IR 05000324/2017002: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II 245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1257 July 31, 2017 EA-17-123 | ||
William Site Vice President Brunswick Steam Electric Plant 8470 River Rd. SE (M/C BNP001) | |||
Southport, NC 28461 | |||
SUBJECT: BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT - NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT NOS.: 05000325/2017002 AND 05000324/2017002 AND EXERCISE OF ENFORCEMENT DISCRETION | SUBJECT: BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT - NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT NOS.: 05000325/2017002 AND 05000324/2017002 AND EXERCISE OF ENFORCEMENT DISCRETION | ||
| Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
On June 30, 2017, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2. On July 12, 2017, the NRC inspectors discussed the results of this inspection with you and other members of your staff. The results of this inspection are documented in the enclosed report. | On June 30, 2017, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2. On July 12, 2017, the NRC inspectors discussed the results of this inspection with you and other members of your staff. The results of this inspection are documented in the enclosed report. | ||
A violation of Technical Specification 3.6.4.1, Secondary Containment, was identified. Because the violation was identified during the discretion period described in Enforcement Guidance Memorandum 11-003, Revision 3, the NRC is | A violation of Technical Specification 3.6.4.1, Secondary Containment, was identified. Because the violation was identified during the discretion period described in Enforcement Guidance Memorandum 11-003, Revision 3, the NRC is exer cising enforcement discretion in accordance with Section 3.5, "Violations Involving Special Circumstances," of the NRC Enforcement Policy and, therefore, will not issue enforcement action for this violation, subject to the license amendment request which was submitted on June 29, 2017. | ||
Further, inspectors documented a licensee-identified violation which was determined to be of very low safety significance in this report. The NRC is treating this violation as non-cited violation (NCV) consistent with Section 2.3.2.a of the Enforcement Policy. | |||
Sincerely,/RA/ Steven D. Rose, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 4 Division of Reactor Projects Docket Nos.: 50-325, 50-324 License Nos.: DPR-71, DPR-62 | If you contest the violation or the significance of the violation, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN.: Document Control Desk, Washington DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator Region II; the Director, Office of Enforcement, and the NRC Resident Inspector at the Brunswick Steam Electric Plant. This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding. | ||
" | |||
Sincerely,/RA/ Steven D. Rose, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 4 Division of Reactor Projects | |||
Docket Nos.: 50-325, 50-324 License Nos.: DPR-71, DPR-62 | |||
===Enclosure:=== | ===Enclosure:=== | ||
| Line 43: | Line 49: | ||
cc Distribution via ListServ | cc Distribution via ListServ | ||
ML17212A137 OFFICE RII:DRP RII:DRP RII: DRP RII:DRP RII:DRP RII:EICS NAME MSchwieg MCatts DJackson JDodson SRose MKowal DATE 7/19/2017 7/24/2017 7/19/2017 7/27/2017 7/28/2017 7/26/2017 Enclosure U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II Docket Nos.: 50-325, 50-324 | ML17212A137 OFFICE RII:DRP RII:DRP RII: DRP RII:DRP RII:DRP RII:EICS NAME MSchwieg MCatts DJackson JDodson SRose MKowal DATE 7/19/2017 7/24/2017 7/19/2017 7/27/2017 7/28/2017 7/26/2017 Enclosure U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II | ||
Docket Nos.: 50-325, 50-324 | |||
License Nos.: DPR-71, DPR-62 | License Nos.: DPR-71, DPR-62 | ||
Report No.: 05000325/2017002, 05000324/2017002 | Report No.: 05000325/2017002, 05000324/2017002 | ||
Licensee: Duke Energy Progress, Inc. | |||
Dates: April 1, 2017 through June 30, 2017 Inspectors: M. Catts, Senior Resident Inspector M. Schwieg, Resident Inspector D. Jackson, RII Project Engineer | Facility: Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 & 2 | ||
Location: Southport, NC | |||
Dates: April 1, 2017 through June 30, 2017 | |||
Inspectors: M. Catts, Senior Resident Inspector M. Schwieg, Resident Inspector D. Jackson, RII Project Engineer | |||
Approved by: Steven D. Rose, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 4 Division of Reactor Projects | Approved by: Steven D. Rose, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 4 Division of Reactor Projects | ||
| Line 60: | Line 74: | ||
The report covered a 3-month period of inspection by resident inspectors and regional inspectors. There were no NRC-identified or self-revealing violations documented in this report. | The report covered a 3-month period of inspection by resident inspectors and regional inspectors. There were no NRC-identified or self-revealing violations documented in this report. | ||
The significance of inspection findings are indicated by their color (i.e., greater than Green, or Green, White, Yellow, Red) and determined using Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, "Significance Determination Process," (SDP) dated April 29, 2015. All violations of NRC requirements are dispositioned in accordance with the NRC's Enforcement Policy dated November 1, 2016. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operations of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process," Revision 6. One violation of very low safety significance that was identified by the licensee has been reviewed by the NRC. Corrective action taken or planned by the licensee has been entered into the licensee's corrective action program (CAP). This violation and corrective action tracking number is listed in Section 4OA7 of this report. | The significance of inspection findings are indicated by their color (i.e., greater than Green, or Green, White, Yellow, Red) and determined using Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, "Significance Determination Process," (SDP) dated April 29, 2015. All violations of NRC requirements are dispositioned in accordance with the NRC's Enforcement Policy dated November 1, 2016. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operations of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process," Revision 6. | ||
One violation of very low safety significance that was identified by the licensee has been reviewed by the NRC. Corrective action taken or planned by the licensee has been entered into the licensee's corrective action program (CAP). This violation and corrective action tracking number is listed in Section 4OA7 of this report. | |||
=REPORT DETAILS= | =REPORT DETAILS= | ||
===Summary of Plant Status=== | ===Summary of Plant Status=== | ||
Unit 1 began the inspection period at 100 percent rated thermal power (RTP). On April 25, 2017, the unit was shut down for a forced outage to repair the 1B recirculation pump seal. On April 28, 2017, the unit was restarted and power was returned to 100 percent on May 1, 2017. On May 2, 2017, power was reduced to 66 percent for a control rod improvement and power was returned to 100 percent on May 4, 2017. On May 6, 2017, power was reduced to 80 percent for a control rod improvement and power was returned to 100 percent on May 8, 2017. On May 31, 2017, power was reduced to 98 percent due to a loss of the 1B variable frequency device controller for the 1B recirculation pump. Power was returned to 100 percent after restoration of the 1B variable frequency device controller on May 31, 2017. On June 9, 2017, power was reduced to 70 percent for a control rod improvement and power was returned to 100 percent on June 11, 2017. The unit remained at or near 100 percent RTP for the remainder of the inspection period. | Unit 1 began the inspection period at 100 percent rated thermal power (RTP). On April 25, 2017, the unit was shut down for a forced outage to repair the 1B recirculation pump seal. On April 28, 2017, the unit was restarted and power was returned to 100 percent on May 1, 2017. On May 2, 2017, power was reduced to 66 percent for a control rod improvement and power was returned to 100 percent on May 4, 2017. On May 6, 2017, power was reduced to 80 percent for a control rod improvement and power was returned to 100 percent on May 8, 2017. On May 31, 2017, power was reduced to 98 percent due to a loss of the 1B variable frequency device controller for the 1B recirculation pump. Power was returned to 100 percent after restoration of the 1B variable frequency device controller on May 31, 2017. On June 9, 2017, power was reduced to 70 percent for a control rod improvement and power was returned to 100 percent on June 11, 2017. The unit remained at or near 100 percent RTP for the remainder of the inspection period. | ||
| Line 71: | Line 88: | ||
==REACTOR SAFETY== | ==REACTOR SAFETY== | ||
Cornerstones: Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, and Barrier Integrity | Cornerstones: Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, and Barrier Integrity | ||
{{a|1R01}} | {{a|1R01}} | ||
==1R01 Adverse Weather Protection== | ==1R01 Adverse Weather Protection== | ||
| Line 76: | Line 94: | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
Seasonal Extreme Weather Conditions | Seasonal Extreme Weather Conditions The inspectors conducted a detailed review of the station's adverse weather procedures written for extreme high temperatures. The inspectors verified that weather-related equipment deficiencies identified during the previous year had been placed into the work control process and/or corrected before the onset of seasonal extremes. The inspectors evaluated the licensee's implementation of adverse weather preparation procedures and compensatory measures before the onset of seasonal extreme weather conditions. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment. | ||
The inspectors evaluated the following risk-significant systems: | The inspectors evaluated the following risk-significant systems: | ||
| Line 88: | Line 106: | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
Partial Walkdown (71111.04 - 4 samples) | Partial Walkdown (71111.04 - 4 samples) | ||
The inspectors verified that critical portions of the selected systems were correctly aligned by performing partial walkdowns. The inspectors selected systems for assessment because they were a redundant or backup system or train, were important for mitigating risk for the current plant conditions, had been recently realigned, or were a single-train system. The inspectors determined the correct system lineup by reviewing plant procedures and drawings. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment. | |||
The inspectors selected the following systems or trains to inspect: | |||
* Unit 1, core spray (CS) train B | * Unit 1, core spray (CS) train B | ||
* Unit 2, reactor core isolation cooling (RCIC) | * Unit 2, reactor core isolation cooling (RCIC) | ||
| Line 100: | Line 121: | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
Quarterly Inspection (71111.05Q - 5 samples) | Quarterly Inspection (71111.05Q - 5 samples) | ||
The inspectors evaluated the adequacy of selected pre-fire plans by comparing the pre-fire plans to the defined hazards and defense-in-depth features specified in the fire protection program. In evaluating the pre-fire plans, the inspectors assessed the following items: | |||
* control of transient combustibles and ignition sources | * control of transient combustibles and ignition sources | ||
* fire detection systems | * fire detection systems | ||
| Line 108: | Line 130: | ||
* passive fire protection features | * passive fire protection features | ||
* compensatory measures and fire watches | * compensatory measures and fire watches | ||
* issues related to fire protection contained in the licensee's CAP | * issues related to fire protection contained in the licensee's CAP The inspectors toured the following fire areas to assess material condition and operational status of fire protection equipment. Documents reviewed are listed in the | ||
. | |||
* 2PFP-TB2-01A, Unit 2 Turbine Building Breezeway, North 20 foot elevation | * 2PFP-TB2-01A, Unit 2 Turbine Building Breezeway, North 20 foot elevation | ||
* 2PFP-RB2-07, Unit 2 Drywell, 20 foot elevation | * 2PFP-RB2-07, Unit 2 Drywell, 20 foot elevation | ||
| Line 123: | Line 146: | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
Underground Cables | Underground Cables The inspectors reviewed related flood analysis documents and inspected the areas listed below containing cables whose failure could disable risk-significant equipment. The inspectors directly observed the condition of cables and cable support structures and, as applicable, verified that dewatering devices and drainage systems were functioning properly. In addition, the inspectors verified the licensee was identifying and properly addressing issues using the CAP. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment. | ||
* Unit 2, manhole 2-MH-6NW, 2-MH-6SW | * Unit 2, manhole 2-MH-6NW, 2-MH-6SW | ||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
