ML020850432: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
Nuclear Management Company, LLC | Nuclear Management Company, LLC | ||
6610 Nuclear Road | 6610 Nuclear Road | ||
Two Rivers, WI 54241 | Two Rivers, WI 54241 | ||
SUBJECT: | SUBJECT: | ||
POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT | |||
NRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-266/02-03(DRP); 50-301/02-03(DRP) | |||
Dear Mr. Warner: | Dear Mr. Warner: | ||
On February 25, 2002, the NRC completed a team inspection at the Point Beach Nuclear Plant. | On February 25, 2002, the NRC completed a team inspection at the Point Beach Nuclear Plant. | ||
The enclosed report documents the inspection findings which were discussed on February 25 | The enclosed report documents the inspection findings which were discussed on February 25 | ||
with you and members of your staff. | with you and members of your staff. | ||
This inspection was an examination of activities conducted under your license as they relate to | This inspection was an examination of activities conducted under your license as they relate to | ||
the identification and resolution of problems, and compliance with the Commissions rules and | the identification and resolution of problems, and compliance with the Commissions rules and | ||
regulations and with the conditions of your operating license. Within these areas, the | regulations and with the conditions of your operating license. Within these areas, the | ||
inspection involved selected examination of procedures and representative records, | inspection involved selected examination of procedures and representative records, | ||
observations of activities, and interviews with personnel. | observations of activities, and interviews with personnel. | ||
On the basis of the samples selected for review, the team concluded that, overall, problems | On the basis of the samples selected for review, the team concluded that, overall, problems | ||
were properly identified, evaluated, and resolved within the problem identification and resolution | were properly identified, evaluated, and resolved within the problem identification and resolution | ||
program. However, the inspectors identified one finding for which the safety significance was | program. However, the inspectors identified one finding for which the safety significance was | ||
still to be determined. This issue pertained to the failure of the 2P-15B safety injection pump on | still to be determined. This issue pertained to the failure of the 2P-15B safety injection pump on | ||
February 20, 2002, because of nitrogen gas binding. The conditions that resulted in the | February 20, 2002, because of nitrogen gas binding. The conditions that resulted in the | ||
accumulation of nitrogen in the pump were still being evaluated by both your staff and the NRC | accumulation of nitrogen in the pump were still being evaluated by both your staff and the NRC | ||
at the end of this inspection. This issue will be considered an Unresolved Item pending | at the end of this inspection. This issue will be considered an Unresolved Item pending | ||
completion of those reviews. A preliminary NRC review of the risk significance of the finding | completion of those reviews. A preliminary NRC review of the risk significance of the finding | ||
determined that it was at least of very low safety significance (Green). | determined that it was at least of very low safety significance (Green). | ||
M. Warner | M. Warner | ||
-2- | |||
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter | In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter | ||
and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public | and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public | ||
Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) component of | Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) component of | ||
NRCs document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at | NRCs document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at | ||
http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/ADAMS/index.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/ADAMS/index.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | ||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ | |||
Roger Lanksbury, Chief | |||
Branch 5 | |||
Division of Reactor Projects | |||
Docket Nos. 50-266; 50-301 | Docket Nos. 50-266; 50-301 | ||
License Nos. DPR-24; DPR-27 | License Nos. DPR-24; DPR-27 | ||
Enclosure: | Enclosure: | ||
Inspection Report 50-266/02-03(DRP); | |||
cc w/encl: | 50-301/02-03(DRP) | ||
cc w/encl: | |||
R. Grigg, President and Chief | |||
Operating Officer, WEPCo | |||
R. Anderson, Executive Vice President | |||
and Chief Nuclear Officer | |||
T. Webb, Licensing Manager | |||
D. Weaver, Nuclear Asset Manager | |||
T. Taylor, Plant Manager | |||
A. Cayia, Site Director | |||
J. ONeill, Jr., Shaw, Pittman, | |||
Potts & Trowbridge | |||
K. Duveneck, Town Chairman | |||
Town of Two Creeks | |||
D. Graham, Director | |||
Bureau of Field Operations | |||
A. Bie, Chairperson, Wisconsin | |||
Public Service Commission | |||
S. Jenkins, Electric Division | |||
Wisconsin Public Service Commission | |||
State Liaison Officer | |||
DOCUMENT NAME: G:\poin\poi2002003 drp.wpd | DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\poin\\poi2002003 drp.wpd | ||
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment/enclosure "E" = Copy with attachment/enclosure "N" = No copy | To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment/enclosure "E" = Copy with attachment/enclosure "N" = No copy | ||
OFFICE | |||
RIII | |||
C RIII | |||
N | |||
NAME | |||
MKunowski/trn | |||
RLanksbury | |||
DATE | |||
03/25/02 | |||
03/25/02 | |||
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY | |||
M. Warner | M. Warner | ||
-3- | |||
ADAMS Distribution: | ADAMS Distribution: | ||
WDR | WDR | ||
DFT | DFT | ||
BAW | BAW | ||
RidsNrrDipmIipb | RidsNrrDipmIipb | ||
| Line 102: | Line 114: | ||
JRK1 | JRK1 | ||
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | |||
REGION III | |||
Docket Nos: | Docket Nos: | ||
License Nos: | 50-266; 50-301 | ||
Report No: | License Nos: | ||
Licensee: | DPR-24; DPR-27 | ||
Facility: | Report No: | ||
Location: | 50-266/02-03(DRP); 50-301/02-03(DRP) | ||
Licensee: | |||
Dates: | Nuclear Management Company, LLC | ||
Inspectors: | Facility: | ||
Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 & 2 | |||
Location: | |||
Approved by: | 6610 Nuclear Road | ||
Two Rivers, WI 54241 | |||
Dates: | |||
January 22 through February 25, 2002 | |||
Inspectors: | |||
M. Kunowski, Project Engineer (Lead Inspector) | |||
P. Krohn, Senior Resident Inspector | |||
R. Langstaff, Senior Reactor Engineer | |||
Approved by: | |||
Roger Lanksbury, Chief | |||
Branch 5 | |||
Division of Reactor Projects | |||
2 | |||
IR 05000266-02-03; 05000301-02-03, on 1/22-2/25/2002. Nuclear Management Company, | SUMMARY OF FINDINGS | ||
IR 05000266-02-03; 05000301-02-03, on 1/22-2/25/2002. Nuclear Management Company, | |||
LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, baseline inspection of the identification and resolution of | LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, baseline inspection of the identification and resolution of | ||
problems. | problems. | ||
The inspection was conducted by two regional inspectors and a resident inspector. No findings | The inspection was conducted by two regional inspectors and a resident inspector. No findings | ||
were identified during this inspection. The significance of most findings is indicated by their | were identified during this inspection. The significance of most findings is indicated by their | ||
color (Green, White, Yellow, Red) using Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Significance | color (Green, White, Yellow, Red) using Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Significance | ||
Determination Process (SDP). Findings for which the SDP does not apply are indicated by | Determination Process (SDP). Findings for which the SDP does not apply are indicated by | ||
No Color or by the severity level of the applicable violation. The NRCs program for | No Color or by the severity level of the applicable violation. The NRCs program for | ||
overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described at its Reactor | overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described at its Reactor | ||
Oversight Process website at http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/index.html. | Oversight Process website at http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/index.html. | ||
Identification and Resolution of Problems | Identification and Resolution of Problems | ||
The team concluded that the licensee was generally effective at identifying problems and | The team concluded that the licensee was generally effective at identifying problems and | ||
putting them into the corrective action program. There was strong management emphasis on | putting them into the corrective action program. There was strong management emphasis on | ||
plant staff to identify problems and, overall, a very responsive plant staff. Since 1997, there | plant staff to identify problems and, overall, a very responsive plant staff. Since 1997, there | ||
had been an average of 4120 condition reports written each year. A recent change from a | had been an average of 4120 condition reports written each year. A recent change from a | ||
mainframe-based, dated, and user-unfriendly corrective action database to a Web-based | mainframe-based, dated, and user-unfriendly corrective action database to a Web-based | ||
system was expected by the licensee to improve plant staff involvement with the corrective | system was expected by the licensee to improve plant staff involvement with the corrective | ||
action program and to increase program management capability. Corrective action program | action program and to increase program management capability. Corrective action program | ||
timeliness was still an area of weakness and one where the licensee was expending additional | timeliness was still an area of weakness and one where the licensee was expending additional | ||
efforts. Included in this effort was an emphasis on making improvements for overdue or less | efforts. Included in this effort was an emphasis on making improvements for overdue or less | ||
than prompt assessments of problems and implementation of corrective actions and for an | than prompt assessments of problems and implementation of corrective actions and for an | ||
excessive number of due date extensions. Although there had been some dissatisfaction | excessive number of due date extensions. Although there had been some dissatisfaction | ||
expressed with some aspects of the corrective action program, the inspectors identified no | expressed with some aspects of the corrective action program, the inspectors identified no | ||
impediments to a safety conscious work environment. One finding was identified that was at | impediments to a safety conscious work environment. One finding was identified that was at | ||
least of very low safety significance (Green). This finding pertained to the failure of the 2P-15B | least of very low safety significance (Green). This finding pertained to the failure of the 2P-15B | ||
safety injection pump on February 20, 2002, because of nitrogen gas binding. The conditions | safety injection pump on February 20, 2002, because of nitrogen gas binding. The conditions | ||
that resulted in the accumulation of nitrogen in the pump were still being evaluated by both the | that resulted in the accumulation of nitrogen in the pump were still being evaluated by both the | ||
licensees staff and the NRC at the end of this inspection. This issue will be considered an | licensees staff and the NRC at the end of this inspection. This issue will be considered an | ||
Unresolved Item pending completion of those reviews. | Unresolved Item pending completion of those reviews. | ||
3 | |||
4. | Report Details | ||
4. | |||
OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA) | |||
4OA2 Identification and Resolution of Problems | 4OA2 Identification and Resolution of Problems | ||
a. Effectiveness of Problem Identification | |||
(1) Inspection Scope | |||
The inspectors conducted plant tours; observed surveillance tests in progress; | |||
interviewed plant personnel; and reviewed inspection reports issued over the last year; | |||
corrective action program documents (condition reports (CRs) - as of | |||
December 21, 2001, CRs were replaced by documents called CAPs (Corrective Action | |||
Program documents)), and selected maintenance work orders (WOs) for several high | |||
risk systems to determine if problems were being properly identified, characterized, and | |||
entered into the corrective action program for evaluation and resolution. These systems | |||
were Service Water (SW), 4160-volt, emergency diesel generators (EDGs), safety | |||
injection (SI), and instrument air. The inspectors also reviewed several recent licensee | |||
audits and self-assessments. The effectiveness of the audits and assessments was | |||
evaluated by comparing the audit and assessment results against self-revealing and | |||
NRC-identified issues. A listing of the documents requested by the inspectors prior to | |||
the inspection and those documents reviewed during the inspection is included at the | |||
end of this report. | |||
(2) Findings | |||
In general, problems were properly identified, characterized, and entered into the | |||
corrective action program for evaluation and resolution. There was strong management | |||
emphasis on plant staff to document problems in the corrective action program and a | |||
plant staff that, overall, was very responsive. Since 1997, there had been an average of | |||
4120 CRs written per year. In 2001, there were 3819 CRs/CAPs generated. On | |||
December 21, 2001, the licensee switched its corrective action program database | |||
system from a mainframe-based, dated, and relatively user-unfriendly system (called | |||
NUTRK) to a Web-based, user-friendly system (called t-Track). | |||
Several process improvements had helped to encourage the writing of CRs\\CAPs: the | |||
CR\\AR hotline; department corrective action program liaisons; the new web-based | |||
system; and the Good Catch initiative for examples of notably good problem | |||
identification. Through routine trending of corrective action program data, the licensee | |||
had identified instances where CR/CAP generation rates by various work groups had | |||
not met station management expectations. For instance, in one plant group, the | |||
expected number of CRs/CAPs were being generated but more than 85% of them were | |||
written by 2 of the 23 persons in the work group. For another group, the percentage of | |||
self-identified CAPs fell below an expected value. In both examples, the licensee took | |||
corrective actions. | |||
4 | |||
Regarding audits and self-assessment findings, there were no major discrepancies with | |||
the observations of the inspectors. Appropriate corrective actions were taken by the | |||
b. | licensee for problems identified during the audits and self-assessments. | ||
b. | |||
Prioritization and Evaluation of Issues | |||
(1) Inspection Scope | |||
The inspectors reviewed a sample of CRs/CAPs to verify the appropriateness of the | |||
category assigned, operability and reportability determinations, extent of condition | |||
evaluations, root and apparent cause evaluations, and the assigned corrective actions. | |||
As part of this assessment, the inspectors attended the stations daily management | |||
meeting where newly generated CRs/CAPs were reviewed and the subsequent daily | |||
meeting of department corrective action program liaisons. The inspectors also attended | |||
a meeting of the Corrective Action Review Board (CARB). In addition, the inspectors | |||
reviewed licensee actions on several problems identified by the inspectors during the | |||
previous problem identification and resolution inspection (PI&R) in March 2001 (NRC | |||
