Information Notice 2007-37, Buildup of Deposits in Steam Generators: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 4
| page count = 4
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATESNUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSIONOFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATIONWASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001November 23, 2007NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2007-37:BUILDUP OF DEPOSITS IN STEAMGENERATORS
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES
 
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
 
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
 
WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001 November 23, 2007 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2007-37:                 BUILDUP OF DEPOSITS IN STEAM
 
GENERATORS


==ADDRESSEES==
==ADDRESSEES==
All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for pressurized water reactors exceptthose that have permanently ceased operations and who have certified that fuel has been
All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for pressurized water reactors except
 
those that have permanently ceased operations and who have certified that fuel has been


permanently removed from the reactor vessel.
permanently removed from the reactor vessel.


==PURPOSE==
==PURPOSE==
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice (IN) to alertaddressees to the potential for deposits to accumulate in their steam generators and potentially
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice (IN) to alert


affect steam generator performance and tube integrity. The NRC expects that recipients of this
addressees to the potential for deposits to accumulate in their steam generators and potentially
 
affect steam generator performance and tube integrity. The NRC expects that recipients of this


IN will review the information for applicability to their facilities and consider taking actions, as
IN will review the information for applicability to their facilities and consider taking actions, as


appropriate, to avoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this IN are not NRC
appropriate, to avoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this IN are not NRC


requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is required.
requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is required.


==DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES==
==DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES==
Operating Experience at a Foreign ReactorBetween 2004 and 2006, three primary-to-secondary leaks occurred at the Cruas NuclearPlant, a multi-unit site in France.  The last primary-to-secondary leak occurred at Cruas Unit 4 in February 2006 (Autorité de Sûreté Nucléaire 2006 Annual Report, http://annual-report.asn.fr/PDF/nuclear-power-plants-EDF.pdf), and it was detected through the


use of nitrogen-16 radiation monitors.  The leak rate increased from very low levels to
===Operating Experience at a Foreign Reactor===
Between 2004 and 2006, three primary-to-secondary leaks occurred at the Cruas Nuclear


approximately 3 gallons per minute [600 liters per hour] in 12 minutes.All three leaks were a result of a circumferential crack in the tube at the location where the tubepasses through the uppermost tube support plate (TSP).  All three tubes were near the center
Plant, a multi-unit site in France. The last primary-to-secondary leak occurred at Cruas Unit 4 in February 2006 (Autorité de Sûreté Nucléaire 2006 Annual Report, http://annual-report.asn.fr/PDF/nuclear-power-plants-EDF.pdf), and it was detected through the


of the tube bundle near an area where no tubes are installed. This tube-free area was intended
use of nitrogen-16 radiation monitors. The leak rate increased from very low levels to


to facilitate secondary water/steam flow into the interior of the tube bundle. The U-bend region
approximately 3 gallons per minute [600 liters per hour] in 12 minutes.
 
All three leaks were a result of a circumferential crack in the tube at the location where the tube
 
passes through the uppermost tube support plate (TSP). All three tubes were near the center
 
of the tube bundle near an area where no tubes are installed. This tube-free area was intended
 
to facilitate secondary water/steam flow into the interior of the tube bundle. The U-bend region


of the affected tubes did not have any anti-vibration bar support since the radii of these
of the affected tubes did not have any anti-vibration bar support since the radii of these


U-bends were small.The cause of the cracks was determined to be high cycle fatigue as a result of flow-inducedvibration. The tubes became susceptible to vibration and fatigue as a result of the buildup of
U-bends were small.
 
The cause of the cracks was determined to be high cycle fatigue as a result of flow-induced
 
vibration. The tubes became susceptible to vibration and fatigue as a result of the buildup of


deposits on the secondary side of the steam generator which changed the flow conditions in the
deposits on the secondary side of the steam generator which changed the flow conditions in the


center of the tube bundle. The deposits had blocked water/steam flow through the
center of the tube bundle. The deposits had blocked water/steam flow through the


quatrefoil-shaped holes in the TSPs, forcing more water/steam into the center of the tube
quatrefoil-shaped holes in the TSPs, forcing more water/steam into the center of the tube


bundle. The extent of the hole blockage was estimated based on visual examinations, analysisof eddy current test results, and evaluation of the wide range feedwater level gauge readings.
bundle. The extent of the hole blockage was estimated based on visual examinations, analysis
 
of eddy current test results, and evaluation of the wide range feedwater level gauge readings.


