ML042960506: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:Nuclear Regulatory Commission Augmented Inspection Team Exit Meeting with Palo Verde Nuclear Generation Station | {{#Wiki_filter:Nuclear Regulatory Commission Augmented Inspection Team Exit Meeting with Palo Verde Nuclear Generation Station | ||
I. I C. | I. | ||
I C. | |||
Inspection Charter | Inspection Charter | ||
* Basis of Augmented Inspection | * Basis of Augmented Inspection | ||
| Line 25: | Line 26: | ||
*. Assess adequacy of plant procedures | *. Assess adequacy of plant procedures | ||
.T 777-1. | |||
-I | |||
I | ; N. | ||
I - | |||
i | |||
: | |||
t ".11 I | |||
,, | |||
I MF*.Wfm Inspection Charter | |||
*:* Assess facility response to event | |||
* Assess facilities determination of apparent cause | * Assess facilities determination of apparent cause | ||
+.* Assess maintenance related contributions | |||
I | I | ||
...rV7 i ',T 110.df bm | |||
-~ | |||
'1gs | |||
-a' 4 | |||
mv-. | |||
Inspection Charter | |||
*. Assess facility coordination of offsite activities | |||
*:* Overall risk assessment of event | |||
I-s | I-s SEQUENCE OF EVENTS | ||
SEQUENCE OF EVENTS | |||
* Fault Initiation | * Fault Initiation | ||
*. Electrical Transmission and Grid | *. Electrical Transmission and Grid | ||
ge i | |||
*:.Plant Transients and Challenges | *s SEQUENCE OF EVENTS | ||
*:+Other Challenges | *:. Plant Transients and Challenges | ||
*:+ | |||
Other Challenges | |||
A-N PERFORMANCE OF PLANT SYSTEMS | A-N PERFORMANCE OF PLANT SYSTEMS | ||
*.*Transmission system protection | *.* Transmission system protection | ||
*.*All three reactors were safely shut down | *.* All three reactors were safely shut down | ||
*: Each unit was stabilized by operators | *: Each unit was stabilized by operators | ||
I me- | I me-2.2S-2 t:'1..Si'4 | ||
;;',pt;saC%1/4lT''.'C-7'' | |||
Er | |||
's..1-.-, | |||
*.c. *..,- | |||
PERFORMANCE OF PLANT SYSTEMS | |||
*:+ Unit 2 Emergency Diesel Generator failure | |||
*.+.Other minor equipment problems noted during shutdown | |||
V ft W-MNM 71"' | |||
V ft W-MNM Mg~ | Mg~ | ||
Plant Procedures | Plant Procedures | ||
*:.Procedures used during event were generally acceptable | *:. Procedures used during event were generally acceptable | ||
*:*Some issues noted | *:* Some issues noted | ||
MMW Facility Response | |||
* Conduct of operations generally good | * Conduct of operations generally good | ||
*:. Emergency response organization challenges | |||
* Some other problems noted by the team | * Some other problems noted by the team | ||
'V *A,jS | |||
*.'.' | |||
*..$A';f...S7VT. | |||
-r:rrrv'-rv | |||
'9, Vt - | |||
s.'?, | |||
4 *y-,.t'V't | |||
j7:;ji Apparent Causes | |||
-. Electrical fault isolation failure | -. Electrical fault isolation failure | ||
*:+ Transmission lines between Hassayampa and Palo Verde switchyard | *:+ | ||
:*.Unit 2 Emergency Diesel Generator failure | Transmission lines between Hassayampa and Palo Verde switchyard | ||
+:+Technical Support Center Emergency Diesel Generator failure | :*. Unit 2 Emergency Diesel Generator failure | ||
*:*Others | +:+ | ||
Technical Support Center Emergency Diesel Generator failure | |||
*:* Others | |||
Maintenance Related Aspects | Maintenance Related Aspects | ||
*:Maintenance of switchyard and substation equipment good | *: Maintenance of switchyard and substation equipment good | ||
*:.Implementation of facility maintenance processes | *:. Implementation of facility maintenance processes | ||
SUEDAMINOs A.C Off-Site Coordination | |||