Inspection Report 50-266/01-06; 50-301/01-06). The documents listed at the end of the | |||
report were used by the inspectors during the assessment of this area. | |||
(2) Findings | |||
In general, issues were appropriately categorized, prioritized, and evaluated. In | |||
addition, licensee actions to address a concern identified during the previous PI&R with | |||
the appropriateness of the initial screening of CRs were generally effective. During the | |||
review of CRs/CAPs, the inspectors identified one example (CR 01-0203, 4KV System | |||
Grounds) where not all of the pertinent evaluations conducted by the licensee for a | |||
problem had been documented in the closed-out CR. This example and other examples | |||
identified by the licensee highlight the need for continued emphasis by the licensee on | |||
thorough documentation of evaluations and corrective actions. | |||
c. Effectiveness of Corrective Actions | |||
(1) Inspection Scope | |||
The inspectors reviewed CRs/CAPs to verify that corrective actions commensurate with | |||
the issues were identified and implemented in a timely manner, including corrective | |||
actions to address common cause or generic concerns. During the previous PI&R, the | |||
inspectors identified concerns with daisy-chaining---the closing of CRs to other CRs | |||
which could be closed to yet other CRs-and the possibility that not all of the corrective | |||
actions for the various CRs would be taken because of the difficulty in tracking all of the | |||
problems that may be closed to any one CR. In addition, the inspectors in the previous | |||
PI&R identified a concern with corrective action program timeliness, in that several CRs | |||
had more than a few due date extensions and several CR evaluations and corrective | |||
actions were overdue or had exceptionally extended due dates. The documents listed | |||
at the end of the report were used during the review. | |||
(2) Findings | 5 | ||
(2) Findings | |||
Generally, effective corrective actions commensurate with the issues were identified by | |||
the licensee and implemented in a timely manner. However, problems with overdue | |||
problem assessments and implementation of corrective actions, and with excessive | |||
number of due date extensions were identified by the licensee and the inspectors. | |||
Licensee corrective actions for these problems were ongoing as of the end of the | |||
inspection. Specific observations in this area are discussed below. | |||
* | |||
The inspectors reviewed the licensees actions on CR 93-137, which was written | |||
in 1993 and was still open at the time of the inspection. This CR was written to | |||
document a potential problem with fault currents exceeding the breaker rating for | |||
certain short circuits (bolted faults) in the 480-volt, 4160-volt, and 13.8-kilovolt | |||
systems. This issue had previously been reviewed in late 1996 by the NRC and | |||
a violation was identified for untimely corrective actions (Inspection Report | |||
No. 50-266/96018; 50-301/96018). During the present inspection, the inspectors | |||
concluded that continuing actions by the licensee had been timely. Through | |||
procedure changes and extensive engineering analyses employing a reduction | |||
of over-conservatisms, the licensee had been able to narrow down the problem | |||
and had developed and approved a plan to upgrade certain 480-volt breakers | |||
and bus-work over the next several years that should allow closure of | |||
CR 93-137. | |||
* | |||
Regarding daisy-chaining, the inspectors reviewed an instance where at least | |||
11 CRs pertaining to various problems with the commercial grade dedication and | |||
procurement programs were ultimately closed, either directly or through other | |||
CRs that were closed directly, to one corrective action (Action Number 23) of the | |||
CR written to address a problem with the Alert and Notification System. The | |||
inspectors identified that the two recommended corrective actions for | |||
CR 00-2933, relating to the procedure for the conditional release of QA items | |||
from receiving, had not been implemented. CR 00-2933 had been closed to | |||
CR 00-2312, which had been closed to Action Number 23. Action Number 23 | |||
was closed on November 16, 2001. In this instance, the items not corrected | |||
were minor. | |||
* | |||
Regarding the issue with excessive due date extensions, during the previous | |||
PI&R, the inspectors noted that a CR written in 1997 (CR 97-0249) for the need | |||
to revise the administrative procedure controlling the use of equivalent spare | |||
parts in safety-related systems had the due date extended 13 times. And while | |||
the procedure was revised early last year in response to the procurement of a | |||
replacement service water pump motor with inadequate wire insulation, the CR | |||
remained open pending incorporation of other planned changes to the | |||
procedure. During this PI&R, the inspectors noted that the CRs due date had | |||
now been extended 18 times; however, near the end of the inspection, the | |||
procedure revision to address the remaining changes was approved. | |||
* | |||
In an issue related to timeliness of corrective actions, the inspectors noted that | |||
CR 01-0368 dealt with an unexpected apparent rise in Unit 2 power during a | |||
dilution on Unit 1 on Feb 2, 2001. For this CR there were two corrective actions, | |||
6 | |||
one to do an apparent cause evaluation (ACE) and the other to make an | |||
Operations Notebook entry to notify all crews. The due date for this last item | |||
was initially April 26, 2001, but was changed five times before the action was | |||
closed without being taken because so much time had elapsed since the event | |||
and the operating crews were already aware of the event. | |||
* | |||
Another timeliness issue was associated with the failure on February 20, 2002, | |||
of the Unit 2 B SI pump. The pump seized and failed during a monthly | |||
preventative-maintenance lubrication activity. The licensees initial determination | |||
was that the pump seized due to nitrogen gas binding caused by leakage of | |||
nitrogen-saturated water from the 2A SI accumulator back through two or more | |||
check valves. The licensee also established that corrective actions proposed | |||
after an August 1999 review of NRC Information Notice (IN) 88-23, | |||
Supplement 5, Potential for Gas Binding of High Pressure Safety Injection | |||
Pumps During a Loss-of-Coolant Accident, pertaining to the potential for gas | |||
binding of high head safety injection pumps, were not timely. Timely completion | |||
of these actions may have prevented the failure of the pump. In addition, the | |||
inspectors noted that the possibility of plant conditions conducive of gas binding | |||
was identified in February 2001 when CR 01-0454 was written because of | |||
decreasing level in the Unit 2A SI accumulator. Since much of this information | |||
came to light at the end of the inspection, the inspectors were not able to | |||
complete an evaluation of these issues and had not come to any enforcement | |||
conclusion on this particular matter. | |||
Using the Significance Determination Process (SDP) Phase 1 Screening | |||
Worksheet and the Phase 2 Worksheets for the Mitigating Systems | |||
Cornerstone, the inspectors concluded that enough nitrogen gas may have been | |||
present to cause failure of the 2P-15B pump at anytime during the 30-day period | |||
prior to the pumps failure. The pumps failure rendered one train of SI incapable | |||
of performing its safety function. Based on this information, this finding was | |||
considered to be at least of very low safety significance (Green). Pending | |||
completion of a Phase 3 SDP analysis, the safety significance of the finding is | |||
d. | To Be Determined (TBD) and this issue is considered an Unresolved Item | ||
(URI 50-301/02-03-01). | |||
d. Assessment of Safety Conscious Work Environment | |||
(1) Inspection Scope | |||
The inspectors interviewed plant staff and CRs/CAPs to assess whether there were | |||
impediments to the establishment of a safety conscious work environment. | |||
(2) Findings | |||
From the interviews and record reviews, the inspectors identified no impediments to a | |||
safety conscious work environment. Some individuals expressed dissatisfaction with | |||
some aspects of the corrective action process, such as the user-unfriendly NUTRK | |||
database system (which had since been replaced by a user-friendly Web-based system) | |||
and workers being assigned to assess and correct problems that were identified by the | |||
7 | |||
same workers but would be more efficiently assessed and corrected by someone else. | |||
But the inspectors noted a strong emphasis by management on establishing an | |||
atmosphere conducive to employees readily documenting and resolving problems and | |||
an overall strong sentiment by interviewed plant staff to document problems. | |||
4OA6 Meeting(s) | 4OA6 Meeting(s) | ||
.1 | .1 | ||
Exit Meeting | |||
The inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. M. Warner and other members of | |||
licensee management in an exit meeting on February 25, 2002. Licensee management | |||
acknowledged the findings presented and indicated that no proprietary information was | |||
provided to the inspectors. | |||
8 | |||
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT | |||
Nuclear Management Company, LLC (NMC) | Nuclear Management Company, LLC (NMC) | ||
J. R. Anderson | J. R. Anderson | ||
L. Armstrong | Point Beach Nuclear Plant (PBNP) Production Planning Manager | ||
D. Black | L. Armstrong | ||
A. J. Cayia | Design Engineering Manager | ||
F. Flentje | D. Black | ||
D. Hettick | Nuclear Safety Analysis Senior Engineer | ||
R. Hopkins | A. J. Cayia | ||
T. C. Kendall | Kewaunee-Point Beach (KPB) Site Director | ||
P. Kleinschmidt | F. Flentje | ||
C. W. Krause | NRC Coordinator | ||
R. G. Mende | D. Hettick | ||
K. Peveler | Performance Assessment Manager | ||
S. A. Pfaff | R. Hopkins | ||
R. Pulec | Nuclear Oversight Supervisor | ||
R. Repshas | T. C. Kendall | ||
G. D. Strharsky | Design Engineering Supervisor | ||
T. H. Taylor | P. Kleinschmidt | ||
M. Warner | Bolted Fault Project Manager | ||
T. J. Webb | C. W. Krause | ||
J. Walsh | Senior Regulatory Compliance Engineer | ||
W. Yarosz | R. G. Mende | ||
KPB Engineering Director | |||
K. Peveler | |||
KPB Nuclear Oversight Manager | |||
S. A. Pfaff | |||
Corrective Action Supervisor | |||
R. Pulec | |||
KPB Performance Assessment Manager | |||
R. Repshas | |||
KPB Support Services Manager | |||
G. D. Strharsky | |||
PBNP Assistant Operations Manager | |||
T. H. Taylor | |||
PBNP Plant Manager | |||
M. Warner | |||
Site Vice-President | |||
T. J. Webb | |||
KPB Regulatory Affairs Manager | |||
J. Walsh | |||
KPB Procedures Program Manager | |||
W. Yarosz | |||
KPB Emergency Planning Supervisor | |||
ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED | |||
Opened | |||
50-301/02-03-01 | |||
URI | |||
2P-15B Safety Injection Pump Failure During Monthly | |||
Preventative Maintenance Lubrication Activity | |||
Closed | |||
None | |||
Discussed | |||
None | |||
9 | |||
ACE | LIST OF ACRONYMS USED | ||
AR | ACE | ||
ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers | Apparent Cause Evaluation | ||
CA | AR | ||
CAP | Action Request | ||
CARB Corrective Action Review Board | ASME | ||
CR | American Society of Mechanical Engineers | ||
DC | CA | ||
EDG | Corrective Action | ||
EOP | CAP | ||
EWR | Corrective Action Program | ||
FSAR Final Safety Analysis Report | CARB | ||
INPO Institute of Nuclear Power Operations | Corrective Action Review Board | ||
KPB | CR | ||
KV | Condition Report | ||
LCO | DC | ||
LER | Direct Current | ||
LTA | EDG | ||
MOV | Emergency Diesel Generator | ||
NCV | EOP | ||
NMC | Emergency Operating Procedure | ||
NP | EWR | ||
OA | Engineering Work Request | ||
OE | FSAR | ||
OI | Final Safety Analysis Report | ||
OOS | INPO | ||
PBNP Point Beach Nuclear Plant | Institute of Nuclear Power Operations | ||
PMT | KPB | ||
psi | Kewaunee-Point Beach | ||
QA | KV | ||
QCR | Kilovolt | ||
RCE | LCO | ||
RCP | Limiting Condition for Operation | ||
SDP | LER | ||
SRO | Licensee Event Report | ||
SW | LTA | ||
TS | Less Than Adequate | ||
V | MOV | ||
WO | Motor-Operated Valve | ||
NCV | |||
Non-Cited Violation | |||
NMC | |||
Nuclear Management Company, LLC | |||
NP | |||
Nuclear Power Business Unit Procedure | |||
OA | |||
Organizational Assessment | |||
OE | |||
Operating Experience | |||
OI | |||
Operating Instruction | |||
OOS | |||
Out-Of-Service | |||
PBNP | |||
Point Beach Nuclear Plant | |||
PMT | |||
Post-Maintenance Testing | |||
psi | |||
Pounds Per Square Inch | |||
QA | |||
Quality Assurance | |||
QCR | |||
Quality Condition Report | |||
RCE | |||
Root Cause Evaluation | |||
RCP | |||
Reactor Coolant Pump | |||
SDP | |||
Significance Determination Process | |||
SRO | |||
Senior Reactor Operator | |||
SW | |||
Service Water | |||
TS | |||
Technical Specification | |||
V | |||
Volt | |||
WO | |||
Work Order | |||
10 | |||
The following is a list of licensee documents reviewed during the inspection. Inclusion of a | LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED | ||
The following is a list of licensee documents reviewed during the inspection. Inclusion of a | |||
document on this list does not imply that NRC inspectors reviewed the entire document, but, | document on this list does not imply that NRC inspectors reviewed the entire document, but, | ||
rather that selected sections or portions of the document were evaluated as part of the overall | rather that selected sections or portions of the document were evaluated as part of the overall | ||
inspection effort. In addition, inclusion of a document on this list does not imply NRC | inspection effort. In addition, inclusion of a document on this list does not imply NRC | ||
acceptance of the document, unless specifically stated in the body of the inspection report. | acceptance of the document, unless specifically stated in the body of the inspection report. | ||
Condition Report | Condition Report | ||
93-137 | |||
Plant Electrical Equipment May Be Used in | |||
Applications Beyond Fault Current Ratings | |||
March 30, 1993 | |||
97-0249 (Quality | |||
Condition Report | |||
(QCR)) | |||
Process Improvements SPEED NP 9.3.3 | |||
October 30, 1997 | |||
98-1004 | |||
SI Accumulator Level Decrease | |||
March 11, 1998 | |||
99-2346 | |||
Seismic Qualification of Service Water | |||
Pump Column Bolting Questioned | |||
October 6, 1999 | |||
00-0094 | |||
Plant Electrical Equipment May Be Placed | |||
Into Alignments Beyond Equipment Fault | |||
Current Ratings | |||
January 7, 2000 | |||
00-0128 | |||
P-32F-M Thermocouple Installation Not | |||
Properly Documented | |||
January 11, 2000 | |||
00-0213 | |||
Low Forebay Level, Lowest -9.6', Trip | |||
January 20, 2000 | |||
00-0494 | |||
CR History of CIM Concerns | |||
February 10, 2000 | |||
00-0514 | |||
QA Classification of Packing Kit for 850 | |||
Hydraulic Cylinder Questioned | |||
February 9, 2000 | |||
00-0834 | |||
Corrosion Inhibitor Used in G-01 Without | |||
the Required Evaluation | |||
March 9, 2000 | |||
00-2077 | |||
Procurement Evaluation Deficiencies | |||
June 16, 2000 | |||
00-2312 | |||
Commercial Grade Dedication Program | |||
August 1, 2000 | |||
00-2335 | |||
Abnormal Sound From P-32A Service | |||
Water Pump | |||
August 3, 2000 | |||
00-2423 | |||
Dedication Criteria Changed During Receipt | |||
Inspection | |||
August 10, 2000 | |||
00-2426 | |||
Lack of As Found Data During Receipt | |||
Inspection | |||
August 10, 2000 | |||
00-2427 Documenting Discrepancies During Receipt | 11 | ||
00-2427 | |||
00-2428 Technical Evaluations Dont Address | Documenting Discrepancies During Receipt | ||
Inspection | |||
00-2792 Less Than Adequate Wire Storage, QA | August 10, 2000 | ||
00-2428 | |||
00-2812 Alert and Notification System (ANS) Siren | Technical Evaluations Dont Address | ||
Equipment Qualification | |||
00-2933 Form for QA Conditional Release Form | August 10, 2000 | ||
00-2792 | |||
00-2948 Crib Freeze Event CAs Concerns | Less Than Adequate Wire Storage, QA | ||
