ML17264A309

Rev 22 to QA Program for Station Operation

ML17264A309
Person / Time
Site:	Ginna
Issue date:	12/19/1995
From:	ROCHESTER GAS & ELECTRIC CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML17264A308	List: ML17264A307 ML17264A309
References
NUDOCS 9601020060
Download: ML17264A309 (155)

Text

Attachment 2

ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION R.E.

GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Quality Assurance Program for Station Operation Revision 22 DOCKET NO. 50-244 December 19, 1995

(

Vb01020060 95i221 PDR ADOCK 05000244

'P PDR

QUALITYASSURANCE PROGRAM FOR STATION OPERATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Pacae 17.1 MANAGEMENT 17.1.1 17.1.2 17.1.3 17.1.4 17.1.5 17.1.6 17.1

~ 7 Methodology Organization Responsibility Authority Personnel Training and Qualification Corrective Action Regulatory Commitments 1

2 9

10

.10 11 11 17.2 PERFORMANCE VERIFICATION 17.2.1 17.2.2 17.2.3 17.2.4 17.2.5 17.2.6 17.2.7 17.2.8 17.2.9 17.2.10 17.2.11 17.2.12 17.2.13 17.2.14 17.2.15 Methodology Design Control Design Verification Procurement Control Procurement Verification Identification and Control of Items

Handling, Storage, and Shipping Test Control Measuring and Test Equipment Control Inspection,

Test, and Operating Status Special Process Control Inspection Corrective Action Document Control Records 24 24 26 27 29 29 30 31 32 33 34 34 35 36 38

17.3 ASSESSMENT

17.3.1 17.3.2 Methodology Assessment 39 39

LIST OF TABLES Table Number 17.1.1-1 17.1.1-2 1 7 1

~ 7 1

17.3.2-1 Title Quality Assurance Policy Statement Supplementary Glossary Conformance of Ginna Station Program to Quality Assurance Standards, Requirements, and Guides Audit List Pacae 12 13 18 LIST OF FIGURES Fi ure Number 17.1.2-1 Title Organization Chart Pacae 23

QUALITYASSURANCE PROGRAM FOR STATION OPERATION

17. 1 MANAGEMENT 17.1.1 Methodology The Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation quality assurance policy is established by the Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer.

This policy is set forth in the Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation Ginna Station Corporate Statement of Quality Assurance

Policy, shown in Table 17.1.1-1, and is binding on all organizations and individuals performing Ginna Station quality affecting activities.

The policy is implemented under the overall direction of the Vice President, Nuclear Operations Gijiij!!Ithrough the Department

Manager, Nuclear Assessment; the Plant Manager, Ginna Station; Group'::)Ytvkskea

Manager, Support Services; and heads of other supporting departments.

The Quality Assurance Program has been developed by the Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation to assure safe and reliable operation of the R.

E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant.

The program covers all existing Seismic Category I and Class 1E structures,

systems, and components (SSCs) including their foundations and supports.

It applies to all activities affecting the safety related functions of these structures,

systems, and components that prevent or mitigate the consequences of postulated accidents that could cause undue risk to the health and safety of the public.

These activities include designing, operating, maintaining, repairing, fabricating,

handling, shipping, storing, procuring, refueling, modifying, cleaning, erecting, installing, testing, inspecting, and inservice inspection.

Quality affecting activities are controlled to an extent consistent with their safety significance.

In addition, the Quality Assurance Program applies to the activities associated with the packaging of licensed radioactive materials to be shipped in accordance with 10CFR Part 71, excluding pe'Si'ji~568ji:::2ab'iiij'ti;:p'ri of shipping casks.

A classification process is established to identify SSCs that are safety related (SR), safety significant (SS), or have no safety impact (NNS).

Criteria are based on information contained in the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR), licensing commitments, guidelines contained in NRC regulatory guides, and

/

and corresponding QA program applicability are determined using approved procedures.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

Vice President, Nuclear Operations pXCup Plant Manager, Ginna Station Department

Manager, Nuclear Engineering Services Department

Manager, Nuclear Assessment

Manager, Quality Assurance

~

Manager, Nuclear Assurance t-'::. "-'...

yygp;rgy, yy..;yyw....y.,;.yy.sy*y,...qy,.y~ywv.<wary:w;q." yuqyuyyu,~rr~yrpyy

'gg'1'eg tg1"j::::::@@ega Q'1+93~E'+p egge jjc@

Department

Manager, Nuclear Training Mv:i.~w gXOgp Manager, Support Services B&A~a Pr'oup Manager, Energy Delivery

9X'~P'up Manager, Information Services SENIOR MANAGEMENT Chairman of the Board President and Chief Executive Officer The Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation directed the establishment of the Quality Assurance Program and issued the governing policy statement..

He established the Nuclear Safety Audit and Review Board to review and audit plant operations.

The Chairman of the NSARB is responsible to the Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer on all activities of the NSARB.

Senior Vice President Geehemm Bo@ .-'.': 0 erations The Senior Vice President.,

Geehemer-Bi'ergyI::,';~Operations reports to t

C gixean.":ok:::t'.:he::::'Boaxk:::::.":Px'eekden4':::::::::::::and":::Qh@ef'

'- tOf'8' 8'l

Z 'h o'perati.ori an'd"'support of Ginna Station, including the Quality Assurance Program.

He is also responsible for those items delineated in the Administrative Controls section of the Technical Specifications.

NUCLEAR OPERATIONS Vice President Nuclear 0 erationsI:-::GY'FY6

The Vice President, Nuclear OperationsINNggegjH is responsible to the Senior Vice President, Customer Operate.ons and has corporate responsibility for operation of Ginna Station in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements.

In addition, he has overall responsibility and authority for directing the Quality Assurance Program and is responsible for the approval of the Nuclear Policy Manual.

He is responsible for establishing the policies and requirements necessary to assure safe and reliable operation of Ginna Station and for oversight of Ginna Station and those support activities associated with Nuclear Engineering Services, Generator Replacement.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

De artment Mana er Nuclear Assessment The Department

Manager, Nuclear Assessment is responsible to the Vice President, Nuclear Operations<Geo'ug for establishing the overall Quality Assurance Program.

He is responsible for assuring that all planned and systematic actions necessary to provide adequate confidence that Ginna Station will operate safely and reliably are established and followed.

He provides management with objective information concerning quality, independent of the individual or group directly responsible for performing the specific activity.

He has the authority and organizational freedom to 'assure all necessary quality activities are performed.

He is responsible for directing the activities of Quality Assurance, Nuclear Assurance, and Operational Assessment.

In addition, he is responsible for Nuclear Emergency Preparedness..

Mana er ualit Assurance The Manager, Quality Assurance reports to the Department

Manager, Nuclear Assessment.

He and the Quality Assurance staff are responsible for interpreting corporate quality assurance policy and for assuring its implementation.

This includes assuring that the program coi'ihinui'into":,.":,.",:."Nsatisfieey,. the requirements of 10CFR50, Appendix B

He is responsible for establishing and implementing an independent assessment program that encompasses all organizations and functions related to the safe operation of Ginna including the qualified suppliers of safety related materials. and services.

Za I

Mana er Nuclear Assurance The Manager, Nuclear Assurance reports to the Department

Manager, Nuclear Assessment and is responsible for assuring that station activities affecting quality are prescribed and carried out in accordance with approved drawings, specifications, and procedures.

He is also responsible for the control and maintenance of documents and records.

Nuclear Assurance is responsible for assuring performance of verification inspection and receipt inspection activities and assuring that inspection requirements are included in approved procedures, procurement documents, and work packages.

'I!11! ii'i'RdCI'2t!3iOllI"':i!i!141'0'1!O'8'Xiii!A'8'8'!'1'2'8'1l'CS!!jipX'bV'lid8'Sj'f!O'011 RGQE QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

68'.08',::-"-;:y NwAwACC'hv45

'yV ~g(AV~~~~' '~VA'LV+~P~W~ WW'l+'W AW '.VAWWA~

@xi'e'e5nx".';:":: "4>itifi':::::::Ex '"iwieVi'ek A WV 'A% VAVA%V~~d px'a ""'im'~':,:::,:'.."a"':,:::.::"..:'.;.:". iiika,:':,'.",""':.a."""ibii'."'"""-'"""""""--'"'"""'" "'" "'"" """ "'""'"'"'"'"'""'*'""=""'"

'"'G&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

1 to the Vice President, Nuclear Operations

'aro4p'!'~for maintaining and implementing a National Academy for Nuclear Training accredited training program and, in conjunction with Support

Services, for providing trained and qualified riggers and crane operators to support nuclear related activities.

SUPPORT SERVICES 9-:~~~::::Garou

':'Mana er Su ort Services

'bl L.:."::::,,:,!ll directing certain activities in support of Ginna Station.

These activities include:

~

procurement of materials,

services, and components from qualified suppliers in accordance with applicable commercial, technical, and quality requirements

~

special processes

~

inservice inspection

~

maintenance of lifting and handling equipment training and qualification of welders and NDE personnel

and, qualification of riggers and crane operators provision of personnel support for Ginna Station maintenance activities A

chemistry services laboratory testing and calibration of eeme-electrical INFORMATION SERVICES isi~'l::'.GYou"::'.:Mana er Information Services

• h

'll'it ill"",,g,,",,

for calibrating 'i'nSta1ligelectric meters used at Ginna Station.

"MS"""'G&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

ENERGY DELIVERY Bivk.~i:CAVY"s:.Mana er Ener Deliver The

'.".;,-',:QXii'ipgNanager, Energy Delivery is responsible for providing a staf'f"'to perform relay engineering services and conduct routine maintenance and testing of Ginna Station meters and relays.

He is responsible for design, modification, and construction activities at Station 13A and for supporting Nuclear Engineering Services design and construction activities at Ginna.

REVIEW AND AUDIT ORGANIZATIONS Three separate organizational units are established for the purpose of review and audit of plant operations and safety-related'atters.

They are:

Plant 0 erations Review Committee PORC

, the on-site operations review group responsible for reviewing those activities that affect nuclear safety.

ualit Assurance, the group responsible for the audit of safety related activities associated with plant operations.

Nuclear Safet Audit and Review Board NSARB

, the independent audit and review group responsible for the periodic review of the activities of the Plant Operations Review Committee, for directing audits and evaluating their results; and for the management evaluation of the status and adequacy of the Quality Assurance Program.

PORC Review activities of the PORC provide, as part of the normal duties of plant supervisory personnel, timely and continuing monitoring of operating activities to assist the Plant Manager in keeping abreast of general plant conditions and to verify that the day-to-day operating activities are conducted safely and in accordance with applicable administrative controls.

PORC also, reviews facility operations to detect potential safety hazards.

These continuing monitoring activities are considered to be an integral part of the routine supervisory function and are important to the safety of plant operation.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

'I

The on-site operating organization (PORC) performs reviews, periodically and as situations

demand, to evaluate plant operations and to plan future activities.

The important elements of the reviews are documented.

The PORC scope of review, organization,

quorum, and records meet the requirements of ANSI/ANS-3.2-1988, Section 4.3.

PORC is comprised of personnel who collectively have the experience and competence in the following areas:

Nuclear Operations

'echanical Maintenance Electrical Maintenance Plant Engineering Reactor Engineering Radiation Safety Chemistry Quality Assurance/Quality Control The PORC chairman meets the qualifications of ANSI Standard N18.1-1971, Section 4.2.2, and holds, or has held, a Senior Reactor Operating License or SRO certification.

PORC members meet the qualifications of section 4.3.1 or 4.4 as applicable.

The PORC is comprised of a minimum of five (5) and maximum of nine (9) regular members, as designated by the Plant Manager.

Alternates are designated in writing by the chairman.

The number of attending alternates will not exceed a minority of the number representing a quorum.

The PORC meets at least once per calendar month and as convened by the PORC Chairman.

The PORC a3.-se-reviews proposed tests and experiments and changes to procedures that may affect nuclear safety.

The PORC recommends in writing to the Plant Manager approval of items submitted for review, documents whether any change constitutes an unreviewed safety question under 10CFR50.59, and provides immediate notification to the Vice President, Nuclear Operations Br'oug~gand the Chairman, NSARB of disagreement between the PORC and the Plant Manager.

OlC 'AW$(gC CHh'NYkÃN AN RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

NSARB The NSARB scope of review meets the requirements of ANSI Standard N18.7-1976, Section 4.3.4.

The NSARB composition, meeting frequency,

quorum, and record requirements meet ANSI. Standard N18.7-1976, Section 4.3.2.

Qualifications of members are commensurate with their functional responsibilities as defined in ANSI/ANS-3.1-1987, Section 4.7, with the exception that the functional areas of nuclear power plant operations and nuclear engineering have over eight (8) years experience in their field with over four (4) years responsible engineering management.

The members of the NSARB are appointed by the Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer.

Records of NSARB activities are prepared,

approved, and distributed within 14 days to the Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer; the'enior Vice d

Nuclear Operations~>.',.:,pe@'gp.

Reports of reviews in the areas encompassed by Sections 4.3.4(4) and 4.3.4(5) of ANSI Standard N18.7-1976 are prepared,

approved, and forwarded to the Vice President, Nuclear Operations 8'rbu'j';:;:.:swithin 14 days of completion of the review.

Audit reports encompassed by Table 17.3.2-1 are forwarded to the Vice President, Nuclear Operations Gic'ipp~and the management positions responsible for the areas audited"within 30 days after completion of the audit.

DELEGATION OF WORK Quality affecting activities may be delegated to contractor organizations and equipment vendors.

Delegated activities are subject to Quality Assurance Program requirements through conformance with the external organization's QA Program as approved by RGEE, thing'gh':ice'0'forean'ce.'.;::::,uxt;:h'.:,:'!RG&E's Quality Assurance

Program, or'"an"appr'oved" combi."nat1on of the two.

RG&E retains overall responsibility for the Quality Assurance Program and management oversight of delegated activities.

The scope of delegated activities and applicable Quality Assurance Program requirements are defined in procurement documents.

17.1.3

, Responsibility All employees of Rochester Gas and Electric involved in the operation of Ginna Station and associated support activities have full personal and corporate responsibility to.assure that the plant is operated, maintained,

tested, inspected, and modified in a safe and reliable manner.

This responsibility includes assuring that an effective Quality Assurance Program is implemented.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

The operation of Ginna Station is governed by the Nuclear Policy

Manual, a portion of which governs the Quality Assurance Program.

It contains the requirements and assignment of responsibilities for implementation of the program.

The manual is prepared,

reviewed, and maintained by Ginna Station and approved by the Vice President, Nuclear Operations Gx'5i'iip.

The Nuclear Safety Audit and Review Board is directed by the Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer to review the status and adequacy of the Quality Assurance Program at least once every two years to assure that it is meaningful and effectively complies with corporate policy and

10CFRSO, Appendix B.

This review consists of an audit, or a review equivalent to an audit, performed by company personnel or outside organizations.

The Quality Assurance Program is implemented through procedures prepared and maintained by the responsible organization and approved for use by their designated manager.

Quality affecting activities are performed in accordance with these procedures, utilizing sufficient trained personnel and necessary resources to accomplish the work.

17.1.4 Authority Persons or organizations who are delegated responsibility for planning, establishing, or implementing any part of the RG&E Quality Assurance Program also have the authority to carry out those responsibilities.

Nuclear Operations and nuclear support organization personnel are empowered to take stop-work action on their own activities if they determine that continuing the activity would preclude identifying and correcting a condition adverse to quality or lead to an unsafe condition.

Designated independent QA/QC personnel have the authority to stop work within the Nuclear Operations

'~;ea 8'r'o'ug, nuclear support organizations, and at supplier locations.

The Plant Manager, Ginna Station has stop work authority for all activities performed in operating the station.

17.1.5 Personnel Training and Qualification RG&E is committed to maintaining National Academy for Nuclear Training accredited training programs that produce qualified, competent personnel to operate and maintain Ginna Station.

supporting Nuclear Operations B&4a-:Pea gjpPy. line management with the development, monitoring, and evalua't'ion of an adequate staff of experienced,

trained, and qualified personnel to ensure the safe and efficient operation, modification, and maintenance of the plant.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

Supervisory personnel are indoctrinated in quality assurance

policies,

'inihi'iat'i;::insmaaeaha, and procedures to assure they understand that these must be implemented and enforced.

Personnel responsible for performing activities affecting quality are trained and indoctrinated in the requirements,

purpose, scope, and implementation of applicable quality related program gA'st'wgegkon'Smaaee-.'he and procedures.

Refresher sessions are held"per1od1cally.

Training of personnel is the responsibility of each department performing an activity affecting quality.

The Vice President, Nuclear Operations Qi'jiiy~is responsible for the formal training, qualification, licensing, and re-qualification of operators, as necessary.

As appropriate, personnel granted unescorted access to Ginna Station are trained in radiation protection, plant safety, and security.

Training and qualification records are maintained for each employee when required.

Documentation of formal training includes objectives, content of the program, attendees, and date of attendance.