High levels of deposits were determined to be present based on these inspections and
High levels of deposits were determined to be present based on these inspections and


analyses. Contributing factors to the buildup of the deposits were determined to be low secondary side pH
analyses.
 
Contributing factors to the buildup of the deposits were determined to be low secondary side pH


(less than 9.6), chemical intrusions (from main condenser cooling water leakage into the
(less than 9.6), chemical intrusions (from main condenser cooling water leakage into the


secondary system), and the TSP hole design (quatrefoil-shaped holes).To address this problem, several corrective actions came under consideration, includingevaluating the level of TSP hole blockage, removing the deposits through chemical cleaning, changing the chemistry conditions on the secondary-side of the plant to reduce the rate of
secondary system), and the TSP hole design (quatrefoil-shaped holes).
 
To address this problem, several corrective actions came under consideration, including
 
evaluating the level of TSP hole blockage, removing the deposits through chemical cleaning, changing the chemistry conditions on the secondary-side of the plant to reduce the rate of


buildup of deposits, analyzing the consequences of the deposits on the flow through the steam
buildup of deposits, analyzing the consequences of the deposits on the flow through the steam
Line 67: Line 99:
generator, and analyzing the stresses that could be imposed on the TSP during transients and
generator, and analyzing the stresses that could be imposed on the TSP during transients and


accidents as a result of the hole blockage. Operating Experience at a U.S. ReactorIn the early 1990s, steam generator water level oscillations were observed at Surry Power Units1 and 2, near Newport News, Virginia.  Due to the severity of these water level oscillations, the
accidents as a result of the hole blockage.
 
===Operating Experience at a U.S. Reactor===
In the early 1990s, steam generator water level oscillations were observed at Surry Power Units


units operated at reduced power levels for varying periods of time. The cause of the steam
1 and 2, near Newport News, Virginia. Due to the severity of these water level oscillations, the
 
units operated at reduced power levels for varying periods of time. The cause of the steam


generator water level oscillations was severe deposit buildup in the TSP quatrefoil-shaped
generator water level oscillations was severe deposit buildup in the TSP quatrefoil-shaped


holes. The licensee corrected the problem by performing chemical cleaning on all steam
holes. The licensee corrected the problem by performing chemical cleaning on all steam


generators at both units to reduce the extent of deposits.
generators at both units to reduce the extent of deposits.


==BACKGROUND==
==BACKGROUND==
Corrosion products can accumulate in the secondary side of the steam generator as a result ofthe gradual erosion and corrosion of secondary side components in a pressurized water
Corrosion products can accumulate in the secondary side of the steam generator as a result of
 
the gradual erosion and corrosion of secondary side components in a pressurized water
 
reactor. This accumulation of corrosion products results in the buildup of deposits on the tubes, tubesheets, and other secondary side steam generator structures (including the holes through


reactor.  This accumulation of corrosion products results in the buildup of deposits on the tubes, tubesheets, and other secondary side steam generator structures (including the holes through
which the tubes pass).


which the tubes pass).Harmful contaminants can concentrate in these deposits and result in corrosion of the steamgenerator tubes. In addition, these deposits can affect the thermal performance of the steam
Harmful contaminants can concentrate in these deposits and result in corrosion of the steam
 
generator tubes. In addition, these deposits can affect the thermal performance of the steam


generator (i.e., the ability to transfer heat from the primary-to-secondary side of the steam
generator (i.e., the ability to transfer heat from the primary-to-secondary side of the steam
Line 88: Line 131:
generator) and the thermal hydraulic characteristics of the steam generator (by changing the
generator) and the thermal hydraulic characteristics of the steam generator (by changing the


flow patterns within the steam generator).As a result of the negative effects of these deposits, plant operators in the U.S. frequentlyremove the deposits from the top of the tubesheet by a process referred to as sludge lancing.
flow patterns within the steam generator).
 
As a result of the negative effects of these deposits, plant operators in the U.S. frequently
 
remove the deposits from the top of the tubesheet by a process referred to as sludge lancing.


