ML062130057: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:James Davis -Additional Question From Bob Jackson From: James Davis To: Bford@entergy.com; Dellisl @entergy.com; Fred Mogolesko Date: 06/29/2006 10:08:49 AM | {{#Wiki_filter:James Davis -Additional Question From Bob Jackson From: James Davis To: Bford@entergy.com; Dellisl @entergy.com; Fred Mogolesko Date: 06/29/2006 10:08:49 AM | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Additional Question From Bob Jackson Bob Jackson has an additional question that should be easy to answer.Jim CC: jacksonwr@ | Additional Question From Bob Jackson Bob Jackson has an additional question that should be easy to answer. | ||
@msn.com; Kenneth Chang; Ram Subbaratnam c:\temp\GW)00001.T MP Page | Jim CC: jacksonwr@ @msn.com; Kenneth Chang; Ram Subbaratnam | ||
: 22 : 35346) | |||
c:\temp\GW)00001.T MP Page c:\temp\GW}OOO01 .TMP Paae 1I.1 Mail Envelope Properties (44A3DEF1.D48 : 22 : 35346) | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Additional Question From Bob Jackson Creation Date 06/29/2006 10:08:49 AM From: James Davis Created By: JAD@nrc.gov Recipients Action Date & Time entergy.com Transferred 06/29/2006 10:09:40 AM BFord (Bford@entergy.com) dellisl (DellisI @entergy.com) fmogole (Fred Mogolesko) msn.com Transferred 06/29/2006 10:09:40 AM jacksonwr CC (jacksonwr@ @msn.com) nrc.gov OWGWPO03.HQGWDO01 Delivered 06/29/2006 10:08:49 AM KXC2 CC (Kenneth Chang) nrc.gov TWGWPO02.HQGWDOO1 Delivered 06/29/2006 10:08:52 AM RXS2 CC (Ram Subbaratnam) Opened 06/29/2006 10:13:22 AM Post Office Delivered Route entergy.com msn.com OWGWPOO3.HQGWDOO1 06/29/2006 10:08:49 AM nrc.gov TWGWPO02.HQGWDOO1 06/29/2006 10:08:52 AM nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 383 06/29/2006 10:08:49 AM AMR Question Set #04 -- Jackson.wpd 7034 06/29/2006 10:03:14 AM Options Auto Delete: No Expiration Date: None | |||
@msn.com) | c:\temp\GW}o0001 .TMP Page 21 Notify Recipients: Yes Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed | ||
Priority: ReplyRequested: | |||
Return Notification: | |||
Concealed | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Security: To Be Delivered: | No Security: Standard To Be Delivered: Immediate Status Tracking: Delivered & Opened | ||
Status Tracking: | |||
& Opened James Davis -AMR Question | Paae ii James Davis James - Question Set AMR Question Davis -1AMR #04 -- Jackson.wpd Set #04 -- | ||
identify the aging effect of cracking (not due to fatigue) and the aging management program is Inservice Inspection. | Jackson.wpd Page 1 1 Questions Related to PNPS Aging Management Review Results for LRA Section 3.1.1 (Reactor Vessel, Internals and Reactor Coolant System) | ||
Prepared by Bob Jackson Question Number: | |||
Question NEW QUESTION: (Submitted after site audit) 6/29/2006 3.1.1-34: | |||
LRA Table 3.1.2-1 includes three AMR results lines related to bolting. Two of these lines | |||
("incore housing bolting" and "other pressure boundary bolting") identify the aging effect of cracking (not due to fatigue) and the aging management program is Inservice Inspection. | |||
GALL AMP XI.M18 (Bolting Integrity) refers to ASME Section XI requirements for detection of aging effects. However, for high strength bolting (> 150 ksi), the GALL AMP states that for bolting size greater than 1-inch nominal diameter a volumetric examination comparable to that of ASME Section XI Examination Category B-G-1 is required in addition to the visual examination required by Examination Category B-G-2 (for pressure retaining bolting 2" and less in diameter). | GALL AMP XI.M18 (Bolting Integrity) refers to ASME Section XI requirements for detection of aging effects. However, for high strength bolting (> 150 ksi), the GALL AMP states that for bolting size greater than 1-inch nominal diameter a volumetric examination comparable to that of ASME Section XI Examination Category B-G-1 is required in addition to the visual examination required by Examination Category B-G-2 (for pressure retaining bolting 2" and less in diameter). | ||
Sufficient information has not been found in the LRA or in other documents reviewed to determine whether the incore housing bolting and other pressure boundary bolting in Table 3.1.2-1 can be excluded from the augmented examination. | Sufficient information has not been found in the LRA or in other documents reviewed to determine whether the incore housing bolting and other pressure boundary bolting in Table 3.1.2-1 can be excluded from the augmented examination. | ||
Question: For the components described as "incore housing bolting" and "other pressure boundary bolting" in LRA Table 3.1.2-1, please provide the following information. | Question: | ||
: 1) Is the yield strength of these components greater or less than 150 ksi?2) Is the diameter of these components greater than 1", and less than or equal to 2"?3) If any of these components have yield strength greater than 150 ksi and diameter between 1" and 2", will PNPS perform the augmented volumetric inspection as recommended in the GALL report? Alternatively, if such components are used at PNPS and PNPS does not propose to perform the augmented volumetric inspection, please provide a plant-specific basis to waive the augmented requirement of the GALL AMP.1 James Davis -AMR Question Set #04 -- Jackson.wpd | For the components described as "incore housing bolting" and "other pressure boundary bolting" in LRA Table 3.1.2-1, please provide the following information. | ||
.... Page 21 James Davis | : 1) Is the yield strength of these components greater or less than 150 ksi? | ||
: 2) Is the diameter of these components greater than 1", and less than or equal to 2"? | |||
: 3) If any of these components have yield strength greater than 150 ksi and diameter between 1" and 2", will PNPS perform the augmented volumetric inspection as recommended in the GALL report? Alternatively, if such components are used at PNPS and PNPS does not propose to perform the augmented volumetric inspection, please provide a plant-specific basis to waive the augmented requirement of the GALL AMP. | |||
1 | |||
James Davis - AMR Question Set #04 -- Jackson.wpd .... | |||
Page 21 James Davis AMR Question Set #04 | |||
- -- Jackson.wpd Paqe 21 I Questions Related to PNPS Aging Management Review Results for LRA Section 3.1.1 (Reactor Vessel, Internals and Reactor Coolant System) | |||
Prepared by Bob Jackson 2}} | |||
Revision as of 15:42, 23 November 2019
| ML062130057 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Pilgrim |
| Issue date: | 06/29/2006 |
| From: | Jennifer Davis Division of Regulatory Improvement Programs |
| To: | Ellis D, Ford B, Mogolesko F - No Known Affiliation, Entergy Nuclear Generation Co |
| References | |
| %dam200612, TAC MC9669 | |
| Download: ML062130057 (5) | |
Text
James Davis -Additional Question From Bob Jackson From: James Davis To: Bford@entergy.com; Dellisl @entergy.com; Fred Mogolesko Date: 06/29/2006 10:08:49 AM
Subject:
Additional Question From Bob Jackson Bob Jackson has an additional question that should be easy to answer.