00-3079 Condenser Steam Dump Malfunction | Versus Non-QA | ||
00-3299 Damaged Breaker Auxiliary Switches | September 20, 2000 | ||
00-4014 Leak On Unit 2 Conoseals | 00-2812 | ||
00-4150 Electrical Perturbation On Unit 2 Generator December 17, 2000 | Alert and Notification System (ANS) Siren | ||
01-0001 Unexpected Alarm During Service Water | Failure Response Weak | ||
September 22, 2000 | |||
01-0003 TS-33 Problems Due To Failing Pressure | 00-2933 | ||
Form for QA Conditional Release Form | |||
01-0022 Less Than Adequate Work Plan To Thaw | Doesnt Match Procedure | ||
September 29, 2000 | |||
01-0030 Service Water Pump Expansion Joints | 00-2948 | ||
01-0039 Service Water Pump Expansion Joints | Crib Freeze Event CAs Concerns | ||
01-0048 P-32C Work Packages Not Ready | October 2, 2002 | ||
01-0102 Less Than Adequate Evaluation of Part 21 | 00-3079 | ||
Condenser Steam Dump Malfunction | |||
01-0109 Rope And Wood On Service Water Piping | October 13, 2000 | ||
01-0111 Untimely CR Initiation by OA Personnel | 00-3299 | ||
01-0112 Replacement Service Water Pump Motors | Damaged Breaker Auxiliary Switches | ||
01-0122 Apparent Cause Evaluation Action Not | October 23, 2000 | ||
00-4014 | |||
01-0148 Wrong Thermocouple Extension Cable | Leak On Unit 2 Conoseals | ||
December 30, 2000 | |||
00-4150 | |||
Electrical Perturbation On Unit 2 Generator | |||
December 17, 2000 | |||
01-0001 | |||
Unexpected Alarm During Service Water | |||
Pump Start | |||
January 1, 2001 | |||
01-0003 | |||
TS-33 Problems Due To Failing Pressure | |||
Indicator | |||
January 2, 2001 | |||
01-0022 | |||
Less Than Adequate Work Plan To Thaw | |||
Frozen Pipe | |||
December 29, 2000 | |||
01-0030 | |||
Service Water Pump Expansion Joints | |||
January 3, 2001 | |||
01-0039 | |||
Service Water Pump Expansion Joints | |||
January 3, 2001 | |||
01-0048 | |||
P-32C Work Packages Not Ready | |||
January 5, 2001 | |||
01-0102 | |||
Less Than Adequate Evaluation of Part 21 | |||
NUTRK Item - AGASTAT | |||
January 10, 2001 | |||
01-0109 | |||
Rope And Wood On Service Water Piping | |||
January 12, 2001 | |||
01-0111 | |||
Untimely CR Initiation by OA Personnel | |||
January 11, 2001 | |||
01-0112 | |||
Replacement Service Water Pump Motors | |||
January 12, 2001 | |||
01-0122 | |||
Apparent Cause Evaluation Action Not | |||
Created | |||
January 12, 2001 | |||
01-0148 | |||
Wrong Thermocouple Extension Cable | |||
Installed | |||
January 16, 2001 | |||
01-0203 4 KV System Grounds | 12 | ||
01-0216 New Thermocouple Found Faulty | 01-0203 | ||
01-0220 Incomplete IWP | 4 KV System Grounds | ||
01-0241 CRs Not Written as Result of | January 19, 2001 | ||
01-0216 | |||
01-0259 West Service Water Supply Isolation Valve | New Thermocouple Found Faulty | ||
January 19, 2001 | |||
01-0289 Service Water Safety Monitor Assumptions | 01-0220 | ||
01-0301 CR Trend Review Problems | Incomplete IWP | ||
01-0307 Service Water Pressure Indicator | January 21, 2001 | ||
01-0310 SW-2930A Valve Body Pitted | 01-0241 | ||
01-0318 No VT-2 Qualified Individual On Shift When January 30, 2001 | CRs Not Written as Result of | ||
Self-Assessment | |||
01-0319 Less Than Adequate Work Plan SFP HX | January 23, 2001 | ||
01-0259 | |||
West Service Water Supply Isolation Valve | |||
01-0323 Temp Change To AOP 9A Concern | Installation | ||
01-0330 Declining Vendor Performance - IPSCO | January 24, 2001 | ||
01-0335 Increased Magnitude Of Change In SW | 01-0289 | ||
Service Water Safety Monitor Assumptions | |||
01-0338 CAP Procedure Violations | January 27, 2001 | ||
01-0341 SW Line Stop Less Than Affective | 01-0301 | ||
01-0344 Service Water Expansion Joint - Spare | CR Trend Review Problems | ||
January 29, 2001 | |||
01-0365 Valve Accessibility Questioned | 01-0307 | ||
01-0368 Unit 2 Rise in Power - Dilution for Unit 1 February 2, 2001 | Service Water Pressure Indicator | ||
01-0369 Energy Had Been Verified Released For | January 30, 2001 | ||
01-0310 | |||
SW-2930A Valve Body Pitted | |||
January 30, 2001 | |||
01-0377 CR Routing and Closing | 01-0318 | ||
01-0380 Line Stop Machines Installation Delays | No VT-2 Qualified Individual On Shift When | ||
Required | |||
January 30, 2001 | |||
01-0319 | |||
Less Than Adequate Work Plan SFP HX | |||
[Spent Fuel Pool Heat Exchanger] Inlet | |||
Valve | |||
January 30, 2001 | |||
01-0323 | |||
Temp Change To AOP 9A Concern | |||
January 30, 2001 | |||
01-0330 | |||
Declining Vendor Performance - IPSCO | |||
February 1, 2001 | |||
01-0335 | |||
Increased Magnitude Of Change In SW | |||
[Service Water] Pump Vibration Readings | |||
February 1, 2001 | |||
01-0338 | |||
CAP Procedure Violations | |||
February 1, 2001 | |||
01-0341 | |||
SW Line Stop Less Than Affective | |||
February 1, 2001 | |||
01-0344 | |||
Service Water Expansion Joint - Spare | |||
Parts Wrong Size | |||
February 2, 2001 | |||
01-0365 | |||
Valve Accessibility Questioned | |||
February 3, 2001 | |||
01-0368 | |||
Unit 2 Rise in Power - Dilution for Unit 1 | |||
February 2, 2001 | |||
01-0369 | |||
Energy Had Been Verified Released For | |||
Tag Series O SW SW-2927A OP REV 2-1 | |||
By The Work Group, But No One From The | |||
Work Group Signed On | |||
February 2, 2001 | |||
01-0377 | |||
CR Routing and Closing | |||
February 6, 2001 | |||
01-0380 | |||
Line Stop Machines Installation Delays | |||
February 5, 2001 | |||
01-0387 SW-2974B Work Schedule Of 2/5/01 Parts | 13 | ||
01-0387 | |||
01-0395 Untimely Corrective Action | SW-2974B Work Schedule Of 2/5/01 Parts | ||
01-0403 Inadequate Safety Screening | Issue | ||
01-0407 Line Stop Seal Failure | February 5, 2001 | ||
01-0418 Procedure Sign Off Sequence Not Used | 01-0395 | ||
01-0421 Service Water Piping Degradation | Untimely Corrective Action | ||
01-0423 4160 VAC Breaker Damage | February 6, 2001 | ||
01-0425 Package Release Without Tag Series | 01-0403 | ||
Inadequate Safety Screening | |||
01-0429 Classification of CR 01-0368 | February 8, 2001 | ||
01-0438 Ineffective Followup on RCE 00-007 Actions | 01-0407 | ||
01-0444 Service Water System Piping Contaminated | Line Stop Seal Failure | ||
01-0448 Containment Fan Cooler SW Flow Out Of | February 7, 2001 | ||
01-0418 | |||
01-0449 NUTRK Not User-Friendly | Procedure Sign Off Sequence Not Used | ||
01-0452 Micrologger Routes Erased | February 8, 2001 | ||
01-0454 U2 'A' Safety Injection SI Accumulator Level February 12, 2001 | 01-0421 | ||
01-0457 Service Water Gauge Out Of Tolerance | Service Water Piping Degradation | ||
01-0471 Accumulator Level Indicator Failing | February 8, 2001 | ||
01-0481 Storage Of Spare SW Pump Motors | 01-0423 | ||
01-0529 Corrective Action Not Incorporated | 4160 VAC Breaker Damage | ||
01-0552 New Piping Insulation Damaged | February 8, 2001 | ||
01-0572 SI Accumulator Level Spikes | 01-0425 | ||
01-0587 Documentation Of Service Water System | Package Release Without Tag Series | ||
Accepted | |||
01-0596 Welder Bypassed Hold Point | February 8, 2001 | ||
01-0605 QCR Closed Prior to Actions Being | 01-0429 | ||
Classification of CR 01-0368 | |||
01-0612 Less Than Adequate Indication On 'F' | February 9, 2001 | ||
01-0438 | |||
Ineffective Followup on RCE 00-007 Actions | |||
January 10, 2001 | |||
01-0444 | |||
Service Water System Piping Contaminated | |||
February 9, 2001 | |||
01-0448 | |||
Containment Fan Cooler SW Flow Out Of | |||
Spec | |||
February 13, 2001 | |||
01-0449 | |||
NUTRK Not User-Friendly | |||
February 13, 2001 | |||
01-0452 | |||
Micrologger Routes Erased | |||
February 12, 2001 | |||
01-0454 | |||
U2 'A' Safety Injection SI Accumulator Level | |||
February 12, 2001 | |||
01-0457 | |||
Service Water Gauge Out Of Tolerance | |||
February 12, 2001 | |||
01-0471 | |||
Accumulator Level Indicator Failing | |||
February 14, 2001 | |||
01-0481 | |||
Storage Of Spare SW Pump Motors | |||
February 14, 2001 | |||
01-0529 | |||
Corrective Action Not Incorporated | |||
February 20, 2001 | |||
01-0552 | |||
New Piping Insulation Damaged | |||
February 22, 2001 | |||
01-0572 | |||
SI Accumulator Level Spikes | |||
February 22, 2001 | |||
01-0587 | |||
Documentation Of Service Water System | |||
Test | |||
February 26, 2001 | |||
01-0596 | |||
Welder Bypassed Hold Point | |||
February 26, 2001 | |||
01-0605 | |||
QCR Closed Prior to Actions Being | |||
Completed | |||
February 26, 2001 | |||
01-0612 | |||
Less Than Adequate Indication On 'F' | |||
Service Water Pump Ammeter | |||
February 27, 2001 | |||
01-0618 Corrective Action Program CAP Self- | 14 | ||
01-0618 | |||
01-0634 RCE 00-067 Corrective Actions | Corrective Action Program CAP Self- | ||
01-0635 Priorities Not Assigned in NUTRK | Assessment Issues | ||
01-0638 SW Mod Work Caused Vacuum Loss | February 28, 2001 | ||
01-0639 SW Mod Work Caused Air In-leakage | 01-0634 | ||
01-0651 Less Than Adequate Closure of Condition March 5, 2001 | RCE 00-067 Corrective Actions | ||
July 1, 2001 | |||
01-0662 Overdue Corrective Action | 01-0635 | ||
01-0693 CIM Not Updated To Reflect New Type | Priorities Not Assigned in NUTRK | ||
March 1, 2001 | |||
01-0697 Condition Report Actions Not Adequately | 01-0638 | ||
SW Mod Work Caused Vacuum Loss | |||
01-0705 Exact Time 'C' CCW [Component Cooling | March 1, 2001 | ||
01-0639 | |||
01-0706 New SW Valves Not Shown On Any | SW Mod Work Caused Air In-leakage | ||
March 1, 2001 | |||
01-0731 Inappropriate Closure of Action | 01-0651 | ||
01-0733 OA Witness Of Shipment | Less Than Adequate Closure of Condition | ||
01-0734 Service Water Motor Shipped | Reports | ||
March 5, 2001 | |||
01-0738 Abnormal Noise From P-32A | 01-0662 | ||
01-0761 CFC [Containment Fan Cooler] Flow | Overdue Corrective Action | ||
March 5, 2001 | |||
01-0768 NUTRK Anonymous Notification | 01-0693 | ||
01-0782 SW Pump Motor Replacement Problems | CIM Not Updated To Reflect New Type | ||
01-0794 Service Water Motor SPEED Insufficient | After Coolers | ||
01-0817 SI Accumulator Fill Concerns | March 7, 2001 | ||
01-0818 Incomplete Weld Exam On Containment | 01-0697 | ||
Condition Report Actions Not Adequately | |||
01-0821 P32C-M Locked Rotor Test Results | Dispositioned - CR 98-1161 | ||
01-0852 Drawings Reflect Wrong Valve Positions | March 6, 2001 | ||
01-0870 Weld Data Sheets Not Complete | 01-0705 | ||
Exact Time 'C' CCW [Component Cooling | |||
Water] Returned To Service Unknown | |||
March 9, 2001 | |||
01-0706 | |||
New SW Valves Not Shown On Any | |||
Controlling Diagrams | |||
March 9, 2001 | |||
01-0731 | |||
Inappropriate Closure of Action | |||
March 12, 2001 | |||
01-0733 | |||
OA Witness Of Shipment | |||
March 10, 2001 | |||
01-0734 | |||
Service Water Motor Shipped | |||
Inappropriately | |||
March 9, 2001 | |||
01-0738 | |||
Abnormal Noise From P-32A | |||
March 11, 2001 | |||
01-0761 | |||
CFC [Containment Fan Cooler] Flow | |||
Outside Of Band | |||
March 13, 2001 | |||
01-0768 | |||
NUTRK Anonymous Notification | |||
March 12, 2001 | |||
01-0782 | |||
SW Pump Motor Replacement Problems | |||
Initiated 3/14/01 | |||
01-0794 | |||
Service Water Motor SPEED Insufficient | |||
March 13, 2001 | |||
01-0817 | |||
SI Accumulator Fill Concerns | |||
March 15, 2001 | |||
01-0818 | |||
Incomplete Weld Exam On Containment | |||
Fan Cooler | |||
March 15, 2001 | |||
01-0821 | |||
P32C-M Locked Rotor Test Results | |||
March 15, 2001 | |||
01-0852 | |||
Drawings Reflect Wrong Valve Positions | |||
March 16, 2001 | |||
01-0870 | |||
Weld Data Sheets Not Complete | |||
March 21, 2001 | |||
01-0903 Procedure Misaligned Valves | 15 | ||
01-0911 Additional Information Provided By | 01-0903 | ||
Procedure Misaligned Valves | |||
March 22, 2001 | |||
01-0919 Wrong Component Danger Tagged | 01-0911 | ||
01-0952 Incorrect Valve Labels | Additional Information Provided By | ||
01-0958 Potential Valve Failure - Valve Stem | Engineering - Operability Of P-32C Drawn | ||
Into Question | |||
01-0983 Containment Fan Cooling Flexible Piping | March 20, 2001 | ||
01-0919 | |||
01-1001 Less Than Adequate Formal Documentation | Wrong Component Danger Tagged | ||
March 22, 2001 | |||
01-0952 | |||
01-1027 Overdue Condition Reports | Incorrect Valve Labels | ||
01-1032 RWST Level Transmitter Found Out of | March 26, 2001 | ||
01-0958 | |||
01-1046 Evaluation Actions Not Documented in | Potential Valve Failure - Valve Stem | ||
Separation | |||
01-1047 NRC/PI&R Inspection Concern of CR Cross | March 26, 2001 | ||
01-0983 | |||
01-1048 NRC/PI&R Inspection Concerns Less Than | Containment Fan Cooling Flexible Piping | ||
Concern | |||
01-1059 Found Local Control Switch | March 28, 2001 | ||
01-1001 | |||
Less Than Adequate Formal Documentation | |||
and Tracking of Effectiveness Review | |||
01-1073 Lost/Misplaced Condition Report | Actions | ||
01-1105 MOV Failed to Shut Remotely | March 30, 2001 | ||
01-1131 Condition Report Closure Inappropriate | 01-1027 | ||
01-1137 Breaker Charging Spring Failed To | Overdue Condition Reports | ||
April 3, 2001 | |||
01-1146 Hoses Not Used For Draining Systems | 01-1032 | ||
01-1150 Breaker Inseat Not Updated In Champs | RWST Level Transmitter Found Out of | ||
01-1178 Heat Exchangers Opened Prior To | Calibration | ||
April 2, 2001 | |||
01-1046 | |||
Evaluation Actions Not Documented in | |||
NUTRK | |||
April 4, 2001 | |||
01-1047 | |||
NRC/PI&R Inspection Concern of CR Cross | |||
Referencing | |||
April 3, 2001 | |||
01-1048 | |||
NRC/PI&R Inspection Concerns Less Than | |||
Adequate SRO Screenings | |||
April 3, 2001 | |||
01-1059 | |||
Found Local Control Switch | |||
For 1A52-84, 1A06 Feed to 1X14 | |||
Transformer, In The Pullout Position. Per | |||
PC 43 Part 2 | |||
April 3, 2001 | |||
01-1073 | |||
Lost/Misplaced Condition Report | |||
April 4, 2001 | |||
01-1105 | |||
MOV Failed to Shut Remotely | |||
April 5, 2001 | |||
01-1131 | |||
Condition Report Closure Inappropriate | |||
April 6, 2001 | |||
01-1137 | |||
Breaker Charging Spring Failed To | |||
Discharge | |||
April 7, 2001 | |||
01-1146 | |||
Hoses Not Used For Draining Systems | |||
April 9, 2001 | |||
01-1150 | |||
Breaker Inseat Not Updated In Champs | |||
April 9, 2001 | |||
01-1178 | |||
Heat Exchangers Opened Prior To | |||
Scheduled | |||
April 17, 2001 | |||
01-1210 Service Water Valve Has Significant Leak | 16 | ||
01-1244 U2 Service Water Leak On A Containment | 01-1210 | ||
Service Water Valve Has Significant Leak | |||
01-1270 High Heat Exchanger Flow Rate | April 11, 2001 | ||
01-1279 Less Than Adequate Specified | 01-1244 | ||
U2 Service Water Leak On A Containment | |||
01-1297 Coordination Of Work Activities | Fan Cooler | ||
April 11, 2001 | |||
01-1319 Containment Fan Cooler Outlet Throttle | 01-1270 | ||
High Heat Exchanger Flow Rate | |||
01-1334 SW-2880 Signature Indicates Valve Stem | April 13, 2001 | ||
01-1279 | |||
01-1339 Closed Work Order - ASME Discrepancies | Less Than Adequate Specified | ||
01-1363 Valves Pre-fabricated Backwards | Post-Maintenance Testing | ||
01-1394 Pressure Test Data | April 14, 2001 | ||
01-1402 ANII Hold Points Bypassed | 01-1297 | ||
01-1453 No Oil in 1P-15A Sightglass | Coordination Of Work Activities | ||
01-1470 Operations Adverse Trend | MR 98-024*J | ||
01-1471 Potentially Decreased Performance | April 14, 2001 | ||
01-1482 Bus And Breaker Short Circuit Rating | 01-1319 | ||
Containment Fan Cooler Outlet Throttle | |||
01-1492 LTA communication on RP Close Out of a | Valve Potential Part 21 | ||
April 17, 2001 | |||
01-1551 Lack of Timely CR Initiation | 01-1334 | ||
01-1556 Condition Report Priority LTA | SW-2880 Signature Indicates Valve Stem | ||
01-1568 Questioning Proper Installation Of CFC Ball May 1, 2001 | Bent | ||
April 18, 2001 | |||
01-1577 Work Order LCO Tracking | 01-1339 | ||
01-1599 Trend Report Finding | Closed Work Order - ASME Discrepancies | ||
01-1600 Potential Adverse Trend in NDE | April 18, 2001 | ||
01-1363 | |||
01-1601 Adverse Trend in Warehouse Fire | Valves Pre-fabricated Backwards | ||
April 19, 2001 | |||
01-1394 | |||
Pressure Test Data | |||
April 21, 2001 | |||
01-1402 | |||
ANII Hold Points Bypassed | |||
April 20, 2001 | |||
01-1453 | |||
No Oil in 1P-15A Sightglass | |||
April 24, 2001 | |||
01-1470 | |||
Operations Adverse Trend | |||
April 24, 2001 | |||
01-1471 | |||
Potentially Decreased Performance | |||