Operators also occasionally remove these deposits from other areas in the steam generator
Operators also occasionally remove these deposits from other areas in the steam generator


through chemical cleaning processes.High cycle fatigue cracking caused by flow-induced vibration have been observed in U.S. steamgenerators.  Fatigue cracking in steam generators with U-shaped tubes was the subject of NRC
through chemical cleaning processes.


Bulletin 88-02, "Rapidly Propagating Fatigue Cracks in Steam Generator Tubes."  This cracking occurred, in part, because of two factors: (1) There was denting of the tubes at the tube-to-TSPintersection and (2) non-uniform anti-vibration bar penetration into the tube bundle caused
High cycle fatigue cracking caused by flow-induced vibration have been observed in U.S. steam


locally high flow velocities. This cracking occurred in tubes with small U-bend radii.  Fatigue
generators. Fatigue cracking in steam generators with U-shaped tubes was the subject of NRC


cracking in large radius U-bends was discussed in NUREG-1604, "Circumferential Cracking of
Bulletin 88-02, Rapidly Propagating Fatigue Cracks in Steam Generator Tubes. This cracking occurred, in part, because of two factors: (1) There was denting of the tubes at the tube-to-TSP


Steam Generator Tubes."  Fatigue cracking in steam generators with straight tubes has also
intersection and (2) non-uniform anti-vibration bar penetration into the tube bundle caused


been observed in the U.S. This cracking is associated with localized high velocities near a
locally high flow velocities. This cracking occurred in tubes with small U-bend radii. Fatigue
 
cracking in large radius U-bends was discussed in NUREG-1604, Circumferential Cracking of
 
Steam Generator Tubes. Fatigue cracking in steam generators with straight tubes has also
 
been observed in the U.S. This cracking is associated with localized high velocities near a


tube-free lane region in the steam generator.
tube-free lane region in the steam generator.


==DISCUSSION==
==DISCUSSION==
Extensive deposit buildup in the TSP holes can increase the vibration of the tubes andpotentially lead to fatigue cracking of the tube. Deposits can also change the loading (stresses)
Extensive deposit buildup in the TSP holes can increase the vibration of the tubes and
on the TSPs during transients and design basis accidents (e.g., a steam line break). Extensive
 
potentially lead to fatigue cracking of the tube. Deposits can also change the loading (stresses)
on the TSPs during transients and design basis accidents (e.g., a steam line break). Extensive


deposit buildup in the tube support holes can change the secondary water recirculation rate and
deposit buildup in the tube support holes can change the secondary water recirculation rate and


may result in water level oscillations within the steam generator.The extent to which deposits can buildup in the steam generator (including the tube supportholes) will vary from unit to unit. It is a function not only of the tube support configuration (e.g.,
may result in water level oscillations within the steam generator.
 
The extent to which deposits can buildup in the steam generator (including the tube support
 
holes) will vary from unit to unit. It is a function not only of the tube support configuration (e.g.,
lattice grid, round hole, quatrefoil-shaped holes), but also of the design and operation of the
lattice grid, round hole, quatrefoil-shaped holes), but also of the design and operation of the


secondary side of the plant. Low secondary side pH levels may increase the corrosion rate on
secondary side of the plant. Low secondary side pH levels may increase the corrosion rate on


the secondary side of the plant and lead to more impurity transport to the steam generators.
the secondary side of the plant and lead to more impurity transport to the steam generators.
Line 121: Line 180:
Chemical intrusions (e.g., from main condenser leakage) may also increase the transport of
Chemical intrusions (e.g., from main condenser leakage) may also increase the transport of


impurities into the steam generator. The more impurities that enter the steam generator, the
impurities into the steam generator. The more impurities that enter the steam generator, the
 
more likely that deposits will buildup on the secondary side of the steam generator.
 
The potential for fatigue cracking of the steam generator tubes also varies from unit to unit. It
 
depends on how the tubes are supported and the secondary side flow conditions (which can be


more likely that deposits will buildup on the secondary side of the steam generator.The potential for fatigue cracking of the steam generator tubes also varies from unit to unit.  Itdepends on how the tubes are supported and the secondary side flow conditions (which can be
affected by the buildup of deposits in the steam generator).


affected by the buildup of deposits in the steam generator).Operating experience demonstrates that once initiated, high cycle fatigue cracks can rapidlypropagate over periods ranging from hours to days to complete severance of the tube. As
Operating experience demonstrates that once initiated, high cycle fatigue cracks can rapidly
 
propagate over periods ranging from hours to days to complete severance of the tube. As


discussed in NRC Bulletin 88-02, enhanced primary-to-secondary leakage monitoring can be an
discussed in NRC Bulletin 88-02, enhanced primary-to-secondary leakage monitoring can be an


effective tool at reducing the potential for a tube rupture.Although there is no specific requirement for licensees to monitor, assess, or remove depositbuildup, there are requirements for licensees to maintain steam generator tube integrity. These
effective tool at reducing the potential for a tube rupture.
 