Jim CC: jacksonwr@ @msn.com; Kenneth Chang; Ram Subbaratnam
c:\temp\GW)00001.T MP Page c:\temp\GW}OOO01 .TMP Paae 1I.1 Mail Envelope Properties (44A3DEF1.D48 : 22 : 35346)
Subject:
Additional Question From Bob Jackson Creation Date 06/29/2006 10:08:49 AM From: James Davis Created By: JAD@nrc.gov Recipients Action Date & Time entergy.com Transferred 06/29/2006 10:09:40 AM BFord (Bford@entergy.com) dellisl (DellisI @entergy.com) fmogole (Fred Mogolesko) msn.com Transferred 06/29/2006 10:09:40 AM jacksonwr CC (jacksonwr@ @msn.com) nrc.gov OWGWPO03.HQGWDO01 Delivered 06/29/2006 10:08:49 AM KXC2 CC (Kenneth Chang) nrc.gov TWGWPO02.HQGWDOO1 Delivered 06/29/2006 10:08:52 AM RXS2 CC (Ram Subbaratnam) Opened 06/29/2006 10:13:22 AM Post Office Delivered Route entergy.com msn.com OWGWPOO3.HQGWDOO1 06/29/2006 10:08:49 AM nrc.gov TWGWPO02.HQGWDOO1 06/29/2006 10:08:52 AM nrc.gov Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 383 06/29/2006 10:08:49 AM AMR Question Set #04 -- Jackson.wpd 7034 06/29/2006 10:03:14 AM Options Auto Delete: No Expiration Date: None
c:\temp\GW}o0001 .TMP Page 21 Notify Recipients: Yes Priority: Standard ReplyRequested: No Return Notification: None Concealed
Subject:
No Security: Standard To Be Delivered: Immediate Status Tracking: Delivered & Opened
Paae ii James Davis James - Question Set AMR Question Davis -1AMR #04 -- Jackson.wpd Set #04 --
Jackson.wpd Page 1 1 Questions Related to PNPS Aging Management Review Results for LRA Section 3.1.1 (Reactor Vessel, Internals and Reactor Coolant System)
Prepared by Bob Jackson Question Number:
Question NEW QUESTION: (Submitted after site audit) 6/29/2006 3.1.1-34:
LRA Table 3.1.2-1 includes three AMR results lines related to bolting. Two of these lines
("incore housing bolting" and "other pressure boundary bolting") identify the aging effect of cracking (not due to fatigue) and the aging management program is Inservice Inspection.
GALL AMP XI.M18 (Bolting Integrity) refers to ASME Section XI requirements for detection of aging effects. However, for high strength bolting (> 150 ksi), the GALL AMP states that for bolting size greater than 1-inch nominal diameter a volumetric examination comparable to that of ASME Section XI Examination Category B-G-1 is required in addition to the visual examination required by Examination Category B-G-2 (for pressure retaining bolting 2" and less in diameter).
Sufficient information has not been found in the LRA or in other documents reviewed to determine whether the incore housing bolting and other pressure boundary bolting in Table 3.1.2-1 can be excluded from the augmented examination.
Question:
For the components described as "incore housing bolting" and "other pressure boundary bolting" in LRA Table 3.1.2-1, please provide the following information.
- 1) Is the yield strength of these components greater or less than 150 ksi?
- 2) Is the diameter of these components greater than 1", and less than or equal to 2"?
- 3) If any of these components have yield strength greater than 150 ksi and diameter between 1" and 2", will PNPS perform the augmented volumetric inspection as recommended in the GALL report? Alternatively, if such components are used at PNPS and PNPS does not propose to perform the augmented volumetric inspection, please provide a plant-specific basis to waive the augmented requirement of the GALL AMP.
1
James Davis - AMR Question Set #04 -- Jackson.wpd ....
Page 21 James Davis AMR Question Set #04
- -- Jackson.wpd Paqe 21 I Questions Related to PNPS Aging Management Review Results for LRA Section 3.1.1 (Reactor Vessel, Internals and Reactor Coolant System)
Prepared by Bob Jackson 2