IR 05000483/2005008: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:ber 14, 2005
{{#Wiki_filter:November 14, 2005


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
Line 42: Line 42:
William B. Jones, Chief Project Branch B Division of Reactor Projects Docket: 50-483 License: NPF-30
William B. Jones, Chief Project Branch B Division of Reactor Projects Docket: 50-483 License: NPF-30


Union Electric Company -2-
Union Electric Company-2-


===Enclosure:===
===Enclosure:===
Line 48: Line 48:


REGION IV==
REGION IV==
Docket: 50-483 License: NPF-30 Report: 05000483/2005008 Licensee: Union Electric Company Facility: Callaway Plant Location: Junction Highway CC and Highway O Fulton, Missouri Dates: July 1 through September 30, 2005 Inspectors: R. Kopriva, Senior Project Engineer, Branch B C. Stancil, Project Engineer, Branch B C. Paulk, Senior Reactor Inspector, Engineering Branch 1 G. George, Reactor Inspector, Engineering Branch 1 W. Sifre, Reactor Inspector, Engineering Branch 1 M. Peck, Senior Resident Inspector D. Dumbacher, Resident Inspector E. Owen, Reactor Inspector Approved By: W. B. Jones, Chief, Project Branch B Enclosure
Docket:
50-483 License:
NPF-30 Report:
05000483/2005008 Licensee:
Union Electric Company Facility:
Callaway Plant Location:
Junction Highway CC and Highway O Fulton, Missouri Dates:
July 1 through September 30, 2005 Inspectors:
R. Kopriva, Senior Project Engineer, Branch B C. Stancil, Project Engineer, Branch B C. Paulk, Senior Reactor Inspector, Engineering Branch 1 G. George, Reactor Inspector, Engineering Branch 1 W. Sifre, Reactor Inspector, Engineering Branch 1 M. Peck, Senior Resident Inspector D. Dumbacher, Resident Inspector E. Owen, Reactor Inspector Approved By:
W. B. Jones, Chief, Project Branch B
 
Enclosure


=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS=
=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS=
Line 59: Line 70:


===NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings===
===NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings===
There were no findings identified in these areas.
There were no findings identified in these areas.


===Licensee-Identified Violations===
===Licensee-Identified Violations===
None
None


Line 70: Line 79:
Plant Status Callaway Plant began the inspection period at essentially full power and remained at this level until September 17, 2005, when the unit was shutdown to commence the fourteenth Refueling Outage (R14). At the end of the report period, the unit was in cold shutdown and defueled.
Plant Status Callaway Plant began the inspection period at essentially full power and remained at this level until September 17, 2005, when the unit was shutdown to commence the fourteenth Refueling Outage (R14). At the end of the report period, the unit was in cold shutdown and defueled.
{{a|1R13}}
{{a|1R13}}
==1R13 Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Evaluation==
==1R13 Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Evaluation==
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71111.13}}
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71111.13}}
Line 80: Line 90:
====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
No findings of significance were identified. {{a|1R17}}
No findings of significance were identified. {{a|1R17}}
==1R17 Evaluation of Permanent Plant Modifications for Steam Generator Replacement==
==1R17 Evaluation of Permanent Plant Modifications for Steam Generator Replacement==
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71111.17}}
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71111.17}}
Line 96: Line 107:
====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
No findings of significance were identified. {{a|1R20}}
No findings of significance were identified. {{a|1R20}}
==1R20 Refueling and Outage Activities==
==1R20 Refueling and Outage Activities==
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71111.20}}
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71111.20}}
Line 106: Line 118:
====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
No findings of significance were identified. {{a|1R23}}
No findings of significance were identified. {{a|1R23}}
==1R23 Temporary Plant Modifications==
==1R23 Temporary Plant Modifications==
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71111.23}}
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71111.23}}
Line 116: Line 129:


