ML14161A650: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Morgan, Nadiyah Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 3:10 PM To: Furio, Patricia S:(CCNPP) (patricia.furio@exeloncorp.com) | ||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Acceptance Review Results Regarding TSTF-426, "Revise or Add Actions to Preclude Entry into LCO 3.0.3-RITSTF Initiatives 6b and 6c AMD (TAC NOS. MF3154and MF3155) | Acceptance Review Results Regarding TSTF-426, "Revise or Add Actions to Preclude Entry into LCO 3.0.3-RITSTF Initiatives 6b and 6c AMD (TAC NOS. MF3154and MF3155) | ||
Pat, By letter dated November 13, 2013 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. ML13318A892), Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, LLC submitted a license amendment request (LAR) that would modify the technical specifications requirements to adopt the changes described in Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF)-426-A, Revision 5, " | : Pat, By letter dated November 13, 2013 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No. | ||
ML13318A892), Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, LLC submitted a license amendment request (LAR) that would modify the technical specifications requirements to adopt the changes described in Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF)-426-A, Revision 5, "Revise or Add Actions to Preclude Entry into LCO 3.0.3 - | |||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in | RITSTF Initiatives 6b and 6c" for Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this LAR and its supplement. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant. | ||
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence. | |||
sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that | |||
impact the NRC | |||
If you have any questions, please contact me. | If you have any questions, please contact me. | ||
: Thanks, Dee Nadiyah S. Morgan | : Thanks, Dee Nadiyah S. Morgan Calvert Cliffs and Pilgrim Project Manager, NRR US Nuclear Regulatory Commission O-8F4 (301) 415-1016 Nadiyah.Morgan@NRC.GOV 1 | ||
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 1353 Mail Envelope Properties (Nadiyah.Morgan@nrc.gov20140610150900) | |||
Hearing Identifier: | |||
==Subject:== | ==Subject:== | ||
Acceptance Review Results Regarding TSTF-426, "Revise or Add Actions to Preclude Entry into LCO 3.0.3-RITSTF Initiatives 6b and 6c AMD (TAC NOS. MF3154and MF3155) | Acceptance Review Results Regarding TSTF-426, "Revise or Add Actions to Preclude Entry into LCO 3.0.3-RITSTF Initiatives 6b and 6c AMD (TAC NOS. MF3154and MF3155) | ||
Sent Date: 6/10/2014 3:09:45 PM Received Date: 6/10/2014 3:09:00 PM From: Morgan, Nadiyah Created By: Nadiyah.Morgan@nrc.gov Recipients: | |||
Post Office: | "Furio, Patricia S:(CCNPP) (patricia.furio@exeloncorp.com)" <patricia.furio@exeloncorp.com> | ||
Tracking Status: None Post Office: | |||
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2087 6/10/2014 3:09:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date: | |||
Recipients Received:}} | |||
Revision as of 03:33, 4 November 2019
| ML14161A650 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Calvert Cliffs  |
| Issue date: | 06/10/2014 |
| From: | Nadiyah Morgan Division of Operating Reactor Licensing |
| To: | Furio P Exelon Corp |
| References | |
| MF3154, MF3155 | |
| Download: ML14161A650 (2) | |
Text
NRR-PMDAPEm Resource From: Morgan, Nadiyah Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2014 3:10 PM To: Furio, Patricia S:(CCNPP) (patricia.furio@exeloncorp.com)
Subject:
Acceptance Review Results Regarding TSTF-426, "Revise or Add Actions to Preclude Entry into LCO 3.0.3-RITSTF Initiatives 6b and 6c AMD (TAC NOS. MF3154and MF3155)
- Pat, By letter dated November 13, 2013 (Agencywide Documents Access and Management System Accession No.
ML13318A892), Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, LLC submitted a license amendment request (LAR) that would modify the technical specifications requirements to adopt the changes described in Technical Specification Task Force (TSTF)-426-A, Revision 5, "Revise or Add Actions to Preclude Entry into LCO 3.0.3 -
RITSTF Initiatives 6b and 6c" for Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant, Unit Nos. 1 and 2. The purpose of this e-mail is to provide the results of the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staffs acceptance review of this LAR and its supplement. The acceptance review was performed to determine if there is sufficient technical information in scope and depth to allow the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review. The acceptance review is also intended to identify whether the application has any readily apparent information insufficiencies in its characterization of the regulatory requirements or the licensing basis of the plant.
The NRC staff has reviewed your application and concluded that it does provide technical information in sufficient detail to enable the NRC staff to complete its detailed technical review and make an independent assessment regarding the acceptability of the proposed amendment in terms of regulatory requirements and the protection of public health and safety and the environment. Given the lesser scope and depth of the acceptance review as compared to the detailed technical review, there may be instances in which issues that impact the NRC staffs ability to complete the detailed technical review are identified despite completion of an adequate acceptance review. If additional information is needed, you will be advised by separate correspondence.
If you have any questions, please contact me.
- Thanks, Dee Nadiyah S. Morgan Calvert Cliffs and Pilgrim Project Manager, NRR US Nuclear Regulatory Commission O-8F4 (301) 415-1016 Nadiyah.Morgan@NRC.GOV 1
Hearing Identifier: NRR_PMDA Email Number: 1353 Mail Envelope Properties (Nadiyah.Morgan@nrc.gov20140610150900)
Subject:
Acceptance Review Results Regarding TSTF-426, "Revise or Add Actions to Preclude Entry into LCO 3.0.3-RITSTF Initiatives 6b and 6c AMD (TAC NOS. MF3154and MF3155)
Sent Date: 6/10/2014 3:09:45 PM Received Date: 6/10/2014 3:09:00 PM From: Morgan, Nadiyah Created By: Nadiyah.Morgan@nrc.gov Recipients:
"Furio, Patricia S:(CCNPP) (patricia.furio@exeloncorp.com)" <patricia.furio@exeloncorp.com>
Tracking Status: None Post Office:
Files Size Date & Time MESSAGE 2087 6/10/2014 3:09:00 PM Options Priority: Standard Return Notification: No Reply Requested: No Sensitivity: Normal Expiration Date:
Recipients Received: