ML20357A102: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 17: Line 17:
=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201
{{#Wiki_filter:ES-201
* Examination Outline Quality Checklist                                     Form ES-201-2 Facility:                                                                             Date of Examination:
* Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility:
Initials Item
Date of Examination:
* Task Description
Initials Item  
                                      -        ~
~
                                                                                  ~
* Task Description  
a       b*     c**
~
w t.
a b*
_R
c**
: a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N.
: t.
b-. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with SectionD.1 of ES-401 or ES--401 N and whether all KJA categories are appropriately sampled.
: a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N.  
                                                                                                                        -'ii/    .. p OtH l ('
-'ii/
I                                                                                                                i -'            ctr}   j I
.. p OtH '
T                                                                                                                                           ~
w b-.
T C. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.               {.J     'i'     Ir,~
Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with l ('
_R SectionD.1 of ES-401 or ES--401 N and whether all KJA categories are appropriately sampled.
i -'
ctr}
j I
I T
Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
{.J 'i' Ir,~  
~
T C.
E
E
: d. As_sess whether the justificatio_ns for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.
: d. As_sess whether the justificatio_ns for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.  
N
-'i" Cf' ~I N
                                                                                                                        -'i"     Cf' ~ I
2.
: 2.       a. Using Form ES-301 -5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of                                   I normal evolutions, instrument.and component failures, technical specifications, and major                       lf s
: a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of I
I t ransients.                                                                                          ,;            lctAt M       b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u           mix of applicants *in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L           without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at                   C-f A           least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T         . applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
normal evolutions, instrument.and component failures, technical specifications, and major lf lctAt s
                                                                                                                          '{~
transients.
r>>t 0
I M
C. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R
: b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u
quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in Section D.S. "Specific Instructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"' of ES-301 (including                 <f'
mix of applicants *in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L
                                                                                                                          ;,J overlap).
without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at C-f A
                                                                                                                                          ~
least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the  
: 3.       a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
'{~
(1) The-outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w                   among the safety functions as specified on the form.
r>>t T  
A             (2) Task repetition from the last two NRG examinations is within the limits specified on the form.
. applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
L.           (3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).
0 To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R
K           (4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.                 l f!
C.
T             (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area           1~
quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in  
H                  tasks meets the criteria on the form.
<f' Section D.S. "Specific Instructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"' of ES-301 (including  
R 0       b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
;,J  
u             (1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.
~
G             (2) At least one task is new or significantly modified.
overlap).
11 lf              ~
: 3.
H            (3) No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRG licensing examinations.
: a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
: c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.                               1-J    <./.      ~
(1) The-outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w
among the safety functions as specified on the form.
A (2) Task repetition from the last two NRG examinations is within the limits specified on the form.
L.
(3)
No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).
lf!
K (4)
The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.
1~
T (5)
The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H
tasks meets the criteria on the form.
R 0
: b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
u (1)
The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.
lf ~
G (2)
At least one task is new or significantly modified.
11 H
(3)
No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRG licensing examinations.
: c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of 1-J
<../
~
applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
I
I
: 4.     a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
: 4.
                                                                                                                        -r"     l/         ~
: a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual  
G E      b. Assess whethe_r the 10 CFR 55.41 , 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.                           ~.J     l f1 N                                                                                                                                         ,,
~
E
plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.  
: c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.             -;{     {/             .
-r" l/
                                                                                                                                          /!4IW'7 R.     d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRG exams.                       -     ;.,/     ~
G Assess whethe_r the 1 O CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.  
A L       e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.                                                         -r     lf'       ,__
~.J E
: f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level {RO or SRO).                                   ,, '     <-/J I~
: b.
l f1 -
N E
: c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.  
-;{ {/  
/!4IW'7.
R.
: d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRG exams.  
- ;.,/  
~
A L
: e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.  
-r lf'
: f.
Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level {RO or SRO).  
,, ' <-/J I~
,'oM. 0 r,~oted Name/~
Date
Date
                                          ,'oM .      r,~oted Name/~
: a. Author  
                                      ~~ - /' . ~
?.!N/!'I
: a. Author                                           0
: b. Facility Reviewer (*)
                                                                                                                                ?. !N/!'I
z  
: b. Facility Reviewer (*)                                                                                                       z   .}1_.;tJ C. NRC's Chief E_x aminer (#)                                                                                             '1-17* I?
.}1_.;tJ C.
: d.     NRC Supervisor                                                                                                         ,[t, , ).2(/HJ
NRC's Chief E_xaminer (#) ~~ - /'. ~
* Not applicable for NRG-prepared examination outlines.
'1-17* I?
# The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.
: d. NRC Supervisor  
ES-201, Page 30 of 32                         d: I )Nile - -p. v*farJ """''}}
,[t, ).2(/HJ
* Not applicable for NRG-prepared examination outlines.  
# The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.
ES-201, Page 30 of 32 d: I )Nile - -p. v*f arJ """''}}

Latest revision as of 11:48, 29 November 2024

2018 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant Exam Form ES-201-2
ML20357A102
Person / Time
Site: Cook  American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 08/13/2018
From: Chuck Zoia
Operations Branch III
To:
Indiana Michigan Power Co
Zoia C
Shared Package
ML17164A385 List:
References
Download: ML20357A102 (1)


Text

ES-201

  • Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility:

Date of Examination:

Initials Item

~

  • Task Description

~

a b*

c**

t.
a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N.

-'ii/

.. p OtH '

w b-.

Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with l ('

_R SectionD.1 of ES-401 or ES--401 N and whether all KJA categories are appropriately sampled.

i -'

ctr}

j I

I T

Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.

{.J 'i' Ir,~

~

T C.

E

d. As_sess whether the justificatio_ns for deselected or rejected KIA statements are appropriate.

-'i" Cf' ~I N

2.

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of I

normal evolutions, instrument.and component failures, technical specifications, and major lf lctAt s

transients.

I M

b. Assess whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and u

mix of applicants *in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L

without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at C-f A

least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the

'{~

r>>t T

. applicants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

0 To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R

C.

quantitative criteria specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in

<f' Section D.S. "Specific Instructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"' of ES-301 (including

,J

~

overlap).

3.
a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1) The-outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant tasks distributed w

among the safety functions as specified on the form.

A (2) Task repetition from the last two NRG examinations is within the limits specified on the form.

L.

(3)

No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audit test(s).

lf!

K (4)

The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.

1~

T (5)

The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H

tasks meets the criteria on the form.

R 0

b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

u (1)

The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.

lf ~

G (2)

At least one task is new or significantly modified.

11 H

(3)

No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRG licensing examinations.

c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of 1-J

<../

~

applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.

I

4.
a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual

~

plant examination insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

-r" l/

G Assess whethe_r the 1 O CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

~.J E

b.

l f1 -

N E

c. Ensure that KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

-;{ {/

/!4IW'7.

R.

d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRG exams.

- ;.,/

~

A L

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

-r lf'

f.

Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level {RO or SRO).

,, ' <-/J I~

,'oM. 0 r,~oted Name/~

Date

a. Author

?.!N/!'I

b. Facility Reviewer (*)

z

.}1_.;tJ C.

NRC's Chief E_xaminer (#) ~~ - /'. ~

'1-17* I?

d. NRC Supervisor

,[t, ).2(/HJ

  • Not applicable for NRG-prepared examination outlines.
  1. The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.

ES-201, Page 30 of 32 d: I )Nile - -p. v*f arJ """