No findings were identified. | No findings were identified. | ||
{{a|1R11}} | {{a|1R11}} | ||
==1R11 Licensed Operator Requalification Program and Licensed Operator Performance== | ==1R11 Licensed Operator Requalification Program and Licensed Operator Performance== | ||
(71111.11 - 2 samples) | |||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
===.1 Resident Inspector Quarterly Review of Licensed Operator Requalification=== | ===.1 Resident Inspector Quarterly Review of Licensed Operator Requalification=== | ||
On June 1, 2017 the inspectors observed an evaluated simulator scenario, involving a NSW header leak and RCIC steam line break with failure to isolate, administered to an operating crew as part of the annual requalification operating test required by 10 CFR 55.59, "Requalification". The inspectors assessed the following: | |||
On June 1, 2017 the inspectors observed an evaluated simulator scenario, involving a NSW header leak and RCIC steam line break with failure to isolate, administered to an operating crew as part of the annual requalification operating test required by 10 CFR 55.59, "Requalification". | |||
The inspectors assessed the following: | |||
* licensed operator performance | * licensed operator performance | ||
* the ability of the licensee to administer the scenario and evaluate the operators | * the ability of the licensee to administer the scenario and evaluate the operators | ||
* the quality of the post-scenario critique | * the quality of the post-scenario critique | ||
* simulator performance | * simulator performance Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment. | ||
===.2 Resident Inspector Quarterly Review of Licensed Operator Performance in the Actual Plant/Main Control Room=== | ===.2 Resident Inspector Quarterly Review of Licensed Operator Performance in the Actual Plant/Main Control Room=== | ||
The inspectors observed licensed operator performance in the main control room on April 14, 2017, during plant startup from Unit 2 refueling outage B223R1. | The inspectors observed licensed operator performance in the main control room on April 14, 2017, during plant startup from Unit 2 refueling outage B223R1. | ||
| Line 151: | Line 178: | ||
* use of human error prevention techniques | * use of human error prevention techniques | ||
* documentation of activities | * documentation of activities | ||
* management and supervision | * management and supervision Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment. | ||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
| Line 165: | Line 192: | ||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
No findings were identified. | No findings were identified. | ||
{{a|1R13}} | {{a|1R13}} | ||
==1R13 Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control== | ==1R13 Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control== | ||
| Line 185: | Line 213: | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
Operability and Functionality Review | Operability and Functionality Review The inspectors selected the operability determinations or functionality evaluations listed below for review based on the risk-significance of the associated components and systems. The inspectors reviewed the technical adequacy of the determinations to ensure that TS operability was properly justified and the components or systems remained capable of performing their design functions. To verify whether components or systems were operable, the inspectors com pared the operability and design criteria in the appropriate sections of the TS and updated final safety analysis report to the licensee's evaluations. Where compensatory measures were required to maintain operability, the inspectors determined whether the measures in place would function as intended and were properly controlled. Additionally, the inspectors reviewed a sample of corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with operability evaluations. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment. | ||
* Unit 2, residual heat removal (RHR) valve F047B, heat exchanger 2B inlet valve, ground alarm, NCR 2113446 | * Unit 2, residual heat removal (RHR) valve F047B, heat exchanger 2B inlet valve, ground alarm, NCR 2113446 | ||
* Unit 2, emergency diesel generators (EDG) 2 overspeed relay failure, NCR 2120738 | * Unit 2, emergency diesel generators (EDG) 2 overspeed relay failure, NCR 2120738 | ||
| Line 202: | Line 230: | ||
The inspectors verified that the plant modifications listed below did not affect the safety functions of important safety systems. The inspectors confirmed the modifications did not degrade the design bases, licensing bases, and performance capability of risk significant SSCs. The inspectors also verified modifications performed during plant configurations involving increased risk did not place the plant in an unsafe condition. | The inspectors verified that the plant modifications listed below did not affect the safety functions of important safety systems. The inspectors confirmed the modifications did not degrade the design bases, licensing bases, and performance capability of risk significant SSCs. The inspectors also verified modifications performed during plant configurations involving increased risk did not place the plant in an unsafe condition. | ||
Additionally, the inspectors evaluated whether system operability and availability, configuration control, post-installation test activities, and changes to documents, such as drawings, procedures, and operator training materials, complied with licensee standards and NRC requirements. In addition, the inspectors reviewed a sample of related corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with modifications. Documents reviewed are listed in the | Additionally, the inspectors evaluated whether system operability and availability, configuration control, post-installation test activities, and changes to documents, such as drawings, procedures, and operator training materials, complied with licensee standards and NRC requirements. In addition, the inspectors reviewed a sample of related corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with modifications. Documents reviewed are listed in the | ||
* NCR 2124497, Carabiners installed for barring gear locking pins on EDGs 1, 2 | . | ||
* NCR 2124497, Carabiners installed for barring gear locking pins on EDGs 1, 2 and 3 | |||
* EC408181, Unit 2 RHR F047B, heat exchanger 2B inlet valve, motor replacement | * EC408181, Unit 2 RHR F047B, heat exchanger 2B inlet valve, motor replacement | ||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
No findings were identified. | No findings were identified. | ||
{{a|1R19}} | {{a|1R19}} | ||
==1R19 Post-Maintenance Testing== | ==1R19 Post-Maintenance Testing== | ||
| Line 219: | Line 249: | ||
* WO 20157390, Unit 2, RHR F047B, heat exchanger 2B inlet valve, motor replacement, May 30, 2017 | * WO 20157390, Unit 2, RHR F047B, heat exchanger 2B inlet valve, motor replacement, May 30, 2017 | ||
* WO 20156298 , Unit 2, HPCI planned maintenance outage, June 14, 2017 | * WO 20156298 , Unit 2, HPCI planned maintenance outage, June 14, 2017 | ||
* WO 13538781, Units 1, EDG 2 planned maintenance outage, June 8, 2017 | * WO 13538781, Units 1, EDG 2 planned maintenance outage, June 8, 2017 The inspectors evaluated these activities for the following: | ||
* Acceptance criteria were clear and demonstrated operational readiness | * Acceptance criteria were clear and demonstrated operational readiness | ||
* Effects of testing on the plant were adequately addressed | * Effects of testing on the plant were adequately addressed | ||
| Line 225: | Line 255: | ||
* Tests were performed in accordance with approved procedures | * Tests were performed in accordance with approved procedures | ||
* Equipment was returned to its operational status following testing | * Equipment was returned to its operational status following testing | ||
* Test documentation was properly evaluated | * Test documentation was properly evaluated Additionally, the inspectors reviewed a sample of corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with post-maintenance testing. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment. | ||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
| Line 237: | Line 267: | ||
===.1 Unit 2 Refueling Outage B223R1=== | ===.1 Unit 2 Refueling Outage B223R1=== | ||
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71111.20|count=1}} | {{IP sample|IP=IP 71111.20|count=1}} | ||
Unit 2 began the inspection period in refueling outage B223R1. The inspectors reviewed outage plans and contingency plans for the Unit 2 refueling outage, which ended with the generator synchronization to the grid on April 15, 2017, to confirm that the licensee had appropriately considered risk, industry experience, and previous site-specific problems in developing and implementing a plan that assured maintenance of defense-in-depth of key safety functions. During the refueling outage, the inspectors monitored licensee controls over the following outage activities: | Unit 2 began the inspection period in refueling outage B223R1. The inspectors reviewed outage plans and contingency plans for the Unit 2 refueling outage, which ended with the generator synchronization to the grid on April 15, 2017, to confirm that the licensee had appropriately considered risk, industry experience, and previous site-specific problems in developing and implementing a plan that assured maintenance of defense-in-depth of key safety functions. | ||
During the refueling outage, the inspectors monitored licensee controls over the following outage activities: | |||
* Licensee configuration management, including maintenance of defense-in-depth for key safety functions and compliance with the applicable Technical Specifications (TSs) when taking equipment out of service | * Licensee configuration management, including maintenance of defense-in-depth for key safety functions and compliance with the applicable Technical Specifications (TSs) when taking equipment out of service | ||
* Implementation of clearance activities and confirmation that tags were properly hung and equipment appropriately configured to safely support the work or testing | * Implementation of clearance activities and confirmation that tags were properly hung and equipment appropriately configured to safely support the work or testing | ||
| Line 248: | Line 280: | ||
* Maintenance of secondary containment as required by TS | * Maintenance of secondary containment as required by TS | ||
* Startup and ascension to full power operation, tracking of startup prerequisites, walkdown of the drywell (primary containment) to verify that debris had not been left which could block emergency core cooling system suction strainers, and reactor physics testing | * Startup and ascension to full power operation, tracking of startup prerequisites, walkdown of the drywell (primary containment) to verify that debris had not been left which could block emergency core cooling system suction strainers, and reactor physics testing | ||
* Licensee identification and resolution of problems related to refueling outage activities | * Licensee identification and resolution of problems related to refueling outage activities Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment. | ||
===.2 Unit 1 Maintenance Outage B120F1=== | ===.2 Unit 1 Maintenance Outage B120F1=== | ||
{{IP sample|IP=IP 71111.20|count=1}} | {{IP sample|IP=IP 71111.20|count=1}} | ||
For the Unit 1 maintenance outage to replace the 1B recirculation pump seal, from April 25, 2017, through April 28, 2017, the inspectors evaluated the following outage activities: | For the Unit 1 maintenance outage to replace the 1B recirculation pump seal, from April 25, 2017, through April 28, 2017, the inspectors evaluated the following outage | ||
activities: | |||
* shutdown, cooldown, heatup, and startup | * shutdown, cooldown, heatup, and startup | ||
* reactor coolant system instrumentation and electrical power configuration | * reactor coolant system instrumentation and electrical power configuration | ||
| Line 260: | Line 294: | ||
* developed work schedules to manage fatigue | * developed work schedules to manage fatigue | ||
* developed mitigation strategies for loss of key safety functions | * developed mitigation strategies for loss of key safety functions | ||
* adhered to operating license and TS requirements | * adhered to operating license and TS requirements Inspectors verified that safety-related and risk-significant SSCs not accessible during power operations were maintained in an operable condition. The inspectors also reviewed a sample of related corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with outage activities. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment. | ||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
| Line 274: | Line 308: | ||
The inspectors evaluated the test activities to assess for preconditioning of equipment, procedure adherence, and equipment alignment following completion of the surveillance. | The inspectors evaluated the test activities to assess for preconditioning of equipment, procedure adherence, and equipment alignment following completion of the surveillance. | ||