==RADIATION SAFETY==
==RADIATION SAFETY==
===Cornerstone: Occupational Radiation Safety===
===Cornerstone: Occupational Radiation Safety===
2OS1 Access Control to Radiologically Significant Areas (50001, 71121.01)
2OS1 Access Control to Radiologically Significant Areas (50001, 71121.01)


Line 140: Line 151:
==OTHER ACTIVITIES==
==OTHER ACTIVITIES==
{{a|4OA2}}
{{a|4OA2}}
==4OA2 Identification and Resolution of Problems==
==4OA2 Identification and Resolution of Problems==
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71152}}
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71152}}


===1. Steam Generator Replacement Outage Inspection (50001)===
===1. Steam Generator Replacement Outage Inspection (50001)===
====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors reviewed the daily Callaway Action Request report summaries and nonconformance reports issued during the replacement project for risk-significant issues to see that the licensee was properly implementing the corrective action program. The inspectors verified that the licensee identified, evaluated, corrected, and trended in accordance with the program requirements were in place.
The inspectors reviewed the daily Callaway Action Request report summaries and nonconformance reports issued during the replacement project for risk-significant issues to see that the licensee was properly implementing the corrective action program. The inspectors verified that the licensee identified, evaluated, corrected, and trended in accordance with the program requirements were in place.
Line 150: Line 161:
====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
No findings of significance were identified. {{a|4OA5}}
No findings of significance were identified. {{a|4OA5}}
==4OA5 Other - Steam Generator Replacement Activities==
==4OA5 Other - Steam Generator Replacement Activities==
{{IP sample|IP=IP 50001}}
{{IP sample|IP=IP 50001}}


===4. Safety Evaluations===
===4. Safety Evaluations===
====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspection was conducted using Inspection Procedure 50001, Steam Generator Replacement Inspection, and Inspection Procedure 71111.02, Evaluation of Changes, Tests, or Experiments, as guidance. The inspectors reviewed 10 applicability determinations, 11 screenings, and 4 safety evaluations, required by 10 CFR 50.59, Evaluation of Changes, Tests, or Experiments, associated with the Callaway steam generator replacement. Additionally, the inspectors reviewed Callaway databases to verify qualifications of Callaways staff to perform, review, and approve 10 CFR 50.59 safety reviews.
The inspection was conducted using Inspection Procedure 50001, Steam Generator Replacement Inspection, and Inspection Procedure 71111.02, Evaluation of Changes, Tests, or Experiments, as guidance. The inspectors reviewed 10 applicability determinations, 11 screenings, and 4 safety evaluations, required by 10 CFR 50.59, Evaluation of Changes, Tests, or Experiments, associated with the Callaway steam generator replacement. Additionally, the inspectors reviewed Callaway databases to verify qualifications of Callaways staff to perform, review, and approve 10 CFR 50.59 safety reviews.
Line 162: Line 173:


===2. Replacement Steam Generator Transport and Lift===
===2. Replacement Steam Generator Transport and Lift===
====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspector reviewed the applicable engineering analysis associated with old steam generator removals and new replacement steam generator transport and lift to final containment positions. The inspection was conducted using Inspection Procedure 50001, Steam Generator Replacement Inspection as guidance.
The inspector reviewed the applicable engineering analysis associated with old steam generator removals and new replacement steam generator transport and lift to final containment positions. The inspection was conducted using Inspection Procedure 50001, Steam Generator Replacement Inspection as guidance.


Specifically, the inspectors reviewed applicable engineering design, modification, and analysis associated with steam generator lifting and rigging including: crane and rigging equipment, steam generator component drop analysis, safe load paths, and load lay-down areas. Additionally, steam generator replacement processes were reviewed for Steam Generator Replacement Project identification, tracking, and resolution of problems related to the Steam Generator Replacement Project to ascertain that they were consistent with plant processes.
Specifically, the inspectors reviewed applicable engineering design, modification, and
 
analysis associated with steam generator lifting and rigging including: crane and rigging equipment, steam generator component drop analysis, safe load paths, and load lay-down areas. Additionally, steam generator replacement processes were reviewed for Steam Generator Replacement Project identification, tracking, and resolution of problems related to the Steam Generator Replacement Project to ascertain that they were consistent with plant processes.


