IR 05000483/2013404: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:July 16, 2013 | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
These findings were determined to involve violations of NRC Requirements. | These findings were determined to involve violations of NRC Requirements. | ||
If you contest the violations or significance of these NCVs, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region IV; the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the Callaway Plant. Two cross-cutting aspects were assigned to the findings in the area of Human Performance because the licensee failed to make risk significant decisions using a systematic process | If you contest the violations or significance of these NCVs, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region IV; the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the Callaway Plant. | ||
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION RE G IO N I V 1600 EAST LAMAR BLVD ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4511 Two cross-cutting aspects were assigned to the findings in the area of Human Performance because the licensee failed to make risk significant decisions using a systematic process | |||
[H.1(a)] and failed to use conservative assumptions in decision making [H.1(b)]. If you disagree with the cross-cutting aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator, Region IV; and the NRC Resident Inspector at Callaway Plant. | [H.1(a)] and failed to use conservative assumptions in decision making [H.1(b)]. If you disagree with the cross-cutting aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator, Region IV; and the NRC Resident Inspector at Callaway Plant. | ||
| Line 46: | Line 48: | ||
Sincerely, | Sincerely, | ||
/RA/ Paul J. Elkmann for Mark S. Haire, Chief Plant Support Branch 1 Division of Reactor Safety Docket: 50-483 License: NPF-30 Nonpublic Enclosure: | /RA/ Paul J. Elkmann for | ||
NRC Inspection Report 05000483/2013404 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information cc w/enclosure: | |||
Mr. Eric Olson Security Manager Callaway Plant, Unit 1 5 Miles North of Hwy 94 Portland, MO 65067 cc w/o enclosure: Electronic Distribution for Callaway Plant | Mark S. Haire, Chief | ||
Plant Support Branch 1 | |||
Division of Reactor Safety | |||
Docket: 50-483 License: NPF-30 | |||
Nonpublic Enclosure: | |||
NRC Inspection Report 05000483/2013404 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information | |||
cc w/enclosure: | |||
Mr. Eric Olson Security Manager Callaway Plant, Unit 1 5 Miles North of Hwy 94 Portland, MO 65067 | |||
cc w/o enclosure: Electronic Distribution for Callaway Plant | |||
}} | }} | ||
Latest revision as of 06:48, 11 January 2025
| ML13197A486 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Callaway  |
| Issue date: | 07/16/2013 |
| From: | Mark Haire Plant Support Branch-1 |
| To: | Heflin A Union Electric Co |
| References | |
| IR-13-404 | |
| Download: ML13197A486 (3) | |
Text
July 16, 2013
SUBJECT:
CALLAWAY PLANT - NRC SECURITY INSPECTION REPORT 05000483/2013404
Dear Mr. Heflin:
On June 6, 2013, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Callaway Plant. The inspection covered one or more of the key attributes of the security cornerstone of the NRCs Reactor Oversight Process. The enclosed inspection report documents the inspection results, which were discussed on June 6, 2013, with Mr. B. Cox, Senior Director Nuclear Operations, and other members of your staff.
The inspection examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to security and compliance with the Commissions rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.
The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.
Two NRC-identified violations of very low security significance (i.e., Green as determined by the Physical Protection Significance Determination Process) were identified during this inspection.
The deficiencies were promptly corrected or compensated for and the plant was in compliance with applicable physical protection and security requirements within the scope of this inspection before the inspectors left the area.
These findings were determined to involve violations of NRC Requirements.
If you contest the violations or significance of these NCVs, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN: Document Control Desk, Washington DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator, Region IV; the Director, Office of Enforcement, United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555-0001; and the NRC Resident Inspector at the Callaway Plant.
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION RE G IO N I V 1600 EAST LAMAR BLVD ARLINGTON, TEXAS 76011-4511 Two cross-cutting aspects were assigned to the findings in the area of Human Performance because the licensee failed to make risk significant decisions using a systematic process
H.1(a) and failed to use conservative assumptions in decision making H.1(b). If you disagree with the cross-cutting aspect assignment in this report, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator, Region IV; and the NRC Resident Inspector at Callaway Plant.
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Website at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
However, the material enclosed herewith contains Security-Related Information in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1) and its disclosure to unauthorized individuals could present a security vulnerability. Therefore, the material in the enclosure will not be made available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the PARS component of NRC's ADAMS. If you choose to provide a response and Security-Related Information is necessary to provide an acceptable response, please mark your entire response Security-Related Information - Withhold from Public Disclosure under 10 CFR 2.390 in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(d)(1) and follow the instructions for withholding in 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1).
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390(b)(1)(ii), the NRC is waiving the affidavit requirements for your response.
Sincerely,
/RA/ Paul J. Elkmann for
Mark S. Haire, Chief
Plant Support Branch 1
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket: 50-483 License: NPF-30
Nonpublic Enclosure:
NRC Inspection Report 05000483/2013404 w/Attachment: Supplemental Information
cc w/enclosure:
Mr. Eric Olson Security Manager Callaway Plant, Unit 1 5 Miles North of Hwy 94 Portland, MO 65067
cc w/o enclosure: Electronic Distribution for Callaway Plant