IR 05000424/2014002: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
 
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II 245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1257 April 29, 2014  
[[Issue date::April 29, 2014]]


Mr. Tom Vice President - Vogtle Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
Mr. Tom Vice President - Vogtle  


Vogtle Electric Generating Plant 7821 River Road Waynesboro, GA 30830
Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.
 
Vogtle Electric Generating Plant  
 
7821 River Road  
 
Waynesboro, GA 30830


SUBJECT: VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT - NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05000424/2014002 AND 05000425/2014002
SUBJECT: VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT - NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05000424/2014002 AND 05000425/2014002


==Dear Mr. Tynan:==
==Dear Mr. Tynan:==
On March 31, 2014, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2. The enclosed integrated inspection report documents the inspection findings, which were discussed on April 22, 2014, with you and other members of your staff.
On March 31, 2014, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection  
 
at your Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2. The enclosed integrated inspection  
 
report documents the inspection findings, which were discussed on April 22, 2014, with you and  
 
other members of your staff.


The inspection(s) examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.
The inspection(s) examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.


The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed personnel.
The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed  
 
personnel.
 
Based on the results of this inspection, no findings of significance were identified. As we
 
informed you in the most recent NRC integrated inspection report, cross-cutting aspects
 
identified in the last six months of 2013 using t he previous terminology were being converted in accordance with the cross-reference in Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0310. Section 4OA5
 
of the enclosed report documents the conversion of these cross-cutting aspects which will be
 
evaluated for cross-cutting themes and potential substantive cross-cutting issues in accordance
 
with IMC 0305 starting with the 2014 mid-cycle assessment review. If you disagree with the
 
cross cutting aspect assigned, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this
 
inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator, Region II,
 
and the NRC Resident Inspector at the Vogtle Plant. In accordance with the 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosures, and your response (if any) will be avail able electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Public ly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's Agencywide Document Access and Managem ent System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public


Based on the results of this inspection, no findings of significance were identified. As we informed you in the most recent NRC integrated inspection report, cross-cutting aspects identified in the last six months of 2013 using the previous terminology were being converted in accordance with the cross-reference in Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0310. Section 4OA5 of the enclosed report documents the conversion of these cross-cutting aspects which will be evaluated for cross-cutting themes and potential substantive cross-cutting issues in accordance with IMC 0305 starting with the 2014 mid-cycle assessment review. If you disagree with the cross cutting aspect assigned, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator, Region II, and the NRC Resident Inspector at the Vogtle Plant. In accordance with the 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosures, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Electronic Reading Room).


Sincerely,/RA/ Frank Ehrhardt, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 2 Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos.: 05000424, 05000425 License Nos.: NPF-68 and NPF-81  
Sincerely,/RA/ Frank Ehrhardt, Chief  
 
Reactor Projects Branch 2  
 
Division of Reactor Projects  
 
Docket Nos.: 05000424, 05000425 License Nos.: NPF-68 and NPF-81  


===Enclosures:===
===Enclosures:===
Line 42: Line 79:


===w/Attachment:===
===w/Attachment:===
Supplemental Information cc distribution via ListServ In accordance with the 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosures, and your response (if any) will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Publicly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's Agencywide Document Access and Management System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Supplemental Information  
 
cc distribution via ListServ  
 
_________________________ SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DRP RII:DRP RII:DRs RII:DRS RII:DRP RII:DRP SIGNATURE Via email Via email Via email Via email Via email FJE /RA/ NAME MCain TChandler RCarrion AVargas AAlen FEhrhardt DATE 04/22/2014 04/23/2014 04/22/2014 04/22/2014 04/22/2014 04/29/2014 E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO Letter to Tom from Frank Ehrhardt dated April 29, 2014
 
SUBJECT: VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT - NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05000424/2014002 AND 05000425/2014002
 
DISTRIBUTION
: C. Evans, RII
 
L. Douglas, RII
 
OE Mail
 
RIDSNRRDIRS
 
PUBLIC RidsNrrPMVogtle Resource
 
Enclosure U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II
 
Docket Nos.: 50-424, 50-425
 
License Nos.: NPF-68, NPF-81


Sincerely,/RA/ Frank Ehrhardt, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 2 Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos.: 05000424, 05000425 License Nos.: NPF-68 and NPF-81
Report Nos.: 05000424/2014002 and 05000425/2014002


===Enclosures:===
Licensee: Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. (SNC)
Inspection Report 05000424/2014002 and 05000425/2014002


===w/Attachment:===
Facility: Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2
Supplemental Information cc distribution via ListServ


PUBLICLY AVAILABLE NON-PUBLICLY AVAILABLE SENSITIVE NON-SENSITIVE ADAMS: Yes ACCESSION NUMBER:_________________________ SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DRP RII:DRP RII:DRs RII:DRS RII:DRP RII:DRP SIGNATURE Via email Via email Via email Via email Via email FJE /RA/ NAME MCain TChandler RCarrion AVargas AAlen FEhrhardt DATE 04/22/2014 04/23/2014 04/22/2014 04/22/2014 04/22/2014 04/29/2014 E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO OFFICIAL RECORD COPY DOCUMENT NAME: G:\DRPII\RPB2\VOGTLE\REPORTS\2014\2014-002\VOGTLE IR 2014-002.DOC Letter to Tom from Frank Ehrhardt dated April 29, 2014
Location: Waynesboro, GA 30830


SUBJECT: VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT - NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05000424/2014002 AND 05000425/2014002 DISTRIBUTION: C. Evans, RII L. Douglas, RII OE Mail RIDSNRRDIRS PUBLIC RidsNrrPMVogtle Resource
Dates: January 1, 2014, through March 31, 2014


Enclosure U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II Docket Nos.: 50-424, 50-425 License Nos.: NPF-68, NPF-81 Report Nos.: 05000424/2014002 and 05000425/2014002 Licensee: Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. (SNC)
Inspectors: M. Cain, Senior Resident Inspector T. Chandler, Resident Inspector R. Carrion, Senior Reactor Inspector (Section 1R08)
Facility: Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2 Location: Waynesboro, GA 30830 Dates: January 1, 2014, through March 31, 2014 Inspectors: M. Cain, Senior Resident Inspector T. Chandler, Resident Inspector R. Carrion, Senior Reactor Inspector (Section 1R08)
A. Vargas, Reactor Inspector (Section 1R08)  
A. Vargas, Reactor Inspector (Section 1R08)  


Approved by: Frank Ehrhardt, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 2 Division of Reactor Projects Enclosure  
Approved by: Frank Ehrhardt, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 2  
 
Division of Reactor Projects Enclosure  


=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS=
=SUMMARY OF FINDINGS=
IR 05000424/2014002, 05000425/2014002; 01/01/2014 - 03/31/2014; Vogtle Electric  
IR 05000424/2014002, 05000425/2014002; 01/01/2014 - 03/31/2014; Vogtle Electric  


Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2, Integrated Inspection Report The report covered a three-month period of inspection by the resident and regional inspectors. No findings of significance were identified. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process" Revision 5.
Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2, Integrated Inspection Report The report covered a three-month period of inspection by the resident and regional inspectors. No findings of significance were identified. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in  
 
NUREG-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process" Revision 5.


=REPORT DETAILS=
=REPORT DETAILS=
Summary of Plant Status Unit 1 started the report period at full rated thermal power (RTP) and was shut down for a planned refueling outage on March 16, 2014. The unit remained shutdown for the remainder of the report period. Unit 2 operated at essentially RTP for the entire inspection period.
 
===Summary of Plant Status===
 
Unit 1 started the report period at full rated thermal power (RTP) and was shut down for a  
 
planned refueling outage on March 16, 2014. The unit remained shutdown for the remainder of  
 
the report period.
 
Unit 2 operated at essentially RTP for the entire inspection period.


==REACTOR SAFETY==
==REACTOR SAFETY==
Line 77: Line 147:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
Impending Adverse Weather Conditions   The inspectors reviewed the licensee's preparations to protect risk-significant systems from severe cold weather conditions expected on January 7, 2014. The inspectors evaluated the licensee's implementation of adverse weather preparation procedures and compensatory measures, including operator staffing, before the onset of and during the adverse weather conditions. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's plans to address the ramifications of potentially lasting effects that may result from cold weather conditions.
Impending Adverse Weather Conditions The inspectors reviewed the licensee's preparations to protect risk-significant systems  
 
from severe cold weather conditions expected on January 7, 2014. The inspectors  
 
evaluated the licensee's implementation of adverse weather preparation procedures and compensatory measures, including operator staffing, before the onset of and during the  
 
adverse weather conditions. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's plans to address the  
 
ramifications of potentially lasting effects that may result from cold weather conditions.
 
The inspectors verified that operator actions specified in the licensee's adverse weather
 
procedure maintain readiness of essential systems. The inspectors verified that required


The inspectors verified that operator actions specified in the licensee's adverse weather procedure maintain readiness of essential systems. The inspectors verified that required surveillances were current, or were scheduled and completed, if practical, before the onset of anticipated adverse weather conditions. The inspectors also verified the licensee implemented periodic equipment walkdowns or other measures to ensure that the condition of plant equipment met operability requirements. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
surveillances were current, or were scheduled and completed, if practical, before the  
 
onset of anticipated adverse weather conditions. The inspectors also verified the  
 
licensee implemented periodic equipment walkdowns or other measures to ensure that the condition of plant equipment met operability requirements. Documents reviewed are  
 
listed in the Attachment.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 88: Line 176:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
Partial Walkdown The inspectors verified that critical portions of selected systems were correctly aligned by performing partial walkdowns. The inspectors selected systems for assessment because they were a redundant or backup system or train, were important for mitigating risk for the current plant conditions, had been recently realigned, or were a single-train system. The inspectors determined the correct system lineup by reviewing plant procedures and drawings. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
Partial Walkdown
 
The inspectors verified that critical portions of selected systems were correctly aligned  
 
by performing partial walkdowns. The ins pectors selected systems for assessment because they were a redundant or backup system or train, were important for mitigating  
 
risk for the current plant conditions, had been recently realigned, or were a single-train system.
 
The inspectors determined the correct system lineup by reviewing plant procedures and  
 
drawings. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.


The inspectors selected the following three systems or trains to inspect:
The inspectors selected the following three systems or trains to inspect:
* Unit 2 "A" train residual heat removal (RHR) system while the "B" train RHR pump was out of service for maintenance
* Unit 2 "A" train residual heat removal (RHR) system while the "B" train RHR pump was out of service for maintenance
* Unit 1 "A" and "C" train auxiliary feedwater (AFW) systems while the "B" train AFW system was out of service for planned maintenance
* Unit 1 "A" and "C" train auxiliary feedwater (AFW) systems while the "B" train AFW system was out of service for planned maintenance
* Unit 2 "A" train nuclear service cooling water (NSCW) transfer system while the "B" train NSCW transfer system was out of service for planned maintenance Complete Walkdown The inspectors verified the alignment of the Unit 1 containment spray (CS) system. The inspectors selected this system for assessment because it is a risk-significant mitigating system. The inspectors determined the correct system lineup by reviewing plant procedures, drawings, the updated final safety analysis report, and other documents. To identify any deficiencies that could affect the ability of the system to perform its function(s), the inspectors reviewed records related to outstanding design issues and maintenance work requests. The inspectors verified that the selected system was correctly aligned by performing a complete walkdown of accessible components.
* Unit 2 "A" train nuclear service cooling water (NSCW) transfer system while the "B" train NSCW transfer system was out of service for planned maintenance  
 
Complete Walkdown The inspectors verified the alignment of the Unit 1 containment spray (CS) system. The  
 
inspectors selected this system for assessment because it is a risk-significant mitigating  
 
system. The inspectors determined the co rrect system lineup by reviewing plant procedures, drawings, the updated final safety analysis report, and other documents. To  
 
identify any deficiencies that could affect the ability of the system to perform its  
 
function(s), the inspectors reviewed records related to outstanding design issues and  
 
maintenance work requests. The inspectors verified that the selected system was  
 
correctly aligned by performing a complete walkdown of accessible components.
 
To verify the licensee was identifying and resolving equipment alignment discrepancies,
 
the inspectors reviewed corrective action documents, including condition reports and
 
outstanding work orders. The inspectors also reviewed periodic reports containing
 
information on the status of risk-significant systems, including maintenance rule reports


To verify the licensee was identifying and resolving equipment alignment discrepancies, the inspectors reviewed corrective action documents, including condition reports and outstanding work orders. The inspectors also reviewed periodic reports containing information on the status of risk-significant systems, including maintenance rule reports and system health reports. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
and system health reports. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 104: Line 224:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
Quarterly Inspection The inspectors evaluated the adequacy of selected fire plans by comparing the fire plans to the defined hazards and defense-in-depth features specified in the fire protection program. In evaluating the fire plans, the inspectors assessed the following items:
Quarterly Inspection The inspectors evaluated the adequacy of selected fire plans by comparing the fire plans  
 
to the defined hazards and defense-in-depth features specified in the fire protection  
 
program. In evaluating the fire plans, the inspectors assessed the following items:
* control of transient combustibles and ignition sources
* control of transient combustibles and ignition sources
* fire detection systems
* fire detection systems
Line 112: Line 236:
* passive fire protection features
* passive fire protection features
* compensatory measures and fire watches
* compensatory measures and fire watches
* issues related to fire protection contained in the licensee's corrective action program The inspectors toured the following five fire areas to assess material condition and operational status of fire protection equipment. Documents reviewed are listed in the  
* issues related to fire protection contained in the licensee's corrective action program
 
The inspectors toured the following five fire areas to assess material condition and  
 
operational status of fire protection equipment. Documents reviewed are listed in the  
.
.
* Unit 1, level "A" east and west penetration areas, fire zones 89, 90, 159, 87, 88, 93, 120, and 158
* Unit 1, level "A" east and west penetration areas, fire zones 89, 90, 159, 87, 88, 93, 120, and 158
Line 118: Line 246:
* Unit 2, 4.16 kV switchgear and remote shutdown rooms, fire zones 91, 92, 98, 103, and 97
* Unit 2, 4.16 kV switchgear and remote shutdown rooms, fire zones 91, 92, 98, 103, and 97
* Unit 2, "B" train emergency diesel generator (EDG) building, fire zones 162 and 164
* Unit 2, "B" train emergency diesel generator (EDG) building, fire zones 162 and 164
* Unit 1 containment building   Annual Inspection The inspectors evaluated the licensee's fire brigade performance during a drill on February 10, 2014, and assessed the brigade's capability to meet fire protection licensing basis requirements. The inspectors observed the following aspects of fire brigade performance:
* Unit 1 containment building Annual Inspection
 
The inspectors evaluated the licensee's fire brigade performance during a drill on  
 
February 10, 2014, and assessed the brigade's capability to meet fire protection  
 
licensing basis requirements. The inspectors observed the following aspects of fire  
 
brigade performance:
* capability of fire brigade members
* capability of fire brigade members
* leadership ability of the brigade leader
* leadership ability of the brigade leader
* use of turnout gear and firefighting equipment
* use of turnout gear and firefighting equipment
* team effectiveness
* team effectiveness
* compliance with site procedures The inspectors also assessed the ability of control room operators to combat potential fires, including identifying the location of the fire, dispatching the fire brigade, and sounding alarms. The inspectors evaluated the licensee's ability to declare the appropriate emergency action level and make required notifications in accordance with NUREG 0654, "Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants (FEMA-REP-1)"
* compliance with site procedures  
and Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, "Domestic Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities."  Documents reviewed are listed in the  
 
The inspectors also assessed the ability of control room operators to combat potential  
 
fires, including identifying the location of the fire, dispatching the fire brigade, and  
 
sounding alarms. The inspectors evaluated the licensee's ability to declare the  
 
appropriate emergency action level and make required notifications in accordance with  
 
NUREG 0654, "Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency  
 
Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants (FEMA-REP-1)"  
 
and Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, "Domestic Licensing  
 
of Production and Utilization Facilities."  Documents reviewed are listed in the  
.
.