Although there is no specific requirement for licensees to monitor, assess, or remove deposit
 
buildup, there are requirements for licensees to maintain steam generator tube integrity. These


integrity requirements are contained, in part, in plant technical specifications. Therefore, it is
integrity requirements are contained, in part, in plant technical specifications. Therefore, it is


important to assess the deposit buildup in a steam generator and the effects that deposits will
important to assess the deposit buildup in a steam generator and the effects that deposits will
Line 137: Line 208:
have on steam generator performance and tube integrity during normal operation and design
have on steam generator performance and tube integrity during normal operation and design


basis accidents. Promptly identifying and removing significant deposit buildup may prevent a
basis accidents. Promptly identifying and removing significant deposit buildup may prevent a


loss of tube integrity and may improve the thermal performance of the steam generator.
loss of tube integrity and may improve the thermal performance of the steam generator.


==CONTACT==
==CONTACT==
This information notice does not require any specific action or written response. Please directany questions about this matter to the technical contact listed below./RA by TQuay for/Michael J. Case, DirectorDivision of Policy and Rulemaking
This information notice does not require any specific action or written response. Please direct
 
any questions about this matter to the technical contact listed below.
 
/RA by TQuay for/
                                            Michael J. Case, Director
 
Division of Policy and Rulemaking


===Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation===
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation


===Technical Contact:===
===Technical Contact:===
Kenneth J. Karwoski, NRR301-415-2752 E-mail: kjk1@nrc.govNote: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site,http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections.
 
===Kenneth J. Karwoski, NRR===
                      301-415-2752 E-mail: kjk1@nrc.gov
 
Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections.


==CONTACT==
==CONTACT==
This information notice does not require any specific action or written response. Please directany questions about this matter to the technical contact listed below./RA by TQuay for/Michael J. Case, DirectorDivision of Policy and Rulemaking
This information notice does not require any specific action or written response. Please direct
 
any questions about this matter to the technical contact listed below.
 
/RA by TQuay for/
                                            Michael J. Case, Director
 
Division of Policy and Rulemaking


===Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation===
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation


===Technical Contact:===
===Technical Contact:===
Kenneth J. Karwoski, NRR301-415-2752 E-mail: kjk1@nrc.govNote:  NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site,http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections.Distribution


:IN Reading FileADAMS Accession Number: ML072910750OFFICEDCIBC:CSGB:DCITECH EDITORD:DCIIPNAMEKKarwoskiAHiserCHsuMEvansJJacobson
===Kenneth J. Karwoski, NRR===
                      301-415-2752 E-mail: kjk1@nrc.gov
 
Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections.
 
Distribution:
 
===IN Reading File===
ADAMS Accession Number: ML072910750
OFFICE    DCI              BC:CSGB:DCI      TECH EDITOR        D:DCI          IP
 
NAME      KKarwoski        AHiser            CHsu              MEvans          JJacobson
 
DATE      10/19/2007      10/25/2007        10/24/2007        11/8/2007      11/6/2007 OFFICE    LA:PGCB:DPR      PGCB:DPR          BC:PGCB:DPR        D:DPR
 
NAME      CHawes          DBeaulieu        MMurphy            MCase


DATE10/19/200710/25/200710/24/200711/8/200711/6/2007 OFFICELA:PGCB:DPRPGCB:DPRBC:PGCB:DPRD:DPRNAMECHawesDBeaulieuMMurphyMCaseDATE11/15/200711/15/200711/23/0711/23/07OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}}
DATE      11/15/2007       11/15/2007        11/23/07          11/23/07 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}}


{{Information notice-Nav}}
{{Information notice-Nav}}

Revision as of 01:44, 23 November 2019

Buildup of Deposits in Steam Generators
ML072910750
Person / Time
Issue date: 11/23/2007
From: Michael Case
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DPR
To:
References
IN-07-037
Download: ML072910750 (4)


UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION

WASHINGTON, DC 20555-0001 November 23, 2007 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 2007-37: BUILDUP OF DEPOSITS IN STEAM

GENERATORS

ADDRESSEES

All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for pressurized water reactors except

those that have permanently ceased operations and who have certified that fuel has been

permanently removed from the reactor vessel.