Containment Access and Closure The cutting of the outer containment wall was not necessary, and therefore, evaluation of a temporary containment opening affecting integrity was not applicable. However, the inspector questioned containment closure capability during plant Modes 5 and 6. During the first two weeks of the outage, the steam generator Hatch Transfer System (HTS)rails were to be laid through the Equipment Hatch opening and used for moving the old and new steam generators in and out of containment, along with other equipment to support the steam generator replacement project. Due to the size and awkwardness of the rail system, the inspector questioned containment closure capability in the event of an external severe weather or internal radiological event (fuel handling accident or loss of inventory), particularly if an event occurred during the transport of a steam generator, in or out of containment. The licensee has historically demonstrated that the installation of the Containment Equipment Hatch takes approximately one hour. The procedure requirement to establish containment closure is two hours for an external/internal event.
Containment Access and Closure The cutting of the outer containment wall was not necessary, and therefore, evaluation of a temporary containment opening affecting integrity was not applicable. However, the inspector questioned containment closure capability during plant Modes 5 and 6. During the first two weeks of the outage, the steam generator Hatch Transfer System (HTS)rails were to be laid through the Equipment Hatch opening and used for moving the old and new steam generators in and out of containment, along with other equipment to support the steam generator replacement project. Due to the size and awkwardness of the rail system, the inspector questioned containment closure capability in the event of an external severe weather or internal radiological event (fuel handling accident or loss of inventory), particularly if an event occurred during the transport of a steam generator, in or out of containment. The licensee has historically demonstrated that the installation of the Containment Equipment Hatch takes approximately one hour. The procedure requirement to establish containment closure is two hours for an external/internal event.
Line 176: Line 188:


===3. Security Considerations===
===3. Security Considerations===
====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspector evaluated security compensatory measures associated with affected vital and protected area barriers that were necessary to facilitate transporting the replacement steam generators into the protected area, and subsequently, into the containment. The inspection was conducted using Inspection Procedure 50001, Steam Generator Replacement Inspection as guidance. The inspector reviewed plans to control access during the outage, when the number of personnel on site increases significantly. Temporary physical changes to the security system were inspected.
The inspector evaluated security compensatory measures associated with affected vital and protected area barriers that were necessary to facilitate transporting the replacement steam generators into the protected area, and subsequently, into the containment. The inspection was conducted using Inspection Procedure 50001, Steam Generator Replacement Inspection as guidance. The inspector reviewed plans to control access during the outage, when the number of personnel on site increases significantly. Temporary physical changes to the security system were inspected.
Line 184: Line 195:


===4. Design and Planning Inspections===
===4. Design and Planning Inspections===
====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors used the guidance in Inspection Procedure 50001 to perform the following steam generator design and planning inspection activities.
The inspectors used the guidance in Inspection Procedure 50001 to perform the following steam generator design and planning inspection activities.
Line 198: Line 208:


===5. Steam Generator Removal and Replacement Inspections===
===5. Steam Generator Removal and Replacement Inspections===
====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors used the guidance in Inspection Procedure 50001 to perform the following steam generator removal and replacement inspection activities.
The inspectors used the guidance in Inspection Procedure 50001 to perform the following steam generator removal and replacement inspection activities.
Line 211: Line 220:


{{a|4OA6}}
{{a|4OA6}}
==4OA6 Meetings==
==4OA6 Meetings==
On August 25, 2005, the inspector debriefed lifting, rigging, and security inspection results to Mr. L. Kanuckel, Manager, Quality Assurance and other members of licensee management. It was noted that this was a debrief and not an exit as further inspection efforts under IR 2005-008 were scheduled. The inspector asked the licensee whether any materials examined during the inspection should be considered proprietary. There were several items identified during the inspection. No proprietary information was removed from the site.
On August 25, 2005, the inspector debriefed lifting, rigging, and security inspection results to Mr. L. Kanuckel, Manager, Quality Assurance and other members of licensee management. It was noted that this was a debrief and not an exit as further inspection efforts under IR 2005-008 were scheduled. The inspector asked the licensee whether any materials examined during the inspection should be considered proprietary. There were several items identified during the inspection. No proprietary information was removed from the site.