Additionally, the inspectors reviewed a sample of related corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with surveillance testing. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment. Routine Surveillance Tests | Additionally, the inspectors reviewed a sample of related corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with surveillance testing. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment. | ||
Routine Surveillance Tests | |||
* Procedure 2MST-RPS41R, RPS Logic System Functional Test, April 6, 2017 | * Procedure 2MST-RPS41R, RPS Logic System Functional Test, April 6, 2017 | ||
* Procedure 0PT-80.1, Reactor Pressure Vessel ASME Section XI Pressure Test, May 11, 2017 | * Procedure 0PT-80.1, Reactor Pressure Vessel ASME Section XI Pressure Test, May 11, 2017 In-Service Tests (IST) | ||
* Procedure 0PT-09.2, HPCI System Operability Test, May 10, 2017 | * Procedure 0PT-09.2, HPCI System Operability Test, May 10, 2017 Reactor Coolant System Leak Detection | ||
* Procedure 0OI-02.3, Unit 1 Drywell Leakage Control, April 25, 2017 | * Procedure 0OI-02.3, Unit 1 Drywell Leakage Control, April 25, 2017 | ||
| Line 284: | Line 320: | ||
===Cornerstone:=== | ===Cornerstone:=== | ||
Emergency Preparedness | Emergency Preparedness | ||
{{a|1EP6}} | {{a|1EP6}} | ||
==1EP6 Drill Evaluation== | ==1EP6 Drill Evaluation== | ||
| Line 319: | Line 356: | ||
===.1 Routine Review=== | ===.1 Routine Review=== | ||
The inspectors screened items entered into the licensee's corrective action program to identify repetitive equipment failures or specific human performance issues for follow-up. | The inspectors screened items entered into the licensee's corrective action program to identify repetitive equipment failures or specific human performance issues for follow-up. | ||
| Line 336: | Line 374: | ||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
The inspectors conducted a detailed review of the following condition report: | The inspectors conducted a detailed review of the following condition report: | ||
* NCR 2120423, rising trend in Unit 2 suppression pool temperature, April 30, 2017 | * NCR 2120423, rising trend in Unit 2 suppression pool temperature, April 30, 2017 The inspectors evaluated the following attributes of the licensee's actions: | ||
* complete and accurate identification of the problem in a timely manner | * complete and accurate identification of the problem in a timely manner | ||
* evaluation and disposition of operability and reportability issues | * evaluation and disposition of operability and reportability issues | ||
| Line 343: | Line 381: | ||
* identification of root and contributing causes of the problem | * identification of root and contributing causes of the problem | ||
* identification of any additional condition reports | * identification of any additional condition reports | ||
* completion of corrective actions in a timely manner | * completion of corrective actions in a timely manner Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment. | ||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
| Line 363: | Line 401: | ||
No findings were identified during the review of this LER. This LER is closed. | No findings were identified during the review of this LER. This LER is closed. | ||
===.2 (Closed) LER 05000324/2017-002-00, Plant Mode Change with Primary Containment | ===.2 (Closed) LER 05000324/2017-002-00, Plant Mode Change with Primary Containment=== | ||
Inoperable | |||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
| Line 373: | Line 413: | ||
The enforcement actions associated with this LER are documented in Section 4OA7. No findings were identified during the review of this LER. This LER is closed. | The enforcement actions associated with this LER are documented in Section 4OA7. No findings were identified during the review of this LER. This LER is closed. | ||
===.3 (Closed) LER 05000325;324/2016-006-01, Control Room AC Units Inoperable Due to | ===.3 (Closed) LER 05000325;324/2016-006-01, Control Room AC Units Inoperable Due to=== | ||
Corroded Supports | |||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
On December 14, 2016, the 2D control room AC unit was declared inoperable due to corrosion on the support channels, and Units 1 and 2 entered TS 3.7.4, Condition A. On January 30, 2017, the 1D control room AC unit was declared inoperable for corrosion on the support channels. The corrosion was due to trapped moisture in contact with steel supports exposed to a local marine environment. The corrosion degraded the supports to the point that the safety function of the AC unit would be lost during a seismic event. | On December 14, 2016, the 2D control room AC unit was declared inoperable due to corrosion on the support channels, and Units 1 and 2 entered TS 3.7.4, Condition A. On January 30, 2017, the 1D control room AC unit was declared inoperable for corrosion on the support channels. The corrosion was due to trapped moisture in contact with steel supports exposed to a local marine environment. The corrosion degraded the supports to the point that the safety function of the AC unit would be lost during a seismic event. | ||
Since the degradation was due to corrosion, both units were determined to be inoperable at the same time. The conditions were determined to have existed longer than the TS 3.7.4 allowed outage time. The licensee entered this issue into the CAP as NCRs 2113799 and 2113800. As corrective | Since the degradation was due to corrosion, both units were determined to be inoperable at the same time. The conditions were determined to have existed longer than the TS 3.7.4 allowed outage time. The licensee entered this issue into the CAP as NCRs 2113799 and 2113800. As corrective ac tions, the licensee replaced both AC units' supports, declared the units operable, and inspected the 2E control room AC unit | ||
for corrosion. | |||
====b. Findings==== | ====b. Findings==== | ||
The inspectors identified the licensee failed to recognize the 1D AC unit was inoperable on December 1, 2016, during the periodic inspection. The inspectors documented an NRC-identified Green NCV in Inspection Report 05000325;324/2017001, Section 4OA2. | The inspectors identified the licensee failed to recognize the 1D AC unit was inoperable on December 1, 2016, during the periodic inspection. The inspectors documented an | ||
NRC-identified Green NCV in Inspection Report 05000325;324/2017001, Section 4OA2. | |||
No additional findings were identified during the review of this LER. This LER is closed. | No additional findings were identified during the review of this LER. This LER is closed. | ||
===.4 (Closed) LER 05000325;324/2017-002, Foreign Material in Switch Results in Unplanned Automatic Start of Emergency Diesel Generators | ===.4 (Closed) LER 05000325;324/2017-002, Foreign Material in Switch Results in Unplanned=== | ||
Automatic Start of Emergency Diesel Generators | |||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
| Line 398: | Line 446: | ||
==4OA5 Other Activities== | ==4OA5 Other Activities== | ||
===.1 Implementation of EGM 11-003, Revision 3, Enforcement Guidance Memorandum on Dispositioning Boiling Water Reactor Licensee Noncompliance with Technical Specification Containment Requirements During Operations with a Potential for Draining the Reactor Vessel | ===.1 Implementation of EGM 11-003, Revision 3, Enforcement Guidance Memorandum on Dispositioning Boiling Water Reactor Licensee Noncompliance with Technical Specification Containment Requirements During Operations with a Potential for Draining=== | ||
the Reactor Vessel | |||
====a. Inspection Scope==== | ====a. Inspection Scope==== | ||
| Line 410: | Line 460: | ||
* March 23, 2017: 48 gallons per minute leakage for hydraulic control unit draining to support rod maintenance | * March 23, 2017: 48 gallons per minute leakage for hydraulic control unit draining to support rod maintenance | ||
* March 24, 2017: 65 gallons per minute leakage to close the excess flow check valve and cap the drain line | * March 24, 2017: 65 gallons per minute leakage to close the excess flow check valve and cap the drain line | ||
* March 27, 2017: 71.2 gallons per minute leakage to replace the low power range monitors and intermediate power range monitors | * March 27, 2017: 71.2 gallons per minute leakage to replace the low power range monitors and intermediate power range monitors These activities took place without secondary containment being operable. | ||
=====Enforcement.===== | =====Enforcement.===== | ||
TS 3.6.4.1, Secondary Containment, requires that secondary containment be operable and is applicable during OPDRVs. The required action if secondary containment is inoperable in this condition is to initiate actions to suspend OPDRVs immediately. Contrary to the above, on March 21, 2017, March 23, 2017, March 24, 2017, and March 27, 2017, the licensee failed to maintain secondary containment operable while performing OPDRVs. | TS 3.6.4.1, Secondary Containment, requires that secondary containment be operable and is applicable during OPDRVs. The required action if secondary containment is inoperable in this condition is to initiate actions to suspend OPDRVs immediately. Contrary to the above, on March 21, 2017, March 23, 2017, March 24, 2017, and March 27, 2017, the licensee failed to maintain secondary | ||
containment operable while performing OPDRVs. | |||
However, because the violations were identified during the discretion period described in EGM 11-003, Revision 3, and the licensee met the criteria established in the EGM prior to and during these activities, the NRC | However, because the violations were identified during the discretion period described in EGM 11-003, Revision 3, and the licensee met the criteria established in the EGM prior | ||
to and during these activities, the NRC exerci sed enforcement discretion (Enforcement Action-17-123) for the dates of March 21, 2017, March 23, 2017, March 24, 2017, and March 27, 2017, in accordance with Section 3.5, "Violations Involving Special Circumstances," of the NRC Enforcement Policy and, therefore, will not issue enforcement action for this violation. The inspectors observed that Brunswick has already submitted a license amendment request (BSEP 17-0060) on June 29, 2017 which was accepted for review by the NRC on July 18, 2017. The licensee entered this issue into the CAP as NCR 2110409. | |||
{{a|4OA6}} | {{a|4OA6}} | ||
==4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit== | ==4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit== | ||
On July 12, 2017, the resident inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. Gideon and other members of the licensee's staff. The inspectors verified that no proprietary information was retained by the inspectors or documented in this report. | On July 12, 2017, the resident inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. Gideon and other members of the licensee's staff. The inspectors verified that no proprietary information was retained by the inspectors or documented in this report. | ||
{{a|4OA7}} | {{a|4OA7}} | ||
==4OA7 Licensee Identified Violations== | ==4OA7 Licensee Identified Violations== | ||
The following violation of very low safety significance (Green) was identified by the licensee and is a violation of NRC requirements which meet the criteria of the NRC Enforcement Policy, for being dispositioned as a non-cited violation. | The following violation of very low safety significance (Green) was identified by the licensee and is a violation of NRC requirements which meet the criteria of the NRC Enforcement Policy, for being dispositioned as a non-cited violation. | ||
* LCO 3.0.4 states, in part, when an LCO is not met, entry into a MODE or other specified condition in the applicability shall only be made when the associated ACTIONS to be entered permit continued operation in the MODE for an unlimited period of time. Contrary to the above, on April 13, 2017, at 2347, the licensee changed modes on Unit 2 from Mode 4 to Mode 2 with the primary containment inoperable. Specifically, TS 3.6.1.1, Primary Containment, requires primary containment to be operable in Modes 1, 2, and 3, however, the reactor was taken to Mode 2 with the primary containment still aligned for venting. In this condition, the drywell ventilation makes the primary containment inoperable due to the drywell and the suppression chamber being in communication to each other. This condition is allowed for two hours before the required action to shutdown to Mode 4 is required. Since the required action is not permitted for continued operation, a violation of LCO 3.0.4 occurred. The cause of the event was the failure of operations personnel to initiate a tracking LCO for primary containment being inoperable in accordance with licensee procedure 0OI-01.01, BNP Conduct of Operations Supplement. The licensee determined a tracking LCO should have been initiated to ensure the primary containment was restored to operable prior to entering Mode 2. As immediate corrective actions, the licensee restored containment to operable on April 14, 2017, at 0030, and the Shift Manager and Control Room Supervisor were removed from shift. Further, a remediation plan was developed and implemented to assess the Shift Manager and Control Room Supervisor for watch standing and reinstatement. | * LCO 3.0.4 states, in part, when an LCO is not met, entry into a MODE or other specified condition in the applicability shall only be made when the associated ACTIONS to be entered permit continued operation in the MODE for an unlimited period of time. | ||