Line 134: Line 285:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
Annual Review The inspectors verified the readiness and availability of the Unit 1 "B" train centrifugal charging pump (CCP) motor heat exchanger to perform its design function by observing performance tests or reviewing reports of those tests, verifying the licensee uses the periodic maintenance method outlined in Generic Letter 89-13, "Service Water System Problems Affecting Safety Related Equipment," dated July 18, 1989, observing the licensee's heat exchanger inspections, and verifying critical operating parameters through direct observation or by reviewing operating data. Additionally, the inspectors verified that the licensee had entered any significant heat exchanger performance problems into their corrective action program and that the corrective actions were appropriate. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
Annual Review The inspectors verified the readiness and availability of the Unit 1 "B" train centrifugal  
 
charging pump (CCP) motor heat exchanger to perform its design function by observing  
 
performance tests or reviewing reports of those tests, verifying the licensee uses the  
 
periodic maintenance method outlined in Generic Letter 89-13, "Service Water System  
 
Problems Affecting Safety Related Equipment," dated July 18, 1989, observing the  
 
licensee's heat exchanger inspections, and verifying critical operating parameters  
 
through direct observation or by reviewing operating data. Additionally, the inspectors  
 
verified that the licensee had entered any significant heat exchanger performance  
 
problems into their corrective action program and that the corrective actions were  
 
appropriate. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 142: Line 311:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
Non-Destructive Examination Activities and Welding Activities:  From March 24, 2014, through April 1, 2014, the inspectors conducted an on-site review of the implementation of the licensee's ISI Program for monitoring degradation of the reactor coolant system, emergency feedwater systems, risk-significant piping and components, and containment systems in Unit 1. The inspectors' activities included a review of non-destructive examinations (NDEs) to evaluate compliance with the applicable edition of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC),
Non-Destructive Examination Activities and Welding Activities
Section XI (Code of Record:  2001 Edition with 2003 Addenda; 3rd Interval, 2nd Period, 3rd Outage), and to verify that indications and defects (if present) were appropriately evaluated and dispositioned in accordance with the requirements of the ASME Code, Section XI, acceptance standards.
:  From March 24, 2014, through April 1, 2014, the inspectors conducted an on-site review of the implementation  
 
of the licensee's ISI Program for monitoring degradation of the reactor coolant system,  
 
emergency feedwater systems, risk-signifi cant piping and components, and containment systems in Unit 1. The inspectors' activities included a review of non-destructive  
 
examinations (NDEs) to evaluate compliance with the applicable edition of the American  
 
Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC),
Section XI (Code of Record:  2001 Edition with 2003 Addenda; 3rd Interval, 2nd Period,  
 
3rd Outage), and to verify that indications and defects (if present) were appropriately  
 
evaluated and dispositioned in accordance with the requirements of the ASME Code, Section XI, acceptance standards.


The inspectors directly observed the following NDE mandated by the ASME Code to evaluate compliance with the ASME Code Section XI and Section V requirements and, if any indications and defects were detected, to evaluate if they were dispositioned in accordance with the ASME Code or an NRC-approved alternative requirement.
The inspectors directly observed the following NDE mandated by the ASME Code to evaluate compliance with the ASME Code Section XI and Section V requirements and, if  
 
any indications and defects were detected, to evaluate if they were dispositioned in  
 
accordance with the ASME Code or an NRC-approved alternative requirement.
* Ultrasonic test of component 1-1204-021-19-RB. 6" Elbow to Pipe Weld, Class 2
* Ultrasonic test of component 1-1204-021-19-RB. 6" Elbow to Pipe Weld, Class 2
* VT-3 of component 1-1202-030-H003, Pipe Support The inspectors reviewed records of the following NDEs mandated by the ASME Code Section XI to evaluate compliance with the ASME Code Section XI and Section V requirements and, if any indications and defects were detected, to evaluate if they were dispositioned in accordance with the ASME Code or an NRC-approved alternative requirement.
* VT-3 of component 1-1202-030-H003, Pipe Support The inspectors reviewed records of the following NDEs mandated by the ASME Code Section XI to evaluate compliance with the ASME Code Section XI and Section V  
 
requirements and, if any indications and defects were detected, to evaluate if they were  
 
dispositioned in accordance with the ASME Code or an NRC-approved alternative  
 
requirement.
* PT of control rod drive (CRD) housing weld, component number 1-1201-V6-001-W184
* PT of control rod drive (CRD) housing weld, component number 1-1201-V6-001-W184
* PT of CRD housing weld, component number 1-1201-V6-001-W188 The inspectors observed the welding activities referenced below and reviewed associated documents in order to evaluate compliance with procedures and the ASME Code. The inspectors reviewed the work order, including the weld data sheets, welding procedures, procedure qualification records, and welder performance qualification records.
* PT of CRD housing weld, component number 1-1201-V6-001-W188  
* Check valve 1-1204-U4-145 replacement on safety injection system line 1-1204-030-2, valve is an ASME Class 1 and 2 break In addition, the inspectors reviewed the following work orders for the weld packages, including weld data sheets, welding procedures, procedure qualification records, and welder performance qualification records.
 
The inspectors observed the welding activities referenced below and reviewed  
 
associated documents in order to evaluate compliance with procedures and the ASME  
 
Code. The inspectors reviewed the work order, including the weld data sheets, welding  
 
procedures, procedure qualification records, and welder performance qualification  
 
records.
* Check valve 1-1204-U4-145 replacement on safety injection system line 1-1204-030-2, valve is an ASME Class 1 and 2 break  
 
In addition, the inspectors reviewed the following work orders for the weld packages,  
 
including weld data sheets, welding procedures, procedure qualification records, and  
 
welder performance qualification records.
* Work order SNC 495226, Seal Weld in the Chemical and Volume Control System Line 1-1208-008-3, ASME Class 1
* Work order SNC 495226, Seal Weld in the Chemical and Volume Control System Line 1-1208-008-3, ASME Class 1
* Work order SNC 555148, Chemical and Volume Control System Line 1-1208-012-2, ASME Class 1 During non-destructive surface and volumetric examinations performed since the previous refueling outage, the licensee did not identify any relevant indications that were analytically evaluated and accepted for continued service. Therefore, no NRC review was completed for this inspection procedure attribute.
* Work order SNC 555148, Chemical and Volume Control System Line 1-1208-012-2, ASME Class 1  
 
During non-destructive surface and volumetric examinations performed since the  
 
previous refueling outage, the licensee did not identify any relevant indications that were  
 
analytically evaluated and accepted for continued service. Therefore, no NRC review  
 
was completed for this inspection procedure attribute.
 
PWR Vessel Upper Head Penetration (VUHP) Inspection Activities
:  For the Unit 1 vessel head, a bare metal visual examination was not required this outage pursuant to
 
10 CFR 50.55a as it had been performed during the last refueling outage. Therefore, no
 
NRC review was done for this inspection procedure attribute.


PWR Vessel Upper Head Penetration (VUHP) Inspection Activities:  For the Unit 1 vessel head, a bare metal visual examination was not required this outage pursuant to 10 CFR 50.55a as it had been performed during the last refueling outage. Therefore, no NRC review was done for this inspection procedure attribute. Boric Acid Corrosion Control (BACC) Inspection Activities:  The inspectors reviewed the licensee's BACC program activities to ensure implementation with commitments made in response to NRC Generic Letter 88-05, "Boric Acid Corrosion of Carbon Steel Reactor Pressure Boundary," and applicable industry guidance documents. Specifically, the inspectors performed an on-site record review of procedures and the results of the licensee's containment walk-down inspections performed during the current spring refueling outage (1R18). The inspectors also interviewed the BACC program owner, conducted an independent walkdown of containment to evaluate compliance with licensee's BACC program requirements, and verified that degraded or non-conforming conditions, such as boric acid leaks, were properly identified and corrected in accordance with the licensee's BACC and corrective action programs.
Boric Acid Corrosion Control (BACC) Inspection Activities
:  The inspectors reviewed the licensee's BACC program activities to ensure implementation with commitments made in  


The inspectors reviewed the following condition reports and associated corrective actions related to evidence of boric acid leakage to evaluate if the corrective actions completed were consistent with the requirements of the ASME Code Section XI and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI.
response to NRC Generic Letter 88-05, "Boric Acid Corrosion of Carbon Steel Reactor
 
Pressure Boundary," and applicable industry guidance documents. Specifically, the
 
inspectors performed an on-site record review of procedures and the results of the
 
licensee's containment walk-down inspections performed during the current spring
 
refueling outage (1R18). The inspectors also interviewed the BACC program owner,
 
conducted an independent walkdown of containment to evaluate compliance with licensee's BACC program requirements, and verified that degraded or non-conforming conditions, such as boric acid leaks, were properly identified and corrected in
 
accordance with the licensee's BACC and corrective action programs.
 
The inspectors reviewed the following condition reports and associated corrective  
 
actions related to evidence of boric acid leakage to evaluate if the corrective actions completed were consistent with the requirements of the ASME Code Section XI and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI.
* CR 533081, Leak of valve 1HV3565
* CR 533081, Leak of valve 1HV3565
* CR 537487, Active boric acid leak on 1-1208-U4-A11
* CR 537487, Active boric acid leak on 1-1208-U4-A11
* CR 547269, Active boric acid leak on 1-1204-U4-137
* CR 547269, Active boric acid leak on 1-1204-U4-137
* CR 738478, Flange downstream of valve 1-1204-U4-009 has active boric acid leak The inspectors reviewed the following engineering evaluations completed for evidence of boric acid leakage to determine if degraded components were documented in the corrective action program. The inspectors also evaluated corrective actions for any degraded components to determine if they met the ASME Section XI Code.
* CR 738478, Flange downstream of valve 1-1204-U4-009 has active boric acid leak  
 
The inspectors reviewed the following engineering evaluations completed for evidence of  
 
boric acid leakage to determine if degraded components were documented in the  
 
corrective action program. The inspectors also evaluated corrective actions for any degraded components to determine if they met the ASME Section XI Code.
* Technical Evaluation (TE) 547817, associated with CR 547269 and includes Corrosion Assessment (CA) 1204-2013-006
* Technical Evaluation (TE) 547817, associated with CR 547269 and includes Corrosion Assessment (CA) 1204-2013-006
* TE 556248, associated with CR 537487 and includes CA 1208-2012-002 Steam Generator (SG) Tube Inspection Activities:  The inspectors observed the following activities and/or reviewed the following documentation and evaluated them against the licensee's technical specifications, commitments made to the NRC, ASME Section XI, and Nuclear Energy Institute 97-06 (Steam Generator Program Guidelines):
* TE 556248, associated with CR 537487 and includes CA 1208-2012-002  
* Reviewed the licensee's in-situ SG tube pressure testing screening criteria. In particular, the inspectors assessed whether assumed NDE flaw sizing accuracy was consistent with data from the EPRI examination technique specification sheets (ETSS) or other applicable performance demonstrations.
 
Steam Generator (SG) Tube Inspection Activities
:  The inspectors observed the following activities and/or reviewed the following documentation and evaluated them  
 
against the licensee's technical specifications, commitments made to the NRC, ASME Section XI, and Nuclear Energy Institute 97-06 (Steam Generator Program Guidelines):
* Reviewed the licensee's in-situ SG tube pressure testing screening criteria. In particular, the inspectors assessed whether assumed NDE flaw sizing accuracy was  
 
consistent with data from the EPRI examination technique specification sheets  
 
(ETSS) or other applicable performance demonstrations.
* Compared the numbers and sizes of SG tube flaws/degradation identified against the licensee's previous outage operational assessment.
* Compared the numbers and sizes of SG tube flaws/degradation identified against the licensee's previous outage operational assessment.
* Reviewed the SG tube eddy current testing (ET) examination scope and expansion criteria.
* Reviewed the SG tube eddy current test ing (ET) examination scope and expansion criteria.
* Evaluated if the licensee's SG tube ET examination scope included potential areas of tube degradation identified in prior outage SG tube inspections and/or as identified in NRC generic industry operating experience applicable to the licensee's SG tubes.
* Evaluated if the licensee's SG tube ET examination scope included potential areas of tube degradation identified in prior outage SG tube inspections and/or as identified  
 
in NRC generic industry operating experience applicable to the licensee's SG tubes.
* Reviewed the licensee's implementation of their extent of condition inspection scope and repairs for new SG tube degradation mechanism(s).
* Reviewed the licensee's implementation of their extent of condition inspection scope and repairs for new SG tube degradation mechanism(s).
* Reviewed the licensee's repair criteria and processes.
* Reviewed the licensee's repair criteria and processes.
* Verified that primary-to-secondary leakage (e.g., SG tube leakage) was below three gallons per day, or the detection threshold, during the previous operating cycle according to licensee procedures.
* Verified that primary-to-secondary leakage (e.g., SG tube leakage) was below three gallons per day, or the detection threshold, during the previous operating cycle  
* Evaluated if the ET equipment and techniques used by the licensee to acquire data from the SG tubes were qualified or validated to detect the known/expected types of SG tube degradation in accordance with Appendix H, "Performance Demonstration for Eddy Current Examination," of EPRI Pressurized Water Reactor Steam Generator Examination Guidelines, Revision 7.
 
according to licensee procedures.
* Evaluated if the ET equipment and techniques used by the licensee to acquire data from the SG tubes were qualified or validated to detect the known/expected types of  
 
SG tube degradation in accordance with Appendix H, "Performance Demonstration  
 
for Eddy Current Examination," of EPRI Pressurized Water Reactor Steam  
 
Generator Examination Guidelines, Revision 7.
* Reviewed the licensee's secondary side SG foreign object search and removal activities.
* Reviewed the licensee's secondary side SG foreign object search and removal activities.
* Reviewed ET personnel qualifications. Identification and Resolution of Problems:  The inspectors performed a review of a sample of ISI-related problems which were identified by the licensee and entered into the corrective action program as CRs. The inspectors reviewed the CRs to confirm that the licensee had appropriately described the scope of the problem, and had initiated corrective actions. The review also included the licensee's consideration and assessment of operating experience events applicable to the plant. The inspectors performed this review to ensure compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, "Corrective Action," requirements. Documents reviewed are listed in the  
* Reviewed ET personnel qualifications.
 
Identification and Resolution of Problems
:  The inspectors performed a review of a sample of ISI-related problems which were identified by the licensee and entered into  
 
the corrective action program as CRs. The inspectors reviewed the CRs to confirm that  
 
the licensee had appropriately described the scope of the problem, and had initiated  
 
corrective actions. The review also included the licensee's consideration and  
 
assessment of operating experience events applicable to the plant. The inspectors  
 
performed this review to ensure compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, "Corrective Action," requirements. Documents reviewed are listed in the  
.
.


Line 184: Line 462:
===.1 Resident Inspector Quarterly Review of Licensed Operator Requalification===
===.1 Resident Inspector Quarterly Review of Licensed Operator Requalification===


The inspectors observed an evaluated simulator scenario administered to an operating crew conducted in accordance with the licensee's accredited requalification training program.
The inspectors observed an evaluated simulator scenario administered to an operating  
 
crew conducted in accordance with the licensee's accredited requalification training  
 
program.


The inspectors assessed the following:
The inspectors assessed the following:
Line 190: Line 472:
* the ability of the licensee to administer the scenario and evaluate the operators
* the ability of the licensee to administer the scenario and evaluate the operators
* the quality of the post-scenario critique
* the quality of the post-scenario critique
* simulator performance   Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
* simulator performance Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.


===.2 Resident Inspector Quarterly Review of Licensed Operator Performance===
===.2 Resident Inspector Quarterly Review of Licensed Operator Performance===


The inspectors observed licensed operator performance in the main control room on February 4, 2014, during the performance of in-service testing.
The inspectors observed licensed operator performance in the main control room on  
 
February 4, 2014, during the performance of in-service testing.


The inspectors assessed the following:
The inspectors assessed the following:
Line 203: Line 487:
* use of human error prevention techniques
* use of human error prevention techniques
* documentation of activities
* documentation of activities
* management and supervision Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
* management and supervision Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 212: Line 496:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors assessed the licensee's treatment of the two issues listed below in order to verify the licensee appropriately addressed equipment problems within the scope of the maintenance rule (10 CFR 50.65, "Requirements for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants"). The inspectors reviewed procedures and records in order to evaluate the licensee's identification, assessment, and characterization of the problems as well as their corrective actions for returning the equipment to a satisfactory condition. The inspectors also interviewed system engineers and the maintenance rule coordinator to assess the accuracy of performance deficiencies and extent of condition. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
The inspectors assessed the licensee's treatment of the two issues listed below in order  
 
to verify the licensee appropriately addressed equipment problems within the scope of  
 
the maintenance rule (10 CFR 50.65, "Requirements for Monitoring the Effectiveness of  
 
Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants"). The inspectors reviewed procedures and  
 
records in order to evaluate the licensee's identification, assessment, and  
 
characterization of the problems as well as their corrective actions for returning the  
 
equipment to a satisfactory condition. The in spectors also interviewed system engineers and the maintenance rule coordinator to assess the accuracy of performance  
 
deficiencies and extent of condition. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
* CR 351658 - Unplanned limiting condition of operation (LCO): Intermediate Range nuclear instrument (NI) 2N-36 failure
* CR 351658 - Unplanned limiting condition of operation (LCO): Intermediate Range nuclear instrument (NI) 2N-36 failure
* CR 664671 and CR 681079 - Unit 2, Chemical and volume control system (CVCS) 1208 taken to maintenance rule a(1) status
* CR 664671 and CR 681079 - Unit 2, Chemical and volume control system (CVCS)1208 taken to maintenance rule a(1) status


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 223: Line 521:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors reviewed the five maintenance activities listed below to verify the licensee assessed and managed plant risk as required by 10 CFR 50.65(a)(4) and licensee procedures. The inspectors assessed the adequacy of the licensee's risk assessments and implementation of risk management actions. The inspectors also verified that the licensee was identifying and resolving problems with assessing and managing maintenance-related risk using the corrective action program. Additionally, for maintenance resulting from unforeseen situations, the inspectors assessed the effectiveness of the licensee's planning and control of emergent work activities.
The inspectors reviewed the five maintenance activities listed below to verify the  
 
licensee assessed and managed plant risk as required by 10 CFR 50.65(a)(4) and  
 
licensee procedures. The inspectors assessed the adequacy of the licensee's risk  
 
assessments and implementation of risk management actions. The inspectors also  
 
verified that the licensee was identifying and resolving problems with assessing and  
 
managing maintenance-related risk using the corrective action program. Additionally, for  
 
maintenance resulting from unforeseen situations, the inspectors assessed the  
 
effectiveness of the licensee's planning and control of emergent work activities.


Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
* Units 1 and 2, week of January 6, 2014, elevated Green risk condition associated with high-risk work in the high-voltage switchyard concurrent with the grid being in alert level 1A due to extreme low temperatures
* Units 1 and 2, week of January 6, 2014, elevated Green risk condition associated with high-risk work in the high-voltage switchyard concurrent with the grid being in  
* Unit 2, week of January 20, 2014, Yellow risk condition associated with the unplanned inoperability of Unit 2 "A" EDG concurrent with the high-risk work being performed in the high-voltage switchyard
 
* Unit 1, week of February 24, 2014, Yellow risk condition due to Unit 1 "A" NSCW pump #1 out of service (OOS) concurrent with Unit 1 "B" RHR pump OOS for scheduled maintenance outage
alert level 1A due to extreme low temperatures
* Unit 2, week of January 20, 2014, Yellow risk condition associated with the unplanned inoperability of Unit 2 "A" EDG concurrent with the high-risk work being  
 
performed in the high-voltage switchyard
* Unit 1, week of February 24, 2014, Yellow risk condition due to Unit 1 "A" NSCW pump #1 out of service (OOS) concurrent with Unit 1 "B" RHR pump OOS for  
 
scheduled maintenance outage
* Unit 1, week of March 3, 2014, Yellow risk condition due to Unit 1 "B" motor-driven AFW pump out of service for maintenance concurrent with Unit 1 "A" NSCW pump  
* Unit 1, week of March 3, 2014, Yellow risk condition due to Unit 1 "B" motor-driven AFW pump out of service for maintenance concurrent with Unit 1 "A" NSCW pump  
#1 out of service for motor replacement
#1 out of service for motor replacement
* Unit 1, week of March 24, 2014, outage risk assessment monitoring (ORAM) Yellow outage risk condition for reactor coolant system (RCS) at mid-loop level
* Unit 1, week of March 24, 2014, outage risk assessment monitoring (ORAM) Yellow outage risk condition for reactor coolant system (RCS) at mid-loop level
Line 240: Line 559:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors selected the six operability determinations or functionality evaluations listed below for review based on the risk-significance of the associated components and systems. The inspectors reviewed the technical adequacy of the determinations to ensure that technical specification operability was properly justified and the components or systems remained capable of performing their design functions. To verify whether components or systems were operable, the inspectors compared the operability and design criteria in the appropriate sections of the technical specification and updated final safety analysis report to the licensee's evaluations. Where compensatory measures were required to maintain operability, the inspectors determined whether the measures in place would function as intended and were properly controlled. Additionally, the inspectors reviewed a sample of corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with operability evaluations.
The inspectors selected the six operability determinations or functionality evaluations  
 
listed below for review based on the risk-significance of the associated components and  
 
systems. The inspectors reviewed the technical adequacy of the determinations to  
 
ensure that technical specification operability was properly justified and the components  
 
or systems remained capable of performing their design functions. To verify whether  
 
components or systems were operable, the inspectors compared the operability and  
 
design criteria in the appropriate sections of the technical specification and updated final  
 
safety analysis report to the licensee's evaluations. Where compensatory measures  
 
were required to maintain operability, the inspectors determined whether the measures  
 
in place would function as intended and were properly controlled. Additionally, the inspectors reviewed a sample of corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with operability evaluations.


Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
Line 257: Line 594:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors verified that the two plant modifications listed below did not affect the safety functions of important safety systems. The inspectors confirmed the modifications did not degrade the design bases, licensing bases, and performance capability of risk significant structures, systems, and components. The inspectors also verified modifications performed during plant configurations involving increased risk did not place the plant in an unsafe condition. Additionally, the inspectors evaluated whether system operability and availability, configuration control, post-installation test activities, and changes to documents, such as drawings, procedures, and operator training materials, complied with licensee standards and NRC requirements. In addition, the inspectors reviewed a sample of related corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with modifications.
The inspectors verified that the two plant modifications listed below did not affect the  
 
safety functions of important safety systems.
 
The inspectors confirmed the modifications did not degrade the design bases, licensing bases, and performance capability of risk  
 
significant structures, systems, and components. The inspectors also verified  
 
modifications performed during plant configurations involving increased risk did not  
 
place the plant in an unsafe condition. Additionally, the inspectors evaluated whether  
 
system operability and availability, configuration control, post-installation test activities,  
 
and changes to documents, such as drawings, procedures, and operator training  
 
materials, complied with licensee standards and NRC requirements. In addition, the  
 
inspectors reviewed a sample of related corrective action documents to verify the  
 
licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with modifications.


Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
Line 270: Line 627:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors either observed post-maintenance testing or reviewed the test results for the six maintenance activities listed below to verify the work performed was completed correctly and the test activities were adequate to verify system operability and functional capability.
The inspectors either observed post-maintenance testing or reviewed the test results for  
 
the six maintenance activities listed below to verify the work performed was completed  
 
correctly and the test activities were adequate to verify system operability and functional  
 
capability.
* Maintenance Work Order (MWO) SNC418749, "A" train NSCW pump 3 rebuild, and MWO SNC407844, "A" train NSCW pump 3 motor refurbish
* Maintenance Work Order (MWO) SNC418749, "A" train NSCW pump 3 rebuild, and MWO SNC407844, "A" train NSCW pump 3 motor refurbish
* MWO SNC532915, - 21205P6002M01 ("2B" RHR pump motor) - Change oil in lower motor bearing
* MWO SNC532915, - 21205P6002M01 ("2B" RHR pump motor) - Change oil in lower motor bearing
* MWO SNC408063, - (1A 1204SIP) - "A" train safety injection (SI) pump 3 motor 11204P6003M01 preventive maintenance (PM) and MWO SNC407988,  - (1A 1204SIP) - 1HV8814 motor-operated mini-flow isolation MOV PM
* MWO SNC408063, - (1A 1204SIP) - "A" train safety injection (SI) pump 3 motor 11204P6003M01 preventive maintenance (PM) and MWO SNC407988,  - (1A  
 
1204SIP) - 1HV8814 motor-operated mini-flow isolation MOV PM
* MWO SNC535924, Unit 2 accumulator tank 1 pressure channel failure
* MWO SNC535924, Unit 2 accumulator tank 1 pressure channel failure
* MWO SNC557853, Unit 2 "A" motor-driven AFW pump tripped while taking to pull-to-lock
* MWO SNC557853, Unit 2 "A" motor-driven AFW pump tripped while taking to pull-to-lock
Line 282: Line 647:
* tests were performed in accordance with approved procedures
* tests were performed in accordance with approved procedures
* equipment was returned to its operational status following testing
* equipment was returned to its operational status following testing
* test documentation was properly evaluated Additionally, the inspectors reviewed a sample of corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with post-maintenance testing. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
* test documentation was properly evaluated  
 
Additionally, the inspectors reviewed a sample of corrective action documents to verify  
 
the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with post-
 
maintenance testing. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 291: Line 662:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
For the Unit 1 refueling outage beginning March 16, 2014, through the remainder of the report period, the inspectors evaluated the following outage activities:
For the Unit 1 refueling outage beginning March 16, 2014, through the remainder of the  
 
report period, the inspectors evaluated the following outage activities:
* outage planning
* outage planning
* shutdown, cooldown, and refueling
* shutdown, cooldown, and refueling
* reactor coolant system instrumentation and electrical power configuration
* reactor coolant system instrumentation and electrical power configuration
* reactivity and inventory control
* reactivity and inventory control
* decay heat removal and spent fuel pool cooling system operation The inspectors verified that the licensee:
* decay heat removal and spent fuel pool cooling system operation The inspectors verified that the licensee:
* considered risk in developing the outage schedule
* considered risk in developing the outage schedule
* controlled plant configuration in accordance with administrative risk reduction methodologies
* controlled plant configuration in accordance with administrative risk reduction methodologies
* developed work schedules to manage fatigue
* developed work schedules to manage fatigue
* developed mitigation strategies for loss of key safety functions
* developed mitigation strategies for loss of key safety functions
* adhered to operating license and technical specification requirements Additionally, inspectors verified that safety-related and risk-significant structures, systems, and components not accessible during power operations were maintained in an operable condition. The inspectors also reviewed a sample of related corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with outage activities. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
* adhered to operating license and technical specification requirements  
 
Additionally, inspectors verified that safety-related and risk-significant structures,  
 
systems, and components not accessible during power operations were maintained in  
 
an operable condition. The inspectors also reviewed a sample of related corrective  
 
action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies  
 
associated with outage activities. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 310: Line 693:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors reviewed the six surveillance tests listed below and either observed the test or reviewed test results to verify testing adequately demonstrated equipment operability and met technical specification and licensee procedural requirements. The inspectors evaluated the test activities to assess for preconditioning of equipment, procedure adherence, and equipment alignment following completion of the surveillance.
The inspectors reviewed the six surveillance tests listed below and either observed the  
 
test or reviewed test results to verify testing adequately demonstrated equipment  
 
operability and met technical specification and licensee procedural requirements. The  
 
inspectors evaluated the test activities to assess for preconditioning of equipment,  
 
procedure adherence, and equipment alignment following completion of the surveillance.
 
Additionally, the inspectors reviewed a sample of related corrective action documents to


Additionally, the inspectors reviewed a sample of related corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with surveillance testing. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with  
 
surveillance testing. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.


Routine Surveillance Tests
Routine Surveillance Tests
Line 319: Line 714:
* 14808B-1 Rev. 4, "Train B Centrifugal Charging Pump and Check Valve IST and Response Time Test"
* 14808B-1 Rev. 4, "Train B Centrifugal Charging Pump and Check Valve IST and Response Time Test"
* 14850-1 Rev. 54.1, "Cold Shutdown Valve Inservice Test" Containment Isolation Valve
* 14850-1 Rev. 54.1, "Cold Shutdown Valve Inservice Test" Containment Isolation Valve
* 24349-1 Rev. 9.0, "Containment Penetration No. 49 Excess Letdown and Seal Water Leakoff Local Leak Rate Test" In-Service Tests (IST)
* 24349-1 Rev. 9.0, "Containment Penetration No. 49 Excess Letdown and Seal Water Leakoff Local Leak Rate Test"  
 
In-Service Tests (IST)
* 14806C-1 Rev. 4, "Containment Spray Pump and Check Valve Refueling Comprehensive Full Flow Inservice Test"
* 14806C-1 Rev. 4, "Containment Spray Pump and Check Valve Refueling Comprehensive Full Flow Inservice Test"


Line 332: Line 729:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors observed the emergency preparedness drill conducted on March 12, 2014. The inspectors observed licensee activities in the Burke County Office Complex during a hostile action based tabletop exercise that included several local and state agencies from both Georgia and South Carolina. The inspectors evaluated implementation of the emergency plan, including event classification, notification, and protective action recommendations. The inspectors evaluated the licensee's performance against criteria established in the licensee's procedures. Additionally, the inspectors attended the post-exercise critique to assess the licensee's effectiveness in identifying emergency preparedness weaknesses and verified the identified weaknesses were entered in the corrective action program.
The inspectors observed the emergency preparedness drill conducted on March 12,  
 
2014. The inspectors observed licensee activiti es in the Burke County Office Complex during a hostile action based tabletop exercise that included several local and state  
 
agencies from both Georgia and South Carolina. The inspectors evaluated  
 
implementation of the emergency plan, including event classification, notification, and  
 
protective action recommendations. The inspectors evaluated the licensee's  
 
performance against criteria established in the licensee's procedures. Additionally, the  
 
inspectors attended the post-exercise critique to assess the licensee's effectiveness in  
 
identifying emergency preparedness weaknesses and verified the identified weaknesses  
 
were entered in the corrective action program.


====b. Findings====
====b. Findings====
Line 343: Line 756:


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors reviewed a sample of the performance indicator (PI) data for Unit 1 and Unit 2, submitted by the licensee, for the PIs listed below. The inspectors reviewed plant records compiled between January 2013, and December 2013 to verify the accuracy and completeness of the data reported for the station. The inspectors verified that the PI data complied with guidance contained in Nuclear Energy Institute 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," and licensee procedures. The inspectors also confirmed the PIs were calculated correctly. In addition, the inspectors reviewed a sample of related corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with PI data. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment. Cornerstone: Initiating Events
The inspectors reviewed a sample of the performance indicator (PI) data for Unit 1 and  
 
Unit 2, submitted by the licensee, for the PIs listed below. The inspectors reviewed plant  
 
records compiled between January 2013, and December 2013 to verify the accuracy  
 
and completeness of the data reported for the station. The inspectors verified that the PI  
 
data complied with guidance contained in Nuclear Energy Institute 99-02, "Regulatory  
 
Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," and licensee procedures. The inspectors also confirmed the PIs were calculated correctly. In addition, the inspectors reviewed a sample of related corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and  
 
correcting any deficiencies associated with PI data. Documents reviewed are listed in  
 
the Attachment.
 
===Cornerstone:===
Initiating Events
* unplanned scrams per 7000 critical hours
* unplanned scrams per 7000 critical hours
* unplanned power changes per 7000 critical hours
* unplanned power changes per 7000 critical hours
Line 354: Line 784:
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71152}}
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71152}}
===.1 Routine Review===
===.1 Routine Review===
The inspectors screened items entered into the licensee's corrective action program in order to identify repetitive equipment failures or specific human performance issues for follow-up. The inspectors reviewed condition reports, attended screening meetings, or accessed the licensee's computerized corrective action database.
 
The inspectors screened items entered into the licensee's corrective action program in  
 
order to identify repetitive equipment failures or specific human performance issues for  
 
follow-up. The inspectors reviewed condition reports, attended screening meetings, or  
 
accessed the licensee's computerized corrective action database.


===.2 Annual Follow-up of Selected Issues===
===.2 Annual Follow-up of Selected Issues===


====a. Inspection Scope====
====a. Inspection Scope====
The inspectors conducted a detailed review of condition reports CR 737334, "Unit 2 safety injection accumulator tank #1 pressure channel failed high," and CR 783219, "Motor-driven AFW pump "A" tripped while taking to pull-to-lock."  The inspectors evaluated the following attributes of the licensee's actions:
The inspectors conducted a detailed review of condition reports CR 737334, "Unit 2  
 
safety injection accumulator tank #1 pressure channel failed high," and CR 783219,  
 
"Motor-driven AFW pump "A" tripped while taking to pull-to-lock."  The inspectors  
 
evaluated the following attributes of the licensee's actions:
* complete and accurate identification of the problem in a timely manner
* complete and accurate identification of the problem in a timely manner
* evaluation and disposition of operability and reportability issues
* evaluation and disposition of operability and reportability issues
Line 366: Line 809:
* identification of root and contributing causes of the problem
* identification of root and contributing causes of the problem
* identification of any additional condition reports
* identification of any additional condition reports
* completion of corrective actions in a timely manner Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
* completion of corrective actions in a timely manner Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.


====b. Findings and Observations====
====b. Findings and Observations====
Line 375: Line 818:


===.1 (Closed) Licensee Event Report (LER) 05000424/2012-005-00:===
===.1 (Closed) Licensee Event Report (LER) 05000424/2012-005-00:===
Main Steam Isolation Valve Failures On October 8, 2013, with Unit 1 in Mode 2, the operators began preparations for power ascension. At 1616, as a main feedwater pump was being placed online, the control room operators noted a divergence in the RCS loop differential temperatures (Ts), steam pressures, and steam flows between loops 1 & 4 and loops 2 & 3. Loops 1 & 4 showed increasing loop Ts, lowering steam pressure, and some minimal steam flow, while loops 2 and 3 showed no loop T, increasing steam pressures (to the point of lifting the loop 2 and 3 atmospheric relief valves), and no steam flow. The Main Control Board hand switches indicated that all MSIVs and associated bypass valves were open.
Main Steam Isolation Valve Failures On October 8, 2013, with Unit 1 in Mode 2, the operators began preparations for power  
 
ascension. At 1616, as a main feedwater pump was being placed online, the control  
 
room operators noted a divergence in the RCS loop differential temperatures (Ts), steam pressures, and steam flows between loops 1 & 4 and loops 2 & 3. Loops 1 & 4  
 
showed increasing loop Ts, lowering steam pressure, and some minimal steam flow, while loops 2 and 3 showed no loop T, increasing steam pressures (to the point of lifting the loop 2 and 3 atmospheric relief valves), and no steam flow. The Main Control  
 
Board hand switches indicated that all MSIVs and associated bypass valves were open.
 
The operators identified the potential impact to the core neutron flux and stopped power
 
ascension. Following discussions with plant management and engineering, the
 
operators placed the plant in a safe condition by inserting a manual trip of the reactor at
 
2155. The licensee subsequently assembled an issue response team (IRT) and a root
 
cause team to investigate the cause of the diverging indications and to determine the


The operators identified the potential impact to the core neutron flux and stopped power ascension. Following discussions with plant management and engineering, the operators placed the plant in a safe condition by inserting a manual trip of the reactor at 2155. The licensee subsequently assembled an issue response team (IRT) and a root cause team to investigate the cause of the diverging indications and to determine the required corrective actions. The root cause team determined that the root cause of the MSIV stem failures was due to temperature aging embrittlement of the stem material. The enforcement aspects associated with this event were documented in NRC integrated inspection report 05000424,425/2012005 (Section 4OA2). No other findings were identified. This LER is closed.
required corrective actions. The root cause team determined that the root cause of the  
 
MSIV stem failures was due to temperature agi ng embrittlement of the stem material.
 
