ML20134D421: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 17: Line 17:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:o ,
{{#Wiki_filter:o a
a May 15, 1985 nucear owareness networc 1347% massachusetts . lauxence, kansas 66044 .(913)749-1640 Hugh Thorapson Director of Division of Licensing US NRC Washington, D.C. 20555
May 15, 1985 nucear owareness networc 1347% massachusetts. lauxence, kansas 66044.(913)749-1640 Hugh Thorapson Director of Division of Licensing US NRC Washington, D.C.
20555


==Dear Hugh,==
==Dear Hugh,==
 
My FOIA requesting information relative to the Quality First (Ql) files (category #1) is dated March 1, 1985.
My FOIA requesting information relative to the Quality First (Ql) files (category #1) is dated March 1, 1985. NRR's response to my FOIA indicating there is no information within your department was dated April 4, 1985.
NRR's response to my FOIA indicating there is no information within your department was dated April 4,
In my meeting with you and Richard Stark on May 9, 1985 in your offices you informed me that.you responded that NRR did not
1985.
                                        ~
In my meeting with you and Richard Stark on May 9, 1985 in your offices you informed me that.you responded that NRR did not have documents relative to my FOIA-because you had not placed
have documents relative to my FOIA-because you had not placed Mr. Stark on the Wolf Creek Quality First case until April 1, 1985.
~
Mr. Stark on the Wolf Creek Quality First case until April 1, 1985.
Obviously, there is still a blatant discrepancy in NRR's response.
Obviously, there is still a blatant discrepancy in NRR's response.
You further indicated that the reports, files an; notes from Mr. Stark's review of the 300 case files within 01, including concerns about William Rudolph's conflict of interest would be made available to me and would not require re-submitting another FOIA to your office. Consequently, I would appreciate an im-mediate response as well as disclosure of NRR's documents relative to Q1 at Wolf Creek be sent to me.
You further indicated that the reports, files an; notes from Mr. Stark's review of the 300 case files within 01, including concerns about William Rudolph's conflict of interest would be made available to me and would not require re-submitting another FOIA to your office.
Consequently, I would appreciate an im-mediate response as well as disclosure of NRR's documents relative to Q1 at Wolf Creek be sent to me.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Sincerely, M
Sincerely, M
Stevi Stephens 8508190211 05051'3 PDR  FOIA       PDR STEPHEBS-A-25}}
Stevi Stephens 8508190211 05051'3 FOIA PDR STEPHEBS-A-25 PDR}}

Latest revision as of 05:28, 12 December 2024

Appeals Denial of FOIA Request for Info Re Quality First Program at Facility.Blatant Discrepancy Re Placement of Quality First Files Obvious
ML20134D421
Person / Time
Site: Wolf Creek Wolf Creek Nuclear Operating Corporation icon.png
Issue date: 05/15/1985
From: Stephens S
NUCLEAR AWARENESS NETWORK
To: Thompson H
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
FOIA-85-161, FOIA-85-A-25 NUDOCS 8508190211
Download: ML20134D421 (1)


Text

o a

May 15, 1985 nucear owareness networc 1347% massachusetts. lauxence, kansas 66044.(913)749-1640 Hugh Thorapson Director of Division of Licensing US NRC Washington, D.C.

20555

Dear Hugh,

My FOIA requesting information relative to the Quality First (Ql) files (category #1) is dated March 1, 1985.

NRR's response to my FOIA indicating there is no information within your department was dated April 4,

1985.

In my meeting with you and Richard Stark on May 9, 1985 in your offices you informed me that.you responded that NRR did not have documents relative to my FOIA-because you had not placed

~

Mr. Stark on the Wolf Creek Quality First case until April 1, 1985.

Obviously, there is still a blatant discrepancy in NRR's response.

You further indicated that the reports, files an; notes from Mr. Stark's review of the 300 case files within 01, including concerns about William Rudolph's conflict of interest would be made available to me and would not require re-submitting another FOIA to your office.

Consequently, I would appreciate an im-mediate response as well as disclosure of NRR's documents relative to Q1 at Wolf Creek be sent to me.

Thank you.

Sincerely, M

Stevi Stephens 8508190211 05051'3 FOIA PDR STEPHEBS-A-25 PDR