*:.Good coordination of actions following event | *:. Good coordination of actions following event | ||
*:t Unrecognized design issue with Hassayampa to Palo Verde transmission line protection | *:t Unrecognized design issue with Hassayampa to Palo Verde transmission line protection | ||
Overall Risk Assessment | Overall Risk Assessment | ||
*:*Given the loss of approximately 5,500 MWe of electrical generation, the grid performed well | *:* Given the loss of approximately 5,500 MWe of electrical generation, the grid performed well | ||
* Electrical power was restored in a timely* | * Electrical power was restored in a timely* | ||
manner | manner | ||
ptn | ptn | ||
~. / ~ P S | |||
~2 2 ~~i 4~ | |||
~ | |||
*~ | |||
22 2 T.,; | |||
Overall Risk Assessment | |||
*:* All three units were stabilized and placed in a safe shutdown mode of operation}} | |||
Latest revision as of 00:30, 16 January 2025
| ML042960506 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde |
| Issue date: | 10/18/2004 |
| From: | NRC Region 4 |
| To: | |
| References | |
| FOIA/PA-2004-0307 | |
| Download: ML042960506 (15) | |
Text
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Augmented Inspection Team Exit Meeting with Palo Verde Nuclear Generation Station
I.
I C.
Inspection Charter
- Basis of Augmented Inspection
- Develop a complete sequence of events
- Assess performance of plant systems
- . Assess adequacy of plant procedures
.T 777-1.
-I
- N.
I -
i
t ".11 I
,,
I MF*.Wfm Inspection Charter
- Assess facility response to event
- Assess facilities determination of apparent cause
+.* Assess maintenance related contributions
I
...rV7 i ',T 110.df bm
-~
'1gs
-a' 4
mv-.
Inspection Charter
- . Assess facility coordination of offsite activities
- Overall risk assessment of event
I-s SEQUENCE OF EVENTS
- Fault Initiation
- . Electrical Transmission and Grid
ge i
- s SEQUENCE OF EVENTS
- . Plant Transients and Challenges
- +
Other Challenges
A-N PERFORMANCE OF PLANT SYSTEMS
- .* Transmission system protection
- .* All three reactors were safely shut down
- Each unit was stabilized by operators
I me-2.2S-2 t:'1..Si'4
- ',pt;saC%1/4lT.'C-7
Er
's..1-.-,
- .c. *..,-
PERFORMANCE OF PLANT SYSTEMS
- + Unit 2 Emergency Diesel Generator failure
- .+.Other minor equipment problems noted during shutdown
V ft W-MNM 71"'
Mg~
Plant Procedures
- . Procedures used during event were generally acceptable
- Some issues noted
MMW Facility Response
- Conduct of operations generally good
- . Emergency response organization challenges
- Some other problems noted by the team
'V *A,jS
- .'.'
- ..$A';f...S7VT.
-r:rrrv'-rv
'9, Vt -
s.'?,
4 *y-,.t'V't
j7:;ji Apparent Causes
-. Electrical fault isolation failure
- +
Transmission lines between Hassayampa and Palo Verde switchyard
- . Unit 2 Emergency Diesel Generator failure
+:+
Technical Support Center Emergency Diesel Generator failure
- Others
Maintenance Related Aspects
- Maintenance of switchyard and substation equipment good
- . Implementation of facility maintenance processes
SUEDAMINOs A.C Off-Site Coordination
- . Good coordination of actions following event
- t Unrecognized design issue with Hassayampa to Palo Verde transmission line protection
Overall Risk Assessment
- Given the loss of approximately 5,500 MWe of electrical generation, the grid performed well
- Electrical power was restored in a timely*
manner
ptn
~. / ~ P S
~2 2 ~~i 4~
~
- ~
22 2 T.,;
Overall Risk Assessment
- All three units were stabilized and placed in a safe shutdown mode of operation