The enforcement aspects associated with this event were documented in NRC  
 
integrated inspection report 05000424,425/2012005 (Section 4OA2). No other findings  
 
were identified. This LER is closed.


===.2 (Closed) Licensee Event Report 05000424/2013-001-00:===
===.2 (Closed) Licensee Event Report 05000424/2013-001-00:===
Failure to Comply with Technical Specification LCO 3.8.4 On November 27, 2013, an internal wiring discrepancy was discovered on the Unit 1 Class 1E battery charger 1AD1CB (one of two redundant battery chargers on "A" train)following the trip of the battery charger input breaker. The wiring discrepancy prevented the charger from performing all required functions of Technical Specification LCO 3.8.4, "DC Sources - Operating," and rendered it inoperable. The LCO requires, in part, one of two redundant battery chargers to be operable. Subsequent review of battery charger maintenance activities determined that on September 30, 2013 the remaining redundant "A" train battery charger (1AD1CA) was removed from service for maintenance activities for approximately 14.5 hours. This resulted in both train "A" battery chargers being inoperable simultaneously, which is condition that requires restoration of the inoperable direct-current (DC) source (i.e. train) within two hours (LCO 3.8.4 Condition C).
Failure to Comply with Technical Specification LCO 3.8.4 On November 27, 2013, an internal wiring discrepancy was discovered on the Unit 1  


Although the degraded charger (1AD1CB) was able to maintain battery terminal voltage within limits under minimal loading condition, the DC source was inoperable for a time greater than allowed by technical specification. The inspectors reviewed the LER, the associated condition report and apparent cause determination, and subsequent action items. The enforcement aspects associated with this event were documented in NRC integrated inspection report 05000424/2013005 (Section 1R19). No other findings were identified. This LER is closed.
Class 1E battery charger 1AD1CB (one of two redundant battery chargers on "A" train)
 
following the trip of the battery charger input breaker. The wiring discrepancy prevented
 
the charger from performing all required functions of Technical Specification LCO 3.8.4,
 
"DC Sources - Operating," and rendered it inoperable. The LCO requires, in part, one of
 
two redundant battery chargers to be operable. Subsequent review of battery charger
 
maintenance activities determined that on September 30, 2013 the remaining redundant
 
"A" train battery charger (1AD1CA) was remo ved from service for maintenance activities for approximately 14.5 hours. This resulted in both train "A" battery chargers being
 
inoperable simultaneously, which is condition that requires restoration of the inoperable
 
direct-current (DC) source (i.e. train) within two hours (LCO 3.8.4 Condition C).
 
Although the degraded charger (1AD1CB) was able to maintain battery terminal voltage  
 
within limits under minimal loading condition, the DC source was inoperable for a time  
 
greater than allowed by technical specification. The inspectors reviewed the LER, the  
 
associated condition report and apparent cause determination, and subsequent action  
 
items. The enforcement aspects associated with this event were documented in NRC  
 
integrated inspection report 05000424/2013005 (Section 1R19). No other findings were  
 
identified. This LER is closed.


===.3 (Closed) Licensee Event Report 05000425/2013-002:===
===.3 (Closed) Licensee Event Report 05000425/2013-002:===
Automatic Unit 2 Reactor Trip due to loss of Generator Excitation On October 19, 2013, while Unit 2 was operating in Mode 1 at 100 percent power, the main generator excitation system experienced a failure that tripped the main generator and subsequently tripped the turbine and reactor. The reactor trip system, the engineered safety features actuation system, feedwater and auxiliary feedwater systems actuated as designed and the plant was stabilized in Mode 3. The inspectors reviewed the LER, the associated condition report and apparent cause determination, and subsequent action items. No findings or violations of NRC requirements were identified.
Automatic Unit 2 Reactor Trip due to loss of Generator Excitation On October 19, 2013, while Unit 2 was operating in Mode 1 at 100 percent power, the  
 
main generator excitation system experienced a failure that tripped the main generator  
 
and subsequently tripped the turbine and reactor. The reactor trip system, the  
 
engineered safety features actuation system
, feedwater and auxiliary feedwater systems actuated as designed and the plant was stabilized in Mode 3. The inspectors reviewed  
 
the LER, the associated condition report and apparent cause determination, and  
 
subsequent action items. No findings or violations of NRC requirements were identified.


This LER is closed.
This LER is closed.


===.4 (Closed) Licensee Event Report 05000425/2013-003:===
===.4 (Closed) Licensee Event Report 05000425/2013-003:===
Manual Reactor Trip due to Lowering Condenser Vacuum On October 22, 2013, while Unit 2 was operating in Mode 1 at 25 percent power, the unit was manually tripped due to lowering condenser vacuum. At the time of the reactor trip, maintenance activities were in progress on the "B" main feedwater pump turbine. Prior to the work commencing, the operators discussed how the maintenance work on the turbine could potentially impact condenser pressure. As a precaution, the operators established operating limits in case condenser vacuum was lost. As the lift of the turbine steam chest was initiated, condenser vacuum began lowering and maintenance personnel were directed to lower the steam chest back on the turbine. However, condenser vacuum continued to decrease, and as it approached the pre-determined operational limit of 23 inches of mercury, the shift supervisor directed a manual reactor trip. The reactor trip system, feedwater and auxiliary feedwater systems actuated as designed and the plant was stabilized in Mode 3. The inspectors reviewed the LER, the associated condition report and apparent cause determination, and subsequent action items. No findings or violations of NRC requirements were identified. This LER is closed.
Manual Reactor Trip due to Lowering Condenser Vacuum On October 22, 2013, while Unit 2 was operating in Mode 1 at 25 percent power, the unit  
 
was manually tripped due to lowering condenser vacuum. At the time of the reactor trip,  
 
maintenance activities were in progress on the "B" main feedwater pump turbine. Prior  
 
to the work commencing, the operators discussed how the maintenance work on the  
 
turbine could potentially impact condenser pressure. As a precaution, the operators  
 
established operating limits in case condenser vacuum was lost. As the lift of the turbine  
 
steam chest was initiated, condenser vacuum began lowering and maintenance  
 
personnel were directed to lower the steam chest back on the turbine. However,  
 
condenser vacuum continued to decrease, and as it approached the pre-determined  
 
operational limit of 23 inches of mercury, the shift supervisor directed a manual reactor  
 
trip. The reactor trip system, feedwater and auxiliary feedwater systems actuated as designed and the plant was stabilized in Mode 3. The inspectors reviewed the LER, the  
 
associated condition report and apparent cause determination, and subsequent action  
 
items. No findings or violations of NRC requirements were identified. This LER is  
 
closed.


{{a|4OA5}}
{{a|4OA5}}
Line 396: Line 932:


===.1 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) Report Review===
===.1 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) Report Review===
In accordance with Executive Director of Operations Procedure 0220, "Coordination with the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations," the inspectors reviewed the most recent INPO evaluation and accreditation reports dated February 10, 2014, to determine if those reports identified safety or training issues not previously identified by NRC evaluations. The report contained no safety issues that were not already known by the NRC.
 
In accordance with Executive Director of Operations Procedure 0220, "Coordination with  
 
the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations," the inspectors reviewed the most recent  
 
INPO evaluation and accreditation reports dated February 10, 2014, to determine if  
 
those reports identified safety or training issues not previously identified by NRC  
 
evaluations. The report contained no safety issues that were not already known by the  
 
NRC.


====b. Findings and Observations====
====b. Findings and Observations====
Line 403: Line 950:
===.2 Cross-Cutting Aspect Common Language Initiative Transition===
===.2 Cross-Cutting Aspect Common Language Initiative Transition===


The table below provides a cross-reference from the 2013 and earlier findings and associated cross-cutting aspects to the new cross-cutting aspects resulting from the common language initiative. These aspects and any others identified since January 2014 will be evaluated for cross-cutting themes and potential substantive cross-cutting issues in accordance with IMC 0305 starting with the 2014 mid-cycle assessment review. Finding Old Cross-Cutting Aspect New Cross-Cutting Aspect 05000424/2013005-01 P.1(c) P.2 05000424,425/2013007-01P.1(c) P.2 05000424,425/2013403-01P.1(a) P.1 05000424,425/2013403-02P.1(d) P.3  
The table below provides a cross-reference from the 2013 and earlier findings and  
 
associated cross-cutting aspects to the new cross-cutting aspects resulting from the  
 
common language initiative. These aspects and any others identified since January  
 
2014 will be evaluated for cross-cutting themes and potential substantive cross-cutting  
 
issues in accordance with IMC 0305 starting with the 2014 mid-cycle assessment  
 
review. Finding Old Cross-Cutting Aspect New Cross-Cutting Aspect 05000424/2013005-01 P.1(c) P.2 05000424,425/2013007-01P.1(c) P.2 05000424,425/2013403-01P.1(a) P.1 05000424,425/2013403-02P.1(d) P.3  
 
{{a|4OA6}}
{{a|4OA6}}
==4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit==
==4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit==


===.1 Exit Meeting===
===.1 Exit Meeting===
On April 22, 2014 the resident inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. T.
On April 22, 2014 the resident inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. T.


Tynan and other members of the licensee's staff. The inspectors confirmed that proprietary information was not provided or examined during the inspection.
Tynan and other members of the licensee's staff. The inspectors confirmed that  
 
proprietary information was not provi ded or examined during the inspection.


ATTACHMENT:   
ATTACHMENT:   
Line 441: Line 1,002:


==LIST OF ITEMS==
==LIST OF ITEMS==
OPENED AND CLOSED
OPENED AND CLOSED  
 
===Closed===
===Closed===
: [[Closes LER::05000424/LER-2012-005]]-00 LER  Main Steam Isolation Valve Failures (Section 4OA3.1)
: [[Closes LER::05000424/LER-2012-005]]-00 LER  Main Steam Isolation Valve Failures (Section  
: [[Closes LER::05000424/LER-2013-001]]-00 LER  Failure to Comply with Technical Specification LCO 3.8.4 (Section 4OA3.2)
: 4OA3.1)
: [[Closes LER::05000425/LER-2013-002]]-00 LER  Automatic Unit 2 Reactor Trip due to loss of Generator Excitation (Section 4OA3.3)
: [[Closes LER::05000424/LER-2013-001]]-00 LER  Failure to Comply with Technical Specification LCO  
: [[Closes LER::05000425/LER-2013-003]]-00 LER  Manual Reactor Trip due to Lowering Condenser Vacuum (Section 4OA3.4)  
: 3.8.4 (Section 4OA3.2)
: [[Closes LER::05000425/LER-2013-002]]-00 LER  Automatic Unit 2 Reactor Trip due to loss of  
: Generator Excitation (Section 4OA3.3)
: [[Closes LER::05000425/LER-2013-003]]-00 LER  Manual Reactor Trip due to Lowering Condenser  
: Vacuum (Section 4OA3.4)  


==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED==
==LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED==
==Section 1R01: Adverse Weather Protection Procedures 11877-1 Rev. 25, Cold Weather Checklist, Unit 1==
==Section 1R01: Adverse Weather Protection==
 
===Procedures===
: 11877-1 Rev. 25, Cold Weather Checklist, Unit 1  
: 11877-2 Rev. 21, Cold Weather Checklist, Unit 2
: 11877-2 Rev. 21, Cold Weather Checklist, Unit 2


==Section 1R04: Equipment Alignment Procedures 11011-2, Rev. 15.1, Residual Heat Removal System Alignment==
==Section 1R04: Equipment Alignment==
 
===Procedures===
: 11011-2, Rev. 15.1, Residual Heat Removal System Alignment  
: 11115-1 Rev. 10.2, Containment Spray System Alignment  
: 11115-1 Rev. 10.2, Containment Spray System Alignment  
: 11150-2 Rev. 23.3, Nuclear Service Cooling Water System Alignment  
: 11150-2 Rev. 23.3, Nuclear Service Cooling Water System Alignment  
Line 458: Line 1,030:
: 14801B-2 Rev. 4.1, Train B NSCW Transfer Pump Inservice Test   
: 14801B-2 Rev. 4.1, Train B NSCW Transfer Pump Inservice Test   
===Drawings===
===Drawings===
: 1X4DB131 Rev. 35.0, P&I Diagram Containment Spray System, System No. 1206 1X4DB161-1, Ver. 45.0, P&I Diagram Fire Protection - Auxiliary Feedwater System Condensate Storage & Degasifier System, System 1302 1X4DB161-2, Ver. 28.0, P&I Diagram Fire Protection - Auxiliary Feedwater System, System 1302 1X4DB161-3, Ver. 42.0, P&I Diagram Fire Protection - Auxiliary Feedwater System, System 1305 2X4DB122 Rev. 53.0, P&I Diagram Residual Heat Removal, System No. 1205  
: 1X4DB131 Rev. 35.0, P&I Diagram Cont ainment Spray System, System No. 1206 1X4DB161-1, Ver. 45.0, P&I Diagram Fire Pr otection - Auxiliary Feedwater System Condensate Storage & Degasifier System, System 1302 1X4DB161-2, Ver. 28.0, P&I Diagram Fire Pr otection - Auxiliary Feedw ater System, System  
: 2X4DB133-2 Rev. 53, P&I Diagram Nuclear Service Cooling Water System, System No. 1202
: 1302 1X4DB161-3, Ver. 42.0, P&I Diagram Fire Pr otection - Auxiliary Feedw ater System, System  
: 2X4DB134 Rev. 31, P&I Diagram Nuclear Service Cooling Water System, System No. 1202
: 1305 2X4DB122 Rev. 53.0, P&I Diagram Residual Heat Removal, System No. 1205  
: 2X4DB135-2 Rev. 29, P&I Diagram Nuclear Service Cooling Water System, System No. 1202
: 2X4DB133-2 Rev. 53, P&I Diagram Nuclear Serv ice Cooling Water System, System No. 1202
: System Health Reports Vogtle Containment Spray System No. 1206 4th QTR 2013
: 2X4DB134 Rev. 31, P&I Diagram Nuclear Serv ice Cooling Water System, System No. 1202
: 2X4DB135-2 Rev. 29, P&I Diagram Nuclear Se rvice Cooling Water System, System No. 1202  
: System Health Reports Vogtle Containment Spray System No. 1206 4
th QTR 2013


==Section 1R05: Fire Protection Procedures 17103A-C Rev. 39.2, Annunciator Response Procedures for the Fire Alarm Computer==
==Section 1R05: Fire Protection==
 
===Procedures===
: 17103A-C Rev. 39.2, Annunciator Response Procedures for the Fire Alarm Computer  
: 2000-C Rev. 27.0, Fire Protection Program  
: 2000-C Rev. 27.0, Fire Protection Program  
: 2005-C Rev. 31, Fire Response Procedure  
: 2005-C Rev. 31, Fire Response Procedure  
: 2704-2 Rev. 2.0, Zone 4 - Auxiliary Building - Level D, Containment Spray Pump "A" Fire Fighting Preplan 92705-2 Rev.3.0, Zone 5 - Auxiliary Building - Level D, Containment Spray Pump "B" Fire Fighting Preplan 92709-2 Rev.2.2, Zone 9 - Auxiliary Building - Level D, Fire Fighting Preplan  
: 2704-2 Rev. 2.0, Zone 4 - Auxiliary Building - Level D, Containment Spray Pump "A" Fire Fighting Preplan  
: 2705-2 Rev.3.0, Zone 5 - Auxiliary Building - Level D, Containment Spray Pump "B" Fire Fighting Preplan  
: 2709-2 Rev.2.2, Zone 9 - Auxiliary Building - Level D, Fire Fighting Preplan  
: 2710-2 Rev.2.2, Zone 10 - Auxiliary Building - Level D, Fire Fighting Preplan  
: 2710-2 Rev.2.2, Zone 10 - Auxiliary Building - Level D, Fire Fighting Preplan  
: 2787-1 Rev. 2.2, Zone 87 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan  
: 2787-1 Rev. 2.2, Zone 87 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan  
Line 475: Line 1,055:
: 2791-2 Rev. 3.2, Zone 91 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan  
: 2791-2 Rev. 3.2, Zone 91 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan  
: 2792-2 Rev. 3.1, Zone 92 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan  
: 2792-2 Rev. 3.1, Zone 92 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan  
: 2793-1 Rev. 3.2, Zone 93 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan Attachment 92797-2 Rev. 3.0, Zone 97 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan 92798-2 Rev. 3.0, Zone 98 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan  
: 2793-1 Rev. 3.2, Zone 93 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan Attachment  
: 2797-2 Rev. 3.0, Zone 97 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan  
: 2798-2 Rev. 3.0, Zone 98 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan  
: 2802-1 Rev. 1.2, Zone 102 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan  
: 2802-1 Rev. 1.2, Zone 102 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan  
: 2803-2 Rev. 2.2, Zone 103 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan  
: 2803-2 Rev. 2.2, Zone 103 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan  
: 2840A-1 Rev. 4, Zone 140A - Containment Building - Levels A, B, 1 and 3 East Fire Fighting Preplan
: 2840A-1 Rev. 4, Zone 140A - Containment Building - Levels A, B, 1 and 3 East Fire Fighting Preplan
: 92840B-1 Rev. 5, Zone 140B - Containment Building - Levels A,B,1,2 and 3 Fire Fighting Preplan
: 2840B-1 Rev. 5, Zone 140B - Containment Building - Levels A,B,1,2 and 3 Fire Fighting Preplan
: 92840C-1 Rev. 4.0, Zone 140C - Containment Building - Levels A,B,1 and 3 Steam Generator Compartment Fire Fighting Preplan
: 2840C-1 Rev. 4.0, Zone 140C - Containment Building - Levels A,B,1 and 3 Steam Generator Compartment Fire Fighting Preplan
: 92840E-1 Rev. 1.0, Zone 140E - Containment Building - Levels A, 1 and 2 Fire Fighting Preplan 92858-1 Rev. 2.2, Zone 158 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan  
: 2840E-1 Rev. 1.0, Zone 140E - Containment Building - Levels A, 1 and 2 Fire Fighting Preplan 92858-1 Rev. 2.2, Zone 158 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan  
: 2859-1 Rev. 2.2, Zone 159 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan  
: 2859-1 Rev. 2.2, Zone 159 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan  
: 2862-2 Rev. 1.1, Zone 162 - Diesel Generator Building Fire Fighting Preplan  
: 2862-2 Rev. 1.1, Zone 162 - Diesel Generator Building Fire Fighting Preplan  
: 2864-2 Rev. 0.2, Zone 164 - Diesel Generator Building - Train B DFO Day Tank Fire Fighting Preplan Other Drill scenario 2014-Q1-01, Fire in room B52
: 2864-2 Rev. 0.2, Zone 164 - Diesel Generator Building - Train B DFO Day Tank Fire Fighting Preplan Other Drill scenario 2014-Q1-01, Fire in room B52