April 24, 2001 | |||
01-1482 | |||
Bus And Breaker Short Circuit Rating | |||
Discrepancies | |||
April 25, 2001 | |||
01-1492 | |||
LTA communication on RP Close Out of a | |||
CR | |||
April 26, 2001 | |||
01-1551 | |||
Lack of Timely CR Initiation | |||
April 30, 2001 | |||
01-1556 | |||
Condition Report Priority LTA | |||
May 1, 2001 | |||
01-1568 | |||
Questioning Proper Installation Of CFC Ball | |||
Valves | |||
May 1, 2001 | |||
01-1577 | |||
Work Order LCO Tracking | |||
May 1, 2001 | |||
01-1599 | |||
Trend Report Finding | |||
May 4, 2001 | |||
01-1600 | |||
Potential Adverse Trend in NDE | |||
[Non-Destructive Evaluation] | |||
May 4, 2001 | |||
01-1601 | |||
Adverse Trend in Warehouse Fire | |||
Protection | |||
May 4, 2001 | |||
01-1602 Error Mode Classifications | 17 | ||
01-1615 Service Water Flow Instrument Misaligned | 01-1602 | ||
01-1631 Effectiveness Review of RCE | Error Mode Classifications | ||
01-1650 Ops Increase Error Rate - Skill Based | May 4, 2001 | ||
01-1615 | |||
01-1677 Coating On Containment Fan Coolers | Service Water Flow Instrument Misaligned | ||
May 2, 2001 | |||
01-1678 Support In Containment Has Unqualified | 01-1631 | ||
Effectiveness Review of RCE | |||
01-1688 TS-76 Concerns | May 4, 2001 | ||
01-1698 Overdue Corrective Actions | 01-1650 | ||
01-1718 Valve Repair Work Inadequacies | Ops Increase Error Rate - Skill Based | ||
01-1723 Work Order Documentation Inadequate | Errors | ||
01-1834 Maintenance Corrective Action Item Due | May 5, 2001 | ||
01-1677 | |||
01-1851 Missing RRM Documentation For | Coating On Containment Fan Coolers | ||
Questioned | |||
01-1856 G01 HX Corrosion | May 7, 2001 | ||
01-1902 Corrective Actions For CR 00-1812 Do Not | 01-1678 | ||
Support In Containment Has Unqualified | |||
01-1962 Condition Report (CR) Without Priorities | Coating | ||
01-1963 Piping Class Incorrectly Shown On P&ID | May 1, 2001 | ||
01-1966 QA/SR RWST Level Transmitter Out of | 01-1688 | ||
TS-76 Concerns | |||
01-1994 OD Part II for CR 01-1559 Not Completed in | May 9, 2001 | ||
01-1698 | |||
01-2035 Lesson Plan Not Revised Per Condition | Overdue Corrective Actions | ||
May 9, 2001 | |||
01-2160 Corrective Action Program Weakness | 01-1718 | ||
01-2085 Safety Injection Pump Motor Bearing Had | Valve Repair Work Inadequacies | ||
May 10, 2001 | |||
01-2104 Insufficient Copper Tubing In Reserve For | 01-1723 | ||
Work Order Documentation Inadequate | |||
May 10, 2001 | |||
01-1834 | |||
Maintenance Corrective Action Item Due | |||
Date Extensions Not Documented | |||
May 21, 2001 | |||
01-1851 | |||
Missing RRM Documentation For | |||
Completed Work | |||
May 23, 2001 | |||
01-1856 | |||
G01 HX Corrosion | |||
May 23, 2001 | |||
01-1902 | |||
Corrective Actions For CR 00-1812 Do Not | |||
Address Concern | |||
May 24, 2001 | |||
01-1962 | |||
Condition Report (CR) Without Priorities | |||
June 4, 2001 | |||
01-1963 | |||
Piping Class Incorrectly Shown On P&ID | |||
June 5, 2001 | |||
01-1966 | |||
QA/SR RWST Level Transmitter Out of | |||
Calibration | |||
June 4, 2001 | |||
01-1994 | |||
OD Part II for CR 01-1559 Not Completed in | |||
30 Days as Required | |||
June 6, 2001 | |||
01-2035 | |||
Lesson Plan Not Revised Per Condition | |||
Report | |||
June 12, 2001 | |||
01-2160 | |||
Corrective Action Program Weakness | |||
June 26, 2001 | |||
01-2085 | |||
Safety Injection Pump Motor Bearing Had | |||
No Oil Visible in Fill Connection | |||
June 17, 2001 | |||
01-2104 | |||
Insufficient Copper Tubing In Reserve For | |||
Work Order | |||
June 18, 2001 | |||
01-2142 U1 Safety Injection Accumulator Level Out | 18 | ||
01-2142 | |||
01-2166 Service Water Isolation Valve Leaks | U1 Safety Injection Accumulator Level Out | ||
of Calibration | |||
01-2168 Service Water Zurn Strainer Inoperable | June 24, 2001 | ||
01-2170 Potential Conflict With Service Water LCOs | 01-2166 | ||
01-2178 Large Fish Kill Results In Unit 2 Trip | Service Water Isolation Valve Leaks | ||
01-2181 Emergent Temp Change To AOP | Through | ||
01-2191 Two Tag Series In Effect For Same Job | June 27, 2001 | ||
01-2237 CR 00-3888 Corrective Action Not | 01-2168 | ||
Service Water Zurn Strainer Inoperable | |||
01-2243 Revision of Operability Determination | June 26, 2001 | ||
01-2170 | |||
01-2264 Corrective Actions Without Assigned | Potential Conflict With Service Water LCOs | ||
June 26, 2001 | |||
01-2267 Scheduled Conflict Would Have Caused | 01-2178 | ||
Large Fish Kill Results In Unit 2 Trip | |||
01-2283 Corrective Action Items Overdue | June 28, 2001 | ||
01-2337 Rework Of Circ Water Seal Supply Strainer | 01-2181 | ||
01-2384 Less Than Adequate Closeout of Condition | Emergent Temp Change To AOP | ||
June 27, 2001 | |||
01-2191 | |||
01-2386 Unknown White Residue On Refueling | Two Tag Series In Effect For Same Job | ||
June 27, 2001 | |||
01-2406 Blockage Of Emergency Diesel Generator | 01-2237 | ||
CR 00-3888 Corrective Action Not | |||
01-2426 Hole In U1 [Unit 1] Refueling Water Storage July 25, 2001 | Completed | ||
July 2, 2001 | |||
01-2487 Priorities Not Assigned As Required to | 01-2243 | ||
Revision of Operability Determination | |||
01-2526 Ineffective Corrective Action - Failure To | Contains Deficiencies | ||
July 3, 2001 | |||
01-2264 | |||
01-2598 AM 3-4 Obsolete Revision of 10 CFR 50.65 | Corrective Actions Without Assigned | ||
Priorities | |||
July 3, 2001 | |||
01-2267 | |||
Scheduled Conflict Would Have Caused | |||
LCO Entry | |||
July 5, 2001 | |||
01-2283 | |||
Corrective Action Items Overdue | |||
July 9, 2001 | |||
01-2337 | |||
Rework Of Circ Water Seal Supply Strainer | |||
July 13, 2001 | |||
01-2384 | |||
Less Than Adequate Closeout of Condition | |||
Report Dealing With Alarm Response Book | |||
Adequacy | |||
July 19, 2001 | |||
01-2386 | |||
Unknown White Residue On Refueling | |||
Water Storage Tank | |||
July 19, 2001 | |||
01-2406 | |||
Blockage Of Emergency Diesel Generator | |||
Cooler Tubes | |||
July 23, 2001 | |||
01-2426 | |||
Hole In U1 [Unit 1] Refueling Water Storage | |||
Tank | |||
July 25, 2001 | |||
01-2487 | |||
Priorities Not Assigned As Required to | |||
Condition Reports | |||
August 3, 2001 | |||
01-2526 | |||
Ineffective Corrective Action - Failure To | |||
Test Redundant Emergency Diesel | |||
Generator | |||
August 8, 2001 | |||
01-2598 | |||
AM 3-4 Obsolete Revision of 10 CFR 50.65 | |||
August 16, 2001 | |||
01-2705 Nuclear Safety Analysis NSA Adverse CR | 19 | ||
01-2705 | |||
01-2707 Condition Report Closed With Uncompleted | Nuclear Safety Analysis NSA Adverse CR | ||
Trend | |||
01-2721 Condition Reports Did Not Determine if | August 29, 2001 | ||
01-2707 | |||
Condition Report Closed With Uncompleted | |||
01-2771 NUTRK Items Without Priority Assigned | Corrective Actions | ||
01-2781 Damaged Auxiliary Switch On 4 KV Breaker | August 29, 2001 | ||
01-2721 | |||
01-2799 Errors In Drawing For G-02 Metering, DCNs | Condition Reports Did Not Determine if | ||
Functional Failures Were Maintenance | |||
01-2810 Potential Adverse Trend in Q List Program | Preventable | ||
01-2918 Evaluation Due Dates | August 29, 2001 | ||
01-2927 Schedule Plant to Revise Refueling | 01-2771 | ||
NUTRK Items Without Priority Assigned | |||
September 7, 2001 | |||
01-2929 Condition Report Closed Without | 01-2781 | ||
Damaged Auxiliary Switch On 4 KV Breaker | |||
A52-DHVR-1200-31 | |||
01-2969 Potential Current Transformer Issue In | September 8, 2001 | ||
01-2799 | |||
01-2994 Less Than Adequate Support For MCE | Errors In Drawing For G-02 Metering, DCNs | ||
Not Done | |||
01-3039 Operability Determinations Not Reviewed | September 9, 2001 | ||
01-2810 | |||
01-3058 Condition Reports With No Assigned Priority October 9, 2001 | Potential Adverse Trend in Q List Program | ||
01-3107 Less Than Adequate Apparent Cause | September 11, 2001 | ||
01-2918 | |||
01-3148 Diesel Testing Not Identified In | Evaluation Due Dates | ||
September 24, 2001 | |||
01-3166 Inadequate Closure of Condition Report CR | 01-2927 | ||
Schedule Plant to Revise Refueling | |||
01-3174 Grounding Card Latch Mechanism Difficult | Procedures to Include Improved Technical | ||
Specifications (ITS) | |||
01-3199 SRO Screening Issues With CR 01-3139 | September 25, 2001 | ||
01-2929 | |||
Condition Report Closed Without | |||
Consideration of Apparent Cause | |||
Evaluation Recommendations | |||
September 28, 2001 | |||
01-2969 | |||
Potential Current Transformer Issue In | |||
1A52-59 Cubicle | |||
September 26, 2001 | |||
01-2994 | |||
Less Than Adequate Support For MCE | |||
Testing Of Unit 2 SI Pump Motor | |||
October 2, 2001 | |||
01-3039 | |||
Operability Determinations Not Reviewed | |||
For ITS Implications | |||
October 5, 2001 | |||
01-3058 | |||
Condition Reports With No Assigned Priority | |||
October 9, 2001 | |||
01-3107 | |||
Less Than Adequate Apparent Cause | |||
Evaluation and Follow-up Actions | |||
October 10, 2001 | |||
01-3148 | |||
Diesel Testing Not Identified In | |||
Schedule/Test Plan | |||
October 16, 2001 | |||
01-3166 | |||
Inadequate Closure of Condition Report CR | |||
01-1329 - FPEE On Modified Fire Damper | |||
October 16, 2001 | |||
01-3174 | |||
Grounding Card Latch Mechanism Difficult | |||
To Verify Engaged | |||
January 18, 2001 | |||
01-3199 | |||
SRO Screening Issues With CR 01-3139 | |||
October 19, 2001 | |||
20 | |||
01-3258 | |||
Safety-Related Bus Voltages High - 7 day | |||
LCO Entered | |||
November 21, 2001 | |||
01-3284 | |||
Condition Reports Threshold for EP Issues | |||
October 26, 2001 | |||
01-3357 | |||
NUTRK Actions Not Prioritized | |||
November 5, 2001 | |||
01-3414 | |||
7% Condition Report Items Overdue | |||
November 9, 2001 | |||
01-3492 | |||
Problems With CR 00-1039 Resolution | |||
November 15, 2001 | |||
01-3545 | |||
Procedures Indicate LCO Is Required May | |||
Be Incorrect | |||
November 26, 2001 | |||
01-3606 | |||
CR Verification Not Completed in Timely | |||
Manner | |||
November 30, 2001 | |||
01-3626 | |||
Less Than Adequate Documentation To | |||
Support Operability Determination | |||
December 3, 2001 | |||
01-3678 | |||
Condition Reports Priority -100 | |||
December 7, 2001 | |||
Operability Determination (OD) | Operability Determination (OD) | ||
OD for CR 93-0137 | |||
Plant Electrical Equipment May Be Used in | |||
Applications Beyond Fault Current Ratings | |||
Revision 8 | |||
August 6, 2001 | |||
OD for CR 00-3299 | |||
Chipped Auxiliary Switch On Breaker | |||
A52-DHVR-1200-15 | |||
October, 2000 | |||
OD for CR 99-2346 | |||
SW Pump Discharge Column Connections | |||
March 6, 2001 | |||
OD for CR 01-1105 | |||
MOV Failed to Shut Remotely | |||
April 6, 2001 | |||
Drawing Number | Drawing Number | ||
PB 31 E APS 240 052 | |||
09 | |||
Schematic Diagram | |||
4160V SWGR Bus 1-A06 (2-A06) | |||
Feeder Breaker 1A52-84 (2A52-89 to STA | |||
Service XFMR IX-14 (2X-14) | |||
Revision D | |||
PB 02 E SIS 000 002 | |||
06 | |||
Elementary Wiring Diagram | |||
4160V SWGR.2A05 Cubicle-74 Safety | |||
Injection Pump 2P-015A | |||
PBNP Unit 2 | |||
Revision D | |||
PB 01 E APS 256 004 | |||
01 | |||
Elementary Wiring Diagram | |||
4160 Switchgear Cubicle-58 Station Service | |||
Transformer Breaker 1A-52-58 | |||
PBNP Unit 1 | |||
Revision E | |||
21 | |||
PB 01 E APW 240 | |||
034 03 | |||
Connection Diagram | |||
4160V Switchgear 1A05-Cubicle 58 | |||
Station Service Transformer 1X-13 | |||
Revision E | |||
PB 01 E APS 03015 | |||
07 | |||
Elementary Wiring Diagram | |||
4160 SWGR 1A05-Cubicle 57 | |||
Bus Tie Breaker 1A52-57 | |||
Revision E | |||
PB 01 E APS 031 001 | |||
11 | |||
Elementary Wiring Diagram | |||
4160 Switchgear Cubicle 60 | |||
Emergency Generator Breaker 1A52-60 | |||
PBNP Unit 1 | |||
Revision E | |||
PB 01 E APS 031 002 | |||
05 | |||
Elementary Wiring Diagram | |||
Alternative Power to 1A-05 from G02 EDG | |||
Breaker 1A52-66 | |||
PBNP Unit 1 | |||
Revision E | |||
PB 01 E RPS 141 | |||
078 18 | |||
Schematic Diagram | |||
SI Logic Engineered Safety Features | |||
(ESF) Systems Train A | |||
Reactor Safeguards Systems | |||
PBNP Unit 1 | |||
Revision E | |||
SK-M-21-2 | |||
Refueling Water Storage Tank - 1-T13, | |||
2-T13 | |||
Revision 0 | |||
PB 01 MSIG 246 001 | |||
05 | |||
1-T13 RWST Assembly And Details | |||
Revision E | |||
Action Request (AR) | Action Request (AR) | ||
AR ACE000251 | |||
Tag Series Changes And Loss Of | |||
Awareness Of Clearance Status | |||
October 22, 2001 | |||
AR ACE000260 | |||
G-04 Low Oil Level | |||
October 30, 2001 | |||
AR ACE000294 | |||
Resistance Readings May Be Affected By | |||
Nomex Wear | |||
November 14, 2001 | |||
AR ACE000299 | |||
IP-29 Turbine-Driven Auxiliary Feedwater | |||
Pump Spurious Overspeed Trips | |||
November 20, 2001 | |||
AR ACE000321 | |||
Wrong Oil Used In Auxiliary Feedwater | |||
Turbine Bearings | |||
December 11, 2001 | |||
AR ACE000325 | |||
Unanticipated Outward Rod Motion | |||
December 13, 2001 | |||
AR ACE000327 | |||
Component Cooling Water Pump Oil | |||
Sample Results | |||
December 17, 2001 | |||
AR ACE000496 Plant Electrical Equipment May Be Used in | 22 | ||
AR ACE000496 | |||
AR ACE000497 4160V and 480V System Operating | Plant Electrical Equipment May Be Used in | ||
Applications Beyond Fault Ratings | |||
April 1, 1993 | |||
AR ACE000498 Operating the 480V System at Voltage | AR ACE000497 | ||
4160V and 480V System Operating | |||
Voltages Are Significantly Higher Than the | |||
Nominal System Voltages | |||
AR ACE000499 System Model Should be Revised With | December 3, 1997 | ||
AR ACE000498 | |||
Operating the 480V System at Voltage | |||
AR ACE000500 Additional Scenarios Should be Analyzed | Magnitudes Higher Than 500V Causes | ||
Equipment to be Derated From Ratings at | |||
480V to Ratings at 600V for Fault Current | |||
December 3, 1997 | |||
AR ACE000526 Missed Surveillance For PAM Core Exit | AR ACE000499 | ||
System Model Should be Revised With | |||
AR CA001184 | Plant Operations to Determine More | ||
Realistic Equipment Alignments | |||
AR CA001193 | December 3, 1997 | ||
AR ACE000500 | |||
Additional Scenarios Should be Analyzed | |||
AR CA001461 | and Existing Scenarios Should be Revised | ||
to More Accurately Reflect How PBNP is | |||
AR CA001634 | Operated | ||
December 3, 1997 | |||
AR ACE000526 | |||
AR CA003148 | Missed Surveillance For PAM Core Exit | ||
AR CA003235 | T/Cs | ||
December 14, 2001 | |||
AR CA001184 | |||
AR CA003236 | Extent of Condition Review of Other | ||
SPEEDs | |||
March 15, 2001 | |||
AR CA001193 | |||
Reinforce Managements Expectations That | |||
Requirements of Administrative Procedures | |||
Are to be Complied With | |||
July 3, 2001 | |||
AR CA001461 | |||
Bus And Breaker Short Circuit Rating | |||
Discrepancies | |||
April 30, 2001 | |||
AR CA001634 | |||
Dilution of Accountability for Programs for | |||
Vendor Technical Information Program and | |||
Component Instruction Manual | |||
June 5, 2001 | |||
AR CA003148 | |||
Revise NP 9.3.3 | |||
November 25, 1997 | |||
AR CA003235 | |||
Review the Calculations for Each Breaker or | |||
Other Piece of Switchgear That is | |||
Calculated to be Overloaded | |||
March 16, 1994 | |||
AR CA003236 | |||
Write and Submit an LER for Condition of | |||
Plant Electrical Equipment May Be Used in | |||
Applications Beyond Fault Ratings | |||
July 10, 1997 | |||
AR CA003237 | 23 | ||
AR CA003237 | |||
Complete a Revision to the Operability | |||
Determination to Address: Equipment | |||
Removed From the List, Equipment Which | |||
May Experience Fault Currents of Higher | |||
Magnitude, and Equipment Added to the | |||
AR CA003238 | List Attached to the New Fault Duty | ||
Calculation | |||
December 3, 1997 | |||
AR CA003239 | AR CA003238 | ||
The SSC in the Operability Determination | |||
for This CR [93-137] Have Been Determined | |||
to be Operable, But Degraded | |||
AR CA003240 | March 26, 1998 | ||
AR CA003239 | |||
Document That the Operability | |||
Determination to Supported Bolted Shorts | |||
AR CA003242 | as Described in CR 93-137 Reflects Most | ||
Recent Review | |||
September 11, 2000 | |||
AR CA003240 | |||
AR CA003518 | Finalize and Issue the New Preliminary | ||
Short Circuit Calculations Based on | |||
Procedure Changes to be Completed Per | |||
AR CA002130 | CR 00-0094 | ||
