IR 05000220/2017502: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:ber 27, 2017 | ||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION - NRC EVALUATED EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE - INSPECTION REPORT 05000220/2017502 AND 05000410/2017502 | |||
05000220/2017502 AND 05000410/2017502 | |||
==Dear Mr. Hanson:== | ==Dear Mr. Hanson:== | ||
| Line 29: | Line 28: | ||
The NRC inspectors did not identify any finding or violation of more than minor significance. | The NRC inspectors did not identify any finding or violation of more than minor significance. | ||
This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, | This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding. | ||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, | ||
/RA/ Raymond McKinley, Chief | /RA/ | ||
Raymond McKinley, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-220 and 50-410 License Nos. DPR-63 and NPF-69 | |||
Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-220 and 50-410 License Nos. DPR-63 and NPF-69 | |||
===Enclosure:=== | ===Enclosure:=== | ||
NRC Inspection Report No. 05000220/2017502; 05000410/2017502 | NRC Inspection Report No. 05000220/2017502; 05000410/2017502 | ||
License Nos. DPR-63 and NPF-69 | REGION I== | ||
Docket Nos.: 50-220 and 50-410 License Nos. DPR-63 and NPF-69 Report Nos. 05000220/2017502 and 05000410/2017502 Licensee: Exelon Generation Company, LLC Facility: Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC Units 1 and 2 Location: Oswego, NY Dates: October 23 - 26, 2017 Inspectors: J. Ambrosini, Sr. Emergency Preparedness Inspector, Division of Reactor Safety (DRS) | |||
Report Nos. 05000220/2017502 and 05000410/2017502 | J. DeBoer, Emergency Preparedness Inspector, DRS B. Fuller, Senior Operations Engineer, DRS J. Schoppy, Senior Reactor Inspector, DRS Approved By: Raymond McKinley, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure | ||
Licensee: Exelon Generation Company, LLC | |||
Facility: Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC Units 1 and 2 | |||
Location: Oswego, NY | |||
Dates: October 23 - 26, 2017 | |||
Inspectors: J. Ambrosini, Sr. Emergency Preparedness Inspector, Division of Reactor Safety (DRS) J. DeBoer, Emergency Preparedness Inspector, DRS B. Fuller, Senior Operations Engineer, DRS J. Schoppy, Senior Reactor Inspector, DRS | |||
Approved By: Raymond McKinley, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety | |||
=SUMMARY= | =SUMMARY= | ||
Inspection Report 05000220/2017502 and 05000410/2017502; 10/23-26, 2017; Nine Mile Point | Inspection Report 05000220/2017502 and 05000410/2017502; 10/23-26, 2017; Nine Mile Point | ||
Nuclear Station; Exercise Evaluation, Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review, Performance Indicator Verification. | Nuclear Station; Exercise Evaluation, Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review, Performance Indicator Verification. | ||
This was an announced inspection conducted by four Region I-based inspectors. No findings were identified during the inspection. The | This was an announced inspection conducted by four Region I-based inspectors. No findings were identified during the inspection. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process, | ||
Revision 6. | |||
No findings were identified. | No findings were identified. | ||
| Line 71: | Line 54: | ||
No findings were identified. | No findings were identified. | ||
=REPORT DETAILS= | =REPORT DETAILS= | ||
===1. === | |||
==REACTOR SAFETY== | ==REACTOR SAFETY== | ||
===Cornerstone: | ===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness=== | ||
{{a|1EP1}} | {{a|1EP1}} | ||
| Line 85: | Line 67: | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
On October 24, 2017, Exelon conducted a biennial emergency preparedness (EP)exercise at the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station. The NRC inspectors evaluated the adequacy of | On October 24, 2017, Exelon conducted a biennial emergency preparedness (EP)exercise at the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station. The NRC inspectors evaluated the adequacy of Exelons conduct of the exercise and its capability to assess staff performance via a formal critique process, as required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.47(b)(14). This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle. | ||
To evaluate the exercise, the inspectors reviewed: | To evaluate the exercise, the inspectors reviewed: | ||
The adequacy of | The adequacy of Exelons performance in the biennial full-participation exercise regarding the implementation of the planning standards described in 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4), (5), (9), and (10), which include: emergency classification, offsite notification, radiological assessment, and onsite and public protective action recommendations, respectively. | ||
The overall adequacy of | The overall adequacy of Exelons emergency response facilities with regard to Nine Mile Point emergency plan commitments. The inspectors assessed the following facilities: the simulator control room, the technical support center, the operations support center, and the emergency operations facility. | ||
Exelons performance in other areas, such as: the emergency response organizations (ERO) recognition of abnormal plant conditions, command and control, communications both within and between facilities, prioritization of mitigation activities, utilization of repair and field monitoring teams, interface with offsite agencies, staffing and procedure adequacy, and the overall implementation of the Nine Mile Point emergency plan and its implementing procedures. | |||