==Section 1R07: Heat Sink Performance Procedures 83309-C Rev. 7, Safety-Related Heat Exchanger Inspection==
==Section 1R07: Heat Sink Performance==
: NMP-ES-012-GL01 Rev. 3.0, Heat Exchanger Program, Heat Exchanger Inspection, Testing and Condition Assessment  
 
===Procedures===
: 83309-C Rev. 7, Safety-Related Heat Exchanger Inspection
: NMP-ES-012-GL01 Rev. 3.0, Heat Exchanger Pr ogram, Heat Exchanger Inspection, Testing and Condition Assessment
===Condition Reports===
===Condition Reports===
: 778805, Unexpected FME Discovered   
: 778805, Unexpected FME Discovered   
Line 493: Line 1,078:
: SNC408284 - B TRN CCP 3 Motor - Clean and Inspect
: SNC408284 - B TRN CCP 3 Motor - Clean and Inspect


==Section 1R08: Inservice Inspection Activities Procedures==
==Section 1R08: Inservice Inspection Activities==
: LTR-SGMP-12-78, Evaluation of Foreign Objects in the Secondary Side of the Vogtle Unit 1 Steam Generators - Fall 2012 1R17 Outage, 10/01/12 MRS 2.4.2
 
: GPC-3, Steam Generator Eddy Current Data Analysis Techniques for Vogtle Units 1 and 2,
===Procedures===
: Rev. 18 MRS 2.4.2
: LTR-SGMP-12-78, Evaluation of Foreign Objects in the Secondary Side of the Vogtle Unit 1  
: Steam Generators - Fall 2012 1R17 Outage, 10/01/12  
: MRS 2.4.2
: GPC-3, Steam Generator Eddy Current Data Analysis Techniques for Vogtle Units 1
and 2,
: Rev. 18  
: MRS 2.4.2
: GPC-37, Steam Generator Eddy Current Data Analysis Techniques for Vogtle Units 1 & 2, Rev. 18
: GPC-37, Steam Generator Eddy Current Data Analysis Techniques for Vogtle Units 1 & 2, Rev. 18
: MRS-TRC-2222, Southern Company Vogtle Unit 1 Use of Qualified Techniques 1R18 Refueling Outage, 03/2014
: MRS-TRC-2222, Southern Company Vogtle Unit 1 Use of Qualified Techniques 1R18 Refueling Outage, 03/2014
Line 509: Line 1,100:
: NMP-ES-024-301, Liquid Penetrant Examination Color Contrast and Fluorescent, Version 11.0
: NMP-ES-024-301, Liquid Penetrant Examination Color Contrast and Fluorescent, Version 11.0
: NMP-ES-024-501, PDI Generic Procedure for the Ultrasonic Examination of Austenitic Pipe Welds (Appendix VIII), Version 5.0
: NMP-ES-024-501, PDI Generic Procedure for the Ultrasonic Examination of Austenitic Pipe Welds (Appendix VIII), Version 5.0
: PDI-UT-2, Generic Procedure for the Ultrasonic Examination of Austenitic Pipe Welds, Revision F, dated March 8, 2013 Procedure 14864-1, Containment General Leak Inspection, Version 2.6
: PDI-UT-2, Generic Procedure for the Ultrasonic Examination of Austenitic Pipe Welds, Revision F, dated March 8, 2013
: SG-SGMP-12-16, Vogtle 1R17 Steam Generator Condition Monitoring and Operational Assessment, Rev. 0
===Procedure===
: 14864-1, Containment General Leak Inspection, Version 2.6
: SG-SGMP-12-16, Vogtle 1R17 Steam Generat or Condition Monitoring and Operational Assessment, Rev. 0
: SG-SGMP-13-26, Vogtle 1R18 Degradation Assessment, Rev. 0  
: SG-SGMP-13-26, Vogtle 1R18 Degradation Assessment, Rev. 0  
: Corrective Actions Condition Report (CR)
: Corrective Actions  
: 653117, Documentation Purposes only, Lack of Funding for ISI 1R18 Outage
===Condition Report (CR)===
: 653117, Documentation Purposes only, Lack of Funding for ISI 1R18  
: Outage
: CR 656061, Gap in standards found in maintenance welding shop
: CR 656061, Gap in standards found in maintenance welding shop
: CR 692556, Additional welding performed after final weld inspection
: CR 692556, Additional welding performed after final weld inspection
Line 521: Line 1,116:
: Technical Evaluation
: Technical Evaluation
: 575854, Check In Self-Assessment Plan and Report, 2013 Plant Vogtle lnservice Inspection Program Assessment Technical Evaluation
: 575854, Check In Self-Assessment Plan and Report, 2013 Plant Vogtle lnservice Inspection Program Assessment Technical Evaluation
: 577428, Boric Acid Corrosion Control Program Self-Assessment Technical Evaluation
: 577428, Boric Acid Corrosion Control Program Self-Assessment  
: 653875, Documentation Purposes only, Lack of Funding for ISI 1R18 Outage (Associated with
: Technical Evaluation
: CR 653117) Technical Evaluation
: 653875, Documentation Purposes only, Lack of Funding for ISI 1R18  
: 694054, Additional welding performed after final weld inspection (Associated with
: Outage (Associated with
: CR 692556) Technical Evaluation
: CR 653117)  
: Technical Evaluation
: 694054, Additional welding performed after final weld inspection  
(Associated with
: CR 692556)  
: Technical Evaluation
: 697243, Replacing ASME III Class 1 Snubbers (Associated with
: 697243, Replacing ASME III Class 1 Snubbers (Associated with
: CR 694887 Technical Evaluation
: CR 694887  
: 697973, Check In Self-Assessment Plan and Report, ISI Assessment for NRC Routine Baseline Inspections in the 2014 Refueling Outages Technical Evaluation
: Technical Evaluation
: 697973, Check In Self-A
ssessment Plan and Report, ISI Assessment for  
: NRC Routine Baseline Inspections in the 2014 Refueling Outages Technical Evaluation
: 732143, Alternative to ASME Section XI requirements needed for the examination of reactor vessel head flange (Associated with
: 732143, Alternative to ASME Section XI requirements needed for the examination of reactor vessel head flange (Associated with
: CR 729534) Technical Evaluation:
: CR 729534)  
: Technical Evaluation:
: 656575, Track corrective actions for
: 656575, Track corrective actions for
: NMP-FLS-017 Violations (Associated with
: NMP-FLS-017 Violations (Associated with
: CR 656061)
: CR 656061)  
: Other Certificate of Calibration for IR Thermometer #30006634  
: Other Certificate of Calibration for IR Thermometer #30006634  
: Certificate of Calibration for IR Thermometer #30006637  
: Certificate of Calibration for IR Thermometer #30006637  
Line 544: Line 1,148:
: Certificate of Certification for Spotcheck
: Certificate of Certification for Spotcheck
: SKC-S, Batch 13A01K  
: SKC-S, Batch 13A01K  
: Certificate of Compliance for Ultrasonic Reference Blocks by Applied Test Systems, Inc., ATS Order #G03-1246, dated August 13,2003 Corrosion Assessment 1204-2013-006 (Associated with
: Certificate of Compliance for Ultrasonic Reference Blocks by Applied Test Systems, Inc., ATS  
: Order #G03-1246, dated August 13,2003  
: Corrosion Assessment 1204-2013-006 (Associated with
: CR 643871)   
: CR 643871)   
: Attachment Corrosion Assessment 1208-2012-001 (Associated with
: Attachment Corrosion Assessment 1208-2012-001 (Associated with
: CR 502004) Corrosion Assessment 1208-2012-002 (Associated with
: CR 502004)  
: Corrosion Assessment 1208-2012-002 (Associated with
: CRs 530116 and 555387)  
: CRs 530116 and 555387)  
: Krautkramer Ultrasonic Systems Transducer Certification, dated August 12, 2003  
: Krautkramer Ultrasonic Systems Transducer Certification, dated August 12, 2003  
: NDE Personnel Certifications: D. Anderson, C. Lewis, A. Wrubleski, M. Grell, A. Morgan, T. Huhe, T. Jackson
: NDE Personnel Certifications: D. Anderson, C. Lewis, A. Wrubleski, M. Grell, A. Morgan,  
: T. Huhe, T. Jackson
: NMP-GM-003-F04, Self-Assessment Final Report, Rev. 01  
: NMP-GM-003-F04, Self-Assessment Final Report, Rev. 01  
: Pipe Support Drawing V1-1202-030-H003, Revision 4  
: Pipe Support Drawing V1-1202-030-H003, Revision 4  
: Report S14V1L003, Ultrasonic Instrument Linearity, dated March 17, 2014
: Report S14V1L003, Ultrasonic Instrument Linearity, dated March 17, 2014


==Section 1R11: Licensed Operator Requalification Program Procedures 14609-1 Rev. 21,==
==Section 1R11: Licensed Operator Requalification Program==
: SSPS Slave Relay K601 Train B Test Safety Injection  
 
===Procedures===
: 14609-1 Rev. 21, SSPS Slave Relay K601 Train B Test Safety Injection  
: 14615-1 Rev. 10, SSPS Slave Relay K608 Train B Test Safety Injection  
: 14615-1 Rev. 10, SSPS Slave Relay K608 Train B Test Safety Injection  
: 14808B-1 Rev. 4, Train B Centrifugal Charging Pump and Check Valve IST and Response Time Test Other V-RQ-SE-14201 Rev. 1.0, Simulator Exercise Guide: Loss of Secondary Heat Sink
: 14808B-1 Rev. 4, Train B Centrifugal Charging Pump and Check Valve IST and Response Time Test Other V-RQ-SE-14201 Rev. 1.0, Simulator Exercise Guide: Loss of Secondary Heat Sink


==Section 1R12: Maintenance Rule Effectiveness Condition Reports and Action Items
==Section 1R12: Maintenance Rule Effectiveness==
: 351658 - Unplanned==
 
: LCO: Intermediate Range NI 2N-36 failure
===Condition Reports===
and Action Items
: 351658 - Unplanned LCO: Intermediate Range NI 2N-36 failure
: 664671 - Unit 2 system 1208 taken to a(1) status
: 664671 - Unit 2 system 1208 taken to a(1) status
: 637701 - Unit 2 system 1602 taken to a(1) status during 04/26/13 MREP   
: 637701 - Unit 2 system 1602 taken to a(1) status during 04/26/13 MREP   
Line 572: Line 1,184:
: TE 638797 - Unit 2 system 1602 taken to a(1) status during 04/26/13 MREP
: TE 638797 - Unit 2 system 1602 taken to a(1) status during 04/26/13 MREP


==Section 1R15: Operability Evaluations Condition Reports 757018,==
==Section 1R15: Operability Evaluations==
: EQPM 11201R5074 for 1PV0455A not performed within required frequency
 
===Condition Reports===
: 757018, EQPM 11201R5074 for 1PV0455A not performed within required frequency
: 757479, Void detected on line
: 757479, Void detected on line
: 1-1204-032-2
: 1-1204-032-2
Line 591: Line 1,205:
: 50085-C Rev. 11, Gas Accumulation Monitoring and Trending
: 50085-C Rev. 11, Gas Accumulation Monitoring and Trending


==Section 1R18: Plant Modifications Procedures==
==Section 1R18: Plant Modifications==
 
===Procedures===
: NMP-AD-010 Rev. 8.0, 10
: NMP-AD-010 Rev. 8.0, 10
: CFR 50.59 Screening/Evaluation
: CFR 50.59 Screening/Evaluation
: NMP-ES-054-001 Rev. 2.0, Temporary Modification Processing   
: NMP-ES-054-001 Rev. 2.0, Temporary Modification Processing   
===Work Orders===
===Work Orders===
: SNC451183 - Temp Mod to restore functionality of annunciator ALB07A01, "BA Tank 1 Hi/Lo Level" SNC517148 - U1 replacement of seal injector filter system with sub-micron filter system Other
: SNC451183 - Temp Mod to restore functionality of annunciator ALB07A01, "BA Tank 1 Hi/Lo Level" SNC517148 - U1 replacement of seal injector f ilter system with sub-micron filter system  
: Other
: CR557426 - Request for a TM to clear ALB07A01, "BA Tank 1 Hi/Lo Level"  
: CR557426 - Request for a TM to clear ALB07A01, "BA Tank 1 Hi/Lo Level"  
: TE558696 - Request for a TM to clear ALB07A01, "BA Tank 1 Hi/Lo Level"
: TE558696 - Request for a TM to clear ALB07A01, "BA Tank 1 Hi/Lo Level"


==Section 1R19: Post Maintenance Testing Procedures 14804A-1 Rev. 4.1, Safety Injection Pump A Inservice and Response Time Test==
==Section 1R19: Post Maintenance Testing==
 
===Procedures===
: 14804A-1 Rev. 4.1, Safety Injection Pump A Inservice and Response Time Test  
: 14805B-2 Rev. 3.2, Train B Residual Heat Removal Pump IST and Response Time Test  
: 14805B-2 Rev. 3.2, Train B Residual Heat Removal Pump IST and Response Time Test  
: 14825-1 Rev. 98, Quarterly Inservice Valve Test  
: 14825-1 Rev. 98, Quarterly Inservice Valve Test  
Line 619: Line 1,239:
: CR 730819 RHRS Pump 2B motor, lower bearing oil sample has elevated particle counts
: CR 730819 RHRS Pump 2B motor, lower bearing oil sample has elevated particle counts
: CR783219, Unit 2 MDAFW pump tripped while taking to pull-to-lock  
: CR783219, Unit 2 MDAFW pump tripped while taking to pull-to-lock  
: TE731411, TE for maintenance rule evaluation for unexpected control room annunciator Unit 1 operator logs for 1/15/14  
: TE731411, TE for maintenance rule evaluation for unexpected control room annunciator  
: Unit 1 operator logs for 1/15/14  
: Unit 1 operator logs for 2/18/14  
: Unit 1 operator logs for 2/18/14  
: Unit 2 operator logs for 1/31/14   
: Unit 2 operator logs for 1/31/14   
: Attachment
: Attachment


==Section 1R22: Surveillance Testing Procedures 14454A-1 Rev. 1.1, Motor Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump A Operability Test==
==Section 1R22: Surveillance Testing==
 
===Procedures===
: 14454A-1 Rev. 1.1, Motor Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump A Operability Test  
: 14609-1 Rev. 21, SSPS Slave Relay K601 Train B Test Safety Injection  
: 14609-1 Rev. 21, SSPS Slave Relay K601 Train B Test Safety Injection  
: 14615-1 Rev. 10, SSPS Slave Relay K608 Train B Test Safety Injection  
: 14615-1 Rev. 10, SSPS Slave Relay K608 Train B Test Safety Injection  
: 14658-2 Rev. 8, SSPS Slave Relay K740 and K741 Train A Test Semi-Automatic Switchover to Containment Sump 14806C-1 Rev. 4, Containment Spray Pump and Check Valve Refueling Comprehensive Full Flow Inservice Test 14808B-1 Rev. 4, Train B Centrifugal Charging Pump and Check Valve IST and Response Time Test 14850-1 Rev. 54.1, Cold Shutdown Valve Inservice Test  
: 14658-2 Rev. 8, SSPS Slave Relay K740 and K741 Train A Test Semi-Automatic Switchover to Containment Sump  
: 24349-1 Rev. 9.0, Containment Penetration No. 49 Excess Letdown and Seal Water Leakoff Local Leak Rate Test  
: 14806C-1 Rev. 4, Containment Spray Pump and Check Valve Refueling Comprehensive Full Flow Inservice Test  
: 14808B-1 Rev. 4, Train B Centrifugal Charging Pump and Check Valve IST and Response Time Test 14850-1 Rev. 54.1, Cold Shutdown Valve Inservice Test  
: 24349-1 Rev. 9.0, Containment Penetration No. 49 Excess Letdown and Seal Water Leakoff Local Leak Rate Test
===Work Orders===
===Work Orders===
: SNC503654 - 14454 MDAFW Pump A Operability Test
: SNC503654 - 14454 MDAFW Pump A Operability Test