AR CAP000126 Short Circuit Fault Current Calculations | September 11, 2000 | ||
AR CAP000726 Corrective Actions For CR 00-1812 Do Not | AR CA003242 | ||
Request a Schedule and Justification be | |||
AR CAP001532 Plant Electrical Equipment May Be Used in | Provided for Which One of the Four Options | ||
That Are Being Considered as Possible | |||
AR CAP001877 FSAR Discrepancy On Definition Of Reg | Solutions to the Bolted Fault Issue | ||
August 14, 2001 | |||
AR CAP001886 Incomplete 50.59 Screening Answer For | AR CA003518 | ||
NRC 50.59 Inspection Requested A | |||
AR CAP001897 Letdown Isolation Valve Appendix R | Procedural Tie Be Created In IT-21 And | ||
IT-22, Back To TRM Section 3.5.1 | |||
January 16, 2002 | |||
AR CAP001900 Incomplete Corrective Actions Regarding | AR CA002130 | ||
Potential Adverse Trend in Q List Program | |||
September 13, 2001 | |||
AR CAP000126 | |||
Short Circuit Fault Current Calculations | |||
January 7, 2000 | |||
AR CAP000726 | |||
Corrective Actions For CR 00-1812 Do Not | |||
Address Concern | |||
May 24, 2001 | |||
AR CAP001532 | |||
Plant Electrical Equipment May Be Used in | |||
Applications Beyond Fault Rating | |||
March 30, 1993 | |||
AR CAP001877 | |||
FSAR Discrepancy On Definition Of Reg | |||
Guide Category 2 | |||
January 16, 2002 | |||
AR CAP001886 | |||
Incomplete 50.59 Screening Answer For | |||
Changes To Relief Valve CC-736A/B | |||
January 16, 2002 | |||
AR CAP001897 | |||
Letdown Isolation Valve Appendix R | |||
Operation During Degraded Voltage | |||
Conditions | |||
January 17, 2002 | |||
AR CAP001900 | |||
Incomplete Corrective Actions Regarding | |||
Classification Of RC-427 | |||
January 17, 2002 | |||
AR CAP001901 FSAR Chapter 9 Changes For CFC Service | 24 | ||
AR CAP001901 | |||
AR CAP001910 Safety Evaluation 2000-0014 Incomplete | FSAR Chapter 9 Changes For CFC Service | ||
AR CAP001915 Questioning Corrective Action For | Water Pressure Not Also Made In Chapter 6 | ||
January 17, 2002 | |||
AR CAP001910 | |||
AR CAP001916 Incorrect Answer To Tech Spec Change | Safety Evaluation 2000-0014 Incomplete | ||
January 17, 2002 | |||
AR CAP001957 Individual Requested To Do Work Not | AR CAP001915 | ||
Questioning Corrective Action For | |||
AR CAP001962 WO For SR Equipment Bypassed QC | CR 00-2859 On Screening Procedure Temp | ||
Change | |||
AR CAP001965 SW Pumps Discharge Expansion Joints | January 18, 2002 | ||
AR CAP001916 | |||
AR CAP001966 Outdated Procedures For New PPCS, With | Incorrect Answer To Tech Spec Change | ||
Question In 50.59 Evaluation | |||
AR CAP001970 Poor Loading Of E-12 (SO4B2) Work Week | January 18, 2002 | ||
AR CAP001979 Minor Deficiencies In The Corrective Action January 25, 2002 | AR CAP001957 | ||
Individual Requested To Do Work Not | |||
AR CAP001984 Negative Trend Of Security Self Reporting | Qualified Or Trained To Do | ||
January 24, 2002 | |||
AR CAP001985 NRC Commitment To Inspection Unit 2 | AR CAP001962 | ||
WO For SR Equipment Bypassed QC | |||
AR CAP001992 NUTRK Database Is Inaccurate | Review | ||
January 24, 2002 | |||
AR CAP001965 | |||
AR CAP001996 Lack Of Documentation Of Adverse Issues | SW Pumps Discharge Expansion Joints | ||
AR CAP002031 NP5.3.1 Does Not Allow Closure Of ARs To | Have Surface Cracks | ||
January 25, 2002 | |||
AR CAP002038 Questionable Acceptable Voltage Ranges | AR CAP001966 | ||
Outdated Procedures For New PPCS, With | |||
AR CAP002039 Vibration Indications On G-01 | No New Procedures In Place | ||
AR CAP002065 CAP Closed Without All Corrective Actions | January 25, 2002 | ||
AR CAP001970 | |||
AR CAP002083 P-032D Service Water Pump Vibration And | Poor Loading Of E-12 (SO4B2) Work Week | ||
January 25, 2002 | |||
AR CAP001979 | |||
Minor Deficiencies In The Corrective Action | |||
Program | |||
January 25, 2002 | |||
AR CAP001984 | |||
Negative Trend Of Security Self Reporting | |||
Issues In Corrective Action System | |||
January 25, 2002 | |||
AR CAP001985 | |||
NRC Commitment To Inspection Unit 2 | |||
Internals Lift Rig Not Met | |||
January 25, 2002 | |||
AR CAP001992 | |||
NUTRK Database Is Inaccurate | |||
And Cluttered With Outdated Action | |||
Requests | |||
January 28, 2002 | |||
AR CAP001996 | |||
Lack Of Documentation Of Adverse Issues | |||
January 28, 2002 | |||
AR CAP002031 | |||
NP5.3.1 Does Not Allow Closure Of ARs To | |||
Other Formal Tracking Mechanisms | |||
January 30, 2002 | |||
AR CAP002038 | |||
Questionable Acceptable Voltage Ranges | |||
For Instrument Buses | |||
January 31, 2002 | |||
AR CAP002039 | |||
Vibration Indications On G-01 | |||
January 31, 2002 | |||
AR CAP002065 | |||
CAP Closed Without All Corrective Actions | |||
Completed | |||
February 4, 2002 | |||
AR CAP002083 | |||
P-032D Service Water Pump Vibration And | |||
Shaft Wear Resolution | |||
February 5, 2002 | |||
25 | |||
AR CAP002264 | |||
Untimely Implementation of | |||
Recommendations From IN 88-023-05 | |||
February 21, 2002 | |||
Lists | Lists | ||
List of Apparent Cause Evaluations - 2001 | |||
2001 | |||
List of Completed Root Cause Evaluations - | |||
2001 | |||
2001 | |||
List of Temporary Modifications - 2001 | |||
January 3, 2002 | |||
Root Cause Evaluations (RCEs) | Root Cause Evaluations (RCEs) | ||
98-190 | |||
Inappropriate Design Pressure For The AFW | |||
[Auxiliary Feedwater] Discharge Valve | |||
Modification | |||
Revision 1 | |||
98-214 | |||
Disabled Service Water Pump Auto Start | |||
Feature On EDG [Emergency Diesel | |||
Generator] Breaker Closure Results in | |||
Missed LCO | |||
November 30, 2001 | |||
00-104 | |||
Common Cause Assessment for Procedure | |||
Quality Issues | |||
March 2, 2001 | |||
01-013 | |||
Speed For P-32C Service Water Pump | |||
Motor | |||
01-013 | |||
Replacement Service Water Pump Motor | |||
Does Not Meet Design Requirements | |||
June 8, 2001 | |||
01-033 | |||
Maintenance Rule Component Common | |||
Cause | |||
May 8, 2001 | |||
01-046 | |||
Unit 1 Loss Of Inverter | |||
July 18, 2001 | |||
01-047 | |||
Unit 1 Main Feed Pump Inboard Bearing | |||
Failure | |||
July 19, 2001 | |||
01-0151 | |||
G04 Generator Failure Equipment Rood | |||
Cause | |||
August 5, 2001 | |||
01-052 | |||
Failure To Perform TS Required EDG | |||
Testing | |||
August 9, 2001 | |||
01-055 | |||
Reactor Coolant Pump Seal Malfunction | |||
Caused Unit Shutdown | |||
September 6, 2001 | |||
26 | |||
Nuclear Plant Memorandum (NPM) | Nuclear Plant Memorandum (NPM) | ||
2002-0006 | |||
Minutes From The December 19, 2001 | |||
CARB Meeting | |||
January 4, 2002 | |||
2002-0052 | |||
Third Quarter 2001 Corrective Action | |||
Program Trends | |||
January 28, 2002 | |||
2002-0056 | |||
CARB Agenda For The February 5, 2002 | |||
Meeting | |||
February 1, 2002 | |||
Work Orders | Work Orders | ||
9924742 | |||
Temporary Relocate 1LT-972/1LI-921 to | |||
Allow for Installation of Welds and | |||
Anchorage on RWST, Then Return to | |||
Original Locations | |||
April 14, 2001 | |||
9937026 | |||
Transmitter Enclosure is Damaged, | |||
Condition Report Submitted | |||
April 2, 2001 | |||
9945054 | |||
IT-013 Repair Weld | |||
July 24, 2001 | |||
9945202 | |||
IT-13 Clean Residue/Insp 2 Day Later | |||
July 19, 2001 | |||
Plant Modifications | Plant Modifications | ||
MR-99-040 | |||
Unit 1 RWST Seismic Upgrade | |||
July 12, 2000 | |||
Engineering Work Request (EWR) | Engineering Work Request (EWR) | ||
02-019 | |||
Protective Enclosure for Sightglass/Oiler | |||
Assemblies | |||
January 25, 2002 | |||
Nuclear Power Business Unit Procedures (NPs) | Nuclear Power Business Unit Procedures (NPs) | ||
5.3.1 | |||
Action Request Process | |||
Revision 19 | |||
5.3.7 | |||
Operability Determinations | |||
Revision 8 | |||
5.4.1 | |||
Open Item Tracking System (NUTRK) | |||
Revision 11 | |||
9.3.3 | |||
Spare Parts Equivalency Evaluation [SPEED] | |||
Revisions 2 and 3 | |||
9.8.1 | |||
Specification Preparation, review, and | |||
Approval Process | |||
Revision 0 | |||
27 | |||
9.8.2 | |||
Technical Review and Approval of | |||
Requisitions | |||
Revisions 0 and 1 | |||
9.8.4 | |||
Safety Classification of Sub-Components | |||
and Materials | |||
Revision 0 | |||
9.8.5 | |||
Dedication of Commercial Grade Items | |||
Revisions 0 and 1 | |||
9.8.6 | |||
Conditional Release of QA-related Items and | |||
Services | |||
Revision 0 | |||
9.8.9 | |||
Product Technical Information | |||
Revision 0 | |||
9.9.2 | |||
Quality Receipt | |||
Revision 0 | |||
9.9.3 | |||
Spare Parts Equivalency Evaluation [SPEED] | |||
Revisions 2 and 3 | |||
9.10.1 | |||
Warehouse Material Issue | |||
Revision 0 | |||
10.2.4 | |||
Work Order Processing | |||
Revision 7 | |||
Other Procedures and Documents | Other Procedures and Documents | ||
AM (Administrative | |||
Manual) 3-4 | |||
Implementation of the Maintenance Rule at | |||
PBNP | |||
Revision 4 | |||
A-P-01-17 | |||
Improved Technical Specifications Audit | |||
October 5, 2001 | |||
A-P-01-018 | |||
Maintenance Rule Audit | |||
August 28, 2001 | |||
FP-NO-SQ-01 | |||
Performance of Supplier Audits/Surveys | |||
Revision 1 | |||
FP-SC-GEN-01 | |||
Procurement - General | |||
Revision 1 | |||
FP-SC-RSI-01 | |||
Receiving | |||
Revision 0 | |||
FP-SC-RSI-02 | |||
Quality Receipt | |||
Revision 0 | |||
FP-SC-RSI-03 | |||
Procurement Deficiency Reports | |||
Revision 0 | |||
Licensee Event | |||
Report 97-032 | |||
Inadequately Rated Electrical Buses Could | |||
Disable Switchgear and Cause Secondary | |||
Fires That Prevent Safe Shutdown Per | |||
Appendix R | |||
July 30, 1997 | |||
OEG (OE Group | |||
Guide) 001 | |||
Root Cause Evaluation | |||
Revision 6 | |||
OEG 003 | |||
Corrective Action Program Guidance | |||
Revision 2 | |||
PBF (Point Beach | |||
Form)-0026q | |||
Procedure Preparer/Technical Reviewer | |||
Checklist | |||
Revision 4 | |||
PBF-0026r | |||
Procedure Validation | |||
Revision 1 | |||
PBF-1531 | 28 | ||
PBF-1583 | PBF-1531 | ||
PBF-1586b | Conditional Release Request | ||
S-A-CA-01-01 | Revision 2 | ||
PBF-1583 | |||
Spare Parts | Design Verification Notice | ||
Equivalency | Revision 1 | ||
PBF-1586b | |||
CI Manual Distribution | |||
S-A-CA-01-01 | |||
Assessment of Point Beach Corrective | |||
Action Program | |||
February 2001 | |||
Spare Parts | |||
Equivalency | |||
Evaluation Document | Evaluation Document | ||
2002-006 | 2002-006 | ||
Replace Obsolete Westinghouse Motor With | |||
Equivalent Marathon Electric Motor | |||
February 8, 2002 | |||
Nuclear Oversight Quarterly Reports | |||
1st, 2nd, and 3rd | |||
Quarters, 2001 | |||
Corrective Action Program Performance | |||
Indicators | |||
October, November, | |||
December 2001; | |||
January 2002 | |||
Bolted Fault Meeting Minutes | |||
January 21, 2002 | |||
Project Work Plan: Bolted AC Fault Issue | |||
Revision 3 | |||
August 28, 2000 | |||
AC Bolted Fault Project History and Timeline | |||
2001 | |||
Chemistry Logs | Electrical Fault Overduty Resolution Plan | ||
NUTRK Operating | Updates | ||
May and November | |||
2001; February | |||
2002 | |||
SI Pump Gas Binding Event Operating | |||
Experience Review | |||
NUTRK Operating | February 23, 2002 | ||
Corrective Action Trend Reports | |||
1st, 2nd, and 3rd | |||
Quarters, 2001 | |||
Corrective Action Review Board Member | |||
Attendance Records | |||
Chemistry Logs | |||
Unit 1 RWST Chemical Analyses | |||
February 5, 2002 | |||
NUTRK Operating | |||
Experience Review | |||
NRC Information Notice 88-023, Potential | |||
for Gas Binding of High Pressure Safety | |||
Injection Pumps During a Loss-of-Coolant | |||
Accident, Original Notice and 5 | |||
Supplements | |||
May 12, 1988 | |||
January 5, 1989 | |||
January 30, 1990 | |||
December 10, 1990 | |||
December 18, 1992 | |||
September 1, 1999 | |||
NUTRK Operating | |||
Experience Review | |||
NRC Information Notice 97-040, Potential | |||
Nitrogen Accumulation Resulting From | |||
Backleakage From Safety Injection Tanks | |||
June 26, 1997 | |||
NUTRK Operating | 29 | ||
NUTRK Operating | |||
Experience Review | |||
NUTRK Operating | SOER 97-01, Potential Loss of High | ||
Pressure Injection and Charging Capability | |||
From Gas Intrusion | |||
December 6, 1997 | |||
NUTRK Operating | NUTRK Operating | ||
Experience Review | |||
SEN 179, Long-Standing Design | |||
NUTRK Operating | Weaknesses and Ineffective Corrective | ||
Actions Cause Gas Binding Failures of High | |||
Head Safety Injection Pumps | |||
January 29, 1998 | |||
NUTRK Operating | |||
Experience Review | |||
OE 8830, Potential Nitrogen Voiding and | |||
Water Hammer in the Low Pressure Safety | |||
Injection System | |||
March 26, 1998 | |||
NUTRK Operating | |||
Experience Review | Experience Review | ||
Plant Internal Letter NRC Information Notice No. 88-23: Potential | OE 9876, 4B HHSI Pump Gas Binding | ||
May 4, 1999 | |||
Plant Internal Letter | |||
NEPB-88-252 | |||
Plant Internal Letter NRC Information Notice No. 88-23, | NRC Information Notice No. 88-23: Potential | ||
For Gas Binding of High-Pressure Safety | |||
Injection Pumps During A Loss-of-Coolant | |||
Accident | |||
Plant Internal Letter NRC Information Notice No. 88-23 | June 7, 1988 | ||
Plant Internal Letter | |||
NEM-89-143 | |||
NRC Information Notice No. 88-23, | |||
Plant Internal Letter NRC Information Notice No. 88-23, | Supplement 1: Potential For Gas Binding of | ||
High-Pressure Safety Injection Pumps | |||
During Loss-of-Coolant Accident | |||
March 6, 1989 | |||
Plant Internal Letter NRC Information Notice No. 88-23, | Plant Internal Letter | ||
NEM-90-368 | |||
NRC Information Notice No. 88-23 | |||
Supplement 2: Potential For Gas Binding of | |||
High-Pressure Safety Injection Pumps | |||
During A Loss-of-Coolant Accident | |||
April 23, 1990 | |||
Plant Internal Letter | |||
NPM 91-0400 | |||
NRC Information Notice No. 88-23, | |||
Supplement 3: Potential For Gas Binding of | |||
High-Pressure Injection Pumps During A | |||
Loss-of-Coolant Accident | |||
June 18, 1991 | |||
Plant Internal Letter | |||
NPM 93-0092 | |||
NRC Information Notice No. 88-23, | |||
Supplement 4: Potential For Gas Binding of | |||
High-Pressure Safety Injection Pumps | |||
During A Design Basis Accident | |||
February 5, 1993 | |||
30 | |||
DOCUMENTS REQUESTED FROM THE LICENSEE PRIOR TO ONSITE INSPECTION | |||
Two copies of administrative procedures related to: | Two copies of administrative procedures related to: | ||
corrective action program | |||
work orders | |||
operability determinations | |||
temporary modifications | |||
root cause analysis | |||
procedure change, use, and adherence | |||
One copy of audits and self-assessments conducted since January 1, 2001, in the following | One copy of audits and self-assessments conducted since January 1, 2001, in the following | ||
areas: | areas: | ||
corrective action process | |||
maintenance/work control | |||
operations | |||
engineering | |||
One copy of minutes for onsite and offsite committee meetings, including the Corrective Actions | One copy of minutes for onsite and offsite committee meetings, including the Corrective Actions | ||
Review Board, conducted since January 1, 2001 | Review Board, conducted since January 1, 2001 | ||
Two copies of a listing of: | Two copies of a listing of: | ||
root cause evaluations completed since January 1, 2001 | |||
CRs generated since January 1, 2001, related to corrective actions | |||
work orders and CRs generated since January 1, 2001, related to the service | |||
water, safety injection, and the 4160-volt systems | |||
temporary modifications | |||
operability determinations | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 19:25, 16 January 2025
| ML020850432 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Point Beach |
| Issue date: | 03/25/2002 |
| From: | Lanksbury R NRC/RGN-III/DRP/RPB5 |
| To: | Warner M Nuclear Management Co |
| References | |
| IR-02-003 | |
| Download: ML020850432 (28) | |
See also: IR 05000266/2002003
Text
March 25, 2002
Mr. M. Warner
Site Vice President
Kewaunee and Point Beach Nuclear Plants
Nuclear Management Company, LLC
6610 Nuclear Road
Two Rivers, WI 54241
SUBJECT:
POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT
NRC INSPECTION REPORT 50-266/02-03(DRP); 50-301/02-03(DRP)
Dear Mr. Warner:
On February 25, 2002, the NRC completed a team inspection at the Point Beach Nuclear Plant.