Contrary to the above, on April 13, 2017, at 2347, the licensee changed modes on | |||
Unit 2 from Mode 4 to Mode 2 with the primary containment inoperable. Specifically, TS 3.6.1.1, Primary Containment, requires primary containment to be operable in Modes 1, 2, and 3, however, the reactor was taken to Mode 2 with the primary containment still aligned for venting. In this condition, the drywell ventilation makes the primary containment inoperable due to the drywell and the suppression chamber being in communication to each other. This condition is allowed for two hours before the required action to shutdown to Mode 4 is required. Since the required action is not permitted for continued operation, a violation of LCO 3.0.4 occurred. The cause of the event was the failure of operations personnel to initiate a tracking LCO for primary containment being inoperable in accordance with licensee procedure 0OI-01.01, BNP Conduct of Operations Supplement. The licensee determined a tracking LCO should have been initiated to ensure the primary containment was restored to operable prior to entering Mode 2. As immediate corrective actions, the licensee restored containment to operable on April 14, 2017, at 0030, and the Shift Manager and Control Room Supervisor were removed from shift. Further, a remediation plan was developed and implemented to assess the Shift Manager and Control Room Supervisor for watch standing and reinstatement. | |||
This finding is associated with the Barrier Integrity Cornerstone. Using IMC 0609, Appendix G, Shutdown Operations Significance Determination Process, 1, Exhibit 4, Barrier Integrity Screening Questions, the finding screened to Green because it did not degrade the ability to close or isolate the containment, it did not degrade the physical integrity of reactor containment, and it did not involve an actual reduction in function of hydrogen control. This issue was documented in the licensee's CAP as NCR 2116753. | This finding is associated with the Barrier Integrity Cornerstone. Using IMC 0609, Appendix G, Shutdown Operations Significance Determination Process, 1, Exhibit 4, Barrier Integrity Screening Questions, the finding screened to Green because it did not degrade the ability to close or isolate the containment, it did not degrade the physical integrity of reactor containment, and it did not involve an actual reduction in function of hydrogen control. This issue was documented in the licensee's CAP as NCR 2116753. | ||
| Line 442: | Line 502: | ||
: [[contact::B. Bryant Manager]], Nuclear Oversight J. Bryant Regulatory Affairs R. Carpenter Radiation Monitor Engineer | : [[contact::B. Bryant Manager]], Nuclear Oversight J. Bryant Regulatory Affairs R. Carpenter Radiation Monitor Engineer | ||
: [[contact::P. Dubrouillet Director]], Nuclear Engineering, Mechanical Systems | : [[contact::P. Dubrouillet Director]], Nuclear Engineering, Mechanical Systems | ||
: [[contact::C. Dunsmore Manager]], Nuclear Outage | : [[contact::C. Dunsmore Manager]], Nuclear Outage | ||
: [[contact:: | W. Gideon | ||
Vice President | |||
: [[contact::L. Grzeck Manager]], Nuclear Regulatory Affairs | |||
: [[contact::J. Hicks Manager]], Nuclear Training | : [[contact::J. Hicks Manager]], Nuclear Training | ||
: [[contact::B. Houston Manager]], Nuclear Maintenance | : [[contact::B. Houston Manager]], Nuclear Maintenance | ||
: [[contact::J. Johnson Manager]], Nuclear Chemistry | : [[contact::J. Johnson Manager]], Nuclear Chemistry | ||
: [[contact::K. Krueger Manager]], Nuclear Operations | : [[contact::K. Krueger Manager]], Nuclear Operations | ||
: [[contact::J. McAdoo Manager]], Nuclear Rad Protection | : [[contact::J. McAdoo Manager]], Nuclear Rad Protection | ||
K. Moser B. Murray | |||
Plant Manager Licensing | |||
: [[contact::J. Nolin General Manager]], Nuclear Engineering | |||
: [[contact::W. Orlando Superintendent]], E/I&C | : [[contact::W. Orlando Superintendent]], E/I&C | ||
O. Paladiy Welding Engineer/Repair & Replacement Engineer | O. Paladiy Welding Engineer/Repair & Replacement Engineer | ||
| Line 462: | Line 526: | ||
: [[contact::S. Williams BWRVIP Program Engineer C. Winslow ISI Program Engineer B. Wonton Director]], Nuclear Organizational Effectiveness | : [[contact::S. Williams BWRVIP Program Engineer C. Winslow ISI Program Engineer B. Wonton Director]], Nuclear Organizational Effectiveness | ||
State of North Carolina | State of North Carolina | ||
P. Cox Department of Health and Human Services | |||
===NRC Personnel=== | ===NRC Personnel=== | ||
: [[contact::S. Rose Chief]], Reactor Projects Branch 4 | : [[contact::S. Rose Chief]], Reactor Projects Branch 4 | ||
| Line 470: | Line 536: | ||
===Opened and Closed=== | ===Opened and Closed=== | ||
: 05000324/2017-001-00 | : 05000324/2017-001-00 | ||
LER Implementation of Enforcement Guidance Memorandum (EGM) 11-003, Revision 3 | |||
(Section 4OA3.1) | (Section 4OA3.1) | ||
: 05000324/2017-002-00 LER Plant Mode Change with Primary Containment Inoperable (Section 4OA3.2) | : 05000324/2017-002-00 LER Plant Mode Change with Primary Containment Inoperable (Section 4OA3.2) | ||
: 05000325;324/2016-006-01 | : 05000325;324/2016-006-01 | ||
: 05000325;324/2017-002 | LER Control Room AC Units Inoperable Due to Corroded | ||
Supports (Section 4OA3.3) | |||
: 05000325;324/2017-002 | |||
LER Foreign Material in Switch Results in Unplanned | |||
Automatic Start of Emergency Diesel Generators | Automatic Start of Emergency Diesel Generators | ||
(Section 4OA3.4) | (Section 4OA3.4) | ||
| Line 483: | Line 556: | ||
==Section 1R01: Adverse Weather Protection Procedures== | ==Section 1R01: Adverse Weather Protection Procedures== | ||
: 0AP-062, Seasonal Preparations, Rev. 6 | : 0AP-062, Seasonal Preparations, Rev. 6 | ||
: AD-WC-ALL-0230, Seasonal Readiness, Rev. 0 | : AD-WC-ALL-0230, Seasonal Readiness, Rev. 0 | ||
===Condition Report=== | ===Condition Report=== | ||
: | : 22700 | ||
: Work Order 20147068 | : Work Order | ||
: 20147068 | |||
==Section 1R04: Equipment Alignment== | |||
== | ===Procedures=== | ||
: 2OP-18, Core Spray System Operating Procedure, Rev. 73 1OP-18, Core Spray System Operating Procedure, Rev. 61 | |||
: AD-EG-ALL-1615, Cable Aging Management Program, Rev. 0 | : AD-EG-ALL-1615, Cable Aging Management Program, Rev. 0 | ||
: 1OP-43, Service Water Operating Procedure, Rev. 128 | : 1OP-43, Service Water Operating Procedure, Rev. 128 | ||
| Line 499: | Line 576: | ||
: D-20041, Service Water System Piping Diagram, Rev. 56 | : D-20041, Service Water System Piping Diagram, Rev. 56 | ||
==Section 1R05: Fire Protection Procedures 2PFP-TB, Turbine Building Pre-Fire Plans, Rev. 31 2PFP-RB, Reactor Building PreFire Plans, Rev. 21 | ==Section 1R05: Fire Protection== | ||
===Procedures=== | |||
: 2PFP-TB, Turbine Building Pre-Fire Plans, Rev. 31 | |||
: 2PFP-RB, Reactor Building PreFire Plans, Rev. 21 | |||
: 0PFP-DG, Diesel Generator Building PreFire Plan, Rev. 26 | : 0PFP-DG, Diesel Generator Building PreFire Plan, Rev. 26 | ||
==Section 1R06: Flood Protection Procedure== | ==Section 1R06: Flood Protection== | ||
: EGR-NGGC-0512, Licensee Renewal | |||
===Procedure=== | |||
: EGR-NGGC-0512, Licensee Renewal Ag ing Management Activities, Rev. 8 | |||
===Condition Report=== | ===Condition Report=== | ||
: | : 23053 | ||
===Work Orders=== | ===Work Orders=== | ||
: 20030212 20030213 | : 20030212 20030213 | ||
==Section 1R11: Licensed Operator | ==Section 1R11: == | ||
: Licensed Operator Requa lification Program and Licensed Operator Performance | |||
===Procedures=== | |||
: LORX-037, NSW Header leak, RCIC steam line break with failure to isolate, Rev. 2 0GP-01, Pre-startup Checklist, Rev. 192 0GP-02, Approach to Criticality and Pressurization of the Reactor, Rev. 110 | : LORX-037, NSW Header leak, RCIC steam line break with failure to isolate, Rev. 2 0GP-01, Pre-startup Checklist, Rev. 192 0GP-02, Approach to Criticality and Pressurization of the Reactor, Rev. 110 | ||
: 0GP-03, Unit Startup and Synchronization, Rev. 84 | : 0GP-03, Unit Startup and Synchronization, Rev. 84 | ||
: 0GP-07, Preparations for Core Alterations, Rev. 63 | : 0GP-07, Preparations for Core Alterations, Rev. 63 | ||
: 0GP-12, Power Changes, Rev. 78 1PT-01.7, Heatup/Cooldown monitoring, Rev. 10 0OI-01.01, BNP Conduct of Operations Supplement, Rev. 82 | : 0GP-12, Power Changes, Rev. 78 | ||
: 1PT-01.7, Heatup/Cooldown monitoring, Rev. 10 0OI-01.01, BNP Conduct of Operations Supplement, Rev. 82 | |||
: 0ENP-24.0, Reactor Engineering Guidelines, Rev. 67 | : 0ENP-24.0, Reactor Engineering Guidelines, Rev. 67 | ||
: 0AP-022, BNP Outage Risk Management, Rev. 56 | : 0AP-022, BNP Outage Risk Management, Rev. 56 | ||
: 0ENP-24.13, Core Verification, Rev. 22 | : 0ENP-24.13, Core Verification, Rev. 22 | ||
==Section 1R12: Maintenance Effectiveness | ==Section 1R12: Maintenance Effectiveness== | ||
===Condition Reports=== | |||
: 23476 | |||
: 2043067 | |||
===Work Orders=== | ===Work Orders=== | ||
: 20132630 | : 20132630 | ||
==Section 1R13: Maintenance Risk Assessment and Emergent Work Control Procedures== | ==Section 1R13: Maintenance Risk Assessment and Emergent Work Control== | ||
===Procedures=== | |||
: AD-OP-ALL-0201, Protected Equipment, Rev. 04 0AP-022, BNP Outage Risk Management, Rev. 56 | : AD-OP-ALL-0201, Protected Equipment, Rev. 04 0AP-022, BNP Outage Risk Management, Rev. 56 | ||
: AD-WC-ALL-0250, Work Implementation and Completion, Rev. 04 | : AD-WC-ALL-0250, Work Implementation and Completion, Rev. 04 | ||
| Line 530: | Line 620: | ||
: AD-WC-ALL-0200, Online Work Management, Rev. 08 | : AD-WC-ALL-0200, Online Work Management, Rev. 08 | ||
: AD-OP-ALL-0201, Protected Equipment, Rev. 04 | : AD-OP-ALL-0201, Protected Equipment, Rev. 04 | ||
: AD-WC-ALL-0430, Outage Risk Review, Rev. 02 0AP-025, BNP Integrated Scheduling, Rev. 56 | : AD-WC-ALL-0430, Outage Risk Review, Rev. 02 0AP-025, BNP Integrated Scheduling, Rev. 56 | ||
===Condition Report=== | ===Condition Report=== | ||
: | : 24169 | ||
: Work Order | : Work Order | ||
: 20072392 | : 20072392 | ||
===Miscellaneous=== | ===Miscellaneous=== | ||
: BNP Outage Risk Assessment | : BNP Outage Risk Assessment | ||
| Line 540: | Line 630: | ||
: BNP-PSA-041, BNP On-Line Equipment Out of Service Probabilistic Safety Assessment Model | : BNP-PSA-041, BNP On-Line Equipment Out of Service Probabilistic Safety Assessment Model | ||
==Section 1R15: Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments Procedures== | ==Section 1R15: Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments== | ||
===Procedures=== | |||
: AD-OP-ALL-0105, Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments, Rev. 3 | : AD-OP-ALL-0105, Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments, Rev. 3 | ||
===Condition Reports=== | ===Condition Reports=== | ||
| Line 548: | Line 640: | ||
: 2126899 | : 2126899 | ||
: 2113446 | : 2113446 | ||
: 2127691 | : 2127691 | ||
===Work Orders=== | ===Work Orders=== | ||
: 20163781 | : 20163781 | ||
| Line 555: | Line 647: | ||
: PDO CR2120738 | : PDO CR2120738 | ||
==Section 1R18: Plant Modifications Procedures== | ==Section 1R18: Plant Modifications== | ||
===Procedures=== | |||
: AD-EG-ALL-1137, Engineering Change Product Selection, Rev. 3 | : AD-EG-ALL-1137, Engineering Change Product Selection, Rev. 3 | ||
: AD-EG-ALL-1138, Standard Design Process, Rev. 0 | : AD-EG-ALL-1138, Standard Design Process, Rev. 0 | ||
| Line 566: | Line 660: | ||
: EC408181, RHR F047B motor replacement | : EC408181, RHR F047B motor replacement | ||
==Section 1R19: Post Maintenance Testing Procedures 0PT-02.3.2, Reactor Building to Suppression Chamber Vacuum Breaker and Valve Operability Test, Rev. 33 | ==Section 1R19: Post Maintenance Testing== | ||
===Procedures=== | |||
: 0PT-02.3.2, Reactor Building to Suppression Chamber Vacuum Breaker and Valve Operability Test, Rev. 33 | |||
: 0PT-12.2B, No. 2 Diesel Generator Monthly Load Test, Rev. 109 | : 0PT-12.2B, No. 2 Diesel Generator Monthly Load Test, Rev. 109 | ||
===Condition Reports=== | ===Condition Reports=== | ||
: | : 24169 | ||
: 2116038 | : 2116038 | ||
: 2113066 | : 2113066 | ||
| Line 589: | Line 686: | ||
: EC 296474, EDG Governor Replacement Modification | : EC 296474, EDG Governor Replacement Modification | ||
==Section 1R20: Refueling and Other Outage Activities Procedures 0GP-01, Pre-startup Checklist, Rev. 192 0GP-02, Approach to Criticality and Pressurization of the Reactor, Rev. 110 | ==Section 1R20: Refueling and Other Outage Activities== | ||
===Procedures=== | |||
: 0GP-01, Pre-startup Checklist, Rev. 192 0GP-02, Approach to Criticality and Pressurization of the Reactor, Rev. 110 | |||
: 0GP-03, Unit Startup and Synchronization, Rev. 84 0GP-05, Unit Shutdown, Rev. 182 0GP-07, Preparations for Core Alterations, Rev. 63 | : 0GP-03, Unit Startup and Synchronization, Rev. 84 0GP-05, Unit Shutdown, Rev. 182 0GP-07, Preparations for Core Alterations, Rev. 63 | ||
