for Drains in the Intake Structure
- 05000317/318/2013003-02, Inadequate Steam Generator Tube Rupture Emergency Operating
Procedure
- 05000317/318/2011004-01,Inadequate corrective actions associated with submerged saltwaterpump motor cables 05000317/318/2012002-01, Failure to establish test program for auxiliary feedwater emergency air accumulators 05000317/318/2012009-01, Failure to establish testing program for engineering safety actuation system shutdown sequencer 0500318/2013002-01, Failure to establish adequate design control measures for diesel fuel oil cloud point 05000317/318/2013003-01, Failure to establish a test program for diesel fuel oil check valves
- 05000317/318/2012003-01, PORV Maintenance Procedure Inadequacy
- 05000317/318/2011004-01, Inadequate Protected Equipment Controls
Operating Experience
- RIS 12-09, Endorsement of Nuclear Energy Institute Guidance Using an Alternative Method to Manage Cumulative Fatigue at Nuclear Power Reactor Sites
- IN 2012-01, Seismic considerations-principally issues involving tanks
- IN 2012-03, Design vulnerability in electrical power systems
- BM-2013-00107, Benchmark on Steam Generator Management
- BM-2011-00193 Benchmark and Self-Assessment on
Operating Experience
(OE) of PI&R related to plant deficiencies
Procedures
- CNG-CA-1.01-1000, "Corrective Action Program," Rev. 00902
- CNG-CA-1.01-1001, "Management Review Committee," Rev. 00500
- CNG-CA-1.01-1003, "Performance Improvement Coordinators," Rev. 00100
- CNG-CA-1.01-1004, "Root Cause Analysis," Rev. 00804
- CNG-CA-1.01-1005, "Apparent Cause Evaluation," Rev. 00200
- CNG-CA-1.01-1007, "Performance Improvement Program Trending and Analysis," Rev. 00200
- CNG-CA-1.01-1010, "Use of Operating Experience," Rev. 01000
- CNG-CA-1.01-1011, "Management Observation Program," Rev. 00501
- CNG-OP-1.01-2010, Operator Workaround/Challenge Control, Revision 00000
- CNG-CA-1.01-GL200, "Causal Analysis Handbook," Rev. 00501
- CNG-CA-1.01-GL400, "Fleet Trend Codes," Rev. 00600
- CNG-CA-1.01-GL700, "Departmental Corrective Action Review Team," Rev. 00100
- CNG-CA-1.01-GL800, "Corrective Action Completion Evaluation," Rev. 00200
- CNG-CA-2.01-1000, Self-Assessment and Benchmarking Process, Revision 00702
- NO-1-123, Managing Operator Impacts, Revision 00101
- Attachment
- NO-1-200, Control of Shift Activities, Revision 05200
- SS-100, Conduct of Security Equipment Modification, Revision 10
- CP-0222, Specifications and Surveillance Diesel Generator Jacket Cooling System, Revision
- 01300
- EOP-5, Loos of Coolant Accident, Revision 22
- EOP-2, Loos of Offsite Power/Loss of Forced Circulation, Revision 14
- EOP-8, Functional Recovery Procedure, Revision 33
- CNG-NL-1.01-1008, "Preparation and Management of External Inspections," Rev 00700
- CNG-AM-1.01-1023, Maintenance Rule Program, Rev 00201
- CNG-NL-1.01-1008, Preparation and Management of External Inspections, Revision 00700
- CNG-AM-1.01-1023, Maintenance Rule Program, Revision 00201
- MAI-13-01-C, Maintenance Program Audit, Revision 0
Work Orders
- C90624813
- C91702359
- C91851962
- C91869686
- C91938041
- C92092763
- C92172212
- C92201042
- C92234558
- C92234559
- C92299069
- C92311279
- C92328793
- C92371110
- C92405589 Drawings 60727sh0002, Diesel Generator Cooling Water, Starting Air, Fuel, & Lube Oil Diesel No. 1B, Revision 39 60710sh0001, Component Cooling System, Revision 39 63017sh0002, Single Line Diagram Reactor 480V
- MCC 214R, Revision 44 63017sh0001, Single Line Diagram Reator 480V
- MCC 204R, Revision 44 61017sh0001, Single line Diagram Reactor 480V
- MCC 104R, Revision 41 61017sh0002, Single line Diagram Reactor 480V
- MCC 114R, Revision 45
- 63022, Single Line Diagram 120V AC Vital System, Revision 41
- 61058, Logic Diagram Engineered Safety Features Actuation System Unit 1, Revision 36 61022sh0001, Single Line Diagram 120V AC Vital Systems, Revision 51 61030, Single Line Diagram Vital 120V AC & 125V DC Emergency 250V DC FSAR Fig. No. 8-5, Revision 32
- 63024, Single Line Diagram 125V DC Vital System Bus 21, Revision 38 61005, Meter and Relay Diagram 4KV System Unit Buses 11 and 14 FSAR Fig No.8-4, Revision 36
- 61025, Single Line Diagram 125V DC Vital System Buses 12 and 22, Revision 31
- 61024, Single Line Diagram 125V DC Vital System Bus 11, Revision 52
Miscellaneous
- CCNPP Utilities Service Alliance Nuclear Safety Culture Assessment, dated August 2011 CCNPP Utilities Service Alliance Nuclear Safety Culture Assessment, dated August 2013
- OI-43C, Unit 2 Main Turbine Performance Evaluation Checks, Rev 20
- NO-1-203, Operations Performance Evaluation Requirements, RT 2-98-4-O-M, Rev 4 Shift Turnover Information Sheets dated 09/12/13 and 09/25/13
- Attachment Security Maintenance Request for Period 01/01/13 through 09/12/13 Agenda - Condition Report and OE Screening Committee dated 09/10/13
- Agenda - Management Review Committee dated 09/11/13 and 09/25/13 Quarterly Operations Aggregate Impact Assessment, July 2013 Part 21 Report 2002-10, Inadequate electric motor winding slot fill, Revisions 1 & 2 Regulatory Guide 1.52, Design, Testing, and Maintenance Criteria for Post Accident Engineered-Safety-Feature Atmosphere Cleanup System Air Filtration and Adsorption Units of Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants, Revision 2, March 1978 Purchase Order
- 421690, Containment Air Cooler and Iodine Removal Unit Motors
- EPRI Technical Report, Closed Cooling Water Chemistry Guideline, Revision 1 ANSI N41.12-1975, IEEE Standards Criteria for Class 1E Power Systems for Nuclear Power Generating Stations, March 14, 1975 EP EAL Upgrade to
- NEI 99-01, Rev 5, as MRC approved on 9/23/2013 EP Department Health Indicator for 2012-2013 PQA Audit
- EPP-13-01-C, Emergency Preparedness Program, dated 2/14/2013, Revision 0
- SA-2012-000046, Maintenance Rule (a)(3) Self-Assessment for
- Nov 2010-Oct 2012, Rev 0
- SA- 2012-000090, Maintenance Self-Assessment on Supervisor Training, Revision 0
- Maintenance Rule Program Health Report for 1/1/2013-3/31/2013, Revision 0
- Maintenance Department Excellence Plan for 2013, Revision 0 Maintenance Corrective Action Program Health Report for August 2013, Revision 0
- Attachment