The enclosed report documents the inspection findings which were discussed on February 25
with you and members of your staff.
This inspection was an examination of activities conducted under your license as they relate to
the identification and resolution of problems, and compliance with the Commissions rules and
regulations and with the conditions of your operating license. Within these areas, the
inspection involved selected examination of procedures and representative records,
observations of activities, and interviews with personnel.
On the basis of the samples selected for review, the team concluded that, overall, problems
were properly identified, evaluated, and resolved within the problem identification and resolution
program. However, the inspectors identified one finding for which the safety significance was
still to be determined. This issue pertained to the failure of the 2P-15B safety injection pump on
February 20, 2002, because of nitrogen gas binding. The conditions that resulted in the
accumulation of nitrogen in the pump were still being evaluated by both your staff and the NRC
at the end of this inspection. This issue will be considered an Unresolved Item pending
completion of those reviews. A preliminary NRC review of the risk significance of the finding
determined that it was at least of very low safety significance (Green).
M. Warner
-2-
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.790 of the NRCs Rules of Practice, a copy of this letter
and its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public
Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) component of
NRCs document system (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at
http://www.nrc.gov/NRC/ADAMS/index.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Roger Lanksbury, Chief
Branch 5
Division of Reactor Projects
Docket Nos. 50-266; 50-301
Enclosure:
Inspection Report 50-266/02-03(DRP);
50-301/02-03(DRP)
cc w/encl:
R. Grigg, President and Chief
Operating Officer, WEPCo
R. Anderson, Executive Vice President
and Chief Nuclear Officer
T. Webb, Licensing Manager
D. Weaver, Nuclear Asset Manager
T. Taylor, Plant Manager
A. Cayia, Site Director
J. ONeill, Jr., Shaw, Pittman,
Potts & Trowbridge
K. Duveneck, Town Chairman
Town of Two Creeks
D. Graham, Director
Bureau of Field Operations
A. Bie, Chairperson, Wisconsin
Public Service Commission
S. Jenkins, Electric Division
Wisconsin Public Service Commission
State Liaison Officer
DOCUMENT NAME: G:\\poin\\poi2002003 drp.wpd
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the box: "C" = Copy without attachment/enclosure "E" = Copy with attachment/enclosure "N" = No copy
OFFICE
RIII
C RIII
N
NAME
MKunowski/trn
RLanksbury
DATE
03/25/02
03/25/02
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
M. Warner
-3-
ADAMS Distribution:
WDR
BAW
RidsNrrDipmIipb
GEG
PGK1
C. Ariano (hard copy)
DRPIII
DRSIII
PLB1
JRK1
U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III
Docket Nos:
50-266; 50-301
License Nos:
Report No:
50-266/02-03(DRP); 50-301/02-03(DRP)
Licensee:
Nuclear Management Company, LLC
Facility:
Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 & 2
Location:
6610 Nuclear Road
Two Rivers, WI 54241
Dates:
January 22 through February 25, 2002
Inspectors:
M. Kunowski, Project Engineer (Lead Inspector)
P. Krohn, Senior Resident Inspector
R. Langstaff, Senior Reactor Engineer
Approved by:
Roger Lanksbury, Chief
Branch 5
Division of Reactor Projects
2
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
IR 05000266-02-03; 05000301-02-03, on 1/22-2/25/2002. Nuclear Management Company,
LLC, Point Beach Nuclear Plant, baseline inspection of the identification and resolution of
problems.
The inspection was conducted by two regional inspectors and a resident inspector. No findings
were identified during this inspection. The significance of most findings is indicated by their
color (Green, White, Yellow, Red) using Inspection Manual Chapter 0609, Significance
Determination Process (SDP). Findings for which the SDP does not apply are indicated by
No Color or by the severity level of the applicable violation. The NRCs program for
overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described at its Reactor
Oversight Process website at http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/index.html.
Identification and Resolution of Problems
The team concluded that the licensee was generally effective at identifying problems and
putting them into the corrective action program. There was strong management emphasis on
plant staff to identify problems and, overall, a very responsive plant staff. Since 1997, there
had been an average of 4120 condition reports written each year. A recent change from a
mainframe-based, dated, and user-unfriendly corrective action database to a Web-based
system was expected by the licensee to improve plant staff involvement with the corrective
action program and to increase program management capability. Corrective action program
timeliness was still an area of weakness and one where the licensee was expending additional
efforts. Included in this effort was an emphasis on making improvements for overdue or less
than prompt assessments of problems and implementation of corrective actions and for an
excessive number of due date extensions. Although there had been some dissatisfaction
expressed with some aspects of the corrective action program, the inspectors identified no
impediments to a safety conscious work environment. One finding was identified that was at
least of very low safety significance (Green). This finding pertained to the failure of the 2P-15B
safety injection pump on February 20, 2002, because of nitrogen gas binding. The conditions
that resulted in the accumulation of nitrogen in the pump were still being evaluated by both the
licensees staff and the NRC at the end of this inspection. This issue will be considered an
Unresolved Item pending completion of those reviews.
3
Report Details
4.
OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)
4OA2 Identification and Resolution of Problems
a. Effectiveness of Problem Identification
(1) Inspection Scope
The inspectors conducted plant tours; observed surveillance tests in progress;
interviewed plant personnel; and reviewed inspection reports issued over the last year;
corrective action program documents (condition reports (CRs) - as of
December 21, 2001, CRs were replaced by documents called CAPs (Corrective Action
Program documents)), and selected maintenance work orders (WOs) for several high
risk systems to determine if problems were being properly identified, characterized, and
entered into the corrective action program for evaluation and resolution. These systems
were Service Water (SW), 4160-volt, emergency diesel generators (EDGs), safety
injection (SI), and instrument air. The inspectors also reviewed several recent licensee
audits and self-assessments. The effectiveness of the audits and assessments was
evaluated by comparing the audit and assessment results against self-revealing and
NRC-identified issues. A listing of the documents requested by the inspectors prior to
the inspection and those documents reviewed during the inspection is included at the
end of this report.
(2) Findings
In general, problems were properly identified, characterized, and entered into the
corrective action program for evaluation and resolution. There was strong management
emphasis on plant staff to document problems in the corrective action program and a
plant staff that, overall, was very responsive. Since 1997, there had been an average of
4120 CRs written per year. In 2001, there were 3819 CRs/CAPs generated. On
December 21, 2001, the licensee switched its corrective action program database
system from a mainframe-based, dated, and relatively user-unfriendly system (called
NUTRK) to a Web-based, user-friendly system (called t-Track).
Several process improvements had helped to encourage the writing of CRs\\CAPs: the
CR\\AR hotline; department corrective action program liaisons; the new web-based
system; and the Good Catch initiative for examples of notably good problem
identification. Through routine trending of corrective action program data, the licensee
had identified instances where CR/CAP generation rates by various work groups had
not met station management expectations. For instance, in one plant group, the
expected number of CRs/CAPs were being generated but more than 85% of them were
written by 2 of the 23 persons in the work group. For another group, the percentage of
self-identified CAPs fell below an expected value. In both examples, the licensee took
corrective actions.
4
Regarding audits and self-assessment findings, there were no major discrepancies with
the observations of the inspectors. Appropriate corrective actions were taken by the
licensee for problems identified during the audits and self-assessments.
b.
Prioritization and Evaluation of Issues
(1) Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed a sample of CRs/CAPs to verify the appropriateness of the
category assigned, operability and reportability determinations, extent of condition
evaluations, root and apparent cause evaluations, and the assigned corrective actions.
As part of this assessment, the inspectors attended the stations daily management
meeting where newly generated CRs/CAPs were reviewed and the subsequent daily
meeting of department corrective action program liaisons. The inspectors also attended
a meeting of the Corrective Action Review Board (CARB). In addition, the inspectors
reviewed licensee actions on several problems identified by the inspectors during the
previous problem identification and resolution inspection (PI&R) in March 2001 (NRC
Inspection Report 50-266/01-06; 50-301/01-06). The documents listed at the end of the
report were used by the inspectors during the assessment of this area.
(2) Findings
In general, issues were appropriately categorized, prioritized, and evaluated. In
addition, licensee actions to address a concern identified during the previous PI&R with
the appropriateness of the initial screening of CRs were generally effective. During the
review of CRs/CAPs, the inspectors identified one example (CR 01-0203, 4KV System
Grounds) where not all of the pertinent evaluations conducted by the licensee for a
problem had been documented in the closed-out CR. This example and other examples
identified by the licensee highlight the need for continued emphasis by the licensee on
thorough documentation of evaluations and corrective actions.
c. Effectiveness of Corrective Actions
(1) Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed CRs/CAPs to verify that corrective actions commensurate with
the issues were identified and implemented in a timely manner, including corrective
actions to address common cause or generic concerns. During the previous PI&R, the
inspectors identified concerns with daisy-chaining---the closing of CRs to other CRs
which could be closed to yet other CRs-and the possibility that not all of the corrective
actions for the various CRs would be taken because of the difficulty in tracking all of the
problems that may be closed to any one CR. In addition, the inspectors in the previous
PI&R identified a concern with corrective action program timeliness, in that several CRs
had more than a few due date extensions and several CR evaluations and corrective
actions were overdue or had exceptionally extended due dates. The documents listed
at the end of the report were used during the review.
5
(2) Findings
Generally, effective corrective actions commensurate with the issues were identified by
the licensee and implemented in a timely manner. However, problems with overdue
problem assessments and implementation of corrective actions, and with excessive
number of due date extensions were identified by the licensee and the inspectors.
Licensee corrective actions for these problems were ongoing as of the end of the
inspection. Specific observations in this area are discussed below.
The inspectors reviewed the licensees actions on CR 93-137, which was written
in 1993 and was still open at the time of the inspection. This CR was written to
document a potential problem with fault currents exceeding the breaker rating for
certain short circuits (bolted faults) in the 480-volt, 4160-volt, and 13.8-kilovolt
systems. This issue had previously been reviewed in late 1996 by the NRC and
a violation was identified for untimely corrective actions (Inspection Report
No. 50-266/96018; 50-301/96018). During the present inspection, the inspectors
concluded that continuing actions by the licensee had been timely. Through
procedure changes and extensive engineering analyses employing a reduction
of over-conservatisms, the licensee had been able to narrow down the problem
and had developed and approved a plan to upgrade certain 480-volt breakers
and bus-work over the next several years that should allow closure of
CR 93-137.
Regarding daisy-chaining, the inspectors reviewed an instance where at least
11 CRs pertaining to various problems with the commercial grade dedication and
procurement programs were ultimately closed, either directly or through other
CRs that were closed directly, to one corrective action (Action Number 23) of the
CR written to address a problem with the Alert and Notification System. The
inspectors identified that the two recommended corrective actions for
CR 00-2933, relating to the procedure for the conditional release of QA items
from receiving, had not been implemented. CR 00-2933 had been closed to
CR 00-2312, which had been closed to Action Number 23. Action Number 23
was closed on November 16, 2001. In this instance, the items not corrected
were minor.
Regarding the issue with excessive due date extensions, during the previous
PI&R, the inspectors noted that a CR written in 1997 (CR 97-0249) for the need
to revise the administrative procedure controlling the use of equivalent spare
parts in safety-related systems had the due date extended 13 times. And while
the procedure was revised early last year in response to the procurement of a
replacement service water pump motor with inadequate wire insulation, the CR
remained open pending incorporation of other planned changes to the
procedure. During this PI&R, the inspectors noted that the CRs due date had
now been extended 18 times; however, near the end of the inspection, the
procedure revision to address the remaining changes was approved.
In an issue related to timeliness of corrective actions, the inspectors noted that
CR 01-0368 dealt with an unexpected apparent rise in Unit 2 power during a
dilution on Unit 1 on Feb 2, 2001. For this CR there were two corrective actions,
6
one to do an apparent cause evaluation (ACE) and the other to make an
Operations Notebook entry to notify all crews. The due date for this last item
was initially April 26, 2001, but was changed five times before the action was
closed without being taken because so much time had elapsed since the event
and the operating crews were already aware of the event.
Another timeliness issue was associated with the failure on February 20, 2002,
of the Unit 2 B SI pump. The pump seized and failed during a monthly
preventative-maintenance lubrication activity. The licensees initial determination
was that the pump seized due to nitrogen gas binding caused by leakage of
nitrogen-saturated water from the 2A SI accumulator back through two or more
check valves. The licensee also established that corrective actions proposed
after an August 1999 review of NRC Information Notice (IN) 88-23,
Supplement 5, Potential for Gas Binding of High Pressure Safety Injection
Pumps During a Loss-of-Coolant Accident, pertaining to the potential for gas
binding of high head safety injection pumps, were not timely. Timely completion
of these actions may have prevented the failure of the pump. In addition, the
inspectors noted that the possibility of plant conditions conducive of gas binding
was identified in February 2001 when CR 01-0454 was written because of
decreasing level in the Unit 2A SI accumulator. Since much of this information
came to light at the end of the inspection, the inspectors were not able to
complete an evaluation of these issues and had not come to any enforcement
conclusion on this particular matter.
Using the Significance Determination Process (SDP) Phase 1 Screening
Worksheet and the Phase 2 Worksheets for the Mitigating Systems
Cornerstone, the inspectors concluded that enough nitrogen gas may have been
present to cause failure of the 2P-15B pump at anytime during the 30-day period
prior to the pumps failure. The pumps failure rendered one train of SI incapable
of performing its safety function. Based on this information, this finding was
considered to be at least of very low safety significance (Green). Pending
completion of a Phase 3 SDP analysis, the safety significance of the finding is
To Be Determined (TBD) and this issue is considered an Unresolved Item
(URI 50-301/02-03-01).
d. Assessment of Safety Conscious Work Environment
(1) Inspection Scope
The inspectors interviewed plant staff and CRs/CAPs to assess whether there were
impediments to the establishment of a safety conscious work environment.
(2) Findings
From the interviews and record reviews, the inspectors identified no impediments to a
safety conscious work environment. Some individuals expressed dissatisfaction with
some aspects of the corrective action process, such as the user-unfriendly NUTRK
database system (which had since been replaced by a user-friendly Web-based system)
and workers being assigned to assess and correct problems that were identified by the
7
same workers but would be more efficiently assessed and corrected by someone else.
But the inspectors noted a strong emphasis by management on establishing an
atmosphere conducive to employees readily documenting and resolving problems and
an overall strong sentiment by interviewed plant staff to document problems.
4OA6 Meeting(s)
.1
Exit Meeting
The inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. M. Warner and other members of
licensee management in an exit meeting on February 25, 2002. Licensee management
acknowledged the findings presented and indicated that no proprietary information was
provided to the inspectors.
8
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
Nuclear Management Company, LLC (NMC)
J. R. Anderson
Point Beach Nuclear Plant (PBNP) Production Planning Manager
L. Armstrong
Design Engineering Manager
D. Black
Nuclear Safety Analysis Senior Engineer
A. J. Cayia
Kewaunee-Point Beach (KPB) Site Director
F. Flentje
NRC Coordinator
D. Hettick
Performance Assessment Manager
R. Hopkins
Nuclear Oversight Supervisor
T. C. Kendall
Design Engineering Supervisor
P. Kleinschmidt
Bolted Fault Project Manager
C. W. Krause
Senior Regulatory Compliance Engineer
R. G. Mende
KPB Engineering Director
K. Peveler
KPB Nuclear Oversight Manager
S. A. Pfaff
Corrective Action Supervisor
R. Pulec
KPB Performance Assessment Manager
R. Repshas
KPB Support Services Manager
G. D. Strharsky
PBNP Assistant Operations Manager
T. H. Taylor
PBNP Plant Manager
M. Warner
Site Vice-President
T. J. Webb
KPB Regulatory Affairs Manager
J. Walsh
KPB Procedures Program Manager
W. Yarosz
KPB Emergency Planning Supervisor
ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED
Opened
50-301/02-03-01
2P-15B Safety Injection Pump Failure During Monthly
Preventative Maintenance Lubrication Activity
Closed
None
Discussed
None
9
LIST OF ACRONYMS USED
Apparent Cause Evaluation
Action Request
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
CA
Corrective Action
Corrective Action Program
Corrective Action Review Board
CR
Condition Report
Direct Current
Emergency Operating Procedure
Engineering Work Request
Final Safety Analysis Report
Institute of Nuclear Power Operations
KPB
Kewaunee-Point Beach
KV
Kilovolt
LCO
Limiting Condition for Operation
LER
Licensee Event Report
Less Than Adequate
Motor-Operated Valve
Non-Cited Violation
Nuclear Management Company, LLC
NP
Nuclear Power Business Unit Procedure
OA
Organizational Assessment
Operating Experience
Operating Instruction
Out-Of-Service
PBNP
Point Beach Nuclear Plant
Post-Maintenance Testing
psi
Pounds Per Square Inch
Quality Assurance
QCR
Quality Condition Report
Root Cause Evaluation
Reactor Coolant Pump
Significance Determination Process
Senior Reactor Operator
TS
Technical Specification
V
Volt
LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED
The following is a list of licensee documents reviewed during the inspection. Inclusion of a
document on this list does not imply that NRC inspectors reviewed the entire document, but,
rather that selected sections or portions of the document were evaluated as part of the overall
inspection effort. In addition, inclusion of a document on this list does not imply NRC
acceptance of the document, unless specifically stated in the body of the inspection report.