: 0GP-12, Power Changes, Rev. 78 | : 0GP-12, Power Changes, Rev. 78 | ||
| Line 616: | Line 716: | ||
: 20074532 | : 20074532 | ||
: 11904847 | : 11904847 | ||
: 2158321 | : 2158321 | ||
===Miscellaneous=== | ===Miscellaneous=== | ||
: Daily Outage Reports Daily Key Safety Function Status Sheets Daily Risk Profiles Crew Turnover Reports Fatigue Rule Management List of Operations with the Potential for Draining the Reactor Vessel (OPDRVs) | : Daily Outage Reports Daily Key Safety Function Status Sheets | ||
: Mode Change Checklists Progress Reporter Schedule Outage Risk Assessment | : Daily Risk Profiles Crew Turnover Reports Fatigue Rule Management List of Operations with the Potential for Draining the Reactor Vessel (OPDRVs) | ||
: Mode Change Checklists | |||
: Progress Reporter Schedule Outage Risk Assessment | |||
: NRC | : NRC | ||
: EGM 11-003, Rev. 3, Dispositioning Boiling Water Reactor Licensee Noncompliance with Technical Specification Containment Requirements during OPDRVs Operator Logs List of Outage Modifications Core Verification Videos | : EGM 11-003, Rev. 3, Dispositioning Boiling Water Reactor Licensee Noncompliance with Technical Specification Containment Requirements during OPDRVs Operator Logs List of Outage Modifications | ||
: Core Verification Videos | |||
==Section 1R22: Surveillance Testing== | ==Section 1R22: Surveillance Testing== | ||
| Line 637: | Line 740: | ||
: LORX-037, NSW Header leak and RCIC steam line break with failure to isolate, Rev. 2 | : LORX-037, NSW Header leak and RCIC steam line break with failure to isolate, Rev. 2 | ||
==Section 4OA1: Performance Indicator Verification Procedures== | ==Section 4OA1: Performance Indicator Verification== | ||
===Procedures=== | |||
: AD-LS-ALL-0004. Performance Indicators and Monthly Operating Report, Rev. 01 | : AD-LS-ALL-0004. Performance Indicators and Monthly Operating Report, Rev. 01 | ||
===Miscellaneous=== | ===Miscellaneous=== | ||
| Line 659: | Line 764: | ||
: AD-PI-ALL-0102, Apparent Cause Evaluation, Rev. 4 | : AD-PI-ALL-0102, Apparent Cause Evaluation, Rev. 4 | ||
: AD-PI-ALL-0103, Quick Cause Evaluation, Rev. 4 | : AD-PI-ALL-0103, Quick Cause Evaluation, Rev. 4 | ||
: AD-PI-ALL-0400, Operating Experience Program, Rev. 4 | : AD-PI-ALL-0400, Operating Experience Program, Rev. 4 | ||
===Condition Reports=== | ===Condition Reports=== | ||
: 2118029 | : 2118029 | ||
| Line 672: | Line 777: | ||
: 2116631 | : 2116631 | ||
: 2116753 | : 2116753 | ||
: 2120423 | : 2120423 | ||
===Miscellaneous=== | ===Miscellaneous=== | ||
: EC 266023 | : EC 266023 | ||
| Line 682: | Line 787: | ||
: AD-WC-ALL-0210, Work Request Initiation, Screening, Prioritization, and Classification, Rev. 7 2SP-15-101, Unit 2 | : AD-WC-ALL-0210, Work Request Initiation, Screening, Prioritization, and Classification, Rev. 7 2SP-15-101, Unit 2 | ||
: EGM 11-003 OPDRV Activities, Rev. 1 | : EGM 11-003 OPDRV Activities, Rev. 1 | ||
: 0OI-01.07, Notifications, Rev. 38 | : 0OI-01.07, Notifications, Rev. 38 | ||
===Condition Reports=== | ===Condition Reports=== | ||
: 2113799 | : 2113799 | ||
| Line 702: | Line 807: | ||
===Procedures=== | ===Procedures=== | ||
: 2SP-15-10R, Unit 2 | : 2SP-15-10R, Unit 2 | ||
: EGM 11-003 OPDRV Activities, Rev. 1 | : EGM 11-003 OPDRV Activities, Rev. 1 | ||
===Condition Reports=== | ===Condition Reports=== | ||
: 2110409 | : 2110409 | ||
===Work Orders=== | ===Work Orders=== | ||
===Miscellaneous=== | |||
: LER 05000324/2017-001-00, Implementation of Enforcement Guidance | : LER 05000324/2017-001-00, Implementation of Enforcement Guidance | ||
: Memorandum (EGM) | : Memorandum (EGM) | ||
: 11-003, Revision 3 | : 11-003, Revision 3 | ||
==Section 4OA7: Licensee Identified Violations Procedures Procedure 0OI-01.01, | ==Section 4OA7: Licensee Identified Violations== | ||
===Procedures=== | |||
: Procedure 0OI-01.01, BNP Conduct of Operations Supplement, Rev. 82 | |||
===Condition Reports=== | ===Condition Reports=== | ||
: 2116753 | : 2116753 | ||
Revision as of 16:57, 29 June 2018
| ML17212A137 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Brunswick |
| Issue date: | 07/31/2017 |
| From: | Rose S D NRC/RGN-II/DRP/RPB4 |
| To: | Gideon W R Duke Energy Progress |
| References | |
| EA-17-123 IR 2017002 | |
| Download: ML17212A137 (27) | |
Text
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II 245 PEACHTREE CENTER AVENUE NE, SUITE 1200 ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303-1257 July 31, 2017 EA-17-123
William Site Vice President Brunswick Steam Electric Plant 8470 River Rd. SE (M/C BNP001)
Southport, NC 28461
SUBJECT: BRUNSWICK STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT - NRC INTEGRATED INSPECTION REPORT NOS.: 05000325/2017002 AND 05000324/2017002 AND EXERCISE OF ENFORCEMENT DISCRETION
Dear Mr. Gideon:
On June 30, 2017, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) completed an inspection at your Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2. On July 12, 2017, the NRC inspectors discussed the results of this inspection with you and other members of your staff. The results of this inspection are documented in the enclosed report.
A violation of Technical Specification 3.6.4.1, Secondary Containment, was identified. Because the violation was identified during the discretion period described in Enforcement Guidance Memorandum 11-003, Revision 3, the NRC is exer cising enforcement discretion in accordance with Section 3.5, "Violations Involving Special Circumstances," of the NRC Enforcement Policy and, therefore, will not issue enforcement action for this violation, subject to the license amendment request which was submitted on June 29, 2017.
Further, inspectors documented a licensee-identified violation which was determined to be of very low safety significance in this report. The NRC is treating this violation as non-cited violation (NCV) consistent with Section 2.3.2.a of the Enforcement Policy.
If you contest the violation or the significance of the violation, you should provide a response within 30 days of the date of this inspection report, with the basis for your denial, to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, ATTN.: Document Control Desk, Washington DC 20555-0001; with copies to the Regional Administrator Region II; the Director, Office of Enforcement, and the NRC Resident Inspector at the Brunswick Steam Electric Plant. This letter, its enclosure, and your response (if any) will be made available for public inspection and copying at http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html and at the NRC Public Document Room in accordance with 10 CFR 2.390, "Public Inspections, Exemptions, Requests for Withholding.
"
Sincerely,/RA/ Steven D. Rose, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 4 Division of Reactor Projects
Docket Nos.: 50-325, 50-324 License Nos.: DPR-71, DPR-62
Enclosure:
IR 05000325, 324/2017002
w/Attachment:
Supplementary Information
cc Distribution via ListServ
ML17212A137 OFFICE RII:DRP RII:DRP RII: DRP RII:DRP RII:DRP RII:EICS NAME MSchwieg MCatts DJackson JDodson SRose MKowal DATE 7/19/2017 7/24/2017 7/19/2017 7/27/2017 7/28/2017 7/26/2017 Enclosure U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION REGION II
Docket Nos.: 50-325, 50-324
Report No.: 05000325/2017002, 05000324/2017002
Licensee: Duke Energy Progress, Inc.
Facility: Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 & 2
Location: Southport, NC
Dates: April 1, 2017 through June 30, 2017
Inspectors: M. Catts, Senior Resident Inspector M. Schwieg, Resident Inspector D. Jackson, RII Project Engineer
Approved by: Steven D. Rose, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 4 Division of Reactor Projects
SUMMARY
Integrated Inspection Report 05000325/2017002, 05000324/2017002; April 1, 2017, through June 30, 2017; Brunswick Steam Electric Plant, Units 1 and 2.
The report covered a 3-month period of inspection by resident inspectors and regional inspectors. There were no NRC-identified or self-revealing violations documented in this report.
The significance of inspection findings are indicated by their color (i.e., greater than Green, or Green, White, Yellow, Red) and determined using Inspection Manual Chapter (IMC) 0609, "Significance Determination Process," (SDP) dated April 29, 2015. All violations of NRC requirements are dispositioned in accordance with the NRC's Enforcement Policy dated November 1, 2016. The NRC's program for overseeing the safe operations of commercial nuclear power reactors is described in NUREG-1649, "Reactor Oversight Process," Revision 6.
One violation of very low safety significance that was identified by the licensee has been reviewed by the NRC. Corrective action taken or planned by the licensee has been entered into the licensee's corrective action program (CAP). This violation and corrective action tracking number is listed in Section 4OA7 of this report.
REPORT DETAILS
Summary of Plant Status
Unit 1 began the inspection period at 100 percent rated thermal power (RTP). On April 25, 2017, the unit was shut down for a forced outage to repair the 1B recirculation pump seal. On April 28, 2017, the unit was restarted and power was returned to 100 percent on May 1, 2017. On May 2, 2017, power was reduced to 66 percent for a control rod improvement and power was returned to 100 percent on May 4, 2017. On May 6, 2017, power was reduced to 80 percent for a control rod improvement and power was returned to 100 percent on May 8, 2017. On May 31, 2017, power was reduced to 98 percent due to a loss of the 1B variable frequency device controller for the 1B recirculation pump. Power was returned to 100 percent after restoration of the 1B variable frequency device controller on May 31, 2017. On June 9, 2017, power was reduced to 70 percent for a control rod improvement and power was returned to 100 percent on June 11, 2017. The unit remained at or near 100 percent RTP for the remainder of the inspection period.
Unit 2 began the inspection period shutdown for refueling outage B223R1. On April 14, 2017, the unit was restarted and power was returned to 100 percent on April 22, 2017. On May 22, 2017, power was reduced to 70 percent to repair a steam leak on 2-MD-V16 and power was returned to 100 percent on May 22, 2017. On June 3, 2017, power was reduced to 70 percent for a control rod sequence exchange and valve testing. Power was returned to 100 percent on June 3, 2017. On June 5, 2017, power was reduced to 70 percent for a control rod sequence exchange. Power was returned to 100 percent on June 5, 2017. The unit remained at or near 100 percent RTP for the remainder of the inspection period.
REACTOR SAFETY
Cornerstones: Initiating Events, Mitigating Systems, and Barrier Integrity
1R01 Adverse Weather Protection
a. Inspection Scope
Seasonal Extreme Weather Conditions The inspectors conducted a detailed review of the station's adverse weather procedures written for extreme high temperatures. The inspectors verified that weather-related equipment deficiencies identified during the previous year had been placed into the work control process and/or corrected before the onset of seasonal extremes. The inspectors evaluated the licensee's implementation of adverse weather preparation procedures and compensatory measures before the onset of seasonal extreme weather conditions. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
The inspectors evaluated the following risk-significant systems:
- service water system
- transformer yard
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1R04 Equipment Alignment
a. Inspection Scope
Partial Walkdown (71111.04 - 4 samples)
The inspectors verified that critical portions of the selected systems were correctly aligned by performing partial walkdowns. The inspectors selected systems for assessment because they were a redundant or backup system or train, were important for mitigating risk for the current plant conditions, had been recently realigned, or were a single-train system. The inspectors determined the correct system lineup by reviewing plant procedures and drawings. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
The inspectors selected the following systems or trains to inspect:
- Unit 1, core spray (CS) train B
- Unit 2, reactor core isolation cooling (RCIC)
- Unit 1, nuclear service water (NSW)
- Unit 2, CS train B
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1R05 Fire Protection
a. Inspection Scope
Quarterly Inspection (71111.05Q - 5 samples)
The inspectors evaluated the adequacy of selected pre-fire plans by comparing the pre-fire plans to the defined hazards and defense-in-depth features specified in the fire protection program. In evaluating the pre-fire plans, the inspectors assessed the following items:
- control of transient combustibles and ignition sources
- fire detection systems
- water-based fire suppression systems
- gaseous fire suppression systems
- manual firefighting equipment and capability
- passive fire protection features
- compensatory measures and fire watches
- issues related to fire protection contained in the licensee's CAP The inspectors toured the following fire areas to assess material condition and operational status of fire protection equipment. Documents reviewed are listed in the
.