A review of past performance issues from the last biennial exercise inspection report and | A review of past performance issues from the last biennial exercise inspection report and Exelons EP drill reports, to determine the effectiveness of corrective actions as demonstrated during the October 24, 2017, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14), which requires licensees to conduct periodic drills and exercises and to correct any deficiencies identified. | ||
The post-exercise critiques, to evaluate | The post-exercise critiques, to evaluate Exelons self-assessment of its ERO performance during the October 24, 2017, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.2.g. | ||
Documents reviewed for each section of this inspection report are listed in the | Documents reviewed for each section of this inspection report are listed in the | ||
. | . | ||
| Line 114: | Line 96: | ||
No findings were identified. | No findings were identified. | ||
===4. === | |||
==OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)== | ==OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)== | ||
{{a|4OA1}} | {{a|4OA1}} | ||
| Line 119: | Line 102: | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
The inspectors reviewed data for the Nine Mile Point EP Performance Indicators (PI), which are: | The inspectors reviewed data for the Nine Mile Point EP Performance Indicators (PI), | ||
which are: | |||
: (1) Drill and Exercise Performance (DEP) (EP01); | : (1) Drill and Exercise Performance (DEP) (EP01); | ||
: (2) ERO Drill Participation (EP02); and | : (2) ERO Drill Participation (EP02); and | ||
: (3) Alert and Notification System (ANS) Reliability (EP03). The last NRC EP inspection at Nine Mile Point was conducted in the July 2016, so the inspectors reviewed supporting documentation from EP drills and tests from the second calendar quarter of 2016 through the second calendar quarter of 2017, to verify the accuracy of the reported PI data. The review of these PIs was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71151, using the acceptance criteria documented in NEI 99-02, | : (3) Alert and Notification System (ANS) Reliability (EP03). The last NRC EP inspection at Nine Mile Point was conducted in the July 2016, so the inspectors reviewed supporting documentation from EP drills and tests from the second calendar quarter of 2016 through the second calendar quarter of 2017, to verify the accuracy of the reported PI data. The review of these PIs was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71151, using the acceptance criteria documented in NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guidelines, Revision 7. | ||
This inspection activity represented the completion of three samples. | This inspection activity represented the completion of three samples. | ||
| Line 132: | Line 116: | ||
==4OA6 Meetings, including Exit== | ==4OA6 Meetings, including Exit== | ||
On October 26, 2017, the inspectors presented the results of this inspection to Mr. Peter Orphanos, Site Vice President and other members of | On October 26, 2017, the inspectors presented the results of this inspection to Mr. Peter Orphanos, Site Vice President and other members of Exelons staff. The inspectors verified that no proprietary information was retained by the inspectors or documented in this report. | ||
ATTACHMENT | ATTACHMENT | ||
=SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION= | =SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION= | ||
| Line 141: | Line 125: | ||
===Licensee Personnel=== | ===Licensee Personnel=== | ||
: [[contact::P. Orphanos]], Nine Mile Point Site Vice President | : [[contact::P. Orphanos]], Nine Mile Point Site Vice President | ||
: [[contact::V. Cwietniewicz]], Exelon Mid-Atlantic Emergency Planning Manager | : [[contact::V. Cwietniewicz]], Exelon Mid-Atlantic Emergency Planning Manager | ||
: [[contact::K. Yurkon]], Nine Mile Point Emergency Planning Manager | : [[contact::K. Yurkon]], Nine Mile Point Emergency Planning Manager | ||
==LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED== | ==LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED== | ||
None | None | ||
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED== | ==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED== | ||
}} | }} | ||
Revision as of 12:46, 22 October 2019
| ML17332A091 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nine Mile Point  |
| Issue date: | 11/27/2017 |
| From: | Raymond Mckinley Plant Support Branch 1 |
| To: | Bryan Hanson Exelon Generation Co, Exelon Nuclear |
| McKinley R | |
| References | |
| IR 2017502 | |
| Download: ML17332A091 (8) | |
Text
ber 27, 2017
SUBJECT:
NINE MILE POINT NUCLEAR STATION - NRC EVALUATED EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS EXERCISE - INSPECTION REPORT 05000220/2017502 AND 05000410/2017502
Dear Mr. Hanson:
On October 26, 2017, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection of the October 24, 2017, evaluated emergency preparedness exercise at the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station. On October 26, 2017, the NRC inspectors discussed the results of this inspection with Mr. Peter Orphanos, Site Vice President, and other members of your staff. The results of this inspection are documented in the enclosed report.
The NRC inspectors did not identify any finding or violation of more than minor significance.