17.1.6 Corxective Action Rochester Gas and Electric has established a corrective action process whereby all personnel are responsible for assuring that conditions adverse to quality are promptly identified, reported, controlled, and corrected.

The process is focused on correcting the problem and its root cause rather than assigning blame or fault.

54v'cry/:,::~t'-'-:rends in geaM~performance are identified, monitored, and""reported to management.

Corrective action and nonconformance control processes are discussed in Section 17.2.13.

17.1.7 Regulatory Commitments The Quality Assurance Program is designed to meet the requirements of 10CFRSO, Appendix B, "Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants."

A listing of Regulatory Guides, requirements, and standards with the conformance status of each is contained in Table 17.1.7-1.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

Jt~ 1

TABLE 17.1.1-1 Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation Ginna Station Corporate Statement of Quality Assurance Policy The Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation has always and continues to be an advocate of quality performance in our daily activities.

The Quality Assurance Program described in the Nuclear Policy Manual has been developed to assure that activities, as defined within the program scope, are being performed correctly and in conformance with applicable requirements.

This program is designed to assure the safe operation of Ginna Station and to meet the requirements of Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50 (10CFR50), Appendix B, "Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants."

The Quality Assurance Program applies to all activities affecting the safety related functions of those Seismic Category 1 or Class 1E structures,

systems, and components that prevent or mitigate the consequences of or monitor the course of postulated accidents, events, or phenomena that could cause undue risk to the health and safety of the public.

These activities include operating, maintaining, modifying, refueling, testing, and inspecting.

In addition, this program applies to 10CFR50 concerns associated with:

a.

maintaining the high degree of integrity of primary and secondary barriers of systems or structures containing radioactive materials b.

providing fire detection, suppression, and consequence mitigation items utilized both to protect the safety related structures,

systems, and components and to assure safe operation in the event of postulated fire c.

providing assurance that instrumentation and controls which monitor accidents, or provide a secondary role in accident monitoring, function correctly and accurately.

This program also applies to the shipping of licensed radioactive material under 10CFR71, except for design and fabrication of shipping casks.

The Department Manager, Nuclear Assessment is responsible for coordinating the formulation of the Quality Assurance Program.

The Manager, Quality Assurance is responsible for assuring that the program is implemented.

Ginna Station, Nuclear Engineering Services, Nuclear Assessment, Nuclear XhmYien-Training, Support Services, Information Services, and Energy Delivery are responsible for implementing the Quality Assurance Program in accordance with the requirements of the Nuclear Policy Manual.

Roger W. Kober Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer Date RG6E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

TABLE 17.1.1-2 Supplementary Glossary Terms with special meanings used in this document that are not defined in ANSI N4S.2.10, "Quality Assurance Terms and Definitions," are defined below.

Adopted RG&E has endorsed, wholly or in part, an industry code,.standard, or NRC Regulatory Guide for which no formal commitment has been made.

Alternative Relates to existing and proposed industry code,

standard, or NRC Regulatory Guide for which RG&E provides other means to assure quality.

. Approval The formal act of endorsing or adding positive authorization, or both, to an action or document.

Approval may be given only by an authorized individual.

As-built drawings Drawings such as flow prints, electrical elementary

diagrams, instrumentation and control schematics, and piping layout drawings that reflect the actual current plant field configuration.

Audit A documented activity to determine, through investigation, the adequacy of and adherence to established procedures, instructions,.

specifications, codes and standards, or other applicable contractual and licensing requirements and the effectiveness of implementation.

Audit (internal)

Audit of those portions of the RG&E Corporation's Quality Assurance Program retained under its direct control and within its organizational structure.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

'E I

I I

4 ~

TABLE 17. 1. 1-2 (cont')

Certification The action, by an authorized person, of determining, verifying, and attesting, in writing, to the qualifications of personnel or material.

Commi tment Conforms I

I

~ c. x+. ~ xQxQxOxQY~~C ~XDXQ:&PÃ( xQxOXQY.w C, X XQ>4@%

8 tP @A'ii'r'it'~i"'!P'868'!,;:::8'i,":th'@4:-':!bY!:.':':RP(E!+<

tkxoUgh'.:4QQ QQQ QP s tQ da,":$

"Qgos+'Qg 'og,".Ibggit'QQ 8RC':: or::::cthe@"::rege3 atomy 'egenoies

~~"aha@

rGgv'3px8$ !,:-::;.'act 3~oQ 8)jt~o'j'hB.:':.:pBxiorm88"+(

44Ns.hwwYviw4403 iv&N4%'A'4&vNVAv%ccN36%h+hvhvhrhviwwNv5wtÃANiwcvA RG&E has committed fully to the requirements without exception.

Deviation A departure of a characteristic from specified requirements.

Handling An act of physically moving items by hand or by mechanical

means, but not including transport on a conveyance, such as motor vehicles,

ships, railroad cars, or aircraft.

Heavy load Any load, carried in a given area after a plant becomes operational, that weighs more than the combined weight of a single spent fuel assembly and its associated handling tool~

(.'~15OOg)

Inservice Inspection A planned, periodic evaluation of the continued structural integrity of installed plant systems and components by nondestructive

methods, conducted in accordance with the rules of Section XI of the ASME Boiler 8

Pressure Vessel Code.

Inspector An individual who has been qualified to perform quality verification inspections.

RGB QAPSO, Revision 22 December 21, 1995

TABLE 17.1.1-2 (cont'd)

Measuring and test equipment Devices or systems used to calibrate,

measure, gage,

test, inspect, or control in order to control data or to acquire data to verify conformance to specified requirements.

Measuring and test equipment does not include permanently installed plant instrumentation or test equipment used for preliminary checks where data obtained will not be used to determine acceptability or be the basis for design or engineering evaluation.

Nonconformance disposition Designated resolution to a nonconforming item by cognizant personnel (e.g.,

rework, repair, use-as-is or reject).

Performance-based An approach that focuses on the end results that directly contribute to safe and 'reliable plant operation.

Meeting a predetermined set of goals, limits, or performance criteria based upon the design basis safety function and the past performance of structures,

systems, components, and organizations, allowing the licensee flexibilityto determine how the results will be achieved and adjust quality practices, as necessary.,

Procedure A document that specif ies or describes how an activity is to be performed.

It may include methods to be employed, a description of equipment or materials to be used, and sequence of operations.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

TM3L@ 17. 1. 1-2 (cont')

Procurement document Purchase requisitions, purchase

orders, drawings, contracts, specifications, documents referenced by purchase orders, bills of material, or other instructions used to define requirements for purchase.

QA surveillance A technique which uses observation or monitoring to provide co'nfidence that ongoing processes and activities are adequately and effectively performed (Per NQA-1 App. 2A-X).

Qualified procedure A procedure which incorporates all

'applicable codes and standards, manufacturer's parameters, and engineering specifications and has been proven adequate for its intended purpose.

Section IX of the ASME Code defines procedure qualifications for welding activities.

Quality affecting activities Activities for which the Quality Assurance Program applies.

Safety related structures,

systems, and components Those appurtenances that are designed to Seismic Category I standards (UFSAR and/or Reg.

Guide 1.29) and w'i@8,",'.:',Lhe L"-."-'---'@'""'8~

preve'nt"or mitigate the consequences of postulated accidents that could cause undue risk to the health and safety of the public.

Safety significant structures,

systems, and components Subset of equipment not required to perform a safety rpl~h'te'd~gfunction but which are subject to add'itional controls established by RGEE.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

TABLE 17.1.1-2 (cont'd)

Supplier surveillance A review, observation, or inspection for the purpose of verifying,that an action has been accomplished as specified at the location of material procurement or manufacture.

Traceability A characteristic given to material, a

document, a group of documents, or material and its related documents which permits the retrieval or reassociation of the items, if necessary, at a later time.

The term is also used to denote a document which records a chronological history of all processes or operations which have been performed on an item.

Verification inspection A phase of quality control which by means of examination, observation, or measurement determines the conformance of materials,

supplies, components,

parts, appurtenances,

systems, processes, or structures to predetermined quality requirements.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

S

TABLE 17. 1.7-1 Conformance of Ginna Station Program to Quality Assurance Standards, Requirements, and Guides Standard R

uirement or Guide Conformance Status Remarks Regulatory Guide 1.8 Rev.(1)-Personnel Selection and Training Regulatory Guide 1.26 Rev.(3)-Quality Group Classifications & Standards for Water, Steam, and Radioactive-Waste Containing Components of Nuclear Power Plants Conforms Alternative RG 1.8 Rev.(1) incorporates ANSI N18.1.

A classification process is established to identify SSCs that are safety related (SR), safety significant (SS), or have no safety impact (NNS). Criteria are based on information contained in the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR), licensing commitments, guidelines contained in NRC regulatory guides, and functional guidance derived from ANSI/ANS 51.1-1983 Regulatory Guide 1.28 Rev.(2)-Quality Assurance Program Requirements (Design and Construction)

Conforms RG 1.28 Rev.(2) incorporates ANSI N45.2-1977.

Regulatory Guide 1.29 Rev.(3)-Seismic Design Classification Alternative Seismic design requirements for existing structures,

systems, and components performing functions listed in positions C.l and C.3 of the Regulatory Guide are specified in the UFSAR.

New structures,

systems, and components, and configuration changes meet the seismic design requirements of this regulatory guide or the UFSAR. The pertinent quality assurance requirements of 10CFR50, Appendix B are applied as required by positions C. 1 and C.4 of this Regulatory Guide, irrespective of an item's seismic design.

Portions of existing structures,

systems, and components with failure consequences described in position C.2 of this guide are designed and constructed to seismic requirements specified in the UFSAR.

New structures,

systems, and components, and configuration changes meet the design and construction seismic requirements of the UFSAR or this Regulatory Guide.

A quality assurance program similar to 10CFR50, Appendix B is applied to the SSE failure prevention function of these items.

These items are not considered basic components pursuant to 10CFR21.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 22, 1995

TABLE 17.1.7-1 (cont'd)

Standard Re uirement or Guide Conformance Status Remarks Regulatory Guide 1.30 Rev.(0)-Quality Assurance Requirements for the Installation, Inspection, and Testing of Instrumentation and Electric Equipment P'egulatory Guide 1.33 Rev.(2)-Quality Assurance Program Requirements (Operations)

Conforms Alternative RG 1.30 Rev.(0) ANSI N.45.2.4-1972.

RG 1.33 Rev.(2) incorporates ANSI N18.7-1976/ANS-3.2.

Ginna Station conforms to Regulatory Positions 1, 3, and Sa in RG 1.33 Rev.(2) and to ANSI N18.7-1976, sections 4.3.2 and 4.3.4.

Ginna conforms to RG 1.33 Rev.(0) except for Appendix A and ANSI N18.7-1972, sections 4.2.2, 4.2.3, 4.2,4, 4.2.5, 4.3, and 4.5.

Ginna also conforms to regulatory staff comments and supplementary guidance in "Guidelines on Quality Assurance Requirements During the Operations Phase of Nuclear Power Plants," Revision 0, October 1973 (Orange Book-Revision 0).

Requirements for the onsite review function meet the guidelines of ANSI/ANS 3.2-1988, section 4.3 in lieu of ANSI N18.7-1976, section 4.4 and ANSI N18.7-1972, section 4.5.

Regulatory Guide 1.36 Rev.(0)-Nonmetallic Thermal Insulation for Austentic Stainless Steel Regulatory Guide 1.37 Rev.(0)-Quality Assurance Requirements for Cleaning of Fluid Systems and Associated Components of Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants Adopted Conforms This Regulatory Guide is adopted for the testing of insulating materials installed on or near safety related stainless steel piping.

Insulating materials are not considered basic components pursuant to 10CFR21 and thus the supplier is not required to have a quality assurance program to cover the testing, lot control, and contamination control provisions of this Regulatory Guide.

A quality assurance'program similar to 10CFR50, Appendix B is applied to the handling, storage, and installation of insulating materials on or near Ginna Station safety related stainless steel piping and components.

RG 1.37 Rev.(0) incorporates ANSI N45.2.1-1973.

Regulatory Guide 1.38 Rev.(2)-Quality Assurance Requirements for Packaging, Shipping, Receiving,

Storage, and Handling of Items for Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants Conforms RG 1.38 Rev.(2) incorporates ANSI N45.2.2-1972.

Regulatory Guide 1.39 Rev.(2)-Housekeeping Requirements for Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants Conforms RG 1.39 Rev.(2) incorporates ANSI N45.2.3-1973.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

TABLE 17.1.7-1 (cont'd)

Standard Re uirement or Guide Regulatory Guide 1.54 Rev.(0)-Quality Assurance Requirements for Protective Coatings Applied to Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants Conformance Status Alternative Remarks Quality assurance requirements apply only when a coating performs a safety related function instead of the provisions stated in this Regulatory Guide and its referenced standard, ANSI N101.4-1972.

See the UFSAR for quality assurance requirements used for existing coatings.

For new coatings and configuration changes to existing coatings, either the quality assurance requirements of the UFSAR or the quality assurance requirements of 10CFR50, Appendix B are used instead of the detailed requirements included in this Regulatory Guide.

Regulatory Guide 1.58 Rev.(1)-Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant Inspection, Examination, and Testing Personnel Regulatory Guide 1.64 Rev.(1)-Quality Assurance Requirements for Design of Nuclear Power Plants Regulatory Guide 1.74 Rev.(0)-Quality Assurance Terms and Definitions Regulatory Guide 1.88 Rev.(2)-Collection, Storage, and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plant Quality Assurance Records Conforms Conforms Conforms Conforms RG 1.58 Rev.(1) incorporates ANSI N45.2.6-1978.

RG 1.64 Rev.(1) incorporates ANSI N45.2.11-1974.

RG 1.74 Rev.(0) incorporates ANSI N45.2. 10-1973.

Some definitions used by Ginna are worded differently than those in this standard; however, the general meanings are the same.

RG 1.88 Rev.(2) incorporates ANSI N45.2.9-1974.

Regulatory Guide 1.94 Re'v. (1)-Quality Assurance Installation, Inspections, and Testing of Structural Concrete and Structural Steel During the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants Not applicable RG 1.94 Rev.(1) incorporates ANSI N45.2.5-1974.

Regulatory Guide applies to plants in the construction phase and was issued after Ginna was built.

Regulatory Guide 1.116 Rev.(O-R)-Quality Assurance Requirements for Installation, Inspections, and Testing of Mechanical Equipment and Systems Regulatory Guide 1.123 Rev.(1)-Quality Assurance Requirements for Control of Procurement of Items and Services for Nuclear Plants Conforms Conforms RG 1.116 Rev.(O-R) incorporates ANSI-N45.2.8-1975.

RG 1. 123 Rev.(1) incorporates ANSI N45.2. 13-1976.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

TABLE 17.1.7-1 (cont'd)

Standard Re uirement or Guide Conformance Status Remarks Regulatory Guide 1.143 Rev.(1)-Design Guidance for Radioactive Waste Management

Systems, Structures, and Components Installed in Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants Regulatory Guide 1. 144 Rev.(l)-Auditing of Quality Assurance Programs for Nuclear Power Plants Regulatory Guide 1. 146 Rev.(0)-Qualiflication of QA Program Audit Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants Regulatory Guide 1.152 Rev.(0)-Criteria for Programmable Digital Computer Systein Software in Safety-Related Systems of Nuclear Power Plants Regulatory Guide 4.15 Rev.(1)-Quality Assurance for Radiological Monitoring Program (Normal Operations)-Effluent Streams and the Environment Regulatory Guide 7.10 Rev.(l)-Establishing Quality Assurance Programs for Packaging Used in the Transport of Radioactive Material 10CFR21 10CFR50, Appendix A-General Design Criteria 10CFR50, Appendix B-Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants Alternative Conforms Conforms Not applicable Adopted Adopted Conforms Alternative Conforms See the UFSAR for design and quality assurance provisions applied to existing radioactive waste management

systems, structures, and components.

New systems, structures, and components and configuration changes to existing items meet the design and quality assurance provisions described in the UFSAR or those specified by this Regulatory Guide.

RG 1.144 Rev.(1) incorporates ANSI N45.2.12-1977.

RG l. 146 Rev.(0) incorporates ANSI N45.2.23-1978.

Ginna does not currently use programmable digital computers in safety related applications.

No applications for use of software covered by this Regulatory Guide are pending.

Ginna conforms to the intent of this Regulatory Guide as addressed in the Process Control Program and applicable to Ginna effluent and environmental radioactivity measurements.

Ginna conforms to the intent of this Regulatory Guide as addressed in the Process Control Program.

These criteria were in draft form or not written at the time Ginna was designed and built.

For existing systems, see UFSAR for criteria applied.

New systems, structures, and components, and configuration changes to existing items meet the criteria as described in the UFSAR or 10CFR50, Appendix A.

10CFR50.55a-Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities (ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI-Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Reactor Coolant Systems)

Conforms 10CFR50.55 Specifies ASME Section XI code dates.

The Ginna program conforms to 10CFR50.55a with the specific editions and addenda of Section XI specified in the Inservice Inspection Plan.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

TABLE 17.1.7-1 (cont'd)

Standard Re uirement or Guide Conformance Status Remarks 10CFR50.55(e)-Conditions of Construction Permits Not applicable Regulatory Guide applies to plants in the construction phase.