Condition Report
93-137
Plant Electrical Equipment May Be Used in
Applications Beyond Fault Current Ratings
March 30, 1993
97-0249 (Quality
Condition Report
(QCR))
Process Improvements SPEED NP 9.3.3
October 30, 1997
98-1004
SI Accumulator Level Decrease
March 11, 1998
99-2346
Seismic Qualification of Service Water
Pump Column Bolting Questioned
October 6, 1999
00-0094
Plant Electrical Equipment May Be Placed
Into Alignments Beyond Equipment Fault
Current Ratings
January 7, 2000
00-0128
P-32F-M Thermocouple Installation Not
Properly Documented
January 11, 2000
00-0213
Low Forebay Level, Lowest -9.6', Trip
January 20, 2000
00-0494
CR History of CIM Concerns
February 10, 2000
00-0514
QA Classification of Packing Kit for 850
Hydraulic Cylinder Questioned
February 9, 2000
00-0834
Corrosion Inhibitor Used in G-01 Without
the Required Evaluation
March 9, 2000
00-2077
Procurement Evaluation Deficiencies
June 16, 2000
00-2312
Commercial Grade Dedication Program
August 1, 2000
00-2335
Abnormal Sound From P-32A Service
Water Pump
August 3, 2000
00-2423
Dedication Criteria Changed During Receipt
Inspection
August 10, 2000
00-2426
Lack of As Found Data During Receipt
Inspection
August 10, 2000
11
00-2427
Documenting Discrepancies During Receipt
Inspection
August 10, 2000
00-2428
Technical Evaluations Dont Address
Equipment Qualification
August 10, 2000
00-2792
Less Than Adequate Wire Storage, QA
Versus Non-QA
September 20, 2000
00-2812
Alert and Notification System (ANS) Siren
Failure Response Weak
September 22, 2000
00-2933
Form for QA Conditional Release Form
Doesnt Match Procedure
September 29, 2000
00-2948
Crib Freeze Event CAs Concerns
October 2, 2002
00-3079
Condenser Steam Dump Malfunction
October 13, 2000
00-3299
Damaged Breaker Auxiliary Switches
October 23, 2000
00-4014
Leak On Unit 2 Conoseals
December 30, 2000
00-4150
Electrical Perturbation On Unit 2 Generator
December 17, 2000
01-0001
Unexpected Alarm During Service Water
Pump Start
January 1, 2001
01-0003
TS-33 Problems Due To Failing Pressure
Indicator
January 2, 2001
01-0022
Less Than Adequate Work Plan To Thaw
Frozen Pipe
December 29, 2000
01-0030
Service Water Pump Expansion Joints
January 3, 2001
01-0039
Service Water Pump Expansion Joints
January 3, 2001
01-0048
P-32C Work Packages Not Ready
January 5, 2001
01-0102
Less Than Adequate Evaluation of Part 21
NUTRK Item - AGASTAT
January 10, 2001
01-0109
Rope And Wood On Service Water Piping
January 12, 2001
01-0111
Untimely CR Initiation by OA Personnel
January 11, 2001
01-0112
Replacement Service Water Pump Motors
January 12, 2001
01-0122
Apparent Cause Evaluation Action Not
Created
January 12, 2001
01-0148
Wrong Thermocouple Extension Cable
Installed
January 16, 2001
12
01-0203
4 KV System Grounds
January 19, 2001
01-0216
New Thermocouple Found Faulty
January 19, 2001
01-0220
Incomplete IWP
January 21, 2001
01-0241
CRs Not Written as Result of
Self-Assessment
January 23, 2001
01-0259
West Service Water Supply Isolation Valve
Installation
January 24, 2001
01-0289
Service Water Safety Monitor Assumptions
January 27, 2001
01-0301
CR Trend Review Problems
January 29, 2001
01-0307
Service Water Pressure Indicator
January 30, 2001
01-0310
SW-2930A Valve Body Pitted
January 30, 2001
01-0318
No VT-2 Qualified Individual On Shift When
Required
January 30, 2001
01-0319
Less Than Adequate Work Plan SFP HX
[Spent Fuel Pool Heat Exchanger] Inlet
Valve
January 30, 2001
01-0323
Temp Change To AOP 9A Concern
January 30, 2001
01-0330
Declining Vendor Performance - IPSCO
February 1, 2001
01-0335
Increased Magnitude Of Change In SW
[Service Water] Pump Vibration Readings
February 1, 2001
01-0338
CAP Procedure Violations
February 1, 2001
01-0341
SW Line Stop Less Than Affective
February 1, 2001
01-0344
Service Water Expansion Joint - Spare
Parts Wrong Size
February 2, 2001
01-0365
Valve Accessibility Questioned
February 3, 2001
01-0368
Unit 2 Rise in Power - Dilution for Unit 1
February 2, 2001
01-0369
Energy Had Been Verified Released For
Tag Series O SW SW-2927A OP REV 2-1
By The Work Group, But No One From The
Work Group Signed On
February 2, 2001
01-0377
CR Routing and Closing
February 6, 2001
01-0380
Line Stop Machines Installation Delays
February 5, 2001
13
01-0387
SW-2974B Work Schedule Of 2/5/01 Parts
Issue
February 5, 2001
01-0395
Untimely Corrective Action
February 6, 2001
01-0403
Inadequate Safety Screening
February 8, 2001
01-0407
Line Stop Seal Failure
February 7, 2001
01-0418
Procedure Sign Off Sequence Not Used
February 8, 2001
01-0421
Service Water Piping Degradation
February 8, 2001
01-0423
4160 VAC Breaker Damage
February 8, 2001
01-0425
Package Release Without Tag Series
Accepted
February 8, 2001
01-0429
Classification of CR 01-0368
February 9, 2001
01-0438
Ineffective Followup on RCE 00-007 Actions
January 10, 2001
01-0444
Service Water System Piping Contaminated
February 9, 2001
01-0448
Containment Fan Cooler SW Flow Out Of
Spec
February 13, 2001
01-0449
NUTRK Not User-Friendly
February 13, 2001
01-0452
Micrologger Routes Erased
February 12, 2001
01-0454
U2 'A' Safety Injection SI Accumulator Level
February 12, 2001
01-0457
Service Water Gauge Out Of Tolerance
February 12, 2001
01-0471
Accumulator Level Indicator Failing
February 14, 2001
01-0481
Storage Of Spare SW Pump Motors
February 14, 2001
01-0529
Corrective Action Not Incorporated
February 20, 2001
01-0552
New Piping Insulation Damaged
February 22, 2001
01-0572
SI Accumulator Level Spikes
February 22, 2001
01-0587
Documentation Of Service Water System
Test
February 26, 2001
01-0596
Welder Bypassed Hold Point
February 26, 2001
01-0605
QCR Closed Prior to Actions Being
Completed
February 26, 2001
01-0612
Less Than Adequate Indication On 'F'
Service Water Pump Ammeter
February 27, 2001
14
01-0618
Corrective Action Program CAP Self-
Assessment Issues
February 28, 2001
01-0634
RCE 00-067 Corrective Actions
July 1, 2001
01-0635
Priorities Not Assigned in NUTRK
March 1, 2001
01-0638
SW Mod Work Caused Vacuum Loss
March 1, 2001
01-0639
SW Mod Work Caused Air In-leakage
March 1, 2001
01-0651
Less Than Adequate Closure of Condition
Reports
March 5, 2001
01-0662
Overdue Corrective Action
March 5, 2001
01-0693
CIM Not Updated To Reflect New Type
After Coolers
March 7, 2001
01-0697
Condition Report Actions Not Adequately
Dispositioned - CR 98-1161
March 6, 2001
01-0705
Exact Time 'C' CCW [Component Cooling
Water] Returned To Service Unknown
March 9, 2001
01-0706
New SW Valves Not Shown On Any
Controlling Diagrams
March 9, 2001
01-0731
Inappropriate Closure of Action
March 12, 2001
01-0733
OA Witness Of Shipment
March 10, 2001
01-0734
Service Water Motor Shipped
Inappropriately
March 9, 2001
01-0738
Abnormal Noise From P-32A
March 11, 2001
01-0761
CFC [Containment Fan Cooler] Flow
Outside Of Band
March 13, 2001
01-0768
NUTRK Anonymous Notification
March 12, 2001
01-0782
SW Pump Motor Replacement Problems
Initiated 3/14/01
01-0794
Service Water Motor SPEED Insufficient
March 13, 2001
01-0817
SI Accumulator Fill Concerns
March 15, 2001
01-0818
Incomplete Weld Exam On Containment
Fan Cooler
March 15, 2001
01-0821
P32C-M Locked Rotor Test Results
March 15, 2001
01-0852
Drawings Reflect Wrong Valve Positions
March 16, 2001
01-0870
Weld Data Sheets Not Complete
March 21, 2001
15
01-0903
Procedure Misaligned Valves
March 22, 2001
01-0911
Additional Information Provided By
Engineering - Operability Of P-32C Drawn
Into Question
March 20, 2001
01-0919
Wrong Component Danger Tagged
March 22, 2001
01-0952
Incorrect Valve Labels
March 26, 2001
01-0958
Potential Valve Failure - Valve Stem
Separation
March 26, 2001
01-0983
Containment Fan Cooling Flexible Piping
Concern
March 28, 2001
01-1001
Less Than Adequate Formal Documentation
and Tracking of Effectiveness Review
Actions
March 30, 2001
01-1027
Overdue Condition Reports
April 3, 2001
01-1032
RWST Level Transmitter Found Out of
Calibration
April 2, 2001
01-1046
Evaluation Actions Not Documented in
NUTRK
April 4, 2001
01-1047
NRC/PI&R Inspection Concern of CR Cross
Referencing
April 3, 2001
01-1048
NRC/PI&R Inspection Concerns Less Than
Adequate SRO Screenings
April 3, 2001
01-1059
Found Local Control Switch
For 1A52-84, 1A06 Feed to 1X14
Transformer, In The Pullout Position. Per
PC 43 Part 2
April 3, 2001
01-1073
Lost/Misplaced Condition Report
April 4, 2001
01-1105
MOV Failed to Shut Remotely
April 5, 2001
01-1131
Condition Report Closure Inappropriate
April 6, 2001
01-1137
Breaker Charging Spring Failed To
Discharge
April 7, 2001
01-1146
Hoses Not Used For Draining Systems
April 9, 2001
01-1150
Breaker Inseat Not Updated In Champs
April 9, 2001
01-1178
Heat Exchangers Opened Prior To
Scheduled
April 17, 2001
16
01-1210
Service Water Valve Has Significant Leak
April 11, 2001
01-1244
U2 Service Water Leak On A Containment
Fan Cooler
April 11, 2001
01-1270
High Heat Exchanger Flow Rate
April 13, 2001
01-1279
Less Than Adequate Specified
Post-Maintenance Testing
April 14, 2001
01-1297
Coordination Of Work Activities
MR 98-024*J
April 14, 2001
01-1319
Containment Fan Cooler Outlet Throttle
Valve Potential Part 21
April 17, 2001
01-1334
SW-2880 Signature Indicates Valve Stem
Bent
April 18, 2001
01-1339
Closed Work Order - ASME Discrepancies
April 18, 2001
01-1363
Valves Pre-fabricated Backwards
April 19, 2001
01-1394
Pressure Test Data
April 21, 2001
01-1402
ANII Hold Points Bypassed
April 20, 2001
01-1453
No Oil in 1P-15A Sightglass
April 24, 2001
01-1470
Operations Adverse Trend
April 24, 2001
01-1471
Potentially Decreased Performance
April 24, 2001
01-1482
Bus And Breaker Short Circuit Rating
Discrepancies
April 25, 2001
01-1492
LTA communication on RP Close Out of a
CR
April 26, 2001
01-1551
Lack of Timely CR Initiation
April 30, 2001
01-1556
Condition Report Priority LTA
May 1, 2001
01-1568
Questioning Proper Installation Of CFC Ball
Valves
May 1, 2001
01-1577
Work Order LCO Tracking
May 1, 2001
01-1599
Trend Report Finding
May 4, 2001
01-1600
Potential Adverse Trend in NDE
[Non-Destructive Evaluation]
May 4, 2001
01-1601
Adverse Trend in Warehouse Fire
Protection
May 4, 2001
17
01-1602
Error Mode Classifications
May 4, 2001
01-1615
Service Water Flow Instrument Misaligned
May 2, 2001
01-1631
Effectiveness Review of RCE
May 4, 2001
01-1650
Ops Increase Error Rate - Skill Based
Errors
May 5, 2001
01-1677
Coating On Containment Fan Coolers
Questioned
May 7, 2001
01-1678
Support In Containment Has Unqualified
Coating
May 1, 2001
01-1688
TS-76 Concerns
May 9, 2001
01-1698
Overdue Corrective Actions
May 9, 2001
01-1718
Valve Repair Work Inadequacies
May 10, 2001
01-1723
Work Order Documentation Inadequate
May 10, 2001
01-1834
Maintenance Corrective Action Item Due
Date Extensions Not Documented
May 21, 2001
01-1851
Missing RRM Documentation For
Completed Work
May 23, 2001
01-1856
G01 HX Corrosion
May 23, 2001
01-1902
Corrective Actions For CR 00-1812 Do Not
Address Concern
May 24, 2001
01-1962
Condition Report (CR) Without Priorities
June 4, 2001
01-1963
Piping Class Incorrectly Shown On P&ID
June 5, 2001
01-1966
QA/SR RWST Level Transmitter Out of
Calibration
June 4, 2001
01-1994
OD Part II for CR 01-1559 Not Completed in
30 Days as Required
June 6, 2001
01-2035
Lesson Plan Not Revised Per Condition
Report
June 12, 2001
01-2160
Corrective Action Program Weakness
June 26, 2001
01-2085
Safety Injection Pump Motor Bearing Had
No Oil Visible in Fill Connection
June 17, 2001
01-2104
Insufficient Copper Tubing In Reserve For
Work Order
June 18, 2001
18
01-2142
U1 Safety Injection Accumulator Level Out
of Calibration
June 24, 2001
01-2166
Service Water Isolation Valve Leaks
Through
June 27, 2001
01-2168
Service Water Zurn Strainer Inoperable
June 26, 2001
01-2170
Potential Conflict With Service Water LCOs
June 26, 2001
01-2178
Large Fish Kill Results In Unit 2 Trip
June 28, 2001
01-2181
Emergent Temp Change To AOP
June 27, 2001
01-2191
Two Tag Series In Effect For Same Job
June 27, 2001
01-2237
CR 00-3888 Corrective Action Not
Completed
July 2, 2001
01-2243
Revision of Operability Determination
Contains Deficiencies
July 3, 2001
01-2264
Corrective Actions Without Assigned
Priorities
July 3, 2001
01-2267
Scheduled Conflict Would Have Caused
LCO Entry
July 5, 2001
01-2283
Corrective Action Items Overdue
July 9, 2001
01-2337
Rework Of Circ Water Seal Supply Strainer
July 13, 2001
01-2384
Less Than Adequate Closeout of Condition
Report Dealing With Alarm Response Book
Adequacy
July 19, 2001
01-2386
Unknown White Residue On Refueling
Water Storage Tank
July 19, 2001
01-2406
Blockage Of Emergency Diesel Generator
Cooler Tubes
July 23, 2001
01-2426
Hole In U1 [Unit 1] Refueling Water Storage
Tank
July 25, 2001
01-2487
Priorities Not Assigned As Required to
Condition Reports
August 3, 2001
01-2526
Ineffective Corrective Action - Failure To
Test Redundant Emergency Diesel
Generator
August 8, 2001
01-2598
AM 3-4 Obsolete Revision of 10 CFR 50.65
August 16, 2001
19
01-2705
Nuclear Safety Analysis NSA Adverse CR
Trend
August 29, 2001
01-2707
Condition Report Closed With Uncompleted
Corrective Actions
August 29, 2001
01-2721
Condition Reports Did Not Determine if
Functional Failures Were Maintenance
Preventable
August 29, 2001
01-2771
NUTRK Items Without Priority Assigned
September 7, 2001
01-2781
Damaged Auxiliary Switch On 4 KV Breaker
A52-DHVR-1200-31
September 8, 2001
01-2799
Errors In Drawing For G-02 Metering, DCNs
Not Done
September 9, 2001
01-2810
Potential Adverse Trend in Q List Program
September 11, 2001
01-2918
Evaluation Due Dates
September 24, 2001
01-2927
Schedule Plant to Revise Refueling
Procedures to Include Improved Technical
Specifications (ITS)
September 25, 2001
01-2929
Condition Report Closed Without
Consideration of Apparent Cause
Evaluation Recommendations
September 28, 2001
01-2969
Potential Current Transformer Issue In
1A52-59 Cubicle
September 26, 2001
01-2994
Less Than Adequate Support For MCE
Testing Of Unit 2 SI Pump Motor
October 2, 2001
01-3039
Operability Determinations Not Reviewed
For ITS Implications
October 5, 2001
01-3058
Condition Reports With No Assigned Priority
October 9, 2001
01-3107
Less Than Adequate Apparent Cause
Evaluation and Follow-up Actions
October 10, 2001
01-3148
Diesel Testing Not Identified In
Schedule/Test Plan
October 16, 2001
01-3166
Inadequate Closure of Condition Report CR
01-1329 - FPEE On Modified Fire Damper
October 16, 2001
01-3174
Grounding Card Latch Mechanism Difficult
To Verify Engaged
January 18, 2001
01-3199
SRO Screening Issues With CR 01-3139
October 19, 2001
20
01-3258
Safety-Related Bus Voltages High - 7 day
LCO Entered
November 21, 2001
01-3284
Condition Reports Threshold for EP Issues
October 26, 2001
01-3357
NUTRK Actions Not Prioritized
November 5, 2001
01-3414
7% Condition Report Items Overdue
November 9, 2001
01-3492
Problems With CR 00-1039 Resolution
November 15, 2001
01-3545
