ML20133M723: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:.     . _ .        _                                            _          _ __      _ _ . . _ _ _ _
{{#Wiki_filter:.
i APPENDIX A i                                         NOTICE OF VIOLATION Texas Utilities Electric Company                     Docket No.:   50-445/85-11 Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Unit 1         Permit:       CPPR-126 During an NRC inspection conducted on August 1-31, 1985, of Comanche Peak Response Team activities, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. The violation involved a failure to report nonconforming conditions identified during reinspection of the essential lighting system in the Unit 1 safeguards building. In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure
i APPENDIX A i
;        for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1985), the violation is listed below:
NOTICE OF VIOLATION Texas Utilities Electric Company Docket No.:
i Criterion XVI of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 states, in part, " Measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defective material and
50-445/85-11 Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Unit 1 Permit:
;                equipment, and nonconformances are promptly identified and corrected. . ."
CPPR-126 During an NRC inspection conducted on August 1-31, 1985, of Comanche Peak Response Team activities, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. The violation involved a failure to report nonconforming conditions identified during reinspection of the essential lighting system in the Unit 1 safeguards building.
Paragraph 3.1.1 of Procedure CP-QP-16.0, Revision 17, dated July 1,1985, j               states, in part, "When a nonconforming condition is identified, the individual shall imediately apply a Hold Tag, when practical . . . ."
In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1985), the violation is listed below:
Paragraph 3.1.2 of this procedure states, in part, " Nonconforming conditions shall be reported on the NCR form . . . ."
i Criterion XVI of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 states, in part, " Measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defective material and equipment, and nonconformances are promptly identified and corrected..."
Contrary to the above, during a NRC witnessed reinspection on i               August 6-7, 1985, of essential lighting system ESB1-42 (Unit 1, I             safeguards building, elevation 773 ft.) by an Evaluation Research i
Paragraph 3.1.1 of Procedure CP-QP-16.0, Revision 17, dated July 1,1985, j
Corporation (ERC) inspector and a TUGC0 QC inspector, nonconforming hardware items were identified with respect to design document requirements. The identified nonconforming items were outside of the defined ERC reinspection activity scope and the TUGC0 inspector stated that they would be documented on a NCR form. As of August 29, 1985, a NCR had 3
states, in part, "When a nonconforming condition is identified, the individual shall imediately apply a Hold Tag, when practical...."
not been written, a hold tag had not been applied and NRC followup j               established that a documented record of the nonconforming items had not
Paragraph 3.1.2 of this procedure states, in part, " Nonconforming conditions shall be reported on the NCR form...."
!                been maintained.
Contrary to the above, during a NRC witnessed reinspection on i
August 6-7, 1985, of essential lighting system ESB1-42 (Unit 1, I
safeguards building, elevation 773 ft.) by an Evaluation Research Corporation (ERC) inspector and a TUGC0 QC inspector, nonconforming i
hardware items were identified with respect to design document requirements.
The identified nonconforming items were outside of the defined ERC reinspection activity scope and the TUGC0 inspector stated that they would be documented on a NCR form.
As of August 29, 1985, a NCR had not been written, a hold tag had not been applied and NRC followup 3
j established that a documented record of the nonconforming items had not been maintained.
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement II)(445/8511-V-01).
This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement II)(445/8511-V-01).
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Texas Utilities Electric Company is hereby required to submit to this office within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each violation:       (1) the reason for the violations if admitted, (2) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Texas Utilities Electric Company is hereby required to submit to this office within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each violation:
8510280220 851011 PDR O      ADOCK 05000445
(1) the reason for the violations if admitted, (2) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.
:                                PDR Dated at Arlington, Texas, this lith day of October, 1985.
8510280220 851011 PDR ADOCK 05000445 O
PDR Dated at Arlington, Texas, this lith day of October, 1985.
l
l
'______.___                                                                        _._____ __}}
.}}

Latest revision as of 07:30, 12 December 2024

Notice of Violation from Insp on 850801-31
ML20133M723
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak Luminant icon.png
Issue date: 10/11/1985
From:
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:
Shared Package
ML20133M720 List:
References
50-445-85-11, NUDOCS 8510280220
Download: ML20133M723 (1)


Text

.

i APPENDIX A i

NOTICE OF VIOLATION Texas Utilities Electric Company Docket No.:

50-445/85-11 Comanche Peak Steam Electric Station, Unit 1 Permit:

CPPR-126 During an NRC inspection conducted on August 1-31, 1985, of Comanche Peak Response Team activities, a violation of NRC requirements was identified. The violation involved a failure to report nonconforming conditions identified during reinspection of the essential lighting system in the Unit 1 safeguards building.

In accordance with the " General Statement of Policy and Procedure for NRC Enforcement Actions," 10 CFR Part 2, Appendix C (1985), the violation is listed below:

i Criterion XVI of Appendix B to 10 CFR Part 50 states, in part, " Measures shall be established to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as failures, malfunctions, deficiencies, deviations, defective material and equipment, and nonconformances are promptly identified and corrected..."

Paragraph 3.1.1 of Procedure CP-QP-16.0, Revision 17, dated July 1,1985, j

states, in part, "When a nonconforming condition is identified, the individual shall imediately apply a Hold Tag, when practical...."

Paragraph 3.1.2 of this procedure states, in part, " Nonconforming conditions shall be reported on the NCR form...."

Contrary to the above, during a NRC witnessed reinspection on i

August 6-7, 1985, of essential lighting system ESB1-42 (Unit 1, I

safeguards building, elevation 773 ft.) by an Evaluation Research Corporation (ERC) inspector and a TUGC0 QC inspector, nonconforming i

hardware items were identified with respect to design document requirements.

The identified nonconforming items were outside of the defined ERC reinspection activity scope and the TUGC0 inspector stated that they would be documented on a NCR form.

As of August 29, 1985, a NCR had not been written, a hold tag had not been applied and NRC followup 3

j established that a documented record of the nonconforming items had not been maintained.

This is a Severity Level IV violation (Supplement II)(445/8511-V-01).

Pursuant to the provisions of 10 CFR 2.201, Texas Utilities Electric Company is hereby required to submit to this office within 30 days of the date of the letter transmitting this Notice, a written statement or explanation in reply, including for each violation:

(1) the reason for the violations if admitted, (2) the corrective steps which have been taken and the results achieved, (3) the corrective steps which will be taken to avoid further violations, and (4) the date when full compliance will be achieved. Where good cause is shown, consideration will be given to extending the response time.

8510280220 851011 PDR ADOCK 05000445 O

PDR Dated at Arlington, Texas, this lith day of October, 1985.

l

.