10CFR55-Operators Licenses 10CFR55, Appendix A-Requalification Programs for Licensed Operators of Production and Utilization Facilities Conforms Conforms Regulatory Positions 2 and 4 of Branch Technical Position CMEB 9.5-1 Alternative Fire protection controls are in accordance with APCSB 9.5-1, regulatory position IV b.6 and IVb.j.

Generic Letter 89-02, and its endorsement of EPRI NP5652 "Guideline for the Utilization of Commercial Grade Items in Safety-Related Applications (NCIG-07)".

ANSI/ANS 3.1-1987, Selection, Qualification and Training of Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants, section 4.7.

Conforms Conforms Qualification requirements ¹o,".~NSARB members

'only:::,as are-addressed by this standard.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

UNKS OF FUNCTIONALRKPORTWG UNE5 OF SVPKRVIQCNANDADISIASTRATIOM CHAIRMANOF THE BOARD. PRKSIDEHT. AMD CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFFCER BEN'IOR VICE PRESIDENT, EMERCY SERVICES SENIOR VICE PRESIDKNt CORPORATK SKRVICKS SENIOR VICE PRK5IDKNT.

ENERGY OPERAtIONS GROVP MANAGER INFORMATION SERVICES DEPARTMENT MANAGER IXSTRIBUTIVE BIFORMATIOM SYSTEMS SUPPORT COMMUNICATIONS MANAGER PRODUCTION SUPPORT SERVICES TECHNICAL BIFORMATION CENTER.

INFORMATION SERVICKS 5 DIVISION SYSTEMS DKPARTMENT MANAGER HUMAN RESOURCE SERVICES EMPLOYEE RELATIONS DEPARTMENT MANAGER TECHNICAL SERVICES MANAGER LABORATORY and INSPECTION SERVICES FACIUTIE5.

PROJKCl'ANAGEMENT

SERVICES, RE<MGINEKRINC.

ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICESAMD CORPORATE SAFETY ENVIRONMENTAL

SCIENCE, LABORATORY CHEMISTRY SERVICES.

MATERIAL5 ENGINEERINC, MDE. ISI d MHE INSPECTION SERVICES AND ELECTRIC LABORATORY SERVICE5 DEPARTMENT MANAGER STRATEGIC SUPPLY MAMACEMENt DKPARTMFNT MANAGER PHYSICAL SKRVICES CROUP MANAGER SUPPOR't SERVICES CROUP MANAGER ENERGY DEUVERY DEPARTMENT MANAGER.

FACIUTY DESIGN RELAY ENGINEERINC.

SVBSTAtlOH DESIGN DKPARTMENT MANAGER OVERHEAD CONSTRUC'tlON ANO MAINTENANCE RELAY TESTING SERVICES VICE PRESIDENT NVCLEAR OPERATIONS GROVP NUCLEAR ASSURANCE, CUAUTY ASSURANCE, PROCESS IMPROVEMENt, PUBUC SAFElY d ACCEPTANCK

SUPPORT, OPE RATING EXPERIENCE, d NUCLEAR EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS ENGINEKRIMGd COMPUTER

SUPPORt, CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT ANO tECHNICAL PROCESSES, NUCLEAR SAFElYAMD

UCKNSING, ELECTRICAI MECHANICAI d STRUCTURAL EMGINEERINC DEPARTMENT DKPARTMEMT MANAGER MANAGER NUCLEAR NVCLEAR A55ESSMENT ENGIMEERINC SERVICES PLANT MANAGER CINNA STATION SUPERINTENDENT GIMNA PRODUCTION OPERATIONS, CHEMISTRYIRAD PROTECTIOIL SYSTEMS ENGINEERING.

SCHEDUUNG ANO PERFORMANCE AND REUABIUTY MANAGER MATERIALS AMD PROCUREMKNl'UPERINTENDENT CINMA MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PLANNIMGISYSTEMS, MAIMTENANCKRULE

PROJECT, ISC ANDELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE,AND MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE SVPERVISOR NUCLEAR SECURITY SKCVRITY SKRVICES SAFETY COORDINATOR NSARB I

PORC Cc 8

0 A

hD MATERIAL PROCUREMENT BCONTROL AND ELECTRIC d GAS METER OPERATIONS GENERAL MAINTENANCE FIELDd SHOP FABRICATION

SERVICES, WELDINC

SERVICES, TRANSPORTATION ANDSURVETIMG SERVICES PRGIECT MANAGERSTEAM GENERATOR REPLACEMENT DEPARTMEH't MANAGER NUCLEAR TRAINING TRAIMIMG SERVICES SUPERVISOR BUDGET d COST

0

17.2 PERFORMANCE VERIFICATION 17.2.1 Methodology All personnel performing activities Kf::fi'at,:i:nm g~up':"::;it',:p:,';)involved in the operation and support of Ginna'S't'at'1on

're" d1rectly responsible for quality.

Employees are empowered to make decisions in their areas of responsibility and are held accountable for the quality of their own work.

Verification of work is performed by each organization to assure that quality objectives are achieved and established performance standards are met.

The Nuclear Operations B&d~~w PXegp and supporting organizations involved in Ginna quality related activities accomplish and verify their work using instructions and procedures.

For quality affecting activities within their area of responsibility, each organization develops,

reviews, approves, and implements such documents.

The activities covered include operation, maintenance,

repair, inservice inspection, refueling, procurement, modification, special processes, inspection and

testing, document control and records management, training of personnel, and audit and surveillance.

In addition, RGEE suppliers and contractors are required to have appropriate instructions and procedures as specified in procurement documents.

Persons preparing, reviewing, and approving instructions and procedures are responsible for assuring that they include appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria for determining that important activities have been satisfactorily accomplished.

In addition, they assure that these documents are

~

kept current.

17.2.2 Design Control Plant configuration changes, including temporary changes, are implemented utilizing design control measures at least commensurate with those applied to the original design.

Nuclear Engineering Services is the design authority for Ginna Station.

Other organizations are authorized to perform design activities as designated in the Nuclear Policy Manual and supported by approved procedures and instructions.

Design control measures are defined and implemented by trained and qualified personnel through approved procedures and instructions.

These procedures and instructions assure that:

~

Design inputs are appropriately specified on a timely basis and correctly translated into design documents.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22

-2S-December 19, 1995

%f'

~

Design interfaces are identified and controlled.

~

The design is suitable for its intended application.

~

Design adequacy is verified by personnel other than those who performed the design.

~

Design changes, including field changes, are governed by control measures.

~

Deviations and nongonformances are controlled.

~

Design records are identified, controlled, and retrievable.

Design inputs (such as design bases, performance requirements, regulatory requirements,

codes, and standards) and changes to design inputs are identified, documented, reviewed and approved, and controlled.

Design documents, including drawings and specifications, are prepared.

and technically reviewed by qualified personnel.

The technical reviewer ensures that the design document is in accordance with the design concept, incorporates appropriate design inputs, and conforms to approved procedures and instructions.

Design change packages are approved by appropriate management or supervision prior to release for implementation.

Design interfaces, both internal and external, are formally identified, and design activities are coordinated among the participating organizations to ensure that design inputs and outputs are properly developed,

reviewed, approved, and distributed.

Multi-discipline changes are reviewed to ensure integration of design outputs.

Design changes are reviewed to determine whether 1 "i'h Specifications or an unreviewed safety question, under the provisions of 10CFR50.59.

the Design data bases, documents, and procedures are revised to reflect changes installed in the plant.

Design records are identified,

indexed, and controlled to allow for retrievability of design basis information and to provide evidence of appropriate design controls.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

17.2.3 Design Verification Design verification is the process of reviewing, confirming, or substantiating the design to assure:

the acceptability of the design inputs adherence to the design process that the design inputs are reflected in the design outputs that design changes are implemented under controls commensurate with those applied to the initial design.

Procedures define acceptable verification methods and controls, design parameters subject to verification, acceptance

criteria, and verification documentation and 'records requirements.

A design change is verified prior to release of the change to perform its design function.

A design may be released for prefabrication or installation prior to completion of the design verification only if controls are established.

The scope of work that can be completed must be defined and controls implemented to ensure that design verification is completed prior to use of the change.

Verification methods include:

~

performance of design reviews

~

use of alternate calculations

~

performance of qualification tests.

If used, qualification tests shall verify the adequacy of the specific design or design feature under the most adverse design conditions, unless those conditions cannot be generated without initiating a plant transient.

- In those

cases, simulated or extrapolated conditions are used.

Design verification is performed by technically qualified individuals other than those who developed the design.

Design verification by the designer's immediate supervisor is allowable if other qualified individuals are not readily available.

The designer's supervisor documents independence from the design development when required to perform a verification.

The design organization determines the extent of verification

required, based upon safety significance, the degree of standardization, and the state-of-the-art of the change.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

I I

17.2.4 Procurement Control Purchased

material, equipment, and services are controlled using five major means:

planning procurement document requirements supplier selection control of supplier performance acceptance of items and services.

All procurement is conducted in accordance with procurement

.documents and governing procedures.

All reviews, inspections, surveillances, and audits are conducted by personnel who are competent to determine whether a supplier is.capable of providing acceptable quality products.

~Plannin Procurement planning by procuring organizations consists of determining the supplier of choice, methods to be used for acceptance of the item or service, and requirements for control of supplier performance.

Source inspection (surveillance),

certificate of conformance, receipt inspection, and pre-or post-installation testing are methods which are considered for item acceptance.

The extent of the acceptance methods and associated verification activities will vary depending upon the relative importance and complexity of the purchased item or service and the supplier's past performance.

Procurement Document Re uirements Procurement document control for the procurement of materials,

parts, components, and services is initiated by department staff personnel.

Procurement procedures require that organizations preparing procurement documents consider and include, as appropriate:

scope of work technical requirements Quality Assurance Program requirements right of access documentation requirements reporting requirements (nonconformance and 10CFR Part 21)

Changes or revisions to procurement documents are subject to the same review and approval requirements as the original documents.

Originating department review of procurement documents includes verification of applicable regulatory,

code, and design requirements and suitability for intended service.

j:n addition, a verification of proper inclusion of the quality standards, quality assurance program requirements, method of procurement, RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

p 5 4) 0

and the applicable acceptance criteria is performed.

For spare or replacement

parts, procurement documents are reviewed to determine similarity to, compatibility with, and acceptance criteria commensurate with the original design.

Su lier Selection Selection of a supplier is based on the evaluation of their capability to provide the items or services in accordance with procurement document requirements.

The evaluation, which is accomplished during procurement

planning, determines the necessity for the supplier selection to be made from the approved suppliers list.

For items and services procured'from suppliers required to have a quality assurance

program, supplier selection is made from the approved suppliers list or from those who are in the process of being added to the list.

Addition of a supplier to the approved suppliers list is based on satisfactory evaluation of the supplier's quality assurance program.

The evaluation guidelines for source selection considers the complexity of the item, method(s) of acceptance, and, for a replacement item, whether the source is to be restricted to the original supplier.

Items or services which meet industry standards and are typically utilized in applications other than nuclear may be purchased from suppliers not listed on the approved suppliers list, provided that item acceptance through receipt inspection can be based on acceptance of standard commercial quality.

This is supplemented, as necessary, with source surveillance, pre-or post-installation

tests, receipt tests, commercial supplier surveys, supplier test

reports, or commercial supplier certificates.

For commercial grade items and services, an evaluation of intended use is completed to determine critical characteristics which must be verified prior to acceptance for use.

Control of Su lier Performance Control of supplier performance includes monitoring and evaluation by requesting submittal of supplier documents for review and by identifying necessary changes for which nonconformances are to be reported.

Control is also exercised through surveillance of supplier activities as necessary.

Acce tance of Items and Services The verification methods for the acceptance of items and services are specified during procurement planning and purchase requisition preparation.

Receipt inspection is a verification method common for the acceptance of aRitems.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

, \\

"I 1

Procurement Verification The supplier's overall quality assurance-organization and program is evaluated in accordance with applicable parts of 10CFR50, Appendix B; codes and standards; and ROTE requirements.

Suppliers on the approved suppliers list are reviewed annually for performance and program changes, and audited at least every three years.

The procuring department is responsible for determining and documenting the degree of supplier surveillance (including review, inspection, or audit) required during design, fabrication, inspection,

testing, and shipping.

The objectives of supplier surveillance are to provide a sampling review of the supplier's quality assurance program implementation and to verify product conformance with respect to the purchase order requirements.

The extent of supplier surveillance will be consistent with the safety significance, complexity, quantity, and frequency of procurement of the item or service.

As necessary, this may require verification of the activities of suppliers below the first tier.

The verification responsibilities for evaluation and surveillance of supplier activities are assigned to Quality Assurance.

Department supervision is responsible for receipt and control of items pending their acceptance.'eceipt inspection is performed for items and associated services for maintenance, repair, modification, and refueling. Inspections are performed to verify acceptability.

To be acceptable, the items and services must conform to procurement documents, have satisfied required inspection and test requirements, and have documentary evidence of conformance available at the plant prior to ApC@pt'8AC8.';'(fan'Xj use.

Personnel performing receipt *inspect'ion and test activities are trained and qualified.

17.2. 6 Identification and Control of Items The identification and control of materials,

parts, and components (including consumable materials and items with limited shelf life) is accomplished in accordance with written requirements and applies in any stage of fabrication,

storage, or installation.

Identification and control requirements are established either by an existing procedure or by requirement documents prepared during the planning stages of a project.

The identification and control requirements cover:

~

Traceability to associated documents (such as drawings, specifications, purchase

orders, manufacturing test data and inspection documents, and physical and chemical mill test reports).

RGGE QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

I Cl

~

Specification of the degree of identification to'reclude a

degradation of the item's functional capability or quality.

~

Proper identification of materials,

parts, and components prior to release for manufacturing, shipping, construction, and installation.

Nuclear Engineering Services is responsible for assuring that, drawings and specifications contain appropriate requirements for the identification and control of materials,

parts, or components.

Suppliers are required to assure that all required documentation for an item is properly identified and related to the item.

17.2.7 Handling, Storage, and Shipping The Nuclear Operations %m~e

'6'i@up and support organizations are responsible for developing and 1mplementing procedures for the handling,

storage, shipping, preservation, and cleaning of quality related material and equipment.

These procedures provide guidelines to protect items from damage,

loss, and deterioration.

Also, items are marked or labeled during packaging,

shipping, handling, and storage to identify and maintain the items'ntegrity and to indicate need for special controls.

Under normal circumstances, manufacturer's specific written instructions and recommendations and purchase specification requirements are invoked for cleanliness, preservation, special

handling, and environmental requirements for storage.

In the absence of, or in addition to, specific manufacturer requirements, management may invoke requirements in accordance with department procedures.

Examples of such requirements include desiccants, shelf life, endcaps, and special packaging requirements Procurement documents and engineering specifications define requirements for the handling,

shipping, storage,

cleaning, and preservation of new fuel and fuel assemblies, materials, and equipment.

When necessary to maintain acceptable

quality, special protective measures (such as containers, shock absorbers, etc.)

are specified and provided.

Procedures are established for the routine maintenance and inspection of lifting and handling equipment and for the handling of heavy loads and safe load paths.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

17.2.8 Test Control

~

~

The Ginna Station test program includes the surveillance test program required by Technical Specifications, inservice pump and valve testing, and testing following modification and maintenance.

The test program requires the identification, control, and documentation of all tests and the preparation of written procedures required for satisfactory accomplishment of the testing.

Written procedures and checklists for the testing program include:

instructions and prerequisites to perform the

test, use of proper test equipment, inspection hold points, and acceptance criteria.

Testing is utilized as follows:

~

To determine continued operability of installed structures,

systems, and components consistent with the surveillance requirements of Technical Specifications and the inservice pump and valve program.

~

To demonstrate the ability and to support the qualification of safety related equipment to function in harsh environmental conditions.

~

To demonstrate the acceptability of replacement and purchased items.

~

To support trouble shooting and investigation of degraded conditions.

~

To.demonstrate the acceptability of items involved.in maintenance,

repair, and modifications.'ontractors who perform testing are required to do so in accordance with RGEE's procurement document requirements.

All test results are required to be documented,

reviewed, and approved by those responsible for performing the test.

Unacceptable test results and test anomalies are evaluated in accordance with established procedures to determine the cause of the problem and the need for retest or for increasing test frequency.

The design organization is responsible for assuring that required tests for maj~modifications are included in RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

"C

17.2.9 Measuring and Test Equipment Control Programs are established which assure that test instruments,

tools, gauges, shop and reference standards, and other measuring and testing devices used in activities affecting quality are properly controlled and calibrated.

Elements of control include calibration procedures, establishment of calibration frequencies, and maintenance requirements for measuring and test equipment.

Calibration procedures include step-by-step calibration methods and requirements for instrument accuracy.

Calibration frequency is based on required accuracy, degree of usage, stability characteristics, manuf acturer' recommendations, experience, and other conditions affecting measurement capability.

