ML20357A102: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201 | {{#Wiki_filter:ES-201 | ||
* Examination Outline Quality Checklist | * Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: | ||
Initials Item | Date of Examination: | ||
* Task Description | Initials Item | ||
~ | |||
* Task Description | |||
a | ~ | ||
a b* | |||
c** | |||
: a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N. | : t. | ||
b-. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with SectionD.1 of ES-401 or ES--401 N and whether all KJA categories are appropriately sampled. | : a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N. | ||
-'ii/ | |||
.. p OtH ' | |||
T | w b-. | ||
Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with l (' | |||
_R SectionD.1 of ES-401 or ES--401 N and whether all KJA categories are appropriately sampled. | |||
i -' | |||
ctr} | |||
j I | |||
I T | |||
Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. | |||
{.J 'i' Ir,~ | |||
~ | |||
T C. | |||
E | E | ||
: d. As_sess whether the justificatio_ns for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. | : d. As_sess whether the justificatio_ns for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate. | ||
-'i" Cf' ~I N | |||
2. | |||
: a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of I | |||
I | normal evolutions, instrument.and component failures, technical specifications, and major lf lctAt s | ||
transients. | |||
I M | |||
: b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u | |||
quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in Section D.S. "Specific Instructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"' of ES-301 (including | mix of applicants *in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L | ||
without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at C-f A | |||
least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the | |||
: 3. | '{~ | ||
(1) The-outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w | r>>t T | ||
A | . applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days. | ||
L. | 0 To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R | ||
K | C. | ||
T | quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in | ||
<f' Section D.S. "Specific Instructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"' of ES-301 (including | |||
R 0 | ;,J | ||
u | ~ | ||
G | overlap). | ||
11 | : 3. | ||
: a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2: | |||
: c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. | (1) The-outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w | ||
among the safety functions as specified on the form. | |||
A (2) Task repetition from the last two NRG examinations is within the limits specified on the form. | |||
L. | |||
(3) | |||
No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s). | |||
lf! | |||
K (4) | |||
The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form. | |||
1~ | |||
T (5) | |||
The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H | |||
tasks meets the criteria on the form. | |||
R 0 | |||
: b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1: | |||
u (1) | |||
The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form. | |||
lf ~ | |||
G (2) | |||
At least one task is new or significantly modified. | |||
11 H | |||
(3) | |||
No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRG licensing examinations. | |||
: c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of 1-J | |||
<../ | |||
~ | |||
applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. | |||
I | I | ||
: 4. | : 4. | ||
: a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual | |||
G | ~ | ||
E | plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections. | ||
: c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. | -r" l/ | ||
G Assess whethe_r the 1 O CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate. | |||
A L | ~.J E | ||
: f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level {RO or SRO). | : b. | ||
l f1 - | |||
N E | |||
: c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5. | |||
-;{ {/ | |||
/!4IW'7. | |||
R. | |||
: d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRG exams. | |||
- ;.,/ | |||
~ | |||
A L | |||
: e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. | |||
-r lf' | |||
: f. | |||
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level {RO or SRO). | |||
,, ' <-/J I~ | |||
,'oM. 0 r,~oted Name/~ | |||
Date | Date | ||
: a. Author | |||
?.!N/!'I | |||
: a. Author | : b. Facility Reviewer (*) | ||
z | |||
: b. Facility Reviewer (*) | .}1_.;tJ C. | ||
: d. | NRC's Chief E_xaminer (#) ~~ - /'. ~ | ||
* Not applicable for NRG-prepared examination outlines. | '1-17* I? | ||
: d. NRC Supervisor | |||
ES-201, Page 30 of 32 | ,[t, ).2(/HJ | ||
* Not applicable for NRG-prepared examination outlines. | |||
# The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required. | |||
ES-201, Page 30 of 32 d: I )Nile - -p. v*f arJ """''}} | |||
Latest revision as of 11:48, 29 November 2024
| ML20357A102 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Cook |
| Issue date: | 08/13/2018 |
| From: | Chuck Zoia Operations Branch III |
| To: | Indiana Michigan Power Co |
| Zoia C | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17164A385 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML20357A102 (1) | |
Text
- Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility:
Date of Examination:
Initials Item
~
- Task Description
~
a b*
c**
- t.
-'ii/
.. p OtH '
w b-.
Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with l ('
_R SectionD.1 of ES-401 or ES--401 N and whether all KJA categories are appropriately sampled.
i -'
ctr}
j I
I T
Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
{.J 'i' Ir,~
~
T C.
E
- d. As_sess whether the justificatio_ns for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
-'i" Cf' ~I N
2.
- a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of I
normal evolutions, instrument.and component failures, technical specifications, and major lf lctAt s
I M
- b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u
mix of applicants *in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L
without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at C-f A
least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the
'{~
r>>t T
. applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
0 To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R
C.
quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in
<f' Section D.S. "Specific Instructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"' of ES-301 (including
- ,J
~
overlap).
- 3.
- a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1) The-outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w
among the safety functions as specified on the form.
A (2) Task repetition from the last two NRG examinations is within the limits specified on the form.
L.
(3)
No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).
lf!
K (4)
The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.
1~
T (5)
The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H
tasks meets the criteria on the form.
R 0
- b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
u (1)
The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.
lf ~
G (2)
At least one task is new or significantly modified.
11 H
(3)
No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRG licensing examinations.
- c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of 1-J
<../
~
applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
I
- 4.
- a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual
~
plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
-r" l/
G Assess whethe_r the 1 O CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
~.J E
- b.
l f1 -
N E
- c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
-;{ {/
/!4IW'7.
R.
- d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRG exams.
- ;.,/
~
A L
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
-r lf'
- f.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level {RO or SRO).
,, ' <-/J I~
,'oM. 0 r,~oted Name/~
Date
- a. Author
?.!N/!'I
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
z
.}1_.;tJ C.
NRC's Chief E_xaminer (#) ~~ - /'. ~
'1-17* I?
- d. NRC Supervisor
,[t, ).2(/HJ
- Not applicable for NRG-prepared examination outlines.
- The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.
ES-201, Page 30 of 32 d: I )Nile - -p. v*f arJ """