ML18121A097: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-301 Operating | {{#Wiki_filter:ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301 -3 Facili Date of Examination: -z. / 2 & . Operatin Test Number: *20 Initials | ||
' audit test (s) ( | : 1. General Criteria a b* c* | ||
: a. The operating test conforms to the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with samplin requirements (e . ., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safe! function distribution). | |||
* The facility | : b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered durin this examination. | ||
: c. The operatin test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s) (see Section D.1.a.). | |||
: d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits. | |||
: e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the desi nated license level. | |||
: 2. Walkthrough Criteria | |||
: a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable: | |||
initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee operationally importa nt specific performance criteria that include-detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the se uence of steps, if ap licable | |||
: b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative wa lkthrough outlines (Forms ES-301 -1 and ES-301-2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last two NRC ~ fr- tffi-1 examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2. - / | |||
: 3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4, and a cop is attached. | |||
: a. Author | |||
: b. Facility Reviewer (*) | |||
: c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)"/-=-~.14..!~~=-...W:::!!o!L-=-J.-=~~~~-+,....,r::.._-!>.-.,~. | |||
: d. NRC Supervisor | |||
* The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests. | |||
# The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner concurrence is required.}} | |||
Revision as of 06:12, 21 October 2019
| ML18121A097 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 04/26/2018 |
| From: | Chuck Zoia Division of Reactor Safety III |
| To: | Detroit Edison, Co |
| Zoia C | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17164A403 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML18121A097 (1) | |
Text
ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301 -3 Facili Date of Examination: -z. / 2 & . Operatin Test Number: *20 Initials
- 1. General Criteria a b* c*
- a. The operating test conforms to the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with samplin requirements (e . ., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safe! function distribution).
- b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered durin this examination.
- c. The operatin test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s) (see Section D.1.a.).
- d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.
- e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent applicants at the desi nated license level.
- 2. Walkthrough Criteria
- a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:
initial conditions initiating cues references and tools, including associated procedures reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time critical by the facility licensee operationally importa nt specific performance criteria that include-detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature system response and other examiner cues statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant criteria for successful completion of the task identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards restrictions on the se uence of steps, if ap licable
- b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative wa lkthrough outlines (Forms ES-301 -1 and ES-301-2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last two NRC ~ fr- tffi-1 examinations) specified on those forms and Form ES-201-2. - /
- 3. Simulator Criteria The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with Form ES-301-4, and a cop is attached.
- a. Author
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)"/-=-~.14..!~~=-...W:::!!o!L-=-J.-=~~~~-+,....,r::.._-!>.-.,~.
- d. NRC Supervisor
- The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
- The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner concurrence is required.