PURPOSE

The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice (IN) to alert

addressees to the potential for deposits to accumulate in their steam generators and potentially

affect steam generator performance and tube integrity. The NRC expects that recipients of this

IN will review the information for applicability to their facilities and consider taking actions, as

appropriate, to avoid similar problems. However, suggestions contained in this IN are not NRC

requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is required.

DESCRIPTION OF CIRCUMSTANCES

Operating Experience at a Foreign Reactor

Between 2004 and 2006, three primary-to-secondary leaks occurred at the Cruas Nuclear

Plant, a multi-unit site in France. The last primary-to-secondary leak occurred at Cruas Unit 4 in February 2006 (Autorité de Sûreté Nucléaire 2006 Annual Report, http://annual-report.asn.fr/PDF/nuclear-power-plants-EDF.pdf), and it was detected through the

use of nitrogen-16 radiation monitors. The leak rate increased from very low levels to

approximately 3 gallons per minute [600 liters per hour] in 12 minutes.

All three leaks were a result of a circumferential crack in the tube at the location where the tube

passes through the uppermost tube support plate (TSP). All three tubes were near the center

of the tube bundle near an area where no tubes are installed. This tube-free area was intended

to facilitate secondary water/steam flow into the interior of the tube bundle. The U-bend region

of the affected tubes did not have any anti-vibration bar support since the radii of these

U-bends were small.

The cause of the cracks was determined to be high cycle fatigue as a result of flow-induced

vibration. The tubes became susceptible to vibration and fatigue as a result of the buildup of

deposits on the secondary side of the steam generator which changed the flow conditions in the

center of the tube bundle. The deposits had blocked water/steam flow through the

quatrefoil-shaped holes in the TSPs, forcing more water/steam into the center of the tube

bundle. The extent of the hole blockage was estimated based on visual examinations, analysis

of eddy current test results, and evaluation of the wide range feedwater level gauge readings.

High levels of deposits were determined to be present based on these inspections and

analyses.

Contributing factors to the buildup of the deposits were determined to be low secondary side pH

(less than 9.6), chemical intrusions (from main condenser cooling water leakage into the

secondary system), and the TSP hole design (quatrefoil-shaped holes).

To address this problem, several corrective actions came under consideration, including

evaluating the level of TSP hole blockage, removing the deposits through chemical cleaning, changing the chemistry conditions on the secondary-side of the plant to reduce the rate of

buildup of deposits, analyzing the consequences of the deposits on the flow through the steam

generator, and analyzing the stresses that could be imposed on the TSP during transients and

accidents as a result of the hole blockage.

Operating Experience at a U.S. Reactor

In the early 1990s, steam generator water level oscillations were observed at Surry Power Units

1 and 2, near Newport News, Virginia. Due to the severity of these water level oscillations, the

units operated at reduced power levels for varying periods of time. The cause of the steam

generator water level oscillations was severe deposit buildup in the TSP quatrefoil-shaped

holes. The licensee corrected the problem by performing chemical cleaning on all steam

generators at both units to reduce the extent of deposits.

BACKGROUND

Corrosion products can accumulate in the secondary side of the steam generator as a result of

the gradual erosion and corrosion of secondary side components in a pressurized water

reactor. This accumulation of corrosion products results in the buildup of deposits on the tubes, tubesheets, and other secondary side steam generator structures (including the holes through

which the tubes pass).

Harmful contaminants can concentrate in these deposits and result in corrosion of the steam

generator tubes. In addition, these deposits can affect the thermal performance of the steam

generator (i.e., the ability to transfer heat from the primary-to-secondary side of the steam

generator) and the thermal hydraulic characteristics of the steam generator (by changing the

flow patterns within the steam generator).

As a result of the negative effects of these deposits, plant operators in the U.S. frequently

remove the deposits from the top of the tubesheet by a process referred to as sludge lancing.