The program for control of measuring and test equipment includes:

~

Assuring timely calibration of equipment.

~

Providing unique identification of the next calibration date on the equipment calibration tags or stickers and traceability to calibration test data.

~

Providing traceability of shop standards to nationally recognized standards and periodic revalidation of shop standards.

Where national standards do not exist, procedures contain instructions to document the basis for calibration.

Except where standards with the same accuracy as the instruments being calibrated are shown to be adequate for the requirements, calibration standards are to have a

greater accuracy than the standards being calibrated.

~

Assuring that calibrating equipment is calibrated against standards that have an accuracy of at least four times the required accuracy of the equipment being calibrated or, if not possible, have an accuracy that ensures the equipment being calibrated will be within the required tolerance.

~

Providing for records to be maintained which indicate the complete status of all items under the calibration system including the maintenance, calibration results, abnormalities, and last and future calibration dates.

~

Controlling the purchase requirements of new equipment to be entered into the calibration and control system including requirements for accuracy, stability, and repeatability under normal use conditions.

In the event a measuring instrument (i.e.,

shop or field standard) is found out of calibration, an investigation is conducted to determine the validity of previous measurements.

RGGH QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

Responsibilities and requirements for the selection and use of calibrated measuring and test equipment are described in the Nuclear Policy Manual and related procedures.

Installed plant instrumentation is subject to calibration and control requirements of Technical Specifications and is not subject to calibration and control requirements for measuring and test equipment.

The Nuclear Policy Manual amplifies responsibilities and requirements for installed plant instruments.

17.2.10 Inspection,

Test, and Operating Status Equipment or systems not ready for normal service are clearly identified by use of tags, control logs, and other suitable means to indicate the status of the items being isolated in order to prevent their inadvertent use.

Ginna Station is responsible for indicating the status of operating equipment or systems to be removed from service for maintenance, repair, or modification in accordance with the approved Electric System Operating Rules.

System status is indicated through the use of hold tags, block

tags, and corresponding control logs.

Equipment or system inspection and test status are indicated by use of test tags,

labels, or status sheets.

Written procedures control the use of hold tags, test tags, and labels.

Personnel who have station holding authority, as designated by the Plant Manager, are responsible for directing the status change of equipment and systems in accordance with the approved station holding procedures.

Job control documents are used to indicate status of the work, inspections or tests, and corresponding acceptance or rejection criteria.

These job control documents preclude the inadvertent bypassing of inspections and tests.

They are maintained at a

designated control location to indicate the status and the completion of required inspections and tests.

Measures are established to monitor the completion status of inservice inspection.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

f

!fj' e

li

17.2.11 Special Process Control Written procedures are established to control special processes, such as welding, brazing, heat treating, and nondestructive examination to assure compliance with applicable

codes, standards, and design specifications.

Qualification of personnel and special process procedures comply with the requirements of applicable codes and standards, When special process qualification requirements are not included in existing codes and standards, they are described in procedures which give details of the special process, personnel qualification requirements, equipment necessary, and special process qualification requirements.

The Nuclear Policy Manual describes the criteria that define which processes are special.

These criteria include processes which are highly dependent on the skill of the worker or the control of the process or both, and in which the desired quality cannot be readily determined by inspection or test.

Procuring organizations are responsible for requiring suppliers, in procurement documents, to control special processes in accordance with the above requirements.

Special process procedures submitted by suppliers and contractors are reviewed for adequacy by RGEE.

Nuclear Assurance and the Ginna Station Maintenance organization are responsible for assuring that personnel performing special processes under their cognizance are qualified and are using qualified procedures.

,,',ll::,::,::::,i of special process personnel and procedures.

Qualification of personnel and procedures is documented.

17.2.12 Inspection Procedures prepared for the control of activities include inspection requirements and hold points'as required by drawings, instructions, requirement documents, specifications,

codes, standards, or regulatory requirements.

For clarification, and to distinguish from preventive maintenance inspections, the following controls are associated with the quality assurance function inspections and referred to as verification inspections.

Verification inspection planning is used to determine the optimum method for performing hold point or final inspections.

Planning considerations include:

hold point execution by witness or inspection, the need for calibrated measuring tools and equipment, use of sample plans for multiple quantities, and the need for other verification options (e.g., non-destructive examination).

RGB QAPSO, Revision 22 1 December 19, 1995

J-4+

Hold points are used as necessary to ensure that inspections are accomplished at the correct points in the sequence of work activities.

Verification inspection procedures include:

identification of quality characteristics to be inspected a description of the method of inspection to be used acceptance and rejection criteria requirements for recording the inspection results the need to provide evidence of inspection activity completion.

Verification inspections are performed by inspection personnel who are appropriately qualified and independent.

They are performed in accordance with approved procedures, instructions, or plans to support preplanned hold points, final acceptance verification, or receipt acceptance activities.

Inspection results are required to be documented.

When items are reworked, the rework is reinspected to the original or equivalent requirements.

Outside contractors are required by procurement documents to have and to follow similar procedures and to use independent inspectors.

17.2.13 Corrective Action Conditions adverse to quality are those conditions which reduce confidence that a structure,

system, or component at Ginna Station will perform satisfactorily in service.

Significant conditions adverse to quality are those conditions which, if uncorrected, could affect the health and safety of the public, seriously affect the ability to operate the plant in a safe manner, represent a serious breakdown in activity controls, or will require a major effort to restore capability to perform specified functions.

Conditions adverse to quality are promptly identified, reported to supervision, corrected, and evaluated to determine if a significant condition adverse to quality exists.

When a significant condition adverse to quality is identified, an evaluation of the effect of continuing the activity is performed.

If continuing the activity would obscure or preclude identification and correction of the deficiency, or if continuing the activity would increase the extent of the deficiency or lead to an unsafe condition, stop work action is taken.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

Il 4

/

Nuclear Assessment has authority to stop work on all activities at or in support of Ginna Station, with the exception of operating deficiencies.

For operating deficiencies, Nuclear Assessment may recommend stop work action to station management.

For significant conditions adverse to quality, RGEE management reviews initiated reports to determine

causes, develops corrective action plans to resolve the condition, and takes action to preclude recurrence.

Procedures are established for the control, evaluation, and disposition of deficient material, parts, and components to prevent their inadvertent test, installation, or use.

Items which do not conform to the drawing or specification requirements are identified, controlled, and reported.

Nonconformances identified at a supplier's facility and reported to RG&E, for which the supplier has recommended a disposition of use-as-is or repair, are normally reviewed and the disposition approved by the procuring organization.

Items are repaired and reworked in accordance with approved procedures and drawings.

The repair or rework must be verified as acceptable by an inspection of the affected'tem or process which is at least equal to the original inspection method.

Items which are accepted "use-as-is" are fully documented with the drawing or specification requirement and technical justification for acceptance, and are screened under the requirements of 10CFR50.59.

Nonconformance status information is compiled and analyzed for adverse trends and provided to management.

17.2.14 Document Control Document control requirements contained in the Nuclear Policy Manual control the issuance of procedures, instructions,

drawings, and specifications.

Ginna Station and Records Management are responsible for the control of all documents d

.::,::If,,:,,ii,,::::::.':,::,;,,ll.:

organization'as procedures'for controlling documents in accordance with the requirements of the Nuclear Policy Manual.

Each organization responsible for an activity is also responsible for providing the necessary review and approval of instructions, procedures, or drawings.

Such review is to assure that documents are adequate, include appropriate qualitative and quantitative requirements, and include quality assurance requirements.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 199S

It' It H,t tt I I

9

Changes to procedures specified in the Administrative Controls Section of the Technical Specifications receive a technical review in accordance with ANSI/ANS 3.2-1988, Section 4.2.

Changes are also reviewed relative to their safety significance by an independent reviewer designated by the PORC Chairman or Plant Manager and subsequently approved by the Plant Manager or designee.

Changes that may affect nuclear safety are referred to and subsequently reviewed by PORC.

The qualifications of the designated reviewer are equivalent to those of regular PORC members and meet ANSI Standard N18.1-1971, Section 4.3.1 or 4.4 as applicable.

Temporary changes to procedures in addition to the review pn8 Kppiavalj~'process described

above, are 53:::8'e.:':~approved by the Shift Super'visor Requirements for the pre-approval review of Ginna Station procedures and the temporary change process are consistent with the guidelines of ANSI N18.7-

1972, Sections 5.4 and 5.5.

The Nuclear Policy Manual requires that documents be controlled as appropriate, considering the type of document, safety significance, and intended use.

Types of documents which are controlled include Technical Specifications, UFSAR, Nuclear Directives, procedures,

drawings, and specifications.

Suppliers of materials, equipment, and services having an I

approved quality assurance program are required in procurement documents to provide for control of documents.

The Nuclear Policy Manual requires that each organization provide in its procedures for measures to:

Assure that documents are available when required.

Properly review and approve documents such as procedures and instructions.

Provide the same reviews and approvals for changes to documents as was required of the original document.

Require that organizations which review and approve documents have access to pertinent information and adequate knowledge of the original document intent.

Assure that approved changes are promptly transmitted for incorporation into documents.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

~

Assure that obsolete or superseded documents are eliminated from the system and not used.

17.2.15 Records The Nuclear Policy Manual defines responsibility and establishes the basic requirements for quality assurance record retention and maintenance.

Organizations performing quality affecting activities are responsible for forwarding the records they keeah&~.

Each organization generating records is responsible for preparation, review, approval, and implementation of specific quality assurance record procedures for their area of responsibility.

Records to be controlled are delineated in ANSI N45.2.9-1974.

Sufficient records of items and activities are generated and maintained to document completed work.

Items and activities requiring records include:

s design engineering procurement manufacturing construction inspection and test (e.g.,

manufacturer's proof and receipt) installation operations maintenance modification audits Requirements and responsibilities for preparation, inspection, identification, indexing, review, storage, retrieval, maintenance, safekeeping, retention, and disposition of quality assurance records are in accordance with applicable records procedures,

codes, standards, and procurement documents.

Requirements for records storage facilities are defined in the Nuclear Policy Manual.

The requirements and responsibilities for record accessibility and transmittal are described in the Nuclear Policy Manual.

Removal of records from storage is documented and accountability is maintained by the responsible record control organization.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

17.3 ASSESSMENT

17.3.1 Methodology A comprehensive program of planned and periodic self and independent assessments is established to keep management apprised of the overall performance of Ginna Station.

Managers and supervisors assess the activities and results within their organizations'reas of responsibility to assure that they meet quality requirements and performance standards.

Through observation and routine monitoring, they detect adverse operational

events, declining performance

trends, and precursors of potential problems.

They take action to correct these problems as well as those identified by external sources.

Independent assessment of the effectiveness of quality program implementation and overall Ginna Station performance is the primary role of the QA organization.

Independent assessments are conducted through internal audits and QA surveillances on behalf of the NSARB the Vice President, Nuclear Operations 9WOgp; and as requested by line management.

This is accomplished'""by monitoring performance, reporting findings to line management in a timely manner, and verifying satisfactory resolution of problems.

Operational Assessment ia

t'e evaluateeioo'::..":..'of', anomalous performance and potential problem precursors from "external sources.

The NSARB conducts independent assessment through periodic review of plant activities and by directing biennial audits and evaluating their results.

The responsibilities of the NSARB are discussed in sections 17.1.2 and 17.1.3.

Independent assessment activities are performed in accordance with instructions and procedures by organizations independent of the areas being assessed.

Organizations performing independent assessment are technically and performance oriented, with their primary focus on the quality of the end product and secondary focus on processes.

17.3.2 Assessment Self-assessment Self-assessment is established in the Nuclear Policy Manual as the responsibility of all organizations with involvement in the operation and support of Ginna Station.

Individuals and work groups are accountable for achieving acceptable quality by adhering to procedures and verifying that their work meets quality requirements and performance standards.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

RII L

l~

Inde endent Assessment A program of planned and periodic independent assessments is established and implemented to confirm that activities affecting quality comply with the Quality Assurance Program and that the program has been implemented effectively.

Assessments provide comprehensive independent evaluation of activities, results, and procedures.

The independent assessment program includes internal audits, external audits, and QA surveillances.

These assessments are both performance-based and compliance-based, with the focus on activities and functions which often cut across organizational lines.

Strengths and weaknesses of an organization's performance are determined in these assessments, allowing QA to identify areas of weaknesses for more frequent scrutiny.

In areas of

strength, assessment efforts can be reduced, freeing resources for examination of activities that could benefit most from independent assessment.

Internal audits of selected aspects of quality affecting activities are performed at a frequency commensurate with safety significance and management concerns.

The audits are regularly scheduled on a formal, preplanned audit schedule in a manner which assures that audits of safety related activities are completed once every twenty-four (24) months.

The audit schedule is dynamic, reviewed and revised periodically to assure appropriate coverage of current and planned activities.

Table 17.3.2-1 is a list of audits.

Supplementing this list are audits of the Nuclear Emergency

Response

Plan to satisfy the requirements of 10CFR50.54 (t), and Station Security Plan to satisfy the requirements of 10CFR50.54 (p) (3), 73.56 (g) (1) and (g)(2) and 10CFR73.55 (g)(4).

Audit frequency and further discussion of these audits. are described in their respective plans.

QA surveillances augment scheduled audits

and, by their nature, require less planning and are more responsive to management requests.

They are also better suited to event driven activities, such as drills, corrective maintenance, and surveillance tests.

Additional audits and QA surveillances are conducted as necessitated by situations or evaluations including:

~

special conditions which preclude deferral

~

management concerns resulting from previous assessment results and corrective action RGGE QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

~

1 h

li

~

j I

II

~

information from external sources (e.g.,

generic experience of the nuclear industry, ASME, peer organizations, and regulatory bodies).

Each audit requires the development of an audit plan to provide information about the audit, such as characteristics and activities to be assessed, acceptance

criteria, names of those who will perform the audit, scheduling arrangements, and the method of reporting findings and recommendations.

Audit planning and performance utilize performance-based techniques that facilitate achievement of assessment objectives.

Audit and QA surveillance assessments are performed in accordance with written procedures or checklists by personnel who do not have direct responsibility in the areas being assessed.

Independent assessments may be conducted by Quality Assurance engineers or other qualified personnel, such as technical specialists from other company departments, outside consultants, and individuals from other utilities.

Assessment results are documented and reported to the assessor's management, the supervisor and division head having responsibility in the area

assessed, and, for audits, to the Nuclear Safety Audit and Review Board.

Within a specified time

period, the person having supervisory responsibility in the area assessed is required to review the results, take necessary action to correct the deficiencies identified by the report, and document and report the corrective action.

External audits of major contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers are conducted during the early stages of design and procurement to evaluate their quality assurance program for compliance with all procurement document requirements.

Audits are conducted, as necessary, to assure that major contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers are auditing their suppliers'uality assurance programs in accordance with procurement documents.

During the project or procurement

process, additional audits are performed, as required, to assure all quality assurance program requirements are properly implemented in accordance with procurement documents.

Nuclear Assessment performs regular analyses of assessment results to evaluate quality and performance trends.

Results of these

analyses, including strengths and weaknesses, are provided to management for their regular review.

Management concerns due to assessment results may necessitate a follow-up assessment, either by audit or by QA surveillance.

The Nuclear Policy Manual provides guidelines for conducting unscheduled audits including the need for reaudits.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

gC r>

0 erational Assessment The Operatigg~gWj@'gjpeg'0 section receives and evaluates informat'1on fiom other utilities, vendors,

INPO, and NRC.;.'.:,:(They ensure that reLevant and timeiy recommended actions are provided to management that will eliminate precursors of similar problems at Ginna.

This is accomplished through:

coordinating feedback program to measure and improve the internalization of lessons learned from Operating Experience reviewing INPO SOERs and SERs reviewing vendor 10CFR Part 21 report of defects E

reviewing NRC information notices.

RG&H QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

'pJ

'l

Table 17.3.2-1 Audit List Audit To ic Areas (24 months) a.

The conformance of facility operation to all provisions contained within the Technical Specifications and applicable license conditions.

b.

Performance,

training, and qualifications of the operating and technical staff.

c.

The results of all actions taken to correct deficiencies occurring in facility equipment, structures,

.systems, or methods of operation that affect nuclear safety.

d.

The performance of all activities required by the Quality Assurance Program to meet the criteria of 10CFR50, Appendix B.

e.

Facility Fire Protection Program and implementing procedures.

Inspection and audit of the fire protection and loss prevention program performed by non-licensee personnel.

personnel may be representatives of ANI, an insurance brokerage firm, or other qualified individuals.

The g.

The radiological environmental monitoring program and the results thereof.

h.

The Offsite Dose Calculation Manual and implementing procedures.

The Process Control Program and implementing procedures.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

Enclosure 1

ROCHESTER GAS AND ELECTRIC CORPORATION R.E.