Line 222: Line 231:


==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT==
==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT==
Licensee
Licensee
: [[contact::F. Diya]], Superintendent, Design Engineering
: [[contact::F. Diya]], Superintendent, Design Engineering
: [[contact::M. Evans]], Manager, Business Operations
: [[contact::M. Evans]], Manager, Business Operations
: [[contact::E. Henson]], Specialist, Regional Regulatory Affairs
: [[contact::E. Henson]], Specialist, Regional Regulatory Affairs  
: [[contact::T. Herrmann]], Manager, Engineering Services
: [[contact::T. Herrmann]], Manager, Engineering Services
: [[contact::L. Kanuckel]], Manager, Quality Assurance
: [[contact::L. Kanuckel]], Manager, Quality Assurance
Line 234: Line 242:
: [[contact::T. Moser]], Manager, Plant Engineering
: [[contact::T. Moser]], Manager, Plant Engineering
: [[contact::S. Petzel]], Engineer, Regional Regulatory Affairs
: [[contact::S. Petzel]], Engineer, Regional Regulatory Affairs
: [[contact::T. Pettus]], Consulting Engineer, Steam Generating Team, Ltd.
: [[contact::T. Pettus]], Consulting Engineer, Steam Generating Team, Ltd.  
: [[contact::M. Reidmeyer]], Supervisor, Regional Regulatory Affairs
: [[contact::M. Reidmeyer]], Supervisor, Regional Regulatory Affairs
NRC
NRC

Latest revision as of 13:30, 15 January 2025

IR 05000483-05-008 on 07/01/05 - 09/30/05 for Callaway Plant; Integrated Resident and Regional Report of Steam Generator Replacement Activities
ML053190115
Person / Time
Site: Callaway Ameren icon.png
Issue date: 11/14/2005
From: William Jones
NRC/RGN-IV/DRP/RPB-B
To: Naslund C
Uihlein Electric
References
IR-05-008
Download: ML053190115 (17)


Text

November 14, 2005

SUBJECT:

CALLAWAY PLANT - NRC INSPECTION REPORT 05000483/2005008

Dear Mr. Naslund:

On September 30, 2005, the NRC completed an inspection at your Callaway Plant. The enclosed report documents the inspection findings which were discussed on November 2, 2005, with Mr. M. Evans and other members of your staff.

This inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.

Within these areas, the inspection consisted of selected examination of procedures and representative records, observations of activities, and interviews with personnel.

Based on the results of this inspection, no findings of significance were identified.

In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, and its enclosure, will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records component of NRCs document system (ADAMS).

ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).

Should you have any questions concerning this inspection, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.

Sincerely,

/RA/

William B. Jones, Chief Project Branch B Division of Reactor Projects Docket: 50-483 License: NPF-30

Union Electric Company-2-

Enclosure:

NRC Inspection Report 05000483/2005008 w/attachment: Supplemental Information

REGION IV==

Docket:

50-483 License:

NPF-30 Report:

05000483/2005008 Licensee:

Union Electric Company Facility:

Callaway Plant Location:

Junction Highway CC and Highway O Fulton, Missouri Dates:

July 1 through September 30, 2005 Inspectors:

R. Kopriva, Senior Project Engineer, Branch B C. Stancil, Project Engineer, Branch B C. Paulk, Senior Reactor Inspector, Engineering Branch 1 G. George, Reactor Inspector, Engineering Branch 1 W. Sifre, Reactor Inspector, Engineering Branch 1 M. Peck, Senior Resident Inspector D. Dumbacher, Resident Inspector E. Owen, Reactor Inspector Approved By:

W. B. Jones, Chief, Project Branch B

Enclosure

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

IR 05000483/2005008; 07/01/05 - 09/30/05; Callaway Plant; Integrated Resident and Regional

Report of Steam Generator Replacement Activities.