- 2PFP-TB2-01A, Unit 2 Turbine Building Breezeway, North 20 foot elevation
- 2PFP-RB2-07, Unit 2 Drywell, 20 foot elevation
- 1PFP-DG-05/04, Unit 1 Diesel Generator Cells 1-2, 23 foot elevation
- 2PFP-TB2-01M, Unit 2 Turbine Building Laydown Area, 70 foot elevation
- 2PFP-RB2-01T, Unit 2 Reactor Building Torus, 0 foot elevation
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1R06 Flood Protection Measures
a. Inspection Scope
Underground Cables The inspectors reviewed related flood analysis documents and inspected the areas listed below containing cables whose failure could disable risk-significant equipment. The inspectors directly observed the condition of cables and cable support structures and, as applicable, verified that dewatering devices and drainage systems were functioning properly. In addition, the inspectors verified the licensee was identifying and properly addressing issues using the CAP. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
- Unit 2, manhole 2-MH-6NW, 2-MH-6SW
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1R11 Licensed Operator Requalification Program and Licensed Operator Performance
(71111.11 - 2 samples)
a. Inspection Scope
.1 Resident Inspector Quarterly Review of Licensed Operator Requalification
On June 1, 2017 the inspectors observed an evaluated simulator scenario, involving a NSW header leak and RCIC steam line break with failure to isolate, administered to an operating crew as part of the annual requalification operating test required by 10 CFR 55.59, "Requalification".
The inspectors assessed the following:
- licensed operator performance
- the ability of the licensee to administer the scenario and evaluate the operators
- the quality of the post-scenario critique
- simulator performance Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
.2 Resident Inspector Quarterly Review of Licensed Operator Performance in the Actual Plant/Main Control Room
The inspectors observed licensed operator performance in the main control room on April 14, 2017, during plant startup from Unit 2 refueling outage B223R1.
The inspectors assessed the following:
- use of plant procedures
- control board manipulations
- communications between crew members
- use and interpretation of instruments, indications, and alarms
- use of human error prevention techniques
- documentation of activities
- management and supervision Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1R12 Maintenance Effectiveness
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors assessed the licensee's treatment of the issues listed below to verify the licensee appropriately addressed equipment problems within the scope of the maintenance rule (10 CFR 50.65, "Requirements for Monitoring the Effectiveness of Maintenance at Nuclear Power Plants"). The inspectors reviewed procedures and records to evaluate the licensee's identification, assessment, and characterization of the problems as well as their corrective actions for returning the equipment to a satisfactory condition. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
- WO 20132630, Unit 1 high pressure coolant injection (HPCI) auxiliary oil pump motor overload relay replacement
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1R13 Maintenance Risk Assessments and Emergent Work Control
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed the maintenance activities listed below to verify that the licensee assessed and managed plant risk as required by 10 CFR 50.65(a)(4) and licensee procedures. The inspectors assessed the adequacy of the licensee's risk assessments and implementation of risk management actions. The inspectors also verified that the licensee was identifying and resolving problems with assessing and managing maintenance-related risk using the CAP. Additionally, for maintenance resulting from unforeseen situations, the inspectors assessed the effectiveness of the licensee's planning and control of emergent work activities. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
- Unit 2, April 3, 2017, elevated risk during refueling outage B223R1 fuel movement
- Unit 2, April 6, 2017, elevated risk during refueling outage B223R1 electrical work window
- Unit 2, April 10, 2017, elevated risk during refueling outage B223R1 vessel draindown
- Unit 2, May 15, 2017, elevated risk with 2-CAC-V17, reactor building to torus vacuum breaker, unplanned inoperability
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1R15 Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments
a. Inspection Scope
Operability and Functionality Review The inspectors selected the operability determinations or functionality evaluations listed below for review based on the risk-significance of the associated components and systems. The inspectors reviewed the technical adequacy of the determinations to ensure that TS operability was properly justified and the components or systems remained capable of performing their design functions. To verify whether components or systems were operable, the inspectors com pared the operability and design criteria in the appropriate sections of the TS and updated final safety analysis report to the licensee's evaluations. Where compensatory measures were required to maintain operability, the inspectors determined whether the measures in place would function as intended and were properly controlled. Additionally, the inspectors reviewed a sample of corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with operability evaluations. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
- Unit 2, residual heat removal (RHR) valve F047B, heat exchanger 2B inlet valve, ground alarm, NCR 2113446
- Unit 2, emergency diesel generators (EDG) 2 overspeed relay failure, NCR 2120738
- Unit 2, primary containment inoperable during startup, NCR 2116753
b. Findings
One licensee-identified violation was documented in Section 4OA7.
1R18 Plant Modifications
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors verified that the plant modifications listed below did not affect the safety functions of important safety systems. The inspectors confirmed the modifications did not degrade the design bases, licensing bases, and performance capability of risk significant SSCs. The inspectors also verified modifications performed during plant configurations involving increased risk did not place the plant in an unsafe condition.
Additionally, the inspectors evaluated whether system operability and availability, configuration control, post-installation test activities, and changes to documents, such as drawings, procedures, and operator training materials, complied with licensee standards and NRC requirements. In addition, the inspectors reviewed a sample of related corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with modifications. Documents reviewed are listed in the
.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1R19 Post-Maintenance Testing
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors either observed post-maintenance testing or reviewed the test results for the maintenance activities listed below to verify the work performed was completed correctly and the test activities were adequate to verify system operability and functional capability.
- WO 20156990, Unit 2, EDG 4 starting air pin failure, March 30, 2017
- WO 20096176, Unit 2, 2-CAC-V17 reactor building to torus vacuum breaker inoperable, May 15, 2017
- WO 20153997, Unit 1, service water backdraft damper lubrication, May 25, 2017
- WO 20157390, Unit 2, RHR F047B, heat exchanger 2B inlet valve, motor replacement, May 30, 2017
- WO 20156298 , Unit 2, HPCI planned maintenance outage, June 14, 2017
- WO 13538781, Units 1, EDG 2 planned maintenance outage, June 8, 2017 The inspectors evaluated these activities for the following:
- Acceptance criteria were clear and demonstrated operational readiness
- Effects of testing on the plant were adequately addressed
- Test instrumentation was appropriate
- Tests were performed in accordance with approved procedures
- Equipment was returned to its operational status following testing
- Test documentation was properly evaluated Additionally, the inspectors reviewed a sample of corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with post-maintenance testing. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1R20 Refueling and Other Outage Activities
a. Inspection Scope
.1 Unit 2 Refueling Outage B223R1
Unit 2 began the inspection period in refueling outage B223R1. The inspectors reviewed outage plans and contingency plans for the Unit 2 refueling outage, which ended with the generator synchronization to the grid on April 15, 2017, to confirm that the licensee had appropriately considered risk, industry experience, and previous site-specific problems in developing and implementing a plan that assured maintenance of defense-in-depth of key safety functions.
During the refueling outage, the inspectors monitored licensee controls over the following outage activities:
- Licensee configuration management, including maintenance of defense-in-depth for key safety functions and compliance with the applicable Technical Specifications (TSs) when taking equipment out of service
- Implementation of clearance activities and confirmation that tags were properly hung and equipment appropriately configured to safely support the work or testing
- Installation and configuration of reactor coolant pressure, level, and temperature instruments to provide accurate indication, accounting for instrument error
- Controls over the status and configuration of electrical systems to ensure that TS and outage safety plan requirements were met, and controls over switchyard activities
- Monitoring of decay heat removal processes, systems, and components
- Controls to ensure that outage work was not impacting the ability of the operators to operate the spent fuel pool cooling system
- Reactor water inventory controls including flow paths, configurations, and alternative means for inventory addition, and controls to prevent inventory loss
- Controls over activities that could affect reactivity
- Maintenance of secondary containment as required by TS
- Startup and ascension to full power operation, tracking of startup prerequisites, walkdown of the drywell (primary containment) to verify that debris had not been left which could block emergency core cooling system suction strainers, and reactor physics testing
- Licensee identification and resolution of problems related to refueling outage activities Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
.2 Unit 1 Maintenance Outage B120F1
For the Unit 1 maintenance outage to replace the 1B recirculation pump seal, from April 25, 2017, through April 28, 2017, the inspectors evaluated the following outage
activities:
- shutdown, cooldown, heatup, and startup
- reactor coolant system instrumentation and electrical power configuration
- reactivity and inventory control
- decay heat removal and spent fuel pool cooling system operation The inspectors verified that the licensee:
- controlled plant configuration in accordance with administrative risk reduction methodologies
- developed work schedules to manage fatigue
- developed mitigation strategies for loss of key safety functions
- adhered to operating license and TS requirements Inspectors verified that safety-related and risk-significant SSCs not accessible during power operations were maintained in an operable condition. The inspectors also reviewed a sample of related corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with outage activities. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
1R22 Surveillance Testing
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed the surveillance tests listed below and either observed the test or reviewed test results to verify testing activities adequately demonstrated that the affected SSCs remained capable of performing the intended safety functions (under conditions as close as practical to design bases conditions or as required by TS) and maintained their operational readiness.
The inspectors evaluated the test activities to assess for preconditioning of equipment, procedure adherence, and equipment alignment following completion of the surveillance.
Additionally, the inspectors reviewed a sample of related corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with surveillance testing. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
Routine Surveillance Tests
- Procedure 2MST-RPS41R, RPS Logic System Functional Test, April 6, 2017
- Procedure 0PT-80.1, Reactor Pressure Vessel ASME Section XI Pressure Test, May 11, 2017 In-Service Tests (IST)
- Procedure 0PT-09.2, HPCI System Operability Test, May 10, 2017 Reactor Coolant System Leak Detection
- Procedure 0OI-02.3, Unit 1 Drywell Leakage Control, April 25, 2017
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
Cornerstone:
1EP6 Drill Evaluation
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors observed the emergency preparedness drill conducted on June 1, 2017, involving a NSW header leak and RCIC steam line break with failure to isolate. The inspectors observed licensee activities in the simulator and technical support center to evaluate implementation of the emergency plan, including event classification, notification, and protective action recommendations. The inspectors evaluated the licensee's performance against criteria established in the licensee's procedures. Additionally, the inspectors attended the post-exercise critique to assess the licensee's effectiveness in identifying emergency preparedness weaknesses and verified the identified weaknesses were entered in the CAP. Documents reviewed are listed in the
.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
OTHER ACTIVITIES
4OA1 Performance Indicator (PI) Verification
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed a sample of the performance indicator data, submitted by the licensee, for the Unit 1 and Unit 2 PIs listed below. The inspectors reviewed plant records compiled between April 1, 2016, through March 31, 2017, to verify the accuracy and completeness of the data reported for the station. The inspectors verified that the PI data complied with guidance contained in Nuclear Energy Institute 99-02, "Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline," and licensee procedures. The inspectors verified the accuracy of reported data that were used to calculate the value of each PI. In addition, the inspectors reviewed a sample of related corrective action documents to verify the licensee was identifying and correcting any deficiencies associated with PI data. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
Cornerstone:
- Units 1 and 2, safety system functional failures
- Units 1 and 2, emergency AC power system
- Units 1 and 2, cooling water system
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
4OA2 Problem Identification and Resolution
.1 Routine Review
The inspectors screened items entered into the licensee's corrective action program to identify repetitive equipment failures or specific human performance issues for follow-up.
The inspectors reviewed condition reports, attended screening meetings, or accessed the licensee's computerized corrective action database.