==Section 4OA1: Performance Indicator (PI) Verification Procedures 00163-C, Rev. 14.6,==
==Section 4OA1: Performance Indicator (PI) Verification==
: NRC Performance Indicator and Monthly Operating Report Preparation and Submittal


==Section 4OA2: Identification and Resolution of Problems Condition Reports
===Procedures===
: 783219 -==
: 00163-C, Rev. 14.6, NRC Performance Indicator and Monthly Operating Report Preparation and Submittal
: MDAFW pump A tripped while taking to PTL
 
==Section 4OA2: Identification and Resolution of Problems==
 
===Condition Reports===
: 783219 - MDAFW pump A tripped while taking to PTL
: 737334 - Unit 2 safety injection accumulator tank #1 pressure channel failed high  
: 737334 - Unit 2 safety injection accumulator tank #1 pressure channel failed high  
: Other Records
: Other Records
Line 643: Line 1,272:
: Unit 2 operator logs for 3/6/14
: Unit 2 operator logs for 3/6/14


==Section 4OA3: Event Follow-up Procedures/Calculations/Engineering Documents 14850-1 Rev. 54.1, Cold Shutdown Valve Inservice Test==
==Section 4OA3: Event Follow-up==
: Procedures/Calculations/Engineering Documents
: 14850-1 Rev. 54.1, Cold Shutdown Valve Inservice Test  
: SNC534699 - Both 1AD1CA and 1AD1CB out of service at same time
: SNC534699 - Both 1AD1CA and 1AD1CB out of service at same time
}}
}}

Revision as of 17:07, 1 July 2018

IR 05000424-14-002, 05000425-14-002; on 01/01/2014 - 03/31/2014; Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2, Integrated Inspection Report
ML14119A418
Person / Time
Site: Vogtle  Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 04/29/2014
From: Ehrhardt F J
NRC/RGN-II/DRP/RPB2
To: Tynan T E
Southern Nuclear Operating Co
References
IR-14-002
Download: ML14119A418 (30)


Text

UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II 245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1257 April 29, 2014

Mr. Tom Vice President - Vogtle

Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc.

Vogtle Electric Generating Plant

7821 River Road

Waynesboro, GA 30830

SUBJECT: VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT - NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05000424/2014002 AND 05000425/2014002

Dear Mr. Tynan:

On March 31, 2014, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection

at your Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2. The enclosed integrated inspection

report documents the inspection findings, which were discussed on April 22, 2014, with you and

other members of your staff.

The inspection(s) examined activities conducted under your license as they relate to safety and compliance with the Commission's rules and regulations and with the conditions of your license.

The inspectors reviewed selected procedures and records, observed activities, and interviewed

personnel.

Based on the results of this inspection, no findings of significance were identified. As we

informed you in the most recent NRC integrated inspection report, cross-cutting aspects

identified in the last six months of 2013 using t he previous terminology were being converted in accordance with the cross-reference in Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0310. Section 4OA5

of the enclosed report documents the conversion of these cross-cutting aspects which will be

evaluated for cross-cutting themes and potential substantive cross-cutting issues in accordance

with IMC 0305 starting with the 2014 mid-cycle assessment review. If you disagree with the

cross cutting aspect assigned, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this

inspection report, with the basis for your disagreement, to the Regional Administrator, Region II,

and the NRC Resident Inspector at the Vogtle Plant. In accordance with the 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter, its enclosures, and your response (if any) will be avail able electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document Room or from the Public ly Available Records (PARS) component of the NRC's Agencywide Document Access and Managem ent System (ADAMS). ADAMS is accessible from the NRC Web site at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public

Electronic Reading Room).

Sincerely,/RA/ Frank Ehrhardt, Chief

Reactor Projects Branch 2

Division of Reactor Projects

Docket Nos.: 05000424, 05000425 License Nos.: NPF-68 and NPF-81

Enclosures:

Inspection Report 05000424/2014002 and 05000425/2014002

w/Attachment:

Supplemental Information

cc distribution via ListServ

_________________________ SUNSI REVIEW COMPLETE FORM 665 ATTACHED OFFICE RII:DRP RII:DRP RII:DRs RII:DRS RII:DRP RII:DRP SIGNATURE Via email Via email Via email Via email Via email FJE /RA/ NAME MCain TChandler RCarrion AVargas AAlen FEhrhardt DATE 04/22/2014 04/23/2014 04/22/2014 04/22/2014 04/22/2014 04/29/2014 E-MAIL COPY? YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO YES NO Letter to Tom from Frank Ehrhardt dated April 29, 2014

SUBJECT: VOGTLE ELECTRIC GENERATING PLANT - NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT 05000424/2014002 AND 05000425/2014002

DISTRIBUTION

C. Evans, RII

L. Douglas, RII

OE Mail

RIDSNRRDIRS

PUBLIC RidsNrrPMVogtle Resource

Enclosure U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II

Docket Nos.: 50-424, 50-425

License Nos.: NPF-68, NPF-81

Report Nos.: 05000424/2014002 and 05000425/2014002

Licensee: Southern Nuclear Operating Company, Inc. (SNC)

Facility: Vogtle Electric Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2

Location: Waynesboro, GA 30830

Dates: January 1, 2014, through March 31, 2014

Inspectors: M. Cain, Senior Resident Inspector T. Chandler, Resident Inspector R. Carrion, Senior Reactor Inspector (Section 1R08)

A. Vargas, Reactor Inspector (Section 1R08)

Approved by: Frank Ehrhardt, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 2

Division of Reactor Projects Enclosure

SUMMARY OF FINDINGS

IR 05000424/2014002, 05000425/2014002; 01/01/2014 - 03/31/2014; Vogtle Electric

Generating Plant, Units 1 and 2, Integrated Inspection Report The report covered a three-month period of inspection by the resident and regional inspectors. No findings of significance were identified. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operation of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in

NUREG-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process" Revision 5.

REPORT DETAILS

Summary of Plant Status

Unit 1 started the report period at full rated thermal power (RTP) and was shut down for a

planned refueling outage on March 16, 2014. The unit remained shutdown for the remainder of

the report period.

Unit 2 operated at essentially RTP for the entire inspection period.

REACTOR SAFETY

Cornerstones: Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, Barrier Integrity

1R01 Adverse Weather Protection

a. Inspection Scope

Impending Adverse Weather Conditions The inspectors reviewed the licensee's preparations to protect risk-significant systems

from severe cold weather conditions expected on January 7, 2014. The inspectors

evaluated the licensee's implementation of adverse weather preparation procedures and compensatory measures, including operator staffing, before the onset of and during the

adverse weather conditions. The inspectors reviewed the licensee's plans to address the

ramifications of potentially lasting effects that may result from cold weather conditions.

The inspectors verified that operator actions specified in the licensee's adverse weather

procedure maintain readiness of essential systems. The inspectors verified that required

surveillances were current, or were scheduled and completed, if practical, before the

onset of anticipated adverse weather conditions. The inspectors also verified the

licensee implemented periodic equipment walkdowns or other measures to ensure that the condition of plant equipment met operability requirements. Documents reviewed are

listed in the Attachment.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R04 Equipment Alignment

a. Inspection Scope

Partial Walkdown

The inspectors verified that critical portions of selected systems were correctly aligned

by performing partial walkdowns. The ins pectors selected systems for assessment because they were a redundant or backup system or train, were important for mitigating

risk for the current plant conditions, had been recently realigned, or were a single-train system.

The inspectors determined the correct system lineup by reviewing plant procedures and

drawings. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.

The inspectors selected the following three systems or trains to inspect:

  • Unit 1 "A" and "C" train auxiliary feedwater (AFW) systems while the "B" train AFW system was out of service for planned maintenance
  • Unit 2 "A" train nuclear service cooling water (NSCW) transfer system while the "B" train NSCW transfer system was out of service for planned maintenance

Complete Walkdown The inspectors verified the alignment of the Unit 1 containment spray (CS) system. The

inspectors selected this system for assessment because it is a risk-significant mitigating

system. The inspectors determined the co rrect system lineup by reviewing plant procedures, drawings, the updated final safety analysis report, and other documents. To

identify any deficiencies that could affect the ability of the system to perform its

function(s), the inspectors reviewed records related to outstanding design issues and

maintenance work requests. The inspectors verified that the selected system was

correctly aligned by performing a complete walkdown of accessible components.

To verify the licensee was identifying and resolving equipment alignment discrepancies,

the inspectors reviewed corrective action documents, including condition reports and

outstanding work orders. The inspectors also reviewed periodic reports containing

information on the status of risk-significant systems, including maintenance rule reports

and system health reports. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R05 Fire Protection

a. Inspection Scope

Quarterly Inspection The inspectors evaluated the adequacy of selected fire plans by comparing the fire plans

to the defined hazards and defense-in-depth features specified in the fire protection

program. In evaluating the fire plans, the inspectors assessed the following items:

  • control of transient combustibles and ignition sources
  • fire detection systems
  • water-based fire suppression systems
  • gaseous fire suppression systems
  • manual firefighting equipment and capability
  • passive fire protection features
  • compensatory measures and fire watches
  • issues related to fire protection contained in the licensee's corrective action program

The inspectors toured the following five fire areas to assess material condition and

operational status of fire protection equipment. Documents reviewed are listed in the

.

  • Unit 1, level "A" east and west penetration areas, fire zones 89, 90, 159, 87, 88, 93, 120, and 158
  • Unit 2, CS and RHR pump rooms, fire zones 4, 5, 9 and 10
  • Unit 1 containment building Annual Inspection

The inspectors evaluated the licensee's fire brigade performance during a drill on

February 10, 2014, and assessed the brigade's capability to meet fire protection

licensing basis requirements. The inspectors observed the following aspects of fire

brigade performance:

  • capability of fire brigade members
  • leadership ability of the brigade leader
  • use of turnout gear and firefighting equipment
  • team effectiveness
  • compliance with site procedures

The inspectors also assessed the ability of control room operators to combat potential

fires, including identifying the location of the fire, dispatching the fire brigade, and

sounding alarms. The inspectors evaluated the licensee's ability to declare the

appropriate emergency action level and make required notifications in accordance with

NUREG 0654, "Criteria for Preparation and Evaluation of Radiological Emergency

Response Plans and Preparedness in Support of Nuclear Power Plants (FEMA-REP-1)"

and Title 10 of the Code of Federal Regulations (10 CFR) Part 50, "Domestic Licensing

of Production and Utilization Facilities." Documents reviewed are listed in the

.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R07 Heat Sink Performance

a. Inspection Scope

Annual Review The inspectors verified the readiness and availability of the Unit 1 "B" train centrifugal

charging pump (CCP) motor heat exchanger to perform its design function by observing

performance tests or reviewing reports of those tests, verifying the licensee uses the

periodic maintenance method outlined in Generic Letter 89-13, "Service Water System

Problems Affecting Safety Related Equipment," dated July 18, 1989, observing the

licensee's heat exchanger inspections, and verifying critical operating parameters

through direct observation or by reviewing operating data. Additionally, the inspectors

verified that the licensee had entered any significant heat exchanger performance

problems into their corrective action program and that the corrective actions were

appropriate. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R08 Inservice Inspection (ISI) Activities (IP 71111.08P, Unit 1)

a. Inspection Scope

Non-Destructive Examination Activities and Welding Activities

From March 24, 2014, through April 1, 2014, the inspectors conducted an on-site review of the implementation

of the licensee's ISI Program for monitoring degradation of the reactor coolant system,

emergency feedwater systems, risk-signifi cant piping and components, and containment systems in Unit 1. The inspectors' activities included a review of non-destructive

examinations (NDEs) to evaluate compliance with the applicable edition of the American

Society of Mechanical Engineers (ASME) Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code (BPVC),

Section XI (Code of Record: 2001 Edition with 2003 Addenda; 3rd Interval, 2nd Period,

3rd Outage), and to verify that indications and defects (if present) were appropriately

evaluated and dispositioned in accordance with the requirements of the ASME Code,Section XI, acceptance standards.

The inspectors directly observed the following NDE mandated by the ASME Code to evaluate compliance with the ASME Code Section XI and Section V requirements and, if

any indications and defects were detected, to evaluate if they were dispositioned in

accordance with the ASME Code or an NRC-approved alternative requirement.

  • Ultrasonic test of component 1-1204-021-19-RB. 6" Elbow to Pipe Weld, Class 2
  • VT-3 of component 1-1202-030-H003, Pipe Support The inspectors reviewed records of the following NDEs mandated by the ASME Code Section XI to evaluate compliance with the ASME Code Section XI and Section V

requirements and, if any indications and defects were detected, to evaluate if they were

dispositioned in accordance with the ASME Code or an NRC-approved alternative

requirement.

  • PT of CRD housing weld, component number 1-1201-V6-001-W188

The inspectors observed the welding activities referenced below and reviewed

associated documents in order to evaluate compliance with procedures and the ASME

Code. The inspectors reviewed the work order, including the weld data sheets, welding

procedures, procedure qualification records, and welder performance qualification

records.

  • Check valve 1-1204-U4-145 replacement on safety injection system line 1-1204-030-2, valve is an ASME Class 1 and 2 break

In addition, the inspectors reviewed the following work orders for the weld packages,

including weld data sheets, welding procedures, procedure qualification records, and

welder performance qualification records.

  • Work order SNC 555148, Chemical and Volume Control System Line 1-1208-012-2, ASME Class 1

During non-destructive surface and volumetric examinations performed since the

previous refueling outage, the licensee did not identify any relevant indications that were

analytically evaluated and accepted for continued service. Therefore, no NRC review

was completed for this inspection procedure attribute.

PWR Vessel Upper Head Penetration (VUHP) Inspection Activities

For the Unit 1 vessel head, a bare metal visual examination was not required this outage pursuant to

10 CFR 50.55a as it had been performed during the last refueling outage. Therefore, no

NRC review was done for this inspection procedure attribute.

Boric Acid Corrosion Control (BACC) Inspection Activities

The inspectors reviewed the licensee's BACC program activities to ensure implementation with commitments made in

response to NRC Generic Letter 88-05, "Boric Acid Corrosion of Carbon Steel Reactor

Pressure Boundary," and applicable industry guidance documents. Specifically, the

inspectors performed an on-site record review of procedures and the results of the

licensee's containment walk-down inspections performed during the current spring

refueling outage (1R18). The inspectors also interviewed the BACC program owner,

conducted an independent walkdown of containment to evaluate compliance with licensee's BACC program requirements, and verified that degraded or non-conforming conditions, such as boric acid leaks, were properly identified and corrected in

accordance with the licensee's BACC and corrective action programs.

The inspectors reviewed the following condition reports and associated corrective

actions related to evidence of boric acid leakage to evaluate if the corrective actions completed were consistent with the requirements of the ASME Code Section XI and 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI.

  • CR 533081, Leak of valve 1HV3565
  • CR 537487, Active boric acid leak on 1-1208-U4-A11
  • CR 547269, Active boric acid leak on 1-1204-U4-137

The inspectors reviewed the following engineering evaluations completed for evidence of

boric acid leakage to determine if degraded components were documented in the

corrective action program. The inspectors also evaluated corrective actions for any degraded components to determine if they met the ASME Section XI Code.

  • Technical Evaluation (TE) 547817, associated with CR 547269 and includes Corrosion Assessment (CA) 1204-2013-006
  • TE 556248, associated with CR 537487 and includes CA 1208-2012-002

Steam Generator (SG) Tube Inspection Activities

The inspectors observed the following activities and/or reviewed the following documentation and evaluated them

against the licensee's technical specifications, commitments made to the NRC, ASME Section XI, and Nuclear Energy Institute 97-06 (Steam Generator Program Guidelines):

  • Reviewed the licensee's in-situ SG tube pressure testing screening criteria. In particular, the inspectors assessed whether assumed NDE flaw sizing accuracy was

consistent with data from the EPRI examination technique specification sheets

(ETSS) or other applicable performance demonstrations.

  • Compared the numbers and sizes of SG tube flaws/degradation identified against the licensee's previous outage operational assessment.
  • Evaluated if the licensee's SG tube ET examination scope included potential areas of tube degradation identified in prior outage SG tube inspections and/or as identified

in NRC generic industry operating experience applicable to the licensee's SG tubes.

  • Reviewed the licensee's implementation of their extent of condition inspection scope and repairs for new SG tube degradation mechanism(s).
  • Reviewed the licensee's repair criteria and processes.
  • Verified that primary-to-secondary leakage (e.g., SG tube leakage) was below three gallons per day, or the detection threshold, during the previous operating cycle

according to licensee procedures.