The report covers a 13-week period of inspection. No findings were identified. The significance of most issues is indicated by their color (Green, White, Yellow, or Red) using IMC 0609,

Significance Determination Process. Findings for which the significance determination process does not apply may be Green or be assigned a severity level after NRC management review. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, Revision 3, dated July 2000.

NRC-Identified and Self-Revealing Findings

There were no findings identified in these areas.

Licensee-Identified Violations

None

REPORT DETAILS

Plant Status Callaway Plant began the inspection period at essentially full power and remained at this level until September 17, 2005, when the unit was shutdown to commence the fourteenth Refueling Outage (R14). At the end of the report period, the unit was in cold shutdown and defueled.

1R13 Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Evaluation

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed two risk evaluations and overall plant configuration control for selected activities to verify compliance with Procedures EDP-ZZ-01129, Callaway Plant Risk Assessment, Revision 8, and APA-ZZ-00150, Outage Preparation and Execution, Revision 17. The inspectors discussed emergent work issues with work control personnel and reviewed the potential risk impact of these activities to verify that the work was adequately planned, controlled, and executed.

  • September 22, 2005, evaluated controls and plans for the movement of heavy loads and equipment within containment during defueling.
  • September 26-30, 2005, movement of Temporary Lifting Device and equipment into containment during operation of shutdown cooling systems and supporting systems.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

1R17 Evaluation of Permanent Plant Modifications for Steam Generator Replacement

a. Inspection Scope

The procedure requires the review of a minimum of five permanent plant modifications.

The inspectors reviewed 10 permanent plant modification packages and associated documentation, including safety evaluation screenings, safety evaluations, and calculations, to verify that they were performed in accordance with plant procedures.

The specific modifications reviewed are listed in the Attachment. The inspectors also reviewed the procedures governing plant modifications to evaluate the effectiveness of programs for implementing modifications to risk-significant systems, structures, and components, such that these changes did not adversely affect the design and licensing basis of the facility. As part of this review, the inspectors reviewed modification packages and safety evaluations associated with the steam generator replacement.

The inspectors interviewed the cognizant design and system engineers for the identified modifications as to their understanding of the modification packages.

The inspectors evaluated the effectiveness of the licensees corrective action process to identify and correct problems concerning the performance of permanent plant modifications. In this effort, the inspectors reviewed three corrective action documents and the subsequent corrective actions pertaining to licensee-identified problems and errors in the performance of permanent plant modifications.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

1R20 Refueling and Outage Activities

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed plant conditions and observed selected refueling outage activities associated with Refueling Outage R14 to verify that the licensee maintained the plant in a configuration consistent with the requirements of Technical Specifications and with the assumptions of the outage risk assessment. For this inspection, the inspectors reviewed the following activities as they related to entering conditions necessary for performing the steam generator replacement. The inspectors observed portions of the following activities:

  • Monitoring of reactor shutdown and plant cooldown activities
  • Clearance activities

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

1R23 Temporary Plant Modifications

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors sampled two temporary plant modifications based on the safety significance of the affected systems. The inspectors performed an in-office review and walked downed affected plant equipment to verify that the installation was consistent with the modification documents. The inspectors reviewed modification configuration controls to verify that the plant documents, such as drawings and procedures, were appropriately updated. The inspectors reviewed postinstallation test results to verify that the actual impact of the temporary modifications on permanent plant systems were satisfactory. The inspectors compared temporary modification documentation against the requirements established in Procedure APA-ZZ-00143, 10 CFR 50.59 Reviews Revision 001, for screening, updated procedures, and drawings.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

