IR 05000390/2013503: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| issue date = 11/07/2013 | | issue date = 11/07/2013 | ||
| title = IR 05000390-13-503; 10/28/2013 - 11/01/2013; Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1; Exercise Evaluation and Baseline Inspection | | title = IR 05000390-13-503; 10/28/2013 - 11/01/2013; Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1; Exercise Evaluation and Baseline Inspection | ||
| author name = Bonser B | | author name = Bonser B | ||
| author affiliation = NRC/RGN-II/DRS/PSB1 | | author affiliation = NRC/RGN-II/DRS/PSB1 | ||
| addressee name = Shea J | | addressee name = Shea J | ||
| addressee affiliation = Tennessee Valley Authority | | addressee affiliation = Tennessee Valley Authority | ||
| docket = 05000390 | | docket = 05000390 | ||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter | {{#Wiki_filter:November 7, 2013 | ||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS INSPECTION | |||
REPORT 05000390/2013503 | |||
==Dear Mr. Shea:== | ==Dear Mr. Shea:== | ||
On November 1, 2013, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results that were discussed on November 1, 2013, with Mr. Tim Cleary and other members of plant staff. | On November 1, 2013, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results that were discussed on November 1, 2013, with Mr. Tim Cleary and other members of plant staff. | ||
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the | The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations, and with the conditions of your license. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel. | ||
Based on the results of this inspection, no findings were identified. | |||
Sincerely,/RA/ | In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390 of the NRC's | ||
"Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its Enclosure, and your response, if any, will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room, or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), which is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room). | |||
Sincerely, | |||
/RA/ | |||
Brian Bonser, Chief | |||
Plant Support Branch 1 | |||
Division of Reactor Safety | |||
Docket No. 50-390 License No. NPF-90 | |||
===Enclosure:=== | ===Enclosure:=== | ||
Inspection Report 05000390/2013503 | Inspection Report 05000390/2013503 w/Attachment: Supplementary Information | ||
REGION II== | |||
Docket No: | |||
05000390 | |||
License No: | |||
NPF-90 | |||
Report No: | |||
05000390/2013503 | |||
Licensee: | |||
Tennessee Valley Authority | |||
Facility: | |||
Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1 | |||
Location: | |||
Spring City, TN | |||
Dates: | |||
October 28, 2013 - November 1, 2013 | |||
Inspectors: | |||
M. Speck, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector | |||
S. Sanchez, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector | |||
W. Loo, Senior Health Physicist | |||
R. Monk, Senior Resident Inspector | |||
Approved by: | |||
Brian Bonser, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety | |||
=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS= | =SUMMARY OF FINDINGS= | ||
IR 05000390/2013503; October | IR 05000390/2013503; October 28 - November 1, 2013; Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1; | ||
Exercise Evaluation and Baseline Inspection | |||
The report covered an announced inspection by two emergency preparedness inspectors, one senior health physicist, and one senior resident inspector. No findings were identified. | |||
=REPORT DETAILS= | =REPORT DETAILS= | ||
==REACTOR SAFETY== | ==REACTOR SAFETY== | ||
===Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness=== | |||
===Cornerstone:=== | 1EP1 Exercise Evaluation | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
| Line 56: | Line 101: | ||
The onsite inspection consisted of the following review and assessment: | The onsite inspection consisted of the following review and assessment: | ||
* The adequacy of the | * The adequacy of the licensees performance in the biennial exercise, conducted on October 30, 2013, was reviewed and assessed regarding the implementation of the Risk Significant Planning Standards (RSPS) in 10 CFR 50.47 (b)(4), (5), (9), and (10)which address emergency classification, offsite notification, radiological assessment, and protective action recommendations, respectively. | ||
* The overall adequacy of the | * The overall adequacy of the licensees emergency response facilities with regard to NUREG-0696, Functional Criteria for Emergency Response Facilities, and Emergency Plan commitments. The facilities assessed were the Control Room Simulator, Technical Support Center (TSC), Operations Support Center (OSC), and Central Emergency Control Center (CECC). | ||
* Other performance areas, such as the emergency response | * Other performance areas, such as the emergency response organizations (ERO)recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control, intra-and inter-facility communications; prioritization of mitigation activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies; and the overall implementation of the emergency plan and its implementing procedures. | ||
* Past performance issues from NRC inspection reports and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)/Department of Homeland Security (DHS) exercise reports to determine the effectiveness of corrective actions as demonstrated during this exercise to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14). | * Past performance issues from NRC inspection reports and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)/Department of Homeland Security (DHS) exercise reports to determine the effectiveness of corrective actions as demonstrated during this exercise to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14). | ||
* The post-exercise critique process and the presentation to the licensee's senior management conducted on October 31, 2013, to evaluate the | * The post-exercise critique process and the presentation to the licensee's senior management conducted on October 31, 2013, to evaluate the licensees self-assessment of its ERO performance during the exercise, and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Subsection IV.F.2.g. | ||