GINNA NUCLEAR POWER PLANT Quality Assurance Program for Station Operation Revision 22 DOCKET NO. 50-244 December 19, 1995

QUALITYASSURANCE PROGRAM FOR STATION OPERATION TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title Pacae 17.1 MANAGEMENT 17.1.1 17.1.2 17.1.3 17.1.4 17.1

~ 5 17.1.6 17.1.7 Methodology Organization Responsibility Authority Personnel Training and Qualification Corrective Action Regulatory Commitments 1

2 9

10 10 11 11 17.2 PERFORMANCE VERIFICATION 17.2.1 17 '.2 17.2.3 17.2.4 17 '.5 17.2.6 17.2.7 17.2.8 17.2.9 17.2.10 17.2.11 17.2.12 17.2.13 17.2.14 17.2.15 Methodology Design Control Design Verification Procurement Control Procurement Verification Identification and Control of Items

Handling, Storage, and Shipping Test Control Measuring and Test Equipment Control Inspection,

Test, and Operating Status Special Process Control Inspection Corrective Action Document Control Records 24 24 26 27 29 29 30 31 32 33 34 34 35 36 38

17.3 ASSESSMENT

17.3.1 17.3.2 Methodology Assessment 39 39

LIST OF TABLES Table Number Title Pacae 17.1.1-1 17.1.1-2 1 7

~ 1

~ 7 1

17.3.2-1 Quality Assurance Policy Statement Supplementary Glossary Conformance of Ginna Station Program to Quality Assurance Standards, Requirements, and Guides Audit List 13 LIST OF FIGURES Fi ure Number 1 7

~ 1 \\ 2 1

Title Organization Chart Pacae 23

I

QUALITYASSURANCE PROGRAM FOR STATION OPERATION

17. 1 MANAGEMENT 17.1.1 Methodology The Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation quality assurance policy is established by the Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer.

This policy is set forth in the Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation Ginna Station Corporate Statement of Quality Assurance

Policy, shown in Table 17.1.1-1, and is binding on all organizations and individuals performing Ginna Station quality affecting activities.

The policy is implemented under the overall direction of the Vice President, Nuclear Operations Group through the Department

Manager, Nuclear Assessment; the Plant Manager, Ginna Station; Group Manager, Support Services; and heads of other supporting departments.

The Quality Assurance Program has been developed by the Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation to assure safe and reliable operation of the R.

E. Ginna Nuclear Power Plant.

The program covers all existing Seismic Category I and Class 1E structures,

systems, and components (SSCs) including their foundations and supports.

It applies to all activities affecting the safety related functions of these structures,

systems, and components that prevent or mitigate the consequences of postulated accidents that could cause undue risk to the health and safety of the public.

These activities include designing, operating, maintaining, repairing, fabricating,

handling, shipping, storing, procuring, refueling, modifying, cleaning, erecting, installing, testing, inspecting, and inservice inspection.

Quality affecting activities are controlled to an extent consistent with their safety significance.

In addition, the Quality Assurance Program applies to the activities associated with the packaging of licensed radioactive materials to be shipped in accordance with 10CFR Part 71, excluding design and fabrication of shipping casks.

A classification process is established to identify SSCs that are safety related (SR), safety significant (SS), or have no safety impact (NNS)

Criteria are based on information contained in the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR), licensing commitments, guidelines contained in NRC regulatory guides, and functional guidance derived from ANSI/ANS 51.1-1983.

For changes to Ginna Station, safety classification and corresponding QA program applicability are determined using approved procedures.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

The Nuclear Policy Manual provides a method of applying a graded QA Program to systems, components,

items, and services which are not classified as safety related (SR), but are considered necessary for reliable plant operation.

Special terms used in this document which are not found in ANSI N45.2.10 "Quality Assurance Terms and Definitions" are defined in Table 17.1.1-2, Supplementary Glossary.

17.1.2 Organization The major organizations participating in the Quality Assurance Program fall within the Energy Operations unit, under the leadership of the Senior Vice President, Energy Operations.

They are:

~

Nuclear 0 erations

- including Ginna Station, Nuclear Engineering Services, Nuclear Assessment, Nuclear Division

Training, and the Plant Operations Review Committee

~

Nuclear Safet Audit and Review Board NSARB o

Su ort Services functional groups including purchasing, materials engineering, inspection services, physical

services, and laboratory services

~

Ener Deliver Additionally, under the Energy Services

Group, Information Services supports the Ginna QA Program.

Figure 17.1.2-l is an organization chart showing these organizations and their relationship to the corporate organization.

Chapter 13 of the UFSAR augments the Figure with organization charts for the various departments.

Positions responsible for the principal elements of the quality assurance program are:

~

Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer

~

Senior Vice President, Energy Operations RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

Vice President, Nuclear Operations Group Plant Manager, Ginna Station Department

Manager, Nuclear Engineering Services Department

Manager, Nuclear Assessment

Manager, Quality Assurance

Manager, Nuclear Assurance Director, Operating Experience Department

Manager, Nuclear Training Group Manager, Support Services Group Manager, Energy Delivery Group Manager, Information Services SENIOR MANAGEMENT Chairman of the Board President and Chief Executive Officer The Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer of the Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation directed the establishment of the Quality Assurance Program and issued the governing policy statement.

He established the Nuclear Safety Audit and Review Board to review and audit plant operations.

The Chairman of the NSARB is responsible to the Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer on all activities of the NSARB.

Senior Vice President Ener 0 erations The Senior Vice President, Energy Operations reports to the Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer and oversees all organizations involved in the operation and support of Ginna Station, including the Quality Assurance Program.

He is also responsible for those items delineated in the Administrative Controls section of the Technical Specifications.

NUCLEAR OPERATIONS Vice President Nuclear 0 erations Grou The Vice President, Nuclear Operations Group is responsible to the Senior Vice President, Customer Operations and has corporate responsibility for operation of Ginna Station in accordance with applicable regulatory requirements.

In addition, he has overall responsibility and authority for directing the Quality Assurance Program and is responsible for the approval of the Nuclear Policy Manual.

He is responsible for establishing the policies and requirements necessary to assure safe and reliable operation of Ginna Station and for oversight of Ginna Station and those support activities associated with Nuclear Engineering Services, Nuclear Assessment, Nuclear Training, and Steam Generator Replacement.

RGEE QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

Plant Mana er Ginna Station The Plant Manager, Ginna Station is responsible to the Vice President, Nuclear Operations Group for the overall on-site safe operation of Ginna Station.

He is responsible for:

the performance of all Ginna Station quality affecting activities in accordance with the requirements of the Quality Assurance Program providing qualified personnel to perform quality affecting activities in accordance with approved drawings, specifications, and procedures implementation of those items delineated in the Administrative Controls Section of Technical Specifications timely referral of appropriate matters to management and the NSARB

~

assuring that significant conditions adverse to quality are identified and corrected.

The Plant Manager, Ginna Station assigns responsibility to Superintendents and designated staff members for the control of all activities involving operation, maintenance,

repair, refueling, implementation of modifications, fire protection, radiation protection, chemistry, procurement and plant security.

Responsibility is delegated for the implementation of Quality Assurance Program requirements at the plant for testing, procurement, storage of material and equipment, operation and test status control, calibration and control of measuring and test equipment, and maintenance of material handling equipment.

De artment Mana er Nuclear En ineerin Services The Department

Manager, Nuclear Engineering Services is responsible to the Vice President, Nuclear Operations Group for:

~

design of modifications to the facility in accordance with applicable design bases, regulatory requirements,

codes, and standards

~

implementation of the licensing/compliance program

~

maintenance of Ginna Station design and licensing basis

~

nuclear fuel management

~

technical support for Ginna corrective action

~

technical support for Ginna operations RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 199S

De artment Mana er Nuclear Assessment The Department

Manager, Nuclear Assessment is responsible to the Vice President, Nuclear Operations Group for establishing the overall Quality Assurance Program.,

He is responsible for assuring that all planned and systematic actions necessary to provide adequate confidence that.Ginna Station will operate safely and reliably are established and followed.

He provides management with objective information concerning quality, independent of the individual or group directly responsible for performing the specific activity.

He has the authority and organizational freedom to assure all necessary quality activities are performed.

He is responsible for directing the activities of Quality Assurance, Nuclear Assurancej,'nd Operational Assessment.

In addition, he is responsible for Nuclear Emergency Preparedness.

Mana er ualit Assurance The Manager, Quality Assurance reports to the Department

Manager, Nuclear Assessment.

He and the Quality Assurance staff are responsible for interpreting corporate quality assurance policy and for assuring its implementation.

This includes assuring that the program continues to satisfy the requirements of 10CFR50, Appendix B.

He is responsible for establishing and implementing an independent assessment program that encompasses all organizations and functions related to the safe operation of Ginna including the qualified suppliers of safety related materials and services.

Mana er Nuclear Assurance The Manager, Nuclear Assurance reports to the Department

Manager, Nuclear Assessment and is responsible for assuring that station activities affecting quality are prescribed and carried out in accordance with approved drawings, specifications, and procedures.

He is also responsible for the control and maintenance of documents and records.

Nuclear Assurance is responsible for assuring performance of verification inspection and receipt inspection activities and assuring that inspection requirements are included in approved procedures, procurement documents, and work packages.

In addition, Nuclear Assurance provides technical support for trending and analysis of corrective action program data.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

Director 0 eratin Ex erience The Director, Operating Experience reports to the Department Manager

- Nuclear Assessment and has responsibility for supporting root cause investigations and corrective action for significant conditions adverse to quality.

He is responsible for evaluating and disseminating industry experience information, and for ensuring that relevant and timely recommended actions are provided to management that will eliminate precursors of similar problems at Ginna Station.

De artment Mana er Nuclear Trainin The Department

Manager, Nuclear Training is responsible to the Vice President, Nuclear Operations Group for maintaining and implementing a National Academy for Nuclear Training accredited training program and, in conjunction with Support Services, for providing trained and qualified riggers and crane operators to support nuclear related activities.

SUPPORT SERVICES Grou Mana er Su ort Services The Group Manager, Support Services is responsible to the Senior Vice President, Energy Operations for directing certain activities in support of Ginna Station.

These activities include:

procurement of materials,

services, and components from qualified suppliers in accordance with applicable commercial, technical, and quality requirements special processes inservice inspection maintenance of lifting and handling equipment training and qualification of welders and NDE personnel

and, in conjunction with Nuclear Training, training and qualification of riggers and crane operators provision of personnel support for Ginna Station maintenance activities chemistry services laboratory testing and calibration of electrical M&TE reference standards.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

INFORMATION SERVICES Grou Mana er Information Services The Group Manager, Information Services is responsible for calibrating installed electric meters used at Ginna Station.

ENERGY DELIVERY Grou Mana er Ener Deliver The Group Manager, Energy Delivery is responsible for providing a staff to perform relay engineering services and conduct routine maintenance and testing of Ginna Station meters and relays.

He is responsible for design, modification, and construction activities at Station 13A and for supporting Nuclear Engineering Services design and construction activities at Ginna.

REVIEW AND AUDIT ORGANIZATIONS Three separate organizational units are established for the purpose of review and audit of plant operations and safety-related matters.

They are:

Plant 0 erations Review Committee PORC

, the on-site operations review group responsible for reviewing those activities that affect nuclear safety.

ualit Assurance, the group responsible for the audit of safety related activities associated with plant operations.

Nuclear Safet Audit and Review Board NSARB

, the independent audit and review group responsible for the periodic review of the activities of the Plant Operations Review Committee, for directing audits and evaluating their

results, and for the management evaluation of the status and adequacy of the Quality Assurance Program.

PORC Review activities of the PORC provide, as part of the normal duties of plant supervisory personnel, timely and continuing monitoring of operating activities to assist the Plant Manager in keeping abreast of general plant conditions and to verify that the day-to-day operating activities are conducted safely and in accordance with applicable administrative controls.

PORC also reviews facility operations to detect potential safety hazards.

These continuing monitoring activities are considered to be an integral part of the routine supervisory function and are important to the safety of plant operation.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

The on-site operating organization (PORC) performs reviews, periodically and as situations

demand, to evaluate plant operations and to plan future activities.

The important elements of the reviews are documented.

The PORC scope of review, organization,

quorum, and records meet the requirements of ANSI/ANS-3.2-1988, Section 4.3.

PORC is comprised of personnel who collectively have the experience and competence in the following areas:

4 4

Nuclear Operations Mechanical Maintenance Electrical Maintenance Plant Engineering Reactor Engineering Radiation Safety Chemistry Quality Assurance/Quality Control The PORC chairman meets the qualifications of ANSI Standard N18.1-1971, Section 4.2.2, and holds, or has held, a Senior Reactor Operating License or SRO certification.

PORC members meet the qualifications of section 4.3.1 or 4.4 as applicable.

The PORC is comprised of a minimum of five (5) and maximum of nine (9) regular members, as designated by the Plant Manager.

Alternates are designated in writing by the chairman.

The number of attending alternates will not exceed a minority of the number representing a quorum.

The PORC meets at least once per calendar month and as convened by the PORC Chairman.

The PORC reviews proposed tests and experiments and changes to procedures that may affect nuclear safety.

The PORC recommends in writing to the Plant Manager approval of items submitted for review, documents whether any change constitutes an unreviewed safety question under 10CFR50.59, and provides immediate notification to the Vice President, Nuclear Operations Group and the Chairman, NSARB of disagreement between the PORC and the Plant Manager.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

8 I

NSARB The NSARB scope of review meets the requirements of ANSI Standard N18.7-1976, Section 4.3.4.

The NSARB composition, meeting frequency,

quorum, and record requirements meet ANSI Standard N18.7-1976, Section 4.3.2.

Qualifications of members are commensurate with their functional responsibilities as defined in ANSI/ANS-3.1-1987, Section 4.7, with the exception that the functional areas of nuclear power plant operations and nuclear engineering have over eight (8) years experience in their field with over four (4) years responsible engineering management.

The members of the NSARB are appointed by the Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer.

Records of NSARB activities are prepared,

approved, and distributed within 14 days to the Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer; the Senior Vice President, Energy Operations; and the Vice President, Nuclear Operations Group.

Reports of reviews in the areas encompassed by Sections 4.3.4(4) and 4.3.4(5) of ANSI Standard N18.7-1976 are

prepared, approved, and forwarded to the Vice President, Nuclear Operations Group within 14 days of completion of the review.

Audit reports encompassed by Table 17.3.2-1 are forwarded to the Vice President, Nuclear Operations Group and the management positions responsible for the areas audited within 30 days after completion of the audit.

DELEGATION OF WORK Quality affecting activities may be delegated to contractor organizations and equipment vendors.

Delegated activities are subject to Quality Assurance Program requirements through conformance with the external organization's QA Program as approved by RG&E, through conformance with RG&E's Quality Assurance

Program, or an approved combination of the two.

RG&E retains overall responsibility for the Quality Assurance Program and management oversight of delegated activities.

The scope of delegated activities and applicable Quality Assurance Program requirements are defined in procurement documents.

17.1.3 Responsibility All employees of Rochester Gas and Electric involved in the operation of Ginna Station and associated support activities have full personal and corporate responsibility to assure that the plant is operated, maintained,

tested, inspected, and modified in a safe and reliable manner.

This responsibility includes assuring that an effective Quality Assurance Program is implemented.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

Cl

'IV

The operation of Ginna Station is governed by the Nuclear Policy

Manual, a portion of which governs the Quality Assurance Program.

Xt contains the requirements and assignment of responsibilities for implementation of the program.

The manual is prepared,

reviewed, and maintained by Ginna Station and approved by the Vice President, Nuclear Operations Group.

The Nuclear Safety Audit and Review Board is directed by the Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer to review the status and adequacy of the Quality Assurance Program at least once every two years to assure that it is meaningful and effectively complies with corporate policy and

10CFR50, Appendix B.

This review consists of an audit, or a review equivalent to an audit, performed by company personnel or outside organizations.

The Quality Assurance Program is implemented through procedures prepared and maintained by the responsible organization and approved for use by their designated manager.

Quality affecting activities are performed in accordance with these procedures, utilizing sufficient trained personnel and necessary resources to accomplish the work.

17.1.4 Authority Persons or organizations who are delegated responsibility for planning, establishing, or implementing any part of the RGGE Quality Assurance Program also have the authority to carry out those responsibilities.

Nuclear Operations and nuclear support organization personnel are empowered to take stop work action on their own activities if they determine that continuing the activity would preclude identifying and correcting a condition adverse to quality or lead to an unsafe condition.

Designated independent QA/QC personnel have the authority to stop work within the Nuclear Operations Group, nuclear support organizations, and at supplier locations'he Plant Manager, Ginna Station has stop work authority for all activities performed in operating the station.

17.1.5 Personnel Training and Qualification RGSE is committed to maintaining National Academy for Nuclear Training accredited training programs that produce qualified, competent personnel to operate and maintain Ginna Station.

Nuclear Training is assigned the responsibility for supporting Nuclear Operations Group line management with the development, monitoring, and evaluation of an adequate staff of experienced,

trained, and qualified personnel to ensure the safe and efficient operation, modification, and maintenance of the plant.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

)

E

Supervisory personnel are indoctrinated in quality assurance policies, instructions, and procedures to assure they understand that these must be implemented and enforced.