RADIATION SAFETY

Cornerstone: Occupational Radiation Safety

2OS1 Access Control to Radiologically Significant Areas (50001, 71121.01)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspector reviewed work activities involving radiological controls for airborne radioactivity areas, radiation areas, and high radiation areas for the steam generator replacement work. The following items were reviewed and compared with regulatory requirements:

  • Area postings and other access controls for steam generator work activities
  • Contamination control activities

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

2OS2 ALARA Planning and Controls (71121.02)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspector reviewed work activities involving radiological controls for airborne radioactivity areas, radiation areas, and high radiation areas. The inspector interviewed radiation protection staff members and other radiation workers to determine the level of planning, communication, ALARA practices, and supervisory oversight integrated into work planning and work activities for the steam generator replacement work. In addition, the following items were reviewed and compared with procedural and regulatory requirements:

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

OTHER ACTIVITIES

4OA2 Identification and Resolution of Problems

1. Steam Generator Replacement Outage Inspection (50001)

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the daily Callaway Action Request report summaries and nonconformance reports issued during the replacement project for risk-significant issues to see that the licensee was properly implementing the corrective action program. The inspectors verified that the licensee identified, evaluated, corrected, and trended in accordance with the program requirements were in place.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

4OA5 Other - Steam Generator Replacement Activities

4. Safety Evaluations

a. Inspection Scope

The inspection was conducted using Inspection Procedure 50001, Steam Generator Replacement Inspection, and Inspection Procedure 71111.02, Evaluation of Changes, Tests, or Experiments, as guidance. The inspectors reviewed 10 applicability determinations, 11 screenings, and 4 safety evaluations, required by 10 CFR 50.59, Evaluation of Changes, Tests, or Experiments, associated with the Callaway steam generator replacement. Additionally, the inspectors reviewed Callaway databases to verify qualifications of Callaways staff to perform, review, and approve 10 CFR 50.59 safety reviews.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

2. Replacement Steam Generator Transport and Lift

a. Inspection Scope

The inspector reviewed the applicable engineering analysis associated with old steam generator removals and new replacement steam generator transport and lift to final containment positions. The inspection was conducted using Inspection Procedure 50001, Steam Generator Replacement Inspection as guidance.

Specifically, the inspectors reviewed applicable engineering design, modification, and

analysis associated with steam generator lifting and rigging including: crane and rigging equipment, steam generator component drop analysis, safe load paths, and load lay-down areas. Additionally, steam generator replacement processes were reviewed for Steam Generator Replacement Project identification, tracking, and resolution of problems related to the Steam Generator Replacement Project to ascertain that they were consistent with plant processes.

Containment Access and Closure The cutting of the outer containment wall was not necessary, and therefore, evaluation of a temporary containment opening affecting integrity was not applicable. However, the inspector questioned containment closure capability during plant Modes 5 and 6. During the first two weeks of the outage, the steam generator Hatch Transfer System (HTS)rails were to be laid through the Equipment Hatch opening and used for moving the old and new steam generators in and out of containment, along with other equipment to support the steam generator replacement project. Due to the size and awkwardness of the rail system, the inspector questioned containment closure capability in the event of an external severe weather or internal radiological event (fuel handling accident or loss of inventory), particularly if an event occurred during the transport of a steam generator, in or out of containment. The licensee has historically demonstrated that the installation of the Containment Equipment Hatch takes approximately one hour. The procedure requirement to establish containment closure is two hours for an external/internal event.