The inspectors reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis. | The inspectors reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis. | ||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
No findings were identified. | No findings were identified. {{a|1EP8}} | ||
{{a|1EP8}} | |||
==1EP8 Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review== | ==1EP8 Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review== | ||
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71114.08}} | {{IP sample|IP=IP 71114.08}} | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
Prior to the inspection activity, the inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario submitted to the NRC using IP 71114.08, | Prior to the inspection activity, the inspectors conducted an in-office review of the | ||
exercise objectives and scenario submitted to the NRC using IP 71114.08, Exercise | |||
Evaluation - Scenario Review, to determine if the exercise would test major elements | |||
of the emergency plan as required by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14). This inspection activity | |||
represents one sample on a biennial cycle. | |||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
No findings were identified | No findings were identified | ||
==OTHER ACTIVITIES== | ==OTHER ACTIVITIES== | ||
{{a|4OA1}} | {{a|4OA1}} | ||
==4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification== | ==4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification== | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals relative to the performance indicators (PI)listed below for the period July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2013. To verify the accuracy of the PI data reported during that period, PI definitions and guidance contained in NEI 99-02, | The inspectors sampled licensee submittals relative to the performance indicators (PI)listed below for the period July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2013. To verify the accuracy of the PI data reported during that period, PI definitions and guidance contained in NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6 was used to confirm the reporting basis for each data element. | ||
Emergency Preparedness Cornerstone | Emergency Preparedness Cornerstone | ||
* Emergency Response Organization Drill/Exercise Performance (DEP) | * Emergency Response Organization Drill/Exercise Performance (DEP) | ||
* Emergency Response Organization Readiness (ERO) | * Emergency Response Organization Readiness (ERO) | ||
* Alert and Notification System Reliability (ANS) | * Alert and Notification System Reliability (ANS) | ||
For the specified review period, the inspectors examined data reported to the NRC, procedural guidance for reporting PI information, and records used by the licensee to identify potential PI occurrences. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the DEP through review of a sample of drill and event records. The inspectors reviewed selected training records to verify the accuracy of the ERO PI for personnel assigned to key positions in the ERO. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PI for ANS reliability through review of a sample of the licensees records of periodic system tests. Licensee procedures, records, and other documents reviewed within this inspection area are listed in the Attachment. | |||
The inspectors reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for each of the three Emergency Preparedness PI, (i.e., DEP, ERO, and ANS) on an annual basis. | The inspectors reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for each of the three Emergency Preparedness PI, (i.e., DEP, ERO, and ANS) on an annual basis. | ||
| Line 93: | Line 148: | ||
No findings were identified. | No findings were identified. | ||
{{a|4OA6}} | {{a|4OA6}} | ||
==4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit== | ==4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit== | ||
On November 1, 2013, the lead inspector presented the inspection results to Mr. T. Cleary, Site Vice President, and other members of the plant staff. The inspectors confirmed that proprietary information was not provided during the | On November 1, 2013, the lead inspector presented the inspection results to Mr. T. Cleary, Site Vice President, and other members of the plant staff. The inspectors confirmed that proprietary information was not provided during the inspection. | ||
ATTACHMENT: | ATTACHMENT: | ||
=SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION= | =SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION= | ||
==KEY POINTS OF CONTACT== | |||
===Licensee Personnel=== | |||
: [[contact::J. Addison]], Manager EP Drills and Exercises | |||
: [[contact::T. Detchemendy]], Emergency Preparedness Manager | |||
: [[contact::T. Cleary]], Site Vice President | |||
: [[contact::W. Lee]], Corporate EP Manager | |||
: [[contact::J. Parshall]], Manager, EP Program Planning and Implementation | |||
: [[contact::M. Phillips]], EP Specialist | |||
: [[contact::T. Morgan]], Licensing Engineer | |||
: [[contact::M. White]], EP Specialist | |||
==ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED== | |||
None | |||
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED== | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 03:24, 11 January 2025
| ML13311B787 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Watts Bar  |
| Issue date: | 11/07/2013 |
| From: | Brian Bonser NRC/RGN-II/DRS/PSB1 |
| To: | James Shea Tennessee Valley Authority |
| Linda K. Gruhler 404-997-4633 | |
| References | |
| IR-13-503 | |
| Download: ML13311B787 (10) | |
Text
November 7, 2013
SUBJECT:
WATTS BAR NUCLEAR PLANT EMERGENCY PREPAREDNESS INSPECTION
REPORT 05000390/2013503
Dear Mr. Shea:
On November 1, 2013, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results that were discussed on November 1, 2013, with Mr. Tim Cleary and other members of plant staff.
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations, and with the conditions of your license. The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.
Based on the results of this inspection, no findings were identified.