Personnel responsible for performing activities affecting quality are trained and indoctrinated in the requirements,

purpose, scope, and implementation of applicable quality related program instructions and procedures.

Refresher sessions are held periodically.

Training of personnel is the responsibility of each department performing an activity affecting quality.

The Vice President, Nuclear Operations Group is responsible for the formal training, qualification, licensing, and re-qualification of operators, as necessary.

As appropriate, personnel granted unescorted access to Ginna Station are trained in radiation protection, plant safety, and security.

Training and qualification records are maintained for each employee when required.

Documentation of formal training includes objectives, content of the program, attendees, and date of attendance.

17.1.6 Corrective Action Rochester Gas and Electric has established a corrective action process whereby all personnel are responsible for assuring that conditions adverse to quality are promptly identified, reported, controlled, and corrected.

The process is focused on correcting the problem and its root cause rather than assigning blame or fault.

Adverse trends in performance are identified, monitored, and reported to management.

Corrective action and nonconformance control processes are discussed in Section 17.2.13.

17.1.7 Regulatory Commitments The Quality Assurance Program is designed to meet the requirements of 10CFR50, Appendix B, "Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants."

A listing of Regulatory Guides, requirements, and standards with the conformance status of each is contained in Table 17.1.7-1.

RG6E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

g %k 4 ~

II 1 1

TABLE 17.1.1-1 Rochester Gas and E<lectric Corporation Ginna Station Corporate Statement of Quality Assurance Policy The Rochester Gas and Electric Corporation has always and continues to be an advocate of quality performance in our daily activities.

The Quality Assurance Program described in the Nuclear Policy Manual has been developed to assure that activities, as defined within the program scope, are being performed correctly and in conformance with applicable requirements.

This program is designed to assure the safe operation of Ginna Station and to meet the requirements of Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 50 (10CFR50), Appendix B, "Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants."

The Quality Assurance Program applies to all activities affecting the safety related functions of those Seismic Category 1 or Class 1E structures,

systems, and components that prevent or mitigate the consequences of or monitor the course of postulated accidents, events, or phenomena that could cause undue risk to the health and safety of the public.

These activities include operating, maintaining, modifying, refueling, testing, and inspecting.

In addition, this program applies to 10CFR50 concerns associated with:

maintaining the high degree of integrity of primary and secondary barriers of systems or structures containing radioactive materials b.

providing fire detection, suppression, and consequence mitigation items utilized both to protect the safety related structures, systems, and components and to assure safe operation in the event of postulated fire c.

providing assurance that instrumentation and controls which monitor accidents, or provide a secondary role in accident monitoring, function correctly and accurately.

This program also applies to the shipping of licensed radioactive material under 10CFR71, except for design and fabrication of shipping casks.

The Department Manager, Nuclear Assessment is responsible for coordinating the formulation of the Quality Assurance Program.

The Manager, Quality Assurance is responsible for assuring that the program is implemented.

Ginna Station, Nuclear Engineering Services, Nuclear Assessment, Nuclear Training, Support Services, Information Services, and Energy Delivery are responsible for implementing the Quality Assurance Program in accordance with the requirements of the Nuclear Policy Manual.

R er W. Kober Chairman of the Board, President, and Chief Executive Officer Date RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

II iL 5

L i'

n

TABLE 17.1.1-2 Supplementary Glossary Terms with special meanings used in this document that are not defined in ANSI N45.2.10, "Quality Assurance Terms and Definitions," are defined below.

Adopted RGRE has endorsed, wholly or in part, an industry code,

standard, or NRC Regulatory Guide for which no formal commitment has been made.

Alternative Relates to existing and proposed industry code,

standard, or NRC Regulatory Guide for which RGEE provides other means to assure quality.

Approval The formal act of endorsing ox adding positive authorization, or both, to an action or document.

Approval may be given only by an authorized individual.

As-built drawings Drawings such as flow prints, electrical elementary

diagrams, instrumentation and control schematics, and piping layout drawings that reflect the actual current plant field configuration.

Audit A documented activity to determine, through investigation, the adequacy of and adherence to established procedures, instructions, specifications, codes and standards, or other applicable contractual and licensing requirements and the effectiveness of implementation.

Audit (internal)

Audit of those portions of the RG&E Corporation's Quality Assurance Program retained under its direct control and within its organizational structure.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 199S

i t

TABLE 17.1.1-2 (cont'd)

Certification The action, by an authorized person, of determining, verifying, and attesting, in writing, to the qualifications of personnel or material.

Commitment A documented explicit statement, made either by RG&E or through uncontested imposition by the NRC or other regulatory agencies, that requires actions to be performed.

Conforms RGEE has committed fully to the requirements without exception.

Deviation A departure of a characteristic from specified requirements.

Handling An act of physically moving items by hand or by mechanical

means, but not including transport on a conveyance, such as motor vehicles,

ships, railroad cars, or aircraft.

Heavy load Any load, carried in a given area after a plant becomes operational, that weighs more than the combined weight of a single spent fuel assembly and its associated handling tool

(>1500N)

Inservice Inspection A planned, periodic evaluation of the continued structural integrity of installed plant systems and components by nondestructive

methods, conducted in accordance with the rules of Section XI of the ASNE Boiler 9 Pressure Vessel Code.

Inspector An individual who has been qualified to perform quality verification inspections.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 21, 1995

TABLE 17.1.1-2 (cont'd)

Measuring and test equipment Devices or systems used to calibrate,

measure, gage,

test, inspect, or control in order to control data or to acquire data to verify conformance to specified requirements.

Measuring and test equipment does not include permanently installed plant instrumentation or test equipment used for preliminary checks where data obtained will not be used to determine acceptability or be the basis for design or engineering evaluation.

Nonconformance disposition Designated resolution to a nonconforming item by cognizant personnel (e.g.,

rework, repair, use-as-is or reject).

Performance-based An approach that focuses on the end results that directly contribute to safe and reliable plant operation.

Meeting a predetermined set of goals, limits, or performance criteria based upon the design basis safety function and the past performance of structures,

systems, components, and organizations, allowing the licensee flexibilityto determine how the results will be achieved and adjust quality practices, as necessary.

Procedure A document that specifies or describes how an activity is to be performed.

It may include methods to be employed, a description of equipment or materials to be used, and sequence of operations.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

)

gl E,*

TABLE 17.1.1-2 (cont'd)

Procurement document Purchase requisitions, purchase

orders, drawings, contracts, specifications, documents referenced by purchase orders, bills of material, or other instructions used to define requirements for purchase.

QA surveillance A technique which uses observation or monitoring to provide confidence that ongoing processes and activities are adequately and effectively performed (Per NQA-1 App. 2A-X).

Qualified procedure A procedure which incorporates all applicable codes and standards, manufacturer's parameters, and engineering specifications and has been proven adequate for its intended purpose.

Section IX of the ASME Code defines procedure qualifications for welding activities.

Quality affecting activities Activities for which the Quality Assurance Program applies.

Safety related structures,

systems, and components Those appurtenances that are designed to Seismic Category I standards (UFSAR and/or Reg.

Guide 1.29) and with the intended function to prevent or mitigate the consequences of postulated accidents that could cause undue risk to the health and safety of the public.

Safety significant structures,

systems, and components Subset of equipment not required to perform a safety related function but which are subject to additional controls established by RGEE.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

TABLE 17.1.1-2 (cont'd)

Supplier surveillance A review, observation, or inspection

.for the purpose of verifying that an action has been accomplished as specified at the location of material procurement or manufacture.

Traceability A characteristic given to material, a

document, a group of documents, or material and its related documents which permits the retrieval or reassociation of the items, if necessary, at a later time.

The term is also used to denote a document which records a chronological history of all processes or operations which have been performed on an item.

Verification inspection A phase of quality control which by means of examination, observation, or measurement determines the conformance of materials,

supplies, components,

parts, appurtenances,

systems, processes, or structures to predetermined quality requirements.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 199S

TABLE 17.1.7-1 Conformance of Ginna Station Program to Quality Assurance Standards, Requirements, and Guides Standard Re uirement or Guide Conformance Status Remarks Regulatory Guide 1.8 Rev.(l)-Personnel Selection and Training Regulatory Guide 1.26 Rev.(3)-Quality Group Classifications 8c Standards for Water, Steam, and Radioactive-Waste Containing Components of Nuclear Power Plants Conforms Alternative RG 1.8 Rev.(1) incorporates ANSI N18.1.

A classification process is established to identify SSCs that are safety related (SR), safety significant (SS), or have no safety impact (NNS). Criteria are based on information contained in the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR), licensing commitments, guidelines contained in NRC regulatory guides, and functional guidance derived from ANSI/ANS 51.1-1983.

Regulatory Guide 1.28 Rev.(2)-Quality Assurance Program Requirements (Design and Construction)

Conforms RG 1.28 Rev.(2) incorporates ANSI N45.2-1977.

Regulatory Guide 1.29 Rev.(3)-Seismic Design Classification Alternative Seismic design requirements for existing structures,

systems, and components performing functions listed in positions C.l and C.3 of the Regulatory Guide are specified in the UFSAR.

New structures,

systems, and components, and configuration changes meet the seisinic design requirements of this regulatory guide or the UFSAR.

The pertinent quality assurance requirements of 10CFR50, Appendix B are applied as required by positions C.1 and C.4 of this Regulatory Guide, irrespective of an item's seismic design.

Portions of existing structures,

systems, and components with failure consequences described in position C.2 of this guide are designed and constructed to seismic requirements specified in the UFSAR.

New structures,

systems, and components, and configuration changes meet the design and construction seismic requirements of the UFSAR or this Regulatory Guide.

A quality assurance program similar to 10CFR50, Appendix B is applied to the SSE failure prevention function of these items.

These items are not considered basic components pursuant to 10CFR21.

RGsE QAPSO, Revision 22 December 22, 1995

TABLE 17.1.7-1 (cont'd)

Standard Re uirement or Guide Conformance Status Remarks Regulatory Guide 1.30 Rev.(0)-Quality Assurance Requirements for the Installation, Inspection, and Testing of Instrumentation and Electric Equipment Regulatory Guide 1.33 Rev.(2)-Quality Assurance Program Requirements (Operations)

Conforms Alternative RG 1.30 Rev.(0) ANSI N.45.2.4-1972.

RG 1.33 Rev.(2) incorporates ANSI N18.7-1976/ANS-3.2.

Ginna Station conforms to Regulatory Positions 1, 3, and 5a in RG 1.33 Rev.(2) and to ANSI N18.7-1976, sections 4.3.2 and 4.3.4.

Ginna conforms to RG 1.33 Rev.(0) except for Appendix A and ANSI N18.7-1972, sections 4.2.2, 4.2.3, 4.2,4, 4.2.5, 4.3, and 4.5.

Ginna also conforms to regulatory staff comments and supplementary guidance in "Guidelines on Quality Assurance Requirements During the Operations Phase of Nuclear Power Plants," Revision 0, October 1973 (Orange Book-Revision 0).

Requirements for the onsite review function meet the guidelines of ANSI/ANS 3.2-1988, section 4.3 in lieu of ANSI N18.7-1976, section 4.4 and ANSI N18.7-1972, section 4.5.

Regulatory Guide 1.36 Rev.(0)-Nonmetallic Thermal Insulation for Austentic Stainless Steel Regulatory Guide 1.37 Rev.(0)-Quality Assurance Requirements for Cleaning of Fluid Systems and Associated Components of Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants Adopted Conforms This Regulatory Guide is adopted for the testing of insulating materials installed on or near safety related stainless steel piping. Insulating materials are not considered basic components pursuant to 10CFR21 and thus the supplier is not required to have a quality assurance program to cover the testing, lot control, and contamination control provisions of this Regulatory Guide.

A quality'assurance program similar to 10CFR50, Appendix B is applied to the handling, storage, and installation of insulating materials on or near Ginna Station safety related stainless steel piping and components.

RG 1.37 Rev.(0) incorporates ANSI N45.2.1-1973.

Regulatory Guide 1.38 Rev.(2)-Quality Assurance Requirements for Packaging, Shipping, Receiving,

Storage, and Handling of Items for Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants Conforms RG 1.38 Rev.(2) incorporates ANSI N45.2.2-1972.

Regulatory Guide 1.39 Rev. (2)-Housekeeping Requirements for Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants Conforms RG 1.39 Rev.(2) incorporates ANSI N45.2.3-1973.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

TABLE 17.1.7-1 (cont'd)

Standard Re uirement or Guide Conformance Status Remarks Regulatory Guide 1.54 Rev.(0)-Quality Assurance Requirements for Protective Coatings Applied to Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants Alternative Quality assurance requirements apply only when a coating performs a safety related function instead of the provisions stated in this Regulatory Guide and its referenced standard, ANSI N101.4-1972.

See the UFSAR for quality assurance requirements used for existing coatings.

For new coatings and configuration changes to existing coatings, either the quality assurance requirements of the UFSAR or the quality assurance requirements of 10CFR50, Appendix B are used instead of the detailed requirements included in this Regulatory Guide.

Regulatory Guide 1.58 Rev.(1)-Qualification of Nuclear Power Plant Inspection, Examination, and Testing Personnel Regulatory Guide 1.64 Rev.(1)-Quality Assurance Requirements for Design of Nuclear Power Plants Regulatory Guide 1.74 Rev.(0)-Quality Assurance Terms and Definitions Regulatory Guide 1.88 Rev.(2)-Collection, Storage, and Maintenance of Nuclear Power Plant Quality Assurance Records Conforms Conforms Conforms Conforms RG 1.58 Rev.(1) incorporates ANSI N45.2.6-1978.

RG 1.64 Rev.(1) incorporates ANSI N45.2.11-1974.

RG 1.74 Rev.(0) incorporates ANSI N45.2.10-1973.

Some definitions used by Ginna are worded differently than those in this standard; however, the general meanings are the same.

RG 1.88 Rev.(2) incorporates ANSI N45.2.9-1974.

Regulatory Guide 1.94 Rev. (1)-Quality Assurance Installation, Inspections, and Testing of Structural Concrete and Structural Steel During the Construction Phase of Nuclear Power Plants Not applicable RG 1.94 Rev.(1) incorporates ANSI N45.2.5-1974.

Regulatory Guide applies to plants in the construction phase and was issued after Ginna was built.

Regulatory Guide 1.116 Rev.(O-R)-Quality Assurance Requirements for Installation, Inspections, and Testing of Mechanical Equipment and Systems Regulatory Guide 1.123 Rev.(1)-Quality Assurance Requirements for Control of Procurement of Items and Services for Nuclear Plants Conforms Conforms RG 1.116 Rev.(O-R) incorporates ANSI N45.2.8-1975.

RG 1.123 Rev.(1) incorporates ANSI N45.2.13-1976.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

TABLE 17.1.7-1 (cont'd)

Standard Re uirement or Guide Conformance Status Remarks Regulatory Guide l.143 Rev.(1)-Design Guidance for Radioactive Waste Management

Systems, Structures, and Components Installed in Light-Water-Cooled Nuclear Power Plants Regulatory Guide 1. 144 Rev.(1)-Auditing of Quality Assurance Programs for Nuclear Power Plants Regulatory Guide 1.146 Rev.(0)-Qualification of QA Program Audit Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants Regulatory Guide 1.152 Rev.(0)-Criteria for Programmable Digital Computer Systein Software in Safety-Related Systems of Nuclear Power Plants Regulatory Guide 4. 15 Rev.(1)-Quality Assurance for Radiological Monitoring Program (Normal Operations)-Effluent Streams and the Environment Regulatory Guide 7.10 Rev.(l)-Establishing Quality Assurance Programs for Packaging Used in the Transport of Radioactive Material 10CFR21 10CFR50, Appendix A-General Design Criteria 10CFR50, Appendix B-Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants Alternative Conforms Conforms Not applicable Adopted Adopted Conforms Alternative Conforms See the UFSAR for design and quality assurance provisions applied to existing radioactive waste management

systems, structures, and components.

New systems, structures, and components and configuration changes to existing items meet the design and quality assurance provisions described in the UFSAR or those specified by this Regulatory Guide.

RG 1. 144 Rev.(1) incorporates ANSI N45.2.12-1977.

RG 1. 146 Rev.(0) incorporates ANSI N45.2.23-1978.

Ginna does not currently use programmable digital computers in safety related applications.

No applications for use of software covered by this Regulatory Guide are pending.

Ginna conforms to the intent of this Regulatory Guide as addressed in the Process Control Program and applicable to Ginna effluent and environmental radioactivity measurements.

Ginna conforms to the intent of this Regulatory Guide as addressed in the Process Control Program.

These criteria were in draft form or not written at the time Ginna was designed and built.

For existing systems, see UFSAR for criteria applied.

New systems, structures, and components, and configuration changes to existing items meet the criteria as described in the UFSAR or 10CFR50, Appendix A.

10CFR50.55a-Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities (ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section XI-Rules for Inservice Inspection of Nuclear Reactor Coolant Systems)

Conforms 10CFR50.55 Specifies ASME Section XI code dates.