  • Evaluated if the ET equipment and techniques used by the licensee to acquire data from the SG tubes were qualified or validated to detect the known/expected types of

SG tube degradation in accordance with Appendix H, "Performance Demonstration

for Eddy Current Examination," of EPRI Pressurized Water Reactor Steam

Generator Examination Guidelines, Revision 7.

  • Reviewed the licensee's secondary side SG foreign object search and removal activities.
  • Reviewed ET personnel qualifications.

Identification and Resolution of Problems

The inspectors performed a review of a sample of ISI-related problems which were identified by the licensee and entered into

the corrective action program as CRs. The inspectors reviewed the CRs to confirm that

the licensee had appropriately described the scope of the problem, and had initiated

corrective actions. The review also included the licensee's consideration and

assessment of operating experience events applicable to the plant. The inspectors

performed this review to ensure compliance with 10 CFR Part 50, Appendix B, Criterion XVI, "Corrective Action," requirements. Documents reviewed are listed in the

.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R11 Licensed Operator Requalification Program

a. Inspection Scope

.1 Resident Inspector Quarterly Review of Licensed Operator Requalification

The inspectors observed an evaluated simulator scenario administered to an operating

crew conducted in accordance with the licensee's accredited requalification training

program.

The inspectors assessed the following:

  • licensed operator performance
  • the ability of the licensee to administer the scenario and evaluate the operators
  • the quality of the post-scenario critique
  • simulator performance Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.

.2 Resident Inspector Quarterly Review of Licensed Operator Performance

The inspectors observed licensed operator performance in the main control room on

February 4, 2014, during the performance of in-service testing.

The inspectors assessed the following:

  • use of plant procedures
  • control board manipulations
  • communications between crew members
  • use and interpretation of instruments, indications, and alarms
  • use of human error prevention techniques
  • documentation of activities
  • management and supervision Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R12 Maintenance Effectiveness

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors assessed the licensee's treatment of the two issues listed below in order

to verify the licensee appropriately addressed equipment problems within the scope of

the maintenance rule (10 CFR 50.65, "Requirements for Monitoring the Effectiveness of

Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants"). The inspectors reviewed procedures and

records in order to evaluate the licensee's identification, assessment, and

characterization of the problems as well as their corrective actions for returning the

equipment to a satisfactory condition. The in spectors also interviewed system engineers and the maintenance rule coordinator to assess the accuracy of performance

deficiencies and extent of condition. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.

  • CR 351658 - Unplanned limiting condition of operation (LCO): Intermediate Range nuclear instrument (NI) 2N-36 failure
  • CR 664671 and CR 681079 - Unit 2, Chemical and volume control system (CVCS)1208 taken to maintenance rule a(1) status

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R13 Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the five maintenance activities listed below to verify the

licensee assessed and managed plant risk as required by 10 CFR 50.65(a)(4) and

licensee procedures. The inspectors assessed the adequacy of the licensee's risk

assessments and implementation of risk management actions. The inspectors also

verified that the licensee was identifying and resolving problems with assessing and

managing maintenance-related risk using the corrective action program. Additionally, for

maintenance resulting from unforeseen situations, the inspectors assessed the

effectiveness of the licensee's planning and control of emergent work activities.

Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.

  • Units 1 and 2, week of January 6, 2014, elevated Green risk condition associated with high-risk work in the high-voltage switchyard concurrent with the grid being in

alert level 1A due to extreme low temperatures

  • Unit 2, week of January 20, 2014, Yellow risk condition associated with the unplanned inoperability of Unit 2 "A" EDG concurrent with the high-risk work being

performed in the high-voltage switchyard

  • Unit 1, week of February 24, 2014, Yellow risk condition due to Unit 1 "A" NSCW pump #1 out of service (OOS) concurrent with Unit 1 "B" RHR pump OOS for

scheduled maintenance outage

  • Unit 1, week of March 3, 2014, Yellow risk condition due to Unit 1 "B" motor-driven AFW pump out of service for maintenance concurrent with Unit 1 "A" NSCW pump
  1. 1 out of service for motor replacement
  • Unit 1, week of March 24, 2014, outage risk assessment monitoring (ORAM) Yellow outage risk condition for reactor coolant system (RCS) at mid-loop level

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R15 Operability Evaluations

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors selected the six operability determinations or functionality evaluations

listed below for review based on the risk-significance of the associated components and

systems. The inspectors reviewed the technical adequacy of the determinations to

ensure that technical specification operability was properly justified and the components

or systems remained capable of performing their design functions. To verify whether

components or systems were operable, the inspectors compared the operability and

design criteria in the appropriate sections of the technical specification and updated final

safety analysis report to the licensee's evaluations. Where compensatory measures

were required to maintain operability, the inspectors determined whether the measures

in place would function as intended and were properly controlled. Additionally, the inspectors reviewed a sample of corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with operability evaluations.

Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.

  • CR 760774, Failure of EDG 2A Over Speed Trip Test
  • CR 757479, Void detected on pipeline 1-1204-032-2
  • CR 769409, Increase of active leak on casing flange connection of jacket water keep warm pump
  • CR 757018, EQPM 11201R5074 for 1PV0455A not performed within required frequency
  • CR 775371, 2AA02-07 Closing springs slow to close

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R18 Plant Modifications

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors verified that the two plant modifications listed below did not affect the

safety functions of important safety systems.

The inspectors confirmed the modifications did not degrade the design bases, licensing bases, and performance capability of risk

significant structures, systems, and components. The inspectors also verified

modifications performed during plant configurations involving increased risk did not

place the plant in an unsafe condition. Additionally, the inspectors evaluated whether

system operability and availability, configuration control, post-installation test activities,

and changes to documents, such as drawings, procedures, and operator training

materials, complied with licensee standards and NRC requirements. In addition, the

inspectors reviewed a sample of related corrective action documents to verify the

licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with modifications.

Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.

  • SNC517148, Unit 1 replacement of seal injector filter system with sub-micron filter system

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R19 Post-Maintenance Testing

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors either observed post-maintenance testing or reviewed the test results for

the six maintenance activities listed below to verify the work performed was completed

correctly and the test activities were adequate to verify system operability and functional

capability.

  • Maintenance Work Order (MWO) SNC418749, "A" train NSCW pump 3 rebuild, and MWO SNC407844, "A" train NSCW pump 3 motor refurbish
  • MWO SNC532915, - 21205P6002M01 ("2B" RHR pump motor) - Change oil in lower motor bearing
  • MWO SNC408063, - (1A 1204SIP) - "A" train safety injection (SI) pump 3 motor 11204P6003M01 preventive maintenance (PM) and MWO SNC407988, - (1A

1204SIP) - 1HV8814 motor-operated mini-flow isolation MOV PM

  • MWO SNC535924, Unit 2 accumulator tank 1 pressure channel failure
  • MWO SNC557853, Unit 2 "A" motor-driven AFW pump tripped while taking to pull-to-lock
  • MWO SNC560682, Unit 1 pressurizer backup heater "A" will not operate from control room The inspectors evaluated these activities for the following:
  • acceptance criteria were clear and demonstrated operational readiness
  • effects of testing on the plant were adequately addressed
  • test instrumentation was appropriate
  • tests were performed in accordance with approved procedures
  • equipment was returned to its operational status following testing
  • test documentation was properly evaluated

Additionally, the inspectors reviewed a sample of corrective action documents to verify

the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with post-

maintenance testing. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R20 Refueling and Other Outage Activities

a. Inspection Scope

For the Unit 1 refueling outage beginning March 16, 2014, through the remainder of the

report period, the inspectors evaluated the following outage activities:

  • outage planning
  • shutdown, cooldown, and refueling
  • reactivity and inventory control
  • decay heat removal and spent fuel pool cooling system operation The inspectors verified that the licensee:
  • considered risk in developing the outage schedule
  • controlled plant configuration in accordance with administrative risk reduction methodologies
  • developed work schedules to manage fatigue
  • developed mitigation strategies for loss of key safety functions
  • adhered to operating license and technical specification requirements

Additionally, inspectors verified that safety-related and risk-significant structures,

systems, and components not accessible during power operations were maintained in

an operable condition. The inspectors also reviewed a sample of related corrective

action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies

associated with outage activities. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

1R22 Surveillance Testing

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed the six surveillance tests listed below and either observed the

test or reviewed test results to verify testing adequately demonstrated equipment

operability and met technical specification and licensee procedural requirements. The

inspectors evaluated the test activities to assess for preconditioning of equipment,

procedure adherence, and equipment alignment following completion of the surveillance.

Additionally, the inspectors reviewed a sample of related corrective action documents to

verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with

surveillance testing. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.

Routine Surveillance Tests

  • 14658-2 Rev. 8, "SSPS Slave Relay K740 and K741 "A" Train Test Semi-automatic Switchover to Containment Sump"
  • 14454A-1 Rev. 1.1, "Motor-driven AFW pump "A" operability test"
  • 14808B-1 Rev. 4, "Train B Centrifugal Charging Pump and Check Valve IST and Response Time Test"
  • 14850-1 Rev. 54.1, "Cold Shutdown Valve Inservice Test" Containment Isolation Valve
  • 24349-1 Rev. 9.0, "Containment Penetration No. 49 Excess Letdown and Seal Water Leakoff Local Leak Rate Test"

In-Service Tests (IST)

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

Cornerstone:

Emergency Preparedness

1EP6 Drill Evaluation

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors observed the emergency preparedness drill conducted on March 12,

2014. The inspectors observed licensee activiti es in the Burke County Office Complex during a hostile action based tabletop exercise that included several local and state

agencies from both Georgia and South Carolina. The inspectors evaluated

implementation of the emergency plan, including event classification, notification, and

protective action recommendations. The inspectors evaluated the licensee's

performance against criteria established in the licensee's procedures. Additionally, the

inspectors attended the post-exercise critique to assess the licensee's effectiveness in

identifying emergency preparedness weaknesses and verified the identified weaknesses

were entered in the corrective action program.

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

OTHER ACTIVITIES

4OA1 Performance Indicator Verification

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors reviewed a sample of the performance indicator (PI) data for Unit 1 and

Unit 2, submitted by the licensee, for the PIs listed below. The inspectors reviewed plant

records compiled between January 2013, and December 2013 to verify the accuracy

and completeness of the data reported for the station. The inspectors verified that the PI

data complied with guidance contained in Nuclear Energy Institute 99-02, "Regulatory

Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," and licensee procedures. The inspectors also confirmed the PIs were calculated correctly. In addition, the inspectors reviewed a sample of related corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and

correcting any deficiencies associated with PI data. Documents reviewed are listed in

the Attachment.

Cornerstone:

Initiating Events

  • unplanned scrams per 7000 critical hours
  • unplanned scrams with complications

b. Findings

No findings were identified.

4OA2 Identification and Resolution of Problems

.1 Routine Review

The inspectors screened items entered into the licensee's corrective action program in

order to identify repetitive equipment failures or specific human performance issues for

follow-up. The inspectors reviewed condition reports, attended screening meetings, or

accessed the licensee's computerized corrective action database.

.2 Annual Follow-up of Selected Issues

a. Inspection Scope

The inspectors conducted a detailed review of condition reports CR 737334, "Unit 2

safety injection accumulator tank #1 pressure channel failed high," and CR 783219,

"Motor-driven AFW pump "A" tripped while taking to pull-to-lock." The inspectors

evaluated the following attributes of the licensee's actions:

  • complete and accurate identification of the problem in a timely manner
  • evaluation and disposition of operability and reportability issues
  • consideration of extent of condition, generic implications, common cause, and previous occurrences
  • classification and prioritization of the problem
  • identification of root and contributing causes of the problem
  • identification of any additional condition reports
  • completion of corrective actions in a timely manner Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.

b. Findings and Observations

No findings were identified.

4OA3 Event Follow-up

.1 (Closed) Licensee Event Report (LER) 05000424/2012-005-00:

Main Steam Isolation Valve Failures On October 8, 2013, with Unit 1 in Mode 2, the operators began preparations for power

ascension. At 1616, as a main feedwater pump was being placed online, the control

room operators noted a divergence in the RCS loop differential temperatures (Ts), steam pressures, and steam flows between loops 1 & 4 and loops 2 & 3. Loops 1 & 4

showed increasing loop Ts, lowering steam pressure, and some minimal steam flow, while loops 2 and 3 showed no loop T, increasing steam pressures (to the point of lifting the loop 2 and 3 atmospheric relief valves), and no steam flow. The Main Control

Board hand switches indicated that all MSIVs and associated bypass valves were open.

The operators identified the potential impact to the core neutron flux and stopped power

ascension. Following discussions with plant management and engineering, the

operators placed the plant in a safe condition by inserting a manual trip of the reactor at

2155. The licensee subsequently assembled an issue response team (IRT) and a root

cause team to investigate the cause of the diverging indications and to determine the

required corrective actions. The root cause team determined that the root cause of the

MSIV stem failures was due to temperature agi ng embrittlement of the stem material.

The enforcement aspects associated with this event were documented in NRC

integrated inspection report 05000424,425/2012005 (Section 4OA2). No other findings

were identified. This LER is closed.

.2 (Closed) Licensee Event Report 05000424/2013-001-00:

Failure to Comply with Technical Specification LCO 3.8.4 On November 27, 2013, an internal wiring discrepancy was discovered on the Unit 1

Class 1E battery charger 1AD1CB (one of two redundant battery chargers on "A" train)

following the trip of the battery charger input breaker. The wiring discrepancy prevented

the charger from performing all required functions of Technical Specification LCO 3.8.4,

"DC Sources - Operating," and rendered it inoperable. The LCO requires, in part, one of

two redundant battery chargers to be operable. Subsequent review of battery charger

maintenance activities determined that on September 30, 2013 the remaining redundant

"A" train battery charger (1AD1CA) was remo ved from service for maintenance activities for approximately 14.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />. This resulted in both train "A" battery chargers being

inoperable simultaneously, which is condition that requires restoration of the inoperable

direct-current (DC) source (i.e. train) within two hours (LCO 3.8.4 Condition C).

Although the degraded charger (1AD1CB) was able to maintain battery terminal voltage

within limits under minimal loading condition, the DC source was inoperable for a time

greater than allowed by technical specification. The inspectors reviewed the LER, the

associated condition report and apparent cause determination, and subsequent action

items. The enforcement aspects associated with this event were documented in NRC

integrated inspection report 05000424/2013005 (Section 1R19). No other findings were

identified. This LER is closed.

.3 (Closed) Licensee Event Report 05000425/2013-002:

Automatic Unit 2 Reactor Trip due to loss of Generator Excitation On October 19, 2013, while Unit 2 was operating in Mode 1 at 100 percent power, the

main generator excitation system experienced a failure that tripped the main generator

and subsequently tripped the turbine and reactor. The reactor trip system, the

engineered safety features actuation system

, feedwater and auxiliary feedwater systems actuated as designed and the plant was stabilized in Mode 3. The inspectors reviewed

the LER, the associated condition report and apparent cause determination, and

subsequent action items. No findings or violations of NRC requirements were identified.

This LER is closed.

.4 (Closed) Licensee Event Report 05000425/2013-003:

Manual Reactor Trip due to Lowering Condenser Vacuum On October 22, 2013, while Unit 2 was operating in Mode 1 at 25 percent power, the unit

was manually tripped due to lowering condenser vacuum. At the time of the reactor trip,

maintenance activities were in progress on the "B" main feedwater pump turbine. Prior

to the work commencing, the operators discussed how the maintenance work on the

turbine could potentially impact condenser pressure. As a precaution, the operators

established operating limits in case condenser vacuum was lost. As the lift of the turbine

steam chest was initiated, condenser vacuum began lowering and maintenance

personnel were directed to lower the steam chest back on the turbine. However,

condenser vacuum continued to decrease, and as it approached the pre-determined

operational limit of 23 inches of mercury, the shift supervisor directed a manual reactor trip. The reactor trip system, feedwater and auxiliary feedwater systems actuated as designed and the plant was stabilized in Mode 3. The inspectors reviewed the LER, the

associated condition report and apparent cause determination, and subsequent action

items. No findings or violations of NRC requirements were identified. This LER is

closed.

4OA5 Other Activities

.1 Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO) Report Review

In accordance with Executive Director of Operations Procedure 0220, "Coordination with

the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations," the inspectors reviewed the most recent

INPO evaluation and accreditation reports dated February 10, 2014, to determine if

those reports identified safety or training issues not previously identified by NRC

evaluations. The report contained no safety issues that were not already known by the

NRC.

b. Findings and Observations

No findings were identified.

.2 Cross-Cutting Aspect Common Language Initiative Transition

The table below provides a cross-reference from the 2013 and earlier findings and

associated cross-cutting aspects to the new cross-cutting aspects resulting from the

common language initiative. These aspects and any others identified since January

2014 will be evaluated for cross-cutting themes and potential substantive cross-cutting

issues in accordance with IMC 0305 starting with the 2014 mid-cycle assessment

review. Finding Old Cross-Cutting Aspect New Cross-Cutting Aspect 05000424/2013005-01 P.1(c) P.2 05000424,425/2013007-01P.1(c) P.2 05000424,425/2013403-01P.1(a) P.1 05000424,425/2013403-02P.1(d) P.3

4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit

.1 Exit Meeting

On April 22, 2014 the resident inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. T.