This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390, Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.
Sincerely,
/RA/
Raymond McKinley, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket Nos. 50-220 and 50-410 License Nos. DPR-63 and NPF-69
Enclosure:
NRC Inspection Report No. 05000220/2017502; 05000410/2017502
REGION I==
Docket Nos.: 50-220 and 50-410 License Nos. DPR-63 and NPF-69 Report Nos. 05000220/2017502 and 05000410/2017502 Licensee: Exelon Generation Company, LLC Facility: Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station, LLC Units 1 and 2 Location: Oswego, NY Dates: October 23 - 26, 2017 Inspectors: J. Ambrosini, Sr. Emergency Preparedness Inspector, Division of Reactor Safety (DRS)
J. DeBoer, Emergency Preparedness Inspector, DRS B. Fuller, Senior Operations Engineer, DRS J. Schoppy, Senior Reactor Inspector, DRS Approved By: Raymond McKinley, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Enclosure
SUMMARY
Inspection Report 05000220/2017502 and 05000410/2017502; 10/23-26, 2017; Nine Mile Point
Nuclear Station; Exercise Evaluation, Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review, Performance Indicator Verification.
This was an announced inspection conducted by four Region I-based inspectors. No findings were identified during the inspection. The NRCs program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, Reactor Oversight Process,
Revision 6.
No findings were identified.
Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness
No findings were identified.
REPORT DETAILS
1.
REACTOR SAFETY
Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness
1EP1 Exercise Evaluation
a. Inspection Scope
On October 24, 2017, Exelon conducted a biennial emergency preparedness (EP)exercise at the Nine Mile Point Nuclear Station. The NRC inspectors evaluated the adequacy of Exelons conduct of the exercise and its capability to assess staff performance via a formal critique process, as required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.47(b)(14). This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle.
To evaluate the exercise, the inspectors reviewed:
The adequacy of Exelons performance in the biennial full-participation exercise regarding the implementation of the planning standards described in 10 CFR 50.47(b)(4), (5), (9), and (10), which include: emergency classification, offsite notification, radiological assessment, and onsite and public protective action recommendations, respectively.
The overall adequacy of Exelons emergency response facilities with regard to Nine Mile Point emergency plan commitments. The inspectors assessed the following facilities: the simulator control room, the technical support center, the operations support center, and the emergency operations facility.
Exelons performance in other areas, such as: the emergency response organizations (ERO) recognition of abnormal plant conditions, command and control, communications both within and between facilities, prioritization of mitigation activities, utilization of repair and field monitoring teams, interface with offsite agencies, staffing and procedure adequacy, and the overall implementation of the Nine Mile Point emergency plan and its implementing procedures.
A review of past performance issues from the last biennial exercise inspection report and Exelons EP drill reports, to determine the effectiveness of corrective actions as demonstrated during the October 24, 2017, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14), which requires licensees to conduct periodic drills and exercises and to correct any deficiencies identified.
The post-exercise critiques, to evaluate Exelons self-assessment of its ERO performance during the October 24, 2017, exercise and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix E, Section IV.F.2.g.
Documents reviewed for each section of this inspection report are listed in the
.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1EP8 Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review
a. Inspection Scope
Prior to the October 24, 2017, EP exercise, the NRC inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario, which Exelon had submitted to the NRC, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the Nine Mile Point emergency plan as required by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14). This overall exercise inspection activity represented the completion of one sample on a biennial cycle.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
4.
OTHER ACTIVITIES (OA)
4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification (71151 - 3 Samples)
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed data for the Nine Mile Point EP Performance Indicators (PI),
which are:
- (1) Drill and Exercise Performance (DEP) (EP01);
- (2) ERO Drill Participation (EP02); and
- (3) Alert and Notification System (ANS) Reliability (EP03). The last NRC EP inspection at Nine Mile Point was conducted in the July 2016, so the inspectors reviewed supporting documentation from EP drills and tests from the second calendar quarter of 2016 through the second calendar quarter of 2017, to verify the accuracy of the reported PI data. The review of these PIs was conducted in accordance with NRC Inspection Procedure 71151, using the acceptance criteria documented in NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guidelines, Revision 7.
This inspection activity represented the completion of three samples.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
4OA6 Meetings, including Exit
On October 26, 2017, the inspectors presented the results of this inspection to Mr. Peter Orphanos, Site Vice President and other members of Exelons staff. The inspectors verified that no proprietary information was retained by the inspectors or documented in this report.
ATTACHMENT
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
Licensee Personnel
- P. Orphanos, Nine Mile Point Site Vice President
- V. Cwietniewicz, Exelon Mid-Atlantic Emergency Planning Manager
- K. Yurkon, Nine Mile Point Emergency Planning Manager
LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED
None