In accordance with Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 2.390 of the NRC's
"Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its Enclosure, and your response, if any, will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room, or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), which is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Brian Bonser, Chief
Plant Support Branch 1
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket No. 50-390 License No. NPF-90
Enclosure:
Inspection Report 05000390/2013503 w/Attachment: Supplementary Information
REGION II==
Docket No:
05000390
License No:
Report No:
Licensee:
Tennessee Valley Authority
Facility:
Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1
Location:
Spring City, TN
Dates:
October 28, 2013 - November 1, 2013
Inspectors:
M. Speck, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector
S. Sanchez, Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector
W. Loo, Senior Health Physicist
R. Monk, Senior Resident Inspector
Approved by:
Brian Bonser, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
IR 05000390/2013503; October 28 - November 1, 2013; Watts Bar Nuclear Plant, Unit 1;
Exercise Evaluation and Baseline Inspection
The report covered an announced inspection by two emergency preparedness inspectors, one senior health physicist, and one senior resident inspector. No findings were identified.
REPORT DETAILS
REACTOR SAFETY
Cornerstone: Emergency Preparedness
1EP1 Exercise Evaluation
a. Inspection Scope
Prior to the arrival onsite, the inspectors conducted an in-office review of the exercise objectives and scenario submitted to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)using inspection procedure (IP) 71114.08, Exercise Evaluation, Scenario Review, to determine if the exercise would test major elements of the emergency plan as required by Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) 50.47(b)(14).
The onsite inspection consisted of the following review and assessment:
- The adequacy of the licensees performance in the biennial exercise, conducted on October 30, 2013, was reviewed and assessed regarding the implementation of the Risk Significant Planning Standards (RSPS) in 10 CFR 50.47 (b)(4), (5), (9), and (10)which address emergency classification, offsite notification, radiological assessment, and protective action recommendations, respectively.
- The overall adequacy of the licensees emergency response facilities with regard to NUREG-0696, Functional Criteria for Emergency Response Facilities, and Emergency Plan commitments. The facilities assessed were the Control Room Simulator, Technical Support Center (TSC), Operations Support Center (OSC), and Central Emergency Control Center (CECC).
- Other performance areas, such as the emergency response organizations (ERO)recognition of abnormal plant conditions; command and control, intra-and inter-facility communications; prioritization of mitigation activities; utilization of repair and field monitoring teams; interface with offsite agencies; and the overall implementation of the emergency plan and its implementing procedures.
- Past performance issues from NRC inspection reports and Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)/Department of Homeland Security (DHS) exercise reports to determine the effectiveness of corrective actions as demonstrated during this exercise to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14).
- The post-exercise critique process and the presentation to the licensee's senior management conducted on October 31, 2013, to evaluate the licensees self-assessment of its ERO performance during the exercise, and to ensure compliance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix E, Subsection IV.F.2.g.
The inspectors reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for the exercise evaluation on a biennial basis.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1EP8 Exercise Evaluation - Scenario Review
a. Inspection Scope
Prior to the inspection activity, the inspectors conducted an in-office review of the
exercise objectives and scenario submitted to the NRC using IP 71114.08, Exercise
Evaluation - Scenario Review, to determine if the exercise would test major elements
of the emergency plan as required by 10 CFR 50.47(b)(14). This inspection activity
represents one sample on a biennial cycle.
b. Findings
No findings were identified
OTHER ACTIVITIES
4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors sampled licensee submittals relative to the performance indicators (PI)listed below for the period July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2013. To verify the accuracy of the PI data reported during that period, PI definitions and guidance contained in NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Revision 6 was used to confirm the reporting basis for each data element.
Emergency Preparedness Cornerstone
- Emergency Response Organization Drill/Exercise Performance (DEP)
- Emergency Response Organization Readiness (ERO)
- Alert and Notification System Reliability (ANS)
For the specified review period, the inspectors examined data reported to the NRC, procedural guidance for reporting PI information, and records used by the licensee to identify potential PI occurrences. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the DEP through review of a sample of drill and event records. The inspectors reviewed selected training records to verify the accuracy of the ERO PI for personnel assigned to key positions in the ERO. The inspectors verified the accuracy of the PI for ANS reliability through review of a sample of the licensees records of periodic system tests. Licensee procedures, records, and other documents reviewed within this inspection area are listed in the Attachment.
The inspectors reviewed various documents which are listed in the Attachment. This inspection activity satisfied one inspection sample for each of the three Emergency Preparedness PI, (i.e., DEP, ERO, and ANS) on an annual basis.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit
On November 1, 2013, the lead inspector presented the inspection results to Mr. T. Cleary, Site Vice President, and other members of the plant staff. The inspectors confirmed that proprietary information was not provided during the inspection.
ATTACHMENT:
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
Licensee Personnel
- J. Addison, Manager EP Drills and Exercises
- T. Detchemendy, Emergency Preparedness Manager
- T. Cleary, Site Vice President
- J. Parshall, Manager, EP Program Planning and Implementation
- M. Phillips, EP Specialist
- T. Morgan, Licensing Engineer
ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED
None