The Ginna program conforms to 10CFR50.55a with the specific editions and addenda of Section XI specified in the Inservice Inspection Plan.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

TABLE 17.1.7-1 (cont'd)

Standard Re uirement or Guide Conformance Status Remarks 10CFR50.55(e)-Conditions of Construction Permits 10CFR55-Operators Licenses 10CFR55, Appendix A-Requalification Programs for Licensed Operators of Production and Utilization Facilities Not applicable Regulatory Guide applies to plants in the construction phase.

Conforms Conforms Regulatory Positions 2 and 4 of Branch Technical Position CMEB 9.5-1 Alternative Fire protection controls are in accordance with APCSB 9.5-1, regulatory position IV b.6 and IV b.7.

Generic Letter 89-02, and its endorsement of EPRI NP5652 "Guideline for the Utilization of Commercial Grade Items in Safety-Related Applications (NCIG-07)".

ANSI/ANS 3.1-1987, Selection, Qualification and Training of Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants, section 4.7.

Conforms Conforms Qualification requirements apply to NSARB members only as addressed by this standard.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

UNES OF FVHCTONALREPORTNG LNFS OF SUPERVISCM ANOADMIISSTRATXMI CHAIRMANOF THE SOARS. PRESIDENT, ANO CHIEF EXECUTIVEOFFICEJt SENNR VICE PRESIDENT.

ENERGY SERVICES SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT

CORPORATE SERVICES SENIOII VICE

'RE SIDfNT.

ENERCY OPfRATIONS CROUP MAHACER INFORMATION SERVICE 5 OfPARTS K N1 MANAGER DI5TRISUTIVE INFORMATION SY51fMS SUPPORT COMMUNICATNMIS MANACER PRODUCTION SUPPORT SfRVICES TECHNICAL NFORMATIOH CENTER INFORMATION 5ERVICKS 4 DVISOH SYSTEMS DEPARTMENT MANAGER HVMAM RESOURCE SERVICES EMPLOYEE RBATIONS DfPARTMEHT MANAGER TECHNICAL SERVICES MANAGER LASORATORY and NSPECTIOH SERVICES FACIUTIES.

PROJKCT MANAGEMENT

~

SERVICES.

Rf<NGNEERINC.

ENVIRONMEN'TAL SERVICES AND CORPORATE SAFETY ENVIRONMENTAL 5CIEHCE.

LABORATORY CHEMISTRY SERVICKS.

MATERIAL5 ENCINKERNC.

NDF ISI 4 MHE NSPECTIOH SERVICES AND ELECTRIC LABORAtOltY SERVICKS CROVP MANAGER SUPPORT SfRVICES C ROVP MANAGER ENERGY DKUVERY DEPARTMENt MANAGER FACIUTY DESIGN RELAY ENGIMEERIMG.

SUBSTATION DESIGN DEPARTMENt MANAGER OVERHEAD CONSTRUCTION AND MAINTENANCE RELAY TESTING SERVICES VICE PRESIDENT NUCLEAR OPKRATIONS CROUP DEPAltTMENT MANACKR NUCLEAR ASSESSMENT DKPARTMENT MANAGER NUCLEAR ENGINEERIMG SERVICES ENGUIKERINC4 COMPUTER SUPPORt.

CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT AHD TECHNICAL PROCESSE5.

HVCLEAR SAFETY AND LICEHSIHC.

ELECTRICAI MECHANICAI STRUCTURAL fNCINEERNG NVCLEAR ASSURANCE, OVAUTY ASSURANCE, PROCESS IMPROVKMENT, PUSLIC SAFETY 4 ACCEPTANCE

SUPPORT, OPERATNC EXPERIEMCQ 4 NUCLEAR EMERCENCY PREPAREDNE5S NSARS PtANT MANAGER GINNA STATION SUPERINTENDENT GINNA PRODVCTIOH OPERATIONS.

CHEMISTRYIRAO PROTECTION, SYSTEMS ENCINEEltlNG, SCHEDVUMG AND PERFORMANCE AND REUASILITY MANAGER MATERIAL5 AND PROCUltEMENT i ~

PORC SUPERINTEHDKHT G IRMA MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE PLAHNNCISYSTEM5.

MAINTENAHCKRULE PROJECT.

ISC ANDfLECT R ICAL MAIN'TENANCE,AMD MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR NVCLEAR SKCVRITY 5ECURITY SERVICES 0

HQ I

p A

DEPARTMENT MAHACER STRATECK 5UPPLY MANAGEMENT MA1ERIAL PROCVRfMfNt 4 COMlROL ANO ELECTRIC 4 GAS METElt OPKRAT NNS DEPARTMKN1 MANAGER PHYSICAL SERVICES CfNfRAL MAIMTKNANCE FIELDS@HOP FASRICATIOH SfRVICES.

WfLDING Sf RVICES.

TRAH5PORTATIOH ANDSURVEYNC SERVICKS PROJECT MANAGERSTEAM GENERATOR REPLACEMENT DEPARTMENT MANAGER NUCLEAR TRAINING TRANIMC 5ERVICES SAFETY COORDINATOR SUPERVISOR SUDG Et 4 COST

17.2 PERFORMANCE VERIFICATION 17.2.1 Methodology All personnel performing activities affecting quality involved in the operation and support of Ginna Station are directly responsible for quality.

Employees are empowered to make decisions in their areas of responsibility and are held accountable for the quality of their own work.

Verification of work is performed by each organization to assure that quality objectives are achieved and established performance standards are met.

The Nuclear Operations Group and supporting organizations involved in Ginna quality related activities accomplish and verify their work using instructions and procedures.

For quality affecting activities within their area of responsibility, each organization develops,

reviews, approves, and implements such documents.

The activities covered include operation, maintenance,

repair, inservice inspection, refueling, procurement, modification, special processes, inspection and

testing, document control and records management, training of personnel, and audit and surveillance.

In addition, RG&E suppliers and contractors are required to have appropriate instructions and procedures as specified in procurement documents.

Persons preparing, reviewing, and approving instructions and procedures are responsible for assuring that they include appropriate quantitative or qualitative acceptance criteria for determining that important activities have been satisfactorily accomplished.

In addition, they assure that these documents are kept current.

17.2.2 Design Control Plant configuration changes, including temporary changes, are implemented utilizing design control measures at least commensurate with those applied to the original design.

Nuclear Engineering Services is the design authority for Ginna Station.

Other organizations are authorized to perform design activities as designated in the Nuclear Policy Manual and supported by approved procedures and instructions.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

Design control measures are defined and implemented by trained and qualified personnel through approved procedures and instructions.

These procedures and instructions assure that:

~

Design inputs are appropriately specified on a timely basis and correctly translated into design documents.

~

Design interfaces are identified and controlled.

~

The design is suitable for its intended application.

o Design adequacy is verified by personnel other than those who performed the design.

~

Design changes, including field changes, are governed by control measures.

~

Deviations and nonconformances are controlled.

~

Design records are identified, controlled, and retrievable.

Design inputs (such as design bases, performance requirements, regulatory requirements,

codes, and standards) and changes to design inputs are identified, documented, reviewed and approved, and controlled.

Design documents, including drawings and specifications, are prepared and technically reviewed by qualified personnel.

The technical reviewer ensures that the design document is in accordance with the design concept, incorporates appropriate design inputs, and conforms to approved procedures and instructions.

Design change packages are approved by appropriate management or supervision prior to release for implementation.

Design interfaces, both internal and external, are formally identified, and design activities are coordinated among the participating organizations to ensure that design inputs and outputs are properly developed,

reviewed, approved, and distributed.

Multi-discipline changes are reviewed to ensure integration of design outputs.

Design changes are reviewed to determine whether the change results in a change to plant Technical Specifications or an unreviewed safety question, under the provisions of 10CFR50.59.

Design data bases, documents, and procedures are revised to reflect changes installed in the plant.

Design records are identified,

indexed, and controlled to allow for retrievability of design basis information and to provide evidence of appropriate design controls.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

t"

17.2.3 Design Verification Design verification is the process of reviewing, confirming, or substantiating the design to assure:

the acceptability of the design inputs adherence to the design process that the design inputs are reflected in the design outputs that design changes are implemented under controls commensurate with those applied to the initial design.

Procedures define acceptable verification methods and controls, design parameters subject to verification, acceptance

criteria, and verification documentation and records requirements.

A design change is verified prior to release of the change to perform its design function.

A design may be released for prefabrication or installation prior to completion of the design verification only if controls are established.

The scope of work that can be completed must be defined and controls implemented to ensure that design verification is completed prior to use of the change.

Verification methods include:

~

performance of design reviews

~

use of alternate calculations 4

performance of qualification tests.

If used, qualification tests shall verify the adequacy of the specific design or design feature under the most adverse design conditions, unless those conditions cannot be generated without initiating a plant transient.

In those

cases, simulated or-extrapolated conditions are used.

Design verification is performed by technically qualified individuals other than those who developed the design.

Design verification by the designer's immediate supervisor is allowable if other qualified individuals are not readily available.

The designer's supervisor documents independence from the design development when required to perform a verification.

The design organization determines the extent of verification

required, based upon safety significance, the degree of standardization, and the state-of-the-art of the change.

RGEE QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

17.2.4 Procurement Control Purchased

material, equipment, and services are controlled using five major means:

planning procurement document requirements supplier selection control of supplier performance acceptance of items and services.

All procurement is conducted in accordance with procurement documents and governing procedures.

All reviews, inspections, surveillances, and audits are conducted by personnel who are competent to determine whether a supplier is capable of providing acceptable quality products.

~Plannin Procurement planning by procuring organizations consists of determining the supplier of choice, methods to be used for acceptance of the item or service, and requirements for control of supplier performance.

Source inspection (surveillance),

certificate of conformance, receipt inspection, and pre-or post-installation testing are methods which are considered for item acceptance.

The extent of the acceptance methods and associated verification activities will vary depending upon the relative importance and complexity of the purchased item or service and the supplier's past performance.

Procurement Document Re uirements Procurement document control for the procurement of materials,

parts, components, and services is initiated by department staff personnel.

Procurement procedures require that organizations preparing procurement documents consider and include, as appropriate:

0 scope of work technical requirements Quality Assurance Program requirements right of access documentation requirements reporting requirements (nonconformance and 10CFR Part 21).

Changes or revisions to procurement documents are subject to the same review and approval requirements as the original documents.

Originating department review of procurement documents includes verification of applicable regulatory,

code, and design requirements and suitability for intended service In addition, a verification of proper inclusion of the quality standards, quality assurance program requirements, method of procurement, RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

r g I

4 Cl

and the applicable acceptance criteria is performed.

For spare or replacement

parts, procurement documents are reviewed to determine similarity to, compatibility with, and acceptance criteria commensurate with the original design.

Su lier Selection Selection of a supplier is based on the evaluation of their capability to provide the items or services in accordance with procurement document requirements.

The evaluation, which is accomplished during procurement

planning, determines the necessity for the supplier selection to be made from the approved suppliers list.

For items and services procured from suppliers required to have a quality assurance

program, supplier selection is made from the approved suppliers list or from those who are in the process of being added to the list.

Addition of a supplier to the approved suppliers list is based on satisfactory evaluation of the supplier's quality assurance program.

The evaluation guidelines for source selection considers the complexity of the item, method(s) of acceptance, and, for a replacement item, whether the source is to be restricted to the original supplier.

Items or services which meet industry standards and are typically utilized in applications other than nuclear may be purchased from suppliers not listed on the approved suppliers list, provided that item acceptance through receipt inspection can be based on acceptance of standard commercial quality.

This is supplemented, as necessary, with source surveillance, pre-or post-installation

tests, receipt tests, commercial supplier surveys, supplier test

reports, or commercial supplier certificates.

For commercial grade items and services, an evaluation of intended use is completed to determine critical characteristics which must be verified prior to acceptance for use.

Control of Su lier Performance Control of supplier performance includes monitoring and evaluation by requesting submittal of supplier documents for review and by identifying necessary changes for which nonconformances are to be reported.

Control is also exercised through surveillance of supplier activities as necessary.

Acce tance of Items and Services The verification methods for the acceptance of items and services are specified during procurement planning and purchase requisition preparation.

Receipt inspection is a verification method common for the acceptance of items.

RG6E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

'I p e>

'i.

~ )

~

)'II jb

17.2.5 Procurement Verification The supplier's overall quality assurance organization and program is evaluated in accordance with applicable parts of 10CFR50, Appendix B; codes and standards; and RG&E requirements.

Suppliers on the approved suppliers list are reviewed annually for performance and program changes, and audited at least every three years.

The procuring department is responsible for determining and documenting the degree of supplier surveillance (including review, inspection, or audit) required during design, fabrication, inspection,

testing, and shipping.

The objectives of supplier surveillance are to provide a sampling review of the supplier's quality assurance program implementation and to verify product conformance with respect to the purchase order requirements.

The extent of supplier surveillance will be consistent with the safety significance, complexity, quantity, and frequency of procurement of the item or service.

As necessary, this may require verification of the activities of suppliers below the first tier.

The verification responsibilities for evaluation and surveillance of supplier activities are assigned to Quality Assurance.

Department supervision is responsible for receipt and control of items pending their acceptance.

Receipt inspection is performed for items and associated services for maintenance, repair, modification, and refueling. Inspections are performed to verify acceptability.

To be acceptable, the items and services must conform to procurement documents, have satisfied.required inspection and test requirements, and have documentary evidence of conformance available at the plant prior to acceptance for use.

Personnel performing receipt inspection and test activities are trained and qualified.

17.2.6 Identification and Control of Items The identification and control of materials,

parts, and components (including consumable materials and items with limited shelf life) is accomplished in accordance with written requirements and applies in any stage of fabrication,

storage, or installation.

Identification and control requirements are established either by an existing procedure or by requirement documents prepared during the planning stages of a project.

The identification and control requirements cover:

~

Traceability to associated documents (such as drawings, specifications, purchase

orders, manufacturing test data and inspection documents, and physical and chemical mill test reports).

RGRE QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

~

Specification of the degree of identification to preclude a

degradation of the item's functional capability or quality.

~

Proper identification of materials,

parts, and components prior to release for manufacturing, shipping, construction, and installation.

Nuclear Engineering Services is responsible for assuring that drawings and specifications contain appropriate requirements for the identification and control of materials,

parts, or components.

Suppliers are required to assure that all required documentation for an item is properly identified and related to the item.

17.2.7 Handling, Storage, and Shipping The Nuclear Operations Group and support organizations are responsible for developing and implementing procedures for the

handling, storage, shipping, preservation, and cleaning of quality related material and equipment.

These procedures provide guidelines to protect items from damage,

loss, and deterioration.

Also, items are marked or labeled during packaging,

shipping, handling, and storage to identify and maintain the items'ntegrity and to indicate need for special controls.

Under normal circumstances, manufacturer's specific written instructions and recommendations and purchase specification requirements are invoked for cleanliness, preservation, special

handling, and environmental requirements for storage.

In the absence of, or in addition to, specific manufacturer requirements, management may invoke requirements in accordance with department procedures.

Examples of such requirements include desiccants, shelf life, endcaps, and special packaging requirements.

Procurement documents and engineering specifications define requirements for the handling,

shipping, storage,

cleaning, and preservation of new fuel and fuel assemblies, materials, and equipment.

When necessary to maintain acceptable

quality, special protective measures (such as containers, shock absorbers, etc.)

are specified and provided.

Procedures are established for the routine maintenance and inspection of lifting and handling equipment and for the handling of heavy loads and safe load paths.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 199S

Il I II-If I

17.2.8 Test Control The Ginna Station test program includes the surveillance test program required by Technical Specifications, inservice pump and valve testing, and testing following modification and maintenance.

The test program requires the identification, control, and documentation of all tests and the preparation of written procedures required for satisfactory accomplishment of the testing.

Written procedures and checklists for the testing program include:

instructions and prerequisites to perform the

test, use of proper test equipment, inspection hold points,. and acceptance criteria.

Testing is utilized as follows:

~

To determine continued operability of installed structures,

systems, and components consistent with the surveillance requirements of Technical Specifications and the inservice pump and valve program.

~

To demonstrate the ability and to support the qualification of safety related equipment to function in harsh environmental conditions.

~

To demonstrate the acceptability of replacement and purchased items.

~

To support trouble shooting and investigation of degraded conditions.

~

To demonstrate the acceptability of items involved in maintenance,

repair, and modifications.

Contractors who perform testing are required to do so in accordance with RG&E's procurement document requirements.

All test results are required to be documented,

reviewed, and approved by those responsible for performing the test.

Unacceptable test results and test anomalies are evaluated in accordance with established procedures to determine the cause of the problem and the need for retest or for increasing test frequency.

The design organization is responsible for assuring that required tests for modifications are included in design documents.

RGEE QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

"> 1'

17.2.9 Measuring and Test Equipment Control Programs are established which assure that test instruments,

tools, gauges, shop and reference standards, and other measuring and testing devices used in activities affecting quality are properly controlled and calibrated.

Elements of control include calibration procedures, establishment of calibration frequencies, and maintenance requirements for measuring and test equipment.