Procedures Indicate LCO Is Required May
Be Incorrect
November 26, 2001
01-3606
CR Verification Not Completed in Timely
Manner
November 30, 2001
01-3626
Less Than Adequate Documentation To
Support Operability Determination
December 3, 2001
01-3678
Condition Reports Priority -100
December 7, 2001
Operability Determination (OD)
OD for CR 93-0137
Plant Electrical Equipment May Be Used in
Applications Beyond Fault Current Ratings
Revision 8
August 6, 2001
OD for CR 00-3299
Chipped Auxiliary Switch On Breaker
A52-DHVR-1200-15
October, 2000
OD for CR 99-2346
SW Pump Discharge Column Connections
March 6, 2001
OD for CR 01-1105
MOV Failed to Shut Remotely
April 6, 2001
Drawing Number
PB 31 E APS 240 052
09
Schematic Diagram
4160V SWGR Bus 1-A06 (2-A06)
Feeder Breaker 1A52-84 (2A52-89 to STA
Service XFMR IX-14 (2X-14)
Revision D
PB 02 E SIS 000 002
06
Elementary Wiring Diagram
4160V SWGR.2A05 Cubicle-74 Safety
Injection Pump 2P-015A
PBNP Unit 2
Revision D
PB 01 E APS 256 004
01
Elementary Wiring Diagram
4160 Switchgear Cubicle-58 Station Service
Transformer Breaker 1A-52-58
PBNP Unit 1
Revision E
21
PB 01 E APW 240
034 03
Connection Diagram
4160V Switchgear 1A05-Cubicle 58
Station Service Transformer 1X-13
Revision E
PB 01 E APS 03015
07
Elementary Wiring Diagram
4160 SWGR 1A05-Cubicle 57
Bus Tie Breaker 1A52-57
Revision E
PB 01 E APS 031 001
11
Elementary Wiring Diagram
4160 Switchgear Cubicle 60
Emergency Generator Breaker 1A52-60
PBNP Unit 1
Revision E
PB 01 E APS 031 002
05
Elementary Wiring Diagram
Alternative Power to 1A-05 from G02 EDG
Breaker 1A52-66
PBNP Unit 1
Revision E
PB 01 E RPS 141
078 18
Schematic Diagram
SI Logic Engineered Safety Features
(ESF) Systems Train A
Reactor Safeguards Systems
PBNP Unit 1
Revision E
SK-M-21-2
Refueling Water Storage Tank - 1-T13,
2-T13
Revision 0
PB 01 MSIG 246 001
05
1-T13 RWST Assembly And Details
Revision E
Action Request (AR)
AR ACE000251
Tag Series Changes And Loss Of
Awareness Of Clearance Status
October 22, 2001
AR ACE000260
G-04 Low Oil Level
October 30, 2001
AR ACE000294
Resistance Readings May Be Affected By
Nomex Wear
November 14, 2001
AR ACE000299
IP-29 Turbine-Driven Auxiliary Feedwater
Pump Spurious Overspeed Trips
November 20, 2001
AR ACE000321
Wrong Oil Used In Auxiliary Feedwater
Turbine Bearings
December 11, 2001
AR ACE000325
Unanticipated Outward Rod Motion
December 13, 2001
AR ACE000327
Component Cooling Water Pump Oil
Sample Results
December 17, 2001
22
AR ACE000496
Plant Electrical Equipment May Be Used in
Applications Beyond Fault Ratings
April 1, 1993
AR ACE000497
4160V and 480V System Operating
Voltages Are Significantly Higher Than the
Nominal System Voltages
December 3, 1997
AR ACE000498
Operating the 480V System at Voltage
Magnitudes Higher Than 500V Causes
Equipment to be Derated From Ratings at
480V to Ratings at 600V for Fault Current
December 3, 1997
AR ACE000499
System Model Should be Revised With
Plant Operations to Determine More
Realistic Equipment Alignments
December 3, 1997
AR ACE000500
Additional Scenarios Should be Analyzed
and Existing Scenarios Should be Revised
to More Accurately Reflect How PBNP is
Operated
December 3, 1997
AR ACE000526
Missed Surveillance For PAM Core Exit
T/Cs
December 14, 2001
AR CA001184
Extent of Condition Review of Other
SPEEDs
March 15, 2001
AR CA001193
Reinforce Managements Expectations That
Requirements of Administrative Procedures
Are to be Complied With
July 3, 2001
AR CA001461
Bus And Breaker Short Circuit Rating
Discrepancies
April 30, 2001
AR CA001634
Dilution of Accountability for Programs for
Vendor Technical Information Program and
Component Instruction Manual
June 5, 2001
AR CA003148
Revise NP 9.3.3
November 25, 1997
AR CA003235
Review the Calculations for Each Breaker or
Other Piece of Switchgear That is
Calculated to be Overloaded
March 16, 1994
AR CA003236
Write and Submit an LER for Condition of
Plant Electrical Equipment May Be Used in
Applications Beyond Fault Ratings
July 10, 1997
23
AR CA003237
Complete a Revision to the Operability
Determination to Address: Equipment
Removed From the List, Equipment Which
May Experience Fault Currents of Higher
Magnitude, and Equipment Added to the
List Attached to the New Fault Duty
Calculation
December 3, 1997
AR CA003238
The SSC in the Operability Determination
for This CR [93-137] Have Been Determined
to be Operable, But Degraded
March 26, 1998
AR CA003239
Document That the Operability
Determination to Supported Bolted Shorts
as Described in CR 93-137 Reflects Most
Recent Review
September 11, 2000
AR CA003240
Finalize and Issue the New Preliminary
Short Circuit Calculations Based on
Procedure Changes to be Completed Per
CR 00-0094
September 11, 2000
AR CA003242
Request a Schedule and Justification be
Provided for Which One of the Four Options
That Are Being Considered as Possible
Solutions to the Bolted Fault Issue
August 14, 2001
AR CA003518
NRC 50.59 Inspection Requested A
Procedural Tie Be Created In IT-21 And
IT-22, Back To TRM Section 3.5.1
January 16, 2002
AR CA002130
Potential Adverse Trend in Q List Program
September 13, 2001
AR CAP000126
Short Circuit Fault Current Calculations
January 7, 2000
AR CAP000726
Corrective Actions For CR 00-1812 Do Not
Address Concern
May 24, 2001
AR CAP001532
Plant Electrical Equipment May Be Used in
Applications Beyond Fault Rating
March 30, 1993
AR CAP001877
FSAR Discrepancy On Definition Of Reg
Guide Category 2
January 16, 2002
AR CAP001886
Incomplete 50.59 Screening Answer For
Changes To Relief Valve CC-736A/B
January 16, 2002
AR CAP001897
Letdown Isolation Valve Appendix R
Operation During Degraded Voltage
Conditions
January 17, 2002
AR CAP001900
Incomplete Corrective Actions Regarding
Classification Of RC-427
January 17, 2002
24
AR CAP001901
FSAR Chapter 9 Changes For CFC Service
Water Pressure Not Also Made In Chapter 6
January 17, 2002
AR CAP001910
Safety Evaluation 2000-0014 Incomplete
January 17, 2002
AR CAP001915
Questioning Corrective Action For
CR 00-2859 On Screening Procedure Temp
Change
January 18, 2002
AR CAP001916
Incorrect Answer To Tech Spec Change
Question In 50.59 Evaluation
January 18, 2002
AR CAP001957
Individual Requested To Do Work Not
Qualified Or Trained To Do
January 24, 2002
AR CAP001962
WO For SR Equipment Bypassed QC
Review
January 24, 2002
AR CAP001965
SW Pumps Discharge Expansion Joints
Have Surface Cracks
January 25, 2002
AR CAP001966
Outdated Procedures For New PPCS, With
No New Procedures In Place
January 25, 2002
AR CAP001970
Poor Loading Of E-12 (SO4B2) Work Week
January 25, 2002
AR CAP001979
Minor Deficiencies In The Corrective Action
Program
January 25, 2002
AR CAP001984
Negative Trend Of Security Self Reporting
Issues In Corrective Action System
January 25, 2002
AR CAP001985
NRC Commitment To Inspection Unit 2
Internals Lift Rig Not Met
January 25, 2002
AR CAP001992
NUTRK Database Is Inaccurate
And Cluttered With Outdated Action
Requests
January 28, 2002
AR CAP001996
Lack Of Documentation Of Adverse Issues
January 28, 2002
AR CAP002031
NP5.3.1 Does Not Allow Closure Of ARs To
Other Formal Tracking Mechanisms
January 30, 2002
AR CAP002038
Questionable Acceptable Voltage Ranges
For Instrument Buses
January 31, 2002
AR CAP002039
Vibration Indications On G-01
January 31, 2002
AR CAP002065
CAP Closed Without All Corrective Actions
Completed
February 4, 2002
AR CAP002083
P-032D Service Water Pump Vibration And
Shaft Wear Resolution
February 5, 2002
25
AR CAP002264
Untimely Implementation of
Recommendations From IN 88-023-05
February 21, 2002
Lists
List of Apparent Cause Evaluations - 2001
2001
List of Completed Root Cause Evaluations -
2001
2001
List of Temporary Modifications - 2001
January 3, 2002
Root Cause Evaluations (RCEs)98-190
Inappropriate Design Pressure For The AFW
[Auxiliary Feedwater] Discharge Valve
Modification
Revision 1
98-214
Disabled Service Water Pump Auto Start
Feature On EDG [Emergency Diesel
Generator] Breaker Closure Results in
Missed LCO
November 30, 2001
00-104
Common Cause Assessment for Procedure
Quality Issues
March 2, 2001
01-013
Speed For P-32C Service Water Pump
Motor
01-013
Replacement Service Water Pump Motor
Does Not Meet Design Requirements
June 8, 2001
01-033
Maintenance Rule Component Common
Cause
May 8, 2001
01-046
Unit 1 Loss Of Inverter
July 18, 2001
01-047
Unit 1 Main Feed Pump Inboard Bearing
Failure
July 19, 2001
01-0151
G04 Generator Failure Equipment Rood
Cause
August 5, 2001
01-052
Failure To Perform TS Required EDG
Testing
August 9, 2001
01-055
Reactor Coolant Pump Seal Malfunction
Caused Unit Shutdown
September 6, 2001
26
Nuclear Plant Memorandum (NPM)
2002-0006
Minutes From The December 19, 2001
CARB Meeting
January 4, 2002
2002-0052
Third Quarter 2001 Corrective Action
Program Trends
January 28, 2002
2002-0056
CARB Agenda For The February 5, 2002
Meeting
February 1, 2002
Work Orders
9924742
Temporary Relocate 1LT-972/1LI-921 to
Allow for Installation of Welds and
Anchorage on RWST, Then Return to
Original Locations
April 14, 2001
9937026
Transmitter Enclosure is Damaged,
Condition Report Submitted
April 2, 2001
9945054
IT-013 Repair Weld
July 24, 2001
9945202
IT-13 Clean Residue/Insp 2 Day Later
July 19, 2001
Plant Modifications
MR-99-040
Unit 1 RWST Seismic Upgrade
July 12, 2000
Engineering Work Request (EWR)02-019
Protective Enclosure for Sightglass/Oiler
Assemblies
January 25, 2002
Nuclear Power Business Unit Procedures (NPs)
5.3.1
Action Request Process
Revision 19
5.3.7
Revision 8
5.4.1
Open Item Tracking System (NUTRK)
Revision 11
9.3.3
Spare Parts Equivalency Evaluation [SPEED]
Revisions 2 and 3
9.8.1
Specification Preparation, review, and
Approval Process
Revision 0
27
9.8.2
Technical Review and Approval of
Requisitions
Revisions 0 and 1
9.8.4
Safety Classification of Sub-Components
and Materials
Revision 0
9.8.5
Dedication of Commercial Grade Items
Revisions 0 and 1
9.8.6
Conditional Release of QA-related Items and
Services
Revision 0
9.8.9
Product Technical Information
Revision 0
9.9.2
Quality Receipt
Revision 0
9.9.3
Spare Parts Equivalency Evaluation [SPEED]
Revisions 2 and 3
9.10.1
Warehouse Material Issue
Revision 0
10.2.4
Work Order Processing
Revision 7
Other Procedures and Documents
AM (Administrative
Manual) 3-4
Implementation of the Maintenance Rule at
PBNP
Revision 4
A-P-01-17
Improved Technical Specifications Audit
October 5, 2001
A-P-01-018
Maintenance Rule Audit
August 28, 2001
FP-NO-SQ-01
Performance of Supplier Audits/Surveys
Revision 1
FP-SC-GEN-01
Procurement - General
Revision 1
FP-SC-RSI-01
Receiving
Revision 0
FP-SC-RSI-02
Quality Receipt
Revision 0
FP-SC-RSI-03
Procurement Deficiency Reports
Revision 0
Licensee Event
Report 97-032
Inadequately Rated Electrical Buses Could
Disable Switchgear and Cause Secondary
Fires That Prevent Safe Shutdown Per
Appendix R
July 30, 1997
OEG (OE Group
Guide) 001
Root Cause Evaluation
Revision 6
OEG 003
Corrective Action Program Guidance
Revision 2
PBF (Point Beach
Form)-0026q
Procedure Preparer/Technical Reviewer
Checklist
Revision 4
PBF-0026r
Procedure Validation
Revision 1
28
PBF-1531
Conditional Release Request
Revision 2
PBF-1583
Design Verification Notice
Revision 1
PBF-1586b
CI Manual Distribution
S-A-CA-01-01
Assessment of Point Beach Corrective
Action Program
February 2001
Spare Parts
Equivalency
Evaluation Document
2002-006
Replace Obsolete Westinghouse Motor With
Equivalent Marathon Electric Motor
February 8, 2002
Nuclear Oversight Quarterly Reports
1st, 2nd, and 3rd
Quarters, 2001
Corrective Action Program Performance
Indicators
October, November,
December 2001;
January 2002
Bolted Fault Meeting Minutes
January 21, 2002
Project Work Plan: Bolted AC Fault Issue
Revision 3
August 28, 2000
AC Bolted Fault Project History and Timeline
2001
Electrical Fault Overduty Resolution Plan
Updates
May and November
2001; February
2002
SI Pump Gas Binding Event Operating
Experience Review
February 23, 2002
Corrective Action Trend Reports
1st, 2nd, and 3rd
Quarters, 2001
Corrective Action Review Board Member
Attendance Records
Chemistry Logs
Unit 1 RWST Chemical Analyses
February 5, 2002
NUTRK Operating
Experience Review
NRC Information Notice 88-023, Potential
for Gas Binding of High Pressure Safety
Injection Pumps During a Loss-of-Coolant
Accident, Original Notice and 5
Supplements
May 12, 1988
January 5, 1989
January 30, 1990
December 10, 1990
December 18, 1992
September 1, 1999
NUTRK Operating
Experience Review
NRC Information Notice 97-040, Potential
Nitrogen Accumulation Resulting From
Backleakage From Safety Injection Tanks
June 26, 1997
29
NUTRK Operating
Experience Review
SOER 97-01, Potential Loss of High
Pressure Injection and Charging Capability
From Gas Intrusion
December 6, 1997
NUTRK Operating
Experience Review
SEN 179, Long-Standing Design
Weaknesses and Ineffective Corrective
Actions Cause Gas Binding Failures of High
Head Safety Injection Pumps
January 29, 1998
NUTRK Operating
Experience Review
OE 8830, Potential Nitrogen Voiding and
Water Hammer in the Low Pressure Safety
Injection System
March 26, 1998
NUTRK Operating
Experience Review
OE 9876, 4B HHSI Pump Gas Binding
May 4, 1999
Plant Internal Letter
NEPB-88-252
NRC Information Notice No. 88-23: Potential
For Gas Binding of High-Pressure Safety
Injection Pumps During A Loss-of-Coolant
Accident
June 7, 1988
Plant Internal Letter
NEM-89-143
NRC Information Notice No. 88-23,
Supplement 1: Potential For Gas Binding of
High-Pressure Safety Injection Pumps
During Loss-of-Coolant Accident
March 6, 1989
Plant Internal Letter
NEM-90-368
NRC Information Notice No. 88-23
Supplement 2: Potential For Gas Binding of
High-Pressure Safety Injection Pumps
During A Loss-of-Coolant Accident
April 23, 1990
Plant Internal Letter
NPM 91-0400
NRC Information Notice No. 88-23,
Supplement 3: Potential For Gas Binding of
High-Pressure Injection Pumps During A
Loss-of-Coolant Accident
June 18, 1991
Plant Internal Letter
NPM 93-0092
NRC Information Notice No. 88-23,
Supplement 4: Potential For Gas Binding of
High-Pressure Safety Injection Pumps
During A Design Basis Accident
February 5, 1993
30
DOCUMENTS REQUESTED FROM THE LICENSEE PRIOR TO ONSITE INSPECTION
Two copies of administrative procedures related to:
corrective action program
work orders
root cause analysis
procedure change, use, and adherence
One copy of audits and self-assessments conducted since January 1, 2001, in the following
areas:
corrective action process
maintenance/work control
operations
engineering
One copy of minutes for onsite and offsite committee meetings, including the Corrective Actions
Review Board, conducted since January 1, 2001
Two copies of a listing of:
root cause evaluations completed since January 1, 2001
CRs generated since January 1, 2001, related to corrective actions
work orders and CRs generated since January 1, 2001, related to the service
water, safety injection, and the 4160-volt systems