This left the licensees contractor one hour to remove any item from the Equipment Hatch, remove the fast materials cart and push-pull rams, and remove the two sections of HTS rails. The contractor mocked up and validated HTS rail removal in eleven minutes. Removal of any item and the cart was expected to take approximately forty minutes based on contractor engineering judgement and experience, thus, meeting the two hour limit.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

3. Security Considerations

a. Inspection Scope

The inspector evaluated security compensatory measures associated with affected vital and protected area barriers that were necessary to facilitate transporting the replacement steam generators into the protected area, and subsequently, into the containment. The inspection was conducted using Inspection Procedure 50001, Steam Generator Replacement Inspection as guidance. The inspector reviewed plans to control access during the outage, when the number of personnel on site increases significantly. Temporary physical changes to the security system were inspected.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

4. Design and Planning Inspections

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors used the guidance in Inspection Procedure 50001 to perform the following steam generator design and planning inspection activities.

Engineering and Technical Support A review of engineering and technical support activities was performed prior to the steam generator replacement outage by resident and regional office-based specialist inspectors. The results of the inspection are documented in Sections 1R13, 1R17, and 1R23.

Lifting and Rigging Inspections to review engineering design, modification, and analysis associated with steam generator lifting and rigging activities were performed by resident and regional inspectors.

Security Considerations Inspectors checked for potential adverse impacts caused by outage activities, equipment configurations, etc., in accordance with Inspection Procedure 50001. The inspectors made frequent observations of security practices to verify that the licensee provided appropriate support for affected vital and protected area barriers during outage activities.

b. Findings

No findings of significance were identified.

5. Steam Generator Removal and Replacement Inspections

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors used the guidance in Inspection Procedure 50001 to perform the following steam generator removal and replacement inspection activities.

Lifting and Rigging Activities (50001 and 71111.23)

The inspectors observed and reviewed several activities throughout the outage associated with lifting and rigging. The inspectors observed and reviewed preparations, procedures, crane and rigging inspections, and lay-down areas associated with the following activities:

  • Construction of the outside lift system
  • Temporary handling device construction and removal
  • Reactor cavity decking construction and removal Radiation Protection Controls An inspection to review radiation protection controls was performed during the steam generator replacement outage by regional office-based specialist inspectors. The results of the inspection are documented in Sections 2OS1 and 2OS2.

Foreign Materials Control The inspectors performed frequent observations of the refueling outage and steam generator replacement activities to verify the licensee was implementing proper foreign materials controls. In particular, the inspectors observed controls related to defueling preparation and reactor coolant system and secondary side openings controls.

4OA6 Meetings

On August 25, 2005, the inspector debriefed lifting, rigging, and security inspection results to Mr. L. Kanuckel, Manager, Quality Assurance and other members of licensee management. It was noted that this was a debrief and not an exit as further inspection efforts under IR 2005-008 were scheduled. The inspector asked the licensee whether any materials examined during the inspection should be considered proprietary. There were several items identified during the inspection. No proprietary information was removed from the site.

On November 2, 2005, the Senior Project Engineer presented inspection results to Mr. M. Evans, Manager, Business Operations, and other members of his staff who acknowledged the findings. The inspectors confirmed that proprietary information was provided and returned during the inspection.

ATTACHMENT:

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee

F. Diya, Superintendent, Design Engineering
M. Evans, Manager, Business Operations
E. Henson, Specialist, Regional Regulatory Affairs
T. Herrmann, Manager, Engineering Services
L. Kanuckel, Manager, Quality Assurance
R. Lamb, Manager, Maintenance
P. LeRoy, Project Engineering Manager, Steam Generating Team, Ltd.
S. Meyer, Supervising Engineer, Quality Assurance
T. Moser, Manager, Plant Engineering
S. Petzel, Engineer, Regional Regulatory Affairs
T. Pettus, Consulting Engineer, Steam Generating Team, Ltd.
M. Reidmeyer, Supervisor, Regional Regulatory Affairs

NRC

M. Peck, Senior Resident Inspector
D. Dumbacher, Resident Inspector
L. Owen, Reactor Inspector, Engineering Branch 1
C. Stancil, Project Engineer, Projects Branch B

DOCUMENTS REVIEWED