Calibration procedures include step-by-step calibration methods and requirements for instrument accuracy.

Calibration frequency is based on required accuracy, degree of usage, stability characteristics, manufacturer's recommendations, experience, and other conditions affecting measurement capability.

The program for control of measuring and test equipment includes:

~

Assuring timely calibration of equipment.

o Providing unique identification of the next calibration date on the equipment calibration tags or stickers and traceability to calibration test data.

~

Providing traceability of shop standards to nationally recognized standards and periodic revalidation of shop standards.

Where national standards do not exist, procedures contain instructions to document the basis for calibration.

,Except where standards with the same accuracy as the instruments being calibrated are shown to be adequate for the requirements, calibration standards are to have a

greater accuracy than the standards being calibrated.-

~

Assuring that calibrating equipment is calibrated against standards that have an accuracy of at least four times the required accuracy of the equipment being calibrated or, if not possible, have an accuracy that ensures the equipment being calibrated will be within the required tolerance.

~

Providing for records to be maintained which indicate the complete status of all items under the calibration system including the maintenance, calibration results, abnormalities, and last and future calibration dates.

~

Controlling the purchase requirements of new equipment to be entered into the calibration and control system including requirements for accuracy, stability, and repeatability under normal use conditions.

Xn the event a measuring instrument (i.e.,

shop or field standard) is found out of calibration, an investigation is conducted to determine the validity of previous measurements.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

)q 0*>

t ~ r

Responsibilities and requirements for the selection and use of calibrated measuring and test equipment are described in the Nuclear Policy Manual and related procedures.

Installed plant instrumentation -is subject to calibration and control requirements of Technical Specifications and is not subject to calibration and control requirements for measuring and test equipment.

The Nuclear Policy Manual amplifies responsibilities and requirements for installed plant instruments.

17.2.10 Inspection,

Test, and Operating Status Equipment or systems not ready for normal service are clearly identified by use of tags, control logs, and other suitable means to indicate the status of the items being isolated in order to prevent their inadvertent use.

Ginna Station is responsible for indicating the status of operating equipment or systems to be removed from service for maintenance, repair, or modification in accordance with the approved Electric System Operating Rules.

System status is indicated through the use of hold. tags, block

tags, and corresponding control logs.

Equipment or system inspection and test status are indicated by use of test tags,

labels, or status sheets.

Written procedures control the use of hold tags, test tags, and labels.

Personnel who have station holding authority, as designated by the Plant Manager, are responsible for directing the status change of equipment and systems in accordance with the approved station holding procedures.

Job control documents are used to indicate status of the work, inspections or tests, and corresponding acceptance or rejection criteria.

These job control documents preclude the inadvertent bypassing of inspections and tests.

They are maintained at a

designated control location to indicate the status and the completion of required inspections and tests.

Measures are established to monitor the completion status of inservice inspection.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

1

,al

't k

\\(%

~

e

17.2.11 Special Process Control Written procedures are established to control special processes, such as welding, brazing, heat treating, and nondestructive examination to assure compliance with applicable

codes, standards, and design specifications.

Qualification of personnel and special process procedures comply with the requirements of applicable codes and standards.

When special process qualification requirements are not included in existing codes and standards, they are described in procedures which give details of the special process, personnel qualification requirements, equipment necessary, and special process qualification requirements.

The Nuclear Policy Manual describes the criteria that define which processes are special.

These criteria include processes which are highly dependent on the skill of the worker or the control of the process or both, and in which the desired quality cannot be readily determined by inspection or test.

Procuring organizations are responsible for requiring suppliers, in procurement documents, to control special processes in accordance with the above requirements.

Special process procedures submitted by suppliers and contractors are reviewed for adequacy by RG&E.

Nuclear Assurance and the Ginna Station Maintenance organization are responsible for assuring that personnel performing special processes under their cognizance are qualified and are using qualified procedures.

Support Services is responsible for the qualification of special process personnel and procedures.

Qualification of personnel and procedures is documented.

17.2.12 Xnspection Procedures prepared for the control of activities include inspection requirements and hold points as required by drawings, instructions, requirement documents, specifications,

codes, standards, or regulatory requirements.

For clarification, and to distinguish from preventive maintenance inspections, the following controls are associated with the quality assurance function inspections and referred to as verification inspections.

Verification inspection planning is used to determine the optimum method for performing hold point or final inspections.

Planning considerations include:

hold point execution by witness or inspection, the need for calibrated measuring tools and equipment, use of sample plans for multiple quantities, and the need for other verification options (e.g.,

non-destructive examination)

RGGE QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

Hold points are used as necessary to ensure that inspections are accomplished at the correct points in the sequence of work activities.

Verification inspection procedures include:

identification of quality characteristics to be inspected a description of the method of inspection to be used acceptance and rejection criteria requirements for recording the inspection results the need to provide evidence of inspection activity completion.

Verification inspections are performed by inspection personnel who are appropriately qualified and independent.

They are performed in accordance with approved procedures, instructions, or plans to support preplanned hold points, final acceptance verification, or receipt acceptance activities.

Inspection results are required to be documented.

When items are reworked, the rework is reinspected to the original or equivalent requirements.

Outside contractors are required by procurement documents to have and to follow similar procedures and to use independent inspectors.

17.2.13 Corrective Action Conditions adverse to quality are those conditions which reduce confidence that a structure,

system, or component at Ginna Station will perform satisfactorily in service.

Significant conditions adverse to quality are those conditions which, if uncorrected, could affect the health and safety of the public, seriously affect the ability to operate the plant in a safe

manner, represent a serious breakdown in activity controls, or will require a major effort to restore capability to perform specified functions.

Conditions adverse to quality are promptly identified, reported to supervision, corrected, and evaluated to determine if a significant condition adverse to quality exists.

When a significant condition adverse to quality is identified, an evaluation of the effect of continuing the activity is performed.

If continuing the activity would obscure or preclude identification and correction of the deficiency, or if continuing the activity would increase the extent of the deficiency or lead to an unsafe condition, stop work action is taken.

RGEE QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

~ +

Nuclear Assessment has authority to stop work on all activities at or in support of Ginna Station, with the exception of operating deficiencies.

For operating deficiencies, Nuclear Assessment may recommend stop work action to station management.

For significant conditions adverse to quality, RGEE management reviews initiated reports to determine

causes, develops corrective action plans to resolve the condition, and takes action to preclude recurrence.

Procedures are established for the control, evaluation, and disposition of deficient material, parts, and components to prevent their inadvertent test, installation, or use.

Items which do not conform to the drawing or specification requirements are identified, controlled, and reported.

Nonconformances identified at a supplier's facility and reported to RGEE, for which the supplier has recommended a disposition of use-as-is or repair, are normally reviewed and the disposition approved by the procuring organization.

Items are repaired-and reworked in accordance with approved procedures and drawings.

The repair or rework must be verified as acceptable by an inspection of the affected item or process which is at least equal to the original inspection method.

Items which are accepted "use-as-is" are fully documented with the drawing or specification requirement and technical justification for acceptance, and are screened under the requirements of 10CFR50.59.

Nonconformance status information is compiled and analyzed for adverse trends and provided to management.

17. 2. 14 Document Control Document control requirements contained in the Nuclear Policy Manual control the issuance of procedures, instructions,

drawings, and specifications.

Ginna Station and Records Management are responsible for the control of all documents issued by organizations supporting Ginna Station.

Each organization has procedures for controlling documents in accordance with the requirements of the Nuclear Policy, Manual.

Each organization responsible for an activity is also responsible for providing the necessary review and approval of instructions, procedures, or drawings.

Such review is to assure that documents are adequate, include appropriate qualitative and quantitative requirements, and include quality assurance requirements.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

~ "l'

%p 1>>

V

Changes to procedures specified in the Administrative Controls Section of the Technical Specifications receive a technical review in accordance with ANSI/ANS 3.2-1988, Section 4.2.

Changes are also reviewed relative to their safety significance by an independent reviewer designated by the PORC Chairman or Plant Manager and subsequently approved by the Plant Manager or designee.

Changes that may affect nuclear safety are referred to and subsequently reviewed by PORC.

The qualifications of the designated reviewer are equivalent to those of regular PORC members and meet ANSI Standard N18. 1-1971, Section 4. 3. 1 or 4. 4 as applicable.

Temporary changes to procedures, in addition to the review and approval process described

above, are also approved by the Shift Supervisor.

Requirements for the pre-approval review of Ginna Station procedures and the temporary change process are consistent with the guidelines of ANSI N18.7-

1972, Sections 5.4 and 5.5.

The Nuclear Policy Manual requires that documents be controlled as appropriate, considering the type of document, safety significance, and intended use.

Types of documents which are controlled include Technical Specifications, UFSAR, Nuclear Directives, procedures,

drawings, and specifications.

Suppliers of materials, equipment, and services having an approved quality assurance program are required in procurement documents to provide for control of documents.

The Nuclear Policy Manual requires that each organization provide in its procedures for measures to:

~

Assure that documents are available when required.

~

Properly review and approve documents such as procedures and instructions.

Provide the same reviews and approvals for changes to documents as was required of the original document.

Require that organizations which review and approve documents have access to pertinent information and adequate knowledge of the original document intent.

Assure that approved changes are promptly transmitted for incorporation into documents.

Assure that obsolete or superseded documents are eliminated from the system and not used.

RGEE QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

17.2.15 Records The Nuclear Policy Manual defines responsibility and establishes the basic requirements for quality assurance record retention and maintenance.

Organizations performing quality affecting activities are responsible for forwarding the records they initiate to Records Management.

Each organization generating records is responsible for preparation, review, approval, and implementation of specific quality assurance record procedures for their area of responsibility.

Records to be controlled are delineated in ANSI N45.2.9-1974.

Sufficient records of items and activities are generated and maintained to document completed work.

Items and activities requiring records include:

design engineering procurement manufacturing construction inspection and test (e.g.,

manufacturer's proof and receipt) installation operations maintenance modification audits Requirements and responsibilities for preparation, inspection, identification, indexing, review, storage, retrieval, maintenance, safekeeping, retention, and disposition of quality assurance records are in accordance with applicable records procedures,

codes, standards, and procurement documents.

Requirements for records storage facilities are defined in the Nuclear Policy Manual.

The requirements and responsibilities for record accessibility and transmittal are described in the Nuclear Policy Manual.

Removal of records from storage is documented and accountability is maintained by the responsible record control organization.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

I t

4, t

iy 1

I

17.3 ASSESSMENT

17.3.1 Methodology A comprehensive program of planned and periodic self and independent assessments is established to keep management apprised of the overall performance of Ginna Station.

Managers and supervisors assess the activities and results within their organizations'reas of responsibility to assure that they meet quality requirements and performance standards.

Through observation and routine monitoring, they detect adverse operational

events, declining performance

trends, and precursors of potential problems.

They take action to correct these problems as well as those identified by external sources.

Independent assessment of the effectiveness of quality program implementation and overall Ginna Station performance is the primary role of the QA organization.

Independent assessments are conducted through internal audits and QA surveillances on behalf of the NSARB; the Vice President, Nuclear Operations Group; and as requested by line management.

This is accomplished by monitoring performance, reporting findings to line management in a timely manner, and verifying satisfactory resolution of problems.

Operational Assessment is the evaluation of anomalous performance and potential problem precursors from external sources.

The NSARB conducts independent assessment through periodic review of plant activities and by directing biennial audits and evaluating their results.

The responsibilities of the NSARB are discussed in sections 17.1.2 and 17.1.3.

Independent assessment activities are performed in accordance with instructions and procedures by organizations independent of the areas being assessed.

Organizations performing independent assessment are technically and performance oriented, with their primary focus on the quality of the end product and secondary focus on processes.

17.3.2 Assessment Self -assessment Self-assessment is established in the Nuclear Policy Manual as the responsibility of all organizations with involvement in the operation and support of Ginna Station.

Individuals and work groups are accountable for achieving acceptable quality by adhering to procedures and verifying that their work meets quality requirements and performance standards.

RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

A1 P4.,

b

~,

Inde endent Assessment A program of planned and periodic independent assessments is established and implemented to confirm that activities affecting quality comply with the Quality Assurance Program and that the program has been implemented effectively.

Assessments provide comprehensive independent evaluation of activities, results, and procedures.

The independent assessment program includes internal audits, external audits, and QA surveillances.

These assessments are both performance-based and compliance-based, with the focus on activities and functions which often cut across organizational lines.

Strengths and weaknesses of an organization's performance are determined in these assessments, allowing QA to identify areas of weaknesses for more frequent scrutiny.

In areas of

strength, assessment efforts can be reduced, freeing resources for examination of activities that could benefit most from independent assessment.

Internal audits of selected aspects of quality affecting activities are performed at a frequency commensurate with safety significance and management concerns.

The audits are regularly scheduled on a formal, preplanned audit schedule in a manner which assures that audits of safety related activities are completed once every twenty-four (24) months.

The audit schedule is dynamic, reviewed and revised periodically to assure appropriate coverage of current and planned activities.

Table 17.3.2-1 is a list of audits.

Supplementing this list are audits of the Nuclear Emergency

Response

Plan to satisfy the requirements of 10CFR50.54 (t), and Station Security Plan to satisfy the requirements of 10CFR50.54 (p)(3),

73.56 (g)(1) and (g)(2) and 10CFR73.55 (g)(4).

Audit frequency and further discussion of these audits are described in their respective plans.

~

QA surveillances augment scheduled audits

and, by their nature, require less planning and are more responsive to management requests.

They are also better suited to event driven activities, such as drills, corrective maintenance, and surveillance tests.

Additional audits and QA surveillances are conducted as necessitated by situations or evaluations including:

~

special conditions which preclude deferral o

management concerns resulting from previous assessment results and corrective action RG&E QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

'S v

t

<4 i

e 1t

,1-t

~

information from external sources (e.g.,

generic experience of the nuclear industry, ASME, peer organizations, and regulatory bodies).

Each audit requires the development of an audit plan to provide information about the audit, such as characteristics and activities to be assessed, acceptance

criteria, names of those who will perform the audit, scheduling arrangements, and the method of reporting findings and recommendations.

Audit planning and performance utilize performance-based techniques that facilitate achievement of assessment objectives

~

Audit and QA surveillance assessments are performed in accordance with written procedures or checklists by personnel who do not have direct responsibility in the areas being assessed.

Independent assessments may be conducted by Quality Assurance engineers or other qualified personnel, such as technical specialists from other company departments, outside consultants, and individuals from other utilities.

Assessment results are documented and reported to the assessor's management, the supervisor and division head having responsibility in the area

assessed, and, for audits, to the Nuclear Safety Audit and Review Board.

Within a specified time

period, the person having supervisory responsibility in the area assessed is required to review the results, take necessary action to correct the deficiencies identified by the report, and document and report the corrective action.

External audits of major contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers are conducted during the early stages of design and procurement to evaluate their quality assurance program for compliance with all procurement document requirements.

Audits are conducted, as necessary, to assure that major contractors, subcontractors, and suppliers are auditing their suppliers'uality assurance programs in accordance with procurement documents.

During the project or procurement

process, additional audits are performed, as required, to assure all quality assurance program requirements are properly implemented in accordance with procurement documents.

Nuclear Assessment performs regular analyses of assessment results to evaluate quality and performance trends.

Results of these

analyses, including strengths and weaknesses, are provided to management for their regular review.

Management concerns due to assessment results may necessitate a follow-up assessment, either by audit or by QA surveillance.

The Nuclear Policy Manual provides guidelines for conducting unscheduled audits including the need for reaudits.

RGGE QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 199S

lfl '

0

0 erational Assessment The Operating Experience section receives and evaluates information from other utilities, vendors,

INPO, and NRC.

The Nuclear Safety and Licensing section of Nuclear Engineering Services receives and evaluates information from the NRC. They ensure that relevant and timely recommended actions are provided to management that will eliminate precursors of similar problems at Ginna.

This is accomplished through:

coordinating feedback program to measure and improve the internalization of lessons learned from Operating Experience reviewing INPO SOERs and SERs reviewing vendor 10CFR Part 21 report of defects reviewing NRC information notices.

RG&H QAPSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

Tl h"

.* I aC Il Jp

'I

Table 17.3.2-1 Audit List Audit To ic Areas (24 months) a.

The conformance of facility operation to all provisions contained within the Technical Specifications and applicable license conditions.

b.

Performance,

training, and qualifications of the operating and technical staff.

The results of all actions taken to correct deficiencies occurring in facility equipment, structures,

systems, or methods of operation that affect nuclear safety.

The performance of all activities required by the Quality Assurance Program to meet the criteria of 10CFRSO, Appendix B.

e.

Facility Fire Protection Program and implementing procedures.

Inspection and audit of the fire protection and loss prevention program performed by non-licensee personnel.

personnel may be representatives of ANI, an insurance brokerage firm, or other qualified individuals.

The g.

The radiological environmental monitoring program and the results thereof.

h.

The Offsite Dose Calculation Manual and implementing procedures.

The Process Control Program and implementing procedures.

RG&E APSO, Revision 22 December 19, 1995

l gf l

I I