ML18121A102
| ML18121A102 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fermi  |
| Issue date: | 04/26/2018 |
| From: | Chuck Zoia Division of Reactor Safety III |
| To: | Detroit Edison, Co |
| Zoia C | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML17164A403 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML18121A102 (1) | |
Text
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4 Facility: Fermi 2 Date of Exam: 2/26/2018 Scenario Numbers: 1/2/3 Operating Test No.: 2018-1 QUALITATIVE ATTRIBUTES Initials a
b*
c#
- 1.
The initial conditions are realistic, in that some equipment and/or instrumentation may be out of service, SMS (lar-but it does not cue the operators into expected events.
~
- 2.
The scenarios consist mostly of related events.
SMS ro- ~
- 3.
Each event description consists of SMS the point in the scenario when it is to be initiated f-v-the malfunction(s) or conditions that are entered to initiate the event
~
the symptoms/cues that will be visible to the crew the expected operator actions (by shift position) the event termination point (if applicable)
- 4.
The events are valid with regard to physics and thermodynamics.
SMS f.- ~
- 5.
Sequencing and timing of events is reasonable, and allows the examination team to obtain complete SMS I\\-- l:!L evaluation results commensurate with the scenario objectives.
- 6.
If time compression techniques are used, the scenario summary clearly so indicates.
NIA If/A-tl//4 Operators have sufficient time to carry out expected activities without undue time constraints.
~
Cues are given.
- 7.
The simulator modeling is not altered.
SMS
~ ~
- 8.
The scenarios have been validated. Pursuant to 10 CFR 55.46(d), any open simulator performance SMS deficiencies or deviations from the referenced plant have been evaluated to ensure that functional r....... ~
fidelity is maintained while running the planned scenarios.
- 9.
Every operator will be evaluated using at least one new or significantly modified scenario. All other scenarios have been altered in accordance with Section D.5 of ES-301.
SMS ~
~
- 10. All individual operator competencies can be evaluated, as verified using Form ES-301 -6 (submit the SMS form along with the simulator scenarios).
~
l~I
- 11. The scenario set provides the opportunity for each applicant to be evaluated in each of the applicable SMS ~ b rating factors. (Competency Rating factors as described on forms ES-303-1 and ES-303-3.)
- 12. Each applicant will be significantly involved in the minimum number of transients and events specified SMS rv-b_
on Form ES-301-5 (submit the form with the simulator scenarios).
- 13. The level of difficulty is appropriate to support licensing decisions for each crew position.
SMS f"" ~
Target Quantitat ive Attributes (Per Scenario; See Section D.5.d)
Actual Attributes
- 1.
Malfunctions after EOP entry (1-2) 3/ 3 12 SMS
"""" ~
- 2.
Abnormal events (2-4) 4 1 4 12 SMS P- ~
- 3.
Major transients (1-2) 1 I 2 / 1 SMS l"- ~
- 4.
EOPs entered/requiring substantive actions (1-2) 2 1 2 12 SMS r---- ~
- 5.
EOP contingencies requiring substantive actions (0-2) 1 I 1 / 1 SMS
~ ~
- 6.
EOP based Critical tasks (2-3) 3 / 2 12 SMS
~"" "?'?
NOTE:
- The facility signature is not applicable for NRG-developed tests.
- Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.
SMS - Scott M. Schmus /s/, DTE Energy, Senior Nuclear Instructor - Operations.