.2 Semi-Annual Trend Review
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed issues entered in the licensee's corrective action program and associated documents to identify trends that could indicate the existence of a more significant safety issue. The inspectors focused their review on human performance trends during Unit 2 refueling outage B223R1, but also considered the results of inspector daily condition report screenings, licensee trending efforts, and licensee human performance results. The review nominally considered the 6-month period of January 1, 2017, through June 30, 2017, although some examples extended beyond those dates when the scope of the trend warranted. The inspectors compared their results with the licensee's analysis of trends. Additionally, the inspectors reviewed the adequacy of corrective actions associated with a sample of the issues identified in the licensee's trend reports. The inspectors also reviewed corrective action documents that were processed by the licensee to identify potential adverse trends in the condition of structures, systems, and/or components as evidenced by acceptance of long-standing non-conforming or degraded conditions. Documents reviewed are listed in the
.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
.3 Annual Follow-Up of Selected Issues
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors conducted a detailed review of the following condition report:
- NCR 2120423, rising trend in Unit 2 suppression pool temperature, April 30, 2017 The inspectors evaluated the following attributes of the licensee's actions:
- complete and accurate identification of the problem in a timely manner
- evaluation and disposition of operability and reportability issues
- consideration of extent of condition, generic implications, common cause, and previous occurrences
- classification and prioritization of the problem
- identification of root and contributing causes of the problem
- identification of any additional condition reports
- completion of corrective actions in a timely manner Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
4OA3 Follow-up of Events
.1 (Closed) Licensee Event Report (LER) 05000324/2017-001-00, Implementation of Enforcement Guidance Memorandum (EGM) 11-003, Revision 3
a. Inspection Scope
On March 22, 2017, Unit 2 implemented the guidance of EGM 11-003, Revision 3, Enforcement Guidance Memorandum on Dispositioning Boiling Water Reactor Licensee Noncompliance with TS Containment Requirements During Operations with a Potential for Draining the Reactor Vessel. Consistent with this EGM, secondary containment operability was not maintained during operations with the potential for draining the reactor vessel activities. The EGM guidance was implemented from March 22, 2017, at 1209 to March 28, 2017, at 1230. The activities are discussed in Section 4OA5. Inspectors verified compliance with the guidelines of EGM 11-003 prior to and during these activities. The licensee has submitted a license amendment request to adopt TS Task Force traveler associated with generic resolution of this issue. The licensee entered this issue into the CAP as NCR 2110409. Documents reviewed are listed in the
.
b. Findings
The enforcement actions associated with this LER are documented in Sections 4OA5.
No findings were identified during the review of this LER. This LER is closed.
.2 (Closed) LER 05000324/2017-002-00, Plant Mode Change with Primary Containment
a. Inspection Scope
On April 13, 2017, Unit 2 was in Mode 4 preparing to exit refueling outage B223R1. The primary containment was being vented to ensure habitability during maintenance in the drywell. At 2347, the reactor was taken to Mode 2 with the primary containment still aligned for venting. In this condition, the drywell ventilation makes the primary containment inoperable due to the drywell and the suppression chamber being in communication to each other. With primary containment inoperable during startup, the plant violated Limiting Condition for Operation (LCO) 3.0.4, which requires all LCOs to be met for the plant condition prior to entry into the applicable mode.
The licensee reported this event in accordance with 10 CFR 50.72(b)(3)(v)(D), a non-emergency 8-hour report. The licensee also reported this event in accordance with 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(i)(B), for entering a condition prohibited by TSs, and 10 CFR 50.73(a)(2)(v)(D), for a loss of safety function. The cause of the event was the failure of operations personnel to initiate a tracking LCO for primary containment being inoperable in accordance with licensee procedure 0OI-01.01, BNP Conduct of Operations Supplement. The licensee determined a tracking LCO should have been initiated to ensure the primary containment was restored to operable prior to entering Mode 2. As immediate corrective actions, the licensee restored containment to operable on April 14, 2017, at 0030, and the Shift Manager and Control Room Supervisor were removed from shift. Further, a remediation plan was developed and implemented to assess the Shift Manager and Control Room Supervisor for watch standing and reinstatement. The licensee entered this issue into CAP as NCR 2116753. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
b. Findings
The enforcement actions associated with this LER are documented in Section 4OA7. No findings were identified during the review of this LER. This LER is closed.
.3 (Closed) LER 05000325;324/2016-006-01, Control Room AC Units Inoperable Due to
Corroded Supports
a. Inspection Scope
On December 14, 2016, the 2D control room AC unit was declared inoperable due to corrosion on the support channels, and Units 1 and 2 entered TS 3.7.4, Condition A. On January 30, 2017, the 1D control room AC unit was declared inoperable for corrosion on the support channels. The corrosion was due to trapped moisture in contact with steel supports exposed to a local marine environment. The corrosion degraded the supports to the point that the safety function of the AC unit would be lost during a seismic event.
Since the degradation was due to corrosion, both units were determined to be inoperable at the same time. The conditions were determined to have existed longer than the TS 3.7.4 allowed outage time. The licensee entered this issue into the CAP as NCRs 2113799 and 2113800. As corrective ac tions, the licensee replaced both AC units' supports, declared the units operable, and inspected the 2E control room AC unit
for corrosion.
b. Findings
The inspectors identified the licensee failed to recognize the 1D AC unit was inoperable on December 1, 2016, during the periodic inspection. The inspectors documented an
NRC-identified Green NCV in Inspection Report 05000325;324/2017001, Section 4OA2.
No additional findings were identified during the review of this LER. This LER is closed.
.4 (Closed) LER 05000325;324/2017-002, Foreign Material in Switch Results in Unplanned
Automatic Start of Emergency Diesel Generators
a. Inspection Scope
On April 17, 2017, Unit 2 was in Mode 1 at approximately 22 percent of rated power and was starting up from a refueling outage. Operators manually tripped the Unit 2 main turbine to halt increasing bearing vibration. The power circuit breakers for the Unit 2 main generator did not open as expected on the turbine trip, but subsequently opened when main generator reverse power relays actuated. This resulted in the automatic start of all four EDGs. The EDGs did not tie to emergency busses because offsite power was still available. This event was caused by a turbine stop valve limit switch failing to open due to foreign material intrusion. There was no safety impact of the failed limit switch.
The licensee entered this issue into the CAP as NCR 2117033. As corrective actions, the licensee will inspect similar switches during the next scheduled refueling outage on each unit (i.e., spring 2018 for Unit 1 and spring 2019 for Unit 2).
b. Findings
No findings were identified.
4OA5 Other Activities
.1 Implementation of EGM 11-003, Revision 3, Enforcement Guidance Memorandum on Dispositioning Boiling Water Reactor Licensee Noncompliance with Technical Specification Containment Requirements During Operations with a Potential for Draining
the Reactor Vessel
a. Inspection Scope
The inspectors reviewed the plant's implementation of NRC EGM 11-003, Revision 3, during Unit 2 maintenance activities for operations with a potential for draining the reactor vessel (OPDRVs), during the Unit 2 refueling outage. Inspectors verified that for all dates, all other TS requirements were met during OPDRVs with secondary containment inoperable. Documents reviewed are listed in the Attachment.
b. Findings
Description.
During the Unit 2 refueling outage, the OPDRVs activities are listed below:
- March 21, 2017: 6 gallons per minute leakage for maintenance associated with the 2B recirculation pump seal rebuild
- March 23, 2017: 48 gallons per minute leakage for hydraulic control unit draining to support rod maintenance
- March 24, 2017: 65 gallons per minute leakage to close the excess flow check valve and cap the drain line
- March 27, 2017: 71.2 gallons per minute leakage to replace the low power range monitors and intermediate power range monitors These activities took place without secondary containment being operable.
Enforcement.
TS 3.6.4.1, Secondary Containment, requires that secondary containment be operable and is applicable during OPDRVs. The required action if secondary containment is inoperable in this condition is to initiate actions to suspend OPDRVs immediately. Contrary to the above, on March 21, 2017, March 23, 2017, March 24, 2017, and March 27, 2017, the licensee failed to maintain secondary
containment operable while performing OPDRVs.
However, because the violations were identified during the discretion period described in EGM 11-003, Revision 3, and the licensee met the criteria established in the EGM prior
to and during these activities, the NRC exerci sed enforcement discretion (Enforcement Action-17-123) for the dates of March 21, 2017, March 23, 2017, March 24, 2017, and March 27, 2017, in accordance with Section 3.5, "Violations Involving Special Circumstances," of the NRC Enforcement Policy and, therefore, will not issue enforcement action for this violation. The inspectors observed that Brunswick has already submitted a license amendment request (BSEP 17-0060) on June 29, 2017 which was accepted for review by the NRC on July 18, 2017. The licensee entered this issue into the CAP as NCR 2110409.
4OA6 Meetings, Including Exit
On July 12, 2017, the resident inspectors presented the inspection results to Mr. Gideon and other members of the licensee's staff. The inspectors verified that no proprietary information was retained by the inspectors or documented in this report.
4OA7 Licensee Identified Violations
The following violation of very low safety significance (Green) was identified by the licensee and is a violation of NRC requirements which meet the criteria of the NRC Enforcement Policy, for being dispositioned as a non-cited violation.
- LCO 3.0.4 states, in part, when an LCO is not met, entry into a MODE or other specified condition in the applicability shall only be made when the associated ACTIONS to be entered permit continued operation in the MODE for an unlimited period of time.
Contrary to the above, on April 13, 2017, at 2347, the licensee changed modes on
Unit 2 from Mode 4 to Mode 2 with the primary containment inoperable. Specifically, TS 3.6.1.1, Primary Containment, requires primary containment to be operable in Modes 1, 2, and 3, however, the reactor was taken to Mode 2 with the primary containment still aligned for venting. In this condition, the drywell ventilation makes the primary containment inoperable due to the drywell and the suppression chamber being in communication to each other. This condition is allowed for two hours before the required action to shutdown to Mode 4 is required. Since the required action is not permitted for continued operation, a violation of LCO 3.0.4 occurred. The cause of the event was the failure of operations personnel to initiate a tracking LCO for primary containment being inoperable in accordance with licensee procedure 0OI-01.01, BNP Conduct of Operations Supplement. The licensee determined a tracking LCO should have been initiated to ensure the primary containment was restored to operable prior to entering Mode 2. As immediate corrective actions, the licensee restored containment to operable on April 14, 2017, at 0030, and the Shift Manager and Control Room Supervisor were removed from shift. Further, a remediation plan was developed and implemented to assess the Shift Manager and Control Room Supervisor for watch standing and reinstatement.
This finding is associated with the Barrier Integrity Cornerstone. Using IMC 0609, Appendix G, Shutdown Operations Significance Determination Process, 1, Exhibit 4, Barrier Integrity Screening Questions, the finding screened to Green because it did not degrade the ability to close or isolate the containment, it did not degrade the physical integrity of reactor containment, and it did not involve an actual reduction in function of hydrogen control. This issue was documented in the licensee's CAP as NCR 2116753.