Tynan and other members of the licensee's staff. The inspectors confirmed that

proprietary information was not provi ded or examined during the inspection.

ATTACHMENT:

SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION

KEY POINTS OF CONTACT

Licensee personnel

R. Barringer, Security Manager
R. Collins, Chemistry Manager
G. Gunn, Licensing Supervisor
R. Hons, Training Manager
M. Johnson, Health Physics Manager
F. Pournia, Engineering Director
J. Robinson, Engineering Programs Manager
G. Saxon, Plant Manager
J. Thomas, Operations Director
T. Thompson, Systems Engineering Manager
T. Tynan, Site Vice-President
K. Walden, Licensing Engineer
S. Waldrup, Licensing Director

NRC personnel

M. Cain, Senior Resident Inspector
T. Chandler, Resident Inspector
F. Ehrhardt, Chief, Region II Reactor Projects Branch 2

LIST OF ITEMS

OPENED AND CLOSED

Closed

05000424/LER-2012-005-00 LER Main Steam Isolation Valve Failures (Section
4OA3.1)
05000424/LER-2013-001-00 LER Failure to Comply with Technical Specification LCO
3.8.4 (Section 4OA3.2)
05000425/LER-2013-002-00 LER Automatic Unit 2 Reactor Trip due to loss of
Generator Excitation (Section 4OA3.3)
05000425/LER-2013-003-00 LER Manual Reactor Trip due to Lowering Condenser
Vacuum (Section 4OA3.4)

LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED

Section 1R01: Adverse Weather Protection

Procedures

11877-1 Rev. 25, Cold Weather Checklist, Unit 1
11877-2 Rev. 21, Cold Weather Checklist, Unit 2

Section 1R04: Equipment Alignment

Procedures

11011-2, Rev. 15.1, Residual Heat Removal System Alignment
11115-1 Rev. 10.2, Containment Spray System Alignment
11150-2 Rev. 23.3, Nuclear Service Cooling Water System Alignment
11610-1, Rev. 20.2, Auxiliary Feedwater System Alignment
14801B-2 Rev. 4.1, Train B NSCW Transfer Pump Inservice Test

Drawings

1X4DB131 Rev. 35.0, P&I Diagram Cont ainment Spray System, System No. 1206 1X4DB161-1, Ver. 45.0, P&I Diagram Fire Pr otection - Auxiliary Feedwater System Condensate Storage & Degasifier System, System 1302 1X4DB161-2, Ver. 28.0, P&I Diagram Fire Pr otection - Auxiliary Feedw ater System, System
1302 1X4DB161-3, Ver. 42.0, P&I Diagram Fire Pr otection - Auxiliary Feedw ater System, System
1305 2X4DB122 Rev. 53.0, P&I Diagram Residual Heat Removal, System No. 1205
2X4DB133-2 Rev. 53, P&I Diagram Nuclear Serv ice Cooling Water System, System No. 1202
2X4DB134 Rev. 31, P&I Diagram Nuclear Serv ice Cooling Water System, System No. 1202
2X4DB135-2 Rev. 29, P&I Diagram Nuclear Se rvice Cooling Water System, System No. 1202
System Health Reports Vogtle Containment Spray System No. 1206 4

th QTR 2013

Section 1R05: Fire Protection

Procedures

17103A-C Rev. 39.2, Annunciator Response Procedures for the Fire Alarm Computer
2000-C Rev. 27.0, Fire Protection Program
2005-C Rev. 31, Fire Response Procedure
2704-2 Rev. 2.0, Zone 4 - Auxiliary Building - Level D, Containment Spray Pump "A" Fire Fighting Preplan
2705-2 Rev.3.0, Zone 5 - Auxiliary Building - Level D, Containment Spray Pump "B" Fire Fighting Preplan
2709-2 Rev.2.2, Zone 9 - Auxiliary Building - Level D, Fire Fighting Preplan
2710-2 Rev.2.2, Zone 10 - Auxiliary Building - Level D, Fire Fighting Preplan
2787-1 Rev. 2.2, Zone 87 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan
2788-1 Rev. 2.2, Zone 88 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan
2789-1 Rev. 2.1, Zone 89 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan
2790-1 Rev. 2.2, Zone 90 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan
2791-2 Rev. 3.2, Zone 91 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan
2792-2 Rev. 3.1, Zone 92 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan
2793-1 Rev. 3.2, Zone 93 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan Attachment
2797-2 Rev. 3.0, Zone 97 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan
2798-2 Rev. 3.0, Zone 98 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan
2802-1 Rev. 1.2, Zone 102 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan
2803-2 Rev. 2.2, Zone 103 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan
2840A-1 Rev. 4, Zone 140A - Containment Building - Levels A, B, 1 and 3 East Fire Fighting Preplan
2840B-1 Rev. 5, Zone 140B - Containment Building - Levels A,B,1,2 and 3 Fire Fighting Preplan
2840C-1 Rev. 4.0, Zone 140C - Containment Building - Levels A,B,1 and 3 Steam Generator Compartment Fire Fighting Preplan
2840E-1 Rev. 1.0, Zone 140E - Containment Building - Levels A, 1 and 2 Fire Fighting Preplan 92858-1 Rev. 2.2, Zone 158 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan
2859-1 Rev. 2.2, Zone 159 - Control Building - Level A Fire Fighting Preplan
2862-2 Rev. 1.1, Zone 162 - Diesel Generator Building Fire Fighting Preplan
2864-2 Rev. 0.2, Zone 164 - Diesel Generator Building - Train B DFO Day Tank Fire Fighting Preplan Other Drill scenario 2014-Q1-01, Fire in room B52

Section 1R07: Heat Sink Performance

Procedures

83309-C Rev. 7, Safety-Related Heat Exchanger Inspection
NMP-ES-012-GL01 Rev. 3.0, Heat Exchanger Pr ogram, Heat Exchanger Inspection, Testing and Condition Assessment

Condition Reports

778805, Unexpected FME Discovered

Work Orders

SNC408284 - B TRN CCP 3 Motor - Clean and Inspect

Section 1R08: Inservice Inspection Activities

Procedures

LTR-SGMP-12-78, Evaluation of Foreign Objects in the Secondary Side of the Vogtle Unit 1
Steam Generators - Fall 2012 1R17 Outage, 10/01/12
MRS 2.4.2
GPC-3, Steam Generator Eddy Current Data Analysis Techniques for Vogtle Units 1

and 2,

Rev. 18
MRS 2.4.2
GPC-37, Steam Generator Eddy Current Data Analysis Techniques for Vogtle Units 1 & 2, Rev. 18
MRS-TRC-2222, Southern Company Vogtle Unit 1 Use of Qualified Techniques 1R18 Refueling Outage, 03/2014
NMP-AP-001-F02, Remote Examination and Removal of Foreign Objects for Steam Generator Secondary Side - Vogtle, Rev. 04
NMP-ES-004-GL01, Steam Generator Program Strategic Plan, Rev. 12
NMP-ES-019, Boric Acid Corrosion Control Program, Version 10.0
NMP-ES-019-001, Boric Acid Corrosion Control Program Implementation, Version 9.0
Attachment
NMP-ES-019-004, Boric Acid Corrosion Control Program - Corrosion Assessment, Version 3.0
NMP-ES-024-101, Reference System for Marking, Measuring, and Recording, Version 2.1
NMP-ES-024-203, Visual Examination (VT-3, Version 5.0
NMP-ES-024-301, Liquid Penetrant Examination Color Contrast and Fluorescent, Version 11.0
NMP-ES-024-501, PDI Generic Procedure for the Ultrasonic Examination of Austenitic Pipe Welds (Appendix VIII), Version 5.0
PDI-UT-2, Generic Procedure for the Ultrasonic Examination of Austenitic Pipe Welds, Revision F, dated March 8, 2013

Procedure

14864-1, Containment General Leak Inspection, Version 2.6
SG-SGMP-12-16, Vogtle 1R17 Steam Generat or Condition Monitoring and Operational Assessment, Rev. 0
SG-SGMP-13-26, Vogtle 1R18 Degradation Assessment, Rev. 0
Corrective Actions

Condition Report (CR)

653117, Documentation Purposes only, Lack of Funding for ISI 1R18
Outage
CR 656061, Gap in standards found in maintenance welding shop
CR 692556, Additional welding performed after final weld inspection
CR 694887, Replacing ASME III Class 1 Snubbers
CR 729534, Alternative to ASME Section XI requirements needed for the examination of reactor vessel head flange
CR792165, Foreign object found in SG 4
Technical Evaluation
575854, Check In Self-Assessment Plan and Report, 2013 Plant Vogtle lnservice Inspection Program Assessment Technical Evaluation
577428, Boric Acid Corrosion Control Program Self-Assessment
Technical Evaluation
653875, Documentation Purposes only, Lack of Funding for ISI 1R18
Outage (Associated with
CR 653117)
Technical Evaluation
694054, Additional welding performed after final weld inspection

(Associated with

CR 692556)
Technical Evaluation
697243, Replacing ASME III Class 1 Snubbers (Associated with
CR 694887
Technical Evaluation
697973, Check In Self-A

ssessment Plan and Report, ISI Assessment for

NRC Routine Baseline Inspections in the 2014 Refueling Outages Technical Evaluation
732143, Alternative to ASME Section XI requirements needed for the examination of reactor vessel head flange (Associated with
CR 729534)
Technical Evaluation:
656575, Track corrective actions for
NMP-FLS-017 Violations (Associated with
CR 656061)
Other Certificate of Calibration for IR Thermometer #30006634
Certificate of Calibration for IR Thermometer #30006637
Certificate of Certification for Spotcheck Developer, Type
SKD-S2, Batch 11H07K
Certificate of Certification for Spotcheck Penetrant, Type
SKL-SP1, Batch 04A06K
Certificate of Certification for Spotcheck Penetrant, Type
SKL-SP, Batch 97K07K
Certificate of Certification for Spotcheck
SKC-S, Batch 13A01K
Certificate of Compliance for Ultrasonic Reference Blocks by Applied Test Systems, Inc., ATS
Order #G03-1246, dated August 13,2003
Corrosion Assessment 1204-2013-006 (Associated with
CR 643871)
Attachment Corrosion Assessment 1208-2012-001 (Associated with
CR 502004)
Corrosion Assessment 1208-2012-002 (Associated with
CRs 530116 and 555387)
Krautkramer Ultrasonic Systems Transducer Certification, dated August 12, 2003
NDE Personnel Certifications: D. Anderson, C. Lewis, A. Wrubleski, M. Grell, A. Morgan,
T. Huhe, T. Jackson
NMP-GM-003-F04, Self-Assessment Final Report, Rev. 01
Pipe Support Drawing V1-1202-030-H003, Revision 4
Report S14V1L003, Ultrasonic Instrument Linearity, dated March 17, 2014

Section 1R11: Licensed Operator Requalification Program

Procedures

14609-1 Rev. 21, SSPS Slave Relay K601 Train B Test Safety Injection
14615-1 Rev. 10, SSPS Slave Relay K608 Train B Test Safety Injection
14808B-1 Rev. 4, Train B Centrifugal Charging Pump and Check Valve IST and Response Time Test Other V-RQ-SE-14201 Rev. 1.0, Simulator Exercise Guide: Loss of Secondary Heat Sink

Section 1R12: Maintenance Rule Effectiveness

Condition Reports

and Action Items

351658 - Unplanned LCO: Intermediate Range NI 2N-36 failure
664671 - Unit 2 system 1208 taken to a(1) status
637701 - Unit 2 system 1602 taken to a(1) status during 04/26/13 MREP

Work Orders

SNC331852 - Unplanned LCO: Intermediate Range NI 2N-36 failure
Other Records
TE 285893 - Unplanned LCO: Intermediate Range NI 2N-36 failure
TE 298047 - 2R15 Outage Lessons Learned - NIS ILRT
TE 638797 - Unit 2 system 1602 taken to a(1) status during 04/26/13 MREP

Section 1R15: Operability Evaluations

Condition Reports

757018, EQPM 11201R5074 for 1PV0455A not performed within required frequency
757479, Void detected on line
1-1204-032-2
760774, Failure of EDG 2A Overspeed Trip Test
769409, Increase of active leak on casing flange connection of jacket water keep warm pump
774835, ATC Nuclear Part 21 Notification for Moore Industries 535 Single Loop Controllers
775371, 2AA02-07 Closing springs slow to close (Unit 2 CCW Pump #3)
Other Records
TE 757162, IDO - Operability of 1PV0455A
TE 757732, IDO - Void detected upstream of valve
1-1204-U4-143
TE 760258, IDO - Operability of 2A EDG
TE 769426, IDO - Increase of active leak on casing flange connection of jacket water keep warm pump Attachment
TE 775504, IDO - Operability of 1TIC12124/5 and 2TIC12124/5
TE 775556, IDO - Operability of Unit 2 CCW Pump #3

Procedures

50085-C Rev. 11, Gas Accumulation Monitoring and Trending

Section 1R18: Plant Modifications

Procedures

NMP-AD-010 Rev. 8.0, 10
CFR 50.59 Screening/Evaluation
NMP-ES-054-001 Rev. 2.0, Temporary Modification Processing

Work Orders

SNC451183 - Temp Mod to restore functionality of annunciator ALB07A01, "BA Tank 1 Hi/Lo Level" SNC517148 - U1 replacement of seal injector f ilter system with sub-micron filter system
Other
CR557426 - Request for a TM to clear ALB07A01, "BA Tank 1 Hi/Lo Level"
TE558696 - Request for a TM to clear ALB07A01, "BA Tank 1 Hi/Lo Level"

Section 1R19: Post Maintenance Testing

Procedures

14804A-1 Rev. 4.1, Safety Injection Pump A Inservice and Response Time Test
14805B-2 Rev. 3.2, Train B Residual Heat Removal Pump IST and Response Time Test
14825-1 Rev. 98, Quarterly Inservice Valve Test
2402-C Rev. 29, Rosemount Transmitter Removal and Installation
24775-2 Rev.16, Accumulator Tank #1 Pressure 2P-961 Channel Calibration
25088-C Rev. 21.3, Hand Switch Replacement
SP-ENG-2014-01 Rev. 1.0, Unit 1 Train A NSCW Pump 3 Functional Test

Work Orders

SNC407844 - A Train NSCW pump 3 motor - Refurbish motor
SNC407988 - (1A 1204SIP) - 1HV8814 MO MINIFLO ISO MOV PM
SNC408063 - (1A 1204SIP) - A TRN SI PMP 3 Motor 11204P6003M01 PM
SNC418749 - A Train NSCW pump 3 - Rebuild
SNC532915 - 21205P6002M01 (2B RHR Pump Motor) - Change oil in lower motor bearing
SNC535924 - Accumulator tank 1 pressure channel failure
SNC557853 - Unit 2A MDAFW pump tripped while taking to pull-to-lock
SNC560682 - Unit 1 pressurizer backup heater A will not operate from control room
Other Records
CR 730819 RHRS Pump 2B motor, lower bearing oil sample has elevated particle counts
CR783219, Unit 2 MDAFW pump tripped while taking to pull-to-lock
TE731411, TE for maintenance rule evaluation for unexpected control room annunciator
Unit 1 operator logs for 1/15/14
Unit 1 operator logs for 2/18/14
Unit 2 operator logs for 1/31/14
Attachment

Section 1R22: Surveillance Testing

Procedures

14454A-1 Rev. 1.1, Motor Driven Auxiliary Feedwater Pump A Operability Test
14609-1 Rev. 21, SSPS Slave Relay K601 Train B Test Safety Injection
14615-1 Rev. 10, SSPS Slave Relay K608 Train B Test Safety Injection
14658-2 Rev. 8, SSPS Slave Relay K740 and K741 Train A Test Semi-Automatic Switchover to Containment Sump
14806C-1 Rev. 4, Containment Spray Pump and Check Valve Refueling Comprehensive Full Flow Inservice Test
14808B-1 Rev. 4, Train B Centrifugal Charging Pump and Check Valve IST and Response Time Test 14850-1 Rev. 54.1, Cold Shutdown Valve Inservice Test
24349-1 Rev. 9.0, Containment Penetration No. 49 Excess Letdown and Seal Water Leakoff Local Leak Rate Test

Work Orders

SNC503654 - 14454 MDAFW Pump A Operability Test

Section 4OA1: Performance Indicator (PI) Verification

Procedures

00163-C, Rev. 14.6, NRC Performance Indicator and Monthly Operating Report Preparation and Submittal

Section 4OA2: Identification and Resolution of Problems

Condition Reports

783219 - MDAFW pump A tripped while taking to PTL
737334 - Unit 2 safety injection accumulator tank #1 pressure channel failed high
Other Records
TE 783723 - TE for MREVAL MDAFW pump A tripped while taking to PTL
Unit 2 operator logs for 3/6/14

Section 4OA3: Event Follow-up

Procedures/Calculations/Engineering Documents
14850-1 Rev. 54.1, Cold Shutdown Valve Inservice Test
SNC534699 - Both 1AD1CA and 1AD1CB out of service at same time