ML20199G575

Lists Three Items Identified as Being Applicable to Qa/Qc Group in Response to 850503 Request for Review of Allegations

ML20199G575
Person / Time
Site:	Comanche Peak, 05000000
Issue date:	05/28/1985
From:	Livermore H NRC
To:	Noonan V NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM)
Shared Package
ML20197J178	List: IR 05000445/1985009 ML20197J173 ML20197J273 ML20197J296 ML20199G064 ML20199G070 ML20199G083 ML20199G092 ML20199G099 ML20199G107 ML20199G116 ML20199G119 ML20199G124 ML20199G133 ML20199G146 ML20199G154 ML20199G163 ML20199G179 ML20199G212 ML20199G284 ML20199G292 ML20199G298 ML20199G306 ML20199G318 ML20199G331 ML20199G343 ML20199G352 ML20199G363 ML20199G383 ML20199G391 ML20199G402 ML20199G420 ML20199G432 ML20199G442 ML20199G453 ML20199G464 ML20199G575 ML20199G614 ML20199G620 ML20199G624 ML20199G630 ML20199G635 ML20199G641 ML20199G645 ML20199G649 ML20199G655 ML20199G661 ML20199G670 ML20199G675 ML20199G681 ... further results
References
FOIA-85-59 NUDOCS 8606250277
Download: ML20199G575 (3)

Text

w n f.

~

MAY 2 8 I!Ei s

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Vincent S. Noonan, Director 4

Comanche Peak Project FROM:

Herbert H. Livermore QA/QC Group Leader

SUBJECT:

RECORD REVIEW GROUP FINDINGS

[

As requested in your letter of May 3,1985, the QA/QC Group has reviewed the listing of allegation identified by the Records Review Group. Three items 2

were' identified as being potentially applicable to the QA/QC Group. These three items (Nos. 17, 2 & 9) were reviewed with the following results:

p Item No. 17:

"NRC inspectors spent insufficient time on each hanger inspection."

g t

This testimony was not related to the TRT, but l 4 involved three individuals from Region IV (i.e.,

Taylor, Smith and Gilbert).

No TRT action required.

g Item No. 2:

"ASME audit team rejected ASME N-Stamp for Brown &

Root."

n This deposition is inaccurate as renewal of B&R's N-Stamp was delayed on one occasion for two months but was not rejected. The TRT hr.d already looked at this subject and it is explained in our SSERs (AQ5).

No TRT action required.

?

Item No. 9:

"NRC was not finding the problem."

"NRC was not investigating all allegations."

i "NRC was not monitoring construction."

The testimony indicates that the subject was y

Regi6n IV personnel (i.e., Taylor) not the TRT.

p No TRT action required.

In conclusion, two of the three items above do not relate to the QA/QC group, and the other one has already been add ssed.

i eb

(

-QA/QC Group Leader i

cc:

C. Poslusny i'"= A a m 0FC :CP l?=g ll 4_4. Q m.. y _

Mh

-NAME :HLivermore:pf 8606250277 86061

_____:.___________:______PDR FO cp PDR

.DATE :5 M S

~ OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

'E

/f m

__L1

- s_ _

-~,

i -

~

n

_ =, _

r T

a UNITED STATES 8

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION h

• WASHING TON, D. C. 20556 j

S 28 M

[

i MEMORANDUM FOR:

Vincent S. Noonan Director Comanche Peak Project FROM:

Herbert H. Livermore QA/QC Group Leader

SUBJECT:

RECORD REVIEW GROUP FINDINGS 4

As requested in your letter of May 3,1985, the QA/QC Group has reviewed the 7

listing of allegation identified by the Records Review Group. Three items

/

were identified as being potentially applicable to the QA/QC Group. These three items (Nos. 17, 2 & 9) were reviewed with the following results:

Item No. 17:

"NRC inspectors spent insufficient time on each hanger inspection."

f This testimony was not related to the TRT, but i

involved three individuals from Region IV (i.e.,

I Taylor Smith and Gilbert).

f No TRT action required.

J

~

f:

Item No. 2r "ASME audit team rejected ASME'N-Stamp for Brown &

E Root."

f.

This deposition is inaccurate as renewal of B&R's?

N-Stamp was delayed on one occasion for two months '

but was not rejected. The TRT had already looked at this subject and it'is explained in our SSERs (AQ5).

No TRT action required.

[

l-Item No. 9:

"NRC wa:: not finding the problem."

L l

"NRC was not investigating all allegations."

l "NRC was not monitoring construction."

l

[

The testimony indicates that the subject was Region IV personnel (i.e. Taylor) not the TRT.

j No TRT action required.

2 p

E In conclusion, two of the three items above do not relate to the QA/QC group.

and the other one has already been addressed.

L W

c/t.

Herbert H. Livermore QA/QC Group Leader cc:

C. Poslusny

[

l 1.

'~~

. I - --

is nA:

=~

x:

e

/,

-,; g w >

- i u

~

OM NU l

= r

. e w.

m MhG

&4

.,a.

a,64 Ju. iia %.. tk

)'

jj)&

s--

Qg Nk?

09"esic Z osef* Tuaw s.

& Y l Y am. AC~3A

So " &

e.

<.c.:i..u, a. nos n n/ ~ s,c.q.-

r x 6 :

k.. v. D m -

d

~

r S S. 1. I L Y ^D Q

's 9

i noe..no amwii L

- t_, d

' For Genremo.

Per Commesuen

/~.

I N

As noeuested For DersueMon Propese Asper

. $, l m

ror v., w n

s is.

I i

M t.

Desament

' invesuesto C :^_ ;

-v 7

M p..

.E. g '

.ht aa'-

()6,Q

. 71,- cW/6/>

e j*/f 4 A,fs-l t.

a.ss,c a u:4 4;<v.a H a c. M &Lan.

W^'

~

' Q.2 f,, ~n ~. c. c. ~ G i. w.

em y

' M is Y

r==44 caMosek. '

/

./

fi,.mhmf e4,Aaseunu m k=)m L,L b

canoesel,e cues osewee useskluf.e k s nR.s et<,

a s

-=-A. 4 L

p.J,*

4 4 k' ~*vt= af h +i. y n

q~1 4.,

j.

. ase 4

e M ovevs=ei d essohn ea., d 'ans k e A;

WG. aw. AseAC.g&m m ---

_% e,e.Meo

~

i i;

% !s,

en gomi.d s~ a ora,,- p 'c t e s t s-f)-

O

'd*4 <f "M Cfm]sfloww awwwe~ ef 4ts

• j e,runna.e,w.

---

 : =;=; =-_. m.._, - r-g m em e.is n,= =. w- _- -

~-

p

.s,50 S t

'l FRotL (NWie, erg. s

(, Ag.ncy/ Plast)

Room No.-Stdg.

'.y hf

@ G

'e-1

/

O.PT.I.ONAL FOftM 41 St.v. 79 J

ses:-see

-. o -

p mas er ee e so, sens o - asi-s:s (see>

, Pressima crus s.n

+;.,

a.:taas u;c,5

[

F

- -...; n

. n,,;...

.a 4 *

}

t

'^

F01A4fMs.

4 8

~ 1.J V 7s-r

-.1..A_.._

..