ML093080803: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 3: Line 3:
| issue date = 05/15/2009
| issue date = 05/15/2009
| title = E-mail from J. White to N. Sheehan, Question Related to Oyster Creek Inspections
| title = E-mail from J. White to N. Sheehan, Question Related to Oyster Creek Inspections
| author name = White J R
| author name = White J
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRS/PSB2
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-I/DRS/PSB2
| addressee name = Sheehan N A
| addressee name = Sheehan N
| addressee affiliation = NRC/RGN-I
| addressee affiliation = NRC/RGN-I
| docket = 05000219
| docket = 05000219

Revision as of 16:19, 11 July 2019

E-mail from J. White to N. Sheehan, Question Related to Oyster Creek Inspections
ML093080803
Person / Time
Site: Oyster Creek
Issue date: 05/15/2009
From: Jason White
NRC/RGN-I/DRS/PSB2
To: Neil Sheehan
NRC Region 1
References
FOIA/PA-2009-0214
Download: ML093080803 (1)


Text

,Gray, Harold From: John White Sent: Friday, May 15, 2009 8:13 AM , -To: Neil Sheehan Cc: Ronald Nimitz; Harold Gray; John Richmond

Subject:

RE: Question re: Oyster Creek inspections A 6" aluminum pipe (A-4, condensate pumps to turbine building) in the same area was inspected previously.

The leaking pipes were CS-24 (10" carbon steel associated with hotwell level control) and CS-25 (8" carbon steel associated with hotwell level control. They were not selected for prior inspection.

From: Neil Sheehan Sent: Thursday, May 14, 2009 4:06 PM'To: John White

Subject:

Question re: Oyster Creek inspections Can you refresh my memory on this?Neil: RE: Al. At least one of them was inspected by Exelon but it looks like in a different spot.'Were one or both pipes with leaks inspected before the plant's license was renewed and, if so, where and when and what were the results?Thanks.Todd