ATTACHMENT:
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION
KEY POINTS OF CONTACT
Licensee Personnel
- K. Allen Director, Design Engineering
- B. Bagwell Environmental & Chemistry A. Baker Supervisor, Environmental & Chemistry
- J. Berry Supervisor, LOCT Training
- A. Brittain Director, Nuclear Plant Security
- P. Brown Manager, Nuclear Performance Improvement
- B. Bryant Manager, Nuclear Oversight J. Bryant Regulatory Affairs R. Carpenter Radiation Monitor Engineer
- P. Dubrouillet Director, Nuclear Engineering, Mechanical Systems
- C. Dunsmore Manager, Nuclear Outage
W. Gideon
Vice President
- L. Grzeck Manager, Nuclear Regulatory Affairs
- J. Hicks Manager, Nuclear Training
- B. Houston Manager, Nuclear Maintenance
- J. Johnson Manager, Nuclear Chemistry
- K. Krueger Manager, Nuclear Operations
- J. McAdoo Manager, Nuclear Rad Protection
K. Moser B. Murray
Plant Manager Licensing
- J. Nolin General Manager, Nuclear Engineering
- W. Orlando Superintendent, E/I&C
O. Paladiy Welding Engineer/Repair & Replacement Engineer
- A. Padleckas Assistant Ops Manager, Training
- D. Petrusic Superintendent, Environmental & Chemistry
- J. Pierce Manager, Nuclear Work Management
E. Rau Operations Training
- M. Regan Project Manager, Major Projects
- L. Rohrbaugh Operator Training M. Smiley Manager, Nuclear Ops Training L. Spencer Operator Training
- R. Wiemann Director, Nuclear Engineering, Electrical Reactor Systems
E. Williams Operations Manager
- S. Williams BWRVIP Program Engineer C. Winslow ISI Program Engineer B. Wonton Director, Nuclear Organizational Effectiveness
State of North Carolina
P. Cox Department of Health and Human Services
NRC Personnel
- S. Rose Chief, Reactor Projects Branch 4
- P. Niebaum Acting Chief, Reactor Projects Branch 4
LIST OF ITEMS OPENED, CLOSED, AND DISCUSSED
Opened and Closed
- 05000324/2017-001-00
LER Implementation of Enforcement Guidance Memorandum (EGM) 11-003, Revision 3
(Section 4OA3.1)
- 05000324/2017-002-00 LER Plant Mode Change with Primary Containment Inoperable (Section 4OA3.2)
- 05000325;324/2016-006-01
LER Control Room AC Units Inoperable Due to Corroded
Supports (Section 4OA3.3)
- 05000325;324/2017-002 LER Foreign Material in Switch Results in Unplanned
Automatic Start of Emergency Diesel Generators
(Section 4OA3.4)
LIST OF DOCUMENTS REVIEWED
Common Documents Reviewed Updated Final Safety Analysis Report Individual Plant Examination Individual Plant Examination of External Events Technical Specifications and Bases Technical Requirements Manual Control Room Narrative Logs Plan of the Day
Section 1R01: Adverse Weather Protection Procedures
- 0AP-062, Seasonal Preparations, Rev. 6
- AD-WC-ALL-0230, Seasonal Readiness, Rev. 0
Condition Report
- 22700
- Work Order
- 20147068
Section 1R04: Equipment Alignment
Procedures
- 2OP-18, Core Spray System Operating Procedure, Rev. 73 1OP-18, Core Spray System Operating Procedure, Rev. 61
- AD-EG-ALL-1615, Cable Aging Management Program, Rev. 0
- 1OP-43, Service Water Operating Procedure, Rev. 128
Condition Report
- 2133573
- Work Order
- 20010900
Drawings
- D-02524, Reactor Building Core Spray System Piping Diagram Sheet 1, Rev. 43 D-25024, Reactor Building Core Spray System Piping Diagram Sheet 2, Rev. 39
- D-20041, Service Water System Piping Diagram, Rev. 56
Section 1R05: Fire Protection
Procedures
- 2PFP-TB, Turbine Building Pre-Fire Plans, Rev. 31
- 2PFP-RB, Reactor Building PreFire Plans, Rev. 21
- 0PFP-DG, Diesel Generator Building PreFire Plan, Rev. 26
Section 1R06: Flood Protection
Procedure
- EGR-NGGC-0512, Licensee Renewal Ag ing Management Activities, Rev. 8
Condition Report
- 23053
Work Orders
- 20030212 20030213
Section 1R11:
- Licensed Operator Requa lification Program and Licensed Operator Performance
Procedures
- LORX-037, NSW Header leak, RCIC steam line break with failure to isolate, Rev. 2 0GP-01, Pre-startup Checklist, Rev. 192 0GP-02, Approach to Criticality and Pressurization of the Reactor, Rev. 110
- 0GP-03, Unit Startup and Synchronization, Rev. 84
- 0GP-07, Preparations for Core Alterations, Rev. 63
- 0GP-12, Power Changes, Rev. 78
- 1PT-01.7, Heatup/Cooldown monitoring, Rev. 10 0OI-01.01, BNP Conduct of Operations Supplement, Rev. 82
- 0ENP-24.0, Reactor Engineering Guidelines, Rev. 67
- 0AP-022, BNP Outage Risk Management, Rev. 56
- 0ENP-24.13, Core Verification, Rev. 22
Section 1R12: Maintenance Effectiveness
Condition Reports
- 23476
- 2043067
Work Orders
- 20132630
Section 1R13: Maintenance Risk Assessment and Emergent Work Control
Procedures
- AD-OP-ALL-0201, Protected Equipment, Rev. 04 0AP-022, BNP Outage Risk Management, Rev. 56
- AD-WC-ALL-0250, Work Implementation and Completion, Rev. 04
- AD-WC-ALL-0410, Work Activity Integrated Risk Management, Rev. 03
- AD-WC-ALL-0200, Online Work Management, Rev. 08
- AD-OP-ALL-0201, Protected Equipment, Rev. 04
- AD-WC-ALL-0430, Outage Risk Review, Rev. 02 0AP-025, BNP Integrated Scheduling, Rev. 56
Condition Report
- 24169
- Work Order
- 20072392
Miscellaneous
- BNP Outage Risk Assessment
- BNP U2 Key Safety Function Daily Risk Assessment EOOS Risk Assessments
- BNP-PSA-041, BNP On-Line Equipment Out of Service Probabilistic Safety Assessment Model
Section 1R15: Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments
Procedures
- AD-OP-ALL-0105, Operability Determinations and Functionality Assessments, Rev. 3
Condition Reports
- 2116753
- 2120738
- 2121027
- 2126899
- 2113446
- 2127691
Work Orders
- 20163781
- 12086324
Miscellaneous
- PDO CR2120738
Section 1R18: Plant Modifications
Procedures
- AD-EG-ALL-1137, Engineering Change Product Selection, Rev. 3
- AD-EG-ALL-1138, Standard Design Process, Rev. 0
- AD-EG-ALL-1132, Preparation and Control of Design Change Engineering Changes, Rev. 6
- AD-EG-ALL-1117, Design Analyses and Calculations, Rev. 4
Condition Reports
- 2113446
- 2124497
Miscellaneous
Section 1R19: Post Maintenance Testing
Procedures
- 0PT-02.3.2, Reactor Building to Suppression Chamber Vacuum Breaker and Valve Operability Test, Rev. 33
- 0PT-12.2B, No. 2 Diesel Generator Monthly Load Test, Rev. 109
Condition Reports
- 24169
- 2116038
- 2113066
- 2113446
- 2131762
- 2130937
- 2131688
Work Orders
- 20072392
- 20156990
- 20156298
- 20153997
- 20096176
- 13538781
Miscellaneous
- Calculation 0SWB-006 Rev 0
- Apparent Cause Evaluation
- 211038
Section 1R20: Refueling and Other Outage Activities
Procedures
- 0GP-01, Pre-startup Checklist, Rev. 192 0GP-02, Approach to Criticality and Pressurization of the Reactor, Rev. 110
- 0GP-03, Unit Startup and Synchronization, Rev. 84 0GP-05, Unit Shutdown, Rev. 182 0GP-07, Preparations for Core Alterations, Rev. 63
- 0GP-12, Power Changes, Rev. 78
- 1PT-01.7, Heatup/Cooldown monitoring, Rev. 10
- 0OI-01.01, BNP Conduct of Operations Supplement, Rev. 82 0OI-01.06, Post Trip Review, Rev. 46 0MMM-015, Operation and Inspection of Cranes and Material Handling Equipment, Rev. 67
- 0ENP-24.0, Reactor Engineering Guidelines, Rev. 67 0AP-022, BNP Outage Risk Management, Rev. 56 0ENP-24.13, Core Verification, Rev. 22
- 2SP-15-101, Unit 2
- EGM 11-003 OPDRV Activities, Rev. 1
Condition Reports
- 2109110
- 2109091
- 2108800
- 2108718
- 2111148
- 2111542
- 2111474
- 2115107
- 2115089
- 2115088
- 2115035
- 2114985
- 2114833
- 2105377
- 2099005
Work Orders
- 20074532
- 11904847
- 2158321
Miscellaneous
- Daily Outage Reports Daily Key Safety Function Status Sheets
- Daily Risk Profiles Crew Turnover Reports Fatigue Rule Management List of Operations with the Potential for Draining the Reactor Vessel (OPDRVs)
- Mode Change Checklists
- Progress Reporter Schedule Outage Risk Assessment
- NRC
- EGM 11-003, Rev. 3, Dispositioning Boiling Water Reactor Licensee Noncompliance with Technical Specification Containment Requirements during OPDRVs Operator Logs List of Outage Modifications
- Core Verification Videos
Section 1R22: Surveillance Testing
Procedures
- 0PT-80.1, Reactor Pressure Vessel ASME Section XI Pressure Test, Rev. 70
- 0OI-02.3, Drywell Leakage Control, Rev.7 2MST-RPS41R, RPS Logic System Functional Test, Rev. 24 0PT-09.2, HPCI System Operability Test, Rev. 148
Section 1EP6: Drill Evaluation
Procedures
- 0OI-01.07, Notifications, Rev. 38 2EOP-01-RSP, Reactor Scram Procedure, Rev. 16
- 0PEP-02.1, Initial Emergency Actions, Rev. 53
- 0PEP-02.1.1, Emergency Control - Notification of Unusual Event, Alert, Site Area Emergency, and General Emergency, Rev. 29
Section 4OA1: Performance Indicator Verification
Procedures
- AD-LS-ALL-0004. Performance Indicators and Monthly Operating Report, Rev. 01
Miscellaneous
- Operator Logs
- NEI 99-02, Regulatory Assessment Performance Indicator Guideline, Rev. 7
- Brunswick Unit 1 PI Summary, April 1, 2016, through March 31, 2017
- Brunswick Unit 2 PI Summary, April 1, 2016, through March 31, 2017
- Monthly PI Reports, April 1, 2016, through March 31, 2017
- System Health Reports, April 1, 2016, through March 31, 2017 Licensee Event Reports, April 1, 2016, through March 31, 2017
Section 4OA2: Problem Identification and Resolution Procedures
- AD-HU-ALL-0001, Human Performance Program, Rev. 11
- AD-PI-ALL-0100, Corrective Action Program, Rev. 7
- AD-SY-ALL-0401, Fitness for Duty Program, Rev. 1
- AD-SY-ALL-0460, Managing Fatigue and Work Hour Limits, Rev. 1
- AD-SY-ALL-1000, Conduct of Security, Rev. 2
- AD-SY-ALL-0520, Security Training, Rev. 1
- SEC-NGGC-2141, Fitness for Duty Unscheduled Work Call Outs, Rev.11
- SEC-NGGC-2166, Security Access Controls, Rev. 15
- AD-PI-ALL-0101, Root Cause Evaluation, Rev. 4
- AD-PI-ALL-0102, Apparent Cause Evaluation, Rev. 4
- AD-PI-ALL-0103, Quick Cause Evaluation, Rev. 4
- AD-PI-ALL-0400, Operating Experience Program, Rev. 4
Condition Reports
- 2118029
- 2111095
- 2113981
- 2114013
- 2114985
- 2115269
- 2115331
- 2115577
- 2115822
- 2116631
- 2116753
- 2120423
Miscellaneous
- Unit 2 Suppression Temperature Rising Trend
Section 4OA3: Follow-up of Events
Procedures
- AD-WC-ALL-0210, Work Request Initiation, Screening, Prioritization, and Classification, Rev. 7 2SP-15-101, Unit 2
- EGM 11-003 OPDRV Activities, Rev. 1
- 0OI-01.07, Notifications, Rev. 38
Condition Reports
- 2113799
- 2113800
- 2095663
- 2116753
- 2110409
- 2117033
Work Orders
- 20132955
- 20068598
- 20160330
Miscellaneous
- LER 05000324/2017-001-00, Implementation of Enforcement Guidance
- Memorandum (EGM)
- 11-003, Revision 3
- LER 05000324/2017-002-00, Plant Mode Change with Primary Containment Inoperable
- LER 05000325;324/2016-006-01, Control Room AC Units Inoperable Due to Corroded Supports Section 4OA5 : Other Activities
Procedures
- 2SP-15-10R, Unit 2
- EGM 11-003 OPDRV Activities, Rev. 1
Condition Reports
- 2110409
Work Orders
Miscellaneous
- LER 05000324/2017-001-00, Implementation of Enforcement Guidance
- Memorandum (EGM)
- 11-003, Revision 3
Section 4OA7: Licensee Identified Violations
Procedures
- Procedure 0OI-01.01, BNP Conduct of Operations Supplement, Rev. 82
Condition Reports
- 2116753
Miscellaneous
- Records
- LER 05000324/2017-002-00, Plant Mode Change with Primary Containment