Operators also occasionally remove these deposits from other areas in the steam generator

through chemical cleaning processes.

High cycle fatigue cracking caused by flow-induced vibration have been observed in U.S. steam

generators. Fatigue cracking in steam generators with U-shaped tubes was the subject of NRC

Bulletin 88-02, Rapidly Propagating Fatigue Cracks in Steam Generator Tubes. This cracking occurred, in part, because of two factors: (1) There was denting of the tubes at the tube-to-TSP

intersection and (2) non-uniform anti-vibration bar penetration into the tube bundle caused

locally high flow velocities. This cracking occurred in tubes with small U-bend radii. Fatigue

cracking in large radius U-bends was discussed in NUREG-1604, Circumferential Cracking of

Steam Generator Tubes. Fatigue cracking in steam generators with straight tubes has also

been observed in the U.S. This cracking is associated with localized high velocities near a

tube-free lane region in the steam generator.

DISCUSSION

Extensive deposit buildup in the TSP holes can increase the vibration of the tubes and

potentially lead to fatigue cracking of the tube. Deposits can also change the loading (stresses)

on the TSPs during transients and design basis accidents (e.g., a steam line break). Extensive

deposit buildup in the tube support holes can change the secondary water recirculation rate and

may result in water level oscillations within the steam generator.

The extent to which deposits can buildup in the steam generator (including the tube support

holes) will vary from unit to unit. It is a function not only of the tube support configuration (e.g.,

lattice grid, round hole, quatrefoil-shaped holes), but also of the design and operation of the

secondary side of the plant. Low secondary side pH levels may increase the corrosion rate on

the secondary side of the plant and lead to more impurity transport to the steam generators.

Chemical intrusions (e.g., from main condenser leakage) may also increase the transport of

impurities into the steam generator. The more impurities that enter the steam generator, the

more likely that deposits will buildup on the secondary side of the steam generator.

The potential for fatigue cracking of the steam generator tubes also varies from unit to unit. It

depends on how the tubes are supported and the secondary side flow conditions (which can be

affected by the buildup of deposits in the steam generator).

Operating experience demonstrates that once initiated, high cycle fatigue cracks can rapidly

propagate over periods ranging from hours to days to complete severance of the tube. As

discussed in NRC Bulletin 88-02, enhanced primary-to-secondary leakage monitoring can be an

effective tool at reducing the potential for a tube rupture.

Although there is no specific requirement for licensees to monitor, assess, or remove deposit

buildup, there are requirements for licensees to maintain steam generator tube integrity. These

integrity requirements are contained, in part, in plant technical specifications. Therefore, it is

important to assess the deposit buildup in a steam generator and the effects that deposits will

have on steam generator performance and tube integrity during normal operation and design

basis accidents. Promptly identifying and removing significant deposit buildup may prevent a

loss of tube integrity and may improve the thermal performance of the steam generator.

CONTACT

This information notice does not require any specific action or written response. Please direct

any questions about this matter to the technical contact listed below.

/RA by TQuay for/

Michael J. Case, Director

Division of Policy and Rulemaking

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical Contact:

Kenneth J. Karwoski, NRR

301-415-2752 E-mail: kjk1@nrc.gov

Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections.

CONTACT

This information notice does not require any specific action or written response. Please direct

any questions about this matter to the technical contact listed below.

/RA by TQuay for/

Michael J. Case, Director

Division of Policy and Rulemaking

Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation

Technical Contact:

Kenneth J. Karwoski, NRR

301-415-2752 E-mail: kjk1@nrc.gov

Note: NRC generic communications may be found on the NRC public Web site, http://www.nrc.gov, under Electronic Reading Room/Document Collections.

Distribution:

IN Reading File

ADAMS Accession Number: ML072910750

OFFICE DCI BC:CSGB:DCI TECH EDITOR D:DCI IP

NAME KKarwoski AHiser CHsu MEvans JJacobson

DATE 10/19/2007 10/25/2007 10/24/2007 11/8/2007 11/6/2007 OFFICE LA:PGCB:DPR PGCB:DPR BC:PGCB:DPR D:DPR

NAME CHawes DBeaulieu MMurphy MCase

DATE 11/15/2007 11/15/2007 11/23/07 11/23/07 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY